Submission for OMB Review; Comment Requested, 88688-88690 [2016-29406]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
88688
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 236 / Thursday, December 8, 2016 / Notices
ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES—CURRENT INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST
Total
number of
respondents
Instrument
Classroom sampling form from Head Start staff .................
Head Start core teacher survey ...........................................
Head Start core program director survey ............................
Head Start core center director survey ...............................
Early care and education administrators survey for Plus
study (Head Start Program Performance Standards) ......
Early care and education providers survey for Plus study
(5E—Early Ed) .................................................................
Total ..............................................................................
Additional Information: Copies of the
proposed collection may be obtained by
writing to the Administration for
Children and Families, Office of
Planning, Research and Evaluation, 330
C Street SW., Washington, DC 20201,
Attn: OPRE Reports Clearance Officer.
All requests should be identified by the
title of the information collection. Email
address: OPREinfocollection@
acf.hhs.gov.
OMB Comment: OMB is required to
make a decision concerning the
collection of information between 30
and 60 days after publication of this
document in the Federal Register.
Therefore, a comment is best assured of
having its full effect if OMB receives it
within 30 days of publication. Written
comments and recommendations for the
proposed information collection should
be sent directly to the following: Office
of Management and Budget, Paperwork
Reduction Project, Fax: OIRA_
SUBMISSION@OMB.EOP.GOV, Attn:
Desk Officer for the Administration for
Children and Families.
Mary Jones,
ACF/OPRE Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016–29373 Filed 12–7–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Requested
Title: RPG National Cross-Site
Evaluation and Evaluation Technical
Assistance.
OMB No.: 0970–0444.
Description: The Children’s Bureau
within the Administration for Children
and Families of the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services seeks a
renewal of clearance to collect
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:28 Dec 07, 2016
Jkt 241001
Annual
number of
respondents
Number of
responses per
respondent
Estimated
annual
burden
hours
360
720
180
360
120
240
60
120
1
1
1
1
0.17
0.50
0.50
0.42
20
120
30
50
540
180
1
0.08
14
720
240
1
0.17
41
........................
........................
........................
........................
275
information for the Regional Partnership
Grants to Increase the Well-being of and
to Improve Permanency Outcomes for
Children Affected by Substance Abuse
Cross-Site Evaluation and EvaluationRelated Technical Assistance and Data
Collection Support for Regional
Partnership Grant Program Round Three
Sites or ‘‘RPG’’ projects. Under RPG, the
Children’s Bureau has issued 21 grants
to organizations such as child welfare or
substance abuse treatment providers or
family court systems to develop
interagency collaborations and
integration of programs, activities, and
services designed to increase well-being,
improve permanency, and enhance the
safety of children who are in an out-ofhome placement or are at risk of being
placed in out-of-home care as a result of
a parent’s or caretaker’s substance use
dependence. The Child and Family
Services Improvement and Innovation
Act (Pub. L. 112–34) includes a targeted
grants program (section 437(f) of the
Social Security Act) that directs the
Secretary of Health and Human Services
to reserve a specified portion of the
appropriation for these Regional
Partnership Grants, to be used to
improve the well-being of children
affected by substance abuse. The overall
objective of the Cross-Site Evaluation
and Technical Assistance projects (the
RPG Cross-Site Evaluation) is to plan,
develop, and implement a rigorous
national cross-site evaluation of the RPG
Grant Program, provide legislativelymandated performance measurement,
furnish evaluation-related technical
assistance to the grantees in order to
improve the quality and rigor of their
local evaluations, and support their
participation in the cross-site
evaluation. The project will evaluate the
programs and activities conducted
through the RPG Program. The
evaluation is being undertaken by the
Children’s Bureau and its contractor
Mathematica Policy Research. The
evaluation is being implemented by
PO 00000
Average
burden hour
per response
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Mathematica Policy Research and its
subcontractors, WRMA, Inc., and
Synergy Enterprises.
