Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes, 90955-90958 [2016-29251]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 242 / Friday, December 16, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
By order of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, December 9, 2016.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2016–29966 Filed 12–14–16; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE P
Examining the AD Docket
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2015–3142; Directorate
Identifier 2015–NM–003–AD; Amendment
39–18725; AD 2016–25–02]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 787–8
airplanes. This AD was prompted by
reports of the accumulation of very fine
particle deposits in the power control
unit (PCU) electro-hydraulic servo
valves (EHSVs) used in the flight control
system; this accumulation caused
degraded performance due to reduced
EHSV internal hydraulic supply
pressures, resulting in the display of
PCU fault status messages from the
engine indication and crew alerting
system (EICAS). This AD requires
installing markers to limit the hydraulic
system fluid used to a specific brand,
doing hydraulic fluid tests of the
hydraulic systems, replacing hydraulic
system fluid if necessary, and doing all
applicable related investigative and
corrective actions. We are issuing this
AD to address the unsafe condition on
these products.
DATES: This AD is effective January 20,
2017.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of January 20, 2017.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this final rule, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes,
Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC
110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740;
telephone 562–797–1717; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
FAA, call 425–227–1221. It is also
available on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
3142.
17:15 Dec 15, 2016
Jkt 241001
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
3142; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is
Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fnu
Winarto, Aerospace Engineer, Systems
and Equipment Branch, ANM–130S,
FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA 98057–3356; phone: 425–
917–6659; fax: 425–917–6590; email:
fnu.winarto@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to certain The Boeing Company
Model 787–8 airplanes. The NPRM
published in the Federal Register on
August 19, 2015 (80 FR 50233) (‘‘the
NPRM’’). The NPRM was prompted by
reports of the accumulation of very fine
particle deposits in the PCU EHSVs
used in the flight control system; this
accumulation caused degraded
performance due to reduced EHSV
internal hydraulic supply pressures,
resulting in the display of PCU fault
status messages from the EICAS. The
NPRM proposed to require installing
markers to limit the hydraulic system
fluid used to a specific brand, doing
hydraulic fluid tests of the hydraulic
systems, replacing hydraulic system
fluid if necessary, and doing all
applicable related investigative and
corrective actions. We are issuing this
AD to prevent the failure of flight
control hydraulic PCUs, which could
lead to reduced controllability of the
airplane.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. The
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
90955
following presents the comments
received on the NPRM and the FAA’s
response to each comment.
Request To Refer to Revised Service
Information
United Airlines (UAL) stated that
there are many errors, omissions, and
inconsistencies in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin B787–81205–SB270026–00,
Issue 001, dated November 25, 2014,
and provided examples of those
mistakes. UAL asked that this service
information be revised to correct these
problems.
Boeing has issued Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB270026–00, Issue 002, dated June 13,
2016. The revised service information
corrects typographical errors and makes
clarifications to the Accomplishment
Instructions in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin B787–81205–SB270026–00,
Issue 001, dated November 25, 2014. We
have included Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin B787–81205–SB270026–00,
Issue 002, dated June 13, 2016, in
paragraphs (c) and (h) of this AD. We
have also included a new paragraph (i)
in this AD to provide credit for actions
done prior to the effective date of this
AD using Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
B787–81205–SB270026–00, Issue 001,
dated November 25, 2014. The
subsequent paragraphs have been
redesignated accordingly.
Request To Clarify the Reason for the
Unsafe Condition
Boeing asked that we remove all
references to hydraulic fluid
contamination causing EHSV
restriction, in the SUMMARY, the
Discussion section of the NPRM, and
paragraph (e) of the proposed AD.
Boeing stated that the issue is not
hydraulic fluid contamination causing
EHSV restriction, but the accumulation
of very fine particle deposits within the
EHSV causing degraded performance
due to reduced EHSV internal hydraulic
supply pressures. Boeing added that the
solution is to change the hydraulic fluid
to a specific brand, considering that it
has been verified to significantly reduce
the rate of accumulation of particles in
the EHSVs. Boeing concluded that this
would clarify the cause of the EICAS
messages.
