Submission for OMB Review; Comment Requested, 88688-88690 [2016-29406]

Download as PDF 88688 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 236 / Thursday, December 8, 2016 / Notices ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES—CURRENT INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST Total number of respondents Instrument Classroom sampling form from Head Start staff ................. Head Start core teacher survey ........................................... Head Start core program director survey ............................ Head Start core center director survey ............................... Early care and education administrators survey for Plus study (Head Start Program Performance Standards) ...... Early care and education providers survey for Plus study (5E—Early Ed) ................................................................. Total .............................................................................. Additional Information: Copies of the proposed collection may be obtained by writing to the Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, 330 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20201, Attn: OPRE Reports Clearance Officer. All requests should be identified by the title of the information collection. Email address: OPREinfocollection@ acf.hhs.gov. OMB Comment: OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collection of information between 30 and 60 days after publication of this document in the Federal Register. Therefore, a comment is best assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent directly to the following: Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, Fax: OIRA_ SUBMISSION@OMB.EOP.GOV, Attn: Desk Officer for the Administration for Children and Families. Mary Jones, ACF/OPRE Reports Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. 2016–29373 Filed 12–7–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4184–22–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Administration for Children and Families sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES Submission for OMB Review; Comment Requested Title: RPG National Cross-Site Evaluation and Evaluation Technical Assistance. OMB No.: 0970–0444. Description: The Children’s Bureau within the Administration for Children and Families of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services seeks a renewal of clearance to collect VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:28 Dec 07, 2016 Jkt 241001 Annual number of respondents Number of responses per respondent Estimated annual burden hours 360 720 180 360 120 240 60 120 1 1 1 1 0.17 0.50 0.50 0.42 20 120 30 50 540 180 1 0.08 14 720 240 1 0.17 41 ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ 275 information for the Regional Partnership Grants to Increase the Well-being of and to Improve Permanency Outcomes for Children Affected by Substance Abuse Cross-Site Evaluation and EvaluationRelated Technical Assistance and Data Collection Support for Regional Partnership Grant Program Round Three Sites or ‘‘RPG’’ projects. Under RPG, the Children’s Bureau has issued 21 grants to organizations such as child welfare or substance abuse treatment providers or family court systems to develop interagency collaborations and integration of programs, activities, and services designed to increase well-being, improve permanency, and enhance the safety of children who are in an out-ofhome placement or are at risk of being placed in out-of-home care as a result of a parent’s or caretaker’s substance use dependence. The Child and Family Services Improvement and Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112–34) includes a targeted grants program (section 437(f) of the Social Security Act) that directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to reserve a specified portion of the appropriation for these Regional Partnership Grants, to be used to improve the well-being of children affected by substance abuse. The overall objective of the Cross-Site Evaluation and Technical Assistance projects (the RPG Cross-Site Evaluation) is to plan, develop, and implement a rigorous national cross-site evaluation of the RPG Grant Program, provide legislativelymandated performance measurement, furnish evaluation-related technical assistance to the grantees in order to improve the quality and rigor of their local evaluations, and support their participation in the cross-site evaluation. The project will evaluate the programs and activities conducted through the RPG Program. The evaluation is being undertaken by the Children’s Bureau and its contractor Mathematica Policy Research. The evaluation is being implemented by PO 00000 Average burden hour per response Frm 00032 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Mathematica Policy Research and its subcontractors, WRMA, Inc., and Synergy Enterprises. The RPG Cross-Site Evaluation includes the following components: 1. Implementation and Partnership Study. The RPG cross-site implementation and partnership study will contribute to building the knowledge base about effective implementation strategies by examining the process of implementation in the 21 RPG projects, with a focus on factors shown in the research literature to be associated with quality implementation of evidence-based programs. This component of the study describes the RPG projects’ target populations, selected interventions and their fit with the target populations, inputs to implementation, and actual services provided (including dosage, duration, content, adherence to curricula, and participant responsiveness). It examines the key attributes of the regional