Combined License Application for Turkey Point Nuclear Plant, Units 6 and 7, 90875-90876 [2016-30154]
Download as PDF
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 241 / Thursday, December 15, 2016 / Notices
authorization to continue to submit
documents in paper format. Such filings
must be submitted by: (1) First class
mail addressed to the Office of the
Secretary of the Commission, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001, Attention:
Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff; or
(2) courier, express mail, or expedited
delivery service to the Office of the
Secretary, 11555 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, Maryland 20852, Attention:
Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff.
Participants filing a document in this
manner are responsible for serving the
document on all other participants.
Filing is considered complete by firstclass mail as of the time of deposit in
the mail, or by courier, express mail, or
expedited delivery service upon
depositing the document with the
provider of the service. A presiding
officer, having granted an exemption
request from using E-Filing, may require
a participant or party to use E-Filing if
the presiding officer subsequently
determines that the reason for granting
the exemption from use of E-Filing no
longer exists.
Documents submitted in adjudicatory
proceedings will appear in the NRC’s
electronic hearing docket which is
available to the public at https://
ehd1.nrc.gov/ehd/, unless excluded
pursuant to an order of the Commission,
or the presiding officer. Participants are
requested not to include personal
privacy information, such as social
security numbers, home addresses, or
home phone numbers in their filings,
unless an NRC regulation or other law
requires submission of such
information. However, in some
instances, a request to intervene will
require including information on local
residence in order to demonstrate a
proximity assertion of interest in the
proceeding. With respect to copyrighted
works, except for limited excerpts that
serve the purpose of the adjudicatory
filings and would constitute a Fair Use
application, participants are requested
not to include copyrighted materials in
their submission.
For further details with respect to this
action, see the application for license
amendment dated November 18, 2016.
Attorney for licensee: Ms. Kathryn M.
Sutton, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLC,
1111 Pennsylvania Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20004–2514.
NRC Branch Chief: Jennifer DixonHerrity.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 8th day
of December 2016.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:19 Dec 14, 2016
Jkt 241001
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Jennifer Dixon-Herrity,
Chief, Licensing Branch 4, Division of New
Reactor Licensing, Office of New Reactors.
[FR Doc. 2016–30152 Filed 12–14–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 52–040 and 52–041; NRC–
2009–0337]
Combined License Application for
Turkey Point Nuclear Plant, Units 6 and
7
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Supplemental environmental
impact statement; issuance.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) and the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District,
are issuing a supplement to the final
environmental impact statement (EIS),
NUREG–2176, ‘‘Environmental Impact
Statement for Combined Licenses (COL)
for Turkey Point Nuclear Plant, Units 6
and 7.’’ Florida Power and Light
Company (FPL) submitted an
application for COLs to construct and
operate two new nuclear power plants
at its Turkey Point site near Homestead,
Florida. This supplement to the final
EIS considers and responds to 59
comment letters that were inadvertently
not included in the final EIS.
DATES: The supplement to the final EIS
is available as of December 2, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2009–0337, when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may obtain publicly-available
information related to this action by the
following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2009–0337. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• NRC’S Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘ADAMS Public Documents,’’ and then
select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
90875
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
supplement to the final EIS is available
in ADAMS under Accession No.
ML16335A219.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
• Project Web site: The final EIS can
be accessed online at the Turkey Point
COL specific Web page at https://
www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors/col/
turkey-point.html.
• South Dade Regional Library and
Homestead Branch Library: The
supplement final EIS is available for
public inspection at 10750 SW 211th
St., Cutler Bay, Florida 33189; and 700
N. Homestead Blvd., Homestead,
Florida 33030.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alicia Williamson Dickerson, Office of
New Reactors, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001, telephone: 301–415–1878, email:
Alicia.Williamson@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NRC
issued NUREG–2176, ‘‘Environmental
Impact Statement for Combined
Licenses (COLs) for Turkey Point
Nuclear Plant, Units 6 and 7,’’ on
October 28, 2016 (ADAMS Accession
No. ML16335A219). On November 2,
2016, the NRC published a Federal
Register notice (81 FR 76392) to
announce the availability of the final
EIS. After publication of the final EIS on
October 28, 2016, however, the NRC
identified 59 comment letters that were
received before the draft EIS comment
period closed but which were
inadvertently not included in Appendix
E to the final EIS.
