Update to Email Address for the Electronic Submission via the Internet of Certain Accident/Incident Reports, 88133-88135 [2016-29309]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 7, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
(b) Nothing in this section shall be
construed as superseding or affecting
any state training requirements related
to criminal law, civil procedure, motor
vehicle code, any other state law, or
state-mandated comparative or annual
in-service training academy or Federal
law enforcement training center.
Issued in Washington, DC, on December 1,
2016.
Amitabha Bose,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2016–29256 Filed 12–6–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
49 CFR Part 225
RIN 2130–AC58
Update to Email Address for the
Electronic Submission via the Internet
of Certain Accident/Incident Reports
Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule updates FRA’s
accident/incident reporting regulations
to provide the current electronic mail
address railroads must use to
electronically submit to FRA certain
accident/incident report forms.
DATES: Effective: December 7, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kebo Chen, Staff Director, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Federal
Railroad Administration, Office of
Safety Analysis, RRS–22, Mail Stop 25,
West Building 3rd Floor, Room W33–
314, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE.,
Washington, DC 20590 (telephone 202–
493–6079); or Gahan Christenson, Trial
Attorney, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Federal Railroad
Administration, Office of Chief Counsel,
RCC–10, Mail Stop 10, West Building
3rd Floor, Room W33–435, 1200 New
Jersey Ave. SE., Washington, DC 20590
(telephone 202–493–1381).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
updates the electronic mail (email)
address provided in 49 CFR part 225 for
railroads to electronically submit certain
FRA accident/incident report forms.1
Part 225 references the FRA email
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
1 FRA is not simultaneously updating the email
address in the FRA Guide for Preparing Accident/
Incident Reports (Guide) because this final rule and
updates on FRA’s Web site, in addition to
communication between FRA and individual
railroads, makes it unnecessary to revise the Guide
at this time.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:02 Dec 06, 2016
Jkt 241001
address in two places: Paragraph (c) of
§ 225.27 and paragraph (c)(1) of
§ 225.37. Those paragraphs direct
railroads to submit the specified forms
to the following email address:
aireports@frasafety.net. This FRA email
address is out of date and no longer
functional. Accordingly, in this rule
FRA is updating the email address
referenced in paragraph (c) of § 225.27
and paragraph (c)(1) of § 225.37 to the
current email address where FRA can
receive these reports. The current email
address is: RsisAiReports@dot.gov.
Starting in 2013, FRA informed
railroad reporting officers of the change
in the email address in §§ 225.27 and
225.37 and started transitioning to the
new RsisAiReports@dot.gov email
address. FRA established the
RsisAiReports@dot.gov email address to
avoid increased costs associated with
the previous email address in the
regulations. Until December 31, 2015,
FRA accepted emailed accident/
incident report forms at the email
address in part 225 (aireports@
frasafety.net) and at RsisAiReports@
dot.gov, but the aireports@frasafety.net
email address no longer functions.
This rule only updates the email
address in the regulation and makes no
other changes to part 225. FRA is
issuing this final rule without providing
an opportunity for prior to public notice
and comment as the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA) normally requires.
See 5 U.S.C. 553. The APA authorizes
agencies to dispense with certain notice
and comment procedures if the agency
finds for good cause that notice and
public procedure are impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest. See 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B).
Because this final rule makes no
substantive amendment to FRA’s
regulations and only changes the email
address for railroads to submit to FRA
certain already required documents,
FRA finds, for good cause, that notice
and public comment is unnecessary,
because the public would not benefit
from such notice. Moreover, The scope
of this regulatory change is very limited;
FRA is merely replacing an outdated
email address with a current email
address.
Regulatory Evaluation
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 and
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
FRA evaluated this final rule under
existing policies and procedures and
determined it to be a non-significant
regulatory action under both Executive
Orders 12866 and 13563 and DOT
policies and procedures. See 44 FR
11034, Feb. 26, 1979. This final rule
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
88133
only updates the email address used by
railroads to report certain accident/
incident forms to FRA, and makes no
substantive changes to part 225’s
reporting requirements. This rule is
necessary because the current email
address is out of date and no longer
accepts accident/incident report forms.
