Allocations of Cross-State Air Pollution Rule Allowances From New Unit Set-Asides for 2016 Control Periods, 89035-89036 [2016-29441]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 237 / Friday, December 9, 2016 / Proposed Rules
40 CFR Part 97
[FRL–9956–22–OAR]
Allocations of Cross-State Air
Pollution Rule Allowances From New
Unit Set-Asides for 2016 Control
Periods
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of data availability
(NODA).
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is providing notice of the
availability of preliminary lists of units
eligible for allocations of emission
allowances under the Cross-State Air
Pollution Rule (CSAPR). Under the
CSAPR federal implementation plans
(FIPs), portions of each covered state’s
annual emissions budgets for each of the
CSAPR emissions trading programs are
reserved for allocation to electricity
generating units that commenced
commercial operation on or after a
certain date (new units) and certain
other units not otherwise obtaining
allowance allocations under the FIPs.
The quantities of allowances allocated
to eligible units from each new unit setaside (NUSA) under the FIPs are
calculated in an annual one- or tworound allocation process. EPA
previously completed the first round of
NUSA allowance allocations for the
2016 control periods for all the CSAPR
trading programs, as well as the second
round of allocations for the CSAPR NOX
Ozone Season Trading Program, and is
now making available preliminary lists
of units eligible for allocations in the
second round of the NUSA allocation
process for the CSAPR NOX Annual,
SO2 Group 1, and SO2 Group 2 Trading
Programs. EPA has posted spreadsheets
containing the preliminary lists on
EPA’s Web site. EPA will consider
timely objections to the lists of eligible
units contained in the spreadsheets and
will promulgate a document responding
to any such objections no later than
February 15, 2017, the deadline for
recording the second-round allocations
of CSAPR NOX Annual, SO2 Group 1,
and SO2 Group 2 allowances in sources’
compliance accounts. This document
may concern CSAPR-affected units in
the following states: Alabama, Georgia,
Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas,
Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan,
Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New
Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, South Carolina,
Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West
Virginia, and Wisconsin.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Dec 08, 2016
Jkt 241001
Objections to the information
referenced in this document must be
received on or before January 9, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit your objections via
email to CSAPR_NUSA@epa.gov.
Include ‘‘2016 NUSA allocations’’ in the
email subject line and include your
name, title, affiliation, address, phone
number, and email address in the body
of the email.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions concerning this action should
be addressed to Robert Miller at (202)
343–9077 or miller.robertL@epa.gov or
Kenon Smith at (202) 343–9164 or
smith.kenon@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
CSAPR FIPs, the mechanisms by which
initial allocations of emission
allowances are determined differ for
‘‘existing’’ and ‘‘new’’ units. For
‘‘existing’’ units—that is, units
commencing commercial operation
before January 1, 2010 for purposes of
the original four 1 CSAPR trading
programs—the specific amounts of
CSAPR FIP allowance allocations for all
control periods have been established
through rulemaking. EPA has
announced the availability of
spreadsheets showing the CSAPR FIP
allowance allocations to existing units
in previous document.2
‘‘New’’ units—that is, units
commencing commercial operation on
or after January 1, 2010 for purposes of
the original four CSAPR trading
programs—as well as certain older units
that would not otherwise obtain FIP
DATES:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
1 In the recently finalized Cross-State Air
Pollution Rule Update for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS
(CSAPR Update Rule), 81 FR 74504 (October 26,
2016), EPA is establishing new or modified FIP
requirements for EGUs in 22 states to address
transported pollution with regard to the 2008 ozone
NAAQS, including requirements to participate in a
new fifth CSAPR trading program—the CSAPR NOX
Ozone Season Group 2 Trading Program—for
emissions occurring in 2017 and later years. In the
same rule, EPA is also withdrawing the FIP
provisions requiring EGUs in 24 states to participate
in the existing trading program addressing
transported pollution with regard to the 1997 ozone
NAAQS for emissions occurring after 2016. (When
the CSAPR Update rule takes effect in December
2016, the existing ozone season program will be
renamed the CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 1
Trading Program.) The 2016 allowance allocations
described in this document concern the CSAPR
annual trading programs and are not affected by the
CSAPR Update Rule.
