Implementation of Executive Orders on Floodplain Management and Establishing a Federal Flood Risk Management Standard and a Process for Further Soliciting and Considering Stakeholder Input, 91150-91151 [2016-30240]
Download as PDF
91150
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 242 / Friday, December 16, 2016 / Notices
(viii) Date Report Delivered to
Congress: December 7, 2016.
* as defined in Section 47(6) of the
Arms Export Control Act.
POLICY JUSTIFICATION
Government of Morocco—Radio
Frequency (RF) TOW 2A, Radio
Frequency (RF) Missile (BGM–71–4B–RF
and Support)
The Government of Morocco has
requested a possible sale of one
thousand two-hundred (1,200) TOW 2A,
Radio Frequency (RF) Missiles (BGM–
71–4B–RF) and fourteen (14) TOW 2A,
Radio Frequency (RF) Missiles (Fly-toBuy Lot Acceptance Missiles). Also
included with this request is U.S.
Government and contractor engineering,
technical and logistics support services;
and other related elements of logistics
and program support. The estimated
MDE sale is $101 million. The total
estimated value is $108 million.
This proposed sale will contribute to
the foreign policy and national security
of the United States by helping to
improve the security of a Major NonNATO Ally that continues to be an
important force for the political stability
and economic progress in North Africa.
This proposed sale directly supports
Morocco and serves the interests of the
Moroccan people and the United States.
The proposed sale of TOW 2A
Missiles and technical support will
advance Morocco’s efforts to develop an
integrated ground defense capability.
Morocco will have no difficulty
absorbing this equipment into its armed
forces.
The proposed sale of this equipment
and support will not alter the basic
military balance in the region.
The principal contractors involved in
this program are: Raytheon Missile
Systems, Tucson, Arizona. There are no
known offset agreements proposed in
connection with this potential sale.
Implementation of this proposed sale
will require the U.S. Government or
contractor representatives to travel to
Morocco.
There will be no adverse impact on
U.S. defense readiness as a result of this
proposed sale.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Transmittal No. 16–52
Notice of Proposed Issuance of Letter of
Offer Pursuant to Section 36(b)(1) of the
Arms Export Control Act, as Amended
Annex
Item No. vii
(vii) Sensitivity of Technology:
1. The Radio Frequency (RF) TOW 2A
Missile (BGM–71E–4B–RF) is designed
to defeat armored vehicles, reinforced
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:42 Dec 15, 2016
Jkt 241001
urban structures, field fortifications and
other such targets. TOW missiles are
fired from a variety of TOW launchers
in the U .S. Army, USMC, and FMS
customer forces. The TOW 2A RF
missile can be launched from the same
launcher platforms as the existing wireguided TOW 2A missile without
modification to the launcher. The TOW
2A missile (both wire & RF) contains
two trackers for the launcher to track
and guide the missile in flight.
Guidance commands from the launcher
are provided to the missile by a RF link
contained within the missile case. The
hardware, software, and technical
publications provided with the sale
thereof are UNCLASSIFIED. However,
the system itself contains sensitive
technology that instructs the system on
how to operate in the presence of
countermeasures.
2. The highest level of classified
information that must be disclosed in
training to use the end item is
UNCLASSIFIED. The highest level of
classified information that must be
disclosed in maintenance of the end
item is UNCLASSIFIED. The highest
level of classified information that could
be disclosed by sale of the end item is
SECRET. The highest level of classified
information that could be revealed by
testing the end item is SECRET. The
highest level of classified information
that could be revealed by reverse
engineering of the end item is SECRET.
3. If a technologically advanced
adversary were to obtain knowledge of
the specific hardware and software
elements, the information could be used
to develop countermeasures that might
reduce weapon system effectiveness or
be used in the development of a system
with similar or advanced capabilities.
4. All defense articles and services
listed in this transmittal have been
authorized for release and export to the
Government of Morocco.
[FR Doc. 2016–30229 Filed 12–15–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of
Engineers
Implementation of Executive Orders on
Floodplain Management and
Establishing a Federal Flood Risk
Management Standard and a Process
for Further Soliciting and Considering
Stakeholder Input
AGENCY:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
DoD.
ACTION:
PO 00000
Notice.
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) has developed draft
internal agency implementation
guidance for the Executive Order on
Floodplain Management to incorporate
the new requirements of the Executive
Order on Establishing a Federal Flood
Risk Management Standard and a
Process for Further Soliciting and
Considering Stakeholder Input. USACE
is seeking feedback from partners, other
government and non-government
stakeholders, Tribes, and members of
the general public on the proposed draft
guidance that has been developed.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before January 30, 2017.
