Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System, 90524-90597 [2016-29366]
Download as PDF
90524
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
I. Executive Summary per Executive
Order 13563
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Executive Order 13563 requires that
regulations be accessible, consistent,
written in plain language, and easy to
understand. This means that regulatory
preambles for lengthy or complex rules
(both proposed and final) must include
executive summaries. Below is the
executive summary for this AFCARS
final rule.
Administration for Children and
Families
45 CFR Part 1355
RIN 0970–AC47
Adoption and Foster Care Analysis
and Reporting System
Administration on Children,
Youth and Families (ACYF),
Administration for Children and
Families (ACF), Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
(1) Purpose of the AFCARS Final Rule
The Social Security Act (the
Act) requires that ACF regulate a
national data collection system that
provides comprehensive demographic
and case-specific information on
children who are in foster care and
adopted. This final rule replaces
existing Adoption and Foster Care
Analysis and Reporting System
(AFCARS) regulations and the
appendices to require title IV–E
agencies to collect and report data to
ACF on children in out-of-home care,
and who exit out-of-home care to
adoption or legal guardianship, children
in out-of-home care who are covered by
the Indian Child Welfare Act, and
children who are covered by a title IV–
E adoption or guardianship assistance
agreement.
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective on January
13, 2017 except for the removal of
§ 1355.40 (amendatory instruction 3)
and Appendices A through E to Part
1355 (amendatory instruction 5), which
are effective as of October 1, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathleen McHugh, Director, Policy
Division, Children’s Bureau, 330 C
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20201.
Email address: cbcomments@
acf.hhs.gov. Deaf and hearing impaired
individuals may call the Federal Dual
Party Relay Service at 1–800–877–8339
between 8:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Eastern
Time.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Table of Contents
I. Executive Summary per Executive Order
13563
II. Background on AFCARS
III. Regulation Development
IV. Discussion of Major Changes to the Final
Rule
V. Implementation Timeframe
VI. Section-by-Section Discussion of
Comments and Regulatory Provisions
VII. Regulatory Impact Analysis
VIII. Tribal Consultation Statement
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
(a) The need for the regulatory action
and how the action will meet that need:
This rule finalizes AFCARS revisions
proposed in a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking on February 9, 2015 (80 FR
7132, hereafter referred to as the 2015
NPRM) and in a Supplemental Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking on April 7, 2016
(81 FR 20283, hereafter referred to as the
2016 SNPRM). We revised the AFCARS
regulations to: (1) Incorporate statutory
requirements enacted since 1993; (2)
implement the statutory mandate to
assess penalties for noncompliant data
submissions; (3) enhance the type and
quality of information title IV–E
agencies report to ACF; and (4)
incorporate data elements related to the
Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). Title
IV–E agencies must submit data files on
a semi-annual basis to ACF. The
regulations specify the reporting
population, standards for compliance,
and all data elements. The final rule
will improve the data reported to ACF
by including more comprehensive
national data on the status of American
Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) children
for whom ICWA applies and historical
data on children in foster care and adds
new data elements to better understand
a child’s experience in out-of-home
care.
(b) Legal authority for the final rule:
Section 479 of the Act mandates HHS
regulate a data collection system for
national adoption and foster care data.
Section 474(f) of the Act requires HHS
to impose penalties for non-compliant
AFCARS data. Section 1102 of the Act
instructs the Secretary to promulgate
regulations necessary for the effective
administration of the functions for
which HHS is responsible under the
Act.
(2) Summary of the Major Provisions of
the Final Rule
(a) Reporting Populations. AFCARS
will have two reporting populations: the
out-of-home care reporting population
and the adoption and guardianship
assistance reporting population. The
out-of-home care reporting population
includes a child of any age who is in
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
foster care under the placement and care
responsibility of the title IV–E agency; is
receiving title IV–E foster care
maintenance payments under a title IV–
E agreement; or has run away or whose
whereabouts are unknown at the time
the title IV–E agency becomes
responsible for the child. Once the child
enters the reporting population, he or
she remains in the reporting population
until the title IV–E agency’s
responsibility for the child ends or the
child’s title IV–E foster care
maintenance payment pursuant to a title
IV–E agreement ends. The adoption and
guardianship assistance reporting
population includes a child whose
adoption or guardianship was finalized
during the report period, and the child’s
adoptive parents or guardians have a
title IV–E adoption or guardianship
assistance agreement with the reporting
title IV–E agency.
(b) Data Structure. Title IV–E agencies
must report AFCARS information in two
separate data files: an out-of-home care
data file and an adoption and
guardianship assistance data file. The
out-of-home care data file is a
combination of point-in-time
information (e.g., demographics) and
information on the events in the child’s
life over time (e.g., every living
arrangement and permanency plan). The
adoption and guardianship assistance
data file contains data that capture a
child’s demographic information,
payment information, and certain
agreement information.
(c) Data Elements. We retained the
majority of data elements proposed for
the out-of-home care reporting
population proposed in the 2015 NPRM,
but removed some data elements in
response to comments (e.g., concurrent
permanency plans) and modified others
(e.g., caseworker visits and prior
adoption/guardianship). We reduced the
adoption and guardianship assistance
reporting to include data on the child’s
demographics, subsidy amounts,
adoption finalization date, and
agreement termination date. Also, we
retained nearly all of the data elements
proposed in the 2016 SNPRM for the
out-of-home care reporting population
specific to Indian children as defined in
ICWA, but removed two data elements:
one data element requiring states to
report if they provided additional
information requested by tribes related
to notification and one data element
indicating the date when the state title
IV–E agency began making active
efforts.
(d) Compliance and Penalties. The
final rule strengthens our ability to hold
title IV–E agencies accountable for
submitting quality data. A title IV–E
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
agency must meet basic file standards,
such as timely data file submissions and
more specific data quality standards,
such as 10 percent or less of a variety
of errors. A title IV–E agency that does
not meet the standards upon initial
submission of the data will have six
months to correct and submit the
corrected data. If a title IV–E agency
does not meet the standards after
corrective action, ACF will apply the
penalties required in statute (section
474(f) of the Act).
(3) Costs and Benefits. We estimate
that costs for the final rule will be
approximately $40.7 million. Benefits
are that we will have an updated
AFCARS regulation for the first time
since 1993. In addition to the current
uses of the data, the new information
will provide more comprehensive
information to deepen our
understanding of guardianships and to
address the unique needs of Indian
children as defined in ICWA who are in
the state’s placement and care
responsibility and who exit to
reunification, adoption or who are
transferred to the custody of the Indian
tribe. This will further our work to draw
national statistics and trends about the
foster care, adoption, and guardianship
populations for assessing the current
state of these federal programs and
inform national policies with respect to
adoption, guardianship, and foster care.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
II. Background on AFCARS
AFCARS regulations were originally
published in December 1993 in
response to the statutory mandate for
adoption and foster care data in section
479 of the Act. That mandate is for a
data collection system which provides
comprehensive national information on:
• the demographic characteristics of
adopted and foster children and their
parents;
• the status and characteristics of the
foster care population;
• the number and characteristics of
children entering and exiting foster care,
children adopted and children placed in
living arrangements outside of the
responsible title IV–E agency;
• the extent and nature of assistance
provided by government programs for
foster care and adoption and the
characteristics of the children that
receive the assistance; and
• the number of foster children
identified as sex trafficking victims
before entering or while in foster care.
We use AFCARS data to:
• Draw national statistics and trends
about the foster care and adoption
populations for assessing the current
state of foster care and adoption.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
• Complete the annual Child Welfare
Outcomes Report to Congress (section
479A of the Act).
• Develop our budgets.
• Calculate payments for the
Adoption and Guardianship Incentive
Payments program.
• Monitor title IV–E agency
compliance with title IV–B and IV–E
requirements, including drawing the
population sample for title IV–E
reviews.
• Develop appropriate national
policies with respect to adoption and
foster care; and
• Address the unique needs of Indian
children as defined by ICWA in foster
care or who exit to adoption, and their
families.
III. Regulation Development
Proposed Rules: We published a
NPRM on January 11, 2008 to revise
AFCARS (73 FR 2082). We did not
finalize that NPRM due to the President
signing into law the Fostering
Connections to Success and Increasing
Adoptions Act of 2008 (Public Law 110–
351) that substantially changed the title
IV–E program. Rather, we analyzed the
comments and sought additional
comments through a Federal Register
Notice (75 FR 43187, issued July 23,
2010). In September 2014, the President
signed into law the Preventing Sex
Trafficking and Strengthening Families
Act (Public Law 113–183) that modified
the AFCARS requirements in section
479 of the Act, the annual Child Welfare
Outcomes Report in section 479A of the
Act, and added a requirement for HHS
to submit several reports to Congress
requiring the collection and reporting of
information on victims of sex
trafficking, children in foster care who
are pregnant or parenting, and children
in foster care in non-foster family
settings and the services they receive.
We published the 2015 NPRM
proposing to modify the requirements
for title IV–E agencies to collect and
report data to ACF on children in outof-home care and who were adopted or
in a legal guardianship with a title IV–
E adoption or guardianship assistance
agreement. In April 2015, we
announced our intent to publish a
supplemental NPRM that would
propose adding ICWA-related data
elements to AFCARS (80 FR 17713,
issued April 2, 2015). ICWA establishes
minimum federal standards for the
removal of Indian children from their
families and the placement of such
children in foster care or adoptive
placements that reflect the unique
values of Indian culture. In cooperation
with the Children’s Bureau, the National
Association of Public Child Welfare
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
90525
Administrators (NAPCWA), an affiliate
of the American Public Human Services
Association (APHSA) hosted a
conference call with state members of
NAPCWA (i.e., representatives of state
child welfare agencies) on April 27,
2015. The purpose of the call was to
obtain input from state members on
what data state title IV–E agencies
currently collect regarding ICWA and
what they believed were the most
important information title IV–E
agencies should report in AFCARS
related to ICWA. In addition, the
Children’s Bureau held a tribal
consultation via conference call on May
1, 2015 to obtain input from tribal
leaders on proposed AFCARS data
elements related to ICWA. Comments
were solicited during the call to
determine essential data elements that
title IV–E agencies should report to
AFCARS. As part of on-going intra- and
inter-agency collaboration, ACF
consulted with federal experts on
whether data exists, or not, and its
utility in understanding the well-being
of Indian children, youth, and families.
ACF also consulted with federal
partners at the Department of Justice
(DOJ) and the Bureau of Indian Affairs
(BIA) at the Department of the Interior
on the ICWA statutory requirements in
25 U.S.C 1901 et seq., the Department of
Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs
Guidelines for State Courts and
Agencies in Indian Child Custody
Proceedings (80 FR 10146 issued
February 25, 2015, hereafter referred to
as BIA’s Guidelines), and Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking to Implement
Regulations for State Courts and
Agencies in Indian Child Custody
Proceedings (80 FR 14880, issued March
20, 2015). After considering all of the
aforementioned input, the 2016 SNPRM
was published on April 7, 2016 (81 FR
20283) and proposed to require that
state title IV–E agencies collect and
report certain information related to
ICWA for Indian children in the
AFCARS out-of-home care reporting
population.
2015 NPRM Comments: In response to
the 2015 NPRM, we received 126
comment letters from states, Indian
tribes and organizations representing
tribal interests, national advocacy/
public interests groups, universities,
and private citizens. Many commenters
supported many of the revisions we
proposed for reporting historical data
and collecting new information on
topics such as caseworker visits,
transition plans, and siblings.
Commenters suggested including data
elements related to ICWA. However,
some commenters expressed concern
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
90526
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
with the burden of modifying state
systems to report the additional data
elements. Suggestions included that we
pare down the overall number of data
elements to a core set that collects
essential information. Commenters
suggested that some of the proposed
data elements were better suited in case
narratives or case reviews rather than
AFCARS. We expand on these
comments in the section-by-section
discussion.
2016 SNPRM Comments: In response
to the 2016 SNPRM, we received 91
comment letters from states, Indian
tribes and organizations representing
tribal interests, national child welfare
advocacy/public interest groups,
universities, and private citizens. Many
commenters supported collecting
ICWA-related data in AFCARS and
stated that it will better inform practice
for Indian children as defined in ICWA.
However, many commenters also
expressed concerns with the burden of
modifying state data systems to collect
and report new and additional data
elements. They suggested that we pare
down the overall number of data
elements to a core set that collects
essential information related to ICWA.
Commenters stated that much of the
proposed data elements were better
suited for case reviews rather than
AFCARS because much of the
information is currently in case
narratives. We expand on these
comments in the section-by-section
discussion.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
IV. Discussion of Major Changes to the
Final Rule
Discussed below are the major
changes and provisions of the final rule.
A. Changes to the Out-of-Home Care
Data File
We received many comments in
response to the AFCARS out-of-home
care data elements proposed in the 2015
NPRM and 2016 SNPRM that helped us
strengthen, clarify, and streamline the
data elements. In general, states and the
national organization that represents
state child welfare agencies believe
there are data elements in both the 2015
NPRM and the 2016 SNPRM that exceed
the scope of the requirements of recent
child welfare legislation and they
recommend that ACF review each
proposed data element and focus on
essential data elements that can be
reasonably collected and compared
across states. Some states expressed
concerns about the proposed data
elements, implementation period,
penalties, timeframe for submission,
limited access to court records, and
associated burden. They suggested
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
paring down the number of data
elements, providing adequate timeline
and structure to implement changes
including data exchanges with courts,
and requested additional resources to
meet the burden of implementation and
training staff. In addition, some states
expressed concerns that the rule
includes data elements that attempt to
capture qualitative and quantitative
information that is not easily reducible
to a single data field, and are more
appropriate for a qualitative case review
rather than an administrative data
collection. We made the following major
changes in the out-of-home care data file
based on public comments:
Citizenship and Immigration
Throughout the final rule, we
removed proposed data elements that
required agencies to report whether or
not the child or parent was born in the
United States. State title IV–E agencies
and a national organization representing
state child welfare agencies were
overwhelmingly opposed to agencies
being required to report this in
AFCARS, commenting that the data
elements are not relevant to their work
at the state and local level and could
adversely impact the worker’s
relationship with families. However, in
response to suggestions to add data
elements related to parental
immigration detainment or deportation,
we included these as response options
in the Child and family circumstances
at removal data element in section
1355.43(d). These changes are explained
in further detail in the section-bysection discussion.
Sexual Orientation
We requested public input in the 2015
NPRM on whether AFCARS should
include information on whether a child
identifies as lesbian, gay, bisexual,
transgender, or questioning (LGBTQ).
We received comments both in favor
and against title IV–E agencies
collecting and reporting this
information to AFCARS but we were
convinced to include data elements in
the final rule related to the sexual
orientation of the child (section
1355.44(b)), the child’s foster parent(s)
(section 1355.44(e)), and adoptive
parent(s) or legal guardian(s) (sections
1355.44(h)). Our goal in including this
information is that the data will assist
title IV–E agencies to help meet the
needs of LGBTQ youth in foster care.
Information on sexual orientation
should be obtained and maintained in a
manner that reflects respectful
treatment, sensitivity, and
confidentiality. Several state and county
agencies, advocacy organizations and
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
human rights organizations have
developed guidance and recommended
practices for how to promote these
conditions in serving LGBT youth in
adoption, foster care and out-of-home
placement settings. ACF provides state
and tribal resources for Working With
LGBTQ Youth and Families at the Child
Welfare Information Gateway. The
following links are provided as general
examples of such guidance (Minnesota
and California examples). ACF will
provide technical assistance to agencies
on collecting this information.
We also added, based on comments,
whether there is family conflict related
to the child’s sexual orientation, gender
identify, or gender expression as a Child
and family circumstance at removal
reported when a child is removed from
home in section 1355.44(d).
Child Financial and Medical Assistance
We proposed in the 2015 NPRM to
collect financial and medical assistance
information that support the child in
two separate data elements: (1) Identify
the source of federal assistance and total
per diem payment amount for each of
the child’s living arrangements from a
list seven types of assistance; and (2)
identify whether the child received
specific non-title IV–E federal or state/
tribal financial and medical assistance
during the report period. We received
many comments expressing concern
about the increased burden in particular
to report specific federal assistance per
diem payment amounts for every living
arrangement. In response to these
concerns, we were persuaded to revise
the data elements by removing the data
element related to per diem payment
amounts for every living arrangement
and consolidated the response options
from both data elements into one data
element. As a result, in section
1355.44(b) of the final rule, we require
title IV–E agencies to report if the child
received any of 13 types of state/tribal
and federal financial and medical
assistance during the report period.
Health, Behavioral or Mental Health
Conditions and IDEA Qualifying
Disability
We proposed in the 2015 NPRM to
require agencies to report on a child’s
health, behavior or mental health
conditions in one data element and the
child’s qualifying disability as defined
by the Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act (IDEA) if he/she has an
Individualized Education Program (IEP)
or Individual Family Service Plan (IFSP)
in another. We received many
comments from state title IV–E agencies
that the response options for both data
elements were very similar conditions,
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
the distinction confusing, and could
lead to unreliable data. We were
persuaded by the commenters to
streamline and consolidate the two data
elements and as a result removed the
specific requirement for agencies to
report a child’s qualifying disability,
and modified and combined the
response options into one data element
called health, behavioral or mental
health conditions with 11 conditions for
agency to report on the child (section
1355.43(b)). This will provide us with
better data on the child’s health
characteristics and meets the federal
requirement to collect this information
per section 479A(a)(7)(A)(v) of the Act
regarding reporting clinically diagnosed
conditions for certain children in foster
care.
Siblings
We revised how we will collect
information on siblings in the out-ofhome care data file in the final rule. In
the 2015 NPRM, we proposed to collect
sibling information in both the out-ofhome care data file and the title IV–E
adoption and guardianship assistance
data file:
• The number of siblings of the child
who are in out-of-home care and the
child record numbers for those siblings,
those siblings who are placed together
in out-of-home care and those not
placed together; and
• the number of siblings who exited
out-of-home care to adoption or
guardianship and the child record
numbers of those siblings who are living
with the child and the child record
numbers of those not living with the
child.
Commenters generally agreed that
information about siblings is important
to collect, but had concerns that our
proposal was too complicated and
would not yield reliable information
because there are many and varied
reasons for siblings not being placed
together. Commenters thought the
proposal did not take into account the
complexity of what may constitute a
family in the eyes of a child, and this
information is best captured
qualitatively. We carefully reviewed the
comments and recommendations. While
we understand the concerns and issues
the commenters raised that may make it
difficult to report sibling information,
we determined that we must continue to
require agencies to report information
about sibling placements. As we noted
in the preamble to the 2015 NPRM,
section 471(a)(31)(A) of the Act requires
title IV–E agencies to make reasonable
efforts to place siblings removed from
their home in the same foster care,
kinship guardianship or adoptive
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
placement, unless such a placement is
contrary to the safety or well-being of
any of the siblings. While we retained
the core requirement for agencies to
report on whether siblings are placed
together in foster care and when siblings
exit to adoption, we simplified
reporting. We removed the data
elements requiring the agency to report
the sibling’s child record numbers
which was one of the concerns raised by
commenters. Thus, the agency reports in
the out-of-home care data file the
following:
• The number of siblings of the child
that are in foster care, and the number
of siblings in the same living
arrangement as the child on the last day
of the report period (section 1355.42(b)).
• The number of siblings of the child
who are in the same adoptive or
guardianship home as the child, if the
child exited foster care to adoption or
guardianship (section 1355.44(h)).
Data Elements Related to ICWA
2016 SNPRM Rationale: The
Government Accountability Office
(GAO) reported in 2005 that there is no
national data on children subject to
ICWA by which to assess the
experiences of AI/AN children in child
welfare systems or with which to target
guidance and assistance to states (GAO–
05–290 Indian Child Welfare Act).
Further, in response to comments on the
2015 NPRM and a reevaluation of our
data collection authority, we were
persuaded to propose that state title IV–
E agencies report ICWA-related data. We
proposed the data elements in the 2016
SNPRM as paragraph (i) to the proposed
section 1355.43 (from the 2015 NPRM)
after considering input from comments
and federal agency experts. Overall,
tribes, organizations, states, and private
citizens supported our mission to
collect additional information related to
Indian children as defined in ICWA.
Moreover, some states, tribes, national
organizations and federal agencies have
stated that ICWA is the ‘‘gold standard’’
of child welfare practice and its
implementation and associated data
collection will likely help to inform
efforts to improve outcomes for all
children and families in state child
welfare systems.
Comments: Generally, tribes,
organizations representing tribal
interests, national child welfare
advocacy organizations, and private
citizens fully support the overall goal
and purpose of including ICWA-related
data in AFCARS, and the data elements
as proposed in the 2016 SNPRM. These
commenters believe that collecting
ICWA-related data in AFCARS will:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
90527
1. provide data on core ICWA
requirements such as ‘‘active efforts’’
and placement preferences, as well as
assess how the child welfare system is
working for Indian children as defined
by ICWA, families and communities;
2. facilitate access to culturallyappropriate services to extended
families and other tribal members who
can serve as resources and high quality
placements for tribal children;
3. help address and reduce the
disproportionality of AI/AN children in
foster care; and
4. provide avenues for collaboration
between states and tribes that are more
meaningful and outcome driven,
including improved policy
development, technical assistance,
training and resource allocation as a
result of having reliable data available.
Overall, tribal commenters and
national child welfare advocacy
organizations believe that collecting
ICWA-related data in AFCARS is a step
in the right direction to ensure that
Indian families will be kept together
when possible, and will help prevent
AI/AN children from entering the foster
care system. Many of the tribal
commenters that supported the 2016
SNPRM also recommended extensive
training for title IV–E agencies and court
personnel in order to ensure accurate
and reliable data reporting. Some
commenters recommended additional
data elements.
Commenters from some states and the
national organization representing state
child welfare agencies generally
supported the overall goal and purpose
of including ICWA-related data in
AFCARS. One state commented that
reporting national data related to ICWA
was needed and long over-due. Some
states reiterated concerns expressed in
their comments to the NPRM related to
the implementation period, penalties,
timeline for submission, limited access
to court records and the associated
burden. Those states made similar
recommendations to reduce the number
of elements, provide an adequate
implementation timeline, and requested
additional resources to implement and
train staff. As with their comments to
the NPRM, some states identified
proposed ICWA-related data elements
that they believe would not be easily
captured in a single data field and may
therefore be better assessed through
qualitative case file review. Some states
also suggested that we clarify the
language of the ICWA-related data
elements and definitions in relation to
BIA’s regulations in order to increase
national uniformity of practice and data
collection. Several states said that they
have a small number of AI/AN children
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
90528
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
in their AFCARS reporting population
and they requested that federal funding
be made available to the fullest extent
possible to help prepare for the lowoccurring event of reporting the ICWArelated information.
Final Rule: We understand the burden
issues that states raised in collecting
and reporting additional data to
AFCARS; however, we have determined
in the final rule that the benefits
outweigh the burden associated with
collecting and reporting the additional
data. Most states commented positively
about improving data on Indian
children as defined in ICWA. As we
stated in the 2016 SNPRM, it is unclear
how well state title IV–E agencies
implement ICWA’s requirements
because of the lack of data related to
ICWA. Even in states with large AI/AN
populations, there may be confusion
regarding how and when to apply
ICWA.
We retained most of the data elements
proposed in the 2016 SNPRM with some
minor revisions to be consistent with
the final rule published by the
Department of the Interior, Bureau of
Indian Affairs that addresses
requirements for state courts regarding
ICWA (81 FR 38778). We modified our
final AFCARS rule requiring state title
IV–E agencies to report whether active
efforts were made prior to removal and
prior to a termination of parental rights
(TPR), and to identify which active
efforts were made prior to removal and
during the child’s out-of-home care
episode. We agree with commenters’
suggestions that we include information
when a state title IV–E agency inquired
of extended family if the child is an
Indian child because extended family
may have information that parents do
not know. We removed the requirement
for states to report the date on which the
state title IV–E agency began making
active efforts in order to coordinate with
the BIA’s regulation clarifying that
ICWA applies when the state title IV–E
agency knows or has reason to know
that a child is an Indian child as defined
in ICWA. We removed the data element
requiring states to report whether the
state provided additional information
the tribe requested related to
notification. We explain this more in the
section-by-section discussion.
We determined the best approach for
the final rule is to integrate the data
elements proposed in the 2016 SNPRM
as section 1355.43(i) into applicable
sections of this final rule at section
1355.44. These sections are: Child
information (section 1355.44(b)); Parent
or legal guardian information (section
1355.44(c)); Removal information
(section 1355.44(d)); Living arrangement
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
and provider information (section
1355.44(e)); Permanency planning
(section 1355.44(f)); General exit
information (section 1355.44(g)); and
Exit to adoption and guardianship
information (section 1355.44(h)).
On June 14, 2016, BIA published the
final rule, Indian Child Welfare Act
Proceedings (81 FR 38778). BIA’s final
rule requires fewer court orders than its
proposed rule and increases flexibility
for recording court decisions. In
response to state and tribal comments
suggesting congruence with the BIA’s
final rule, we revised data elements in
this final rule as appropriate to reflect
the BIA’s regulations including
removing requirements that state title
IV–E agencies report certain information
only from ICWA-specific court orders.
These changes should allow the state
title IV–E agency more flexibility,
alleviate some of the burden and other
concerns identified by states, help target
technical assistance to increase state
title IV–E agency communication and
coordination with courts, and improve
practice and national data on all
children who are in foster care.
B. Revisions to Data on Children Who
Are Adopted and Children Who Are
Placed in Legal Guardianships
2015 NPRM Proposal and Rationale:
In the 2015 NPRM, we proposed a new
data file to collect information on
children who have title IV–E adoption
or guardianship assistance agreements
and several new out-of-home care data
elements to collect information on
children who exit out-of-home care to
adoption or legal guardianship.
Title IV–E Adoption and
Guardianship Assistance data file: We
proposed in the 2015 NPRM to require
the title IV–E agency to report ongoing
information on children under a title
IV–E adoption and guardianship
assistance agreement (called the title
IV–E adoption and guardianship
assistance data file), regardless of
whether the agreement is for an ongoing
subsidy, nonrecurring costs or in the
case of a title IV–E finalized adoption,
a Medicaid-only subsidy. The
information included: demographics on
each child, finalization/legalization
dates, jurisdiction of the adoption,
adoption or guardianship placing
agency, subsidy and nonrecurring costs
amounts, and sibling information.
Section 1355.44(h) Exit to adoption
and guardianship information: We also
proposed data elements in the out-ofhome care data file related to all
children who exit out-of-home care to
adoption or legal guardianship. This
included children who have a title IV–
E adoption or guardianship assistance
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
agreement, with or without a subsidy,
and those who do not have either an
agreement or subsidy. We proposed to
require that the title IV–E agency report
information on children who exit out-ofhome care to adoption or legal
guardianship, including: Demographic
information (race, ethnicity, date of
birth) on the adoptive parents/legal
guardians; child’s relationship to the
adoptive parents/legal guardians;
whether the child was placed within or
outside of the state or tribal service area,
or into another country for adoption or
legal guardianship, and if so the name
of the jurisdiction; and the agency that
placed the child.
Comments: We received public
comments on the overall proposal to
collect information on children under
title IV–E adoption and guardianship
agreements, comments on individual
data elements, and suggestions for
expanding the information to be
reported. A national organization
representing state child welfare agencies
requested that we remove the title IV–
E adoption and guardianship assistance
data file from the final rule and in
general recommended that all AFCARS
data elements be clearly defined and
structured to provide accurate, reliable,
and valid information. Additional
comments and concerns raised by the
organization were that: some state laws
and/or policies regarding the oversight
allowed with an adoptive family
restricts the ongoing collection and use
of information about these children;
children under guardianship and
adoption assistance agreements do not
have open service cases even when
there is a subsidy; many states capture
the financial information regarding title
IV–E adoption and guardianship
subsidies in other systems; and many
states would be required to make a
significant changes to their application
and report programs. In addition, the
organization specifically noted that
requiring agencies to report on an
optional program for a child under a
title IV–E guardianship assistance
agreement reaches beyond our statutory
authority. Several others, including
states, agreed with the recommendation
to remove the title IV–E adoption and
guardianship assistance data file, raising
additional concerns about the burden on
workers. Some national advocacy/
public interest groups representing
children and adoption agency interests
supported the collection of information
on children under title IV–E assistance
agreements. Some of these groups
suggested including data elements on
children with state guardianship
agreements and additional historical
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
data elements. We also received specific
comments on the data elements in
section 1355.44(h) that we address in
the section-by section discussion of the
preamble related to gender of the
adoptive parents and legal guardians,
sexual orientation of the adoptive
parents and legal guardians, the
definition of kin, and information on
siblings.
We carefully reviewed all of the
comments and reconsidered our
essential needs at the federal level for
data on children who are adopted and
in legal guardianships, and revised the
final rule as described below.
Final Rule: Adoption Assistance data
file: We retained the adoption and
guardianship assistance reporting
population as proposed, given the
growing dominance of this population
as a component of the title IV–E
beneficiary population. However, we
reduced the data elements to those that
are essential for our needs in
understanding this population of
children who are receiving Federal
benefits: a child’s basic demographic
information, subsidy amounts, and
adoption and guardianship finalization
and subsidy termination dates. As
specified in the NPRM, this information
will be used to discern changing
circumstances and fluctuations in title
IV–E payment amounts, responding to
questions raised by Congress, and for
budgetary planning and projection
purposes. We removed the requirements
for agencies to report non-recurring
costs amounts as we do not have a
specified need for this case level
information and agencies report this
type of information in the aggregate. We
reduced reporting on siblings which is
only reported in the out-of-home care
file, as is the adoption jurisdiction and
adoption reporting agency.
Final Rule: Section 1355.44(h) Exit to
adoption and guardianship information:
We determined that it was essential for
us to have more robust information
about all children who exit state or
tribal foster care to adoption or legal
guardianship, which is found in the outof-home care data file at section
1355.44(h). We added and revised data
elements based on commenters’
suggestions to ensure we have a
comprehensive set of information about
children who exit foster care to
adoption and guardianship. The most
notable data elements we added to the
out-of-home care data file for children
who exit to adoption or guardianship
are:
• Sexual orientation of the adoptive
parent(s) or legal guardian(s);
• Tribal membership of the adoptive
parent(s) or legal guardian(s);
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
• The assistance agreement type
(adoption assistance agreement, state/
tribal adoption assistance agreement,
adoption-title IV–E agreement, nonrecurring expenses only; Medicaid only;
title IV–E guardianship assistance
agreement, state/tribal guardianship
assistance agreement, or no agreement);
and
• The number of siblings of the child
who are in the same adoptive or
guardianship home as the child who
exited out-of-home care to adoption or
guardianship.
C. Report Periods and Deadlines
In section 1355.43(a) Report periods
and deadlines, we modified the final
rule to allow title IV–E agencies up to
45 days after the end of the report
period to transmit the AFCARS data
files.
V. Implementation Timeframe
We are providing two fiscal years for
title IV–E agencies to comply with
sections 1355.41 through 1355.47. State
and tribal title IV–E agencies must
continue to report data related to
children in foster care and who have
been adopted with title IV–E agency
involvement to ACF in accordance with
section 1355.40 and the appendix to
part 1355 during the implementation
period. It is essential for agencies to
continue to report AFCARS data to ACF
without interruption because AFCARS
data is used for various reports,
planning and monitoring, and to make
the Adoption and Guardianship
Incentive awards.
We received comments from many
states on the implementation timeframe
and several offered suggestions. State
commenters to both the 2015 NPRM and
the 2016 SNPRM indicated they would
need sufficient time to make changes to
their electronic case management
systems to collect new information.
Several state title IV–E agencies and a
national organization representing state
title IV–E agencies indicated that
implementing the ICWA-related data
elements proposed in the 2016 SNPRM
in addition to the elements proposed in
the 2015 NPRM would require more
time than one year and two states
indicated a need for two to three years.
Several state title IV–E agencies
indicated that ICWA-related information
is documented in case files and in
narrative formats. Additionally, several
state title IV–E agencies noted that
collecting the information from courts
would impact their implementation
timeframe because the court information
systems do not always contain the
information proposed in the 2016
SNPRM or because there is no data
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
90529
exchange interface between the court
and state title IV–E agency’s case
management system. Commenters to the
2015 NPRM also suggested that this
final rule not be implemented until after
Round 3 of the Child and Family
Services Reviews (CFSR).
State title IV–E agencies and the
national organization representing state
title IV–E agencies recommended either
a tiered or a phased-in approach to
compliance with the AFCARS
requirements and penalties. Several of
those commenters suggested that we
allow agencies additional time to
implement the changes proposed in the
2016 SNPRM regarding ICWA data
elements.
We understand states’ concerns about
the system changes that are needed
since this final rule will implement the
statutory AFCARS penalties. However,
we determined that a two federal fiscal
year period is sufficient for states to
implement all changes for the AFCARS
final rule. We are not providing a phasein period for the ICWA-related data
elements. As we noted in the 2016
SNPRM, we are issuing one final rule on
AFCARS and we considered all
comments on the 2015 NPRM and the
2016 SNPRM.
VI. Section-by-Section Discussion of
Comments and Regulatory Provisions
Section 1355.40 Foster Care and
Adoption Data Collection
In this section, we modified the
requirements in the current section
1355.40 to require title IV–E agencies to
continue to submit AFCARS data during
the implementation timeframe. We must
keep the current AFCARS regulations at
section 1355.40 and the appendices to
part 1355 until the dates listed in the
DATES section of this rule. This means
that title IV–E agencies must continue to
report AFCARS data in the same
manner they do currently until the
implementation date of this final rule as
discussed in section V of this final rule.
Section 1355.41 Scope of the Adoption
and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting
System
In this section, we set forth the scope
of AFCARS.
In paragraph (a), we specify that state
and tribal title IV–E agencies must
collect and report AFCARS data, unless
it is indicated for state title IV–E
agencies only.
In paragraph (b), we specify that title
IV–E agencies must submit the data to
ACF on a semi-annual basis as required
in section 1355.43 in a format according
to ACF’s specifications.
In paragraph (c)(1), we clarified that
the terms in section 1355.41 through
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
90530
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
1355.47 are defined as they appear in 45
CFR 1355.20, except that for purposes of
specified data elements related to the
Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978
(ICWA), terms are defined as they
appear in 25 CFR 23.2 and 25 U.S.C.
1903. This is similar to paragraph (i)(1)
as proposed in the 2016 SNPRM and
incorporates the definitions recently
promulgated in BIA’s regulations at 25
CFR 23.2.
In paragraph (c)(2), we clarified for
state title IV–E agencies that in cases
where ICWA applies, the term ‘‘legal
guardian’’ includes an Indian custodian
as defined in ICWA at 25 U.S.C. 1903.
These data elements are in sections
1355.44(c)(1), (c)(2), (d)(4), and (d)(5).
We understand that there are instances
when ICWA applies where Indian
custodians may have legal responsibility
for the child. Since we are integrating
the ICWA-related data elements into
select sections of this regulation, we
want to take this opportunity to clarify
that in the instances where ICWA
applies and an Indian custodian may
have legal responsibility of the child
who is now in out-of-home care, the
term ‘‘legal guardian’’ includes an
Indian custodian.
Comment: A few commenters
suggested additional definitions, such as
‘‘voluntary’’ placement, ‘‘ICWA eligible
child,’’ and ‘‘reactivation’’ of children
who have multiple removals for the
same reasons, and to expand the
definition of tribe to distinguish
between federally recognized, nonfederally recognized, and historic/
aboriginal tribes.
Response: We did not add a definition
of ‘‘voluntary’’ placement because the
term is already defined by section 472(f)
of the Act. We did not define
‘‘reactivation’’ because it is not a term
used in these regulations. We did not
specifically define ‘‘ICWA eligible
child’’ in this regulation, but we did
include by reference definitions in the
BIA’s ICWA regulation at 25 CFR 23.2
so if the BIA amends the definition of
children to whom ICWA applies, it will
automatically be changed for the
purpose of these regulations rather than
requiring ACF to issue another
regulatory action. Since we integrated
the ICWA-related data elements into
other sections of the final rule we no
longer have a list of applicable
definitions pertaining to the ICWArelated data elements. Rather, section
1355.41(c)(1) specifies that terms in
sections 1355.41 through 1355.47 are
defined as they appear in 45 CFR
1355.20, except that for purposes of data
elements related to ICWA, terms that
appear in sections 1344.44(b)(3) through
(b)(8), (c)(3), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(7), (d)(3),
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
(e)(8) through (e)(11), (f)(10), and (h)(20)
through (h)(23) are defined as they
appear in 25 CFR 23.2 and 25 U.S.C.
1903. This means that the ICWA-related
data elements will follow either BIA
regulations as they appear in 25 CFR
23.2 or the statute at 25 U.S.C. 1903. In
paragraph (c)(2), we clarified for state
title IV–E agencies that in cases where
ICWA applies, the term ‘‘legal guardian’’
includes an Indian custodian as defined
in ICWA at 25 U.S.C. 1903. These data
elements are in sections 1355.44(c)(1),
(c)(2), (d)(4), and (d)(5).
Section 1355.42
Reporting Populations
In this section, we define the
reporting populations for the AFCARS
out-of-home care and adoption and
guardianship assistance data files.
Section 1355.42(a) Out-of-Home Care
Reporting Population
In paragraph (a), we define and clarify
the out-of-home care reporting
population. Consistent with current
AFCARS, the child enters the out-ofhome care reporting population when
the child’s first placement meets the
definition of foster care in section
1355.20. A title IV–E agency must report
a child of any age who is in out-of-home
care for more than 24 hours.
Comment: Several state title IV–E
agencies, a national organization
representing state child welfare agencies
and other commenters supported the
out-of-home care reporting population.
However, several states and others
expressed confusion over who is
included in this population, particularly
juvenile justice youth, runaway and
homeless youth, youth on a trial home
visit and children who reenter care.
Response: We take this opportunity to
clarify the reporting population for outof-home care. Overall, the out-of-home
care reporting population includes a
child of any age who is in foster care as
defined in 1355.20 for longer than 24
hours until the title IV–E agency no
longer has placement and care
responsibility. The out-of-home care
reporting population includes a child
under the title IV–E agency’s placement
and care who:
• Has run away or whose
whereabouts are unknown at the time
the title IV–E agency becomes
responsible for the child, until the title
IV–E agency’s responsibility for
placement and care ends;
• is placed into foster care after a
non-foster care setting, until the title IV–
E agency’s placement and care
responsibility ends;
• is placed at home, including a child
on a trial discharge or trial home visit,
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
until the title IV–E agency’s placement
and care responsibility ends;
• is placed from a foster care
placement into a non-foster care setting,
until the title IV–E agency’s placement
and care responsibility ends;
• is age 18 and older, including those
in a supervised independent living
setting, until the title IV–E agency’s
placement and care responsibility ends.
The out-of-home care reporting
population also includes a child who is
under the placement and care
responsibility of another public agency
that has an agreement with the title IV–
E agency pursuant to section
472(a)(2)(B) of the Act, or an Indian
tribe, tribal organization or consortium
with which the title IV–E agency has an
agreement, and, on whose behalf title
IV–E foster care maintenance payments
are made until title IV–E foster care
maintenance payments cease to be made
on behalf of the child. We specifically
note that children placed pursuant to
title IV–E agreements are reported in the
out-of-home care reporting population
only if the child is receiving a title IV–
E foster care maintenance payment
under the title IV–E agreement. We
added the phrase ‘‘for more than 24
hours’’ to the regulation so that it now
reads ‘‘A title IV–E agency must report
a child of any age who is in out-of-home
care for more than 24 hours.’’ We want
to be clear how title IV–E agencies must
report children in the out-of-home care
reporting population, consistent with
current AFCARS regulations, found in
the Appendix to section 1355. Since we
removed the appendix, we are adding it
to the regulation. During AFCARS
Assessment Reviews, states have
inquired about this policy many times
and we feel that it is clearer to specify
this in regulation.
Consistent with existing AFCARS
policy, the out-of-home care reporting
population also includes a child who is
in foster care under the joint
responsibility of another public agency,
such as the juvenile justice agency, and
the title IV–E agency until title IV–E
foster care maintenance payments cease
to be made on behalf of the child (see
the Child Welfare Policy Manual section
1.3, question 13).
We understand there has been
confusion in the past both in the
reporting and analysis of the current
AFCARS foster care reporting
population related to children who are
under the responsibility of another
public agency or an Indian tribe
pursuant to a title IV–E agreement. As
noted in paragraph (a)(1)(ii), title IV–E
agencies must include children for
whom title IV–E foster care maintenance
payments are provided under a title IV–
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
E agreement between the title IV–E
agency and a public agency or an Indian
tribe. We would like to clarify that only
those children who are provided a title
IV–E foster care maintenance payment
under the title IV–E agreement are
included in the out-of-home care
reporting population; it does not
include all the children in the other
public agency or Indian tribe’s
placement and care responsibility. In
paragraph (a)(1)(ii) we refer to only title
IV–E agreements that meet the
requirements of section 472(a)(2) of the
Act; not all interagency agreements or
contracts with the other public agency
or Indian tribe for services or payments
meet these requirements. Section
472(a)(2) of the Act allows for payment
of title IV–E foster care maintenance on
behalf of an eligible child if there is a
title IV–E agreement with another
public agency or Indian tribe even
though the child is not under the
placement and care responsibility of the
reporting title IV–E agency. This
clarification reflects a continuation of
the AFCARS reporting requirements and
is not a change in the out-of-home care
reporting population. To further clarify
the children in the out-of-home care
reporting population, we modified the
regulation in section 1355.44(d)(6) Child
and family circumstances at removal to
identify these children reported in
AFCARS and we discuss in the
preamble for that section.
Comment: Several state title IV–E
agencies expressed concerns that the
proposal expands the reporting
population and will be burdensome for
agencies to report all data elements on
the reporting population; one state
expressed concern that the reporting
population would impact their CFSR
measures; and one state commented that
the expansion of the reporting
population imposes an unrealistic
mandate on state child welfare agencies
to be responsible and penalized for data
collected by other agencies.
Response: We retained the
requirement for title IV–E agencies to
report a child until the title IV–E agency
no longer has placement and care
responsibility. We expect that title IV–
E agencies would have the information
that we require to be reported if they
have responsibility for the child,
regardless of where the child is placed.
The revision to the out-of-home care
reporting population has no impact on
the population of children for the CFSR
measures because only the children in
foster care will be included in the
outcome measures. We continue to
believe that the benefits of data
reporting on the out-of-home care
reporting population will allow ACF to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
develop a comprehensive picture of a
child’s experience in the title IV–E
agency’s placement and care with all
removals, living arrangements,
permanency plans, and exits from outof-home care and the ability to better
inform our monitoring efforts. We will
provide technical assistance to agencies
on any remaining clarifications
regarding state specific questions related
to the reporting population.
Section 1355.42(b) Adoption and
Guardianship Assistance Reporting
Population
In paragraph (b), we define the
reporting population for the adoption
and guardianship assistance data file.
In paragraph (b)(1) we require that the
title IV–E agency must report data as
described in section 1355.45 on each
child who meets one of the conditions
in the paragraphs (b)(1)(i) or (b)(1)(ii).
In paragraph (b)(1)(i), we require the
title IV–E agency to report information
required by section 1355.45 on any
child for whom there is a finalized
adoption under a title IV–E adoption
assistance agreement (per section 473(a)
of the Act) with the reporting title IV–
E agency that is or was in effect at some
point during the report period.
In paragraph (b)(1)(ii), we collect the
information in section 1355.45 on any
child in a legal guardianship who is
under a title IV–E guardianship
assistance agreement, pursuant to
section 473(d) of the Act, with the
reporting title IV–E agency that is or was
in effect at some point during the
current report period.
In paragraph (b)(2), we clarify that a
child remains in the adoption and
guardianship assistance reporting
population through the end of the report
period in which the title IV–E
agreement ends or is terminated.
Comment: Many commenters objected
to reporting ongoing information on
children who are in this reporting
population, stating that adopted
children do not have open service cases
even when there is a subsidy attached.
Additionally, many commenters felt
that collecting information on any child
who is in a legal guardianship under a
title IV–E guardianship assistance
agreement reaches beyond our statutory
authority and would require a
significant change in the application
and report programs and laws and
policies in many states. Several other
groups agreed with this opinion and
raised concerns about the burden on
workers and duplication to information
in the out-of-home care data file (section
1355.44(h)). Some national advocacy/
public interest groups representing
children and adoption agency interests
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
90531
were supportive of the separate data file
proposed in the 2015 NPRM, and some
suggested including children for whom
there are finalized adoptions and
guardianships without title IV–E
assistance agreements.
Response: We carefully considered
the comments and have retained the
adoption and guardianship assistance
reporting population as proposed for the
reasons we identified in the NPRM and
given the growing dominance of this
population as a component of the title
IV–E beneficiary population. Overall,
we believe there is a basic good
governance principle at stake in having
data about children who are receiving
Federal benefits, especially considering
the tremendous growth in the title IV–
E adoption and guardianship assistance
population over the last several years.
While there is no statutory mandate to
collect information for children under a
title IV–E guardianship assistance
agreement, section 479(c)(3)(C)(i) of the
Act authorizes AFCARS to collect data
on the ‘‘characteristics of children . . .
removed from foster care’’, which
encompasses the title IV–E guardianship
assistance population. We continue to
believe it is essential to collect the same
information on children under title IV–
E guardianship agreements as for title
IV–E adoption agreements because we
have the same need for the information
for children supported by title IV–E
funding.
Section 1355.43 Data Reporting
Requirements
This section contains the AFCARS
data reporting requirements.
Section 1355.43(a) Report Periods and
Deadlines
In paragraph (a), we specify that: (1)
There are two six-month report periods
based on the federal fiscal year, October
1 to March 31 and April 1 to September
30 and; (2) the title IV–E agency must
submit the AFCARS data files to ACF
within 45 days of the end of the report
period (i.e., by May 15 and November
14).
Comment: A national organization
representing state child welfare agencies
recommended that we maintain the 45
day window for submitting data. They
believe the 30 day requirement
proposed in the 2015 NPRM would
compromise data accuracy and integrity
because some data may be excluded and
there would not be enough time for
agencies to check for errors in 30 days,
particularly for state-supervised,
county-administered states. Eight states
and three other commenters opposed
the shortened timeframe for the same
reasons.
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
90532
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Response: We modified the regulation
to allow title IV–E agencies up to 45
days after the end of the report period
to transmit the AFCARS file to
accommodate commenter concerns.
However, we wish to emphasize that the
purpose of this 45 day transmission
period is to extract the data and ensure
the file is in the proper format for
transmission. Data accuracy and
integrity is to be completed by the IV–
E agency on a continuous basis
throughout the year. This is consistent
with current AFCARS guidance.
Section 1355.43(b) Out-of-Home Care
Data File
In paragraph (b), we provide
instructions on how the title IV–E
agency must report information for the
out-of-home care reporting population.
In paragraph (b)(1), we require a title
IV–E agency to submit the most recent
information for data elements in the
General information (section 1355.44(a))
and Child information (section
1355.44(b)) sections of the out-of-home
care data file.
In paragraph (b)(2), we require the
title IV–E agency to submit the most
recent and historical information for
most data elements in the following
sections of the out-of-home care data
file, unless the exception in paragraph
(b)(3) applies:
• § 1355.44(c) Parent or legal
guardian information
• § 1355.44(d) Removal information
• § 1355.44(e) Living arrangement
and provider information
• § 1355.44(f) Permanency planning
• § 1355.44(g) General exit
information
• § 1355.44(h) Exit to adoption and
guardianship information
Comment: In general, states, a
national organization representing state
child welfare agencies, and other
national/advocacy organizations and
individuals were supportive of the move
to a historical data set because of the
benefits in understanding outcomes for
children and their experiences in out-ofhome care. However, many commented
that they are concerned that the final
rule will be a challenge for states to
implement because of a significant
burden to title IV–E agencies to collect
and report new additional historical
data with existing resources. In
addition, they expressed concern with
the magnitude of historical data that
would be required to be reported as it
would need to be tracked at local levels
in order to produce six-month report
period data files.
Several national advocacy
organizations and others made
suggestions to expand historical
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
reporting to other data elements, while
others, mostly state title IV–E agencies,
suggested we limit the data to ‘‘core
elements’’ that have utility and validity
at the national level. A national
organization representing state child
welfare agencies suggested that we
allow AFCARS revisions to occur in
stages, by first creating historical data
files and then adding data elements that
are truly necessary in a federal database.
Response: We are retaining the
requirement that title IV–E agencies
report certain historical data for the
original reasons we proposed. In
general, we removed several data
elements and included other data
elements as appropriate, which we
explain in the section-by-section
preamble. We acknowledge that there
are a few states that currently do not
have a comprehensive electronic case
management system or central database
that contains the child’s information
across all counties. However, based on
AFCARS Assessment Reviews, we
believe that many of the historical data
elements are available in the state’s
information system or electronic case
record. We continue to believe that the
benefits of historical data reporting will
allow ACF to develop a comprehensive
picture of a child’s experience in the
title IV–E agency’s placement and care
with all entries, living arrangements,
permanency plans, and exits from outof-home care. We believe there will be
many benefits from receiving historical
data, including: eliminating information
gaps that exist in current AFCARS data
which raise questions about the child’s
experiences and make the data more
difficult to analyze; building upon
ACF’s ability to conduct sophisticated
analyses of what happens to a child or
groups of children in foster care; and
providing better data to inform the
current CFSR and other outcome
monitoring efforts such as time in foster
care, foster care re-entries and the
stability of foster care placements.
Finally, we did not revise the regulation
to allow AFCARS revisions to occur in
stages. Issuing one final rule on
AFCARS with all revisions is the
efficient way to revise AFCARS, since
revisions to AFCARS have been
proposed since the 2008 NPRM. We will
provide technical assistance via
webinars and other media channels to
facilitate AFCARS implementation as
well as offer one-on-one assistance to
title IV–E agencies.
Comment: Several states noted that
there was not enough detail on the
technical specifics related to the
structure of the data set and asked for
more specificity to better understand
how title IV–E agencies will need to
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
modify their systems. States,
organizations, and others asked
technical clarification questions and
several recommended that states have
access to these data files. Finally, there
were a few technical clarification
questions about the state specific system
issues.
Response: While we are not regulating
the technical specifications for reporting
historical data, we anticipate that title
IV–E agencies will submit a data file in
much the same way that they submit it
now, only with more information. Most
of the information that will be historical
is currently stored in a state’s electronic
case file, based on our current
knowledge of agency systems through
our AFCARS Assessment Reviews. We
will work through these technical pieces
during implementation, which is
consistent with the approach we took
for the National Youth in Transition
Database (NYTD). We intend to issue
technical guidance as noted throughout
the preamble regarding file
specifications. Also, we will provide
technical assistance via webinars and
other media to implement AFCARS as
well as providing one-on-one assistance
with title IV–E agencies.
In paragraph (b)(3), we require that
the title IV–E agency report the date of
removal, exit date, and exit reason for
each child who had an out-of-home care
episode prior to the final rule. This
means that title IV–E agencies do not
need to report complete historical and
current information for these children.
We did not receive any comments.
Section 1355.43(c) Adoption and
Guardianship Assistance Data File
In paragraph (c), we require that the
title IV–E agency report the most recent
information for the applicable data
elements in § 1355.45 that pertains to
each child in the adoption and
guardianship assistance reporting
population on the last day of the report
period. We did not receive comments on
the 2015 NPRM specific to this
paragraph.
Section 1355.43(d) Missing Information
In paragraph (d), we specify how the
title IV–E agency must report missing
information.
Comment: Several states and a
national organization representing state
child welfare agencies were concerned
about the burden on workers of having
to manually fill in blank information
and stated that data systems should be
able to automatically mark as blank.
Response: We would like to take this
opportunity to explain what is meant by
‘‘missing’’ information as workers will
not ‘‘manually fill in blank
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
information.’’ The requirements in this
paragraph relate to the technical aspects
of creating the AFCARS data file and
prohibit defaulting to a valid response
option when the worker did not enter
information into the case management
system and it is therefore missing. This
prohibition is longstanding ACF
practice and consistent with the
statutory mandate in section 479(c)(2) of
the Act that any AFCARS data collected
must be reliable and consistent over
time. If the worker did not enter
information into the case management
system necessary for reporting on a
particular data element (for example, it
is missing), then the agency must report
the data element as blank. We did not
make substantive changes to the final
rule in response to comments.
Comment: Several commenters asked
how ‘‘blank’’ information is
distinguished from missing data and if
missing information could be used to
determine penalties.
Response: ‘‘Blank’’ is a valid response
option only when specified in
individual data elements in section
1355.44. When ‘‘blank’’ is not a valid
response option, and no information
was entered into the information system
for a data element, then that is
considered a missing data error under
section 1355.46(b)(1). This is consistent
with ACF’s longstanding practice. Errors
under section 1355.46(b) are subject to
the penalty provisions of section
1355.47.
Section 1355.43(e) Electronic
Submission
In paragraph (e), we require a title IV–
E agency to submit its data files to ACF
electronically, in a format according to
ACF’s specifications.
Comment: Several commenters
requested details for data file
submissions, the type of technologies
title IV–E agencies must use to submit
AFCARS data, and made a
recommendation to use the same
electronic submission process used for
the NYTD.
Response: We have intentionally left
the specific details for electronic
submissions out of the regulation. We
have learned through our experience
with the existing AFCARS that it is
prudent not to regulate the technical
specifications for transmitting data
because as technology changes, we must
keep pace with the most current,
practical, and efficient transmission
methods that will meet title IV–E agency
and federal needs. We currently provide
guidance on submission of technical
requirements and specifications through
official ACF policy and technical
bulletins and we will continue to do so
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
in providing guidance on the final rule.
We appreciate the suggestion with
regard to the NYTD process, and we will
determine whether we can use a similar
process upon implementation of the
final rule.
Section 1355.43(f) Record Retention
In paragraph (f), we require that title
IV–E agencies must retain all records
necessary to comply with the data
requirements in sections 1355.41
through 1355.45. As we stated in the
2015 NPRM (80 FR 7146), practically,
this means the title IV–E agency must
keep applicable records until the child
is no longer of an age to be in the
reporting populations.
Comment: Four states expressed
concerns with the proposed record
retention timeframes, stating that they
extend beyond the state’s record
retention and destruction laws, may
require a legislative change to meet this
retention schedule, and potential costs
to procure new storage hardware or
expand data centers.
Response: This is a clarification of
current AFCARS requirements.
Currently, title IV–E agencies must
maintain the child’s history up to the
time the child would no longer be
eligible for services due to age in order
to report the date of the first removal,
the number of removals, and the date of
discharge from the prior removals.
Based on our AFCARS and SACWIS
reviews, we understand that all agencies
have electronic case records and that
title IV–E agencies maintain all the
information in their systems up to the
time the child would no longer be
eligible for services due to age. We
understand that the typical age will be
between 18 and 21, depending on the
state or tribe’s foster care program and
we will work with agencies on this at
implementation. We want to be clear
that title IV–E agencies must retain all
information on a child that is required
to be reported to AFCARS electronically
and not purge the data since AFCARS
data files will now contain certain
historical information on children in the
out-of-home care reporting population.
We are retaining the data element
without changes in the final rule
because title IV–E agencies must report
historical information on a child in outof-home care to be in compliance.
Section 1355.44 Out-of-Home Care
Data File Elements
This section includes all of the data
element descriptions for the out-ofhome care reporting population.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
90533
Section 1355.44(a) General Information
In paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(3), we
require that title IV–E agencies collect
and report the following general
information: (1) The title IV–E agency
submitting the AFCARS data; (2) the
report period date; and (3) the local
county, jurisdiction or equivalent unit
that has responsibility for the child. We
received no substantive comments on
the general information data elements in
paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(3) or
recommendations for changes. However,
we clarified in the regulation text that
the information must be submitted in a
format according to ACF’s
specifications.
In paragraph (a)(4), we require that
the title IV–E agency report the child’s
record number, which is an encrypted
unique person identification number
that is the same for the child, no matter
where the child lives while in the
placement and care responsibility of the
title IV–E agency in out-of-home care
and across all report periods and
episodes.
Comment: A couple of commenters
noted that maintaining one encrypted
record number for each child would be
useful, for example, in reducing
duplicate entries and erroneous
eligibility determinations. However, a
couple of state title IV–E agencies
questioned why the agency must
maintain the same number since
agencies must include the complete
placement history in each AFCARS
transmission noting the administrative
burden associated with maintaining the
same number. Another commenter
indicated there could be difficulties in
maintaining the same child record
number if the child was previously
placed in a different county.
Response: Our proposal for a
consistent, unique, encrypted child
record number for AFCARS reporting
purposes is consistent with current
practice. Ensuring that the child record
number is consistent throughout the
child’s entire out-of-home care
experience ensures that the agency
reports the child’s entire history. It also
assists us in the analysis of the NYTD
data, which also requires the use of an
encrypted child record number. We are
retaining this requirement and will
provide technical assistance around this
data element, including assistance
related to maintaining record numbers
across counties, to any agency
requesting it at implementation.
Section 1355.44(b) Child Information
In paragraph (b), we require that the
title IV–E agency report information
about the child in out-of-home care
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
90534
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
including demographic, health,
parenting, and other pertinent
information about the child. We made
several revisions to this section from the
2015 NPRM and integrated ICWArelated data elements that were
proposed in the 2016 SNPRM, revised
data elements as suggested by
commenters, moved data elements, and
removed some proposed data elements
that we describe below:
• Removed the data element requiring
agencies to report whether or not the
child was born in the United States.
State title IV–E agencies and a national
organization representing state child
welfare agencies were opposed, stating:
this level of specificity is not relevant to
child welfare practice, could adversely
impact work with families, and is not
necessary in the AFCARS; it will be
difficult to draw conclusions from this
element; and, it does not address other
situations, for example, whether the
child is a naturalized citizen or one of
the many U.S. citizens who are born on
foreign soil. We still believe it is
important to track information related to
parental immigration detainment or
deportation because we understand that
this contributes to children entering
foster care across the nation. In fact, the
Applied Research Center recently
estimated that up to 5,100 children were
in foster care after their parents were
detained or deported. Therefore, we
added a circumstance at removal in
paragraph (d) to address this instead.
• Removed data elements requiring
agencies to report information related to
the child’s qualifying disability under
IDEA. Several state title IV–E agencies
and a national organization representing
state child welfare agencies expressed
confusion with the conditions in this
data element and the health, behavioral
or mental health conditions stating that
the conditions were cumbersome and
overlapped, which would lead to
confusion among workers and
commenters suggested the conditions be
reconciled. Thus, we removed the data
element on IDEA qualifying disability
and revised the data element on health,
behavioral or mental health conditions
because we still want to track child
disabilities, but we do not need to know
the disability that qualified a child for
IDEA (discussed below).
Section 1355.44(b)(1) Child’s Date of
Birth
In paragraph (b)(1), we require the
title IV–E agency to report the child’s
birthdate. If the actual date of birth is
unknown because the child has been
abandoned, the agency must provide an
estimated date of birth.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
Comment: One commenter suggested
that we expand the definition of
‘‘abandoned’’ to include circumstances
where the child was left with others and
the identity of the parent(s) is known,
but the parent(s) has not returned and
therefore the child’s date of birth is not
known.
Response: We have provided a
specific definition of abandoned as
follows: The child was left alone or with
others and the identity of the parent(s)
or legal guardian(s) is unknown and
cannot be ascertained. We will retain
the data element as proposed because an
estimated date of birth is to be used in
very restrictive circumstances when a
parent’s identity is not known, and not
for an instance when a parent may be
temporarily unavailable to provide the
actual date of birth.
Section 1355.44(b)(2)(i) Child’s Gender
In paragraph (b)(2)(i), we require that
the title IV–E agency report the child’s
gender. We did not receive any relevant
comments on this data element,
however, we made a minor revision to
rename the data element ‘‘Child’s
gender.’’
Section 1355.44(b)(2)(ii) Child’s Sexual
Orientation
In paragraph (b)(2)(ii), we require that
the title IV–E agency report the child’s
self-reported sexual orientation for
youth age 14 and older. The title IV–E
agency must report whether the child
self-identifies as ‘‘straight or
heterosexual,’’ ‘‘gay or lesbian,’’
‘‘bisexual,’’ ‘‘don’t know,’’ ‘‘something
else,’’ or ‘‘decline’’ if the child declined
to provide the information. The title IV–
E agency must report ‘‘not applicable’’
for youth age 13 and under.
Comment: We requested input on
whether to require title IV–E agencies to
collect LGBTQ-related data on youth in
AFCARS. State title IV–E agencies,
national advocacy/public interests
groups and other organizations
submitted comments on this topic.
Commenters who supported collecting
LGBTQ-related data were primarily
advocacy organizations representing
LGTBQ interests and generally asserted
that such children/youth are overrepresented in the child welfare system,
but we do not have a full picture of their
experiences in foster care. Supportive
commenters also noted that such youth
often have unique service needs, are at
an increased risk for poor outcomes, are
more likely to be placed in group
settings and experience more
placements. Many of these same
commenters suggested that we require
agencies to collect information about a
child’s gender identity or gender
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
expression, or the assigned gender of the
child or caregiver at birth, which would
allow agencies to understand data about
gender transition over the course of a
child’s life. One commenter suggested
adding ‘‘two spirited’’ to address
American Indian and Alaska Native
children’s identities. In contrast, other
commenters, primarily state IV–E
agencies and a national organization
representing state child welfare
agencies, suggested that we should not
collect data related to sexual orientation
in AFCARS. However, they expressed
appreciation for ACF’s interest in
supporting and protecting LGBTQ youth
in foster care and agreed that it is
important to work toward a mechanism
for collecting information related to a
youth’s sexual orientation, gender
identity and expression. State
commenters pointed to the following
reasons for their objection to collecting
the data: It is unlikely that the data will
be reliable and consistent because the
youth would self-report which could
result in an undercount of LGBTQ
children in foster care; the sensitive and
private nature of the data and sexual
identity issues and questioned the
implications of having this information
in a government record and it being
used in a discriminatory way; and
collecting the data may pose safety
concerns because the LGBTQ
community is still vulnerable to
discrimination in many parts of the
country. State commenters also
expressed the importance of proper staff
training to collect information for a data
element on sexual orientation.
Response: We were persuaded by the
commenters who suggested we include
a data element on a child’s self-reported
sexual orientation. In this final rule, we
require title IV–E agencies to indicate
whether the child self identifies as
‘‘straight or heterosexual,’’ ‘‘gay or
lesbian,’’ ‘‘bisexual,’’ ‘‘don’t know,’’
‘‘something else,’’ or ‘‘decline’’ if the
child declined to report this
information. These response options are
consistent with the Youth Risk Behavior
Surveillance System (YRBSS)
questionnaire from the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention. We did
not add a response option of ‘‘two
spirited’’ to be consistent with the
YRBSS. By requiring this information to
be reported, we hope to move closer
toward our goal to better support
children and youth in foster care who
identify as LGBTQ and ensure that
foster care placement resources and
services are designed appropriately to
meet their needs. We are aware of
situations where youth in foster care
have been unsupported in their foster
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
care placements when their foster
caregivers became aware of their sexual
orientation. We did not add data
elements requiring agencies to report
information about a child’s gender
identity or gender expression, or the
assigned gender of the child. We
understand the concerns expressed by
commenters; however, we anticipate
that adding this data element is the first
step in addressing the needs of this
population, and also will assist title IV–
E agencies in recruiting and training
foster care providers in meeting the
needs of these youth. In regard to the
concern that youth should not be
obligated to report this sensitive and
private information to their caseworker,
the youth must self-report this
information and if they do not feel
comfortable disclosing such
information, they may decline to report
the information. In regard to the concern
about having this information in a
government record, information in state
and tribal systems is protected by
confidentiality requirements. We
require title IV–E agencies to report ‘‘not
applicable’’ for children age 13 and
under to align with other statutory case
planning requirements that apply to
youth age 14 and older, for example the
child’s case plan must be developed in
consultation with the child age 14 and
older and the child’s case planning team
(at the child’s option) (sections
475(1)(B) and 475(5)(C)(iv) of the Act)
and must document the child’s rights,
including the right to receive a credit
report annually. Additionally, the child
must sign an acknowledgement that he/
she received these rights and that they
were explained in an age appropriate
way (section 475A of the Act). We will
provide technical assistance to agencies
on collecting this information as
needed.
Section 1355.44(b)(3) Reason To Know
a Child Is an Indian Child as Defined in
the Indian Child Welfare Act
In paragraph (b)(3), we require that
the state title IV–E agency report
whether the state title IV–E agency
researched whether there is reason to
know that a child is an ‘‘Indian Child’’
as defined in ICWA by: Inquiring with
the child, the child’s biological or
adoptive parents (if not deceased), the
child’s Indian custodian (if the child has
one), and the child’s extended family;
indicating whether the child is a
member or eligible for membership in a
tribe; and indicating whether the
domicile or residence of the child,
parent, or the Indian custodian is on an
Indian reservation or in an Alaska
Native Village. This is similar to
paragraph (i)(3) as proposed in the 2016
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
SNPRM, however we moved data
elements related to ascertaining the
tribal membership status of the child’s
parents to section 1355.44(c)(3) and
(c)(4), and we added, in response to
comments discussed later, a data
element for inquiring with the child’s
extended family in paragraph (b)(3)(iv).
Comment: Tribes, tribal organizations,
child welfare organizations, and some
states expressed that researching to
determine whether a child may be an
Indian child under ICWA is necessary to
determine tribal status and for
implementation of ICWA. Commenters
stated that failure to research whether a
child is an Indian child risks Indian
children not being identified, and risks
delay, expensive repetition of court
proceedings, and placement instability
if it is later discovered that a child is an
Indian child under ICWA. Several states
said that information on identifying
whether a child is an Indian child as
defined in ICWA is currently collected,
although states varied in how they
collect this information with some
stating that it is collected through case
narratives (electronic or paper). A state
objected to expending resources
required to report data in AFCARS that
is already collected in case narrative.
Several states and the national
organization representing state child
welfare agencies suggested simplifying
the data element, stating that the
primary focus should be on whether the
agency made an inquiry, of whom, and
whether that triggered notice per ICWA
to a federally recognized tribe. One state
suggested including a response option
noting whether a particular data
element is ‘‘not applicable due to age or
developmental ability.’’
Response: We did not make changes
based on these comments to simplify
the data elements. We retained the data
elements to reflect requirements in
BIA’s regulation at 25 CFR 23.107(a).
BIA’s regulation requires state courts to
ask each participant in an emergency,
voluntary or involuntary child-custody
proceeding whether the participant
knows or has reason to know that the
child is an Indian child. The data will
help identify of which sources title IV–
E agencies most often inquire about
whether a child is an Indian child as
defined in ICWA and for which sources
title IV–E agencies may need resource or
training to support inquiry. Further, we
are not revising the response options to
allow for a ‘‘not applicable’’ response
option. The requirement is for the state
title IV–E agency to report whether or
not it inquired of the specific
individuals listed, including the child,
whether the child is a member of or
eligible for membership in an Indian
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
90535
tribe. If the state title IV–E agency was
unable to inquire with the child, the
agency would respond ‘‘no.’’
Comment: A state commented that
these data elements ask for responses of
‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no’’ that removes a level of
specificity and obscures some
incomplete data, such as there is no way
to indicate when there are multiple
tribes involved.
Response: We understand the
suggestion to be a technical issue for
when states design their systems to
report the required information and
does not require a change in the final
rule. We will work with state title IV–
E agencies as they implement the final
rule as needed.
Comment: A state expressed that this
data element doesn’t explicitly note
there is a single parent by indicating the
response option of ‘‘no’’ and stated that
the elements are gender specific.
Response: We understand the
suggestion to be a technical issue for
when states design their systems to
report the required information. We will
work with state title IV–E agencies as
they implement the final rule.
Comment: One state suggested adding
a data element that records when a tribe
confirms that the child is a member or
eligible for membership.
Response: We did not revise the final
rule in response to these suggestions.
The final rule contains the data
elements we believe are most critical in
relation to children to whom ICWA
applies.
Comment: A tribe stated that the
language ‘‘inquired’’ is vague and was
confused what the agency is inquiring
about in this section.
Response: We modified the language
of the data element to require the state
title IV–E agency to indicate whether
the state title IV–E agency researched
whether there is a reason to know that
the child is an Indian child as defined
in ICWA. In each paragraph (b)(3)(i)
through (b)(3)(vii), the state title IV–E
agency must respond to these threshold
questions that indicate whether the state
title IV–E agency knows or has ‘‘reason
to know’’ that a child is an Indian child
and thus is subject to the protections
under ICWA.
Comment: Tribes and several national
advocacy organizations suggested
adding the phrase ‘‘extended family’’ to
the list of persons to whom the state
may have inquired stating that the
extended family would have useful
information regarding whether the child
may be an Indian child.
Response: We agree with the
suggestion and added the requirement
for the state title IV–E agency to also
report whether it inquired with the
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
90536
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
child’s extended family in paragraph
(b)(3)(iv).
Comment: Tribes and organizations
representing tribal interests
recommended replacing ‘‘on an Indian
reservation’’ with ‘‘within a
predominantly Indian community’’ to
be more inclusive to tribal communities.
A state suggested adding individual data
elements to inquire about the residences
of each child, parent, and Indian
custodian to determine whether any of
them are domiciled on a reservation.
Response: We did not revise the final
rule in response to these suggestions
because the data element in paragraph
(b)(5)(vii) follows the language used in
several sections of BIA’s regulation (e.g.,
25 CFR 23.107 and 23.113) about the
‘‘domicile or residence . . . on a
reservation or in an Alaska Native
village.’’
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Section 1355.44(b)(4) Application of
ICWA and (b)(5) Court Determination
That ICWA Applies
In paragraph (b)(4), we require that
the state title IV–E agency indicate
whether it knows or has reason to know
that a child is an Indian child as defined
in ICWA. If the state title IV–E agency
indicates ‘‘yes,’’ the state title IV–E
agency must indicate the date it first
discovered information that indicates
that the child is or may be an Indian
child as defined by ICWA in paragraph
(b)(4)(i) and all federally recognized
Indian tribes that are or may potentially
be the Indian child’s tribe(s) in
paragraph (b)(4)(ii).
In paragraph (b)(5), we require that
the state title IV–E agency indicate
whether a court determined that ICWA
applies or that the court is applying
ICWA because it knows or has reason to
know a child is an Indian child as
defined in ICWA in accordance with 25
CFR 23.107(b)(2), by indicating ‘‘yes,
ICWA applies,’’ ‘‘no, ICWA does not
apply,’’ or ‘‘no court determination.’’ If
the state title IV–E agency indicated
‘‘yes, ICWA applies,’’ the state title IV–
E agency must report the date that the
court determined that ICWA applies in
paragraph (b)(5)(i), and the Indian tribe
the court determined to be the Indian
child’s tribe for ICWA purposes in
paragraph (b)(5)(ii). This is similar to
paragraph (i)(5) as proposed in the 2016
SNPRM.
Comment: States commented that
some state laws offer protections that
exceed the minimum federal standards
in ICWA. For example, some states
require ICWA protections for children
who are members of state recognized
tribes, children who are descendants but
not enrolled, or eligible for enrollment
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
in a tribe, or for children who are
members of tribes in Canada.
Response: We encourage states to
collect data they need to implement and
evaluate state child welfare laws but
only require collecting and reporting the
ICWA related data through AFCARS as
outlined in this rule.
Comment: One commenter was
concerned about reporting the court
finding because the state may not know
whether the tribe was asked or verified
the child’s membership status. Another
commenter recommended that this
element be removed because of
uncertainty in how this element is
different from asking if the state agency
has reason to know the child is covered
by ICWA.
Response: We did not make any
changes to the final rule to remove this
data element. As we indicated in our
rational in the 2016 SNPRM, data
elements related to whether ICWA
applies are essential because application
of ICWA triggers procedural and
substantive protections and this data
will provide a national number of
children in the out-of-home care
reporting population to whom ICWA
applies. However, we revised the final
rule to reflect the language in the BIA’s
regulation at 25 CFR 23.107, which does
not require a court order but instead a
‘‘court determination.’’ We also revised
the final rule for the state title IV–E
agency to indicate the date that the
court determined that ICWA applies
(paragraph (b)(5)(i)), rather than the date
of the court order.
Comment: One tribe suggested that
the state title IV–E agency should be
required to continue to report data that
accurately reflects tribal involvement
even when a court order does not
include the information. The
commenter felt this is important to
capture to ensure that courts are diligent
about engaging the tribe and avoid
opportunities to misrepresent the true
number of ICWA cases involved in State
court.
Response: We agree that tribal
involvement is an essential component
of ensuring the courts are diligent about
engaging tribes. However, we did not
add the suggested data element because
we must balance the need to have the
information with the burden and cost it
places on state agencies to do so.
Comment: One commenter asked
whether ACF will compare the name of
the tribe indicated in this data element,
with the name of the tribe listed in other
data elements, and whether it will be
considered an error if the name of the
tribe is different for each element. The
commenter suggests that the data
element instead ask whether the title
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
IV–E agency verified that agency records
regarding the name of the Indian tribe
matched state records.
Response: ACF will develop and issue
error specifications in separate guidance
and will work with state title IV–E
agencies during implementation to
address these types of technical issues
with reporting the data.
Section 1355.44(b)(6) Notification
In paragraph (b)(6), if a state title IV–
E agency indicated ‘‘yes’’ to paragraph
(b)(4) or indicated ‘‘yes, ICWA applies’’
to paragraph (b)(5), we require that the
state title IV–E agency report: Whether
the Indian child’s parent or Indian
custodian was sent legal notice of the
child custody proceeding more than 10
days prior to the first child custody
proceeding in accordance with 25
U.S.C. 1912(a); whether the Indian
child’s tribe(s) (if known) was sent legal
notice of the child custody proceedings
more than 10 days prior to the first child
custody proceeding; and the name(s) of
the tribe(s) sent notice. The first two
requirements are similar to paragraph
(i)(8) as proposed in the 2016 SNPRM
and the third requirement is the same as
paragraph (i)(9) as proposed in the 2016
SNPRM.
Comment: Two states suggested
requiring the state to report the date that
the tribe, mother, father, and Indian
custodian were notified of the child’s
removal as that will provide information
on whether the 10 day legal notice
requirements were met. One state
commented that because they do not
know 10 days in advance when a child
is going to be removed that we instead
require the state to report the date that
the notice was sent. Another state
suggested adding a data element asking
when a notification was made to the
tribe and when/if the tribe provided a
response, and another state suggested
removing notification elements until
data exchanges are improved with the
court to make this efficient. One state
suggested removing the response option
‘‘the child’s Indian tribe is unknown’’
and for the state to report the Indian
child’s tribe’s name.
Response: We did not make any
changes to the final rule to remove the
suggested response option or to require
agencies to provide the date of
notification. We determined that the
actual date of the notification is not
essential, but instead, as we proposed,
whether the state sent the notice within
the statutory 10 day notification
requirement. We are retaining the
response option ‘‘the child’s Indian tribe
is unknown’’ as we are aware that there
may be instances where ICWA applies
because a state knows or has reason to
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
know a child is an Indian child yet the
name of the child’s tribe is unknown.
We proposed in the 2016 SNPRM and
retained in the final rule the
requirement for the state to indicate the
name of the Indian child’s tribe that was
sent proper legal notice more than 10
days prior to the first child custody
proceeding in accordance with 25
U.S.C. 1912. We have, however,
removed the requirement for the state
title IV–E agency to report whether the
state title IV–E agency replied with
additional information that the Indian
child’s tribe(s) requested, if such a
request was made.
Comment: A state noted the proposed
data element does not accommodate a
situation when there are potentially
multiple tribes that were sent the
notification.
Response: We are retaining the
requirement in the final rule for the
state to indicate whether the Indian
child’s tribe(s) was given proper legal
notice more than 10 days prior to the
first child custody proceeding in
accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1912(a). We
will provide technical assistance to
states that need assistance in reporting
multiple tribes.
Comment: The national organization
representing state child welfare agencies
supports the notification data elements
that align with ICWA mandates. They
noted that states have different methods
to notify the parties, such as through a
court process, the state’s attorney
general’s office, or by the state agency.
The organization recommends
simplifying the data elements to require
the agency to report to whom the agency
gave proper notice, i.e., parents,
custodians, and tribes.
Response: We understand the
suggestion to be a technical issue for
when states design their systems to
collect the required information that
would not require a change to the final
rule. States may design a drop down
menu or another mechanism
appropriate to their system to report the
notice requirements as long as the state
can report whether the state sent the
notice to the mandated parties more
than 10 days prior to the proceeding.
Comment: A tribe recommended that
we also require states to report that the
state sent the notifications when
parental rights will be terminated for an
Indian child.
Response: We are retaining the
notification requirements for the state to
report whether it provided the 10 day
notifications in reference to the first
child custody proceeding. The BIA
defines child-custody proceeding for
ICWA purposes to mean and include
any action, other than an emergency
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
proceeding, that may culminate in one
of the following outcomes: Foster-care
placement, termination of parental
rights, pre-adoptive placement, and
adoptive placement. Therefore, if the
first child custody proceeding is in
reference to a TPR, the agency must
report that information to AFCARS.
Comment: Two organizations
suggested that we require states to
report whether a state court or agency
used the list of tribes published by the
Bureau of Indian Affairs to notify a tribe
of the first child custody hearing.
Response: We determined that it is
not essential for states to specify in
AFCARS whether they sent the notice to
the tribe as it is listed in the BIA
publication. As we indicated in the
preamble to the 2016 SNPRM, the
timing of the notice is an essential
procedural protection provided by
ICWA. Hence, we proposed and issued
in the final rule the requirement for
states to report whether proper legal
notice of the child custody proceedings
was sent more than 10 days prior to the
first child custody proceeding. This is
consistent with the requirements under
the ICWA statute at 25 U.S.C. 1912(a)
and the BIA regulations at 23.11(c).
Comment: Two organizations
suggested that we require the state to
report whether legal notice was
provided for the first child custody
hearing to the same grandparents and
other adult relatives who were notified
about a child’s placement into foster
care as required by title IV–E.
Response: We tailored the ICWA data
elements that we proposed and issued
in the final rule to be consistent with
the requirements under the ICWA
statute and the BIA regulations, and
relative notification of the first child
custody hearing is not required.
However, we added a requirement in
1355.44(b)(3)(iv) for the state to report
whether the state title IV–E agency
researched whether there is a reason to
know that the child is an Indian child
as defined in ICWA by indicating
whether the state agency inquired with
the child’s extended family. We believe
this could respond to the intent of the
commenter’s suggestion, which is to
ensure that an Indian child’s relatives
are made aware when a child in their
family is placed into foster care.
Comment: We received several
comments regarding the proposed data
element requiring the state to report in
instances where the tribe(s) requested
additional information, whether the
state title IV–E agency replied with the
additional information that the Indian
tribe(s) requested. One state commented
that the data element is unclear and
asked whether the timeframe was at any
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
90537
time during the six month report period
or whether it only applied to the first
child custody proceeding. Another state
commented that it does not collect data
on whether the tribe(s) requested
additional information or whether the
agency replied to the request. The
national organization representing state
child welfare agencies also
recommended removing the element
because they did not believe the
proposed data file element provides
essential information on children for
whom ICWA applies. A tribe
recommended adding the date of the
tribal request for additional information
and the date the agency responded to
the tribe’s request for additional
information.
Response: We agree with the
suggestions to remove the data element
in proposed (i)(10) in the 2016 SNPRM
that required the state to indicate
whether the state title IV–E agency
replied with the additional information
that the Indian tribe(s) requested. We
have removed this data element from
the final rule.
Section 1355.44(b)(7) Request To
Transfer to Tribal Court and (b)(8)
Denial of Transfer
In paragraph (b)(7), if the state title
IV–E agency indicated ‘‘yes’’ to
paragraph (b)(4) or indicated ‘‘yes,
ICWA applies’’ to paragraph (b)(5), we
require that the state title IV–E agency
report whether either parent, the Indian
custodian, or Indian child’s tribe
requested, orally on the record or in
writing, that the state court transfer the
foster care or termination of parental
rights proceeding to the jurisdiction of
the child’s tribe at any point during the
report period. This is similar to
paragraph (i)(6) as proposed in the 2016
SNPRM, except that the language was
updated to be consistent with 25 CFR
23.115.
In paragraph (b)(8), if the state title
IV–E agency indicated ‘‘yes’’ to
paragraph (b)(7), we require that the
state title IV–E agency report whether
the state court denied the request to
transfer the case to tribal jurisdiction
and if so, the reason for the denial from
a list of three options, as outlined in
ICWA statute: (1) Either of the parents
objected to transferring the case to the
tribal court; or (2) the tribal court
declined the transfer to the tribal court;
or (3) the state court determined good
cause exists for denying the transfer to
the tribal court. This is similar to
paragraph (i)(7) as proposed in the 2016
SNPRM, except that we updated the
language to be consistent with 25 CFR
23.118.
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
90538
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Comment: A tribe commented that
‘‘good cause’’ findings should be made
as outlined in the BIA’s Guidelines and
suggested that we add a data element
that captures the specific ‘‘good cause’’
finding used to decline each transfer.
Response: We have not made any
changes to the final rule to incorporate
recommendations for the noted BIA’s
Guidelines. Rather in the final rule, if
the state court determined that transfer
is not appropriate, the state must report
which reason from among a list of three
options, as outlined in ICWA statute (25
U.S.C. 1911(b)) and BIA’s regulation at
25 CFR 23.117: (1) Either of the parents
objected to transferring the case to the
tribal court; or (2) the tribal court
declined the transfer to the tribal court;
or (3) the state court determined good
cause exists for denying the transfer to
the tribal court.
Comment: The national organization
representing state child welfare agencies
supports capturing data from the court
order indicating a transfer of the case to
the tribal court of the Indian child’s
tribe and an indication on the reason for
denial (when applicable). However, they
suggested simplifying the data elements
to ask only whether a tribe requested to
transfer the case to tribal court and if
yes, whether the transfer was ordered.
We also received suggestions from states
on revising the element. One state
recommended changing the data
element to capture the most recent
transfer request regardless of when the
request occurred as long as it is during
the current removal episode.
Response: ACF is not persuaded by
the comments to revise the data
elements regarding transferring cases
from state court to tribal jurisdictions.
We are retaining the two proposed data
elements with modifications to be
consistent with the BIA regulation at 25
CFR 23.115. That regulation states that
the parents, Indian custodian, or the
Indian child’s tribe may request, orally
on the record or in writing, that the state
court transfer the child custody
proceeding to tribal jurisdiction. It does
not require that the request be contained
in a court order. Therefore we are
removing the requirement for the agency
to report only when there is a specific
court order requesting a transfer of
jurisdiction and adopting the same BIA
regulatory language so that we are
consistent. Further, we clarified the
instructions for this element in the final
rule to require the state to report if there
was a request at any point during the
report period.
Comment: Several organizations
representing tribal interests suggested
that we require the state to report the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
date that the state court approved
transfer of jurisdiction to the tribe.
Response: We appreciate the
suggestion and understand the value for
determining timely implementation of
ICWA and case transfer between
jurisdictions, however, we did not
change the final rule to add this data
element. Rather, we retained the two
transfer data elements we proposed in
the 2016 SNPRM and modified them to
be consistent with the BIA regulations.
As we indicated in the 2016 SNPRM, we
require two transfer data elements to
provide an understanding of how many
children in foster care with ICWA
protections are or are not transferred to
the Indian child’s tribe, the reasons why
a state court did not transfer the case,
and aid in identifying tribal capacity
needs and issues that may prevent tribes
from taking jurisdiction.
Comment: One tribe suggested that
the phrase ‘‘a court order’’ be expanded
to include ‘‘or other entry of the Court’’,
as at times the state court may not enter
an order transferring the case at the
same hearing as when a petition to
transfer is submitted to a court.
Response: We have removed the term
‘‘court order’’ from paragraphs (b)(7)
and (b)(8) to be consistent with the BIA
regulation at 25 CFR 23.115 through
23.117. That regulation states that the
parents, Indian custodian, or the Indian
child’s tribe may request, orally on the
record or in writing, that the state court
transfer the child custody proceeding to
tribal jurisdiction. The BIA regulation
does not require that the request or the
order for transfer be contained in a court
order.
Section 1355.44(b)(9) Child’s Race
In paragraph (b)(9), we require that
the title IV–E agency report the race of
the child. The options are: American
Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Black or
African American, Native Hawaiian or
Other Pacific Islander, White, declined,
abandoned, and unknown because the
child or parent or legal guardian does
not know or is unable to communicate
the child’s race, or at least one race of
the child.
Comment: Two states and one other
commenter did not agree that we should
include ‘‘race-abandoned’’ as a response
option in this data element because it is
not a race. One commenter also noted
that including ‘‘race-abandoned’’ and
‘‘race-unknown’’ as response options are
confusing.
Response: We provide the agency
with the option of not reporting a
specific race in two situations when the
race is not known: When the child is
abandoned and therefore the race of the
child is unknown (race-abandoned) or
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
that the race is unknown because the
child or parent or legal guardian does
not know or is unable to communicate
the child’s race (race-unknown). The
response option of race-abandoned
allows us to differentiate when there is
no parent available to provide race
information from when the child or
parent does not know or is unable to
communicate it. A child’s race can be
categorized as unknown only if a child
or his parents do not actually know the
child’s race. If the title IV–E agency has
not asked the child or parent for the
child’s race, the agency may not report
unknown as the response. Further, it is
acceptable for the child to identify that
he or she is multi-racial, but does not
know one of those races. In such cases,
the title IV–E agency must indicate the
racial classifications that apply and also
indicate that a race is unknown.
Comment: Two commenters
representing tribal interests suggested
that we amend the racial category of
American Indian or Alaska Native to
include whether the child has origins in
any of the original peoples of North or
South America and if yes, whether the
child is a member of, or eligible for,
membership in a federally recognized
Indian tribe. Both commenters also
recommended that we delete the
language, ‘‘maintains tribal affiliation
and community attachment’’ in the race
definition of American Indian or Alaska
Native.
Response: The language used reflects
the OMB Revised Standards for the
Classification of Federal Data on Race
and Ethnicity, standardizing federal
data collection. We agree that requiring
state title IV–E agencies to collect and
report data that could identify a child as
an Indian child as defined in ICWA is
of paramount importance. Therefore,
while we did not revise this data
element, we require additional
information on the child’s tribal
membership or eligibility for tribal
membership in paragraphs (b)(3), (b)(4),
and (b)(5).
Section 1355.44(b)(10) Child’s Hispanic
or Latino Ethnicity
In paragraph (b)(10), we require that
the title IV–E agency report the Hispanic
or Latino ethnicity of the child. The
agency must respond ‘‘yes,’’ ‘‘no,’’
‘‘declined,’’ ‘‘abandoned,’’ or
‘‘unknown’’ because the child, parent or
legal guardian does not know or is
unable to communicate the child’s
ethnicity.
Comment: One commenter suggested
that we expand the definition of
‘‘abandoned’’ to include circumstances
where the child was left with others and
the identity of the parent(s) is known,
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
but the parent(s) has failed to return and
therefore the child’s Hispanic or Latino
ethnicity is not known.
Response: We have provided a
specific definition of abandoned as
follows: The child was left alone or with
others and the identity of the parent(s)
or legal guardian(s) is unknown and
cannot be ascertained. We will retain
the data element as proposed as it is to
be used in very limited circumstances
when a parent’s identity is not known,
and therefore not available to identify
the child’s ethnicity, and not any time
a parent may be temporarily
unavailable.
Section 1355.44(b)(11) and (b)(12)
Health Assessment Date and Timely
In paragraphs (b)(11) and (12), we
require the title IV–E agency to report
whether the child had a health
assessment during the current out-ofhome care episode, and if so, the date
of the child’s most recent health
assessment and if it was within the
timeframes established by the title IV–
E agency.
Comment: State title IV–E agencies
and a national organization representing
state child welfare agencies raised
concerns about collecting information
on timeliness and frequency of health
assessments. They indicated that health
assessment requirements would differ
based on the agency’s schedule and
individual child circumstances, such as
age and medical condition; therefore, it
would be difficult to compare data
across title IV–E agencies. They stated
that to answer the question of
timeliness, the system must know the
assessment schedule and dates of
assessments, doubling the data entry
requirements. States suggested that this
information would be better assessed as
part of a qualitative assessment that
focuses on child well-being outcomes or
case reviews, rather than a national data
set. One state recommended that we
require agencies to report health
assessment information according to an
established federal timeline.
Response: We appreciate the
comments, but did not remove the
requirement for reporting on health
assessments because we still believe it
is important to ensure that the title IV–
E agency is identifying and addressing
the health needs of children in foster
care. As we indicated in the 2015
NPRM, collecting this information will
allow us to ensure children in foster
care are receiving health assessments in
accordance with the title IV–E agency’s
established schedule per the statutory
requirements in section 422(b)(15)(A) of
the Act. It also provides us an
opportunity to ensure that the child’s
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
health needs are identified, reviewed,
and addressed by a medical professional
through routine health assessments.
These data elements may also serve as
a proxy for other well-being indicators.
We also did not impose a requirement
that title IV–E agencies report health
assessment information according to an
established federal timeline because
section 422(b)(15)(A) does not provide
ACF with the authority to impose a
federal timeframe on title IV–E agencies.
Instead, agencies describe and adhere to
the timeframes described in their Child
and Family Services Plan.
Comment: One national advocacy/
public interest group supported
including this data, but suggested
clarifying the language to read ‘‘timely
health assessment as defined by the
state.’’ Another national advocacy/
public interest group pointed out that
the term ‘‘health assessment’’ has
varying implications and suggested that
ACF provide guidance on the difference
between health screenings and health
evaluations.
Response: In reference to the
suggestion to clarify that the
assessments are timely based on title
IV–E agency specific definitions,
paragraph (b)(11) asks whether the date
reported in paragraph (b)(12)(ii), if
applicable, is ‘‘within the timeframes for
initial and follow-up health screenings
established by the title IV–E agency, as
required by section 422(b)(15)(A) of the
Act.’’ Hence, the information that the
title IV–E agency indicates should be in
the context of this title IV–B plan
requirement regarding the ongoing
oversight of health care services, with
which agencies are already complying.
The title IV–E agency must report the
most recent health screenings that are
conducted according to the agency’s
established schedule. ACF provided
guidance in ACF–CB–PI–10–11 that
agency schedules for initial and
periodic health screenings ‘‘should
mirror or incorporate elements of
existing professional guidelines for
physical, mental, and dental health
screenings and standards of care.’’ In
regard to the request to distinguish
between a health screening and a health
evaluation, we will provide technical
assistance to states if they need
assistance in determining how to report
on a child’s health assessment, which
could be either a screening or an
evaluation, depending on the agency’s
process.
Comment: State title IV–E agencies
felt that the language of the data
elements was vague and questioned
how to report whether a health
assessment is ‘‘timely’’ based on the
agency’s ‘‘own established schedule.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
90539
Several states asked whether these data
elements included all initial or followup assessments during the out-of-home
care episode and pre-placement
screenings.
Response: We appreciate the
commenters’ questions and revised the
regulation to clarify the instructions,
based on the commenters’ concerns. We
revised the regulation to require first
that the agency report whether the child
had a health assessment during the
current out-of-home care episode in
paragraph (b)(11)(i). The assessment
could include an initial health screening
or any follow-up health screening per
section 422(b)(15)(A) of the Act. If so,
the title IV–E agency must report the
date the child’s most recent health
assessment during the out-of-home care
episode and whether it is within the
timeframes for initial and follow-up
health screenings established by the title
IV–E agency per section 422(b)(15)(A) of
the Act (paragraphs (b)(11)(ii) and
(b)(12)). This revision is to make clear
that the agency is to report on the
timeliness of the most recent health
assessment. If the agency indicates that
there was no health assessment done,
there is no requirement to report the
date and timeliness of the assessment.
Comment: A state title IV–E agency
asked how a blank response is
distinguished from missing data and
how to report if a child is not in care
long enough to receive a health
assessment or the timeliness straddles
reporting periods.
Response: In reference to the blank
response query, consistent with ACF’s
longstanding practice, ‘‘blank’’ is a valid
response option only when specified in
individual data elements. In paragraph
(b)(11)(i), the agency must report either
‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no;’’ ‘‘blank’’ is not an
appropriate response and is considered
a missing data error under section
1355.46(b)(1). ‘‘Blank’’ is an appropriate
response for paragraphs (b)(11)(ii) and
(b)(12) only if the response to paragraph
(b)(11)(i) is ‘‘no.’’ Thus, if a child has
not been in foster care long enough to
have an assessment, the agency would
report no in paragraph (b)(11)(i) and
blank for paragraphs (b)(11)(ii) and
(b)(12).
Comment: Several national advocacy/
public interest groups suggested
additional data elements, such as
specific dates of the initial health
assessment; initial dental evaluations
and other preventative dental care;
whether children in foster care are
receiving Early and Period Screening,
Diagnosis, and Treatment (EPSDT)
services under Medicaid; and for title
IV–E agencies to report on each aspect
of the title IV–B Health Care
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
90540
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Coordination and Oversight Plan under
section 422(b)(15)(A) of the Act (for
example, how children’s medical
information will be updated, steps to
ensure continuity of health services, and
protocols for the oversight of
prescription medicines).
Response: As we indicated in the
2015 NPRM, collecting health,
behavioral or mental health related
information will allow us to ensure
children in foster care are receiving
health assessments in accordance with
the title IV–E agency’s established
schedule per the statutory requirements
in section 422(b)(15)(A) if the Act.
Therefore, we will not require agencies
to report additional health assessment
information because we do not have a
need for those details at the national
level.
Section 1355.44(b)(13) Health,
Behavioral or Mental Health Conditions
In paragraph (b)(13), we require the
title IV–E agency to report whether the
child was diagnosed by a qualified
professional as having one or more
health, behavioral or mental health
conditions from a list of eleven
conditions prior to or during the child’s
current out-of-home care episode. If so,
the agency must report whether it’s an
existing condition or a previous
condition (a previous diagnoses that no
longer exists as a current condition).
The title IV–E agency must also report
if the child had an exam or assessment,
but none of the conditions apply, or if
the agency has not received the results
of the exam or assessment. When the
child has not had an exam or
assessment, the agency must indicate so.
Comment: State title IV–E agencies, a
national organization representing state
child welfare agencies, and many other
national advocacy/public interest
groups indicated that the qualifying
disabilities of the proposed element
IDEA Qualifying Disability and the
conditions for health, behavioral or
mental health conditions overlapped
which would confuse workers and lead
to inaccurate and misleading data at a
national level. Some national advocacy/
public interest groups also suggested
including specific additional
conditions, such as oppositional defiant
disorder, major depressive disorder,
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder,
and traumatic brain injury.
Response: We were persuaded by the
number of commenters who expressed
concern about the overlapping health,
behavioral or mental health conditions
and the IDEA qualifying disabilities and
revised the final rule so that there is one
element that addresses a child’s health,
behavioral or mental health conditions.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
We removed the data element IDEA
Qualifying Disability in the final rule.
We combined some of the conditions we
proposed for the IDEA Qualifying
Disability data element with the Health,
behavioral or mental health conditions
that we modified to update with current
common diagnoses suggested by several
commenters, separated out conditions
that are currently reported together, as
suggested by commenters, and revised
to more closely align with definitions
for diagnoses from the National
Institutes of Health (NIH). We describe
these revisions below. We believe that
this revised list will provide us with
better data on the child’s health
characteristics and meet the
requirement of section 479A(a)(7)(A)(v)
of the Act regarding reporting clinically
diagnosed conditions for certain
children in foster care.
Paragraph (b)(13)(i) is ‘‘Intellectual
disability’’ ’’ and is unchanged from the
2015 NPRM because we did not receive
comments specifically asking for a
revision to this definition.
Paragraph (b)(13)(ii) is ‘‘Autism
spectrum disorder’’ that we combined
from the IDEA qualifying disability data
element proposed in the 2015 NPRM
and revised to be more closely aligned
with the definition from the NIH
Neurological Disorders and Stroke.
Paragraph (b)(13)(iii) is ‘‘Visual
impairment and blindness’’ that we
combined from the IDEA qualifying
disability and Health, behavioral or
mental health conditions data elements
proposed in the 2015 NPRM.
Paragraph (b)(13)(iv) is ‘‘Hearing
impairment and deafness’’ that we
combined from the IDEA qualifying
disability and Health, behavioral or
mental health conditions data elements
proposed in the 2015 NPRM.
Paragraph (b)(13)(v) is ‘‘Orthopedic
impairment or other physical
condition’’ that we combined from the
IDEA qualifying disability and Health,
behavioral or mental health conditions
data elements proposed in the 2015
NPRM.
Paragraph (b)(13)(vi) is ‘‘Mental/
emotional disorders’’ that we combined
from the IDEA qualifying disability and
Health, behavioral or mental health
conditions data elements proposed in
the 2015 NPRM.
Paragraph (b)(13)(vii) is ‘‘Attention
deficit hyperactivity disorder’’ that we
included as a separate condition, based
on comments suggesting that it not be
included with another condition. The
definition is based on the definition
from the NIH National Institutes of
Mental Health.
Paragraph (b)(13)(viii) is ‘‘Serious
mental disorders’’ that we included as a
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
separate condition that comprises
several disorders previously proposed
under the IDEA qualifying disability and
Health, behavioral or mental health
conditions data elements. The definition
is also based in part on the definitions
for bipolar disorder and psychotic
disorders from the NIH National Library
of Medicine.
Paragraph (b)(13)(ix) is
‘‘Developmental delay’’ that we
combined from the IDEA qualifying
disability data element proposed in the
2015 NPRM and revised to include
delays related to language/speech and
motor skills.
