Covered Asset Acquisitions, 88103-88110 [2016-28755]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 7, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
(iii) Other individuals who:
(A) Reside regularly in the household
of the principal alien;
(B) Are not members of some other
household;
(C) Are recognized as dependents of
the principal alien by the sending
government or international
organization, as demonstrated by
eligibility for rights and benefits, such
as the issuance of a diplomatic or
official passport, or travel or other
allowances; and
(D) Are individually authorized by the
Department.
*
*
*
*
*
3. Section 41.22 is amended by
revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
■
§ 41.22
Officials of foreign governments.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Classification under INA section
101(a)(15)(A). An alien entitled to
classification under INA section
101(a)(15)(A) shall be classified under
this section even if eligible for another
nonimmigrant classification. An
exception may be made where an
immediate family member is classifiable
as A–1 or A–2 under paragraph (a)(2) of
this section is also independently
classifiable as a principal under INA
section 101(a)(15)(G)(i), (ii), (iii), (iv) or
in NATO–1 through NATO–6
classification.
*
*
*
*
*
4. Section 41.24 is amended by
revising paragraph (b)(4) to read as
follows:
■
§ 41.24
International organization aliens.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(4) An alien not classifiable under
INA section 101(a)(15)(A) or in NATO–
1 through NATO–6 classification but
entitled to classification under INA
section 101(a)(15)(G) shall be classified
under section 101(a)(15)(G), even if also
eligible for another nonimmigrant
classification. An alien classified under
INA section 101(a)(15)(G) as an
immediate family member of a principal
alien classifiable G–1, G–2, G–3 or G–4,
may continue to be so classified even if
he or she obtains employment
subsequent to his or her initial entry
into the United States that would allow
classification under INA section
101(a)(15)(A). Such alien shall not be
classified in a category other than A or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:02 Dec 06, 2016
Jkt 241001
G, even if also eligible for another
nonimmigrant classification.
*
*
*
*
*
Michele Thoren Bond,
Assistant Secretary for Consular Affairs,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2016–28518 Filed 12–6–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9800]
RIN 1545–BM75
Covered Asset Acquisitions
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Temporary regulations.
AGENCY:
This document contains
temporary Income Tax Regulations
under section 901(m) of the Internal
Revenue Code (Code) with respect to
transactions that generally are treated as
asset acquisitions for U.S. income tax
purposes and either are treated as stock
acquisitions or are disregarded for
foreign income tax purposes. These
regulations are necessary to provide
guidance on applying section 901(m).
The text of the temporary regulations
also serves in part as the text of the
proposed regulations under section
901(m) (REG–129128–14) published in
the Proposed Rules section of this issue
of the Federal Register.
DATES: Effective date: These regulations
are effective on December 7, 2016.
Applicability dates: For dates of
applicability, see §§ 1.901(m)–1T(b),
1.901(m)–2T(f), 1.901(m)–4T(g),
1.901(m)–5T(i), and 1.901(m)–6T(d).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey L. Parry, (202) 317–6936 (not a
toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
I. Section 901(m)
Section 212 of the Education Jobs and
Medicaid Assistance Act (EJMAA),
enacted on August 10, 2010 (Public Law
111–226), added section 901(m) to the
Code. Section 901(m)(1) provides that,
in the case of a covered asset acquisition
(CAA), the disqualified portion of any
foreign income tax determined with
respect to the income or gain
attributable to relevant foreign assets
(RFAs) will not be taken into account in
determining the foreign tax credit
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
88103
allowed under section 901(a), and in the
case of foreign income tax paid by a
section 902 corporation (as defined in
section 909(d)(5)), will not be taken into
account for purposes of section 902 or
960. Instead, the disqualified portion of
any foreign income tax (the disqualified
tax amount) is permitted as a deduction.
See section 901(m)(6).
Under section 901(m)(2), a CAA is (i)
a qualified stock purchase (as defined in
section 338(d)(3)) to which section
338(a) applies; (ii) any transaction that
is treated as an acquisition of assets for
U.S. income tax purposes and as the
acquisition of stock of a corporation (or
is disregarded) for purposes of a foreign
income tax; (iii) any acquisition of an
interest in a partnership that has an
election in effect under section 754; and
(iv) to the extent provided by the
Secretary, any other similar transaction.
Section 901(m)(3)(A) provides that the
term ‘‘disqualified portion’’ means, with
respect to any CAA, for any taxable
year, the ratio (expressed as a
percentage) of (i) the aggregate basis
differences (but not below zero)
allocable to such taxable year with
respect to all RFAs; divided by (ii) the
income on which the foreign income tax
referenced in section 901(m)(1) is
determined. If the taxpayer fails to
substantiate the income on which the
foreign income tax is determined to the
satisfaction of the Secretary, such
income will be determined by dividing
the amount of such foreign income tax
by the highest marginal tax rate
applicable to the taxpayer’s income in
the relevant jurisdiction.
Section 901(m)(3)(B)(i) provides the
general rule that the basis difference
with respect to any RFA will be
allocated to taxable years using the
applicable cost recovery method for U.S.
income tax purposes. Section
901(m)(3)(B)(ii) provides that, except as
otherwise provided by the Secretary, if
there is a disposition of an RFA, the
basis difference allocated to the taxable
year of the disposition will be the excess
of the basis difference of such asset over
the aggregate basis difference of such
asset that has been allocated to all prior
taxable years. The statute further
provides that no basis difference with
respect to such asset will be allocated to
any taxable year thereafter.
Section 901(m)(3)(C)(i) provides that
basis difference means, with respect to
any RFA, the excess of (i) the adjusted
basis of such asset immediately after the
CAA, over (ii) the adjusted basis of such
asset immediately before the CAA. If the
adjusted basis of an RFA immediately
before the CAA exceeds the adjusted
basis of the RFA immediately after the
CAA (that is, where the adjusted basis
E:\FR\FM\07DER1.SGM
07DER1
88104
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 7, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
of an asset with a built-in loss is
reduced in a CAA), such excess is taken
into account as a basis difference of a
negative amount. See section
901(m)(3)(C)(ii).
Section 901(m)(4) provides that an
RFA means, with respect to a CAA, an
asset (including goodwill, going concern
value, or other intangible) with respect
to such acquisition if income,
deduction, gain, or loss attributable to
such asset is taken into account in
determining the foreign income tax
referenced in section 901(m)(1).
Section 901(m)(7) provides that the
Secretary may issue regulations or other
guidance as is necessary or appropriate
to carry out the purposes of section
901(m).
II. Notices 2014–44 and 2014–45
The Department of the Treasury
(Treasury Department) and the IRS
issued Notice 2014–44 (2014–32 I.R.B
270 (July 21, 2014)) and Notice 2014–45
(2014–34 I.R.B. 388 (July 29, 2014)),
announcing the intent to issue
regulations addressing the application
of section 901(m) to dispositions of
RFAs following CAAs and to CAAs
described in section 901(m)(2)(C)
(regarding section 754 elections).
The notices were issued in response
to certain taxpayers engaging in
transactions shortly after a CAA with
the intention of invoking the application
of the statutory disposition rule under
section 901(m)(3)(B)(ii) to avoid the
purposes of section 901(m). To address
these transactions, Notice 2014–44
described the definition of disposition
that would be set forth in future
regulations, as well as the rules for
determining the portion of basis
difference that would be taken into
account upon a disposition of an RFA
(the disposition amount). In addition,
Notice 2014–44 described the
computation of basis difference and
disposition amount with respect to an
RFA that is subject to a section 743(b)
CAA. Notice 2014–44 also announced
that future regulations would provide
successor rules for the continued
application of section 901(m) after a
subsequent transfer of an RFA with
remaining basis difference. Notice
2014–44 further provided that future
regulations would provide that, if an
asset is an RFA with respect to two
section 743(b) CAAs involving the same
partnership interest, the RFA will be
treated as having no remaining basis
difference with respect to the first
section 743(b) CAA if the basis
difference with respect to the second
section 743(b) CAA is determined
independently from the first section
743(b) CAA. In this regard, see generally
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:02 Dec 06, 2016
Jkt 241001
§ 1.743–1(f) and proposed § 1.743–
1(f)(2).
Notice 2014–44 provided that the
future regulations described therein
would apply (i) concerning dispositions,
to dispositions occurring on or after July
21, 2014 (the date Notice 2014–44 was
issued), (ii) concerning section 743(b)
CAAs, to section 743(b) CAAs occurring
on or after July 21, 2014, unless a
taxpayer consistently applied those
provisions to all section 743(b) CAAs
occurring on or after January 1, 2011,
and (iii) concerning successor rules, to
remaining basis difference with respect
to an RFA as of July 21, 2014, and any
basis difference with respect to an RFA
that arises in a CAA occurring on or
after July 21, 2014. Notice 2014–45
provided that the future regulations
described in Notice 2014–44 also would
apply to determine the tax
consequences under section 901(m) of
an entity classification election made
under § 301.7701–3 that is filed on or
after July 29, 2014 (the date Notice
2014–45 was issued), including whether
a disposition results from the election
for purposes of section 901(m) and the
treatment of any remaining basis
difference that results from such an
election.
III. Proposed Regulations Under
Section 901(m)
Proposed regulations under section
901(m) are being issued at the same time
as these temporary regulations. In
addition to cross-referencing these
temporary regulations, the proposed
regulations provide guidance under
section 901(m) concerning issues not
addressed in the temporary regulations.
Consulting the preamble to the
proposed regulations is recommended
for a better understanding of how these
temporary regulations are intended to
work.
Explanation of Provisions
I. Overview
Section 1.901(m)–1T provides
definitions that apply for purposes of
the temporary regulations. Section
1.901(m)–2T identifies the transactions
that are CAAs and the assets that are
RFAs with respect to a CAA. Section
1.901(m)–4T provides the general rule
for determining basis difference with
respect to an RFA under section
901(m)(3)(C), as well as a special rule
for determining basis difference with
respect to an RFA that arises as a result
of an acquisition of an interest in a
partnership that has made a section 754
election (section 743(b) CAA). Section
1.901(m)–5T provides rules for taking
into account basis difference under the
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
applicable cost recovery method or as a
result of a disposition of an RFA.
Section 1.901(m)–6T provides successor
rules for applying section 901(m) to
subsequent transfers of RFAs that have
basis difference that has not yet been
fully taken into account.
II. Effective/Applicability Dates
The applicability dates of the
temporary regulations relate back to the
issuance of Notices 2014–44 and 2014–
45. Accordingly, the temporary
regulations apply to CAAs occurring on
or after July 21, 2014, and to CAAs
occurring before that date resulting from
an entity classification election made
under § 301.7701–3 that is filed on or
after July 29, 2014, and that is effective
on or before July 21, 2014 (referred to
as the general applicability date). The
temporary regulations also apply to
CAAs occurring on or after January 1,
2011, and before the general
applicability date (the transition
period), but only if the basis difference
within the meaning of section
901(m)(3)(C)(i) (statutory basis
difference) in one or more RFAs with
respect to such a CAA had not been
fully taken into account under section
901(m)(3)(B) either as of July 21, 2014,
or, in the case of an entity classification
election made under § 301.7701–3 that
is filed on or after July 29, 2014, and
that is effective on or before July 21,
2014, prior to the transactions that are
deemed to occur under § 301.7701–3(g)
as a result of the change in
classification.
Taxpayers also may choose to
consistently apply § 1.901(m)–4T(d)(1)
(regarding the determination of basis
difference in an RFA with respect to a
section 743(b) CAA) to all section 743(b)
CAAs occurring on or after January 1,
2011.
III. CAAs and RFAs
Section 1.901(m)–2T(b) identifies the
transactions that are CAAs under
section 901(m)(2)(A) through (C).
Section 1.901(m)–2T(c) provides that,
with respect to a foreign income tax and
a CAA, an RFA is any asset (including
goodwill, going concern value, or other
intangible) subject to the CAA that is
relevant in determining foreign income
for purposes of the foreign income tax.
An asset is subject to a CAA, if, for
example (i) in the case of a qualified
stock purchase of a target corporation
(as defined in section 338(d)(3)) to
which section 338(a) applies, ‘‘new’’
target is treated as purchasing the asset
from ‘‘old’’ target; (ii) in the case of a
taxable acquisition of a disregarded
entity that is treated as an acquisition of
stock for foreign income tax purposes,
E:\FR\FM\07DER1.SGM
07DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 7, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
88105
tax, basis difference with respect to each
foreign income tax is separately taken
into account under § 1.901(m)–5T.
the deemed liquidation might otherwise
be considered a ‘‘disposition’’ of assets
under other provisions of the Code.