Over the past three years, FRA has
repeatedly notified railroads of the new
email address that should be used for
submitting accident/incident report
forms. Consequently, most railroads
already use the new email address
referenced in this rule, but some do not
and will need to do so under this final
rule. These railroads will incur a minor
administrative burden to make note of
the new email address and revise their
contact lists accordingly, in comparison
to no change in the email address used
to submit accident/incident report forms
to FRA.
The administrative burden to update
the email address will depend on how
the railroads submit accident/incident
report forms to FRA. In general,
railroads use the email address in two
ways to submit accident/incident report
forms. First, a railroad may manually
enter the email address into its email
program or electronic device (such as a
multi-function printer) each time the
railroad submits an accident/incident
report form to FRA. In this case,
substituting the new email address for
the old one would present no additional
burden because the railroad would have
had to enter an email address regardless.
Furthermore, if occasionally updating
email addresses is a regular part of a
railroad reporting officer’s duties (the
employee most likely to submit
accident/incident report forms to FRA),
the burden of updating the email
address is already taken into account.
The railroad employee would only need
to take note of the new email address,
requiring a minimal amount of time.
Second, a railroad may use an
automated system to submit accident/
incident report forms to FRA. In such a
system, the reporting officer would need
to update, save and/or compile, and
check for errors when using the new
email address (such as entering in the
email address wrong). These steps are
standardized, and again, would require
minimal time to update one email
address. In addition, whether email
addresses are entered manually, or
stored in an automated system, the
email address would only need to be
updated once. Thus, given the small
amount of time needed to revise the
current email address to the new one,
and one-time occurrence of the task, the
costs associated with this change will be
minimal.
E:\FR\FM\07DER1.SGM
07DER1
88134
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 7, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
In sum, this final rule makes no
substantive changes to part 225’s
reporting requirements. The rule only
makes an administrative change to
facilitate railroads submission of
accident/incident forms to FRA. Thus,
the rule imposes no significant
additional costs, and creates no new
significant benefits and FRA has
determined further analysis under
Executive Orders 12866, 13563 or DOT
policies and procedures is not
necessary.
Regulatory Flexibility Act and Executive
Order 13272
FRA developed this rule under
Executive Order 13272 (‘‘Proper
Consideration of Small Entities in
Agency Rulemaking’’) and DOT’s
procedures and policies to promote
compliance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) to
ensure potential impacts of rules on
small entities are properly considered.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA) requires an agency to review
regulations to assess their impact on
small entities. An agency must conduct
a regulatory flexibility analysis unless it
determines and certifies that a rule is
not expected to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This final rule simply updates an
email address railroads use to
electronically submit to FRA certain
accident/incident report forms. This
rule does not contain any new
substantive regulatory requirements. As
a result, this rule will impose no new
compliance costs on small entities other
than those minimal potential costs
outlined above in the Regulatory
Evaluation section. Under the RFA, the
Administrator of FRA certifies this final
rule will have no significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Furthermore, FRA has determined the
RFA does not apply to this rulemaking
because FRA is not publishing a
proposed rule in this proceeding. Given
the minor change to replace an outdated
email address with a current email
address and FRA’s finding that notice
and public comment is unnecessary and
would serve no public benefit, per
guidance from the Small Business
Administration, the RFA does not
apply. See A Guide for Government
Agencies: How to Comply with the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, Small
Business Administration, Office of
Advocacy (May 2012, p.55).
Paperwork Reduction Act
There are no new or additional
information collection requirements
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:02 Dec 06, 2016
Jkt 241001
associated with this final rule. FRA’s
collection of accident/incident reporting
and recordkeeping information is
currently approved under OMB No.
2130–0500. Therefore, FRA is not
required to provide an estimate of a
public reporting burden in this
document.
Federalism Implications
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
(64 FR 43255, Aug. 10, 1999), requires
FRA to develop an accountable process
to ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input
by State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that
have federalism implications.’’ ‘‘Policies
that have federalism implications’’ are
defined in the Executive Order to
include regulations that have
‘‘substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.’’ Under Executive
Order 13132, the agency may not issue
a regulation with federalism
implications that imposes substantial
direct compliance costs and that is not
required by statute, unless the Federal
government provides the funds
necessary to pay the direct compliance
costs incurred by State and local
governments, or the agency consults
with State and local government
officials early in the process of
developing the regulation. Where a
regulation has federalism implications
and preempts State law, the agency
seeks to consult with State and local
officials in the process of developing the
regulation.