We agree that the reason for the
unsafe condition should be clarified, for
the reasons provided. Therefore, we
have removed the references to
hydraulic fluid contamination causing
EHSV restriction and replaced that
language with a more accurate reason
for the unsafe condition in the SUMMARY,
the Discussion section of the final rule,
and paragraph (e) of this AD.
E:\FR\FM\16DER1.SGM
16DER1
90956
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 242 / Friday, December 16, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Request To Issue Global Alternative
Method of Compliance (AMOC)
UAL asked that a fleet-wide AMOC be
issued for Boeing Service Bulletin
B787–81205–SB290022–00, Issue 001,
dated September 4, 2014, to correct a
part number (P/N) reference. Task 1,
Figure 1, and Task 2, Figure 1, of Boeing
Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB290022–00, Issue 001, dated
September 4, 2014, identify P/N
710Z7290–9##ALT1 for the left and
right engine diagonal braces; however,
the correct P/N is 710Z7290–9 with no
##ALT suffix. UAL stated that the
correct part number is identified in the
Illustrated Parts Catalog (IPC).
We acknowledge the commenter’s
concern that an incorrect part number
for the left and right engine diagonal
braces is identified in Boeing Service
Bulletin B787–81205–SB290022–00,
Issue 001, dated September 4, 2014. We
have discussed this error with Boeing,
and it was confirmed that the part
number in the IPC (as noted by UAL) is
correct and should be used. In light of
this information, we do not agree that a
global AMOC should be issued.
However, we have added a new Note 2
to paragraph (g) of this AD to clarify the
correct part number.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Request To Change Certain Instructions
in the Service Information
UAL stated that Boeing Service
Bulletin B787–81205–SB290022–00,
Issue 001, dated September 4, 2014,
includes procedures for the HyJet V
marker installation, which is a
‘‘Required for Compliance (RC)’’ item in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787–
81205–SB270026–00, Issue 001, dated
November 25, 2014, and must be done
before or concurrently with that service
information. UAL noted that there is no
RC language in Boeing Service Bulletin
B787–81205–SB290022–00, Issue 001,
dated September 4, 2014, which makes
the entire service bulletin ‘‘RC.’’ UAL
asked that the steps that specify access
and close be marked as non-RC steps.
We do not agree to change Boeing
Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB290022–00, Issue 001, dated
September 4, 2014, to mark the steps RC
and non-RC. However, we do agree to
clarify the steps that are required to
accomplish the marker installation.
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787–
81205–SB270026–00, Issue 001, dated
November 25, 2014, has an RC step that
specifies to install markers. That RC
step does not specify to perform access
and close steps for the marker
installation; therefore those access and
close steps are not required by this AD.
We have not changed this AD in this
regard.
UAL also asked we change the
procedures in Part 4 of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB270026–00, Issue 001, dated
November 25, 2014, which specify
options for either replacing the
hydraulic fluid again, or draining and
filling the hydraulic reservoir. UAL
stated that if either option is used, then
Part 2 of the service information titled
‘‘Cycle Hydraulic Fluid’’ must again be
done, or the airplane must be flown at
least one flight cycle, and then a sample
drawn for testing. UAL added that this
procedure, done in accordance with the
instructions in the referenced service
information, results in excessive cycling
if the operator needs to only replace a
small amount of fluid and chooses the
reservoir drain-and-fill option. UAL
asked to use a procedure that would
specify draining and filling the
reservoir, flight control cycling, and
taking a fresh sample for testing, all at
the same time. UAL noted that Option
10 specifies ‘‘Drain and Fill Hydraulic
Reservoir’’ and is acceptable to operate
the flight controls six to eight times to
let the fluid flow through all the
systems. UAL stated that this is the
procedure used by Boeing before taking
fluid samples per the Boeing 787
Airplane Maintenance Manual.