The RPG Cross-Site Evaluation
includes the following components:
1. Implementation and Partnership
Study. The RPG cross-site
implementation and partnership study
will contribute to building the
knowledge base about effective
implementation strategies by examining
the process of implementation in the 21
RPG projects, with a focus on factors
shown in the research literature to be
associated with quality implementation
of evidence-based programs. This
component of the study describes the
RPG projects’ target populations,
selected interventions and their fit with
the target populations, inputs to
implementation, and actual services
provided (including dosage, duration,
content, adherence to curricula, and
participant responsiveness). It examines
the key attributes of the regional
partnerships that grantees develop (for
example, partnerships among child
welfare and substance abuse treatment
providers, social services, and family
courts). It describes the characteristics
and roles of the partner organizations,
the extent of coordination and
collaboration, and their potential to
sustain the partnerships after the grant
ends. Key data collection activities of
the implementation and partnership
study are: (1) Conducting site visits
during which researchers interview RPG
program directors, managers,
supervisors, and frontline staff who
work directly with families; (2)
administering a survey to frontline staff
involved in providing direct services to
children, adults, and families; (3) asking
grantees to provide information about
implementation and their partnerships
as part of their federally required semiannual progress reports; (4) obtaining
service use data from grantees,
enrollment date and demographics of
enrollees, exit date and reason, and
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 236 / Thursday, December 8, 2016 / Notices
service participation, which are entered
into a web-based system operated by
Mathematica Policy Research and its
subcontractors; and (5) administering a
survey to representatives of the partner
organizations.
2. Outcomes Study. The goal of the
outcomes study is to describe the
changes that occur in children and
families who participate in the RPG
programs. This study will describe
participant outcomes in five domains:
(1) Child well-being, (2) family
functioning/stability, (3) adult recovery
from substance use disorder, (4) child
permanency, and (5) child safety. Two
main types of outcome data will be
used—both of which are being collected
by RPG grantees: (1) Administrative
child welfare and adult substance abuse
treatment records and (2) standardized
instruments administered to the parents
and/or caregivers. The Children’s
Bureau is requiring grantees to obtain
and report specified administrative
records, and to use a prescribed set of
standardized instruments. Grantees will
provide these data to the cross-site
evaluation team twice a year by
uploading them to a data system
operated by Mathematica Policy
Research and its subcontractors.
3. Impact Study. The goal of the
impact study is to assess the impact of
the RPG interventions on child, adult,
and family outcomes by comparing
outcomes for people enrolled in RPG
services to those in comparison groups,
such as people who do not receive RPG
services or receive only a subset of the
services. The impact study will use
demographic and outcome data on both
program (treatment) and comparison
groups from a subset of grantees with
appropriate local evaluation designs
such as randomized controlled trials or
strong quasi-experimental designs; 5 of
the 21 grantees have such designs. Sitespecific impacts will be estimated for
these seven grantees. Aggregated impact
estimates will be created by pooling
impact estimates across appropriate
sites to obtain a more powerful
summary of the effectiveness of RPG
interventions.
In addition to conducting local
evaluations and participating in the RPG
Cross-Site Evaluation, the RPG grantees
are legislatively required to report
performance indicators aligned with
their proposed program strategies and
activities. A key strategy of the RPG
Cross-Site Evaluation is to minimize
burden on the grantees by ensuring that
the cross-site evaluation, which
includes all grantees in a study that
collects data to report on
implementation, the partnerships, and
participant characteristics and
outcomes, fully meets the need for
performance reporting. Thus, rather
than collecting separate evaluation and
performance indicator data, the grantees
need only participate in the cross-site
evaluation. In addition, using the
standardized instruments that the
88689
Children’s Bureau has specified will
ensure that grantees have valid and
reliable data on child and family
outcomes for their local evaluations.
The inclusion of an impact study
conducted on a subset of grantees with
rigorous designs will also provide the
Children’s Bureau, Congress, grantees,
providers, and researchers with
information about the effectiveness of
RPG programs.
A 60-day Federal Register Notice was
published for this study on June 24,
2016. This 30-day Federal Register
Notice covers the following data
collection activities: (1) The site visits
with grantees; (2) the web-based survey
of frontline staff who provide direct
services to children, adults, and
families, and their supervisors; (3) the
semi-annual progress reports; (4)
enrollment and service data provided by
grantees; (5) the web-based survey of
grantee partners; and (6) outcome data
provided by grantees.
