Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; NUCALA, 89946-89947 [2016-29838]
Download as PDF
89946
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 13, 2016 / Notices
EARLY TERMINATIONS GRANTED NOVEMBER 1, 2016 THRU NOVEMBER 30, 2016—Continued
20170269
20170271
20170272
20170280
20170289
G
G
G
G
G
Kendall Automotive Group, Inc.; David and Lorraine Edmark; Kendall Automotive Group, Inc.
Ascent Holdings, LLC; Fulcrum BioEnergy, Inc.; Ascent Holdings, LLC.
JBG SMITH Properties; JBG/Operating Partners, L.P.; JBG SMITH Properties.
Blue Star Parent, L.P.; Ansira Holdings, LLC; Blue Star Parent, L.P.
Antelope NewCo, Inc.; AlixPartners Holdings, LLP; Antelope NewCo, Inc.
11/30/2016
20170159
20170169
20170274
20170279
20170281
20170284
20170296
20170298
20170300
20170306
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
The Hearst Family Trust; GTCR Fund X/A LP; The Hearst Family Trust.
Insight MB Parent LLC; MB Parent Holdings, LLC; Insight MB Parent LLC.
Quintiles IMS Holdings, Inc.; Jon C. Anderson; Quintiles IMS Holdings, Inc.
Calpine Corporation; NAPGS Holdco, LLC; Calpine Corporation.
Adobe Systems Incorporated; TubeMogul, Inc.; Adobe Systems Incorporated.
CENTRO ARTE SCIENZA E TECNOLOGIA S.R.L.; Nestle S. A.; CENTRO ARTE SCIENZA E TECNOLOGIA S.R.L.
Bain Capital Fund XI, L.P.; Blue Nile, Inc.; Bain Capital Fund XI, L.P.
AIPCF VI AIV Moly-Cop (Cayman), LP; Arrium Limited; AIPCF VI AIV Moly-Cop (Cayman), LP.
Wind Point Partners, VIII-A, L.P.; Michael J. Baab; Wind Point Partners, VIII-A, L.P.
AIM Marina Holdings, LLC; John D. Brewer, Jr. and Margaret S. Brewer; AIM Marina Holdings, LLC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Theresa Kingsberry Program Support
Specialist, Federal Trade Commission
Premerger Notification Office Bureau of
Competition, Room CC–5301,
Washington, DC 20024, (202) 326–3100.
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark
Secretary.
Electronic Submissions
[FR Doc. 2016–29771 Filed 12–12–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2016–E–0625]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; NUCALA
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for
NUCALA and is publishing this notice
of that determination as required by
law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of an
application to the Director of the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO),
Department of Commerce, for the
extension of a patent which claims that
human biological product.
DATES: Anyone with knowledge that any
of the dates as published (see the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section) are
incorrect may submit either electronic
or written comments and ask for a
redetermination by February 13, 2017.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:08 Dec 12, 2016
Jkt 241001
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
June 12, 2017. See ‘‘Petitions’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
more information.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
as follows:
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management, FDA will post your
comment, as well as any attachments,
except for information submitted,
marked and identified, as confidential,
if submitted as detailed in
‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2016–E–0625 for ‘‘Determination of
Regulatory Review Period for Purposes
of Patent Extension; NUCALA.’’
Received comments will be placed in
the docket and, except for those
submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Division of Dockets Management
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
both copies to the Division of Dockets
Management. If you do not wish your
name and contact information to be
made publicly available, you can
provide this information on the cover
sheet and not in the body of your
comments and you must identify this
information as ‘‘confidential.’’ Any
E:\FR\FM\13DEN1.SGM
13DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 13, 2016 / Notices
information marked as ‘‘confidential’’
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more
information about FDA’s posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR
56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://www.fda.gov/
regulatoryinformation/dockets/
default.htm.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51,
Rm. 6250, Silver Spring, MD 20993,
301–796–3600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES
I. Background
The Drug Price Competition and
Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984
(Pub. L. 98–417) and the Generic
Animal Drug and Patent Term
Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100–670)
generally provide that a patent may be
extended for a period of up to 5 years
so long as the patented item (human
drug product, animal drug product,
medical device, food additive, or color
additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was
marketed. Under these acts, a product’s
regulatory review period forms the basis
for determining the amount of extension
an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For human
biological products, the testing phase
begins when the exemption to permit
the clinical investigations of the
biological product becomes effective
and runs until the approval phase
begins. The approval phase starts with
the initial submission of an application
to market the human biological product
and continues until FDA grants
permission to market the biological
product. Although only a portion of a
regulatory review period may count
toward the actual amount of extension
that the Director of the USPTO may
award (for example, half the testing
phase must be subtracted as well as any
time that may have occurred before the
patent was issued), FDA’s determination
of the length of a regulatory review
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:08 Dec 12, 2016
Jkt 241001
period for a human biological product
will include all of the testing phase and
approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C.
156(g)(1)(B).
FDA has approved for marketing the
human biologic product NUCALA
(mepolizumab). NUCALA is indicated
for add-on maintenance treatment of
patients with severe asthma aged 12
years and older, and with an
eosinophilic phenotype. Subsequent to
this approval, the USPTO received a
patent term restoration application for
NUCALA (U.S. Patent No. 5,693,323)
from GlaxoSmithKline LLC, and the
USPTO requested FDA’s assistance in
determining this patent’s eligibility for
patent term restoration. In a letter dated
May 10, 2016, FDA advised the USPTO
that this human biological product had
undergone a regulatory review period
and that the approval of NUCALA
represented the first permitted
commercial marketing or use of the
product. Thereafter, the USPTO
requested that FDA determine the
product’s regulatory review period.