Paragraph (b)(13)(x) is
‘‘Developmental disability’’ and is
unchanged from the 2015 NPRM
because it is based on statute.
Paragraph (b)(13)(xi) is ‘‘Other
diagnosed condition’’ that we combined
from several conditions proposed in the
IDEA qualifying disability and Health,
behavioral or mental health conditions
data elements proposed in the 2015
NPRM.
Comment: A national organization
representing state child welfare agencies
and a few states commented that
reporting over time whether a child’s
condition is existing, previous, or does
not apply could make the data file
cumbersome, confuse aggregate data at
the federal level, and place burden on
workers who may not have the training
or expertise on detailed, technical
health care information. They felt that
what was collected in AFCARS for
conditions is reasonable because it
informs the relevant issues at a high
level. They made suggestions for other
mechanisms to report the data, such as
data sharing agreements with other
agencies.
Response: We have not removed the
requirement for agencies to report
whether a child’s condition is existing,
previous, or does not apply. We
continue to believe, as we stated in the
2015 NPRM, that it is important to
capture comprehensive information on a
child’s diagnosed health, behavioral and
mental health conditions beyond the
current AFCARS report period, which
this data element will allow. Collecting
conditions for which the child was
previously diagnosed, but do not exist
as current diagnoses, will provide
increased opportunities for analysis
regarding the health and service needs
of children in out-of-home care, which
current AFCARS data does not allow.
We will provide technical assistance on
reporting this information as needed.
Comment: Two states asked for
clarification as to who is considered a
‘‘qualified professional.’’
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Response: As stated in the 2015
NPRM preamble (80 FR 7149), a
qualified professional is determined by
applicable laws and policies of the state
or tribal service area and may include a
doctor, psychiatrist, or, if applicable in
the state or tribal service area, a licensed
clinical psychologist or social worker.
This is consistent with current AFCARS
practice.
Comment: Two states were confused
by the response options on whether a
qualified professional has conducted an
exam or assessment and recommend we
only provide two response options for
the agency to indicate whether or not
the child has a diagnosed condition, or
if it’s unknown.
Response: We did not revise the final
rule based on the comments to allow for
an ‘‘unknown’’ response option. We
intentionally did not propose a response
option of ‘‘unknown’’ because it is too
broad for a meaningful analysis and has
a high potential to be overused. These
responses as well as the response
options for previous or existing
condition are designed to give us
information regarding a child’s health,
behavioral or mental health conditions
that vary over time without having to
track other more complicated historical
information such as start and end dates
of conditions. We believe that this will
provide us with better data on the
child’s health characteristics and meet
the requirement of section
479A(a)(7)(A)(v) of the Act regarding
reporting clinically diagnosed
conditions for certain children in foster
care. Additionally, we will provide
technical assistance on reporting this
information as needed.
Comment: Six states sought
clarification on when to mark
conditions as ‘‘previous.’’
Response: The agency reports the
response option of ‘‘previous’’ when a
child was diagnosed for a condition that
no longer exists as decided by a medical
professional.
Comment: One state suggested that
agencies should collect start and end
dates of diagnoses to allow for a more
robust analysis and would give agencies
the ability to determine when a
diagnosis was applicable if the
diagnosis changes during the report
period.
Response: We did not make changes
to the final rule based on this comment
as the response options of existing
condition, previous condition, and does
not apply will provide us an adequate
history on the occurrence of a child’s
conditions at the federal level without
the dates of diagnosis.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
Section 1355.44(b)(14) School
Enrollment, (b)(15) Educational Level,
and (b)(16) Educational Stability
In paragraph (b)(14), the title IV–E
agency must report whether the child is
a full-time student at and enrolled in (or
in the process of enrolling in)
elementary or secondary education, or is
a full or part-time student at and
enrolled in post-secondary education or
training, or college, or whether the child
is not enrolled in any school setting. We
made a minor revision to this data
element in the final rule to include parttime students in the response options
‘‘post-secondary education or training’’
or ‘‘college.’’
In paragraph (b)(15), the title IV–E
agency must report the highest
educational level from kindergarten to
college or post-secondary education/
training completed by the child as of the
last day of the report period. We made
a minor change to this data element in
the final rule to add a response option
of ‘‘GED’’ if the child has completed a
general equivalency degree or other high
school equivalent.
In paragraph (b)(16), the title IV–E
agency must report if the child is
enrolled or is in the process of enrolling
in a new elementary or secondary
school prompted by an initial placement
after entry into foster care or a
placement change during the report
period and if so, reason(s) for the change
in enrollment (paragraphs (b)(16)(i)
through (b)(16)(vii)).
Comment: In general, a national
organization representing state child
welfare agencies and states expressed
concerns with state title IV–E agencies
gathering data elements related to
educational information because they
stated it would create a burden for
workers and would not result in
accurate or useful data at the federal
level since educational information,
such as enrollment information, varies
among jurisdictions and states. Three
state commenters suggested forming a
data exchange with the Department of
Education instead of state title IV–E
agencies collecting education
information proposed through AFCARS.
Response: We considered the
comments concerned about the
increased burden, however we are
retaining the educational data elements
related to school enrollment,
educational level, and educational
stability because, as we stated in the
2015 NPRM, these data elements
address the requirements in section
471(a)(30) of the Act relating to an
assurance for title IV–E eligible children
being full-time elementary or secondary
school students or completed secondary
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
90541
school, section 475(1)(C)(ii) of the Act
relating to the child’s health and
education records and grade level
performance while in foster care, and
section 475(1)(G) of the Act relating to
the case plan requirement to develop an
educational stability plan for a child in
foster care. We have learned through
AFCARS Assessment Reviews and
technical assistance that several title IV–
E agencies already collect information
on school enrollment, the highest level
of education completed, and the reasons
for changes in school enrollment. These
data elements provide important
information about this issue. As we
explained in the 2015 NPRM, we
believe that it is beneficial to collect
information on the highest educational
achievement of the child so that we can
analyze trends in the relationship
between a child’s age and his or her
educational achievement. Information
on a child’s recently completed grade
level measures educational progress and
aligns with statutory changes made by
the Fostering Connections to Success
and Increasing Adoptions Act of 2008
(Pub. L. 110–351). Collecting
information on the reasons title IV–E
agencies determine that remaining in
the school of origin or a previous school
is not in the child’s best interest will
help to identify and address barriers to
educational stability after an initial
placement into foster care or a change
in living arrangements. In reference to
the suggestion for a data exchange with
the Department of Education to collect
a child’s education information rather
than collect it through AFCARS, we
determined that approach would not
yield consistent information. The
Department of Education collects
different and varied data from states,
none of which is at the child level, as
is the case with AFCARS. We will
provide technical assistance as needed
to title IV–E agencies to ensure accuracy
of reporting.
Comment: In response to paragraph
(b)(14), a national organization
representing state child welfare agencies
and state title IV–E agencies expressed
concerns about consistency in reporting
school enrollment information due to
variations in the definitions of
elementary, secondary, post-secondary
education or training, college, not
school-age, and not enrolled among
jurisdictions. They suggested removing
the data element. Other states and
national advocacy/public interest
groups suggested reporting children
enrolled in any ‘‘formal education
program’’ to capture children in half
and full-day kindergarten programs in
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
90542
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
states where compulsory attendance
begins at first grade.
Response: We did not remove the
requirement for agencies to report on
student enrollment or make changes to
the definitions of ‘‘elementary’’ or
‘‘secondary’’ based on the comments
because the data element is based on the
statutory requirement in section
471(a)(30) of the Act. That provision
specifies that title IV–E agencies must
assure that each child who has attained
the minimum age for compulsory school
attendance under state law and with
respect to whom there is eligibility for
a payment under the title IV–E plan is
a full-time elementary or secondary
school student or has completed
secondary school. The provision also
defines an ‘‘elementary or secondary
school student’’ as ‘‘the child is (A)
enrolled (or in the process of enrolling)
in an institution which provides
elementary or secondary education, as
determined under the law of the State
or other jurisdiction in which the
institution is located; (B) instructed in
an elementary or secondary education
program in accordance with a home
school law of the State or other
jurisdiction in which the home is
located; (C) in an independent study
elementary or secondary education
program, in accordance with the law of
the State or other jurisdiction in which
the program is located, that is
administered by the local school or
school district; or (D) incapable of
attending school on a fulltime basis due
to the medical condition of the child,
which incapability is supported by
regularly updated information in the
case plan of the child.’’
Comment: In response to paragraph
(b)(14), state title IV–E agencies and
national advocacy/public interest
groups suggested that agencies report
‘‘part-time’’ post-secondary education.
Response: We agreed with the
commenters to include ‘‘part-time’’
enrollment in addition to full-time and
revised the definitions for the response
options ‘‘post-secondary education or
training’’ and ‘‘college’’ to include parttime enrollment. Now, the regulation
specifies that enrollment in ‘‘postsecondary education or training’’ refers
to full or part-time enrollment in any
post-secondary education or training,
other than an education pursued at a
college or university and enrollment in
‘‘college’’ refers to a child that is
enrolled full or part-time at a college or
university. We understand that many
older foster youth who are enrolled in
post-secondary education or training or
college attend part-time and therefore,
we wish to capture both enrollment
options for these older youth.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
Comment: In response to paragraph
(b)(15), three states expressed concern
with the proposal to report the highest
educational level completed by the
child as of the last day of the report
period, noting that a child who is in
kindergarten on the last day of the
report period will be reported as ‘‘not
school-age.’’
Response: We understand the
commenter’s concern, however, we are
retaining the requirement for the agency
to report the highest educational level
completed by the child as of the last day
of the report period. We are not seeking
information on the child’s current
educational level. As we explained in
the 2015 NPRM, we proposed to collect
information on the child’s highest
educational level which measures
educational progress and aligns with
section 475(1)(C)(ii) of the Act relating
to the child’s health and education
records and grade level performance
while in foster care.
Comment: In response to paragraph
(b)(15), national advocacy/public
interest groups suggested additions to
paragraph (b)(15) that included, adding
early childhood response options,
adding general equivalency degree
(GED) or other high school equivalent,
and adding different levels of higher
education to include one year and two
year degrees/certificates.
Response: We agree with the
commenters who recommended adding
GED as a response option, so we added
it to the regulation which now reads:
‘‘Indicate ‘‘GED’’ if the child has
completed a general equivalency degree
or other high school equivalent.’’ We
did not add response options
recommended by other comments
because we do not need the suggested
detail about different levels of early
childhood education or higher
education for children in foster care at
the national level.
Comments: In response to paragraph
(b)(16), a national organization
representing state child welfare agencies
and three state title IV–E agencies
suggested removing the data element on
educational stability stating that the
data would be unreliable and not useful
because the reasons for new school
enrollments are often more complex
than the six response options presented.
They also suggested that a child’s
educational stability would be better
assessed through a qualitative review
and recommended that we collect only
whether a change in a child’s school
occurred. One commenter was
concerned that due to the complexity of
this data element, workers would be
likely to select ‘‘other,’’ reducing the
accuracy of the responses.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Response: We did not make changes
to the regulation based on these
comments because we continue to
believe that a child’s educational
stability is an important issue and this
data element is a step to gathering more
information on this issue. As we stated
in the 2015 NPRM, we seek this
information because it will conform to
section 475(1)(G) of the Act which is a
case plan requirement to ensure the
development of a plan for the
educational stability of a child in foster
care. We will provide technical
assistance to title IV–E agencies as
needed to ensure that this data element
is reported accurately.
Comment: In response to paragraph
(b)(16), national advocacy/public
interest groups recommend requiring
agencies to report all school changes
during a report period. They also
recommended adding more data
elements to gather information about
whether or not school changes were in
the best interests of a child, including
whether the placement supports the
child’s permanency plan, whether it
was a school discipline transfer, and
whether there was a lack of living
options near the original school.
Response: We are retaining the
language proposed in the 2015 NPRM in
the final rule and did not add the
response options recommended by the
commenters for several reasons. We do
not need details at the national level
about multiple school changes during a
report period or other more detailed
reasons for a school change. As we
indicated in the 2015 NPRM, collecting
information on the reasons title IV–E
agencies determine that remaining in
the school of origin or a previous school
is not in the child’s best interest will
help to identify and address barriers to
educational stability after an initial
placement into foster care or a change
in living arrangements. We believe the
response options in paragraphs (b)(16)(i)
through (b)(16)(vii) will allow us to
identify those barriers and to determine
ways to best address them.
Section 1355.44(b)(17) Pregnant or
Parenting
In paragraph (b)(17)(i), the title IV–E
agency must report whether the child is
pregnant as of the end of the report
period. We revised this data element in
the final rule. In the 2015 NPRM, we
proposed to require the agency to report
whether the child is or was previously
pregnant.
In paragraph (b)(17)(ii), the title IV–E
agency must report whether the child
has ever fathered or bore a child. We
revised this data element in the final
rule. In the 2015 NPRM, we proposed to
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
require the agency to report the number
of children of the minor parent.
In paragraph (b)(17)(iii), the title IV–
E agency must report whether the child
and his/her child(ren) are placed
together in foster care. We revised this
data element in the final rule. In the
2015 NPRM, we proposed to require the
agency to report the number of children
living with the minor parent.
Comment: Several states and a
national organization representing state
child welfare agencies generally
objected to collecting information on
children in foster care who are parents
or pregnant for various reasons
including: It is relevant in the NYTD
(see 45 CFR 1356.83(g)(52)) not
AFCARS; it will only be applicable to a
small number of children and will not
result in accurate reporting; it could
impose an extensive data collection
burden on case workers since there is no
minimum age imposed on who the
agency is to report, it is difficult to
know a pregnancy begin date, and it
would inappropriately apply to youth
who are not of child-bearing age.
Response: We require information on
children in foster care who are pregnant
or parenting to be reported in AFCARS
because state-by-state data on this topic
is required to be included in the annual
report to Congress per section
479A(a)(7)(B) of the Act. The NYTD
does not provide case level information
on all children in foster care; therefore
this type of data is not available in the
NYTD. We revised the proposed data
elements on pregnancy and minor
parents and combined them into one
data element that will meet the data
needed in section 479A(A)(7)(B) of the
Act for the report to Congress. We now
require agencies to meet this
requirement through one yes/no
element, thus reducing the reporting
burden for these elements. We moved
away from our 2015 NPRM proposal
that required agencies to report the total
number of biological children either
fathered or borne by the child because
we do not need that level of
information. Lastly, while we still
require agencies to report whether the
child in foster care is placed with his/
her children, we limited the scope to
any point during the report period, and
not for each living arrangement. We will
provide technical assistance to title IV–
E agencies as needed to ensure that this
data element is reported accurately.
Comment: Several commenters
suggested that agencies report more
information about children in foster care
who are pregnant or parenting, such as
data on fathers and parenting
responsibilities of youth in care, and
situations when the child is placed
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
90543
separately in foster care from the minor
parent.
Response: We revised the data
elements on children who are pregnant
or parenting for purposes of meeting the
data reporting requirement in section
479A(a)(7)(B) of the Act for the Annual
Report to Congress. These suggestions
would go beyond the data we need for
that report and therefore, are not needed
at the federal level.
section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act as
it is a civil rights statute which prohibits
discrimination against individuals with
disabilities, which we did not propose
in the 2015 NPRM. This data element
relates to special education as defined
in 20 U.S.C. 1401(29), which means
specifically designed instruction, at no
cost to the parent(s), to meet the unique
needs of a child with a disability (80 FR
7151, Feb. 9, 2015).
Section 1355.44(b)(18) Special
Education
In paragraph (b)(18), we require the
title IV–E agency to report on the child’s
special education, status by indicating
whether the child has an Individualized
Education Program (IEP) or an
Individualized Family Service Program
(IFSP).
Comment: A state title IV–E agency,
the association representing state title
IV–E agencies, and others recommended
that we simplify data reporting
regarding a child’s special education
status. They did not believe it would be
useful to distinguish between an IEP
and IFSP for comparison across states
due to the variability across
jurisdictions. Since only children from
birth through age three will have an
IFSP, the age of the child will indicate
which type of plan is in place for the
child. One state asked when the state
should report about a child’s IEP/IFSP.
Response: We made revisions to the
final rule in response to these
comments. Agencies will be required to
indicate ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no’’ as to whether the
child has an IEP/IFSP. The agency
reports this information as of the end of
the report period.
Comment: One state asked if children
with an IEP for advanced placement
should be included in the element.
Response: Yes, if the IEP meets the
definition in section 614(d)(1) of Part B
of Title I of the IDEA and implementing
regulations.
Comment: Several commenters
suggested additional data elements such
as specifics on the types of special
needs services provided to a child,
whether a representative from the
agency attended the child’s IEP/IFSP
meetings, and to provide an option to
identify children who are receiving
services and accommodations in
compliance with section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act.
Response: We did not make changes
to the final rule in response to these
comments because the overwhelming
number of comments we received asked
us to simplify this element. In addition,
we wanted to note that it would not be
appropriate for us to require agencies to
report about a child’s services under
Section 1355.44(b)(19) Prior Adoption
In paragraph (b)(19), the title IV–E
agency must report whether the child
experienced a prior legal adoption,
including any public, private, or
independent adoption in the United
States or adoption in another country,
and a tribal customary adoption, prior to
the current out-of-home care episode. If
so, in paragraph (b)(19)(i), the title IV–
E agency must report the date it was
finalized, and in paragraph (b)(19)(ii),
the title IV–E agency must report
whether the child’s prior adoption was
an intercountry adoption.
Comment: Several states, a national
organization representing state child
welfare agencies, and others objected to
us collecting data on all of the child’s
prior adoptions including the detailed
information on the type of the prior
adoption, and where the child was
previously adopted. The commenters
concerns were that agencies capture
information on prior adoptions ad hoc
based on the willingness of the person
to provide the information; that this
level of detail may not exist; that the
reliability of collecting every prior
adoption is questionable; that it would
be overly burdensome to research all of
the child’s prior adoptions and
questioned the usefulness of the
information and our authority to collect
it. Several states suggested instead that
we collect only the date of the most
recent prior adoption and whether or
not the child was adopted within the
state.
Response: We were persuaded by the
objections noted about these data
elements and revised the final rule to
address some of the concerns We are
statutorily mandated to collect
information about the number of
children who enter foster care after an
adoption was legalized per section
479(d) of the Act. As such, we did not
remove the prior adoption data elements
entirely, but revised them to require the
title IV–E agency to report information
for the most recent prior adoption only.
We also revised the data element on the
type of each prior adoption to instead
require the title IV–E agency to report if
a prior adoption was an intercountry
adoption and revised the name of the
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
90544
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
data element. This is to address
reporting on disrupted intercountry
adoptions required under section
422(b)(12) of the Act which is currently
provided in the state’s annual title IV–
B plan update. We removed the data
element proposed in the 2015 NPRM
asking for the jurisdiction name of each
prior adoption.
Comment: Associations representing
tribal interests suggested including
customary tribal adoptions to bring
awareness and data to this issue.
Response: We agree and revised the
final rule to include that title IV–E
agencies report whether the child
experienced a prior legal adoption,
including a tribal customary adoption,
before the current out-of-home care
episode.
Comment: National advocacy/public
interest groups suggested that we collect
more information on prior adoptions,
such as the child’s birth country,
whether the previous adoption
assistance agreement was terminated
and the previous adoptive parents are
still receiving subsidies, whether the
previous adoption was open or closed,
the reasons why the adoption disrupted/
dissolved, and categorizing adoption
dissolutions and disruptions separately.
Response: We considered these
comments, but did not make any
changes to the final rule based on this
comment and instead reduced the
information required on prior adoptions
to collect information needed to satisfy
statutory requirements in section 479(d)
and 422(b)(12) of the Act. In addition,
we took into consideration the
overwhelming response from state
agencies that our proposal to collect
more details on prior adoptions would
be burdensome and outweighs its
utility.
Comment: States questioned how they
would report on prior adoptions if they
did not know or could not ascertain the
information. They were concerned
about missing data counting towards a
penalty.
Response: We have revised the
requirements for reporting on prior
adoptions so that the agency only has to
report the most recent prior adoption.
As such, we do not expect that agencies
will have difficulty in ascertaining
whether the child was adopted prior to
entering foster care. If the information is
unknown because the child was
abandoned, then the title IV–E agency
would report ‘‘abandoned’’ for
paragraph (b)(19).
Section 1355.44(b)(20) Prior
Guardianship
In paragraph (b)(20)(i), the title IV–E
agency must report whether the child
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
experienced a prior legal guardianship
and if so, to report the date that the
prior legal guardianship became
legalized in paragraph (b)(20)(ii). We
revised our 2015 NPRM proposal to
only require the title IV–E agency report
the date of the most recent prior
guardianship and eliminated reporting
on the type and jurisdiction of each
prior guardianship.
Comment: Several states objected to
us collecting all of the child’s prior legal
guardianships, and the detailed
information on the type of the prior
guardianship and where the child had a
prior legal guardianship. The
commenters concerns were that
agencies capture information on prior
guardianships ad hoc based on the
willingness of the person to provide the
information; that this level of detail may
not exist; that the reliability of
collecting every prior guardianship is
questionable; that it would be overly
burdensome to research all of the child’s
prior guardianships; and questioned
how useful the information is and our
authority for collecting it.
Response: We were persuaded by the
objections noted and revised the final
rule to address the concerns about
reporting each prior legal guardianship
and the type and jurisdiction of each
prior guardianship. We are statutorily
mandated to collect information about
the number of children who enter foster
care after a legalized guardianship per
section 479(d) of the Act. As such, we
did not remove the prior legal
guardianship data element entirely, but
revised it to require the title IV–E
agency to report the date of the most
recent prior legal guardianship only if
the child experiences a prior legal
guardianship. In addition, we removed
the data elements proposed in the 2015
NPRM on the type and jurisdiction of
each prior guardianship.
Section 1355.44(b)(21) Child Financial
and Medical Assistance
In paragraph (b)(21), we require the
title IV–E agency to report whether the
child received financial and medical
assistance, other than title IV–E foster
care maintenance payments. If so, in
paragraphs (b)(21)(i) through
(b)(21)(xiii), the title IV–E agency must
indicate whether each type of federal or
state/tribal assistance applies: SSI or
Social Security benefits; Title XIX
Medicaid; Title XXI SCHIP; State/Tribal
adoption assistance; State/Tribal foster
care; Child support; Title IV–E adoption
subsidy; Title IV–E guardianship
assistance; Title IV–A TANF; Title IV–
B; SSBG; Chafee Foster Care
Independence Program; Other.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Comment: States, a national
organization representing state child
welfare agencies, and others opposed
our proposal to require the title IV–E
agency to report specific federal
assistance per diem payment amounts
for each of the child’s living
arrangements and expressed concern
about the increased burden and
potential inaccuracies in reporting the
data. One commenter indicated that
collecting this information would be
burdensome for counties.
Response: In response to these
concerns, we were persuaded to revise
the financial assistance data elements by
removing the data element related to
federal assistance per diem payment
amounts for every living arrangement
and consolidated the financial and
medical assistance response options
into one data element. We must still
collect the extent and nature of
assistance per section 479(c) of the Act;
therefore, in paragraph (b)(21) we
require title IV–E agencies to report
whether or not the child is receiving
each of 13 types of state/tribal and
federal financial and medical assistance
during the report period.
Comment: One commenter questioned
whether this data element includes a
situation where a child returns home
but remains in the agency’s custody and
whether the data element applies to
financial and medical assistance that the
child received during the reporting
period but prior to coming into the
agency’s custody.
Response: The title IV–E agency must
report the assistance that applies
beginning when the child enters the
reporting population and continues
until the child is no longer in the
agency’s placement and care
responsibility. Therefore, yes the agency
must report the assistance that applies
if the child is placed at home and
remains under the placement and care
responsibility of the title IV–E agency.
Section 1355.44(b)(22) Title IV–E Foster
Care During Report Period
In paragraph (b)(22), we require the
title IV–E agency to report whether a
title IV–E foster care maintenance
payment was paid on behalf of the child
at any point during the report period.
We received no comments on this data
element.
Section 1355.43(b)(23) Through (b)(25)
Siblings
In paragraph (b)(23), we require the
title IV–E agency to report the total
number of siblings that the child under
the placement and care responsibility of
the title IV–E agency has, if applicable.
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
In paragraph (b)(24), we require the
title IV–E agency to report the number
of siblings of the child who are in foster
care as defined in section 1355.20.
In paragraph (b)(25), we require the
title IV–E agency to report the number
of siblings of the child who are in the
same living arrangement as the child, on
the last day of the report period.
Comment: In general, several states
and a national organization representing
state child welfare agencies agreed that
the issue of sibling placement is
important at the practice level when
planning for children, but is better
captured as a qualitative data set.
Commenters noted it may not be
possible for the caseworker to know
whether the child has siblings and if so
how many, because agencies encounter
multiple overlapping sibling groups,
uncertain parentage, and mixed
biological, legal, and step-parent
relationships. They had concerns and
questions about the 2015 NPRM
proposal on siblings (which were in the
sections 1355.43(e) and 1355.44 of the
2015 NPRM) including the definition of
siblings, reporting sibling record
numbers, and the reliability and
consistency of the data. They
commented that it would not provide
meaningful valid information for
national review, pointed out that there
are many varied reasons for siblings not
being be placed together, and that our
proposal would not take into account
the complexity of what may constitute
a family in the eyes of a child. Some
states questioned the value of trying to
match sibling record numbers and
believe this requirement is onerous and
of limited value. Some commenters
recommended that if data on siblings
must be gathered in AFCARS, we
should collect the number of siblings of
the child, the number of siblings who
are also in care, and the number of
siblings who are in the same placement
with the child. Another commenter
recommended that we collect the
number of siblings placed with the child
at the start of the placement and at any
point during the child’s time in this
placement to determine if the child was
placed with siblings when initially
removed from home.
Response: We carefully reviewed the
comments and suggestions and while
we understand the concerns raised, we
determined that it is important to
continue require title IV–E agencies to
report information about siblings. We
acknowledge that there are many issues
that make collecting data on siblings
difficult. As we noted in the preamble
to the 2015 NPRM, section 471(a)(31)(A)
of the Act requires title IV–E agencies to
make reasonable efforts to place siblings
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
removed from their home in the same
foster care, kinship guardianship, or
adoptive placement, unless such a
placement is contrary to the safety or
well-being of any of the siblings.
However, we were persuaded to revise
the sibling data elements to address
commenter concerns and simplify
reporting. We addressed one of the
major concerns raised by commenters
by removing the data elements requiring
the agency to report the sibling’s child
record numbers, which indicated which
siblings were or were not placed with
the child. Now, title IV–E agencies must
report the total number of siblings of the
child, the number of siblings that are
also in foster care as defined in section
1355.20, and the number in the same
living arrangement on the last day of the
report period. We recognize the frequent
movement of children makes it difficult
to capture sibling information, so we
will only require reporting as of the last
day of the report period for the data
element on siblings who are in the same
living arrangement.
Comment: States asked for a clearer
definition of sibling and questioned, for
example whether to report if the child
in foster care has step-siblings with
which the child has no contact.
Response: We define a sibling to the
child as his or her brother or sister by
biological, legal, or marital connection.
We acknowledge that title IV–E agencies
may confront issues that may make
collecting data on siblings difficult;
however, we are not providing further
specifics on the definition of sibling.
The definition is broad and would
include reporting the total number of
step-siblings which constitutes a legal
connection.
Section 1355.44(c) Parent or Legal
Guardian Information
In paragraph (c), the title IV–E agency
must report information on the child’s
parent(s) or legal guardian(s). In the
2015 NPRM we proposed to require the
title IV–E agency to report the date of
the first judicial finding that the child
has been subject to child abuse or
neglect, if applicable. We received
comments from states requesting that
we remove this data element stating that
is excessive information, has limited
value in measuring outcomes, and it
does not add substantive value to the
data file. States also questioned the
usefulness of this data element due to
varying state practices and believed it
would be best left to a qualitative review
process to determine how timeframes
for permanency are being met by
agencies rather than collecting
information that may or may not be
applicable. Another state and a
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
90545
university expressed confusion in how
to report a judicial finding for multiple
removals and a private citizen suggested
revising the name of the data element to
use broader judicial terminology for
states that do not have judicial findings
of abuse or neglect. We were persuaded
by the commenters and removed this
element.
Section 1355.44(c)(1) and (c)(2) Year of
Birth Parent or Legal Guardian
In paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2), the
title IV–E agency must report the birth
year of the child’s parent(s) or legal
guardian(s). We did not receive
comments on these data elements.
Section 1355.44(c)(3) and (c)(4) Tribal
Membership for Mother and Father
In these paragraphs, state title IV–E
agencies must indicate whether the
mother and father are members of an
Indian tribe. In the 2016 SNPRM we
proposed that state title IV–E agencies
gather information about the parents’
tribal membership in sections
1355.43(i)(3)(ii) and (i)(3)(iv). We
determined that this information is
better integrated in section 1355.44(c)
with other data elements on parent and
legal guardian information. We retained
the requirement in the 2016 SNPRM
that these elements apply only to state
title IV–E agencies because they collect
information related to the potential
application of ICWA. We did not receive
substantive comments to the 2016
SNPRM on this specific data element
and have retained it in the final rule.
Section 1355.44(c)(5) Termination/
Modification of Parental Rights
In paragraph (c)(5), the title IV–E
agency must report whether the parents’
rights were terminated or modified on a
voluntary or involuntary basis. A
voluntary termination means the
parent(s) voluntarily relinquished their
parental rights to the title IV–E agency,
with or without court involvement. This
is a new data element that we added in
response to a state commenter who
asked for clarification on how the
agency should report voluntary
surrenders, stating that the type of
termination of parental rights (TPR) and
the pertinent dates can be different for
each parent. In the 2016 SNPRM, we
proposed to require that the state title
IV–E agency report whether the rights of
the Indian child’s parents or Indian
custodian were involuntarily or
voluntarily terminated in paragraph
(i)(19). However, this information is
already required in paragraph (c)(5).
In paragraph (c)(5)(i), the title IV–E
agency must report each date the title
IV–E agency filed a petition to
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
90546
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
terminate/modify parental rights
regarding the child’s biological, legal,
and/or putative parent(s), if applicable.
Comment: An organization
representing tribal interests commented
that the data element for the TPR
petition filing date should be consistent
with ACF’s policy that allows tribes to
use alternative methods for helping a
child achieve a permanent placement,
such as modification or suspension of
parental rights (Child Welfare Policy
Manual section 9.2, question 12).
Response: We agree that the
regulation should be consistent with the
noted policy and revised the regulation
to require the title IV–E agency to report
the dates the agency filed a petition for
a ‘‘modification’’ of parental rights or a
termination of parental rights.
Comment: Two states commented that
we should eliminate the data element
for the TPR petition filing date stating
it does not provide substantive value to
the data file. They suggested that we
should limit reporting to the most recent
petition filing date if the child is
currently available for adoption or was
available during the reporting period. A
university asked whether we need the
TPR filing petition date for national
policy development or program
monitoring. A state supported the TPR
petition filing date element to analyze
the length of time it takes for a child to
achieve permanency through adoption
but questioned the purpose of reporting
each petition date when multiple
petitions are filed.
Response: We are retaining the
requirement for the title IV–E agency to
report each date the agency filed a
petition to terminate or modify parental
rights of the child’s biological, legal,
and/or putative parent(s), if applicable.
The petition date and date of the
termination or modification of parental
rights in paragraph (c)(5)(ii) will allow
us to determine the time between when
the agency files a petition to terminate
or modify parental rights and the actual
date of the termination or modification.
Additionally, AFCARS Assessment
Reviews have shown that TPR filing
petition dates are typically in the state
electronic case files. Regarding multiple
petitions, we require title IV–E agencies
to report each petition date in the event
that multiple petitions are filed for
putative parents. As we stated in the
2015 NPRM, we require title IV–E
agencies to report information on a
child’s putative father, if applicable. A
putative father is a person who is
alleged to be the father of a child, or
who claims to be the father of a child,
at a time when there may not be enough
evidence or information available to
determine if that is correct. For the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
existing AFCARS, we have fielded
questions on whether title IV–E agencies
should provide information on putative
fathers. Since the parental rights of any
putative fathers may need to be
terminated before a child legally is free
for adoption in some jurisdictions, we
want to be clear that we are interested
in collecting information on putative
fathers as well. We will work with title
IV–E agencies during implementation
and provide technical bulletins for
reporting the termination and
modification of parental rights petition
dates.
Comment: Two states commented that
the petition and termination/
modification dates should be tied to the
individual parent.
Response: We agree and will work
with title IV–E agencies during
implementation if there is any
additional clarification needed.
Comment: Two states asked how to
report the petition dates if the child was
previously adopted and whether it is
limited to the current removal episode.
Response: We’d like to clarify. If a
child was adopted, later enters the outof-home-care reporting population, and
the agency files a petition to terminate
or modify parental rights, the agency
must report the petition filing date for
the adoptive parent because that is the
parent of the child. We will work with
title IV–E agencies during
implementation if further clarification is
needed.
In paragraph (c)(5)(ii), the title IV–E
agency must report the date that
parental rights are voluntarily or
involuntarily terminated/modified for
each biological, legal and/or putative
parent, if applicable.
Comment: An organization
representing tribal interests commented
that this data element should include
language consistent with ACF’s policy
that allows tribes to use alternative
methods for helping a child achieve a
permanent placement, such as
modification or suspension of parental
rights (Child Welfare Policy Manual
section 9.2, question 12).
Response: We agree that the
regulation should be consistent with the
noted policy and revised the regulation
to require the title IV–E agency to report
the dates of a ‘‘modification’’ of parental
rights or a termination of parental rights.
Section 1355.44(c)(6) Involuntary
Termination/Modification of Parental
Rights Under ICWA
If the state title IV–E agency indicated
in paragraph (c)(5) that the TPR was
involuntary and if a state title IV–E
agency indicated ‘‘yes’’ to paragraph
(b)(4) or indicated ‘‘yes, ICWA applies’’
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
to paragraph (b)(5), we require that the
state title IV–E agency indicate:
• Whether the state court found
beyond a reasonable doubt, that
continued custody of the Indian child
by the parent or Indian custodian is
likely to result in serious emotional or
physical damage to the Indian child in
accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1912(f)
(paragraph (c)(6)(i));
• whether the court decision to
involuntarily terminate parental rights
included the testimony of one or more
qualified expert witnesses (QEW) in
accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1912(f)
(paragraph (c)(6)(ii)); and
• whether prior to TPR, the court
concluded that active efforts have been
made to prevent the breakup of the
Indian family and that those efforts were
unsuccessful in accordance with 25
U.S.C. 1912(d) (paragraph (c)(6)(iii)).
These are similar to paragraph s
(i)(20) and (i)(21) of the 2016 SNPRM
except that we updated the language
consistent with 25 CFR 23.121.
Comment: The national organization
representing state child welfare agencies
and state title IV–E agencies suggested
revisions to simplify this section, such
as reporting only whether a court made
findings that continued custody of the
Indian child by the parent or Indian
custodian is likely to result in serious
emotional or physical damage for
termination of parental rights and if yes,
did a QEW support this finding or only
report court order information for
involuntary TPRs. Another state
suggested that we re-order and simplify
the voluntary TPR data elements. A
commenter also suggested that we ask
whether a TPR was voluntary or
involuntary.
Response: We did not make changes
to the final rule in response to these
comments to simplify these elements.
As we indicated in the 2016 SNPRM
preamble, termination standards are
important protections for Indian
children as defined in ICWA given that
Congress specifically created minimum
federal standards for removal of an
Indian child to prevent the breakup of
Indian families and to promote the
stability and security of families and
Indian tribes by preserving the child’s
links to their parents and to the tribe
through the child’s parent(s). Further,
distinguishing between involuntary and
voluntary terminations of parental rights
is important in ICWA given specific
protections that must be provided in
each context (25 U.S.C. 1912(e), (f) and
25 U.S.C. 1913). The final rule now
requires state and tribal title IV–E
agencies to report whether a TPR is
voluntary or involuntary in paragraph
(c)(5). Furthermore, we integrated the
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
ICWA-related data elements into certain
sections of the final rule, thereby
moving the data elements on TPR
proposed in the 2016 SNPRM to
paragraph (c) and added a new data
element on active efforts at involuntary
TPR (paragraph (c)(6)(iii)).
Comment: A state recommended that
we require states to list the reasons for
involuntary TPR, using the reasons from
its state statute, such as whether a
parent is palpably unfit or abuses
chemicals.
Response: We did not make changes
in response to these suggestions. States
information systems differ and include
information useful for their own
internal purposes, but not mandated by
AFCARS. We encourage states to
consider collecting data that helps states
to evaluate and implement state law, but
we do not require that they report those
data to AFCARS.
Comment: A state and tribe suggested
adding data elements asking about
alternatives to TPR, such as tribal
customary adoption, where the parental
rights are modified and not severed, and
the adoptive parent is granted the same
rights and responsibilities as they would
under a contemporary adoption.
Response: We’d like to clarify. As we
explained in the preamble to the 2016
SNPRM, the state title IV–E agency must
report information regarding voluntary
and involuntary terminations/
modification of parental rights, which
include tribal customary adoptions.
Comment: Tribes and organizations
representing tribal interests recommend
that we add numerous data elements,
including:
• Whether the court made a
determination in a court order that
active efforts at TPR had been made by
the state title IV–E agency and whether
active efforts were provided by any
party seeking TPR.
• whether the tribe was notified when
a state seeks TPR for an Indian child.
Response: We agree with the
suggestion to require state title IV–E
agencies to report on active efforts at
involuntary TPR. Active efforts are
required under the ICWA to prevent the
breakup of the Indian family in two
instances: Prior to removal and prior to
involuntary TPR. Specifically in
paragraph (c)(6)(iii), we require state
title IV–E agencies to report for
involuntary TPR whether prior to
terminating parental rights, the court
concluded that active efforts have been
made to prevent the breakup of the
Indian family and that those efforts were
unsuccessful in accordance with 25
U.S.C. 1912(d). This language is
consistent with the BIA regulation at 25
CFR 23.120 which requires that a court
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
concluded that active efforts were made,
and does not require a court order. We
decline to require state title IV–E
agencies to report the date on which the
tribe was notified when a state seeks
involuntary TPR for an Indian child and
provide our reasoning in the preamble
section on Notification in paragraph (b).
Section 1355.44(c)(7) Voluntary
Termination/Modification of Parental
Rights Under ICWA
If the title IV–E agency indicates in
paragraph (c)(5) that the TPR was
voluntary, and the state title IV–E
agency indicated ‘‘yes’’ to paragraph
(b)(4) or indicated ‘‘yes, ICWA applies’’
to paragraph (b)(5), the state title IV–E
agency must indicate whether the
consent to termination of parental or
Indian custodian rights was executed in
writing and recorded before a court of
competent jurisdiction with a
certification by the court that the terms
and consequences of consent were
explained on the record in detail and
were fully understood by the parent or
Indian custodian in accordance with 25
CFR 23.125(a) and (c). This is similar to
sections 1355.43(i)(22), (i)(23) and
(i)(24) as proposed in the 2016 SNPRM,
however, we updated the language
consistent with 25 CFR 23.125.
Comment: One state recommended
including a mechanism or process to
ensure that an Indian child retains tribal
membership after voluntary TPR
because it’s important for a child to
know his/her lineage and tribal
membership, which offers benefits such
as health services and educational
resources for higher education.
Response: We agree that it is
important to recognize such
mechanisms and revised the regulation
to refer to either a ‘‘modification’’ of
parental rights or a termination of
parental rights. However, AFCARS is
not the appropriate vehicle for
establishing a mechanism or process
regarding maintaining tribal
membership because AFCARS is a data
reporting system.
Section 1355.44(d) Removal Information
In paragraph (d), we require that the
title IV–E agency report information on
each of the child’s removal(s) from
home.
Section 1355.44(d)(1) Date of Child’s
Removal
In paragraphs (d)(1)(i) through
(d)(1)(iii), we require the title IV–E
agency to collect and report the date(s)
on which the child was removed for
each removal of a child who enters the
placement and care responsibility of the
title IV–E agency. We received no
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
90547
comments on this data element and
have retained the 2015 NPRM proposed
language in the final rule.
Section 1355.44(d)(2) Removal
Transaction Date
In paragraph (d)(2) we require the title
IV–E agency to report the transaction
date for each of the child’s removal
dates reported in paragraph (d)(1). The
transaction date is a non-modifiable,
computer-generated date which
accurately indicates the month, day and
year each response to paragraph (d)(1)
was entered into the information
system. We did not receive relevant
comments on this data element and
have retained the 2015 NPRM proposed
language.
Section 1355.44(d)(3) Removals Under
ICWA
In paragraph (d)(3), if a state title IV–
E agency indicated ‘‘yes’’ to paragraph
(b)(4) or indicated ‘‘yes, ICWA applies’’
to paragraph (b)(5), we require that the
state title IV–E agency indicate:
• Whether the court order for foster
care placement was made as a result of
clear and convincing evidence that
continued custody of the Indian child
by the parent or Indian custodian was
likely to result in serious emotional or
physical damage to the Indian child in
accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1912(e) and
25 CFR 23.121(a) (paragraph (d)(3)(i));
• whether the evidence presented for
foster care placement as indicated in
paragraph (d)(3)(i) included the
testimony of a qualified expert witness
in accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1912(e)
and 25 CFR 23.121(a) (paragraph
(d)(3)(ii)); and
• whether the evidence presented for
foster care placement as indicated in
paragraph (d)(3)(i) indicates that prior to
each removal reported in paragraph
(d)(1) that active efforts have been made
to prevent the breakup of the Indian
family and that those efforts were
unsuccessful in accordance with 25
U.S.C. 1912(d) (paragraph (d)(3)(iii)).
These are similar to sections
1355.43(i)(12) and (i)(14) as proposed in
the 2016 SNPRM.
Comment: The national organization
representing state child welfare agencies
was in support of a data element asking
about court determinations of active
efforts because members believe this is
the best data element to capture
information on active efforts to prevent
the breakup of the Indian family. One
tribal commenter noted that in some
state courts, local practice has been to
stipulate to active efforts, rather than
creating a record that demonstrates
active efforts.
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
90548
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Response: We retained the
requirement regarding court
determinations that active efforts were
made to prevent the breakup of the
Indian family with modifications to be
consistent with BIA regulations at 25
CFR 23.120. We now require state title
IV–E agencies to indicate in paragraph
(d)(3)(iii) whether the evidence
presented for foster care placement as
indicated in paragraph (d)(3)(i) indicates
that prior to each removal active efforts
were made to prevent the breakup of the
Indian family and that these efforts were
unsuccessful in accordance with 25
U.S.C. 1912(d).
Comment: We received several
concerns and suggestions about the
requirement for the state title IV–E
agency to report whether the court
found that continued custody of the
Indian child by the parent or Indian
custodian was likely to result in serious
emotional or physical damage to the
Indian child and that the evidence
presented included testimony by a
QEW. Two tribes suggested that states
be required to report whether the QEW
meets the standards per the BIA’s
Guidelines. The national organization
representing state child welfare agencies
noted that states experience challenges
in meeting the requirement in ICWA for
QEWs, stating there are not enough
QEWs to meet the need for court
proceedings. One state noted that there
is no way to report that a court does not
require a QEW to testify even if the
agency knows that a QEW should
testify.
Response: We did not make changes
to the final rule in response to these
comments. We are retaining the
requirement that the state must report
whether evidence presented included
the testimony of a QEW for the specified
court finding but updated the language
to reflect the BIA regulation at 25 CFR
121(a). As we noted in the preamble to
the 2016 SNPRM, the removal data
elements will provide data on the extent
to which Indian children as defined in
ICWA are removed in a manner that
conforms to ICWA’s standards, informs
ACF about the frequency of and
evidentiary standards applied to
removals of Indian children, helps
identify needs for training and technical
assistance related to ICWA, and
highlights substantive opportunities for
building and improving relationships
between states and tribes. Removing the
requirement for agencies to report
whether a QEW provided testimony
would diminish our ability to achieve
these purposes. We require the state title
IV–E agency to report whether the
evidence presented for foster care
placement as indicated in paragraph
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
(d)(3)(i) included the testimony of a
QEW in accordance with 25 U.S.C.
1912(e) and 25 CFR 121(a) (paragraph
(d)(3)(ii)). Thus, we are not asking
whether or not the state title IV–E
agency knows that ICWA requires a
QEW’s testimony, rather we are
requiring the state title IV–E agency to
indicate whether the evidence presented
included the testimony of a QEW.
Comment: We received comments
suggesting additional data elements
related to: Emergency removals per
section 1922 of ICWA, such as whether
the court determined that the state
properly removed the Indian child and
how long the emergency removal lasted;
and foster care voluntary removals, such
as whether a court order indicates that
the voluntary consent to a foster care
placement was made in writing and
recorded in the presence of a judge.
Response: We did not revise the final
rule in response to these suggestions.
We understand the value of collecting
data related to voluntary foster
placements and emergency removals of
children to whom ICWA applies. We
encourage states to consider collecting
this information, if consistent with their
own practice models, but we decline to
require collecting and reporting it to
AFCARS. At this time, we seek to
understand the scope of all removals of
children to whom ICWA applies and
therefore we’ve required broad data
elements we believe are most critical in
relation to Indian children as defined in
ICWA.
or is not related to the child. We did not
add a separate response option for
‘‘homelessness’’ because it is included
in the response option of ‘‘other.’’
However, we added ‘‘homelessness’’ as
a circumstance of removal at paragraph
(d)(6)(xxxiv).
Comment: Three commenters
representing tribal interests
recommended adding a response option
for ‘‘Indian custodian,’’ who is a person
recognized under ICWA that may not be
a relative, parent, or legal guardian.
Response: We specified in section
1355.41(c)(2) that for an Indian child as
defined in ICWA, the term ‘‘legal
guardian’’ in the specific data elements
of §§ 1355.44(c)(1), (c)(2), (d)(4), and
(d)(5), includes an Indian custodian as
defined in ICWA at 25 U.S.C. 1903 if the
Indian custodian has legal responsibility
for the child.
Section 1355.44(d)(4) Environment at
Removal
In paragraph (d)(4) we require the title
IV–E agency to report the type of
environment (household or facility)
from a list of seven that the child was
living in at the time of each of the
child’s removals reported in paragraph
(d)(1).
Comment: One state recommended
adding whether a legal guardian is a
child’s relative as a response option
because in the proposal, both ‘‘legal
guardian’’ and ‘‘child’s relative’’ are
defined to exclude the other choice,
even though the legal guardian may be
a child’s relative. Other homelessness
advocacy groups suggested adding
‘‘homeless’’ as a separate response
option because they feel that data on
homelessness is very important and
relevant to collect to get a more detailed
picture of where youth running away
from system involvement are running
to.
Response: We agree with the
suggestion to add ‘‘relative legal
guardian’’ as a response option to
distinguish between a guardian who is
In paragraph (d)(6), we require the
title IV–E agency to report all of the
circumstances surrounding the child
and family at each removal reported in
paragraph (d)(1) from a list of 35
circumstances. The agency must report
all child and family circumstances that
are present at the time of each removal,
including the circumstances that
contributed to the decision to place the
child into foster care.
We modified the regulation by
revising the name of two circumstances
at removal. In paragraph (d)(6)(xi) we
revised the name of the circumstance
from ‘‘caretaker’s alcohol abuse’’ to
‘‘caretaker’s alcohol use’’ and in
paragraph (d)(6)(xii) we revised the
name of the circumstance from
‘‘caretaker’s drug abuse’’ to ‘‘caretaker’s
drug use.’’ We did not change the
definition of the data element. These
language changes are based on language
guidelines (https://
www.whitehouse.gov/ondcp/changingthe-language-draft) recently released by
the White House Office of National Drug
Control Policy that are designed to
reduce the harmful stigma associated
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Section 1355.44(d)(5) Authority for
Placement and Care Responsibility
In paragraph (d)(5) we require the title
IV–E agency to indicate, for each of the
child’s removals, whether the title IV–
E agency’s authority for placement and
care responsibility of the child was
based on a court order. We did not
receive substantive comments to this
data element and have mostly retained
the language as proposed in the 2015
NPRM, clarifying only that we intended
‘‘guardian’’ to refer to ‘‘legal guardian’’.
Section 1355.44(d)(6) Child and Family
Circumstances at Removal
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
with substance use disorders and
addiction.
We also modified the regulation by
adding two circumstances at removal
(paragraphs (d)(6)(xxxii) and
(d)(6)(xxxiii)) so that we can identify
children who are under a title IV–E
agreement for title IV–E foster care
maintenance payments. A commenter to
the 2015 NPRM suggested that we add
a data element allowing title IV–E
agencies to specify children reported to
AFCARS who are under title IV–E
agreements. We have also received this
suggestion from several states during
AFCARS Assessment Reviews. We
believe that the best way to address
these comments is to add a
circumstance at removal that title IV–E
agencies may indicate if this situation
applies for a child. We believe this will
lead to more accurate reporting and
analysis of the appropriate children. In
addition, this will allow us to clearly
identify when an Indian child is under
the state title IV–E agency’s placement
and care responsibility versus receiving
a title IV–E foster care maintenance
payment under a title IV–E agreement.
We believe this information, along with
the ICWA-related data elements state
title IV–E agencies are now required to
report will provide a clearer picture of
the AFCARS out-of-home care reporting
population. We included separate
circumstances at removal for title IV–E
agreements with another public agency
and title IV–E agreements with an
Indian tribe to better inform which title
IV–E agreement the child is reported
under and provide clarity for title IV–E
agencies on who is to be included in the
out-of-home care reporting population.
Comments: Several commenters
suggested adding ‘‘sex trafficking
victim’’ as a circumstance at removal.
Response: We agree with the
suggestions to add ‘‘sex trafficking
victim’’ as a circumstance and have
added it as paragraph (d)(6)(xxviii). This
will inform us whether the child is a sex
trafficking victim at the time the child
entered the out-of-home care reporting
population. The requirements to collect
sex trafficking information in
paragraphs (d)(7) and (d)(8) relate to a
child who was a victim prior to or while
in foster care, which is designed to meet
statutory reporting requirements.
Comment: One commenter suggested
adding ‘‘prenatal substance exposure’’
as a circumstance at removal.
Response: We did not add ‘‘prenatal
substance exposure’’ as a child and
family circumstance at removal because
we already have response options
‘‘prenatal alcohol exposure’’ and
‘‘prenatal drug exposure.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
Comment: Advocacy organizations
suggested adding immigration-related
response options as child and family
circumstances at removal stating that a
child’s immigration status is important
to understand the barriers and services
to support this population. They also
noted that an unintended consequence
of immigration enforcement can be the
separation of detained parents from
their children.
Response: We were persuaded by
commenters who suggested it was
important to know when a circumstance
at removal is that the parent was
detained or deported for immigration
reasons and added ‘‘parental
immigration detainment or deportation’’
as a child and family circumstance at
removal to paragraph (d)(6)(xxix).
Commenters pointed out that this
information is important in order to
assess the critical services that may be
required to support the child and the
family. In addition, it is important to
understand what barriers exist for the
child and family. We removed the data
elements from the 2015 NPRM proposal
in paragraphs (b) and (c) to collect
whether the child and parents were
born in the U.S. for the reasons noted by
many commenters who opposed them
and instead require that agencies report
this circumstance at removal. We did
not add a data element on a child’s
immigration status because that
information is not needed at the federal
level since agencies at the state, tribal,
and local level determine a child’s
eligibility for services.
Comment: Advocates and
organizations representing the homeless
suggested adding many separate
circumstances at removal related to
homelessness stating that data on
homelessness is important and relevant
to collect. Recommendations included
types of homelessness habitations and
particular family situations such as:
‘‘places not meant for human
habitation’’ (i.e., abandoned buildings);
‘‘couch-surfing’’; ‘‘family is living in a
shelter or on the streets’’; ‘‘family home
is overcrowded’’; and ‘‘family home is
hazardous condition.’’
Response: We agree with the
suggestions to add ‘‘homelessness’’ as a
circumstance and have added it as
paragraph (d)(6)(xxxiv). Such
information can help agencies identify
services and support for children and
families. We define homelessness
consistent with the definition used in
the National Youth in Transition
Database (NYTD) at 1356.83(g)(49).
Comment: Commenters expressed
confusion on why we provided
domestic violence as a child and family
circumstance at removal stating that the
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
90549
reason for removal would be harm to the
child. Other commenters suggested that
we should modify the domestic violence
circumstance to require agencies to
report intimate partner violence
experienced or perpetrated by a child of
any age and not only those who are
eighteen years of age and older.
Response: We appreciate the
suggestions to revise this circumstance
at removal and revised it to make it
more consistent with the definition of
domestic violence in the Family
Violence Prevention and Services Act
(FVPSA). In response to the confusion
on why we provided domestic violence
as a child and family circumstance at
removal, we noted in the 2015 NPRM
that the agency must report all of the
circumstances that are present at the
time of the child’s removal, in addition
to the circumstances or reasons for the
child’s removal and placement into
foster care.
Comment: In the 2015 NPRM we
solicited comments on whether we
should collect information on LGBTQ
youth, and if so, what information.
Several commenters pointed out the
unique plight of LGBTQ youth in foster
care stating that research indicates that
LGBTQ youth are disproportionately
represented within the child welfare
system, experience high rates of family
rejection, and experience unique
challenges to their personal safety and
stability.
Response: We support further
understanding of LGBTQ youth in foster
care and their experiences while in
foster care. Such information can help
agencies improve their supports and
services to these young people. We
included a circumstance at removal in
paragraph (d)(6)(xxx) as to whether
there is ‘‘family conflict related to the
child’s sexual orientation, gender
identity, or gender expression’’ to aid us
in recognizing the needs and
experiences of LGBTQ youth who enter
foster care. Knowing whether family
conflict regarding the child’s sexual
orientation, gender identity, or gender
expression was a circumstance at the
child’s removal may allow the title IV–
E agency to more accurately assess the
child and plan for the child’s safety,
permanency, and well-being while in
foster care.
Comment: National advocacy/public
interest groups suggested that we add
educational neglect and unaccompanied
minor as child and family
circumstances at removal.
Response: We agree it is important to
capture whether educational neglect is a
child and family circumstance at
removal and included it. We defined
‘‘educational neglect’’ based on the
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
90550
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
American Humane Association
definition as ‘‘alleged or substantiated
failure of a parent or caregiver to enroll
a child of mandatory school age in
school or provide appropriate home
schooling or needed special educational
training, thus allowing the child or
youth to engage in chronic truancy.’’ We
did not include ‘‘unaccompanied
minor’’ as one of the circumstances at
removal since the child’s immigration
status is irrelevant to their placement in
foster care. We did, however, include a
circumstance at removal of ‘‘parental
immigration detainment or deportation’’
to paragraph (d)(6)(xxix).
Section 1355.44(d)(7) Victim of Sex
Trafficking Prior To Entering Foster
Care
In paragraph (d)(7), we require the
title IV–E agency to report whether the
child had been a victim of sex
trafficking before the current out-ofhome care episode. If so, in paragraphs
(d)(7)(i) and (d)(7)(ii) we require the title
IV–E agency to indicate whether the
agency reported each instance to law
enforcement and the dates of each
report.
Comment: One commenter asked if
the agency should report this
information for a time prior to the title
IV–E agency’s involvement with the
child or family.
Response: Yes, the responses to
paragraphs (d)(7)(i) and (d)(7)(ii) require
the title IV–E agency to report about
victims of sex trafficking prior to
entering foster care and prior to any
agency involvement. We have retained
the proposed rule language with minor
edits.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Section 1355.44(d)(8) Victim of Sex
Trafficking While in Foster Care
In paragraph (d)(8), we require the
title IV–E agency to report whether the
child was a victim of sex trafficking
while in out-of-home care during the
current episode. If so, in paragraphs
(d)(8)(i) and (d)(8)(ii) we require the title
IV–E agency to indicate whether the
agency reported each instance to law
enforcement and the dates of each
report. We have retained the proposed
rule language with minor edits.
Comment: A commenter sought
clarification on whether the agency
should report a date the report was
made to law enforcement if an agency
other than the title IV–E agency made
the report.
Response: No, the agency reports on
whether or not the title IV–E agency
itself made the report to law
enforcement. We modified the
regulation to make this clearer.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
Comment: Many commenters asked if
it will be possible for the agency to
report data on multiple instances of sex
trafficking that may have occurred
during the report period. Another
commenter suggested that we include
sex trafficking as a child and family
circumstance at the time of removal.
Response: We agree with the
suggestion to add sex trafficking as a
response option in paragraph (d)(6)
Child and family circumstances at
removal. Because this information is to
be reported as it relates to each removal
episode and is not information that is to
be overwritten, we have moved it to, the
‘‘removal’’ section of the final rule and
specified that each instance of sex
trafficking, report to law enforcement,
and date must be reported. In addition,
we modified the language and location
of these elements to allow agencies to
report multiple instances of sex
trafficking. We believe these changes
clarify many of the questions raised by
commenters.
Comment: Organizations representing
tribal interests noted that there are
federal laws and policy barriers that
prevent tribes from submitting any
criminal or civil data to certain national
databases, therefore tribes should be
allowed to indicate they were not
authorized or allowed to report
information about sex trafficking to law
enforcement.
Response: Title IV–E agencies are
only required to report in AFCARS
whether or not they reported a child
that they identified as a sex trafficking
victim to law enforcement. Therefore, in
the instance where the tribe was
prohibited by federal law or otherwise
to make a report to law enforcement and
therefore did not make a report the tribe
would indicate ‘‘no.’’ This data element
is not a mandate on the tribe to make
a report of sex trafficking to law
enforcement, but to indicate in AFCARS
whether or not they made a report.
Comment: We received several other
suggestions. One organization suggested
we provide greater guidance and clarity
about child victims of sex trafficking
when they run away from foster care;
several commenters suggested including
additional elements, including health
and mental health services a child
receives related to sex trafficking,
whether a sex-trafficking victim was
criminally charged, had been homeless,
missing or a runaway. Further, several
commenters suggested that we include
this information in a different data
collection system, the National Child
Abuse and Neglect Data System
(NCANDS).
Response: We examined the
suggestions to add data elements
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
regarding victims of sex trafficking, but
have not made further changes. We do
not have a specific use for the additional
detailed information the commenters
requested as we are requiring reporting
on sex trafficking victims to meet
statutory requirements for reporting this
information to Congress per section 105
of Public Law 113–183 and for
including this information in AFCARS
per section 479(c)(3)(E) of the Act. In
addition, the statute mandates that this
specific sex trafficking victim data we
are requiring title IV–E agencies to
report be included in AFCARS and not
NCANDS. However, effective May 29,
2017, Child Abuse Prevention and
Treatment Act (CAPTA) state grant
recipients must report, to the maximum
extent practicable, the number of
children determined to be victims of sex
trafficking (section 106(d)(17) of
CAPTA).
Section 1355.44(e) Living Arrangement
and Provider Information
In paragraph (e), we require that the
title IV–E agency report information on
each of the child’s living arrangements
for each out-of-home care episode. We
revised some of the proposed data
elements as suggested by commenters,
integrated data elements relating to
ICWA placement preferences proposed
in the 2016 SNPRM, and removed
others as follows:
• Removed a data element requiring
agencies to report the total number of
children who are living with their minor
parent in each living arrangement. We
instead require agencies to report
whether the child and his/her child(ren)
are placed together at any point during
the report period in paragraph (b).
• Removed the data element requiring
agencies to report the assistance that
supports each of the child’s living
arrangements. We merged this list of
assistance with the data element Child
financial and medical assistance in
paragraph (b).
• Removed a data element requiring
agencies to report the total per diem
amount of the title IV–E foster care
maintenance, adoption assistance, or
guardianship assistance payment that
the child is eligible for or received in
response to comments. Commenters
stated that reporting a child’s eligibility
for a funding source, and the amount for
which the child is eligible, when a
payment has not actually been made
creates the potential for inaccurate data.
In addition a national organization
representing state child welfare agencies
commented that reporting these data
elements outweighs its usefulness.
• Removed the requirement the title
IV–E agency report whether the child is
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
receiving the following types of services
if placed in a non-foster family home
living arrangement: Specialized
education, treatment, counseling, and
other services. Some commenters noted
that collecting this service data would
be difficult and costly, other
commenters pointed out that this
requirement is not well defined, and it
is unclear how ACF would use this data.
Section 1355.44(e)(1) Date of Living
Arrangement
In paragraph (e)(1), we require the
title IV–E agency to report the dates of
placement for each of the child’s living
arrangements for each out-of-home care
episode. We received no comments and
have retained the 2015 NPRM proposed
rule language.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Section 1355.44(e)(2) Foster Family
Home
In paragraph (e)(2), we require the
title IV–E agency to report whether each
of the child’s living arrangements is a
foster family home. We received no
comments and have made only minor
conforming changes to this paragraph.
Section 1355.44(e)(3) Foster Family
Home Type
In paragraph (e)(3), we require the
title IV–E agency to report whether each
type of foster family home, from a list
of six, applies for each foster family
home reported. These are: Licensed
home, therapeutic foster family home,
shelter care foster family home, relative
foster family home, pre-adoptive home,
or kin foster family home.
Comment: Several commenters
supported the inclusion of a response
option of ‘‘kin foster family home’’ but
were concerned that workers will be
confused about who should be included
in this category and misreport data.
Many agencies define ‘‘kin’’ to include
relatives by blood, marriage or adoption,
in addition to what is frequently
referred to as ‘‘fictive kin’’ and this
could lead to worker confusion about
when to indicate the response option
‘‘relative foster family home’’ versus
‘‘kin foster family home.’’ Thus,
commenters suggested that we revise
the definition of ‘‘kin foster family
home’’ to specifically note that the child
is not related to the foster parent(s) by
biological, legal or marital connection.
Commenters made similar comments for
the data elements Child’s relationships
to the foster parent(s) in paragraph
(e)(13) and Child’s relationship to the
adoptive parent(s) or guardian(s) in
paragraph (h)(2).
Response: We agree with the
suggestion to modify the definition of
‘‘kin foster family home’’ so it now
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
specifies that the child is not related to
the foster parent by a ‘‘biological, legal
or marital connection.’’ The revised
definition reads: ‘‘The home is one in
which there is a kin relationship as
defined by the title IV–E agency, such
as one where a psychological, cultural
or emotional relationship between the
child or the child’s family and the foster
parent(s) and there is not a legal,
biological, or marital connection
between the child and foster parent.’’
We also made a similar modification to
the definition of ‘‘kin’’ in the data
elements Child’s relationships to the
foster parent(s) in paragraph (e)(13) and
Child’s relationship to the adoptive
parent(s) or guardian(s) in paragraph
(h)(2). The remaining foster family home
type definitions are retained as
proposed in the 2015 NPRM.
Section 1355.44(e)(4) Other Living
Arrangement Type
In paragraph (e)(4), we require the
title IV–E agency to report whether a
child who is not placed in a foster
family home is placed in one of the
following thirteen living arrangements:
Group home-family-operated, group
home-staff-operated, group home-shelter
care, residential treatment center, child
care institution, child care institutionshelter care, supervised independent
living, juvenile justice facility, medical
or rehabilitative facility, psychiatric
hospital, runaway, whereabouts
unknown and placed at home. We
retained the response options as
proposed in the 2015 NPRM.
Comment: A commenter requested
definitions for each of the other living
arrangement types.
Response: Each response option for
the types of other living arrangements is
explained in detail in paragraph (e)(4) of
the regulation text. For example
‘‘residential treatment center’’ is defined
as a facility that has the purpose of
treating children with mental health or
behavioral conditions; ‘‘supervised
independent living’’ is defined as where
the child is living independently in a
supervised setting; and ‘‘medical or
rehabilitative facility’’ is defined as
where an individual receives medical or
physical health care, such as a hospital.
Comment: One commenter suggested
that title IV–E agencies have the option
of classifying a ‘‘group home-family
operated’’ as a type of foster family
home. Also, a national organization
representing state child welfare agencies
commented that ‘‘group home family
operated’’ and ‘‘group home staff
operated’’ are different across
jurisdictions and may be confusing to
agencies.
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
90551
Response: We recognize there are
variations in how agencies license and
approve group homes and will provide
technical assistance to title IV–E
agencies on a case by case basis on how
to categorize group home living
arrangements in their jurisdiction for
AFCARS reporting purposes.
Comment: One commenter asked if
medical and rehabilitative facilities
include children in a hospital for
illness. The commenter also asked if
psychiatric hospitals include acute care
(e.g., three to five days).
Response: Yes, a ‘‘medical or
rehabilitative facility’’ is one where a
child receives medical or physical
health care, and includes a hospital.
Paragraph (e) includes options for where
a child is currently placed and a time
frame is irrelevant as the title IV–E
agency must to report all living
arrangements regardless of length of
stay. We will work with title IV–E
agencies on reporting children in these
facilities as needed upon
implementation.
Section 1355.44(e)(5) Private Agency
Living Arrangement
In paragraph (e)(5), we require the
title IV–E agency to report whether each
of the child’s living arrangements is
licensed, managed, or run by a private
agency. We received no comments on
this data element and have retained the
2015 NPRM proposed rule language.
Section 1355.44(e)(6) Location of Living
Arrangement
In paragraph (e)(6), we require that
the title IV–E agency report the
jurisdiction of the child’s living
arrangement, specifically whether the
child is placed within or outside of the
reporting agency’s jurisdiction. The
agency must also indicate if the child
ran away or his or her whereabouts are
unknown. We received no comments on
this data element and have retained the
2015 NPRM proposed rule language
with minor clarifying edits.
Section 1355.44(e)(7) Jurisdiction or
Country Where Child Is Living
In paragraph (e)(7), we require the
title IV–E agency to report the name of
the state, tribal service area, Indian
reservation or country where the title
IV–E agency placed the child for each
living arrangement, for children placed
outside their jurisdiction. We received
no substantive comments on this data
element but added a sentence that IV–
E agencies must report the information
in a format according to ACF’s
specifications to conform with this
revision throughout the rule. We will
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
90552
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
work with title IV–E agencies on how to
report this information.
Section 1355.44(e)(8) Available ICWA
Foster Care and Pre-Adoptive Placement
Preferences
In paragraph (e)(8), if the state title
IV–E agency indicated ‘‘yes’’ to
paragraph (b)(4) or indicated ‘‘yes,
ICWA applies’’ to paragraph (b)(5), we
require that the state title IV–E agency
indicate which of the foster care and
pre-adoptive placements from a list of
five are willing to accept placement of
the Indian child. The five placements
options are: A member of the Indian
child’s extended family; a foster home
licensed, approved, or specified by the
Indian child’s tribe; an Indian foster
home licensed or approved by an
authorized non-Indian licensing
authority; an institution for children
approved by an Indian tribe or operated
by an Indian organization which has a
program suitable to meet the Indian
child’s needs; and a placement that
complies with the order of preference
for foster care or pre-adoptive
placements established by an Indian
child’s tribe, in accordance with 25
U.S.C. 1915(c). This is similar to
paragraph (i)(15) as proposed in the
2016 SNPRM.
Comment: The national organization
representing state child welfare agencies
suggested we eliminate the requirement
for the state to report on the availability
of foster care placements that meet
ICWA placement preferences stating
that it is not essential. One state, citing
burden, also recommended that we
eliminate this data element because
other information collected on foster
care placement preferences is more
salient. Another state sought
clarification on whether this data
element is asking a broad question about
the availability of foster care providers
or if it is child specific and suggested
simplifying the information to only
indicate with whom the child is placed
and not availability. Another suggested
revising the element to indicate all that
apply rather than asking for yes/no
responses. One tribe was concerned that
the language ‘‘were available to accept
placement’’ is subjective. They
suggested revising the language as
follows: ‘‘were pursued to accept
placement pursuant to subsection
13(xi).’’
Response: We were not persuaded to
remove the data element indicating the
availability of foster care placements
that meet ICWA’s preferences nor make
any of the other recommended changes
in the final rule. No tribes, national
tribal organization, or national child
welfare organizations suggested
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
removing or modifying data elements
related to the availability of homes that
meet ICWA foster or pre-adoptive
placement preferences. However, we
modified the term ‘available’ to ‘willing’
to be consistent with the adoption
placement preference data element at
paragraph (h), although we presume that
any home that meets ICWA placement
preferences that is willing to foster the
Indian child is also available, and that
a home that meets ICWA placement
preferences but is unwilling to foster the
Indian child is unavailable. The option
to use terminology ‘‘check all that
apply’’ versus responding with ‘‘yes’’ or
‘‘no’’ is an implementation issue that
does not require a regulation change and
we will provide technical assistance on
this as needed.
The availability of foster care
placements that meet ICWA’s
preferences is critical for meeting the
purposes of ICWA. This information is
essential for ACF to determine whether
resources are needed for recruitment to
increase the availability of AI/AN
homes that can meet ICWA’s placement
preferences. Under the BIA’s regulations
at 25 CFR 23.132, whether a home is
available is not a subjective state title
IV–E agency determination. Rather it is
evidence offered by the state title IV–E
agency to the court that there is good
cause to deviate from ICWA’s placement
preferences in a particular case where
there is also evidence that the state title
IV–E agency conducted a diligent search
to identify a placement that meets the
preferences (25 CFR 23.132).
Comment: One state commented that
at the time of placement, the agency
does not exhaust all possible relative
placements for any child, so they are
unclear which relatives ACF expects to
be included, noting that their
information system would have to be
modified to include placement
preference elements.
Response: We’d like to clarify the data
element, as it does not require the state
to report whether they exhausted all
relative placements. The state is to
indicate ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no’’ whether there
was a member of the Indian child’s
extended family willing to provide a
foster care or pre-adoptive placement.
Such a member would meet the
placement preferences of ICWA in 25
U.S.C. 1915(b).
Section 1355.44(e)(9) Foster Care and
Pre-Adoptive Placement Preferences
Under ICWA
In paragraph (e)(9) if the state title IV–
E agency indicated ‘‘yes’’ to paragraph
(b)(4) or indicated ‘‘yes, ICWA applies’’
to paragraph (b)(5), we require that the
state title IV–E agency indicate whether
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
each of the Indian child’s placements
(indicated in paragraph (e)(1)) meets the
placement preferences of ICWA at 25
U.S.C. 1915(b) by indicating with whom
the Indian child is placed from a list of
six response options. This is similar to
paragraph (i)(16) as proposed in the
2016 SNPRM, except that we changed
the response option of ‘‘none’’ to
‘‘placement does not meet ICWA
placement preferences.’’
Comment: The national organization
representing state child welfare agencies
suggested we reduce the data elements
by asking only whether the child was
placed in compliance with the
placement preferences and if no,
whether a court make a finding of good
cause to deviate from the placement
preferences.
Response: We did not make any
changes in response to the comment to
only require reporting on whether or not
the child is in a foster care or preadoptive placement that meets the
ICWA placement preferences. We seek
information on the specific placement
because the requirements around
placement preferences in ICWA are a
key piece of the protections mandated
by ICWA. Placement preferences serve
to protect the best interests of Indian
children and promote the stability and
security of families and Indian tribes by
keeping Indian children with their
extended families or in Indian foster
homes and communities. Factors unique
to Indian children, including the
availability of American Indian foster
homes, influence decisions about the
placement of Indian children.
Comment: One state recommended
that we add a response option for
‘‘group home approved or operated by
Indian tribe/organization.’’
Response: We considered this
suggestion but decline to make a change
because our response options reflect the
foster care placement preference
language in ICWA at 25 U.S.C. 1915(b).
Comment: A tribe suggested including
if the tribe agreed with the application
of the placement preferences.
Response: We are not making a
change as a result of this comment. If
the tribe has established by resolution a
different order of preference than that
specified in ICWA, the tribe’s placement
preferences apply subject to
requirements of 25 U.S.C. 1915(c) and
25 CFR 23.131 and these placements are
captured in AFCARS.
Comment: Several organizations
suggested that we clarify whether the
placements were tribally licensed or
approved homes or another Indian
family guardian home approved by the
state.
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Response: We considered this
suggestion but decline to make
additional changes because our
response options reflect the foster care
placement preference language in ICWA
in 25 U.S.C. 1915(b).
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Section 1355.44(e)(10) Good Cause
Under ICWA
In paragraph (e)(10), if a state title IV–
E agency indicated ‘‘yes’’ to paragraph
(b)(4) or indicated ‘‘yes, ICWA applies’’
to paragraph (b)(5), and the state title
IV–E agency indicated ‘‘placement does
not meet ICWA placement preferences’’
in paragraph (e)(9), we require the state
title IV–E agency to indicate whether
the court determined by clear and
convincing evidence, on the record or in
writing, a good cause to depart from the
ICWA placement preferences (25 U.S.C.
1915(b)), or the Indian child’s tribe, if
the placement preferences for foster care
and pre-adoptive placements were not
followed. This is similar to paragraph
(i)(17) as proposed in the 2016 SNPRM,
except that we updated the language
consistent with 25 CFR 23.132.
Comment: The national organization
representing state child welfare agencies
suggested that we remove the language
‘‘as indicated on court order’’ from this
data element because it could be
interpreted in different ways and may
not accurately reflect the court orders
finding of good cause.
Response: We modified the regulation
text so that the final rule does not
include a requirement for the state to
report only if the court order included
the good cause determination. This is
consistent with the BIA’s regulations at
25 CFR 23.132(c). The data element as
revised requires states to indicate
whether the court determined by clear
and convincing evidence on the record
or in writing, a good cause to depart
from the ICWA placement preferences
under 25 U.S.C. 1915(a) or to depart
from the placement preferences of the
Indian child’s tribe under 25 U.S.C.
1915(c). This provides states with
multiple options for obtaining the
information.
Section 1355.44(e)(11) Basis for Good
Cause
In paragraph (e)(11), if a state title IV–
E agency indicated ‘‘yes’’ to paragraph
(b)(4) or indicated ‘‘yes, ICWA applies’’
to paragraph (b)(5), and the state title
IV–E agency indicated ‘‘yes’’ to
paragraph (e)(10), we require that the
state title IV–E agency indicate the state
court’s basis for the determination of
good cause to depart from the ICWA
placement preferences from a list of five
response options. This is similar to
paragraph (i)(18) as proposed in the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
2016 SNPRM except that we updated
the language consistent with 25 CFR
23.132.
Comment: A tribe stated that they are
not clear what the response option of
‘‘other’’ indicates and recommended
that we clarify the response option. One
state recommended adding a list of
‘‘extraordinary physical or emotional
needs of the Indian child’’ to the good
cause reasons.
Response: We removed the ‘‘other’’
option and modified the list of reasons
for the state court’s basis for the
determination of good cause to depart
from ICWA placement preferences in
ICWA to be consistent with 23.132(c) of
the BIA regulations. The final regulation
no longer includes the response option
of ‘‘other.’’
Section 1355.44(e)(12) Marital Status of
the Foster Parent(s)
In paragraph (e)(12), we require the
title IV–E agency to report information
regarding the marital status of the each
of the foster parent(s) where the child is
placed. While we received no comments
on this data element, we revised the
final rule to be consistent with reporting
the marital status of adoptive parents
and legal guardians in paragraph (h). As
we also explain in paragraph (h), several
commenters recommended that we
revise the marital status response
options. As such, the response options
will be as follows: Married couple,
unmarried couple, separated, and single
adult. We replaced the response options
of ‘‘single male’’ and ‘‘single female’’
with ‘‘single adult.’’
Section 1355.44(e)(13) Child’s
Relationships to the Foster Parent(s)
In paragraph (e)(13), we require the
title IV–E agency to report the type of
relationship between the child and the
foster parent(s) for each foster family
home in which the child is placed, from
one of seven options: Paternal
grandparent(s), maternal grandparent(s),
other parental relative(s), other maternal
relative(s), non-relative(s), kin, or
sibling(s).
Comment: One commenter suggested
that we modify the term ‘‘kin’’ when
describing the relationship between the
child and foster parent to make clear
that the child is not related to the foster
parent(s) by biological, legal or marital
connection. Commenters made similar
comments for the data elements Foster
family home type in paragraph (e)(3)
and Child’s relationship to the adoptive
parent(s) or guardian(s) in paragraph
(h)(2).
Response: We appreciate the
suggestion and modified the term ‘‘kin’’
to indicate that there is not a legal,
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
90553
biological, or marital connection
between the child and foster parent. We
also made a similar modification to the
definition of ‘‘kin’’ in the data elements
Foster family home type in paragraph
(e)(3) and Child’s relationship to the
adoptive parent(s) or guardian(s) in
paragraph (h)(2).
Comment: One commenter suggested
that we add aunt and uncle as response
options for the child’s relationship to
the foster parents.
Response: If a child is placed with an
aunt or uncle, the level of information
we are seeking is whether it was a
maternal or paternal relative, and are
not seeking more detailed information
than that. We did not make changes in
response to the suggestion.
Section 1355.44(e)(14) and (e)(20) Year
of Birth for Foster Parent(s)
In paragraphs (e)(14) and (e)(20), we
require the title IV–E agency to report
the year of birth of each of the child’s
foster parent(s). We received no
comments on this data element and
have retained the language as proposed
in the 2015 NPRM.
Section 1355.44(e)(15) and (e)(21) Foster
Parent(s) Tribal Membership
In paragraphs (e)(15) and (e)(21), we
require the title IV–E agency to report
whether the foster parent(s) is a member
of an Indian tribe. These are new data
elements not previously proposed in the
2015 NPRM or 2016 SNPRM.
Additionally, we are collecting the same
information in paragraph (h) regarding
adoptive parents and legal guardians. It
was clear as we analyzed the comments
to the 2016 SNPRM that including data
elements that inquire about the tribal
membership of the foster parent(s) is
information that is in line with our goals
to expand the information we collect on
foster care providers for children in outof-home care. We believe that this
information will provide more insight
on meeting the requirements in ICWA
on foster care placement preferences
and will inform recruitment of foster
care providers that meet the needs of
AI/AN children in out-of-home care.
Section 1355.44(e)(16) and (e)(22) Race
of Foster Parent(s)
In paragraphs (e)(16)(i) through
(e)(16)(vii) and (e)(22)(i) through
(e)(22)(vii), we require the title IV–E
agency to report the race of each of the
foster parent(s) which the child has
been placed.
Comment: Organizations representing
tribal interests recommended we
include whether: (1) The foster parent
have origins in any of the original
peoples of North and South America; (2)
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
90554
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
whether the foster parent is a member
of a federally recognized Indian tribe
and; if so, (3) the name of the tribe.
Response: The response options are
consistent with the OMB Revised
Standards for the Classification of
Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity, and
therefore, we are unable to make a
change. These definitions can be found
at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/
inforeg/re_guidance2000update.pdf.
While we did not revise this data
element, at section 1355.44(e)(16) and
(e)(22) we require the state title IV–E
agency report whether the foster
parent(s) is a member of an Indian tribe
in paragraphs (e)(15) and (e)(21).
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Section 1355.44(e)(17) and (e)(23)
Hispanic or Latino Ethnicity for Foster
Parent(s)
In paragraphs (e)(17) and (e)(23), we
require the title IV–E agency to report
the Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of the
foster parent(s), if applicable. We
received no comments on this data
element.
Section 1355.44(e)(18) and (e)(24)
Gender of Foster Parent(s) and (e)(19)
and (e)(25) Foster Parent(s) Sexual
Orientation
In paragraphs (e)(18) and (e)(24), we
added a requirement for the title IV–E
agency to indicate whether each foster
parent self identifies as ‘‘male’’ or
‘‘female.’’
In paragraph (e)(19) and (e)(25), we
added a requirement that the title IV–E
agency report whether the foster
parent(s) self identifies as ‘‘straight or
heterosexual,’’ ‘‘gay or lesbian,’’
‘‘bisexual,’’ ‘‘don’t know,’’ ‘‘something
else,’’ or ‘‘declined’’ if the second foster
parent declined to identify his/her
status.
Comment: While we requested input
in the 2015 NPRM on whether to require
title IV–E agencies to collect LGBTQrelated data in AFCARS on children, we
received comments about collecting
sexual orientation data on foster and
adoptive parents from state title IV–E
agencies, national advocacy/public
interest groups and other organizations.
Those that supported collecting data on
the foster parents’ sexual orientation
were primarily advocacy organizations
representing LGBTQ interests and
generally noted that the LGBTQ
community remains an untapped
resource for finding permanent families
for children and youth in foster care.
They stated that some of these
prospective parents face barriers when
they attempt to foster or adopt because
they identify as LGBTQ. They further
commented that including this
information in AFCARS will promote
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
routine discussions between prospective
foster parents and title IV–E agencies,
normalize conversations around sexual
orientation, and signal increased
acceptance of LGBTQ caretakers. State
title IV–E agencies expressed some of
the same concerns with collecting
sexual orientation data on foster parents
as they did for children in foster care:
Privacy concerns and implications of
having this information in a government
record; concerns that the data may be
used in a discriminatory way; and they
expressed the importance of proper staff
training for data elements on sexual
orientation.
Response: We were persuaded by the
commenters who suggested data
elements in AFCARS on a foster
parent’s sexual orientation and require
agencies to report when a foster parent
self identifies as ‘‘straight or
heterosexual,’’ ‘‘gay or lesbian,’’
‘‘bisexual,’’ ‘‘don’t know,’’ ‘‘something
else,’’ or ‘‘declined.’’ We anticipate that
these data elements will assist title IV–
E agencies in recruiting, training, and
retaining an increased pool of foster care
providers who can meet the needs of
children in foster care. We specifically
added a decline response option to
respond to the privacy issues raised by
commenters. Information on sexual
orientation should be obtained and
maintained in a manner that reflects
respectful treatment, sensitivity, and
confidentiality. Several state and county
agencies, advocacy organizations and
human rights organizations have
developed guidance and recommended
practices for how to promote these
conditions in serving LGBTQ youth in
adoption, foster care and out-of-home
placement settings. ACF provides state
and tribal resources for Working With
LGBTQ Youth and Families at the Child
Welfare Information Gateway. The
following links are provided as general
examples of such guidance (Minnesota
and California examples). ACF will
provide technical assistance to agencies
on collecting this information.
Additionally, for the same reasons, we
made corresponding changes in
paragraph (h) related to the adoptive
parent or legal guardian. We also made
a minor change in reporting the foster
parent’s gender, in that we require the
title IV–E agency to indicate whether
each foster parent self identifies as
‘‘male’’ or ‘‘female’’ and made the same
change for the adoptive parent or legal
guardian.
Section 1355.44(f) Permanency Planning
In paragraph (f), we require that the
title IV–E agency report information
related to permanency planning for
children in foster care. We made several
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
revisions to this section from the 2015
NPRM to remove some proposed data
elements that we describe below:
• We removed the requirement for
agencies to report concurrent planning
information based on the comments
from a national organization
representing state child welfare agencies
and several states. They suggested that
this information is better captured at the
case level and noted that since that
concurrent planning is an optional
practice that not all title IV–E agencies
use, the information would not be
useful at a national level.
• We removed the requirement for
agencies to report the reason(s) for
permanency plan changes based on
comments from a national organization
representing state child welfare agencies
and many state title IV–E agencies
stating that the data element is too
subjective, the response options are
overly broad, the data element will not
capture plans that change more than
once during a report period, and the
data is too qualitative for AFCARS and
better analyzed at the case level. The
commenters also said that reporting this
information would be burdensome and
training workers and monitoring data
quality would be challenging.
• We removed the requirement for
agencies to report the purpose of each
in person, face-to-face visit based on
comments that this data element is not
well defined, and that many visits
involve multiple purposes and will not
be well distinguished.
• We removed the requirement for
agencies to report whether the
caseworker visited with the child alone.
Several commenters were in support of
this data element, however, the
statutory requirement is for agencies to
report whether a face-to-face visit has
occurred within the calendar month and
whether it occurred in the child’s
residence. In addition, commenters
indicated that collecting information on
if a worker visits alone would be time
consuming and it is not always
appropriate for the caseworker to visit
the child alone.
• We removed the requirement that
agencies indicate whether the contents
of the transition plan apply based on
comments that while the existence of
the plan and its timing is knowable,
reporting the provisions contained in
the transition plan is unnecessary
because the quality and relevance of a
transition plan cannot be determined
quantitatively.
Section 1355.44(f)(1) and (2)
Permanency Plan and Date
In paragraph (f)(1), we require that the
title IV–E agency report each
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
permanency plan for the child and in
(f)(2) the date each plan(s) was
established during each out-of-home
care episode. There are six options:
Reunify with parent(s) or legal
guardian(s), live with other relatives,
adoption, guardianship, and another
planned permanent living arrangement.
Comment: Two states sought
clarification on how these elements
apply to children who have runaway
and whether the response options
should be consistent with CFSR.
Response: We require the permanency
plan response options to be consistent
with the law at section 475(5)(C) of the
Act. The permanency plan options in
the CFSR are broader and encompasses
the discrete response options from
AFCARS because AFCARS applies to all
youth in the out-of-home care reporting
population, which includes children for
whom the title IV–E agency has
placement and care responsibility but
who have runaway or whose
whereabouts are unknown at the time
that the title IV–E agency receives
placement and care responsibility for
the child.
Comment: Other commenters,
including national advocacy/public
interest groups and a private citizen,
offered several suggestions, including:
Adding data that addresses whether the
child was consulted or participated in
developing the permanency plan; about
the visitation and services the agency
provided during visits for children with
a permanency plan of reunification; and
adding a permanency plan response
option for ‘‘waiting for adoption.’’ One
commenter questioned the usefulness of
this data at a federal level.
Response: We reviewed these
suggestions, however we did not make
changes in response to the commenter’s
suggestions This level of detail and
specific case level information go
beyond designating a child’s
permanency plan and are not needed at
the federal level to meet the
requirements of section 479(c)(3) of the
Act. Additionally, we currently collect
the child’s most recent case plan goal in
AFCARS.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Section 1355.44(f)(3) and (4) Periodic
Review and Permanency Hearing Dates
In paragraphs (f)(3) and (4), the title
IV–E agency must report the date of
each periodic review and the date of
each permanency hearing (per section
475(5)(C) of the Act). We did not receive
substantive comments on these data
elements and have retained them as
proposed in the 2015 NPRM.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
Section 1355.44(f)(5) Juvenile Justice
In paragraph (f)(5), we require the title
IV–E agency to report whether a
juvenile judge or court found the child
to be a status offender or adjudicated
delinquent during the report period.
Comment: Four states expressed
concerns with our proposal for agencies
to report specifically whether the court
identified the child to be an
‘‘adjudicated delinquent’’ or a ‘‘status
offender.’’ They cited concerns about
training workers to ensure data quality
and difficulty in distinguishing the
proposed response option ‘‘adjudicated
delinquent’’ from ‘‘status offender.’’ One
organization representing state child
welfare agencies suggested that agencies
simply report whether or not the court
found a child to be either a status
offender or an adjudicated delinquent
because distinguishing between the two
is not necessary and will vary by and
within jurisdictions.
Response: We were persuaded by the
commenters who said we did not need
to distinguish the specific type of
juvenile justice involvement for each
child. As such, we revised the data
element to require title IV–E agencies to
report yes/no whether or not a court
found the child to be a status offender
or adjudicated delinquent, no longer
requiring the agency to distinguish
between the two.
Section 1355.44(f)(6) and (7) Caseworker
Visit Dates and Location
In paragraphs (f)(6) and (f)(7), we
require the title IV–E agency to report
information on visits between the
child’s caseworker and the child. In
paragraph (f)(6), we require the title IV–
E agency to report the date of each inperson, face-to-face visit between the
caseworker and the child. In paragraph
(f)(7), we require the title IV–E agency
to report the location of each in-person
visit between the caseworker and the
child.
Comment: A state asked if this data
element pertains to visits during the
reporting period, the removal episode,
or the child’s lifetime involvement with
child welfare services.
Response: We’d like to clarify that the
title IV–E agency must collect and
report the date and other required
information for each in-person, face-toface caseworker visit during each six
month report period. Therefore, if the
worker visits the child in-person, faceto-face each month during the six month
report period, the agency will report the
six dates and locations of the visits.
Comment: One commenter questioned
why we require the agency to report
caseworker visit information for every
case worker visit to a child.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
90555
Response: We require agencies to
collect and report the date and location
of each in-person, face-to-face
caseworker visit to meet the
requirements in section 424(f) of the
Act, which requires that 90 percent of
children in foster care are visited on a
monthly basis by their workers, and that
the majority of the visits occur in the
residence of the child.
Comment: Several commenters
recommended that we require agencies
to also report: What went on during the
caseworker visit; the types of services
provided by the caseworker during the
visit; and whether coaching or mental
health treatment was provided during
the visit. One commenter suggested that
we also collect information on a child’s
visits with biological parents.
Response: We are retaining the
requirements for the title IV–E agency to
report the date and location of each inperson, face-to-face caseworker visits to
meet the statutory requirements in
section 424(f) of the Act. Therefore, we
did not make any additional changes to
include the suggested information as we
do not have a specific use for it and will
not require the agency to collect
information not required by the law.
Section 1355.44(f)(8) and (f)(9)
Transition Plans
In paragraph (f)(8), we require the title
IV–E agency to report whether the child
has a transition plan that meets the
requirements of section 475(5)(H) of the
Act. If the child has a transition plan,
the title IV–E agency must report the
plan date in paragraph (f)(9).
Comment: A national organization
representing state child welfare agencies
and states objected to reporting the
content of the transition plan. They
indicated that while the existence of the
plan and its timing is knowable,
reporting the provisions contained in
the transition plan is unnecessary
because the quality and relevance of a
transition plan cannot be determined
quantitatively. Other national advocacy/
public interest groups supported
collecting data we proposed on
transition plans.
Response: We were persuaded by the
comments and removed the data
element.
Commenters: One state asked whether
agencies must report transition plans
that are developed before the 90-day
period before the youth turns age 18 (or
greater age).
Response: Yes, agencies must report a
transition plan developed before the 90day period. We amended the regulation
text to make it clear that agencies
should report all plans developed in
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
90556
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
response to the statute, even if it is
before the 90 day period.
Commenters: An organization
representing tribal interests suggested
that we collect information about
whether Indian children have
information on and access to tribal
specific resources and services for youth
and young adults.
Response: While there is not
requirement for transition plans to be
this detailed, agencies should be
responsive to the individualized needs
of a specific Indian child.
Section 1355.44(f)(10) Active Efforts
In paragraph (f)(10), if a state title IV–
E agency indicated ‘‘yes’’ to paragraph
(b)(4) or indicated ‘‘yes, ICWA applies’’
to paragraph (b)(5), we require the state
title IV–E agency to indicate whether
the active efforts in each paragraph
(f)(10)(i) through (f)(10)(xiii) ‘‘applies’’
or ‘‘does not apply.’’ The state title IV–
E agency must indicate all of the active
efforts that apply once the child enters
the AFCARS out-of-home care reporting
population per section 1355.42(a)
through the child’s exit per paragraph
(g)(1) of this section and the active
efforts made to prevent removal prior to
the child entering the out-of-home care
reporting population. This is similar to
paragraph (i)(13) as proposed in the
2016 SNPRM, however, we updated the
language consistent with BIA’s
regulation at 25 CFR 23.2.
Comment: Many commenters
suggested that the response options be
updated consistent with BIA’s
Guidelines and BIA’s regulations at 25
CFR 23.2 and several commenters
suggested allowing state title IV–E
agencies to incorporate active efforts as
defined under state law.
Response: We agree and revised the
final rule to be consistent with the BIA
regulations at 25 CFR 23.2, which
contains the regulatory definition of
active efforts. Section 1355.41(c)
specifies that terms in ICWA for
specified data elements mean the same
as in ICWA at 25 U.S.C. 1903 and 25
CFR 23.2. As such, the state title IV–E
agency must report if any of the active
efforts listed in paragraphs (f)(10)(i)
through (f)(10)(xiii) were provided prior
to and during the child’s stay in out-ofhome care. The state title IV–E agency
may report active efforts as defined
under state law under the response
option of ‘‘other active efforts tailored to
the facts and circumstances of the case’’,
as appropriate.
Comment: Tribes and organizations
representing tribal interests commented
that data on active efforts is important
to report to AFCARS because it impacts
the individual child’s case and is a key
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
protection provided in ICWA. However,
several commenters and the national
organization representing state child
welfare agencies do not support
requiring the state title IV–E agency to
report information on active efforts as it
was proposed in the 2016 SNPRM. They
recommended removing the data
element because state title IV–E
agencies already mirror the best
practices that strengthen and ensure the
safety of families by limiting the need to
remove children from their homes and
separating from parents, guardians or
caregivers for early outreach and
engagement to provide support and
services for families before a removal is
warranted. Several commenters believe
that collecting information on the
specific active efforts that were
provided is more appropriate for a case
review than for AFCARS data collection
because these responses do not get to
the quality of those efforts. Several
commenters expressed concerns with
the functionality of this data element for
national reporting. One commenter
expressed an issue with an absence of
court orders expressly describing the
active efforts and therefore state title IV–
E agencies will not be able to accurately
report this information.
Response: We are not persuaded by
these comments to revise the final rule
because the ‘‘active efforts’’ requirement
is a vital part of ICWA’s requirements.
The preamble to the BIA’s final
regulation at 25 CFR 23.2 details at
length the reasons for and benefits of
active efforts including that ICWA’s
active efforts requirement continues to
provide a critical protection against the
removal and TPR of an Indian child
from a fit and loving parent by ensuring
that parents who are or may readily
become fit parents are provided with
service necessary to retain or regain
custody of their child. Data about the
frequency with which each active effort
type is made will help develop policy,
resources, and technical assistance to
support states to employ a range of
efforts that can meet the needs of Indian
children in out-of-home care. Lastly, we
revised the data element language to
reflect BIA’s regulation at 23.2 and
23.120(a).
Comment: One commenter requested
clarification on whether the response
options are based on the court
identifying that the state title IV–E
agency did one or more of the active
efforts listed or whether it is the state
title IV–E agency making a
determination as to which active efforts
were made.
Response: The state must report the
active efforts which the state title IV–E
agency made throughout the child’s stay
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
in out-of-home care, which may or may
not be documented in a court order.
Comment: Commenters requested
clarification on the terminology used in
the active efforts examples, such as
what ACF considers to be part of an
‘‘extended family,’’ how ACF defines
the ‘‘most natural setting safely
possible,’’ and how ‘‘regular visits’’ and
‘‘trial home visits’’ differs from regular
caseworker contacts.
Response: The list of active efforts in
paragraphs (f)(10)(i) through (f)(10)(xiii)
are examples of active efforts drawn
from BIA’s definition of ‘‘active efforts’’
in 25 CFR 23.2. The BIA does not define
the terms used in the examples and
therefore, we will not define the
terminology further. Consistent with
BIA’s regulation at 25 CFR 23.2, to the
extent possible, active efforts should be
provided in a manner consistent with
the prevailing social and cultural
conditions of the Indian child’s tribe,
and in partnership with the child,
parents, extended family, and tribe.
Comment: A commenter
recommended adding data elements to
capture whether the state title IV–E
agency conducted or caused to be
conducted a diligent search for the
Indian child’s extended family members
for assistance and possible placement,
and if no extended family members are
identified, whether the state title IV–E
agency conducted a diligent search for
other ICWA-compliant placement
options.
Response: We did not make changes
to the response options based on this
comment because we wanted to be
consistent with the BIA’s regulation and
examples of ‘‘active efforts’’ in 25 CFR
23.2. However, we added ‘‘extended
family’’ to paragraph (f)(10)(v) to match
the addition of this in paragraph (b).
Comment: One commenter suggested
that if siblings are not kept together, that
the state title IV–E agency must report
why the siblings were separated. The
commenter stated that collecting this
information would strengthen the data
and create new opportunities to address
the needs of Indian children in out-ofhome care. Two commenters suggest
that because we proposed in the 2015
NPRM data elements related to siblings
for all children in the out-of-home care
reporting population, this data element
should be removed. The commenter
stated that keeping siblings together
captures a goal that agencies attempt to
achieve for all families.
Response: Although information
about siblings is collected elsewhere in
the final rule for all children in the outof-home care reporting population, we
did not make changes to the response
options in paragraph (f)(10) based on
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
this comment because this data element
is consistent with BIA’s regulation at 25
CFR 23.2.
In the 2016 SNPRM, we proposed that
title IV–E agencies report the date active
efforts began in paragraph (i)(11),
however after reviewing the comments
we removed this proposed data element.
Comment: The national organization
representing state child welfare agencies
recommended that ACF remove this
data element because state agencies
follow practice standards for early
outreach and engagement to provide
support and services for families before
a removal is warranted. In addition, the
organization recommended overall that
we remove data elements that may be
unreliable, potentially invalid, and that
place unnecessary burdens. We also
received a state comment requesting
clarification and another state noted
they did not currently collect this
information.
Response: We agree with the
suggestion to remove the date active
efforts began and revised the final rule
accordingly. The BIA’s regulation at
23.107 specifies that ICWA applies
when it is known or there is reason to
know a child is an Indian child as
defined in ICWA and that treatment as
an Indian child continues until it is
determined on the court record that the
child does not meet the definition of an
Indian child in ICWA.
Section 1355.44(g) General Exit
Information
In paragraph (g), we require that the
title IV–E agency must report when and
why a child exits the out-of-home care
reporting population.