partnerships that grantees develop (for example, partnerships among child welfare and substance abuse treatment providers, social services, and family courts). It describes the characteristics and roles of the partner organizations, the extent of coordination and collaboration, and their potential to sustain the partnerships after the grant ends. Key data collection activities of the implementation and partnership study are: (1) Conducting site visits during which researchers interview RPG program directors, managers, supervisors, and frontline staff who work directly with families; (2) administering a survey to frontline staff involved in providing direct services to children, adults, and families; (3) asking grantees to provide information about implementation and their partnerships as part of their federally required semiannual progress reports; (4) obtaining service use data from grantees, enrollment date and demographics of enrollees, exit date and reason, and E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM 08DEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 236 / Thursday, December 8, 2016 / Notices service participation, which are entered into a web-based system operated by Mathematica Policy Research and its subcontractors; and (5) administering a survey to representatives of the partner organizations. 2. Outcomes Study. The goal of the outcomes study is to describe the changes that occur in children and families who participate in the RPG programs. This study will describe participant outcomes in five domains: (1) Child well-being, (2) family functioning/stability, (3) adult recovery from substance use disorder, (4) child permanency, and (5) child safety. Two main types of outcome data will be used—both of which are being collected by RPG grantees: (1) Administrative child welfare and adult substance abuse treatment records and (2) standardized instruments administered to the parents and/or caregivers. The Children’s Bureau is requiring grantees to obtain and report specified administrative records, and to use a prescribed set of standardized instruments. Grantees will provide these data to the cross-site evaluation team twice a year by uploading them to a data system operated by Mathematica Policy Research and its subcontractors. 3. Impact Study. The goal of the impact study is to assess the impact of the RPG interventions on child, adult, and family outcomes by comparing outcomes for people enrolled in RPG services to those in comparison groups, such as people who do not receive RPG services or receive only a subset of the services. The impact study will use demographic and outcome data on both program (treatment) and comparison groups from a subset of grantees with appropriate local evaluation designs such as randomized controlled trials or strong quasi-experimental designs; 5 of the 21 grantees have such designs. Sitespecific impacts will be estimated for these seven grantees. Aggregated impact estimates will be created by pooling impact estimates across appropriate sites to obtain a more powerful summary of the effectiveness of RPG interventions. In addition to conducting local evaluations and participating in the RPG Cross-Site Evaluation, the RPG grantees are legislatively required to report performance indicators aligned with their proposed program strategies and activities. A key strategy of the RPG Cross-Site Evaluation is to minimize burden on the grantees by ensuring that the cross-site evaluation, which includes all grantees in a study that collects data to report on implementation, the partnerships, and participant characteristics and outcomes, fully meets the need for performance reporting. Thus, rather than collecting separate evaluation and performance indicator data, the grantees need only participate in the cross-site evaluation. In addition, using the standardized instruments that the 88689 Children’s Bureau has specified will ensure that grantees have valid and reliable data on child and family outcomes for their local evaluations. The inclusion of an impact study conducted on a subset of grantees with rigorous designs will also provide the Children’s Bureau, Congress, grantees, providers, and researchers with information about the effectiveness of RPG programs. A 60-day Federal Register Notice was published for this study on June 24, 2016. This 30-day Federal Register Notice covers the following data collection activities: (1) The site visits with grantees; (2) the web-based survey of frontline staff who provide direct services to children, adults, and families, and their supervisors; (3) the semi-annual progress reports; (4) enrollment and service data provided by grantees; (5) the web-based survey of grantee partners; and (6) outcome data provided by grantees. Respondents. Respondents include grantee staff or contractors (such as local evaluators) and partner staff. Specific types of respondents and the expected number per data collection effort are noted in the burden table below. Annual burden estimates. The following instruments are proposed for public comment under this 30-day Federal Register Notice. Burden for all components is annualized over three years. RPG CROSS-SITE EVALUATION ANNUALIZED BURDEN ESTIMATES Total number of respondents Data collection activity Number of responses per respondent Average burden hours per response (in hours) Estimatedtotal burden hours Total annual burden hours Implementation and Partnership Study Program director individual interview ................................... Program manager/supervisor group interview ..................... Program manager/supervisor individual interviews ............. Frontline staff individual interviews ...................................... Semi-annual progress reports ............................................. Case enrollment data ........................................................... Service log entries ............................................................... Staff survey .......................................................................... Partner survey ...................................................................... 