A. Determining Cost Recovery Amounts
IV. Determining Basis Difference With
Respect to an RFA
A basis difference is computed
separately with respect to each foreign
income tax for which an asset is an
RFA. Consistent with section
901(m)(3)(C), § 1.901(m)–4T(b) provides
the general rule that basis difference
with respect to an RFA is the U.S. basis
in the RFA immediately after the CAA,
less the U.S. basis in the RFA
immediately before the CAA. If,
however, an asset is an RFA with
respect to a section 743(b) CAA,
§ 1.901(m)–4T(d) provides that basis
difference with respect to the RFA is the
resulting basis adjustment under section
743(b) that is allocated to the RFA under
section 755.
Section 1.901(m)–2T(e) ‘‘resets’’ the
basis difference in an RFA with respect
to a CAA that occurred during the
transition period by defining basis
difference in the RFA as the portion of
statutory basis difference that had not
been taken into account under section
901(m)(3)(B) either as of July 21, 2014,
or, in the case of an entity classification
election made under § 301.7701–3 that
is filed on or after July 29, 2014, and
that is effective on or before July 21,
2014, prior to the transactions that are
deemed to occur under § 301.7701–3(g)
as a result of the change in
classification. This is the basis
difference in the RFA for the period to
which the temporary regulations apply.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
the asset is owned by the disregard
entity at that time of the purchase and
therefore the buyer is treated as
purchasing the asset from the seller; and
(iii) in the case of a section 743(b) CAA,
the asset is attributable to the
partnership interest transferred in the
section 743(b) CAA.
Section 1.901(m)–2T(d) provides that
the statutory definitions under section
901(m)(2) and 901(m)(4) apply to
determine whether a transaction that
occurred during the transition period is
a CAA and which assets are RFAs with
respect to those CAAs, respectively.
Section 901(m)(3)(B)(ii) provides that,
except as otherwise provided by the
Secretary, if there is a disposition of an
RFA, the basis difference allocated to
the U.S. taxable year of the disposition
shall be the excess of the basis
difference of such RFA over the total
amount of such basis difference that has
been allocated to all prior U.S. taxable
years (unallocated basis difference).
This result is appropriate when all the
gain or loss from the disposition is
recognized for both U.S. and foreign
income tax purposes. In other cases,
however, a disposition may not be the
appropriate time for all of the
unallocated basis difference to be taken
into account. For example, it may not be
appropriate for all of the unallocated
basis difference to be taken into account
upon a disposition that is fully taxable
for U.S. income tax purposes but not for
foreign income tax purposes.
Accordingly, under the specific
authority granted to the Secretary with
respect to dispositions, these temporary
regulations provide rules to determine
when less than all of the unallocated
basis difference is taken into account as
a result of a disposition.
3. Determining a Disposition Amount
Section 1.901(m)–5T(c)(2) provides
rules for determining a disposition
amount. If a disposition of an RFA is
fully taxable for U.S. and foreign income
tax purposes, the disposition amount
will be any remaining unallocated basis
difference with respect to that RFA.
This is because there generally will no
longer be a disparity in the U.S. basis
and the foreign basis of the RFA.
If a disposition is not fully taxable for
both U.S. and foreign income tax
purposes, generally there will continue
to be a disparity in the U.S. basis and
the foreign basis following the
disposition, and it will be appropriate
for the RFA to continue to have
unallocated basis difference. To the
extent that the disparity in the U.S.
basis and the foreign basis is reduced as
a result of the disposition, however, a
portion of the unallocated basis
difference (or, in certain cases, all of the
unallocated basis difference) should be
taken into account. Whether the
disposition reduces the basis disparity
will depend on whether the basis
difference is positive or negative and the
jurisdiction in which gain or loss is
recognized.
If an RFA has a positive basis
difference, a reduction in basis disparity
generally will occur upon a disposition
of the RFA if (i) a foreign disposition
gain is recognized, which generally
results in an increase in the foreign
basis of the RFA, or (ii) a U.S.
disposition loss is recognized, which
generally results in a decrease in the
U.S. basis of the RFA. Accordingly, if an
RFA has a positive basis difference, the
disposition amount equals the lesser of
(i) any foreign disposition gain plus any
U.S. disposition loss (for this purpose,
expressed as a positive amount), or (ii)
unallocated basis difference. See
§ 1.901(m)–5T(c)(2)(ii)(A).
If an RFA has a negative basis
difference, a reduction in basis disparity
generally will occur upon a disposition
of the RFA if (i) a foreign disposition
loss is recognized, which generally
results in a decrease in the foreign basis
of the RFA, or (ii) a U.S. disposition
gain is recognized, which generally
results in an increase in the U.S. basis
of the RFA. Accordingly, if an RFA has
a negative basis difference, the
disposition amount equals the greater of
(i) any U.S. disposition gain (for this
purpose, expressed as a negative
amount) plus any foreign disposition
loss, or (ii) unallocated basis difference.
See § 1.901(m)–5T(c)(2)(ii)(B).
V. Basis Difference Taken Into Account
Section 1.901(m)–5T provides rules
for determining the amount of basis
difference with respect to an RFA that
is taken into account in a given U.S.
taxable year (allocated basis difference).
The amount of basis difference taken
into account in a U.S. taxable year is
used to compute a disqualified tax
amount for the U.S. taxable year. Basis
difference is taken into account in two
ways: Under an applicable cost recovery
method or as a result of a disposition of
the RFA. If an asset is an RFA with
respect to more than one foreign income
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:02 Dec 06, 2016
Jkt 241001
Consistent with section
901(m)(3)(B)(i), § 1.901(m)–5T(b)(2)
provides that a cost recovery amount for
an RFA is determined by applying an
applicable cost recovery method to the
basis difference rather than to the U.S.
basis of the RFA.
B. Determining Disposition Amounts
1. Overview
2. Definition of Disposition
Section 1.901(m)–1T(a)(10) defines a
disposition for purposes of section
901(m) as an event that results in gain
or loss being recognized with respect to
an RFA for purposes of U.S. income tax
or foreign income tax, or both. Thus, the
definition excludes certain transfers that
might otherwise be considered
dispositions under the ordinary
meaning of that term. For example, an
entity classification election by an RFA
owner that results in a tax-free deemed
liquidation for U.S. income tax purposes
but that is disregarded for foreign
income tax purposes does not result in
a disposition of the RFAs under section
901(m), because no gain or loss is
recognized for U.S. or foreign income
tax purposes with respect to the
distribution of the RFAs in the deemed
liquidation. This is the case even though
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\07DER1.SGM
07DER1
88106
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 7, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
For the avoidance of doubt, the
determination of whether there is a
disposition for U.S. income tax
purposes, and the amount of U.S.
disposition gain or U.S. disposition loss,
is made without regard to whether gain
or loss is deferred or disallowed or
otherwise not taken into account
currently (for example, see section 267,
which defers or disallows certain
recognized losses, and § 1.1502–13,
which provides rules for taking into
account items of income, gain,
deduction, and loss of members of a
U.S. consolidated group from
intercompany transactions). This
principle also applies if foreign law has
an equivalent concept whereby gain or
loss that is realized and recognized is
deferred or disallowed.
If an asset is an RFA by reason of a
section 743(b) CAA and subsequently
there is a disposition of the RFA, then
for purposes of determining the
disposition amount, foreign disposition
gain or foreign disposition loss means
the amount of gain or loss recognized
for purposes of a foreign income tax on
the disposition of the RFA that is
allocable to the partnership interest that
was transferred in the section 743(b)
CAA. See § 1.901(m)–5T(c)(2)(iii). In
addition, U.S. disposition gain or U.S.
disposition loss means the amount of
gain or loss recognized for U.S. income
tax purposes on the disposition of the
RFA that is allocable to the partnership
interest that was transferred in the
section 743(b) CAA, taking into account
the basis adjustment under section
743(b) that was allocated to the RFA
under section 755 in the section 743(b)
CAA. See id.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
VI. Successor Rules for Unallocated
Basis Difference
A. General Rules
Section 1.901(m)–6T(b) provides that
section 901(m) continues to apply to
any unallocated basis difference with
respect to an RFA after there is a
transfer of the RFA for U.S. income tax
purposes (successor transaction),
regardless of whether the transfer is a
disposition, a CAA, or a non-taxable
transaction. A successor transaction
does not occur if, as a result of the
transfer of an RFA, the entire
unallocated basis difference is taken
into account because, for example, the
transfer results in all realized gain or
loss in the RFA being recognized for
U.S. and foreign income tax purposes.
Notice 2014–44 stated that the
Treasury Department and the IRS are
continuing to study whether and to
what extent section 901(m) should
apply to an asset received in exchange
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:02 Dec 06, 2016
Jkt 241001
for an RFA in a transaction in which the
U.S. basis of the asset is determined by
reference to the U.S. basis of the
transferred RFA. The Treasury
Department and the IRS have
determined that an asset should not
become an RFA solely because the U.S.
basis of that asset is determined by
reference to the U.S. basis of an RFA for
which the asset is exchanged in a
successor transaction. Accordingly, for
example, if, in a successor transaction,
an RFA owner transfers an RFA to a
corporation in a transfer to which
section 351 applies, the stock of the
transferee corporation received is not an
RFA even though the U.S. basis of the
stock is determined under section 358
by reference to the U.S. basis of the RFA
transferred.
B. Successor Transactions That Are
CAAs
An asset may be an RFA with respect
to multiple CAAs if a successor
transaction is also a CAA (subsequent
CAA). In this case, the subsequent CAA
may give rise to additional basis
difference. Section 1.901(m)–6T(b)(4)(i)
provides generally that the unallocated
basis difference with respect to a CAA
that occurred prior to the subsequent
CAA (referred to in the regulations as a
‘‘prior CAA’’) will continue to be taken
into account under section 901(m) after
the subsequent CAA.
Section 1.901(m)–6T(b)(4)(iii)
provides an exception to the general
rule if an RFA is subject to two section
743(b) CAAs (referred to in the
regulations as a ‘‘prior section 743(b)
CAA’’ and a ‘‘subsequent section 743(b)
CAA’’). In this case, to the extent the
same partnership interest is transferred
in the section 743(b) CAAs, the RFA
will be treated as having no unallocated
basis difference with respect to the prior
section 743(b) CAA if basis difference
for the subsequent section 743(b) CAA
is determined independently from the
prior section 743(b) CAA. In this regard,
see generally § 1.743–1(f) and proposed
§ 1.743–1(f)(2). If the subsequent section
743(b) CAA results from the acquisition
of only a portion of the partnership
interest acquired in the prior section
743(b) CAA, the transferor must
equitably apportion the unallocated
basis difference attributable to the prior
section 743(b) CAA between the portion
of the interest retained and the portion
of the interest transferred. With respect
to the portion transferred, the RFA will
be treated as having no unallocated
basis difference attributable to the prior
section 743(b) CAA.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
VII. Definition of Foreign Income Tax
For purposes of section 901(m), the
temporary regulations define ‘‘foreign
income tax’’ as any income, war profits,
or excess profits tax for which a credit
is allowable under section 901 or 903,
other than any withholding tax
determined on a gross basis as described
in section 901(k)(1)(B). The Treasury
Department and the IRS have
determined that a withholding tax
should not be subject to disallowance
under section 901(m) because a
withholding tax is a gross basis tax that
is generally unaffected by changes in
asset basis.
Effect on Other Documents
The following publications are
obsolete as of December 7, 2016:
Notice 2014–44 (2014–32 I.R.B. 270)
and Notice 2014–45 (2014–34 I.R.B.
388).
Special Analyses
Certain IRS regulations, including
these, are exempt from the requirements
of Executive Order 12866, as
supplemented and reaffirmed by
Executive Order 13563. Therefore, a
regulatory impact assessment is not
required. For the applicability of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 6), refer to the Special Analyses
section of the preamble of the crossreferenced notice of proposed
rulemaking published in this issue of
the Federal Register. Pursuant to
section 7805(f) of the Internal Revenue
Code, these regulations has been
submitted to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on its
impact on small businesses.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these
regulations is Jeffrey L. Parry of the
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(International). However, other
personnel from the Treasury
Department and the IRS participated in
their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is
amended as follows:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 is amended by adding entries
in numerical order to read as follows:
■
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
E:\FR\FM\07DER1.SGM
07DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 7, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Sections 1.901(m)–1T through –8T also
issued under 26 U.S.C. 901(m)(7).