Section 1355.44(g)(1) Date of Exit
In paragraph (g)(1), we require the
title IV–E agency to report the date for
each of the child’s exits from out-ofhome care, if applicable. We did not
receive relevant comments on this data
element and retained the 2015 NPRM
proposed rule language.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Section 1355.44(g)(2) Exit Transaction
Date
In paragraph (g)(2), we require the
title IV–E agency to report the
transaction date for each exit date
reported in paragraph (g)(1). The
transaction date is a non-modifiable,
computer-generated date which
accurately indicates the month, day and
year each response to paragraph (g)(1)
was entered into the information
system. We did not receive relevant
comments on this data element and
have retained the 2015 NPRM proposed
rule language.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
Section 1355.44(g)(3) and (4) Exit
Reason and Transfer to Another Agency
In paragraphs (g)(3) and (4), we
require the title IV–E agency to report
the reason for each of the child’s exit(s)
from out-of-home care, and if the exit
reason is ‘‘transfer to another agency,’’
the agency type.
Comment: We received several
suggestions to modify the exit reason
response options to: Identify the manner
of a child’s death; change how a child
who exits foster care for jail or prison
is reported; add exit reasons to identify
when a youth becomes ineligible for
extended foster care; and when a youth
voluntarily leaves extended foster care.
A few states disagreed with some of our
proposed response options for exit
reason.
Response: We made a minor change to
remove the response option ‘‘other’’
proposed in the 2015 NPRM because
based on our experience, we believe that
the response options adequately reflect
the reasons why children exit out-ofhome care and we do not need a
response option of ‘‘other.’’ We do not
need to revise or add other reasons
because these exit reasons are designed
to capture information about when and
where a child exits out-of-home care,
and are not intended to identify other
specifics about the child’s exit.
Comment: For the response option
‘‘transfer to another agency’’ in
paragraph (g)(3), a commenter asked for
clarification about the phrase ‘‘but not if
the transfer is to a public agency, Indian
Tribe, Tribal organization or consortium
that has an agreement with a title IV–E
agency under section 472(a)(2)(B) of the
Act.’’
Response: We recognized that this
language as proposed in the 2015 NPRM
can be confusing because of variation in
title IV–E agency policies and
procedures for transfers and title IV–E
agreements. Therefore, we revised the
response option ‘‘transfer to another
agency’’ in the regulation to be less
specific than we proposed in the 2015
NPRM to read as follows: Indicate
‘‘transfer to another agency’’ if
placement and care responsibility for
the child was transferred to another
agency, either within or outside of the
reporting state or tribal service area.
This revision will permit ACF to
provide targeted technical assistance for
case specific circumstances.
Section 1355.44(h) Exit to Adoption and
Guardianship Information
In paragraph (h), we require that the
title IV–E agency report information on
the child’s exit from out-of-home care to
a finalized adoption or legal
guardianship.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
90557
Comment: Several national advocacy/
public interest groups recommended
that we add the following elements:
‘‘sex assigned at birth of adoptive
parent(s) or legal guardian(s),’’ ‘‘gender
identity of adoptive parent(s) or legal
guardian(s),’’ ‘‘sex of adoptive parents/
legal guardians,’’ and ‘‘sexual
orientation of adoptive parent(s) or legal
guardian(s).’’
Response: In response to these
suggestions, we removed the response
options ‘‘single female’’ and ‘‘single
male’’ and replaced them with ‘‘single
adult.’’ We added new data elements on
the gender of the adoptive parent(s) or
legal guardian(s) with the other
demographic information on adoptive
parents and legal guardians. This will
provide the gender of each adoptive
parent or legal guardian separately from
their marital status. The new data
elements are in paragraphs (h)(7) for the
first adoptive parent or legal guardian
and (h)(13) for the second adoptive
parent or legal guardian. These revisions
are similar to revisions we made in
response to comments regarding foster
parent demographic information in
paragraph (e).
Section 1355.44(h)(1) Marital Status of
the Adoptive Parent(s) or Guardian(s)
In paragraph 1355.43(h)(1), the title
IV–E agency must report the marital
status of the adoptive parent(s) or legal
guardian(s).
Comment: We received several
recommendations to revise the marital
status response options, as well as a
recommendation to remove this data
element stating that there is no need for
this level of detail at the national level.
The commenters recommended
revisions to the marital status response
options here and the foster parent
marital status response options in
paragraph (e) or to include other
response options, such as ‘‘separated’’
and ‘‘married, but adopting
individually.’’
Response: We examined the
suggestions and modified the marital
status response options. We added the
response options of ‘‘separated’’ and
‘‘married, but adopting or obtaining
legal guardianship individually.’’ Since
we added the response option ‘‘married,
but adopting or obtaining legal
guardianship individually,’’ we no
longer need, and removed for the final
rule, the instruction we included in the
2015 NPRM that instructed title IV–E
agencies to ‘‘complete this data element
even if only one person of the married
or common law married couple is the
adoptive parent or legal guardian of the
child.’’
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
90558
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Section 1355.44(h)(2) Child’s
Relationship to the Adoptive Parent(s)
or Guardian(s)
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
In paragraph (h)(2), we require the
title IV–E agency to report the
relationship(s) between the child and
his or her adoptive parent(s) or legal
guardian(s) from eight options: Paternal
grandparent(s), maternal grandparent(s),
other paternal relative(s), other maternal
relative(s), sibling(s), kin, nonrelative(s), and foster parent(s).
Comment: Several commenters
supported the inclusion of ‘‘kin’’ as a
response option for this data element,
but asked for clarification on the
definition. Another commenter
suggested that we not include ‘‘kin’’ as
an option because it is confusing,
overlaps with ‘‘non-relative’’ and is a
colloquial term with varied meanings.
Commenters stated that many agencies
define ‘‘kin’’ to include relatives by
blood, marriage or adoption, in addition
to what is frequently referred to as
‘‘fictive kin’’ and this could lead to
worker confusion about when to
indicate the response option ‘‘kin’’ verse
the other response options for relatives.
Commenters made similar comments for
the data elements Foster family home
type in paragraph (e)(3) and Child’s
relationships to the foster parent(s) in
paragraph (e)(13).
Response: We agree with the
suggestion to modify the definition of
‘‘kin’’ so it now specifies that the child
is not related to the adoptive parent or
legal guardian by a ‘‘biological, legal or
marital connection.’’ The revised
definition reads: ‘‘The adoptive
parent(s) or legal guardian(s) has a kin
relationship with the child, as defined
by the title IV–E agency, such as one
where there is a psychological, cultural
or emotional relationship between the
child or the child’s family and the
adoptive parent(s) or legal guardian(s)
and there is not a legal, biological, or
marital connection between the child
and foster parent.’’ We also made a
similar modification to the definition of
‘‘kin foster family home’’ in the data
element Foster family home type in
paragraph (e)(3) and Child’s
relationships to the foster parent(s) in
paragraph (e)(13).
Section 1355.44(h)(3) and (h)(9) Date of
Birth of Adoptive Parent(s) or
Guardian(s)
In paragraphs (h)(3) and (h)(9), we
require the title IV–E agency to report
each adoptive parent or legal guardian’s
birthdate. We received no comments on
these data elements and have retained
the language as proposed in the 2015
NPRM.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
Section 1355.44(h)(4) and (h)(10)
Adoptive Parent(s) Tribal Membership
In paragraphs (h)(4) and (h)(10), we
require the title IV–E agency to report
whether the adoptive parent(s) or legal
guardian is a member of an Indian tribe.
These are data elements not previously
proposed in the 2015 NPRM or 2016
SNPRM. Additionally, we are collecting
the same information in paragraph (e)
regarding foster parents. It was clear as
we analyzed the comments to the 2016
SNPRM that including data elements
that inquire about the tribal membership
of the adoptive parent(s) or legal
guardian is information that is in line
with our goals to expand the
information we collect on adoptive
parents and guardians of children who
exit out-of-home care to adoption or
legal guardianship. We believe that this
information will provide more insight
on meeting the requirements to meet
placement preferences under ICWA and
will inform recruitment of providers
that meet the needs of AI/AN children
who exit out-of-home care to adoption
or legal guardianship.
Section 1355.44(h)(5) and (h)(11) Race
of Adoptive Parent(s) or Guardian(s)
In paragraphs (h)(5)(i) through
(h)(5)(vii) and (h)(11)(i) through
(h)(11)(vii), we require the title IV–E
agency to report the race of each
adoptive parent or legal guardian.
Comment: Groups representing tribal
interests recommended that we include
whether the adoptive parent/legal
guardian has origins in any of the
original peoples of North and South
America and if so whether the adoptive
or guardian parent a member of a
federally recognized Indian tribe and
the name of the tribe, and if the child
maintains tribal affiliation and
community attachment.
Response: The response options for
race are consistent with the OMB
Revised Standards for the Classification
of Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity,
and therefore, we are unable to make a
change. These definitions can be found
at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/
inforeg/re_guidance2000update.pdf.
While we did not revise this data
element, we require at paragraphs
1355.44(h)(4) and (h)(10) that title IV–E
agencies report whether the adoptive
parent(s) or legal guardian is a member
of an Indian tribe in paragraphs (h)(4)
and (h)(10).
Section 1355.44(h)(6) and (h)(12)
Hispanic or Latino Ethnicity of Birth of
Adoptive Parent(s) or Guardian(s)
In paragraphs (h)(6) and (h)(12), we
require the title IV–E agency to report
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
the Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of each
adoptive parent or legal guardian. We
received no comments on these data
elements.
Section 1355.44(h)(7) and (h)(13)
Gender of Adoptive Parent(s) or
Guardian(s), and (h)(8) and (h)(14)
Adoptive Parent(s) or Guardian(s),
Sexual Orientation
In paragraphs (h)(7) and (h)(13), we
require the title IV–E agency to indicate
whether each adoptive parent(s) or legal
guardian(s) self identifies as ‘‘male’’ or
‘‘female.’’
In paragraph (h)(8) and (h)(14), we
require that the title IV–E agency report
whether the adoptive parent(s) or legal
guardian(s) self identifies as ‘‘straight or
heterosexual,’’ ‘‘gay or lesbian,’’
‘‘bisexual,’’ ‘‘don’t know,’’ ‘‘something
else,’’ or ‘‘declined’’ if the second
adoptive parent(s) or legal guardian(s)
declined to identify his/her status.
Comment: Although we requested
input on whether to require title IV–E
agencies to collect LGBTQ-related data
in AFCARS for youth, we received
comments from state title IV–E agencies,
national advocacy/public interest
groups and other organizations
specifically commented on collecting
whether a caretaker identifies as
LGBTQ. Those that supported collecting
LGBTQ-related data on adoptive parents
or legal guardians were primarily
advocacy organizations representing
LGBTQ interests and generally noted
that the LGBTQ community remains an
untapped resource for finding
permanent families for children and
youth in foster care. They stated that
some of these prospective parents face
barriers when they attempt to adopt or
obtain legal guardianship because they
identify as LGBTQ. They further
commented that including this
information in AFCARS will promote
routine discussions between prospective
adoptive parents or legal guardians and
title IV–E agencies, normalize
conversations around sexual
orientation, and signal increased
acceptance of LGBTQ caretakers. State
title IV–E agencies expressed some of
the same concerns with collecting
LGBTQ-related data on adoptive parents
or legal guardians as they did for
children in foster care: Privacy concerns
and implications of having this
information in a government record;
concerns that the data may be used in
a discriminatory way; and they
expressed the importance of proper staff
training for data elements on sexual
orientation.
Response: We were persuaded by the
commenters and we include data
elements in AFCARS on an adoptive
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
parent’s or legal guardian’s self-reported
gender and sexual orientation. We
anticipate that these data elements will
assist title IV–E agencies in recruiting,
training, and retaining an increased pool
of providers who can meet the needs of
children who exit out-of-home care to
adoption or legal guardianship. We
specifically added a decline response
option to respond to the privacy issues
raised by commenters. Additionally, for
the same reasons, we made
corresponding changes in paragraph (e)
related to the foster parent(s). As
previously stated, information on sexual
orientation should be obtained and
maintained in a manner that reflects
respectful treatment, sensitivity, and
confidentiality. Several state and county
agencies, advocacy organizations and
human rights organizations have
developed guidance and recommended
practices for how to promote these
conditions in serving LGBTQ youth in
adoption, foster care and out-of-home
placement settings. ACF provides state
and tribal resources for Working With
LGBTQ Youth and Families at the Child
Welfare Information Gateway. The
following links are provided as general
examples of such guidance (Minnesota
and California examples). ACF will
provide technical assistance to agencies
on collecting this information. We also
made a minor change in reporting the
adoptive parents’ or legal guardians’
gender, in that we require the title IV–
E agency to indicate whether each self
identifies as ‘‘male’’ or ‘‘female’’ and
made the same change for foster
parent(s) in paragraph (e).
Section 1355.44(h)(15) and (16) Inter/
Intrajurisdictional Adoption or
Guardianship
In paragraphs (h)(15) through (h)(16),
we require the title IV–E agency to
report information on the jurisdiction
where the child was placed for the
adoption or legal guardianship.
Comment: One commenter indicated
that collecting information on private or
international adoptions will impose
additional workload on staff and will
require policy, training, and information
system changes.
Response: We do not expect that
reporting these data elements would
require additional work or training for
the title IV–E agency since they apply
only to children who are under the
placement and care responsibility of the
title IV–E agency when they exit foster
care to adoption or guardianship. The
title IV–E agency would have been
reporting the children while in foster
care, and thus would know where they
placed these children, and whether it is
in another country or by a private
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
agency through an arrangement with the
title IV–E agency. As we stated in the
2015 NPRM, similar information on
adoptions is already collected in the
current AFCARS.
Comment: A commenter was
concerned that interjurisdictional and
intrajurisdictional are too much alike
and will continually be confused.
Response: We believe the regulation is
clear. The response options for reporting
where a child is placed for adoption or
guardianship within the U.S. are limited
to placements within or outside of the
title IV–E agency’s jurisdiction. We can
provide technical assistance during
implementation to agencies that need it.
Section 1355.44(h)(17) Adoption or
Guardianship Placing Agency
In paragraph (h)(17), we require the
title IV–E agency to report the agency
that placed the child for adoption or
legal guardianship. We received no
comments on this data element and
have retained the language proposed in
the 2015 NPRM.
Section 1355.44(h)(18) Assistance
Agreement Type
In paragraph (h)(18), we require the
title IV–E agency to report the type of
assistance agreement that the child has
from five response options: Title IV–E
adoption assistance agreement; State/
tribal adoption assistance agreement;
Adoption-Title IV–E agreement nonrecurring expenses only; Adoption-Title
IV–E agreement Medicaid only; Title
IV–E guardianship assistance
agreement; State/tribal guardianship
assistance agreement; or no agreement.
We originally proposed to collect
information about whether a child was
receiving a title IV–E adoption or
guardianship assistance subsidy in a
separate data file, which we explained
in the preamble discussion for section
1355.45 that we removed for the final
rule. Since we are still interested in
knowing how a child is supported when
he or she exits to adoption or
guardianship, we now collect
information on title IV–E assistance
agreements and non-title IV–E
assistance agreements in the out-ofhome care data file. We also have a
response option for ‘‘no agreement’’ if a
child exits out-of-home care to adoption
or guardianship without an assistance
agreement. We did not receive
comments on this data element as
proposed in the 2015 NPRM as section
1355.44(c)(1).
Section 1355.44(h)(19) Siblings in
Adoptive or Guardianship Home
In paragraph (h)(19), we require title
IV–E agencies to report the number of
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
90559
siblings of the child who are in the same
adoptive or guardianship home as the
child.
Comment: We received several
comments to our 2015 NPRM proposal
to collect information on siblings, which
we also discussed in paragraph (b). In
general, several states and a national
organization representing state child
welfare agencies agreed that the issue of
sibling placement is important at the
practice level when planning for
children, but is better captured as a
qualitative data set. Commenters noted
it may not be possible for the
caseworker to know whether the child
has siblings and if so how many because
agencies encounter multiple
overlapping sibling groups, uncertain
parentage, and mixed biological, legal,
and stepparent relationships. They had
concerns and questions about the 2015
NPRM proposal on siblings (which were
in the sections 1355.43(e) and 1355.44
of the 2015 NPRM) including the
definition of siblings, reporting sibling
record numbers, and the reliability and
consistency of the data. Specifically
related to siblings placed together in
adoption or guardianship, commenters
had questions about whether and when
to report the child record number for a
sibling who exited to adoption or legal
guardianship and one state commented
that sibling information is not carried
into TPR and adoption cases and so the
agency would not be able to report if a
child in out-of-home care is placed in
the same setting as a sibling who is
adopted. One commenter suggested that
we simplify the reporting and require
agencies to report if siblings who exited
foster care were placed together in the
same adoptive or guardianship home.
Response: We carefully reviewed the
comments and suggestions and while
we understand the concerns raised, we
determined that it is important to
continue to require title IV–E agencies
to report information about siblings. As
we noted in the preamble to the 2015
NPRM, section 471(a)(31)(A) of the Act
requires title IV–E agencies to make
reasonable efforts to place siblings
removed from their home in the same
foster care, kinship guardianship, or
adoptive placement, unless such a
placement is contrary to the safety or
well-being of any of the siblings.
However, we acknowledge that there are
many issues that make collecting data
on siblings difficult and we were
persuaded to revise the sibling data
elements to address commenter
concerns and simplify reporting.
Therefore, we revised the regulation to
require the agency to report the number
of the child’s siblings who are in the
same adoptive or guardianship home as
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
90560
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
the child. We believe that this data
element, along with the data elements in
paragraph (b) related to siblings placed
together in out-of-home care, are less
complicated than the 2015 NPRM
proposal and will yield useful
information about siblings.
Section 1355.44(h)(20) Available ICWA
Adoptive Placements
In paragraph (h)(20), if a state title IV–
E agency indicated ‘‘yes’’ to paragraph
(b)(4) or indicated ‘‘yes, ICWA applies’’
to paragraph (b)(5), we require that the
state title IV–E agency to indicate which
adoptive placements from a list of four
were willing to accept placement of the
Indian child. This is the same as
paragraph (i)(26) proposed in the 2016
SNPRM.
Comment: A few state and tribal
commenters recommend this data
element be removed. One state believes
that while it is ‘nice to know’ which
placements are ‘willing’, the more
salient questions are whether the
preferences were followed in regard to
the child’s adoption and, if not, why
not. Another commenter is concerned
the language seems to leave the answer
open to a very subjective interpretation
of ‘‘were available/willing to accept
placement’’ and answering ‘‘yes’’ or
‘‘no’’ does not document diligent or
active efforts to ensure the child is
adopted by an ICWA compliant
placement. That commenter suggests
replacing it with which ICWA
placement preferences were pursued to
accept a placement for adoption. One
tribal commenter expressed concern
about asking which ICWA placement
preferences were willing to accept
placement because if there are not
enough willing Indian foster and
adoptive homes, it may appear that
tribes are disinterested in providing
homes for Indian children.
Response: We were not persuaded to
remove the data element indicating the
availability of adoptive placements that
meet ICWA’s placement preferences.
The availability of adoptive placements
that meet ICWA’s preferences is critical
for meeting the purposes of ICWA. This
information is essential for ACF to
determine whether resources are needed
for recruitment to increase the
availability of AI/AN homes that can
meet ICWA’s placement preferences for
adoption. Under the BIA’s regulation at
25 CFR 23.130, whether a home is
available is not a subjective state title
IV–E agency determination but rather is
evidence offered by the state title IV–E
agency to the court that there is good
cause to deviate from ICWA’s placement
preferences in a particular case where
there is also evidence that the state title
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
IV–E agency conducted a diligent search
to identify a placement that meets the
preferences (25 CFR 23.130).
Section 1355.44(h)(21) Adoption
Placement Preferences Under ICWA
In paragraph (h)(21), if a state title IV–
E agency indicated ‘‘yes’’ to paragraph
(b)(4) or indicated ‘‘yes, ICWA applies’’
to paragraph (b)(5), we require the state
title IV–E agency indicate whether each
placement reported in paragraph (h)(1)
meets the placement preferences of
ICWA in 25 U.S.C. 1915(a) by indicating
with whom the Indian child is placed
from a list of five response options. This
is similar to paragraph (i)(27) as
proposed in the 2016 SNPRM, except
that we changed the response option
‘‘none’’ to ‘‘placement does not meet
ICWA placement preferences.’’
Comment: One commenter
recommends adding a data element to
collect information on whether the tribe
supported the placement and adoption
of the child.
Response: We are not making a
change as a result of this comment.
Rather, we are retaining the data
elements as proposed to require that the
state title IV–E agency report certain
information on adoptive placement
preferences, which are requirements in
ICWA at 25 U.S.C. 1915(a), if the Indian
child exited foster care to adoption.
Collecting information on whether the
tribe supported the placement and
adoption of the child is not required by
ICWA at 25 U.S.C. 1915(a).
Section 1355.44(h)(22) Good Cause
Under ICWA
In paragraph (h)(22), if a state title IV–
E agency indicated ‘‘yes’’ to paragraph
(b)(4) or indicated ‘‘yes, ICWA applies’’
to paragraph (b)(5), we require that if the
state title IV–E agency indicated
‘‘placement does not meet ICWA
placement preferences’’ in paragraph
(h)(21), the state title IV–E agency
indicate whether the court determined
by clear and convincing evidence, on
the record or in writing, a good cause to
depart from the ICWA placement
preferences (25 U.S.C. 1915(a)) or to
depart from the placement preferences
of the Indian child’s tribe (25 U.S.C.
1915(c)). This is similar to paragraph
(i)(28) as proposed in the 2016 SNPRM,
except that we updated the language
consistent with 25 CFR 23.132.
Comment: The national organization
representing state child welfare agencies
recommended removing this data
element, or alternatively, modifying this
data element to read ‘‘indicate whether
there is a court order that indicates the
court’s basis for the finding of good
cause.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Response: We are not persuaded to
remove this data element for the reasons
we set forth in the preamble to the 2016
SNPRM. However, the final rule does
not include a requirement for the state
to report only if the determination was
made in a court order. We revised the
data element to be consistent with the
BIA’s regulations at 25 CFR 23.132(c).
Now, states are to indicate whether the
court determined by clear and
convincing evidence on the record or in
writing, a good cause to depart from the
ICWA placement preferences under 25
U.S.C. 1915(a) or to depart from the
placement preferences of the Indian
child’s tribe under 25 U.S.C. 1915(c).
This provides states with multiple
options for obtaining the information.
Section 1355.44(h)(23) Basis for Good
Cause
In paragraph (h)(23), if a state title IV–
E agency indicated ‘‘yes’’ to paragraph
(b)(4) or indicated ‘‘yes, ICWA applies’’
to paragraph (b)(5), and the state title
IV–E agency indicated ‘‘placement does
not meet ICWA placement preferences’’
in paragraph (h)(22), we require that the
state title IV–E agency indicate the state
court’s basis for the determination of
good cause to depart from ICWA
placement preferences, from a list of
five response options. This is similar to
paragraph (i)(29) as proposed in the
2016 SNPRM except that we updated
the language consistent with 25 CFR
23.132; removed the response option
‘‘other’’; and added a response option
‘‘The presence of a sibling attachment
that can be maintained only through a
particular placement.’’
Comment: The national organization
representing state child welfare agencies
recommends removing the courts basis
for the finding of good cause so that
states can focus on the one essential
data file element to understand how
many Indian children exited the child
welfare system to a permanent adoption
placement. Another commenter
requested clarification regarding what
an ‘‘other’’ good cause might be, and
recommended that if ‘‘other’’ is selected,
the worker must enter into a narrative
field explanation of the court’s finding.
Response: We were not persuaded to
remove the data element indicating the
reasons for good cause not to place
according to ICWA placement
preferences. As we indicated in the
preamble to the 2016 SNPRM, reporting
information on good cause will help
agencies better understand why the
ICWA placement preferences are not
followed. In addition, such information
will aid in targeting training and
resources needed to assist states in
improving Indian child outcomes.
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
However, we integrated the ICWArelated data elements into other sections
of the final rule, thereby moving the
data elements on adoption placement
preferences proposed in the 2016
SNPRM in paragraph (i) to paragraph (h)
and modified the list of reasons for the
state court’s basis for the determination
of good cause to depart from ICWA
placement preferences in ICWA to be
consistent with 25 CFR 23.132(c) of the
BIA regulations. The possible reasons
no longer include the option of ‘‘other’’
and now include the following options:
Request of one or both of the child’s
parents; request of the Indian child; the
unavailability of a suitable placement
after a determination by the court that
a diligent search was conducted to find
suitable placements meeting the
placement preferences in ICWA at 25
U.S.C. 1915(a) but none has been
located; the extraordinary physical,
mental, or emotional needs of the Indian
child, such as specialized treatment
services that may be unavailable in the
community where families who meet
the placement preferences live; and the
presence of a sibling attachment that
can be maintained only through a
particular placement.
Section 1355.45 Adoption and
Guardianship Assistance Data File
Elements
In this section, we require the title IV–
E agency to report: (1) Information on
the title IV–E agency submitting the
adoption and guardianship assistance
data file and the report date; (2) basic
demographic information on each child,
including the child’s date of birth,
gender, race and ethnicity; (3)
information in the child’s title IV–E
adoption or guardianship agreement,
including the date of adoption or
guardianship finalization, and amount
of subsidy, and 4) information about the
agreement termination date, if
applicable.
We retained many of the data
elements proposed in the 2015 NPRM,
but modified section 1355.45 of the final
rule to remove the proposal to collect
information regarding: Whether a child
is born in the U.S., non-recurring costs,
inter/intra-jurisdictional adoption or
guardianship, inter-jurisdictional
adoption or guardianship jurisdiction,
adoption or guardianship placing
agency information, and sibling
information. These response options
ensure that title IV–E agencies report
only the essential core set of data
elements that we describe below.
Section 1355.45(a) General Information
In paragraph (a), we require that the
title IV–E agency report information
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
about the title IV–E agency, report date
and child record number.
Section 1355.45(a)(1) Title IV–E Agency
In paragraph (a)(1), we require that
the title IV–E agency indicate the title
IV–E agency responsible for submitting
AFCARS data to ACF. We received no
comments on this element.
Section 1355.45(a)(2) Report Date
In paragraph (a)(2), we require that a
title IV–E agency indicate the current
report period. We received no
comments on this element.
Section 1355.45(a)(3) Child Record
Number
In paragraph (a)(3), we require that
the title IV–E agency report the child’s
record number. We received no relevant
comments on this element.
Section 1355.45(b) Child Demographics
In paragraph (b), we require that the
title IV–E agency report information on
the child’s date of birth, gender, race
and ethnicity.
Section 1355.45(b)(1) Child’s Date of
Birth
In paragraph (b)(1), we require the
agency to report the child’s birthdate.
This data element will be used with
paragraph (d) to determine whether the
child is in either the ‘‘pre-adolescent
child adoption’’ or ‘‘older child
adoption’’ category. We received no
comments on this element.
Section 1355.45(b)(2) Child’s Gender
In paragraph (b)(2) we require the title
IV–E agency to indicate whether the
child is ‘‘male’’ or ‘‘female’’ as
appropriate.
Comment: One state commented that
all gender fields should include
additional response option(s) to capture
transgender, gender fluid, and other
non-binary individuals.
Response: We revised the name of the
data elements in sections 1355.44(e) and
(h) to require title IV–E agencies to
report the gender of the foster parent(s),
adoptive parent(s), and legal
guardian(s).
Section 1355.45(b)(3) Child’s Race
In paragraph (b)(3), we require the
title IV–E agency to indicate a child’s
race as determined by the child or the
child’s parent(s) or legal guardians from
a list categories described in paragraphs
(b)(3)(i) through (b)(3)(viii) of this
section.
Comment: One group recommended
asking about membership in a federallyrecognized tribe. One commenter
suggested that regional standards and
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
90561
practices should be documented
regarding Latinos that show overrepresentation and outcome disparities,
stating that without specific efforts to
collect data related to Indian, African
American and Latino families, the
information will continually be left out
of scrutiny and interpretation of data
will lack the substance necessary to
identify successful efforts and areas that
are lacking.
Response: The language used reflects
the OMB Revised Standards for the
Classification of Federal Data on Race
and Ethnicity, standardizing federal
data collection. We agree that requiring
state title IV–E agencies to collect and
report data that could identify a child as
an Indian child as defined in ICWA is
of paramount importance. Therefore,
while we did not revise this data
element, we require additional
information on the child’s tribal
membership or eligibility for tribal
membership in the out-of-home care
population.
Section 1355.45(b)(4) Hispanic or Latino
Ethnicity
In paragraph (b)(4), we require the
title IV–E agency to indicate a child’s
ethnicity as determined by the child or
the child’s parent(s) or legal guardian(s).
We received no comments on this
element.
In paragraph (c) we require that the
title IV–E agency report information on
the type of assistance agreement, and
the subsidy amount.
Comment: Several national
organizations recommended that we
require title IV–E agencies to report
additional data elements including:
when a successor adopter or guardian
has been named in the agreement for
Adoption Assistance or guardianship
assistance, whether the successor
became the adoptive parent or guardian,
whether the caretaker has been
informed of federal and/or state postpermanency services available outside
of the adoption assistance or
guardianship assistance funds subsidy
and/or Medicaid specific benefits.
Commenters recommend these
additional data elements because they
believe the data can provide more
information about what work is needed
to ensure successors are named in the
agreements whenever possible, and to
prevent unnecessary re-entry into foster
care.
Response: We considered these
suggestions, but did not make changes
in response. States information systems
differ and include information useful for
their own internal purposes, but not
mandated by AFCARS. We encourage
states to consider collecting data that
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
90562
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
helps states identify how to ensure
successors are named in the agreements
whenever possible, and to evaluate how
to prevent unnecessary re-entry into
foster care, but we do not require that
they report those data to AFCARS.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Section 1355.45(c)(1) Assistance
Agreement Type
In paragraph (c)(1) we require the title
IV–E agency to report whether the child
is or was in a finalized adoption with a
title IV–E adoption assistance agreement
or in a legal guardianship with a title
IV–E guardianship assistance
agreement, pursuant to sections 473(a)
and 473(d) of the Act, in effect during
the report period.
Comment: One state requested
clarification regarding why title IV–E
agencies must report information on
only those children that have a title IV–
E agreement. The state expressed
concern that this limited information
does not present a complete picture of
adoptions across the state.
Response: We did not make changes
in response to these suggestions. In the
2015 NPRM, we proposed one data
element with narrowed response
options since we propose to collect
information on children under title IV–
E adoption and guardianship assistance
agreements only, rather than both title
IV–E and non-title IV–E agreements.
This is in line with our responsibility
regarding matters related to children
receiving Federal benefits, such as
Federal budget projections. We
encourage states to consider collecting
data that helps states to evaluate and
implement state law, but we do not
require that they report those data to
AFCARS.
Section 1355.45(c)(2) Adoption or
Guardianship Subsidy Amount
In paragraph (c)(2), we require the
title IV–E agency to report the per diem
dollar amount of the financial subsidy
paid to the adoptive parent(s) or legal
guardian(s) on behalf of the child during
the last month of the current report
period, if any.
Comment: One national organization
commented that children under
guardianship of others and adopted
children do not have open service cases
even when there is a subsidy attached.
The financial information for
continuation of subsidy is captured by
many states in other systems. Reporting
on the expanded population would
require a significant change in the
application and report programs and
laws and policies in many states.
Response: We are not persuaded to
make a change based on this comment.
We currently do not collect data on
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
children receiving ongoing financial
assistance after an adoption or
guardianship is finalized, though those
children typically receive benefits for
many years, until age 18 and possibly
up to age 21. When AFCARS was
originally implemented, such children
were a smaller portion of the caseload
and program cost. However, in recent
years, the adoption assistance caseload
alone has grown dramatically, and now
represents approximately 70 percent of
title IV–E beneficiaries. As we explained
in the 2015 NPRM, since title IV–E
funds are reimbursed for adoption
assistance and guardianship assistance
costs, this information is essential for
conducting budget projections and
program planning for both title IV–E
adoption assistance and guardianship
assistance programs.
Section 1355.45(d) Adoption
Finalization or Guardianship
Legalization Date
In paragraph (d), we require the title
IV–E agency to report the date that the
title IV–E adoption was finalized or the
guardianship became legalized. This
data element will be used with
paragraph (b) to determine whether the
child is in either the ‘‘pre-adolescent
child adoption’’ or ‘‘older child
adoption’’ category. We received no
comments on this element.
Section 1355.45(e) Agreement
Termination Date
In paragraph (e), we require that if the
title IV–E agency terminated the
adoption assistance or guardianship
assistance agreement or the agreement
expired during the reporting period, the
title IV–E agency to report the month,
day and year that the agreement
terminated or expired.
Comment: Several national
organizations recommended that the
title IV–E agency report the reason why
guardianship and adoption agreements
are terminated so that agencies can
capture more information about
dissolutions and identify what
additional supports may be needed for
the children involved, and
recommended that such reasons
include: Death of adoptive parent or
guardian, incapacitation, dissolution,
child reached age of majority, or other.
One state requested that we explain the
value of collecting Agreement
Termination Dates, especially with not
collecting why the agreements are
closing.
Response: We considered these
suggestions, but did not make changes
in response to commenters because we
determined that at a national level we
do not have a use for or need for this
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
level of detail to determine how many
agreements exist. We are collecting the
end dates for title IV–E adoption and
guardianship assistance agreements
because combined with the child’s date
of birth they will allow us to calculate
more accurately the number of children
served under title IV–E agreements, as
well as the incidence of dissolution of
adoption and legal guardianships for
children supported by the title IV–E
programs. States may include such
additional data in their data system if it
is useful for their own internal
purposes, but not mandated by
AFCARS.
Section 1355.46 Compliance
In section 1355.46, we specify the
type of assessments we will conduct to
determine the accuracy of a title IV–E
agency’s data, the data that is subject to
these assessments, the compliance
standards and the manner in which the
title IV–E agency initially determined to
be out of compliance can correct its
data.
Comment: Overall, states that
commented believe these compliance
standards may negatively affect the
status of a state’s AFCARS Improvement
Plan or SACWIS improvements, and
that compliance with the new data
requirements may require states to
rebuild existing systems or may be
incompatible with recent SACWIS
improvements.
Response: We recognize that agencies
will need to make revisions and
improvements to their electronic case
management systems for the final rule.
We intend to close out all AFCARS
Improvement Plans and we will work
with title IV–E agencies to meet the final
rule requirements. Enhancements to the
title IV–E agency’s case management
system to support the revised data
collection requirements may be eligible
for title IV–E administrative funds for
development costs.
Comment: One commenter pointed
out that there appears to be no
administrative process for a state to
challenge ACF’s initial assessment of
data noncompliance.
Response: That is correct. Rather, we
provide the title IV–E agency with an
opportunity to appeal the ‘‘final’’
determination of compliance to the HHS
Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
after the agency has had an opportunity
to submit corrected data and come into
compliance. This is covered in section
1355.47(d) ‘‘Appeals.’’
Section 1355.46(a) Files Subject to
Compliance
In paragraph (a), we specify that ACF
will determine whether a title IV–E
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
agency’s AFCARS data are in
compliance with section 1355.43 and
data file and quality standards described
in paragraphs (c) and (d). We specify
that ACF will exempt records related to
a child in either data file whose 18th
birthday occurred in a prior report
period and will exempt records relating
to a child in the adoption and
guardianship assistance data file who is
in a title IV–E guardianship from a
compliance determination as described
in paragraph (e) of this section.
Comment: Several commenters
believe that the data and the multiple
data file requirements are complex and
thus compliance failures and penalties
are unavoidable.
Response: We understand the
commenters to be concerned that
because of the revised data file
standards, it will be more difficult for a
state to submit compliant data. The
standards we set forth are authorized by
the law and in line with the requirement
that the data submitted to us is reliable
and consistent. We established the
specific standards for compliance
consistent with our current
requirements (see Appendix E to part
1355 of current regulations).
Furthermore, the statute allows a sixmonth period for corrective action
during which time technical assistance
will be available to assist title IV–E
agencies in submitting compliant data.
The approach is also consistent with the
how we implemented the NYTD.
Section 1355.46(b) Errors
In paragraph (b), we outline the
definitions of errors in paragraphs (b)(1)
through (b)(5) regarding missing data,
invalid data, internally inconsistent
data, cross-file errors, and tardy
transactions. We also provide for how
we will identify those errors when we
assess information collected in a title
IV–E agency’s out-of-home care data file
(per section 1355.44) and adoption and
guardianship assistance data file (per
section 1355.45).
Comment: Several commenters
requested clarification about what ACF
will consider ‘‘errors’’ for elements,
whether errors would be identified by
internal consistency checks within the
data file, and whether errors would be
identified by review during a later
AFCARS or SACWIS audit.
Response: We identify five errors in
paragraph (b) that we will assess:
Missing data, invalid data, internally
inconsistent data, cross-file errors, and
tardy transactions. Assessing these
errors will help ACF determine if the
title IV–E agency’s data files meet the
data file submission and data quality
standards outlined in paragraphs (c) and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
(d) of this section. ACF will develop and
issue error specifications in separate
guidance.
Comment: One commenter requested
clarification about whether a title IV–E
agency will be non-compliant if the data
are incomplete or unavailable for the
title IV–E kinship guardian assistance
program or extension of foster care to
age 21 programs.
Response: We’d like to clarify that the
regulation text specifies that ACF will
exempt records related to a child in
either data file whose 18th birthday
occurred in a prior report period and
will exempt records relating to a child
in the adoption and guardianship
assistance data file who is in a title IV–
E guardianship from a compliance
determination as described in paragraph
(e) of this section. However, this
information is still important to ACF
and we plan to ensure that title IV–E
agencies submit quality data through
such means as program improvement
plans, targeted technical assistance, or
data quality utilities.
Comment: One commenter stated that
it is unreasonable that we are not
publishing more detailed information
on compliance standards in the
regulation. Further, the commenter
stated that changing internal
consistency and cross-check standards
‘‘as needed,’’ results in the compliance
target becoming elusive.
Response: We understand the
commenter is concerned that we have
chosen not to promulgate details on
error specifications and checks through
notice and comment rulemaking.
Instead, we plan to publish these error
checks outside of formal rulemaking
through official technical bulletins and
policy. This provides us the flexibility
to update and revise them as needed to
keep pace with changing and advancing
technology. This is consistent with the
approach we have taken with the NYTD
compliance checks.
Comment: A national organization
representing state child welfare
agencies, four states and two other
organizations objected to the 30 day
transaction date timeframe for
paragraphs (d)(2) and (g)(2) stating that
it is an insufficient timeframe for
entering the removal and exit dates.
They recommended that it remain at 60
days as in current AFCARS. They cited
the burden of the shorter timeframe,
commenting that it is unduly onerous
and would be a challenge for local
agencies to meet.
Response: We understand the
concern; however, we retained our
proposal for the 30 day timeframe
because ensuring a title IV–E agency’s
timely entry of removal and exit dates
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
90563
is critical to quality data. Additionally,
as is the current practice in AFCARS,
these errors are only assessed once. So,
if the date was not entered in a timely
manner, we will assess the title IV–E
agency out of compliance for the report
period the event occurred only and we
will not re-assess it in the next and
future report periods. The penalty, thus,
will only be applied to the applicable
six-month report period. We have
retained paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(5)
as proposed in the 2015 NRPM.
Section 1355.46(c) Data File Standards
In paragraph (c), we set the data file
submission standards (timely
submission, proper format, and
acceptable cross-file) for ACF to
determine that the title IV–E agency’s
AFCARS data is in compliance. In
paragraph (c)(1), we require that the title
IV–E agency submit AFCARS data
within 45 days of the end of each sixmonth report period. In paragraph (c)(2),
we require that a title IV–E agency send
us its data files in a format that meets
our specifications and submit 100
percent error-free data on limited basic
information including title IV–E agency
name, report period, the child’s
demographic information for the out-ofhome care data file and the adoption
and guardianship assistance data file.
Comment: Four title IV–E agencies do
not support the deadline of 30 days after
the end of the report period to submit
the data file believing it will limit the
agency’s ability to provide an accurate
data file. They stated that they would
have less time to ensure that all data is
entered, provide direction to the field
on any needed data corrections, and test
and validate the data file before
submitting it to ACF. The commenters
recommended staying with the current
45 day submission deadline.
Response: We modified the regulation
to allow title IV–E agencies up to 45
days after the end of the report period
to transmit the AFCARS data files.
However, we wish to emphasize that the
purpose of this transmission period is to
extract the data and ensure the file is in
the proper format for transmission.
Agencies should review the information
in the system, including information
used in AFCARS reporting, on a regular
and ongoing basis in accordance with
the title IV–B quality assurance system
requirements. This is consistent with
current practice with AFCARS.
Comment: A handful of commenters
were concerned about ACF’s data
quality requirements of 100 percent
compliance with data format standards
believing it is unlikely any title IV–E
agencies will be able to meet these
standards. In addition, there was
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
90564
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
confusion by some commenters
misunderstanding that we expected 100
percent freedom from ‘‘cross-file’’
errors.
Response: We proposed 100 percent
compliance for data format standards
only for proper format and on certain
data elements specified in section
1355.46(c)(2) because the proper format
is crucial to the proper transmission and
receipt of the data file. The
administrative elements (agency, date,
etc.) and the basic demographic data
elements specified in section
1355.46(c)(2) contain information that is
readily available to the title IV–E agency
and is essential to our ability to analyze
the data and determine whether the title
IV–E agency is in compliance with the
remaining data standards. The five data
elements in the adoption assistance data
file are basic administrative data
elements and are directly linked to
calculating adoption incentive
payments under section 473A of the
Act. Also, based on our experience with
the existing AFCARS and with the
NYTD, we have found that problems in
these data elements are often the result
of minor errors that can be rectified
easily. We therefore believe that a 100
percent data format compliance
standard for these basic and critical data
elements specified in section
1355.46(c)(2) is appropriate. The
approach is also consistent with how we
implemented the NYTD. We will issue
guidance on cross-file compliance
during implementation.
Comment: One state suggested that
ACF use a method similar to the
NCANDS transmission method noting it
is much simpler and more direct.
Response: The transmission method
for AFCARS is outside the scope of the
regulations as we did not regulate the
specific method used by AFCARS, only
that it must be electronic. However, we
should note that the current AFCARS
method is in compliance with federal
security protocols for the proper
submission of data files.
Comment: One commenter believes
the data file structure needs to be
clarified and the public should have the
opportunity to comment. Another
commenter asked if ACF will provide
technical assistance or support to states
that are unable to meet the AFCARS
basic file standards.
Response: As we explained in the
preamble to section 1355.46(b), we did
not regulate the technical requirements
for formatting or transmitting the
AFCARS data files because of inevitable
future advances in technology. Instead,
we will issue technical requirements
and specifications through official ACF
policy and technical bulletins. Further,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
we will consider what form of technical
assistance may be needed by title IV–E
agencies to meet the AFCARS data file
submission standards. The approach is
also consistent with the how we
implemented the NYTD.
Section 1355.46(d) Data Quality
Standards
In paragraph (d)(1), we specify the
data quality standards for the title IV–
E agency to be in compliance with
AFCARS requirements. We received no
substantive comments on this section.
In paragraph (d)(2), we specify the
acceptable cross-file standards, which
are that the data files must be free of
cross-file errors that exceed the
acceptable thresholds, as defined by
ACF. In the 2015 NPRM, we proposed
this as paragraph (c)(3) of this section.
We did not receive comments on this
paragraph. However, to match the
requirement in paragraph (e)(2) of this
section, we moved the acceptable crossfile requirement to paragraph (d) with
the data quality standards. If each data
file meets the data file standards of
paragraph (c) of this section, ACF will
then determine whether each data file
meets the data quality standards in
paragraph (d) of this section.
Section 1355.46(e) Compliance
Determination and Corrected Data
In paragraph (e), we specify the
methodology for determining
compliance and a title IV–E agency’s
opportunity to submit corrected data
when ACF has initially determined that
the title IV–E agency’s original
submission does not meet the AFCARS
standards. We received no specific
comments on this section and have
retained the proposed language with
minor conforming edits.
Section 1355.46(f) Noncompliance
In paragraph (f), we specify that a title
IV–E agency has not complied with the
AFCARS requirements if the title IV–E
agency either does not submit corrected
data files, or does not submit corrected
data files that meet the compliance
standards in paragraphs (c) and (d) of
this section. We received no specific
comments on this section and have
retained the proposed language with
minor conforming edits.
Section 1355.46(g) Other Assessments
In paragraph (g), we explain that ACF
may use other monitoring tools that are
not explicitly mentioned in regulation
to determine whether the title IV–E
agency meets all AFCARS requirements.
We received no specific comments on
this section and have retained the
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
proposed language with minor
conforming edits.
Section 1355.47
Penalties
In section 1355.47 we provide for how
ACF will assess and take penalties for
a title IV–E agency’s noncompliance
with AFCARS requirements outlined in
section 1355.46.
Section 1355.47(a) Federal Funds
Subject to a Penalty
In paragraph (a), we specify the pool
of funds that are subject to a penalty for
noncompliance as required by law. We
did not receive specific comments on
paragraph (a) and have retained the
proposed language with minor
conforming edits.
Section 1355.47(b) Penalty Amounts
In paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2), we
specify the penalty amounts for
noncompliance and continued
noncompliance as required by section
474(f)(2) of the Act.
Comment: Many of commenters,
particularly title IV–E agencies, do not
support the penalty provisions as
proposed in section 1355.47 and
suggested a variety of alternatives,
including phasing in the penalties,
providing incentives, reinvesting
penalties back into data improvements,
or waiving penalties. A couple
commenters believed that the penalty
structure did not allow for a graduated
or proportional structure to assess
penalties reflective of an individual
agency’s level of compliance, or any
consideration of past efforts to produce
the required data. A few commenters
supported penalties as a method to
incentivize title IV–E agencies to fulfill
their duties. One organization suggested
applying the penalties to the optional
title IV–E programs including kinship
guardianship and extended foster care.
Response: We did not revise the
penalty provisions in response to these
comments because the penalties are
required by law and the structure is
consistent with section 474(f) of the Act.
There is no provision in the law for
incentives or reinvestment of penalties.
The penalty structure applies to all title
IV–E agencies and, we have retained our
proposal not to apply the penalty to the
optional title IV–E programs. We are
allowing ample time for state and tribal
title IV–E agencies to modify their
systems to report quality data as
required by the final rule.
Comment: A couple states oppose the
timeframe for corrective action and
penalties for subsequent reporting
periods and one commenter suggested
that we allow time for system
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
improvements as part of corrective
action before ACF issues a penalty.
Response: We did not make any
changes to address this comment
because the statute specifies the time
period for corrective action and thus we
are unable to provide a lengthier
timeframe for corrections to systems or
otherwise.
Comment: A state commenter asked if
there will be technical assistance and
support offered to title IV–E agencies
that are unable to meet basic file
standards.
Response: We will continue to
conduct AFCARS assessment reviews to
address situations expressed by the
commenter about quality data and
engage state and tribal title IV–E
agencies in technical assistance in all
aspects of the implementation of
AFCARS.
Section 1355.47(c) Penalty Reduction
From Grant
In paragraph (c), we specify that we
will collect an assessed penalty by
reducing the title IV–E agency’s title IV–
E foster care funding following ACF’s
notification of the final determination of
noncompliance. We did not receive any
comments on paragraph (c).
Section 1355.47(d) Appeals
In paragraph (d), we specify that the
title IV–E agency has an opportunity to
appeal a final determination that the
title IV–E agency is out of compliance
and assessed financial penalties to the
HHS Departmental Appeals Board
(DAB). We did not receive any
comments on paragraph (d).
VII. Regulatory Impact Analysis
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Executive Order 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. The
Department has determined that this
final rule is consistent with these
priorities and principles. In particular,
ACF has determined that a regulation is
the best and most cost effective way to
implement the statutory mandate for a
data collection system regarding
children in foster care and those who
exit to permanency and support other
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
statutory obligations to provide
oversight of child welfare programs.
ACF consulted with the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
determined that this rule does meet the
criteria for a significant regulatory
action under E.O. 12866. Thus, it was
subject to OMB review.
ACF determined that the costs to title
IV–E agencies as a result of this rule will
not be significant as defined in
Executive Order 12866 (have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million
or more or adversely affect in a material
way the economy, a sector of the
economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities). Federal
reimbursement under title IV–E will be
available for a portion of the costs that
title IV–E agencies will incur as a result
of the revisions in this rule, depending
on each agency’s cost allocation plan,
information system, and other factors.
Estimated burden and costs to the
federal government are provided below
in the Burden estimate section, which
we estimate to be $40,749,492. As a
result of this rule, title IV–E agencies
will report historical data on children in
out-of-home care and information on
legal guardianships, and we will have
national data on Indian children as
defined in ICWA.
Alternatives Considered:
1. ACF considered whether other
existing data sets could yield similar
information. ACF determined that
AFCARS is the only comprehensive
case-level data set on the incidence and
experiences of children who are in outof-home care under the placement and
care of the title IV–E agency or who are
adopted under a title IV–E adoption
assistance agreement.
2. We also received state comments to
the 2016 SNPRM citing they have few
Indian children in foster care, if any.
ACF considered alternatives to
collecting ICWA-related data through
AFCARS, such as providing an
exemption from reporting, but
alternative approaches are not feasible
due to:
• AFCARS data must be
comprehensive per section 479(c)(3) of
the Act and exempting some states from
reporting the ICWA-related data
elements is not consistent with this
statutory mandate, and would render it
difficult to use this data for
development of national policies.
• Section 474(f) of the Act provides
for mandatory penalties on the title IV–
E agency for non-compliance on
AFCARS data that is based on the total
amount expended by the title IV–E
agency for administration of foster care
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
90565
activities. Therefore, we are not
authorized to permit some states to be
subject to a penalty and not others. In
addition, allowing states an alternate
submission process would complicate
and/or prevent the assessment of
penalties per § 1355.47, including
penalties for failure to submit data files
free of cross-file errors, missing, invalid,
or internally inconsistent data, or tardy
transactions for each data element of
applicable records.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
The Secretary certifies, under 5 U.S.C.
605(b), as enacted by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96–354), that
this rule will not result in a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This final rule does not affect
small entities because it is applicable
only to state and tribal title IV–E
agencies.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(Pub. L. 104–4) requires agencies to
prepare an assessment of anticipated
costs and benefits before proposing any
rule that may result in an annual
expenditure by state, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation). That
threshold level is currently
approximately $146 million. This final
rule does not impose any mandates on
state, local, or tribal governments, or the
private sector that will result in an
annual expenditure of $146 million or
more.
Congressional Review
This regulation is not a major rule as
defined in 5 U.S.C. 8.
Assessment of Federal Regulations and
Policies on Families
Section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106–58) requires
federal agencies to determine whether a
policy or regulation may affect family
well-being. If the agency’s
determination is affirmative, then the
agency must prepare an impact
assessment addressing seven criteria
specified in the law. This final
regulation will not have an impact on
family well-being as defined in the law.
Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132 requires that
federal agencies consult with state and
local government officials in the
development of regulatory policies with
Federalism implications. Consistent
with E.O. 13132 and Guidance for
Implementing E.O. 13132 issued on
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
90566
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
October 28, 1999, the Department must
include in ‘‘a separately identified
portion of the preamble to the
regulation’’ a ‘‘federalism summary
impact statement’’ (Secs. 6(b)(2)(B) &
(c)(2)). The Department’s ‘‘federalism
summary impact statement’’ is as
follows—
• ‘‘A description of the extent of the
agency’s prior consultation with State
and local officials’’—ACF held
consultation calls for the 2015 NPRM on
February 18 and 20, 2015 and public
comment period was open from
February 9, 2015 to April 10, 2015
where we solicited comments via
regulations.gov, email, and postal mail.
ACF held consultation calls for the 2016
SNPRM on April 15, 22, 25, and 29,
2016 and the public comment period
was open from April 7, 2016 to May 9,
2016 where we solicited comments via
regulations.gov, email, and postal mail.
• ‘‘A summary of the nature of their
concerns and the agency’s position
supporting the need to issue the
regulation’’—As we’ve discussed in the
preamble to this final rule, many
commenters to the 2015 NPRM
supported many of the revisions we
proposed for AFCARS; however, some
commenters expressed concern with the
burden of additional data elements.
Many commenters to the 2016 SNPRM
supported collecting ICWA-related data
in AFCARS and stated that it will better
inform practice for AI/AN children.
However, they also expressed concern
with the burden of additional data
elements and suggested that we pare
down the overall number of data
element to a core set that collects
essential information related to ICWA.
• ‘‘A statement of the extent to which
the concerns of State and local officials
have been met’’ (Secs. 6(b)(2)(B) &
6(c)(2))—As we discuss in the sectionby-section discussion preamble, we
streamlined many data elements that we
proposed in the 2015 NPRM. We also
sought to reduce duplication by
integrating the ICWA-related data
elements proposed in the 2016 SNPRM
into other sections of AFCARS. We
expand on these comments in the
section-by-section discussion.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 35, as amended) (PRA), all
Departments are required to submit to
OMB for review and approval any
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
inherent in a proposed or final rule.
PRA rules require that ACF estimate the
total burden created by this final rule
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
regardless of what information is
available. ACF provides burden and cost
estimates using the best available
information. Information collection for
AFCARS is currently authorized under
OMB number 0970–0422; however, this
final rule significantly changes the
collection requirements by requiring
title IV–E agencies to report historical
data and data related to ICWA. This
final rule contains information
collection requirements in proposed
§ 1355.44, the out-of-home care data file,
and § 1355.45, the adoption and
guardianship assistance data file, that
the Department has submitted to OMB
for its review. This final rule requires:
• State and tribal title IV–E agencies
to report information on children who
are in the out-of-home care reporting
population per § 1355.42(a);
• State and tribal title IV–E agencies
to report information on children who
are in the adoption assistance reporting
population per § 1355.42(b); and
• State title IV–E agencies to report
ICWA-related information in the out-ofhome care data file.
Comments to the 2015 NPRM: State
title IV–E agencies and the national
organization representing state child
welfare agencies felt that our burden
estimates were low, but very few states
provided estimates on burden hours or
costs to implement the 2015 NPRM as
a comparison. The comments were
primarily about technical or
programmer costs to modify the
information system and did not include
the work associated with gathering
information or training. The estimates
we received to modify a state
information system ranged from 2,000
hours to 20,000 hours.
Comments to the 2016 SNPRM:
Overall, many states and the national
organization representing state child
welfare agencies felt that the burden of
the 2016 SNPRM will be significantly
higher than the estimates provided.
They said that reporting ICWA-related
information would require significant
upgrades to the SACWIS or other case
management system to be able to report
the data. States said that they collect
some information, but not all
information (e.g., name of tribes) is in an
extractable data field and it is
documented in case narratives. They
also stated there will be an increased
workload due to manually entering
information from paper court orders or
case narratives into the system for
AFCARS reporting and limited or no
electronic exchange exists in some
states between the state title IV–E
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
agency and state court. One organization
expressed concern that the 2016 SNPRM
burden calculations assumed all states
would be equally impacted, and
suggested that states with few Indian
children, as defined in ICWA, be
allowed to format data collection in a
different way. This commenter also
expressed that states with larger AI/AN
population would face a large burden
for staff to meet the mandates.
Five state title IV–E agencies provided
specific burden and cost estimates and
suggestions for how to calculate the
estimates for the 2016 SNPRM. They
ranged from:
• Implementation timeframe of 24
months to 3.5 years to design, develop,
and implement system modifications.
• One-time costs of $100,000 to
$803,000 to make system changes.
• Annual costs of $120,000 per year
to enter data from court records.
• Increase the average hourly labor
rate we used in the 2016 SNPRM
include hourly rates for programming
staff, staff attorneys, and paralegals
because they would all be working
together to implement the requirements
of the 2016 SNPRM.
• Increase the time to determine
whether a child is an Indian child as
defined in ICWA to 1.5 hours per child.
• Base the estimates on all children
entering foster care and not limit it to
those for whom the race AI/AN was
indicated.
Although ACF appreciates that these
agencies provided this information on
hourly and cost burden estimates, ACF
received too few estimates to reference
for calculating the cost and burden
associated with this final rule. We
understand the new data requirements
could impact the time workers spend
providing casework directly with
children and families. However, this
final rule reflects careful consideration
of input received from states and tribes
and balances the need for more current
data with concerns from commenters
about the burden that new reporting
requirements represent. Thus, ACF
carefully considered the statutory
requirement in section 479(c)(1) of the
Act to ‘‘avoid unnecessary diversion of
resources from agencies responsible for
adoption and foster care’’ and
determined that the Final Rule does not
represent an unnecessary diversion of
resources. ACF provides estimates using
the best available information.
Burden Estimate
The following are estimates.
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
90567
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Number of
respondents
Collection—AFCARS
Number of
responses per
respondent
Average
burden
hours per
response
Total
annual
burden
hours
Recordkeeping .................................................................................................
Reporting .........................................................................................................
59
59
2
2
8,204.25
18
968,102
2,124
Total ..........................................................................................................
........................
........................
........................
970,226
Respondents: The 59 respondents
comprise 52 state title IV–E agencies
and seven tribal title IV–E agencies,
which are Indian tribes, tribal
organizations or consortium with an
approved title IV–E plan under section
479B of the Act.
Recordkeeping burden: Searching
data sources, gathering information, and
entering the information into the
system, developing or modifying
procedures and systems to collect,
validate, and verify the information and
adjusting existing ways to comply with
AFCARS requirements, administrative
tasks associated with training personnel
on the AFCARS requirements (e.g.,
reviewing instructions, developing the
training and manuals), and training
personnel on AFCARS requirements.
Reporting burden: Extracting the
information for AFCARS reporting and
transmitting the information to ACF.
Total annual
burden hours
Collection—AFCARS
Annualized Cost to the Federal
Government
Federal reimbursement under title IV–
E will be available for a portion of the
costs that title IV–E agencies will incur
as a result of the revisions proposed in
this rule, depending on each agency’s
cost allocation plan, information
system, and other factors. For this
estimate, we used the 50% FFP rate.
Average
hourly labor
rate
Total cost
Estimate
Federal costs
(50% FFP)
968,102
2,124
$84
84
$81,320,668
178,416
$40,660,284
89,208
Total ..........................................................................................................
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Recordkeeping .................................................................................................
Reporting .........................................................................................................
........................
........................
........................
40,749,492
Assumptions for Estimates
We made a number of assumptions
when calculating the burden and costs:
• To determine the number of
children for which title IV–E agencies
will have to report in the out-of-home
care data file, ACF used the most recent
FY 2015 AFCARS data available:
Æ 269,509 Number of children who
entered foster care during FY 2015. Of
those, 6,350 children had a reported
race of AI/AN.
Æ We estimate the number of children
to whom the ICWA-related data
elements apply by using as a proxy
those children whose race was reported
as ‘‘American Indian or Alaska Native’’
in the most recent FY 2015 AFCARS
data available. This is the best available
data we can use for the burden estimate
of the ICWA-related information even
though we understand that not every
child of this reported race category will
be covered under ICWA and would also
include children reported by a tribal
title IV–E agency. The state title IV–E
agency must report whether all children
who enter foster care may be Indian
children as defined in ICWA.
• To determine the number of
children for which title IV–E agencies
must report in the adoption and
guardianship assistance file, ACF used
the most recent title IV–E Programs
Quarterly Financial Report, CB–496, for
FY 2015. 440,934 children received title
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
IV–E adoption assistance and 21,173
children received guardianship
assistance.
• For this final rule, we integrated the
ICWA-related data elements into other
sections of the regulation. Tribal title
IV–E agencies are not required to collect
the ICWA-related information.
• The state title IV–E agency will be
required to collect information for
approximately 98 data elements for all
children who are in both the out-ofhome care reporting population and
adoption and guardianship assistance
reporting population and for
approximately 17 data elements on
children to whom the ICWA-related
data elements apply in the out-of-home
care reporting population.
• Tribal title IV–E agencies will be
required to collect information for
approximately 95 data elements for all
children who are in the out-of-home
care reporting population and adoption
and guardianship assistance reporting
population.
• ACF assumed that the burden for
state and tribal title IV–E agencies to
modify systems is similar to how long
it would take to make revisions to a
Comprehensive Child Welfare
Information Systems (CCWIS).
Currently, 36 states have an operational
SACWIS and title IV–E agencies will
have the option to transition to or build
a CCIWS under the revised regulations
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
at 45 CFR 1355.50 et sq. ACF also
recognizes that most title IV–E agencies
will require revisions to electronic case
management systems to meet the
requirements of this final rule. As more
title IV–E agencies build CCWIS, ACF
anticipates it will lead to more
efficiency in reporting and less costs
and burden associated with this
AFCARS final rule to the agencies.
• After reviewing the 2015 Bureau of
Labor Statistics data and comments to
the 2016 SNPRM to help determine the
costs of the final rule, ACF assumed that
there will be a mix of programming,
management, caseworkers, and legal
staff working to meet both the one-time
and annual requirements of this final
rule. For this estimate, we used the job
roles of: Computer and Mathematical
Operations (15–0000) with a hourly
wage of $41.43; Social Workers (21–
1020) with a mean hourly wage estimate
of $23.88; Management Analyst (13–
1111) with a mean hourly wage estimate
of $44.12; Social and Community
Service Managers (11–9151) with a
mean hourly wage estimate of $33.38;
and Paralegals and Legal Assistants (23–
2011) with a mean hourly wage estimate
of $25.19. Thus, ACF averaged these
wages to come to an average labor rate
of $42. In order to ensure we took into
account overhead costs associated with
these labor costs, ACF doubled this rate
($84).
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
90568
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Calculations for Estimates
Recordkeeping: Adding the bullets
below produces a total of 968,102 record
keeping hours annually.
• For the out-of-home care data file,
searching data sources, gathering
information, and entering the
information into the system will take on
average 3 hours annually for all children
who enter foster care and 10 hours for
children who are Indian children as
defined in ICWA. (3 hours × 269,509
children = 808,527 annual hours. 10
hours × 6,350 children = 63,500 annual
hours. 808,527 + 63,500 = 872,027 total
annual hours for this bullet.)
• For the adoption and guardianship
assistance data file, updates or changes
on an annual or biennial basis will take
an average of 0.2 hours annually for
records of children who have an
adoption assistance agreement and 0.3
hours annually for children who have
an guardianship assistance agreement
for a total annual hours of 94,539. (0.2
hours × 440,934 children = 88,187
hours. 0.3 hours × 21,173 children =
6,352 hours. 6,352 hours + 88,187 hours
= 94,539 total annual burden hours for
this bullet.)
• Developing or modifying
procedures and systems to collect,
validate, and verify the information and
adjusting existing ways to comply with
AFCARS requirements will take on
average 230 hours annually.
• Administrative tasks associated
with training personnel on the AFCARS
requirements (e.g., reviewing
instructions, developing the training
and manuals), and training personnel on
AFCARS requirements will take on
average 1,306 hours annually.
Reporting: Extracting the information
for AFCARS reporting and transmitting
the information to ACF will take on
average 18 hours.
In the above estimates, ACF
acknowledges: (1) ACF has used average
figures for title IV–E agencies of very
different sizes and of which, some states
may have larger populations of children
served than other agencies, (2) these are
rough estimates of the burden because
state title IV–E agencies have not been
required previously to report ICWArelated information in AFCARS, and (3)
as described, ACF has limited
information to use in making these
estimates.
OMB is required to make a decision
concerning the collection of information
contained in this regulation between 30
and 60 days after publication of this
document in the Federal Register.
Therefore, a comment is best assured of
having its full effect if OMB receives it
within 30 days of publication. This does
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
not affect the deadline for the public to
comment to the Department on the
proposed regulations. Written
comments to OMB or the proposed
information collection should be sent
directly to the following: Office of
Management and Budget, either by fax
to 202–395–6974 or by email to OIRA_
submission@omb.eop.gov. Please mark
faxes and emails to the attention of the
desk officer for ACF.
VIII. Tribal Consultation Statement
ACF is committed to consulting with
Indian tribes and tribal leadership to the
extent practicable and permitted by law,
prior to promulgating any regulation
that has tribal implications. As we
developed this rule, ACF engaged with
tribes through multiples means. The
requirements in this final rule were
informed by consultations with and
comments from tribal representatives.
Starting mid-2015, we began tribal
consultation, conducted in accordance
with the ACF Tribal Consultation Policy
(76 FR 55678) with tribal
representatives to obtain input on
proposing additional AFCARS data
elements related to ICWA. There was a
conference call on May 1, 2015, that was
co-facilitated by CB Associate
Commissioner and the Chairperson of
the ACF Tribal Advisory Committee,
who also serves as the Vice Chair of the
Jamestown S’Klallam Tribal Council.
Tribes were informed of these
consultations and conference calls
through letters to tribal leaders.
Comments were solicited during the call
to determine essential data elements
that state title IV–E agencies should
report to AFCARS including, but not
limited to: Whether the requirements of
ICWA were applied to a child; notice for
child welfare proceedings; active efforts
to prevent removal or to reunify the
Indian child with the child’s biological
or adoptive parents or Indian custodian;
placement preferences in ICWA; and
terminations of parental rights for an
Indian child. Tribal representatives did
not provide specific suggestions on the
call, but noted that they would provide
formal comments on the 2016 SNPRM
when it was issued.
In addition to the May 2015 tribal
consultation, we reviewed comments to
the 2015 NPRM that suggested we
include ICWA-related data elements and
we used these comments to help inform
the 2016 SNPRM. We received 45
comments to the 2015 NPRM that
recommended collecting basic
information about the applicability of
ICWA for children in out-of-home care,
including: Identification of American
Indian and Alaska Native children and
their family structure, tribal notification
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
and intervention in state court
proceedings, the relationship of the
foster parents and other providers to the
child, decisions to place a child in outof-home care (including data on active
efforts and continued custody), whether
a placement was licensed by an Indian
tribe, whether the placement
preferences in ICWA were followed, and
termination of parental rights (both
voluntary and involuntary).
After the 2016 SNPRM was published,
ACF conducted additional consultations
with tribal representatives and the
public via conference calls on April 22,
25, and 27, 2016 during the public
comment period. Tribes were informed
of these consultations and conference
calls through letters to tribal leaders and
emails on ACF’s tribal list serves. Much
of the dialogue from call attendees was
supportive of the data elements
proposed in the 2016 SNPRM stating
they are an important step to allowing
tribes, states, and federal agencies the
ability to develop a more detailed
understanding of the unique
experiences, needs, and barriers to
permanency for AI/AN children. There
was also discussion regarding how state
title IV–E agencies will implement
specific data elements around qualified
expert witnesses, how state title IV–E
agencies will share the data gathered
with tribes, and the process for
determining whether a state title IV–E
agency will be found in non-compliance
with data collection. Throughout the
calls, we encouraged tribal
representatives to submit written
comments during the public comment
period. We received 41 comments from
tribes and 11 comments from
organizations representing tribal
interests, many of which were co-signed
by multiple tribes. We addressed public
comments in the section-by-section
discussion preamble. This final rule was
informed by these consultations and
comments.
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 1355
Adoption and foster care, Child
welfare, Grant programs—social
programs.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 93.658, Foster Care
Maintenance; 93.659, Adoption Assistance;
93.645, Child Welfare Services—State
Grants).
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: October 11, 2016.
Mark H. Greenberg,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Children and
Families.
Approved: October 14, 2016.
Sylvia M. Burwell,
Secretary.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, we amend 45 CFR part 1355
as follows:
PART 1355—GENERAL
1. The authority citation for part 1355
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 620 et seq., 42 U.S.C.
670 et seq., 42 U.S.C. 1302.
2. Amend § 1355.40 by redesignating
paragraphs (a) through (e) as (b) through
(f), adding a new paragraph (a), revising
the second sentence of newly
redesignated paragraph (b)(1), and
revising newly redesignated paragraph
(f) to read as follows:
■
§ 1355.40 Foster care and adoption data
collection.
(a) Scope. State and tribal title IV–E
agencies must follow the requirements
of this section and Appendices A
through E of part 1355 until September
30, 2019. As of October 1, 2019, state
and tribal title IV–E agencies must
comply with §§ 1355.41 through
1355.47.
(b) * * *
(1) * * * The data reporting system
must meet the requirements of
§ 1355.40(c) and electronically report
certain data regarding children in foster
care and adoption. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Substantial noncompliance.
Failure by a title IV–E agency to meet
any of the standards described in
paragraphs (b) through (e) of this section
is considered a substantial failure to
meet the requirements of the title IV–E
plan.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 1355.40
[Removed and Reserved]
3. Effective October 1, 2019, remove
and reserve § 1355.40.
■ 4. Add §§ 1355.41 through 1355.47 to
read as follows:
■
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
§ 1355.41 Scope of the Adoption and
Foster Care Analysis and Reporting
System.
(a) This section applies to state and
tribal title IV–E agencies unless
indicated for state title IV–E agencies
only.
(b) An agency described in paragraph
(a) of this section must report
information on the characteristics and
experiences of a child in the reporting
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
populations described in § 1355.42. The
title IV–E agency must submit the
information collected to ACF on a semiannual basis in an out-of-home care data
file and adoption assistance data file as
required in § 1355.43, pertaining to
information described in §§ 1355.44 and
1355.45 and in a format according to
ACF’s specifications.
(c) Definitions. (1) Terms in 45 CFR
1355.41 through 1355.47 are defined as
they appear in 45 CFR 1355.20, except
that for purposes of data elements
related to the Indian Child Welfare Act
of 1978 (ICWA), terms that appear in
§ 1344.44(b)(3) through (b)(8), (c)(3),
(c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(7), (d)(3), (e)(8) through
(e)(11), (f)(10), and (h)(20) through
(h)(23) are defined as they appear in 25
CFR 23.2 and 25 U.S.C. 1903.
(2) For state title IV–E agencies only:
If the state title IV–E agency indicated
‘‘yes’’ to § 1355.44(b)(4) or indicated
‘‘yes, ICWA applies’’ to § 1355.44(b)(5),
for § 1355.44(c)(1), (c)(2), (d)(4), and
(d)(5), the term ‘‘legal guardian’’
includes an Indian custodian as defined
in ICWA at 25 U.S.C. 1903 if the Indian
custodian has legal responsibility for the
child.
§ 1355.42
Reporting populations.
(a) Out-of-home care reporting
population. (1) A title IV–E agency must
report a child of any age who is in outof-home care for more than 24 hours.
The out-of-home care reporting
population includes a child in the
following situations:
(i) A child in foster care as defined in
§ 1355.20.
(ii) A child on whose behalf title IV–
E foster care maintenance payments are
made and who is under the placement
and care responsibility of another public
agency or an Indian tribe, tribal
organization or consortium with which
the title IV–E agency has an agreement
pursuant to section 472(a)(2)(B)(ii) of
the Act.
(iii) A child who runs away or whose
whereabouts are unknown at the time
the child is placed under the placement
and care responsibility of the title IV–
E agency.
(2) Once a child enters the out-ofhome care reporting population, the
child remains in the out-of-home care
reporting population through the end of
the report period in which the title IV–
E agency’s placement and care
responsibility ends, or a child’s title IV–
E foster care maintenance payment
pursuant to a title IV–E agreement per
section 472(a)(2) of the Act ends,
regardless of any subsequent living
arrangement.
(b) Adoption and guardianship
assistance reporting population. (1) The
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
90569
title IV–E agency must include in the
adoption and guardianship assistance
reporting population any child who is:
(i) In a finalized adoption under a title
IV–E adoption assistance agreement
pursuant to section 473(a) of the Act
with the reporting title IV–E agency that
is or was in effect at some point during
the current report period; or
(ii) In a legal guardianship under a
title IV–E guardianship assistance
agreement pursuant to section 473(d) of
the Act with the reporting title IV–E
agency that is or was in effect at some
point during the current report period.
(2) A child remains in the adoption or
guardianship assistance reporting
population through the end of the report
period in which the title IV–E
agreement ends or is terminated.
§ 1355.43
Data reporting requirements.
(a) Report periods and deadlines.
There are two six-month report periods
based on the Federal fiscal year: October
1 to March 31 and April 1 to September
30. The title IV–E agency must submit
the out-of-home care and adoption
assistance data files to ACF within 45
days of the end of the report period (i.e.,
by May 15 and November 14). If the
reporting deadline falls on a weekend,
the title IV–E agency has through the
end of the following Monday to submit
the data file.
(b) Out-of-home care data file. A title
IV–E agency must report the
information required in § 1355.44
pertaining to each child in the out-ofhome care reporting population, in
accordance with the following:
(1) The title IV–E agency must report
the most recent information for the
applicable data elements in § 1355.44(a)
and (b).
(2) Except as provided in paragraph
(b)(3) of this section, the title IV–E
agency must report the most recent
information and all historical
information for the applicable data
elements described in § 1355.44(c)
through (h).
(3) For a child who had an out-ofhome care episode(s) as defined in
§ 1355.42(a) prior to October 1, 2019,
the title IV–E agency must report only
the information for the data elements
described in § 1355.44(d)(1), (g)(1) and
(g)(3) for the out-of-home care episode(s)
that occurred prior to October 1, 2019.
(c) Adoption and guardianship
assistance data file. A title IV–E agency
must report the most recent information
for the applicable data elements in
§ 1355.45 that pertains to each child in
the adoption and guardianship
assistance reporting population on the
last day of the report period.
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
90570
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
(d) Missing information. If the title
IV–E agency fails to collect the
information for a data element, the title
IV–E agency must report the element as
blank or otherwise missing. The title
IV–E agency is not permitted to default
or map missing information that was not
collected to a valid response option.
(e) Electronic submission. The title
IV–E agency must submit the required
data files electronically and in a format
according to ACF’s specifications.
(f) Record retention. The title IV–E
agency must retain all records necessary
to comply with the data requirements in
§§ 1355.41 through 1355.45. The title
IV–E agency’s retention of such records
is not limited to the requirements of 45
CFR 92.42(b) and (c).
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
§ 1355.44 Out-of-home care data file
elements.
(a) General information. (1) Title IV–
E agency. Indicate the title IV–E agency
responsible for submitting the AFCARS
data in a format according to ACF’s
specifications.
(2) Report date. The report date
corresponds with the end of the report
period. Indicate the last month and the
year of the report period.
(3) Local agency. Indicate the local
county, jurisdiction or equivalent unit
that has primary responsibility for the
child in a format according to ACF’s
specifications.
(4) Child record number. Indicate the
child’s record number. This is an
encrypted, unique person identification
number that is the same for the child,
no matter where the child lives while in
the placement and care responsibility of
the title IV–E agency in out-of-home
care and across all report periods and
episodes. The title IV–E agency must
apply and retain the same encryption
routine or method for the person
identification number across all report
periods. The record number must be
encrypted in accordance with ACF
standards.
(b) Child information—(1) Child’s
date of birth. Indicate the month, day
and year of the child’s birth. If the
actual date of birth is unknown because
the child has been abandoned, provide
an estimated date of birth. Abandoned
means that the child was left alone or
with others and the identity of the
parent(s) or legal guardian(s) is
unknown and cannot be ascertained.
This includes a child left at a ‘‘safe
haven.’’
(2)(i) Child’s gender. Indicate whether
the child is ‘‘male’’ or ‘‘female,’’ as
appropriate.
(ii) Child’s sexual orientation. For
children age 14 and older, indicate
whether the child self identifies as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
‘‘straight or heterosexual,’’ ‘‘gay or
lesbian,’’ ‘‘bisexual,’’ ‘‘don’t know,’’
‘‘something else,’’ or ‘‘decline,’’ if the
child declined to provide the
information. Indicate ‘‘not applicable’’
for children age 13 and under.
(3) Reason to know a child is an
‘‘Indian Child’’ as defined in the Indian
Child Welfare Act. For state title IV–E
agencies only: Indicate whether the state
title IV–E agency researched whether
there is reason to know that the child is
an Indian child as defined in ICWA in
each paragraph (b)(3)(i) through (vii) of
this section.
(i) Indicate whether the state title IV–
E agency inquired with the child’s
biological or adoptive mother. Indicate
‘‘yes,’’ ‘‘no’’ or ‘‘the biological or
adoptive mother is deceased.’’
(ii) Indicate whether the state title IV–
E agency inquired with the child’s
biological or adoptive father. Indicate
‘‘yes,’’ ‘‘no,’’ or ‘‘the biological or
adoptive father is deceased.’’
(iii) Indicate whether the state title
IV–E agency inquired with the child’s
Indian custodian, if the child has one.
Indicate ‘‘yes,’’ ‘‘no,’’ or ‘‘child does not
have an Indian custodian.’’
(iv) Indicate whether the state title
IV–E agency inquired with the child’s
extended family. Indicate ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’
(v) Indicate whether the state title IV–
E agency inquired with the child who is
the subject of the proceeding. Indicate
‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’
(vi) Indicate whether the child is a
member of or eligible for membership in
an Indian tribe. Indicate ‘‘yes,’’ ‘‘no,’’ or
‘‘unknown.’’
(vii) Indicate whether the domicile or
residence of the child, the child’s
parent, or the child’s Indian custodian
is on a reservation or in an Alaska
Native village. Indicate ‘‘yes,’’ ‘‘no,’’ or
‘‘unknown.’’
(4) Application of ICWA. For state
title IV–E agencies only: Indicate
whether the state title IV–E agency
knows or has reason to know, that the
child is an Indian child as defined in
ICWA. Indicate ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’ If the
state title IV–E agency indicated ‘‘yes,’’
then the state title IV–E agency must
complete paragraphs (b)(4)(i) and (ii). If
the state title IV–E agency indicated
‘‘no,’’ then the state title IV–E agency
must leave paragraphs (b)(4)(i) and (ii)
of this section blank.
(i) Indicate the date that the state title
IV–E agency first discovered the
information indicating the child is or
may be an Indian child as defined in
ICWA.
(ii) Indicate all federally recognized
Indian tribe (s) that may potentially be
the Indian child’s tribe(s). The title IV–
E agency must submit the information
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
in a format according to ACF’s
specifications.
(5) Court determination that ICWA
applies. For state title IV–E agencies
only: Indicate whether a court
determined that ICWA applies or that
the court is applying ICWA because it
knows or has reason to know a child is
an Indian child as defined in ICWA in
accordance with 25 CFR 23.107(b)(2).
Indicate ‘‘yes, ICWA applies,’’ ‘‘no,
ICWA does not apply,’’ or ‘‘no court
determination.’’ If the state title IV–E
agency indicated ‘‘yes, ICWA applies,’’
the state title IV–E agency must
complete paragraphs (b)(5)(i) and (ii). If
the state title IV–E agency indicated
‘‘no, ICWA does not apply’’ or ‘‘no court
determination,’’ the state title IV–E
agency must leave paragraphs (b)(5)(i)
and (ii) of this section blank.
(i) Indicate the date that the court
determined that ICWA applies.
(ii) Indicate the Indian tribe that the
court determined is the Indian child’s
tribe for ICWA purposes. The title IV–
E agency must submit the information
in a format according to ACF’s
specifications.
(6) Notification. State title IV–E
agencies only: If the state title IV–E
agency indicated ‘‘yes’’ to paragraph
(b)(4) or indicated ‘‘yes, ICWA applies’’
to paragraph (b)(5), the state title IV–E
agency must complete paragraphs
(b)(6)(i) through (iii). Otherwise, leave
paragraphs (b)(6)(i) through (iii) of this
section blank.
(i) Indicate whether the Indian child’s
parent or Indian custodian was sent
legal notice more than 10 days prior to
the first child custody proceeding in
accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1912(a).
Indicate ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’
(ii) Indicate whether the Indian
child’s tribe(s) was sent legal notice
more than 10 days prior to the first child
custody proceeding in accordance with
25 U.S.C. 1912(a). Indicate ‘‘yes’’, ‘‘no’’
or ‘‘the child’s Indian tribe is
unknown’’.
(iii) Indicate the Indian tribe(s) that
were sent notice for a child custody
proceeding as required in ICWA at 25
U.S.C. 1912(a). The title IV–E agency
must report the information in a format
according to ACF’s specifications.
(7) Request to transfer to tribal court.
For state title IV–E agencies only: If the
state title IV–E agency indicated ‘‘yes’’
to paragraph (b)(4) or indicated ‘‘yes,
ICWA applies’’ to paragraph (b)(5),
indicate whether either parent, the
Indian custodian, or the Indian child’s
tribe requested, orally on the record or
in writing, that the state court transfer
a foster-care or termination-of-parental
rights proceeding to the jurisdiction of
the Indian child’s tribe, in accordance
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
with 25 U.S.C. 1911(b), at any point
during the report period. Indicate ‘‘yes’’
or ‘‘no.’’ If the state title IV–E agency
indicated ‘‘yes,’’ then the state title IV–
E agency must complete paragraph
(b)(8) of this section. If the state title IV–
E agency indicated ‘‘no,’’ the state title
IV–E agency must leave paragraph (b)(8)
of this section blank.
(8) Denial of transfer. For state title
IV–E agencies only: If the state title IV–
E agency indicated ‘‘yes’’ to paragraph
(b)(7), indicate whether the state court
denied the request to transfer the case
to tribal jurisdiction. Indicate ‘‘yes’’ or
‘‘no.’’ If the state title IV–E agency
indicated ‘‘yes,’’ then the state title IV–
E agency must indicate in paragraphs
(b)(8)(i) through (iii) of this section
whether each reason for denial
‘‘applies’’ or ‘‘does not apply.’’
Otherwise leave these paragraphs blank.
(i) Either of the parents objected to
transferring the case to the tribal court.
(ii) The tribal court declined the
transfer to the tribal court.
(iii) The state court determined good
cause exists for denying the transfer to
the tribal court.
(9) Child’s race. In general, a child’s
race is determined by the child, the
child’s parent(s) or legal guardian(s).
Indicate whether each race category
listed in the data elements described in
paragraphs (b)(9)(i) through (viii) of this
section applies with a ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’
(i) Race—American Indian or Alaska
Native. An American Indian or Alaska
Native child has origins in any of the
original peoples of North or South
America (including Central America),
and maintains tribal affiliation or
community attachment.
(ii) Race—Asian. An Asian child has
origins in any of the original peoples of
the Far East, Southeast Asia or the
Indian subcontinent including, for
example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan,
Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the
Philippine Islands, Thailand and
Vietnam.
(iii) Race—Black or African
American. A Black or African American
child has origins in any of the black
racial groups of Africa.
(iv) Race—Native Hawaiian or Other
Pacific Islander. A Native Hawaiian or
Other Pacific Islander child has origins
in any of the original peoples of Hawaii,
Guam, Samoa or other Pacific Islands.
(v) Race—White. A white child has
origins in any of the original peoples of
Europe, the Middle East or North Africa.
(vi) Race—unknown. The child or
parent or legal guardian does not know
or is unable to communicate the race, or
at least one race of the child.
(vii) Race—abandoned. The child’s
race is unknown because the child has
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
been abandoned. Abandoned means that
the child was left alone or with others
and the identity of the parent(s) or legal
guardian(s) is unknown and cannot be
ascertained. This includes a child left at
a ‘‘safe haven.’’
(viii) Race—declined. The child or
parent(s) or legal guardian(s) has
declined to identify a race.
(10) Child’s Hispanic or Latino
ethnicity. In general, a child’s ethnicity
is determined by the child or the child’s
parent(s) or legal guardian(s). A child is
of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity if the
child is a person of Cuban, Mexican,
Puerto Rican, South or Central
American or other Spanish culture or
origin, regardless of race. Indicate
whether this category applies with a
‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’ If the child or the child’s
parent(s) or legal guardian(s) does not
know or is unable to communicate
whether the child is of Hispanic or
Latino ethnicity, indicate ‘‘unknown.’’ If
the child is abandoned indicate
‘‘abandoned.’’ Abandoned means that
the child was left alone or with others
and the identity of the parent(s) or legal
guardian(s) is unknown and cannot be
ascertained. This includes a child left at
a ‘‘safe haven.’’ If the child or the child’s
parent(s) or legal guardian(s) refuses to
identify the child’s ethnicity, indicate
‘‘declined.’’
(11)(i) Health assessment. Indicate
whether the child had a health
assessment during the current out-ofhome care episode. This assessment
could include an initial health screening
or any follow-up health screening per
section 422(b)(15)(A) of the Act.
Indicate ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’ If the title IV–
E agency indicated ‘‘yes,’’ the title IV–
E must complete paragraphs (b)(11)(ii)
and (b)(12); otherwise leave paragraphs
(b)(11)(ii) and (b)(12) of this section
blank.
(ii) Date of health assessment.
Indicate the month, day, and year of the
child’s most recent health assessment, if
the title IV–E agency reported ‘‘yes’’ in
paragraph (b)(11)(i) of this section;
otherwise leave this paragraph blank.
(12) Timely health assessment.
Indicate whether the date reported in
paragraph (b)(11)(ii) is within the
timeframes for initial and follow-up
health screenings established by the title
IV–E agency per section 422(b)(15)(A) of
the Act. Indicate ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’ If the
title IV–E agency reported ‘‘no’’ in
paragraph (b)(11)(i) of this section, the
title IV–E agency must leave this
paragraph blank.
(13) Health, behavioral or mental
health conditions. Indicate whether the
child was diagnosed by a qualified
professional, as defined by the state or
tribe, as having a health, behavioral or
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
90571
mental health condition listed below,
prior to or during the child’s current
out-of-home care episode as of the last
day of the report period. Indicate ‘‘child
has a diagnosed condition’’ if a qualified
professional has made such a diagnosis
and for each data element described in
paragraphs (b)(13)(i) through (xii) of this
section indicate ‘‘existing condition,’’
‘‘previous condition’’ or ‘‘does not
apply,’’ as applicable. Indicate ‘‘no
exam or assessment conducted’’ if a
qualified professional has not
conducted a medical exam or
assessment of the child and leave
paragraphs (b)(13)(i) through (xii) blank.
Indicate ‘‘exam or assessment
conducted and none of the conditions
apply’’ if a qualified professional has
conducted a medical exam or
assessment and has concluded that the
child does not have one of the
conditions listed below and leave
paragraphs (b)(13)(i) through (xii) blank.
Indicate ‘‘exam or assessment
conducted but results not received’’ if a
qualified professional has conducted a
medical exam or assessment but the title
IV–E agency has not yet received the
results of such an exam or assessment
and leave paragraphs (b)(13)(i) through
(xii) blank.
(i) Intellectual disability. The child
has, or had previously, significantly
sub-average general cognitive and motor
functioning existing concurrently with
deficits in adaptive behavior manifested
during the developmental period that
adversely affect the child’s socialization
and learning.
(ii) Autism spectrum disorder. The
child has, or had previously, a
neurodevelopment disorder,
characterized by social impairments,
communication difficulties, and
restricted, repetitive, and stereotyped
patterns of behavior. This includes the
range of disorders from autistic
disorder, sometimes called autism or
classical autism spectrum disorder, to
milder forms known as Asperger
syndrome and pervasive developmental
disorder not otherwise specified.
(iii) Visual impairment and blindness.
The child has, or had previously, a
visual impairment that may adversely
affects the day-to-day functioning or
educational performance, such as
blindness, amblyopia, or color
blindness.
(iv) Hearing impairment and
deafness. The child has, or had
previously, an impairment in hearing,
whether permanent or fluctuating, that
adversely affects the child’s day-to-day
functioning and educational
performance.
(v) Orthopedic impairment or other
physical condition. The child has, or
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
90572
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
had previously, a physical deformity,
such as amputations and fractures or
burns that cause contractures, or an
orthopedic impairment, including
impairments caused by a congenital
anomalies or disease, such as cerebral
palsy, spina bifida, multiple sclerosis, or
muscular dystrophy.
(vi) Mental/emotional disorders. The
child has, or had previously, one or
more mood or personality disorders or
conditions over a long period of time
and to a marked degree, such as conduct
disorder, oppositional defiant disorder,
emotional disturbance, anxiety disorder,
obsessive-compulsive disorder, or eating
disorder.
(vii) Attention deficit hyperactivity
disorder. The child has, or had
previously, a diagnosis of the
neurobehavioral disorders of attention
deficit or hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)
or attention deficit disorder (ADD).
(viii) Serious mental disorders. The
child has, or had previously, a diagnosis
of a serious mental disorder or illness,
such as bipolar disorder, depression,
psychotic disorders, or schizophrenia.
(ix) Developmental delay. The child
has been assessed by appropriate
diagnostic instruments and procedures
and is experiencing delays in one or
more of the following areas: physical
development or motor skills, cognitive
development, communication, language,
or speech development, social or
emotional development, or adaptive
development.
(x) Developmental disability. The
child has, or had previously been
diagnosed with a developmental
disability as defined in the
Developmental Disabilities Assistance
and Bill of Rights Act of 2000 (Pub. L.
106–402), section 102(8). This means a
severe, chronic disability of an
individual that is attributable to a
mental or physical impairment or
combination of mental and physical
impairments that manifests before the
age of 22, is likely to continue
indefinitely and results in substantial
functional limitations in three or more
areas of major life activity. Areas of
major life activity include: Self-care;
receptive and expressive language;
learning; mobility; self-direction;
capacity for independent living; and
economic self-sufficiency; and reflects
the individual’s need for a combination
and sequence of special,
interdisciplinary, or generic services,
individualized supports or other forms
of assistance that are of lifelong or
extended duration and are individually
planned and coordinated. If a child is
given the diagnosis of ‘‘developmental
disability,’’ do not indicate the
individual conditions that form the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
basis of this diagnosis separately in
other data elements.
(xi) Other diagnosed condition. The
child has, or had previously, a
diagnosed condition or other health
impairment other than those described
above, which requires special medical
care, such as asthma, diabetes, chronic
illnesses, a diagnosis as HIV positive or
AIDS, epilepsy, traumatic brain injury,
other neurological disorders, speech/
language impairment, learning
disability, or substance use issues.
(14) School enrollment. Indicate
whether the child is a full-time student
at and enrolled in (or in the process of
enrolling in) ‘‘elementary’’ or
‘‘secondary’’ education, or is a full or
part-time student at and enrolled in
‘‘post-secondary education or training’’
or ‘‘college,’’ as of the earlier of the last
day of the report period or the day of
exit for a child exiting out-of-home care
prior to the end of the report period. A
child is still considered enrolled in
school if the child would otherwise be
enrolled in a school that is currently out
of session. An ‘‘elementary or secondary
school student’’ is defined in section
471(a)(30) of the Act as a child that is:
enrolled (or in the process of enrolling)
in an institution which provides
elementary or secondary education, as
determined under the law of the state or
other jurisdiction in which the
institution is located; instructed in
elementary or secondary education at
home in accordance with a home school
law of the state or other jurisdiction in
which the home is located; in an
independent study elementary or
secondary education program in
accordance with the law of the state or
other jurisdiction in which the program
is located, which is administered by the
local school or school district; or
incapable of attending school on a fulltime basis due to the medical condition
of the child, which incapability is
supported by a regularly updated
information in the case plan of the
child. Enrollment in ‘‘post-secondary
education or training’’ refers to full or
part-time enrollment in any postsecondary education or training, other
than an education pursued at a college
or university. Enrollment in ‘‘college’’
refers to a child that is enrolled full or
part-time at a college or university. If
child has not reached compulsory
school age, indicate ‘‘not school-age.’’ If
the child has reached compulsory
school-age, but is not enrolled or is in
the process of enrolling in any school
setting full-time, indicate ‘‘not
enrolled.’’
(15) Educational level. Indicate the
highest educational level from
kindergarten to college or post-
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
secondary education/training completed
by the child as of the last day of the
report period. If child has not reached
compulsory school-age, indicate ‘‘not
school-age.’’ Indicate ‘‘kindergarten’’ if
the child is currently in or about to
begin 1st grade. Indicate ‘‘1st grade’’ if
the child is currently in or about to
begin 2nd grade. Indicate ‘‘2nd grade’’ if
the child is currently in or about to
begin 3rd grade. Indicate ‘‘3rd grade’’ if
the child is currently in or about to
begin 4th grade. Indicate ‘‘4th grade’’ if
the child is currently in or about to
begin 5th grade. Indicate ‘‘5th grade’’ if
the child is currently in or about to
begin 6th grade. Indicate ‘‘6th grade’’ if
the child is currently in or about to
begin 7th grade. Indicate ‘‘7th grade’’ if
the child is currently in or about to
begin 8th grade. Indicate ‘‘8th grade’’ if
the child is currently in or about to
begin 9th grade. Indicate ‘‘9th grade’’ if
the child is currently in or about to
begin 10th grade. Indicate ‘‘10th grade’’
if the child is currently in or about to
begin 11th grade. Indicate ‘‘11th grade’’
if the child is currently in or about to
begin 12th grade. Indicate ‘‘12th grade’’
if the child has graduated from high
school. Indicate ‘‘GED’’ if the child has
completed a general equivalency degree
or other high school equivalent. Indicate
‘‘Post-secondary education or training’’
if the child has completed any postsecondary education or training,
including vocational training, other than
an education pursued at a college or
university. Indicate ‘‘College’’ if the
child has completed at least a semester
of study at a college or university.
(16) Educational stability. Indicate if
the child is enrolled or is in the process
of enrolling in a new elementary or
secondary school prompted by an initial
placement after entry into foster care or
a placement change during the report
period with ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no’’ as
appropriate. If ‘‘yes,’’ indicate which of
the applicable reason(s) for the change
in enrollment as described in
paragraphs (b)(16)(i) through (vii) of this
section ‘‘applies’’ or ‘‘does not apply;’’
if ‘‘no,’’ the title IV–E agency must leave
those data elements blank.
(i) Proximity. The child enrolled in a
new school because of the distance to
his or her former school.
(ii) District/zoning rules. The child
enrolled in a new school because county
or jurisdictional law or regulations
prohibited attendance at former school.
(iii) Residential facility. The child
enrolled in a new school because he or
she formerly attended school on the
campus of a residential facility.
(iv) Services/programs. The child
enrolled in a new school to participate
in services or programs (academic,
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
behavioral or supportive services) not
offered at former school.
(v) Child request. The child enrolled
in a new school because he or she
requested to leave former school and
enroll in new school.
(vi) Parent/Legal guardian request.
The child enrolled in a new school
because his or her parent(s) or legal
guardian(s) requested for the child to
leave the former school and enroll in a
new school.
(vii) Other. The child enrolled in a
new school for a reason other than those
detailed in paragraphs (b)(13)(i) through
(vi) of this section.
(17) Pregnant or parenting. (i) Indicate
whether the child is pregnant as of the
end of the report period. Indicate ‘‘yes’’
or ‘‘no.’’
(ii) Indicate whether the child has
ever fathered or bore a child. Indicate
‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’
(iii) Indicate whether the child and
his/her child(ren) are placed together at
any point during the report period, if
the response in paragraph (b)(17)(ii) is
‘‘yes.’’ Indicate ‘‘yes,’’ ‘‘no,’’ or ‘‘not
applicable’’ if the response in paragraph
(b)(17)(ii) of this section is ‘‘no.’’
(18) Special education. Indicate
whether the child has an Individualized
Education Program (IEP) as defined in
section 614(d)(1) of Part B of Title I of
the Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act (IDEA) and implementing
regulations, or an Individualized Family
Service Program (IFSP) as defined in
section 636 of Part C of Title I of IDEA
and implementing regulations, as of the
end of the report period. Indicate ‘‘yes’’
if the child has either an IEP or an IFSP
or ‘‘no’’ if the child has neither.
(19) Prior adoption. Indicate whether
the child experienced a prior legal
adoption before the current out-of-home
care episode. Include any public,
private or independent adoption in the
United States or adoption in another
country and tribal customary adoptions.
Indicate ‘‘yes,’’ ‘‘no’’ or ‘‘abandoned’’ if
the information is unknown because the
child has been abandoned. Abandoned
means that the child was left alone or
with others and the identity of the
parent(s) or legal guardian(s) is
unknown and cannot be ascertained.
This includes a child left at a ‘‘safe
haven.’’ If the child has experienced a
prior legal adoption, the title IV–E
agency must complete paragraphs
(b)(19)(i) and (ii) of this section;
otherwise the title IV–E agency must
leave those data elements blank.
(i) Prior adoption date. Indicate the
month and year that the most recent
prior adoption was finalized. In the case
of a prior intercountry adoption where
the adoptive parent(s) readopted the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
child in the United States, the title
IV–E agency must provide the date of
the adoption (either the original
adoption in the home country or the readoption in the United States) that is
considered final in accordance with
applicable laws.
(ii) Prior adoption intercountry.
Indicate whether the child’s most recent
prior adoption was an intercountry
adoption, meaning that the child’s prior
adoption occurred in another country or
the child was brought into the United
States for the purposes of finalizing the
prior adoption. Indicate ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’
(20)(i) Prior guardianship. Indicate
whether the child experienced a prior
legal guardianship before the current
out-of-home care episode. Include any
public, private or independent
guardianship(s) in the United States that
meets the definition in section 475(7) of
the Act. This includes any judicially
created relationship between a child
and caretaker which is intended to be
permanent and self-sustaining as
evidenced by the transfer to the
caretaker of the following parental rights
with respect to the child: Protection,
education, care and control, custody,
and decision making. Indicate ‘‘yes,’’
‘‘no,’’ or ‘‘abandoned’’ if the information
is unknown because the child has been
abandoned. Abandoned means that the
child was left alone or with others and
the identity of the parent(s) or legal
guardian(s) is unknown and cannot be
ascertained. This includes a child left at
a ‘‘safe haven.’’ If the child has
experienced a prior legal guardianship,
the title IV–E agency must complete
paragraph (b)(20)(ii); otherwise the title
IV–E agency must leave it blank.
(ii) Prior guardianship date. Indicate
the month and year that the most recent
prior guardianship became legalized.