4 36 24 24 21 63 126 80 80 1 1 1 1 6 90 2,340 1 1 2 2 1 1 16.5 0.25 0.05 0.42 0.33 8 72 24 24 2,079 1,417.5 14,742 33.6 26.4 2.67 24 8 8 693 472.5 4,914 11.2 8.8 ........................ 18 144 ........................ 112.5 100 ........................ 378 18,144 ........................ 14,175 12,600 126 6,048 ........................ 4,725 4,200 .25 ........................ 1,085 ........................ 361.6 21,602.77 sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES Data Entry for Outcomes Study Administrative Data: Obtain access to administrative data ........................... Report administrative data ............................................ Standardized instruments: Enter data into local database ...................................... Review records and submit .......................................... ........................ 21 21 ........................ 21 21 ........................ 2 6 ........................ 6 6 Additional Data Entry for Impact Study Data entry for comparison study sites (7 grantees) ............ Estimated Total Burden Hours ..................................... VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:28 Dec 07, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 5 ........................ Frm 00033 Fmt 4703 1 ........................ Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM 08DEN1 88690 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 236 / Thursday, December 8, 2016 / Notices In compliance with the requirements of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Children’s Bureau within the Administration for Children and Families is soliciting public comment on the specific aspects of the information collection described above. Copies of the proposed collection of information can be obtained and comments may be forwarded by writing to Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, 330 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20416, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer. Email address: infocollection@acf.hhs.gov. All requests should be identified by the title of the information collection. OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collection of information between 30 and 60 days after publication of this document in the Federal Register. Therefore, a comment is best assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent directly to the following: Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, Email: OIRASUBMISSION@OMB.EoP.GOV, Attn: Desk Officer for the Administration of Children and Families. Robert Sargis, Reports Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. 2016–29406 Filed 12–7–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4184–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health Privacy Act of 1974; Notice To Establish an Exempt System of Records National Institutes of Health (NIH), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). ACTION: Notice to establish an exempt system of records. AGENCY: In accordance with the requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) proposes to establish a new system of records, to be numbered and titled: SORN 09–25–0225 ‘‘NIH Electronic Research Administration (eRA) Records, HHS/NIH/OD/OER,’’ which will be related to, but separate from, the system of records covered in SORN 09–25–0036 ‘‘NIH Extramural Awards and Chartered Advisory sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:28 Dec 07, 2016 Jkt 241001 Committee (IMPAC II), Contract Information (DCIS), and Cooperative Agreement Information, HHS/NIH.’’ The new system of records will cover records used by NIH throughout the research and development award lifecycle, from application to scientific peer review, post-award monitoring, and close-out. Elsewhere in today’s Federal Register, NIH has published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) proposing to exempt confidential source-identifying material in the new system of records (i.e., material that would inappropriately reveal the identities of referees who provide letters of recommendation and peer reviewers who provide written evaluative input and recommendations to NIH about particular funding applications under an express promise by the government that their identities in association with the written work products they authored and provided to the government will be kept confidential) from certain requirements of the Privacy Act, specifically, from the provisions pertaining to providing an accounting of disclosures, access and amendment and notification. The exemptions and the promises of confidentiality are necessary to protect the integrity of NIH extramural peer review and award processes and ensure that NIH efforts to obtain accurate and objective assessments and evaluations of funding applications from referees and peer reviewers is not hindered. The exemptions will become effective when NIH publishes a Final Rule, which will not occur until the 60-day comment period provided in the NPRM has expired and any comments received on the NPRM (or on this System of Records Notice) have been addressed. DATES: The comment period for this System of Records Notice (SORN) is coextensive with the 60-day comment period provided in the NPRM; i.e., written comments on the SORN should be submitted within 60 days from today’s publication date. The new system, including the routine uses and the exemptions, will become effective when NIH publishes a Final Rule, which will not occur until the 60-day comment period provided in the NPRM has expired and any comments received on the NPRM (or on this SORN) have been addressed. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by the Privacy Act System of Records Number (09–25–0225), by any of the following methods: Email: privacy@mail.nih.gov and include PA SOR number (09–25–0225) in the subject line of the message. Phone: (301) PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 402–6201. Fax: (301) 402–0169. Mail or hand-delivery: NIH Privacy Act Officer, Office of Management Assessment, National Institutes of Health, 6011 Executive Boulevard, Suite 601, MSC 7669, Rockville, Maryland 20852. Comments received will be available for public inspection at this same address from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Please call 301–496–4606 for an appointment. NIH Privacy Act Officer, Office of Management Assessment (OMA), Office of the Director (OD), National Institutes of Health (NIH), 6011 Executive Boulevard, Suite 601, MSC 7669, Rockville, Maryland 20852, or telephone (301) 402–6201. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: I. Background on the NIH Electronic Research Administration (eRA) Records System The new system of records established in this Notice, ‘‘NIH Electronic Research Administration (eRA) Records, HHS/NIH/OD/OER’’ (hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘NIH eRA Records’’ system), will cover records used throughout the research and development award lifecycle, including pre-award stages of application submission, scientific peer review, award processing, post-award monitoring, and close-out. Many of the records in the system will contain information about more than one individual or type of individual (e.g., applicants, awardees, faculty members of applicant and awardee entities, application reviewers). By design, any of the records can be (and in practice will be) retrieved using the name or other personal identifier of any of the individuals whose information is contained in the records, to the extent required to help ensure that award proceedings are carried out by the NIH in accordance with all applicable federal statutes and regulations. The eRA information technology (IT) system associated with this system of records is an HHS-designated Center of Excellence, and is used as a grants management line of business system by other federal agencies to manage their award records. Records pertaining to awards of other agencies in the eRA IT system are not covered under SORN 09– 25–0225, but would be covered under SORN(s) those agencies publish, if their records require a SORN. II. The Privacy Act The Privacy Act governs the collection, maintenance, use, and E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM 08DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 236 (Thursday, December 8, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 88688-88690]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-29406]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Requested

    Title: RPG National Cross-Site Evaluation and Evaluation Technical 
Assistance.
    OMB No.: 0970-0444.
    Description: The Children's Bureau within the Administration for 
Children and Families of the U.S. Department of Health and Human 
Services seeks a renewal of clearance to collect information for the 
Regional Partnership Grants to Increase the Well-being of and to 
Improve Permanency Outcomes for Children Affected by Substance Abuse 
Cross-Site Evaluation and Evaluation-Related Technical Assistance and 
Data Collection Support for Regional Partnership Grant Program Round 
Three Sites or ``RPG'' projects. Under RPG, the Children's Bureau has 
issued 21 grants to organizations such as child welfare or substance 
abuse treatment providers or family court systems to develop 
interagency collaborations and integration of programs, activities, and 
services designed to increase well-being, improve permanency, and 
enhance the safety of children who are in an out-of-home placement or 
are at risk of being placed in out-of-home care as a result of a 
parent's or caretaker's substance use dependence. The Child and Family 
Services Improvement and Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112-34) includes a 
targeted grants program (section 437(f) of the Social Security Act) 
that directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to reserve a 
specified portion of the appropriation for these Regional Partnership 
Grants, to be used to improve the well-being of children affected by 
substance abuse. The overall objective of the Cross-Site Evaluation and 
Technical Assistance projects (the RPG Cross-Site Evaluation) is to 
plan, develop, and implement a rigorous national cross-site evaluation 
of the RPG Grant Program, provide legislatively-mandated performance 
measurement, furnish evaluation-related technical assistance to the 
grantees in order to improve the quality and rigor of their local 
evaluations, and support their participation in the cross-site 
evaluation. The project will evaluate the programs and activities 
conducted through the RPG Program. The evaluation is being undertaken 
by the Children's Bureau and its contractor Mathematica Policy 
Research. The evaluation is being implemented by Mathematica Policy 
Research and its subcontractors, WRMA, Inc., and Synergy Enterprises.