Section 1.901(m)–5T also issued under 26
U.S.C. 901(m)(3)(B)(ii). * * *
Par. 2. Section 1.901(m)–1T is added
to read as follows:
■
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 1.901(m)–1T
Definitions (temporary).
(a) Definitions. For purposes of
section 901(m), this section, and
§§ 1.901(m)–2T through 1.901(m)–8T,
the following definitions apply:
(1)–(5) [Reserved]
(6) The term basis difference has the
meaning provided in § 1.901(m)–4T.
(7) The term cost recovery amount has
the meaning provided in § 1.901(m)–
5T(b)(2).
(8) The term covered asset acquisition
(or CAA) has the meaning provided in
§ 1.901(m)–2T.
(9) [Reserved]
(10) The term disposition means an
event (for example, a sale,
abandonment, or mark-to-market event)
that results in gain or loss being
recognized with respect to an RFA for
purposes of U.S. income tax or a foreign
income tax, or both.
(11) The term disposition amount has
the meaning provided in § 1.901(m)5T(c)(2).
(12) [Reserved]
(13) The term disregarded entity
means an entity that is disregarded as an
entity separate from its owner, as
described in § 301.7701–2(c)(2)(i) of this
chapter.
(14) The term fiscally transparent
entity means an entity, including a
Disregarded Entity, that is fiscally
transparent under the principles of
§ 1.894–1(d)(3) for purposes of U.S.
income tax or a foreign income tax (or
both).
(15)–(17) [Reserved].
(18) The term foreign disposition gain
means, with respect to a foreign income
tax, the amount of gain recognized on a
disposition of an RFA in determining
Foreign Income, regardless of whether
the gain is deferred or otherwise not
taken into account currently.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if after a
section 743(b) CAA there is a
disposition of an asset that is an RFA
with respect to that section 743(b) CAA,
foreign disposition gain has the meaning
provided in § 1.901(m)–5T(c)(2)(iii).
(19) The term foreign disposition loss
means, with respect to a foreign income
tax, the amount of loss recognized on a
disposition of an RFA in determining
Foreign Income, regardless of whether
the loss is deferred or disallowed or
otherwise not taken into account
currently. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, if after a section 743(b) CAA
there is a disposition of an asset that is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:02 Dec 06, 2016
Jkt 241001
an RFA with respect to that section
743(b) CAA, foreign disposition loss has
the meaning provided in § 1.901(m)–
5T(c)(2)(iii).
(20) The term foreign income means,
with respect to a foreign income tax, the
taxable income (or loss) reflected on a
foreign tax return (as properly amended
or adjusted), even if the taxable income
(or loss) is reported by an entity that is
a fiscally transparent entity for purposes
of the foreign income tax. If, however,
foreign law imposes tax on the
combined income (within the meaning
of § 1.901–2(f)(3)(ii)) of two or more
Foreign Payors, foreign income means
the combined taxable income (or loss) of
such Foreign Payors, regardless of
whether such income (or loss) is
reflected on a single foreign tax return.
(21) The term foreign income tax
means an income, war profits, or excess
profits tax for which a credit is
allowable under section 901 or 903,
except that it does not include any
withholding tax determined on a gross
basis as described in section
901(k)(1)(B).
(22)–(25) [Reserved]
(26) The term prior CAA has the
meaning provided in § 1.901(m)–
6T(b)(2).
(27) The term prior section 743(b)
CAA has the meaning provided in
§ 1.901(m)–6T(b)(4)(iii).
(28) The term relevant foreign asset
(or RFA) has the meaning provided in
§ 1.901(m)–2T.
(29)–(32) [Reserved]
(33) The term section 338 CAA has
the meaning provided in § 1.901(m)–
2T(b)(1).
(34) The term section 743(b) CAA has
the meaning provided in § 1.901(m)–
2T(b)(3).
(35) [Reserved]
(36) The term subsequent CAA has the
meaning provided in § 1.901(m)–
6T(b)(4)(i).
(37) The term subsequent section
743(b) CAA has the meaning provided
in § 1.901(m)–6T(b)(4)(iii).
(38) The term successor transaction
has the meaning provided in
§ 1.901(m)–6T(b)(2).
(39) [Reserved]
(40) The term unallocated basis
difference means, with respect to an
RFA and a foreign income tax, the basis
difference reduced by the sum of the
cost recovery amounts and the
disposition amounts that have been
computed under § 1.901(m)–5T.
(41) The term U.S. basis means the
adjusted basis of an asset determined for
U.S. income tax purposes.
(42) [Reserved].
(43) The term U.S. disposition gain
means the amount of gain recognized for
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
88107
U.S. income tax purposes on a
disposition of an RFA, regardless of
whether the gain is deferred or
otherwise not taken into account
currently. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, if after a section 743(b) CAA
there is a disposition of an asset that is
an RFA with respect to that section
743(b) CAA, U.S. disposition gain has
the meaning provided in § 1.901(m)–
5T(c)(2)(iii).
(44) The term U.S. disposition loss
means the amount of loss recognized for
U.S. income tax purposes on a
disposition of an RFA, regardless of
whether the loss is deferred or
disallowed or otherwise not taken into
account currently. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, if after a section 743(b) CAA
there is a disposition of an asset that is
an RFA with respect to that section
743(b) CAA, U.S. disposition loss has
the meaning provided in § 1.901(m)–
5T(c)(2)(iii).
(45) The term U.S. taxable year means
a taxable year as defined in section
7701(a)(23).
(b) Effective/applicability date. (1)
[Reserved].
(2) Paragraphs (a)(6), (7), (8), (10),
(11), (13), (14), (18), (19), (20), (21), (26),
(27), (28), (33), (34), (36), (37), (38), (40),
(41), (43), (44), and (45) of this section
apply to CAAs occurring on or after July
21, 2014, and to CAAs occurring before
that date resulting from an entity
classification election made under
§ 301.7701–3 that is filed on or after July
29, 2014, and that is effective on or
before July 21, 2014. Paragraphs (a)(6),
(7), (8), (10), (11), (13), (14), (18), (19),
(20), (21), (26), (27), (28), (33), (34), (36),
(37), (38), (40), (41), (43), (44), and (45)
of this section also apply to CAAs
occurring on or after January 1, 2011,
and before July 21, 2014, other than
CAAs occurring before July 21, 2014,
resulting from an entity classification
election made under § 301.7701–3 that
is filed on or after July 29, 2014, and
that is effective on or before July 21,
2014, but only if the basis difference
(within the meaning of section
901(m)(3)(C)(i)) in one or more RFAs
with respect to the CAA had not been
fully taken into account under section
901(m)(3)(B) either as of July 21, 2014,
or, in the case of an entity classification
election made under § 301.7701–3 that
is filed on or after July 29, 2014, and
that is effective on or before July 21,
2014, prior to the transactions that are
deemed to occur under § 301.7701–3(g)
as a result of the change in
classification.
(3) [Reserved].
(c) Expiration date. The applicability
of this section expires on December 6,
2019.
E:\FR\FM\07DER1.SGM
07DER1
88108
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 7, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Par. 3. Section 1.901(m)–2T is added
to read as follows:
■
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 1.901(m)–2T Covered asset acquisitions
and relevant foreign assets (temporary).
(a) In general. Paragraph (b) of this
section sets forth the transactions that
are covered asset acquisitions (or
CAAs). Paragraph (c) of this section
provides rules for identifying assets that
are relevant foreign assets (or RFAs)
with respect to a CAA. Paragraph (d) of
this section provides special rules for
identifying CAAs and RFAs with
respect to transactions to which
paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section do
not apply. Paragraph (e) of this section
provides examples illustrating the rules
of this section. Paragraph (f) of this
section provides the effective/
applicability date, and paragraph (g) of
this section provides the expiration
date.
(b) Covered asset acquisitions. Except
as provided in paragraph (d) of this
section, the transactions set forth in this
paragraph (b) are CAAs.
(1) A qualified stock purchase (as
defined in section 338(d)(3)) to which
section 338(a) applies (section 338
CAA);
(2) Any transaction that is treated as
an acquisition of assets for U.S. income
tax purposes and as an acquisition of
stock of a corporation (or the transaction
is disregarded) for foreign income tax
purposes;
(3) Any acquisition of an interest in a
partnership that has an election in effect
under section 754 (section 743(b) CAA);
(4)–(6) [Reserved].
(c) Relevant foreign asset—(1) In
general. Except as provided in
paragraph (d) of this section, an RFA
means, with respect to a foreign income
tax and a CAA, any asset (including
goodwill, going concern value, or other
intangible) subject to the CAA that is
relevant in determining foreign income
for purposes of the foreign income tax.
(2) RFA status with respect to a
foreign income tax [Reserved].
(3) Subsequent RFA status with
respect to another foreign income tax
[Reserved].
(d) Identifying covered asset
acquisitions and relevant foreign assets
to which paragraphs (b) and (c) of this
section do not apply. For transactions
occurring on or after January 1, 2011,
and before July 21, 2014, other than
transactions occurring before July 21,
2014, resulting from an entity
classification election made under
§ 301.7701–3 of this chapter that is filed
on or after July 29, 2014, and that is
effective on or before July 21, 2014, the
transactions set forth under section
901(m)(2) are CAAs and the assets that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:02 Dec 06, 2016
Jkt 241001
are relevant foreign assets with respect
to the CAA under section 901(m)(4) are
RFAs.
(e) Examples. [Reserved].
(f) Effective/applicability date—(1)
Paragraphs (a), (b)(1) through (3), and
(c)(1) of this section apply to
transactions occurring on or after July
21, 2014, and to transactions occurring
before that date resulting from an entity
classification election made under
§ 301.7701–3 of this chapter that is filed
on or after July 29, 2014, and that is
effective on or before July 21, 2014.
Paragraph (d) of this section applies to
transactions occurring on or after
January 1, 2011, and before July 21,
2014, other than transactions occurring
before July 21, 2014, resulting from an
entity classification election made
under § 301.7701–3 of this chapter that
is filed on or after July 29, 2014, and
that is effective on or before July 21,
2014.
(2)–(3) [Reserved]
(g) Expiration date. The applicability
of this section expires on December 6,
2019.
■ Par. 4. Section 1.901(m)–3T is added
and reserved to read as follows:
§ 1.901(m)–3T Disqualified tax amount and
aggregate basis difference carryover
(temporary). [Reserved].
Par. 5. Section 1.901(m)–4T is added
to read as follows:
■
§ 1.901(m)–4T Determination of basis
difference (temporary).
(a) In general. This section provides
rules for determining for each RFA the
basis difference that arises as a result of
a CAA. A basis difference is computed
separately with respect to each foreign
income tax for which an asset subject to
a CAA is an RFA. Paragraph (b) of this
section provides the general rule for
determining basis difference that
references only U.S. basis in the RFA.
Paragraph (c) of this section provides for
an election to determine basis difference
by reference to foreign basis and sets
forth the procedures for making the
election. Paragraph (d) of this section
provides special rules for determining
basis difference in the case of a section
743(b) CAA. Paragraph (e) of this
section provides a special rule for
determining basis difference in an RFA
with respect to a CAA to which
paragraphs (b) through (d) of this
section do not apply. Paragraph (f) of
this section provides examples
illustrating the rules of this section.
Paragraph (g) of this section provides
the effective/applicability date, and
paragraph (h) of this section provides
the expiration date.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(b) General rule. Except as otherwise
provided in paragraphs (c), (d), and (e)
of this section, basis difference is the
U.S. basis in the RFA immediately after
the CAA, less the U.S. basis in the RFA
immediately before the CAA. Basis
difference is an attribute that attaches to
an RFA.
(c) Foreign basis election. [Reserved].
(d) Determination of basis difference
in a section 743(b) CAA—(1) In general.
Except as provided in paragraphs (d)(2)
and (e) of this section, if there is a
section 743(b) CAA, basis difference is
the resulting basis adjustment under
section 743(b) that is allocated to the
RFA under section 755.
(2) Foreign basis election. [Reserved].