ADDRESSES:
Email: USACE–EO11988@
usace.army.mil and include
‘‘Implementation Comments’’, in the
subject line of the message.
Mail: HQ, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, ATTN: EO13690/CECW–HS/
3G68, 441 G Street NW., Washington,
DC 20314–1000.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Due to
security requirements, we cannot
receive comments by hand delivery or
courier.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Stephanie Bray, Headquarters, Office of
Homeland Security, Washington, DC at
202–761–4827.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Executive
Order 11988, Floodplain Management,
was issued in 1977 and directed
agencies to avoid to the extent possible
the long and short-term adverse impacts
associated with the occupancy and
modification of floodplains and to avoid
direct and indirect support of floodplain
development wherever there is a
practicable alternative. EO 11988
applied to Federal agencies carrying out
its responsibilities for:
• Acquiring, managing, and disposing
of federal lands and facilities;
• Providing federally-undertaken,
financed, or assisted construction and
improvements;
• Conducting federal activities and
programs affecting land use, including
but not limited to water and related land
resources planning, regulation, and
licensing activities.
It required agencies performing
federal actions in the base floodplain
(floodplain associated with the 1
percent annual chance (also known as 1
percent annual exceedance probability)
flood) to do the following:
1. Determine if a proposed action is in
the base floodplain (that area which has
a one percent or greater chance of
flooding in any given year).
2. Conduct early public review,
including public notice.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM
16DEN1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 242 / Friday, December 16, 2016 / Notices
3. Identify and evaluate practicable
alternatives to locating in the base
floodplain, including alternative sites
outside of the floodplain.
4. Identify impacts of the proposed
action.
5. If impacts cannot be avoided,
develop measures to minimize the
impacts and restore and preserve the
floodplain, as appropriate.
6. Reevaluate alternatives.
7. Present the findings and a public
explanation.
8. Implement the action.
Following issuance of EO 11988 and
the corresponding interagency
Implementing Guidelines, USACE
developed Engineering Regulation (ER)
1165–2–26 for interpreting and
implementing the requirements of EO
11988. The regulation applies to all field
operating activities having Civil Works
responsibilities, with the exception of
the Regulatory Program which
implements EO 11988 through its
regulations. Section 14 of ER 1165–2–26
explains how EO 11988 applies to
specific Civil Works programs.
On January 30, 2015, the White House
issued Executive Order 13690—
Establishing a Federal Flood Risk
Management Standard and a Process for
Further Soliciting and Considering
Public Input. EO 13690 and the Federal
Flood Risk Management Standard
(FFRMS), implemented through
guidelines established by the Water
Resources Council (‘‘Implementing
Guidelines’’), updated EO 11988 to
include the following:
• Requires the use of an expanded
floodplain for some actions that are
federal investments.
• Requires that the elevation and
horizontal extent of the expanded
floodplain be determined using one of
three approaches: The climate-informed
science approach, the freeboard value
approach, and the 500-year flood
elevation approach.
• Requires agencies to use natural
and nature based approaches, where
possible.
• Establishes higher standards for
critical actions.
USACE established a Product
Development Team (PDT) to investigate
what impacts EO 13690 and the FFRMS
would have on its policies and programs
and, in particular, to develop revised
implementation guidance for EO 11988,
as amended. A draft Engineer Circular
(EC) that will ultimately rescind ER
1165–2–26 has been developed to
provide overarching guidance for the
implementation of EO 11988, as
amended. The EC will expire two years
from issuance, which will provide
USACE time to evaluate the guidance
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:42 Dec 15, 2016
Jkt 241001
provided, consider initial
implementation experience to identify
any necessary clarifications or changes,
and incorporate any changes introduced
by the reassessment of the FFRMS
required by EO 13690. After two years,
the EC will either be revised and
reissued or converted to an ER, which
does not expire and is more permanent
agency guidance.
The draft EC is intended to provide
overarching guidance to all USACE
Civil Works mission areas. As such, it
does not provide extensive detail about
how the requirements will be
implemented within specific program
areas or activities; instead it establishes
intended implementation principles
that will be clarified in greater detail in
individual program specific guidance
documents, to be developed or revised
at a later date. Generally, the new
requirements will be incorporated into
specific guidance documents as they are
updated through the agency’s regular
process and schedule, unless a new
guidance document needs to be
prepared to address some aspect of
implementation of the requirements.
USACE now invites review and
comment from our partners and
stakeholders on the proposed
implementation guidance contained
within the draft EC.