We do not agree to change the
procedure for servicing the hydraulic
fluid. Although UAL’s proposal is an
accepted procedure in the Boeing 787
Airplane Maintenance Manual, this
procedure does not include operating
the other hydraulic-powered
subsystems, such as the landing gear,
thrust reverser, and brakes.
Subsequently, it could result in stagnant
fluid measurements not intermixing
with other hydraulic system fluid
following replacement of the hydraulic
system fluid, and could generate fluid
test samples that do not include the
entire system. In light of these factors,
we have not changed this AD in this
regard.
Clarification to Paragraph (g) of This
AD
We have added a new Note 1 to
paragraph (g) of this AD to refer to
Boeing Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB290022–00, Issue 001, dated
September 4, 2014, as an additional
source of guidance for installing
markers to allow servicing of hydraulic
systems with only HyJet V hydraulic
fluid.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data,
considered the comments received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting this AD
with the changes described previously
and minor editorial changes. We have
determined that these minor changes:
• Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM for
correcting the unsafe condition; and
• Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM.
We also determined that these
changes will not increase the economic
burden on any operator or increase the
scope of this AD.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
We have reviewed Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB270026–00, Issue 002, dated June 13,
2016. This service information describes
procedures for installing markers to
limit the hydraulic system fluid used to
a specific brand; doing hydraulic fluid
tests of the hydraulic systems, replacing
the hydraulic system fluid if necessary,
and related investigative and corrective
actions. This service information is
reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business
or by the means identified in the
ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 11
airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to
comply with this AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Install markers .................................................
Test and replace left, center, and right hydraulic system fluid.
2 work-hours × $85 per hour = $170 .............
104 work-hours × $85 per hour = $8,840 ......
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 Dec 15, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Parts cost
E:\FR\FM\16DER1.SGM
$95
1,020
16DER1
Cost per
product
$265
9,860
Cost on U.S.
operators
$2,915
108,460
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 242 / Friday, December 16, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
We estimate the following costs to do
any necessary replacements that may be
required based on the results of the
inspection. We have no way of
90957
determining the number of aircraft that
might need these replacements:
ON-CONDITION COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Replace power control unit of elevator ........................
Replace power control unit of aileron ..........................
9 × $85 per hour = $765 ..............................................
9 × $85 per hour = $765 ..............................................
According to the manufacturer, some
of the costs of this AD may be covered
under warranty, thereby reducing the
cost impact on affected individuals. We
do not control warranty coverage for
affected individuals. As a result, we
have included all costs in our cost
estimate.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 Dec 15, 2016
Jkt 241001
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
2016–25–02 The Boeing Company:
Amendment 39–18725; Docket No.
FAA–2015–3142; Directorate Identifier
2015–NM–003–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective January 20, 2017.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company
Model 787–8 series airplanes, certificated in
any category, as identified in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin B787–81205–SB270026–00,
Issue 002, dated June 13, 2016.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 27, Flight Control Systems.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of the
accumulation of very fine particle deposits in
the power control unit (PCU) electrohydraulic servo valves (EHSVs) used in the
flight control system; this accumulation
caused degraded performance due to reduced
EHSV internal hydraulic supply pressures,
resulting in the display of PCU fault status
messages from the engine indication and
crew alerting system (EICAS). We are issuing
this AD to prevent failure of flight control
hydraulic PCUs, which could lead to reduced
controllability of the airplane.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Parts cost
$108,000
118,000
Cost per
product
$108,765
118,765
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Marker Installation
Within 36 months after the effective date
of this AD, install markers to allow servicing
of hydraulic systems with only HyJet V
hydraulic fluid, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin B787–81205–SB270026–00,
Issue 002, dated June 13, 2016.