FRA analyzed this final rule under the
principles and criteria in Executive
Order 13132. This rule will not have a
substantial direct effect on States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and the
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in the
Executive Order 13132. In addition,
FRA determined this rule does not
impose substantial direct compliance
costs on State and local governments.
Accordingly, FRA concluded the
consultation and funding requirements
of Executive Order 13132 do not apply
and preparation of a federalism
assessment is not required.
Environmental Impact
FRA evaluated this final rule under its
‘‘Procedures for Considering
Environmental Impacts’’ (FRA’s
Procedures) (64 FR 28545, May 26,
1999) as required by the National
Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
4321 et seq.), other environmental
statutes, Executive Orders, and related
regulatory requirements. FRA has
determined this final rule is not a major
FRA action (requiring the preparation of
an environmental impact statement or
environmental assessment) because it is
categorically excluded from detailed
environmental review under section
4(c)(20) of FRA’s Procedures. See 64 FR
28547, May 26, 1999. Section 4(c)(20)
reads as follows:
(c) Actions categorically excluded. Certain
classes of FRA actions have been determined
to be categorically excluded from the
requirements of these Procedures as they do
not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment.
. . . The following classes of FRA actions
are categorically excluded: . . . (20)
Promulgation of railroad safety rules and
policy statements that do not result in
significantly increased emissions or air or
water pollutants or noise or increased traffic
congestion in any mode of transportation.
Consistent with section 4(c)(20) of
FRA’s Procedures, FRA concluded that
no extraordinary circumstances exist
with respect to this regulation that
might trigger the need for a more
detailed environmental review. As a
result, FRA finds this rule is not a major
Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Under Section 201 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public
Law 104–4, 2 U.S.C. 1531), each Federal
agency ‘‘shall, unless otherwise
prohibited by law, assess the effects of
Federal regulatory actions on State,
local, and tribal governments, and the
private sector (other than to the extent
that such regulations incorporate
requirements specifically set forth in
law).’’ Section 202 of the Act (2 U.S.C.
1532) further requires that
before promulgating any general notice of
proposed rulemaking that is likely to result
in the promulgation of any rule that includes
any Federal mandate that may result in
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any 1
year, and before promulgating any final rule
for which a general notice of proposed
rulemaking was published, the agency shall
prepare a written statement
detailing the effect on State, local, and
tribal governments and the private
sector. This final rule will not result in
the expenditure of more than
$156,000,000 by the public sector in any
one year. Thus, preparation of such a
statement is not required.
E:\FR\FM\07DER1.SGM
07DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 7, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Energy Impact
Executive Order 13211 requires
Federal agencies to prepare a Statement
of Energy Effects for any ‘‘significant
energy action.’’ 66 FR 28355, May 22,
2001. Under the Executive Order, a
‘‘significant energy action’’ is defined as
any action by an agency (normally
published in the Federal Register) that
promulgates or is expected to lead to the
promulgation of, a final rule or
regulation (including a notice of
inquiry, advance notice of proposed
rulemaking, and notice of proposed
rulemaking) that (1)(i) is a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866 or any successor order, and (ii) is
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy; or (2) is designated by the
Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs as a
significant energy action. FRA has
evaluated this rule under Executive
Order 13211. FRA has determined this
rule will not have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy, and, thus, is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211.
Executive Order 12898 (Environmental
Justice)
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Executive Order 12898, Federal
Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations, and DOT
Order 5610.2(a) (91 FR 27534, May 10,
2012) require DOT agencies to achieve
environmental justice as part of their
mission by identifying and addressing,
as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects, including
interrelated social and economic effects,
of their programs, policies, and
activities on minority populations and
low-income populations. The DOT
Order instructs DOT agencies to address
compliance with Executive Order 12898
and requirements within the DOT Order
in rulemaking activities, as appropriate.
FRA evaluated this final rule under
Executive Order 12898 and the DOT
Order and determined it would not
cause disproportionately high and
adverse human health and
environmental effects on minority or
low-income populations.
