Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Tri-State Fuel Breaks Project, Owyhee County, ID, and Malheur County, OR, 87954-87956 [2016-29202]
Download as PDF
87954
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 6, 2016 / Notices
Sea otter population biology at Big Sur
and Monterey California: investigating
the consequences of resource abundance
and anthropogenic stressors for sea otter
recovery. Draft Final Report to California
Coastal Conservancy and U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service. University of
California, Santa Cruz, 243 pp.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2003. Final
Revised Recovery Plan for the Southern
Sea Otter (Enhydra lutris nereis).
Portland, Oregon, xi + 165 pp.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2015.
Southern Sea Otter (Enhydra lutris
nereis) 5-Year Review: Summary and
Evaluation. Ventura, California. 42 pp.
Valentine, K., D.A. Duffield, L.E. Patrick, D.R.
Hatch, V.L. Butler, R.L. Hall, and N.
Lehman. 2008. Ancient DNA reveals
genotypic relationships among Oregon
populations of the sea otter (Enhydra
lutris). Conservation Genetics 9:933–938.
Vezie, C., J. Rapala, J. Vaitomaa, J. Seitsonen,
and K. Sivonen. 2002. Effect of nitrogen
and phosphorus on growth of toxic and
nontoxic Microcystis strains and on
intracellular microcystin concentrations.
Microbial Ecology 43:443–454.
Walther, G.-R, E. Post, P. Convey, A. Menzel,
C. Parmesank, T.J.C. Beebee, J.-M.
Fromentin, O. Hoegh-Guldberg, and F.
Bairlein. 2002. Ecological responses to
recent climate change. Nature 416:389–
395.
Wendell, F.E., R.A. Hardy, and J.A. Ames.
1986. An assessment of the accidental
take of sea otters, Enhydra lutris, in gill
and trammel nets. California Department
of Fish and Game, Mar. Res. Tech. Rep.
No. 54, 31 pp.
Wilson, D.E., M.A. Bogan, R.L. Brownell, Jr.,
A.M. Burdin, and M.K. Maminov. 1991.
Geographic variation in sea otters,
Enhydra lutris. Journal of Mammalogy
72:22–36.
Authority: The authority for this action is
the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972,
as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et al.).
Dated: November 23, 2016.
James W. Kurth,
Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–29190 Filed 12–5–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
[15XL LLIDB03000 LF3100000 DD0000
LFHFFR650000 241A 4500078680]
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Proposed Tri-State Fuel Breaks
Project, Owyhee County, ID, and
Malheur County, OR
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In compliance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:39 Dec 05, 2016
Jkt 241001
1969, as amended (NEPA), the Federal
Land Policy and Management Act of
1976, as amended, and the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as
amended (NHPA), the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) Boise District
Office, Boise, Idaho, and the Vale
District Office, Vale, Oregon, will
prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) for a landscape level
fuel break project located in Owyhee
County, Idaho, and Malheur County,
Oregon.
This notice initiates the public
scoping process for the EIS. Comments
on issues may be submitted in writing
until January 5, 2017. Any scoping
meetings will be announced at least 15
days in advance through local media,
and online at www.blm.gov/id and at
www.blm.gov/or. To be most helpful in
the preparation of the Draft EIS,
comments must be postmarked, faxed,
or submitted electronically by the close
of the 30-day scoping period or 15 days
after the last public meeting, whichever
is later. The BLM will provide
additional opportunities for public
involvement upon publication of the
Draft EIS.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments related to
the Tri-state Fuel Breaks Project by any
of the following methods:
• Email: blm_id_tristate@blm.gov
• Fax: 208–384–3489
• Mail: 3948 South Development
Ave., Boise, ID 83705
Documents pertinent to this proposal
may be examined at the BLM Boise
District Office located at the above
address and the BLM Vale District
Office, 100 Oregon Street, Vale, OR
97918.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lance Okeson, Project Lead, Fuels
Assistant Fire Management Officer;
telephone: 208–384–3300; address: 3948
South Development Ave., Boise, ID
83705; email: blm_id_tristate@blm.gov.
Contact Mr. Okeson to add your name
to our mailing list. Persons using a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS) at (800) 877–8339. The
FIRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days
a week, to leave a message or question
for Mr. Okeson. You will receive a reply
during normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Southwest
Idaho, southeast Oregon, and northern
Nevada (the Tri-state area) comprise one
of the largest intact areas of Greater
Sage-grouse (GRSG) habitat in the
Northern Great Basin. The shrub-steppe
ecosystem within this area is also one of
the most imperiled ecosystems in the
United States. The U.S. Fish and
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Wildlife Service identified the Northern
Great Basin as a Priority Area for
Conservation (PAC) in its 2013
Conservation Objectives Team Report
due to the threat of wildfire, invasive
annual grasses, and conifer expansion.