Note 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD: Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB270026–00, Issue 002, dated June 13, 2016,
refers to Boeing Service Bulletin B787–
81205–SB290022–00, Issue 001, dated
September 4, 2014, as an additional source of
guidance for installing markers to allow
servicing of hydraulic systems with only
HyJet V hydraulic fluid.
Note 2 to paragraph (g) of this AD: Task
1, Figure 1, and Task 2, Figure 1, of Boeing
Service Bulletin B787–81205–SB290022–00,
Issue 001, dated September 4, 2014, identify
P/N 710Z7290–9##ALT1 for the left and right
engine diagonal braces; however, the correct
P/N is 710Z7290–9 with no ##ALT suffix.
(h) Fluid Tests of the Left, Right, and Center
Hydraulic Systems
For airplanes identified in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin B787–81205–SB270026–00,
Issue 002, dated June 13, 2016, as Group 1,
Configuration 2, Group 2: Within 36 months
after the effective date of this AD, do
hydraulic fluid tests of the left, right, and
center hydraulic systems, replace the
hydraulic system fluid, if necessary, and do
all applicable related investigative and
corrective actions, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin B787–81205–SB270026–00,
Issue 002, dated June 13, 2016. Do all
applicable related investigative and
corrective actions within 36 months after the
effective date of this AD.
(i) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the
actions required by paragraphs (g) and (h) of
this AD, if those actions were performed
before the effective date of this AD using
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB270026–00, Issue 001, dated November 25,
2014.
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
E:\FR\FM\16DER1.SGM
16DER1
90958
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 242 / Friday, December 16, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in
paragraph (k)(1) of this AD. Information may
be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) For service information that contains
steps that are labeled as Required for
Compliance (RC), the provisions of
paragraphs (j)(3)(i) and (j)(3)(ii) apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including
substeps under an RC step and any figures
identified in an RC step, must be done to
comply with the AD. If a step or sub-step is
labeled ‘‘RC Exempt,’’ then the RC
requirement is removed from that step or
sub-step. An AMOC is required for any
deviations to RC steps, including substeps
and identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in
accordance with the operator’s maintenance
or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the RC steps,
including substeps and identified figures, can
still be done as specified, and the airplane
can be put back in an airworthy condition.
(4) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO
to make those findings. For a repair method
to be approved, the repair must meet the
certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
(k) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Fnu Winarto, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM–130S,
FAA, Seattle ACO, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA 98057–3356; phone: 425–917–
6659; fax: 425–917–6590; email:
fnu.winarto@faa.gov.
(2) Service information identified in this
AD that is not incorporated by reference is
available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (l)(3) and (l)(4) of this AD.
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787–
81205–SB270026–00, Issue 002, dated June
13, 2016.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 Dec 15, 2016
Jkt 241001
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd.,
MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740;
telephone 562–797–1717; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
November 25, 2016.
John P. Piccola, Jr.,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–29251 Filed 12–15–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2016–9509; Directorate
Identifier 2016–NM–177–AD; Amendment
39–18750; AD 2016–25–24]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Airbus Model A319, A320, and A321
series airplanes. This AD requires
repetitive general visual inspections for
broken battery retaining rods and
replacement if necessary. We are issuing
this AD to address the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
January 3, 2017.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of January 3, 2017.