The NRC staff considered all 59
comment letters and determined that
none of them provides new and
significant information regarding the
project or its environmental impacts. In
evaluating the comments in the letters,
the staff determined that it had already
addressed the majority of comments by
responding to other similar comments
in Appendix E to the final EIS. In
developing a document to respond to
the comments in the letters not included
in the final EIS, the staff concluded that,
for public access and readability, the
most effective method for documenting
the staff responses would include
reprinting the applicable existing
responses in Appendix E. The staff also
recognized that responses drawn from
the final EIS (including existing
responses in Appendix E) would be
E:\FR\FM\15DEN1.SGM
15DEN1
90876
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 241 / Thursday, December 15, 2016 / Notices
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
warranted if an existing response did
not explicitly address a comment.
Accordingly, the NRC staff is of the
opinion that issuance of a supplement
under the unique circumstances present
here—primarily the length of the
document due to the repetition of
existing text from the final EIS for
clarity and readability—will enhance
the transparency of the NRC process for
implementing the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as
amended (NEPA) and will further the
purposes of NEPA. Therefore, the NRC
staff has prepared Supplement 1 to
NUREG–2176 in accordance with
section 51.92(c) of title 10 of the Code
of Federal Regulations (10 CFR). This
supplement solely responds to
comments previously submitted on the
draft EIS. Because there are no changes
to the proposed action and the
comments do not provide new and
significant information relevant to
environmental concerns bearing on the
proposed action or its impacts, 10 CFR
51.92(f) does not require the NRC to
solicit comments on the supplement.
The final EIS summarizes the results
of the review team’s environmental
analysis of the FPL COL application for
compliance with the requirements of 10
CFR part 51. On the basis of the
information contained in the final EIS
and this supplement, the review team
finds that the comment letters not
included in the final EIS did not
provide information that would change
the analysis in the final EIS or the NRC
staff’s recommendation to the
Commission that the COLs be issued as
proposed. This recommendation is
based on (1) the application, including
the Environmental Report (ER),
submitted by FPL; (2) consultation with
Federal, State, Tribal, and local
agencies; (3) the review team’s
independent review; (4) consideration
of public comments received on the
environmental review; and (5) the
assessments summarized in the EIS and
this supplement, including the potential
mitigation measures identified in the ER
and the EIS.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 8th day
of December, 2016.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Francis Akstulewicz,
Director, Division of New Reactor Licensing,
Office of New Reactors.
[FR Doc. 2016–30154 Filed 12–14–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:19 Dec 14, 2016
Jkt 241001
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–79518; File No. SR–
NYSEArca–2016–84]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing of
Amendment No. 3, and Order Granting
Accelerated Approval of Proposed
Rule Change, as Modified by
Amendment No. 3, Relating to the
Listing and Trading of Shares of the
Long Dollar Gold Trust Under NYSE
Arca Equities Rule 8.201
December 9, 2016.
I. Introduction
On June 1, 2016, NYSE Arca, Inc.
(‘‘NYSE Arca’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Exchange
Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a
proposed rule change to list and trade
shares (‘‘Shares’’) of the Long Dollar
Gold Trust (‘‘Fund’’) under NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 8.201. The proposed rule
change was published for comment in
the Federal Register on June 21, 2016.3
On July 27, 2016, the Commission
extended the time period within which
to approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or
institute proceedings to determine
whether to approve or disapprove the
proposed rule change to September 19,
2016.4 On July 29, 2016, the Exchange
filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed
rule change, which replaced and
superseded the proposed rule change as
originally filed.5 On September 8, 2016,
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78075
(June 15, 2016), 81 FR 40381.
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78425
(July 27, 2016), 81 FR 50759 (August 2, 2016).