2 The latest spreadsheet of CSAPR FIP allowance
allocations to existing units covered by CSAPR NOX
Annual, SO2 Group 1, and SO2 Group 2 Trading
Programs, updated in 2014 to reflect changes to
CSAPR’s implementation schedule but with
allocation amounts unchanged since June 2012, is
available at https://www.epa.gov/csapr/datechange-affirmation-rules-cross-state-air-pollutionrule-csapr under the ‘‘Notice of Data Availability’’
header. See Availability of Data on Allocations of
Cross-State Air Pollution Rule Allowances to
Existing Electricity Generating Units, 79 FR 71674
(December 3, 2014).
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
89035
allowance allocations do not have preestablished allowance allocations.
Instead, the CSAPR FIPs reserve a
portion of each state’s total annual
emissions budget for each CSAPR
emissions trading program as a new unit
set-aside (NUSA) 3 and establish an
annual process for allocating NUSA
allowances to eligible units. States with
Indian country within their borders
have separate Indian country NUSAs.
The annual process for allocating
allowances from the NUSAs and Indian
country NUSAs to eligible units is set
forth in the CSAPR regulations at 40
CFR 97.411(b) and 97.412 (NOX Annual
Trading Program), 97.511(b) and 97.512
(NOX Ozone Season Trading Program),
97.611(b) and 97.612 (SO2 Group 1
Trading Program), and 97.711(b) and
97.712 (SO2 Group 2 Trading Program).
Each NUSA allowance allocation
process involves up to two rounds of
allocations to new units followed by the
allocation to existing units of any
allowances not allocated to new units.
EPA provides public notice at certain
points in the process.
EPA has already completed the first
round of allocations of 2016 NUSA
allowances for all the CSAPR trading
programs, as well as the second round
of 2016 NUSA allocations to units
subject to the CSAPR Ozone Season
Trading Program, as announced in
documents previously published in the
Federal Register.4 The first and secondround NUSA allocation process was
discussed in those previous documents.
This document concerns the second
round of NUSA allowance allocations
for the CSAPR NOx Annual, SO2 Group
1, and SO2 Group 2 Trading Programs
for the 2016 control period.5
The units eligible to receive secondround NUSA allocations for the CSAPR
NOX Annual, SO2 Group 1, and SO2
Group 2 Trading Programs are defined
in §§ 97.411(b)(1)(iii) and 97.412(a)(9)(i),
97.611(b)(1)(iii) and 97.612(a)(9)(i), and
97.711(b)(1)(iii) and 97.712(a)(9)(i),
respectively. Generally, eligible units
include any CSAPR-affected unit that
commenced commercial operation
between January 1 of the year before the
control period in question and
November 30 of the year of the control
period in question. In the case of the
3 The NUSA amounts range from two percent to
eight percent of the respective state budgets. The
variation in percentages reflects differences among
states in the quantities of emission allowances
projected to be required by known new units at the
time the budgets were set or amended.
4 81 FR 33636 (May 27, 2016); 81 FR 50630
(August 2, 2016); 81 FR 63156 (September 14,
2016); 81 FR 80593 (November 16, 2016).
5 At this time, EPA is not aware of any unit
eligible for a second-round allocation from any
Indian country NUSA.
E:\FR\FM\09DEP1.SGM
09DEP1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
89036
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 237 / Friday, December 9, 2016 / Proposed Rules
2016 control period, an eligible unit
therefore must have commenced
commercial operation between January
1, 2015 and November 30, 2016
(inclusive).
The total quantity of allowances to be
allocated through the 2016 NUSA
allowance allocation process for each
state and emissions trading program—in
the two rounds of the allocation process
combined—is generally the state’s 2016
emissions budget less the sum of (1) the
total of the 2016 CSAPR FIP allowance
allocations to existing units and (2) the
amount of the 2016 Indian country
NUSA, if any.6 The amounts of CSAPR
NOX Annual, SO2 Group 1, and SO2
Group 2 NUSA allowances may be
increased in certain circumstances as set
forth in §§ 97.412(a)(2), 97.612(a)(2),
and 97.712(a)(2), respectively.