We must receive comments on this
AD by January 30, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this final rule, contact Airbus,
Airworthiness Office—EIAS, 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone: +33 5 61 93
36 96; fax: +33 5 61 93 44 51; email:
account.airworth-eas@airbus.com;
Internet: https://www.airbus.com. You
may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221. It is also
available on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
9509.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
9509; or in person at the Docket
Operations office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone:
800–647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; telephone: 425–227–1405;
fax: 425–227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, has issued EASA AD 2016–0204,
dated October 13, 2016; corrected
October 19, 2016 (referred to after this
as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the
MCAI’’); to correct an unsafe condition
for certain Airbus Model A319, A320,
and A321 series airplanes. The MCAI
states:
E:\FR\FM\16DER1.SGM
16DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 242 (Friday, December 16, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 90955-90958]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-29251]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2015-3142; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-003-AD;
Amendment 39-18725; AD 2016-25-02]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 787-8 airplanes. This AD was prompted by
reports of the accumulation of very fine particle deposits in the power
control unit (PCU) electro-hydraulic servo valves (EHSVs) used in the
flight control system; this accumulation caused degraded performance
due to reduced EHSV internal hydraulic supply pressures, resulting in
the display of PCU fault status messages from the engine indication and
crew alerting system (EICAS). This AD requires installing markers to
limit the hydraulic system fluid used to a specific brand, doing
hydraulic fluid tests of the hydraulic systems, replacing hydraulic
system fluid if necessary, and doing all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions. We are issuing this AD to address
the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective January 20, 2017.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of January 20,
2017.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA
90740; telephone 562-797-1717; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221. It
is also available on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-3142.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
3142; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-
5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fnu Winarto, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-
3356; phone: 425-917-6659; fax: 425-917-6590; email:
fnu.winarto@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain The Boeing Company
Model 787-8 airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on
August 19, 2015 (80 FR 50233) (``the NPRM''). The NPRM was prompted by
reports of the accumulation of very fine particle deposits in the PCU
EHSVs used in the flight control system; this accumulation caused
degraded performance due to reduced EHSV internal hydraulic supply
pressures, resulting in the display of PCU fault status messages from
the EICAS. The NPRM proposed to require installing markers to limit the
hydraulic system fluid used to a specific brand, doing hydraulic fluid
tests of the hydraulic systems, replacing hydraulic system fluid if
necessary, and doing all applicable related investigative and
corrective actions. We are issuing this AD to prevent the failure of
flight control hydraulic PCUs, which could lead to reduced
controllability of the airplane.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM and
the FAA's response to each comment.
Request To Refer to Revised Service Information
United Airlines (UAL) stated that there are many errors, omissions,
and inconsistencies in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787-81205-
SB270026-00, Issue 001, dated November 25, 2014, and provided examples
of those mistakes. UAL asked that this service information be revised
to correct these problems.
Boeing has issued Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787-81205-
SB270026-00, Issue 002, dated June 13, 2016. The revised service
information corrects typographical errors and makes clarifications to
the Accomplishment Instructions in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787-
81205-SB270026-00, Issue 001, dated November 25, 2014. We have included
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB270026-00, Issue 002, dated
June 13, 2016, in paragraphs (c) and (h) of this AD. We have also
included a new paragraph (i) in this AD to provide credit for actions
done prior to the effective date of this AD using Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin B787-81205-SB270026-00, Issue 001, dated November 25, 2014.
The subsequent paragraphs have been redesignated accordingly.
Request To Clarify the Reason for the Unsafe Condition
Boeing asked that we remove all references to hydraulic fluid
contamination causing EHSV restriction, in the SUMMARY, the Discussion
section of the NPRM, and paragraph (e) of the proposed AD. Boeing
stated that the issue is not hydraulic fluid contamination causing EHSV
restriction, but the accumulation of very fine particle deposits within
the EHSV causing degraded performance due to reduced EHSV internal
hydraulic supply pressures. Boeing added that the solution is to change
the hydraulic fluid to a specific brand, considering that it has been
verified to significantly reduce the rate of accumulation of particles
in the EHSVs. Boeing concluded that this would clarify the cause of the
EICAS messages.
We agree that the reason for the unsafe condition should be
clarified, for the reasons provided. Therefore, we have removed the
references to hydraulic fluid contamination causing EHSV restriction
and replaced that language with a more accurate reason for the unsafe
condition in the SUMMARY, the Discussion section of the final rule, and
paragraph (e) of this AD.