    The RPG Cross-Site Evaluation includes the following components:
    1. Implementation and Partnership Study. The RPG cross-site 
implementation and partnership study will contribute to building the 
knowledge base about effective implementation strategies by examining 
the process of implementation in the 21 RPG projects, with a focus on 
factors shown in the research literature to be associated with quality 
implementation of evidence-based programs. This component of the study 
describes the RPG projects' target populations, selected interventions 
and their fit with the target populations, inputs to implementation, 
and actual services provided (including dosage, duration, content, 
adherence to curricula, and participant responsiveness). It examines 
the key attributes of the regional partnerships that grantees develop 
(for example, partnerships among child welfare and substance abuse 
treatment providers, social services, and family courts). It describes 
the characteristics and roles of the partner organizations, the extent 
of coordination and collaboration, and their potential to sustain the 
partnerships after the grant ends. Key data collection activities of 
the implementation and partnership study are: (1) Conducting site 
visits during which researchers interview RPG program directors, 
managers, supervisors, and frontline staff who work directly with 
families; (2) administering a survey to frontline staff involved in 
providing direct services to children, adults, and families; (3) asking 
grantees to provide information about implementation and their 
partnerships as part of their federally required semi-annual progress 
reports; (4) obtaining service use data from grantees, enrollment date 
and demographics of enrollees, exit date and reason, and

[[Page 88689]]

service participation, which are entered into a web-based system 
operated by Mathematica Policy Research and its subcontractors; and (5) 
administering a survey to representatives of the partner organizations.
    2. Outcomes Study. The goal of the outcomes study is to describe 
the changes that occur in children and families who participate in the 
RPG programs. This study will describe participant outcomes in five 
domains: (1) Child well-being, (2) family functioning/stability, (3) 
adult recovery from substance use disorder, (4) child permanency, and 
(5) child safety. Two main types of outcome data will be used--both of 
which are being collected by RPG grantees: (1) Administrative child 
welfare and adult substance abuse treatment records and (2) 
standardized instruments administered to the parents and/or caregivers. 
The Children's Bureau is requiring grantees to obtain and report 
specified administrative records, and to use a prescribed set of 
standardized instruments. Grantees will provide these data to the 
cross-site evaluation team twice a year by uploading them to a data 
system operated by Mathematica Policy Research and its subcontractors.
    3. Impact Study. The goal of the impact study is to assess the 
impact of the RPG interventions on child, adult, and family outcomes by 
comparing outcomes for people enrolled in RPG services to those in 
comparison groups, such as people who do not receive RPG services or 
receive only a subset of the services. The impact study will use 
demographic and outcome data on both program (treatment) and comparison 
groups from a subset of grantees with appropriate local evaluation 
designs such as randomized controlled trials or strong quasi-
experimental designs; 5 of the 21 grantees have such designs. Site-
specific impacts will be estimated for these seven grantees. Aggregated 
impact estimates will be created by pooling impact estimates across 
appropriate sites to obtain a more powerful summary of the 
effectiveness of RPG interventions.