Respondents. Respondents include
grantee staff or contractors (such as local
evaluators) and partner staff. Specific
types of respondents and the expected
number per data collection effort are
noted in the burden table below.
Annual burden estimates. The
following instruments are proposed for
public comment under this 30-day
Federal Register Notice. Burden for all
components is annualized over three
years.
RPG CROSS-SITE EVALUATION ANNUALIZED BURDEN ESTIMATES
Total number
of respondents
Data collection activity
Number of
responses per
respondent
Average
burden hours
per response
(in hours)
Estimatedtotal
burden hours
Total annual
burden hours
Implementation and Partnership Study
Program director individual interview ...................................
Program manager/supervisor group interview .....................
Program manager/supervisor individual interviews .............
Frontline staff individual interviews ......................................
Semi-annual progress reports .............................................
Case enrollment data ...........................................................
Service log entries ...............................................................
Staff survey ..........................................................................
Partner survey ......................................................................
4
36
24
24
21
63
126
80
80
1
1
1
1
6
90
2,340
1
1
2
2
1
1
16.5
0.25
0.05
0.42
0.33
8
72
24
24
2,079
1,417.5
14,742
33.6
26.4
2.67
24
8
8
693
472.5
4,914
11.2
8.8
........................
18
144
........................
112.5
100
........................
378
18,144
........................
14,175
12,600
126
6,048
........................
4,725
4,200
.25
........................
1,085
........................
361.6
21,602.77
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Data Entry for Outcomes Study
Administrative Data:
Obtain access to administrative data ...........................
Report administrative data ............................................
Standardized instruments:
Enter data into local database ......................................
Review records and submit ..........................................
........................
21
21
........................
21
21
........................
2
6
........................
6
6
Additional Data Entry for Impact Study
Data entry for comparison study sites (7 grantees) ............
Estimated Total Burden Hours .....................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:28 Dec 07, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
5
........................
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
1
........................
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
88690
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 236 / Thursday, December 8, 2016 / Notices
In compliance with the requirements
of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Children’s Bureau within the
Administration for Children and
Families is soliciting public comment
on the specific aspects of the
information collection described above.
Copies of the proposed collection of
information can be obtained and
comments may be forwarded by writing
to Administration for Children and
Families, Office of Planning, Research,
and Evaluation, 330 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20416, Attn: ACF
Reports Clearance Officer. Email
address: infocollection@acf.hhs.gov. All
requests should be identified by the title
of the information collection.
OMB is required to make a decision
concerning the collection of information
between 30 and 60 days after
publication of this document in the
Federal Register. Therefore, a comment
is best assured of having its full effect
if OMB receives it within 30 days of
publication. Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
directly to the following: Office of
Management and Budget, Paperwork
Reduction Project, Email:
OIRASUBMISSION@OMB.EoP.GOV,
Attn: Desk Officer for the
Administration of Children and
Families.
Robert Sargis,
Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016–29406 Filed 12–7–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
Privacy Act of 1974; Notice To
Establish an Exempt System of
Records
National Institutes of Health
(NIH), Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice to establish an exempt
system of records.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974,
as amended, the National Institutes of
Health (NIH) proposes to establish a
new system of records, to be numbered
and titled: SORN 09–25–0225 ‘‘NIH
Electronic Research Administration
(eRA) Records, HHS/NIH/OD/OER,’’
which will be related to, but separate
from, the system of records covered in
SORN 09–25–0036 ‘‘NIH Extramural
Awards and Chartered Advisory
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:28 Dec 07, 2016
Jkt 241001
Committee (IMPAC II), Contract
Information (DCIS), and Cooperative
Agreement Information, HHS/NIH.’’ The
new system of records will cover
records used by NIH throughout the
research and development award
lifecycle, from application to scientific
peer review, post-award monitoring,
and close-out.