Second-round NUSA allocations for a
given state, trading program, and control
period are made only if the NUSA
contains allowances after completion of
the first-round allocations.
The amounts of second-round
allocations of CSAPR NOX Annual, SO2
Group 1, and SO2 Group 2 allowances
to eligible new units from each NUSA
are calculated according to the
procedures set forth in §§ 97.412(a)(9),
(10) and (12), 97.612(a)(9), (10), and
(12), and 97.712(a)(9), (10), and (12),
respectively. Generally, the procedures
call for each eligible unit to receive a
second-round 2016 NUSA allocation
equal to the positive difference, if any,
between its emissions during the 2016
annual control periods (i.e., January 1,
2016 through December 31, 2016) as
reported under 40 CFR part 75 and any
first-round allocation the unit received,
unless the total of such allocations to all
eligible units would exceed the amount
of allowances in the NUSA, in which
case the allocations are reduced on a
pro-rata basis.
Any allowances remaining in the
CSAPR NOX Annual, SO2 Group 1, or
SO2 Group 2 NUSA for a given state and
control period after the second round of
NUSA allocations to new units will be
allocated to the existing units in the
state according to the procedures set
forth in §§ 97.412(a)(10) and (12),
97.612(a)(10) and (12), and 97.712(a)(10)
and (12), respectively.
EPA notes that an allocation or lack
of allocation of allowances to a given
EGU does not constitute a determination
that CSAPR does or does not apply to
the EGU. EPA also notes that allocations
6 The quantities of allowances to be allocated
through the NUSA allowance allocation process
may differ slightly from the NUSA amounts set
forth in §§ 97.410(a), 97.510(a), 97.610(a), and
97.710(a) because of rounding in the spreadsheet of
CSAPR FIP allowance allocations to existing units.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Dec 08, 2016
Jkt 241001
are subject to potential correction if a
unit to which NUSA allowances have
been allocated for a given control period
is not actually an affected unit as of the
start of that control period.7
The preliminary lists of units eligible
for second-round 2016 NUSA allowance
allocations for the three CSAPR annual
trading programs are set forth in Excel
spreadsheets titled ‘‘CSAPR_NUSA_
2016_NOX_Annual_2nd_Round_
Prelim_Data,’’ ‘‘CSAPR_NUSA_2016_
SO2_Group_1_2nd_Round_Prelim_
Data,’’ and ‘‘CSAPR_NUSA_2016_SO2_
Group_2_2nd_Round_Prelim_Data’’
available on EPA’s Web site at https://
www.epa.gov/csapr/csapr-complianceyear-2016-nusa-nodas. Each
spreadsheet contains a separate
worksheet for each state covered by that
program showing each unit
preliminarily identified as eligible for a
second-round NUSA allocation.
Each state worksheet also contains a
summary showing (1) the quantity of
allowances initially available in that
state’s 2016 NUSA, (2) the sum of the
2016 NUSA allowance allocations that
were made in the first-round to new
units in that state (if any), and (3) the
quantity of allowances in the 2016
NUSA available for distribution in
second-round allocations to new units
(or ultimately for allocation to existing
units).
Objections should be strictly limited
to whether EPA has correctly identified
the new units eligible for second-round
2016 NUSA allocations of CSAPR NOX
Annual, SO2 Group 1, and SO2 Group 2
allowances according to the criteria
described above and should be emailed
to the address identified in ADDRESSES.
Objections must include: (1) Precise
identification of the specific data the
commenter believes are inaccurate, (2)
new proposed data upon which the
commenter believes EPA should rely
instead, and (3) the reasons why EPA
should rely on the commenter’s
proposed data and not the data
referenced in this document.
Authority: 40 CFR 97.411(b), 97.611(b),
and 97.711(b).
Dated: December 1, 2016.
Reid P. Harvey,
Director, Clean Air Markets Division, Office
of Atmospheric Programs, Office of Air and
Radiation.
