Health Insurance Providers Fee, 89017-89019 [2016-29487]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 237 / Friday, December 9, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Department requests information as to
why this should be so. Additionally, the
Department seeks views and proposals
on what an entirely new proposed rule
may look like. For instance, if the
Department should no longer issue
licenses, what do commenters envision
Federal involvement to be?
3. How can revisions to the existing
rule ensure that persons who conduct
trade are reputable and that there are
mechanisms in place to address traders
who violate Federal or Tribal law?
If there is a need to update 25 CFR
part 140, we solicit information and
suggestions on how revisions to the
existing rule can ensure that there are
reputable actors in Indian Country.
Further, the Department requests
information and suggestions on
revisions to the existing rule to ensure
that violations of Federal or Tribal law
are properly addressed. The Department
acknowledges that many Tribes have
comprehensive schemes in place
regulating traders conducting business
within their jurisdiction.
4. How do Tribes currently regulate
trade in Indian Country, and how might
revisions to 25 CFR part 140 help Tribes
regulate trade in Indian Country?
As mentioned, the Department
recognizes that many Tribes have
enacted comprehensive laws concerning
economic activity occurring on Tribal
lands and that many Tribal courts retain
jurisdiction over Indian traders. For
example, the Department is aware that
some Tribes have required disclosure of
violations of business licenses and of
enforcement actions taken by a Federal,
Tribal, or State entity for trade-related
activity. Tribes have also required the
disclosure of any pending lawsuits
involving the person and the business,
and disclosure of tax liens against the
business and other unsatisfied
judgments. Other items that Tribes have
required include a Federal employer
identification number, a State
registration number, insurance or
bonding information, copies of all
licenses (state, county, city or Tribal)
currently held by the business, and
affiliation with any other businesses.
With this in mind, the Department
requests information on how Tribes
currently regulate trade within their
jurisdiction. The Department requests
specific information and suggestions,
including language on how the Federal
government can bolster those Tribes that
currently comprehensively regulate
trade, as well as those Tribes that do not
do so presently.
5. What types of trade should be
regulated and what types of traders
should be subject to regulation?
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Dec 08, 2016
Jkt 241001
The Department has received
numerous proposals from various Tribes
pertaining to Indian Trader regulation.
Many of these proposals suggest that
trade regulated under part 140 should
include not only commercial activities,
but also mineral and energy
development and any form of naturalresources extraction or agriculture.
Currently, section 140.5(a)(1) of the
existing rule has the following
definitions:
(5) Contract means any agreement
made or under negotiation with any
Indian for the purchase, transportation
or delivery of goods or supplies.
(6) Trading means buying, selling,
bartering, renting, leasing, permitting
and any other transaction involving the
acquisition of property or services.
(7) Commercial trading means any
trading transaction where an employee
engages in the business of buying or
selling services or items which he/she is
trading.
The Department seeks comments on
whether the definitions of contract,
trading, and commercial trading should
be revised, or struck in their entirety,
and why.
Additionally, the current definitions
do not define the type of trader
conducting business with an Indian
Tribe. The draft proposals the
Department has received recommend
that the revised rule apply to any person
conducting trade in Indian Country,
including non-Indians. The Department
solicits comments on whether an
updated part 140 should define who the
rule would apply to and whether or not
this definition should broadly include
any person conducting trade within
Indian Country.
6. How might revisions to the
regulations promote economic viability
and sustainability in Indian Country?
The Department is interested in
receiving feedback on how revisions to
the trade regulations could facilitate
economic activity in Indian country and
tribal economic self-sufficiency.
7. What services do Tribes currently
provide to individuals or entities doing
business in Indian Country and what
role do tax revenues play in providing
such services?
The Department recognizes that
Tribes provide a range of services to
Indians and non-Indians doing business
within their Indian Country. The
Department seeks comments identifying
the types of services offered, such as law
enforcement, food sanitation and health
inspections, transportation and other
infrastructure, etc. The Department also
seeks information on whether and to
what extent Tribes are able to rely on
tax revenues to provide such services.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
89017
Dated: December 1, 2016.