Elsewhere in today’s Federal Register,
NIH has published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) proposing to
exempt confidential source-identifying
material in the new system of records
(i.e., material that would
inappropriately reveal the identities of
referees who provide letters of
recommendation and peer reviewers
who provide written evaluative input
and recommendations to NIH about
particular funding applications under
an express promise by the government
that their identities in association with
the written work products they authored
and provided to the government will be
kept confidential) from certain
requirements of the Privacy Act,
specifically, from the provisions
pertaining to providing an accounting of
disclosures, access and amendment and
notification. The exemptions and the
promises of confidentiality are
necessary to protect the integrity of NIH
extramural peer review and award
processes and ensure that NIH efforts to
obtain accurate and objective
assessments and evaluations of funding
applications from referees and peer
reviewers is not hindered. The
exemptions will become effective when
NIH publishes a Final Rule, which will
not occur until the 60-day comment
period provided in the NPRM has
expired and any comments received on
the NPRM (or on this System of Records
Notice) have been addressed.
DATES: The comment period for this
System of Records Notice (SORN) is coextensive with the 60-day comment
period provided in the NPRM; i.e.,
written comments on the SORN should
be submitted within 60 days from
today’s publication date. The new
system, including the routine uses and
the exemptions, will become effective
when NIH publishes a Final Rule,
which will not occur until the 60-day
comment period provided in the NPRM
has expired and any comments received
on the NPRM (or on this SORN) have
been addressed.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by the Privacy Act System of
Records Number (09–25–0225), by any
of the following methods: Email:
privacy@mail.nih.gov and include PA
SOR number (09–25–0225) in the
subject line of the message. Phone: (301)
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
402–6201. Fax: (301) 402–0169. Mail or
hand-delivery: NIH Privacy Act Officer,
Office of Management Assessment,
National Institutes of Health, 6011
Executive Boulevard, Suite 601, MSC
7669, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
Comments received will be available for
public inspection at this same address
from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Please call 301–496–4606 for an
appointment.
NIH
Privacy Act Officer, Office of
Management Assessment (OMA), Office
of the Director (OD), National Institutes
of Health (NIH), 6011 Executive
Boulevard, Suite 601, MSC 7669,
Rockville, Maryland 20852, or
telephone (301) 402–6201.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Background on the NIH Electronic
Research Administration (eRA)
Records System
The new system of records
established in this Notice, ‘‘NIH
Electronic Research Administration
(eRA) Records, HHS/NIH/OD/OER’’
(hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘NIH eRA
Records’’ system), will cover records
used throughout the research and
development award lifecycle, including
pre-award stages of application
submission, scientific peer review,
award processing, post-award
monitoring, and close-out. Many of the
records in the system will contain
information about more than one
individual or type of individual (e.g.,
applicants, awardees, faculty members
of applicant and awardee entities,
application reviewers). By design, any
of the records can be (and in practice
will be) retrieved using the name or
other personal identifier of any of the
individuals whose information is
contained in the records, to the extent
required to help ensure that award
proceedings are carried out by the NIH
in accordance with all applicable
federal statutes and regulations.
The eRA information technology (IT)
system associated with this system of
records is an HHS-designated Center of
Excellence, and is used as a grants
management line of business system by
other federal agencies to manage their
award records. Records pertaining to
awards of other agencies in the eRA IT
system are not covered under SORN 09–
25–0225, but would be covered under
SORN(s) those agencies publish, if their
records require a SORN.
II. The Privacy Act
The Privacy Act governs the
collection, maintenance, use, and
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 236 (Thursday, December 8, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 88688-88690]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-29406]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and Families
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Requested
Title: RPG National Cross-Site Evaluation and Evaluation Technical
Assistance.
OMB No.: 0970-0444.