[FR Doc. 2016–29441 Filed 12–8–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
7 See
PO 00000
40 CFR 97.411(c), 97.611(c), and 97.711(c).
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0008; FRL–9953–69]
Receipt of Several Pesticide Petitions
Filed for Residues of Pesticide
Chemicals in or on Various
Commodities
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of filing of petitions and
request for comment.
AGENCY:
This document announces the
Agency’s receipt of several initial filings
of pesticide petitions requesting the
establishment or modification of
regulations for residues of pesticide
chemicals in or on various commodities.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 9, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number and the pesticide petition
number (PP) of interest as shown in the
body of this document, by one of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket,
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael L. Goodis, P.E., Registration
Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; main
telephone number: (703) 305–7090;
email address: RDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
E:\FR\FM\09DEP1.SGM
09DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 237 (Friday, December 9, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 89035-89036]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-29441]
[[Page 89035]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 97
[FRL-9956-22-OAR]
Allocations of Cross-State Air Pollution Rule Allowances From New
Unit Set-Asides for 2016 Control Periods
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of data availability (NODA).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is providing notice
of the availability of preliminary lists of units eligible for
allocations of emission allowances under the Cross-State Air Pollution
Rule (CSAPR). Under the CSAPR federal implementation plans (FIPs),
portions of each covered state's annual emissions budgets for each of
the CSAPR emissions trading programs are reserved for allocation to
electricity generating units that commenced commercial operation on or
after a certain date (new units) and certain other units not otherwise
obtaining allowance allocations under the FIPs. The quantities of
allowances allocated to eligible units from each new unit set-aside
(NUSA) under the FIPs are calculated in an annual one- or two-round
allocation process. EPA previously completed the first round of NUSA
allowance allocations for the 2016 control periods for all the CSAPR
trading programs, as well as the second round of allocations for the
CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Trading Program, and is now making
available preliminary lists of units eligible for allocations in the
second round of the NUSA allocation process for the CSAPR
NOX Annual, SO2 Group 1, and SO2 Group
2 Trading Programs. EPA has posted spreadsheets containing the
preliminary lists on EPA's Web site. EPA will consider timely
objections to the lists of eligible units contained in the spreadsheets
and will promulgate a document responding to any such objections no
later than February 15, 2017, the deadline for recording the second-
round allocations of CSAPR NOX Annual, SO2 Group
1, and SO2 Group 2 allowances in sources' compliance
accounts. This document may concern CSAPR-affected units in the
following states: Alabama, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas,
Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New
Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina,
Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin.
DATES: Objections to the information referenced in this document must
be received on or before January 9, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit your objections via email to CSAPR_NUSA@epa.gov.
Include ``2016 NUSA allocations'' in the email subject line and include
your name, title, affiliation, address, phone number, and email address
in the body of the email.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions concerning this action
should be addressed to Robert Miller at (202) 343-9077 or
miller.robertL@epa.gov or Kenon Smith at (202) 343-9164 or
smith.kenon@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the CSAPR FIPs, the mechanisms by
which initial allocations of emission allowances are determined differ
for ``existing'' and ``new'' units. For ``existing'' units--that is,
units commencing commercial operation before January 1, 2010 for
purposes of the original four \1\ CSAPR trading programs--the specific
amounts of CSAPR FIP allowance allocations for all control periods have
been established through rulemaking. EPA has announced the availability
of spreadsheets showing the CSAPR FIP allowance allocations to existing
units in previous document.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ In the recently finalized Cross-State Air Pollution Rule
Update for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS (CSAPR Update Rule), 81 FR 74504
(October 26, 2016), EPA is establishing new or modified FIP
requirements for EGUs in 22 states to address transported pollution
with regard to the 2008 ozone NAAQS, including requirements to
participate in a new fifth CSAPR trading program--the CSAPR
NOX Ozone Season Group 2 Trading Program--for emissions
occurring in 2017 and later years. In the same rule, EPA is also
withdrawing the FIP provisions requiring EGUs in 24 states to
participate in the existing trading program addressing transported
pollution with regard to the 1997 ozone NAAQS for emissions
occurring after 2016. (When the CSAPR Update rule takes effect in
December 2016, the existing ozone season program will be renamed the
CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 1 Trading Program.) The 2016
allowance allocations described in this document concern the CSAPR
annual trading programs and are not affected by the CSAPR Update
Rule.