[[Page 90956]]
Request To Issue Global Alternative Method of Compliance (AMOC)
UAL asked that a fleet-wide AMOC be issued for Boeing Service
Bulletin B787-81205-SB290022-00, Issue 001, dated September 4, 2014, to
correct a part number (P/N) reference. Task 1, Figure 1, and Task 2,
Figure 1, of Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB290022-00, Issue 001,
dated September 4, 2014, identify P/N 710Z7290-9##ALT1 for the left and
right engine diagonal braces; however, the correct P/N is 710Z7290-9
with no ##ALT suffix. UAL stated that the correct part number is
identified in the Illustrated Parts Catalog (IPC).
We acknowledge the commenter's concern that an incorrect part
number for the left and right engine diagonal braces is identified in
Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB290022-00, Issue 001, dated
September 4, 2014. We have discussed this error with Boeing, and it was
confirmed that the part number in the IPC (as noted by UAL) is correct
and should be used. In light of this information, we do not agree that
a global AMOC should be issued. However, we have added a new Note 2 to
paragraph (g) of this AD to clarify the correct part number.
Request To Change Certain Instructions in the Service Information
UAL stated that Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB290022-00,
Issue 001, dated September 4, 2014, includes procedures for the HyJet V
marker installation, which is a ``Required for Compliance (RC)'' item
in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB270026-00, Issue 001,
dated November 25, 2014, and must be done before or concurrently with
that service information. UAL noted that there is no RC language in
Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB290022-00, Issue 001, dated
September 4, 2014, which makes the entire service bulletin ``RC.'' UAL
asked that the steps that specify access and close be marked as non-RC
steps.
We do not agree to change Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-
SB290022-00, Issue 001, dated September 4, 2014, to mark the steps RC
and non-RC. However, we do agree to clarify the steps that are required
to accomplish the marker installation. Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
B787-81205-SB270026-00, Issue 001, dated November 25, 2014, has an RC
step that specifies to install markers. That RC step does not specify
to perform access and close steps for the marker installation;
therefore those access and close steps are not required by this AD. We
have not changed this AD in this regard.
UAL also asked we change the procedures in Part 4 of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB270026-00, Issue 001, dated November 25,
2014, which specify options for either replacing the hydraulic fluid
again, or draining and filling the hydraulic reservoir. UAL stated that
if either option is used, then Part 2 of the service information titled
``Cycle Hydraulic Fluid'' must again be done, or the airplane must be
flown at least one flight cycle, and then a sample drawn for testing.
UAL added that this procedure, done in accordance with the instructions
in the referenced service information, results in excessive cycling if
the operator needs to only replace a small amount of fluid and chooses
the reservoir drain-and-fill option. UAL asked to use a procedure that
would specify draining and filling the reservoir, flight control
cycling, and taking a fresh sample for testing, all at the same time.
UAL noted that Option 10 specifies ``Drain and Fill Hydraulic
Reservoir'' and is acceptable to operate the flight controls six to
eight times to let the fluid flow through all the systems. UAL stated
that this is the procedure used by Boeing before taking fluid samples
per the Boeing 787 Airplane Maintenance Manual.
We do not agree to change the procedure for servicing the hydraulic
fluid. Although UAL's proposal is an accepted procedure in the Boeing
787 Airplane Maintenance Manual, this procedure does not include
operating the other hydraulic-powered subsystems, such as the landing
gear, thrust reverser, and brakes. Subsequently, it could result in
stagnant fluid measurements not intermixing with other hydraulic system
fluid following replacement of the hydraulic system fluid, and could
generate fluid test samples that do not include the entire system. In
light of these factors, we have not changed this AD in this regard.
Clarification to Paragraph (g) of This AD
We have added a new Note 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD to refer to
Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB290022-00, Issue 001, dated
September 4, 2014, as an additional source of guidance for installing
markers to allow servicing of hydraulic systems with only HyJet V
hydraulic fluid.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD with the changes described previously and minor editorial
changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
We have reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB270026-
00, Issue 002, dated June 13, 2016. This service information describes
procedures for installing markers to limit the hydraulic system fluid
used to a specific brand; doing hydraulic fluid tests of the hydraulic
systems, replacing the hydraulic system fluid if necessary, and related
investigative and corrective actions. This service information is
reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business or by the means identified in
the ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 11 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Install markers....................... 2 work-hours x $85 per $95 $265 $2,915
hour = $170.