(21) Child financial and medical
assistance. Indicate whether the child
received financial and medical
assistance at any point during the sixmonth report period. Indicate ‘‘child has
received support/assistance’’ if the child
was the recipient of such assistance
during the report period, and indicate
which of the following sources of
support described in paragraphs
(b)(21)(i) through (xiii) of this section
‘‘applies’’ or ‘‘does not apply.’’ Indicate
‘‘no support/assistance received’’ if
none of these apply.
(i) SSI or Social Security benefits. The
child is receiving support from
Supplemental Security Income (SSI) or
other Social Security benefits under title
II or title XVI of the Act.
(ii) Title XIX Medicaid. The child is
eligible for and may be receiving
assistance under the state’s title XIX
program for medical assistance,
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
90573
including any benefits through title XIX
waivers or demonstration programs.
(iii) Title XXI SCHIP. The child is
eligible for and receiving assistance
under a state’s Children’s Health
Insurance Program (SCHIP) under title
XXI of the Act, including any benefits
under title XXI waivers or
demonstration programs.
(iv) State/Tribal adoption assistance.
The child is receiving an adoption
subsidy or other adoption assistance
paid for solely by the state or Indian
tribe.
(v) State/Tribal foster care. The child
is receiving a foster care payment that
is solely funded by the state or Indian
tribe.
(vi) Child support. Child support
funds are being paid to the title IV–E
agency for the benefit of the child by
assignment from the receiving parent.
(vii) Title IV–E adoption subsidy. The
child is determined eligible for a title
IV–E adoption assistance subsidy.
(viii) Title IV–E guardianship
assistance. The child is determined
eligible for a title IV–E guardianship
assistance subsidy.
(ix) Title IV–A TANF. The child is
living with relatives who are receiving
a Temporary Assistance for Needy
Families (TANF) cash assistance
payment on behalf of the child.
(x) Title IV–B. The child’s living
arrangement is supported by funds
under title IV–B of the Act.
(xi) SSBG. The child’s living
arrangement is supported by funds
under title XX of the Act.
(xii) Chafee Foster Care Independence
Program. The child is living
independently and is supported by
funds under the John F. Chafee Foster
Care Independence Program.
(xiii) Other. The child is receiving
financial support from another source
not previously listed above.
(22) Title IV–E foster care during
report period. Indicate whether a title
IV–E foster care maintenance payment
was paid on behalf of the child at any
point during the report period that is
claimed under title IV–E foster care with
a ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no,’’ as appropriate. Indicate
‘‘yes’’ if the child has met all eligibility
requirements of section 472(a) of the Act
and the title IV–E agency has claimed,
or intends to claim, Federal
reimbursement for foster care
maintenance payments made on the
child’s behalf during the report period.
(23) Total number of siblings. Indicate
the total number of siblings of the child.
A sibling to the child is his or her
brother or sister by biological, legal, or
marital connection. Do not include the
child who is subject of this record in the
total number. If the child does not have
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
90574
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
any siblings, the title IV–E agency must
indicate ‘‘0.’’ If the title IV–E agency
indicates ‘‘0,’’ the title IV–E agency
must leave paragraphs (b)(24) and
(b)(25) of this section blank.
(24) Siblings in foster care. Indicate
the number of siblings of the child who
are in foster care as defined in
§ 1355.20. A sibling to the child is his
or her brother or sister by biological,
legal, or marital connection. Do not
include the child who is subject of this
record in the total number. If the child
does not have any siblings, the title IV–
E agency must leave this paragraph
blank. If the child has siblings, but they
are not in foster care as defined in
§ 1355.20, the title IV–E agency must
indicate ‘‘0.’’ If the title IV–E agency
reported ‘‘0,’’ leave paragraph (b)(25) of
this section blank.
(25) Siblings in living arrangement.
Indicate the number of siblings of the
child who are in the same living
arrangement as the child, on the last day
of the report period. A sibling to the
child is his or her brother or sister by
biological, legal, or marital connection.
Do not include the child who is subject
of this record in the total number. If the
child does not have any siblings, the
title IV–E agency must leave this
paragraph blank. If the child has
siblings, but they are not in the same
living arrangement as the child, the title
IV–E agency must indicate ‘‘0.’’
(c) Parent or legal guardian
information—(1) Year of birth of first
parent or legal guardian. If applicable,
indicate the year of birth of the first
parent (biological, legal or adoptive) or
legal guardian of the child. To the extent
that a child has both a parent and a legal
guardian, or two different sets of legal
parents, the title IV–E agency must
report on those who had legal
responsibility for the child. We are not
seeking information on putative
parent(s) in this paragraph. If there is
only one parent or legal guardian of the
child, that person’s year of birth must be
reported here. If the child was
abandoned indicate ‘‘abandoned.’’
Abandoned means that the child was
left alone or with others and the identity
of the child’s parent(s) or legal
guardian(s) is unknown and cannot be
ascertained. This includes a child left at
a ‘‘safe haven.’’
(2) Year of birth of second parent or
legal guardian. If applicable, indicate
the year of birth of the second parent
(biological, legal or adoptive) or legal
guardian of the child. We are not
seeking information on putative
parent(s) in this paragraph. If the child
was abandoned, indicate ‘‘abandoned.’’
Abandoned means that the child was
left alone or with others and the identity
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
of the child’s parent(s) or legal
guardian(s) is unknown and cannot be
ascertained. This includes a child left at
a ‘‘safe haven.’’ Indicate ‘‘not
applicable’’ if there is not another
parent or legal guardian.
(3) Tribal membership mother. For
state title IV–E agencies only, indicate
whether the biological or adoptive
mother is a member of an Indian tribe.
Indicate ‘‘yes,’’ ‘‘no,’’ or ‘‘unknown.’’
(4) Tribal membership father. For
state title IV–E agencies only, indicate
whether the biological or adoptive
father is a member of an Indian tribe.
Indicate ‘‘yes,’’ ‘‘no,’’ or ‘‘unknown.’’
(5) Termination/modification of
parental rights. Indicate whether the
termination/modification of parental
rights for each parent (biological, legal
and/or putative) was voluntary or
involuntary. Voluntary means the
parent voluntary relinquished their
parental rights to the title IV–E agency,
with or without court involvement.
Indicate ‘‘voluntary’’ or ‘‘involuntary.’’
Indicate ‘‘not applicable’’ if there was
no termination/modification and leave
paragraphs (c)(5)(i), (c)(5)(ii), (c)(6) and
(c)(7) of this section blank.
(i) Termination/modification of
parental rights petition. Indicate the
month, day and year that each petition
to terminate/modify the parental rights
of a biological, legal and/or putative
parent was filed in court, if applicable.
Indicate ‘‘deceased’’ if the parent is
deceased.
(ii) Termination/modification of
parental rights. Enter the month, day
and year that the parental rights were
voluntarily or involuntarily terminated/
modified, for each biological, legal and/
or putative parent, if applicable. If the
parent is deceased, enter the date of
death.
(6) Involuntary termination/
modification of parental rights under
ICWA. For state title IV–E agencies only:
If the state title IV–E agency indicated
‘‘yes’’ to paragraph (b)(4) or indicated
‘‘yes, ICWA applies’’ to paragraph (b)(5),
and indicated ‘‘involuntary’’ to
paragraph (c)(5), the state title IV–E
agency must complete paragraphs
(c)(6)(i) through (iii) of this section.
(i) Indicate whether the state court
found beyond a reasonable doubt that
continued custody of the Indian child
by the parent or Indian custodian is
likely to result in serious emotional or
physical damage to the Indian child in
accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1912(f).
Indicate with ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’
(ii) Indicate whether the court
decision to involuntarily terminate
parental rights included the testimony
of one or more qualified expert
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
witnesses in accordance with 25 U.S.C.
1912(f). Indicate ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’
(iii) Indicate whether prior to
terminating parental rights, the court
concluded that active efforts have been
made to prevent the breakup of the
Indian family and that those efforts were
unsuccessful in accordance with 25
U.S.C. 1912(d). Indicate ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’
(7) Voluntary termination/
modification of parental rights under
ICWA. For state title IV–E agencies only:
If the state title IV–E agency indicated
‘‘yes’’ to paragraph (b)(4) or indicated
‘‘yes, ICWA applies’’ to paragraph (b)(5),
and indicated ‘‘voluntary’’ to paragraph
(c)(5) of this section, indicate whether
the consent to termination of parental or
Indian custodian rights was executed in
writing and recorded before a court of
competent jurisdiction with a
certification by the court that the terms
and consequences of consent were
explained on the record in detail and
were fully understood by the parent or
Indian custodian in accordance with 25
CFR 23.125(a) and (c). Indicate ‘‘yes’’ or
‘‘no.’’
(d) Removal information—(1) Date of
child’s removal. Indicate the removal
date(s) in month, day and year format
for each removal of a child who enters
the placement and care responsibility of
the title IV–E agency. For a child who
is removed and is placed initially in
foster care, indicate the date that the
title IV–E agency received placement
and care responsibility. For a child who
ran away or whose whereabouts are
unknown at the time the child is
removed and is placed in the placement
and care responsibility of the title IV–
E agency, indicate the date that the title
IV–E agency received placement and
care responsibility. For a child who is
removed and is placed initially in a
non-foster care setting, indicate the date
that the child enters foster care as the
date of removal.
(2) Removal transaction date. A nonmodifiable, computer-generated date
which accurately indicates the month,
day and year each response to paragraph
(d)(1) of this section was entered into
the information system.
(3) Removals under ICWA. For state
title IV–E agencies: If the state title IV–
E agency indicated ‘‘yes’’ to paragraph
(b)(4) or indicated ‘‘yes, ICWA applies’’
to paragraph (b)(5), the state title IV–E
agency must complete paragraphs
(d)(3)(i) through (d)(3)(iii) for each
removal reported in paragraph (d)(1) of
this section.
(i) Indicate whether the court order
for foster care placement was made as
a result of clear and convincing
evidence that continued custody of the
Indian child by the parent or Indian
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
custodian was likely to result in serious
emotional or physical damage to the
Indian child in accordance with 25
U.S.C. 1912(e) and 25 CFR 121(a).
Indicate ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’
(ii) Indicate whether the evidence
presented for foster care placement as
indicated in paragraph (d)(3)(i) of this
section included the testimony of a
qualified expert witness in accordance
with 25 U.S.C. 1912(e) and 25 CFR
23.121(a). Indicate ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’
(iii) Indicate whether the evidence
presented for foster care placement as
indicated in paragraph (d)(3)(i) indicates
that prior to each removal reported in
paragraph (d)(1) of this section that
active efforts have been made to prevent
the breakup of the Indian family and
that those efforts were unsuccessful in
accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1912(d).
Indicate ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’
(4) Environment at removal. Indicate
the type of environment (household or
facility) the child was living in at the
time of each removal for each removal
reported in paragraph (d)(1) of this
section. Indicate ‘‘parent household’’ if
the child was living in a household that
included one or both of the child’s
parents, whether biological, adoptive or
legal. Indicate ‘‘relative household’’ if
the child was living with a relative(s),
the relative(s) is not the child’s legal
guardian and neither of the child’s
parents were living in the household.
Indicate ‘‘legal guardian household’’ if
the child was living with a legal
guardian(s), the guardian(s) is not the
child’s relative and neither of the child’s
parents were living in the household.
Indicate ‘‘relative legal guardian
household’’ if the child was living with
a relative(s) who is also the child’s legal
guardian. Indicate ‘‘justice facility’’ if
the child was in a detention center, jail
or other similar setting where the child
was detained. Indicate ‘‘medical/mental
health facility’’ if the child was living in
a facility such as a medical or
psychiatric hospital or residential
treatment center. Indicate ‘‘other’’ if the
child was living in another situation not
so described, such as living
independently or homeless.
(5) Authority for placement and care
responsibility. Indicate the title IV–E
agency’s authority for placement and
care responsibility of the child for each
removal reported in paragraph (d)(1) of
this section. ‘‘Court ordered’’ means that
the court has issued an order that is the
basis for the title IV–E agency’s
placement and care responsibility.
‘‘Voluntary placement agreement’’
means that an official voluntary
placement agreement has been executed
between the parent(s), legal guardian(s),
or child age 18 or older and the title IV–
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
E agency. The placement remains
voluntary even if a subsequent court
order is issued to continue the child in
out-of-home care. ‘‘Not yet determined’’
means that a voluntary placement
agreement has not been signed or a
court order has not been issued. When
either a voluntary placement agreement
is signed or a court order issued, the
record must be updated from ‘‘not yet
determined’’ to the appropriate response
option to reflect the title IV–E agency’s
authority for placement and care
responsibility at that time.
(6) Child and family circumstances at
removal. Indicate all child and family
circumstances that were present at the
time of the child’s removal and/or
related to the child being placed into
foster care for each removal reported in
paragraph (d)(1) of this section. Indicate
whether each circumstance listed in the
data elements described in paragraphs
(d)(6)(i) through (xxxiii) ‘‘applies’’ or
‘‘does not apply’’ for each removal
indicated in paragraph (d)(1) of this
section.
(i) Runaway. The child has left,
without authorization, the home or
facility where the child was residing.
(ii) Whereabouts unknown. The
child’s whereabouts are unknown and
the title IV–E agency does not consider
the child to have run away.
(iii) Physical abuse. Alleged or
substantiated physical abuse, injury or
maltreatment of the child by a person
responsible for the child’s welfare.
(iv) Sexual abuse. Alleged or
substantiated sexual abuse or
exploitation of the child by a person
who is responsible for the child’s
welfare.
(v) Psychological or emotional abuse.
Alleged or substantiated psychological
or emotional abuse, including verbal
abuse, of the child by a person who is
responsible for the child’s welfare.
(vi) Neglect. Alleged or substantiated
negligent treatment or maltreatment of
the child, including failure to provide
adequate food, clothing, shelter,
supervision or care by a person who is
responsible for the child’s welfare.
(vii) Medical neglect. Alleged or
substantiated medical neglect caused by
a failure to provide for the appropriate
health care of the child by a person who
is responsible for the child’s welfare,
although the person was financially able
to do so, or was offered financial or
other means to do so.
(viii) Domestic violence. Alleged or
substantiated violent act(s), including
any forceful detention of an individual,
that results in, threatens to result in, or
attempts to cause physical injury or
mental harm. This is committed by a
person against another individual
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
90575
residing in the child’s home and with
whom such person is in an intimate
relationship; dating relationship; is or
was related by marriage; or has a child
in common. This circumstance includes
domestic violence between the child
and his or her partner and applies to a
child or youth of any age (including
those younger and older than the age of
majority. This does not include alleged
or substantiated maltreatment of the
child by a person who is responsible for
the child’s welfare.
(ix) Abandonment. The child was left
alone or with others and the parent or
legal guardian’s identity is unknown
and cannot be ascertained. This
includes a child left at a ‘‘safe haven.’’
This category does not apply when the
identity of the parent(s) or legal
guardian(s) is known.
(x) Failure to return. The parent, legal
guardian or caretaker did not or has not
returned for the child or made his or her
whereabouts known. This category does
not apply when the identity of the
parent, legal guardian or caretaker is
unknown.
(xi) Caretaker’s alcohol use. A parent,
legal guardian or other caretaker
responsible for the child uses alcohol
compulsively that is not of a temporary
nature.
(xii) Caretaker’s drug use. A parent,
legal guardian or other caretaker
responsible for the child uses drugs
compulsively that is not of a temporary
nature.
(xiii) Child alcohol use. The child
uses alcohol.
(xiv) Child drug use. The child uses
drugs.
(xv) Prenatal alcohol exposure. The
child has been identified as prenatally
exposed to alcohol, resulting in fetal
alcohol spectrum disorders such as fetal
alcohol exposure, fetal alcohol effect or
fetal alcohol syndrome.
(xvi) Prenatal drug exposure. The
child has been identified as prenatally
exposed to drugs.
(xvii) Diagnosed condition. The child
has a clinical diagnosis by a qualified
professional of a health, behavioral or
mental health condition, such as one or
more of the following: Intellectual
disability, emotional disturbance,
specific learning disability, hearing,
speech or sight impairment, physical
disability or other clinically diagnosed
condition.
(xviii) Inadequate access to mental
health services. The child and/or child’s
family has inadequate resources to
access the necessary mental health
services outside of the child’s out-ofhome care placement.
(xix) Inadequate access to medical
services. The child and/or child’s family
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
90576
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
has inadequate resources to access the
necessary medical services outside of
the child’s out-of-home care placement.
(xx) Child behavior problem. The
child’s behavior in his or her school
and/or community adversely affects his
or her socialization, learning, growth
and/or moral development. This
includes all child behavior problems, as
well as adjudicated and non-adjudicated
status or delinquency offenses and
convictions.
(xxi) Death of caretaker. Existing
family stress in caring for the child or
an inability to care for the child due to
the death of a parent, legal guardian or
other caretaker.
(xxii) Incarceration of caretaker. The
child’s parent, legal guardian or
caretaker is temporarily or permanently
placed in jail or prison which adversely
affects his or her ability to care for the
child.
(xxiii) Caretaker’s significant
impairment—physical/emotional. A
physical or emotional illness or
disabling condition of the child’s
parent, legal guardian or caretaker that
adversely limits his or her ability to care
for the child.
(xxiv) Caretaker’s significant
impairment—cognitive. The child’s
parent, legal guardian or caretaker has
cognitive limitations that impact his or
her ability to function in areas of daily
life, which adversely affect his or her
ability to care for the child. It also may
be characterized by a significantly
below-average score on a test of mental
ability or intelligence.
(xxv) Inadequate housing. The child’s
or his or her family’s housing is
substandard, overcrowded, unsafe or
otherwise inadequate which results in it
being inappropriate for the child to
reside.
(xxvi) Voluntary relinquishment for
adoption. The child’s parent has
voluntarily relinquished the child by
assigning the physical and legal custody
of the child to the title IV–E agency, in
writing, for the purpose of having the
child adopted.
(xxvii) Child requested placement.
The child, age 18 or older, has requested
placement into foster care.
(xxviii) Sex trafficking. The child is a
victim of sex trafficking at the time of
removal.
(xxix) Parental immigration
detainment or deportation. The parent
is or was detained or deported by
immigration officials.
(xxx) Family conflict related to child’s
sexual orientation, gender identity, or
gender expression. There is family
conflict related to the child’s sexual
orientation, gender identity, or gender
expression. This includes the child’s
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
expressed identity or perceived status as
lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender,
questioning, queer, or gender nonconforming. This also includes any
conflict related to the ways in which a
child manifests masculinity or
femininity.
(xxxi) Educational neglect. Alleged or
substantiated failure of a parent or
caregiver to enroll a child of mandatory
school age in school or provide
appropriate home schooling or needed
special educational training, thus
allowing the child or youth to engage in
chronic truancy.
(xxxii) Public agency title IV–E
agreement. The child is in the
placement and care responsibility of
another public agency that has an
agreement with the title IV–E agency
pursuant to section 472(a)(2)(B) of the
Act and on whose behalf title IV–E
foster care maintenance payments are
made
(xxxiii) Tribal title IV–E agreement.
The child is in the placement and care
responsibility of an Indian tribe, tribal
organization or consortium with which
the title IV–E agency has an agreement
and on whose behalf title IV–E foster
care maintenance payments are made.
(xxxiv) Homelessness. The child or
his or her family has no regular or
adequate place to live. This includes
living in a car, or on the street, or
staying in a homeless or other
temporary shelter.
(7) Victim of sex trafficking prior to
entering foster care. Indicate whether
the child had been a victim of sex
trafficking before the current out-ofhome care episode. Indicate ‘‘yes’’ if the
child was a victim or ‘‘no’’ if the child
had not been a victim.
(i) Report to law enforcement. If the
title IV–E agency indicated ‘‘yes’’ in
paragraph (d)(7), indicate whether the
title IV–E agency made a report to law
enforcement for entry into the National
Crime Information Center (NCIC)
database. Indicate ‘‘yes’’ if the agency
made a report to law enforcement and
indicate ‘‘no’’ if the agency did not
make a report.
(ii) Date. If the title IV–E agency
indicated ‘‘yes’’ in paragraph (d)(7)(i) of
this section, indicate the date that the
agency made the report to law
enforcement.
(8) Victim of sex trafficking while in
foster care. Indicate ‘‘yes’’ if the child
was a victim of sex trafficking while in
out-of-home care during the current outof-home care episode. Indicate ‘‘no’’ if
the child was not a victim of sex
trafficking during the current out-ofhome care episode.
(i) Report to law enforcement. If the
title IV–E agency indicated ‘‘yes’’ in this
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
paragraph (d)(8) of this section, indicate
whether the agency made a report to law
enforcement for entry into the NCIC
database. Indicate ‘‘yes’’ if the title IV–
E agency made a report(s) to law
enforcement and indicate ‘‘no’’ if the
title IV–E agency did not make a report.
(ii) Date. If the title IV–E agency
indicated ‘‘yes’’ in paragraph (d)(8)(i),
indicate the date(s) the agency made the
report(s) to law enforcement.
(e) Living arrangement and provider
information—(1) Date of living
arrangement. Indicate the month, day
and year representing the first date of
placement in each of the child’s living
arrangements for each out-of-home care
episode. In the case of a child who has
run away, whose whereabouts are
unknown, or who is already in a living
arrangement and remains there when
the title IV–E agency receives placement
and care responsibility, indicate the
date of the VPA or court order providing
the title IV–E agency with placement
and care responsibility for the child,
rather than the date when the child was
originally placed in the living
arrangement.
(2) Foster family home. Indicate
whether each of the child’s living
arrangements is a foster family home,
with a ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no’’ as appropriate. If
the child has run away or the child’s
whereabouts are unknown, indicate
‘‘no.’’ If the title IV–E agency indicates
that the child is living in a foster family
home, by indicating ‘‘yes,’’ the title IV–
E agency must complete the data
element Foster family home type in
paragraph (e)(3) of this section. If the
title IV–E agency indicates ‘‘no,’’ the
title IV–E agency must complete the
data element Other living arrangement
type in paragraph (e)(4).
(3) Foster family home type. If the title
IV–E agency indicated that the child is
living in a foster family home in the
data element described in paragraph
(e)(2), indicate whether each foster
family home type listed in the data
elements in paragraphs (e)(3)(i) through
(e)(3)(vi) of this section applies or does
not apply; otherwise the title IV–E
agency must leave this data element
blank.
(i) Licensed home. The child’s living
arrangement is licensed or approved by
the state or tribal licensing/approval
authority.
(ii) Therapeutic foster family home.
The home provides specialized care and
services.
(iii) Shelter care foster family home.
The home is so designated by the state
or tribal licensing/approval authority,
and is designed to provide short-term or
transitional care.
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
(iv) Relative foster family home. The
foster parent(s) is related to the child by
biological, legal or marital connection
and the relative foster parent(s) lives in
the home as his or her primary
residence.
(v) Pre-adoptive home. The home is
one in which the family and the title
IV–E agency have agreed on a plan to
adopt the child.
(vi) Kin foster family home. The home
is one in which there is a kin
relationship as defined by the title IV–
E agency, such as one where there is a
psychological, cultural or emotional
relationship between the child or the
child’s family and the foster parent(s)
and there is not a legal, biological, or
marital connection between the child
and foster parent.
(4) Other living arrangement type. If
the title IV–E agency indicated that the
child’s living arrangement is other than
a foster family home in the data element
Foster family home in paragraph (e)(2)
of this section, indicate the type of
setting; otherwise the title IV–E agency
must leave this data element blank.
Indicate ‘‘group home-family operated’’
if the child is in a group home that
provides 24-hour care in a private
family home where the family members
are the primary caregivers. Indicate
‘‘group home-staff operated’’ if the child
is in a group home that provides 24hour care for children where the caregiving is provided by shift or rotating
staff. Indicate ‘‘group home-shelter
care’’ if the child is in a group home that
provides 24-hour care which is shortterm or transitional in nature, and is
designated by the state or tribal
licensing/approval authority to provide
shelter care. Indicate ‘‘residential
treatment center’’ if the child is in a
facility that has the purpose of treating
children with mental health or
behavioral conditions. Indicate ‘‘child
care institution’’ if the child is in a
private child care institution, or a public
child care institution which
accommodates no more than 25
children, and is licensed by the state or
tribal authority responsible for licensing
or approving child care institutions.
This does not include detention
facilities, forestry camps, training
schools or any other facility operated
primarily for the detention of children
who are determined to be delinquent.
Indicate ‘‘child care institution-shelter
care’’ if the child is in a child care
institution as defined above and the
institution is designated to provide
shelter care by the state or tribal
authority responsible for licensing or
approving child care institutions and is
short-term or transitional in nature.
Indicate ‘‘supervised independent
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
living’’ if the child is living
independently in a supervised setting.
Indicate ‘‘juvenile justice facility’’ if the
child is in a secure facility or institution
where alleged or adjudicated juvenile
delinquents are housed. Indicate
‘‘medical or rehabilitative facility’’ if the
child is in a facility where an individual
receives medical or physical health care,
such as a hospital. Indicate ‘‘psychiatric
hospital’’ if the child is in a facility that
provides emotional or psychological
health care and is licensed or accredited
as a hospital. Indicate ‘‘runaway’’ if the
child has left, without authorization, the
home or facility where the child was
placed. Indicate ‘‘whereabouts
unknown’’ if the child is not in the
physical custody of the title IV–E
agency or person or institution with
whom the child has been placed, the
child’s whereabouts are unknown and
the title IV–E agency does not consider
the child to have run away. Indicate
‘‘placed at home’’ if the child is home
with the parent(s) or legal guardian(s) in
preparation for the title IV–E agency to
return the child home permanently.
(5) Private agency living arrangement.
Indicate the type of contractual
relationship with a private agency for
each of the child’s living arrangements
reported in paragraph (e)(1) of this
section. Indicate ‘‘private agency
involvement’’ if the child is placed in a
living arrangement that is either
licensed, managed, or run by a private
agency that is under contract with the
title IV–E agency. Indicate ‘‘no private
agency involvement’’ if the child’s
living arrangement is not licensed,
managed or run by a private agency.
(6) Location of living arrangement.
Indicate whether each of the child’s
living arrangements reported in
paragraph (e)(1) of this section is located
within or outside of the reporting state
or tribal service area or is outside of the
country. Indicate ‘‘out-of-state or out-oftribal service area’’ if the child’s living
arrangement is located outside of the
reporting state or tribal service area but
inside the United States. Indicate ‘‘instate or in-tribal service area’’ if the
child’s living arrangement is located
within the reporting state or tribal
service area. Indicate ‘‘out-of-country’’ if
the child’s living arrangement is outside
of the United States. Indicate ‘‘runaway
or whereabouts unknown’’ if the child
has run away from his or her living
arrangement or the child’s whereabouts
are unknown. If the title IV–E agency
indicates either ‘‘out-of-state or out-oftribal service area’’ or ‘‘out-of-country’’
for the child’s living arrangement, the
title IV–E agency must complete the
data element in paragraph (e)(7) of this
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
90577
section; otherwise the title IV–E agency
must leave paragraph (e)(7) blank.
(7) Jurisdiction or country where child
is living. Indicate the state, tribal service
area, Indian reservation, or country
where the reporting title IV–E agency
placed the child for each living
arrangement, if the title IV–E agency
indicated either ‘‘out-of-state’’ or ‘‘outof-tribal service area’’ or ‘‘out-ofcountry’’ in paragraph (e)(6) of this
section; otherwise the title IV–E agency
must leave paragraph (e)(7) blank. The
title IV–E agency must report the
information in a format according to
ACF’s specifications.
(8) Available ICWA foster care and
pre-adoptive placement preferences. For
state title IV–E agencies only: If the state
title IV–E agency indicated ‘‘yes’’ to
paragraph (b)(4) or indicated ‘‘yes,
ICWA applies’’ to paragraph (b)(5),
indicate which foster care or preadoptive placements that meet the
placement preferences of ICWA in 25
U.S.C. 1915(b) were willing to accept
placement for each of the child’s living
arrangements reported in paragraph
(e)(1) of this section. Indicate in each
paragraph (e)(8)(i) through (v) of this
section ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’
(i) A member of the Indian child’s
extended family.
(ii) A foster home licensed, approved,
or specified by the Indian child’s tribe.
(iii) An Indian foster home licensed or
approved by an authorized non-Indian
licensing authority.
(iv) An institution for children
approved by an Indian tribe or operated
by an Indian organization which has a
program suitable to meet the Indian
child’s needs.
(v) A placement that complies with
the order of preference for foster care or
pre-adoptive placements established by
an Indian child’s tribe, in accordance
with 25 U.S.C. 1915(c).
(9) Foster care and pre-adoptive
placement preferences under ICWA. For
state title IV–E agencies only: If the state
title IV–E agency indicated ‘‘yes’’ to
paragraph (b)(4) or indicated ‘‘yes,
ICWA applies’’ to paragraph (b)(5), for
each of the Indian child’s foster care or
pre-adoptive placement(s) reported in
paragraph (e)(1) of this section, indicate
whether the placement meets the
placement preferences of ICWA in 25
U.S.C. 1915(b) by indicating with whom
the Indian child is placed. Indicate ‘‘a
member of the Indian child’s extended
family,’’ ‘‘a foster home licensed,
approved, or specified by the Indian
child’s tribe,’’ ‘‘an Indian foster home
licensed or approved by an authorized
non-Indian licensing authority,’’ ‘‘an
institution for children approved by an
Indian tribe or operated by an Indian
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
90578
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
organization which has a program
suitable to meet the Indian child’s
needs,’’ ‘‘a placement that complies
with the order of preference for foster
care or pre-adoptive placements
established by an Indian child’s tribe, in
accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1915(c)’’ or
‘‘placement does not meet ICWA
placement preferences.’’ If the state IV–
E agency indicated ‘‘placement does not
meet ICWA placement preferences,’’
then the state IV–E agency must
complete paragraph (e)(10). Otherwise,
the state title IV–E agency must leave
paragraph (e)(10) blank.
(10) Good cause under ICWA. For
state title IV–E agencies only: If the state
title IV–E agency indicated ‘‘placement
does not meet ICWA placement
preferences’’ in paragraph (e)(9),
indicate whether the court determined
by clear and convincing evidence, on
the record or in writing, a good cause to
depart from the ICWA placement
preferences in accordance with 25
U.S.C. 1915(b) or to depart from the
placement preferences of the Indian
child’s tribe in accordance with 25
U.S.C. 1915(c). Indicate ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’
If the state title IV–E agency indicated
‘‘yes,’’ then the state title IV–E agency
must indicate the basis for good cause
in paragraph (e)(11) of this section. If
the state title IV–E agency indicated
‘‘no,’’ then the state title IV–E agency
must leave paragraph (e)(11) blank.
(11) Basis for good cause. For state
title IV–E agencies only: If the state title
IV–E agency indicated ‘‘yes’’ to
paragraph (e)(10), indicate the state
court’s basis for determining good cause
to depart from ICWA placement
preferences by indicating ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no’’
in each paragraph (e)(11)(i) through (v)
of this section.
(i) Request of one or both of the
Indian child’s parents.
(ii) Request of the Indian child.
(iii) The unavailability of a suitable
placement after a determination by the
court that a diligent search was
conducted to find suitable placements
meeting the placement preferences in
ICWA at 25 U.S.C. 1915 but none has
been located.
(iv) The extraordinary physical,
mental or emotional needs of the Indian
child, such as specialized treatment
services that may be unavailable in the
community where families who meet
the placement preferences live.
(v) The presence of a sibling
attachment that can be maintained only
through a particular placement.
(12) Marital status of the foster
parent(s). Indicate the marital status of
the child’s foster parent(s) for each
foster family home living arrangement
in which the child is placed, as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
indicated in paragraph (e)(3) of this
section. Indicate ‘‘married couple’’ if the
foster parents are considered united in
matrimony according to applicable
laws. Include common law marriage,
where provided by applicable laws.
Indicate ‘‘unmarried couple’’ if the
foster parents are living together as a
couple, but are not united in matrimony
according to applicable laws. Indicate
‘‘separated’’ if the foster parent is legally
separated or is living apart from his or
her spouse. Indicate ‘‘single adult’’ if the
foster parent is not married and is not
living with another individual as part of
a couple. If the response is either
‘‘married couple’’ or ‘‘unmarried
couple,’’ the title IV–E agency must
complete the data elements for the
second foster parent in paragraphs
(e)(20) through (e)(25) of this section;
otherwise the title IV–E agency must
leave those data elements blank.
(13) Child’s relationships to the foster
parent(s). Indicate the type of
relationship between the child and his
or her foster parent(s), for each foster
family home living arrangement in
which the child is placed, as indicated
in paragraph (e)(3) of this section.
Indicate ‘‘paternal grandparent(s)’’ if the
foster parent(s) is the child’s paternal
grandparent (by biological, legal or
marital connection). Indicate ‘‘maternal
grandparent(s)’’ if the foster parent(s) is
the child’s maternal grandparent (by
biological, legal or marital connection).
Indicate ‘‘other paternal relative(s)’’ if
the foster parent(s) is the child’s
paternal relative (by biological, legal or
marital connection) other than a
grandparent, such as an aunt, uncle or
cousin. Indicate ‘‘other maternal
relative(s)’’ if the foster parent(s) is the
child’s maternal relative (by biological,
legal or marital connection) other than
a grandparent, such as an aunt, uncle or
cousin. Indicate ‘‘sibling(s)’’ if the foster
parent(s) is a brother or sister of the
child, either biologically, legally or by
marriage. Indicate ‘‘non-relative(s)’’ if
the foster parent(s) is not related to the
child (by biological, legal or marital
connection). Indicate ‘‘kin’’ if the foster
parent(s) has kin relationship to the
child as defined by the title IV–E
agency, such as one where there is a
psychological, cultural or emotional
relationship between the child or the
child’s family and the foster parent(s)
and there is not a legal, biological, or
marital connection between the child
and foster parent.
(14) Year of birth for first foster
parent. Indicate the year of birth for the
first foster parent for each foster family
home living arrangement in which the
child is placed, as indicated in
paragraph (e)(3) of this section.
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(15) First foster parent tribal
membership. Indicate whether the first
foster parent is a member of an Indian
tribe. Indicate ‘‘yes,’’ ‘‘no,’’ or
‘‘unknown.’’
(16) Race of first foster parent.
Indicate the race of the first foster parent
for each foster family home living
arrangement in which the child is
placed, as indicated in paragraph (e)(3)
of this section. In general, an
individual’s race is determined by the
individual. Indicate whether each race
category listed in the data elements
described in paragraphs (e)(16)(i)
through (vii) of this section applies with
a ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’
(i) Race—American Indian or Alaska
Native. An American Indian or Alaska
Native individual has origins in any of
the original peoples of North or South
America (including Central America)
and maintains tribal affiliation or
community attachment.
(ii) Race—Asian. An Asian individual
has origins in any of the original
peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia
or the Indian subcontinent including,
for example, Cambodia, China, India,
Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the
Philippine Islands, Thailand and
Vietnam.
(iii) Race—Black or African
American. A Black or African American
individual has origins in any of the
black racial groups of Africa.
(iv) Race—Native Hawaiian or Other
Pacific Islander. A Native Hawaiian or
Other Pacific Islander individual has
origins in any of the original peoples of
Hawaii, Guam, Samoa or other Pacific
Islands.
(v) Race—White. A White individual
has origins in any of the original
peoples of Europe, the Middle East or
North Africa.
(vi) Race—unknown. The foster
parent does not know his or her race, or
at least one race.
(vii) Race—declined. The first foster
parent has declined to identify a race.
(17) Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of
first foster parent. Indicate the Hispanic
or Latino ethnicity of the first foster
parent for each foster family home
living arrangement in which the child is
placed, as indicated in paragraph (e)(3)
of this section. In general, an
individual’s ethnicity is determined by
the individual. An individual is of
Hispanic or Latino ethnicity if the
individual is a person of Cuban,
Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central
American or other Spanish culture or
origin, regardless of race. Indicate
whether this category applies with a
‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’ If the first foster parent
does not know his or her ethnicity
indicate ‘‘unknown.’’ If the individual
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
refuses to identify his or her ethnicity,
indicate ‘‘declined.’’
(18) Gender of first foster parent.
Indicate whether the first foster parent
self identifies as ‘‘female’’ or ‘‘male.’’
(19) First foster parent sexual
orientation. Indicate whether the first
foster parent self identifies as ‘‘straight
or heterosexual,’’ ‘‘gay or lesbian,’’
‘‘bisexual,’’ ‘‘don’t know,’’ ‘‘something
else,’’ or ‘‘declined’’ if the first foster
parent declined to identify his/her
status.
(20) Year of birth for second foster
parent. Indicate the birth year of the
second foster parent for each foster
family home living arrangement in
which the child is placed, as indicated
in paragraph (e)(3) of this section, if
applicable. The title IV–E agency must
leave this data element blank if there is
no second foster parent according to
paragraph (e)(12) of this section.
(21) Second foster parent tribal
membership. Indicate whether the
second foster parent is a member of an
Indian tribe. Indicate ‘‘yes,’’ ‘‘no,’’ or
‘‘unknown.’’
(22) Race of second foster parent.
Indicate the race of the second foster
parent for each foster family home
living arrangement in which the child is
placed, as indicated in paragraph (e)(3)
of this section, if applicable. In general,
an individual’s race is determined by
the individual. Indicate whether each
race category listed in the data elements
described in paragraphs (e)(22)(i)
through (vii) of this section applies with
a ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’ The title IV–E agency
must leave this data element blank if
there is no second foster parent
according to paragraph (e)(12) of this
section.
(i) Race—American Indian or Alaska
Native. An American Indian or Alaska
Native individual has origins in any of
the original peoples of North or South
America (including Central America)
and maintains tribal affiliation or
community attachment.
(ii) Race—Asian. An Asian individual
has origins in any of the original
peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia
or the Indian subcontinent including,
for example, Cambodia, China, India,
Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the
Philippine Islands, Thailand and
Vietnam.
(iii) Race—Black or African
American. A Black or African American
individual has origins in any of the
black racial groups of Africa.
(iv) Race—Native Hawaiian or Other
Pacific Islander. A Native Hawaiian or
Other Pacific Islander individual has
origins in any of the original peoples of
Hawaii, Guam, Samoa or other Pacific
Islands.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
(v) Race—White. A White individual
has origins in any of the original
peoples of Europe, the Middle East or
North Africa.
(vi) Race—unknown. The second
foster parent does not know his or her
race, or at least one race.
(vii) Race—declined. The second
foster parent has declined to identify a
race.
(23) Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of
second foster parent. Indicate the
Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of the
second foster parent for each foster
family home living arrangement in
which the child is placed, as indicated
in paragraph (e)(3) of this section, if
applicable. In general, an individual’s
ethnicity is determined by the
individual. An individual is of Hispanic
or Latino ethnicity if the individual is
a person of Cuban, Mexican, Puerto
Rican, South or Central American or
other Spanish culture or origin,
regardless of race. Indicate whether this
category applies with a ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’
If the second foster parent does not
know his or her ethnicity, indicate
‘‘unknown.’’ If the individual refuses to
identify his or her ethnicity, indicate
‘‘declined.’’ The title IV–E agency must
leave this data element blank if there is
no second foster parent according to
paragraph (e)(12) of this section.
(24) Gender of second foster parent.
Indicate whether the second foster
parent self identifies as ‘‘female’’ or
‘‘male.’’
(25) Second foster parent sexual
orientation. Indicate whether the second
foster parent self identifies as ‘‘straight
or heterosexual,’’ ‘‘gay or lesbian,’’
‘‘bisexual,’’ ‘‘don’t know,’’ ‘‘something
else,’’ or ‘‘declined’’ if the second foster
parent declined to identify his/her
status.
(f) Permanency planning—(1)
Permanency plan. Indicate each
permanency plan established for the
child. Indicate ‘‘reunify with parent(s)
or legal guardian(s)’’ if the plan is to
keep the child in out-of-home care for
a limited time and the title IV–E agency
is to work with the child’s parent(s) or
legal guardian(s) to establish a stable
family environment. Indicate ‘‘live with
other relatives’’ if the plan is for the
child to live permanently with a
relative(s) (by biological, legal or marital
connection) who is not the child’s
parent(s) or legal guardian(s). Indicate
‘‘adoption’’ if the plan is to facilitate the
child’s adoption by relatives, foster
parents, kin or other unrelated
individuals. Indicate ‘‘guardianship’’ if
the plan is to establish a new legal
guardianship. Indicate ‘‘planned
permanent living arrangement’’ if the
plan is for the child to remain in foster
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
90579
care until the title IV–E agency’s
placement and care responsibility ends.
The title IV–E agency must only select
‘‘planned permanent living
arrangement’’ consistent with the
requirements in section 475(5)(C)(i) of
the Act. Indicate ‘‘permanency plan not
established’’ if a permanency plan has
not yet been established.
(2) Date of permanency plan. Indicate
the month, day and year that each
permanency plan(s) was established
during each out-of-home care episode.
(3) Date of periodic review. Enter the
month, day and year of each periodic
review, either by a court or by
administrative review (as defined in
section 475(6) of the Act) that meets the
requirements of section 475(5)(B) of the
Act.
(4) Date of permanency hearing. Enter
the month, day and year of each
permanency hearing held by a court or
an administrative body appointed or
approved by the court that meets the
requirements of section 475(5)(C) of the
Act.
(5) Juvenile justice. Indicate whether
the child was found to be a status
offender or adjudicated delinquent by a
juvenile judge or court at any time
during the report period. A status
offense is specific to juveniles, such as
running away, truancy or underage
alcohol violations. Indicate ‘‘yes’’ or
‘‘no.’’
(6) Caseworker visit dates. Enter each
date in which a caseworker had an inperson, face-to-face visit with the child
consistent with section 422(b)(17) of the
Act. Indicate the month, day and year of
each visit.
(7) Caseworker visit location. Indicate
the location of each in-person, face-toface visit between the caseworker and
the child. Indicate ‘‘child’s residence’’ if
the visit occurred at the location where
the child is currently residing, such as
the current foster care provider’s home,
child care institution or facility. Indicate
‘‘other location’’ if the visit occurred at
any location other than where the child
currently resides, such as the child’s
school, a court, a child welfare office or
in the larger community.
(8) Transition plan. Indicate whether
a child has a transition plan that meets
the requirements of section 475(5)(H) of
the Act, including plans developed
before the 90-day period. Indicate ‘‘yes,’’
‘‘no’’ or ‘‘not applicable.’’
(9) Date of transition plan. Indicate
the month, day and year of the child’s
transition plan, if the title IV–E agency
indicated in paragraph (f)(8) of this
section that the child has a transition
plan that meets the requirements of
section 475(5)(H) of the Act; otherwise
leave this paragraph blank.
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
90580
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
(10) Active efforts. For state title IV–
E agencies only: If the state title IV–E
agency indicated ‘‘yes’’ to paragraph
(b)(4) or indicated ‘‘yes, ICWA applies’’
to paragraph (b)(5), indicate whether the
active efforts in each paragraph (f)(10)(i)
through (xiii) ‘‘applies’’ or ‘‘does not
apply.’’ The state title IV–E agency must
indicate all of the active efforts that
apply once the child enters the AFCARS
out-of-home care reporting population
per § 1355.42(a) through the child’s exit
per paragraph (g)(1) of this section and
the active efforts made prior to the child
entering the out-of-home care reporting
population.
(i) Assist the parent(s) or Indian
custodian through the steps of a case
plan and with developing the resources
necessary to satisfy the case plan.
(ii) Conduct a comprehensive
assessment of the circumstances of the
Indian child’s family, with a focus on
safe reunification as the most desirable
goal.
(iii) Identify appropriate services to
help the parent overcome barriers,
including actively assisting the parents
in obtaining such services.
(iv) Identify, notify and invite
representatives of the Indian child’s
tribe to participate in providing support
and services to the Indian child’s family
and in family team meetings,
permanency planning and resolution of
placement issues.
(v) Conduct or cause to be conducted
a diligent search for the Indian child’s
extended family members, and contact
and consult with extended family
members to provide family structure
and support for the Indian child and the
Indian child’s parents.
(vi) Offer and employ all available
and culturally appropriate family
preservation strategies and facilitate the
use of remedial and rehabilitative
services provide by the child’s tribe.
(vii) Take steps to keep siblings
together whenever possible.
(viii) Support regular visits with
parents or Indian custodians in the most
natural setting possible as well as trial
home visits of the Indian child during
any period of removal, consistent with
the need to ensure the health, safety,
and welfare of the child.
(ix) Identify community resources
including housing, financial,
transportation, mental health, substance
use and peer support services and
actively assisting the Indian child’s
parents or when appropriate, the child’s
family, in utilizing and accessing those
resources.
(x) Monitor progress and participation
in services.
(xi) Consider alternative ways to
address the needs of the Indian child’s
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
parents and, where appropriate, the
family, if the optimum services do not
exist or are not available.
(xii) Provide post-reunification
services and monitoring.
(xiii) Other active efforts tailored to
the facts and circumstances of the case.
(g) General exit information. Provide
exit information for each out-of-home
care episode. An exit occurs when the
title IV–E agency’s placement and care
responsibility of the child ends.
(1) Date of exit. Indicate the month,
day and year for each of the child’s exits
from out-of-home care. An exit occurs
when the title IV–E agency’s placement
and care responsibility of the child
ends. If the child has not exited out-ofhome care the title IV–E agency must
leave this data element blank. If this
data element is applicable, the data
elements in paragraphs (g)(2) and (3) of
this section must have a response.
(2) Exit transaction date. A nonmodifiable, computer-generated date
which accurately indicates the month,
day and year each response to paragraph
(g)(1) of this section was entered into
the information system.
(3) Exit reason. Indicate the reason for
each of the child’s exits from out-ofhome care. Indicate ‘‘not applicable’’ if
the child has not exited out-of-home
care. Indicate ‘‘reunify with parent(s)/
legal guardian(s)’’ if the child was
returned to his or her parent(s) or legal
guardian(s) and the title IV–E agency no
longer has placement and care
responsibility. Indicate ‘‘live with other
relatives’’ if the child exited to live with
a relative (related by a biological, legal
or marital connection) other than his or
her parent(s) or legal guardian(s).
Indicate ‘‘adoption’’ if the child was
legally adopted. Indicate
‘‘emancipation’’ if the child exited care
due to age. Indicate ‘‘guardianship’’ if
the child exited due to a legal
guardianship of the child. Indicate
‘‘runaway or whereabouts unknown’’ if
the child ran away or the child’s
whereabouts were unknown at the time
that the title IV–E agency’s placement
and care responsibility ends. Indicate
‘‘death of child’’ if the child died while
in out-of-home care. Indicate ‘‘transfer
to another agency’’ if placement and
care responsibility for the child was
transferred to another agency, either
within or outside of the reporting state
or tribal service area.
(4) Transfer to another agency. If the
title IV–E agency indicated the child
was transferred to another agency in the
data element Exit reason described in
paragraph (g)(3) of this section, indicate
the type of agency that received
placement and care responsibility for
the child from the following options:
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
‘‘State title IV–E agency,’’ ‘‘Tribal title
IV–E agency,’’ ‘‘Indian tribe or tribal
agency (non-IV–E),’’ ‘‘juvenile justice
agency,’’ ‘‘mental health agency,’’ ‘‘other
public agency’’ or ‘‘private agency.’’
(h) Exit to adoption and guardianship
information. Report information in
paragraph (h) only if the title IV–E
agency indicated the child exited to
adoption or legal guardianship in the
data element Exit reason described in
paragraph (g)(3) of this section.
Otherwise the title IV–E agency must
leave the data elements in paragraph (h)
blank.
(1) Marital status of the adoptive
parent(s) or guardian(s). Indicate the
marital status of the adoptive parent(s)
or legal guardian(s). Indicate ‘‘married
couple’’ if the adoptive parents or legal
guardians are considered united in
matrimony according to applicable
laws. Include common law marriage,
where provided by applicable laws.
Indicate ‘‘married but individually
adopting or obtaining legal
guardianship’’ if the adoptive parents or
legal guardians are considered united in
matrimony according to applicable
laws, but are individually adopting or
obtaining legal guardianship. Indicate
‘‘separated’’ if the foster parent is legally
separated or is living apart from his or
her spouse. Indicate ‘‘unmarried
couple’’ if the adoptive parents or
guardians are living together as a
couple, but are not united in matrimony
according to applicable laws. Use this
response option even if only one person
of the unmarried couple is the adoptive
parent or legal guardian of the child.
Indicate ‘‘single adult’’ if the adoptive
parent or legal guardian is not married
and is not living with another
individual as part of a couple. If the
response is ‘‘married couple’’ or
‘‘unmarried couple,’’ the title IV–E
agency also must complete the data
elements for the second adoptive parent
or second legal guardian in paragraphs
(h)(9) through (14) of this section;
otherwise the title IV–E agency must
leave these data elements blank.
(2) Child’s relationship to the
adoptive parent(s) or guardian(s).
Indicate the type of relationship,
kinship or otherwise, between the child
and his or her adoptive parent(s) or legal
guardian(s). Indicate whether each
relationship listed in the data elements
described in paragraphs (h)(2)(i) through
(viii) of this section ‘‘applies’’ or ‘‘does
not apply.’’
(i) Paternal grandparent(s). The
adoptive parent(s) or legal guardian(s) is
the child’s paternal grandparent(s), by
biological, legal or marital connection.
(ii) Maternal grandparent(s). The
adoptive parent(s) or legal guardian(s) is
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
the child’s maternal grandparent(s), by
biological, legal or marital connection.
(iii) Other paternal relative(s). The
adoptive parent(s) or legal guardian(s) is
the child’s paternal relative (by
biological, legal or marital connection)
other than a grandparent, such as an
aunt, uncle or cousin.
(iv) Other maternal relative(s). The
adoptive parent(s) or legal guardian(s) is
the child’s maternal relative (by
biological, legal or marital connection)
other than a grandparent, such as an
aunt, uncle or cousin.
(v) Sibling(s). The adoptive parent or
legal guardian is a brother or sister of
the child, either biologically, legally or
by marriage.
(vi) Kin. The adoptive parent(s) or
legal guardian(s) has a kin relationship
with the child, as defined by the title
IV–E agency, such as one where there is
a psychological, cultural or emotional
relationship between the child or the
child’s family and the adoptive parent(s)
or legal guardian(s) and there is not a
legal, biological, or marital connection
between the child and foster parent.
(vii) Non-relative(s). The adoptive
parent(s) or legal guardian(s) is not
related to the child by biological, legal
or marital connection.
(viii) Foster parent(s). The adoptive
parent(s) or legal guardian(s) was the
child’s foster parent(s).
(3) Date of birth of first adoptive
parent or guardian. Indicate the month,
day and year of the birth of the first
adoptive parent or legal guardian.
(4) First adoptive parent or guardian
tribal membership. Indicate whether the
first adoptive parent or guardian is a
member of an Indian tribe. Indicate
‘‘yes,’’ ‘‘no’’ or ‘‘unknown.’’
(5) Race of first adoptive parent or
guardian. In general, an individual’s
race is determined by the individual.
Indicate whether each race category
listed in the data elements described in
paragraphs (h)(5)(i) through (vii) of this
section applies with a ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’
(i) Race—American Indian or Alaska
Native. An American Indian or Alaska
Native individual has origins in any of
the original peoples of North or South
America (including Central America),
and maintains tribal affiliation or
community attachment.
(ii) Race—Asian. An Asian individual
has origins in any of the original
peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia
or the Indian subcontinent including,
for example, Cambodia, China, India,
Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the
Philippine Islands, Thailand and
Vietnam.
(iii) Race—Black or African
American. A Black or African American
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
individual has origins in any of the
black racial groups of Africa.
(iv) Race—Native Hawaiian or Other
Pacific Islander. A Native Hawaiian or
Other Pacific Islander individual has
origins in any of the original peoples of
Hawaii, Guam, Samoa or other Pacific
Islands.
(v) Race—White. A White individual
has origins in any of the original
peoples of Europe, the Middle East or
North Africa.
(vi) Race—Unknown. The first
adoptive parent or legal guardian does
not know his or her race, or at least one
race.
(vii) Race—Declined. The first
adoptive parent, or legal guardian has
declined to identify a race.
(6) Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of first
adoptive parent or guardian. In general,
an individual’s ethnicity is determined
by the individual. An individual is of
Hispanic or Latino ethnicity if the
individual is a person of Cuban,
Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central
American or other Spanish culture or
origin, regardless of race. Indicate
whether this category applies with a
‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’ If the first adoptive
parent or legal guardian does not know
his or her ethnicity, indicate
‘‘unknown.’’ If the individual refuses to
identify his or her ethnicity, indicate
‘‘declined.’’
(7) Gender of first adoptive parent or
guardian. Indicate whether the first
adoptive parent self identifies as
‘‘female’’ or ‘‘male.’’
(8) First adoptive parent or legal
guardian sexual orientation. Indicate
whether the first adoptive parent or
legal guardian self identifies as ‘‘straight
or heterosexual,’’ ‘‘gay or lesbian,’’
‘‘bisexual,’’ ‘‘don’t know,’’ ‘‘something
else,’’ or ‘‘declined’’ if the first adoptive
parent or legal guardian declined to
identify his/her status.
(9) Date of birth of second adoptive
parent, guardian, or other member of
the couple. Indicate the month, day and
year of the date of birth of the second
adoptive parent, legal guardian, or other
member of the couple. The title IV–E
agency must leave this data element
blank if there is no second adoptive
parent, legal guardian, or other member
of the couple according to paragraph
(h)(1) of this section.
(10) Second adoptive parent,
guardian, or other member of the couple
tribal membership. Indicate whether the
second adoptive parent or guardian is a
member of an Indian tribe. Indicate
‘‘yes,’’ ‘‘no’’ or ‘‘unknown.’’
(11) Race of second adoptive parent,
guardian, or other member of the
couple. In general, an individual’s race
is determined by the individual.
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
90581
Indicate whether each race category
listed in the data elements described in
paragraphs (h)(11)(i) through (vii) of this
section applies with a ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’
The title IV–E agency must leave this
data element blank if there is no second
adoptive parent, legal guardian, or other
member of the couple according to
paragraph (h)(1) of this section.
(i) Race—American Indian or Alaska
Native. An American Indian or Alaska
Native individual has origins in any of
the original peoples of North or South
America (including Central America),
and maintains tribal affiliation or
community attachment.
(ii) Race—Asian. An Asian individual
has origins in any of the original
peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia
or the Indian subcontinent including,
for example, Cambodia, China, India,
Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the
Philippine Islands, Thailand and
Vietnam.
(iii) Race—Black or African
American. A Black or African American
individual has origins in any of the
black racial groups of Africa.
(iv) Race—Native Hawaiian or Other
Pacific Islander. A Native Hawaiian or
Other Pacific Islander individual has
origins in any of the original peoples of
Hawaii, Guam, Samoa or other Pacific
Islands.
(v) Race—White. A White individual
has origins in any of the original
peoples of Europe, the Middle East or
North Africa.
(vi) Race—Unknown. The second
adoptive parent, legal guardian, or other
member of the couple does not know his
or her race, or at least one race.
(vii) Race—Declined. The second
adoptive parent, legal guardian, or other
member of the couple has declined to
identify a race.
(12) Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of
second adoptive parent, guardian, or
other member of the couple. In general,
an individual’s ethnicity is determined
by the individual. An individual is of
Hispanic or Latino ethnicity if the
individual is a person of Cuban,
Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central
American or other Spanish culture or
origin, regardless of race. Indicate
whether this category applies with a
‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’ If the second adoptive
parent, legal guardian, or other member
of the couple does not know his or her
ethnicity, indicate ‘‘unknown.’’ If the
individual refuses to identify his or her
ethnicity, indicate ‘‘declined.’’ The title
IV–E agency must leave this data
element blank if there is no second
adoptive parent, legal guardian, or other
member of the couple according to
paragraph (h)(1) of this section.
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
90582
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
(13) Gender of second adoptive
parent, guardian, or other member of
the couple. Indicate whether the second
adoptive parent, guardian, or other
member of the couple self identifies as
‘‘female’’ or ‘‘male.’’
(14) Second adoptive parent,
guardian, or other member of the couple
sexual orientation. Indicate whether the
second adoptive parent or legal
guardian self identifies as ‘‘straight or
heterosexual, ’’ ‘‘gay or lesbian,’’
‘‘bisexual,’’ ‘‘don’t know,’’ ‘‘something
else,’’ or ‘‘declined’’ if the second
adoptive parent or legal guardian
declined to identify his/her status.
(15) Inter/Intrajurisdictional adoption
or guardianship. Indicate whether the
child was placed within the state or
tribal service area, outside of the state or
tribal service area or into another
country for adoption or legal
guardianship. Indicate
‘‘interjurisdictional adoption or
guardianship’’ if the reporting title IV–
E agency placed the child for adoption
or legal guardianship outside of the state
or tribal service area but within the
United States. Indicate ‘‘intercountry
adoption or guardianship’’ if the
reporting title IV–E agency placed the
child for adoption or legal guardianship
outside of the United States. Indicate
‘‘intrajurisdictional adoption or
guardianship’’ if the reporting title IV–
E agency placed the child within the
same state or tribal service area as the
one with placing responsibility. If the
title IV–E agency indicates either
‘‘interjurisdictional adoption or
guardianship’’ or ‘‘intercountry
adoption or guardianship’’ apply for the
child’s adoption or legal guardianship,
the title IV–E agency must complete the
data element in paragraph (h)(16) of this
section; otherwise the title IV–E agency
must leave it blank.
(16) Interjurisdictional adoption or
guardianship jurisdiction. Indicate the
state, tribal service area, Indian
reservation or country where the
reporting title IV–E agency placed the
child for adoption or legal guardianship,
in a format according to ACF’s
specifications. The title IV–E agency
must complete this data element only if
the title IV–E agency indicated either
‘‘interjurisdictional adoption or
guardianship’’ or ‘‘intercountry
adoption or guardianship’’ in paragraph
(h)(15) of this section; otherwise the title
IV–E agency must leave it blank.
(17) Adoption or guardianship
placing agency. Indicate the agency that
placed the child for adoption or legal
guardianship. Indicate ‘‘title IV–E
agency’’ if the reporting title IV–E
agency placed the child for adoption or
legal guardianship. Indicate ‘‘private
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
agency under agreement’’ if a private
agency placed the child for adoption or
legal guardianship through an
agreement with the reporting title IV–E
agency. Indicate ‘‘Indian tribe under
contract/agreement’’ if an Indian tribe,
tribal organization or consortia placed
the child for adoption or legal
guardianship through a contract or an
agreement with the reporting title IV–E
agency.
(18) Assistance agreement type.
Indicate the type of assistance
agreement between the title IV–E agency
and the adoptive parent(s) or legal
guardian(s): ‘‘Title IV–E adoption
assistance agreement;’’ ‘‘State/tribal
adoption assistance agreement;’’
‘‘Adoption-Title IV–E agreement nonrecurring expenses only;’’ ‘‘AdoptionTitle IV–E agreement Medicaid only;’’
‘‘Title IV–E guardianship assistance
agreement;’’ ‘‘State/tribal guardianship
assistance agreement;’’ or ‘‘no
agreement’’ if there is no assistance
agreement.
(19) Siblings in adoptive or
guardianship home. Indicate the
number of siblings of the child who are
in the same adoptive or guardianship
home as the child. A sibling to the child
is his or her brother or sister by
biological, legal, or marital connection.
Do not include the child who is subject
of this record in the total number. If the
child does not have any siblings, the
title IV–E agency must indicate ‘‘not
applicable.’’ If the child has siblings, but
they are not in the same adoptive or
guardianship home as the child, the title
IV–E agency must indicate ‘‘0.’’
(20) Available ICWA Adoptive
placements. For state title IV–E agencies
only: If the state title IV–E agency
indicated ‘‘yes’’ to paragraph (b)(4) or
indicated ‘‘yes, ICWA applies’’ to
paragraph (b)(5), indicate which
adoptive placements that meet the
placement preferences in ICWA at 25
U.S.C. 1915(a) were willing to accept
placement. Indicate in each paragraph
(h)(20)(i) through (h)(20)(iv) of this
section ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’
(i) A member of the Indian child’s
extended family.
(ii) Other members of the Indian
child’s tribe.
(iii) Other Indian families.
(iv) A placement that complies with
the order of preference for foster care or
pre-adoptive placements established by
an Indian child’s tribe, in accordance
with 25 U.S.C. 1915(c).
(21) Adoption placement preferences
under ICWA. For state title IV–E
agencies only: If the state title IV–E
agency indicated ‘‘yes’’ to paragraph
(b)(4) or indicated ‘‘yes, ICWA applies’’
to paragraph (b)(5) of this section,
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
indicate whether the adoptive
placement meets the adoptive
placement preferences of ICWA in 25
U.S.C. 1915(a) by indicating with whom
the Indian child is placed. Indicate ‘‘a
member of the Indian child’s extended
family,’’ ‘‘other members of the Indian
child’s tribe,’’ ‘‘other Indian families,’’
‘‘a placement that complies with the
order of preference for adoptive
placements established by an Indian
child’s tribe, in accordance with 25
U.S.C. 1915(c),’’ or ‘‘placement does not
meet ICWA placement preferences.’’ If
the state IV–E agency indicated
‘‘placement does not meet ICWA
placement preferences,’’ then the state
IV–E agency must complete paragraph
(h)(22). Otherwise, leave blank.
(22) Good cause under ICWA. For
state title IV–E agencies only: If the state
title IV–E agency indicated ‘‘placement
does not meet ICWA placement
preferences’’ in paragraph (h)(21),
indicate whether the court determined
by clear and convincing evidence, on
the record or in writing, a good cause to
depart from the ICWA placement
preferences under 25 U.S.C. 1915(a) or
to depart from the placement
preferences of the Indian child’s tribe
under 25 U.S.C. 1915(c). Indicate ‘‘yes’’
or ‘‘no.’’ If the state title IV–E agency
indicated ‘‘yes,’’ then the state title IV–
E agency must indicate the basis for
good cause in paragraph (h)(23) of this
section. If the state title IV–E agency
indicated ‘‘no,’’ then the state title IV–
E agency must leave paragraph (h)(23)
blank.
(23) Basis for good cause. For state
title IV–E agencies only: If the state title
IV–E agency indicated ‘‘yes’’ in
paragraph (h)(22), indicate the state
court’s basis for determining good cause
to depart from ICWA adoptive
placement preferences by indicating
‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no’’ in each paragraph
(h)(23)(i) through (v) of this section.
(i) Request of one or both of the
child’s parents.
(ii) Request of the Indian child.
(iii) The unavailability of a suitable
placement after a determination by the
court that a diligent search was
conducted to find suitable placements
meeting the placement preferences in
ICWA at 25 U.S.C. 1915 but none has
been located.
(iv) The extraordinary physical,
mental, or emotional needs of the Indian
child, such as specialized treatment
services that may be unavailable in the
community where families who meet
the placement preferences live.
(v) The presence of a sibling
attachment that can be maintained only
through a particular placement.
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
§ 1355.45 Adoption and guardianship
assistance data file elements.
A title IV–E agency must report the
following information for each child in
the adoption and guardianship
assistance reporting population, if
applicable based on § 1355.42(b).
(a) General information—(1) Title IV–
E agency. Indicate the title IV–E agency
responsible for submitting the AFCARS
data to ACF per requirements issued by
ACF.
(2) Report date. The report date
corresponds to the end of the current
report period. Indicate the last month
and the year of the report period.
(3) Child record number. The child
record number is the encrypted, unique
person identification number. The
record number must be encrypted in
accordance with ACF standards.
Indicate the record number for the
child.
(b) Child demographics—(1) Child’s
date of birth. Indicate the month, day
and year of the child’s birth.
(2) Child’s gender. Indicate whether
the child is ‘‘male’’ or ‘‘female,’’ as
appropriate.
(3) Child’s race. In general, a child’s
race is determined by the child or the
child’s parent(s) or legal guardian(s).
Indicate whether each race category
listed in the data elements described in
paragraphs (b)(2)(i) through (viii) of this
section applies with a ‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’
(i) Race—American Indian or Alaska
Native. An American Indian or Alaska
Native child has origins in any of the
original peoples of North or South
America (including Central America),
and maintains Tribal affiliation or
community attachment.
(ii) Race—Asian. An Asian child has
origins in any of the original peoples of
the Far East, Southeast Asia or the
Indian subcontinent including, for
example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan,
Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the
Philippine Islands, Thailand and
Vietnam.
(iii) Race—Black or African
American. A Black or African American
child has origins in any of the black
racial groups of Africa.
(iv) Race—Native Hawaiian or Other
Pacific Islander. A Native Hawaiian or
Other Pacific Islander child has origins
in any of the original peoples of Hawaii,
Guam, Samoa or other Pacific Islands.
(v) Race—White. A White child has
origins in any of the original peoples of
Europe, the Middle East or North Africa.
(vi) Race—Unknown. The child or
parent or legal guardian does not know
the race, or at least one race of the child.
(vii) Race—Abandoned. The child’s
race is unknown because the child has
been abandoned. Abandoned means that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
the child was left alone or with others
and the parent(s) or legal guardian(s)’
identity is unknown and cannot be
ascertained. This includes a child left at
a ‘‘safe haven.’’
(viii) Race—Declined. The child or
parent or legal guardian has declined to
identify a race.
(4) Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. In
general, a child’s ethnicity is
determined by the child or the child’s
parent(s) or legal guardian(s). A child is
of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity if the
child is a person of Cuban, Mexican,
Puerto Rican, South or Central
American or other Spanish culture or
origin, regardless of race. Indicate
whether this category applies with a
‘‘yes’’ or ‘‘no.’’ If the child or the child’s
parent or legal guardian does not know
or cannot communicate whether the
child is of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity,
indicate ‘‘unknown.’’ If the child was
abandoned indicate ‘‘abandoned.’’
Abandoned means that the child was
left alone or with others and the
parent(s) or legal guardian(s)’ identity is
unknown and cannot be ascertained.
This includes a child left at a ‘‘safe
haven.’’ If the child or the child’s
parent(s) or legal guardian(s) refuses to
identify the child’s ethnicity, indicate
‘‘declined.’’
(c) Adoption and guardianship
assistance agreement information—(1)
Assistance agreement type. Indicate
whether the child is or was in a
finalized adoption with a title IV–E
adoption assistance agreement or in a
legal guardianship with a title IV–E
guardianship assistance agreement,
pursuant to sections 473(a) and 473(d)
of the Act, in effect during the report
period. Indicate ‘‘title IV–E adoption
assistance agreement’’ or ‘‘title IV–E
guardianship assistance agreement,’’ as
appropriate.
(2) Adoption or guardianship subsidy
amount. Indicate the per diem dollar
amount of the financial subsidy paid to
the adoptive parent(s) or legal
guardian(s) on behalf of the child during
the last month of the current report
period, if any. The title IV–E agency
must indicate ‘‘0’’ if a financial subsidy
was not paid during the last month of
the report period.
(d) Adoption finalization or
guardianship legalization date. Indicate
the month, day and year that the child’s
adoption was finalized or the
guardianship became legalized.
(e) Agreement termination date. If the
title IV–E agency terminated the
adoption assistance or guardianship
assistance agreement or the agreement
expired during the report period,
indicate the month, day and year that
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
90583
the agreement terminated or expired;
otherwise leave this data element blank.
§ 1355.46
Compliance.
(a) Files subject to compliance. ACF
will evaluate the out-of-home care and
adoption and guardianship assistance
data files that a title IV–E agency
submits to determine whether the data
complies with the requirements of
§ 1355.43 and the data file submission
and data quality standards described in
paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section.
ACF will exempt records related to a
child in either data file whose 18th
birthday occurred in a prior report
period and will exempt records relating
to a child in the adoption and
guardianship assistance data file who is
in a title IV–E guardianship from a
compliance determination as described
in paragraph (e) of this section.
(b) Errors. ACF will utilize the error
definitions in paragraphs (b)(1) through
(5) of this section to assess a title IV–E
agency’s out-of-home care and adoption
and guardianship assistance data files.
This assessment of errors will help ACF
to determine if the title IV–E agency’s
submitted data files meet the data file
submission and data quality standards
outlined in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this
section. ACF will develop and issue
error specifications.
(1) Missing data. Missing data refers
to instances in which a data element has
a blank or otherwise missing response,
when such a response is not a valid
option as described in §§ 1355.44 or
1355.45.
(2) Invalid data. Invalid data refers to
instances in which a data element
contains a value that is outside the
parameters of acceptable responses or
exceeds, either positively or negatively,
the acceptable range of response options
as described in §§ 1355.44 or 1355.45.
(3) Internally inconsistent data.
Internally inconsistent data refers to
instances in which a data element fails
an internal consistency check designed
to validate the logical relationship
between data elements within each
record. This assessment will identify all
data elements involved in a particular
check as in error.
(4) Cross-file errors. A cross-file error
occurs when a cross-file check
determines that a response option for a
data element recurs across the records
in either the out-of-home care data file
or adoption and guardianship assistance
data file beyond a specified acceptable
threshold as specified per ACF.
(5) Tardy transactions. Tardy
transactions are instances in which the
removal transaction date or exit
transaction date described in
§ 1355.44(d)(2) and (g)(2) respectively,
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
90584
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
are entered into the title IV–E agency’s
information system more than 30 days
after the event.
(c) Data file standards. To be in
compliance with the AFCARS
requirements, the title IV–E agency must
submit a data file in accordance with
the data file standards described in
paragraphs (c)(1) through (3) of this
section.
(1) Timely submission. ACF must
receive the data files on or before the
reporting deadline described in
§ 1355.43(a).
(2) Proper format. The data files must
meet the technical standards issued by
ACF for data file construction and
transmission. In addition, each record
subject to compliance standards within
the data file must have the data
elements described in §§ 1355.44(a)(1)
through (4), 1355.44(b)(1) and (b)(2)(i),
1355.45(a), and 1355.45(b)(1) and (2) be
100 percent free of missing data, invalid
data and internally inconsistent data
(see paragraphs (b)(1) through (3) of this
section). ACF will not process a title IV–
E agency’s data file that does not meet
the proper format standard.
(d) Data quality standards. (1) To be
in compliance with the AFCARS
requirements, the title IV–E agency must
submit a data file that has no more than
10 percent total of missing, invalid, or
internally inconsistent data, or tardy
transactions for each data element of
applicable records. These standards are
in addition to the formatting standards
described in paragraph (c)(2) of this
section.
(2) Acceptable cross-file. The data
files must be free of cross-file errors that
exceed the acceptable thresholds, as
defined by ACF.
(e) Compliance determination and
corrected data. (1) ACF will first
determine whether the title IV–E
agency’s out-of-home care data file and
adoption and guardianship assistance
data file meets the data file standards in
paragraph (c) of this section.
Compliance is determined separately for
each data file.
(2) If each data file meets the data file
standards, ACF will then determine
whether each data file meets the data
quality standards in paragraph (d) of
this section. For every data element, we
will divide the total number of
applicable records in error (numerator)
by the total number of applicable
records (denominator), to determine
whether the title IV–E agency has met
the applicable data quality standards.
(3) In general, a title IV–E agency that
has not met either the data file
formatting standards or data quality
standards must submit a corrected data
file(s) no later than when data is due for
the subsequent six month report period
(i.e., by May 15 and November 14), as
applicable. ACF will determine that the
corrected data file(s) is in compliance if
it meets the data file and data standards
in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section.
Exception: If ACF determines initially
that the title IV–E agency’s data file has
not met the data quality standard related
to tardy transactions, ACF will
determine compliance with regard to
the transaction dates only in the out-ofhome care data file submitted for the
subsequent report period.
(f) Noncompliance. If the title IV–E
agency does not submit a corrected data
file, or submits a corrected data file that
fails to meet the compliance standards
in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section,
ACF will notify the title IV–E agency of
such and apply penalties as provided in
§ 1355.47.
(g) Other assessments. ACF may use
other monitoring tools or assessment
procedures to determine whether the
title IV–E agency is meeting all of the
requirements of §§ 1355.41 through
1355.45.
§ 1355.47
Penalties.
(a) Federal funds subject to a penalty.
The funds that are subject to a penalty
are the title IV–E agency’s claims for
title IV–E foster care administration and
training for the quarter in which the title
IV–E agency is required to submit the
data files. For data files due on May 15,
ACF will assess the penalty based on
the title IV–E agency’s claims for the
third quarter of the Federal fiscal year.
For data files due on November 14, ACF
will assess the penalty based on the title
IV–E agency’s claims for the first quarter
of the Federal fiscal year.
(b) Penalty amounts. ACF will assess
penalties in the following amounts:
(1) First six month period. ACF will
assess a penalty in the amount of one
sixth of one percent (1⁄6 of 1%) of the
funds described in paragraph (a) of this
section for the first six month period in
which the title IV–E agency’s submitted
corrected data file does not comply with
§ 1355.46.
(2) Subsequent six month periods.
ACF will assess a penalty in the amount
of one fourth of one percent (1⁄4 of 1%)
of the funds described in paragraph (a)
of this section for each subsequent six
month period in which the title IV–E
agency continues to be out of
compliance.
(c) Penalty reduction from grant. ACF
will offset the title IV–E agency’s title
IV–E foster care grant award in the
amount of the penalty from the title IV–
E agency’s claims following the title IV–
E agency notification of ACF’s final
determination of noncompliance.
(d) Appeals. The title IV–E agency
may appeal ACF’s final determination of
noncompliance to the HHS
Departmental Appeals Board pursuant
to 45 CFR part 16.
Appendices A through E to Part 1355
[Removed]
5. Effective October 1, 2019, remove
Appendices A through E to Part 1355.
■
Note: The following attachments will not
appear in the Code of Federal Regulations.
ATTACHMENT A—OUT-OF-HOME CARE DATA FILE ELEMENTS § 1355.44
Category
Element
Reponses options
General information .............................
Title IV–E agency ................................
Report date ..........................................
Local agency .......................................
Child record number ............................
Child’s date of birth .............................
Child’s gender .....................................
Name ...................................................
Date .....................................................
Name ...................................................
Number ................................................
Date .....................................................
Male .....................................................
Female. ................................................
Straight or heterosexual ......................
Gay or lesbian
Bisexual
Don’t know
Something else
Decline
Not applicable
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Child information ..................................
Child’s sexual orientation ....................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:32 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
Section citation
1355.44(a)(1).
1355.44(a)(2).
1355.44(a)(3).
1355.44(a)(4).
1355.44(b)(1).
1355.44(b)(2)(i).
1355.44(b)(2)(ii).
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
90585
ATTACHMENT A—OUT-OF-HOME CARE DATA FILE ELEMENTS § 1355.44—Continued
Category
Element
Reponses options
Reason to know a child is an ‘‘Indian
child’’ as defined in the Indian Child
Welfare Act.
Inquired with the child’s biological or
adoptive mother.
..............................................................
1355.44(b)(3).
Yes ......................................................
No
The biological or adoptive mother is
deceased
Yes ......................................................
No
The biological or adoptive father is deceased
Yes ......................................................
No
Child does not have an Indian custodian
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Unknown
Yes ......................................................
No
Unknown
1355.44(b)(3)(i).
Yes ......................................................
No
Date .....................................................
1355.44(b)(4).
1355.44(b)(4)(i).
Name(s) ...............................................
1355.44(b)(4)(ii).
Yes, ICWA applies ..............................
No, ICWA does not apply
No court determination
Date .....................................................
1355.44(b)(5).
1355.44(b)(5)(i).
Name ...................................................
1355.44(b)(5)(ii).
..............................................................
Yes ......................................................
No
1355.44(b)(6).
1355.44(b)(6)(i).
Yes ......................................................
No
1355.44(b)(6)(ii).
Name(s) ...............................................
1355.44(b)(6)(iii).
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
1355.44(b)(7).
..............................................................
Yes ......................................................
No
1355.44(b)(9).
1355.44(b)(9)(i).
Inquired with the child’s biological or
adoptive father.
Inquired with the child’s Indian custodian.
Inquired with the child’s extended
family.
Inquired with the child .........................
Child is a member or eligible for membership in an Indian tribe.
Domicile or residence of the child, the
child’s parent, or the child’s Indian
custodian is on a reservation or in
an Alaska Native village.
Application of ICWA ............................
The date that the state title IV–E
agency first discovered information
indicating the child is or may be an
Indian child as defined in ICWA.
All federally recognized Indian tribe(s)
that may potentially be the Indian
child’s tribe(s).
Court determination that ICWA applies
Date court determined that ICWA applies.
Indian tribe that the court determined
is the Indian child’s tribe for ICWA
purposes.
Notification ...........................................
Whether the Indian child’s parent or
Indian custodian was sent legal notice more than 10 days prior to the
first child custody proceeding in accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1912(a).
Whether the Indian child’s tribe(s) was
sent legal notice more than 10 days
prior to the first child custody proceedings in accordance with 25
U.S.C. 1912(a).
The Indian tribe(s) that were sent notice for a child custody proceeding
as required in ICWA at 25 U.S.C.
1912(a).
Request to transfer to tribal court .......
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Denial of transfer .................................
Either of the parents objected to
transferring the case to tribal court.
The tribal court declined the transfer
to the tribal court.
The state court determined good
cause exists for denying the transfer to tribal court.
Child’s race ..........................................
Race—American Indian or Alaska Native.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:32 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
Section citation
1355.44(b)(3)(ii).
1355.44(b)(3)(iii).
1355.44(b)(3)(iv).
1355.44(b)(3)(v).
1355.44(b)(3)(vi).
1355.44(b)(3)(vii).
1355.44(b)(8).
1355.44(b)(8)(i).
1355.44(b)(8)(ii).
1355.44(b)(8)(iii).
90586
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
ATTACHMENT A—OUT-OF-HOME CARE DATA FILE ELEMENTS § 1355.44—Continued
Category
Element
Reponses options
Race—Asian ........................................
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Unknown
Abandoned
Declined
Yes ......................................................
No
Date .....................................................
Yes ......................................................
No
Child has a diagnosed condition .........
No exam or assessment conducted
Exam or assessment conducted and
none of the conditions apply
Exam or assessment conducted but
results not received
Existing condition ................................
Previous condition
Does not apply
Existing condition ................................
Previous condition
Does not apply
Existing condition ................................
Previous condition
Does not apply
Existing condition ................................
Previous condition
Does not apply
Existing condition ................................
Previous condition
Does not apply
Existing condition ................................
Previous condition
Does not apply
Existing condition ................................
Previous condition
Does not apply
Existing condition ................................
Previous condition
Does not apply
Existing condition ................................
Previous condition
Does not apply
Existing condition ................................
Previous condition
Does not apply
Existing condition ................................
Previous condition
Does not apply
Elementary ..........................................
Secondary
Post-secondary education or training
College
Not school-age
Not enrolled
Not school-age ....................................
Kindergarten
1st grade
Race—Black or African America .........
Race—Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander.
Race—White .......................................
Race—Unknown ..................................
Race—Abandoned ..............................
Race—Declined ...................................
Child’s Hispanic or Latino ethnicity .....
Health assessment ..............................
Date of health assessment .................
Timely health assessment ...................
Health, behavioral or mental health
conditions.
Intellectual disability ............................
Autism spectrum disorder ...................
Visual impairment and blindness ........
Hearing impairment and deafness ......
Orthopedic impairment or other physical condition.
Mental/emotional disorders .................
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
Serious mental disorders ....................
Developmental delay ...........................
Developmental disability ......................
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Other diagnosed condition ..................
School enrollment ................................
Educational level .................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:32 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
Section citation
1355.44(b)(9)(ii).
1355.44(b)(9)(iii).
1355.44(b)(9)(iv).
1355.44(b)(9)(v).
1355.44(b)(9)(vi).
1355.44(b)(9)(vii).
1355.44(b)(9)(viii).
1355.44(b)(10).
1355.44(b)(11)(i).
1355.44(b)(11)(ii).
1355.44(b)(12).
1355.44(b)(13).
1355.44(b)(13)(i).
1355.44(b)(13)(ii).
1355.44(b)(13)(iii).
1355.44(b)(13)(iv).
1355.44(b)(13)(v).
1355.44(b)(13)(vi).
1355.44(b)(13)(vii).
1355.44(b)(13)(viii).
1355.44(b)(13)(ix).
1355.44(b)(13)(x).
1355.44(b)(13)(xi).
1355.44(b)(14).
1355.44(b)(15).
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
90587
ATTACHMENT A—OUT-OF-HOME CARE DATA FILE ELEMENTS § 1355.44—Continued
Category
Element
Reponses options
Educational stability .............................
Proximity ..............................................
District/zoning rules .............................
Residential facility ................................
Services/programs ...............................
Child request .......................................
Parent/Legal guardian request ............
Other ....................................................
Pregnant or parenting .........................
Child is pregnant as of end of report
period.
Child has ever fathered or bore a
child.
Child and his/her child(re) are placed
together at any point during the report period.
Special education ................................
Prior adoption ......................................
Prior adoption date ..............................
Prior adoption intercountry ..................
Prior guardianship ...............................
Prior guardianship date .......................
Child financial and medical assistance
SSI or Social Security benefits ...........
Title XIX Medicaid ...............................
Title XXI SCHIP ...................................
State/Tribal adoption assistance .........
State/Tribal foster care ........................
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Child support .......................................
Title IV–E adoption subsidy ................
Title IV–E guardianship assistance .....
Title IV–A TANF ..................................
Title IV–B .............................................
SSBG ...................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:32 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4701
2nd grade
3rd grade
4th grade
5th grade
6th grade
7th grade
8th grade
9th grade
10th grade
11th grade
12th grade
GED
Post-secondary education or training
College
Yes ......................................................
No
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
..............................................................
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Not applicable
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No abandoned
Date .....................................................
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Abandoned
Date .....................................................
Child has received support/assistance
No support/assistance received
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
Section citation
1355.44(b)(16).
1355.44(b)(16)(i).
1355.44(b)(16)(ii).
1355.44(b)(16)(iii).
1355.44(b)(16)(iv).
1355.44(b)(16)(v).
1355.44(b)(16)(vi).
1355.44(b)(16)(vii).
1355.44(b)(17).
1355.44(b)(17)(i).
1355.44(b)(17)(ii).
1355.44(b)(17)(iii).
1355.44(b)(18).
1355.44(b)(19).
1355.44(b)(19)(i).
1355.44(b)(19)(ii).
1355.44(b)(20)(i).
1355.44(b)(20)(ii).
1355.44(b)(21).
1355.44(b)(21)(i).
1355.44(b)(21)(ii).
1355.44(b)(21)(iii).
1355.44(b)(21)(iv).
1355.44(b)(21)(v).
1355.44(b)(21)(vi).
1355.44(b)(21)(vii).
1355.44(b)(21)(viii).
1355.44(b)(21)(ix).
1355.44(b)(21)(x).
1355.44(b)(21)(xi).
90588
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
ATTACHMENT A—OUT-OF-HOME CARE DATA FILE ELEMENTS § 1355.44—Continued
Category
Element
Reponses options
Chafee Foster Care Independence
Program.
Other ....................................................
Parent or legal guardian information ...
Title IV–E foster care during report
period.
Total number of siblings ......................
Siblings in foster care ..........................
Siblings in living arrangement .............
Year of birth of first parent or legal
guardian.
Year of birth of second parent or legal
guardian.
Tribal membership mother ..................
Tribal membership father ....................
Termination/modification of parental
rights.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Removal information ............................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Termination/modification of parental
rights petition.
Termination/modification of parental
rights.
Involuntary termination/modification of
parental rights under ICWA.
State court found beyond reasonable
doubt that continued custody of the
Indian child by the parent or Indian
custodian is likely to result in serious emotional or physical damage
to the Indian child in accordance
with 25 U.S.C. 1912(f).
Court decision to involuntary terminate
parental rights included the testimony of one or more qualified expert witnesses in accordance with
25 U.S.C. 1912(f).
Prior to terminating parental rights, the
court concluded that active efforts
have been made to prevent the
breakup of the Indian family and
that those efforts were unsuccessful
in accordance with 25 U.S.C.
1912(d).
Voluntary termination/modification of
parental rights under ICWA.
Date of child’s removal ........................
Removal transaction date ...................
Removals under ICWA ........................
Court order for foster care placement
was made as a result of clear and
convincing evidence that continued
custody of the Indian child by the
parent or Indian custodian was likely to result in serious emotional or
physical damage to the Indian child
in accordance with 25 U.S.C.
1912(e) and 25 CFR 121(a).
Evidence presented for foster care
placement as indicated in paragraph (d)(3)(i) included the testimony of a qualified expert witness
in accordance with 25 U.S.C.
1912(e) and 25 CFR 121(a).
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4701
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Yes ......................................................
No
Number ................................................
Number ................................................
Number ................................................
Date .....................................................
Section citation
1355.44(b)(xii).
1355.44(b)(xiii).
1355.44(b)(22).
1355.44(b)(23).
1355.44(b)(24).
1355.44(b)(25).
1355.44(c)(1).
Date .....................................................
1355.44(c)(2).
Yes ......................................................
No
Unknown
Yes ......................................................
No
Unknown
Voluntary .............................................
Involuntary
Not applicable
Date .....................................................
1355.44(c)(3).
1355.44(c)(5)(i).
Date .....................................................
1355.44(c)(5)(ii).
..............................................................
1355.44(c)(6).
Yes ......................................................
No
1355.44(c)(6)(i).
Yes ......................................................
No
1355.44(c)(6)(ii).
Yes ......................................................
No
1355.44(c)(6)(iii).
Yes ......................................................
No
Date .....................................................
Date .....................................................
..............................................................
Yes ......................................................
No
1355.44(c)(7).
Yes ......................................................
No
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
1355.44(c)(4).
1355.44(c)(5).
1355.44(d)(1).
1355.44(d)(2).
1355.44(d)(3).
1355.44(d)(3)(i).
1355.44(d)(3)(ii).
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
90589
ATTACHMENT A—OUT-OF-HOME CARE DATA FILE ELEMENTS § 1355.44—Continued
Category
Element
Reponses options
Evidence presented for foster care
placement as indicated in paragraph (d)(3)(i) indicates that prior to
each removal reported in paragraph
(d)(1) that active efforts have been
made to prevent the breakup of the
Indian family and that those efforts
were unsuccessful in accordance
with 25 U.S.C. 1912(d).
Environment at removal ......................
Yes ......................................................
No
1355.44(d)(3)(iii).
Parent household ................................
Relative household
Legal guardian household
Relative legal guardian household
Justice facility
Medical/mental health facility
Other
Court ordered ......................................
Voluntary placement agreement
Not yet determined
..............................................................
1355.44(d)(4).
Authority for placement and care responsibility.
Child and family circumstances at removal.
Runaway ..............................................
Whereabouts unknown ........................
Physical abuse ....................................
Sexual abuse .......................................
Psychological or emotional abuse ......
Neglect ................................................
Medical neglect ...................................
Domestic violence ...............................
Abandonment ......................................
Failure to return ...................................
Caretaker’s alcohol use .......................
Caretaker’s drug use ...........................
Child alcohol use .................................
Child drug use .....................................
Prenatal alcohol exposure ...................
Prenatal drug exposure .......................
Diagnosed condition ............................
Inadequate access to mental health
services.
Inadequate access to medical services.
Child behavior problem .......................
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Death of caretaker ...............................
Incarceration of caretaker ...................
Caretaker’s significant impairment—
physical/emotional.
Caretaker’s significant impairment—
cognitive.
Inadequate housing .............................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4701
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
Section citation
1355.44(d)(5).
1355.44(d)(6).
1355.44(d)(6)(i).
1355.44(d)(6)(ii).
1355.44(d)(6)(iii).
1355.44(d)(6)(iv).
1355.44(d)(6)(v).
1355.44(d)(6)(vi)
1355.44(d)(6)(vii).
1355.44(d)(6)(viii).
1355.44(d)(6)(ix).
1355.44(d)(6)(x).
1355.44(d)(6)(xi).
1355.44(d)(6)(xii).
1355.44(d)(6)(xiii).
1355.44(d)(6)(xiv).
1355.44(d)(6)(xv).
1355.44(d)(6)(xvi).
1355.44(d)(6)(xvii).
1355.44(d)(6)(xviii).
1355.44(d)(6)(xix).
1355.44(d)(6)(xx).
1355.44(d)(6)(xxi).
1355.44(d)(6)(xxii).
1355.44(d)(6)(xxiii).
1355.44(d)(6)(xxiv).
1355.44(d)(6)(xxv).
90590
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
ATTACHMENT A—OUT-OF-HOME CARE DATA FILE ELEMENTS § 1355.44—Continued
Category
Element
Reponses options
Voluntary relinquishment for adoption
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Child requested placement .................
Sex trafficking ......................................
Parental immigration detainment or
deportation.
Family conflict related to child’s sexual
orientation, gender identity, or gender expression.
Educational neglect .............................
Public agency title IV–E agreement ....
Tribal title IV–E agreement .................
Homelessness .....................................
Victim of sex trafficking prior to entering foster care.
Report to law enforcement ..................
Date .....................................................
Victim of sex trafficking while in foster
care.
Report to law enforcement ..................
Living arrangement and provider information.
Date .....................................................
Date of living arrangement
Foster family home ..............................
Foster family home type ......................
Licensed home ....................................
Therapeutic foster family home ...........
Shelter care foster family home ..........
Relative foster family home .................
Pre-adoptive home ..............................
Kin foster family home ........................
Other living arrangement type .............
Private agency living arrangement ......
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Location of living arrangement ............
Jurisdiction or country where child is
living.
Available ICWA foster care and preadoptive placement preferences.
A member of the Indian’s extended
family.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4701
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Date .....................................................
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Date .....................................................
Date
Yes ......................................................
No
..............................................................
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Group home-family operated ..............
Group home-staff operated
Group home-shelter care
Residential treatment center
Child care institution
Child care institution-shelter care
Supervised independent living
Juvenile justice facility
Medical or rehabilitative facility
Psychiatric hospital
Runaway
Whereabouts unknown
Placed at home
Private agency involvement ................
No private agency involvement
Out-of-state or out-of-tribal service
area
In-state or in-tribal service area
Out-of-country
Runaway or whereabouts Unknown
Name ...................................................
Section citation
1355.44(d)(6)(xxvi).
1355.44(d)(6)(xxvii).
1355.44(d)(6)(xxviii).
1355.44(d)(6)(xxix).
1355.44(d)(6)(xxx).
1355.44(d)(6)(xxxi).
1355.44(d)(6)(xxxii).
1355.44(d)(6)(xxxiii).
1355.44(d)(6)(xxxiv).
1355.44(d)(7).
1355.44(d)(7)(i).
1355.44(d)(7)(ii)
1355.44(d)(8).
1355.44(d)(8)(i).
1355.44(d)(8)(ii)
1355.44(e)(1)
1355.44(e)(2)
1355.44(e)(3)
1355.44(e)(3)(i).
1355.44(e)(3)(ii).
1355.44(e)(3)(iii).
1355.44(e)(3)(iv).
1355.44(e)(3)(v).
1355.44(e)(3)(vi).
1355.44(e)(4).
1355.44(e)(5)
1355.44(e)(6).
1355.44(e)(7).
..............................................................
1355.44(e)(8).
Yes ......................................................
No
1355.44(e)(8)(i).
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
90591
ATTACHMENT A—OUT-OF-HOME CARE DATA FILE ELEMENTS § 1355.44—Continued
Category
Element
Reponses options
A foster home licensed, approved, or
specified by the Indian child’s tribe.
An Indian foster home licensed or approved by an authorized non-Indian
licensing authority.
An institution for children approved by
an Indian tribe or operated by an Indian organization which has a program suitable to meet the Indian
child’s needs.
A placement that complies with the
order of preference for foster care
or pre-adoptive placements established by an Indian child’s tribe, in
accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1915(c).
Foster care and pre-adoptive placements preferences under ICWA.
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
1355.44(e)(8)(ii).
Yes ......................................................
No
1355.44(e)(8)(iv).
Yes ......................................................
No
1355.44(e)(8)(v).
A member of the Indian child’s extended family
A foster home licensed, approved, or
specified by the Indian child’s tribe
An Indian foster home licensed or approved by an authorized non-Indian
licensing authority
An institution for children approved by
an Indian tribe or operated by an Indian organization which has a program suitable to meet the Indian
child’s needs
A placement that complies with the
order of preference for foster care
or pre-adoptive placements established by an Indian child’s tribe, in
accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1915(c)
Placement does not meet ICWA
placement preferences
Yes ......................................................
No
..............................................................
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
1355.44(e)(9).
Yes ......................................................
No
1355.44(e)(11)(iv).
Yes ......................................................
No
1355.44(e)(11)(v).
Married couple .....................................
Unmarried couple
Separated
Single adult
Paternal grandparent(s)
Maternal grandparent(s) ......................
Other paternal relative(s)
Other maternal relative(s)
Sibling(s)
Non-relative(s)
Kin
Date .....................................................
1355.44(e)(12).
Good cause under ICWA ....................
Basis for good cause ..........................
Request of one or both of the Indian
child’s parents.
Request of the Indian child .................
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Unavailability of suitable placement
after a determination by the court
that a diligent search was conducted to find suitable placements
meeting the placement preferences
in ICWA art 25 U.S.C. 1915 but
none has been located.
Extraordinary physical, mental or
emotional needs of the Indian child,
such as specialized treatment services that may be unavailable in the
community where families who
meet the placement preferences
live.
Presence of a sibling attachment that
can be maintained only through a
particular placement.
Marital status of the foster parents .....
Child’s relationships to the foster parents.
Year of birth for first foster parent .......
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
Section citation
1355.44(e)(8)(iii).
1355.44(e)(10).
1355.44(e)(11)
1355.44(e)(11)(i).
1355.44(e)(11)(ii).
1355.44(e)(11)(iii).
1355.44(e)(13).
1355.44(e)(14).
90592
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
ATTACHMENT A—OUT-OF-HOME CARE DATA FILE ELEMENTS § 1355.44—Continued
Category
Element
Reponses options
First foster parent tribal membership ..
Yes ......................................................
No
Unknown
..............................................................
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Unknown
Declined
Female .................................................
Male
Straight or heterosexual ......................
Gay or lesbian
Bisexual
Don’t know
Something else
Declined
Date .....................................................
Yes ......................................................
No
Unknown
..............................................................
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Unknown
Declined
Female .................................................
Male
Straight or heterosexual ......................
Gay or lesbian
Bisexual
Don’t know
Something else
Declined
Reunify with parent(s) or legal guardian(s)
Live with other relatives
Adoption
Guardianship
Planned permanent living arrangement
Permanency plan not established
Date .....................................................
Date .....................................................
Date .....................................................
Race of first foster parent ...................
Race—American Indian or Alaska Native.
Race—Asian ........................................
Race—Black or African America .........
Race—Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander.
Race—White .......................................
Race—Unknown ..................................
Race—Declined ...................................
Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of first foster parent.
Gender of first foster parent ................
First foster parent sexual orientation ..
Year of birth for second foster parent
Second foster parent tribal membership.
Race of second foster parent ..............
Race—American Indian or Alaska Native.
Race—Asian ........................................
Race—Black or African America .........
Race—Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander.
Race—White .......................................
Race—Unknown ..................................
Race—Declined ...................................
Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of second
foster parent.
Gender of second foster parent ..........
Second foster parent sexual orientation.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Permanency planning ..........................
Permanency plan ................................
Date of permanency plan ....................
Date of periodic review .......................
Date of permanency hearing ...............
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
Section citation
1355.44(e)(15).
1355.44(e)(16).
1355.44(e)(16)(i).
1355.44(e)(16)(ii).
1355.44(e)(16)(iii).
1355.44(e)(16)(iv)
1355.44(e)(16)(v).
1355.44(e)(16)(vi).
1355.44(e)(16)(vii).
1355.44(e)(17).
1355.44(e)(18).
1355.44(e)(19).
1355.44(e)(20).
1355.44(e)(21).
1355.44(e)(22).
1355.44(e)(22)(i).
1355.44(e)(22)(ii).
1355.44(e)(22)(iii).
1355.44(e)(22)(iv).
1355.44(e)(22)(v)
1355.44(e)(22)(vi).
1355.44(e)(22)(vii).
1355.44(e)(23).
1355.44(e)(24).
1355.44(e)(25).
1355.44(f)(1)
1355.44(f)(2).
1355.44(f)(3).
1355.44(f)(4).
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
90593
ATTACHMENT A—OUT-OF-HOME CARE DATA FILE ELEMENTS § 1355.44—Continued
Category
Element
Reponses options
Juvenile justice ....................................
Yes ......................................................
No
Date .....................................................
Child’s residence .................................
Other location
Yes ......................................................
No
Not applicable
Date .....................................................
..............................................................
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
1355.44(f)(5)
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
1355.44(f)(10)(ii).
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
1355.44(f)(10)(iii).
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
1355.44(f)(10)(iv).
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
1355.44(f)(10)(v).
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
1355.44(f)(10)(vi).
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
1355.44(f)(10)(vii).
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
1355.44(f)(10)(ix).
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
1355.44(f)(10)(x).
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
1355.44(f)(10)(xii).
Caseworker visit dates ........................
Caseworker visit location ....................
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Transition plan .....................................
Date of transition plan .........................
Active efforts ........................................
Assist the parent(s) or Indian custodian through the steps of a case
plan and with developing the resources necessary to satisfy the
case plan.
Conduct a comprehensive assessment of the circumstances of the Indian child’s family, with a focus on
safe reunification as the most desirable goal.
Identify appropriate services and to
help the parent overcome barriers,
including actively assisting the parents in obtaining such services.
Identify, notify and invite representatives of the Indian child’s tribe to
participate in providing support and
services to the Indian child’s family
and in family team meetings, permanency planning and resolution of
placement issues.
Conduct or cause to be conducted a
diligent search for the Indian child’s
expended family members, and
contacting and consulting with extended family members to provide
family structure and support for the
Indian child and the Indian child’s
parents.