Executive Order 13175 (Tribal
Consultation)
FRA evaluated this final rule under
the principles and criteria in Executive
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:02 Dec 06, 2016
Jkt 241001
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, dated November 6, 2000.
The final rule would not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, would not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
Indian tribal governments, and would
not preempt tribal laws. Therefore, the
funding and consultation requirements
of Executive Order 13175 do not apply,
and a tribal summary impact statement
is not required.
Trade Impact
The Trade Agreements Act of 1979 19
U.S.C. 2501 et seq.) prohibits Federal
agencies from engaging in any standards
setting or related activities that create
unnecessary obstacles to the foreign
commerce of the United States.
Legitimate domestic objectives, such as
safety, are not considered unnecessary
obstacles. The statute also requires
consideration of international standards
and, where appropriate, that they be the
basis for U.S. standards. FRA assessed
the potential effect of this final rule on
foreign commerce and concluded its
requirements are consistent with the
Trade Agreements Act.
Privacy Act
Interested parties should be aware
that anyone can search the electronic
form of all written comments received
into any agency docket by the name of
the individual submitting the comment
(or signing the comment, if submitted
on behalf of an association, business,
labor union, etc.). You may review
DOT’s complete Privacy Act Statement
in the Federal Register (65 FR 19477–
19478, Apr. 11, 2000) or you may visit
https://www.transportation.gov/privacy.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 225
Investigations, Penalties, Railroad
safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
The Rule
In consideration of the foregoing, FRA
amends part 225 of chapter II, subtitle
B of title 49, Code of Federal
Regulations, as follows:
PART 225—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 225
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 103, 322(a), 20103,
20107, 20901–02, 21301, 21302, 21311; 28
U.S.C. 2461, note; and 49 CFR 1.89.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
88135
2. Amend § 225.27 by revising the first
sentence of paragraph (c) to read as
follows:
■
§ 225.27
Retention of records.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Each railroad shall retain the
original hard copy of each completed
and signed Form FRA F 6180.55,
‘‘Railroad Injury and Illness Summary,’’
that the railroad submits to FRA on
optical media (CD–ROM) or
electronically via the Internet to
RsisAiReports@dot.gov for at least five
years after the calendar year to which it
relates. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend § 225.37 by revising
paragraph (c)(1) introductory text to
read as follows:
§ 225.37 Optical media transfer and
electronic submission.
*
*
*
*
*
(c)(1) Each railroad utilizing the
electronic submission via the Internet
option shall submit to FRA at
RsisAiReports@dot.gov:
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Washington, DC, on December 1,
2016.
Amitabha Bose,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2016–29309 Filed 12–6–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 160630573–6999–02]
RIN 0648–BG19
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; Reef Fish
Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; Red
Snapper Management Measures
Correction
In rule document 2016–28905
beginning on page 876971 in the issue
of Friday, December 2, 2016, make the
following correction:
1. On page 86971, in the first column,
after the DATES heading, the second line,
‘‘January 3, 2016.’’ should read ‘‘January
3, 2017.’’
[FR Doc. C1–2016–28905 Filed 12–6–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1301–00–D
E:\FR\FM\07DER1.SGM
07DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 7, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 88133-88135]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-29309]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
49 CFR Part 225
RIN 2130-AC58
Update to Email Address for the Electronic Submission via the
Internet of Certain Accident/Incident Reports
AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule updates FRA's accident/incident reporting
regulations to provide the current electronic mail address railroads
must use to electronically submit to FRA certain accident/incident
report forms.