Instructions for Providing Comments
Online
USACE is requesting assistance in the
form of data, comments, literature
references, or field experiences, to help
clarify the policy requirements for
implementing EO 11988 and EO 13690
for agency activities. The draft EC is
available for review on the USACE EO
13690 Implementation Web site (https://
www.iwr.usace.army.mil/Missions/
FloodRiskManagement/
FloodRiskManagementProgram/
AbouttheProgram/PolicyandGuidance/
FederalFloodRiskManagement
Standard.aspx). An Executive Summary
of the draft EC is also available on the
Web site to provide a high-level
overview of the document and summary
of the more substantial changes since
the original 1984 ER. Additionally, a list
of topics and issues for which feedback
would be especially helpful is posted
for reviewer’s consideration. While
USACE welcomes any and all feedback
on the draft EC, feedback responding to
the list of identified topics and issues
will be particularly helpful to USACE in
clarifying areas requiring new policy or
practice. The most useful comments are
from specific experiences and case
examples. Commenters should use their
knowledge of working with USACE on
various types of federal actions as well
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
91151
as their understanding of EO 11988 and
EO 13690. When comments are being
made on specific sections of the
document, USACE requests that
commenters identify the relevant page
and line numbers to which the comment
applies.
All comments, literature citations,
experiential references, data, other
relevant reports, and input in response
to the guiding topics and issues are
being accepted through email, or
through the postal service. All
comments submitted by the date
identified above will be compiled and
sent to the PDT for their consideration.
Future Actions
Feedback and comments provided in
response to this notice will be
considered and the draft EC will be
updated as appropriate. When the final
EC is published, a notice will be placed
in the Federal Register and on the
USACE EO 13690 Implementation Web
site, and the document itself will be
made available through the USACE
publications Web site (https://
www.publications.usace.army.mil/).
Dated: December 12, 2016.
Karen Durham-Aguilera,
Director of Contingency, Operations and
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2016–30240 Filed 12–15–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720–58–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers
Notice of Availability of the Draft
Missouri River Recovery Management
Plan and Environmental Impact
Statement
Department of the Army, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Kansas City and Omaha
Districts of the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE), in cooperation with
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS), have developed the Missouri
River Recovery Management Plan and
Environmental Impact Statement
(MRRMP–EIS). This document is a
programmatic assessment of (1) major
federal actions necessary to avoid a
finding of jeopardy to the pallid
sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus albus),
interior least tern (Sterna antillarum
athalassos), and the Northern Great
Plains piping plover (Charadrius
melodus) caused by operation of the
Missouri River Mainstem and Kansas
River Reservoir System and operation
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM
16DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 242 (Friday, December 16, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 91150-91151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-30240]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers
Implementation of Executive Orders on Floodplain Management and
Establishing a Federal Flood Risk Management Standard and a Process for
Further Soliciting and Considering Stakeholder Input
AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) has developed draft
internal agency implementation guidance for the Executive Order on
Floodplain Management to incorporate the new requirements of the
Executive Order on Establishing a Federal Flood Risk Management
Standard and a Process for Further Soliciting and Considering
Stakeholder Input. USACE is seeking feedback from partners, other
government and non-government stakeholders, Tribes, and members of the
general public on the proposed draft guidance that has been developed.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before January 30, 2017.
ADDRESSES:
Email: USACE-EO11988@usace.army.mil and include ``Implementation
Comments'', in the subject line of the message.
Mail: HQ, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, ATTN: EO13690/CECW-HS/3G68,
441 G Street NW., Washington, DC 20314-1000.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Due to security requirements, we cannot
receive comments by hand delivery or courier.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Stephanie Bray, Headquarters,
Office of Homeland Security, Washington, DC at 202-761-4827.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Executive Order 11988, Floodplain
Management, was issued in 1977 and directed agencies to avoid to the
extent possible the long and short-term adverse impacts associated with
the occupancy and modification of floodplains and to avoid direct and
indirect support of floodplain development wherever there is a
practicable alternative. EO 11988 applied to Federal agencies carrying
out its responsibilities for:
Acquiring, managing, and disposing of federal lands and
facilities;
Providing federally-undertaken, financed, or assisted
construction and improvements;
Conducting federal activities and programs affecting land
use, including but not limited to water and related land resources
planning, regulation, and licensing activities.
It required agencies performing federal actions in the base
floodplain (floodplain associated with the 1 percent annual chance
(also known as 1 percent annual exceedance probability) flood) to do
the following:
1. Determine if a proposed action is in the base floodplain (that
area which has a one percent or greater chance of flooding in any given
year).
2. Conduct early public review, including public notice.
[[Page 91151]]
3. Identify and evaluate practicable alternatives to locating in
the base floodplain, including alternative sites outside of the
floodplain.