Offer and employ all available and
culturally appropriate family preservation strategies and facilitate the
use of remedial and rehabilitative
services provide by the child’s tribe.
Take steps to keep siblings together
whenever possible.
Support regular visits with parents or
Indian custodians in the most natural setting possible as well as trial
home visits of the Indian child during any period of removal, consistent with the need to ensure the
health, safety, and welfare of the
child.
Identify community resources including housing, financial, transportation, mental health, substance use
and peer support services and actively assisting the Indian child’s
parents or when appropriate, the
child’s family in utilizing and accessing those resources.
Monitor progress and participation in
services.
Consider alternative ways to address
the needs of the Indian child’s parents and, where appropriate, the
family, if the optimum services do
not exist or are not available.
Provide post-reunification services
and monitoring.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
Section citation
1355.44(f)(6).
1355.44(f)(7).
1355.44(f)(8).
1355.44(f)(9).
1355.44(f)(10)
1355.44(f)(10)(i).
1355.44(f)(10)(viii).
1355.44(f)(10)(xi).
90594
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
ATTACHMENT A—OUT-OF-HOME CARE DATA FILE ELEMENTS § 1355.44—Continued
Category
Element
Reponses options
General exit information ......................
Other active efforts tailored to the
facts and circumstances of the case.
Date of exit ..........................................
Exit transaction date ............................
Exit reason ..........................................
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Date .....................................................
Date .....................................................
Not applicable ......................................
Reunify with parent(s)/legal guardian(s)
Live with other relatives
Adoption
Emancipation
Guardianship
Runaway or whereabouts unknown
Death of child
Transfer to another agency
State title IV–E agency ........................
Tribal title IV–E agency
Indian tribe or tribal agency (non IV–
E)
Juvenile justice agency
Mental health agency
Other public agency
Private agency
Married couple .....................................
Married but individually adopting or
obtaining legal guardianship
Separated
Unmarried couple
Single adult
..............................................................
Transfer to another agency .................
Exit to adoption and guardianship information.
Marital status of adoptive parent(s) or
guardian(s).
Child’s relationship to the adoptive
parent(s) or guardian(s).
Paternal grandparent(s) ......................
Maternal grandparent(s) ......................
Other paternal relative(s) ....................
Other maternal relative(s) ...................
Sibling(s) ..............................................
Kin .......................................................
Non-relative(s) .....................................
Foster parent(s) ...................................
Date of birth of first adoptive parent or
guardian.
First adoptive parent or guardian tribal
membership.
Race of first adoptive parent or guardian.
Race—American Indian or Alaska Native.
Race—Asian ........................................
Race—Black or African America .........
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Race—Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander.
Race—White .......................................
Race—Unknown ..................................
Race—Declined ...................................
Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of first
adoptive parent or guardian.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4701
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Applies .................................................
Does not apply
Date .....................................................
Yes ......................................................
No
Unknown
..............................................................
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Unknown
Declined
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
Section citation
1355.44(f)(10)(xiii).
1355.44(g)(1).
1355.44(g)(2).
1355.44(g)(3)
1355.44(g)(4)
1355.44(h)(1).
1355.44(h)(2)
1355.44(h)(2)(i).
1355.44(h)(2)(ii).
1355.44(h)(2)(iii).
1355.44(h)(2)(iv).
1355.44(h)(2)(v).
1355.44(h)(2)(vi).
1355.44(h)(2)(vii).
1355.44(h)(2)(viii).
1355.44(h)(3).
1355.44(h)(4).
1355.44(h)(5)
1355.44(h)(5)(i).
1355.44(h)(5)(ii).
1355.44(h)(5)(iii).
1355.44(h)(5)(iv).
1355.44(h)(5)(v).
1355.44(h)(5)(vi).
1355.44(h)(5)(vii).
1355.44(h)(6).
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
90595
ATTACHMENT A—OUT-OF-HOME CARE DATA FILE ELEMENTS § 1355.44—Continued
Category
Element
Reponses options
Gender of first adoptive parent or
guardian.
First adoptive parent or legal guardian
sexual orientation.
Female .................................................
Male
Straight or Heterosexual .....................
Gay or lesbian
Bisexual
Don’t know
Something else
Declined
Date .....................................................
Date of birth of second adoptive parent, guardian or other member of
the couple.
Second adoptive parent, guardian, or
other member of the couple tribal
membership.
Race of second adoptive parent,
guardian, or other member of the
couple.
Race—American Indian or Alaska Native.
Race—Asian ........................................
Race—Black or African America .........
Race—Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander.
Race—White .......................................
Race—Unknown ..................................
Race—Declined ...................................
Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of second
adoptive parent, guardian, or other
member of the couple.
Gender of second adoptive parent,
guardian, or other member of the
couple.
Second adoptive parent, guardian, or
other member of the couple sexual
orientation.
Inter/Intrajurisdictional
guardianship.
adoption
or
Interjurisdictional adoption or guardianship jurisdiction.
Adoption or guardianship placing
agency.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Assistance agreement type .................
Siblings in adoptive or guardianship
home.
Available ICWA adoptive placements
A member of the Indian child’s extended family.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4701
Yes ......................................................
No
Unknown
..............................................................
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Unknown
Declined
Female .................................................
Male
Straight or heterosexual ......................
Gay or lesbian
Bisexual
Don’t know
Something else
Declined
Interjurisdictional adoption or guardianship
Intercountry adoption or guardianship
Intrajurisdictional adoption or guardianship
Name ...................................................
Title IV–E agency ................................
Private agency under agreement
Indian tribe under contract/agreement
Title IV–E adoption assistance agreement
State/tribal adoption assistance agreement
Adoption—Title IV–E agreement nonrecurring expenses only
Adoption—Title IV–E agreement Medicaid only
Title IV–E guardianship assistance
agreement
State/tribal guardianship assistance
agreement
No agreement
Number ................................................
..............................................................
Yes ......................................................
No
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
Section citation
1355.44(h)(7).
1355.44(h)(8).
1355.44(h)(9)
1355.44(h)(10).
1355.44(h)(11).
1355.44(h)(11)(i).
1355.44(h)(11)(ii).
1355.44(h)(11)(iii).
1355.44(h)(11)(iv).
1355.44(h)(11)(v).
1355.44(h)(11)(vi).
1355.44(h)(11)(vii).
1355.44(h)(12).
1355.44(h)(13).
1355.44(h)(14).
1355.44(h)(15).
1355.44(h)(16).
1355.44(h)(17).
1355.44(h)(18).
1355.44(h)(19).
1355.44(h)(20).
1355.44(h)(20)(i).
90596
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
ATTACHMENT A—OUT-OF-HOME CARE DATA FILE ELEMENTS § 1355.44—Continued
Category
Element
Reponses options
Other members of the Indian child’s
tribe.
Other Indian families ...........................
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No.
A placement that complies with the
order of preference for foster care
or pre-adoptive placements established by an Indian child’s tribe, in
accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1915(c).
Adoption
placement
preferences
under ICWA.
Good cause under ICWA ....................
Basis for good cause ..........................
Request of one or both of the child’s
parents.
Request of the Indian child .................
The unavailability of a suitable placement after a determination by the
court that a diligent search was
conducted to find suitable placements meeting the placement preferences in ICWA at 25 U.S.C. 1915
but none has been located.
The extraordinary physical, mental, or
emotional needs of the Indian child,
such as specialized treatment services that may be unavailable in the
community where families who
meet the placement preferences
live.
The presence of a sibling attachment
that can be maintained only through
a particular placement.
Section citation
1355.44(h)(20)(ii).
1355.44(h)(20)(iii).
1355.44(h)(20)(iv).
A member of the Indian child’s extended family
Other members of the Indian child’s
tribe
Other Indian families
A placement that complies with the
order of preference for adoptive
placements established by an Indian child’s tribe, in accordance with
25 U.S.C. 1915(c)
Placement does not meet ICWA
placement preferences
Yes ......................................................
No
..............................................................
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
Yes ......................................................
No
1355.44(h)(21).
Yes ......................................................
No
1355.44(h)(23)(iv).
Yes ......................................................
No
1355.44(h)(23)(v).
1355.44(h)(22).
1355.44(h)(23)
1355.44(h)(23)(i)
1355.44(h)(23)(ii).
1355.44(h)(23)(iii).
ATTACHMENT B—ADOPTION ASSISTANCE DATA FILE ELEMENTS § 1355.45
Element
Reponses options
Title IV–E agency ..................................................................
Report date ...........................................................................
Child record number .............................................................
Child’s date of birth ...............................................................
Child’s gender .......................................................................
Name ....................................................................................
Date ......................................................................................
Number .................................................................................
Date ......................................................................................
Male ......................................................................................
Female.
Child’s race ...........................................................................
Race—American Indian or Alaska Native ............................
Race—Asian .........................................................................
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
Race—Black or African America ..........................................
Race—Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander ................
Race—White .........................................................................
Race—Unknown ...................................................................
Race—Abandoned ................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Yes
No.
Yes
No.
Yes
No.
Yes
No.
Yes
No.
Yes
No.
Yes
No.
Frm 00074
Section citation
1355.45(a)(1).
1355.45(a)(2).
1355.45(a)(3).
1355.45(b)(1).
1355.45(b)(2).
.......................................................................................
1355.45(b)(3).
1355.45(b)(3)(i).
.......................................................................................
1355.45(b)(3)(ii).
.......................................................................................
1355.45(b)(3)(iii).
.......................................................................................
1355.45(b)(3)(iv).
.......................................................................................
1355.45(b)(3)(v).
.......................................................................................
1355.45(b)(3)(vi).
.......................................................................................
1355.45(b)(3)(vii).
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
90597
ATTACHMENT B—ADOPTION ASSISTANCE DATA FILE ELEMENTS § 1355.45—Continued
Element
Reponses options
Race—Declined ....................................................................
Yes .......................................................................................
No.
Yes .......................................................................................
No.
Unknown.
Abandoned.
Declined.
Title IV–E adoption assistance agreement ..........................
Title IV–E guardianship assistance agreement.
Number .................................................................................
Date ......................................................................................
Date ......................................................................................
Hispanic or Latino Ethnicity ..................................................
Assistance agreement type ..................................................
Subsidy amount ....................................................................
Adoption finalization or guardianship legalization date ........
Agreement termination date .................................................
Section citation
[FR Doc. 2016–29366 Filed 12–13–16; 8:45 am]
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES3
BILLING CODE P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Dec 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\14DER3.SGM
14DER3
1355.45(b)(3)(viii).
1355.45(b)(4).
1355.45(c)(1).
1355.45(c)(2).
1355.45(d).
1355.45(e).
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 240 (Wednesday, December 14, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 90524-90597]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-29366]
[[Page 90523]]
Vol. 81
Wednesday,
No. 240
December 14, 2016
Part III
Department of Health and Human Services
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Administration for Children and Families
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
45 CFR Part 1355
Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System; Final Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 81 , No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2016 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 90524]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and Families
45 CFR Part 1355
RIN 0970-AC47
Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System
AGENCY: Administration on Children, Youth and Families (ACYF),
Administration for Children and Families (ACF), Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Social Security Act (the Act) requires that ACF regulate a
national data collection system that provides comprehensive demographic
and case-specific information on children who are in foster care and
adopted. This final rule replaces existing Adoption and Foster Care
Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS) regulations and the appendices
to require title IV-E agencies to collect and report data to ACF on
children in out-of-home care, and who exit out-of-home care to adoption
or legal guardianship, children in out-of-home care who are covered by
the Indian Child Welfare Act, and children who are covered by a title
IV-E adoption or guardianship assistance agreement.
DATES: This rule is effective on January 13, 2017 except for the
removal of Sec. 1355.40 (amendatory instruction 3) and Appendices A
through E to Part 1355 (amendatory instruction 5), which are effective
as of October 1, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen McHugh, Director, Policy
Division, Children's Bureau, 330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20201.
Email address: cbcomments@acf.hhs.gov. Deaf and hearing impaired
individuals may call the Federal Dual Party Relay Service at 1-800-877-
8339 between 8:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Eastern Time.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Executive Summary per Executive Order 13563
II. Background on AFCARS
III. Regulation Development
IV. Discussion of Major Changes to the Final Rule
V. Implementation Timeframe
VI. Section-by-Section Discussion of Comments and Regulatory
Provisions
VII. Regulatory Impact Analysis
VIII. Tribal Consultation Statement
I. Executive Summary per Executive Order 13563
Executive Order 13563 requires that regulations be accessible,
consistent, written in plain language, and easy to understand. This
means that regulatory preambles for lengthy or complex rules (both
proposed and final) must include executive summaries. Below is the
executive summary for this AFCARS final rule.
(1) Purpose of the AFCARS Final Rule
(a) The need for the regulatory action and how the action will meet
that need: This rule finalizes AFCARS revisions proposed in a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking on February 9, 2015 (80 FR 7132, hereafter referred
to as the 2015 NPRM) and in a Supplemental Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking on April 7, 2016 (81 FR 20283, hereafter referred to as the
2016 SNPRM). We revised the AFCARS regulations to: (1) Incorporate
statutory requirements enacted since 1993; (2) implement the statutory
mandate to assess penalties for noncompliant data submissions; (3)
enhance the type and quality of information title IV-E agencies report
to ACF; and (4) incorporate data elements related to the Indian Child
Welfare Act (ICWA). Title IV-E agencies must submit data files on a
semi-annual basis to ACF. The regulations specify the reporting
population, standards for compliance, and all data elements. The final
rule will improve the data reported to ACF by including more
comprehensive national data on the status of American Indian/Alaska
Native (AI/AN) children for whom ICWA applies and historical data on
children in foster care and adds new data elements to better understand
a child's experience in out-of-home care.
(b) Legal authority for the final rule: Section 479 of the Act
mandates HHS regulate a data collection system for national adoption
and foster care data. Section 474(f) of the Act requires HHS to impose
penalties for non-compliant AFCARS data. Section 1102 of the Act
instructs the Secretary to promulgate regulations necessary for the
effective administration of the functions for which HHS is responsible
under the Act.
(2) Summary of the Major Provisions of the Final Rule
(a) Reporting Populations. AFCARS will have two reporting
populations: the out-of-home care reporting population and the adoption
and guardianship assistance reporting population. The out-of-home care
reporting population includes a child of any age who is in foster care
under the placement and care responsibility of the title IV-E agency;
is receiving title IV-E foster care maintenance payments under a title
IV-E agreement; or has run away or whose whereabouts are unknown at the
time the title IV-E agency becomes responsible for the child. Once the
child enters the reporting population, he or she remains in the
reporting population until the title IV-E agency's responsibility for
the child ends or the child's title IV-E foster care maintenance
payment pursuant to a title IV-E agreement ends. The adoption and
guardianship assistance reporting population includes a child whose
adoption or guardianship was finalized during the report period, and
the child's adoptive parents or guardians have a title IV-E adoption or
guardianship assistance agreement with the reporting title IV-E agency.
(b) Data Structure. Title IV-E agencies must report AFCARS
information in two separate data files: an out-of-home care data file
and an adoption and guardianship assistance data file. The out-of-home
care data file is a combination of point-in-time information (e.g.,
demographics) and information on the events in the child's life over
time (e.g., every living arrangement and permanency plan). The adoption
and guardianship assistance data file contains data that capture a
child's demographic information, payment information, and certain
agreement information.
(c) Data Elements. We retained the majority of data elements
proposed for the out-of-home care reporting population proposed in the
2015 NPRM, but removed some data elements in response to comments
(e.g., concurrent permanency plans) and modified others (e.g.,
caseworker visits and prior adoption/guardianship). We reduced the
adoption and guardianship assistance reporting to include data on the
child's demographics, subsidy amounts, adoption finalization date, and
agreement termination date. Also, we retained nearly all of the data
elements proposed in the 2016 SNPRM for the out-of-home care reporting
population specific to Indian children as defined in ICWA, but removed
two data elements: one data element requiring states to report if they
provided additional information requested by tribes related to
notification and one data element indicating the date when the state
title IV-E agency began making active efforts.
(d) Compliance and Penalties. The final rule strengthens our
ability to hold title IV-E agencies accountable for submitting quality
data. A title IV-E
[[Page 90525]]
agency must meet basic file standards, such as timely data file
submissions and more specific data quality standards, such as 10
percent or less of a variety of errors. A title IV-E agency that does
not meet the standards upon initial submission of the data will have
six months to correct and submit the corrected data. If a title IV-E
agency does not meet the standards after corrective action, ACF will
apply the penalties required in statute (section 474(f) of the Act).
(3) Costs and Benefits. We estimate that costs for the final rule
will be approximately $40.7 million. Benefits are that we will have an
updated AFCARS regulation for the first time since 1993. In addition to
the current uses of the data, the new information will provide more
comprehensive information to deepen our understanding of guardianships
and to address the unique needs of Indian children as defined in ICWA
who are in the state's placement and care responsibility and who exit
to reunification, adoption or who are transferred to the custody of the
Indian tribe. This will further our work to draw national statistics
and trends about the foster care, adoption, and guardianship
populations for assessing the current state of these federal programs
and inform national policies with respect to adoption, guardianship,
and foster care.
II. Background on AFCARS
AFCARS regulations were originally published in December 1993 in
response to the statutory mandate for adoption and foster care data in
section 479 of the Act. That mandate is for a data collection system
which provides comprehensive national information on:
the demographic characteristics of adopted and foster
children and their parents;
the status and characteristics of the foster care
population;
the number and characteristics of children entering and
exiting foster care, children adopted and children placed in living
arrangements outside of the responsible title IV-E agency;
the extent and nature of assistance provided by government
programs for foster care and adoption and the characteristics of the
children that receive the assistance; and
the number of foster children identified as sex
trafficking victims before entering or while in foster care.
We use AFCARS data to:
Draw national statistics and trends about the foster care
and adoption populations for assessing the current state of foster care
and adoption.
Complete the annual Child Welfare Outcomes Report to
Congress (section 479A of the Act).
Develop our budgets.
Calculate payments for the Adoption and Guardianship
Incentive Payments program.
Monitor title IV-E agency compliance with title IV-B and
IV-E requirements, including drawing the population sample for title
IV-E reviews.
Develop appropriate national policies with respect to
adoption and foster care; and
Address the unique needs of Indian children as defined by
ICWA in foster care or who exit to adoption, and their families.
III. Regulation Development
Proposed Rules: We published a NPRM on January 11, 2008 to revise
AFCARS (73 FR 2082). We did not finalize that NPRM due to the President
signing into law the Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing
Adoptions Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-351) that substantially changed
the title IV-E program. Rather, we analyzed the comments and sought
additional comments through a Federal Register Notice (75 FR 43187,
issued July 23, 2010). In September 2014, the President signed into law
the Preventing Sex Trafficking and Strengthening Families Act (Public
Law 113-183) that modified the AFCARS requirements in section 479 of
the Act, the annual Child Welfare Outcomes Report in section 479A of
the Act, and added a requirement for HHS to submit several reports to
Congress requiring the collection and reporting of information on
victims of sex trafficking, children in foster care who are pregnant or
parenting, and children in foster care in non-foster family settings
and the services they receive. We published the 2015 NPRM proposing to
modify the requirements for title IV-E agencies to collect and report
data to ACF on children in out-of-home care and who were adopted or in
a legal guardianship with a title IV-E adoption or guardianship
assistance agreement. In April 2015, we announced our intent to publish
a supplemental NPRM that would propose adding ICWA-related data
elements to AFCARS (80 FR 17713, issued April 2, 2015). ICWA
establishes minimum federal standards for the removal of Indian
children from their families and the placement of such children in
foster care or adoptive placements that reflect the unique values of
Indian culture. In cooperation with the Children's Bureau, the National
Association of Public Child Welfare Administrators (NAPCWA), an
affiliate of the American Public Human Services Association (APHSA)
hosted a conference call with state members of NAPCWA (i.e.,
representatives of state child welfare agencies) on April 27, 2015. The
purpose of the call was to obtain input from state members on what data
state title IV-E agencies currently collect regarding ICWA and what
they believed were the most important information title IV-E agencies
should report in AFCARS related to ICWA. In addition, the Children's
Bureau held a tribal consultation via conference call on May 1, 2015 to
obtain input from tribal leaders on proposed AFCARS data elements
related to ICWA. Comments were solicited during the call to determine
essential data elements that title IV-E agencies should report to
AFCARS. As part of on-going intra- and inter-agency collaboration, ACF
consulted with federal experts on whether data exists, or not, and its
utility in understanding the well-being of Indian children, youth, and
families. ACF also consulted with federal partners at the Department of
Justice (DOJ) and the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) at the Department
of the Interior on the ICWA statutory requirements in 25 U.S.C 1901 et
seq., the Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs Guidelines
for State Courts and Agencies in Indian Child Custody Proceedings (80
FR 10146 issued February 25, 2015, hereafter referred to as BIA's
Guidelines), and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to Implement Regulations
for State Courts and Agencies in Indian Child Custody Proceedings (80
FR 14880, issued March 20, 2015). After considering all of the
aforementioned input, the 2016 SNPRM was published on April 7, 2016 (81
FR 20283) and proposed to require that state title IV-E agencies
collect and report certain information related to ICWA for Indian
children in the AFCARS out-of-home care reporting population.
2015 NPRM Comments: In response to the 2015 NPRM, we received 126
comment letters from states, Indian tribes and organizations
representing tribal interests, national advocacy/public interests
groups, universities, and private citizens. Many commenters supported
many of the revisions we proposed for reporting historical data and
collecting new information on topics such as caseworker visits,
transition plans, and siblings. Commenters suggested including data
elements related to ICWA. However, some commenters expressed concern
[[Page 90526]]
with the burden of modifying state systems to report the additional
data elements. Suggestions included that we pare down the overall
number of data elements to a core set that collects essential
information. Commenters suggested that some of the proposed data
elements were better suited in case narratives or case reviews rather
than AFCARS. We expand on these comments in the section-by-section
discussion.
2016 SNPRM Comments: In response to the 2016 SNPRM, we received 91
comment letters from states, Indian tribes and organizations
representing tribal interests, national child welfare advocacy/public
interest groups, universities, and private citizens. Many commenters
supported collecting ICWA-related data in AFCARS and stated that it
will better inform practice for Indian children as defined in ICWA.
However, many commenters also expressed concerns with the burden of
modifying state data systems to collect and report new and additional
data elements. They suggested that we pare down the overall number of
data elements to a core set that collects essential information related
to ICWA. Commenters stated that much of the proposed data elements were
better suited for case reviews rather than AFCARS because much of the
information is currently in case narratives. We expand on these
comments in the section-by-section discussion.
IV. Discussion of Major Changes to the Final Rule
Discussed below are the major changes and provisions of the final
rule.
A. Changes to the Out-of-Home Care Data File
We received many comments in response to the AFCARS out-of-home
care data elements proposed in the 2015 NPRM and 2016 SNPRM that helped
us strengthen, clarify, and streamline the data elements. In general,
states and the national organization that represents state child
welfare agencies believe there are data elements in both the 2015 NPRM
and the 2016 SNPRM that exceed the scope of the requirements of recent
child welfare legislation and they recommend that ACF review each
proposed data element and focus on essential data elements that can be
reasonably collected and compared across states. Some states expressed
concerns about the proposed data elements, implementation period,
penalties, timeframe for submission, limited access to court records,
and associated burden. They suggested paring down the number of data
elements, providing adequate timeline and structure to implement
changes including data exchanges with courts, and requested additional
resources to meet the burden of implementation and training staff. In
addition, some states expressed concerns that the rule includes data
elements that attempt to capture qualitative and quantitative
information that is not easily reducible to a single data field, and
are more appropriate for a qualitative case review rather than an
administrative data collection. We made the following major changes in
the out-of-home care data file based on public comments:
Citizenship and Immigration
Throughout the final rule, we removed proposed data elements that
required agencies to report whether or not the child or parent was born
in the United States. State title IV-E agencies and a national
organization representing state child welfare agencies were
overwhelmingly opposed to agencies being required to report this in
AFCARS, commenting that the data elements are not relevant to their
work at the state and local level and could adversely impact the
worker's relationship with families. However, in response to
suggestions to add data elements related to parental immigration
detainment or deportation, we included these as response options in the
Child and family circumstances at removal data element in section
1355.43(d). These changes are explained in further detail in the
section-by-section discussion.
Sexual Orientation
We requested public input in the 2015 NPRM on whether AFCARS should
include information on whether a child identifies as lesbian, gay,
bisexual, transgender, or questioning (LGBTQ). We received comments
both in favor and against title IV-E agencies collecting and reporting
this information to AFCARS but we were convinced to include data
elements in the final rule related to the sexual orientation of the
child (section 1355.44(b)), the child's foster parent(s) (section
1355.44(e)), and adoptive parent(s) or legal guardian(s) (sections
1355.44(h)). Our goal in including this information is that the data
will assist title IV-E agencies to help meet the needs of LGBTQ youth
in foster care.
Information on sexual orientation should be obtained and maintained
in a manner that reflects respectful treatment, sensitivity, and
confidentiality. Several state and county agencies, advocacy
organizations and human rights organizations have developed guidance
and recommended practices for how to promote these conditions in
serving LGBT youth in adoption, foster care and out-of-home placement
settings. ACF provides state and tribal resources for Working With
LGBTQ Youth and Families at the Child Welfare Information Gateway. The
following links are provided as general examples of such guidance
(Minnesota and California examples). ACF will provide technical
assistance to agencies on collecting this information.
We also added, based on comments, whether there is family conflict
related to the child's sexual orientation, gender identify, or gender
expression as a Child and family circumstance at removal reported when
a child is removed from home in section 1355.44(d).
Child Financial and Medical Assistance
We proposed in the 2015 NPRM to collect financial and medical
assistance information that support the child in two separate data
elements: (1) Identify the source of federal assistance and total per
diem payment amount for each of the child's living arrangements from a
list seven types of assistance; and (2) identify whether the child
received specific non-title IV-E federal or state/tribal financial and
medical assistance during the report period. We received many comments
expressing concern about the increased burden in particular to report
specific federal assistance per diem payment amounts for every living
arrangement. In response to these concerns, we were persuaded to revise
the data elements by removing the data element related to per diem
payment amounts for every living arrangement and consolidated the
response options from both data elements into one data element. As a
result, in section 1355.44(b) of the final rule, we require title IV-E
agencies to report if the child received any of 13 types of state/
tribal and federal financial and medical assistance during the report
period.
Health, Behavioral or Mental Health Conditions and IDEA Qualifying
Disability
We proposed in the 2015 NPRM to require agencies to report on a
child's health, behavior or mental health conditions in one data
element and the child's qualifying disability as defined by the
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) if he/she has an
Individualized Education Program (IEP) or Individual Family Service
Plan (IFSP) in another. We received many comments from state title IV-E
agencies that the response options for both data elements were very
similar conditions,
[[Page 90527]]
the distinction confusing, and could lead to unreliable data. We were
persuaded by the commenters to streamline and consolidate the two data
elements and as a result removed the specific requirement for agencies
to report a child's qualifying disability, and modified and combined
the response options into one data element called health, behavioral or
mental health conditions with 11 conditions for agency to report on the
child (section 1355.43(b)). This will provide us with better data on
the child's health characteristics and meets the federal requirement to
collect this information per section 479A(a)(7)(A)(v) of the Act
regarding reporting clinically diagnosed conditions for certain
children in foster care.
Siblings
We revised how we will collect information on siblings in the out-
of-home care data file in the final rule. In the 2015 NPRM, we proposed
to collect sibling information in both the out-of-home care data file
and the title IV-E adoption and guardianship assistance data file:
The number of siblings of the child who are in out-of-home
care and the child record numbers for those siblings, those siblings
who are placed together in out-of-home care and those not placed
together; and
the number of siblings who exited out-of-home care to
adoption or guardianship and the child record numbers of those siblings
who are living with the child and the child record numbers of those not
living with the child.
Commenters generally agreed that information about siblings is
important to collect, but had concerns that our proposal was too
complicated and would not yield reliable information because there are
many and varied reasons for siblings not being placed together.
Commenters thought the proposal did not take into account the
complexity of what may constitute a family in the eyes of a child, and
this information is best captured qualitatively. We carefully reviewed
the comments and recommendations. While we understand the concerns and
issues the commenters raised that may make it difficult to report
sibling information, we determined that we must continue to require
agencies to report information about sibling placements. As we noted in
the preamble to the 2015 NPRM, section 471(a)(31)(A) of the Act
requires title IV-E agencies to make reasonable efforts to place
siblings removed from their home in the same foster care, kinship
guardianship or adoptive placement, unless such a placement is contrary
to the safety or well-being of any of the siblings. While we retained
the core requirement for agencies to report on whether siblings are
placed together in foster care and when siblings exit to adoption, we
simplified reporting. We removed the data elements requiring the agency
to report the sibling's child record numbers which was one of the
concerns raised by commenters. Thus, the agency reports in the out-of-
home care data file the following:
The number of siblings of the child that are in foster
care, and the number of siblings in the same living arrangement as the
child on the last day of the report period (section 1355.42(b)).
The number of siblings of the child who are in the same
adoptive or guardianship home as the child, if the child exited foster
care to adoption or guardianship (section 1355.44(h)).
Data Elements Related to ICWA
2016 SNPRM Rationale: The Government Accountability Office (GAO)
reported in 2005 that there is no national data on children subject to
ICWA by which to assess the experiences of AI/AN children in child
welfare systems or with which to target guidance and assistance to
states (GAO-05-290 Indian Child Welfare Act). Further, in response to
comments on the 2015 NPRM and a reevaluation of our data collection
authority, we were persuaded to propose that state title IV-E agencies
report ICWA-related data. We proposed the data elements in the 2016
SNPRM as paragraph (i) to the proposed section 1355.43 (from the 2015
NPRM) after considering input from comments and federal agency experts.
Overall, tribes, organizations, states, and private citizens supported
our mission to collect additional information related to Indian
children as defined in ICWA. Moreover, some states, tribes, national
organizations and federal agencies have stated that ICWA is the ``gold
standard'' of child welfare practice and its implementation and
associated data collection will likely help to inform efforts to
improve outcomes for all children and families in state child welfare
systems.
Comments: Generally, tribes, organizations representing tribal
interests, national child welfare advocacy organizations, and private
citizens fully support the overall goal and purpose of including ICWA-
related data in AFCARS, and the data elements as proposed in the 2016
SNPRM. These commenters believe that collecting ICWA-related data in
AFCARS will:
1. provide data on core ICWA requirements such as ``active
efforts'' and placement preferences, as well as assess how the child
welfare system is working for Indian children as defined by ICWA,
families and communities;
2. facilitate access to culturally-appropriate services to extended
families and other tribal members who can serve as resources and high
quality placements for tribal children;
3. help address and reduce the disproportionality of AI/AN children
in foster care; and
4. provide avenues for collaboration between states and tribes that
are more meaningful and outcome driven, including improved policy
development, technical assistance, training and resource allocation as
a result of having reliable data available.
Overall, tribal commenters and national child welfare advocacy
organizations believe that collecting ICWA-related data in AFCARS is a
step in the right direction to ensure that Indian families will be kept
together when possible, and will help prevent AI/AN children from
entering the foster care system. Many of the tribal commenters that
supported the 2016 SNPRM also recommended extensive training for title
IV-E agencies and court personnel in order to ensure accurate and
reliable data reporting. Some commenters recommended additional data
elements.
Commenters from some states and the national organization
representing state child welfare agencies generally supported the
overall goal and purpose of including ICWA-related data in AFCARS. One
state commented that reporting national data related to ICWA was needed
and long over-due. Some states reiterated concerns expressed in their
comments to the NPRM related to the implementation period, penalties,
timeline for submission, limited access to court records and the
associated burden. Those states made similar recommendations to reduce
the number of elements, provide an adequate implementation timeline,
and requested additional resources to implement and train staff. As
with their comments to the NPRM, some states identified proposed ICWA-
related data elements that they believe would not be easily captured in
a single data field and may therefore be better assessed through
qualitative case file review. Some states also suggested that we
clarify the language of the ICWA-related data elements and definitions
in relation to BIA's regulations in order to increase national
uniformity of practice and data collection. Several states said that
they have a small number of AI/AN children
[[Page 90528]]
in their AFCARS reporting population and they requested that federal
funding be made available to the fullest extent possible to help
prepare for the low-occurring event of reporting the ICWA-related
information.
Final Rule: We understand the burden issues that states raised in
collecting and reporting additional data to AFCARS; however, we have
determined in the final rule that the benefits outweigh the burden
associated with collecting and reporting the additional data. Most
states commented positively about improving data on Indian children as
defined in ICWA. As we stated in the 2016 SNPRM, it is unclear how well
state title IV-E agencies implement ICWA's requirements because of the
lack of data related to ICWA. Even in states with large AI/AN
populations, there may be confusion regarding how and when to apply
ICWA.
We retained most of the data elements proposed in the 2016 SNPRM
with some minor revisions to be consistent with the final rule
published by the Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs
that addresses requirements for state courts regarding ICWA (81 FR
38778). We modified our final AFCARS rule requiring state title IV-E
agencies to report whether active efforts were made prior to removal
and prior to a termination of parental rights (TPR), and to identify
which active efforts were made prior to removal and during the child's
out-of-home care episode. We agree with commenters' suggestions that we
include information when a state title IV-E agency inquired of extended
family if the child is an Indian child because extended family may have
information that parents do not know. We removed the requirement for
states to report the date on which the state title IV-E agency began
making active efforts in order to coordinate with the BIA's regulation
clarifying that ICWA applies when the state title IV-E agency knows or
has reason to know that a child is an Indian child as defined in ICWA.
We removed the data element requiring states to report whether the
state provided additional information the tribe requested related to
notification. We explain this more in the section-by-section
discussion.
We determined the best approach for the final rule is to integrate
the data elements proposed in the 2016 SNPRM as section 1355.43(i) into
applicable sections of this final rule at section 1355.44. These
sections are: Child information (section 1355.44(b)); Parent or legal
guardian information (section 1355.44(c)); Removal information (section
1355.44(d)); Living arrangement and provider information (section
1355.44(e)); Permanency planning (section 1355.44(f)); General exit
information (section 1355.44(g)); and Exit to adoption and guardianship
information (section 1355.44(h)).
On June 14, 2016, BIA published the final rule, Indian Child
Welfare Act Proceedings (81 FR 38778). BIA's final rule requires fewer
court orders than its proposed rule and increases flexibility for
recording court decisions. In response to state and tribal comments
suggesting congruence with the BIA's final rule, we revised data
elements in this final rule as appropriate to reflect the BIA's
regulations including removing requirements that state title IV-E
agencies report certain information only from ICWA-specific court
orders. These changes should allow the state title IV-E agency more
flexibility, alleviate some of the burden and other concerns identified
by states, help target technical assistance to increase state title IV-
E agency communication and coordination with courts, and improve
practice and national data on all children who are in foster care.
B. Revisions to Data on Children Who Are Adopted and Children Who Are
Placed in Legal Guardianships
2015 NPRM Proposal and Rationale: In the 2015 NPRM, we proposed a
new data file to collect information on children who have title IV-E
adoption or guardianship assistance agreements and several new out-of-
home care data elements to collect information on children who exit
out-of-home care to adoption or legal guardianship.
Title IV-E Adoption and Guardianship Assistance data file: We
proposed in the 2015 NPRM to require the title IV-E agency to report
ongoing information on children under a title IV-E adoption and
guardianship assistance agreement (called the title IV-E adoption and
guardianship assistance data file), regardless of whether the agreement
is for an ongoing subsidy, nonrecurring costs or in the case of a title
IV-E finalized adoption, a Medicaid-only subsidy. The information
included: demographics on each child, finalization/legalization dates,
jurisdiction of the adoption, adoption or guardianship placing agency,
subsidy and nonrecurring costs amounts, and sibling information.
Section 1355.44(h) Exit to adoption and guardianship information:
We also proposed data elements in the out-of-home care data file
related to all children who exit out-of-home care to adoption or legal
guardianship. This included children who have a title IV-E adoption or
guardianship assistance agreement, with or without a subsidy, and those
who do not have either an agreement or subsidy. We proposed to require
that the title IV-E agency report information on children who exit out-
of-home care to adoption or legal guardianship, including: Demographic
information (race, ethnicity, date of birth) on the adoptive parents/
legal guardians; child's relationship to the adoptive parents/legal
guardians; whether the child was placed within or outside of the state
or tribal service area, or into another country for adoption or legal
guardianship, and if so the name of the jurisdiction; and the agency
that placed the child.
Comments: We received public comments on the overall proposal to
collect information on children under title IV-E adoption and
guardianship agreements, comments on individual data elements, and
suggestions for expanding the information to be reported. A national
organization representing state child welfare agencies requested that
we remove the title IV-E adoption and guardianship assistance data file
from the final rule and in general recommended that all AFCARS data
elements be clearly defined and structured to provide accurate,
reliable, and valid information. Additional comments and concerns
raised by the organization were that: some state laws and/or policies
regarding the oversight allowed with an adoptive family restricts the
ongoing collection and use of information about these children;
children under guardianship and adoption assistance agreements do not
have open service cases even when there is a subsidy; many states
capture the financial information regarding title IV-E adoption and
guardianship subsidies in other systems; and many states would be
required to make a significant changes to their application and report
programs. In addition, the organization specifically noted that
requiring agencies to report on an optional program for a child under a
title IV-E guardianship assistance agreement reaches beyond our
statutory authority. Several others, including states, agreed with the
recommendation to remove the title IV-E adoption and guardianship
assistance data file, raising additional concerns about the burden on
workers. Some national advocacy/public interest groups representing
children and adoption agency interests supported the collection of
information on children under title IV-E assistance agreements. Some of
these groups suggested including data elements on children with state
guardianship agreements and additional historical
[[Page 90529]]
data elements. We also received specific comments on the data elements
in section 1355.44(h) that we address in the section-by section
discussion of the preamble related to gender of the adoptive parents
and legal guardians, sexual orientation of the adoptive parents and
legal guardians, the definition of kin, and information on siblings.
We carefully reviewed all of the comments and reconsidered our
essential needs at the federal level for data on children who are
adopted and in legal guardianships, and revised the final rule as
described below.
Final Rule: Adoption Assistance data file: We retained the adoption
and guardianship assistance reporting population as proposed, given the
growing dominance of this population as a component of the title IV-E
beneficiary population. However, we reduced the data elements to those
that are essential for our needs in understanding this population of
children who are receiving Federal benefits: a child's basic
demographic information, subsidy amounts, and adoption and guardianship
finalization and subsidy termination dates. As specified in the NPRM,
this information will be used to discern changing circumstances and
fluctuations in title IV-E payment amounts, responding to questions
raised by Congress, and for budgetary planning and projection purposes.
We removed the requirements for agencies to report non-recurring costs
amounts as we do not have a specified need for this case level
information and agencies report this type of information in the
aggregate. We reduced reporting on siblings which is only reported in
the out-of-home care file, as is the adoption jurisdiction and adoption
reporting agency.
Final Rule: Section 1355.44(h) Exit to adoption and guardianship
information: We determined that it was essential for us to have more
robust information about all children who exit state or tribal foster
care to adoption or legal guardianship, which is found in the out-of-
home care data file at section 1355.44(h). We added and revised data
elements based on commenters' suggestions to ensure we have a
comprehensive set of information about children who exit foster care to
adoption and guardianship. The most notable data elements we added to
the out-of-home care data file for children who exit to adoption or
guardianship are:
Sexual orientation of the adoptive parent(s) or legal
guardian(s);
Tribal membership of the adoptive parent(s) or legal
guardian(s);
The assistance agreement type (adoption assistance
agreement, state/tribal adoption assistance agreement, adoption-title
IV-E agreement, non-recurring expenses only; Medicaid only; title IV-E
guardianship assistance agreement, state/tribal guardianship assistance
agreement, or no agreement); and
The number of siblings of the child who are in the same
adoptive or guardianship home as the child who exited out-of-home care
to adoption or guardianship.
C. Report Periods and Deadlines
In section 1355.43(a) Report periods and deadlines, we modified the
final rule to allow title IV-E agencies up to 45 days after the end of
the report period to transmit the AFCARS data files.
V. Implementation Timeframe
We are providing two fiscal years for title IV-E agencies to comply
with sections 1355.41 through 1355.47. State and tribal title IV-E
agencies must continue to report data related to children in foster
care and who have been adopted with title IV-E agency involvement to
ACF in accordance with section 1355.40 and the appendix to part 1355
during the implementation period. It is essential for agencies to
continue to report AFCARS data to ACF without interruption because
AFCARS data is used for various reports, planning and monitoring, and
to make the Adoption and Guardianship Incentive awards.
We received comments from many states on the implementation
timeframe and several offered suggestions. State commenters to both the
2015 NPRM and the 2016 SNPRM indicated they would need sufficient time
to make changes to their electronic case management systems to collect
new information. Several state title IV-E agencies and a national
organization representing state title IV-E agencies indicated that
implementing the ICWA-related data elements proposed in the 2016 SNPRM
in addition to the elements proposed in the 2015 NPRM would require
more time than one year and two states indicated a need for two to
three years. Several state title IV-E agencies indicated that ICWA-
related information is documented in case files and in narrative
formats. Additionally, several state title IV-E agencies noted that
collecting the information from courts would impact their
implementation timeframe because the court information systems do not
always contain the information proposed in the 2016 SNPRM or because
there is no data exchange interface between the court and state title
IV-E agency's case management system. Commenters to the 2015 NPRM also
suggested that this final rule not be implemented until after Round 3
of the Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSR).
State title IV-E agencies and the national organization
representing state title IV-E agencies recommended either a tiered or a
phased-in approach to compliance with the AFCARS requirements and
penalties. Several of those commenters suggested that we allow agencies
additional time to implement the changes proposed in the 2016 SNPRM
regarding ICWA data elements.
We understand states' concerns about the system changes that are
needed since this final rule will implement the statutory AFCARS
penalties. However, we determined that a two federal fiscal year period
is sufficient for states to implement all changes for the AFCARS final
rule. We are not providing a phase-in period for the ICWA-related data
elements. As we noted in the 2016 SNPRM, we are issuing one final rule
on AFCARS and we considered all comments on the 2015 NPRM and the 2016
SNPRM.
VI. Section-by-Section Discussion of Comments and Regulatory Provisions
Section 1355.40 Foster Care and Adoption Data Collection
In this section, we modified the requirements in the current
section 1355.40 to require title IV-E agencies to continue to submit
AFCARS data during the implementation timeframe. We must keep the
current AFCARS regulations at section 1355.40 and the appendices to
part 1355 until the dates listed in the DATES section of this rule.
This means that title IV-E agencies must continue to report AFCARS data
in the same manner they do currently until the implementation date of
this final rule as discussed in section V of this final rule.
Section 1355.41 Scope of the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and
Reporting System
In this section, we set forth the scope of AFCARS.
In paragraph (a), we specify that state and tribal title IV-E
agencies must collect and report AFCARS data, unless it is indicated
for state title IV-E agencies only.
In paragraph (b), we specify that title IV-E agencies must submit
the data to ACF on a semi-annual basis as required in section 1355.43
in a format according to ACF's specifications.
In paragraph (c)(1), we clarified that the terms in section 1355.41
through
[[Page 90530]]
1355.47 are defined as they appear in 45 CFR 1355.20, except that for
purposes of specified data elements related to the Indian Child Welfare
Act of 1978 (ICWA), terms are defined as they appear in 25 CFR 23.2 and
25 U.S.C. 1903. This is similar to paragraph (i)(1) as proposed in the
2016 SNPRM and incorporates the definitions recently promulgated in
BIA's regulations at 25 CFR 23.2.
In paragraph (c)(2), we clarified for state title IV-E agencies
that in cases where ICWA applies, the term ``legal guardian'' includes
an Indian custodian as defined in ICWA at 25 U.S.C. 1903. These data
elements are in sections 1355.44(c)(1), (c)(2), (d)(4), and (d)(5). We
understand that there are instances when ICWA applies where Indian
custodians may have legal responsibility for the child. Since we are
integrating the ICWA-related data elements into select sections of this
regulation, we want to take this opportunity to clarify that in the
instances where ICWA applies and an Indian custodian may have legal
responsibility of the child who is now in out-of-home care, the term
``legal guardian'' includes an Indian custodian.
Comment: A few commenters suggested additional definitions, such as
``voluntary'' placement, ``ICWA eligible child,'' and ``reactivation''
of children who have multiple removals for the same reasons, and to
expand the definition of tribe to distinguish between federally
recognized, non-federally recognized, and historic/aboriginal tribes.
Response: We did not add a definition of ``voluntary'' placement
because the term is already defined by section 472(f) of the Act. We
did not define ``reactivation'' because it is not a term used in these
regulations. We did not specifically define ``ICWA eligible child'' in
this regulation, but we did include by reference definitions in the
BIA's ICWA regulation at 25 CFR 23.2 so if the BIA amends the
definition of children to whom ICWA applies, it will automatically be
changed for the purpose of these regulations rather than requiring ACF
to issue another regulatory action. Since we integrated the ICWA-
related data elements into other sections of the final rule we no
longer have a list of applicable definitions pertaining to the ICWA-
related data elements. Rather, section 1355.41(c)(1) specifies that
terms in sections 1355.41 through 1355.47 are defined as they appear in
45 CFR 1355.20, except that for purposes of data elements related to
ICWA, terms that appear in sections 1344.44(b)(3) through (b)(8),
(c)(3), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(7), (d)(3), (e)(8) through (e)(11),
(f)(10), and (h)(20) through (h)(23) are defined as they appear in 25
CFR 23.2 and 25 U.S.C. 1903. This means that the ICWA-related data
elements will follow either BIA regulations as they appear in 25 CFR
23.2 or the statute at 25 U.S.C. 1903. In paragraph (c)(2), we
clarified for state title IV-E agencies that in cases where ICWA
applies, the term ``legal guardian'' includes an Indian custodian as
defined in ICWA at 25 U.S.C. 1903. These data elements are in sections
1355.44(c)(1), (c)(2), (d)(4), and (d)(5).
Section 1355.42 Reporting Populations
In this section, we define the reporting populations for the AFCARS
out-of-home care and adoption and guardianship assistance data files.
Section 1355.42(a) Out-of-Home Care Reporting Population
In paragraph (a), we define and clarify the out-of-home care
reporting population. Consistent with current AFCARS, the child enters
the out-of-home care reporting population when the child's first
placement meets the definition of foster care in section 1355.20. A
title IV-E agency must report a child of any age who is in out-of-home
care for more than 24 hours.
Comment: Several state title IV-E agencies, a national organization
representing state child welfare agencies and other commenters
supported the out-of-home care reporting population. However, several
states and others expressed confusion over who is included in this
population, particularly juvenile justice youth, runaway and homeless
youth, youth on a trial home visit and children who reenter care.
Response: We take this opportunity to clarify the reporting
population for out-of-home care. Overall, the out-of-home care
reporting population includes a child of any age who is in foster care
as defined in 1355.20 for longer than 24 hours until the title IV-E
agency no longer has placement and care responsibility. The out-of-home
care reporting population includes a child under the title IV-E
agency's placement and care who:
Has run away or whose whereabouts are unknown at the time
the title IV-E agency becomes responsible for the child, until the
title IV-E agency's responsibility for placement and care ends;
is placed into foster care after a non-foster care
setting, until the title IV-E agency's placement and care
responsibility ends;
is placed at home, including a child on a trial discharge
or trial home visit, until the title IV-E agency's placement and care
responsibility ends;
is placed from a foster care placement into a non-foster
care setting, until the title IV-E agency's placement and care
responsibility ends;
is age 18 and older, including those in a supervised
independent living setting, until the title IV-E agency's placement and
care responsibility ends.
The out-of-home care reporting population also includes a child who
is under the placement and care responsibility of another public agency
that has an agreement with the title IV-E agency pursuant to section
472(a)(2)(B) of the Act, or an Indian tribe, tribal organization or
consortium with which the title IV-E agency has an agreement, and, on
whose behalf title IV-E foster care maintenance payments are made until
title IV-E foster care maintenance payments cease to be made on behalf
of the child. We specifically note that children placed pursuant to
title IV-E agreements are reported in the out-of-home care reporting
population only if the child is receiving a title IV-E foster care
maintenance payment under the title IV-E agreement. We added the phrase
``for more than 24 hours'' to the regulation so that it now reads ``A
title IV-E agency must report a child of any age who is in out-of-home
care for more than 24 hours.'' We want to be clear how title IV-E
agencies must report children in the out-of-home care reporting
population, consistent with current AFCARS regulations, found in the
Appendix to section 1355. Since we removed the appendix, we are adding
it to the regulation. During AFCARS Assessment Reviews, states have
inquired about this policy many times and we feel that it is clearer to
specify this in regulation.
Consistent with existing AFCARS policy, the out-of-home care
reporting population also includes a child who is in foster care under
the joint responsibility of another public agency, such as the juvenile
justice agency, and the title IV-E agency until title IV-E foster care
maintenance payments cease to be made on behalf of the child (see the
Child Welfare Policy Manual section 1.3, question 13).
We understand there has been confusion in the past both in the
reporting and analysis of the current AFCARS foster care reporting
population related to children who are under the responsibility of
another public agency or an Indian tribe pursuant to a title IV-E
agreement. As noted in paragraph (a)(1)(ii), title IV-E agencies must
include children for whom title IV-E foster care maintenance payments
are provided under a title IV-
[[Page 90531]]
E agreement between the title IV-E agency and a public agency or an
Indian tribe. We would like to clarify that only those children who are
provided a title IV-E foster care maintenance payment under the title
IV-E agreement are included in the out-of-home care reporting
population; it does not include all the children in the other public
agency or Indian tribe's placement and care responsibility. In
paragraph (a)(1)(ii) we refer to only title IV-E agreements that meet
the requirements of section 472(a)(2) of the Act; not all interagency
agreements or contracts with the other public agency or Indian tribe
for services or payments meet these requirements. Section 472(a)(2) of
the Act allows for payment of title IV-E foster care maintenance on
behalf of an eligible child if there is a title IV-E agreement with
another public agency or Indian tribe even though the child is not
under the placement and care responsibility of the reporting title IV-E
agency. This clarification reflects a continuation of the AFCARS
reporting requirements and is not a change in the out-of-home care
reporting population. To further clarify the children in the out-of-
home care reporting population, we modified the regulation in section
1355.44(d)(6) Child and family circumstances at removal to identify
these children reported in AFCARS and we discuss in the preamble for
that section.
Comment: Several state title IV-E agencies expressed concerns that
the proposal expands the reporting population and will be burdensome
for agencies to report all data elements on the reporting population;
one state expressed concern that the reporting population would impact
their CFSR measures; and one state commented that the expansion of the
reporting population imposes an unrealistic mandate on state child
welfare agencies to be responsible and penalized for data collected by
other agencies.
Response: We retained the requirement for title IV-E agencies to
report a child until the title IV-E agency no longer has placement and
care responsibility. We expect that title IV-E agencies would have the
information that we require to be reported if they have responsibility
for the child, regardless of where the child is placed. The revision to
the out-of-home care reporting population has no impact on the
population of children for the CFSR measures because only the children
in foster care will be included in the outcome measures. We continue to
believe that the benefits of data reporting on the out-of-home care
reporting population will allow ACF to develop a comprehensive picture
of a child's experience in the title IV-E agency's placement and care
with all removals, living arrangements, permanency plans, and exits
from out-of-home care and the ability to better inform our monitoring
efforts. We will provide technical assistance to agencies on any
remaining clarifications regarding state specific questions related to
the reporting population.
Section 1355.42(b) Adoption and Guardianship Assistance Reporting
Population
In paragraph (b), we define the reporting population for the
adoption and guardianship assistance data file.
In paragraph (b)(1) we require that the title IV-E agency must
report data as described in section 1355.45 on each child who meets one
of the conditions in the paragraphs (b)(1)(i) or (b)(1)(ii).
In paragraph (b)(1)(i), we require the title IV-E agency to report
information required by section 1355.45 on any child for whom there is
a finalized adoption under a title IV-E adoption assistance agreement
(per section 473(a) of the Act) with the reporting title IV-E agency
that is or was in effect at some point during the report period.
In paragraph (b)(1)(ii), we collect the information in section
1355.45 on any child in a legal guardianship who is under a title IV-E
guardianship assistance agreement, pursuant to section 473(d) of the
Act, with the reporting title IV-E agency that is or was in effect at
some point during the current report period.
In paragraph (b)(2), we clarify that a child remains in the
adoption and guardianship assistance reporting population through the
end of the report period in which the title IV-E agreement ends or is
terminated.
Comment: Many commenters objected to reporting ongoing information
on children who are in this reporting population, stating that adopted
children do not have open service cases even when there is a subsidy
attached. Additionally, many commenters felt that collecting
information on any child who is in a legal guardianship under a title
IV-E guardianship assistance agreement reaches beyond our statutory
authority and would require a significant change in the application and
report programs and laws and policies in many states. Several other
groups agreed with this opinion and raised concerns about the burden on
workers and duplication to information in the out-of-home care data
file (section 1355.44(h)). Some national advocacy/public interest
groups representing children and adoption agency interests were
supportive of the separate data file proposed in the 2015 NPRM, and
some suggested including children for whom there are finalized
adoptions and guardianships without title IV-E assistance agreements.
Response: We carefully considered the comments and have retained
the adoption and guardianship assistance reporting population as
proposed for the reasons we identified in the NPRM and given the
growing dominance of this population as a component of the title IV-E
beneficiary population. Overall, we believe there is a basic good
governance principle at stake in having data about children who are
receiving Federal benefits, especially considering the tremendous
growth in the title IV-E adoption and guardianship assistance
population over the last several years. While there is no statutory
mandate to collect information for children under a title IV-E
guardianship assistance agreement, section 479(c)(3)(C)(i) of the Act
authorizes AFCARS to collect data on the ``characteristics of children
. . . removed from foster care'', which encompasses the title IV-E
guardianship assistance population. We continue to believe it is
essential to collect the same information on children under title IV-E
guardianship agreements as for title IV-E adoption agreements because
we have the same need for the information for children supported by
title IV-E funding.
Section 1355.43 Data Reporting Requirements
This section contains the AFCARS data reporting requirements.
Section 1355.43(a) Report Periods and Deadlines
In paragraph (a), we specify that: (1) There are two six-month
report periods based on the federal fiscal year, October 1 to March 31
and April 1 to September 30 and; (2) the title IV-E agency must submit
the AFCARS data files to ACF within 45 days of the end of the report
period (i.e., by May 15 and November 14).
Comment: A national organization representing state child welfare
agencies recommended that we maintain the 45 day window for submitting
data. They believe the 30 day requirement proposed in the 2015 NPRM
would compromise data accuracy and integrity because some data may be
excluded and there would not be enough time for agencies to check for
errors in 30 days, particularly for state-supervised, county-
administered states. Eight states and three other commenters opposed
the shortened timeframe for the same reasons.
[[Page 90532]]
Response: We modified the regulation to allow title IV-E agencies
up to 45 days after the end of the report period to transmit the AFCARS
file to accommodate commenter concerns. However, we wish to emphasize
that the purpose of this 45 day transmission period is to extract the
data and ensure the file is in the proper format for transmission. Data
accuracy and integrity is to be completed by the IV-E agency on a
continuous basis throughout the year. This is consistent with current
AFCARS guidance.
Section 1355.43(b) Out-of-Home Care Data File
In paragraph (b), we provide instructions on how the title IV-E
agency must report information for the out-of-home care reporting
population.
In paragraph (b)(1), we require a title IV-E agency to submit the
most recent information for data elements in the General information
(section 1355.44(a)) and Child information (section 1355.44(b))
sections of the out-of-home care data file.
In paragraph (b)(2), we require the title IV-E agency to submit the
most recent and historical information for most data elements in the
following sections of the out-of-home care data file, unless the
exception in paragraph (b)(3) applies:
Sec. 1355.44(c) Parent or legal guardian information
Sec. 1355.44(d) Removal information
Sec. 1355.44(e) Living arrangement and provider
information
Sec. 1355.44(f) Permanency planning
Sec. 1355.44(g) General exit information
Sec. 1355.44(h) Exit to adoption and guardianship
information
Comment: In general, states, a national organization representing
state child welfare agencies, and other national/advocacy organizations
and individuals were supportive of the move to a historical data set
because of the benefits in understanding outcomes for children and
their experiences in out-of-home care. However, many commented that
they are concerned that the final rule will be a challenge for states
to implement because of a significant burden to title IV-E agencies to
collect and report new additional historical data with existing
resources. In addition, they expressed concern with the magnitude of
historical data that would be required to be reported as it would need
to be tracked at local levels in order to produce six-month report
period data files.
Several national advocacy organizations and others made suggestions
to expand historical reporting to other data elements, while others,
mostly state title IV-E agencies, suggested we limit the data to ``core
elements'' that have utility and validity at the national level. A
national organization representing state child welfare agencies
suggested that we allow AFCARS revisions to occur in stages, by first
creating historical data files and then adding data elements that are
truly necessary in a federal database.
Response: We are retaining the requirement that title IV-E agencies
report certain historical data for the original reasons we proposed. In
general, we removed several data elements and included other data
elements as appropriate, which we explain in the section-by-section
preamble. We acknowledge that there are a few states that currently do
not have a comprehensive electronic case management system or central
database that contains the child's information across all counties.
However, based on AFCARS Assessment Reviews, we believe that many of
the historical data elements are available in the state's information
system or electronic case record. We continue to believe that the
benefits of historical data reporting will allow ACF to develop a
comprehensive picture of a child's experience in the title IV-E
agency's placement and care with all entries, living arrangements,
permanency plans, and exits from out-of-home care. We believe there
will be many benefits from receiving historical data, including:
eliminating information gaps that exist in current AFCARS data which
raise questions about the child's experiences and make the data more
difficult to analyze; building upon ACF's ability to conduct
sophisticated analyses of what happens to a child or groups of children
in foster care; and providing better data to inform the current CFSR
and other outcome monitoring efforts such as time in foster care,
foster care re-entries and the stability of foster care placements.
Finally, we did not revise the regulation to allow AFCARS revisions to
occur in stages. Issuing one final rule on AFCARS with all revisions is
the efficient way to revise AFCARS, since revisions to AFCARS have been
proposed since the 2008 NPRM. We will provide technical assistance via
webinars and other media channels to facilitate AFCARS implementation
as well as offer one-on-one assistance to title IV-E agencies.
Comment: Several states noted that there was not enough detail on
the technical specifics related to the structure of the data set and
asked for more specificity to better understand how title IV-E agencies
will need to modify their systems. States, organizations, and others
asked technical clarification questions and several recommended that
states have access to these data files. Finally, there were a few
technical clarification questions about the state specific system
issues.
Response: While we are not regulating the technical specifications
for reporting historical data, we anticipate that title IV-E agencies
will submit a data file in much the same way that they submit it now,
only with more information. Most of the information that will be
historical is currently stored in a state's electronic case file, based
on our current knowledge of agency systems through our AFCARS
Assessment Reviews. We will work through these technical pieces during
implementation, which is consistent with the approach we took for the
National Youth in Transition Database (NYTD). We intend to issue
technical guidance as noted throughout the preamble regarding file
specifications. Also, we will provide technical assistance via webinars
and other media to implement AFCARS as well as providing one-on-one
assistance with title IV-E agencies.
In paragraph (b)(3), we require that the title IV-E agency report
the date of removal, exit date, and exit reason for each child who had
an out-of-home care episode prior to the final rule. This means that
title IV-E agencies do not need to report complete historical and
current information for these children. We did not receive any
comments.
Section 1355.43(c) Adoption and Guardianship Assistance Data File
In paragraph (c), we require that the title IV-E agency report the
most recent information for the applicable data elements in Sec.
1355.45 that pertains to each child in the adoption and guardianship
assistance reporting population on the last day of the report period.
We did not receive comments on the 2015 NPRM specific to this
paragraph.
Section 1355.43(d) Missing Information
In paragraph (d), we specify how the title IV-E agency must report
missing information.
Comment: Several states and a national organization representing
state child welfare agencies were concerned about the burden on workers
of having to manually fill in blank information and stated that data
systems should be able to automatically mark as blank.
Response: We would like to take this opportunity to explain what is
meant by ``missing'' information as workers will not ``manually fill in
blank
[[Page 90533]]
information.'' The requirements in this paragraph relate to the
technical aspects of creating the AFCARS data file and prohibit
defaulting to a valid response option when the worker did not enter
information into the case management system and it is therefore
missing. This prohibition is longstanding ACF practice and consistent
with the statutory mandate in section 479(c)(2) of the Act that any
AFCARS data collected must be reliable and consistent over time. If the
worker did not enter information into the case management system
necessary for reporting on a particular data element (for example, it
is missing), then the agency must report the data element as blank. We
did not make substantive changes to the final rule in response to
comments.
Comment: Several commenters asked how ``blank'' information is
distinguished from missing data and if missing information could be
used to determine penalties.
Response: ``Blank'' is a valid response option only when specified
in individual data elements in section 1355.44. When ``blank'' is not a
valid response option, and no information was entered into the
information system for a data element, then that is considered a
missing data error under section 1355.46(b)(1). This is consistent with
ACF's longstanding practice. Errors under section 1355.46(b) are
subject to the penalty provisions of section 1355.47.
Section 1355.43(e) Electronic Submission
In paragraph (e), we require a title IV-E agency to submit its data
files to ACF electronically, in a format according to ACF's
specifications.
Comment: Several commenters requested details for data file
submissions, the type of technologies title IV-E agencies must use to
submit AFCARS data, and made a recommendation to use the same
electronic submission process used for the NYTD.
Response: We have intentionally left the specific details for
electronic submissions out of the regulation. We have learned through
our experience with the existing AFCARS that it is prudent not to
regulate the technical specifications for transmitting data because as
technology changes, we must keep pace with the most current, practical,
and efficient transmission methods that will meet title IV-E agency and
federal needs. We currently provide guidance on submission of technical
requirements and specifications through official ACF policy and
technical bulletins and we will continue to do so in providing guidance
on the final rule. We appreciate the suggestion with regard to the NYTD
process, and we will determine whether we can use a similar process
upon implementation of the final rule.
Section 1355.43(f) Record Retention
In paragraph (f), we require that title IV-E agencies must retain
all records necessary to comply with the data requirements in sections
1355.41 through 1355.45. As we stated in the 2015 NPRM (80 FR 7146),
practically, this means the title IV-E agency must keep applicable
records until the child is no longer of an age to be in the reporting
populations.
Comment: Four states expressed concerns with the proposed record
retention timeframes, stating that they extend beyond the state's
record retention and destruction laws, may require a legislative change
to meet this retention schedule, and potential costs to procure new
storage hardware or expand data centers.
Response: This is a clarification of current AFCARS requirements.
Currently, title IV-E agencies must maintain the child's history up to
the time the child would no longer be eligible for services due to age
in order to report the date of the first removal, the number of
removals, and the date of discharge from the prior removals. Based on
our AFCARS and SACWIS reviews, we understand that all agencies have
electronic case records and that title IV-E agencies maintain all the
information in their systems up to the time the child would no longer
be eligible for services due to age. We understand that the typical age
will be between 18 and 21, depending on the state or tribe's foster
care program and we will work with agencies on this at implementation.
We want to be clear that title IV-E agencies must retain all
information on a child that is required to be reported to AFCARS
electronically and not purge the data since AFCARS data files will now
contain certain historical information on children in the out-of-home
care reporting population. We are retaining the data element without
changes in the final rule because title IV-E agencies must report
historical information on a child in out-of-home care to be in
compliance.
Section 1355.44 Out-of-Home Care Data File Elements
This section includes all of the data element descriptions for the
out-of-home care reporting population.
Section 1355.44(a) General Information
In paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(3), we require that title IV-E
agencies collect and report the following general information: (1) The
title IV-E agency submitting the AFCARS data; (2) the report period
date; and (3) the local county, jurisdiction or equivalent unit that
has responsibility for the child. We received no substantive comments
on the general information data elements in paragraphs (a)(1) through
(a)(3) or recommendations for changes. However, we clarified in the
regulation text that the information must be submitted in a format
according to ACF's specifications.
In paragraph (a)(4), we require that the title IV-E agency report
the child's record number, which is an encrypted unique person
identification number that is the same for the child, no matter where
the child lives while in the placement and care responsibility of the
title IV-E agency in out-of-home care and across all report periods and
episodes.
Comment: A couple of commenters noted that maintaining one
encrypted record number for each child would be useful, for example, in
reducing duplicate entries and erroneous eligibility determinations.
However, a couple of state title IV-E agencies questioned why the
agency must maintain the same number since agencies must include the
complete placement history in each AFCARS transmission noting the
administrative burden associated with maintaining the same number.
Another commenter indicated there could be difficulties in maintaining
the same child record number if the child was previously placed in a
different county.
Response: Our proposal for a consistent, unique, encrypted child
record number for AFCARS reporting purposes is consistent with current
practice. Ensuring that the child record number is consistent
throughout the child's entire out-of-home care experience ensures that
the agency reports the child's entire history. It also assists us in
the analysis of the NYTD data, which also requires the use of an
encrypted child record number. We are retaining this requirement and
will provide technical assistance around this data element, including
assistance related to maintaining record numbers across counties, to
any agency requesting it at implementation.
Section 1355.44(b) Child Information
In paragraph (b), we require that the title IV-E agency report
information about the child in out-of-home care
[[Page 90534]]
including demographic, health, parenting, and other pertinent
information about the child. We made several revisions to this section
from the 2015 NPRM and integrated ICWA-related data elements that were
proposed in the 2016 SNPRM, revised data elements as suggested by
commenters, moved data elements, and removed some proposed data
elements that we describe below:
Removed the data element requiring agencies to report
whether or not the child was born in the United States. State title IV-
E agencies and a national organization representing state child welfare
agencies were opposed, stating: this level of specificity is not
relevant to child welfare practice, could adversely impact work with
families, and is not necessary in the AFCARS; it will be difficult to
draw conclusions from this element; and, it does not address other
situations, for example, whether the child is a naturalized citizen or
one of the many U.S. citizens who are born on foreign soil. We still
believe it is important to track information related to parental
immigration detainment or deportation because we understand that this
contributes to children entering foster care across the nation. In
fact, the Applied Research Center recently estimated that up to 5,100
children were in foster care after their parents were detained or
deported. Therefore, we added a circumstance at removal in paragraph
(d) to address this instead.
Removed data elements requiring agencies to report
information related to the child's qualifying disability under IDEA.
Several state title IV-E agencies and a national organization
representing state child welfare agencies expressed confusion with the
conditions in this data element and the health, behavioral or mental
health conditions stating that the conditions were cumbersome and
overlapped, which would lead to confusion among workers and commenters
suggested the conditions be reconciled. Thus, we removed the data
element on IDEA qualifying disability and revised the data element on
health, behavioral or mental health conditions because we still want to
track child disabilities, but we do not need to know the disability
that qualified a child for IDEA (discussed below).
Section 1355.44(b)(1) Child's Date of Birth
In paragraph (b)(1), we require the title IV-E agency to report the
child's birthdate. If the actual date of birth is unknown because the
child has been abandoned, the agency must provide an estimated date of
birth.
Comment: One commenter suggested that we expand the definition of
``abandoned'' to include circumstances where the child was left with
others and the identity of the parent(s) is known, but the parent(s)
has not returned and therefore the child's date of birth is not known.
Response: We have provided a specific definition of abandoned as
follows: The child was left alone or with others and the identity of
the parent(s) or legal guardian(s) is unknown and cannot be
ascertained. We will retain the data element as proposed because an
estimated date of birth is to be used in very restrictive circumstances
when a parent's identity is not known, and not for an instance when a
parent may be temporarily unavailable to provide the actual date of
birth.
Section 1355.44(b)(2)(i) Child's Gender
In paragraph (b)(2)(i), we require that the title IV-E agency
report the child's gender. We did not receive any relevant comments on
this data element, however, we made a minor revision to rename the data
element ``Child's gender.''
Section 1355.44(b)(2)(ii) Child's Sexual Orientation
In paragraph (b)(2)(ii), we require that the title IV-E agency
report the child's self-reported sexual orientation for youth age 14
and older. The title IV-E agency must report whether the child self-
identifies as ``straight or heterosexual,'' ``gay or lesbian,''
``bisexual,'' ``don't know,'' ``something else,'' or ``decline'' if the
child declined to provide the information. The title IV-E agency must
report ``not applicable'' for youth age 13 and under.
Comment: We requested input on whether to require title IV-E
agencies to collect LGBTQ-related data on youth in AFCARS. State title
IV-E agencies, national advocacy/public interests groups and other
organizations submitted comments on this topic. Commenters who
supported collecting LGBTQ-related data were primarily advocacy
organizations representing LGTBQ interests and generally asserted that
such children/youth are over-represented in the child welfare system,
but we do not have a full picture of their experiences in foster care.
Supportive commenters also noted that such youth often have unique
service needs, are at an increased risk for poor outcomes, are more
likely to be placed in group settings and experience more placements.
Many of these same commenters suggested that we require agencies to
collect information about a child's gender identity or gender
expression, or the assigned gender of the child or caregiver at birth,
which would allow agencies to understand data about gender transition
over the course of a child's life. One commenter suggested adding ``two
spirited'' to address American Indian and Alaska Native children's
identities. In contrast, other commenters, primarily state IV-E
agencies and a national organization representing state child welfare
agencies, suggested that we should not collect data related to sexual
orientation in AFCARS. However, they expressed appreciation for ACF's
interest in supporting and protecting LGBTQ youth in foster care and
agreed that it is important to work toward a mechanism for collecting
information related to a youth's sexual orientation, gender identity
and expression. State commenters pointed to the following reasons for
their objection to collecting the data: It is unlikely that the data
will be reliable and consistent because the youth would self-report
which could result in an undercount of LGBTQ children in foster care;
the sensitive and private nature of the data and sexual identity issues
and questioned the implications of having this information in a
government record and it being used in a discriminatory way; and
collecting the data may pose safety concerns because the LGBTQ
community is still vulnerable to discrimination in many parts of the
country. State commenters also expressed the importance of proper staff
training to collect information for a data element on sexual
orientation.
Response: We were persuaded by the commenters who suggested we
include a data element on a child's self-reported sexual orientation.
In this final rule, we require title IV-E agencies to indicate whether
the child self identifies as ``straight or heterosexual,'' ``gay or
lesbian,'' ``bisexual,'' ``don't know,'' ``something else,'' or
``decline'' if the child declined to report this information. These
response options are consistent with the Youth Risk Behavior
Surveillance System (YRBSS) questionnaire from the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention. We did not add a response option of ``two
spirited'' to be consistent with the YRBSS. By requiring this
information to be reported, we hope to move closer toward our goal to
better support children and youth in foster care who identify as LGBTQ
and ensure that foster care placement resources and services are
designed appropriately to meet their needs. We are aware of situations
where youth in foster care have been unsupported in their foster
[[Page 90535]]
care placements when their foster caregivers became aware of their
sexual orientation. We did not add data elements requiring agencies to
report information about a child's gender identity or gender
expression, or the assigned gender of the child. We understand the
concerns expressed by commenters; however, we anticipate that adding
this data element is the first step in addressing the needs of this
population, and also will assist title IV-E agencies in recruiting and
training foster care providers in meeting the needs of these youth. In
regard to the concern that youth should not be obligated to report this
sensitive and private information to their caseworker, the youth must
self-report this information and if they do not feel comfortable
disclosing such information, they may decline to report the
information. In regard to the concern about having this information in
a government record, information in state and tribal systems is
protected by confidentiality requirements. We require title IV-E
agencies to report ``not applicable'' for children age 13 and under to
align with other statutory case planning requirements that apply to
youth age 14 and older, for example the child's case plan must be
developed in consultation with the child age 14 and older and the
child's case planning team (at the child's option) (sections 475(1)(B)
and 475(5)(C)(iv) of the Act) and must document the child's rights,
including the right to receive a credit report annually. Additionally,
the child must sign an acknowledgement that he/she received these
rights and that they were explained in an age appropriate way (section
475A of the Act). We will provide technical assistance to agencies on
collecting this information as needed.
Section 1355.44(b)(3) Reason To Know a Child Is an Indian Child as
Defined in the Indian Child Welfare Act
In paragraph (b)(3), we require that the state title IV-E agency
report whether the state title IV-E agency researched whether there is
reason to know that a child is an ``Indian Child'' as defined in ICWA
by: Inquiring with the child, the child's biological or adoptive
parents (if not deceased), the child's Indian custodian (if the child
has one), and the child's extended family; indicating whether the child
is a member or eligible for membership in a tribe; and indicating
whether the domicile or residence of the child, parent, or the Indian
custodian is on an Indian reservation or in an Alaska Native Village.
This is similar to paragraph (i)(3) as proposed in the 2016 SNPRM,
however we moved data elements related to ascertaining the tribal
membership status of the child's parents to section 1355.44(c)(3) and
(c)(4), and we added, in response to comments discussed later, a data
element for inquiring with the child's extended family in paragraph
(b)(3)(iv).
Comment: Tribes, tribal organizations, child welfare organizations,
and some states expressed that researching to determine whether a child
may be an Indian child under ICWA is necessary to determine tribal
status and for implementation of ICWA. Commenters stated that failure
to research whether a child is an Indian child risks Indian children
not being identified, and risks delay, expensive repetition of court
proceedings, and placement instability if it is later discovered that a
child is an Indian child under ICWA. Several states said that
information on identifying whether a child is an Indian child as
defined in ICWA is currently collected, although states varied in how
they collect this information with some stating that it is collected
through case narratives (electronic or paper). A state objected to
expending resources required to report data in AFCARS that is already
collected in case narrative. Several states and the national
organization representing state child welfare agencies suggested
simplifying the data element, stating that the primary focus should be
on whether the agency made an inquiry, of whom, and whether that
triggered notice per ICWA to a federally recognized tribe. One state
suggested including a response option noting whether a particular data
element is ``not applicable due to age or developmental ability.''
Response: We did not make changes based on these comments to
simplify the data elements. We retained the data elements to reflect
requirements in BIA's regulation at 25 CFR 23.107(a). BIA's regulation
requires state courts to ask each participant in an emergency,
voluntary or involuntary child-custody proceeding whether the
participant knows or has reason to know that the child is an Indian
child. The data will help identify of which sources title IV-E agencies
most often inquire about whether a child is an Indian child as defined
in ICWA and for which sources title IV-E agencies may need resource or
training to support inquiry. Further, we are not revising the response
options to allow for a ``not applicable'' response option. The
requirement is for the state title IV-E agency to report whether or not
it inquired of the specific individuals listed, including the child,
whether the child is a member of or eligible for membership in an
Indian tribe. If the state title IV-E agency was unable to inquire with
the child, the agency would respond ``no.''
Comment: A state commented that these data elements ask for
responses of ``yes'' or ``no'' that removes a level of specificity and
obscures some incomplete data, such as there is no way to indicate when
there are multiple tribes involved.
Response: We understand the suggestion to be a technical issue for
when states design their systems to report the required information and
does not require a change in the final rule. We will work with state
title IV-E agencies as they implement the final rule as needed.
Comment: A state expressed that this data element doesn't
explicitly note there is a single parent by indicating the response
option of ``no'' and stated that the elements are gender specific.
Response: We understand the suggestion to be a technical issue for
when states design their systems to report the required information. We
will work with state title IV-E agencies as they implement the final
rule.
Comment: One state suggested adding a data element that records
when a tribe confirms that the child is a member or eligible for
membership.
Response: We did not revise the final rule in response to these
suggestions. The final rule contains the data elements we believe are
most critical in relation to children to whom ICWA applies.
Comment: A tribe stated that the language ``inquired'' is vague and
was confused what the agency is inquiring about in this section.
Response: We modified the language of the data element to require
the state title IV-E agency to indicate whether the state title IV-E
agency researched whether there is a reason to know that the child is
an Indian child as defined in ICWA. In each paragraph (b)(3)(i) through
(b)(3)(vii), the state title IV-E agency must respond to these
threshold questions that indicate whether the state title IV-E agency
knows or has ``reason to know'' that a child is an Indian child and
thus is subject to the protections under ICWA.
Comment: Tribes and several national advocacy organizations
suggested adding the phrase ``extended family'' to the list of persons
to whom the state may have inquired stating that the extended family
would have useful information regarding whether the child may be an
Indian child.
Response: We agree with the suggestion and added the requirement
for the state title IV-E agency to also report whether it inquired with
the
[[Page 90536]]
child's extended family in paragraph (b)(3)(iv).
Comment: Tribes and organizations representing tribal interests
recommended replacing ``on an Indian reservation'' with ``within a
predominantly Indian community'' to be more inclusive to tribal
communities. A state suggested adding individual data elements to
inquire about the residences of each child, parent, and Indian
custodian to determine whether any of them are domiciled on a
reservation.
Response: We did not revise the final rule in response to these
suggestions because the data element in paragraph (b)(5)(vii) follows
the language used in several sections of BIA's regulation (e.g., 25 CFR
23.107 and 23.113) about the ``domicile or residence . . . on a
reservation or in an Alaska Native village.''
Section 1355.44(b)(4) Application of ICWA and (b)(5) Court
Determination That ICWA Applies
In paragraph (b)(4), we require that the state title IV-E agency
indicate whether it knows or has reason to know that a child is an
Indian child as defined in ICWA. If the state title IV-E agency
indicates ``yes,'' the state title IV-E agency must indicate the date
it first discovered information that indicates that the child is or may
be an Indian child as defined by ICWA in paragraph (b)(4)(i) and all
federally recognized Indian tribes that are or may potentially be the
Indian child's tribe(s) in paragraph (b)(4)(ii).
In paragraph (b)(5), we require that the state title IV-E agency
indicate whether a court determined that ICWA applies or that the court
is applying ICWA because it knows or has reason to know a child is an
Indian child as defined in ICWA in accordance with 25 CFR 23.107(b)(2),
by indicating ``yes, ICWA applies,'' ``no, ICWA does not apply,'' or
``no court determination.'' If the state title IV-E agency indicated
``yes, ICWA applies,'' the state title IV-E agency must report the date
that the court determined that ICWA applies in paragraph (b)(5)(i), and
the Indian tribe the court determined to be the Indian child's tribe
for ICWA purposes in paragraph (b)(5)(ii). This is similar to paragraph
(i)(5) as proposed in the 2016 SNPRM.
Comment: States commented that some state laws offer protections
that exceed the minimum federal standards in ICWA. For example, some
states require ICWA protections for children who are members of state
recognized tribes, children who are descendants but not enrolled, or
eligible for enrollment in a tribe, or for children who are members of
tribes in Canada.
Response: We encourage states to collect data they need to
implement and evaluate state child welfare laws but only require
collecting and reporting the ICWA related data through AFCARS as
outlined in this rule.
Comment: One commenter was concerned about reporting the court
finding because the state may not know whether the tribe was asked or
verified the child's membership status. Another commenter recommended
that this element be removed because of uncertainty in how this element
is different from asking if the state agency has reason to know the
child is covered by ICWA.
Response: We did not make any changes to the final rule to remove
this data element. As we indicated in our rational in the 2016 SNPRM,
data elements related to whether ICWA applies are essential because
application of ICWA triggers procedural and substantive protections and
this data will provide a national number of children in the out-of-home
care reporting population to whom ICWA applies. However, we revised the
final rule to reflect the language in the BIA's regulation at 25 CFR
23.107, which does not require a court order but instead a ``court
determination.'' We also revised the final rule for the state title IV-
E agency to indicate the date that the court determined that ICWA
applies (paragraph (b)(5)(i)), rather than the date of the court order.
Comment: One tribe suggested that the state title IV-E agency
should be required to continue to report data that accurately reflects
tribal involvement even when a court order does not include the
information. The commenter felt this is important to capture to ensure
that courts are diligent about engaging the tribe and avoid
opportunities to misrepresent the true number of ICWA cases involved in
State court.
Response: We agree that tribal involvement is an essential
component of ensuring the courts are diligent about engaging tribes.
However, we did not add the suggested data element because we must
balance the need to have the information with the burden and cost it
places on state agencies to do so.
Comment: One commenter asked whether ACF will compare the name of
the tribe indicated in this data element, with the name of the tribe
listed in other data elements, and whether it will be considered an
error if the name of the tribe is different for each element. The
commenter suggests that the data element instead ask whether the title
IV-E agency verified that agency records regarding the name of the
Indian tribe matched state records.
Response: ACF will develop and issue error specifications in
separate guidance and will work with state title IV-E agencies during
implementation to address these types of technical issues with
reporting the data.
Section 1355.44(b)(6) Notification
In paragraph (b)(6), if a state title IV-E agency indicated ``yes''
to paragraph (b)(4) or indicated ``yes, ICWA applies'' to paragraph
(b)(5), we require that the state title IV-E agency report: Whether the
Indian child's parent or Indian custodian was sent legal notice of the
child custody proceeding more than 10 days prior to the first child
custody proceeding in accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1912(a); whether the
Indian child's tribe(s) (if known) was sent legal notice of the child
custody proceedings more than 10 days prior to the first child custody
proceeding; and the name(s) of the tribe(s) sent notice. The first two
requirements are similar to paragraph (i)(8) as proposed in the 2016
SNPRM and the third requirement is the same as paragraph (i)(9) as
proposed in the 2016 SNPRM.
Comment: Two states suggested requiring the state to report the
date that the tribe, mother, father, and Indian custodian were notified
of the child's removal as that will provide information on whether the
10 day legal notice requirements were met. One state commented that
because they do not know 10 days in advance when a child is going to be
removed that we instead require the state to report the date that the
notice was sent. Another state suggested adding a data element asking
when a notification was made to the tribe and when/if the tribe
provided a response, and another state suggested removing notification
elements until data exchanges are improved with the court to make this
efficient. One state suggested removing the response option ``the
child's Indian tribe is unknown'' and for the state to report the
Indian child's tribe's name.
Response: We did not make any changes to the final rule to remove
the suggested response option or to require agencies to provide the
date of notification. We determined that the actual date of the
notification is not essential, but instead, as we proposed, whether the
state sent the notice within the statutory 10 day notification
requirement. We are retaining the response option ``the child's Indian
tribe is unknown'' as we are aware that there may be instances where
ICWA applies because a state knows or has reason to
[[Page 90537]]
know a child is an Indian child yet the name of the child's tribe is
unknown. We proposed in the 2016 SNPRM and retained in the final rule
the requirement for the state to indicate the name of the Indian
child's tribe that was sent proper legal notice more than 10 days prior
to the first child custody proceeding in accordance with 25 U.S.C.
1912. We have, however, removed the requirement for the state title IV-
E agency to report whether the state title IV-E agency replied with
additional information that the Indian child's tribe(s) requested, if
such a request was made.
Comment: A state noted the proposed data element does not
accommodate a situation when there are potentially multiple tribes that
were sent the notification.
Response: We are retaining the requirement in the final rule for
the state to indicate whether the Indian child's tribe(s) was given
proper legal notice more than 10 days prior to the first child custody
proceeding in accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1912(a). We will provide
technical assistance to states that need assistance in reporting
multiple tribes.
Comment: The national organization representing state child welfare
agencies supports the notification data elements that align with ICWA
mandates. They noted that states have different methods to notify the
parties, such as through a court process, the state's attorney
general's office, or by the state agency. The organization recommends
simplifying the data elements to require the agency to report to whom
the agency gave proper notice, i.e., parents, custodians, and tribes.
Response: We understand the suggestion to be a technical issue for
when states design their systems to collect the required information
that would not require a change to the final rule. States may design a
drop down menu or another mechanism appropriate to their system to
report the notice requirements as long as the state can report whether
the state sent the notice to the mandated parties more than 10 days
prior to the proceeding.
Comment: A tribe recommended that we also require states to report
that the state sent the notifications when parental rights will be
terminated for an Indian child.
Response: We are retaining the notification requirements for the
state to report whether it provided the 10 day notifications in
reference to the first child custody proceeding. The BIA defines child-
custody proceeding for ICWA purposes to mean and include any action,
other than an emergency proceeding, that may culminate in one of the
following outcomes: Foster-care placement, termination of parental
rights, pre-adoptive placement, and adoptive placement. Therefore, if
the first child custody proceeding is in reference to a TPR, the agency
must report that information to AFCARS.
Comment: Two organizations suggested that we require states to
report whether a state court or agency used the list of tribes
published by the Bureau of Indian Affairs to notify a tribe of the
first child custody hearing.
Response: We determined that it is not essential for states to
specify in AFCARS whether they sent the notice to the tribe as it is
listed in the BIA publication. As we indicated in the preamble to the
2016 SNPRM, the timing of the notice is an essential procedural
protection provided by ICWA. Hence, we proposed and issued in the final
rule the requirement for states to report whether proper legal notice
of the child custody proceedings was sent more than 10 days prior to
the first child custody proceeding. This is consistent with the
requirements under the ICWA statute at 25 U.S.C. 1912(a) and the BIA
regulations at 23.11(c).
Comment: Two organizations suggested that we require the state to
report whether legal notice was provided for the first child custody
hearing to the same grandparents and other adult relatives who were
notified about a child's placement into foster care as required by
title IV-E.
Response: We tailored the ICWA data elements that we proposed and
issued in the final rule to be consistent with the requirements under
the ICWA statute and the BIA regulations, and relative notification of
the first child custody hearing is not required. However, we added a
requirement in 1355.44(b)(3)(iv) for the state to report whether the
state title IV-E agency researched whether there is a reason to know
that the child is an Indian child as defined in ICWA by indicating
whether the state agency inquired with the child's extended family. We
believe this could respond to the intent of the commenter's suggestion,
which is to ensure that an Indian child's relatives are made aware when
a child in their family is placed into foster care.
Comment: We received several comments regarding the proposed data
element requiring the state to report in instances where the tribe(s)
requested additional information, whether the state title IV-E agency
replied with the additional information that the Indian tribe(s)
requested. One state commented that the data element is unclear and
asked whether the timeframe was at any time during the six month report
period or whether it only applied to the first child custody
proceeding. Another state commented that it does not collect data on
whether the tribe(s) requested additional information or whether the
agency replied to the request. The national organization representing
state child welfare agencies also recommended removing the element
because they did not believe the proposed data file element provides
essential information on children for whom ICWA applies. A tribe
recommended adding the date of the tribal request for additional
information and the date the agency responded to the tribe's request
for additional information.
Response: We agree with the suggestions to remove the data element
in proposed (i)(10) in the 2016 SNPRM that required the state to
indicate whether the state title IV-E agency replied with the
additional information that the Indian tribe(s) requested. We have
removed this data element from the final rule.
Section 1355.44(b)(7) Request To Transfer to Tribal Court and (b)(8)
Denial of Transfer
In paragraph (b)(7), if the state title IV-E agency indicated
``yes'' to paragraph (b)(4) or indicated ``yes, ICWA applies'' to
paragraph (b)(5), we require that the state title IV-E agency report
whether either parent, the Indian custodian, or Indian child's tribe
requested, orally on the record or in writing, that the state court
transfer the foster care or termination of parental rights proceeding
to the jurisdiction of the child's tribe at any point during the report
period. This is similar to paragraph (i)(6) as proposed in the 2016
SNPRM, except that the language was updated to be consistent with 25
CFR 23.115.
In paragraph (b)(8), if the state title IV-E agency indicated
``yes'' to paragraph (b)(7), we require that the state title IV-E
agency report whether the state court denied the request to transfer
the case to tribal jurisdiction and if so, the reason for the denial
from a list of three options, as outlined in ICWA statute: (1) Either
of the parents objected to transferring the case to the tribal court;
or (2) the tribal court declined the transfer to the tribal court; or
(3) the state court determined good cause exists for denying the
transfer to the tribal court. This is similar to paragraph (i)(7) as
proposed in the 2016 SNPRM, except that we updated the language to be
consistent with 25 CFR 23.118.
[[Page 90538]]
Comment: A tribe commented that ``good cause'' findings should be
made as outlined in the BIA's Guidelines and suggested that we add a
data element that captures the specific ``good cause'' finding used to
decline each transfer.
Response: We have not made any changes to the final rule to
incorporate recommendations for the noted BIA's Guidelines. Rather in
the final rule, if the state court determined that transfer is not
appropriate, the state must report which reason from among a list of
three options, as outlined in ICWA statute (25 U.S.C. 1911(b)) and
BIA's regulation at 25 CFR 23.117: (1) Either of the parents objected
to transferring the case to the tribal court; or (2) the tribal court
declined the transfer to the tribal court; or (3) the state court
determined good cause exists for denying the transfer to the tribal
court.
Comment: The national organization representing state child welfare
agencies supports capturing data from the court order indicating a
transfer of the case to the tribal court of the Indian child's tribe
and an indication on the reason for denial (when applicable). However,
they suggested simplifying the data elements to ask only whether a
tribe requested to transfer the case to tribal court and if yes,
whether the transfer was ordered. We also received suggestions from
states on revising the element. One state recommended changing the data
element to capture the most recent transfer request regardless of when
the request occurred as long as it is during the current removal
episode.
Response: ACF is not persuaded by the comments to revise the data
elements regarding transferring cases from state court to tribal
jurisdictions. We are retaining the two proposed data elements with
modifications to be consistent with the BIA regulation at 25 CFR
23.115. That regulation states that the parents, Indian custodian, or
the Indian child's tribe may request, orally on the record or in
writing, that the state court transfer the child custody proceeding to
tribal jurisdiction. It does not require that the request be contained
in a court order. Therefore we are removing the requirement for the
agency to report only when there is a specific court order requesting a
transfer of jurisdiction and adopting the same BIA regulatory language
so that we are consistent. Further, we clarified the instructions for
this element in the final rule to require the state to report if there
was a request at any point during the report period.
Comment: Several organizations representing tribal interests
suggested that we require the state to report the date that the state
court approved transfer of jurisdiction to the tribe.
Response: We appreciate the suggestion and understand the value for
determining timely implementation of ICWA and case transfer between
jurisdictions, however, we did not change the final rule to add this
data element. Rather, we retained the two transfer data elements we
proposed in the 2016 SNPRM and modified them to be consistent with the
BIA regulations. As we indicated in the 2016 SNPRM, we require two
transfer data elements to provide an understanding of how many children
in foster care with ICWA protections are or are not transferred to the
Indian child's tribe, the reasons why a state court did not transfer
the case, and aid in identifying tribal capacity needs and issues that
may prevent tribes from taking jurisdiction.
Comment: One tribe suggested that the phrase ``a court order'' be
expanded to include ``or other entry of the Court'', as at times the
state court may not enter an order transferring the case at the same
hearing as when a petition to transfer is submitted to a court.
Response: We have removed the term ``court order'' from paragraphs
(b)(7) and (b)(8) to be consistent with the BIA regulation at 25 CFR
23.115 through 23.117. That regulation states that the parents, Indian
custodian, or the Indian child's tribe may request, orally on the
record or in writing, that the state court transfer the child custody
proceeding to tribal jurisdiction. The BIA regulation does not require
that the request or the order for transfer be contained in a court
order.
Section 1355.44(b)(9) Child's Race
In paragraph (b)(9), we require that the title IV-E agency report
the race of the child. The options are: American Indian or Alaska
Native, Asian, Black or African American, Native Hawaiian or Other
Pacific Islander, White, declined, abandoned, and unknown because the
child or parent or legal guardian does not know or is unable to
communicate the child's race, or at least one race of the child.
Comment: Two states and one other commenter did not agree that we
should include ``race-abandoned'' as a response option in this data
element because it is not a race. One commenter also noted that
including ``race-abandoned'' and ``race-unknown'' as response options
are confusing.
Response: We provide the agency with the option of not reporting a
specific race in two situations when the race is not known: When the
child is abandoned and therefore the race of the child is unknown
(race-abandoned) or that the race is unknown because the child or
parent or legal guardian does not know or is unable to communicate the
child's race (race-unknown). The response option of race-abandoned
allows us to differentiate when there is no parent available to provide
race information from when the child or parent does not know or is
unable to communicate it. A child's race can be categorized as unknown
only if a child or his parents do not actually know the child's race.
If the title IV-E agency has not asked the child or parent for the
child's race, the agency may not report unknown as the response.
Further, it is acceptable for the child to identify that he or she is
multi-racial, but does not know one of those races. In such cases, the
title IV-E agency must indicate the racial classifications that apply
and also indicate that a race is unknown.
Comment: Two commenters representing tribal interests suggested
that we amend the racial category of American Indian or Alaska Native
to include whether the child has origins in any of the original peoples
of North or South America and if yes, whether the child is a member of,
or eligible for, membership in a federally recognized Indian tribe.
Both commenters also recommended that we delete the language,
``maintains tribal affiliation and community attachment'' in the race
definition of American Indian or Alaska Native.
Response: The language used reflects the OMB Revised Standards for
the Classification of Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity, standardizing
federal data collection. We agree that requiring state title IV-E
agencies to collect and report data that could identify a child as an
Indian child as defined in ICWA is of paramount importance. Therefore,
while we did not revise this data element, we require additional
information on the child's tribal membership or eligibility for tribal
membership in paragraphs (b)(3), (b)(4), and (b)(5).
Section 1355.44(b)(10) Child's Hispanic or Latino Ethnicity
In paragraph (b)(10), we require that the title IV-E agency report
the Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of the child. The agency must respond
``yes,'' ``no,'' ``declined,'' ``abandoned,'' or ``unknown'' because
the child, parent or legal guardian does not know or is unable to
communicate the child's ethnicity.
Comment: One commenter suggested that we expand the definition of
``abandoned'' to include circumstances where the child was left with
others and the identity of the parent(s) is known,
[[Page 90539]]
but the parent(s) has failed to return and therefore the child's
Hispanic or Latino ethnicity is not known.
Response: We have provided a specific definition of abandoned as
follows: The child was left alone or with others and the identity of
the parent(s) or legal guardian(s) is unknown and cannot be
ascertained. We will retain the data element as proposed as it is to be
used in very limited circumstances when a parent's identity is not
known, and therefore not available to identify the child's ethnicity,
and not any time a parent may be temporarily unavailable.
Section 1355.44(b)(11) and (b)(12) Health Assessment Date and Timely
In paragraphs (b)(11) and (12), we require the title IV-E agency to
report whether the child had a health assessment during the current
out-of-home care episode, and if so, the date of the child's most
recent health assessment and if it was within the timeframes
established by the title IV-E agency.
Comment: State title IV-E agencies and a national organization
representing state child welfare agencies raised concerns about
collecting information on timeliness and frequency of health
assessments. They indicated that health assessment requirements would
differ based on the agency's schedule and individual child
circumstances, such as age and medical condition; therefore, it would
be difficult to compare data across title IV-E agencies. They stated
that to answer the question of timeliness, the system must know the
assessment schedule and dates of assessments, doubling the data entry
requirements. States suggested that this information would be better
assessed as part of a qualitative assessment that focuses on child
well-being outcomes or case reviews, rather than a national data set.
One state recommended that we require agencies to report health
assessment information according to an established federal timeline.
Response: We appreciate the comments, but did not remove the
requirement for reporting on health assessments because we still
believe it is important to ensure that the title IV-E agency is
identifying and addressing the health needs of children in foster care.
As we indicated in the 2015 NPRM, collecting this information will
allow us to ensure children in foster care are receiving health
assessments in accordance with the title IV-E agency's established
schedule per the statutory requirements in section 422(b)(15)(A) of the
Act. It also provides us an opportunity to ensure that the child's
health needs are identified, reviewed, and addressed by a medical
professional through routine health assessments. These data elements
may also serve as a proxy for other well-being indicators. We also did
not impose a requirement that title IV-E agencies report health
assessment information according to an established federal timeline
because section 422(b)(15)(A) does not provide ACF with the authority
to impose a federal timeframe on title IV-E agencies. Instead, agencies
describe and adhere to the timeframes described in their Child and
Family Services Plan.
Comment: One national advocacy/public interest group supported
including this data, but suggested clarifying the language to read
``timely health assessment as defined by the state.'' Another national
advocacy/public interest group pointed out that the term ``health
assessment'' has varying implications and suggested that ACF provide
guidance on the difference between health screenings and health
evaluations.
Response: In reference to the suggestion to clarify that the
assessments are timely based on title IV-E agency specific definitions,
paragraph (b)(11) asks whether the date reported in paragraph
(b)(12)(ii), if applicable, is ``within the timeframes for initial and
follow-up health screenings established by the title IV-E agency, as
required by section 422(b)(15)(A) of the Act.'' Hence, the information
that the title IV-E agency indicates should be in the context of this
title IV-B plan requirement regarding the ongoing oversight of health
care services, with which agencies are already complying. The title IV-
E agency must report the most recent health screenings that are
conducted according to the agency's established schedule. ACF provided
guidance in ACF-CB-PI-10-11 that agency schedules for initial and
periodic health screenings ``should mirror or incorporate elements of
existing professional guidelines for physical, mental, and dental
health screenings and standards of care.'' In regard to the request to
distinguish between a health screening and a health evaluation, we will
provide technical assistance to states if they need assistance in
determining how to report on a child's health assessment, which could
be either a screening or an evaluation, depending on the agency's
process.
Comment: State title IV-E agencies felt that the language of the
data elements was vague and questioned how to report whether a health
assessment is ``timely'' based on the agency's ``own established
schedule.'' Several states asked whether these data elements included
all initial or follow-up assessments during the out-of-home care
episode and pre-placement screenings.