\2\ The latest spreadsheet of CSAPR FIP allowance allocations to
existing units covered by CSAPR NOX Annual,
SO2 Group 1, and SO2 Group 2 Trading Programs,
updated in 2014 to reflect changes to CSAPR's implementation
schedule but with allocation amounts unchanged since June 2012, is
available at https://www.epa.gov/csapr/date-change-affirmation-rules-cross-state-air-pollution-rule-csapr under the ``Notice of
Data Availability'' header. See Availability of Data on Allocations
of Cross-State Air Pollution Rule Allowances to Existing Electricity
Generating Units, 79 FR 71674 (December 3, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
``New'' units--that is, units commencing commercial operation on or
after January 1, 2010 for purposes of the original four CSAPR trading
programs--as well as certain older units that would not otherwise
obtain FIP allowance allocations do not have pre-established allowance
allocations. Instead, the CSAPR FIPs reserve a portion of each state's
total annual emissions budget for each CSAPR emissions trading program
as a new unit set-aside (NUSA) \3\ and establish an annual process for
allocating NUSA allowances to eligible units. States with Indian
country within their borders have separate Indian country NUSAs. The
annual process for allocating allowances from the NUSAs and Indian
country NUSAs to eligible units is set forth in the CSAPR regulations
at 40 CFR 97.411(b) and 97.412 (NOX Annual Trading Program),
97.511(b) and 97.512 (NOX Ozone Season Trading Program),
97.611(b) and 97.612 (SO2 Group 1 Trading Program), and
97.711(b) and 97.712 (SO2 Group 2 Trading Program). Each
NUSA allowance allocation process involves up to two rounds of
allocations to new units followed by the allocation to existing units
of any allowances not allocated to new units. EPA provides public
notice at certain points in the process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The NUSA amounts range from two percent to eight percent of
the respective state budgets. The variation in percentages reflects
differences among states in the quantities of emission allowances
projected to be required by known new units at the time the budgets
were set or amended.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA has already completed the first round of allocations of 2016
NUSA allowances for all the CSAPR trading programs, as well as the
second round of 2016 NUSA allocations to units subject to the CSAPR
Ozone Season Trading Program, as announced in documents previously
published in the Federal Register.\4\ The first and second-round NUSA
allocation process was discussed in those previous documents. This
document concerns the second round of NUSA allowance allocations for
the CSAPR NOx Annual, SO2 Group 1, and SO2 Group
2 Trading Programs for the 2016 control period.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 81 FR 33636 (May 27, 2016); 81 FR 50630 (August 2, 2016); 81
FR 63156 (September 14, 2016); 81 FR 80593 (November 16, 2016).
\5\ At this time, EPA is not aware of any unit eligible for a
second-round allocation from any Indian country NUSA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The units eligible to receive second-round NUSA allocations for the
CSAPR NOX Annual, SO2 Group 1, and SO2
Group 2 Trading Programs are defined in Sec. Sec. 97.411(b)(1)(iii)
and 97.412(a)(9)(i), 97.611(b)(1)(iii) and 97.612(a)(9)(i), and
97.711(b)(1)(iii) and 97.712(a)(9)(i), respectively. Generally,
eligible units include any CSAPR-affected unit that commenced
commercial operation between January 1 of the year before the control
period in question and November 30 of the year of the control period in
question. In the case of the
[[Page 89036]]
2016 control period, an eligible unit therefore must have commenced
commercial operation between January 1, 2015 and November 30, 2016
(inclusive).