    In addition to conducting local evaluations and participating in 
the RPG Cross-Site Evaluation, the RPG grantees are legislatively 
required to report performance indicators aligned with their proposed 
program strategies and activities. A key strategy of the RPG Cross-Site 
Evaluation is to minimize burden on the grantees by ensuring that the 
cross-site evaluation, which includes all grantees in a study that 
collects data to report on implementation, the partnerships, and 
participant characteristics and outcomes, fully meets the need for 
performance reporting. Thus, rather than collecting separate evaluation 
and performance indicator data, the grantees need only participate in 
the cross-site evaluation. In addition, using the standardized 
instruments that the Children's Bureau has specified will ensure that 
grantees have valid and reliable data on child and family outcomes for 
their local evaluations. The inclusion of an impact study conducted on 
a subset of grantees with rigorous designs will also provide the 
Children's Bureau, Congress, grantees, providers, and researchers with 
information about the effectiveness of RPG programs.
    A 60-day Federal Register Notice was published for this study on 
June 24, 2016. This 30-day Federal Register Notice covers the following 
data collection activities: (1) The site visits with grantees; (2) the 
web-based survey of frontline staff who provide direct services to 
children, adults, and families, and their supervisors; (3) the semi-
annual progress reports; (4) enrollment and service data provided by 
grantees; (5) the web-based survey of grantee partners; and (6) outcome 
data provided by grantees.
    Respondents. Respondents include grantee staff or contractors (such 
as local evaluators) and partner staff. Specific types of respondents 
and the expected number per data collection effort are noted in the 
burden table below.
    Annual burden estimates. The following instruments are proposed for 
public comment under this 30-day Federal Register Notice. Burden for 
all components is annualized over three years.

                              RPG Cross-Site Evaluation Annualized Burden Estimates
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  Average burden
                                   Total number      Number of       hours per    Estimatedtotal   Total annual
    Data collection activity      of respondents   responses per   response (in    burden hours    burden hours
                                                    respondent        hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                      Implementation and Partnership Study
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Program director individual                    4               1               2               8            2.67
 interview......................
Program manager/supervisor group              36               1               2              72              24
 interview......................
Program manager/supervisor                    24               1               1              24               8
 individual interviews..........
Frontline staff individual                    24               1               1              24               8
 interviews.....................
Semi-annual progress reports....              21               6            16.5           2,079             693
Case enrollment data............              63              90            0.25         1,417.5           472.5
Service log entries.............             126           2,340            0.05          14,742           4,914
Staff survey....................              80               1            0.42            33.6            11.2
Partner survey..................              80               1            0.33            26.4             8.8
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Data Entry for Outcomes Study
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Administrative Data:              ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............
    Obtain access to                          21               2              18             378             126
     administrative data........
    Report administrative data..              21               6             144          18,144           6,048
Standardized instruments:         ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............
    Enter data into local                     21               6           112.5          14,175           4,725
     database...................
    Review records and submit...              21               6             100          12,600           4,200
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     Additional Data Entry for Impact Study
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Data entry for comparison study                5               1             .25           1,085           361.6
 sites (7 grantees).............
    Estimated Total Burden Hours  ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............       21,602.77
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 88690]]

    In compliance with the requirements of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Children's Bureau within the 
Administration for Children and Families is soliciting public comment 
on the specific aspects of the information collection described above. 
Copies of the proposed collection of information can be obtained and 
comments may be forwarded by writing to Administration for Children and 
Families, Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, 330 C Street 
SW., Washington, DC 20416, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer. Email 
address: infocollection@acf.hhs.gov. All requests should be identified 
by the title of the information collection.
    OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collection of 
information between 30 and 60 days after publication of this document 
in the Federal Register. Therefore, a comment is best assured of having 
its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication. 
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent directly to the following: Office of 
Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, Email: 
OIRASUBMISSION@OMB.EoP.GOV, Attn: Desk Officer for the Administration 
of Children and Families.

Robert Sargis,
Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016-29406 Filed 12-7-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4184-01-P