DATES: Effective: December 7, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kebo Chen, Staff Director, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration, Office
of Safety Analysis, RRS-22, Mail Stop 25, West Building 3rd Floor, Room
W33-314, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., Washington, DC 20590 (telephone 202-
493-6079); or Gahan Christenson, Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration, Office of Chief
Counsel, RCC-10, Mail Stop 10, West Building 3rd Floor, Room W33-435,
1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., Washington, DC 20590 (telephone 202-493-
1381).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule updates the electronic mail
(email) address provided in 49 CFR part 225 for railroads to
electronically submit certain FRA accident/incident report forms.\1\
Part 225 references the FRA email address in two places: Paragraph (c)
of Sec. 225.27 and paragraph (c)(1) of Sec. 225.37. Those paragraphs
direct railroads to submit the specified forms to the following email
address: aireports@frasafety.net. This FRA email address is out of date
and no longer functional. Accordingly, in this rule FRA is updating the
email address referenced in paragraph (c) of Sec. 225.27 and paragraph
(c)(1) of Sec. 225.37 to the current email address where FRA can
receive these reports. The current email address is:
RsisAiReports@dot.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ FRA is not simultaneously updating the email address in the
FRA Guide for Preparing Accident/Incident Reports (Guide) because
this final rule and updates on FRA's Web site, in addition to
communication between FRA and individual railroads, makes it
unnecessary to revise the Guide at this time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Starting in 2013, FRA informed railroad reporting officers of the
change in the email address in Sec. Sec. 225.27 and 225.37 and started
transitioning to the new RsisAiReports@dot.gov email address. FRA
established the RsisAiReports@dot.gov email address to avoid increased
costs associated with the previous email address in the regulations.
Until December 31, 2015, FRA accepted emailed accident/incident report
forms at the email address in part 225 (aireports@frasafety.net) and at
RsisAiReports@dot.gov, but the aireports@frasafety.net email address no
longer functions.
This rule only updates the email address in the regulation and
makes no other changes to part 225. FRA is issuing this final rule
without providing an opportunity for prior to public notice and comment
as the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) normally requires. See 5
U.S.C. 553. The APA authorizes agencies to dispense with certain notice
and comment procedures if the agency finds for good cause that notice
and public procedure are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the
public interest. See 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B). Because this final rule
makes no substantive amendment to FRA's regulations and only changes
the email address for railroads to submit to FRA certain already
required documents, FRA finds, for good cause, that notice and public
comment is unnecessary, because the public would not benefit from such
notice. Moreover, The scope of this regulatory change is very limited;
FRA is merely replacing an outdated email address with a current email
address.
Regulatory Evaluation
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 and DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures
FRA evaluated this final rule under existing policies and
procedures and determined it to be a non-significant regulatory action
under both Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 and DOT policies and
procedures. See 44 FR 11034, Feb. 26, 1979. This final rule only
updates the email address used by railroads to report certain accident/
incident forms to FRA, and makes no substantive changes to part 225's
reporting requirements. This rule is necessary because the current
email address is out of date and no longer accepts accident/incident
report forms. Over the past three years, FRA has repeatedly notified
railroads of the new email address that should be used for submitting
accident/incident report forms. Consequently, most railroads already
use the new email address referenced in this rule, but some do not and
will need to do so under this final rule. These railroads will incur a
minor administrative burden to make note of the new email address and
revise their contact lists accordingly, in comparison to no change in
the email address used to submit accident/incident report forms to FRA.
The administrative burden to update the email address will depend
on how the railroads submit accident/incident report forms to FRA. In
general, railroads use the email address in two ways to submit
accident/incident report forms. First, a railroad may manually enter
the email address into its email program or electronic device (such as
a multi-function printer) each time the railroad submits an accident/
incident report form to FRA. In this case, substituting the new email
address for the old one would present no additional burden because the
railroad would have had to enter an email address regardless.
Furthermore, if occasionally updating email addresses is a regular part
of a railroad reporting officer's duties (the employee most likely to
submit accident/incident report forms to FRA), the burden of updating
the email address is already taken into account. The railroad employee
would only need to take note of the new email address, requiring a
minimal amount of time.
Second, a railroad may use an automated system to submit accident/
incident report forms to FRA. In such a system, the reporting officer
would need to update, save and/or compile, and check for errors when
using the new email address (such as entering in the email address
wrong). These steps are standardized, and again, would require minimal
time to update one email address. In addition, whether email addresses
are entered manually, or stored in an automated system, the email
address would only need to be updated once. Thus, given the small
amount of time needed to revise the current email address to the new
one, and one-time occurrence of the task, the costs associated with
this change will be minimal.
[[Page 88134]]
In sum, this final rule makes no substantive changes to part 225's
reporting requirements. The rule only makes an administrative change to
facilitate railroads submission of accident/incident forms to FRA.
Thus, the rule imposes no significant additional costs, and creates no
new significant benefits and FRA has determined further analysis under
Executive Orders 12866, 13563 or DOT policies and procedures is not
necessary.