(e) Determination of basis difference
in an RFA with respect to a CAA with
respect to which paragraphs (b), (c), and
(d) of this section do not apply. For
CAAs occurring on or after January 1,
2011, and before July 21, 2014, other
than CAAs occurring before July 21,
2014, resulting from an entity
classification election made under
§ 301.7701–3 of this chapter that is filed
on or after July 29, 2014, and that is
effective on or before July 21, 2014,
basis difference in an RFA with respect
to the CAA is the amount of any basis
difference (within the meaning of
section 901(m)(3)(C)(i)) that had not
been taken into account under section
901(m)(3)(B) either as of July 21, 2014,
or, in the case of an entity classification
election made under § 301.7701–3 of
this chapter that is filed on or after July
29, 2014, and that is effective on or
before July 21, 2014, prior to the
transactions that are deemed to occur
under § 301.7701–3(g) as a result of the
change in classification.
(f) Examples. [Reserved].
(g) Effective/applicability date. (1)
Paragraphs (a), (b), and (d)(1) of this
section apply to CAAs occurring on or
after July 21, 2014, and to CAAs
occurring before that date resulting from
an entity classification election made
under § 301.7701–3 that is filed on or
after July 29, 2014, and that is effective
on or before July 21, 2014. Paragraph (e)
of this section applies to CAAs
occurring on or after January 1, 2011,
and before July 21, 2014, other than
CAAs occurring before July 21, 2014,
resulting from an entity classification
election made under § 301.7701–3 of
this chapter that is filed on or after July
29, 2014, and that is effective on or
before July 21, 2014. Taxpayers may,
however, consistently apply paragraph
(d)(1) of this section to all section 743(b)
CAAs occurring on or after January 1,
2011. For this purpose, persons that are
related (within the meaning of section
E:\FR\FM\07DER1.SGM
07DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 7, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
267(b) or 707(b)) will be treated as a
single taxpayer.
(2)–(3) [Reserved]
(h) Expiration date. The applicability
of this section expires on December 6,
2019.
■ Par. 6. Section 1.901(m)–5T is added
to read as follows:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 1.901(m)–5T Basis difference taken into
account (temporary).
(a) In general. [Reserved].
(b) Basis difference taken into account
under applicable cost recovery
method—(1) In general. [Reserved].
(2) Determining a cost recovery
amount—(i) General rule. A cost
recovery amount for an RFA is
determined by applying the applicable
cost recovery method to the basis
difference rather than to the U.S. basis.
(ii) U.S. basis subject to multiple cost
recovery methods. [Reserved].
(3) Applicable cost recovery method.
[Reserved].
(c) Basis difference taken into account
as a result of a disposition—(1) In
general. [Reserved].
(2) Determining a disposition
amount—(i) Disposition is fully taxable
for purposes of both U.S. income tax
and the foreign income tax. If a
disposition of an RFA is fully taxable
(that is, results in all gain or loss, if any,
being recognized with respect to the
RFA) for purposes of both U.S. income
tax and the foreign income tax, the
disposition amount is equal to the
unallocated basis difference with
respect to the RFA.
(ii) Disposition is not fully taxable for
purposes of U.S. income tax or the
foreign income tax (or both). If the
disposition of an RFA is not fully
taxable for purposes of both U.S. income
tax and the foreign income tax, the
disposition amount is determined under
this paragraph (c)(2)(ii). See § 1.901(m)–
6T for rules regarding the continued
application of section 901(m) if the RFA
has any unallocated basis difference
after determining the disposition
amount under paragraph (c)(2)(ii)(A) or
(B) of this section, as applicable.
(A) Positive basis difference. If the
disposition of an RFA is not fully
taxable for purposes of both U.S. income
tax and the foreign income tax, and the
RFA has a positive basis difference, the
disposition amount equals the lesser of:
(1) Any foreign disposition gain plus
any U.S. disposition loss (for this
purpose, expressed as a positive
amount), or
(2) Unallocated basis difference with
respect to the RFA.
(B) Negative basis difference. If the
disposition of an RFA is not fully
taxable for purposes of both U.S. income
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:02 Dec 06, 2016
Jkt 241001
tax and the foreign income tax, and the
RFA has a negative basis difference, the
disposition amount equals the greater
of:
(1) Any U.S. disposition gain (for this
purpose, expressed as a negative
amount) plus any foreign disposition
loss, or
(2) Unallocated basis difference with
respect to the RFA.
(iii) Disposition of an RFA after a
section 743(b) CAA. If an RFA was
subject to a section 743(b) CAA and
subsequently there is a disposition of
the RFA, then, for purposes of
determining the disposition amount,
foreign disposition gain or foreign
disposition loss are specially defined to
mean the amount of gain or loss
recognized for purposes of the foreign
income tax on the disposition of the
RFA that is allocable to the partnership
interest that was transferred in the
section 743(b) CAA. In addition, U.S.
disposition gain or U.S. disposition loss
are specially defined to mean the
amount of gain or loss recognized for
U.S. income tax purposes on the
disposition of the RFA that is allocable
to the partnership interest that was
transferred in the section 743(b) CAA,
taking into account the basis adjustment
under section 743(b) that was allocated
to the RFA under section 755.
(d) General rules for allocating and
assigning a cost recovery amount or a
disposition amount when the RFA
owner (U.S.) is a fiscally transparent
entity. [Reserved].
(e) Special rules for certain section
743(b) CAAs. [Reserved]
(f) Mid-year transactions. [Reserved]
(g) Reverse hybrids. [Reserved]
(h) Examples. [Reserved]
(i) Effective/applicability date. (1)
[Reserved]
(2) Paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (c)(2) of
this section apply to CAAs occurring on
or after July 21, 2014, and to CAAs
occurring before that date resulting from
an entity classification election made
under § 301.7701–3 of this chapter that
is filed on or after July 29, 2014, and
that is effective on or before July 21,
2014. Paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (c)(2) of
this section also apply to CAAs
occurring on or after January 1, 2011,
and before July 21, 2014, other than
CAAs occurring before July 21, 2014,
resulting from an entity classification
election made under § 301.7701–3 that
is filed on or after July 29, 2014, and
that is effective on or before July 21,
2014, but only with respect to basis
difference determined under
§ 1.901(m)–4T(e) with respect to the
CAA.
(3) [Reserved]
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
88109
(j) Expiration date. The applicability
of this section expires on December 6,
2019.
■ Par. 7. Section 1.901(m)–6T is added
to read as follows:
§ 1.901(m)–6T
(temporary).
Successor rules
(a) In general. This section provides
successor rules applicable to section
901(m). Paragraph (b) of this section
provides rules for the continued
application of section 901(m) after an
RFA that has unallocated basis
difference has been transferred,
including special rules applicable to
successor transactions that are also
CAAs or that involve partnerships.
Paragraph (c) of this section provides
rules for determining when an aggregate
basis difference carryover of a section
901(m) payor either becomes an
aggregate basis difference carryover of
the section 901(m) payor with respect to
another foreign payor or is transferred to
another section 901(m) payor. Paragraph
(d) of this section provides the effective/
applicability date, and paragraph (e) of
this section provides the expiration
date.
(b) Successor rules for unallocated
basis difference—(1) In general. Except
as provided in paragraph (b)(4) of this
section, section 901(m) continues to
apply after a successor transaction to
any unallocated basis difference
attached to a transferred RFA until the
entire basis difference has been taken
into account as a cost recovery amount
or a disposition amount (or both) under
§ 1.901(m)–5T.
(2) Definition of a successor
transaction. A successor transaction
occurs with respect to an RFA if, after
a CAA (prior CAA), there is a transfer
of the RFA for U.S. income tax purposes
and the RFA has unallocated basis
difference with respect to the prior
CAA, determined immediately after the
transfer. A successor transaction may
occur regardless of whether the transfer
of the RFA is a disposition, a CAA, or
a non-taxable transaction for purposes
of U.S. income tax. If the RFA was
subject to multiple prior CAAs, a
separate determination must be made
with respect to each prior CAA as to
whether the transfer is a successor
transaction.
(3) Special considerations. [Reserved].
(4) Successor transaction is a CAA—
(i) In general. An asset may be an RFA
with respect to multiple CAAs if a
successor transaction is also a CAA
(subsequent CAA). Except as otherwise
provided in this paragraph (b)(4), if
there is a subsequent CAA, unallocated
basis difference with respect to any
prior CAAs will continue to be taken
E:\FR\FM\07DER1.SGM
07DER1
88110
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 7, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
into account under section 901(m) after
the subsequent CAA. Furthermore, the
subsequent CAA may give rise to
additional basis difference subject to
section 901(m).
(ii) Foreign basis election. [Reserved].
(iii) Multiple section 743(b) CAAs. If
an RFA is subject to two section 743(b)
CAAs (prior section 743(b) CAA and
subsequent section 743(b) CAA) and the
same partnership interest is acquired in
both the CAAs, the RFA will be treated
as having no unallocated basis
difference with respect to the prior
section 743(b) CAA if the basis
difference for the section 743(b) CAA is
determined independently from the
prior section 743(b) CAA. In this regard,
see generally § 1.743–1(f). If the
subsequent section 743(b) CAA results
from the acquisition of only a portion of
the partnership interest acquired in the
prior section 743(b) CAA, then the
transferor will be required to equitably
apportion the unallocated basis
difference attributable to the prior
section 743(b) CAA between the portion
retained by the transferor and the
portion transferred. In this case, with
respect to the portion transferred, the
RFAs will be treated as having no
unallocated basis difference with
respect to the prior section 743(b) CAA
if basis difference for the subsequent
section 743(b) CAA is determined
independently from the prior section
743(b) CAA.
(5) Example. The following example
illustrates the rules of paragraph (b) of
this section.
Example. (i) Facts. USP, a domestic
corporation, wholly owns CFC, a foreign
corporation organized in Country A and
treated as a corporation for both U.S. and
Country A tax purposes. FT is an unrelated
foreign corporation organized in Country A
and treated as a corporation for both U.S. and
Country A tax purposes. FT owns one asset,
a parcel of land (Asset). Country A imposes
a single tax that is a foreign income tax. On
January 1, Year 1, CFC acquires all of the
stock of FT in exchange for 300u in a
qualified stock purchase (as defined in
section 338(d)(3)) to which section 338(a)
applies (Acquisition). Immediately before the
Acquisition, Asset had a U.S. basis of 100u,
and immediately after the Acquisition, Asset
had a U.S. basis of 300u. Effective on
February 1, Year 1, FT elects to be a
disregarded entity pursuant to § 301.7701–3.
As a result of the election, FT is deemed, for
U.S. income tax purposes, to distribute Asset
to CFC in liquidation (Deemed Liquidation)
immediately before the closing of the day
before the election is effective pursuant to
§ 301.7701–3(g)(1)(iii) and (3)(ii). The
Deemed Liquidation is disregarded for
Country A tax purposes. No gain or loss is
recognized on the Deemed Liquidation for
either U.S. or Country A tax purposes.
(ii) Result. Under § 1.901(m)–2T(b)(1), the
Acquisition by CFC of the stock of FT is a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:02 Dec 06, 2016
Jkt 241001
section 338 CAA. Under § 1.901(m)–2T(c)(1),
Asset is an RFA with respect to Country A
tax and the Acquisition, because immediately
after the Acquisition, Asset is relevant in
determining foreign income of FT for
Country A tax purposes, and FT owned Asset
when the Acquisition occurred. Under
§ 1.901(m)–4T(b), the basis difference with
respect to Asset is 200u (300u¥100u). Under
§ 1.901(m)–2T(b)(2), the Deemed Liquidation
is a CAA (subsequent CAA) because the
Deemed Liquidation is treated as an
acquisition of assets for U.S. income tax
purposes and is disregarded for Country A
tax purposes. Because the U.S. basis in Asset
is 300u immediately before and after the
Deemed Liquidation, the subsequent CAA
does not give rise to any additional basis
difference. The Deemed Liquidation is not a
disposition under § 1.901(m)–1T(a)(10)
because it did not result in gain or loss being
recognized with respect to Asset for U.S. or
Country A tax purposes. Accordingly, no
basis difference with respect to Asset is taken
into account under § 1.901(m)–5T as a result
of the Deemed Liquidation, and the
unallocated basis difference with respect to
Asset immediately after the Deemed
Liquidation is 200u (200u¥0u). Under
paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the Deemed
Liquidation is a successor transaction
because there is a transfer of Asset for U.S.
income tax purposes from FT to CFC and
Asset has unallocated basis difference with
respect to the Acquisition immediately after
the Deemed Liquidation. Accordingly, under
paragraph (b)(1) of this section, section
901(m) will continue to apply to the
unallocated basis difference with respect to
Asset until the entire 200u basis difference
has been taken into account under
§ 1.901(m)–5T.