Lawrence S. Roberts,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian
Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2016–29253 Filed 12–8–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 57
[REG–134438–15]
RIN 1545–BN10
Health Insurance Providers Fee
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
This document contains
proposed regulations that would modify
the current definition of ‘‘net premiums
written’’ for purposes of the fee imposed
by section 9010 of the Patient Protection
and Affordable Care Act, as amended.
The proposed regulations will affect
persons engaged in the business of
providing health insurance for United
States health risks.
DATES: Comments and requests for a
public hearing must be received by
March 9, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–134438–15), room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, PO Box
7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington,
DC 20044. Submissions may be handdelivered Monday through Friday
between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–134438–15),
Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20224, or sent
electronically, via the Federal
eRulemaking portal at
www.regulations.gov (IRS REG–134438–
15)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the proposed regulations,
Rachel S. Smith, (202) 317–6855;
concerning submissions of comments
and request for a hearing, Regina
Johnson, (202) 317–6901 (not toll-free
numbers).
SUMMARY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 9010 of the Patient Protection
and Affordable Care Act (PPACA),
Public Law 111–148 (124 Stat. 119
(2010)), as amended by section 10905 of
PPACA, and as further amended by
section 1406 of the Health Care and
Education Reconciliation Act of 2010,
E:\FR\FM\09DEP1.SGM
09DEP1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
89018
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 237 / Friday, December 9, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Public Law 111–152 (124 Stat. 1029
(2010)) (collectively, the Affordable Care
Act or ACA) imposes an annual fee on
covered entities that provide health
insurance for United States health risks.
Section 9010 did not amend the Internal
Revenue Code (Code) but contains
cross-references to specified Code
sections. In this preamble all references
to section 9010 are references to section
9010 of the ACA and all references to
‘‘fee’’ are references to the fee imposed
by section 9010.
Section 9010(a) imposes an annual fee
on each covered entity engaged in the
business of providing health insurance.
The fee is due by the annual date
specified by the Secretary, but in no
event later than September 30th of each
calendar year in which a fee must be
paid (fee year).
Section 9010(b) requires the Secretary
to determine the annual fee for each
covered entity based on the ratio of the
covered entity’s net premiums written
for health insurance for any United
States health risk that are taken into
account for the calendar year
immediately before the fee year (data
year) to the aggregate net premiums
written for health insurance of United
States health risks of all covered entities
that are taken into account during the
data year. In calculating the fee, the
Secretary must determine each covered
entity’s net premiums written for United
States health risks based on reports
submitted to the Secretary by the
covered entity and through the use of
any other source of information
available to the Secretary. Section 9010
does not define the term ‘‘net premiums
written.’’
On November 29, 2013, the Treasury
Department and the IRS published in
the Federal Register (TD 9643; 78 FR
71476) final regulations regarding the
fee (final regulations). The final
regulations define net premiums written
to mean premiums written, including
reinsurance premiums written, reduced
by reinsurance ceded, and reduced by
ceding commissions and medical loss
ratio (MLR) rebates with respect to the
data year. Net premiums written do not
include premiums written for indemnity
reinsurance (and are not reduced by
indemnity reinsurance ceded) because
indemnity reinsurance is not considered
health insurance for purposes of section
9010. However, net premiums written
do include premiums written (and are
reduced by premiums ceded) for
assumption reinsurance; that is,
reinsurance for which there is a
novation and the reinsurer takes over
the entire risk.
The preamble to the final regulations
explained that, for covered entities that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Dec 08, 2016
Jkt 241001
file the Supplemental Health Care
Exhibit (SHCE) with the National
Association of Insurance Commissioners
(NAIC), net premiums written for health
insurance generally will equal the
amount reported on the SHCE as direct
premiums written minus MLR rebates
with respect to the data year, subject to
any applicable exclusions under section
9010. The instructions to Form 8963,
Report of Health Insurance Provider
Information, provide additional
information on how to determine net
premiums written using the SHCE and
any equivalent forms as the source of
data, and can be updated to reflect
changes to the SHCE.