Regulatory Flexibility Act and Executive Order 13272
FRA developed this rule under Executive Order 13272 (``Proper
Consideration of Small Entities in Agency Rulemaking'') and DOT's
procedures and policies to promote compliance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) to ensure potential impacts of
rules on small entities are properly considered.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA) requires an agency to
review regulations to assess their impact on small entities. An agency
must conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis unless it determines and
certifies that a rule is not expected to have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This final rule simply updates an email address railroads use to
electronically submit to FRA certain accident/incident report forms.
This rule does not contain any new substantive regulatory requirements.
As a result, this rule will impose no new compliance costs on small
entities other than those minimal potential costs outlined above in the
Regulatory Evaluation section. Under the RFA, the Administrator of FRA
certifies this final rule will have no significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Furthermore, FRA has determined the RFA does not apply to this
rulemaking because FRA is not publishing a proposed rule in this
proceeding. Given the minor change to replace an outdated email address
with a current email address and FRA's finding that notice and public
comment is unnecessary and would serve no public benefit, per guidance
from the Small Business Administration, the RFA does not apply. See A
Guide for Government Agencies: How to Comply with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy (May
2012, p.55).
Paperwork Reduction Act
There are no new or additional information collection requirements
associated with this final rule. FRA's collection of accident/incident
reporting and recordkeeping information is currently approved under OMB
No. 2130-0500. Therefore, FRA is not required to provide an estimate of
a public reporting burden in this document.
Federalism Implications
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, Aug. 10, 1999),
requires FRA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful
and timely input by State and local officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have federalism implications.'' ``Policies
that have federalism implications'' are defined in the Executive Order
to include regulations that have ``substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.'' Under Executive Order 13132, the agency
may not issue a regulation with federalism implications that imposes
substantial direct compliance costs and that is not required by
statute, unless the Federal government provides the funds necessary to
pay the direct compliance costs incurred by State and local
governments, or the agency consults with State and local government
officials early in the process of developing the regulation. Where a
regulation has federalism implications and preempts State law, the
agency seeks to consult with State and local officials in the process
of developing the regulation.
FRA analyzed this final rule under the principles and criteria in
Executive Order 13132. This rule will not have a substantial direct
effect on States, on the relationship between the national government
and the States, or on the distribution of power and the
responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified
in the Executive Order 13132. In addition, FRA determined this rule
does not impose substantial direct compliance costs on State and local
governments. Accordingly, FRA concluded the consultation and funding
requirements of Executive Order 13132 do not apply and preparation of a
federalism assessment is not required.
Environmental Impact
FRA evaluated this final rule under its ``Procedures for
Considering Environmental Impacts'' (FRA's Procedures) (64 FR 28545,
May 26, 1999) as required by the National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), other environmental statutes, Executive Orders,
and related regulatory requirements. FRA has determined this final rule
is not a major FRA action (requiring the preparation of an
environmental impact statement or environmental assessment) because it
is categorically excluded from detailed environmental review under
section 4(c)(20) of FRA's Procedures. See 64 FR 28547, May 26, 1999.
Section 4(c)(20) reads as follows:
(c) Actions categorically excluded. Certain classes of FRA actions
have been determined to be categorically excluded from the
requirements of these Procedures as they do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. . .
. The following classes of FRA actions are categorically excluded: .
. . (20) Promulgation of railroad safety rules and policy statements
that do not result in significantly increased emissions or air or
water pollutants or noise or increased traffic congestion in any
mode of transportation.
Consistent with section 4(c)(20) of FRA's Procedures, FRA concluded
that no extraordinary circumstances exist with respect to this
regulation that might trigger the need for a more detailed
environmental review. As a result, FRA finds this rule is not a major
Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human
environment.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Under Section 201 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Public Law 104-4, 2 U.S.C. 1531), each Federal agency ``shall, unless
otherwise prohibited by law, assess the effects of Federal regulatory
actions on State, local, and tribal governments, and the private sector
(other than to the extent that such regulations incorporate
requirements specifically set forth in law).'' Section 202 of the Act
(2 U.S.C. 1532) further requires that
before promulgating any general notice of proposed rulemaking that
is likely to result in the promulgation of any rule that includes
any Federal mandate that may result in expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector,
of $100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for inflation) in any 1
year, and before promulgating any final rule for which a general
notice of proposed rulemaking was published, the agency shall
prepare a written statement
detailing the effect on State, local, and tribal governments and the
private sector. This final rule will not result in the expenditure of
more than $156,000,000 by the public sector in any one year. Thus,
preparation of such a statement is not required.