(c) Successor rules for aggregate basis
difference carryover [Reserved].
(d) Effective/applicability date. (1)
Paragraphs (a), (b)(1), (b)(2), (b)(4)(i),
(b)(4)(iii), and (b)(5) of this section
apply to CAAs occurring on or after July
21, 2014, and to CAAs occurring before
that date resulting from an entity
classification election made under
§ 301.7701–3 of this chapter that is filed
on or after July 29, 2014, and that is
effective on or before July 21, 2014.
Paragraphs (a), (b)(1), (b)(2), (b)(4)(i),
(b)(4)(iii), and (b)(5) of this section also
apply to CAAs occurring on or after
January 1, 2011, and before July 21,
2014, other than CAAs occurring before
July 21, 2014, resulting from an entity
classification election made under
§ 301.7701–3 that is filed on or after July
29, 2014, and that is effective on or
before July 21, 2014, but only with
respect to basis difference determined
under § 1.901(m)–4T(e) with respect to
the CAA.
(2)–(3) [Reserved]
(e) Expiration date. The applicability
of this section expires on December 6,
2019.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Par. 8. Sections 1.901(m)–7T and
1.901(m)–8T are added and reserved to
read as follows:
■
§ 1.901(m)–7T
[Reserved].
De minimis rules.
§ 1.901(m)–8T
Miscellaneous. [Reserved].
John Dalrymple,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
Approved: November 4, 2016.
Mark J. Mazur,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax
Policy).
[FR Doc. 2016–28755 Filed 12–6–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of the Secretary
29 CFR Part 38
RIN 1291–AA36
Implementation of the
Nondiscrimination and Equal
Opportunity Provisions of the
Workforce Innovation and Opportunity
Act
Correction
In rule document 2016–27737
beginning on page 87130 in the issue of
Friday, December 2, 2016, make the
following correction:
1. On page 87130, in the first column,
after the DATES heading, the second line,
‘‘December 2, 2016.’’ should read
‘‘January 3, 2017.’’
[FR Doc. C1–2016–27737 Filed 12–6–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1301–00–D
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2016–1020]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Upper Mississippi River,
St. Louis, MO
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
navigable waters on the Upper
Mississippi River from mile 179.2 to
mile 180. The safety zone is needed to
protect personnel, vessels, and the
marine environment from potential
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\07DER1.SGM
07DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 7, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 88103-88110]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-28755]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9800]
RIN 1545-BM75
Covered Asset Acquisitions
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Temporary regulations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains temporary Income Tax Regulations under
section 901(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) with respect to
transactions that generally are treated as asset acquisitions for U.S.
income tax purposes and either are treated as stock acquisitions or are
disregarded for foreign income tax purposes. These regulations are
necessary to provide guidance on applying section 901(m). The text of
the temporary regulations also serves in part as the text of the
proposed regulations under section 901(m) (REG-129128-14) published in
the Proposed Rules section of this issue of the Federal Register.
DATES: Effective date: These regulations are effective on December 7,
2016.
Applicability dates: For dates of applicability, see Sec. Sec.
1.901(m)-1T(b), 1.901(m)-2T(f), 1.901(m)-4T(g), 1.901(m)-5T(i), and
1.901(m)-6T(d).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey L. Parry, (202) 317-6936 (not
a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
I. Section 901(m)
Section 212 of the Education Jobs and Medicaid Assistance Act
(EJMAA), enacted on August 10, 2010 (Public Law 111-226), added section
901(m) to the Code. Section 901(m)(1) provides that, in the case of a
covered asset acquisition (CAA), the disqualified portion of any
foreign income tax determined with respect to the income or gain
attributable to relevant foreign assets (RFAs) will not be taken into
account in determining the foreign tax credit allowed under section
901(a), and in the case of foreign income tax paid by a section 902
corporation (as defined in section 909(d)(5)), will not be taken into
account for purposes of section 902 or 960. Instead, the disqualified
portion of any foreign income tax (the disqualified tax amount) is
permitted as a deduction. See section 901(m)(6).
Under section 901(m)(2), a CAA is (i) a qualified stock purchase
(as defined in section 338(d)(3)) to which section 338(a) applies; (ii)
any transaction that is treated as an acquisition of assets for U.S.
income tax purposes and as the acquisition of stock of a corporation
(or is disregarded) for purposes of a foreign income tax; (iii) any
acquisition of an interest in a partnership that has an election in
effect under section 754; and (iv) to the extent provided by the
Secretary, any other similar transaction.
Section 901(m)(3)(A) provides that the term ``disqualified
portion'' means, with respect to any CAA, for any taxable year, the
ratio (expressed as a percentage) of (i) the aggregate basis
differences (but not below zero) allocable to such taxable year with
respect to all RFAs; divided by (ii) the income on which the foreign
income tax referenced in section 901(m)(1) is determined. If the
taxpayer fails to substantiate the income on which the foreign income
tax is determined to the satisfaction of the Secretary, such income
will be determined by dividing the amount of such foreign income tax by
the highest marginal tax rate applicable to the taxpayer's income in
the relevant jurisdiction.
Section 901(m)(3)(B)(i) provides the general rule that the basis
difference with respect to any RFA will be allocated to taxable years
using the applicable cost recovery method for U.S. income tax purposes.
Section 901(m)(3)(B)(ii) provides that, except as otherwise provided by
the Secretary, if there is a disposition of an RFA, the basis
difference allocated to the taxable year of the disposition will be the
excess of the basis difference of such asset over the aggregate basis
difference of such asset that has been allocated to all prior taxable
years. The statute further provides that no basis difference with
respect to such asset will be allocated to any taxable year thereafter.
Section 901(m)(3)(C)(i) provides that basis difference means, with
respect to any RFA, the excess of (i) the adjusted basis of such asset
immediately after the CAA, over (ii) the adjusted basis of such asset
immediately before the CAA. If the adjusted basis of an RFA immediately
before the CAA exceeds the adjusted basis of the RFA immediately after
the CAA (that is, where the adjusted basis
[[Page 88104]]
of an asset with a built-in loss is reduced in a CAA), such excess is
taken into account as a basis difference of a negative amount. See
section 901(m)(3)(C)(ii).
Section 901(m)(4) provides that an RFA means, with respect to a
CAA, an asset (including goodwill, going concern value, or other
intangible) with respect to such acquisition if income, deduction,
gain, or loss attributable to such asset is taken into account in
determining the foreign income tax referenced in section 901(m)(1).
Section 901(m)(7) provides that the Secretary may issue regulations
or other guidance as is necessary or appropriate to carry out the
purposes of section 901(m).
II. Notices 2014-44 and 2014-45
The Department of the Treasury (Treasury Department) and the IRS
issued Notice 2014-44 (2014-32 I.R.B 270 (July 21, 2014)) and Notice
2014-45 (2014-34 I.R.B. 388 (July 29, 2014)), announcing the intent to
issue regulations addressing the application of section 901(m) to
dispositions of RFAs following CAAs and to CAAs described in section
901(m)(2)(C) (regarding section 754 elections).
The notices were issued in response to certain taxpayers engaging
in transactions shortly after a CAA with the intention of invoking the
application of the statutory disposition rule under section
901(m)(3)(B)(ii) to avoid the purposes of section 901(m). To address
these transactions, Notice 2014-44 described the definition of
disposition that would be set forth in future regulations, as well as
the rules for determining the portion of basis difference that would be
taken into account upon a disposition of an RFA (the disposition
amount). In addition, Notice 2014-44 described the computation of basis
difference and disposition amount with respect to an RFA that is
subject to a section 743(b) CAA. Notice 2014-44 also announced that
future regulations would provide successor rules for the continued
application of section 901(m) after a subsequent transfer of an RFA
with remaining basis difference. Notice 2014-44 further provided that
future regulations would provide that, if an asset is an RFA with
respect to two section 743(b) CAAs involving the same partnership
interest, the RFA will be treated as having no remaining basis
difference with respect to the first section 743(b) CAA if the basis
difference with respect to the second section 743(b) CAA is determined
independently from the first section 743(b) CAA. In this regard, see
generally Sec. 1.743-1(f) and proposed Sec. 1.743-1(f)(2).
Notice 2014-44 provided that the future regulations described
therein would apply (i) concerning dispositions, to dispositions
occurring on or after July 21, 2014 (the date Notice 2014-44 was
issued), (ii) concerning section 743(b) CAAs, to section 743(b) CAAs
occurring on or after July 21, 2014, unless a taxpayer consistently
applied those provisions to all section 743(b) CAAs occurring on or
after January 1, 2011, and (iii) concerning successor rules, to
remaining basis difference with respect to an RFA as of July 21, 2014,
and any basis difference with respect to an RFA that arises in a CAA
occurring on or after July 21, 2014. Notice 2014-45 provided that the
future regulations described in Notice 2014-44 also would apply to
determine the tax consequences under section 901(m) of an entity
classification election made under Sec. 301.7701-3 that is filed on or
after July 29, 2014 (the date Notice 2014-45 was issued), including
whether a disposition results from the election for purposes of section
901(m) and the treatment of any remaining basis difference that results
from such an election.
III. Proposed Regulations Under Section 901(m)
Proposed regulations under section 901(m) are being issued at the
same time as these temporary regulations. In addition to cross-
referencing these temporary regulations, the proposed regulations
provide guidance under section 901(m) concerning issues not addressed
in the temporary regulations. Consulting the preamble to the proposed
regulations is recommended for a better understanding of how these
temporary regulations are intended to work.
Explanation of Provisions
I. Overview
Section 1.901(m)-1T provides definitions that apply for purposes of
the temporary regulations. Section 1.901(m)-2T identifies the
transactions that are CAAs and the assets that are RFAs with respect to
a CAA. Section 1.901(m)-4T provides the general rule for determining
basis difference with respect to an RFA under section 901(m)(3)(C), as
well as a special rule for determining basis difference with respect to
an RFA that arises as a result of an acquisition of an interest in a
partnership that has made a section 754 election (section 743(b) CAA).
Section 1.901(m)-5T provides rules for taking into account basis
difference under the applicable cost recovery method or as a result of
a disposition of an RFA. Section 1.901(m)-6T provides successor rules
for applying section 901(m) to subsequent transfers of RFAs that have
basis difference that has not yet been fully taken into account.
II. Effective/Applicability Dates
The applicability dates of the temporary regulations relate back to
the issuance of Notices 2014-44 and 2014-45. Accordingly, the temporary
regulations apply to CAAs occurring on or after July 21, 2014, and to
CAAs occurring before that date resulting from an entity classification
election made under Sec. 301.7701-3 that is filed on or after July 29,
2014, and that is effective on or before July 21, 2014 (referred to as
the general applicability date). The temporary regulations also apply
to CAAs occurring on or after January 1, 2011, and before the general
applicability date (the transition period), but only if the basis
difference within the meaning of section 901(m)(3)(C)(i) (statutory
basis difference) in one or more RFAs with respect to such a CAA had
not been fully taken into account under section 901(m)(3)(B) either as
of July 21, 2014, or, in the case of an entity classification election
made under Sec. 301.7701-3 that is filed on or after July 29, 2014,
and that is effective on or before July 21, 2014, prior to the
transactions that are deemed to occur under Sec. 301.7701-3(g) as a
result of the change in classification.
Taxpayers also may choose to consistently apply Sec. 1.901(m)-
4T(d)(1) (regarding the determination of basis difference in an RFA
with respect to a section 743(b) CAA) to all section 743(b) CAAs
occurring on or after January 1, 2011.
III. CAAs and RFAs
Section 1.901(m)-2T(b) identifies the transactions that are CAAs
under section 901(m)(2)(A) through (C). Section 1.901(m)-2T(c) provides
that, with respect to a foreign income tax and a CAA, an RFA is any
asset (including goodwill, going concern value, or other intangible)
subject to the CAA that is relevant in determining foreign income for
purposes of the foreign income tax. An asset is subject to a CAA, if,
for example (i) in the case of a qualified stock purchase of a target
corporation (as defined in section 338(d)(3)) to which section 338(a)
applies, ``new'' target is treated as purchasing the asset from ``old''
target; (ii) in the case of a taxable acquisition of a disregarded
entity that is treated as an acquisition of stock for foreign income
tax purposes,
[[Page 88105]]
the asset is owned by the disregard entity at that time of the purchase
and therefore the buyer is treated as purchasing the asset from the
seller; and (iii) in the case of a section 743(b) CAA, the asset is
attributable to the partnership interest transferred in the section
743(b) CAA.