Description: The Children's Bureau within the Administration for
Children and Families of the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services seeks a renewal of clearance to collect information for the
Regional Partnership Grants to Increase the Well-being of and to
Improve Permanency Outcomes for Children Affected by Substance Abuse
Cross-Site Evaluation and Evaluation-Related Technical Assistance and
Data Collection Support for Regional Partnership Grant Program Round
Three Sites or ``RPG'' projects. Under RPG, the Children's Bureau has
issued 21 grants to organizations such as child welfare or substance
abuse treatment providers or family court systems to develop
interagency collaborations and integration of programs, activities, and
services designed to increase well-being, improve permanency, and
enhance the safety of children who are in an out-of-home placement or
are at risk of being placed in out-of-home care as a result of a
parent's or caretaker's substance use dependence. The Child and Family
Services Improvement and Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112-34) includes a
targeted grants program (section 437(f) of the Social Security Act)
that directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to reserve a
specified portion of the appropriation for these Regional Partnership
Grants, to be used to improve the well-being of children affected by
substance abuse. The overall objective of the Cross-Site Evaluation and
Technical Assistance projects (the RPG Cross-Site Evaluation) is to
plan, develop, and implement a rigorous national cross-site evaluation
of the RPG Grant Program, provide legislatively-mandated performance
measurement, furnish evaluation-related technical assistance to the
grantees in order to improve the quality and rigor of their local
evaluations, and support their participation in the cross-site
evaluation. The project will evaluate the programs and activities
conducted through the RPG Program. The evaluation is being undertaken
by the Children's Bureau and its contractor Mathematica Policy
Research. The evaluation is being implemented by Mathematica Policy
Research and its subcontractors, WRMA, Inc., and Synergy Enterprises.
The RPG Cross-Site Evaluation includes the following components:
1. Implementation and Partnership Study. The RPG cross-site
implementation and partnership study will contribute to building the
knowledge base about effective implementation strategies by examining
the process of implementation in the 21 RPG projects, with a focus on
factors shown in the research literature to be associated with quality
implementation of evidence-based programs. This component of the study
describes the RPG projects' target populations, selected interventions
and their fit with the target populations, inputs to implementation,
and actual services provided (including dosage, duration, content,
adherence to curricula, and participant responsiveness). It examines
the key attributes of the regional partnerships that grantees develop
(for example, partnerships among child welfare and substance abuse
treatment providers, social services, and family courts). It describes
the characteristics and roles of the partner organizations, the extent
of coordination and collaboration, and their potential to sustain the
partnerships after the grant ends. Key data collection activities of
the implementation and partnership study are: (1) Conducting site
visits during which researchers interview RPG program directors,
managers, supervisors, and frontline staff who work directly with
families; (2) administering a survey to frontline staff involved in
providing direct services to children, adults, and families; (3) asking
grantees to provide information about implementation and their
partnerships as part of their federally required semi-annual progress
reports; (4) obtaining service use data from grantees, enrollment date
and demographics of enrollees, exit date and reason, and
[[Page 88689]]
service participation, which are entered into a web-based system
operated by Mathematica Policy Research and its subcontractors; and (5)
administering a survey to representatives of the partner organizations.
2. Outcomes Study. The goal of the outcomes study is to describe
the changes that occur in children and families who participate in the
RPG programs. This study will describe participant outcomes in five
domains: (1) Child well-being, (2) family functioning/stability, (3)
adult recovery from substance use disorder, (4) child permanency, and
(5) child safety. Two main types of outcome data will be used--both of
which are being collected by RPG grantees: (1) Administrative child
welfare and adult substance abuse treatment records and (2)
standardized instruments administered to the parents and/or caregivers.
The Children's Bureau is requiring grantees to obtain and report
specified administrative records, and to use a prescribed set of
standardized instruments. Grantees will provide these data to the
cross-site evaluation team twice a year by uploading them to a data
system operated by Mathematica Policy Research and its subcontractors.
3. Impact Study. The goal of the impact study is to assess the
impact of the RPG interventions on child, adult, and family outcomes by
comparing outcomes for people enrolled in RPG services to those in
comparison groups, such as people who do not receive RPG services or
receive only a subset of the services. The impact study will use
demographic and outcome data on both program (treatment) and comparison
groups from a subset of grantees with appropriate local evaluation
designs such as randomized controlled trials or strong quasi-
experimental designs; 5 of the 21 grantees have such designs. Site-
specific impacts will be estimated for these seven grantees. Aggregated
impact estimates will be created by pooling impact estimates across
appropriate sites to obtain a more powerful summary of the
effectiveness of RPG interventions.