Response: We appreciate the commenters' questions and revised the
regulation to clarify the instructions, based on the commenters'
concerns. We revised the regulation to require first that the agency
report whether the child had a health assessment during the current
out-of-home care episode in paragraph (b)(11)(i). The assessment could
include an initial health screening or any follow-up health screening
per section 422(b)(15)(A) of the Act. If so, the title IV-E agency must
report the date the child's most recent health assessment during the
out-of-home care episode and whether it is within the timeframes for
initial and follow-up health screenings established by the title IV-E
agency per section 422(b)(15)(A) of the Act (paragraphs (b)(11)(ii) and
(b)(12)). This revision is to make clear that the agency is to report
on the timeliness of the most recent health assessment. If the agency
indicates that there was no health assessment done, there is no
requirement to report the date and timeliness of the assessment.
Comment: A state title IV-E agency asked how a blank response is
distinguished from missing data and how to report if a child is not in
care long enough to receive a health assessment or the timeliness
straddles reporting periods.
Response: In reference to the blank response query, consistent with
ACF's longstanding practice, ``blank'' is a valid response option only
when specified in individual data elements. In paragraph (b)(11)(i),
the agency must report either ``yes'' or ``no;'' ``blank'' is not an
appropriate response and is considered a missing data error under
section 1355.46(b)(1). ``Blank'' is an appropriate response for
paragraphs (b)(11)(ii) and (b)(12) only if the response to paragraph
(b)(11)(i) is ``no.'' Thus, if a child has not been in foster care long
enough to have an assessment, the agency would report no in paragraph
(b)(11)(i) and blank for paragraphs (b)(11)(ii) and (b)(12).
Comment: Several national advocacy/public interest groups suggested
additional data elements, such as specific dates of the initial health
assessment; initial dental evaluations and other preventative dental
care; whether children in foster care are receiving Early and Period
Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment (EPSDT) services under Medicaid;
and for title IV-E agencies to report on each aspect of the title IV-B
Health Care
[[Page 90540]]
Coordination and Oversight Plan under section 422(b)(15)(A) of the Act
(for example, how children's medical information will be updated, steps
to ensure continuity of health services, and protocols for the
oversight of prescription medicines).
Response: As we indicated in the 2015 NPRM, collecting health,
behavioral or mental health related information will allow us to ensure
children in foster care are receiving health assessments in accordance
with the title IV-E agency's established schedule per the statutory
requirements in section 422(b)(15)(A) if the Act. Therefore, we will
not require agencies to report additional health assessment information
because we do not have a need for those details at the national level.
Section 1355.44(b)(13) Health, Behavioral or Mental Health Conditions
In paragraph (b)(13), we require the title IV-E agency to report
whether the child was diagnosed by a qualified professional as having
one or more health, behavioral or mental health conditions from a list
of eleven conditions prior to or during the child's current out-of-home
care episode. If so, the agency must report whether it's an existing
condition or a previous condition (a previous diagnoses that no longer
exists as a current condition). The title IV-E agency must also report
if the child had an exam or assessment, but none of the conditions
apply, or if the agency has not received the results of the exam or
assessment. When the child has not had an exam or assessment, the
agency must indicate so.
Comment: State title IV-E agencies, a national organization
representing state child welfare agencies, and many other national
advocacy/public interest groups indicated that the qualifying
disabilities of the proposed element IDEA Qualifying Disability and the
conditions for health, behavioral or mental health conditions
overlapped which would confuse workers and lead to inaccurate and
misleading data at a national level. Some national advocacy/public
interest groups also suggested including specific additional
conditions, such as oppositional defiant disorder, major depressive
disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and traumatic brain
injury.
Response: We were persuaded by the number of commenters who
expressed concern about the overlapping health, behavioral or mental
health conditions and the IDEA qualifying disabilities and revised the
final rule so that there is one element that addresses a child's
health, behavioral or mental health conditions. We removed the data
element IDEA Qualifying Disability in the final rule. We combined some
of the conditions we proposed for the IDEA Qualifying Disability data
element with the Health, behavioral or mental health conditions that we
modified to update with current common diagnoses suggested by several
commenters, separated out conditions that are currently reported
together, as suggested by commenters, and revised to more closely align
with definitions for diagnoses from the National Institutes of Health
(NIH). We describe these revisions below. We believe that this revised
list will provide us with better data on the child's health
characteristics and meet the requirement of section 479A(a)(7)(A)(v) of
the Act regarding reporting clinically diagnosed conditions for certain
children in foster care.
Paragraph (b)(13)(i) is ``Intellectual disability'' '' and is
unchanged from the 2015 NPRM because we did not receive comments
specifically asking for a revision to this definition.
Paragraph (b)(13)(ii) is ``Autism spectrum disorder'' that we
combined from the IDEA qualifying disability data element proposed in
the 2015 NPRM and revised to be more closely aligned with the
definition from the NIH Neurological Disorders and Stroke.
Paragraph (b)(13)(iii) is ``Visual impairment and blindness'' that
we combined from the IDEA qualifying disability and Health, behavioral
or mental health conditions data elements proposed in the 2015 NPRM.
Paragraph (b)(13)(iv) is ``Hearing impairment and deafness'' that
we combined from the IDEA qualifying disability and Health, behavioral
or mental health conditions data elements proposed in the 2015 NPRM.
Paragraph (b)(13)(v) is ``Orthopedic impairment or other physical
condition'' that we combined from the IDEA qualifying disability and
Health, behavioral or mental health conditions data elements proposed
in the 2015 NPRM.
Paragraph (b)(13)(vi) is ``Mental/emotional disorders'' that we
combined from the IDEA qualifying disability and Health, behavioral or
mental health conditions data elements proposed in the 2015 NPRM.
Paragraph (b)(13)(vii) is ``Attention deficit hyperactivity
disorder'' that we included as a separate condition, based on comments
suggesting that it not be included with another condition. The
definition is based on the definition from the NIH National Institutes
of Mental Health.
Paragraph (b)(13)(viii) is ``Serious mental disorders'' that we
included as a separate condition that comprises several disorders
previously proposed under the IDEA qualifying disability and Health,
behavioral or mental health conditions data elements. The definition is
also based in part on the definitions for bipolar disorder and
psychotic disorders from the NIH National Library of Medicine.
Paragraph (b)(13)(ix) is ``Developmental delay'' that we combined
from the IDEA qualifying disability data element proposed in the 2015
NPRM and revised to include delays related to language/speech and motor
skills.
Paragraph (b)(13)(x) is ``Developmental disability'' and is
unchanged from the 2015 NPRM because it is based on statute.
Paragraph (b)(13)(xi) is ``Other diagnosed condition'' that we
combined from several conditions proposed in the IDEA qualifying
disability and Health, behavioral or mental health conditions data
elements proposed in the 2015 NPRM.
Comment: A national organization representing state child welfare
agencies and a few states commented that reporting over time whether a
child's condition is existing, previous, or does not apply could make
the data file cumbersome, confuse aggregate data at the federal level,
and place burden on workers who may not have the training or expertise
on detailed, technical health care information. They felt that what was
collected in AFCARS for conditions is reasonable because it informs the
relevant issues at a high level. They made suggestions for other
mechanisms to report the data, such as data sharing agreements with
other agencies.
Response: We have not removed the requirement for agencies to
report whether a child's condition is existing, previous, or does not
apply. We continue to believe, as we stated in the 2015 NPRM, that it
is important to capture comprehensive information on a child's
diagnosed health, behavioral and mental health conditions beyond the
current AFCARS report period, which this data element will allow.
Collecting conditions for which the child was previously diagnosed, but
do not exist as current diagnoses, will provide increased opportunities
for analysis regarding the health and service needs of children in out-
of-home care, which current AFCARS data does not allow. We will provide
technical assistance on reporting this information as needed.
Comment: Two states asked for clarification as to who is considered
a ``qualified professional.''
[[Page 90541]]
Response: As stated in the 2015 NPRM preamble (80 FR 7149), a
qualified professional is determined by applicable laws and policies of
the state or tribal service area and may include a doctor,
psychiatrist, or, if applicable in the state or tribal service area, a
licensed clinical psychologist or social worker. This is consistent
with current AFCARS practice.
Comment: Two states were confused by the response options on
whether a qualified professional has conducted an exam or assessment
and recommend we only provide two response options for the agency to
indicate whether or not the child has a diagnosed condition, or if it's
unknown.
Response: We did not revise the final rule based on the comments to
allow for an ``unknown'' response option. We intentionally did not
propose a response option of ``unknown'' because it is too broad for a
meaningful analysis and has a high potential to be overused. These
responses as well as the response options for previous or existing
condition are designed to give us information regarding a child's
health, behavioral or mental health conditions that vary over time
without having to track other more complicated historical information
such as start and end dates of conditions. We believe that this will
provide us with better data on the child's health characteristics and
meet the requirement of section 479A(a)(7)(A)(v) of the Act regarding
reporting clinically diagnosed conditions for certain children in
foster care. Additionally, we will provide technical assistance on
reporting this information as needed.
Comment: Six states sought clarification on when to mark conditions
as ``previous.''
Response: The agency reports the response option of ``previous''
when a child was diagnosed for a condition that no longer exists as
decided by a medical professional.
Comment: One state suggested that agencies should collect start and
end dates of diagnoses to allow for a more robust analysis and would
give agencies the ability to determine when a diagnosis was applicable
if the diagnosis changes during the report period.
Response: We did not make changes to the final rule based on this
comment as the response options of existing condition, previous
condition, and does not apply will provide us an adequate history on
the occurrence of a child's conditions at the federal level without the
dates of diagnosis.
Section 1355.44(b)(14) School Enrollment, (b)(15) Educational Level,
and (b)(16) Educational Stability
In paragraph (b)(14), the title IV-E agency must report whether the
child is a full-time student at and enrolled in (or in the process of
enrolling in) elementary or secondary education, or is a full or part-
time student at and enrolled in post-secondary education or training,
or college, or whether the child is not enrolled in any school setting.
We made a minor revision to this data element in the final rule to
include part-time students in the response options ``post-secondary
education or training'' or ``college.''
In paragraph (b)(15), the title IV-E agency must report the highest
educational level from kindergarten to college or post-secondary
education/training completed by the child as of the last day of the
report period. We made a minor change to this data element in the final
rule to add a response option of ``GED'' if the child has completed a
general equivalency degree or other high school equivalent.
In paragraph (b)(16), the title IV-E agency must report if the
child is enrolled or is in the process of enrolling in a new elementary
or secondary school prompted by an initial placement after entry into
foster care or a placement change during the report period and if so,
reason(s) for the change in enrollment (paragraphs (b)(16)(i) through
(b)(16)(vii)).
Comment: In general, a national organization representing state
child welfare agencies and states expressed concerns with state title
IV-E agencies gathering data elements related to educational
information because they stated it would create a burden for workers
and would not result in accurate or useful data at the federal level
since educational information, such as enrollment information, varies
among jurisdictions and states. Three state commenters suggested
forming a data exchange with the Department of Education instead of
state title IV-E agencies collecting education information proposed
through AFCARS.
Response: We considered the comments concerned about the increased
burden, however we are retaining the educational data elements related
to school enrollment, educational level, and educational stability
because, as we stated in the 2015 NPRM, these data elements address the
requirements in section 471(a)(30) of the Act relating to an assurance
for title IV-E eligible children being full-time elementary or
secondary school students or completed secondary school, section
475(1)(C)(ii) of the Act relating to the child's health and education
records and grade level performance while in foster care, and section
475(1)(G) of the Act relating to the case plan requirement to develop
an educational stability plan for a child in foster care. We have
learned through AFCARS Assessment Reviews and technical assistance that
several title IV-E agencies already collect information on school
enrollment, the highest level of education completed, and the reasons
for changes in school enrollment. These data elements provide important
information about this issue. As we explained in the 2015 NPRM, we
believe that it is beneficial to collect information on the highest
educational achievement of the child so that we can analyze trends in
the relationship between a child's age and his or her educational
achievement. Information on a child's recently completed grade level
measures educational progress and aligns with statutory changes made by
the Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act of
2008 (Pub. L. 110-351). Collecting information on the reasons title IV-
E agencies determine that remaining in the school of origin or a
previous school is not in the child's best interest will help to
identify and address barriers to educational stability after an initial
placement into foster care or a change in living arrangements. In
reference to the suggestion for a data exchange with the Department of
Education to collect a child's education information rather than
collect it through AFCARS, we determined that approach would not yield
consistent information. The Department of Education collects different
and varied data from states, none of which is at the child level, as is
the case with AFCARS. We will provide technical assistance as needed to
title IV-E agencies to ensure accuracy of reporting.
Comment: In response to paragraph (b)(14), a national organization
representing state child welfare agencies and state title IV-E agencies
expressed concerns about consistency in reporting school enrollment
information due to variations in the definitions of elementary,
secondary, post-secondary education or training, college, not school-
age, and not enrolled among jurisdictions. They suggested removing the
data element. Other states and national advocacy/public interest groups
suggested reporting children enrolled in any ``formal education
program'' to capture children in half and full-day kindergarten
programs in
[[Page 90542]]
states where compulsory attendance begins at first grade.
Response: We did not remove the requirement for agencies to report
on student enrollment or make changes to the definitions of
``elementary'' or ``secondary'' based on the comments because the data
element is based on the statutory requirement in section 471(a)(30) of
the Act. That provision specifies that title IV-E agencies must assure
that each child who has attained the minimum age for compulsory school
attendance under state law and with respect to whom there is
eligibility for a payment under the title IV-E plan is a full-time
elementary or secondary school student or has completed secondary
school. The provision also defines an ``elementary or secondary school
student'' as ``the child is (A) enrolled (or in the process of
enrolling) in an institution which provides elementary or secondary
education, as determined under the law of the State or other
jurisdiction in which the institution is located; (B) instructed in an
elementary or secondary education program in accordance with a home
school law of the State or other jurisdiction in which the home is
located; (C) in an independent study elementary or secondary education
program, in accordance with the law of the State or other jurisdiction
in which the program is located, that is administered by the local
school or school district; or (D) incapable of attending school on a
fulltime basis due to the medical condition of the child, which
incapability is supported by regularly updated information in the case
plan of the child.''
Comment: In response to paragraph (b)(14), state title IV-E
agencies and national advocacy/public interest groups suggested that
agencies report ``part-time'' post-secondary education.
Response: We agreed with the commenters to include ``part-time''
enrollment in addition to full-time and revised the definitions for the
response options ``post-secondary education or training'' and
``college'' to include part-time enrollment. Now, the regulation
specifies that enrollment in ``post-secondary education or training''
refers to full or part-time enrollment in any post-secondary education
or training, other than an education pursued at a college or university
and enrollment in ``college'' refers to a child that is enrolled full
or part-time at a college or university. We understand that many older
foster youth who are enrolled in post-secondary education or training
or college attend part-time and therefore, we wish to capture both
enrollment options for these older youth.
Comment: In response to paragraph (b)(15), three states expressed
concern with the proposal to report the highest educational level
completed by the child as of the last day of the report period, noting
that a child who is in kindergarten on the last day of the report
period will be reported as ``not school-age.''
Response: We understand the commenter's concern, however, we are
retaining the requirement for the agency to report the highest
educational level completed by the child as of the last day of the
report period. We are not seeking information on the child's current
educational level. As we explained in the 2015 NPRM, we proposed to
collect information on the child's highest educational level which
measures educational progress and aligns with section 475(1)(C)(ii) of
the Act relating to the child's health and education records and grade
level performance while in foster care.
Comment: In response to paragraph (b)(15), national advocacy/public
interest groups suggested additions to paragraph (b)(15) that included,
adding early childhood response options, adding general equivalency
degree (GED) or other high school equivalent, and adding different
levels of higher education to include one year and two year degrees/
certificates.
Response: We agree with the commenters who recommended adding GED
as a response option, so we added it to the regulation which now reads:
``Indicate ``GED'' if the child has completed a general equivalency
degree or other high school equivalent.'' We did not add response
options recommended by other comments because we do not need the
suggested detail about different levels of early childhood education or
higher education for children in foster care at the national level.
Comments: In response to paragraph (b)(16), a national organization
representing state child welfare agencies and three state title IV-E
agencies suggested removing the data element on educational stability
stating that the data would be unreliable and not useful because the
reasons for new school enrollments are often more complex than the six
response options presented. They also suggested that a child's
educational stability would be better assessed through a qualitative
review and recommended that we collect only whether a change in a
child's school occurred. One commenter was concerned that due to the
complexity of this data element, workers would be likely to select
``other,'' reducing the accuracy of the responses.
Response: We did not make changes to the regulation based on these
comments because we continue to believe that a child's educational
stability is an important issue and this data element is a step to
gathering more information on this issue. As we stated in the 2015
NPRM, we seek this information because it will conform to section
475(1)(G) of the Act which is a case plan requirement to ensure the
development of a plan for the educational stability of a child in
foster care. We will provide technical assistance to title IV-E
agencies as needed to ensure that this data element is reported
accurately.
Comment: In response to paragraph (b)(16), national advocacy/public
interest groups recommend requiring agencies to report all school
changes during a report period. They also recommended adding more data
elements to gather information about whether or not school changes were
in the best interests of a child, including whether the placement
supports the child's permanency plan, whether it was a school
discipline transfer, and whether there was a lack of living options
near the original school.
Response: We are retaining the language proposed in the 2015 NPRM
in the final rule and did not add the response options recommended by
the commenters for several reasons. We do not need details at the
national level about multiple school changes during a report period or
other more detailed reasons for a school change. As we indicated in the
2015 NPRM, collecting information on the reasons title IV-E agencies
determine that remaining in the school of origin or a previous school
is not in the child's best interest will help to identify and address
barriers to educational stability after an initial placement into
foster care or a change in living arrangements. We believe the response
options in paragraphs (b)(16)(i) through (b)(16)(vii) will allow us to
identify those barriers and to determine ways to best address them.
Section 1355.44(b)(17) Pregnant or Parenting
In paragraph (b)(17)(i), the title IV-E agency must report whether
the child is pregnant as of the end of the report period. We revised
this data element in the final rule. In the 2015 NPRM, we proposed to
require the agency to report whether the child is or was previously
pregnant.
In paragraph (b)(17)(ii), the title IV-E agency must report whether
the child has ever fathered or bore a child. We revised this data
element in the final rule. In the 2015 NPRM, we proposed to
[[Page 90543]]
require the agency to report the number of children of the minor
parent.
In paragraph (b)(17)(iii), the title IV-E agency must report
whether the child and his/her child(ren) are placed together in foster
care. We revised this data element in the final rule. In the 2015 NPRM,
we proposed to require the agency to report the number of children
living with the minor parent.
Comment: Several states and a national organization representing
state child welfare agencies generally objected to collecting
information on children in foster care who are parents or pregnant for
various reasons including: It is relevant in the NYTD (see 45 CFR
1356.83(g)(52)) not AFCARS; it will only be applicable to a small
number of children and will not result in accurate reporting; it could
impose an extensive data collection burden on case workers since there
is no minimum age imposed on who the agency is to report, it is
difficult to know a pregnancy begin date, and it would inappropriately
apply to youth who are not of child-bearing age.
Response: We require information on children in foster care who are
pregnant or parenting to be reported in AFCARS because state-by-state
data on this topic is required to be included in the annual report to
Congress per section 479A(a)(7)(B) of the Act. The NYTD does not
provide case level information on all children in foster care;
therefore this type of data is not available in the NYTD. We revised
the proposed data elements on pregnancy and minor parents and combined
them into one data element that will meet the data needed in section
479A(A)(7)(B) of the Act for the report to Congress. We now require
agencies to meet this requirement through one yes/no element, thus
reducing the reporting burden for these elements. We moved away from
our 2015 NPRM proposal that required agencies to report the total
number of biological children either fathered or borne by the child
because we do not need that level of information. Lastly, while we
still require agencies to report whether the child in foster care is
placed with his/her children, we limited the scope to any point during
the report period, and not for each living arrangement. We will provide
technical assistance to title IV-E agencies as needed to ensure that
this data element is reported accurately.
Comment: Several commenters suggested that agencies report more
information about children in foster care who are pregnant or
parenting, such as data on fathers and parenting responsibilities of
youth in care, and situations when the child is placed separately in
foster care from the minor parent.
Response: We revised the data elements on children who are pregnant
or parenting for purposes of meeting the data reporting requirement in
section 479A(a)(7)(B) of the Act for the Annual Report to Congress.
These suggestions would go beyond the data we need for that report and
therefore, are not needed at the federal level.
Section 1355.44(b)(18) Special Education
In paragraph (b)(18), we require the title IV-E agency to report on
the child's special education, status by indicating whether the child
has an Individualized Education Program (IEP) or an Individualized
Family Service Program (IFSP).
Comment: A state title IV-E agency, the association representing
state title IV-E agencies, and others recommended that we simplify data
reporting regarding a child's special education status. They did not
believe it would be useful to distinguish between an IEP and IFSP for
comparison across states due to the variability across jurisdictions.
Since only children from birth through age three will have an IFSP, the
age of the child will indicate which type of plan is in place for the
child. One state asked when the state should report about a child's
IEP/IFSP.
Response: We made revisions to the final rule in response to these
comments. Agencies will be required to indicate ``yes'' or ``no'' as to
whether the child has an IEP/IFSP. The agency reports this information
as of the end of the report period.
Comment: One state asked if children with an IEP for advanced
placement should be included in the element.
Response: Yes, if the IEP meets the definition in section 614(d)(1)
of Part B of Title I of the IDEA and implementing regulations.
Comment: Several commenters suggested additional data elements such
as specifics on the types of special needs services provided to a
child, whether a representative from the agency attended the child's
IEP/IFSP meetings, and to provide an option to identify children who
are receiving services and accommodations in compliance with section
504 of the Rehabilitation Act.
Response: We did not make changes to the final rule in response to
these comments because the overwhelming number of comments we received
asked us to simplify this element. In addition, we wanted to note that
it would not be appropriate for us to require agencies to report about
a child's services under section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act as it is
a civil rights statute which prohibits discrimination against
individuals with disabilities, which we did not propose in the 2015
NPRM. This data element relates to special education as defined in 20
U.S.C. 1401(29), which means specifically designed instruction, at no
cost to the parent(s), to meet the unique needs of a child with a
disability (80 FR 7151, Feb. 9, 2015).
Section 1355.44(b)(19) Prior Adoption
In paragraph (b)(19), the title IV-E agency must report whether the
child experienced a prior legal adoption, including any public,
private, or independent adoption in the United States or adoption in
another country, and a tribal customary adoption, prior to the current
out-of-home care episode. If so, in paragraph (b)(19)(i), the title IV-
E agency must report the date it was finalized, and in paragraph
(b)(19)(ii), the title IV-E agency must report whether the child's
prior adoption was an intercountry adoption.
Comment: Several states, a national organization representing state
child welfare agencies, and others objected to us collecting data on
all of the child's prior adoptions including the detailed information
on the type of the prior adoption, and where the child was previously
adopted. The commenters concerns were that agencies capture information
on prior adoptions ad hoc based on the willingness of the person to
provide the information; that this level of detail may not exist; that
the reliability of collecting every prior adoption is questionable;
that it would be overly burdensome to research all of the child's prior
adoptions and questioned the usefulness of the information and our
authority to collect it. Several states suggested instead that we
collect only the date of the most recent prior adoption and whether or
not the child was adopted within the state.
Response: We were persuaded by the objections noted about these
data elements and revised the final rule to address some of the
concerns We are statutorily mandated to collect information about the
number of children who enter foster care after an adoption was
legalized per section 479(d) of the Act. As such, we did not remove the
prior adoption data elements entirely, but revised them to require the
title IV-E agency to report information for the most recent prior
adoption only. We also revised the data element on the type of each
prior adoption to instead require the title IV-E agency to report if a
prior adoption was an intercountry adoption and revised the name of the
[[Page 90544]]
data element. This is to address reporting on disrupted intercountry
adoptions required under section 422(b)(12) of the Act which is
currently provided in the state's annual title IV-B plan update. We
removed the data element proposed in the 2015 NPRM asking for the
jurisdiction name of each prior adoption.
Comment: Associations representing tribal interests suggested
including customary tribal adoptions to bring awareness and data to
this issue.
Response: We agree and revised the final rule to include that title
IV-E agencies report whether the child experienced a prior legal
adoption, including a tribal customary adoption, before the current
out-of-home care episode.
Comment: National advocacy/public interest groups suggested that we
collect more information on prior adoptions, such as the child's birth
country, whether the previous adoption assistance agreement was
terminated and the previous adoptive parents are still receiving
subsidies, whether the previous adoption was open or closed, the
reasons why the adoption disrupted/dissolved, and categorizing adoption
dissolutions and disruptions separately.
Response: We considered these comments, but did not make any
changes to the final rule based on this comment and instead reduced the
information required on prior adoptions to collect information needed
to satisfy statutory requirements in section 479(d) and 422(b)(12) of
the Act. In addition, we took into consideration the overwhelming
response from state agencies that our proposal to collect more details
on prior adoptions would be burdensome and outweighs its utility.
Comment: States questioned how they would report on prior adoptions
if they did not know or could not ascertain the information. They were
concerned about missing data counting towards a penalty.
Response: We have revised the requirements for reporting on prior
adoptions so that the agency only has to report the most recent prior
adoption. As such, we do not expect that agencies will have difficulty
in ascertaining whether the child was adopted prior to entering foster
care. If the information is unknown because the child was abandoned,
then the title IV-E agency would report ``abandoned'' for paragraph
(b)(19).
Section 1355.44(b)(20) Prior Guardianship
In paragraph (b)(20)(i), the title IV-E agency must report whether
the child experienced a prior legal guardianship and if so, to report
the date that the prior legal guardianship became legalized in
paragraph (b)(20)(ii). We revised our 2015 NPRM proposal to only
require the title IV-E agency report the date of the most recent prior
guardianship and eliminated reporting on the type and jurisdiction of
each prior guardianship.
Comment: Several states objected to us collecting all of the
child's prior legal guardianships, and the detailed information on the
type of the prior guardianship and where the child had a prior legal
guardianship. The commenters concerns were that agencies capture
information on prior guardianships ad hoc based on the willingness of
the person to provide the information; that this level of detail may
not exist; that the reliability of collecting every prior guardianship
is questionable; that it would be overly burdensome to research all of
the child's prior guardianships; and questioned how useful the
information is and our authority for collecting it.
Response: We were persuaded by the objections noted and revised the
final rule to address the concerns about reporting each prior legal
guardianship and the type and jurisdiction of each prior guardianship.
We are statutorily mandated to collect information about the number of
children who enter foster care after a legalized guardianship per
section 479(d) of the Act. As such, we did not remove the prior legal
guardianship data element entirely, but revised it to require the title
IV-E agency to report the date of the most recent prior legal
guardianship only if the child experiences a prior legal guardianship.
In addition, we removed the data elements proposed in the 2015 NPRM on
the type and jurisdiction of each prior guardianship.
Section 1355.44(b)(21) Child Financial and Medical Assistance
In paragraph (b)(21), we require the title IV-E agency to report
whether the child received financial and medical assistance, other than
title IV-E foster care maintenance payments. If so, in paragraphs
(b)(21)(i) through (b)(21)(xiii), the title IV-E agency must indicate
whether each type of federal or state/tribal assistance applies: SSI or
Social Security benefits; Title XIX Medicaid; Title XXI SCHIP; State/
Tribal adoption assistance; State/Tribal foster care; Child support;
Title IV-E adoption subsidy; Title IV-E guardianship assistance; Title
IV-A TANF; Title IV-B; SSBG; Chafee Foster Care Independence Program;
Other.
Comment: States, a national organization representing state child
welfare agencies, and others opposed our proposal to require the title
IV-E agency to report specific federal assistance per diem payment
amounts for each of the child's living arrangements and expressed
concern about the increased burden and potential inaccuracies in
reporting the data. One commenter indicated that collecting this
information would be burdensome for counties.
Response: In response to these concerns, we were persuaded to
revise the financial assistance data elements by removing the data
element related to federal assistance per diem payment amounts for
every living arrangement and consolidated the financial and medical
assistance response options into one data element. We must still
collect the extent and nature of assistance per section 479(c) of the
Act; therefore, in paragraph (b)(21) we require title IV-E agencies to
report whether or not the child is receiving each of 13 types of state/
tribal and federal financial and medical assistance during the report
period.
Comment: One commenter questioned whether this data element
includes a situation where a child returns home but remains in the
agency's custody and whether the data element applies to financial and
medical assistance that the child received during the reporting period
but prior to coming into the agency's custody.
Response: The title IV-E agency must report the assistance that
applies beginning when the child enters the reporting population and
continues until the child is no longer in the agency's placement and
care responsibility. Therefore, yes the agency must report the
assistance that applies if the child is placed at home and remains
under the placement and care responsibility of the title IV-E agency.
Section 1355.44(b)(22) Title IV-E Foster Care During Report Period
In paragraph (b)(22), we require the title IV-E agency to report
whether a title IV-E foster care maintenance payment was paid on behalf
of the child at any point during the report period. We received no
comments on this data element.
Section 1355.43(b)(23) Through (b)(25) Siblings
In paragraph (b)(23), we require the title IV-E agency to report
the total number of siblings that the child under the placement and
care responsibility of the title IV-E agency has, if applicable.
[[Page 90545]]
In paragraph (b)(24), we require the title IV-E agency to report
the number of siblings of the child who are in foster care as defined
in section 1355.20.
In paragraph (b)(25), we require the title IV-E agency to report
the number of siblings of the child who are in the same living
arrangement as the child, on the last day of the report period.
Comment: In general, several states and a national organization
representing state child welfare agencies agreed that the issue of
sibling placement is important at the practice level when planning for
children, but is better captured as a qualitative data set. Commenters
noted it may not be possible for the caseworker to know whether the
child has siblings and if so how many, because agencies encounter
multiple overlapping sibling groups, uncertain parentage, and mixed
biological, legal, and step-parent relationships. They had concerns and
questions about the 2015 NPRM proposal on siblings (which were in the
sections 1355.43(e) and 1355.44 of the 2015 NPRM) including the
definition of siblings, reporting sibling record numbers, and the
reliability and consistency of the data. They commented that it would
not provide meaningful valid information for national review, pointed
out that there are many varied reasons for siblings not being be placed
together, and that our proposal would not take into account the
complexity of what may constitute a family in the eyes of a child. Some
states questioned the value of trying to match sibling record numbers
and believe this requirement is onerous and of limited value. Some
commenters recommended that if data on siblings must be gathered in
AFCARS, we should collect the number of siblings of the child, the
number of siblings who are also in care, and the number of siblings who
are in the same placement with the child. Another commenter recommended
that we collect the number of siblings placed with the child at the
start of the placement and at any point during the child's time in this
placement to determine if the child was placed with siblings when
initially removed from home.
Response: We carefully reviewed the comments and suggestions and
while we understand the concerns raised, we determined that it is
important to continue require title IV-E agencies to report information
about siblings. We acknowledge that there are many issues that make
collecting data on siblings difficult. As we noted in the preamble to
the 2015 NPRM, section 471(a)(31)(A) of the Act requires title IV-E
agencies to make reasonable efforts to place siblings removed from
their home in the same foster care, kinship guardianship, or adoptive
placement, unless such a placement is contrary to the safety or well-
being of any of the siblings. However, we were persuaded to revise the
sibling data elements to address commenter concerns and simplify
reporting. We addressed one of the major concerns raised by commenters
by removing the data elements requiring the agency to report the
sibling's child record numbers, which indicated which siblings were or
were not placed with the child. Now, title IV-E agencies must report
the total number of siblings of the child, the number of siblings that
are also in foster care as defined in section 1355.20, and the number
in the same living arrangement on the last day of the report period. We
recognize the frequent movement of children makes it difficult to
capture sibling information, so we will only require reporting as of
the last day of the report period for the data element on siblings who
are in the same living arrangement.
Comment: States asked for a clearer definition of sibling and
questioned, for example whether to report if the child in foster care
has step-siblings with which the child has no contact.
Response: We define a sibling to the child as his or her brother or
sister by biological, legal, or marital connection. We acknowledge that
title IV-E agencies may confront issues that may make collecting data
on siblings difficult; however, we are not providing further specifics
on the definition of sibling. The definition is broad and would include
reporting the total number of step-siblings which constitutes a legal
connection.
Section 1355.44(c) Parent or Legal Guardian Information
In paragraph (c), the title IV-E agency must report information on
the child's parent(s) or legal guardian(s). In the 2015 NPRM we
proposed to require the title IV-E agency to report the date of the
first judicial finding that the child has been subject to child abuse
or neglect, if applicable. We received comments from states requesting
that we remove this data element stating that is excessive information,
has limited value in measuring outcomes, and it does not add
substantive value to the data file. States also questioned the
usefulness of this data element due to varying state practices and
believed it would be best left to a qualitative review process to
determine how timeframes for permanency are being met by agencies
rather than collecting information that may or may not be applicable.
Another state and a university expressed confusion in how to report a
judicial finding for multiple removals and a private citizen suggested
revising the name of the data element to use broader judicial
terminology for states that do not have judicial findings of abuse or
neglect. We were persuaded by the commenters and removed this element.
Section 1355.44(c)(1) and (c)(2) Year of Birth Parent or Legal Guardian
In paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2), the title IV-E agency must report
the birth year of the child's parent(s) or legal guardian(s). We did
not receive comments on these data elements.
Section 1355.44(c)(3) and (c)(4) Tribal Membership for Mother and
Father
In these paragraphs, state title IV-E agencies must indicate
whether the mother and father are members of an Indian tribe. In the
2016 SNPRM we proposed that state title IV-E agencies gather
information about the parents' tribal membership in sections
1355.43(i)(3)(ii) and (i)(3)(iv). We determined that this information
is better integrated in section 1355.44(c) with other data elements on
parent and legal guardian information. We retained the requirement in
the 2016 SNPRM that these elements apply only to state title IV-E
agencies because they collect information related to the potential
application of ICWA. We did not receive substantive comments to the
2016 SNPRM on this specific data element and have retained it in the
final rule.
Section 1355.44(c)(5) Termination/Modification of Parental Rights
In paragraph (c)(5), the title IV-E agency must report whether the
parents' rights were terminated or modified on a voluntary or
involuntary basis. A voluntary termination means the parent(s)
voluntarily relinquished their parental rights to the title IV-E
agency, with or without court involvement. This is a new data element
that we added in response to a state commenter who asked for
clarification on how the agency should report voluntary surrenders,
stating that the type of termination of parental rights (TPR) and the
pertinent dates can be different for each parent. In the 2016 SNPRM, we
proposed to require that the state title IV-E agency report whether the
rights of the Indian child's parents or Indian custodian were
involuntarily or voluntarily terminated in paragraph (i)(19). However,
this information is already required in paragraph (c)(5).
In paragraph (c)(5)(i), the title IV-E agency must report each date
the title IV-E agency filed a petition to
[[Page 90546]]
terminate/modify parental rights regarding the child's biological,
legal, and/or putative parent(s), if applicable.
Comment: An organization representing tribal interests commented
that the data element for the TPR petition filing date should be
consistent with ACF's policy that allows tribes to use alternative
methods for helping a child achieve a permanent placement, such as
modification or suspension of parental rights (Child Welfare Policy
Manual section 9.2, question 12).
Response: We agree that the regulation should be consistent with
the noted policy and revised the regulation to require the title IV-E
agency to report the dates the agency filed a petition for a
``modification'' of parental rights or a termination of parental
rights.
Comment: Two states commented that we should eliminate the data
element for the TPR petition filing date stating it does not provide
substantive value to the data file. They suggested that we should limit
reporting to the most recent petition filing date if the child is
currently available for adoption or was available during the reporting
period. A university asked whether we need the TPR filing petition date
for national policy development or program monitoring. A state
supported the TPR petition filing date element to analyze the length of
time it takes for a child to achieve permanency through adoption but
questioned the purpose of reporting each petition date when multiple
petitions are filed.
Response: We are retaining the requirement for the title IV-E
agency to report each date the agency filed a petition to terminate or
modify parental rights of the child's biological, legal, and/or
putative parent(s), if applicable. The petition date and date of the
termination or modification of parental rights in paragraph (c)(5)(ii)
will allow us to determine the time between when the agency files a
petition to terminate or modify parental rights and the actual date of
the termination or modification. Additionally, AFCARS Assessment
Reviews have shown that TPR filing petition dates are typically in the
state electronic case files. Regarding multiple petitions, we require
title IV-E agencies to report each petition date in the event that
multiple petitions are filed for putative parents. As we stated in the
2015 NPRM, we require title IV-E agencies to report information on a
child's putative father, if applicable. A putative father is a person
who is alleged to be the father of a child, or who claims to be the
father of a child, at a time when there may not be enough evidence or
information available to determine if that is correct. For the existing
AFCARS, we have fielded questions on whether title IV-E agencies should
provide information on putative fathers. Since the parental rights of
any putative fathers may need to be terminated before a child legally
is free for adoption in some jurisdictions, we want to be clear that we
are interested in collecting information on putative fathers as well.
We will work with title IV-E agencies during implementation and provide
technical bulletins for reporting the termination and modification of
parental rights petition dates.
Comment: Two states commented that the petition and termination/
modification dates should be tied to the individual parent.
Response: We agree and will work with title IV-E agencies during
implementation if there is any additional clarification needed.
Comment: Two states asked how to report the petition dates if the
child was previously adopted and whether it is limited to the current
removal episode.
Response: We'd like to clarify. If a child was adopted, later
enters the out-of-home-care reporting population, and the agency files
a petition to terminate or modify parental rights, the agency must
report the petition filing date for the adoptive parent because that is
the parent of the child. We will work with title IV-E agencies during
implementation if further clarification is needed.
In paragraph (c)(5)(ii), the title IV-E agency must report the date
that parental rights are voluntarily or involuntarily terminated/
modified for each biological, legal and/or putative parent, if
applicable.
Comment: An organization representing tribal interests commented
that this data element should include language consistent with ACF's
policy that allows tribes to use alternative methods for helping a
child achieve a permanent placement, such as modification or suspension
of parental rights (Child Welfare Policy Manual section 9.2, question
12).
Response: We agree that the regulation should be consistent with
the noted policy and revised the regulation to require the title IV-E
agency to report the dates of a ``modification'' of parental rights or
a termination of parental rights.
Section 1355.44(c)(6) Involuntary Termination/Modification of Parental
Rights Under ICWA
If the state title IV-E agency indicated in paragraph (c)(5) that
the TPR was involuntary and if a state title IV-E agency indicated
``yes'' to paragraph (b)(4) or indicated ``yes, ICWA applies'' to
paragraph (b)(5), we require that the state title IV-E agency indicate:
Whether the state court found beyond a reasonable doubt,
that continued custody of the Indian child by the parent or Indian
custodian is likely to result in serious emotional or physical damage
to the Indian child in accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1912(f) (paragraph
(c)(6)(i));
whether the court decision to involuntarily terminate
parental rights included the testimony of one or more qualified expert
witnesses (QEW) in accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1912(f) (paragraph
(c)(6)(ii)); and
whether prior to TPR, the court concluded that active
efforts have been made to prevent the breakup of the Indian family and
that those efforts were unsuccessful in accordance with 25 U.S.C.
1912(d) (paragraph (c)(6)(iii)).
These are similar to paragraph s (i)(20) and (i)(21) of the 2016
SNPRM except that we updated the language consistent with 25 CFR
23.121.
Comment: The national organization representing state child welfare
agencies and state title IV-E agencies suggested revisions to simplify
this section, such as reporting only whether a court made findings that
continued custody of the Indian child by the parent or Indian custodian
is likely to result in serious emotional or physical damage for
termination of parental rights and if yes, did a QEW support this
finding or only report court order information for involuntary TPRs.
Another state suggested that we re-order and simplify the voluntary TPR
data elements. A commenter also suggested that we ask whether a TPR was
voluntary or involuntary.
Response: We did not make changes to the final rule in response to
these comments to simplify these elements. As we indicated in the 2016
SNPRM preamble, termination standards are important protections for
Indian children as defined in ICWA given that Congress specifically
created minimum federal standards for removal of an Indian child to
prevent the breakup of Indian families and to promote the stability and
security of families and Indian tribes by preserving the child's links
to their parents and to the tribe through the child's parent(s).
Further, distinguishing between involuntary and voluntary terminations
of parental rights is important in ICWA given specific protections that
must be provided in each context (25 U.S.C. 1912(e), (f) and 25 U.S.C.
1913). The final rule now requires state and tribal title IV-E agencies
to report whether a TPR is voluntary or involuntary in paragraph
(c)(5). Furthermore, we integrated the
[[Page 90547]]
ICWA-related data elements into certain sections of the final rule,
thereby moving the data elements on TPR proposed in the 2016 SNPRM to
paragraph (c) and added a new data element on active efforts at
involuntary TPR (paragraph (c)(6)(iii)).
Comment: A state recommended that we require states to list the
reasons for involuntary TPR, using the reasons from its state statute,
such as whether a parent is palpably unfit or abuses chemicals.
Response: We did not make changes in response to these suggestions.
States information systems differ and include information useful for
their own internal purposes, but not mandated by AFCARS. We encourage
states to consider collecting data that helps states to evaluate and
implement state law, but we do not require that they report those data
to AFCARS.
Comment: A state and tribe suggested adding data elements asking
about alternatives to TPR, such as tribal customary adoption, where the
parental rights are modified and not severed, and the adoptive parent
is granted the same rights and responsibilities as they would under a
contemporary adoption.
Response: We'd like to clarify. As we explained in the preamble to
the 2016 SNPRM, the state title IV-E agency must report information
regarding voluntary and involuntary terminations/modification of
parental rights, which include tribal customary adoptions.
Comment: Tribes and organizations representing tribal interests
recommend that we add numerous data elements, including:
Whether the court made a determination in a court order
that active efforts at TPR had been made by the state title IV-E agency
and whether active efforts were provided by any party seeking TPR.
whether the tribe was notified when a state seeks TPR for
an Indian child.
Response: We agree with the suggestion to require state title IV-E
agencies to report on active efforts at involuntary TPR. Active efforts
are required under the ICWA to prevent the breakup of the Indian family
in two instances: Prior to removal and prior to involuntary TPR.
Specifically in paragraph (c)(6)(iii), we require state title IV-E
agencies to report for involuntary TPR whether prior to terminating
parental rights, the court concluded that active efforts have been made
to prevent the breakup of the Indian family and that those efforts were
unsuccessful in accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1912(d). This language is
consistent with the BIA regulation at 25 CFR 23.120 which requires that
a court concluded that active efforts were made, and does not require a
court order. We decline to require state title IV-E agencies to report
the date on which the tribe was notified when a state seeks involuntary
TPR for an Indian child and provide our reasoning in the preamble
section on Notification in paragraph (b).
Section 1355.44(c)(7) Voluntary Termination/Modification of Parental
Rights Under ICWA
If the title IV-E agency indicates in paragraph (c)(5) that the TPR
was voluntary, and the state title IV-E agency indicated ``yes'' to
paragraph (b)(4) or indicated ``yes, ICWA applies'' to paragraph
(b)(5), the state title IV-E agency must indicate whether the consent
to termination of parental or Indian custodian rights was executed in
writing and recorded before a court of competent jurisdiction with a
certification by the court that the terms and consequences of consent
were explained on the record in detail and were fully understood by the
parent or Indian custodian in accordance with 25 CFR 23.125(a) and (c).
This is similar to sections 1355.43(i)(22), (i)(23) and (i)(24) as
proposed in the 2016 SNPRM, however, we updated the language consistent
with 25 CFR 23.125.
Comment: One state recommended including a mechanism or process to
ensure that an Indian child retains tribal membership after voluntary
TPR because it's important for a child to know his/her lineage and
tribal membership, which offers benefits such as health services and
educational resources for higher education.
Response: We agree that it is important to recognize such
mechanisms and revised the regulation to refer to either a
``modification'' of parental rights or a termination of parental
rights. However, AFCARS is not the appropriate vehicle for establishing
a mechanism or process regarding maintaining tribal membership because
AFCARS is a data reporting system.
Section 1355.44(d) Removal Information
In paragraph (d), we require that the title IV-E agency report
information on each of the child's removal(s) from home.
Section 1355.44(d)(1) Date of Child's Removal
In paragraphs (d)(1)(i) through (d)(1)(iii), we require the title
IV-E agency to collect and report the date(s) on which the child was
removed for each removal of a child who enters the placement and care
responsibility of the title IV-E agency. We received no comments on
this data element and have retained the 2015 NPRM proposed language in
the final rule.
Section 1355.44(d)(2) Removal Transaction Date
In paragraph (d)(2) we require the title IV-E agency to report the
transaction date for each of the child's removal dates reported in
paragraph (d)(1). The transaction date is a non-modifiable, computer-
generated date which accurately indicates the month, day and year each
response to paragraph (d)(1) was entered into the information system.
We did not receive relevant comments on this data element and have
retained the 2015 NPRM proposed language.
Section 1355.44(d)(3) Removals Under ICWA
In paragraph (d)(3), if a state title IV-E agency indicated ``yes''
to paragraph (b)(4) or indicated ``yes, ICWA applies'' to paragraph
(b)(5), we require that the state title IV-E agency indicate:
Whether the court order for foster care placement was made
as a result of clear and convincing evidence that continued custody of
the Indian child by the parent or Indian custodian was likely to result
in serious emotional or physical damage to the Indian child in
accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1912(e) and 25 CFR 23.121(a) (paragraph
(d)(3)(i));
whether the evidence presented for foster care placement
as indicated in paragraph (d)(3)(i) included the testimony of a
qualified expert witness in accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1912(e) and 25
CFR 23.121(a) (paragraph (d)(3)(ii)); and
whether the evidence presented for foster care placement
as indicated in paragraph (d)(3)(i) indicates that prior to each
removal reported in paragraph (d)(1) that active efforts have been made
to prevent the breakup of the Indian family and that those efforts were
unsuccessful in accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1912(d) (paragraph
(d)(3)(iii)).
These are similar to sections 1355.43(i)(12) and (i)(14) as
proposed in the 2016 SNPRM.
Comment: The national organization representing state child welfare
agencies was in support of a data element asking about court
determinations of active efforts because members believe this is the
best data element to capture information on active efforts to prevent
the breakup of the Indian family. One tribal commenter noted that in
some state courts, local practice has been to stipulate to active
efforts, rather than creating a record that demonstrates active
efforts.
[[Page 90548]]
Response: We retained the requirement regarding court
determinations that active efforts were made to prevent the breakup of
the Indian family with modifications to be consistent with BIA
regulations at 25 CFR 23.120. We now require state title IV-E agencies
to indicate in paragraph (d)(3)(iii) whether the evidence presented for
foster care placement as indicated in paragraph (d)(3)(i) indicates
that prior to each removal active efforts were made to prevent the
breakup of the Indian family and that these efforts were unsuccessful
in accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1912(d).
Comment: We received several concerns and suggestions about the
requirement for the state title IV-E agency to report whether the court
found that continued custody of the Indian child by the parent or
Indian custodian was likely to result in serious emotional or physical
damage to the Indian child and that the evidence presented included
testimony by a QEW. Two tribes suggested that states be required to
report whether the QEW meets the standards per the BIA's Guidelines.
The national organization representing state child welfare agencies
noted that states experience challenges in meeting the requirement in
ICWA for QEWs, stating there are not enough QEWs to meet the need for
court proceedings. One state noted that there is no way to report that
a court does not require a QEW to testify even if the agency knows that
a QEW should testify.
Response: We did not make changes to the final rule in response to
these comments. We are retaining the requirement that the state must
report whether evidence presented included the testimony of a QEW for
the specified court finding but updated the language to reflect the BIA
regulation at 25 CFR 121(a). As we noted in the preamble to the 2016
SNPRM, the removal data elements will provide data on the extent to
which Indian children as defined in ICWA are removed in a manner that
conforms to ICWA's standards, informs ACF about the frequency of and
evidentiary standards applied to removals of Indian children, helps
identify needs for training and technical assistance related to ICWA,
and highlights substantive opportunities for building and improving
relationships between states and tribes. Removing the requirement for
agencies to report whether a QEW provided testimony would diminish our
ability to achieve these purposes. We require the state title IV-E
agency to report whether the evidence presented for foster care
placement as indicated in paragraph (d)(3)(i) included the testimony of
a QEW in accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1912(e) and 25 CFR 121(a) (paragraph
(d)(3)(ii)). Thus, we are not asking whether or not the state title IV-
E agency knows that ICWA requires a QEW's testimony, rather we are
requiring the state title IV-E agency to indicate whether the evidence
presented included the testimony of a QEW.
Comment: We received comments suggesting additional data elements
related to: Emergency removals per section 1922 of ICWA, such as
whether the court determined that the state properly removed the Indian
child and how long the emergency removal lasted; and foster care
voluntary removals, such as whether a court order indicates that the
voluntary consent to a foster care placement was made in writing and
recorded in the presence of a judge.
Response: We did not revise the final rule in response to these
suggestions. We understand the value of collecting data related to
voluntary foster placements and emergency removals of children to whom
ICWA applies. We encourage states to consider collecting this
information, if consistent with their own practice models, but we
decline to require collecting and reporting it to AFCARS. At this time,
we seek to understand the scope of all removals of children to whom
ICWA applies and therefore we've required broad data elements we
believe are most critical in relation to Indian children as defined in
ICWA.
Section 1355.44(d)(4) Environment at Removal
In paragraph (d)(4) we require the title IV-E agency to report the
type of environment (household or facility) from a list of seven that
the child was living in at the time of each of the child's removals
reported in paragraph (d)(1).
Comment: One state recommended adding whether a legal guardian is a
child's relative as a response option because in the proposal, both
``legal guardian'' and ``child's relative'' are defined to exclude the
other choice, even though the legal guardian may be a child's relative.
Other homelessness advocacy groups suggested adding ``homeless'' as a
separate response option because they feel that data on homelessness is
very important and relevant to collect to get a more detailed picture
of where youth running away from system involvement are running to.
Response: We agree with the suggestion to add ``relative legal
guardian'' as a response option to distinguish between a guardian who
is or is not related to the child. We did not add a separate response
option for ``homelessness'' because it is included in the response
option of ``other.'' However, we added ``homelessness'' as a
circumstance of removal at paragraph (d)(6)(xxxiv).
Comment: Three commenters representing tribal interests recommended
adding a response option for ``Indian custodian,'' who is a person
recognized under ICWA that may not be a relative, parent, or legal
guardian.
Response: We specified in section 1355.41(c)(2) that for an Indian
child as defined in ICWA, the term ``legal guardian'' in the specific
data elements of Sec. Sec. 1355.44(c)(1), (c)(2), (d)(4), and (d)(5),
includes an Indian custodian as defined in ICWA at 25 U.S.C. 1903 if
the Indian custodian has legal responsibility for the child.
Section 1355.44(d)(5) Authority for Placement and Care Responsibility
In paragraph (d)(5) we require the title IV-E agency to indicate,
for each of the child's removals, whether the title IV-E agency's
authority for placement and care responsibility of the child was based
on a court order. We did not receive substantive comments to this data
element and have mostly retained the language as proposed in the 2015
NPRM, clarifying only that we intended ``guardian'' to refer to ``legal
guardian''.
Section 1355.44(d)(6) Child and Family Circumstances at Removal
In paragraph (d)(6), we require the title IV-E agency to report all
of the circumstances surrounding the child and family at each removal
reported in paragraph (d)(1) from a list of 35 circumstances. The
agency must report all child and family circumstances that are present
at the time of each removal, including the circumstances that
contributed to the decision to place the child into foster care.
We modified the regulation by revising the name of two
circumstances at removal. In paragraph (d)(6)(xi) we revised the name
of the circumstance from ``caretaker's alcohol abuse'' to ``caretaker's
alcohol use'' and in paragraph (d)(6)(xii) we revised the name of the
circumstance from ``caretaker's drug abuse'' to ``caretaker's drug
use.'' We did not change the definition of the data element. These
language changes are based on language guidelines (https://www.whitehouse.gov/ondcp/changing-the-language-draft) recently released
by the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy that are
designed to reduce the harmful stigma associated
[[Page 90549]]
with substance use disorders and addiction.
We also modified the regulation by adding two circumstances at
removal (paragraphs (d)(6)(xxxii) and (d)(6)(xxxiii)) so that we can
identify children who are under a title IV-E agreement for title IV-E
foster care maintenance payments. A commenter to the 2015 NPRM
suggested that we add a data element allowing title IV-E agencies to
specify children reported to AFCARS who are under title IV-E
agreements. We have also received this suggestion from several states
during AFCARS Assessment Reviews. We believe that the best way to
address these comments is to add a circumstance at removal that title
IV-E agencies may indicate if this situation applies for a child. We
believe this will lead to more accurate reporting and analysis of the
appropriate children. In addition, this will allow us to clearly
identify when an Indian child is under the state title IV-E agency's
placement and care responsibility versus receiving a title IV-E foster
care maintenance payment under a title IV-E agreement. We believe this
information, along with the ICWA-related data elements state title IV-E
agencies are now required to report will provide a clearer picture of
the AFCARS out-of-home care reporting population. We included separate
circumstances at removal for title IV-E agreements with another public
agency and title IV-E agreements with an Indian tribe to better inform
which title IV-E agreement the child is reported under and provide
clarity for title IV-E agencies on who is to be included in the out-of-
home care reporting population.
Comments: Several commenters suggested adding ``sex trafficking
victim'' as a circumstance at removal.
Response: We agree with the suggestions to add ``sex trafficking
victim'' as a circumstance and have added it as paragraph
(d)(6)(xxviii). This will inform us whether the child is a sex
trafficking victim at the time the child entered the out-of-home care
reporting population. The requirements to collect sex trafficking
information in paragraphs (d)(7) and (d)(8) relate to a child who was a
victim prior to or while in foster care, which is designed to meet
statutory reporting requirements.
Comment: One commenter suggested adding ``prenatal substance
exposure'' as a circumstance at removal.
Response: We did not add ``prenatal substance exposure'' as a child
and family circumstance at removal because we already have response
options ``prenatal alcohol exposure'' and ``prenatal drug exposure.''
Comment: Advocacy organizations suggested adding immigration-
related response options as child and family circumstances at removal
stating that a child's immigration status is important to understand
the barriers and services to support this population. They also noted
that an unintended consequence of immigration enforcement can be the
separation of detained parents from their children.
Response: We were persuaded by commenters who suggested it was
important to know when a circumstance at removal is that the parent was
detained or deported for immigration reasons and added ``parental
immigration detainment or deportation'' as a child and family
circumstance at removal to paragraph (d)(6)(xxix). Commenters pointed
out that this information is important in order to assess the critical
services that may be required to support the child and the family. In
addition, it is important to understand what barriers exist for the
child and family. We removed the data elements from the 2015 NPRM
proposal in paragraphs (b) and (c) to collect whether the child and
parents were born in the U.S. for the reasons noted by many commenters
who opposed them and instead require that agencies report this
circumstance at removal. We did not add a data element on a child's
immigration status because that information is not needed at the
federal level since agencies at the state, tribal, and local level
determine a child's eligibility for services.
Comment: Advocates and organizations representing the homeless
suggested adding many separate circumstances at removal related to
homelessness stating that data on homelessness is important and
relevant to collect. Recommendations included types of homelessness
habitations and particular family situations such as: ``places not
meant for human habitation'' (i.e., abandoned buildings); ``couch-
surfing''; ``family is living in a shelter or on the streets'';
``family home is overcrowded''; and ``family home is hazardous
condition.''
Response: We agree with the suggestions to add ``homelessness'' as
a circumstance and have added it as paragraph (d)(6)(xxxiv). Such
information can help agencies identify services and support for
children and families. We define homelessness consistent with the
definition used in the National Youth in Transition Database (NYTD) at
1356.83(g)(49).
Comment: Commenters expressed confusion on why we provided domestic
violence as a child and family circumstance at removal stating that the
reason for removal would be harm to the child. Other commenters
suggested that we should modify the domestic violence circumstance to
require agencies to report intimate partner violence experienced or
perpetrated by a child of any age and not only those who are eighteen
years of age and older.
Response: We appreciate the suggestions to revise this circumstance
at removal and revised it to make it more consistent with the
definition of domestic violence in the Family Violence Prevention and
Services Act (FVPSA). In response to the confusion on why we provided
domestic violence as a child and family circumstance at removal, we
noted in the 2015 NPRM that the agency must report all of the
circumstances that are present at the time of the child's removal, in
addition to the circumstances or reasons for the child's removal and
placement into foster care.
Comment: In the 2015 NPRM we solicited comments on whether we
should collect information on LGBTQ youth, and if so, what information.
Several commenters pointed out the unique plight of LGBTQ youth in
foster care stating that research indicates that LGBTQ youth are
disproportionately represented within the child welfare system,
experience high rates of family rejection, and experience unique
challenges to their personal safety and stability.
Response: We support further understanding of LGBTQ youth in foster
care and their experiences while in foster care. Such information can
help agencies improve their supports and services to these young
people. We included a circumstance at removal in paragraph (d)(6)(xxx)
as to whether there is ``family conflict related to the child's sexual
orientation, gender identity, or gender expression'' to aid us in
recognizing the needs and experiences of LGBTQ youth who enter foster
care. Knowing whether family conflict regarding the child's sexual
orientation, gender identity, or gender expression was a circumstance
at the child's removal may allow the title IV-E agency to more
accurately assess the child and plan for the child's safety,
permanency, and well-being while in foster care.
Comment: National advocacy/public interest groups suggested that we
add educational neglect and unaccompanied minor as child and family
circumstances at removal.
Response: We agree it is important to capture whether educational
neglect is a child and family circumstance at removal and included it.
We defined ``educational neglect'' based on the
[[Page 90550]]
American Humane Association definition as ``alleged or substantiated
failure of a parent or caregiver to enroll a child of mandatory school
age in school or provide appropriate home schooling or needed special
educational training, thus allowing the child or youth to engage in
chronic truancy.'' We did not include ``unaccompanied minor'' as one of
the circumstances at removal since the child's immigration status is
irrelevant to their placement in foster care. We did, however, include
a circumstance at removal of ``parental immigration detainment or
deportation'' to paragraph (d)(6)(xxix).
Section 1355.44(d)(7) Victim of Sex Trafficking Prior To Entering
Foster Care
In paragraph (d)(7), we require the title IV-E agency to report
whether the child had been a victim of sex trafficking before the
current out-of-home care episode. If so, in paragraphs (d)(7)(i) and
(d)(7)(ii) we require the title IV-E agency to indicate whether the
agency reported each instance to law enforcement and the dates of each
report.
Comment: One commenter asked if the agency should report this
information for a time prior to the title IV-E agency's involvement
with the child or family.
Response: Yes, the responses to paragraphs (d)(7)(i) and (d)(7)(ii)
require the title IV-E agency to report about victims of sex
trafficking prior to entering foster care and prior to any agency
involvement. We have retained the proposed rule language with minor
edits.
Section 1355.44(d)(8) Victim of Sex Trafficking While in Foster Care
In paragraph (d)(8), we require the title IV-E agency to report
whether the child was a victim of sex trafficking while in out-of-home
care during the current episode. If so, in paragraphs (d)(8)(i) and
(d)(8)(ii) we require the title IV-E agency to indicate whether the
agency reported each instance to law enforcement and the dates of each
report. We have retained the proposed rule language with minor edits.
Comment: A commenter sought clarification on whether the agency
should report a date the report was made to law enforcement if an
agency other than the title IV-E agency made the report.
Response: No, the agency reports on whether or not the title IV-E
agency itself made the report to law enforcement. We modified the
regulation to make this clearer.
Comment: Many commenters asked if it will be possible for the
agency to report data on multiple instances of sex trafficking that may
have occurred during the report period. Another commenter suggested
that we include sex trafficking as a child and family circumstance at
the time of removal.
Response: We agree with the suggestion to add sex trafficking as a
response option in paragraph (d)(6) Child and family circumstances at
removal. Because this information is to be reported as it relates to
each removal episode and is not information that is to be overwritten,
we have moved it to, the ``removal'' section of the final rule and
specified that each instance of sex trafficking, report to law
enforcement, and date must be reported. In addition, we modified the
language and location of these elements to allow agencies to report
multiple instances of sex trafficking. We believe these changes clarify
many of the questions raised by commenters.
Comment: Organizations representing tribal interests noted that
there are federal laws and policy barriers that prevent tribes from
submitting any criminal or civil data to certain national databases,
therefore tribes should be allowed to indicate they were not authorized
or allowed to report information about sex trafficking to law
enforcement.
Response: Title IV-E agencies are only required to report in AFCARS
whether or not they reported a child that they identified as a sex
trafficking victim to law enforcement. Therefore, in the instance where
the tribe was prohibited by federal law or otherwise to make a report
to law enforcement and therefore did not make a report the tribe would
indicate ``no.'' This data element is not a mandate on the tribe to
make a report of sex trafficking to law enforcement, but to indicate in
AFCARS whether or not they made a report.
Comment: We received several other suggestions. One organization
suggested we provide greater guidance and clarity about child victims
of sex trafficking when they run away from foster care; several
commenters suggested including additional elements, including health
and mental health services a child receives related to sex trafficking,
whether a sex-trafficking victim was criminally charged, had been
homeless, missing or a runaway. Further, several commenters suggested
that we include this information in a different data collection system,
the National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS).
Response: We examined the suggestions to add data elements
regarding victims of sex trafficking, but have not made further
changes. We do not have a specific use for the additional detailed
information the commenters requested as we are requiring reporting on
sex trafficking victims to meet statutory requirements for reporting
this information to Congress per section 105 of Public Law 113-183 and
for including this information in AFCARS per section 479(c)(3)(E) of
the Act. In addition, the statute mandates that this specific sex
trafficking victim data we are requiring title IV-E agencies to report
be included in AFCARS and not NCANDS. However, effective May 29, 2017,
Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA) state grant recipients
must report, to the maximum extent practicable, the number of children
determined to be victims of sex trafficking (section 106(d)(17) of
CAPTA).
Section 1355.44(e) Living Arrangement and Provider Information
In paragraph (e), we require that the title IV-E agency report
information on each of the child's living arrangements for each out-of-
home care episode. We revised some of the proposed data elements as
suggested by commenters, integrated data elements relating to ICWA
placement preferences proposed in the 2016 SNPRM, and removed others as
follows:
Removed a data element requiring agencies to report the
total number of children who are living with their minor parent in each
living arrangement. We instead require agencies to report whether the
child and his/her child(ren) are placed together at any point during
the report period in paragraph (b).
Removed the data element requiring agencies to report the
assistance that supports each of the child's living arrangements. We
merged this list of assistance with the data element Child financial
and medical assistance in paragraph (b).
Removed a data element requiring agencies to report the
total per diem amount of the title IV-E foster care maintenance,
adoption assistance, or guardianship assistance payment that the child
is eligible for or received in response to comments. Commenters stated
that reporting a child's eligibility for a funding source, and the
amount for which the child is eligible, when a payment has not actually
been made creates the potential for inaccurate data. In addition a
national organization representing state child welfare agencies
commented that reporting these data elements outweighs its usefulness.
Removed the requirement the title IV-E agency report
whether the child is
[[Page 90551]]
receiving the following types of services if placed in a non-foster
family home living arrangement: Specialized education, treatment,
counseling, and other services. Some commenters noted that collecting
this service data would be difficult and costly, other commenters
pointed out that this requirement is not well defined, and it is
unclear how ACF would use this data.
Section 1355.44(e)(1) Date of Living Arrangement
In paragraph (e)(1), we require the title IV-E agency to report the
dates of placement for each of the child's living arrangements for each
out-of-home care episode. We received no comments and have retained the
2015 NPRM proposed rule language.
Section 1355.44(e)(2) Foster Family Home
In paragraph (e)(2), we require the title IV-E agency to report
whether each of the child's living arrangements is a foster family
home. We received no comments and have made only minor conforming
changes to this paragraph.
Section 1355.44(e)(3) Foster Family Home Type
In paragraph (e)(3), we require the title IV-E agency to report
whether each type of foster family home, from a list of six, applies
for each foster family home reported. These are: Licensed home,
therapeutic foster family home, shelter care foster family home,
relative foster family home, pre-adoptive home, or kin foster family
home.
Comment: Several commenters supported the inclusion of a response
option of ``kin foster family home'' but were concerned that workers
will be confused about who should be included in this category and
misreport data. Many agencies define ``kin'' to include relatives by
blood, marriage or adoption, in addition to what is frequently referred
to as ``fictive kin'' and this could lead to worker confusion about
when to indicate the response option ``relative foster family home''
versus ``kin foster family home.'' Thus, commenters suggested that we
revise the definition of ``kin foster family home'' to specifically
note that the child is not related to the foster parent(s) by
biological, legal or marital connection. Commenters made similar
comments for the data elements Child's relationships to the foster
parent(s) in paragraph (e)(13) and Child's relationship to the adoptive
parent(s) or guardian(s) in paragraph (h)(2).
Response: We agree with the suggestion to modify the definition of
``kin foster family home'' so it now specifies that the child is not
related to the foster parent by a ``biological, legal or marital
connection.'' The revised definition reads: ``The home is one in which
there is a kin relationship as defined by the title IV-E agency, such
as one where a psychological, cultural or emotional relationship
between the child or the child's family and the foster parent(s) and
there is not a legal, biological, or marital connection between the
child and foster parent.'' We also made a similar modification to the
definition of ``kin'' in the data elements Child's relationships to the
foster parent(s) in paragraph (e)(13) and Child's relationship to the
adoptive parent(s) or guardian(s) in paragraph (h)(2). The remaining
foster family home type definitions are retained as proposed in the
2015 NPRM.
Section 1355.44(e)(4) Other Living Arrangement Type
In paragraph (e)(4), we require the title IV-E agency to report
whether a child who is not placed in a foster family home is placed in
one of the following thirteen living arrangements: Group home-family-
operated, group home-staff-operated, group home-shelter care,
residential treatment center, child care institution, child care
institution-shelter care, supervised independent living, juvenile
justice facility, medical or rehabilitative facility, psychiatric
hospital, runaway, whereabouts unknown and placed at home. We retained
the response options as proposed in the 2015 NPRM.
Comment: A commenter requested definitions for each of the other
living arrangement types.
Response: Each response option for the types of other living
arrangements is explained in detail in paragraph (e)(4) of the
regulation text. For example ``residential treatment center'' is
defined as a facility that has the purpose of treating children with
mental health or behavioral conditions; ``supervised independent
living'' is defined as where the child is living independently in a
supervised setting; and ``medical or rehabilitative facility'' is
defined as where an individual receives medical or physical health
care, such as a hospital.
Comment: One commenter suggested that title IV-E agencies have the
option of classifying a ``group home-family operated'' as a type of
foster family home. Also, a national organization representing state
child welfare agencies commented that ``group home family operated''
and ``group home staff operated'' are different across jurisdictions
and may be confusing to agencies.
Response: We recognize there are variations in how agencies license
and approve group homes and will provide technical assistance to title
IV-E agencies on a case by case basis on how to categorize group home
living arrangements in their jurisdiction for AFCARS reporting
purposes.
Comment: One commenter asked if medical and rehabilitative
facilities include children in a hospital for illness. The commenter
also asked if psychiatric hospitals include acute care (e.g., three to
five days).
Response: Yes, a ``medical or rehabilitative facility'' is one
where a child receives medical or physical health care, and includes a
hospital. Paragraph (e) includes options for where a child is currently
placed and a time frame is irrelevant as the title IV-E agency must to
report all living arrangements regardless of length of stay. We will
work with title IV-E agencies on reporting children in these facilities
as needed upon implementation.
Section 1355.44(e)(5) Private Agency Living Arrangement
In paragraph (e)(5), we require the title IV-E agency to report
whether each of the child's living arrangements is licensed, managed,
or run by a private agency. We received no comments on this data
element and have retained the 2015 NPRM proposed rule language.
Section 1355.44(e)(6) Location of Living Arrangement
In paragraph (e)(6), we require that the title IV-E agency report
the jurisdiction of the child's living arrangement, specifically
whether the child is placed within or outside of the reporting agency's
jurisdiction. The agency must also indicate if the child ran away or
his or her whereabouts are unknown. We received no comments on this
data element and have retained the 2015 NPRM proposed rule language
with minor clarifying edits.
Section 1355.44(e)(7) Jurisdiction or Country Where Child Is Living
In paragraph (e)(7), we require the title IV-E agency to report the
name of the state, tribal service area, Indian reservation or country
where the title IV-E agency placed the child for each living
arrangement, for children placed outside their jurisdiction. We
received no substantive comments on this data element but added a
sentence that IV-E agencies must report the information in a format
according to ACF's specifications to conform with this revision
throughout the rule. We will
[[Page 90552]]
work with title IV-E agencies on how to report this information.
Section 1355.44(e)(8) Available ICWA Foster Care and Pre-Adoptive
Placement Preferences
In paragraph (e)(8), if the state title IV-E agency indicated
``yes'' to paragraph (b)(4) or indicated ``yes, ICWA applies'' to
paragraph (b)(5), we require that the state title IV-E agency indicate
which of the foster care and pre-adoptive placements from a list of
five are willing to accept placement of the Indian child. The five
placements options are: A member of the Indian child's extended family;
a foster home licensed, approved, or specified by the Indian child's
tribe; an Indian foster home licensed or approved by an authorized non-
Indian licensing authority; an institution for children approved by an
Indian tribe or operated by an Indian organization which has a program
suitable to meet the Indian child's needs; and a placement that
complies with the order of preference for foster care or pre-adoptive
placements established by an Indian child's tribe, in accordance with
25 U.S.C. 1915(c). This is similar to paragraph (i)(15) as proposed in
the 2016 SNPRM.
Comment: The national organization representing state child welfare
agencies suggested we eliminate the requirement for the state to report
on the availability of foster care placements that meet ICWA placement
preferences stating that it is not essential. One state, citing burden,
also recommended that we eliminate this data element because other
information collected on foster care placement preferences is more
salient. Another state sought clarification on whether this data
element is asking a broad question about the availability of foster
care providers or if it is child specific and suggested simplifying the
information to only indicate with whom the child is placed and not
availability. Another suggested revising the element to indicate all
that apply rather than asking for yes/no responses. One tribe was
concerned that the language ``were available to accept placement'' is
subjective. They suggested revising the language as follows: ``were
pursued to accept placement pursuant to subsection 13(xi).''
Response: We were not persuaded to remove the data element
indicating the availability of foster care placements that meet ICWA's
preferences nor make any of the other recommended changes in the final
rule. No tribes, national tribal organization, or national child
welfare organizations suggested removing or modifying data elements
related to the availability of homes that meet ICWA foster or pre-
adoptive placement preferences. However, we modified the term
`available' to `willing' to be consistent with the adoption placement
preference data element at paragraph (h), although we presume that any
home that meets ICWA placement preferences that is willing to foster
the Indian child is also available, and that a home that meets ICWA
placement preferences but is unwilling to foster the Indian child is
unavailable. The option to use terminology ``check all that apply''
versus responding with ``yes'' or ``no'' is an implementation issue
that does not require a regulation change and we will provide technical
assistance on this as needed.
The availability of foster care placements that meet ICWA's
preferences is critical for meeting the purposes of ICWA. This
information is essential for ACF to determine whether resources are
needed for recruitment to increase the availability of AI/AN homes that
can meet ICWA's placement preferences. Under the BIA's regulations at
25 CFR 23.132, whether a home is available is not a subjective state
title IV-E agency determination. Rather it is evidence offered by the
state title IV-E agency to the court that there is good cause to
deviate from ICWA's placement preferences in a particular case where
there is also evidence that the state title IV-E agency conducted a
diligent search to identify a placement that meets the preferences (25
CFR 23.132).
Comment: One state commented that at the time of placement, the
agency does not exhaust all possible relative placements for any child,
so they are unclear which relatives ACF expects to be included, noting
that their information system would have to be modified to include
placement preference elements.
Response: We'd like to clarify the data element, as it does not
require the state to report whether they exhausted all relative
placements. The state is to indicate ``yes'' or ``no'' whether there
was a member of the Indian child's extended family willing to provide a
foster care or pre-adoptive placement. Such a member would meet the
placement preferences of ICWA in 25 U.S.C. 1915(b).
Section 1355.44(e)(9) Foster Care and Pre-Adoptive Placement
Preferences Under ICWA
In paragraph (e)(9) if the state title IV-E agency indicated
``yes'' to paragraph (b)(4) or indicated ``yes, ICWA applies'' to
paragraph (b)(5), we require that the state title IV-E agency indicate
whether each of the Indian child's placements (indicated in paragraph
(e)(1)) meets the placement preferences of ICWA at 25 U.S.C. 1915(b) by
indicating with whom the Indian child is placed from a list of six
response options. This is similar to paragraph (i)(16) as proposed in
the 2016 SNPRM, except that we changed the response option of ``none''
to ``placement does not meet ICWA placement preferences.''
Comment: The national organization representing state child welfare
agencies suggested we reduce the data elements by asking only whether
the child was placed in compliance with the placement preferences and
if no, whether a court make a finding of good cause to deviate from the
placement preferences.
Response: We did not make any changes in response to the comment to
only require reporting on whether or not the child is in a foster care
or pre-adoptive placement that meets the ICWA placement preferences. We
seek information on the specific placement because the requirements
around placement preferences in ICWA are a key piece of the protections
mandated by ICWA. Placement preferences serve to protect the best
interests of Indian children and promote the stability and security of
families and Indian tribes by keeping Indian children with their
extended families or in Indian foster homes and communities. Factors
unique to Indian children, including the availability of American
Indian foster homes, influence decisions about the placement of Indian
children.
Comment: One state recommended that we add a response option for
``group home approved or operated by Indian tribe/organization.''
Response: We considered this suggestion but decline to make a
change because our response options reflect the foster care placement
preference language in ICWA at 25 U.S.C. 1915(b).
Comment: A tribe suggested including if the tribe agreed with the
application of the placement preferences.
Response: We are not making a change as a result of this comment.
If the tribe has established by resolution a different order of
preference than that specified in ICWA, the tribe's placement
preferences apply subject to requirements of 25 U.S.C. 1915(c) and 25
CFR 23.131 and these placements are captured in AFCARS.
Comment: Several organizations suggested that we clarify whether
the placements were tribally licensed or approved homes or another
Indian family guardian home approved by the state.
[[Page 90553]]
Response: We considered this suggestion but decline to make
additional changes because our response options reflect the foster care
placement preference language in ICWA in 25 U.S.C. 1915(b).
Section 1355.44(e)(10) Good Cause Under ICWA
In paragraph (e)(10), if a state title IV-E agency indicated
``yes'' to paragraph (b)(4) or indicated ``yes, ICWA applies'' to
paragraph (b)(5), and the state title IV-E agency indicated ``placement
does not meet ICWA placement preferences'' in paragraph (e)(9), we
require the state title IV-E agency to indicate whether the court
determined by clear and convincing evidence, on the record or in
writing, a good cause to depart from the ICWA placement preferences (25
U.S.C. 1915(b)), or the Indian child's tribe, if the placement
preferences for foster care and pre-adoptive placements were not
followed. This is similar to paragraph (i)(17) as proposed in the 2016
SNPRM, except that we updated the language consistent with 25 CFR
23.132.
Comment: The national organization representing state child welfare
agencies suggested that we remove the language ``as indicated on court
order'' from this data element because it could be interpreted in
different ways and may not accurately reflect the court orders finding
of good cause.
Response: We modified the regulation text so that the final rule
does not include a requirement for the state to report only if the
court order included the good cause determination. This is consistent
with the BIA's regulations at 25 CFR 23.132(c). The data element as
revised requires states to indicate whether the court determined by
clear and convincing evidence on the record or in writing, a good cause
to depart from the ICWA placement preferences under 25 U.S.C. 1915(a)
or to depart from the placement preferences of the Indian child's tribe
under 25 U.S.C. 1915(c). This provides states with multiple options for
obtaining the information.
Section 1355.44(e)(11) Basis for Good Cause
In paragraph (e)(11), if a state title IV-E agency indicated
``yes'' to paragraph (b)(4) or indicated ``yes, ICWA applies'' to
paragraph (b)(5), and the state title IV-E agency indicated ``yes'' to
paragraph (e)(10), we require that the state title IV-E agency indicate
the state court's basis for the determination of good cause to depart
from the ICWA placement preferences from a list of five response
options. This is similar to paragraph (i)(18) as proposed in the 2016
SNPRM except that we updated the language consistent with 25 CFR
23.132.
Comment: A tribe stated that they are not clear what the response
option of ``other'' indicates and recommended that we clarify the
response option. One state recommended adding a list of ``extraordinary
physical or emotional needs of the Indian child'' to the good cause
reasons.
Response: We removed the ``other'' option and modified the list of
reasons for the state court's basis for the determination of good cause
to depart from ICWA placement preferences in ICWA to be consistent with
23.132(c) of the BIA regulations. The final regulation no longer
includes the response option of ``other.''
Section 1355.44(e)(12) Marital Status of the Foster Parent(s)
In paragraph (e)(12), we require the title IV-E agency to report
information regarding the marital status of the each of the foster
parent(s) where the child is placed. While we received no comments on
this data element, we revised the final rule to be consistent with
reporting the marital status of adoptive parents and legal guardians in
paragraph (h). As we also explain in paragraph (h), several commenters
recommended that we revise the marital status response options. As
such, the response options will be as follows: Married couple,
unmarried couple, separated, and single adult. We replaced the response
options of ``single male'' and ``single female'' with ``single adult.''
Section 1355.44(e)(13) Child's Relationships to the Foster Parent(s)
In paragraph (e)(13), we require the title IV-E agency to report
the type of relationship between the child and the foster parent(s) for
each foster family home in which the child is placed, from one of seven
options: Paternal grandparent(s), maternal grandparent(s), other
parental relative(s), other maternal relative(s), non-relative(s), kin,
or sibling(s).
Comment: One commenter suggested that we modify the term ``kin''
when describing the relationship between the child and foster parent to
make clear that the child is not related to the foster parent(s) by
biological, legal or marital connection. Commenters made similar
comments for the data elements Foster family home type in paragraph
(e)(3) and Child's relationship to the adoptive parent(s) or
guardian(s) in paragraph (h)(2).
Response: We appreciate the suggestion and modified the term
``kin'' to indicate that there is not a legal, biological, or marital
connection between the child and foster parent. We also made a similar
modification to the definition of ``kin'' in the data elements Foster
family home type in paragraph (e)(3) and Child's relationship to the
adoptive parent(s) or guardian(s) in paragraph (h)(2).
Comment: One commenter suggested that we add aunt and uncle as
response options for the child's relationship to the foster parents.
Response: If a child is placed with an aunt or uncle, the level of
information we are seeking is whether it was a maternal or paternal
relative, and are not seeking more detailed information than that. We
did not make changes in response to the suggestion.
Section 1355.44(e)(14) and (e)(20) Year of Birth for Foster Parent(s)
In paragraphs (e)(14) and (e)(20), we require the title IV-E agency
to report the year of birth of each of the child's foster parent(s). We
received no comments on this data element and have retained the
language as proposed in the 2015 NPRM.
Section 1355.44(e)(15) and (e)(21) Foster Parent(s) Tribal Membership
In paragraphs (e)(15) and (e)(21), we require the title IV-E agency
to report whether the foster parent(s) is a member of an Indian tribe.
These are new data elements not previously proposed in the 2015 NPRM or
2016 SNPRM. Additionally, we are collecting the same information in
paragraph (h) regarding adoptive parents and legal guardians. It was
clear as we analyzed the comments to the 2016 SNPRM that including data
elements that inquire about the tribal membership of the foster
parent(s) is information that is in line with our goals to expand the
information we collect on foster care providers for children in out-of-
home care. We believe that this information will provide more insight
on meeting the requirements in ICWA on foster care placement
preferences and will inform recruitment of foster care providers that
meet the needs of AI/AN children in out-of-home care.
Section 1355.44(e)(16) and (e)(22) Race of Foster Parent(s)
In paragraphs (e)(16)(i) through (e)(16)(vii) and (e)(22)(i)
through (e)(22)(vii), we require the title IV-E agency to report the
race of each of the foster parent(s) which the child has been placed.
Comment: Organizations representing tribal interests recommended we
include whether: (1) The foster parent have origins in any of the
original peoples of North and South America; (2)
[[Page 90554]]
whether the foster parent is a member of a federally recognized Indian
tribe and; if so, (3) the name of the tribe.
Response: The response options are consistent with the OMB Revised
Standards for the Classification of Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity,
and therefore, we are unable to make a change. These definitions can be
found at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/inforeg/re_guidance2000update.pdf. While we did not revise this data element,
at section 1355.44(e)(16) and (e)(22) we require the state title IV-E
agency report whether the foster parent(s) is a member of an Indian
tribe in paragraphs (e)(15) and (e)(21).
Section 1355.44(e)(17) and (e)(23) Hispanic or Latino Ethnicity for
Foster Parent(s)
In paragraphs (e)(17) and (e)(23), we require the title IV-E agency
to report the Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of the foster parent(s), if
applicable. We received no comments on this data element.
Section 1355.44(e)(18) and (e)(24) Gender of Foster Parent(s) and
(e)(19) and (e)(25) Foster Parent(s) Sexual Orientation
In paragraphs (e)(18) and (e)(24), we added a requirement for the
title IV-E agency to indicate whether each foster parent self
identifies as ``male'' or ``female.''
In paragraph (e)(19) and (e)(25), we added a requirement that the
title IV-E agency report whether the foster parent(s) self identifies
as ``straight or heterosexual,'' ``gay or lesbian,'' ``bisexual,''
``don't know,'' ``something else,'' or ``declined'' if the second
foster parent declined to identify his/her status.
Comment: While we requested input in the 2015 NPRM on whether to
require title IV-E agencies to collect LGBTQ-related data in AFCARS on
children, we received comments about collecting sexual orientation data
on foster and adoptive parents from state title IV-E agencies, national
advocacy/public interest groups and other organizations. Those that
supported collecting data on the foster parents' sexual orientation
were primarily advocacy organizations representing LGBTQ interests and
generally noted that the LGBTQ community remains an untapped resource
for finding permanent families for children and youth in foster care.
They stated that some of these prospective parents face barriers when
they attempt to foster or adopt because they identify as LGBTQ. They
further commented that including this information in AFCARS will
promote routine discussions between prospective foster parents and
title IV-E agencies, normalize conversations around sexual orientation,
and signal increased acceptance of LGBTQ caretakers. State title IV-E
agencies expressed some of the same concerns with collecting sexual
orientation data on foster parents as they did for children in foster
care: Privacy concerns and implications of having this information in a
government record; concerns that the data may be used in a
discriminatory way; and they expressed the importance of proper staff
training for data elements on sexual orientation.
Response: We were persuaded by the commenters who suggested data
elements in AFCARS on a foster parent's sexual orientation and require
agencies to report when a foster parent self identifies as ``straight
or heterosexual,'' ``gay or lesbian,'' ``bisexual,'' ``don't know,''
``something else,'' or ``declined.'' We anticipate that these data
elements will assist title IV-E agencies in recruiting, training, and
retaining an increased pool of foster care providers who can meet the
needs of children in foster care. We specifically added a decline
response option to respond to the privacy issues raised by commenters.
Information on sexual orientation should be obtained and maintained in
a manner that reflects respectful treatment, sensitivity, and
confidentiality. Several state and county agencies, advocacy
organizations and human rights organizations have developed guidance
and recommended practices for how to promote these conditions in
serving LGBTQ youth in adoption, foster care and out-of-home placement
settings. ACF provides state and tribal resources for Working With
LGBTQ Youth and Families at the Child Welfare Information Gateway. The
following links are provided as general examples of such guidance
(Minnesota and California examples). ACF will provide technical
assistance to agencies on collecting this information. Additionally,
for the same reasons, we made corresponding changes in paragraph (h)
related to the adoptive parent or legal guardian. We also made a minor
change in reporting the foster parent's gender, in that we require the
title IV-E agency to indicate whether each foster parent self
identifies as ``male'' or ``female'' and made the same change for the
adoptive parent or legal guardian.
Section 1355.44(f) Permanency Planning
In paragraph (f), we require that the title IV-E agency report
information related to permanency planning for children in foster care.
We made several revisions to this section from the 2015 NPRM to remove
some proposed data elements that we describe below:
We removed the requirement for agencies to report
concurrent planning information based on the comments from a national
organization representing state child welfare agencies and several
states. They suggested that this information is better captured at the
case level and noted that since that concurrent planning is an optional
practice that not all title IV-E agencies use, the information would
not be useful at a national level.
We removed the requirement for agencies to report the
reason(s) for permanency plan changes based on comments from a national
organization representing state child welfare agencies and many state
title IV-E agencies stating that the data element is too subjective,
the response options are overly broad, the data element will not
capture plans that change more than once during a report period, and
the data is too qualitative for AFCARS and better analyzed at the case
level. The commenters also said that reporting this information would
be burdensome and training workers and monitoring data quality would be
challenging.
We removed the requirement for agencies to report the
purpose of each in person, face-to-face visit based on comments that
this data element is not well defined, and that many visits involve
multiple purposes and will not be well distinguished.
We removed the requirement for agencies to report whether
the caseworker visited with the child alone. Several commenters were in
support of this data element, however, the statutory requirement is for
agencies to report whether a face-to-face visit has occurred within the
calendar month and whether it occurred in the child's residence. In
addition, commenters indicated that collecting information on if a
worker visits alone would be time consuming and it is not always
appropriate for the caseworker to visit the child alone.
We removed the requirement that agencies indicate whether
the contents of the transition plan apply based on comments that while
the existence of the plan and its timing is knowable, reporting the
provisions contained in the transition plan is unnecessary because the
quality and relevance of a transition plan cannot be determined
quantitatively.
Section 1355.44(f)(1) and (2) Permanency Plan and Date
In paragraph (f)(1), we require that the title IV-E agency report
each
[[Page 90555]]
permanency plan for the child and in (f)(2) the date each plan(s) was
established during each out-of-home care episode. There are six
options: Reunify with parent(s) or legal guardian(s), live with other
relatives, adoption, guardianship, and another planned permanent living
arrangement.
Comment: Two states sought clarification on how these elements
apply to children who have runaway and whether the response options
should be consistent with CFSR.
Response: We require the permanency plan response options to be
consistent with the law at section 475(5)(C) of the Act. The permanency
plan options in the CFSR are broader and encompasses the discrete
response options from AFCARS because AFCARS applies to all youth in the
out-of-home care reporting population, which includes children for whom
the title IV-E agency has placement and care responsibility but who
have runaway or whose whereabouts are unknown at the time that the
title IV-E agency receives placement and care responsibility for the
child.
Comment: Other commenters, including national advocacy/public
interest groups and a private citizen, offered several suggestions,
including: Adding data that addresses whether the child was consulted
or participated in developing the permanency plan; about the visitation
and services the agency provided during visits for children with a
permanency plan of reunification; and adding a permanency plan response
option for ``waiting for adoption.'' One commenter questioned the
usefulness of this data at a federal level.
Response: We reviewed these suggestions, however we did not make
changes in response to the commenter's suggestions This level of detail
and specific case level information go beyond designating a child's
permanency plan and are not needed at the federal level to meet the
requirements of section 479(c)(3) of the Act. Additionally, we
currently collect the child's most recent case plan goal in AFCARS.
Section 1355.44(f)(3) and (4) Periodic Review and Permanency Hearing
Dates
In paragraphs (f)(3) and (4), the title IV-E agency must report the
date of each periodic review and the date of each permanency hearing
(per section 475(5)(C) of the Act). We did not receive substantive
comments on these data elements and have retained them as proposed in
the 2015 NPRM.
Section 1355.44(f)(5) Juvenile Justice
In paragraph (f)(5), we require the title IV-E agency to report
whether a juvenile judge or court found the child to be a status
offender or adjudicated delinquent during the report period.
Comment: Four states expressed concerns with our proposal for
agencies to report specifically whether the court identified the child
to be an ``adjudicated delinquent'' or a ``status offender.'' They
cited concerns about training workers to ensure data quality and
difficulty in distinguishing the proposed response option ``adjudicated
delinquent'' from ``status offender.'' One organization representing
state child welfare agencies suggested that agencies simply report
whether or not the court found a child to be either a status offender
or an adjudicated delinquent because distinguishing between the two is
not necessary and will vary by and within jurisdictions.
Response: We were persuaded by the commenters who said we did not
need to distinguish the specific type of juvenile justice involvement
for each child. As such, we revised the data element to require title
IV-E agencies to report yes/no whether or not a court found the child
to be a status offender or adjudicated delinquent, no longer requiring
the agency to distinguish between the two.
Section 1355.44(f)(6) and (7) Caseworker Visit Dates and Location
In paragraphs (f)(6) and (f)(7), we require the title IV-E agency
to report information on visits between the child's caseworker and the
child. In paragraph (f)(6), we require the title IV-E agency to report
the date of each in-person, face-to-face visit between the caseworker
and the child. In paragraph (f)(7), we require the title IV-E agency to
report the location of each in-person visit between the caseworker and
the child.
Comment: A state asked if this data element pertains to visits
during the reporting period, the removal episode, or the child's
lifetime involvement with child welfare services.
Response: We'd like to clarify that the title IV-E agency must
collect and report the date and other required information for each in-
person, face-to-face caseworker visit during each six month report
period. Therefore, if the worker visits the child in-person, face-to-
face each month during the six month report period, the agency will
report the six dates and locations of the visits.
Comment: One commenter questioned why we require the agency to
report caseworker visit information for every case worker visit to a
child.
Response: We require agencies to collect and report the date and
location of each in-person, face-to-face caseworker visit to meet the
requirements in section 424(f) of the Act, which requires that 90
percent of children in foster care are visited on a monthly basis by
their workers, and that the majority of the visits occur in the
residence of the child.
Comment: Several commenters recommended that we require agencies to
also report: What went on during the caseworker visit; the types of
services provided by the caseworker during the visit; and whether
coaching or mental health treatment was provided during the visit. One
commenter suggested that we also collect information on a child's
visits with biological parents.
Response: We are retaining the requirements for the title IV-E
agency to report the date and location of each in-person, face-to-face
caseworker visits to meet the statutory requirements in section 424(f)
of the Act. Therefore, we did not make any additional changes to
include the suggested information as we do not have a specific use for
it and will not require the agency to collect information not required
by the law.
Section 1355.44(f)(8) and (f)(9) Transition Plans
In paragraph (f)(8), we require the title IV-E agency to report
whether the child has a transition plan that meets the requirements of
section 475(5)(H) of the Act. If the child has a transition plan, the
title IV-E agency must report the plan date in paragraph (f)(9).
Comment: A national organization representing state child welfare
agencies and states objected to reporting the content of the transition
plan. They indicated that while the existence of the plan and its
timing is knowable, reporting the provisions contained in the
transition plan is unnecessary because the quality and relevance of a
transition plan cannot be determined quantitatively. Other national
advocacy/public interest groups supported collecting data we proposed
on transition plans.
Response: We were persuaded by the comments and removed the data
element.
Commenters: One state asked whether agencies must report transition
plans that are developed before the 90-day period before the youth
turns age 18 (or greater age).
Response: Yes, agencies must report a transition plan developed
before the 90-day period. We amended the regulation text to make it
clear that agencies should report all plans developed in
[[Page 90556]]
response to the statute, even if it is before the 90 day period.
Commenters: An organization representing tribal interests suggested
that we collect information about whether Indian children have
information on and access to tribal specific resources and services for
youth and young adults.
Response: While there is not requirement for transition plans to be
this detailed, agencies should be responsive to the individualized
needs of a specific Indian child.
Section 1355.44(f)(10) Active Efforts
In paragraph (f)(10), if a state title IV-E agency indicated
``yes'' to paragraph (b)(4) or indicated ``yes, ICWA applies'' to
paragraph (b)(5), we require the state title IV-E agency to indicate
whether the active efforts in each paragraph (f)(10)(i) through
(f)(10)(xiii) ``applies'' or ``does not apply.'' The state title IV-E
agency must indicate all of the active efforts that apply once the
child enters the AFCARS out-of-home care reporting population per
section 1355.42(a) through the child's exit per paragraph (g)(1) of
this section and the active efforts made to prevent removal prior to
the child entering the out-of-home care reporting population. This is
similar to paragraph (i)(13) as proposed in the 2016 SNPRM, however, we
updated the language consistent with BIA's regulation at 25 CFR 23.2.
Comment: Many commenters suggested that the response options be
updated consistent with BIA's Guidelines and BIA's regulations at 25
CFR 23.2 and several commenters suggested allowing state title IV-E
agencies to incorporate active efforts as defined under state law.
Response: We agree and revised the final rule to be consistent with
the BIA regulations at 25 CFR 23.2, which contains the regulatory
definition of active efforts. Section 1355.41(c) specifies that terms
in ICWA for specified data elements mean the same as in ICWA at 25
U.S.C. 1903 and 25 CFR 23.2. As such, the state title IV-E agency must
report if any of the active efforts listed in paragraphs (f)(10)(i)
through (f)(10)(xiii) were provided prior to and during the child's
stay in out-of-home care. The state title IV-E agency may report active
efforts as defined under state law under the response option of ``other
active efforts tailored to the facts and circumstances of the case'',
as appropriate.
Comment: Tribes and organizations representing tribal interests
commented that data on active efforts is important to report to AFCARS
because it impacts the individual child's case and is a key protection
provided in ICWA. However, several commenters and the national
organization representing state child welfare agencies do not support
requiring the state title IV-E agency to report information on active
efforts as it was proposed in the 2016 SNPRM. They recommended removing
the data element because state title IV-E agencies already mirror the
best practices that strengthen and ensure the safety of families by
limiting the need to remove children from their homes and separating
from parents, guardians or caregivers for early outreach and engagement
to provide support and services for families before a removal is
warranted. Several commenters believe that collecting information on
the specific active efforts that were provided is more appropriate for
a case review than for AFCARS data collection because these responses
do not get to the quality of those efforts. Several commenters
expressed concerns with the functionality of this data element for
national reporting. One commenter expressed an issue with an absence of
court orders expressly describing the active efforts and therefore
state title IV-E agencies will not be able to accurately report this
information.
Response: We are not persuaded by these comments to revise the
final rule because the ``active efforts'' requirement is a vital part
of ICWA's requirements. The preamble to the BIA's final regulation at
25 CFR 23.2 details at length the reasons for and benefits of active
efforts including that ICWA's active efforts requirement continues to
provide a critical protection against the removal and TPR of an Indian
child from a fit and loving parent by ensuring that parents who are or
may readily become fit parents are provided with service necessary to
retain or regain custody of their child. Data about the frequency with
which each active effort type is made will help develop policy,
resources, and technical assistance to support states to employ a range
of efforts that can meet the needs of Indian children in out-of-home
care. Lastly, we revised the data element language to reflect BIA's
regulation at 23.2 and 23.120(a).
Comment: One commenter requested clarification on whether the
response options are based on the court identifying that the state
title IV-E agency did one or more of the active efforts listed or
whether it is the state title IV-E agency making a determination as to
which active efforts were made.
Response: The state must report the active efforts which the state
title IV-E agency made throughout the child's stay in out-of-home care,
which may or may not be documented in a court order.
Comment: Commenters requested clarification on the terminology used
in the active efforts examples, such as what ACF considers to be part
of an ``extended family,'' how ACF defines the ``most natural setting
safely possible,'' and how ``regular visits'' and ``trial home visits''
differs from regular caseworker contacts.
Response: The list of active efforts in paragraphs (f)(10)(i)
through (f)(10)(xiii) are examples of active efforts drawn from BIA's
definition of ``active efforts'' in 25 CFR 23.2. The BIA does not
define the terms used in the examples and therefore, we will not define
the terminology further. Consistent with BIA's regulation at 25 CFR
23.2, to the extent possible, active efforts should be provided in a
manner consistent with the prevailing social and cultural conditions of
the Indian child's tribe, and in partnership with the child, parents,
extended family, and tribe.
Comment: A commenter recommended adding data elements to capture
whether the state title IV-E agency conducted or caused to be conducted
a diligent search for the Indian child's extended family members for
assistance and possible placement, and if no extended family members
are identified, whether the state title IV-E agency conducted a
diligent search for other ICWA-compliant placement options.
Response: We did not make changes to the response options based on
this comment because we wanted to be consistent with the BIA's
regulation and examples of ``active efforts'' in 25 CFR 23.2. However,
we added ``extended family'' to paragraph (f)(10)(v) to match the
addition of this in paragraph (b).
Comment: One commenter suggested that if siblings are not kept
together, that the state title IV-E agency must report why the siblings
were separated. The commenter stated that collecting this information
would strengthen the data and create new opportunities to address the
needs of Indian children in out-of-home care. Two commenters suggest
that because we proposed in the 2015 NPRM data elements related to
siblings for all children in the out-of-home care reporting population,
this data element should be removed. The commenter stated that keeping
siblings together captures a goal that agencies attempt to achieve for
all families.
Response: Although information about siblings is collected
elsewhere in the final rule for all children in the out-of-home care
reporting population, we did not make changes to the response options
in paragraph (f)(10) based on
[[Page 90557]]
this comment because this data element is consistent with BIA's
regulation at 25 CFR 23.2.
In the 2016 SNPRM, we proposed that title IV-E agencies report the
date active efforts began in paragraph (i)(11), however after reviewing
the comments we removed this proposed data element.
Comment: The national organization representing state child welfare
agencies recommended that ACF remove this data element because state
agencies follow practice standards for early outreach and engagement to
provide support and services for families before a removal is
warranted. In addition, the organization recommended overall that we
remove data elements that may be unreliable, potentially invalid, and
that place unnecessary burdens. We also received a state comment
requesting clarification and another state noted they did not currently
collect this information.
Response: We agree with the suggestion to remove the date active
efforts began and revised the final rule accordingly. The BIA's
regulation at 23.107 specifies that ICWA applies when it is known or
there is reason to know a child is an Indian child as defined in ICWA
and that treatment as an Indian child continues until it is determined
on the court record that the child does not meet the definition of an
Indian child in ICWA.