5 In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange: (1)
Provided additional information about WM/
Reuters, which calculates the ‘‘Spot Rate’’
(discussed below); (2) provided additional
information about calculation of the Spot Rate; (3)
provided additional information about
dissemination of the value of the underlying index;
(4) corrected a statement that the net asset value
(‘‘NAV’’) of the Shares would not be calculated
during the occurrence of a Market Disruption Event
(discussed below) or Extraordinary Event
(discussed below), and instead stated that, if the
LBMA Gold Price AM is unavailable during such
circumstances, the Fund would calculate NAV
using the last published LBMA Gold Price AM; (5)
identified circumstances in which the Fund may
reject a purchase order; (6) modified the
circumstances in which the Fund may reject a
redemption order; and (7) explained how market
makers in the Shares would be able to hedge their
positions. All amendments to the proposed rule
change are available at: https://www.sec.gov/
comments/sr-nysearca-2016-84/
nysearca201684.shtml.
2 17
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the Exchange filed Amendment No. 2 to
the proposed rule change, which
replaced and superseded the proposed
rule change as modified by Amendment
No. 1.6 On September 16, 2016, the
Commission noticed the filing of
Amendment No. 2, and instituted
proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) of
the Exchange Act 7 to determine
whether to approve or disapprove the
proposed rule change, as modified by
Amendment No. 2.8 On November 22,
2016, the Exchange filed Amendment
No. 3, which replaced the proposed rule
change as modified by Amendment No.
2.9 The Commission has not received
any comments on the proposed rule
change. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on
Amendment No. 3 from interested
persons, and is approving the proposed
rule change, as modified by Amendment
No. 3, on an accelerated basis.
6 In Amendment No. 2, the Exchange: (1) Changed
the names of the Fund and the Trust; (2) stated that
the methodology of the underlying index is
transparent; (3) explained how market makers in
the Shares could calculate an approximate value for
the underlying index during the Exchange’s Core
Trading Session, which is ordinarily between 9:30
a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Eastern time (‘‘ET’’); (4) made
further modifications to its description of when and
how NAV would be calculated, and when it would
be disseminated; (5) disclosed more information
regarding the availability of the value of the
underlying index; (6) provided information about
its ability to obtain information from Exchange
Trading Permit Holders (‘‘ETP Holders’’) regarding
their trading in currencies and currency derivatives;
and (7) represented that it (a) may halt trading in
the Shares during the trading day if an interruption
occurs in the dissemination of the value of the
underlying index, and (b) would halt trading in the
Shares no later than the beginning of the trading
day following the interruption if the interruption in
the dissemination of the value of the underlying
index persists past the trading day in which it
occurs.
7 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78859,
81 FR 65431 (September 22, 2016) (‘‘OIP’’). The
Commission instituted proceedings to allow for
additional analysis of the proposed rule change’s
consistency with Section 6(b)(5) of the Exchange
Act, which requires, among other things, that the
rules of a national securities exchange be ‘‘designed
to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles
of trade,’’ and ‘‘to protect investors and the public
interest.’’ Id., 81 FR at 65441.
9 In Amendment No. 3, the Exchange: (1)
Proposes to expand NYSE Arca Equities Rule
8.201(g), which governs market maker accounts, to
include non-U.S. currencies; (2) states that the
administrator of the WM/Reuters currency
benchmarks complies with the International
Organization of Securities Commissions (‘‘IOSCO’’)
Principles for Financial Benchmarks; and (3) states
that: (a) The Commission has previously approved
the listing and trading of other issues of securities
based on a WM/Reuters exchange rate or an index
that uses such a rate, and (b) WM/Reuters utilizes
the same methodology in calculating the ‘‘Closing
Spot Rate’’ (discussed below) and the Spot Rate.