Explanation of Provisions
The proposed regulations would
amend and clarify the rules for how
‘‘net premiums written’’ take into
account certain premium adjustments
and payments.
1. Retrospective Premium Adjustments
Following the publication of the final
regulations, the Treasury Department
and the IRS received comments
requesting that premium adjustments
related to retrospectively rated contracts
be taken into account in determining net
premiums written. The NAIC’s
Accounting Practices and Procedures
Manual Statement of Statutory
Accounting Principles No. 66,
Retrospectively Rated Contracts, defines
a retrospectively rated contract as a
contract which has the final policy
premium calculated based on the loss
experience of the insured during the
term of the policy (including loss
development after the term of the
policy) and on the stipulated formula
set forth in the policy or a formula
required by law. These premium
adjustments, made periodically, may
involve either the payment of return
premium to the insured (a
‘‘retrospectively rated contract
payment’’) or payment of an additional
premium by the insured (a
‘‘retrospectively rated contract receipt’’),
or both, depending on experience.
Commenters recommended that in
calculating net premiums written,
premiums written should be increased
by retrospectively rated contract
receipts and reduced by retrospectively
rated contract payments. Commenters
asserted that retrospectively rated
contract payments are refunded to
policyholders in much the same way as
MLR rebates. Therefore, without an
adjustment for retrospectively rated
contract payments, covered entities that
make these payments will bear a
liability for an amount of the annual fee
that correlates to premiums from which
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
they do not actually receive an
economic benefit.
In response to these comments, the
proposed regulations would modify the
current definition of net premiums
written to account for premium
adjustments related to retrospectively
rated contracts, computed on an accrual
basis. These amounts are received from
and paid to policyholders annually
based on experience. Retrospectively
rated contract receipts and payments do
not include changes to funds or
accounts that remain under the control
of the covered entity, such as changes to
premium stabilization reserves.
2. Risk Adjustment Payments and
Charges
Following the publication of the final
regulations, questions also arose about
the treatment of risk adjustment
payments under the ACA. Section 1343
of the ACA provides a permanent risk
adjustment program for certain plans in
the individual and small group markets.
In general, the program transfers risk
adjustment funds from health insurance
plans with relatively lower-risk
enrollees to issuers that
disproportionately attract high-risk
populations, such as individuals with
chronic conditions. Section 1343(a)(1)
generally requires each state, or the
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) acting on behalf of the
state, to assess a charge on health plans
and health insurance issuers in the
individual or small group markets
within a state (with respect to health
insurance coverage) if the actuarial risk
of the enrollees of such plans or
coverage for a year is less than the
average actuarial risk of all enrollees in
all plans or coverage in the state for the
year that are not self-insured group
health plans. Section 1343(a)(2)
generally requires each state, or HHS
acting on behalf of the state, to make a
payment to health plans and health
insurance issuers in the individual or
small group markets within a state (with
respect to health insurance coverage) if
the actuarial risk of the enrollees of such
plans or coverage for a year is greater
than the average actuarial risk of all
enrollees in all plans and coverage in
the state for the year that are not selfinsured group health plans.
Although not specifically listed, net
premiums written, as defined in the
final regulations, include risk
adjustment payments received by a
covered entity under section 1343(a)(2)
of the ACA and are reduced for risk
adjustment charges paid by a covered
entity under section 1343(a)(1) of the
ACA. Nonetheless, several covered
entities asked whether net premiums
E:\FR\FM\09DEP1.SGM
09DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 237 / Friday, December 9, 2016 / Proposed Rules
written included risk adjustment
payments received and charges paid.
Therefore, these proposed regulations
add specific language to the definition
of net premiums written to clarify that
net premiums written include risk
adjustment payments received and are
reduced for risk adjustment charges
paid. If a covered entity did not include
risk adjustment payments received as
direct premiums written on its SHCE or
did not file an SHCE, these amounts are
still part of net premiums written and
must be reported as such on Form 8963.
For this purpose, risk adjustment
payments received and charges paid are
computed on an accrual basis.