Section 1355.44(g) General Exit Information
In paragraph (g), we require that the title IV-E agency must report
when and why a child exits the out-of-home care reporting population.
Section 1355.44(g)(1) Date of Exit
In paragraph (g)(1), we require the title IV-E agency to report the
date for each of the child's exits from out-of-home care, if
applicable. We did not receive relevant comments on this data element
and retained the 2015 NPRM proposed rule language.
Section 1355.44(g)(2) Exit Transaction Date
In paragraph (g)(2), we require the title IV-E agency to report the
transaction date for each exit date reported in paragraph (g)(1). The
transaction date is a non-modifiable, computer-generated date which
accurately indicates the month, day and year each response to paragraph
(g)(1) was entered into the information system. We did not receive
relevant comments on this data element and have retained the 2015 NPRM
proposed rule language.
Section 1355.44(g)(3) and (4) Exit Reason and Transfer to Another
Agency
In paragraphs (g)(3) and (4), we require the title IV-E agency to
report the reason for each of the child's exit(s) from out-of-home
care, and if the exit reason is ``transfer to another agency,'' the
agency type.
Comment: We received several suggestions to modify the exit reason
response options to: Identify the manner of a child's death; change how
a child who exits foster care for jail or prison is reported; add exit
reasons to identify when a youth becomes ineligible for extended foster
care; and when a youth voluntarily leaves extended foster care. A few
states disagreed with some of our proposed response options for exit
reason.
Response: We made a minor change to remove the response option
``other'' proposed in the 2015 NPRM because based on our experience, we
believe that the response options adequately reflect the reasons why
children exit out-of-home care and we do not need a response option of
``other.'' We do not need to revise or add other reasons because these
exit reasons are designed to capture information about when and where a
child exits out-of-home care, and are not intended to identify other
specifics about the child's exit.
Comment: For the response option ``transfer to another agency'' in
paragraph (g)(3), a commenter asked for clarification about the phrase
``but not if the transfer is to a public agency, Indian Tribe, Tribal
organization or consortium that has an agreement with a title IV-E
agency under section 472(a)(2)(B) of the Act.''
Response: We recognized that this language as proposed in the 2015
NPRM can be confusing because of variation in title IV-E agency
policies and procedures for transfers and title IV-E agreements.
Therefore, we revised the response option ``transfer to another
agency'' in the regulation to be less specific than we proposed in the
2015 NPRM to read as follows: Indicate ``transfer to another agency''
if placement and care responsibility for the child was transferred to
another agency, either within or outside of the reporting state or
tribal service area. This revision will permit ACF to provide targeted
technical assistance for case specific circumstances.
Section 1355.44(h) Exit to Adoption and Guardianship Information
In paragraph (h), we require that the title IV-E agency report
information on the child's exit from out-of-home care to a finalized
adoption or legal guardianship.
Comment: Several national advocacy/public interest groups
recommended that we add the following elements: ``sex assigned at birth
of adoptive parent(s) or legal guardian(s),'' ``gender identity of
adoptive parent(s) or legal guardian(s),'' ``sex of adoptive parents/
legal guardians,'' and ``sexual orientation of adoptive parent(s) or
legal guardian(s).''
Response: In response to these suggestions, we removed the response
options ``single female'' and ``single male'' and replaced them with
``single adult.'' We added new data elements on the gender of the
adoptive parent(s) or legal guardian(s) with the other demographic
information on adoptive parents and legal guardians. This will provide
the gender of each adoptive parent or legal guardian separately from
their marital status. The new data elements are in paragraphs (h)(7)
for the first adoptive parent or legal guardian and (h)(13) for the
second adoptive parent or legal guardian. These revisions are similar
to revisions we made in response to comments regarding foster parent
demographic information in paragraph (e).
Section 1355.44(h)(1) Marital Status of the Adoptive Parent(s) or
Guardian(s)
In paragraph 1355.43(h)(1), the title IV-E agency must report the
marital status of the adoptive parent(s) or legal guardian(s).
Comment: We received several recommendations to revise the marital
status response options, as well as a recommendation to remove this
data element stating that there is no need for this level of detail at
the national level. The commenters recommended revisions to the marital
status response options here and the foster parent marital status
response options in paragraph (e) or to include other response options,
such as ``separated'' and ``married, but adopting individually.''
Response: We examined the suggestions and modified the marital
status response options. We added the response options of ``separated''
and ``married, but adopting or obtaining legal guardianship
individually.'' Since we added the response option ``married, but
adopting or obtaining legal guardianship individually,'' we no longer
need, and removed for the final rule, the instruction we included in
the 2015 NPRM that instructed title IV-E agencies to ``complete this
data element even if only one person of the married or common law
married couple is the adoptive parent or legal guardian of the child.''
[[Page 90558]]
Section 1355.44(h)(2) Child's Relationship to the Adoptive Parent(s) or
Guardian(s)
In paragraph (h)(2), we require the title IV-E agency to report the
relationship(s) between the child and his or her adoptive parent(s) or
legal guardian(s) from eight options: Paternal grandparent(s), maternal
grandparent(s), other paternal relative(s), other maternal relative(s),
sibling(s), kin, non-relative(s), and foster parent(s).
Comment: Several commenters supported the inclusion of ``kin'' as a
response option for this data element, but asked for clarification on
the definition. Another commenter suggested that we not include ``kin''
as an option because it is confusing, overlaps with ``non-relative''
and is a colloquial term with varied meanings. Commenters stated that
many agencies define ``kin'' to include relatives by blood, marriage or
adoption, in addition to what is frequently referred to as ``fictive
kin'' and this could lead to worker confusion about when to indicate
the response option ``kin'' verse the other response options for
relatives. Commenters made similar comments for the data elements
Foster family home type in paragraph (e)(3) and Child's relationships
to the foster parent(s) in paragraph (e)(13).
Response: We agree with the suggestion to modify the definition of
``kin'' so it now specifies that the child is not related to the
adoptive parent or legal guardian by a ``biological, legal or marital
connection.'' The revised definition reads: ``The adoptive parent(s) or
legal guardian(s) has a kin relationship with the child, as defined by
the title IV-E agency, such as one where there is a psychological,
cultural or emotional relationship between the child or the child's
family and the adoptive parent(s) or legal guardian(s) and there is not
a legal, biological, or marital connection between the child and foster
parent.'' We also made a similar modification to the definition of
``kin foster family home'' in the data element Foster family home type
in paragraph (e)(3) and Child's relationships to the foster parent(s)
in paragraph (e)(13).
Section 1355.44(h)(3) and (h)(9) Date of Birth of Adoptive Parent(s) or
Guardian(s)
In paragraphs (h)(3) and (h)(9), we require the title IV-E agency
to report each adoptive parent or legal guardian's birthdate. We
received no comments on these data elements and have retained the
language as proposed in the 2015 NPRM.
Section 1355.44(h)(4) and (h)(10) Adoptive Parent(s) Tribal Membership
In paragraphs (h)(4) and (h)(10), we require the title IV-E agency
to report whether the adoptive parent(s) or legal guardian is a member
of an Indian tribe. These are data elements not previously proposed in
the 2015 NPRM or 2016 SNPRM. Additionally, we are collecting the same
information in paragraph (e) regarding foster parents. It was clear as
we analyzed the comments to the 2016 SNPRM that including data elements
that inquire about the tribal membership of the adoptive parent(s) or
legal guardian is information that is in line with our goals to expand
the information we collect on adoptive parents and guardians of
children who exit out-of-home care to adoption or legal guardianship.
We believe that this information will provide more insight on meeting
the requirements to meet placement preferences under ICWA and will
inform recruitment of providers that meet the needs of AI/AN children
who exit out-of-home care to adoption or legal guardianship.
Section 1355.44(h)(5) and (h)(11) Race of Adoptive Parent(s) or
Guardian(s)
In paragraphs (h)(5)(i) through (h)(5)(vii) and (h)(11)(i) through
(h)(11)(vii), we require the title IV-E agency to report the race of
each adoptive parent or legal guardian.
Comment: Groups representing tribal interests recommended that we
include whether the adoptive parent/legal guardian has origins in any
of the original peoples of North and South America and if so whether
the adoptive or guardian parent a member of a federally recognized
Indian tribe and the name of the tribe, and if the child maintains
tribal affiliation and community attachment.
Response: The response options for race are consistent with the OMB
Revised Standards for the Classification of Federal Data on Race and
Ethnicity, and therefore, we are unable to make a change. These
definitions can be found at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/inforeg/re_guidance2000update.pdf. While we did not revise this data element,
we require at paragraphs 1355.44(h)(4) and (h)(10) that title IV-E
agencies report whether the adoptive parent(s) or legal guardian is a
member of an Indian tribe in paragraphs (h)(4) and (h)(10).
Section 1355.44(h)(6) and (h)(12) Hispanic or Latino Ethnicity of Birth
of Adoptive Parent(s) or Guardian(s)
In paragraphs (h)(6) and (h)(12), we require the title IV-E agency
to report the Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of each adoptive parent or
legal guardian. We received no comments on these data elements.
Section 1355.44(h)(7) and (h)(13) Gender of Adoptive Parent(s) or
Guardian(s), and (h)(8) and (h)(14) Adoptive Parent(s) or Guardian(s),
Sexual Orientation
In paragraphs (h)(7) and (h)(13), we require the title IV-E agency
to indicate whether each adoptive parent(s) or legal guardian(s) self
identifies as ``male'' or ``female.''
In paragraph (h)(8) and (h)(14), we require that the title IV-E
agency report whether the adoptive parent(s) or legal guardian(s) self
identifies as ``straight or heterosexual,'' ``gay or lesbian,''
``bisexual,'' ``don't know,'' ``something else,'' or ``declined'' if
the second adoptive parent(s) or legal guardian(s) declined to identify
his/her status.
Comment: Although we requested input on whether to require title
IV-E agencies to collect LGBTQ-related data in AFCARS for youth, we
received comments from state title IV-E agencies, national advocacy/
public interest groups and other organizations specifically commented
on collecting whether a caretaker identifies as LGBTQ. Those that
supported collecting LGBTQ-related data on adoptive parents or legal
guardians were primarily advocacy organizations representing LGBTQ
interests and generally noted that the LGBTQ community remains an
untapped resource for finding permanent families for children and youth
in foster care. They stated that some of these prospective parents face
barriers when they attempt to adopt or obtain legal guardianship
because they identify as LGBTQ. They further commented that including
this information in AFCARS will promote routine discussions between
prospective adoptive parents or legal guardians and title IV-E
agencies, normalize conversations around sexual orientation, and signal
increased acceptance of LGBTQ caretakers. State title IV-E agencies
expressed some of the same concerns with collecting LGBTQ-related data
on adoptive parents or legal guardians as they did for children in
foster care: Privacy concerns and implications of having this
information in a government record; concerns that the data may be used
in a discriminatory way; and they expressed the importance of proper
staff training for data elements on sexual orientation.
Response: We were persuaded by the commenters and we include data
elements in AFCARS on an adoptive
[[Page 90559]]
parent's or legal guardian's self-reported gender and sexual
orientation. We anticipate that these data elements will assist title
IV-E agencies in recruiting, training, and retaining an increased pool
of providers who can meet the needs of children who exit out-of-home
care to adoption or legal guardianship. We specifically added a decline
response option to respond to the privacy issues raised by commenters.
Additionally, for the same reasons, we made corresponding changes in
paragraph (e) related to the foster parent(s). As previously stated,
information on sexual orientation should be obtained and maintained in
a manner that reflects respectful treatment, sensitivity, and
confidentiality. Several state and county agencies, advocacy
organizations and human rights organizations have developed guidance
and recommended practices for how to promote these conditions in
serving LGBTQ youth in adoption, foster care and out-of-home placement
settings. ACF provides state and tribal resources for Working With
LGBTQ Youth and Families at the Child Welfare Information Gateway. The
following links are provided as general examples of such guidance
(Minnesota and California examples). ACF will provide technical
assistance to agencies on collecting this information. We also made a
minor change in reporting the adoptive parents' or legal guardians'
gender, in that we require the title IV-E agency to indicate whether
each self identifies as ``male'' or ``female'' and made the same change
for foster parent(s) in paragraph (e).
Section 1355.44(h)(15) and (16) Inter/Intrajurisdictional Adoption or
Guardianship
In paragraphs (h)(15) through (h)(16), we require the title IV-E
agency to report information on the jurisdiction where the child was
placed for the adoption or legal guardianship.
Comment: One commenter indicated that collecting information on
private or international adoptions will impose additional workload on
staff and will require policy, training, and information system
changes.
Response: We do not expect that reporting these data elements would
require additional work or training for the title IV-E agency since
they apply only to children who are under the placement and care
responsibility of the title IV-E agency when they exit foster care to
adoption or guardianship. The title IV-E agency would have been
reporting the children while in foster care, and thus would know where
they placed these children, and whether it is in another country or by
a private agency through an arrangement with the title IV-E agency. As
we stated in the 2015 NPRM, similar information on adoptions is already
collected in the current AFCARS.
Comment: A commenter was concerned that interjurisdictional and
intrajurisdictional are too much alike and will continually be
confused.
Response: We believe the regulation is clear. The response options
for reporting where a child is placed for adoption or guardianship
within the U.S. are limited to placements within or outside of the
title IV-E agency's jurisdiction. We can provide technical assistance
during implementation to agencies that need it.
Section 1355.44(h)(17) Adoption or Guardianship Placing Agency
In paragraph (h)(17), we require the title IV-E agency to report
the agency that placed the child for adoption or legal guardianship. We
received no comments on this data element and have retained the
language proposed in the 2015 NPRM.
Section 1355.44(h)(18) Assistance Agreement Type
In paragraph (h)(18), we require the title IV-E agency to report
the type of assistance agreement that the child has from five response
options: Title IV-E adoption assistance agreement; State/tribal
adoption assistance agreement; Adoption-Title IV-E agreement non-
recurring expenses only; Adoption-Title IV-E agreement Medicaid only;
Title IV-E guardianship assistance agreement; State/tribal guardianship
assistance agreement; or no agreement. We originally proposed to
collect information about whether a child was receiving a title IV-E
adoption or guardianship assistance subsidy in a separate data file,
which we explained in the preamble discussion for section 1355.45 that
we removed for the final rule. Since we are still interested in knowing
how a child is supported when he or she exits to adoption or
guardianship, we now collect information on title IV-E assistance
agreements and non-title IV-E assistance agreements in the out-of-home
care data file. We also have a response option for ``no agreement'' if
a child exits out-of-home care to adoption or guardianship without an
assistance agreement. We did not receive comments on this data element
as proposed in the 2015 NPRM as section 1355.44(c)(1).
Section 1355.44(h)(19) Siblings in Adoptive or Guardianship Home
In paragraph (h)(19), we require title IV-E agencies to report the
number of siblings of the child who are in the same adoptive or
guardianship home as the child.
Comment: We received several comments to our 2015 NPRM proposal to
collect information on siblings, which we also discussed in paragraph
(b). In general, several states and a national organization
representing state child welfare agencies agreed that the issue of
sibling placement is important at the practice level when planning for
children, but is better captured as a qualitative data set. Commenters
noted it may not be possible for the caseworker to know whether the
child has siblings and if so how many because agencies encounter
multiple overlapping sibling groups, uncertain parentage, and mixed
biological, legal, and stepparent relationships. They had concerns and
questions about the 2015 NPRM proposal on siblings (which were in the
sections 1355.43(e) and 1355.44 of the 2015 NPRM) including the
definition of siblings, reporting sibling record numbers, and the
reliability and consistency of the data. Specifically related to
siblings placed together in adoption or guardianship, commenters had
questions about whether and when to report the child record number for
a sibling who exited to adoption or legal guardianship and one state
commented that sibling information is not carried into TPR and adoption
cases and so the agency would not be able to report if a child in out-
of-home care is placed in the same setting as a sibling who is adopted.
One commenter suggested that we simplify the reporting and require
agencies to report if siblings who exited foster care were placed
together in the same adoptive or guardianship home.
Response: We carefully reviewed the comments and suggestions and
while we understand the concerns raised, we determined that it is
important to continue to require title IV-E agencies to report
information about siblings. As we noted in the preamble to the 2015
NPRM, section 471(a)(31)(A) of the Act requires title IV-E agencies to
make reasonable efforts to place siblings removed from their home in
the same foster care, kinship guardianship, or adoptive placement,
unless such a placement is contrary to the safety or well-being of any
of the siblings. However, we acknowledge that there are many issues
that make collecting data on siblings difficult and we were persuaded
to revise the sibling data elements to address commenter concerns and
simplify reporting. Therefore, we revised the regulation to require the
agency to report the number of the child's siblings who are in the same
adoptive or guardianship home as
[[Page 90560]]
the child. We believe that this data element, along with the data
elements in paragraph (b) related to siblings placed together in out-
of-home care, are less complicated than the 2015 NPRM proposal and will
yield useful information about siblings.
Section 1355.44(h)(20) Available ICWA Adoptive Placements
In paragraph (h)(20), if a state title IV-E agency indicated
``yes'' to paragraph (b)(4) or indicated ``yes, ICWA applies'' to
paragraph (b)(5), we require that the state title IV-E agency to
indicate which adoptive placements from a list of four were willing to
accept placement of the Indian child. This is the same as paragraph
(i)(26) proposed in the 2016 SNPRM.
Comment: A few state and tribal commenters recommend this data
element be removed. One state believes that while it is `nice to know'
which placements are `willing', the more salient questions are whether
the preferences were followed in regard to the child's adoption and, if
not, why not. Another commenter is concerned the language seems to
leave the answer open to a very subjective interpretation of ``were
available/willing to accept placement'' and answering ``yes'' or ``no''
does not document diligent or active efforts to ensure the child is
adopted by an ICWA compliant placement. That commenter suggests
replacing it with which ICWA placement preferences were pursued to
accept a placement for adoption. One tribal commenter expressed concern
about asking which ICWA placement preferences were willing to accept
placement because if there are not enough willing Indian foster and
adoptive homes, it may appear that tribes are disinterested in
providing homes for Indian children.
Response: We were not persuaded to remove the data element
indicating the availability of adoptive placements that meet ICWA's
placement preferences. The availability of adoptive placements that
meet ICWA's preferences is critical for meeting the purposes of ICWA.
This information is essential for ACF to determine whether resources
are needed for recruitment to increase the availability of AI/AN homes
that can meet ICWA's placement preferences for adoption. Under the
BIA's regulation at 25 CFR 23.130, whether a home is available is not a
subjective state title IV-E agency determination but rather is evidence
offered by the state title IV-E agency to the court that there is good
cause to deviate from ICWA's placement preferences in a particular case
where there is also evidence that the state title IV-E agency conducted
a diligent search to identify a placement that meets the preferences
(25 CFR 23.130).
Section 1355.44(h)(21) Adoption Placement Preferences Under ICWA
In paragraph (h)(21), if a state title IV-E agency indicated
``yes'' to paragraph (b)(4) or indicated ``yes, ICWA applies'' to
paragraph (b)(5), we require the state title IV-E agency indicate
whether each placement reported in paragraph (h)(1) meets the placement
preferences of ICWA in 25 U.S.C. 1915(a) by indicating with whom the
Indian child is placed from a list of five response options. This is
similar to paragraph (i)(27) as proposed in the 2016 SNPRM, except that
we changed the response option ``none'' to ``placement does not meet
ICWA placement preferences.''
Comment: One commenter recommends adding a data element to collect
information on whether the tribe supported the placement and adoption
of the child.
Response: We are not making a change as a result of this comment.
Rather, we are retaining the data elements as proposed to require that
the state title IV-E agency report certain information on adoptive
placement preferences, which are requirements in ICWA at 25 U.S.C.
1915(a), if the Indian child exited foster care to adoption. Collecting
information on whether the tribe supported the placement and adoption
of the child is not required by ICWA at 25 U.S.C. 1915(a).
Section 1355.44(h)(22) Good Cause Under ICWA
In paragraph (h)(22), if a state title IV-E agency indicated
``yes'' to paragraph (b)(4) or indicated ``yes, ICWA applies'' to
paragraph (b)(5), we require that if the state title IV-E agency
indicated ``placement does not meet ICWA placement preferences'' in
paragraph (h)(21), the state title IV-E agency indicate whether the
court determined by clear and convincing evidence, on the record or in
writing, a good cause to depart from the ICWA placement preferences (25
U.S.C. 1915(a)) or to depart from the placement preferences of the
Indian child's tribe (25 U.S.C. 1915(c)). This is similar to paragraph
(i)(28) as proposed in the 2016 SNPRM, except that we updated the
language consistent with 25 CFR 23.132.
Comment: The national organization representing state child welfare
agencies recommended removing this data element, or alternatively,
modifying this data element to read ``indicate whether there is a court
order that indicates the court's basis for the finding of good cause.''
Response: We are not persuaded to remove this data element for the
reasons we set forth in the preamble to the 2016 SNPRM. However, the
final rule does not include a requirement for the state to report only
if the determination was made in a court order. We revised the data
element to be consistent with the BIA's regulations at 25 CFR
23.132(c). Now, states are to indicate whether the court determined by
clear and convincing evidence on the record or in writing, a good cause
to depart from the ICWA placement preferences under 25 U.S.C. 1915(a)
or to depart from the placement preferences of the Indian child's tribe
under 25 U.S.C. 1915(c). This provides states with multiple options for
obtaining the information.
Section 1355.44(h)(23) Basis for Good Cause
In paragraph (h)(23), if a state title IV-E agency indicated
``yes'' to paragraph (b)(4) or indicated ``yes, ICWA applies'' to
paragraph (b)(5), and the state title IV-E agency indicated ``placement
does not meet ICWA placement preferences'' in paragraph (h)(22), we
require that the state title IV-E agency indicate the state court's
basis for the determination of good cause to depart from ICWA placement
preferences, from a list of five response options. This is similar to
paragraph (i)(29) as proposed in the 2016 SNPRM except that we updated
the language consistent with 25 CFR 23.132; removed the response option
``other''; and added a response option ``The presence of a sibling
attachment that can be maintained only through a particular
placement.''
Comment: The national organization representing state child welfare
agencies recommends removing the courts basis for the finding of good
cause so that states can focus on the one essential data file element
to understand how many Indian children exited the child welfare system
to a permanent adoption placement. Another commenter requested
clarification regarding what an ``other'' good cause might be, and
recommended that if ``other'' is selected, the worker must enter into a
narrative field explanation of the court's finding.
Response: We were not persuaded to remove the data element
indicating the reasons for good cause not to place according to ICWA
placement preferences. As we indicated in the preamble to the 2016
SNPRM, reporting information on good cause will help agencies better
understand why the ICWA placement preferences are not followed. In
addition, such information will aid in targeting training and resources
needed to assist states in improving Indian child outcomes.
[[Page 90561]]
However, we integrated the ICWA-related data elements into other
sections of the final rule, thereby moving the data elements on
adoption placement preferences proposed in the 2016 SNPRM in paragraph
(i) to paragraph (h) and modified the list of reasons for the state
court's basis for the determination of good cause to depart from ICWA
placement preferences in ICWA to be consistent with 25 CFR 23.132(c) of
the BIA regulations. The possible reasons no longer include the option
of ``other'' and now include the following options: Request of one or
both of the child's parents; request of the Indian child; the
unavailability of a suitable placement after a determination by the
court that a diligent search was conducted to find suitable placements
meeting the placement preferences in ICWA at 25 U.S.C. 1915(a) but none
has been located; the extraordinary physical, mental, or emotional
needs of the Indian child, such as specialized treatment services that
may be unavailable in the community where families who meet the
placement preferences live; and the presence of a sibling attachment
that can be maintained only through a particular placement.
Section 1355.45 Adoption and Guardianship Assistance Data File Elements
In this section, we require the title IV-E agency to report: (1)
Information on the title IV-E agency submitting the adoption and
guardianship assistance data file and the report date; (2) basic
demographic information on each child, including the child's date of
birth, gender, race and ethnicity; (3) information in the child's title
IV-E adoption or guardianship agreement, including the date of adoption
or guardianship finalization, and amount of subsidy, and 4) information
about the agreement termination date, if applicable.
We retained many of the data elements proposed in the 2015 NPRM,
but modified section 1355.45 of the final rule to remove the proposal
to collect information regarding: Whether a child is born in the U.S.,
non-recurring costs, inter/intra-jurisdictional adoption or
guardianship, inter-jurisdictional adoption or guardianship
jurisdiction, adoption or guardianship placing agency information, and
sibling information. These response options ensure that title IV-E
agencies report only the essential core set of data elements that we
describe below.
Section 1355.45(a) General Information
In paragraph (a), we require that the title IV-E agency report
information about the title IV-E agency, report date and child record
number.
Section 1355.45(a)(1) Title IV-E Agency
In paragraph (a)(1), we require that the title IV-E agency indicate
the title IV-E agency responsible for submitting AFCARS data to ACF. We
received no comments on this element.
Section 1355.45(a)(2) Report Date
In paragraph (a)(2), we require that a title IV-E agency indicate
the current report period. We received no comments on this element.
Section 1355.45(a)(3) Child Record Number
In paragraph (a)(3), we require that the title IV-E agency report
the child's record number. We received no relevant comments on this
element.
Section 1355.45(b) Child Demographics
In paragraph (b), we require that the title IV-E agency report
information on the child's date of birth, gender, race and ethnicity.
Section 1355.45(b)(1) Child's Date of Birth
In paragraph (b)(1), we require the agency to report the child's
birthdate. This data element will be used with paragraph (d) to
determine whether the child is in either the ``pre-adolescent child
adoption'' or ``older child adoption'' category. We received no
comments on this element.
Section 1355.45(b)(2) Child's Gender
In paragraph (b)(2) we require the title IV-E agency to indicate
whether the child is ``male'' or ``female'' as appropriate.
Comment: One state commented that all gender fields should include
additional response option(s) to capture transgender, gender fluid, and
other non-binary individuals.
Response: We revised the name of the data elements in sections
1355.44(e) and (h) to require title IV-E agencies to report the gender
of the foster parent(s), adoptive parent(s), and legal guardian(s).
Section 1355.45(b)(3) Child's Race
In paragraph (b)(3), we require the title IV-E agency to indicate a
child's race as determined by the child or the child's parent(s) or
legal guardians from a list categories described in paragraphs
(b)(3)(i) through (b)(3)(viii) of this section.
Comment: One group recommended asking about membership in a
federally-recognized tribe. One commenter suggested that regional
standards and practices should be documented regarding Latinos that
show over-representation and outcome disparities, stating that without
specific efforts to collect data related to Indian, African American
and Latino families, the information will continually be left out of
scrutiny and interpretation of data will lack the substance necessary
to identify successful efforts and areas that are lacking.
Response: The language used reflects the OMB Revised Standards for
the Classification of Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity, standardizing
federal data collection. We agree that requiring state title IV-E
agencies to collect and report data that could identify a child as an
Indian child as defined in ICWA is of paramount importance. Therefore,
while we did not revise this data element, we require additional
information on the child's tribal membership or eligibility for tribal
membership in the out-of-home care population.
Section 1355.45(b)(4) Hispanic or Latino Ethnicity
In paragraph (b)(4), we require the title IV-E agency to indicate a
child's ethnicity as determined by the child or the child's parent(s)
or legal guardian(s). We received no comments on this element.
In paragraph (c) we require that the title IV-E agency report
information on the type of assistance agreement, and the subsidy
amount.
Comment: Several national organizations recommended that we require
title IV-E agencies to report additional data elements including: when
a successor adopter or guardian has been named in the agreement for
Adoption Assistance or guardianship assistance, whether the successor
became the adoptive parent or guardian, whether the caretaker has been
informed of federal and/or state post-permanency services available
outside of the adoption assistance or guardianship assistance funds
subsidy and/or Medicaid specific benefits. Commenters recommend these
additional data elements because they believe the data can provide more
information about what work is needed to ensure successors are named in
the agreements whenever possible, and to prevent unnecessary re-entry
into foster care.
Response: We considered these suggestions, but did not make changes
in response. States information systems differ and include information
useful for their own internal purposes, but not mandated by AFCARS. We
encourage states to consider collecting data that
[[Page 90562]]
helps states identify how to ensure successors are named in the
agreements whenever possible, and to evaluate how to prevent
unnecessary re-entry into foster care, but we do not require that they
report those data to AFCARS.
Section 1355.45(c)(1) Assistance Agreement Type
In paragraph (c)(1) we require the title IV-E agency to report
whether the child is or was in a finalized adoption with a title IV-E
adoption assistance agreement or in a legal guardianship with a title
IV-E guardianship assistance agreement, pursuant to sections 473(a) and
473(d) of the Act, in effect during the report period.
Comment: One state requested clarification regarding why title IV-E
agencies must report information on only those children that have a
title IV-E agreement. The state expressed concern that this limited
information does not present a complete picture of adoptions across the
state.
Response: We did not make changes in response to these suggestions.
In the 2015 NPRM, we proposed one data element with narrowed response
options since we propose to collect information on children under title
IV-E adoption and guardianship assistance agreements only, rather than
both title IV-E and non-title IV-E agreements. This is in line with our
responsibility regarding matters related to children receiving Federal
benefits, such as Federal budget projections. We encourage states to
consider collecting data that helps states to evaluate and implement
state law, but we do not require that they report those data to AFCARS.
Section 1355.45(c)(2) Adoption or Guardianship Subsidy Amount
In paragraph (c)(2), we require the title IV-E agency to report the
per diem dollar amount of the financial subsidy paid to the adoptive
parent(s) or legal guardian(s) on behalf of the child during the last
month of the current report period, if any.
Comment: One national organization commented that children under
guardianship of others and adopted children do not have open service
cases even when there is a subsidy attached. The financial information
for continuation of subsidy is captured by many states in other
systems. Reporting on the expanded population would require a
significant change in the application and report programs and laws and
policies in many states.
Response: We are not persuaded to make a change based on this
comment. We currently do not collect data on children receiving ongoing
financial assistance after an adoption or guardianship is finalized,
though those children typically receive benefits for many years, until
age 18 and possibly up to age 21. When AFCARS was originally
implemented, such children were a smaller portion of the caseload and
program cost. However, in recent years, the adoption assistance
caseload alone has grown dramatically, and now represents approximately
70 percent of title IV-E beneficiaries. As we explained in the 2015
NPRM, since title IV-E funds are reimbursed for adoption assistance and
guardianship assistance costs, this information is essential for
conducting budget projections and program planning for both title IV-E
adoption assistance and guardianship assistance programs.
Section 1355.45(d) Adoption Finalization or Guardianship Legalization
Date
In paragraph (d), we require the title IV-E agency to report the
date that the title IV-E adoption was finalized or the guardianship
became legalized. This data element will be used with paragraph (b) to
determine whether the child is in either the ``pre-adolescent child
adoption'' or ``older child adoption'' category. We received no
comments on this element.
Section 1355.45(e) Agreement Termination Date
In paragraph (e), we require that if the title IV-E agency
terminated the adoption assistance or guardianship assistance agreement
or the agreement expired during the reporting period, the title IV-E
agency to report the month, day and year that the agreement terminated
or expired.
Comment: Several national organizations recommended that the title
IV-E agency report the reason why guardianship and adoption agreements
are terminated so that agencies can capture more information about
dissolutions and identify what additional supports may be needed for
the children involved, and recommended that such reasons include: Death
of adoptive parent or guardian, incapacitation, dissolution, child
reached age of majority, or other. One state requested that we explain
the value of collecting Agreement Termination Dates, especially with
not collecting why the agreements are closing.
Response: We considered these suggestions, but did not make changes
in response to commenters because we determined that at a national
level we do not have a use for or need for this level of detail to
determine how many agreements exist. We are collecting the end dates
for title IV-E adoption and guardianship assistance agreements because
combined with the child's date of birth they will allow us to calculate
more accurately the number of children served under title IV-E
agreements, as well as the incidence of dissolution of adoption and
legal guardianships for children supported by the title IV-E programs.
States may include such additional data in their data system if it is
useful for their own internal purposes, but not mandated by AFCARS.
Section 1355.46 Compliance
In section 1355.46, we specify the type of assessments we will
conduct to determine the accuracy of a title IV-E agency's data, the
data that is subject to these assessments, the compliance standards and
the manner in which the title IV-E agency initially determined to be
out of compliance can correct its data.
Comment: Overall, states that commented believe these compliance
standards may negatively affect the status of a state's AFCARS
Improvement Plan or SACWIS improvements, and that compliance with the
new data requirements may require states to rebuild existing systems or
may be incompatible with recent SACWIS improvements.
Response: We recognize that agencies will need to make revisions
and improvements to their electronic case management systems for the
final rule. We intend to close out all AFCARS Improvement Plans and we
will work with title IV-E agencies to meet the final rule requirements.
Enhancements to the title IV-E agency's case management system to
support the revised data collection requirements may be eligible for
title IV-E administrative funds for development costs.
Comment: One commenter pointed out that there appears to be no
administrative process for a state to challenge ACF's initial
assessment of data noncompliance.
Response: That is correct. Rather, we provide the title IV-E agency
with an opportunity to appeal the ``final'' determination of compliance
to the HHS Departmental Appeals Board (DAB) after the agency has had an
opportunity to submit corrected data and come into compliance. This is
covered in section 1355.47(d) ``Appeals.''
Section 1355.46(a) Files Subject to Compliance
In paragraph (a), we specify that ACF will determine whether a
title IV-E
[[Page 90563]]
agency's AFCARS data are in compliance with section 1355.43 and data
file and quality standards described in paragraphs (c) and (d). We
specify that ACF will exempt records related to a child in either data
file whose 18th birthday occurred in a prior report period and will
exempt records relating to a child in the adoption and guardianship
assistance data file who is in a title IV-E guardianship from a
compliance determination as described in paragraph (e) of this section.
Comment: Several commenters believe that the data and the multiple
data file requirements are complex and thus compliance failures and
penalties are unavoidable.
Response: We understand the commenters to be concerned that because
of the revised data file standards, it will be more difficult for a
state to submit compliant data. The standards we set forth are
authorized by the law and in line with the requirement that the data
submitted to us is reliable and consistent. We established the specific
standards for compliance consistent with our current requirements (see
Appendix E to part 1355 of current regulations). Furthermore, the
statute allows a six-month period for corrective action during which
time technical assistance will be available to assist title IV-E
agencies in submitting compliant data. The approach is also consistent
with the how we implemented the NYTD.
Section 1355.46(b) Errors
In paragraph (b), we outline the definitions of errors in
paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(5) regarding missing data, invalid data,
internally inconsistent data, cross-file errors, and tardy
transactions. We also provide for how we will identify those errors
when we assess information collected in a title IV-E agency's out-of-
home care data file (per section 1355.44) and adoption and guardianship
assistance data file (per section 1355.45).
Comment: Several commenters requested clarification about what ACF
will consider ``errors'' for elements, whether errors would be
identified by internal consistency checks within the data file, and
whether errors would be identified by review during a later AFCARS or
SACWIS audit.
Response: We identify five errors in paragraph (b) that we will
assess: Missing data, invalid data, internally inconsistent data,
cross-file errors, and tardy transactions. Assessing these errors will
help ACF determine if the title IV-E agency's data files meet the data
file submission and data quality standards outlined in paragraphs (c)
and (d) of this section. ACF will develop and issue error
specifications in separate guidance.
Comment: One commenter requested clarification about whether a
title IV-E agency will be non-compliant if the data are incomplete or
unavailable for the title IV-E kinship guardian assistance program or
extension of foster care to age 21 programs.
Response: We'd like to clarify that the regulation text specifies
that ACF will exempt records related to a child in either data file
whose 18th birthday occurred in a prior report period and will exempt
records relating to a child in the adoption and guardianship assistance
data file who is in a title IV-E guardianship from a compliance
determination as described in paragraph (e) of this section. However,
this information is still important to ACF and we plan to ensure that
title IV-E agencies submit quality data through such means as program
improvement plans, targeted technical assistance, or data quality
utilities.
Comment: One commenter stated that it is unreasonable that we are
not publishing more detailed information on compliance standards in the
regulation. Further, the commenter stated that changing internal
consistency and cross-check standards ``as needed,'' results in the
compliance target becoming elusive.
Response: We understand the commenter is concerned that we have
chosen not to promulgate details on error specifications and checks
through notice and comment rulemaking. Instead, we plan to publish
these error checks outside of formal rulemaking through official
technical bulletins and policy. This provides us the flexibility to
update and revise them as needed to keep pace with changing and
advancing technology. This is consistent with the approach we have
taken with the NYTD compliance checks.
Comment: A national organization representing state child welfare
agencies, four states and two other organizations objected to the 30
day transaction date timeframe for paragraphs (d)(2) and (g)(2) stating
that it is an insufficient timeframe for entering the removal and exit
dates. They recommended that it remain at 60 days as in current AFCARS.
They cited the burden of the shorter timeframe, commenting that it is
unduly onerous and would be a challenge for local agencies to meet.
Response: We understand the concern; however, we retained our
proposal for the 30 day timeframe because ensuring a title IV-E
agency's timely entry of removal and exit dates is critical to quality
data. Additionally, as is the current practice in AFCARS, these errors
are only assessed once. So, if the date was not entered in a timely
manner, we will assess the title IV-E agency out of compliance for the
report period the event occurred only and we will not re-assess it in
the next and future report periods. The penalty, thus, will only be
applied to the applicable six-month report period. We have retained
paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(5) as proposed in the 2015 NRPM.
Section 1355.46(c) Data File Standards
In paragraph (c), we set the data file submission standards (timely
submission, proper format, and acceptable cross-file) for ACF to
determine that the title IV-E agency's AFCARS data is in compliance. In
paragraph (c)(1), we require that the title IV-E agency submit AFCARS
data within 45 days of the end of each six-month report period. In
paragraph (c)(2), we require that a title IV-E agency send us its data
files in a format that meets our specifications and submit 100 percent
error-free data on limited basic information including title IV-E
agency name, report period, the child's demographic information for the
out-of-home care data file and the adoption and guardianship assistance
data file.
Comment: Four title IV-E agencies do not support the deadline of 30
days after the end of the report period to submit the data file
believing it will limit the agency's ability to provide an accurate
data file. They stated that they would have less time to ensure that
all data is entered, provide direction to the field on any needed data
corrections, and test and validate the data file before submitting it
to ACF. The commenters recommended staying with the current 45 day
submission deadline.
Response: We modified the regulation to allow title IV-E agencies
up to 45 days after the end of the report period to transmit the AFCARS
data files. However, we wish to emphasize that the purpose of this
transmission period is to extract the data and ensure the file is in
the proper format for transmission. Agencies should review the
information in the system, including information used in AFCARS
reporting, on a regular and ongoing basis in accordance with the title
IV-B quality assurance system requirements. This is consistent with
current practice with AFCARS.
Comment: A handful of commenters were concerned about ACF's data
quality requirements of 100 percent compliance with data format
standards believing it is unlikely any title IV-E agencies will be able
to meet these standards. In addition, there was
[[Page 90564]]
confusion by some commenters misunderstanding that we expected 100
percent freedom from ``cross-file'' errors.
Response: We proposed 100 percent compliance for data format
standards only for proper format and on certain data elements specified
in section 1355.46(c)(2) because the proper format is crucial to the
proper transmission and receipt of the data file. The administrative
elements (agency, date, etc.) and the basic demographic data elements
specified in section 1355.46(c)(2) contain information that is readily
available to the title IV-E agency and is essential to our ability to
analyze the data and determine whether the title IV-E agency is in
compliance with the remaining data standards. The five data elements in
the adoption assistance data file are basic administrative data
elements and are directly linked to calculating adoption incentive
payments under section 473A of the Act. Also, based on our experience
with the existing AFCARS and with the NYTD, we have found that problems
in these data elements are often the result of minor errors that can be
rectified easily. We therefore believe that a 100 percent data format
compliance standard for these basic and critical data elements
specified in section 1355.46(c)(2) is appropriate. The approach is also
consistent with how we implemented the NYTD. We will issue guidance on
cross-file compliance during implementation.
Comment: One state suggested that ACF use a method similar to the
NCANDS transmission method noting it is much simpler and more direct.
Response: The transmission method for AFCARS is outside the scope
of the regulations as we did not regulate the specific method used by
AFCARS, only that it must be electronic. However, we should note that
the current AFCARS method is in compliance with federal security
protocols for the proper submission of data files.
Comment: One commenter believes the data file structure needs to be
clarified and the public should have the opportunity to comment.
Another commenter asked if ACF will provide technical assistance or
support to states that are unable to meet the AFCARS basic file
standards.
Response: As we explained in the preamble to section 1355.46(b), we
did not regulate the technical requirements for formatting or
transmitting the AFCARS data files because of inevitable future
advances in technology. Instead, we will issue technical requirements
and specifications through official ACF policy and technical bulletins.
Further, we will consider what form of technical assistance may be
needed by title IV-E agencies to meet the AFCARS data file submission
standards. The approach is also consistent with the how we implemented
the NYTD.
Section 1355.46(d) Data Quality Standards
In paragraph (d)(1), we specify the data quality standards for the
title IV-E agency to be in compliance with AFCARS requirements. We
received no substantive comments on this section.
In paragraph (d)(2), we specify the acceptable cross-file
standards, which are that the data files must be free of cross-file
errors that exceed the acceptable thresholds, as defined by ACF. In the
2015 NPRM, we proposed this as paragraph (c)(3) of this section. We did
not receive comments on this paragraph. However, to match the
requirement in paragraph (e)(2) of this section, we moved the
acceptable cross-file requirement to paragraph (d) with the data
quality standards. If each data file meets the data file standards of
paragraph (c) of this section, ACF will then determine whether each
data file meets the data quality standards in paragraph (d) of this
section.
Section 1355.46(e) Compliance Determination and Corrected Data
In paragraph (e), we specify the methodology for determining
compliance and a title IV-E agency's opportunity to submit corrected
data when ACF has initially determined that the title IV-E agency's
original submission does not meet the AFCARS standards. We received no
specific comments on this section and have retained the proposed
language with minor conforming edits.
Section 1355.46(f) Noncompliance
In paragraph (f), we specify that a title IV-E agency has not
complied with the AFCARS requirements if the title IV-E agency either
does not submit corrected data files, or does not submit corrected data
files that meet the compliance standards in paragraphs (c) and (d) of
this section. We received no specific comments on this section and have
retained the proposed language with minor conforming edits.
Section 1355.46(g) Other Assessments
In paragraph (g), we explain that ACF may use other monitoring
tools that are not explicitly mentioned in regulation to determine
whether the title IV-E agency meets all AFCARS requirements. We
received no specific comments on this section and have retained the
proposed language with minor conforming edits.
Section 1355.47 Penalties
In section 1355.47 we provide for how ACF will assess and take
penalties for a title IV-E agency's noncompliance with AFCARS
requirements outlined in section 1355.46.
Section 1355.47(a) Federal Funds Subject to a Penalty
In paragraph (a), we specify the pool of funds that are subject to
a penalty for noncompliance as required by law. We did not receive
specific comments on paragraph (a) and have retained the proposed
language with minor conforming edits.
Section 1355.47(b) Penalty Amounts
In paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2), we specify the penalty amounts for
noncompliance and continued noncompliance as required by section
474(f)(2) of the Act.
Comment: Many of commenters, particularly title IV-E agencies, do
not support the penalty provisions as proposed in section 1355.47 and
suggested a variety of alternatives, including phasing in the
penalties, providing incentives, reinvesting penalties back into data
improvements, or waiving penalties. A couple commenters believed that
the penalty structure did not allow for a graduated or proportional
structure to assess penalties reflective of an individual agency's
level of compliance, or any consideration of past efforts to produce
the required data. A few commenters supported penalties as a method to
incentivize title IV-E agencies to fulfill their duties. One
organization suggested applying the penalties to the optional title IV-
E programs including kinship guardianship and extended foster care.
Response: We did not revise the penalty provisions in response to
these comments because the penalties are required by law and the
structure is consistent with section 474(f) of the Act. There is no
provision in the law for incentives or reinvestment of penalties. The
penalty structure applies to all title IV-E agencies and, we have
retained our proposal not to apply the penalty to the optional title
IV-E programs. We are allowing ample time for state and tribal title
IV-E agencies to modify their systems to report quality data as
required by the final rule.
Comment: A couple states oppose the timeframe for corrective action
and penalties for subsequent reporting periods and one commenter
suggested that we allow time for system
[[Page 90565]]
improvements as part of corrective action before ACF issues a penalty.
Response: We did not make any changes to address this comment
because the statute specifies the time period for corrective action and
thus we are unable to provide a lengthier timeframe for corrections to
systems or otherwise.
Comment: A state commenter asked if there will be technical
assistance and support offered to title IV-E agencies that are unable
to meet basic file standards.
Response: We will continue to conduct AFCARS assessment reviews to
address situations expressed by the commenter about quality data and
engage state and tribal title IV-E agencies in technical assistance in
all aspects of the implementation of AFCARS.
Section 1355.47(c) Penalty Reduction From Grant
In paragraph (c), we specify that we will collect an assessed
penalty by reducing the title IV-E agency's title IV-E foster care
funding following ACF's notification of the final determination of
noncompliance. We did not receive any comments on paragraph (c).
Section 1355.47(d) Appeals
In paragraph (d), we specify that the title IV-E agency has an
opportunity to appeal a final determination that the title IV-E agency
is out of compliance and assessed financial penalties to the HHS
Departmental Appeals Board (DAB). We did not receive any comments on
paragraph (d).
VII. Regulatory Impact Analysis
Executive Order 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. The Department has determined that this final rule is
consistent with these priorities and principles. In particular, ACF has
determined that a regulation is the best and most cost effective way to
implement the statutory mandate for a data collection system regarding
children in foster care and those who exit to permanency and support
other statutory obligations to provide oversight of child welfare
programs. ACF consulted with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
and determined that this rule does meet the criteria for a significant
regulatory action under E.O. 12866. Thus, it was subject to OMB review.
ACF determined that the costs to title IV-E agencies as a result of
this rule will not be significant as defined in Executive Order 12866
(have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or
communities). Federal reimbursement under title IV-E will be available
for a portion of the costs that title IV-E agencies will incur as a
result of the revisions in this rule, depending on each agency's cost
allocation plan, information system, and other factors. Estimated
burden and costs to the federal government are provided below in the
Burden estimate section, which we estimate to be $40,749,492. As a
result of this rule, title IV-E agencies will report historical data on
children in out-of-home care and information on legal guardianships,
and we will have national data on Indian children as defined in ICWA.
Alternatives Considered:
1. ACF considered whether other existing data sets could yield
similar information. ACF determined that AFCARS is the only
comprehensive case-level data set on the incidence and experiences of
children who are in out-of-home care under the placement and care of
the title IV-E agency or who are adopted under a title IV-E adoption
assistance agreement.
2. We also received state comments to the 2016 SNPRM citing they
have few Indian children in foster care, if any. ACF considered
alternatives to collecting ICWA-related data through AFCARS, such as
providing an exemption from reporting, but alternative approaches are
not feasible due to:
AFCARS data must be comprehensive per section 479(c)(3) of
the Act and exempting some states from reporting the ICWA-related data
elements is not consistent with this statutory mandate, and would
render it difficult to use this data for development of national
policies.
Section 474(f) of the Act provides for mandatory penalties
on the title IV-E agency for non-compliance on AFCARS data that is
based on the total amount expended by the title IV-E agency for
administration of foster care activities. Therefore, we are not
authorized to permit some states to be subject to a penalty and not
others. In addition, allowing states an alternate submission process
would complicate and/or prevent the assessment of penalties per Sec.
1355.47, including penalties for failure to submit data files free of
cross-file errors, missing, invalid, or internally inconsistent data,
or tardy transactions for each data element of applicable records.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
The Secretary certifies, under 5 U.S.C. 605(b), as enacted by the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96-354), that this rule will not
result in a significant impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This final rule does not affect small entities because it is
applicable only to state and tribal title IV-E agencies.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (Pub. L. 104-4) requires agencies
to prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and benefits before
proposing any rule that may result in an annual expenditure by state,
local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private
sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for inflation). That
threshold level is currently approximately $146 million. This final
rule does not impose any mandates on state, local, or tribal
governments, or the private sector that will result in an annual
expenditure of $146 million or more.
Congressional Review
This regulation is not a major rule as defined in 5 U.S.C. 8.
Assessment of Federal Regulations and Policies on Families
Section 654 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-58) requires federal agencies to determine
whether a policy or regulation may affect family well-being. If the
agency's determination is affirmative, then the agency must prepare an
impact assessment addressing seven criteria specified in the law. This
final regulation will not have an impact on family well-being as
defined in the law.
Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132 requires that federal agencies consult with
state and local government officials in the development of regulatory
policies with Federalism implications. Consistent with E.O. 13132 and
Guidance for Implementing E.O. 13132 issued on
[[Page 90566]]
October 28, 1999, the Department must include in ``a separately
identified portion of the preamble to the regulation'' a ``federalism
summary impact statement'' (Secs. 6(b)(2)(B) & (c)(2)). The
Department's ``federalism summary impact statement'' is as follows--
``A description of the extent of the agency's prior
consultation with State and local officials''--ACF held consultation
calls for the 2015 NPRM on February 18 and 20, 2015 and public comment
period was open from February 9, 2015 to April 10, 2015 where we
solicited comments via regulations.gov, email, and postal mail. ACF
held consultation calls for the 2016 SNPRM on April 15, 22, 25, and 29,
2016 and the public comment period was open from April 7, 2016 to May
9, 2016 where we solicited comments via regulations.gov, email, and
postal mail.
``A summary of the nature of their concerns and the
agency's position supporting the need to issue the regulation''--As
we've discussed in the preamble to this final rule, many commenters to
the 2015 NPRM supported many of the revisions we proposed for AFCARS;
however, some commenters expressed concern with the burden of
additional data elements. Many commenters to the 2016 SNPRM supported
collecting ICWA-related data in AFCARS and stated that it will better
inform practice for AI/AN children. However, they also expressed
concern with the burden of additional data elements and suggested that
we pare down the overall number of data element to a core set that
collects essential information related to ICWA.
``A statement of the extent to which the concerns of State
and local officials have been met'' (Secs. 6(b)(2)(B) & 6(c)(2))--As we
discuss in the section-by-section discussion preamble, we streamlined
many data elements that we proposed in the 2015 NPRM. We also sought to
reduce duplication by integrating the ICWA-related data elements
proposed in the 2016 SNPRM into other sections of AFCARS. We expand on
these comments in the section-by-section discussion.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 35, as amended) (PRA),
all Departments are required to submit to OMB for review and approval
any reporting or recordkeeping requirements inherent in a proposed or
final rule. PRA rules require that ACF estimate the total burden
created by this final rule regardless of what information is available.
ACF provides burden and cost estimates using the best available
information. Information collection for AFCARS is currently authorized
under OMB number 0970-0422; however, this final rule significantly
changes the collection requirements by requiring title IV-E agencies to
report historical data and data related to ICWA. This final rule
contains information collection requirements in proposed Sec. 1355.44,
the out-of-home care data file, and Sec. 1355.45, the adoption and
guardianship assistance data file, that the Department has submitted to
OMB for its review. This final rule requires:
State and tribal title IV-E agencies to report information
on children who are in the out-of-home care reporting population per
Sec. 1355.42(a);
State and tribal title IV-E agencies to report information
on children who are in the adoption assistance reporting population per
Sec. 1355.42(b); and
State title IV-E agencies to report ICWA-related
information in the out-of-home care data file.
Comments to the 2015 NPRM: State title IV-E agencies and the
national organization representing state child welfare agencies felt
that our burden estimates were low, but very few states provided
estimates on burden hours or costs to implement the 2015 NPRM as a
comparison. The comments were primarily about technical or programmer
costs to modify the information system and did not include the work
associated with gathering information or training. The estimates we
received to modify a state information system ranged from 2,000 hours
to 20,000 hours.
Comments to the 2016 SNPRM: Overall, many states and the national
organization representing state child welfare agencies felt that the
burden of the 2016 SNPRM will be significantly higher than the
estimates provided. They said that reporting ICWA-related information
would require significant upgrades to the SACWIS or other case
management system to be able to report the data. States said that they
collect some information, but not all information (e.g., name of
tribes) is in an extractable data field and it is documented in case
narratives. They also stated there will be an increased workload due to
manually entering information from paper court orders or case
narratives into the system for AFCARS reporting and limited or no
electronic exchange exists in some states between the state title IV-E
agency and state court. One organization expressed concern that the
2016 SNPRM burden calculations assumed all states would be equally
impacted, and suggested that states with few Indian children, as
defined in ICWA, be allowed to format data collection in a different
way. This commenter also expressed that states with larger AI/AN
population would face a large burden for staff to meet the mandates.
Five state title IV-E agencies provided specific burden and cost
estimates and suggestions for how to calculate the estimates for the
2016 SNPRM. They ranged from:
Implementation timeframe of 24 months to 3.5 years to
design, develop, and implement system modifications.
One-time costs of $100,000 to $803,000 to make system
changes.
Annual costs of $120,000 per year to enter data from court
records.
Increase the average hourly labor rate we used in the 2016
SNPRM include hourly rates for programming staff, staff attorneys, and
paralegals because they would all be working together to implement the
requirements of the 2016 SNPRM.
Increase the time to determine whether a child is an
Indian child as defined in ICWA to 1.5 hours per child.
Base the estimates on all children entering foster care
and not limit it to those for whom the race AI/AN was indicated.
Although ACF appreciates that these agencies provided this
information on hourly and cost burden estimates, ACF received too few
estimates to reference for calculating the cost and burden associated
with this final rule. We understand the new data requirements could
impact the time workers spend providing casework directly with children
and families. However, this final rule reflects careful consideration
of input received from states and tribes and balances the need for more
current data with concerns from commenters about the burden that new
reporting requirements represent. Thus, ACF carefully considered the
statutory requirement in section 479(c)(1) of the Act to ``avoid
unnecessary diversion of resources from agencies responsible for
adoption and foster care'' and determined that the Final Rule does not
represent an unnecessary diversion of resources. ACF provides estimates
using the best available information.
Burden Estimate
The following are estimates.
[[Page 90567]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Average burden
Collection--AFCARS Number of responses per hours per Total annual
respondents respondent response burden hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recordkeeping................................... 59 2 8,204.25 968,102
Reporting....................................... 59 2 18 2,124
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................................... .............. .............. .............. 970,226
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Respondents: The 59 respondents comprise 52 state title IV-E
agencies and seven tribal title IV-E agencies, which are Indian tribes,
tribal organizations or consortium with an approved title IV-E plan
under section 479B of the Act.
Recordkeeping burden: Searching data sources, gathering
information, and entering the information into the system, developing
or modifying procedures and systems to collect, validate, and verify
the information and adjusting existing ways to comply with AFCARS
requirements, administrative tasks associated with training personnel
on the AFCARS requirements (e.g., reviewing instructions, developing
the training and manuals), and training personnel on AFCARS
requirements.
Reporting burden: Extracting the information for AFCARS reporting
and transmitting the information to ACF.
Annualized Cost to the Federal Government
Federal reimbursement under title IV-E will be available for a
portion of the costs that title IV-E agencies will incur as a result of
the revisions proposed in this rule, depending on each agency's cost
allocation plan, information system, and other factors. For this
estimate, we used the 50% FFP rate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimate
Collection--AFCARS Total annual Average hourly Total cost Federal costs
burden hours labor rate (50% FFP)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recordkeeping................................... 968,102 $84 $81,320,668 $40,660,284
Reporting....................................... 2,124 84 178,416 89,208
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................................... .............. .............. .............. 40,749,492
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assumptions for Estimates
We made a number of assumptions when calculating the burden and
costs:
To determine the number of children for which title IV-E
agencies will have to report in the out-of-home care data file, ACF
used the most recent FY 2015 AFCARS data available:
[cir] 269,509 Number of children who entered foster care during FY
2015. Of those, 6,350 children had a reported race of AI/AN.
[cir] We estimate the number of children to whom the ICWA-related
data elements apply by using as a proxy those children whose race was
reported as ``American Indian or Alaska Native'' in the most recent FY
2015 AFCARS data available. This is the best available data we can use
for the burden estimate of the ICWA-related information even though we
understand that not every child of this reported race category will be
covered under ICWA and would also include children reported by a tribal
title IV-E agency. The state title IV-E agency must report whether all
children who enter foster care may be Indian children as defined in
ICWA.
To determine the number of children for which title IV-E
agencies must report in the adoption and guardianship assistance file,
ACF used the most recent title IV-E Programs Quarterly Financial
Report, CB-496, for FY 2015. 440,934 children received title IV-E
adoption assistance and 21,173 children received guardianship
assistance.
For this final rule, we integrated the ICWA-related data
elements into other sections of the regulation. Tribal title IV-E
agencies are not required to collect the ICWA-related information.
The state title IV-E agency will be required to collect
information for approximately 98 data elements for all children who are
in both the out-of-home care reporting population and adoption and
guardianship assistance reporting population and for approximately 17
data elements on children to whom the ICWA-related data elements apply
in the out-of-home care reporting population.
Tribal title IV-E agencies will be required to collect
information for approximately 95 data elements for all children who are
in the out-of-home care reporting population and adoption and
guardianship assistance reporting population.
ACF assumed that the burden for state and tribal title IV-
E agencies to modify systems is similar to how long it would take to
make revisions to a Comprehensive Child Welfare Information Systems
(CCWIS). Currently, 36 states have an operational SACWIS and title IV-E
agencies will have the option to transition to or build a CCIWS under
the revised regulations at 45 CFR 1355.50 et sq. ACF also recognizes
that most title IV-E agencies will require revisions to electronic case
management systems to meet the requirements of this final rule. As more
title IV-E agencies build CCWIS, ACF anticipates it will lead to more
efficiency in reporting and less costs and burden associated with this
AFCARS final rule to the agencies.
After reviewing the 2015 Bureau of Labor Statistics data
and comments to the 2016 SNPRM to help determine the costs of the final
rule, ACF assumed that there will be a mix of programming, management,
caseworkers, and legal staff working to meet both the one-time and
annual requirements of this final rule. For this estimate, we used the
job roles of: Computer and Mathematical Operations (15-0000) with a
hourly wage of $41.43; Social Workers (21-1020) with a mean hourly wage
estimate of $23.88; Management Analyst (13-1111) with a mean hourly
wage estimate of $44.12; Social and Community Service Managers (11-
9151) with a mean hourly wage estimate of $33.38; and Paralegals and
Legal Assistants (23-2011) with a mean hourly wage estimate of $25.19.
Thus, ACF averaged these wages to come to an average labor rate of $42.
In order to ensure we took into account overhead costs associated with
these labor costs, ACF doubled this rate ($84).
[[Page 90568]]
Calculations for Estimates
Recordkeeping: Adding the bullets below produces a total of 968,102
record keeping hours annually.
For the out-of-home care data file, searching data
sources, gathering information, and entering the information into the
system will take on average 3 hours annually for all children who enter
foster care and 10 hours for children who are Indian children as
defined in ICWA. (3 hours x 269,509 children = 808,527 annual hours. 10
hours x 6,350 children = 63,500 annual hours. 808,527 + 63,500 =
872,027 total annual hours for this bullet.)
For the adoption and guardianship assistance data file,
updates or changes on an annual or biennial basis will take an average
of 0.2 hours annually for records of children who have an adoption
assistance agreement and 0.3 hours annually for children who have an
guardianship assistance agreement for a total annual hours of 94,539.
(0.2 hours x 440,934 children = 88,187 hours. 0.3 hours x 21,173
children = 6,352 hours. 6,352 hours + 88,187 hours = 94,539 total
annual burden hours for this bullet.)
Developing or modifying procedures and systems to collect,
validate, and verify the information and adjusting existing ways to
comply with AFCARS requirements will take on average 230 hours
annually.
Administrative tasks associated with training personnel on
the AFCARS requirements (e.g., reviewing instructions, developing the
training and manuals), and training personnel on AFCARS requirements
will take on average 1,306 hours annually.
Reporting: Extracting the information for AFCARS reporting and
transmitting the information to ACF will take on average 18 hours.
In the above estimates, ACF acknowledges: (1) ACF has used average
figures for title IV-E agencies of very different sizes and of which,
some states may have larger populations of children served than other
agencies, (2) these are rough estimates of the burden because state
title IV-E agencies have not been required previously to report ICWA-
related information in AFCARS, and (3) as described, ACF has limited
information to use in making these estimates.
OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collection of
information contained in this regulation between 30 and 60 days after
publication of this document in the Federal Register. Therefore, a
comment is best assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it
within 30 days of publication. This does not affect the deadline for
the public to comment to the Department on the proposed regulations.
Written comments to OMB or the proposed information collection should
be sent directly to the following: Office of Management and Budget,
either by fax to 202-395-6974 or by email to
OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov. Please mark faxes and emails to the
attention of the desk officer for ACF.
VIII. Tribal Consultation Statement
ACF is committed to consulting with Indian tribes and tribal
leadership to the extent practicable and permitted by law, prior to
promulgating any regulation that has tribal implications. As we
developed this rule, ACF engaged with tribes through multiples means.
The requirements in this final rule were informed by consultations with
and comments from tribal representatives.
Starting mid-2015, we began tribal consultation, conducted in
accordance with the ACF Tribal Consultation Policy (76 FR 55678) with
tribal representatives to obtain input on proposing additional AFCARS
data elements related to ICWA. There was a conference call on May 1,
2015, that was co-facilitated by CB Associate Commissioner and the
Chairperson of the ACF Tribal Advisory Committee, who also serves as
the Vice Chair of the Jamestown S'Klallam Tribal Council. Tribes were
informed of these consultations and conference calls through letters to
tribal leaders. Comments were solicited during the call to determine
essential data elements that state title IV-E agencies should report to
AFCARS including, but not limited to: Whether the requirements of ICWA
were applied to a child; notice for child welfare proceedings; active
efforts to prevent removal or to reunify the Indian child with the
child's biological or adoptive parents or Indian custodian; placement
preferences in ICWA; and terminations of parental rights for an Indian
child. Tribal representatives did not provide specific suggestions on
the call, but noted that they would provide formal comments on the 2016
SNPRM when it was issued.
In addition to the May 2015 tribal consultation, we reviewed
comments to the 2015 NPRM that suggested we include ICWA-related data
elements and we used these comments to help inform the 2016 SNPRM. We
received 45 comments to the 2015 NPRM that recommended collecting basic
information about the applicability of ICWA for children in out-of-home
care, including: Identification of American Indian and Alaska Native
children and their family structure, tribal notification and
intervention in state court proceedings, the relationship of the foster
parents and other providers to the child, decisions to place a child in
out-of-home care (including data on active efforts and continued
custody), whether a placement was licensed by an Indian tribe, whether
the placement preferences in ICWA were followed, and termination of
parental rights (both voluntary and involuntary).
After the 2016 SNPRM was published, ACF conducted additional
consultations with tribal representatives and the public via conference
calls on April 22, 25, and 27, 2016 during the public comment period.
Tribes were informed of these consultations and conference calls
through letters to tribal leaders and emails on ACF's tribal list
serves. Much of the dialogue from call attendees was supportive of the
data elements proposed in the 2016 SNPRM stating they are an important
step to allowing tribes, states, and federal agencies the ability to
develop a more detailed understanding of the unique experiences, needs,
and barriers to permanency for AI/AN children. There was also
discussion regarding how state title IV-E agencies will implement
specific data elements around qualified expert witnesses, how state
title IV-E agencies will share the data gathered with tribes, and the
process for determining whether a state title IV-E agency will be found
in non-compliance with data collection. Throughout the calls, we
encouraged tribal representatives to submit written comments during the
public comment period. We received 41 comments from tribes and 11
comments from organizations representing tribal interests, many of
which were co-signed by multiple tribes. We addressed public comments
in the section-by-section discussion preamble. This final rule was
informed by these consultations and comments.
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 1355
Adoption and foster care, Child welfare, Grant programs--social
programs.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 93.658,
Foster Care Maintenance; 93.659, Adoption Assistance; 93.645, Child
Welfare Services--State Grants).
[[Page 90569]]
Dated: October 11, 2016.
Mark H. Greenberg,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Children and Families.
Approved: October 14, 2016.
Sylvia M. Burwell,
Secretary.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, we amend 45 CFR part
1355 as follows:
PART 1355--GENERAL
0
1. The authority citation for part 1355 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 620 et seq., 42 U.S.C. 670 et seq., 42
U.S.C. 1302.
0
2. Amend Sec. 1355.40 by redesignating paragraphs (a) through (e) as
(b) through (f), adding a new paragraph (a), revising the second
sentence of newly redesignated paragraph (b)(1), and revising newly
redesignated paragraph (f) to read as follows:
Sec. 1355.40 Foster care and adoption data collection.
(a) Scope. State and tribal title IV-E agencies must follow the
requirements of this section and Appendices A through E of part 1355
until September 30, 2019. As of October 1, 2019, state and tribal title
IV-E agencies must comply with Sec. Sec. 1355.41 through 1355.47.
(b) * * *
(1) * * * The data reporting system must meet the requirements of
Sec. 1355.40(c) and electronically report certain data regarding
children in foster care and adoption. * * *
* * * * *
(f) Substantial noncompliance. Failure by a title IV-E agency to
meet any of the standards described in paragraphs (b) through (e) of
this section is considered a substantial failure to meet the
requirements of the title IV-E plan.
* * * * *
Sec. 1355.40 [Removed and Reserved]
0
3. Effective October 1, 2019, remove and reserve Sec. 1355.40.
0
4. Add Sec. Sec. 1355.41 through 1355.47 to read as follows:
Sec. 1355.41 Scope of the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and
Reporting System.
(a) This section applies to state and tribal title IV-E agencies
unless indicated for state title IV-E agencies only.
(b) An agency described in paragraph (a) of this section must
report information on the characteristics and experiences of a child in
the reporting populations described in Sec. 1355.42. The title IV-E
agency must submit the information collected to ACF on a semi-annual
basis in an out-of-home care data file and adoption assistance data
file as required in Sec. 1355.43, pertaining to information described
in Sec. Sec. 1355.44 and 1355.45 and in a format according to ACF's
specifications.
(c) Definitions. (1) Terms in 45 CFR 1355.41 through 1355.47 are
defined as they appear in 45 CFR 1355.20, except that for purposes of
data elements related to the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA),
terms that appear in Sec. 1344.44(b)(3) through (b)(8), (c)(3),
(c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(7), (d)(3), (e)(8) through (e)(11), (f)(10), and
(h)(20) through (h)(23) are defined as they appear in 25 CFR 23.2 and
25 U.S.C. 1903.
(2) For state title IV-E agencies only: If the state title IV-E
agency indicated ``yes'' to Sec. 1355.44(b)(4) or indicated ``yes,
ICWA applies'' to Sec. 1355.44(b)(5), for Sec. 1355.44(c)(1), (c)(2),
(d)(4), and (d)(5), the term ``legal guardian'' includes an Indian
custodian as defined in ICWA at 25 U.S.C. 1903 if the Indian custodian
has legal responsibility for the child.
Sec. 1355.42 Reporting populations.
(a) Out-of-home care reporting population. (1) A title IV-E agency
must report a child of any age who is in out-of-home care for more than
24 hours. The out-of-home care reporting population includes a child in
the following situations:
(i) A child in foster care as defined in Sec. 1355.20.
(ii) A child on whose behalf title IV-E foster care maintenance
payments are made and who is under the placement and care
responsibility of another public agency or an Indian tribe, tribal
organization or consortium with which the title IV-E agency has an
agreement pursuant to section 472(a)(2)(B)(ii) of the Act.
(iii) A child who runs away or whose whereabouts are unknown at the
time the child is placed under the placement and care responsibility of
the title IV-E agency.
(2) Once a child enters the out-of-home care reporting population,
the child remains in the out-of-home care reporting population through
the end of the report period in which the title IV-E agency's placement
and care responsibility ends, or a child's title IV-E foster care
maintenance payment pursuant to a title IV-E agreement per section
472(a)(2) of the Act ends, regardless of any subsequent living
arrangement.
(b) Adoption and guardianship assistance reporting population. (1)
The title IV-E agency must include in the adoption and guardianship
assistance reporting population any child who is:
(i) In a finalized adoption under a title IV-E adoption assistance
agreement pursuant to section 473(a) of the Act with the reporting
title IV-E agency that is or was in effect at some point during the
current report period; or
(ii) In a legal guardianship under a title IV-E guardianship
assistance agreement pursuant to section 473(d) of the Act with the
reporting title IV-E agency that is or was in effect at some point
during the current report period.
(2) A child remains in the adoption or guardianship assistance
reporting population through the end of the report period in which the
title IV-E agreement ends or is terminated.
Sec. 1355.43 Data reporting requirements.
(a) Report periods and deadlines. There are two six-month report
periods based on the Federal fiscal year: October 1 to March 31 and
April 1 to September 30. The title IV-E agency must submit the out-of-
home care and adoption assistance data files to ACF within 45 days of
the end of the report period (i.e., by May 15 and November 14). If the
reporting deadline falls on a weekend, the title IV-E agency has
through the end of the following Monday to submit the data file.
(b) Out-of-home care data file. A title IV-E agency must report the
information required in Sec. 1355.44 pertaining to each child in the
out-of-home care reporting population, in accordance with the
following:
(1) The title IV-E agency must report the most recent information
for the applicable data elements in Sec. 1355.44(a) and (b).
(2) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(3) of this section, the
title IV-E agency must report the most recent information and all
historical information for the applicable data elements described in
Sec. 1355.44(c) through (h).
(3) For a child who had an out-of-home care episode(s) as defined
in Sec. 1355.42(a) prior to October 1, 2019, the title IV-E agency
must report only the information for the data elements described in
Sec. 1355.44(d)(1), (g)(1) and (g)(3) for the out-of-home care
episode(s) that occurred prior to October 1, 2019.
(c) Adoption and guardianship assistance data file. A title IV-E
agency must report the most recent information for the applicable data
elements in Sec. 1355.45 that pertains to each child in the adoption
and guardianship assistance reporting population on the last day of the
report period.
[[Page 90570]]
(d) Missing information. If the title IV-E agency fails to collect
the information for a data element, the title IV-E agency must report
the element as blank or otherwise missing. The title IV-E agency is not
permitted to default or map missing information that was not collected
to a valid response option.
(e) Electronic submission. The title IV-E agency must submit the
required data files electronically and in a format according to ACF's
specifications.
(f) Record retention. The title IV-E agency must retain all records
necessary to comply with the data requirements in Sec. Sec. 1355.41
through 1355.45. The title IV-E agency's retention of such records is
not limited to the requirements of 45 CFR 92.42(b) and (c).
Sec. 1355.44 Out-of-home care data file elements.
(a) General information. (1) Title IV-E agency. Indicate the title
IV-E agency responsible for submitting the AFCARS data in a format
according to ACF's specifications.
(2) Report date. The report date corresponds with the end of the
report period. Indicate the last month and the year of the report
period.
(3) Local agency. Indicate the local county, jurisdiction or
equivalent unit that has primary responsibility for the child in a
format according to ACF's specifications.
(4) Child record number. Indicate the child's record number. This
is an encrypted, unique person identification number that is the same
for the child, no matter where the child lives while in the placement
and care responsibility of the title IV-E agency in out-of-home care
and across all report periods and episodes. The title IV-E agency must
apply and retain the same encryption routine or method for the person
identification number across all report periods. The record number must
be encrypted in accordance with ACF standards.
(b) Child information--(1) Child's date of birth. Indicate the
month, day and year of the child's birth. If the actual date of birth
is unknown because the child has been abandoned, provide an estimated
date of birth. Abandoned means that the child was left alone or with
others and the identity of the parent(s) or legal guardian(s) is
unknown and cannot be ascertained. This includes a child left at a
``safe haven.''
(2)(i) Child's gender. Indicate whether the child is ``male'' or
``female,'' as appropriate.
(ii) Child's sexual orientation. For children age 14 and older,
indicate whether the child self identifies as ``straight or
heterosexual,'' ``gay or lesbian,'' ``bisexual,'' ``don't know,''
``something else,'' or ``decline,'' if the child declined to provide
the information. Indicate ``not applicable'' for children age 13 and
under.
(3) Reason to know a child is an ``Indian Child'' as defined in the
Indian Child Welfare Act. For state title IV-E agencies only: Indicate
whether the state title IV-E agency researched whether there is reason
to know that the child is an Indian child as defined in ICWA in each
paragraph (b)(3)(i) through (vii) of this section.
(i) Indicate whether the state title IV-E agency inquired with the
child's biological or adoptive mother. Indicate ``yes,'' ``no'' or
``the biological or adoptive mother is deceased.''
(ii) Indicate whether the state title IV-E agency inquired with the
child's biological or adoptive father. Indicate ``yes,'' ``no,'' or
``the biological or adoptive father is deceased.''
(iii) Indicate whether the state title IV-E agency inquired with
the child's Indian custodian, if the child has one. Indicate ``yes,''
``no,'' or ``child does not have an Indian custodian.''
(iv) Indicate whether the state title IV-E agency inquired with the
child's extended family. Indicate ``yes'' or ``no.''
(v) Indicate whether the state title IV-E agency inquired with the
child who is the subject of the proceeding. Indicate ``yes'' or ``no.''
(vi) Indicate whether the child is a member of or eligible for
membership in an Indian tribe. Indicate ``yes,'' ``no,'' or
``unknown.''
(vii) Indicate whether the domicile or residence of the child, the
child's parent, or the child's Indian custodian is on a reservation or
in an Alaska Native village. Indicate ``yes,'' ``no,'' or ``unknown.''
(4) Application of ICWA. For state title IV-E agencies only:
Indicate whether the state title IV-E agency knows or has reason to
know, that the child is an Indian child as defined in ICWA. Indicate
``yes'' or ``no.'' If the state title IV-E agency indicated ``yes,''
then the state title IV-E agency must complete paragraphs (b)(4)(i) and
(ii). If the state title IV-E agency indicated ``no,'' then the state
title IV-E agency must leave paragraphs (b)(4)(i) and (ii) of this
section blank.
(i) Indicate the date that the state title IV-E agency first
discovered the information indicating the child is or may be an Indian
child as defined in ICWA.
(ii) Indicate all federally recognized Indian tribe (s) that may
potentially be the Indian child's tribe(s). The title IV-E agency must
submit the information in a format according to ACF's specifications.
(5) Court determination that ICWA applies. For state title IV-E
agencies only: Indicate whether a court determined that ICWA applies or
that the court is applying ICWA because it knows or has reason to know
a child is an Indian child as defined in ICWA in accordance with 25 CFR
23.107(b)(2). Indicate ``yes, ICWA applies,'' ``no, ICWA does not
apply,'' or ``no court determination.'' If the state title IV-E agency
indicated ``yes, ICWA applies,'' the state title IV-E agency must
complete paragraphs (b)(5)(i) and (ii). If the state title IV-E agency
indicated ``no, ICWA does not apply'' or ``no court determination,''
the state title IV-E agency must leave paragraphs (b)(5)(i) and (ii) of
this section blank.
(i) Indicate the date that the court determined that ICWA applies.
(ii) Indicate the Indian tribe that the court determined is the
Indian child's tribe for ICWA purposes. The title IV-E agency must
submit the information in a format according to ACF's specifications.
(6) Notification. State title IV-E agencies only: If the state
title IV-E agency indicated ``yes'' to paragraph (b)(4) or indicated
``yes, ICWA applies'' to paragraph (b)(5), the state title IV-E agency
must complete paragraphs (b)(6)(i) through (iii). Otherwise, leave
paragraphs (b)(6)(i) through (iii) of this section blank.
(i) Indicate whether the Indian child's parent or Indian custodian
was sent legal notice more than 10 days prior to the first child
custody proceeding in accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1912(a). Indicate
``yes'' or ``no.''
(ii) Indicate whether the Indian child's tribe(s) was sent legal
notice more than 10 days prior to the first child custody proceeding in
accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1912(a). Indicate ``yes'', ``no'' or ``the
child's Indian tribe is unknown''.
(iii) Indicate the Indian tribe(s) that were sent notice for a
child custody proceeding as required in ICWA at 25 U.S.C. 1912(a). The
title IV-E agency must report the information in a format according to
ACF's specifications.
(7) Request to transfer to tribal court. For state title IV-E
agencies only: If the state title IV-E agency indicated ``yes'' to
paragraph (b)(4) or indicated ``yes, ICWA applies'' to paragraph
(b)(5), indicate whether either parent, the Indian custodian, or the
Indian child's tribe requested, orally on the record or in writing,
that the state court transfer a foster-care or termination-of-parental
rights proceeding to the jurisdiction of the Indian child's tribe, in
accordance
[[Page 90571]]
with 25 U.S.C. 1911(b), at any point during the report period. Indicate
``yes'' or ``no.'' If the state title IV-E agency indicated ``yes,''
then the state title IV-E agency must complete paragraph (b)(8) of this
section. If the state title IV-E agency indicated ``no,'' the state
title IV-E agency must leave paragraph (b)(8) of this section blank.
(8) Denial of transfer. For state title IV-E agencies only: If the
state title IV-E agency indicated ``yes'' to paragraph (b)(7), indicate
whether the state court denied the request to transfer the case to
tribal jurisdiction. Indicate ``yes'' or ``no.'' If the state title IV-
E agency indicated ``yes,'' then the state title IV-E agency must
indicate in paragraphs (b)(8)(i) through (iii) of this section whether
each reason for denial ``applies'' or ``does not apply.'' Otherwise
leave these paragraphs blank.
(i) Either of the parents objected to transferring the case to the
tribal court.
(ii) The tribal court declined the transfer to the tribal court.
(iii) The state court determined good cause exists for denying the
transfer to the tribal court.
(9) Child's race. In general, a child's race is determined by the
child, the child's parent(s) or legal guardian(s). Indicate whether
each race category listed in the data elements described in paragraphs
(b)(9)(i) through (viii) of this section applies with a ``yes'' or
``no.''
(i) Race--American Indian or Alaska Native. An American Indian or
Alaska Native child has origins in any of the original peoples of North
or South America (including Central America), and maintains tribal
affiliation or community attachment.
(ii) Race--Asian. An Asian child has origins in any of the original
peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia or the Indian subcontinent
including, for example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia,
Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand and Vietnam.
(iii) Race--Black or African American. A Black or African American
child has origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa.
(iv) Race--Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. A Native
Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander child has origins in any of the
original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa or other Pacific Islands.
(v) Race--White. A white child has origins in any of the original
peoples of Europe, the Middle East or North Africa.
(vi) Race--unknown. The child or parent or legal guardian does not
know or is unable to communicate the race, or at least one race of the
child.
(vii) Race--abandoned. The child's race is unknown because the
child has been abandoned. Abandoned means that the child was left alone
or with others and the identity of the parent(s) or legal guardian(s)
is unknown and cannot be ascertained. This includes a child left at a
``safe haven.''
(viii) Race--declined. The child or parent(s) or legal guardian(s)
has declined to identify a race.
(10) Child's Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. In general, a child's
ethnicity is determined by the child or the child's parent(s) or legal
guardian(s). A child is of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity if the child is
a person of Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central American or
other Spanish culture or origin, regardless of race. Indicate whether
this category applies with a ``yes'' or ``no.'' If the child or the
child's parent(s) or legal guardian(s) does not know or is unable to
communicate whether the child is of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity,
indicate ``unknown.'' If the child is abandoned indicate ``abandoned.''
Abandoned means that the child was left alone or with others and the
identity of the parent(s) or legal guardian(s) is unknown and cannot be
ascertained. This includes a child left at a ``safe haven.'' If the
child or the child's parent(s) or legal guardian(s) refuses to identify
the child's ethnicity, indicate ``declined.''
(11)(i) Health assessment. Indicate whether the child had a health
assessment during the current out-of-home care episode. This assessment
could include an initial health screening or any follow-up health
screening per section 422(b)(15)(A) of the Act. Indicate ``yes'' or
``no.'' If the title IV-E agency indicated ``yes,'' the title IV-E must
complete paragraphs (b)(11)(ii) and (b)(12); otherwise leave paragraphs
(b)(11)(ii) and (b)(12) of this section blank.
(ii) Date of health assessment. Indicate the month, day, and year
of the child's most recent health assessment, if the title IV-E agency
reported ``yes'' in paragraph (b)(11)(i) of this section; otherwise
leave this paragraph blank.
(12) Timely health assessment. Indicate whether the date reported
in paragraph (b)(11)(ii) is within the timeframes for initial and
follow-up health screenings established by the title IV-E agency per
section 422(b)(15)(A) of the Act. Indicate ``yes'' or ``no.'' If the
title IV-E agency reported ``no'' in paragraph (b)(11)(i) of this
section, the title IV-E agency must leave this paragraph blank.
(13) Health, behavioral or mental health conditions. Indicate
whether the child was diagnosed by a qualified professional, as defined
by the state or tribe, as having a health, behavioral or mental health
condition listed below, prior to or during the child's current out-of-
home care episode as of the last day of the report period. Indicate
``child has a diagnosed condition'' if a qualified professional has
made such a diagnosis and for each data element described in paragraphs
(b)(13)(i) through (xii) of this section indicate ``existing
condition,'' ``previous condition'' or ``does not apply,'' as
applicable. Indicate ``no exam or assessment conducted'' if a qualified
professional has not conducted a medical exam or assessment of the
child and leave paragraphs (b)(13)(i) through (xii) blank. Indicate
``exam or assessment conducted and none of the conditions apply'' if a
qualified professional has conducted a medical exam or assessment and
has concluded that the child does not have one of the conditions listed
below and leave paragraphs (b)(13)(i) through (xii) blank. Indicate
``exam or assessment conducted but results not received'' if a
qualified professional has conducted a medical exam or assessment but
the title IV-E agency has not yet received the results of such an exam
or assessment and leave paragraphs (b)(13)(i) through (xii) blank.
(i) Intellectual disability. The child has, or had previously,
significantly sub-average general cognitive and motor functioning
existing concurrently with deficits in adaptive behavior manifested
during the developmental period that adversely affect the child's
socialization and learning.
(ii) Autism spectrum disorder. The child has, or had previously, a
neurodevelopment disorder, characterized by social impairments,
communication difficulties, and restricted, repetitive, and stereotyped
patterns of behavior. This includes the range of disorders from
autistic disorder, sometimes called autism or classical autism spectrum
disorder, to milder forms known as Asperger syndrome and pervasive
developmental disorder not otherwise specified.
(iii) Visual impairment and blindness. The child has, or had
previously, a visual impairment that may adversely affects the day-to-
day functioning or educational performance, such as blindness,
amblyopia, or color blindness.
(iv) Hearing impairment and deafness. The child has, or had
previously, an impairment in hearing, whether permanent or fluctuating,
that adversely affects the child's day-to-day functioning and
educational performance.
(v) Orthopedic impairment or other physical condition. The child
has, or
[[Page 90572]]
had previously, a physical deformity, such as amputations and fractures
or burns that cause contractures, or an orthopedic impairment,
including impairments caused by a congenital anomalies or disease, such
as cerebral palsy, spina bifida, multiple sclerosis, or muscular
dystrophy.
(vi) Mental/emotional disorders. The child has, or had previously,
one or more mood or personality disorders or conditions over a long
period of time and to a marked degree, such as conduct disorder,
oppositional defiant disorder, emotional disturbance, anxiety disorder,
obsessive-compulsive disorder, or eating disorder.
(vii) Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. The child has, or
had previously, a diagnosis of the neurobehavioral disorders of
attention deficit or hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or attention deficit
disorder (ADD).
(viii) Serious mental disorders. The child has, or had previously,
a diagnosis of a serious mental disorder or illness, such as bipolar
disorder, depression, psychotic disorders, or schizophrenia.
(ix) Developmental delay. The child has been assessed by
appropriate diagnostic instruments and procedures and is experiencing
delays in one or more of the following areas: physical development or
motor skills, cognitive development, communication, language, or speech
development, social or emotional development, or adaptive development.
(x) Developmental disability. The child has, or had previously been
diagnosed with a developmental disability as defined in the
Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 2000
(Pub. L. 106-402), section 102(8). This means a severe, chronic
disability of an individual that is attributable to a mental or
physical impairment or combination of mental and physical impairments
that manifests before the age of 22, is likely to continue indefinitely
and results in substantial functional limitations in three or more
areas of major life activity. Areas of major life activity include:
Self-care; receptive and expressive language; learning; mobility; self-
direction; capacity for independent living; and economic self-
sufficiency; and reflects the individual's need for a combination and
sequence of special, interdisciplinary, or generic services,
individualized supports or other forms of assistance that are of
lifelong or extended duration and are individually planned and
coordinated. If a child is given the diagnosis of ``developmental
disability,'' do not indicate the individual conditions that form the
basis of this diagnosis separately in other data elements.
(xi) Other diagnosed condition. The child has, or had previously, a
diagnosed condition or other health impairment other than those
described above, which requires special medical care, such as asthma,
diabetes, chronic illnesses, a diagnosis as HIV positive or AIDS,
epilepsy, traumatic brain injury, other neurological disorders, speech/
language impairment, learning disability, or substance use issues.
(14) School enrollment. Indicate whether the child is a full-time
student at and enrolled in (or in the process of enrolling in)
``elementary'' or ``secondary'' education, or is a full or part-time
student at and enrolled in ``post-secondary education or training'' or
``college,'' as of the earlier of the last day of the report period or
the day of exit for a child exiting out-of-home care prior to the end
of the report period. A child is still considered enrolled in school if
the child would otherwise be enrolled in a school that is currently out
of session. An ``elementary or secondary school student'' is defined in
section 471(a)(30) of the Act as a child that is: enrolled (or in the
process of enrolling) in an institution which provides elementary or
secondary education, as determined under the law of the state or other
jurisdiction in which the institution is located; instructed in
elementary or secondary education at home in accordance with a home
school law of the state or other jurisdiction in which the home is
located; in an independent study elementary or secondary education
program in accordance with the law of the state or other jurisdiction
in which the program is located, which is administered by the local
school or school district; or incapable of attending school on a full-
time basis due to the medical condition of the child, which
incapability is supported by a regularly updated information in the
case plan of the child. Enrollment in ``post-secondary education or
training'' refers to full or part-time enrollment in any post-secondary
education or training, other than an education pursued at a college or
university. Enrollment in ``college'' refers to a child that is
enrolled full or part-time at a college or university. If child has not
reached compulsory school age, indicate ``not school-age.'' If the
child has reached compulsory school-age, but is not enrolled or is in
the process of enrolling in any school setting full-time, indicate
``not enrolled.''
(15) Educational level. Indicate the highest educational level from
kindergarten to college or post-secondary education/training completed
by the child as of the last day of the report period. If child has not
reached compulsory school-age, indicate ``not school-age.'' Indicate
``kindergarten'' if the child is currently in or about to begin 1st
grade. Indicate ``1st grade'' if the child is currently in or about to
begin 2nd grade. Indicate ``2nd grade'' if the child is currently in or
about to begin 3rd grade. Indicate ``3rd grade'' if the child is
currently in or about to begin 4th grade. Indicate ``4th grade'' if the
child is currently in or about to begin 5th grade. Indicate ``5th
grade'' if the child is currently in or about to begin 6th grade.
Indicate ``6th grade'' if the child is currently in or about to begin
7th grade. Indicate ``7th grade'' if the child is currently in or about
to begin 8th grade. Indicate ``8th grade'' if the child is currently in
or about to begin 9th grade. Indicate ``9th grade'' if the child is
currently in or about to begin 10th grade. Indicate ``10th grade'' if
the child is currently in or about to begin 11th grade. Indicate ``11th
grade'' if the child is currently in or about to begin 12th grade.
Indicate ``12th grade'' if the child has graduated from high school.
Indicate ``GED'' if the child has completed a general equivalency
degree or other high school equivalent. Indicate ``Post-secondary
education or training'' if the child has completed any post-secondary
education or training, including vocational training, other than an
education pursued at a college or university. Indicate ``College'' if
the child has completed at least a semester of study at a college or
university.
(16) Educational stability. Indicate if the child is enrolled or is
in the process of enrolling in a new elementary or secondary school
prompted by an initial placement after entry into foster care or a
placement change during the report period with ``yes'' or ``no'' as
appropriate. If ``yes,'' indicate which of the applicable reason(s) for
the change in enrollment as described in paragraphs (b)(16)(i) through
(vii) of this section ``applies'' or ``does not apply;'' if ``no,'' the
title IV-E agency must leave those data elements blank.
(i) Proximity. The child enrolled in a new school because of the
distance to his or her former school.
(ii) District/zoning rules. The child enrolled in a new school
because county or jurisdictional law or regulations prohibited
attendance at former school.
(iii) Residential facility. The child enrolled in a new school
because he or she formerly attended school on the campus of a
residential facility.
(iv) Services/programs. The child enrolled in a new school to
participate in services or programs (academic,
[[Page 90573]]
behavioral or supportive services) not offered at former school.
(v) Child request. The child enrolled in a new school because he or
she requested to leave former school and enroll in new school.
(vi) Parent/Legal guardian request. The child enrolled in a new
school because his or her parent(s) or legal guardian(s) requested for
the child to leave the former school and enroll in a new school.
(vii) Other. The child enrolled in a new school for a reason other
than those detailed in paragraphs (b)(13)(i) through (vi) of this
section.
(17) Pregnant or parenting. (i) Indicate whether the child is
pregnant as of the end of the report period. Indicate ``yes'' or
``no.''
(ii) Indicate whether the child has ever fathered or bore a child.
Indicate ``yes'' or ``no.''
(iii) Indicate whether the child and his/her child(ren) are placed
together at any point during the report period, if the response in
paragraph (b)(17)(ii) is ``yes.'' Indicate ``yes,'' ``no,'' or ``not
applicable'' if the response in paragraph (b)(17)(ii) of this section
is ``no.''
(18) Special education. Indicate whether the child has an
Individualized Education Program (IEP) as defined in section 614(d)(1)
of Part B of Title I of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
(IDEA) and implementing regulations, or an Individualized Family
Service Program (IFSP) as defined in section 636 of Part C of Title I
of IDEA and implementing regulations, as of the end of the report
period. Indicate ``yes'' if the child has either an IEP or an IFSP or
``no'' if the child has neither.
(19) Prior adoption. Indicate whether the child experienced a prior
legal adoption before the current out-of-home care episode. Include any
public, private or independent adoption in the United States or
adoption in another country and tribal customary adoptions. Indicate
``yes,'' ``no'' or ``abandoned'' if the information is unknown because
the child has been abandoned. Abandoned means that the child was left
alone or with others and the identity of the parent(s) or legal
guardian(s) is unknown and cannot be ascertained. This includes a child
left at a ``safe haven.'' If the child has experienced a prior legal
adoption, the title IV-E agency must complete paragraphs (b)(19)(i) and
(ii) of this section; otherwise the title IV-E agency must leave those
data elements blank.
(i) Prior adoption date. Indicate the month and year that the most
recent prior adoption was finalized. In the case of a prior
intercountry adoption where the adoptive parent(s) readopted the child
in the United States, the title IV-E agency must provide the date of
the adoption (either the original adoption in the home country or the
re-adoption in the United States) that is considered final in
accordance with applicable laws.
(ii) Prior adoption intercountry. Indicate whether the child's most
recent prior adoption was an intercountry adoption, meaning that the
child's prior adoption occurred in another country or the child was
brought into the United States for the purposes of finalizing the prior
adoption. Indicate ``yes'' or ``no.''
(20)(i) Prior guardianship. Indicate whether the child experienced
a prior legal guardianship before the current out-of-home care episode.
Include any public, private or independent guardianship(s) in the
United States that meets the definition in section 475(7) of the Act.
This includes any judicially created relationship between a child and
caretaker which is intended to be permanent and self-sustaining as
evidenced by the transfer to the caretaker of the following parental
rights with respect to the child: Protection, education, care and
control, custody, and decision making. Indicate ``yes,'' ``no,'' or
``abandoned'' if the information is unknown because the child has been
abandoned. Abandoned means that the child was left alone or with others
and the identity of the parent(s) or legal guardian(s) is unknown and
cannot be ascertained. This includes a child left at a ``safe haven.''
If the child has experienced a prior legal guardianship, the title IV-E
agency must complete paragraph (b)(20)(ii); otherwise the title IV-E
agency must leave it blank.
(ii) Prior guardianship date. Indicate the month and year that the
most recent prior guardianship became legalized.
(21) Child financial and medical assistance. Indicate whether the
child received financial and medical assistance at any point during the
six-month report period. Indicate ``child has received support/
assistance'' if the child was the recipient of such assistance during
the report period, and indicate which of the following sources of
support described in paragraphs (b)(21)(i) through (xiii) of this
section ``applies'' or ``does not apply.'' Indicate ``no support/
assistance received'' if none of these apply.
(i) SSI or Social Security benefits. The child is receiving support
from Supplemental Security Income (SSI) or other Social Security
benefits under title II or title XVI of the Act.
(ii) Title XIX Medicaid. The child is eligible for and may be
receiving assistance under the state's title XIX program for medical
assistance, including any benefits through title XIX waivers or
demonstration programs.
(iii) Title XXI SCHIP. The child is eligible for and receiving
assistance under a state's Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP)
under title XXI of the Act, including any benefits under title XXI
waivers or demonstration programs.
(iv) State/Tribal adoption assistance. The child is receiving an
adoption subsidy or other adoption assistance paid for solely by the
state or Indian tribe.
(v) State/Tribal foster care. The child is receiving a foster care
payment that is solely funded by the state or Indian tribe.
(vi) Child support. Child support funds are being paid to the title
IV-E agency for the benefit of the child by assignment from the
receiving parent.
(vii) Title IV-E adoption subsidy. The child is determined eligible
for a title IV-E adoption assistance subsidy.
(viii) Title IV-E guardianship assistance. The child is determined
eligible for a title IV-E guardianship assistance subsidy.
(ix) Title IV-A TANF. The child is living with relatives who are
receiving a Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) cash
assistance payment on behalf of the child.
(x) Title IV-B. The child's living arrangement is supported by
funds under title IV-B of the Act.
(xi) SSBG. The child's living arrangement is supported by funds
under title XX of the Act.
(xii) Chafee Foster Care Independence Program. The child is living
independently and is supported by funds under the John F. Chafee Foster
Care Independence Program.
(xiii) Other. The child is receiving financial support from another
source not previously listed above.
(22) Title IV-E foster care during report period. Indicate whether
a title IV-E foster care maintenance payment was paid on behalf of the
child at any point during the report period that is claimed under title
IV-E foster care with a ``yes'' or ``no,'' as appropriate. Indicate
``yes'' if the child has met all eligibility requirements of section
472(a) of the Act and the title IV-E agency has claimed, or intends to
claim, Federal reimbursement for foster care maintenance payments made
on the child's behalf during the report period.
(23) Total number of siblings. Indicate the total number of
siblings of the child. A sibling to the child is his or her brother or
sister by biological, legal, or marital connection. Do not include the
child who is subject of this record in the total number. If the child
does not have
[[Page 90574]]
any siblings, the title IV-E agency must indicate ``0.'' If the title
IV-E agency indicates ``0,'' the title IV-E agency must leave
paragraphs (b)(24) and (b)(25) of this section blank.
(24) Siblings in foster care. Indicate the number of siblings of
the child who are in foster care as defined in Sec. 1355.20. A sibling
to the child is his or her brother or sister by biological, legal, or
marital connection. Do not include the child who is subject of this
record in the total number. If the child does not have any siblings,
the title IV-E agency must leave this paragraph blank. If the child has
siblings, but they are not in foster care as defined in Sec. 1355.20,
the title IV-E agency must indicate ``0.'' If the title IV-E agency
reported ``0,'' leave paragraph (b)(25) of this section blank.
(25) Siblings in living arrangement. Indicate the number of
siblings of the child who are in the same living arrangement as the
child, on the last day of the report period. A sibling to the child is
his or her brother or sister by biological, legal, or marital
connection. Do not include the child who is subject of this record in
the total number. If the child does not have any siblings, the title
IV-E agency must leave this paragraph blank. If the child has siblings,
but they are not in the same living arrangement as the child, the title
IV-E agency must indicate ``0.''
(c) Parent or legal guardian information--(1) Year of birth of
first parent or legal guardian. If applicable, indicate the year of
birth of the first parent (biological, legal or adoptive) or legal
guardian of the child. To the extent that a child has both a parent and
a legal guardian, or two different sets of legal parents, the title IV-
E agency must report on those who had legal responsibility for the
child. We are not seeking information on putative parent(s) in this
paragraph. If there is only one parent or legal guardian of the child,
that person's year of birth must be reported here. If the child was
abandoned indicate ``abandoned.'' Abandoned means that the child was
left alone or with others and the identity of the child's parent(s) or
legal guardian(s) is unknown and cannot be ascertained. This includes a
child left at a ``safe haven.''
(2) Year of birth of second parent or legal guardian. If
applicable, indicate the year of birth of the second parent
(biological, legal or adoptive) or legal guardian of the child. We are
not seeking information on putative parent(s) in this paragraph. If the
child was abandoned, indicate ``abandoned.'' Abandoned means that the
child was left alone or with others and the identity of the child's
parent(s) or legal guardian(s) is unknown and cannot be ascertained.
This includes a child left at a ``safe haven.'' Indicate ``not
applicable'' if there is not another parent or legal guardian.
(3) Tribal membership mother. For state title IV-E agencies only,
indicate whether the biological or adoptive mother is a member of an
Indian tribe. Indicate ``yes,'' ``no,'' or ``unknown.''
(4) Tribal membership father. For state title IV-E agencies only,
indicate whether the biological or adoptive father is a member of an
Indian tribe. Indicate ``yes,'' ``no,'' or ``unknown.''