Test and replace left, center, and 104 work-hours x $85 per 1,020 9,860 108,460
right hydraulic system fluid. hour = $8,840.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 90957]]
We estimate the following costs to do any necessary replacements
that may be required based on the results of the inspection. We have no
way of determining the number of aircraft that might need these
replacements:
On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per
Action Labor cost Parts cost product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replace power control unit of elevator........ 9 x $85 per hour = $765......... $108,000 $108,765
Replace power control unit of aileron......... 9 x $85 per hour = $765......... 118,000 118,765
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2016-25-02 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-18725; Docket No. FAA-
2015-3142; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-003-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective January 20, 2017.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 787-8 series
airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB270026-00, Issue 002, dated June
13, 2016.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27, Flight
Control Systems.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of the accumulation of very fine
particle deposits in the power control unit (PCU) electro-hydraulic
servo valves (EHSVs) used in the flight control system; this
accumulation caused degraded performance due to reduced EHSV
internal hydraulic supply pressures, resulting in the display of PCU
fault status messages from the engine indication and crew alerting
system (EICAS). We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of flight
control hydraulic PCUs, which could lead to reduced controllability
of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Marker Installation
Within 36 months after the effective date of this AD, install
markers to allow servicing of hydraulic systems with only HyJet V
hydraulic fluid, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB270026-00, Issue 002,
dated June 13, 2016.
Note 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD: Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin B787-81205-SB270026-00, Issue 002, dated June 13, 2016,
refers to Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB290022-00, Issue 001,
dated September 4, 2014, as an additional source of guidance for
installing markers to allow servicing of hydraulic systems with only
HyJet V hydraulic fluid.
Note 2 to paragraph (g) of this AD: Task 1, Figure 1, and Task
2, Figure 1, of Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB290022-00,
Issue 001, dated September 4, 2014, identify P/N 710Z7290-9##ALT1
for the left and right engine diagonal braces; however, the correct
P/N is 710Z7290-9 with no ##ALT suffix.
(h) Fluid Tests of the Left, Right, and Center Hydraulic Systems
For airplanes identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787-
81205-SB270026-00, Issue 002, dated June 13, 2016, as Group 1,
Configuration 2, Group 2: Within 36 months after the effective date
of this AD, do hydraulic fluid tests of the left, right, and center
hydraulic systems, replace the hydraulic system fluid, if necessary,
and do all applicable related investigative and corrective actions,
in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB270026-00, Issue 002, dated June 13,
2016. Do all applicable related investigative and corrective actions
within 36 months after the effective date of this AD.
(i) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the actions required by
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, if those actions were performed
before the effective date of this AD using Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin B787-81205-SB270026-00, Issue 001, dated November 25, 2014.
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
[[Page 90958]]
requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance
with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or
local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (k)(1) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) For service information that contains steps that are labeled
as Required for Compliance (RC), the provisions of paragraphs
(j)(3)(i) and (j)(3)(ii) apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply
with the AD. If a step or sub-step is labeled ``RC Exempt,'' then
the RC requirement is removed from that step or sub-step. An AMOC is
required for any deviations to RC steps, including substeps and
identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition.
(4) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO to make
those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must
meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(k) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Fnu Winarto,
Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA,
Seattle ACO, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone:
425-917-6659; fax: 425-917-6590; email: fnu.winarto@faa.gov.
(2) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (l)(3) and (l)(4) of this AD.
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB270026-00, Issue
002, dated June 13, 2016.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740;
telephone 562-797-1717; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 25, 2016.
John P. Piccola, Jr.,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-29251 Filed 12-15-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P