3. Other Premium Adjustments
These proposed regulations would
authorize the IRS to provide rules in
guidance published in the Internal
Revenue Bulletin for additional
amounts to be taken into account in
determining net premiums written. If
the Treasury Department and the IRS
determine that published guidance
providing additional adjustments to net
premiums written is warranted, such
guidance will be published in the
Internal Revenue Bulletin.
Proposed Effective/Applicability Date
These regulations are proposed to
apply with respect to any fee that is due
on or after September 30, 2018.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
Special Analyses
Certain IRS regulations, including
these, are exempt from the requirements
of Executive Order 12866, as
supplemented and reaffirmed by
Executive Order 13563. Therefore, a
regulatory assessment is not required.
Because these regulations do not
include a collection of information, a
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis under
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 6) is not required. Pursuant to
Code section 7805(f), this notice of
proposed rulemaking will be submitted
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration for
comment on its impact on small
business.
Comments and Public Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are
adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any
written (a signed original and eight (8)
copies) or electronic comments that are
submitted timely to the IRS. Comments
are requested on all aspects of these
proposed regulations. The Treasury
Department and the IRS specifically
request comments on the following:
1. How the adjustments to net
premiums written under these proposed
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Dec 08, 2016
Jkt 241001
regulations tie to amounts reported on
the SHCE.
2. Whether there should be a
transition rule for premium adjustments
related to retrospectively rated contracts
and how any such rule should be
implemented.
All comments will be available for
public inspection and copying. A public
hearing may be scheduled if requested
in writing by any person that timely
submits written comments. If a public
hearing is scheduled, notice of the date,
time, and place for the hearing will be
published in the Federal Register.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these
proposed regulations is Rachel S. Smith,
IRS Office of the Associate Chief
Counsel (Passthroughs and Special
Industries). However, other personnel
from the Treasury Department and the
IRS participated in their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 57
Health Insurance, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 57 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 57—HEALTH INSURANCE
PROVIDERS FEE
1. The authority citation for part 57
continues to read in part as follows:
■
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
*
*
*
*
*
2. Section 57.2 is amended by revising
paragraph (k) to read as follows:
■
§ 57.2
Explanation of terms.
*
*
*
*
*
(k) Net premiums written—(1) In
general. The term net premiums written
means premiums written, adjusted as
provided in paragraph (k)(2) of this
section.
(2) Adjustments. Net premiums
written include adjustments to account
for:
(i) Assumption reinsurance, but not
indemnity reinsurance. Net premiums
written include reinsurance premiums
written, reduced by reinsurance ceded,
and reduced by ceding commissions
with respect to the data year. Net
premiums written do not include
premiums written for indemnity
reinsurance and are not reduced by
indemnity reinsurance ceded because
indemnity reinsurance within the
meaning of paragraph (h)(5)(i) of this
section is not health insurance under
paragraph (h)(1) of this section.
However, in the case of assumption
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
89019
reinsurance within the meaning of
paragraph (h)(5)(ii) of this section, net
premiums written include premiums
written for assumption reinsurance,
reduced by assumption reinsurance
premiums ceded.
(ii) Medical loss ratio (MLR) rebates.
Net premiums written are reduced by
MLR rebates with respect to the data
year. For this purpose, MLR rebates are
computed on an accrual basis.
(iii) Premium adjustments related to
retrospectively rated contracts. Net
premiums written include
retrospectively rated contract receipts
and are reduced by retrospectively rated
contract payments with respect to the
data year. For this purpose, net
premium adjustments related to
retrospectively rated contracts are
computed on an accrual basis.
(iv) Amounts related to the risk
adjustment program under section 1343
of the ACA. Net premiums written
include risk adjustment payments
(within the meaning of 42 U.S.C.
18063(b)) received with respect to the
data year and are reduced by risk
adjustment charges (within the meaning
of 42 U.S.C. 18063(a)) paid with respect
to the data year. For this purpose, risk
adjustment payments and risk
adjustment charges are computed on an
accrual basis.
(v) Additional adjustments published
in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. The
IRS may provide rules in guidance
published in the Internal Revenue
Bulletin (see § 601.601(d)(2) of this
chapter) for additional adjustments
against premiums written in
determining net premiums written.