Section 1.901(m)-2T(d) provides that the statutory definitions
under section 901(m)(2) and 901(m)(4) apply to determine whether a
transaction that occurred during the transition period is a CAA and
which assets are RFAs with respect to those CAAs, respectively.
IV. Determining Basis Difference With Respect to an RFA
A basis difference is computed separately with respect to each
foreign income tax for which an asset is an RFA. Consistent with
section 901(m)(3)(C), Sec. 1.901(m)-4T(b) provides the general rule
that basis difference with respect to an RFA is the U.S. basis in the
RFA immediately after the CAA, less the U.S. basis in the RFA
immediately before the CAA. If, however, an asset is an RFA with
respect to a section 743(b) CAA, Sec. 1.901(m)-4T(d) provides that
basis difference with respect to the RFA is the resulting basis
adjustment under section 743(b) that is allocated to the RFA under
section 755.
Section 1.901(m)-2T(e) ``resets'' the basis difference in an RFA
with respect to a CAA that occurred during the transition period by
defining basis difference in the RFA as the portion of statutory basis
difference that had not been taken into account under section
901(m)(3)(B) either as of July 21, 2014, or, in the case of an entity
classification election made under Sec. 301.7701-3 that is filed on or
after July 29, 2014, and that is effective on or before July 21, 2014,
prior to the transactions that are deemed to occur under Sec.
301.7701-3(g) as a result of the change in classification. This is the
basis difference in the RFA for the period to which the temporary
regulations apply.
V. Basis Difference Taken Into Account
Section 1.901(m)-5T provides rules for determining the amount of
basis difference with respect to an RFA that is taken into account in a
given U.S. taxable year (allocated basis difference). The amount of
basis difference taken into account in a U.S. taxable year is used to
compute a disqualified tax amount for the U.S. taxable year. Basis
difference is taken into account in two ways: Under an applicable cost
recovery method or as a result of a disposition of the RFA. If an asset
is an RFA with respect to more than one foreign income tax, basis
difference with respect to each foreign income tax is separately taken
into account under Sec. 1.901(m)-5T.
A. Determining Cost Recovery Amounts
Consistent with section 901(m)(3)(B)(i), Sec. 1.901(m)-5T(b)(2)
provides that a cost recovery amount for an RFA is determined by
applying an applicable cost recovery method to the basis difference
rather than to the U.S. basis of the RFA.
B. Determining Disposition Amounts
1. Overview
Section 901(m)(3)(B)(ii) provides that, except as otherwise
provided by the Secretary, if there is a disposition of an RFA, the
basis difference allocated to the U.S. taxable year of the disposition
shall be the excess of the basis difference of such RFA over the total
amount of such basis difference that has been allocated to all prior
U.S. taxable years (unallocated basis difference). This result is
appropriate when all the gain or loss from the disposition is
recognized for both U.S. and foreign income tax purposes. In other
cases, however, a disposition may not be the appropriate time for all
of the unallocated basis difference to be taken into account. For
example, it may not be appropriate for all of the unallocated basis
difference to be taken into account upon a disposition that is fully
taxable for U.S. income tax purposes but not for foreign income tax
purposes. Accordingly, under the specific authority granted to the
Secretary with respect to dispositions, these temporary regulations
provide rules to determine when less than all of the unallocated basis
difference is taken into account as a result of a disposition.
2. Definition of Disposition
Section 1.901(m)-1T(a)(10) defines a disposition for purposes of
section 901(m) as an event that results in gain or loss being
recognized with respect to an RFA for purposes of U.S. income tax or
foreign income tax, or both. Thus, the definition excludes certain
transfers that might otherwise be considered dispositions under the
ordinary meaning of that term. For example, an entity classification
election by an RFA owner that results in a tax-free deemed liquidation
for U.S. income tax purposes but that is disregarded for foreign income
tax purposes does not result in a disposition of the RFAs under section
901(m), because no gain or loss is recognized for U.S. or foreign
income tax purposes with respect to the distribution of the RFAs in the
deemed liquidation. This is the case even though the deemed liquidation
might otherwise be considered a ``disposition'' of assets under other
provisions of the Code.
3. Determining a Disposition Amount
Section 1.901(m)-5T(c)(2) provides rules for determining a
disposition amount. If a disposition of an RFA is fully taxable for
U.S. and foreign income tax purposes, the disposition amount will be
any remaining unallocated basis difference with respect to that RFA.
This is because there generally will no longer be a disparity in the
U.S. basis and the foreign basis of the RFA.
If a disposition is not fully taxable for both U.S. and foreign
income tax purposes, generally there will continue to be a disparity in
the U.S. basis and the foreign basis following the disposition, and it
will be appropriate for the RFA to continue to have unallocated basis
difference. To the extent that the disparity in the U.S. basis and the
foreign basis is reduced as a result of the disposition, however, a
portion of the unallocated basis difference (or, in certain cases, all
of the unallocated basis difference) should be taken into account.
Whether the disposition reduces the basis disparity will depend on
whether the basis difference is positive or negative and the
jurisdiction in which gain or loss is recognized.
If an RFA has a positive basis difference, a reduction in basis
disparity generally will occur upon a disposition of the RFA if (i) a
foreign disposition gain is recognized, which generally results in an
increase in the foreign basis of the RFA, or (ii) a U.S. disposition
loss is recognized, which generally results in a decrease in the U.S.
basis of the RFA. Accordingly, if an RFA has a positive basis
difference, the disposition amount equals the lesser of (i) any foreign
disposition gain plus any U.S. disposition loss (for this purpose,
expressed as a positive amount), or (ii) unallocated basis difference.
See Sec. 1.901(m)-5T(c)(2)(ii)(A).
If an RFA has a negative basis difference, a reduction in basis
disparity generally will occur upon a disposition of the RFA if (i) a
foreign disposition loss is recognized, which generally results in a
decrease in the foreign basis of the RFA, or (ii) a U.S. disposition
gain is recognized, which generally results in an increase in the U.S.
basis of the RFA. Accordingly, if an RFA has a negative basis
difference, the disposition amount equals the greater of (i) any U.S.
disposition gain (for this purpose, expressed as a negative amount)
plus any foreign disposition loss, or (ii) unallocated basis
difference. See Sec. 1.901(m)-5T(c)(2)(ii)(B).
[[Page 88106]]
For the avoidance of doubt, the determination of whether there is a
disposition for U.S. income tax purposes, and the amount of U.S.
disposition gain or U.S. disposition loss, is made without regard to
whether gain or loss is deferred or disallowed or otherwise not taken
into account currently (for example, see section 267, which defers or
disallows certain recognized losses, and Sec. 1.1502-13, which
provides rules for taking into account items of income, gain,
deduction, and loss of members of a U.S. consolidated group from
intercompany transactions). This principle also applies if foreign law
has an equivalent concept whereby gain or loss that is realized and
recognized is deferred or disallowed.
If an asset is an RFA by reason of a section 743(b) CAA and
subsequently there is a disposition of the RFA, then for purposes of
determining the disposition amount, foreign disposition gain or foreign
disposition loss means the amount of gain or loss recognized for
purposes of a foreign income tax on the disposition of the RFA that is
allocable to the partnership interest that was transferred in the
section 743(b) CAA. See Sec. 1.901(m)-5T(c)(2)(iii). In addition, U.S.
disposition gain or U.S. disposition loss means the amount of gain or
loss recognized for U.S. income tax purposes on the disposition of the
RFA that is allocable to the partnership interest that was transferred
in the section 743(b) CAA, taking into account the basis adjustment
under section 743(b) that was allocated to the RFA under section 755 in
the section 743(b) CAA. See id.
VI. Successor Rules for Unallocated Basis Difference
A. General Rules
Section 1.901(m)-6T(b) provides that section 901(m) continues to
apply to any unallocated basis difference with respect to an RFA after
there is a transfer of the RFA for U.S. income tax purposes (successor
transaction), regardless of whether the transfer is a disposition, a
CAA, or a non-taxable transaction. A successor transaction does not
occur if, as a result of the transfer of an RFA, the entire unallocated
basis difference is taken into account because, for example, the
transfer results in all realized gain or loss in the RFA being
recognized for U.S. and foreign income tax purposes.
Notice 2014-44 stated that the Treasury Department and the IRS are
continuing to study whether and to what extent section 901(m) should
apply to an asset received in exchange for an RFA in a transaction in
which the U.S. basis of the asset is determined by reference to the
U.S. basis of the transferred RFA. The Treasury Department and the IRS
have determined that an asset should not become an RFA solely because
the U.S. basis of that asset is determined by reference to the U.S.
basis of an RFA for which the asset is exchanged in a successor
transaction. Accordingly, for example, if, in a successor transaction,
an RFA owner transfers an RFA to a corporation in a transfer to which
section 351 applies, the stock of the transferee corporation received
is not an RFA even though the U.S. basis of the stock is determined
under section 358 by reference to the U.S. basis of the RFA
transferred.
B. Successor Transactions That Are CAAs
An asset may be an RFA with respect to multiple CAAs if a successor
transaction is also a CAA (subsequent CAA). In this case, the
subsequent CAA may give rise to additional basis difference. Section
1.901(m)-6T(b)(4)(i) provides generally that the unallocated basis
difference with respect to a CAA that occurred prior to the subsequent
CAA (referred to in the regulations as a ``prior CAA'') will continue
to be taken into account under section 901(m) after the subsequent CAA.
Section 1.901(m)-6T(b)(4)(iii) provides an exception to the general
rule if an RFA is subject to two section 743(b) CAAs (referred to in
the regulations as a ``prior section 743(b) CAA'' and a ``subsequent
section 743(b) CAA''). In this case, to the extent the same partnership
interest is transferred in the section 743(b) CAAs, the RFA will be
treated as having no unallocated basis difference with respect to the
prior section 743(b) CAA if basis difference for the subsequent section
743(b) CAA is determined independently from the prior section 743(b)
CAA. In this regard, see generally Sec. 1.743-1(f) and proposed Sec.
1.743-1(f)(2). If the subsequent section 743(b) CAA results from the
acquisition of only a portion of the partnership interest acquired in
the prior section 743(b) CAA, the transferor must equitably apportion
the unallocated basis difference attributable to the prior section
743(b) CAA between the portion of the interest retained and the portion
of the interest transferred. With respect to the portion transferred,
the RFA will be treated as having no unallocated basis difference
attributable to the prior section 743(b) CAA.
VII. Definition of Foreign Income Tax
For purposes of section 901(m), the temporary regulations define
``foreign income tax'' as any income, war profits, or excess profits
tax for which a credit is allowable under section 901 or 903, other
than any withholding tax determined on a gross basis as described in
section 901(k)(1)(B). The Treasury Department and the IRS have
determined that a withholding tax should not be subject to disallowance
under section 901(m) because a withholding tax is a gross basis tax
that is generally unaffected by changes in asset basis.
Effect on Other Documents
The following publications are obsolete as of December 7, 2016:
Notice 2014-44 (2014-32 I.R.B. 270) and Notice 2014-45 (2014-34
I.R.B. 388).
Special Analyses
Certain IRS regulations, including these, are exempt from the
requirements of Executive Order 12866, as supplemented and reaffirmed
by Executive Order 13563. Therefore, a regulatory impact assessment is
not required. For the applicability of the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. chapter 6), refer to the Special Analyses section of the
preamble of the cross-referenced notice of proposed rulemaking
published in this issue of the Federal Register. Pursuant to section
7805(f) of the Internal Revenue Code, these regulations has been
submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on its impact on small businesses.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these regulations is Jeffrey L. Parry of
the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (International). However, other
personnel from the Treasury Department and the IRS participated in
their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is amended as follows:
PART 1--INCOME TAXES
0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 is amended by adding
entries in numerical order to read as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
[[Page 88107]]
Sections 1.901(m)-1T through -8T also issued under 26 U.S.C.
901(m)(7).
Section 1.901(m)-5T also issued under 26 U.S.C.
901(m)(3)(B)(ii). * * *
0
Par. 2. Section 1.901(m)-1T is added to read as follows:
Sec. 1.901(m)-1T Definitions (temporary).
(a) Definitions. For purposes of section 901(m), this section, and
Sec. Sec. 1.901(m)-2T through 1.901(m)-8T, the following definitions
apply:
(1)-(5) [Reserved]
(6) The term basis difference has the meaning provided in Sec.
1.901(m)-4T.
(7) The term cost recovery amount has the meaning provided in Sec.