II. Determination of Regulatory Review
Period
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
NUCALA is 6,862 days. Of this time,
6,496 days occurred during the testing
phase of the regulatory review period,
while 366 days occurred during the
approval phase. These periods of time
were derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(i))
became effective: January 22, 1997. The
applicant claims January 21, 1997, as
the date the investigational new drug
application (IND) became effective.
However, FDA records indicate that the
IND effective date was January 22, 1997,
which was 30 days after FDA receipt of
the IND.
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
human biological product under section
351 of the Public Health Service Act (42
U.S.C. 262): November 4, 2014. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that the
biologics license application (BLA) for
NUCALA (BLA 125526) was initially
submitted on November 4, 2014.
3. The date the application was
approved: November 4, 2015. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that BLA
125526 was approved on November 4,
2015.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the USPTO applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
89947
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 5 years of patent
term extension.
III. Petitions
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit either electronic or written
comments and ask for a redetermination
(see DATES). Furthermore, any interested
person may petition FDA for a
determination regarding whether the
applicant for extension acted with due
diligence during the regulatory review
period. To meet its burden, the petition
must be timely (see DATES) and contain
sufficient facts to merit an FDA
investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1,
98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41–42, 1984.)
Petitions should be in the format
specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Submit petitions electronically to
https://www.regulations.gov at Docket
No. FDA–2013–S–0610. Submit written
petitions (two copies are required) to the
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.
Dated: December 8, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016–29838 Filed 12–12–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2013–N–0764]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for Office of
Management and Budget Review;
Comment Request; Animal Feed
Regulatory Program Standards
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing
that a proposed collection of
information has been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the
collection of information by January 12,
2017.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on
the information collection are received,
OMB recommends that written
comments be faxed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, FAX:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13DEN1.SGM
13DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 239 (Tuesday, December 13, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 89946-89947]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-29838]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2016-E-0625]
Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; NUCALA
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the
regulatory review period for NUCALA and is publishing this notice of
that determination as required by law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of an application to the Director of the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), Department of Commerce, for the
extension of a patent which claims that human biological product.
DATES: Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published (see
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section) are incorrect may submit either
electronic or written comments and ask for a redetermination by
February 13, 2017. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA
for a determination regarding whether the applicant for extension acted
with due diligence during the regulatory review period by June 12,
2017. See ``Petitions'' in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
more information.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper comments submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2016-E-0625 for ``Determination of Regulatory Review Period for
Purposes of Patent Extension; NUCALA.'' Received comments will be
placed in the docket and, except for those submitted as ``Confidential
Submissions,'' publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at
the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Division of Dockets Management. If you do not
wish your name and contact information to be made publicly available,
you can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body
of your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any
[[Page 89947]]
information marked as ``confidential'' will not be disclosed except in
accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other applicable disclosure law. For
more information about FDA's posting of comments to public dockets, see
80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access the information at: https://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/dockets/default.htm.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg.
51, Rm. 6250, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-3600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984
(Pub. L. 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug and Patent Term
Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100-670) generally provide that a patent may
be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as the patented item
(human drug product, animal drug product, medical device, food
additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory review by FDA
before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a product's regulatory
review period forms the basis for determining the amount of extension
an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A
testing phase and an approval phase. For human biological products, the
testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the biological product becomes effective and runs
until the approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the
initial submission of an application to market the human biological
product and continues until FDA grants permission to market the
biological product. Although only a portion of a regulatory review
period may count toward the actual amount of extension that the
Director of the USPTO may award (for example, half the testing phase
must be subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before
the patent was issued), FDA's determination of the length of a
regulatory review period for a human biological product will include
all of the testing phase and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C.
156(g)(1)(B).
FDA has approved for marketing the human biologic product NUCALA
(mepolizumab). NUCALA is indicated for add-on maintenance treatment of
patients with severe asthma aged 12 years and older, and with an
eosinophilic phenotype. Subsequent to this approval, the USPTO received
a patent term restoration application for NUCALA (U.S. Patent No.
5,693,323) from GlaxoSmithKline LLC, and the USPTO requested FDA's
assistance in determining this patent's eligibility for patent term
restoration. In a letter dated May 10, 2016, FDA advised the USPTO that
this human biological product had undergone a regulatory review period
and that the approval of NUCALA represented the first permitted
commercial marketing or use of the product. Thereafter, the USPTO
requested that FDA determine the product's regulatory review period.
II. Determination of Regulatory Review Period
FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for
NUCALA is 6,862 days. Of this time, 6,496 days occurred during the
testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 366 days occurred
during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the
following dates:
1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective: January 22,
1997. The applicant claims January 21, 1997, as the date the
investigational new drug application (IND) became effective. However,
FDA records indicate that the IND effective date was January 22, 1997,
which was 30 days after FDA receipt of the IND.
2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to
the human biological product under section 351 of the Public Health
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262): November 4, 2014. FDA has verified the
applicant's claim that the biologics license application (BLA) for
NUCALA (BLA 125526) was initially submitted on November 4, 2014.
3. The date the application was approved: November 4, 2015. FDA has
verified the applicant's claim that BLA 125526 was approved on November
4, 2015.
This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the USPTO
applies several statutory limitations in its calculations of the actual
period for patent extension. In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 5 years of patent term extension.
III. Petitions
Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are
incorrect may submit either electronic or written comments and ask for
a redetermination (see DATES). Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence during the regulatory review period.
To meet its burden, the petition must be timely (see DATES) and contain
sufficient facts to merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part
1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the
format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Submit petitions electronically to https://www.regulations.gov at
Docket No. FDA-2013-S-0610. Submit written petitions (two copies are
required) to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Dated: December 8, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-29838 Filed 12-12-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P