(5) Termination/modification of parental rights. Indicate whether
the termination/modification of parental rights for each parent
(biological, legal and/or putative) was voluntary or involuntary.
Voluntary means the parent voluntary relinquished their parental rights
to the title IV-E agency, with or without court involvement. Indicate
``voluntary'' or ``involuntary.'' Indicate ``not applicable'' if there
was no termination/modification and leave paragraphs (c)(5)(i),
(c)(5)(ii), (c)(6) and (c)(7) of this section blank.
(i) Termination/modification of parental rights petition. Indicate
the month, day and year that each petition to terminate/modify the
parental rights of a biological, legal and/or putative parent was filed
in court, if applicable. Indicate ``deceased'' if the parent is
deceased.
(ii) Termination/modification of parental rights. Enter the month,
day and year that the parental rights were voluntarily or involuntarily
terminated/modified, for each biological, legal and/or putative parent,
if applicable. If the parent is deceased, enter the date of death.
(6) Involuntary termination/modification of parental rights under
ICWA. For state title IV-E agencies only: If the state title IV-E
agency indicated ``yes'' to paragraph (b)(4) or indicated ``yes, ICWA
applies'' to paragraph (b)(5), and indicated ``involuntary'' to
paragraph (c)(5), the state title IV-E agency must complete paragraphs
(c)(6)(i) through (iii) of this section.
(i) Indicate whether the state court found beyond a reasonable
doubt that continued custody of the Indian child by the parent or
Indian custodian is likely to result in serious emotional or physical
damage to the Indian child in accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1912(f).
Indicate with ``yes'' or ``no.''
(ii) Indicate whether the court decision to involuntarily terminate
parental rights included the testimony of one or more qualified expert
witnesses in accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1912(f). Indicate ``yes'' or
``no.''
(iii) Indicate whether prior to terminating parental rights, the
court concluded that active efforts have been made to prevent the
breakup of the Indian family and that those efforts were unsuccessful
in accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1912(d). Indicate ``yes'' or ``no.''
(7) Voluntary termination/modification of parental rights under
ICWA. For state title IV-E agencies only: If the state title IV-E
agency indicated ``yes'' to paragraph (b)(4) or indicated ``yes, ICWA
applies'' to paragraph (b)(5), and indicated ``voluntary'' to paragraph
(c)(5) of this section, indicate whether the consent to termination of
parental or Indian custodian rights was executed in writing and
recorded before a court of competent jurisdiction with a certification
by the court that the terms and consequences of consent were explained
on the record in detail and were fully understood by the parent or
Indian custodian in accordance with 25 CFR 23.125(a) and (c). Indicate
``yes'' or ``no.''
(d) Removal information--(1) Date of child's removal. Indicate the
removal date(s) in month, day and year format for each removal of a
child who enters the placement and care responsibility of the title IV-
E agency. For a child who is removed and is placed initially in foster
care, indicate the date that the title IV-E agency received placement
and care responsibility. For a child who ran away or whose whereabouts
are unknown at the time the child is removed and is placed in the
placement and care responsibility of the title IV-E agency, indicate
the date that the title IV-E agency received placement and care
responsibility. For a child who is removed and is placed initially in a
non-foster care setting, indicate the date that the child enters foster
care as the date of removal.
(2) Removal transaction date. A non-modifiable, computer-generated
date which accurately indicates the month, day and year each response
to paragraph (d)(1) of this section was entered into the information
system.
(3) Removals under ICWA. For state title IV-E agencies: If the
state title IV-E agency indicated ``yes'' to paragraph (b)(4) or
indicated ``yes, ICWA applies'' to paragraph (b)(5), the state title
IV-E agency must complete paragraphs (d)(3)(i) through (d)(3)(iii) for
each removal reported in paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
(i) Indicate whether the court order for foster care placement was
made as a result of clear and convincing evidence that continued
custody of the Indian child by the parent or Indian
[[Page 90575]]
custodian was likely to result in serious emotional or physical damage
to the Indian child in accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1912(e) and 25 CFR
121(a). Indicate ``yes'' or ``no.''
(ii) Indicate whether the evidence presented for foster care
placement as indicated in paragraph (d)(3)(i) of this section included
the testimony of a qualified expert witness in accordance with 25
U.S.C. 1912(e) and 25 CFR 23.121(a). Indicate ``yes'' or ``no.''
(iii) Indicate whether the evidence presented for foster care
placement as indicated in paragraph (d)(3)(i) indicates that prior to
each removal reported in paragraph (d)(1) of this section that active
efforts have been made to prevent the breakup of the Indian family and
that those efforts were unsuccessful in accordance with 25 U.S.C.
1912(d). Indicate ``yes'' or ``no.''
(4) Environment at removal. Indicate the type of environment
(household or facility) the child was living in at the time of each
removal for each removal reported in paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
Indicate ``parent household'' if the child was living in a household
that included one or both of the child's parents, whether biological,
adoptive or legal. Indicate ``relative household'' if the child was
living with a relative(s), the relative(s) is not the child's legal
guardian and neither of the child's parents were living in the
household. Indicate ``legal guardian household'' if the child was
living with a legal guardian(s), the guardian(s) is not the child's
relative and neither of the child's parents were living in the
household. Indicate ``relative legal guardian household'' if the child
was living with a relative(s) who is also the child's legal guardian.
Indicate ``justice facility'' if the child was in a detention center,
jail or other similar setting where the child was detained. Indicate
``medical/mental health facility'' if the child was living in a
facility such as a medical or psychiatric hospital or residential
treatment center. Indicate ``other'' if the child was living in another
situation not so described, such as living independently or homeless.
(5) Authority for placement and care responsibility. Indicate the
title IV-E agency's authority for placement and care responsibility of
the child for each removal reported in paragraph (d)(1) of this
section. ``Court ordered'' means that the court has issued an order
that is the basis for the title IV-E agency's placement and care
responsibility. ``Voluntary placement agreement'' means that an
official voluntary placement agreement has been executed between the
parent(s), legal guardian(s), or child age 18 or older and the title
IV-E agency. The placement remains voluntary even if a subsequent court
order is issued to continue the child in out-of-home care. ``Not yet
determined'' means that a voluntary placement agreement has not been
signed or a court order has not been issued. When either a voluntary
placement agreement is signed or a court order issued, the record must
be updated from ``not yet determined'' to the appropriate response
option to reflect the title IV-E agency's authority for placement and
care responsibility at that time.
(6) Child and family circumstances at removal. Indicate all child
and family circumstances that were present at the time of the child's
removal and/or related to the child being placed into foster care for
each removal reported in paragraph (d)(1) of this section. Indicate
whether each circumstance listed in the data elements described in
paragraphs (d)(6)(i) through (xxxiii) ``applies'' or ``does not apply''
for each removal indicated in paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
(i) Runaway. The child has left, without authorization, the home or
facility where the child was residing.
(ii) Whereabouts unknown. The child's whereabouts are unknown and
the title IV-E agency does not consider the child to have run away.
(iii) Physical abuse. Alleged or substantiated physical abuse,
injury or maltreatment of the child by a person responsible for the
child's welfare.
(iv) Sexual abuse. Alleged or substantiated sexual abuse or
exploitation of the child by a person who is responsible for the
child's welfare.
(v) Psychological or emotional abuse. Alleged or substantiated
psychological or emotional abuse, including verbal abuse, of the child
by a person who is responsible for the child's welfare.
(vi) Neglect. Alleged or substantiated negligent treatment or
maltreatment of the child, including failure to provide adequate food,
clothing, shelter, supervision or care by a person who is responsible
for the child's welfare.
(vii) Medical neglect. Alleged or substantiated medical neglect
caused by a failure to provide for the appropriate health care of the
child by a person who is responsible for the child's welfare, although
the person was financially able to do so, or was offered financial or
other means to do so.
(viii) Domestic violence. Alleged or substantiated violent act(s),
including any forceful detention of an individual, that results in,
threatens to result in, or attempts to cause physical injury or mental
harm. This is committed by a person against another individual residing
in the child's home and with whom such person is in an intimate
relationship; dating relationship; is or was related by marriage; or
has a child in common. This circumstance includes domestic violence
between the child and his or her partner and applies to a child or
youth of any age (including those younger and older than the age of
majority. This does not include alleged or substantiated maltreatment
of the child by a person who is responsible for the child's welfare.
(ix) Abandonment. The child was left alone or with others and the
parent or legal guardian's identity is unknown and cannot be
ascertained. This includes a child left at a ``safe haven.'' This
category does not apply when the identity of the parent(s) or legal
guardian(s) is known.
(x) Failure to return. The parent, legal guardian or caretaker did
not or has not returned for the child or made his or her whereabouts
known. This category does not apply when the identity of the parent,
legal guardian or caretaker is unknown.
(xi) Caretaker's alcohol use. A parent, legal guardian or other
caretaker responsible for the child uses alcohol compulsively that is
not of a temporary nature.
(xii) Caretaker's drug use. A parent, legal guardian or other
caretaker responsible for the child uses drugs compulsively that is not
of a temporary nature.
(xiii) Child alcohol use. The child uses alcohol.
(xiv) Child drug use. The child uses drugs.
(xv) Prenatal alcohol exposure. The child has been identified as
prenatally exposed to alcohol, resulting in fetal alcohol spectrum
disorders such as fetal alcohol exposure, fetal alcohol effect or fetal
alcohol syndrome.
(xvi) Prenatal drug exposure. The child has been identified as
prenatally exposed to drugs.
(xvii) Diagnosed condition. The child has a clinical diagnosis by a
qualified professional of a health, behavioral or mental health
condition, such as one or more of the following: Intellectual
disability, emotional disturbance, specific learning disability,
hearing, speech or sight impairment, physical disability or other
clinically diagnosed condition.
(xviii) Inadequate access to mental health services. The child and/
or child's family has inadequate resources to access the necessary
mental health services outside of the child's out-of-home care
placement.
(xix) Inadequate access to medical services. The child and/or
child's family
[[Page 90576]]
has inadequate resources to access the necessary medical services
outside of the child's out-of-home care placement.
(xx) Child behavior problem. The child's behavior in his or her
school and/or community adversely affects his or her socialization,
learning, growth and/or moral development. This includes all child
behavior problems, as well as adjudicated and non-adjudicated status or
delinquency offenses and convictions.
(xxi) Death of caretaker. Existing family stress in caring for the
child or an inability to care for the child due to the death of a
parent, legal guardian or other caretaker.
(xxii) Incarceration of caretaker. The child's parent, legal
guardian or caretaker is temporarily or permanently placed in jail or
prison which adversely affects his or her ability to care for the
child.
(xxiii) Caretaker's significant impairment--physical/emotional. A
physical or emotional illness or disabling condition of the child's
parent, legal guardian or caretaker that adversely limits his or her
ability to care for the child.
(xxiv) Caretaker's significant impairment--cognitive. The child's
parent, legal guardian or caretaker has cognitive limitations that
impact his or her ability to function in areas of daily life, which
adversely affect his or her ability to care for the child. It also may
be characterized by a significantly below-average score on a test of
mental ability or intelligence.
(xxv) Inadequate housing. The child's or his or her family's
housing is substandard, overcrowded, unsafe or otherwise inadequate
which results in it being inappropriate for the child to reside.
(xxvi) Voluntary relinquishment for adoption. The child's parent
has voluntarily relinquished the child by assigning the physical and
legal custody of the child to the title IV-E agency, in writing, for
the purpose of having the child adopted.
(xxvii) Child requested placement. The child, age 18 or older, has
requested placement into foster care.
(xxviii) Sex trafficking. The child is a victim of sex trafficking
at the time of removal.
(xxix) Parental immigration detainment or deportation. The parent
is or was detained or deported by immigration officials.
(xxx) Family conflict related to child's sexual orientation, gender
identity, or gender expression. There is family conflict related to the
child's sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression. This
includes the child's expressed identity or perceived status as lesbian,
gay, bisexual, transgender, questioning, queer, or gender non-
conforming. This also includes any conflict related to the ways in
which a child manifests masculinity or femininity.
(xxxi) Educational neglect. Alleged or substantiated failure of a
parent or caregiver to enroll a child of mandatory school age in school
or provide appropriate home schooling or needed special educational
training, thus allowing the child or youth to engage in chronic
truancy.
(xxxii) Public agency title IV-E agreement. The child is in the
placement and care responsibility of another public agency that has an
agreement with the title IV-E agency pursuant to section 472(a)(2)(B)
of the Act and on whose behalf title IV-E foster care maintenance
payments are made
(xxxiii) Tribal title IV-E agreement. The child is in the placement
and care responsibility of an Indian tribe, tribal organization or
consortium with which the title IV-E agency has an agreement and on
whose behalf title IV-E foster care maintenance payments are made.
(xxxiv) Homelessness. The child or his or her family has no regular
or adequate place to live. This includes living in a car, or on the
street, or staying in a homeless or other temporary shelter.
(7) Victim of sex trafficking prior to entering foster care.
Indicate whether the child had been a victim of sex trafficking before
the current out-of-home care episode. Indicate ``yes'' if the child was
a victim or ``no'' if the child had not been a victim.
(i) Report to law enforcement. If the title IV-E agency indicated
``yes'' in paragraph (d)(7), indicate whether the title IV-E agency
made a report to law enforcement for entry into the National Crime
Information Center (NCIC) database. Indicate ``yes'' if the agency made
a report to law enforcement and indicate ``no'' if the agency did not
make a report.
(ii) Date. If the title IV-E agency indicated ``yes'' in paragraph
(d)(7)(i) of this section, indicate the date that the agency made the
report to law enforcement.
(8) Victim of sex trafficking while in foster care. Indicate
``yes'' if the child was a victim of sex trafficking while in out-of-
home care during the current out-of-home care episode. Indicate ``no''
if the child was not a victim of sex trafficking during the current
out-of-home care episode.
(i) Report to law enforcement. If the title IV-E agency indicated
``yes'' in this paragraph (d)(8) of this section, indicate whether the
agency made a report to law enforcement for entry into the NCIC
database. Indicate ``yes'' if the title IV-E agency made a report(s) to
law enforcement and indicate ``no'' if the title IV-E agency did not
make a report.
(ii) Date. If the title IV-E agency indicated ``yes'' in paragraph
(d)(8)(i), indicate the date(s) the agency made the report(s) to law
enforcement.
(e) Living arrangement and provider information--(1) Date of living
arrangement. Indicate the month, day and year representing the first
date of placement in each of the child's living arrangements for each
out-of-home care episode. In the case of a child who has run away,
whose whereabouts are unknown, or who is already in a living
arrangement and remains there when the title IV-E agency receives
placement and care responsibility, indicate the date of the VPA or
court order providing the title IV-E agency with placement and care
responsibility for the child, rather than the date when the child was
originally placed in the living arrangement.
(2) Foster family home. Indicate whether each of the child's living
arrangements is a foster family home, with a ``yes'' or ``no'' as
appropriate. If the child has run away or the child's whereabouts are
unknown, indicate ``no.'' If the title IV-E agency indicates that the
child is living in a foster family home, by indicating ``yes,'' the
title IV-E agency must complete the data element Foster family home
type in paragraph (e)(3) of this section. If the title IV-E agency
indicates ``no,'' the title IV-E agency must complete the data element
Other living arrangement type in paragraph (e)(4).
(3) Foster family home type. If the title IV-E agency indicated
that the child is living in a foster family home in the data element
described in paragraph (e)(2), indicate whether each foster family home
type listed in the data elements in paragraphs (e)(3)(i) through
(e)(3)(vi) of this section applies or does not apply; otherwise the
title IV-E agency must leave this data element blank.
(i) Licensed home. The child's living arrangement is licensed or
approved by the state or tribal licensing/approval authority.
(ii) Therapeutic foster family home. The home provides specialized
care and services.
(iii) Shelter care foster family home. The home is so designated by
the state or tribal licensing/approval authority, and is designed to
provide short-term or transitional care.
[[Page 90577]]
(iv) Relative foster family home. The foster parent(s) is related
to the child by biological, legal or marital connection and the
relative foster parent(s) lives in the home as his or her primary
residence.
(v) Pre-adoptive home. The home is one in which the family and the
title IV-E agency have agreed on a plan to adopt the child.
(vi) Kin foster family home. The home is one in which there is a
kin relationship as defined by the title IV-E agency, such as one where
there is a psychological, cultural or emotional relationship between
the child or the child's family and the foster parent(s) and there is
not a legal, biological, or marital connection between the child and
foster parent.
(4) Other living arrangement type. If the title IV-E agency
indicated that the child's living arrangement is other than a foster
family home in the data element Foster family home in paragraph (e)(2)
of this section, indicate the type of setting; otherwise the title IV-E
agency must leave this data element blank. Indicate ``group home-family
operated'' if the child is in a group home that provides 24-hour care
in a private family home where the family members are the primary
caregivers. Indicate ``group home-staff operated'' if the child is in a
group home that provides 24-hour care for children where the care-
giving is provided by shift or rotating staff. Indicate ``group home-
shelter care'' if the child is in a group home that provides 24-hour
care which is short-term or transitional in nature, and is designated
by the state or tribal licensing/approval authority to provide shelter
care. Indicate ``residential treatment center'' if the child is in a
facility that has the purpose of treating children with mental health
or behavioral conditions. Indicate ``child care institution'' if the
child is in a private child care institution, or a public child care
institution which accommodates no more than 25 children, and is
licensed by the state or tribal authority responsible for licensing or
approving child care institutions. This does not include detention
facilities, forestry camps, training schools or any other facility
operated primarily for the detention of children who are determined to
be delinquent. Indicate ``child care institution-shelter care'' if the
child is in a child care institution as defined above and the
institution is designated to provide shelter care by the state or
tribal authority responsible for licensing or approving child care
institutions and is short-term or transitional in nature. Indicate
``supervised independent living'' if the child is living independently
in a supervised setting. Indicate ``juvenile justice facility'' if the
child is in a secure facility or institution where alleged or
adjudicated juvenile delinquents are housed. Indicate ``medical or
rehabilitative facility'' if the child is in a facility where an
individual receives medical or physical health care, such as a
hospital. Indicate ``psychiatric hospital'' if the child is in a
facility that provides emotional or psychological health care and is
licensed or accredited as a hospital. Indicate ``runaway'' if the child
has left, without authorization, the home or facility where the child
was placed. Indicate ``whereabouts unknown'' if the child is not in the
physical custody of the title IV-E agency or person or institution with
whom the child has been placed, the child's whereabouts are unknown and
the title IV-E agency does not consider the child to have run away.
Indicate ``placed at home'' if the child is home with the parent(s) or
legal guardian(s) in preparation for the title IV-E agency to return
the child home permanently.
(5) Private agency living arrangement. Indicate the type of
contractual relationship with a private agency for each of the child's
living arrangements reported in paragraph (e)(1) of this section.
Indicate ``private agency involvement'' if the child is placed in a
living arrangement that is either licensed, managed, or run by a
private agency that is under contract with the title IV-E agency.
Indicate ``no private agency involvement'' if the child's living
arrangement is not licensed, managed or run by a private agency.
(6) Location of living arrangement. Indicate whether each of the
child's living arrangements reported in paragraph (e)(1) of this
section is located within or outside of the reporting state or tribal
service area or is outside of the country. Indicate ``out-of-state or
out-of-tribal service area'' if the child's living arrangement is
located outside of the reporting state or tribal service area but
inside the United States. Indicate ``in-state or in-tribal service
area'' if the child's living arrangement is located within the
reporting state or tribal service area. Indicate ``out-of-country'' if
the child's living arrangement is outside of the United States.
Indicate ``runaway or whereabouts unknown'' if the child has run away
from his or her living arrangement or the child's whereabouts are
unknown. If the title IV-E agency indicates either ``out-of-state or
out-of-tribal service area'' or ``out-of-country'' for the child's
living arrangement, the title IV-E agency must complete the data
element in paragraph (e)(7) of this section; otherwise the title IV-E
agency must leave paragraph (e)(7) blank.
(7) Jurisdiction or country where child is living. Indicate the
state, tribal service area, Indian reservation, or country where the
reporting title IV-E agency placed the child for each living
arrangement, if the title IV-E agency indicated either ``out-of-state''
or ``out-of-tribal service area'' or ``out-of-country'' in paragraph
(e)(6) of this section; otherwise the title IV-E agency must leave
paragraph (e)(7) blank. The title IV-E agency must report the
information in a format according to ACF's specifications.
(8) Available ICWA foster care and pre-adoptive placement
preferences. For state title IV-E agencies only: If the state title IV-
E agency indicated ``yes'' to paragraph (b)(4) or indicated ``yes, ICWA
applies'' to paragraph (b)(5), indicate which foster care or pre-
adoptive placements that meet the placement preferences of ICWA in 25
U.S.C. 1915(b) were willing to accept placement for each of the child's
living arrangements reported in paragraph (e)(1) of this section.
Indicate in each paragraph (e)(8)(i) through (v) of this section
``yes'' or ``no.''
(i) A member of the Indian child's extended family.
(ii) A foster home licensed, approved, or specified by the Indian
child's tribe.
(iii) An Indian foster home licensed or approved by an authorized
non-Indian licensing authority.
(iv) An institution for children approved by an Indian tribe or
operated by an Indian organization which has a program suitable to meet
the Indian child's needs.
(v) A placement that complies with the order of preference for
foster care or pre-adoptive placements established by an Indian child's
tribe, in accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1915(c).
(9) Foster care and pre-adoptive placement preferences under ICWA.
For state title IV-E agencies only: If the state title IV-E agency
indicated ``yes'' to paragraph (b)(4) or indicated ``yes, ICWA
applies'' to paragraph (b)(5), for each of the Indian child's foster
care or pre-adoptive placement(s) reported in paragraph (e)(1) of this
section, indicate whether the placement meets the placement preferences
of ICWA in 25 U.S.C. 1915(b) by indicating with whom the Indian child
is placed. Indicate ``a member of the Indian child's extended family,''
``a foster home licensed, approved, or specified by the Indian child's
tribe,'' ``an Indian foster home licensed or approved by an authorized
non-Indian licensing authority,'' ``an institution for children
approved by an Indian tribe or operated by an Indian
[[Page 90578]]
organization which has a program suitable to meet the Indian child's
needs,'' ``a placement that complies with the order of preference for
foster care or pre-adoptive placements established by an Indian child's
tribe, in accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1915(c)'' or ``placement does not
meet ICWA placement preferences.'' If the state IV-E agency indicated
``placement does not meet ICWA placement preferences,'' then the state
IV-E agency must complete paragraph (e)(10). Otherwise, the state title
IV-E agency must leave paragraph (e)(10) blank.
(10) Good cause under ICWA. For state title IV-E agencies only: If
the state title IV-E agency indicated ``placement does not meet ICWA
placement preferences'' in paragraph (e)(9), indicate whether the court
determined by clear and convincing evidence, on the record or in
writing, a good cause to depart from the ICWA placement preferences in
accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1915(b) or to depart from the placement
preferences of the Indian child's tribe in accordance with 25 U.S.C.
1915(c). Indicate ``yes'' or ``no.'' If the state title IV-E agency
indicated ``yes,'' then the state title IV-E agency must indicate the
basis for good cause in paragraph (e)(11) of this section. If the state
title IV-E agency indicated ``no,'' then the state title IV-E agency
must leave paragraph (e)(11) blank.
(11) Basis for good cause. For state title IV-E agencies only: If
the state title IV-E agency indicated ``yes'' to paragraph (e)(10),
indicate the state court's basis for determining good cause to depart
from ICWA placement preferences by indicating ``yes'' or ``no'' in each
paragraph (e)(11)(i) through (v) of this section.
(i) Request of one or both of the Indian child's parents.
(ii) Request of the Indian child.
(iii) The unavailability of a suitable placement after a
determination by the court that a diligent search was conducted to find
suitable placements meeting the placement preferences in ICWA at 25
U.S.C. 1915 but none has been located.
(iv) The extraordinary physical, mental or emotional needs of the
Indian child, such as specialized treatment services that may be
unavailable in the community where families who meet the placement
preferences live.
(v) The presence of a sibling attachment that can be maintained
only through a particular placement.
(12) Marital status of the foster parent(s). Indicate the marital
status of the child's foster parent(s) for each foster family home
living arrangement in which the child is placed, as indicated in
paragraph (e)(3) of this section. Indicate ``married couple'' if the
foster parents are considered united in matrimony according to
applicable laws. Include common law marriage, where provided by
applicable laws. Indicate ``unmarried couple'' if the foster parents
are living together as a couple, but are not united in matrimony
according to applicable laws. Indicate ``separated'' if the foster
parent is legally separated or is living apart from his or her spouse.
Indicate ``single adult'' if the foster parent is not married and is
not living with another individual as part of a couple. If the response
is either ``married couple'' or ``unmarried couple,'' the title IV-E
agency must complete the data elements for the second foster parent in
paragraphs (e)(20) through (e)(25) of this section; otherwise the title
IV-E agency must leave those data elements blank.
(13) Child's relationships to the foster parent(s). Indicate the
type of relationship between the child and his or her foster parent(s),
for each foster family home living arrangement in which the child is
placed, as indicated in paragraph (e)(3) of this section. Indicate
``paternal grandparent(s)'' if the foster parent(s) is the child's
paternal grandparent (by biological, legal or marital connection).
Indicate ``maternal grandparent(s)'' if the foster parent(s) is the
child's maternal grandparent (by biological, legal or marital
connection). Indicate ``other paternal relative(s)'' if the foster
parent(s) is the child's paternal relative (by biological, legal or
marital connection) other than a grandparent, such as an aunt, uncle or
cousin. Indicate ``other maternal relative(s)'' if the foster parent(s)
is the child's maternal relative (by biological, legal or marital
connection) other than a grandparent, such as an aunt, uncle or cousin.
Indicate ``sibling(s)'' if the foster parent(s) is a brother or sister
of the child, either biologically, legally or by marriage. Indicate
``non-relative(s)'' if the foster parent(s) is not related to the child
(by biological, legal or marital connection). Indicate ``kin'' if the
foster parent(s) has kin relationship to the child as defined by the
title IV-E agency, such as one where there is a psychological, cultural
or emotional relationship between the child or the child's family and
the foster parent(s) and there is not a legal, biological, or marital
connection between the child and foster parent.
(14) Year of birth for first foster parent. Indicate the year of
birth for the first foster parent for each foster family home living
arrangement in which the child is placed, as indicated in paragraph
(e)(3) of this section.
(15) First foster parent tribal membership. Indicate whether the
first foster parent is a member of an Indian tribe. Indicate ``yes,''
``no,'' or ``unknown.''
(16) Race of first foster parent. Indicate the race of the first
foster parent for each foster family home living arrangement in which
the child is placed, as indicated in paragraph (e)(3) of this section.
In general, an individual's race is determined by the individual.
Indicate whether each race category listed in the data elements
described in paragraphs (e)(16)(i) through (vii) of this section
applies with a ``yes'' or ``no.''
(i) Race--American Indian or Alaska Native. An American Indian or
Alaska Native individual has origins in any of the original peoples of
North or South America (including Central America) and maintains tribal
affiliation or community attachment.
(ii) Race--Asian. An Asian individual has origins in any of the
original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia or the Indian
subcontinent including, for example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan,
Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand and
Vietnam.
(iii) Race--Black or African American. A Black or African American
individual has origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa.
(iv) Race--Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. A Native
Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander individual has origins in any of the
original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa or other Pacific Islands.
(v) Race--White. A White individual has origins in any of the
original peoples of Europe, the Middle East or North Africa.
(vi) Race--unknown. The foster parent does not know his or her
race, or at least one race.
(vii) Race--declined. The first foster parent has declined to
identify a race.
(17) Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of first foster parent. Indicate
the Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of the first foster parent for each
foster family home living arrangement in which the child is placed, as
indicated in paragraph (e)(3) of this section. In general, an
individual's ethnicity is determined by the individual. An individual
is of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity if the individual is a person of
Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central American or other
Spanish culture or origin, regardless of race. Indicate whether this
category applies with a ``yes'' or ``no.'' If the first foster parent
does not know his or her ethnicity indicate ``unknown.'' If the
individual
[[Page 90579]]
refuses to identify his or her ethnicity, indicate ``declined.''
(18) Gender of first foster parent. Indicate whether the first
foster parent self identifies as ``female'' or ``male.''
(19) First foster parent sexual orientation. Indicate whether the
first foster parent self identifies as ``straight or heterosexual,''
``gay or lesbian,'' ``bisexual,'' ``don't know,'' ``something else,''
or ``declined'' if the first foster parent declined to identify his/her
status.
(20) Year of birth for second foster parent. Indicate the birth
year of the second foster parent for each foster family home living
arrangement in which the child is placed, as indicated in paragraph
(e)(3) of this section, if applicable. The title IV-E agency must leave
this data element blank if there is no second foster parent according
to paragraph (e)(12) of this section.
(21) Second foster parent tribal membership. Indicate whether the
second foster parent is a member of an Indian tribe. Indicate ``yes,''
``no,'' or ``unknown.''
(22) Race of second foster parent. Indicate the race of the second
foster parent for each foster family home living arrangement in which
the child is placed, as indicated in paragraph (e)(3) of this section,
if applicable. In general, an individual's race is determined by the
individual. Indicate whether each race category listed in the data
elements described in paragraphs (e)(22)(i) through (vii) of this
section applies with a ``yes'' or ``no.'' The title IV-E agency must
leave this data element blank if there is no second foster parent
according to paragraph (e)(12) of this section.
(i) Race--American Indian or Alaska Native. An American Indian or
Alaska Native individual has origins in any of the original peoples of
North or South America (including Central America) and maintains tribal
affiliation or community attachment.
(ii) Race--Asian. An Asian individual has origins in any of the
original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia or the Indian
subcontinent including, for example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan,
Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand and
Vietnam.
(iii) Race--Black or African American. A Black or African American
individual has origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa.
(iv) Race--Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. A Native
Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander individual has origins in any of the
original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa or other Pacific Islands.
(v) Race--White. A White individual has origins in any of the
original peoples of Europe, the Middle East or North Africa.
(vi) Race--unknown. The second foster parent does not know his or
her race, or at least one race.
(vii) Race--declined. The second foster parent has declined to
identify a race.
(23) Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of second foster parent. Indicate
the Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of the second foster parent for each
foster family home living arrangement in which the child is placed, as
indicated in paragraph (e)(3) of this section, if applicable. In
general, an individual's ethnicity is determined by the individual. An
individual is of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity if the individual is a
person of Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central American or
other Spanish culture or origin, regardless of race. Indicate whether
this category applies with a ``yes'' or ``no.'' If the second foster
parent does not know his or her ethnicity, indicate ``unknown.'' If the
individual refuses to identify his or her ethnicity, indicate
``declined.'' The title IV-E agency must leave this data element blank
if there is no second foster parent according to paragraph (e)(12) of
this section.
(24) Gender of second foster parent. Indicate whether the second
foster parent self identifies as ``female'' or ``male.''
(25) Second foster parent sexual orientation. Indicate whether the
second foster parent self identifies as ``straight or heterosexual,''
``gay or lesbian,'' ``bisexual,'' ``don't know,'' ``something else,''
or ``declined'' if the second foster parent declined to identify his/
her status.
(f) Permanency planning--(1) Permanency plan. Indicate each
permanency plan established for the child. Indicate ``reunify with
parent(s) or legal guardian(s)'' if the plan is to keep the child in
out-of-home care for a limited time and the title IV-E agency is to
work with the child's parent(s) or legal guardian(s) to establish a
stable family environment. Indicate ``live with other relatives'' if
the plan is for the child to live permanently with a relative(s) (by
biological, legal or marital connection) who is not the child's
parent(s) or legal guardian(s). Indicate ``adoption'' if the plan is to
facilitate the child's adoption by relatives, foster parents, kin or
other unrelated individuals. Indicate ``guardianship'' if the plan is
to establish a new legal guardianship. Indicate ``planned permanent
living arrangement'' if the plan is for the child to remain in foster
care until the title IV-E agency's placement and care responsibility
ends. The title IV-E agency must only select ``planned permanent living
arrangement'' consistent with the requirements in section 475(5)(C)(i)
of the Act. Indicate ``permanency plan not established'' if a
permanency plan has not yet been established.
(2) Date of permanency plan. Indicate the month, day and year that
each permanency plan(s) was established during each out-of-home care
episode.
(3) Date of periodic review. Enter the month, day and year of each
periodic review, either by a court or by administrative review (as
defined in section 475(6) of the Act) that meets the requirements of
section 475(5)(B) of the Act.
(4) Date of permanency hearing. Enter the month, day and year of
each permanency hearing held by a court or an administrative body
appointed or approved by the court that meets the requirements of
section 475(5)(C) of the Act.
(5) Juvenile justice. Indicate whether the child was found to be a
status offender or adjudicated delinquent by a juvenile judge or court
at any time during the report period. A status offense is specific to
juveniles, such as running away, truancy or underage alcohol
violations. Indicate ``yes'' or ``no.''
(6) Caseworker visit dates. Enter each date in which a caseworker
had an in-person, face-to-face visit with the child consistent with
section 422(b)(17) of the Act. Indicate the month, day and year of each
visit.
(7) Caseworker visit location. Indicate the location of each in-
person, face-to-face visit between the caseworker and the child.
Indicate ``child's residence'' if the visit occurred at the location
where the child is currently residing, such as the current foster care
provider's home, child care institution or facility. Indicate ``other
location'' if the visit occurred at any location other than where the
child currently resides, such as the child's school, a court, a child
welfare office or in the larger community.
(8) Transition plan. Indicate whether a child has a transition plan
that meets the requirements of section 475(5)(H) of the Act, including
plans developed before the 90-day period. Indicate ``yes,'' ``no'' or
``not applicable.''
(9) Date of transition plan. Indicate the month, day and year of
the child's transition plan, if the title IV-E agency indicated in
paragraph (f)(8) of this section that the child has a transition plan
that meets the requirements of section 475(5)(H) of the Act; otherwise
leave this paragraph blank.
[[Page 90580]]
(10) Active efforts. For state title IV-E agencies only: If the
state title IV-E agency indicated ``yes'' to paragraph (b)(4) or
indicated ``yes, ICWA applies'' to paragraph (b)(5), indicate whether
the active efforts in each paragraph (f)(10)(i) through (xiii)
``applies'' or ``does not apply.'' The state title IV-E agency must
indicate all of the active efforts that apply once the child enters the
AFCARS out-of-home care reporting population per Sec. 1355.42(a)
through the child's exit per paragraph (g)(1) of this section and the
active efforts made prior to the child entering the out-of-home care
reporting population.
(i) Assist the parent(s) or Indian custodian through the steps of a
case plan and with developing the resources necessary to satisfy the
case plan.
(ii) Conduct a comprehensive assessment of the circumstances of the
Indian child's family, with a focus on safe reunification as the most
desirable goal.
(iii) Identify appropriate services to help the parent overcome
barriers, including actively assisting the parents in obtaining such
services.
(iv) Identify, notify and invite representatives of the Indian
child's tribe to participate in providing support and services to the
Indian child's family and in family team meetings, permanency planning
and resolution of placement issues.
(v) Conduct or cause to be conducted a diligent search for the
Indian child's extended family members, and contact and consult with
extended family members to provide family structure and support for the
Indian child and the Indian child's parents.
(vi) Offer and employ all available and culturally appropriate
family preservation strategies and facilitate the use of remedial and
rehabilitative services provide by the child's tribe.
(vii) Take steps to keep siblings together whenever possible.
(viii) Support regular visits with parents or Indian custodians in
the most natural setting possible as well as trial home visits of the
Indian child during any period of removal, consistent with the need to
ensure the health, safety, and welfare of the child.
(ix) Identify community resources including housing, financial,
transportation, mental health, substance use and peer support services
and actively assisting the Indian child's parents or when appropriate,
the child's family, in utilizing and accessing those resources.
(x) Monitor progress and participation in services.
(xi) Consider alternative ways to address the needs of the Indian
child's parents and, where appropriate, the family, if the optimum
services do not exist or are not available.
(xii) Provide post-reunification services and monitoring.
(xiii) Other active efforts tailored to the facts and circumstances
of the case.
(g) General exit information. Provide exit information for each
out-of-home care episode. An exit occurs when the title IV-E agency's
placement and care responsibility of the child ends.
(1) Date of exit. Indicate the month, day and year for each of the
child's exits from out-of-home care. An exit occurs when the title IV-E
agency's placement and care responsibility of the child ends. If the
child has not exited out-of-home care the title IV-E agency must leave
this data element blank. If this data element is applicable, the data
elements in paragraphs (g)(2) and (3) of this section must have a
response.
(2) Exit transaction date. A non-modifiable, computer-generated
date which accurately indicates the month, day and year each response
to paragraph (g)(1) of this section was entered into the information
system.
(3) Exit reason. Indicate the reason for each of the child's exits
from out-of-home care. Indicate ``not applicable'' if the child has not
exited out-of-home care. Indicate ``reunify with parent(s)/legal
guardian(s)'' if the child was returned to his or her parent(s) or
legal guardian(s) and the title IV-E agency no longer has placement and
care responsibility. Indicate ``live with other relatives'' if the
child exited to live with a relative (related by a biological, legal or
marital connection) other than his or her parent(s) or legal
guardian(s). Indicate ``adoption'' if the child was legally adopted.
Indicate ``emancipation'' if the child exited care due to age. Indicate
``guardianship'' if the child exited due to a legal guardianship of the
child. Indicate ``runaway or whereabouts unknown'' if the child ran
away or the child's whereabouts were unknown at the time that the title
IV-E agency's placement and care responsibility ends. Indicate ``death
of child'' if the child died while in out-of-home care. Indicate
``transfer to another agency'' if placement and care responsibility for
the child was transferred to another agency, either within or outside
of the reporting state or tribal service area.
(4) Transfer to another agency. If the title IV-E agency indicated
the child was transferred to another agency in the data element Exit
reason described in paragraph (g)(3) of this section, indicate the type
of agency that received placement and care responsibility for the child
from the following options: ``State title IV-E agency,'' ``Tribal title
IV-E agency,'' ``Indian tribe or tribal agency (non-IV-E),'' ``juvenile
justice agency,'' ``mental health agency,'' ``other public agency'' or
``private agency.''
(h) Exit to adoption and guardianship information. Report
information in paragraph (h) only if the title IV-E agency indicated
the child exited to adoption or legal guardianship in the data element
Exit reason described in paragraph (g)(3) of this section. Otherwise
the title IV-E agency must leave the data elements in paragraph (h)
blank.
(1) Marital status of the adoptive parent(s) or guardian(s).
Indicate the marital status of the adoptive parent(s) or legal
guardian(s). Indicate ``married couple'' if the adoptive parents or
legal guardians are considered united in matrimony according to
applicable laws. Include common law marriage, where provided by
applicable laws. Indicate ``married but individually adopting or
obtaining legal guardianship'' if the adoptive parents or legal
guardians are considered united in matrimony according to applicable
laws, but are individually adopting or obtaining legal guardianship.
Indicate ``separated'' if the foster parent is legally separated or is
living apart from his or her spouse. Indicate ``unmarried couple'' if
the adoptive parents or guardians are living together as a couple, but
are not united in matrimony according to applicable laws. Use this
response option even if only one person of the unmarried couple is the
adoptive parent or legal guardian of the child. Indicate ``single
adult'' if the adoptive parent or legal guardian is not married and is
not living with another individual as part of a couple. If the response
is ``married couple'' or ``unmarried couple,'' the title IV-E agency
also must complete the data elements for the second adoptive parent or
second legal guardian in paragraphs (h)(9) through (14) of this
section; otherwise the title IV-E agency must leave these data elements
blank.
(2) Child's relationship to the adoptive parent(s) or guardian(s).
Indicate the type of relationship, kinship or otherwise, between the
child and his or her adoptive parent(s) or legal guardian(s). Indicate
whether each relationship listed in the data elements described in
paragraphs (h)(2)(i) through (viii) of this section ``applies'' or
``does not apply.''
(i) Paternal grandparent(s). The adoptive parent(s) or legal
guardian(s) is the child's paternal grandparent(s), by biological,
legal or marital connection.
(ii) Maternal grandparent(s). The adoptive parent(s) or legal
guardian(s) is
[[Page 90581]]
the child's maternal grandparent(s), by biological, legal or marital
connection.
(iii) Other paternal relative(s). The adoptive parent(s) or legal
guardian(s) is the child's paternal relative (by biological, legal or
marital connection) other than a grandparent, such as an aunt, uncle or
cousin.
(iv) Other maternal relative(s). The adoptive parent(s) or legal
guardian(s) is the child's maternal relative (by biological, legal or
marital connection) other than a grandparent, such as an aunt, uncle or
cousin.
(v) Sibling(s). The adoptive parent or legal guardian is a brother
or sister of the child, either biologically, legally or by marriage.
(vi) Kin. The adoptive parent(s) or legal guardian(s) has a kin
relationship with the child, as defined by the title IV-E agency, such
as one where there is a psychological, cultural or emotional
relationship between the child or the child's family and the adoptive
parent(s) or legal guardian(s) and there is not a legal, biological, or
marital connection between the child and foster parent.
(vii) Non-relative(s). The adoptive parent(s) or legal guardian(s)
is not related to the child by biological, legal or marital connection.
(viii) Foster parent(s). The adoptive parent(s) or legal
guardian(s) was the child's foster parent(s).
(3) Date of birth of first adoptive parent or guardian. Indicate
the month, day and year of the birth of the first adoptive parent or
legal guardian.
(4) First adoptive parent or guardian tribal membership. Indicate
whether the first adoptive parent or guardian is a member of an Indian
tribe. Indicate ``yes,'' ``no'' or ``unknown.''
(5) Race of first adoptive parent or guardian. In general, an
individual's race is determined by the individual. Indicate whether
each race category listed in the data elements described in paragraphs
(h)(5)(i) through (vii) of this section applies with a ``yes'' or
``no.''
(i) Race--American Indian or Alaska Native. An American Indian or
Alaska Native individual has origins in any of the original peoples of
North or South America (including Central America), and maintains
tribal affiliation or community attachment.
(ii) Race--Asian. An Asian individual has origins in any of the
original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia or the Indian
subcontinent including, for example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan,
Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand and
Vietnam.
(iii) Race--Black or African American. A Black or African American
individual has origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa.
(iv) Race--Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. A Native
Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander individual has origins in any of the
original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa or other Pacific Islands.
(v) Race--White. A White individual has origins in any of the
original peoples of Europe, the Middle East or North Africa.
(vi) Race--Unknown. The first adoptive parent or legal guardian
does not know his or her race, or at least one race.
(vii) Race--Declined. The first adoptive parent, or legal guardian
has declined to identify a race.
(6) Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of first adoptive parent or
guardian. In general, an individual's ethnicity is determined by the
individual. An individual is of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity if the
individual is a person of Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or
Central American or other Spanish culture or origin, regardless of
race. Indicate whether this category applies with a ``yes'' or ``no.''
If the first adoptive parent or legal guardian does not know his or her
ethnicity, indicate ``unknown.'' If the individual refuses to identify
his or her ethnicity, indicate ``declined.''
(7) Gender of first adoptive parent or guardian. Indicate whether
the first adoptive parent self identifies as ``female'' or ``male.''
(8) First adoptive parent or legal guardian sexual orientation.
Indicate whether the first adoptive parent or legal guardian self
identifies as ``straight or heterosexual,'' ``gay or lesbian,''
``bisexual,'' ``don't know,'' ``something else,'' or ``declined'' if
the first adoptive parent or legal guardian declined to identify his/
her status.
(9) Date of birth of second adoptive parent, guardian, or other
member of the couple. Indicate the month, day and year of the date of
birth of the second adoptive parent, legal guardian, or other member of
the couple. The title IV-E agency must leave this data element blank if
there is no second adoptive parent, legal guardian, or other member of
the couple according to paragraph (h)(1) of this section.
(10) Second adoptive parent, guardian, or other member of the
couple tribal membership. Indicate whether the second adoptive parent
or guardian is a member of an Indian tribe. Indicate ``yes,'' ``no'' or
``unknown.''
(11) Race of second adoptive parent, guardian, or other member of
the couple. In general, an individual's race is determined by the
individual. Indicate whether each race category listed in the data
elements described in paragraphs (h)(11)(i) through (vii) of this
section applies with a ``yes'' or ``no.'' The title IV-E agency must
leave this data element blank if there is no second adoptive parent,
legal guardian, or other member of the couple according to paragraph
(h)(1) of this section.
(i) Race--American Indian or Alaska Native. An American Indian or
Alaska Native individual has origins in any of the original peoples of
North or South America (including Central America), and maintains
tribal affiliation or community attachment.
(ii) Race--Asian. An Asian individual has origins in any of the
original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia or the Indian
subcontinent including, for example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan,
Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand and
Vietnam.
(iii) Race--Black or African American. A Black or African American
individual has origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa.
(iv) Race--Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. A Native
Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander individual has origins in any of the
original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa or other Pacific Islands.
(v) Race--White. A White individual has origins in any of the
original peoples of Europe, the Middle East or North Africa.
(vi) Race--Unknown. The second adoptive parent, legal guardian, or
other member of the couple does not know his or her race, or at least
one race.
(vii) Race--Declined. The second adoptive parent, legal guardian,
or other member of the couple has declined to identify a race.
(12) Hispanic or Latino ethnicity of second adoptive parent,
guardian, or other member of the couple. In general, an individual's
ethnicity is determined by the individual. An individual is of Hispanic
or Latino ethnicity if the individual is a person of Cuban, Mexican,
Puerto Rican, South or Central American or other Spanish culture or
origin, regardless of race. Indicate whether this category applies with
a ``yes'' or ``no.'' If the second adoptive parent, legal guardian, or
other member of the couple does not know his or her ethnicity, indicate
``unknown.'' If the individual refuses to identify his or her
ethnicity, indicate ``declined.'' The title IV-E agency must leave this
data element blank if there is no second adoptive parent, legal
guardian, or other member of the couple according to paragraph (h)(1)
of this section.
[[Page 90582]]
(13) Gender of second adoptive parent, guardian, or other member of
the couple. Indicate whether the second adoptive parent, guardian, or
other member of the couple self identifies as ``female'' or ``male.''
(14) Second adoptive parent, guardian, or other member of the
couple sexual orientation. Indicate whether the second adoptive parent
or legal guardian self identifies as ``straight or heterosexual, ''
``gay or lesbian,'' ``bisexual,'' ``don't know,'' ``something else,''
or ``declined'' if the second adoptive parent or legal guardian
declined to identify his/her status.
(15) Inter/Intrajurisdictional adoption or guardianship. Indicate
whether the child was placed within the state or tribal service area,
outside of the state or tribal service area or into another country for
adoption or legal guardianship. Indicate ``interjurisdictional adoption
or guardianship'' if the reporting title IV-E agency placed the child
for adoption or legal guardianship outside of the state or tribal
service area but within the United States. Indicate ``intercountry
adoption or guardianship'' if the reporting title IV-E agency placed
the child for adoption or legal guardianship outside of the United
States. Indicate ``intrajurisdictional adoption or guardianship'' if
the reporting title IV-E agency placed the child within the same state
or tribal service area as the one with placing responsibility. If the
title IV-E agency indicates either ``interjurisdictional adoption or
guardianship'' or ``intercountry adoption or guardianship'' apply for
the child's adoption or legal guardianship, the title IV-E agency must
complete the data element in paragraph (h)(16) of this section;
otherwise the title IV-E agency must leave it blank.
(16) Interjurisdictional adoption or guardianship jurisdiction.
Indicate the state, tribal service area, Indian reservation or country
where the reporting title IV-E agency placed the child for adoption or
legal guardianship, in a format according to ACF's specifications. The
title IV-E agency must complete this data element only if the title IV-
E agency indicated either ``interjurisdictional adoption or
guardianship'' or ``intercountry adoption or guardianship'' in
paragraph (h)(15) of this section; otherwise the title IV-E agency must
leave it blank.
(17) Adoption or guardianship placing agency. Indicate the agency
that placed the child for adoption or legal guardianship. Indicate
``title IV-E agency'' if the reporting title IV-E agency placed the
child for adoption or legal guardianship. Indicate ``private agency
under agreement'' if a private agency placed the child for adoption or
legal guardianship through an agreement with the reporting title IV-E
agency. Indicate ``Indian tribe under contract/agreement'' if an Indian
tribe, tribal organization or consortia placed the child for adoption
or legal guardianship through a contract or an agreement with the
reporting title IV-E agency.
(18) Assistance agreement type. Indicate the type of assistance
agreement between the title IV-E agency and the adoptive parent(s) or
legal guardian(s): ``Title IV-E adoption assistance agreement;''
``State/tribal adoption assistance agreement;'' ``Adoption-Title IV-E
agreement non-recurring expenses only;'' ``Adoption-Title IV-E
agreement Medicaid only;'' ``Title IV-E guardianship assistance
agreement;'' ``State/tribal guardianship assistance agreement;'' or
``no agreement'' if there is no assistance agreement.
(19) Siblings in adoptive or guardianship home. Indicate the number
of siblings of the child who are in the same adoptive or guardianship
home as the child. A sibling to the child is his or her brother or
sister by biological, legal, or marital connection. Do not include the
child who is subject of this record in the total number. If the child
does not have any siblings, the title IV-E agency must indicate ``not
applicable.'' If the child has siblings, but they are not in the same
adoptive or guardianship home as the child, the title IV-E agency must
indicate ``0.''
(20) Available ICWA Adoptive placements. For state title IV-E
agencies only: If the state title IV-E agency indicated ``yes'' to
paragraph (b)(4) or indicated ``yes, ICWA applies'' to paragraph
(b)(5), indicate which adoptive placements that meet the placement
preferences in ICWA at 25 U.S.C. 1915(a) were willing to accept
placement. Indicate in each paragraph (h)(20)(i) through (h)(20)(iv) of
this section ``yes'' or ``no.''
(i) A member of the Indian child's extended family.
(ii) Other members of the Indian child's tribe.
(iii) Other Indian families.
(iv) A placement that complies with the order of preference for
foster care or pre-adoptive placements established by an Indian child's
tribe, in accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1915(c).
(21) Adoption placement preferences under ICWA. For state title IV-
E agencies only: If the state title IV-E agency indicated ``yes'' to
paragraph (b)(4) or indicated ``yes, ICWA applies'' to paragraph (b)(5)
of this section, indicate whether the adoptive placement meets the
adoptive placement preferences of ICWA in 25 U.S.C. 1915(a) by
indicating with whom the Indian child is placed. Indicate ``a member of
the Indian child's extended family,'' ``other members of the Indian
child's tribe,'' ``other Indian families,'' ``a placement that complies
with the order of preference for adoptive placements established by an
Indian child's tribe, in accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1915(c),'' or
``placement does not meet ICWA placement preferences.'' If the state
IV-E agency indicated ``placement does not meet ICWA placement
preferences,'' then the state IV-E agency must complete paragraph
(h)(22). Otherwise, leave blank.
(22) Good cause under ICWA. For state title IV-E agencies only: If
the state title IV-E agency indicated ``placement does not meet ICWA
placement preferences'' in paragraph (h)(21), indicate whether the
court determined by clear and convincing evidence, on the record or in
writing, a good cause to depart from the ICWA placement preferences
under 25 U.S.C. 1915(a) or to depart from the placement preferences of
the Indian child's tribe under 25 U.S.C. 1915(c). Indicate ``yes'' or
``no.'' If the state title IV-E agency indicated ``yes,'' then the
state title IV-E agency must indicate the basis for good cause in
paragraph (h)(23) of this section. If the state title IV-E agency
indicated ``no,'' then the state title IV-E agency must leave paragraph
(h)(23) blank.
(23) Basis for good cause. For state title IV-E agencies only: If
the state title IV-E agency indicated ``yes'' in paragraph (h)(22),
indicate the state court's basis for determining good cause to depart
from ICWA adoptive placement preferences by indicating ``yes'' or
``no'' in each paragraph (h)(23)(i) through (v) of this section.
(i) Request of one or both of the child's parents.
(ii) Request of the Indian child.
(iii) The unavailability of a suitable placement after a
determination by the court that a diligent search was conducted to find
suitable placements meeting the placement preferences in ICWA at 25
U.S.C. 1915 but none has been located.
(iv) The extraordinary physical, mental, or emotional needs of the
Indian child, such as specialized treatment services that may be
unavailable in the community where families who meet the placement
preferences live.
(v) The presence of a sibling attachment that can be maintained
only through a particular placement.
[[Page 90583]]
Sec. 1355.45 Adoption and guardianship assistance data file elements.
A title IV-E agency must report the following information for each
child in the adoption and guardianship assistance reporting population,
if applicable based on Sec. 1355.42(b).
(a) General information--(1) Title IV-E agency. Indicate the title
IV-E agency responsible for submitting the AFCARS data to ACF per
requirements issued by ACF.
(2) Report date. The report date corresponds to the end of the
current report period. Indicate the last month and the year of the
report period.
(3) Child record number. The child record number is the encrypted,
unique person identification number. The record number must be
encrypted in accordance with ACF standards. Indicate the record number
for the child.
(b) Child demographics--(1) Child's date of birth. Indicate the
month, day and year of the child's birth.
(2) Child's gender. Indicate whether the child is ``male'' or
``female,'' as appropriate.
(3) Child's race. In general, a child's race is determined by the
child or the child's parent(s) or legal guardian(s). Indicate whether
each race category listed in the data elements described in paragraphs
(b)(2)(i) through (viii) of this section applies with a ``yes'' or
``no.''
(i) Race--American Indian or Alaska Native. An American Indian or
Alaska Native child has origins in any of the original peoples of North
or South America (including Central America), and maintains Tribal
affiliation or community attachment.
(ii) Race--Asian. An Asian child has origins in any of the original
peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia or the Indian subcontinent
including, for example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia,
Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand and Vietnam.
(iii) Race--Black or African American. A Black or African American
child has origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa.
(iv) Race--Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. A Native
Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander child has origins in any of the
original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa or other Pacific Islands.
(v) Race--White. A White child has origins in any of the original
peoples of Europe, the Middle East or North Africa.
(vi) Race--Unknown. The child or parent or legal guardian does not
know the race, or at least one race of the child.
(vii) Race--Abandoned. The child's race is unknown because the
child has been abandoned. Abandoned means that the child was left alone
or with others and the parent(s) or legal guardian(s)' identity is
unknown and cannot be ascertained. This includes a child left at a
``safe haven.''
(viii) Race--Declined. The child or parent or legal guardian has
declined to identify a race.
(4) Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. In general, a child's ethnicity
is determined by the child or the child's parent(s) or legal
guardian(s). A child is of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity if the child is
a person of Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central American or
other Spanish culture or origin, regardless of race. Indicate whether
this category applies with a ``yes'' or ``no.'' If the child or the
child's parent or legal guardian does not know or cannot communicate
whether the child is of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity, indicate
``unknown.'' If the child was abandoned indicate ``abandoned.''
Abandoned means that the child was left alone or with others and the
parent(s) or legal guardian(s)' identity is unknown and cannot be
ascertained. This includes a child left at a ``safe haven.'' If the
child or the child's parent(s) or legal guardian(s) refuses to identify
the child's ethnicity, indicate ``declined.''
(c) Adoption and guardianship assistance agreement information--(1)
Assistance agreement type. Indicate whether the child is or was in a
finalized adoption with a title IV-E adoption assistance agreement or
in a legal guardianship with a title IV-E guardianship assistance
agreement, pursuant to sections 473(a) and 473(d) of the Act, in effect
during the report period. Indicate ``title IV-E adoption assistance
agreement'' or ``title IV-E guardianship assistance agreement,'' as
appropriate.
(2) Adoption or guardianship subsidy amount. Indicate the per diem
dollar amount of the financial subsidy paid to the adoptive parent(s)
or legal guardian(s) on behalf of the child during the last month of
the current report period, if any. The title IV-E agency must indicate
``0'' if a financial subsidy was not paid during the last month of the
report period.
(d) Adoption finalization or guardianship legalization date.
Indicate the month, day and year that the child's adoption was
finalized or the guardianship became legalized.
(e) Agreement termination date. If the title IV-E agency terminated
the adoption assistance or guardianship assistance agreement or the
agreement expired during the report period, indicate the month, day and
year that the agreement terminated or expired; otherwise leave this
data element blank.
Sec. 1355.46 Compliance.
(a) Files subject to compliance. ACF will evaluate the out-of-home
care and adoption and guardianship assistance data files that a title
IV-E agency submits to determine whether the data complies with the
requirements of Sec. 1355.43 and the data file submission and data
quality standards described in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section.
ACF will exempt records related to a child in either data file whose
18th birthday occurred in a prior report period and will exempt records
relating to a child in the adoption and guardianship assistance data
file who is in a title IV-E guardianship from a compliance
determination as described in paragraph (e) of this section.
(b) Errors. ACF will utilize the error definitions in paragraphs
(b)(1) through (5) of this section to assess a title IV-E agency's out-
of-home care and adoption and guardianship assistance data files. This
assessment of errors will help ACF to determine if the title IV-E
agency's submitted data files meet the data file submission and data
quality standards outlined in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section.
ACF will develop and issue error specifications.
(1) Missing data. Missing data refers to instances in which a data
element has a blank or otherwise missing response, when such a response
is not a valid option as described in Sec. Sec. 1355.44 or 1355.45.
(2) Invalid data. Invalid data refers to instances in which a data
element contains a value that is outside the parameters of acceptable
responses or exceeds, either positively or negatively, the acceptable
range of response options as described in Sec. Sec. 1355.44 or
1355.45.
(3) Internally inconsistent data. Internally inconsistent data
refers to instances in which a data element fails an internal
consistency check designed to validate the logical relationship between
data elements within each record. This assessment will identify all
data elements involved in a particular check as in error.
(4) Cross-file errors. A cross-file error occurs when a cross-file
check determines that a response option for a data element recurs
across the records in either the out-of-home care data file or adoption
and guardianship assistance data file beyond a specified acceptable
threshold as specified per ACF.
(5) Tardy transactions. Tardy transactions are instances in which
the removal transaction date or exit transaction date described in
Sec. 1355.44(d)(2) and (g)(2) respectively,
[[Page 90584]]
are entered into the title IV-E agency's information system more than
30 days after the event.
(c) Data file standards. To be in compliance with the AFCARS
requirements, the title IV-E agency must submit a data file in
accordance with the data file standards described in paragraphs (c)(1)
through (3) of this section.
(1) Timely submission. ACF must receive the data files on or before
the reporting deadline described in Sec. 1355.43(a).
(2) Proper format. The data files must meet the technical standards
issued by ACF for data file construction and transmission. In addition,
each record subject to compliance standards within the data file must
have the data elements described in Sec. Sec. 1355.44(a)(1) through
(4), 1355.44(b)(1) and (b)(2)(i), 1355.45(a), and 1355.45(b)(1) and (2)
be 100 percent free of missing data, invalid data and internally
inconsistent data (see paragraphs (b)(1) through (3) of this section).
ACF will not process a title IV-E agency's data file that does not meet
the proper format standard.
(d) Data quality standards. (1) To be in compliance with the AFCARS
requirements, the title IV-E agency must submit a data file that has no
more than 10 percent total of missing, invalid, or internally
inconsistent data, or tardy transactions for each data element of
applicable records. These standards are in addition to the formatting
standards described in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.
(2) Acceptable cross-file. The data files must be free of cross-
file errors that exceed the acceptable thresholds, as defined by ACF.
(e) Compliance determination and corrected data. (1) ACF will first
determine whether the title IV-E agency's out-of-home care data file
and adoption and guardianship assistance data file meets the data file
standards in paragraph (c) of this section. Compliance is determined
separately for each data file.
(2) If each data file meets the data file standards, ACF will then
determine whether each data file meets the data quality standards in
paragraph (d) of this section. For every data element, we will divide
the total number of applicable records in error (numerator) by the
total number of applicable records (denominator), to determine whether
the title IV-E agency has met the applicable data quality standards.
(3) In general, a title IV-E agency that has not met either the
data file formatting standards or data quality standards must submit a
corrected data file(s) no later than when data is due for the
subsequent six month report period (i.e., by May 15 and November 14),
as applicable. ACF will determine that the corrected data file(s) is in
compliance if it meets the data file and data standards in paragraphs
(c) and (d) of this section. Exception: If ACF determines initially
that the title IV-E agency's data file has not met the data quality
standard related to tardy transactions, ACF will determine compliance
with regard to the transaction dates only in the out-of-home care data
file submitted for the subsequent report period.
(f) Noncompliance. If the title IV-E agency does not submit a
corrected data file, or submits a corrected data file that fails to
meet the compliance standards in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this
section, ACF will notify the title IV-E agency of such and apply
penalties as provided in Sec. 1355.47.
(g) Other assessments. ACF may use other monitoring tools or
assessment procedures to determine whether the title IV-E agency is
meeting all of the requirements of Sec. Sec. 1355.41 through 1355.45.
Sec. 1355.47 Penalties.
(a) Federal funds subject to a penalty. The funds that are subject
to a penalty are the title IV-E agency's claims for title IV-E foster
care administration and training for the quarter in which the title IV-
E agency is required to submit the data files. For data files due on
May 15, ACF will assess the penalty based on the title IV-E agency's
claims for the third quarter of the Federal fiscal year. For data files
due on November 14, ACF will assess the penalty based on the title IV-E
agency's claims for the first quarter of the Federal fiscal year.
(b) Penalty amounts. ACF will assess penalties in the following
amounts:
(1) First six month period. ACF will assess a penalty in the amount
of one sixth of one percent (\1/6\ of 1%) of the funds described in
paragraph (a) of this section for the first six month period in which
the title IV-E agency's submitted corrected data file does not comply
with Sec. 1355.46.
(2) Subsequent six month periods. ACF will assess a penalty in the
amount of one fourth of one percent (\1/4\ of 1%) of the funds
described in paragraph (a) of this section for each subsequent six
month period in which the title IV-E agency continues to be out of
compliance.
(c) Penalty reduction from grant. ACF will offset the title IV-E
agency's title IV-E foster care grant award in the amount of the
penalty from the title IV-E agency's claims following the title IV-E
agency notification of ACF's final determination of noncompliance.
(d) Appeals. The title IV-E agency may appeal ACF's final
determination of noncompliance to the HHS Departmental Appeals Board
pursuant to 45 CFR part 16.
Appendices A through E to Part 1355 [Removed]
0
5. Effective October 1, 2019, remove Appendices A through E to Part
1355.
Note: The following attachments will not appear in the Code of
Federal Regulations.
Attachment A--Out-of-Home Care Data File Elements Sec. 1355.44
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category Element Reponses options Section citation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
General information............... Title IV-E agency.... Name................ 1355.44(a)(1).
Report date.......... Date................ 1355.44(a)(2).
Local agency......... Name................ 1355.44(a)(3).
Child record number.. Number.............. 1355.44(a)(4).
Child information................. Child's date of birth Date................ 1355.44(b)(1).
Child's gender....... Male................ 1355.44(b)(2)(i).
Female..............
Child's sexual Straight or 1355.44(b)(2)(ii).
orientation. heterosexual.
Gay or lesbian
Bisexual
Don't know
Something else
Decline
Not applicable
[[Page 90585]]
Reason to know a .................... 1355.44(b)(3).
child is an ``Indian
child'' as defined
in the Indian Child
Welfare Act.
Inquired with the Yes................. 1355.44(b)(3)(i).
child's biological No..................
or adoptive mother. The biological or
adoptive mother is
deceased.
Inquired with the Yes................. 1355.44(b)(3)(ii).
child's biological No..................
or adoptive father. The biological or
adoptive father is
deceased.
Inquired with the Yes................. 1355.44(b)(3)(iii).
child's Indian No..................
custodian. Child does not have
an Indian custodian.
Inquired with the Yes................. 1355.44(b)(3)(iv).
child's extended No..................
family.
Inquired with the Yes................. 1355.44(b)(3)(v).
child. No..................
Child is a member or Yes................. 1355.44(b)(3)(vi).
eligible for No..................
membership in an Unknown.............
Indian tribe.
Domicile or residence Yes................. 1355.44(b)(3)(vii).
of the child, the No..................
child's parent, or Unknown.............
the child's Indian
custodian is on a
reservation or in an
Alaska Native
village.
Application of ICWA.. Yes................. 1355.44(b)(4).
No..................
The date that the Date................ 1355.44(b)(4)(i).
state title IV-E
agency first
discovered
information
indicating the child
is or may be an
Indian child as
defined in ICWA.
All federally Name(s)............. 1355.44(b)(4)(ii).
recognized Indian
tribe(s) that may
potentially be the
Indian child's
tribe(s).
Court determination Yes, ICWA applies... 1355.44(b)(5).
that ICWA applies. No, ICWA does not
apply.
No court
determination.
Date court determined Date................ 1355.44(b)(5)(i).
that ICWA applies.
Indian tribe that the Name................ 1355.44(b)(5)(ii).
court determined is
the Indian child's
tribe for ICWA
purposes.
Notification......... .................... 1355.44(b)(6).
Whether the Indian Yes................. 1355.44(b)(6)(i).
child's parent or No..................
Indian custodian was
sent legal notice
more than 10 days
prior to the first
child custody
proceeding in
accordance with 25
U.S.C. 1912(a).
Whether the Indian Yes................. 1355.44(b)(6)(ii).
child's tribe(s) was No..................
sent legal notice
more than 10 days
prior to the first
child custody
proceedings in
accordance with 25
U.S.C. 1912(a).
The Indian tribe(s) Name(s)............. 1355.44(b)(6)(iii).
that were sent
notice for a child
custody proceeding
as required in ICWA
at 25 U.S.C. 1912(a).
Request to transfer Yes................. 1355.44(b)(7).
to tribal court. No..................
Denial of transfer... Yes................. 1355.44(b)(8).
No..................
Either of the parents Applies............. 1355.44(b)(8)(i).
objected to Does not apply......
transferring the
case to tribal court.
The tribal court Applies............. 1355.44(b)(8)(ii).
declined the Does not apply......
transfer to the
tribal court.
The state court Applies............. 1355.44(b)(8)(iii).
determined good Does not apply......
cause exists for
denying the transfer
to tribal court.
Child's race......... .................... 1355.44(b)(9).
Race--American Indian Yes................. 1355.44(b)(9)(i).
or Alaska Native. No..................
[[Page 90586]]
Race--Asian.......... Yes................. 1355.44(b)(9)(ii).
No..................
Race--Black or Yes................. 1355.44(b)(9)(iii).
African America. No..................
Race--Native Hawaiian Yes................. 1355.44(b)(9)(iv).
or Other Pacific No..................
Islander.
Race--White.......... Yes................. 1355.44(b)(9)(v).
No..................
Race--Unknown........ Yes................. 1355.44(b)(9)(vi).
No..................
Race--Abandoned...... Yes................. 1355.44(b)(9)(vii).
No..................
Race--Declined....... Yes................. 1355.44(b)(9)(viii).
No..................
Child's Hispanic or Yes................. 1355.44(b)(10).
Latino ethnicity. No..................
Unknown.............
Abandoned...........
Declined............
Health assessment.... Yes................. 1355.44(b)(11)(i).
No..................
Date of health Date................ 1355.44(b)(11)(ii).
assessment.
Timely health Yes................. 1355.44(b)(12).
assessment. No..................
Health, behavioral or Child has a 1355.44(b)(13).
mental health diagnosed condition.
conditions. No exam or
assessment
conducted.
Exam or assessment
conducted and none
of the conditions
apply.
Exam or assessment
conducted but
results not
received.
Intellectual Existing condition.. 1355.44(b)(13)(i).
disability.
Previous condition
Does not apply
Autism spectrum Existing condition.. 1355.44(b)(13)(ii).
disorder.
Previous condition
Does not apply
Visual impairment and Existing condition.. 1355.44(b)(13)(iii).
blindness.
Previous condition
Does not apply
Hearing impairment Existing condition.. 1355.44(b)(13)(iv).
and deafness.
Previous condition
Does not apply
Orthopedic impairment Existing condition.. 1355.44(b)(13)(v).
or other physical Previous condition..
condition. Does not apply......
Mental/emotional Existing condition.. 1355.44(b)(13)(vi).
disorders.
Previous condition
Does not apply
Attention deficit Existing condition.. 1355.44(b)(13)(vii).
hyperactivity Previous condition..
disorder. Does not apply......
Serious mental Existing condition.. 1355.44(b)(13)(viii).
disorders.
Previous condition
Does not apply
Developmental delay.. Existing condition.. 1355.44(b)(13)(ix).
Previous condition
Does not apply
Developmental Existing condition.. 1355.44(b)(13)(x).
disability.
Previous condition
Does not apply
Other diagnosed Existing condition.. 1355.44(b)(13)(xi).
condition.
Previous condition
Does not apply
School enrollment.... Elementary.......... 1355.44(b)(14).
Secondary
Post-secondary
education or
training
College
Not school-age
Not enrolled
Educational level.... Not school-age...... 1355.44(b)(15).
Kindergarten
1st grade
[[Page 90587]]
2nd grade
3rd grade
4th grade
5th grade
6th grade
7th grade
8th grade
9th grade
10th grade
11th grade
12th grade
GED
Post-secondary
education or
training
College
Educational stability Yes................. 1355.44(b)(16).
No
Proximity............ Applies............. 1355.44(b)(16)(i).
Does not apply
District/zoning rules Applies............. 1355.44(b)(16)(ii).
Does not apply
Residential facility. Applies............. 1355.44(b)(16)(iii).
Does not apply
Services/programs.... Applies............. 1355.44(b)(16)(iv).
Does not apply
Child request........ Applies............. 1355.44(b)(16)(v).
Does not apply
Parent/Legal guardian Applies............. 1355.44(b)(16)(vi).
request.
Does not apply
Other................ Applies............. 1355.44(b)(16)(vii).
Does not apply
Pregnant or parenting .................... 1355.44(b)(17).
Child is pregnant as Yes................. 1355.44(b)(17)(i).
of end of report No..................
period.
Child has ever Yes................. 1355.44(b)(17)(ii).
fathered or bore a No..................
child.
Child and his/her Yes................. 1355.44(b)(17)(iii).
child(re) are placed No..................
together at any Not applicable......
point during the
report period.
Special education.... Yes................. 1355.44(b)(18).
No
Prior adoption....... Yes................. 1355.44(b)(19).
No abandoned
Prior adoption date.. Date................ 1355.44(b)(19)(i).
Prior adoption Yes................. 1355.44(b)(19)(ii).
intercountry.
No
Prior guardianship... Yes................. 1355.44(b)(20)(i).
No
Abandoned
Prior guardianship Date................ 1355.44(b)(20)(ii).
date.
Child financial and Child has received 1355.44(b)(21).
medical assistance. support/assistance
No support/
assistance received
SSI or Social Applies............. 1355.44(b)(21)(i).
Security benefits. Does not apply......
Title XIX Medicaid... Applies............. 1355.44(b)(21)(ii).
Does not apply
Title XXI SCHIP...... Applies............. 1355.44(b)(21)(iii).
Does not apply
State/Tribal adoption Applies............. 1355.44(b)(21)(iv).
assistance. Does not apply......
State/Tribal foster Applies............. 1355.44(b)(21)(v).
care. Does not apply......
Child support........ Applies............. 1355.44(b)(21)(vi).
Does not apply
Title IV-E adoption Applies............. 1355.44(b)(21)(vii).
subsidy. Does not apply......
Title IV-E Applies............. 1355.44(b)(21)(viii).
guardianship Does not apply......
assistance.
Title IV-A TANF...... Applies............. 1355.44(b)(21)(ix).
Does not apply
Title IV-B........... Applies............. 1355.44(b)(21)(x).
Does not apply
SSBG................. Applies............. 1355.44(b)(21)(xi).
[[Page 90588]]
Does not apply
Chafee Foster Care Applies............. 1355.44(b)(xii).
Independence Program. Does not apply......
Other................ Applies............. 1355.44(b)(xiii).
Does not apply
Title IV-E foster Yes................. 1355.44(b)(22).
care during report No..................
period.
Total number of Number.............. 1355.44(b)(23).
siblings.
Siblings in foster Number.............. 1355.44(b)(24).
care.
Siblings in living Number.............. 1355.44(b)(25).
arrangement.
Parent or legal guardian Year of birth of Date................ 1355.44(c)(1).
information. first parent or
legal guardian.
Year of birth of Date................ 1355.44(c)(2).
second parent or
legal guardian.
Tribal membership Yes................. 1355.44(c)(3).
mother. No..................
Unknown.............
Tribal membership Yes................. 1355.44(c)(4).
father. No..................
Unknown.............
Termination/ Voluntary........... 1355.44(c)(5).
modification of Involuntary.........
parental rights. Not applicable......
Termination/ Date................ 1355.44(c)(5)(i).
modification of
parental rights
petition.
Termination/ Date................ 1355.44(c)(5)(ii).
modification of
parental rights.
Involuntary .................... 1355.44(c)(6).
termination/
modification of
parental rights
under ICWA.
State court found Yes................. 1355.44(c)(6)(i).
beyond reasonable No..................
doubt that continued
custody of the
Indian child by the
parent or Indian
custodian is likely
to result in serious
emotional or
physical damage to
the Indian child in
accordance with 25
U.S.C. 1912(f).
Court decision to Yes................. 1355.44(c)(6)(ii).
involuntary No..................
terminate parental
rights included the
testimony of one or
more qualified
expert witnesses in
accordance with 25
U.S.C. 1912(f).
Prior to terminating Yes................. 1355.44(c)(6)(iii).
parental rights, the No..................
court concluded that
active efforts have
been made to prevent
the breakup of the
Indian family and
that those efforts
were unsuccessful in
accordance with 25
U.S.C. 1912(d).
Voluntary termination/ Yes................. 1355.44(c)(7).
modification of No..................
parental rights
under ICWA.
Removal information............... Date of child's Date................ 1355.44(d)(1).
removal.
Removal transaction Date................ 1355.44(d)(2).
date.
Removals under ICWA.. .................... 1355.44(d)(3).
Court order for Yes................. 1355.44(d)(3)(i).
foster care No..................
placement was made
as a result of clear
and convincing
evidence that
continued custody of
the Indian child by
the parent or Indian
custodian was likely
to result in serious
emotional or
physical damage to
the Indian child in
accordance with 25
U.S.C. 1912(e) and
25 CFR 121(a).
Evidence presented Yes................. 1355.44(d)(3)(ii).
for foster care No..................
placement as
indicated in
paragraph (d)(3)(i)
included the
testimony of a
qualified expert
witness in
accordance with 25
U.S.C. 1912(e) and
25 CFR 121(a).
[[Page 90589]]
Evidence presented Yes................. 1355.44(d)(3)(iii).
for foster care No..................
placement as
indicated in
paragraph (d)(3)(i)
indicates that prior
to each removal
reported in
paragraph (d)(1)
that active efforts
have been made to
prevent the breakup
of the Indian family
and that those
efforts were
unsuccessful in
accordance with 25
U.S.C. 1912(d).
Environment at Parent household.... 1355.44(d)(4).
removal. Relative household..
Legal guardian
household
Relative legal
guardian household
Justice facility
Medical/mental
health facility
Other
Authority for Court ordered....... 1355.44(d)(5).
placement and care Voluntary placement
responsibility. agreement.
Not yet determined
Child and family .................... 1355.44(d)(6).
circumstances at
removal.
Runaway.............. Applies............. 1355.44(d)(6)(i).
Does not apply
Whereabouts unknown.. Applies............. 1355.44(d)(6)(ii).
Does not apply......
Physical abuse....... Applies............. 1355.44(d)(6)(iii).
Does not apply
Sexual abuse......... Applies............. 1355.44(d)(6)(iv).
Does not apply
Psychological or Applies............. 1355.44(d)(6)(v).
emotional abuse. Does not apply......
Neglect.............. Applies............. 1355.44(d)(6)(vi)
Does not apply
Medical neglect...... Applies............. 1355.44(d)(6)(vii).
Does not apply
Domestic violence.... Applies............. 1355.44(d)(6)(viii).
Does not apply
Abandonment.......... Applies............. 1355.44(d)(6)(ix).
Does not apply
Failure to return.... Applies............. 1355.44(d)(6)(x).
Does not apply
Caretaker's alcohol Applies............. 1355.44(d)(6)(xi).
use. Does not apply......
Caretaker's drug use. Applies............. 1355.44(d)(6)(xii).
Does not apply
Child alcohol use.... Applies............. 1355.44(d)(6)(xiii).
Does not apply
Child drug use....... Applies............. 1355.44(d)(6)(xiv).
Does not apply
Prenatal alcohol Applies............. 1355.44(d)(6)(xv).
exposure. Does not apply......
Prenatal drug Applies............. 1355.44(d)(6)(xvi).
exposure. Does not apply......
Diagnosed condition.. Applies............. 1355.44(d)(6)(xvii).
Does not apply
Inadequate access to Applies............. 1355.44(d)(6)(xviii).
mental health Does not apply......
services.
Inadequate access to Applies............. 1355.44(d)(6)(xix).
medical services. Does not apply......
Child behavior Applies............. 1355.44(d)(6)(xx).
problem. Does not apply......
Death of caretaker... Applies............. 1355.44(d)(6)(xxi).
Does not apply
Incarceration of Applies............. 1355.44(d)(6)(xxii).
caretaker. Does not apply......
Caretaker's Applies............. 1355.44(d)(6)(xxiii).
significant Does not apply......
impairment--physical/
emotional.
Caretaker's Applies............. 1355.44(d)(6)(xxiv).
significant Does not apply......
impairment--cognitiv
e.
Inadequate housing... Applies............. 1355.44(d)(6)(xxv).
Does not apply
[[Page 90590]]
Voluntary Applies............. 1355.44(d)(6)(xxvi).
relinquishment for Does not apply......
adoption.
Child requested Applies............. 1355.44(d)(6)(xxvii).
placement. Does not apply......
Sex trafficking...... Applies............. 1355.44(d)(6)(xxviii).
Does not apply
Parental immigration Applies............. 1355.44(d)(6)(xxix).
detainment or Does not apply......
deportation.
Family conflict Applies............. 1355.44(d)(6)(xxx).
related to child's Does not apply......
sexual orientation,
gender identity, or
gender expression.
Educational neglect.. Applies............. 1355.44(d)(6)(xxxi).
Does not apply
Public agency title Applies............. 1355.44(d)(6)(xxxii).
IV-E agreement. Does not apply......
Tribal title IV-E Applies............. 1355.44(d)(6)(xxxiii).
agreement. Does not apply......
Homelessness......... Applies............. 1355.44(d)(6)(xxxiv).
Does not apply
Victim of sex Yes................. 1355.44(d)(7).
trafficking prior to No..................
entering foster care.
Report to law Yes................. 1355.44(d)(7)(i).
enforcement. No..................
Date................. Date................ 1355.44(d)(7)(ii)
Victim of sex Yes................. 1355.44(d)(8).
trafficking while in No..................
foster care.
Report to law Yes................. 1355.44(d)(8)(i).
enforcement. No..................
Date................. Date................ 1355.44(d)(8)(ii)
Living arrangement and provider Date of living Date 1355.44(e)(1)
information. arrangement Yes................. 1355.44(e)(2)
Foster family home...
No
Foster family home .................... 1355.44(e)(3)
type.
Licensed home........ Applies............. 1355.44(e)(3)(i).
Does not apply
Therapeutic foster Applies............. 1355.44(e)(3)(ii).
family home. Does not apply......
Shelter care foster Applies............. 1355.44(e)(3)(iii).
family home. Does not apply......
Relative foster Applies............. 1355.44(e)(3)(iv).
family home. Does not apply......
Pre-adoptive home.... Applies............. 1355.44(e)(3)(v).
Does not apply
Kin foster family Applies............. 1355.44(e)(3)(vi).
home.
Does not apply
Other living Group home-family 1355.44(e)(4).
arrangement type. operated.
Group home-staff
operated
Group home-shelter
care
Residential
treatment center
Child care
institution
Child care
institution-shelter
care
Supervised
independent living
Juvenile justice
facility
Medical or
rehabilitative
facility
Psychiatric hospital
Runaway
Whereabouts unknown
Placed at home
Private agency living Private agency 1355.44(e)(5)
arrangement. involvement.
No private agency
involvement
Location of living Out-of-state or out- 1355.44(e)(6).
arrangement. of-tribal service
area
In-state or in-
tribal service area
Out-of-country
Runaway or
whereabouts Unknown
Jurisdiction or Name................ 1355.44(e)(7).
country where child
is living.
Available ICWA foster .................... 1355.44(e)(8).
care and pre-
adoptive placement
preferences.
A member of the Yes................. 1355.44(e)(8)(i).
Indian's extended No..................
family.
[[Page 90591]]
A foster home Yes................. 1355.44(e)(8)(ii).
licensed, approved, No..................
or specified by the
Indian child's tribe.
An Indian foster home Yes................. 1355.44(e)(8)(iii).
licensed or approved No..................
by an authorized non-
Indian licensing
authority.
An institution for Yes................. 1355.44(e)(8)(iv).
children approved by No..................
an Indian tribe or
operated by an
Indian organization
which has a program
suitable to meet the
Indian child's needs.
A placement that Yes................. 1355.44(e)(8)(v).
complies with the No..................
order of preference
for foster care or
pre-adoptive
placements
established by an
Indian child's
tribe, in accordance
with 25 U.S.C.
1915(c).
Foster care and pre- A member of the 1355.44(e)(9).
adoptive placements Indian child's
preferences under extended family
ICWA. A foster home
licensed, approved,
or specified by the
Indian child's
tribe.
An Indian foster
home licensed or
approved by an
authorized non-
Indian licensing
authority
An institution for
children approved
by an Indian tribe
or operated by an
Indian organization
which has a program
suitable to meet
the Indian child's
needs
A placement that
complies with the
order of preference
for foster care or
pre-adoptive
placements
established by an
Indian child's
tribe, in
accordance with 25
U.S.C. 1915(c)
Placement does not
meet ICWA placement
preferences
Good cause under ICWA Yes................. 1355.44(e)(10).
No..................
Basis for good cause. .................... 1355.44(e)(11)
Request of one or Yes................. 1355.44(e)(11)(i).
both of the Indian No..................
child's parents.
Request of the Indian Yes................. 1355.44(e)(11)(ii).
child. No..................
Unavailability of Yes................. 1355.44(e)(11)(iii).
suitable placement No..................
after a
determination by the
court that a
diligent search was
conducted to find
suitable placements
meeting the
placement
preferences in ICWA
art 25 U.S.C. 1915
but none has been
located.
Extraordinary Yes................. 1355.44(e)(11)(iv).
physical, mental or No..................
emotional needs of
the Indian child,
such as specialized
treatment services
that may be
unavailable in the
community where
families who meet
the placement
preferences live.
Presence of a sibling Yes................. 1355.44(e)(11)(v).
attachment that can No..................
be maintained only
through a particular
placement.
Marital status of the Married couple...... 1355.44(e)(12).
foster parents. Unmarried couple....
Separated
Single adult
Child's relationships Paternal 1355.44(e)(13).
to the foster grandparent(s)
parents. Maternal
grandparent(s).
Other paternal
relative(s)
Other maternal
relative(s)
Sibling(s)
Non-relative(s)
Kin
Year of birth for Date................ 1355.44(e)(14).
first foster parent.
[[Page 90592]]
First foster parent Yes................. 1355.44(e)(15).
tribal membership. No..................
Unknown.............
Race of first foster .................... 1355.44(e)(16).
parent.
Race--American Indian Yes................. 1355.44(e)(16)(i).
or Alaska Native. No..................
Race--Asian.......... Yes................. 1355.44(e)(16)(ii).
No
Race--Black or Yes................. 1355.44(e)(16)(iii).
African America. No..................
Race--Native Hawaiian Yes................. 1355.44(e)(16)(iv)
or Other Pacific No..................
Islander.
Race--White.......... Yes................. 1355.44(e)(16)(v).
No
Race--Unknown........ Yes................. 1355.44(e)(16)(vi).
No
Race--Declined....... Yes................. 1355.44(e)(16)(vii).
No
Hispanic or Latino Yes................. 1355.44(e)(17).
ethnicity of first No..................
foster parent. Unknown.............
Declined............
Gender of first Female.............. 1355.44(e)(18).
foster parent. Male................
First foster parent Straight or 1355.44(e)(19).
sexual orientation. heterosexual.
Gay or lesbian......
Bisexual
Don't know
Something else
Declined
Year of birth for Date................ 1355.44(e)(20).
second foster parent.
Second foster parent Yes................. 1355.44(e)(21).
tribal membership. No..................
Unknown.............
Race of second foster .................... 1355.44(e)(22).
parent.
Race--American Indian Yes................. 1355.44(e)(22)(i).
or Alaska Native. No..................
Race--Asian.......... Yes................. 1355.44(e)(22)(ii).
No
Race--Black or Yes................. 1355.44(e)(22)(iii).
African America. No..................
Race--Native Hawaiian Yes................. 1355.44(e)(22)(iv).
or Other Pacific No..................
Islander.
Race--White.......... Yes................. 1355.44(e)(22)(v)
No
Race--Unknown........ Yes................. 1355.44(e)(22)(vi).
No
Race--Declined....... Yes................. 1355.44(e)(22)(vii).
No
Hispanic or Latino Yes................. 1355.44(e)(23).
ethnicity of second No..................
foster parent. Unknown.............
Declined............
Gender of second Female.............. 1355.44(e)(24).
foster parent. Male................
Second foster parent Straight or 1355.44(e)(25).
sexual orientation. heterosexual.
Gay or lesbian......
Bisexual
Don't know
Something else
Declined
Permanency planning............... Permanency plan...... Reunify with 1355.44(f)(1)
parent(s) or legal
guardian(s)
Live with other
relatives
Adoption
Guardianship
Planned permanent
living arrangement
Permanency plan not
established
Date of permanency Date................ 1355.44(f)(2).
plan.
Date of periodic Date................ 1355.44(f)(3).
review.
Date of permanency Date................ 1355.44(f)(4).
hearing.
[[Page 90593]]
Juvenile justice..... Yes................. 1355.44(f)(5)
No
Caseworker visit Date................ 1355.44(f)(6).
dates.
Caseworker visit Child's residence... 1355.44(f)(7).
location. Other location......
Transition plan...... Yes................. 1355.44(f)(8).
No
Not applicable
Date of transition Date................ 1355.44(f)(9).
plan.
Active efforts....... .................... 1355.44(f)(10)
Assist the parent(s) Applies............. 1355.44(f)(10)(i).
or Indian custodian Does not apply......
through the steps of
a case plan and with
developing the
resources necessary
to satisfy the case
plan.
Conduct a Applies............. 1355.44(f)(10)(ii).
comprehensive Does not apply......
assessment of the
circumstances of the
Indian child's
family, with a focus
on safe
reunification as the
most desirable goal.
Identify appropriate Applies............. 1355.44(f)(10)(iii).
services and to help Does not apply......
the parent overcome
barriers, including
actively assisting
the parents in
obtaining such
services.
Identify, notify and Applies............. 1355.44(f)(10)(iv).
invite Does not apply......
representatives of
the Indian child's
tribe to participate
in providing support
and services to the
Indian child's
family and in family
team meetings,
permanency planning
and resolution of
placement issues.
Conduct or cause to Applies............. 1355.44(f)(10)(v).
be conducted a Does not apply......
diligent search for
the Indian child's
expended family
members, and
contacting and
consulting with
extended family
members to provide
family structure and
support for the
Indian child and the
Indian child's
parents.
Offer and employ all Applies............. 1355.44(f)(10)(vi).
available and Does not apply......
culturally
appropriate family
preservation
strategies and
facilitate the use
of remedial and
rehabilitative
services provide by
the child's tribe.
Take steps to keep Applies............. 1355.44(f)(10)(vii).
siblings together Does not apply......
whenever possible.
Support regular Applies............. 1355.44(f)(10)(viii).
visits with parents Does not apply......
or Indian custodians
in the most natural
setting possible as
well as trial home
visits of the Indian
child during any
period of removal,
consistent with the
need to ensure the
health, safety, and
welfare of the child.
Identify community Applies............. 1355.44(f)(10)(ix).
resources including Does not apply......
housing, financial,
transportation,
mental health,
substance use and
peer support
services and
actively assisting
the Indian child's
parents or when
appropriate, the
child's family in
utilizing and
accessing those
resources.
Monitor progress and Applies............. 1355.44(f)(10)(x).
participation in Does not apply......
services.
Consider alternative Applies............. 1355.44(f)(10)(xi).
ways to address the Does not apply......
needs of the Indian
child's parents and,
where appropriate,
the family, if the
optimum services do
not exist or are not
available.
Provide post- Applies............. 1355.44(f)(10)(xii).
reunification Does not apply......
services and
monitoring.
[[Page 90594]]
Other active efforts Applies............. 1355.44(f)(10)(xiii).
tailored to the Does not apply......
facts and
circumstances of the
case.
General exit information.......... Date of exit......... Date................ 1355.44(g)(1).
Exit transaction date Date................ 1355.44(g)(2).
Exit reason.......... Not applicable...... 1355.44(g)(3)
Reunify with
parent(s)/legal
guardian(s)
Live with other
relatives
Adoption
Emancipation
Guardianship
Runaway or
whereabouts unknown
Death of child
Transfer to another
agency
Transfer to another State title IV-E 1355.44(g)(4)
agency. agency.
Tribal title IV-E
agency
Indian tribe or
tribal agency (non
IV-E)
Juvenile justice
agency
Mental health agency
Other public agency
Private agency
Exit to adoption and guardianship Marital status of Married couple...... 1355.44(h)(1).
information. adoptive parent(s) Married but
or guardian(s). individually
adopting or
obtaining legal
guardianship.
Separated
Unmarried couple
Single adult
Child's relationship .................... 1355.44(h)(2)
to the adoptive
parent(s) or
guardian(s).
Paternal Applies............. 1355.44(h)(2)(i).
grandparent(s). Does not apply......
Maternal Applies............. 1355.44(h)(2)(ii).
grandparent(s). Does not apply......
Other paternal Applies............. 1355.44(h)(2)(iii).
relative(s). Does not apply......
Other maternal Applies............. 1355.44(h)(2)(iv).
relative(s). Does not apply......
Sibling(s)........... Applies............. 1355.44(h)(2)(v).
Does not apply
Kin.................. Applies............. 1355.44(h)(2)(vi).
Does not apply
Non-relative(s)...... Applies............. 1355.44(h)(2)(vii).
Does not apply
Foster parent(s)..... Applies............. 1355.44(h)(2)(viii).
Does not apply
Date of birth of Date................ 1355.44(h)(3).
first adoptive
parent or guardian.
First adoptive parent Yes................. 1355.44(h)(4).
or guardian tribal No..................
membership. Unknown.............
Race of first .................... 1355.44(h)(5)
adoptive parent or
guardian.
Race--American Indian Yes................. 1355.44(h)(5)(i).
or Alaska Native. No..................
Race--Asian.......... Yes................. 1355.44(h)(5)(ii).
No
Race--Black or Yes................. 1355.44(h)(5)(iii).
African America. No..................
Race--Native Hawaiian Yes................. 1355.44(h)(5)(iv).
or Other Pacific No..................
Islander.
Race--White.......... Yes................. 1355.44(h)(5)(v).
No
Race--Unknown........ Yes................. 1355.44(h)(5)(vi).
No
Race--Declined....... Yes................. 1355.44(h)(5)(vii).
No
Hispanic or Latino Yes................. 1355.44(h)(6).
ethnicity of first No..................
adoptive parent or Unknown.............
guardian. Declined............
[[Page 90595]]
Gender of first Female.............. 1355.44(h)(7).
adoptive parent or Male................
guardian.
First adoptive parent Straight or 1355.44(h)(8).
or legal guardian Heterosexual.
sexual orientation. Gay or lesbian......
Bisexual
Don't know
Something else
Declined
Date of birth of Date................ 1355.44(h)(9)
second adoptive
parent, guardian or
other member of the
couple.
Second adoptive Yes................. 1355.44(h)(10).
parent, guardian, or No..................
other member of the Unknown.............
couple tribal
membership.
Race of second .................... 1355.44(h)(11).
adoptive parent,
guardian, or other
member of the couple.
Race--American Indian Yes................. 1355.44(h)(11)(i).
or Alaska Native. No..................
Race--Asian.......... Yes................. 1355.44(h)(11)(ii).
No
Race--Black or Yes................. 1355.44(h)(11)(iii).
African America. No..................
Race--Native Hawaiian Yes................. 1355.44(h)(11)(iv).
or Other Pacific No..................
Islander.
Race--White.......... Yes................. 1355.44(h)(11)(v).
No
Race--Unknown........ Yes................. 1355.44(h)(11)(vi).
No
Race--Declined....... Yes................. 1355.44(h)(11)(vii).
No
Hispanic or Latino Yes................. 1355.44(h)(12).
ethnicity of second No..................
adoptive parent, Unknown.............
guardian, or other Declined............
member of the couple.
Gender of second Female.............. 1355.44(h)(13).
adoptive parent, Male................
guardian, or other
member of the couple.
Second adoptive Straight or 1355.44(h)(14).
parent, guardian, or heterosexual.
other member of the Gay or lesbian......
couple sexual Bisexual............
orientation. Don't know..........
Something else
Declined
Inter/ Interjurisdictional 1355.44(h)(15).
Intrajurisdictional adoption or
adoption or guardianship
guardianship.
Intercountry
adoption or
guardianship
Intrajurisdictional
adoption or
guardianship
Interjurisdictional Name................ 1355.44(h)(16).
adoption or
guardianship
jurisdiction.
Adoption or Title IV-E agency... 1355.44(h)(17).
guardianship placing Private agency under
agency. agreement.
Indian tribe under
contract/agreement
Assistance agreement Title IV-E adoption 1355.44(h)(18).
type. assistance
agreement
State/tribal
adoption assistance
agreement
Adoption--Title IV-E
agreement non-
recurring expenses
only
Adoption--Title IV-E
agreement Medicaid
only
Title IV-E
guardianship
assistance
agreement
State/tribal
guardianship
assistance
agreement
No agreement
Siblings in adoptive Number.............. 1355.44(h)(19).
or guardianship home.
Available ICWA .................... 1355.44(h)(20).
adoptive placements.
A member of the Yes................. 1355.44(h)(20)(i).
Indian child's No..................
extended family.
[[Page 90596]]
Other members of the Yes................. 1355.44(h)(20)(ii).
Indian child's tribe. No..................
Other Indian families Yes................. 1355.44(h)(20)(iii).
No
A placement that Yes................. 1355.44(h)(20)(iv).
complies with the No..................
order of preference
for foster care or
pre-adoptive
placements
established by an
Indian child's
tribe, in accordance
with 25 U.S.C.
1915(c).
Adoption placement A member of the 1355.44(h)(21).
preferences under Indian child's
ICWA. extended family
Other members of the
Indian child's
tribe
Other Indian
families
A placement that
complies with the
order of preference
for adoptive
placements
established by an
Indian child's
tribe, in
accordance with 25
U.S.C. 1915(c)
Placement does not
meet ICWA placement
preferences
Good cause under ICWA Yes................. 1355.44(h)(22).
No..................
Basis for good cause. .................... 1355.44(h)(23)
Request of one or Yes................. 1355.44(h)(23)(i)
both of the child's No..................
parents.
Request of the Indian Yes................. 1355.44(h)(23)(ii).
child. No..................
The unavailability of Yes................. 1355.44(h)(23)(iii).
a suitable placement No..................
after a
determination by the
court that a
diligent search was
conducted to find
suitable placements
meeting the
placement
preferences in ICWA
at 25 U.S.C. 1915
but none has been
located.
The extraordinary Yes................. 1355.44(h)(23)(iv).
physical, mental, or No..................
emotional needs of
the Indian child,
such as specialized
treatment services
that may be
unavailable in the
community where
families who meet
the placement
preferences live.
The presence of a Yes................. 1355.44(h)(23)(v).
sibling attachment No..................
that can be
maintained only
through a particular
placement.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment B--Adoption Assistance Data File Elements Sec. 1355.45
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Element Reponses options Section citation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title IV-E agency........................ Name........................ 1355.45(a)(1).
Report date.............................. Date........................ 1355.45(a)(2).
Child record number...................... Number...................... 1355.45(a)(3).
Child's date of birth.................... Date........................ 1355.45(b)(1).
Child's gender........................... Male........................ 1355.45(b)(2).
Female......................
Child's race............................. 1355.45(b)(3).
Race--American Indian or Alaska Native... Yes......................... 1355.45(b)(3)(i).
No..........................
Race--Asian.............................. Yes......................... 1355.45(b)(3)(ii).
No..........................
Race--Black or African America........... Yes......................... 1355.45(b)(3)(iii).
No..........................
Race--Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Yes......................... 1355.45(b)(3)(iv).
Islander. No..........................
Race--White.............................. Yes......................... 1355.45(b)(3)(v).
No..........................
Race--Unknown............................ Yes......................... 1355.45(b)(3)(vi).
No..........................
Race--Abandoned.......................... Yes......................... 1355.45(b)(3)(vii).
No..........................
[[Page 90597]]
Race--Declined........................... Yes......................... 1355.45(b)(3)(viii).
No..........................
Hispanic or Latino Ethnicity............. Yes......................... 1355.45(b)(4).
No..........................
Unknown.....................
Abandoned...................
Declined....................
Assistance agreement type................ Title IV-E adoption 1355.45(c)(1).
assistance agreement.
Title IV-E guardianship
assistance agreement.
Subsidy amount........................... Number...................... 1355.45(c)(2).
Adoption finalization or guardianship Date........................ 1355.45(d).
legalization date.
Agreement termination date............... Date........................ 1355.45(e).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2016-29366 Filed 12-13-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P