The total quantity of allowances to be allocated through the 2016
NUSA allowance allocation process for each state and emissions trading
program--in the two rounds of the allocation process combined--is
generally the state's 2016 emissions budget less the sum of (1) the
total of the 2016 CSAPR FIP allowance allocations to existing units and
(2) the amount of the 2016 Indian country NUSA, if any.\6\ The amounts
of CSAPR NOX Annual, SO2 Group 1, and
SO2 Group 2 NUSA allowances may be increased in certain
circumstances as set forth in Sec. Sec. 97.412(a)(2), 97.612(a)(2),
and 97.712(a)(2), respectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The quantities of allowances to be allocated through the
NUSA allowance allocation process may differ slightly from the NUSA
amounts set forth in Sec. Sec. 97.410(a), 97.510(a), 97.610(a), and
97.710(a) because of rounding in the spreadsheet of CSAPR FIP
allowance allocations to existing units.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Second-round NUSA allocations for a given state, trading program,
and control period are made only if the NUSA contains allowances after
completion of the first-round allocations.
The amounts of second-round allocations of CSAPR NOX
Annual, SO2 Group 1, and SO2 Group 2 allowances
to eligible new units from each NUSA are calculated according to the
procedures set forth in Sec. Sec. 97.412(a)(9), (10) and (12),
97.612(a)(9), (10), and (12), and 97.712(a)(9), (10), and (12),
respectively. Generally, the procedures call for each eligible unit to
receive a second-round 2016 NUSA allocation equal to the positive
difference, if any, between its emissions during the 2016 annual
control periods (i.e., January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016) as
reported under 40 CFR part 75 and any first-round allocation the unit
received, unless the total of such allocations to all eligible units
would exceed the amount of allowances in the NUSA, in which case the
allocations are reduced on a pro-rata basis.
Any allowances remaining in the CSAPR NOX Annual,
SO2 Group 1, or SO2 Group 2 NUSA for a given
state and control period after the second round of NUSA allocations to
new units will be allocated to the existing units in the state
according to the procedures set forth in Sec. Sec. 97.412(a)(10) and
(12), 97.612(a)(10) and (12), and 97.712(a)(10) and (12), respectively.
EPA notes that an allocation or lack of allocation of allowances to
a given EGU does not constitute a determination that CSAPR does or does
not apply to the EGU. EPA also notes that allocations are subject to
potential correction if a unit to which NUSA allowances have been
allocated for a given control period is not actually an affected unit
as of the start of that control period.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See 40 CFR 97.411(c), 97.611(c), and 97.711(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The preliminary lists of units eligible for second-round 2016 NUSA
allowance allocations for the three CSAPR annual trading programs are
set forth in Excel spreadsheets titled
``CSAPR_NUSA_2016_NOX_Annual_2nd_Round_Prelim_Data,''
``CSAPR_NUSA_2016_SO2_Group_1_2nd_Round_Prelim_Data,'' and
``CSAPR_NUSA_2016_SO2_Group_2_2nd_Round_Prelim_Data''
available on EPA's Web site at https://www.epa.gov/csapr/csapr-compliance-year-2016-nusa-nodas. Each spreadsheet contains a separate
worksheet for each state covered by that program showing each unit
preliminarily identified as eligible for a second-round NUSA
allocation.
Each state worksheet also contains a summary showing (1) the
quantity of allowances initially available in that state's 2016 NUSA,
(2) the sum of the 2016 NUSA allowance allocations that were made in
the first-round to new units in that state (if any), and (3) the
quantity of allowances in the 2016 NUSA available for distribution in
second-round allocations to new units (or ultimately for allocation to
existing units).
Objections should be strictly limited to whether EPA has correctly
identified the new units eligible for second-round 2016 NUSA
allocations of CSAPR NOX Annual, SO2 Group 1, and
SO2 Group 2 allowances according to the criteria described
above and should be emailed to the address identified in ADDRESSES.
Objections must include: (1) Precise identification of the specific
data the commenter believes are inaccurate, (2) new proposed data upon
which the commenter believes EPA should rely instead, and (3) the
reasons why EPA should rely on the commenter's proposed data and not
the data referenced in this document.
Authority: 40 CFR 97.411(b), 97.611(b), and 97.711(b).
Dated: December 1, 2016.
Reid P. Harvey,
Director, Clean Air Markets Division, Office of Atmospheric Programs,
Office of Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 2016-29441 Filed 12-8-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P