1.901(m)-5T(b)(2).
(8) The term covered asset acquisition (or CAA) has the meaning
provided in Sec. 1.901(m)-2T.
(9) [Reserved]
(10) The term disposition means an event (for example, a sale,
abandonment, or mark-to-market event) that results in gain or loss
being recognized with respect to an RFA for purposes of U.S. income tax
or a foreign income tax, or both.
(11) The term disposition amount has the meaning provided in Sec.
1.901(m)-5T(c)(2).
(12) [Reserved]
(13) The term disregarded entity means an entity that is
disregarded as an entity separate from its owner, as described in Sec.
301.7701-2(c)(2)(i) of this chapter.
(14) The term fiscally transparent entity means an entity,
including a Disregarded Entity, that is fiscally transparent under the
principles of Sec. 1.894-1(d)(3) for purposes of U.S. income tax or a
foreign income tax (or both).
(15)-(17) [Reserved].
(18) The term foreign disposition gain means, with respect to a
foreign income tax, the amount of gain recognized on a disposition of
an RFA in determining Foreign Income, regardless of whether the gain is
deferred or otherwise not taken into account currently. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, if after a section 743(b) CAA there is a disposition of
an asset that is an RFA with respect to that section 743(b) CAA,
foreign disposition gain has the meaning provided in Sec. 1.901(m)-
5T(c)(2)(iii).
(19) The term foreign disposition loss means, with respect to a
foreign income tax, the amount of loss recognized on a disposition of
an RFA in determining Foreign Income, regardless of whether the loss is
deferred or disallowed or otherwise not taken into account currently.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if after a section 743(b) CAA there is a
disposition of an asset that is an RFA with respect to that section
743(b) CAA, foreign disposition loss has the meaning provided in Sec.
1.901(m)-5T(c)(2)(iii).
(20) The term foreign income means, with respect to a foreign
income tax, the taxable income (or loss) reflected on a foreign tax
return (as properly amended or adjusted), even if the taxable income
(or loss) is reported by an entity that is a fiscally transparent
entity for purposes of the foreign income tax. If, however, foreign law
imposes tax on the combined income (within the meaning of Sec. 1.901-
2(f)(3)(ii)) of two or more Foreign Payors, foreign income means the
combined taxable income (or loss) of such Foreign Payors, regardless of
whether such income (or loss) is reflected on a single foreign tax
return.
(21) The term foreign income tax means an income, war profits, or
excess profits tax for which a credit is allowable under section 901 or
903, except that it does not include any withholding tax determined on
a gross basis as described in section 901(k)(1)(B).
(22)-(25) [Reserved]
(26) The term prior CAA has the meaning provided in Sec. 1.901(m)-
6T(b)(2).
(27) The term prior section 743(b) CAA has the meaning provided in
Sec. 1.901(m)-6T(b)(4)(iii).
(28) The term relevant foreign asset (or RFA) has the meaning
provided in Sec. 1.901(m)-2T.
(29)-(32) [Reserved]
(33) The term section 338 CAA has the meaning provided in Sec.
1.901(m)-2T(b)(1).
(34) The term section 743(b) CAA has the meaning provided in Sec.
1.901(m)-2T(b)(3).
(35) [Reserved]
(36) The term subsequent CAA has the meaning provided in Sec.
1.901(m)-6T(b)(4)(i).
(37) The term subsequent section 743(b) CAA has the meaning
provided in Sec. 1.901(m)-6T(b)(4)(iii).
(38) The term successor transaction has the meaning provided in
Sec. 1.901(m)-6T(b)(2).
(39) [Reserved]
(40) The term unallocated basis difference means, with respect to
an RFA and a foreign income tax, the basis difference reduced by the
sum of the cost recovery amounts and the disposition amounts that have
been computed under Sec. 1.901(m)-5T.
(41) The term U.S. basis means the adjusted basis of an asset
determined for U.S. income tax purposes.
(42) [Reserved].
(43) The term U.S. disposition gain means the amount of gain
recognized for U.S. income tax purposes on a disposition of an RFA,
regardless of whether the gain is deferred or otherwise not taken into
account currently. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if after a section
743(b) CAA there is a disposition of an asset that is an RFA with
respect to that section 743(b) CAA, U.S. disposition gain has the
meaning provided in Sec. 1.901(m)-5T(c)(2)(iii).
(44) The term U.S. disposition loss means the amount of loss
recognized for U.S. income tax purposes on a disposition of an RFA,
regardless of whether the loss is deferred or disallowed or otherwise
not taken into account currently. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if
after a section 743(b) CAA there is a disposition of an asset that is
an RFA with respect to that section 743(b) CAA, U.S. disposition loss
has the meaning provided in Sec. 1.901(m)-5T(c)(2)(iii).
(45) The term U.S. taxable year means a taxable year as defined in
section 7701(a)(23).
(b) Effective/applicability date. (1) [Reserved].
(2) Paragraphs (a)(6), (7), (8), (10), (11), (13), (14), (18),
(19), (20), (21), (26), (27), (28), (33), (34), (36), (37), (38), (40),
(41), (43), (44), and (45) of this section apply to CAAs occurring on
or after July 21, 2014, and to CAAs occurring before that date
resulting from an entity classification election made under Sec.
301.7701-3 that is filed on or after July 29, 2014, and that is
effective on or before July 21, 2014. Paragraphs (a)(6), (7), (8),
(10), (11), (13), (14), (18), (19), (20), (21), (26), (27), (28), (33),
(34), (36), (37), (38), (40), (41), (43), (44), and (45) of this
section also apply to CAAs occurring on or after January 1, 2011, and
before July 21, 2014, other than CAAs occurring before July 21, 2014,
resulting from an entity classification election made under Sec.
301.7701-3 that is filed on or after July 29, 2014, and that is
effective on or before July 21, 2014, but only if the basis difference
(within the meaning of section 901(m)(3)(C)(i)) in one or more RFAs
with respect to the CAA had not been fully taken into account under
section 901(m)(3)(B) either as of July 21, 2014, or, in the case of an
entity classification election made under Sec. 301.7701-3 that is
filed on or after July 29, 2014, and that is effective on or before
July 21, 2014, prior to the transactions that are deemed to occur under
Sec. 301.7701-3(g) as a result of the change in classification.
(3) [Reserved].
(c) Expiration date. The applicability of this section expires on
December 6, 2019.
[[Page 88108]]
0
Par. 3. Section 1.901(m)-2T is added to read as follows:
Sec. 1.901(m)-2T Covered asset acquisitions and relevant foreign
assets (temporary).
(a) In general. Paragraph (b) of this section sets forth the
transactions that are covered asset acquisitions (or CAAs). Paragraph
(c) of this section provides rules for identifying assets that are
relevant foreign assets (or RFAs) with respect to a CAA. Paragraph (d)
of this section provides special rules for identifying CAAs and RFAs
with respect to transactions to which paragraphs (b) and (c) of this
section do not apply. Paragraph (e) of this section provides examples
illustrating the rules of this section. Paragraph (f) of this section
provides the effective/applicability date, and paragraph (g) of this
section provides the expiration date.
(b) Covered asset acquisitions. Except as provided in paragraph (d)
of this section, the transactions set forth in this paragraph (b) are
CAAs.
(1) A qualified stock purchase (as defined in section 338(d)(3)) to
which section 338(a) applies (section 338 CAA);
(2) Any transaction that is treated as an acquisition of assets for
U.S. income tax purposes and as an acquisition of stock of a
corporation (or the transaction is disregarded) for foreign income tax
purposes;
(3) Any acquisition of an interest in a partnership that has an
election in effect under section 754 (section 743(b) CAA);
(4)-(6) [Reserved].
(c) Relevant foreign asset--(1) In general. Except as provided in
paragraph (d) of this section, an RFA means, with respect to a foreign
income tax and a CAA, any asset (including goodwill, going concern
value, or other intangible) subject to the CAA that is relevant in
determining foreign income for purposes of the foreign income tax.
(2) RFA status with respect to a foreign income tax [Reserved].
(3) Subsequent RFA status with respect to another foreign income
tax [Reserved].
(d) Identifying covered asset acquisitions and relevant foreign
assets to which paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section do not apply.
For transactions occurring on or after January 1, 2011, and before July
21, 2014, other than transactions occurring before July 21, 2014,
resulting from an entity classification election made under Sec.
301.7701-3 of this chapter that is filed on or after July 29, 2014, and
that is effective on or before July 21, 2014, the transactions set
forth under section 901(m)(2) are CAAs and the assets that are relevant
foreign assets with respect to the CAA under section 901(m)(4) are
RFAs.
(e) Examples. [Reserved].
(f) Effective/applicability date--(1) Paragraphs (a), (b)(1)
through (3), and (c)(1) of this section apply to transactions occurring
on or after July 21, 2014, and to transactions occurring before that
date resulting from an entity classification election made under Sec.
301.7701-3 of this chapter that is filed on or after July 29, 2014, and
that is effective on or before July 21, 2014. Paragraph (d) of this
section applies to transactions occurring on or after January 1, 2011,
and before July 21, 2014, other than transactions occurring before July
21, 2014, resulting from an entity classification election made under
Sec. 301.7701-3 of this chapter that is filed on or after July 29,
2014, and that is effective on or before July 21, 2014.
(2)-(3) [Reserved]
(g) Expiration date. The applicability of this section expires on
December 6, 2019.
0
Par. 4. Section 1.901(m)-3T is added and reserved to read as follows:
Sec. 1.901(m)-3T Disqualified tax amount and aggregate basis
difference carryover (temporary). [Reserved].
0
Par. 5. Section 1.901(m)-4T is added to read as follows:
Sec. 1.901(m)-4T Determination of basis difference (temporary).
(a) In general. This section provides rules for determining for
each RFA the basis difference that arises as a result of a CAA. A basis
difference is computed separately with respect to each foreign income
tax for which an asset subject to a CAA is an RFA. Paragraph (b) of
this section provides the general rule for determining basis difference
that references only U.S. basis in the RFA. Paragraph (c) of this
section provides for an election to determine basis difference by
reference to foreign basis and sets forth the procedures for making the
election. Paragraph (d) of this section provides special rules for
determining basis difference in the case of a section 743(b) CAA.
Paragraph (e) of this section provides a special rule for determining
basis difference in an RFA with respect to a CAA to which paragraphs
(b) through (d) of this section do not apply. Paragraph (f) of this
section provides examples illustrating the rules of this section.
Paragraph (g) of this section provides the effective/applicability
date, and paragraph (h) of this section provides the expiration date.
(b) General rule. Except as otherwise provided in paragraphs (c),
(d), and (e) of this section, basis difference is the U.S. basis in the
RFA immediately after the CAA, less the U.S. basis in the RFA
immediately before the CAA. Basis difference is an attribute that
attaches to an RFA.
(c) Foreign basis election. [Reserved].
(d) Determination of basis difference in a section 743(b) CAA--(1)
In general. Except as provided in paragraphs (d)(2) and (e) of this
section, if there is a section 743(b) CAA, basis difference is the
resulting basis adjustment under section 743(b) that is allocated to
the RFA under section 755.
(2) Foreign basis election. [Reserved].
(e) Determination of basis difference in an RFA with respect to a
CAA with respect to which paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section
do not apply. For CAAs occurring on or after January 1, 2011, and
before July 21, 2014, other than CAAs occurring before July 21, 2014,
resulting from an entity classification election made under Sec.
301.7701-3 of this chapter that is filed on or after July 29, 2014, and
that is effective on or before July 21, 2014, basis difference in an
RFA with respect to the CAA is the amount of any basis difference
(within the meaning of section 901(m)(3)(C)(i)) that had not been taken
into account under section 901(m)(3)(B) either as of July 21, 2014, or,
in the case of an entity classification election made under Sec.
301.7701-3 of this chapter that is filed on or after July 29, 2014, and
that is effective on or before July 21, 2014, prior to the transactions
that are deemed to occur under Sec. 301.7701-3(g) as a result of the
change in classification.
(f) Examples. [Reserved].
(g) Effective/applicability date. (1) Paragraphs (a), (b), and
(d)(1) of this section apply to CAAs occurring on or after July 21,
2014, and to CAAs occurring before that date resulting from an entity
classification election made under Sec. 301.7701-3 that is filed on or
after July 29, 2014, and that is effective on or before July 21, 2014.