In addition to conducting local evaluations and participating in
the RPG Cross-Site Evaluation, the RPG grantees are legislatively
required to report performance indicators aligned with their proposed
program strategies and activities. A key strategy of the RPG Cross-Site
Evaluation is to minimize burden on the grantees by ensuring that the
cross-site evaluation, which includes all grantees in a study that
collects data to report on implementation, the partnerships, and
participant characteristics and outcomes, fully meets the need for
performance reporting. Thus, rather than collecting separate evaluation
and performance indicator data, the grantees need only participate in
the cross-site evaluation. In addition, using the standardized
instruments that the Children's Bureau has specified will ensure that
grantees have valid and reliable data on child and family outcomes for
their local evaluations. The inclusion of an impact study conducted on
a subset of grantees with rigorous designs will also provide the
Children's Bureau, Congress, grantees, providers, and researchers with
information about the effectiveness of RPG programs.
A 60-day Federal Register Notice was published for this study on
June 24, 2016. This 30-day Federal Register Notice covers the following
data collection activities: (1) The site visits with grantees; (2) the
web-based survey of frontline staff who provide direct services to
children, adults, and families, and their supervisors; (3) the semi-
annual progress reports; (4) enrollment and service data provided by
grantees; (5) the web-based survey of grantee partners; and (6) outcome
data provided by grantees.
Respondents. Respondents include grantee staff or contractors (such
as local evaluators) and partner staff. Specific types of respondents
and the expected number per data collection effort are noted in the
burden table below.
Annual burden estimates. The following instruments are proposed for
public comment under this 30-day Federal Register Notice. Burden for
all components is annualized over three years.
RPG Cross-Site Evaluation Annualized Burden Estimates
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average burden
Total number Number of hours per Estimatedtotal Total annual
Data collection activity of respondents responses per response (in burden hours burden hours
respondent hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Implementation and Partnership Study
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Program director individual 4 1 2 8 2.67
interview......................
Program manager/supervisor group 36 1 2 72 24
interview......................
Program manager/supervisor 24 1 1 24 8
individual interviews..........
Frontline staff individual 24 1 1 24 8
interviews.....................
Semi-annual progress reports.... 21 6 16.5 2,079 693
Case enrollment data............ 63 90 0.25 1,417.5 472.5
Service log entries............. 126 2,340 0.05 14,742 4,914
Staff survey.................... 80 1 0.42 33.6 11.2
Partner survey.................. 80 1 0.33 26.4 8.8
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Data Entry for Outcomes Study
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Administrative Data: .............. .............. .............. ..............
Obtain access to 21 2 18 378 126
administrative data........
Report administrative data.. 21 6 144 18,144 6,048
Standardized instruments: .............. .............. .............. .............. ..............
Enter data into local 21 6 112.5 14,175 4,725
database...................
Review records and submit... 21 6 100 12,600 4,200
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additional Data Entry for Impact Study
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Data entry for comparison study 5 1 .25 1,085 361.6
sites (7 grantees).............
Estimated Total Burden Hours .............. .............. .............. .............. 21,602.77
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 88690]]
In compliance with the requirements of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Children's Bureau within the
Administration for Children and Families is soliciting public comment
on the specific aspects of the information collection described above.
Copies of the proposed collection of information can be obtained and
comments may be forwarded by writing to Administration for Children and
Families, Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, 330 C Street
SW., Washington, DC 20416, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer. Email
address: infocollection@acf.hhs.gov. All requests should be identified
by the title of the information collection.
OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collection of
information between 30 and 60 days after publication of this document
in the Federal Register. Therefore, a comment is best assured of having
its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication.
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information
collection should be sent directly to the following: Office of
Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, Email:
OIRASUBMISSION@OMB.EoP.GOV, Attn: Desk Officer for the Administration
of Children and Families.
Robert Sargis,
Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016-29406 Filed 12-7-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-P