■ 3. Section 57.10 is amended by
revising paragraph (a) and adding
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
§ 57.10
Effective/applicability date.
(a) In general. Except as provided in
paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section,
§§ 57.1 through 57.9 apply to any fee
that is due on or after September 30,
2014.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Paragraph (k) of § 57.2. Paragraph
(k) of § 57.2 applies to any fee that is
due on or after September 30, 2018.
John Dalrymple,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2016–29487 Filed 12–8–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
E:\FR\FM\09DEP1.SGM
09DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 237 (Friday, December 9, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 89017-89019]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-29487]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 57
[REG-134438-15]
RIN 1545-BN10
Health Insurance Providers Fee
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations that would modify
the current definition of ``net premiums written'' for purposes of the
fee imposed by section 9010 of the Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act, as amended. The proposed regulations will affect persons
engaged in the business of providing health insurance for United States
health risks.
DATES: Comments and requests for a public hearing must be received by
March 9, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-134438-15), room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, PO Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions may be hand-delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-
134438-15), Courier's Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20224, or sent electronically, via the
Federal eRulemaking portal at www.regulations.gov (IRS REG-134438-15)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the proposed regulations,
Rachel S. Smith, (202) 317-6855; concerning submissions of comments and
request for a hearing, Regina Johnson, (202) 317-6901 (not toll-free
numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 9010 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
(PPACA), Public Law 111-148 (124 Stat. 119 (2010)), as amended by
section 10905 of PPACA, and as further amended by section 1406 of the
Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010,
[[Page 89018]]
Public Law 111-152 (124 Stat. 1029 (2010)) (collectively, the
Affordable Care Act or ACA) imposes an annual fee on covered entities
that provide health insurance for United States health risks. Section
9010 did not amend the Internal Revenue Code (Code) but contains cross-
references to specified Code sections. In this preamble all references
to section 9010 are references to section 9010 of the ACA and all
references to ``fee'' are references to the fee imposed by section
9010.
Section 9010(a) imposes an annual fee on each covered entity
engaged in the business of providing health insurance. The fee is due
by the annual date specified by the Secretary, but in no event later
than September 30th of each calendar year in which a fee must be paid
(fee year).
Section 9010(b) requires the Secretary to determine the annual fee
for each covered entity based on the ratio of the covered entity's net
premiums written for health insurance for any United States health risk
that are taken into account for the calendar year immediately before
the fee year (data year) to the aggregate net premiums written for
health insurance of United States health risks of all covered entities
that are taken into account during the data year. In calculating the
fee, the Secretary must determine each covered entity's net premiums
written for United States health risks based on reports submitted to
the Secretary by the covered entity and through the use of any other
source of information available to the Secretary. Section 9010 does not
define the term ``net premiums written.''
On November 29, 2013, the Treasury Department and the IRS published
in the Federal Register (TD 9643; 78 FR 71476) final regulations
regarding the fee (final regulations). The final regulations define net
premiums written to mean premiums written, including reinsurance
premiums written, reduced by reinsurance ceded, and reduced by ceding
commissions and medical loss ratio (MLR) rebates with respect to the
data year. Net premiums written do not include premiums written for
indemnity reinsurance (and are not reduced by indemnity reinsurance
ceded) because indemnity reinsurance is not considered health insurance
for purposes of section 9010. However, net premiums written do include
premiums written (and are reduced by premiums ceded) for assumption
reinsurance; that is, reinsurance for which there is a novation and the
reinsurer takes over the entire risk.
The preamble to the final regulations explained that, for covered
entities that file the Supplemental Health Care Exhibit (SHCE) with the
National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), net premiums
written for health insurance generally will equal the amount reported
on the SHCE as direct premiums written minus MLR rebates with respect
to the data year, subject to any applicable exclusions under section
9010. The instructions to Form 8963, Report of Health Insurance
Provider Information, provide additional information on how to
determine net premiums written using the SHCE and any equivalent forms
as the source of data, and can be updated to reflect changes to the
SHCE.