[[Page 88135]]
Energy Impact
Executive Order 13211 requires Federal agencies to prepare a
Statement of Energy Effects for any ``significant energy action.'' 66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001. Under the Executive Order, a ``significant
energy action'' is defined as any action by an agency (normally
published in the Federal Register) that promulgates or is expected to
lead to the promulgation of, a final rule or regulation (including a
notice of inquiry, advance notice of proposed rulemaking, and notice of
proposed rulemaking) that (1)(i) is a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866 or any successor order, and (ii) is likely
to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or
use of energy; or (2) is designated by the Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs as a significant energy action.
FRA has evaluated this rule under Executive Order 13211. FRA has
determined this rule will not have a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy, and, thus, is not a
``significant energy action'' under Executive Order 13211.
Executive Order 12898 (Environmental Justice)
Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, and DOT
Order 5610.2(a) (91 FR 27534, May 10, 2012) require DOT agencies to
achieve environmental justice as part of their mission by identifying
and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects, including interrelated social
and economic effects, of their programs, policies, and activities on
minority populations and low-income populations. The DOT Order
instructs DOT agencies to address compliance with Executive Order 12898
and requirements within the DOT Order in rulemaking activities, as
appropriate. FRA evaluated this final rule under Executive Order 12898
and the DOT Order and determined it would not cause disproportionately
high and adverse human health and environmental effects on minority or
low-income populations.
Executive Order 13175 (Tribal Consultation)
FRA evaluated this final rule under the principles and criteria in
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, dated November 6, 2000. The final rule would not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, would not
impose substantial direct compliance costs on Indian tribal
governments, and would not preempt tribal laws. Therefore, the funding
and consultation requirements of Executive Order 13175 do not apply,
and a tribal summary impact statement is not required.
Trade Impact
The Trade Agreements Act of 1979 19 U.S.C. 2501 et seq.) prohibits
Federal agencies from engaging in any standards setting or related
activities that create unnecessary obstacles to the foreign commerce of
the United States. Legitimate domestic objectives, such as safety, are
not considered unnecessary obstacles. The statute also requires
consideration of international standards and, where appropriate, that
they be the basis for U.S. standards. FRA assessed the potential effect
of this final rule on foreign commerce and concluded its requirements
are consistent with the Trade Agreements Act.
Privacy Act
Interested parties should be aware that anyone can search the
electronic form of all written comments received into any agency docket
by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the
comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in
the Federal Register (65 FR 19477-19478, Apr. 11, 2000) or you may
visit https://www.transportation.gov/privacy.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 225
Investigations, Penalties, Railroad safety, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
The Rule
In consideration of the foregoing, FRA amends part 225 of chapter
II, subtitle B of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 225--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 225 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 103, 322(a), 20103, 20107, 20901-02, 21301,
21302, 21311; 28 U.S.C. 2461, note; and 49 CFR 1.89.
0
2. Amend Sec. 225.27 by revising the first sentence of paragraph (c)
to read as follows:
Sec. 225.27 Retention of records.
* * * * *
(c) Each railroad shall retain the original hard copy of each
completed and signed Form FRA F 6180.55, ``Railroad Injury and Illness
Summary,'' that the railroad submits to FRA on optical media (CD-ROM)
or electronically via the Internet to RsisAiReports@dot.gov for at
least five years after the calendar year to which it relates. * * *
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 225.37 by revising paragraph (c)(1) introductory text to
read as follows:
Sec. 225.37 Optical media transfer and electronic submission.
* * * * *
(c)(1) Each railroad utilizing the electronic submission via the
Internet option shall submit to FRA at RsisAiReports@dot.gov:
* * * * *
Issued in Washington, DC, on December 1, 2016.
Amitabha Bose,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2016-29309 Filed 12-6-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P