4. Identify impacts of the proposed action.
5. If impacts cannot be avoided, develop measures to minimize the
impacts and restore and preserve the floodplain, as appropriate.
6. Reevaluate alternatives.
7. Present the findings and a public explanation.
8. Implement the action.
Following issuance of EO 11988 and the corresponding interagency
Implementing Guidelines, USACE developed Engineering Regulation (ER)
1165-2-26 for interpreting and implementing the requirements of EO
11988. The regulation applies to all field operating activities having
Civil Works responsibilities, with the exception of the Regulatory
Program which implements EO 11988 through its regulations. Section 14
of ER 1165-2-26 explains how EO 11988 applies to specific Civil Works
programs.
On January 30, 2015, the White House issued Executive Order 13690--
Establishing a Federal Flood Risk Management Standard and a Process for
Further Soliciting and Considering Public Input. EO 13690 and the
Federal Flood Risk Management Standard (FFRMS), implemented through
guidelines established by the Water Resources Council (``Implementing
Guidelines''), updated EO 11988 to include the following:
Requires the use of an expanded floodplain for some
actions that are federal investments.
Requires that the elevation and horizontal extent of the
expanded floodplain be determined using one of three approaches: The
climate-informed science approach, the freeboard value approach, and
the 500-year flood elevation approach.
Requires agencies to use natural and nature based
approaches, where possible.
Establishes higher standards for critical actions.
USACE established a Product Development Team (PDT) to investigate
what impacts EO 13690 and the FFRMS would have on its policies and
programs and, in particular, to develop revised implementation guidance
for EO 11988, as amended. A draft Engineer Circular (EC) that will
ultimately rescind ER 1165-2-26 has been developed to provide
overarching guidance for the implementation of EO 11988, as amended.
The EC will expire two years from issuance, which will provide USACE
time to evaluate the guidance provided, consider initial implementation
experience to identify any necessary clarifications or changes, and
incorporate any changes introduced by the reassessment of the FFRMS
required by EO 13690. After two years, the EC will either be revised
and reissued or converted to an ER, which does not expire and is more
permanent agency guidance.
The draft EC is intended to provide overarching guidance to all
USACE Civil Works mission areas. As such, it does not provide extensive
detail about how the requirements will be implemented within specific
program areas or activities; instead it establishes intended
implementation principles that will be clarified in greater detail in
individual program specific guidance documents, to be developed or
revised at a later date. Generally, the new requirements will be
incorporated into specific guidance documents as they are updated
through the agency's regular process and schedule, unless a new
guidance document needs to be prepared to address some aspect of
implementation of the requirements. USACE now invites review and
comment from our partners and stakeholders on the proposed
implementation guidance contained within the draft EC.
Instructions for Providing Comments Online
USACE is requesting assistance in the form of data, comments,
literature references, or field experiences, to help clarify the policy
requirements for implementing EO 11988 and EO 13690 for agency
activities. The draft EC is available for review on the USACE EO 13690
Implementation Web site (https://www.iwr.usace.army.mil/Missions/FloodRiskManagement/FloodRiskManagementProgram/AbouttheProgram/PolicyandGuidance/FederalFloodRiskManagementStandard.aspx). An
Executive Summary of the draft EC is also available on the Web site to
provide a high-level overview of the document and summary of the more
substantial changes since the original 1984 ER. Additionally, a list of
topics and issues for which feedback would be especially helpful is
posted for reviewer's consideration. While USACE welcomes any and all
feedback on the draft EC, feedback responding to the list of identified
topics and issues will be particularly helpful to USACE in clarifying
areas requiring new policy or practice. The most useful comments are
from specific experiences and case examples. Commenters should use
their knowledge of working with USACE on various types of federal
actions as well as their understanding of EO 11988 and EO 13690. When
comments are being made on specific sections of the document, USACE
requests that commenters identify the relevant page and line numbers to
which the comment applies.
All comments, literature citations, experiential references, data,
other relevant reports, and input in response to the guiding topics and
issues are being accepted through email, or through the postal service.
All comments submitted by the date identified above will be compiled
and sent to the PDT for their consideration.
Future Actions
Feedback and comments provided in response to this notice will be
considered and the draft EC will be updated as appropriate. When the
final EC is published, a notice will be placed in the Federal Register
and on the USACE EO 13690 Implementation Web site, and the document
itself will be made available through the USACE publications Web site
(https://www.publications.usace.army.mil/).
Dated: December 12, 2016.
Karen Durham-Aguilera,
Director of Contingency, Operations and Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2016-30240 Filed 12-15-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720-58-P