E:\FR\FM\15DEN1.SGM
15DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 241 (Thursday, December 15, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 90875-90876]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-30154]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 52-040 and 52-041; NRC-2009-0337]
Combined License Application for Turkey Point Nuclear Plant,
Units 6 and 7
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Supplemental environmental impact statement; issuance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District, are issuing a supplement to
the final environmental impact statement (EIS), NUREG-2176,
``Environmental Impact Statement for Combined Licenses (COL) for Turkey
Point Nuclear Plant, Units 6 and 7.'' Florida Power and Light Company
(FPL) submitted an application for COLs to construct and operate two
new nuclear power plants at its Turkey Point site near Homestead,
Florida. This supplement to the final EIS considers and responds to 59
comment letters that were inadvertently not included in the final EIS.
DATES: The supplement to the final EIS is available as of December 2,
2016.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2009-0337, when contacting the
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You
may obtain publicly-available information related to this action by the
following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2009-0337. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415-
3463; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this document.
NRC'S Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents,'' and
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
supplement to the final EIS is available in ADAMS under Accession No.
ML16335A219.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
Project Web site: The final EIS can be accessed online at
the Turkey Point COL specific Web page at https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors/col/turkey-point.html.
South Dade Regional Library and Homestead Branch Library:
The supplement final EIS is available for public inspection at 10750 SW
211th St., Cutler Bay, Florida 33189; and 700 N. Homestead Blvd.,
Homestead, Florida 33030.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alicia Williamson Dickerson, Office of
New Reactors, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-
0001, telephone: 301-415-1878, email: Alicia.Williamson@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NRC issued NUREG-2176, ``Environmental
Impact Statement for Combined Licenses (COLs) for Turkey Point Nuclear
Plant, Units 6 and 7,'' on October 28, 2016 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML16335A219). On November 2, 2016, the NRC published a Federal Register
notice (81 FR 76392) to announce the availability of the final EIS.
After publication of the final EIS on October 28, 2016, however, the
NRC identified 59 comment letters that were received before the draft
EIS comment period closed but which were inadvertently not included in
Appendix E to the final EIS.
The NRC staff considered all 59 comment letters and determined that
none of them provides new and significant information regarding the
project or its environmental impacts. In evaluating the comments in the
letters, the staff determined that it had already addressed the
majority of comments by responding to other similar comments in
Appendix E to the final EIS. In developing a document to respond to the
comments in the letters not included in the final EIS, the staff
concluded that, for public access and readability, the most effective
method for documenting the staff responses would include reprinting the
applicable existing responses in Appendix E. The staff also recognized
that responses drawn from the final EIS (including existing responses
in Appendix E) would be
[[Page 90876]]
warranted if an existing response did not explicitly address a comment.
Accordingly, the NRC staff is of the opinion that issuance of a
supplement under the unique circumstances present here--primarily the
length of the document due to the repetition of existing text from the
final EIS for clarity and readability--will enhance the transparency of
the NRC process for implementing the National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969, as amended (NEPA) and will further the purposes of NEPA.
Therefore, the NRC staff has prepared Supplement 1 to NUREG-2176 in
accordance with section 51.92(c) of title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR). This supplement solely responds to comments
previously submitted on the draft EIS. Because there are no changes to
the proposed action and the comments do not provide new and significant
information relevant to environmental concerns bearing on the proposed
action or its impacts, 10 CFR 51.92(f) does not require the NRC to
solicit comments on the supplement.
The final EIS summarizes the results of the review team's
environmental analysis of the FPL COL application for compliance with
the requirements of 10 CFR part 51. On the basis of the information
contained in the final EIS and this supplement, the review team finds
that the comment letters not included in the final EIS did not provide
information that would change the analysis in the final EIS or the NRC
staff's recommendation to the Commission that the COLs be issued as
proposed. This recommendation is based on (1) the application,
including the Environmental Report (ER), submitted by FPL; (2)
consultation with Federal, State, Tribal, and local agencies; (3) the
review team's independent review; (4) consideration of public comments
received on the environmental review; and (5) the assessments
summarized in the EIS and this supplement, including the potential
mitigation measures identified in the ER and the EIS.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 8th day of December, 2016.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Francis Akstulewicz,
Director, Division of New Reactor Licensing, Office of New Reactors.
[FR Doc. 2016-30154 Filed 12-14-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P