Explanation of Provisions
The proposed regulations would amend and clarify the rules for how
``net premiums written'' take into account certain premium adjustments
and payments.
1. Retrospective Premium Adjustments
Following the publication of the final regulations, the Treasury
Department and the IRS received comments requesting that premium
adjustments related to retrospectively rated contracts be taken into
account in determining net premiums written. The NAIC's Accounting
Practices and Procedures Manual Statement of Statutory Accounting
Principles No. 66, Retrospectively Rated Contracts, defines a
retrospectively rated contract as a contract which has the final policy
premium calculated based on the loss experience of the insured during
the term of the policy (including loss development after the term of
the policy) and on the stipulated formula set forth in the policy or a
formula required by law. These premium adjustments, made periodically,
may involve either the payment of return premium to the insured (a
``retrospectively rated contract payment'') or payment of an additional
premium by the insured (a ``retrospectively rated contract receipt''),
or both, depending on experience.
Commenters recommended that in calculating net premiums written,
premiums written should be increased by retrospectively rated contract
receipts and reduced by retrospectively rated contract payments.
Commenters asserted that retrospectively rated contract payments are
refunded to policyholders in much the same way as MLR rebates.
Therefore, without an adjustment for retrospectively rated contract
payments, covered entities that make these payments will bear a
liability for an amount of the annual fee that correlates to premiums
from which they do not actually receive an economic benefit.
In response to these comments, the proposed regulations would
modify the current definition of net premiums written to account for
premium adjustments related to retrospectively rated contracts,
computed on an accrual basis. These amounts are received from and paid
to policyholders annually based on experience. Retrospectively rated
contract receipts and payments do not include changes to funds or
accounts that remain under the control of the covered entity, such as
changes to premium stabilization reserves.
2. Risk Adjustment Payments and Charges
Following the publication of the final regulations, questions also
arose about the treatment of risk adjustment payments under the ACA.
Section 1343 of the ACA provides a permanent risk adjustment program
for certain plans in the individual and small group markets. In
general, the program transfers risk adjustment funds from health
insurance plans with relatively lower-risk enrollees to issuers that
disproportionately attract high-risk populations, such as individuals
with chronic conditions. Section 1343(a)(1) generally requires each
state, or the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) acting on
behalf of the state, to assess a charge on health plans and health
insurance issuers in the individual or small group markets within a
state (with respect to health insurance coverage) if the actuarial risk
of the enrollees of such plans or coverage for a year is less than the
average actuarial risk of all enrollees in all plans or coverage in the
state for the year that are not self-insured group health plans.
Section 1343(a)(2) generally requires each state, or HHS acting on
behalf of the state, to make a payment to health plans and health
insurance issuers in the individual or small group markets within a
state (with respect to health insurance coverage) if the actuarial risk
of the enrollees of such plans or coverage for a year is greater than
the average actuarial risk of all enrollees in all plans and coverage
in the state for the year that are not self-insured group health plans.
Although not specifically listed, net premiums written, as defined
in the final regulations, include risk adjustment payments received by
a covered entity under section 1343(a)(2) of the ACA and are reduced
for risk adjustment charges paid by a covered entity under section
1343(a)(1) of the ACA. Nonetheless, several covered entities asked
whether net premiums
[[Page 89019]]
written included risk adjustment payments received and charges paid.
Therefore, these proposed regulations add specific language to the
definition of net premiums written to clarify that net premiums written
include risk adjustment payments received and are reduced for risk
adjustment charges paid. If a covered entity did not include risk
adjustment payments received as direct premiums written on its SHCE or
did not file an SHCE, these amounts are still part of net premiums
written and must be reported as such on Form 8963. For this purpose,
risk adjustment payments received and charges paid are computed on an
accrual basis.
3. Other Premium Adjustments
These proposed regulations would authorize the IRS to provide rules
in guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin for additional
amounts to be taken into account in determining net premiums written.
If the Treasury Department and the IRS determine that published
guidance providing additional adjustments to net premiums written is
warranted, such guidance will be published in the Internal Revenue
Bulletin.