Paragraph (e) of this section applies to CAAs occurring on or after
January 1, 2011, and before July 21, 2014, other than CAAs occurring
before July 21, 2014, resulting from an entity classification election
made under Sec. 301.7701-3 of this chapter that is filed on or after
July 29, 2014, and that is effective on or before July 21, 2014.
Taxpayers may, however, consistently apply paragraph (d)(1) of this
section to all section 743(b) CAAs occurring on or after January 1,
2011. For this purpose, persons that are related (within the meaning of
section
[[Page 88109]]
267(b) or 707(b)) will be treated as a single taxpayer.
(2)-(3) [Reserved]
(h) Expiration date. The applicability of this section expires on
December 6, 2019.
0
Par. 6. Section 1.901(m)-5T is added to read as follows:
Sec. 1.901(m)-5T Basis difference taken into account (temporary).
(a) In general. [Reserved].
(b) Basis difference taken into account under applicable cost
recovery method--(1) In general. [Reserved].
(2) Determining a cost recovery amount--(i) General rule. A cost
recovery amount for an RFA is determined by applying the applicable
cost recovery method to the basis difference rather than to the U.S.
basis.
(ii) U.S. basis subject to multiple cost recovery methods.
[Reserved].
(3) Applicable cost recovery method. [Reserved].
(c) Basis difference taken into account as a result of a
disposition--(1) In general. [Reserved].
(2) Determining a disposition amount--(i) Disposition is fully
taxable for purposes of both U.S. income tax and the foreign income
tax. If a disposition of an RFA is fully taxable (that is, results in
all gain or loss, if any, being recognized with respect to the RFA) for
purposes of both U.S. income tax and the foreign income tax, the
disposition amount is equal to the unallocated basis difference with
respect to the RFA.
(ii) Disposition is not fully taxable for purposes of U.S. income
tax or the foreign income tax (or both). If the disposition of an RFA
is not fully taxable for purposes of both U.S. income tax and the
foreign income tax, the disposition amount is determined under this
paragraph (c)(2)(ii). See Sec. 1.901(m)-6T for rules regarding the
continued application of section 901(m) if the RFA has any unallocated
basis difference after determining the disposition amount under
paragraph (c)(2)(ii)(A) or (B) of this section, as applicable.
(A) Positive basis difference. If the disposition of an RFA is not
fully taxable for purposes of both U.S. income tax and the foreign
income tax, and the RFA has a positive basis difference, the
disposition amount equals the lesser of:
(1) Any foreign disposition gain plus any U.S. disposition loss
(for this purpose, expressed as a positive amount), or
(2) Unallocated basis difference with respect to the RFA.
(B) Negative basis difference. If the disposition of an RFA is not
fully taxable for purposes of both U.S. income tax and the foreign
income tax, and the RFA has a negative basis difference, the
disposition amount equals the greater of:
(1) Any U.S. disposition gain (for this purpose, expressed as a
negative amount) plus any foreign disposition loss, or
(2) Unallocated basis difference with respect to the RFA.
(iii) Disposition of an RFA after a section 743(b) CAA. If an RFA
was subject to a section 743(b) CAA and subsequently there is a
disposition of the RFA, then, for purposes of determining the
disposition amount, foreign disposition gain or foreign disposition
loss are specially defined to mean the amount of gain or loss
recognized for purposes of the foreign income tax on the disposition of
the RFA that is allocable to the partnership interest that was
transferred in the section 743(b) CAA. In addition, U.S. disposition
gain or U.S. disposition loss are specially defined to mean the amount
of gain or loss recognized for U.S. income tax purposes on the
disposition of the RFA that is allocable to the partnership interest
that was transferred in the section 743(b) CAA, taking into account the
basis adjustment under section 743(b) that was allocated to the RFA
under section 755.
(d) General rules for allocating and assigning a cost recovery
amount or a disposition amount when the RFA owner (U.S.) is a fiscally
transparent entity. [Reserved].
(e) Special rules for certain section 743(b) CAAs. [Reserved]
(f) Mid-year transactions. [Reserved]
(g) Reverse hybrids. [Reserved]
(h) Examples. [Reserved]
(i) Effective/applicability date. (1) [Reserved]
(2) Paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (c)(2) of this section apply to CAAs
occurring on or after July 21, 2014, and to CAAs occurring before that
date resulting from an entity classification election made under Sec.
301.7701-3 of this chapter that is filed on or after July 29, 2014, and
that is effective on or before July 21, 2014. Paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and
(c)(2) of this section also apply to CAAs occurring on or after January
1, 2011, and before July 21, 2014, other than CAAs occurring before
July 21, 2014, resulting from an entity classification election made
under Sec. 301.7701-3 that is filed on or after July 29, 2014, and
that is effective on or before July 21, 2014, but only with respect to
basis difference determined under Sec. 1.901(m)-4T(e) with respect to
the CAA.
(3) [Reserved]
(j) Expiration date. The applicability of this section expires on
December 6, 2019.
0
Par. 7. Section 1.901(m)-6T is added to read as follows:
Sec. 1.901(m)-6T Successor rules (temporary).
(a) In general. This section provides successor rules applicable to
section 901(m). Paragraph (b) of this section provides rules for the
continued application of section 901(m) after an RFA that has
unallocated basis difference has been transferred, including special
rules applicable to successor transactions that are also CAAs or that
involve partnerships. Paragraph (c) of this section provides rules for
determining when an aggregate basis difference carryover of a section
901(m) payor either becomes an aggregate basis difference carryover of
the section 901(m) payor with respect to another foreign payor or is
transferred to another section 901(m) payor. Paragraph (d) of this
section provides the effective/applicability date, and paragraph (e) of
this section provides the expiration date.
(b) Successor rules for unallocated basis difference--(1) In
general. Except as provided in paragraph (b)(4) of this section,
section 901(m) continues to apply after a successor transaction to any
unallocated basis difference attached to a transferred RFA until the
entire basis difference has been taken into account as a cost recovery
amount or a disposition amount (or both) under Sec. 1.901(m)-5T.
(2) Definition of a successor transaction. A successor transaction
occurs with respect to an RFA if, after a CAA (prior CAA), there is a
transfer of the RFA for U.S. income tax purposes and the RFA has
unallocated basis difference with respect to the prior CAA, determined
immediately after the transfer. A successor transaction may occur
regardless of whether the transfer of the RFA is a disposition, a CAA,
or a non-taxable transaction for purposes of U.S. income tax. If the
RFA was subject to multiple prior CAAs, a separate determination must
be made with respect to each prior CAA as to whether the transfer is a
successor transaction.
(3) Special considerations. [Reserved].
(4) Successor transaction is a CAA--(i) In general. An asset may be
an RFA with respect to multiple CAAs if a successor transaction is also
a CAA (subsequent CAA). Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph
(b)(4), if there is a subsequent CAA, unallocated basis difference with
respect to any prior CAAs will continue to be taken
[[Page 88110]]
into account under section 901(m) after the subsequent CAA.
Furthermore, the subsequent CAA may give rise to additional basis
difference subject to section 901(m).
(ii) Foreign basis election. [Reserved].
(iii) Multiple section 743(b) CAAs. If an RFA is subject to two
section 743(b) CAAs (prior section 743(b) CAA and subsequent section
743(b) CAA) and the same partnership interest is acquired in both the
CAAs, the RFA will be treated as having no unallocated basis difference
with respect to the prior section 743(b) CAA if the basis difference
for the section 743(b) CAA is determined independently from the prior
section 743(b) CAA. In this regard, see generally Sec. 1.743-1(f). If
the subsequent section 743(b) CAA results from the acquisition of only
a portion of the partnership interest acquired in the prior section
743(b) CAA, then the transferor will be required to equitably apportion
the unallocated basis difference attributable to the prior section
743(b) CAA between the portion retained by the transferor and the
portion transferred. In this case, with respect to the portion
transferred, the RFAs will be treated as having no unallocated basis
difference with respect to the prior section 743(b) CAA if basis
difference for the subsequent section 743(b) CAA is determined
independently from the prior section 743(b) CAA.
(5) Example. The following example illustrates the rules of
paragraph (b) of this section.
Example. (i) Facts. USP, a domestic corporation, wholly owns
CFC, a foreign corporation organized in Country A and treated as a
corporation for both U.S. and Country A tax purposes. FT is an
unrelated foreign corporation organized in Country A and treated as
a corporation for both U.S. and Country A tax purposes. FT owns one
asset, a parcel of land (Asset). Country A imposes a single tax that
is a foreign income tax. On January 1, Year 1, CFC acquires all of
the stock of FT in exchange for 300u in a qualified stock purchase
(as defined in section 338(d)(3)) to which section 338(a) applies
(Acquisition). Immediately before the Acquisition, Asset had a U.S.
basis of 100u, and immediately after the Acquisition, Asset had a
U.S. basis of 300u. Effective on February 1, Year 1, FT elects to be
a disregarded entity pursuant to Sec. 301.7701-3. As a result of
the election, FT is deemed, for U.S. income tax purposes, to
distribute Asset to CFC in liquidation (Deemed Liquidation)
immediately before the closing of the day before the election is
effective pursuant to Sec. 301.7701-3(g)(1)(iii) and (3)(ii). The
Deemed Liquidation is disregarded for Country A tax purposes. No
gain or loss is recognized on the Deemed Liquidation for either U.S.
or Country A tax purposes.
(ii) Result. Under Sec. 1.901(m)-2T(b)(1), the Acquisition by
CFC of the stock of FT is a section 338 CAA. Under Sec. 1.901(m)-
2T(c)(1), Asset is an RFA with respect to Country A tax and the
Acquisition, because immediately after the Acquisition, Asset is
relevant in determining foreign income of FT for Country A tax
purposes, and FT owned Asset when the Acquisition occurred. Under
Sec. 1.901(m)-4T(b), the basis difference with respect to Asset is
200u (300u-100u). Under Sec. 1.901(m)-2T(b)(2), the Deemed
Liquidation is a CAA (subsequent CAA) because the Deemed Liquidation
is treated as an acquisition of assets for U.S. income tax purposes
and is disregarded for Country A tax purposes. Because the U.S.
basis in Asset is 300u immediately before and after the Deemed
Liquidation, the subsequent CAA does not give rise to any additional
basis difference. The Deemed Liquidation is not a disposition under
Sec. 1.901(m)-1T(a)(10) because it did not result in gain or loss
being recognized with respect to Asset for U.S. or Country A tax
purposes. Accordingly, no basis difference with respect to Asset is
taken into account under Sec. 1.901(m)-5T as a result of the Deemed
Liquidation, and the unallocated basis difference with respect to
Asset immediately after the Deemed Liquidation is 200u (200u-0u).
Under paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the Deemed Liquidation is a
successor transaction because there is a transfer of Asset for U.S.
income tax purposes from FT to CFC and Asset has unallocated basis
difference with respect to the Acquisition immediately after the
Deemed Liquidation. Accordingly, under paragraph (b)(1) of this
section, section 901(m) will continue to apply to the unallocated
basis difference with respect to Asset until the entire 200u basis
difference has been taken into account under Sec. 1.901(m)-5T.
(c) Successor rules for aggregate basis difference carryover
[Reserved].
(d) Effective/applicability date. (1) Paragraphs (a), (b)(1),
(b)(2), (b)(4)(i), (b)(4)(iii), and (b)(5) of this section apply to
CAAs occurring on or after July 21, 2014, and to CAAs occurring before
that date resulting from an entity classification election made under
Sec. 301.7701-3 of this chapter that is filed on or after July 29,
2014, and that is effective on or before July 21, 2014. Paragraphs (a),
(b)(1), (b)(2), (b)(4)(i), (b)(4)(iii), and (b)(5) of this section also
apply to CAAs occurring on or after January 1, 2011, and before July
21, 2014, other than CAAs occurring before July 21, 2014, resulting
from an entity classification election made under Sec. 301.7701-3 that
is filed on or after July 29, 2014, and that is effective on or before
July 21, 2014, but only with respect to basis difference determined
under Sec. 1.901(m)-4T(e) with respect to the CAA.
(2)-(3) [Reserved]
(e) Expiration date. The applicability of this section expires on
December 6, 2019.
0
Par. 8. Sections 1.901(m)-7T and 1.901(m)-8T are added and reserved to
read as follows:
Sec. 1.901(m)-7T De minimis rules. [Reserved].
Sec. 1.901(m)-8T Miscellaneous. [Reserved].
John Dalrymple,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
Approved: November 4, 2016.
Mark J. Mazur,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 2016-28755 Filed 12-6-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P