Proposed Effective/Applicability Date
These regulations are proposed to apply with respect to any fee
that is due on or after September 30, 2018.
Special Analyses
Certain IRS regulations, including these, are exempt from the
requirements of Executive Order 12866, as supplemented and reaffirmed
by Executive Order 13563. Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not
required. Because these regulations do not include a collection of
information, a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) is not required. Pursuant to Code
section 7805(f), this notice of proposed rulemaking will be submitted
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration
for comment on its impact on small business.
Comments and Public Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any written (a signed original and eight
(8) copies) or electronic comments that are submitted timely to the
IRS. Comments are requested on all aspects of these proposed
regulations. The Treasury Department and the IRS specifically request
comments on the following:
1. How the adjustments to net premiums written under these proposed
regulations tie to amounts reported on the SHCE.
2. Whether there should be a transition rule for premium
adjustments related to retrospectively rated contracts and how any such
rule should be implemented.
All comments will be available for public inspection and copying. A
public hearing may be scheduled if requested in writing by any person
that timely submits written comments. If a public hearing is scheduled,
notice of the date, time, and place for the hearing will be published
in the Federal Register.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these proposed regulations is Rachel S.
Smith, IRS Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and
Special Industries). However, other personnel from the Treasury
Department and the IRS participated in their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 57
Health Insurance, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 57 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 57--HEALTH INSURANCE PROVIDERS FEE
0
1. The authority citation for part 57 continues to read in part as
follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
* * * * *
0
2. Section 57.2 is amended by revising paragraph (k) to read as
follows:
Sec. 57.2 Explanation of terms.
* * * * *
(k) Net premiums written--(1) In general. The term net premiums
written means premiums written, adjusted as provided in paragraph
(k)(2) of this section.
(2) Adjustments. Net premiums written include adjustments to
account for:
(i) Assumption reinsurance, but not indemnity reinsurance. Net
premiums written include reinsurance premiums written, reduced by
reinsurance ceded, and reduced by ceding commissions with respect to
the data year. Net premiums written do not include premiums written for
indemnity reinsurance and are not reduced by indemnity reinsurance
ceded because indemnity reinsurance within the meaning of paragraph
(h)(5)(i) of this section is not health insurance under paragraph
(h)(1) of this section. However, in the case of assumption reinsurance
within the meaning of paragraph (h)(5)(ii) of this section, net
premiums written include premiums written for assumption reinsurance,
reduced by assumption reinsurance premiums ceded.
(ii) Medical loss ratio (MLR) rebates. Net premiums written are
reduced by MLR rebates with respect to the data year. For this purpose,
MLR rebates are computed on an accrual basis.
(iii) Premium adjustments related to retrospectively rated
contracts. Net premiums written include retrospectively rated contract
receipts and are reduced by retrospectively rated contract payments
with respect to the data year. For this purpose, net premium
adjustments related to retrospectively rated contracts are computed on
an accrual basis.
(iv) Amounts related to the risk adjustment program under section
1343 of the ACA. Net premiums written include risk adjustment payments
(within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. 18063(b)) received with respect to the
data year and are reduced by risk adjustment charges (within the
meaning of 42 U.S.C. 18063(a)) paid with respect to the data year. For
this purpose, risk adjustment payments and risk adjustment charges are
computed on an accrual basis.
(v) Additional adjustments published in the Internal Revenue
Bulletin. The IRS may provide rules in guidance published in the
Internal Revenue Bulletin (see Sec. 601.601(d)(2) of this chapter) for
additional adjustments against premiums written in determining net
premiums written.
0
3. Section 57.10 is amended by revising paragraph (a) and adding
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 57.10 Effective/applicability date.
(a) In general. Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of
this section, Sec. Sec. 57.1 through 57.9 apply to any fee that is due
on or after September 30, 2014.
* * * * *
(c) Paragraph (k) of Sec. 57.2. Paragraph (k) of Sec. 57.2
applies to any fee that is due on or after September 30, 2018.
John Dalrymple,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2016-29487 Filed 12-8-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P