Management of wildfire has been
identified as one of the key issues for
maintaining sage-grouse populations in
sagebrush-dominated landscapes.
Secretarial Order 3336 calls for ‘‘. . . an
increased focus to suppressing wildfire
in highly valuable portions of sagebrush
steppe ecosystem to reduce the loss of
critically important greater sage-grouse
habitat . . . .’’ The 2010 Rapid Ecoregional Assessment of the Northern
Basin and Range and Snake River Plain
identified the Tri-state area as being at
high risk for large-scale wildfires.
Wildfires in this remote area can grow
quickly and affect hundreds of
thousands of acres of sage-grouse habitat
within a matter of days. The 2012 Long
Draw Fire (558,198 acres), the 2014
Buzzard Complex Fire (395,747 acres),
and the 2015 Soda Fire (285,360 acres),
all in or near the project area, each had
multiple hundred thousand-acre runs in
a single burning period, at rates of
spread between 10 and 15 miles per
hour.
Tri-State Strategy
The Tri-state Strategy is being
developed as an integrated approach to
protecting valuable, intact sage-grouse
habitat from the threat of wildfire in the
Tri-state area. There are several
components to the strategy:
Coordinating wildfire suppression per
the Idaho-Oregon-Nevada Tri-state Local
Operating Plan; applying existing and
future travel management planning
decisions for road access and
maintenance, which are essential for fire
suppression operations; applying
national and local wildfire suppression
policies and directives that prioritize
protection of important habitats;
assessing strategic pre-positioning
locations of suppression resources,
necessary infrastructure additions and
funding sources needed to shorten
response times; and implementing the
Tri-state Fuel Breaks Project, which is
the subject of this notice.
Purpose and Need
The Tri-state area provides important
sage-grouse habitat. There is a high
potential for large wildfires in the Tristate area due to its remoteness,
continuous fuels (i.e., intact sagebrush
and understory), and limited sites for
firefighters to establish safe anchor
points (i.e., secure locations for
firefighters to engage a fire without the
chance of being outflanked by the fire).
E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM
06DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 6, 2016 / Notices
Therefore, strategic measures must be
taken to protect habitat in this area.
Lightning-caused wildfires in the Tristate area generally involve multiple,
simultaneous ignitions, which exhaust
fire suppression resources quickly.
Constructing fuel breaks—gaps in
combustible material (i.e., vegetation)
that slow or stop progress of a wildfire—
by manipulating vegetation strategically
along roads is a proactive measure to
protect this important area for species’
habitat. Strategically placed fuel breaks
across district and State boundaries
enhance fire suppression efforts by
providing tactical and logistical
opportunities, compartmentalizing areas
between fuel breaks to constrain
wildfires into more manageable units,
and minimizing fire spread. Fuel breaks
provide fire suppression resources with
opportunities to safely engage wildfires
and to be more effective across a larger
area with fewer resources.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Goals of the Tri-State Fuel Breaks
Project
• Develop, maintain, and utilize fuel
breaks to conserve and protect sagegrouse and sagebrush-obligate species’
habitat across southwest Idaho and
southeast Oregon, and to integrate with
similar, existing fuel breaks in northern
Nevada;
• Compartmentalize areas between
fuel breaks to help contain large
wildfires across the Tri-state landscape
and district boundaries;
• Provide optimal anchor points for
firefighters to safely engage wildfires;
• Reduce the risk of sagebrush
community conversion to annual
grasslands from repeated wildfire;
• Reduce spread of invasive plant
species along fuel break/transportation
corridors; and
• Coordinate with current and
ongoing travel management planning
and implementation to ensure fire
personnel have access to fuel breaks.
Proposed Action
The BLM Boise and Vale Districts
propose to create a strategic system of
fuel breaks spanning State and BLM
District boundaries by manipulating
vegetation adjacent to existing roads.
Proposed fuel break design
considerations for this draft EIS will
include:
• Reduction of highly combustible
vegetation such as invasive annual
grasses through chemical and/or
mechanical treatments;
• Seeding areas with native and/or
non-native plant species that retain a
higher moisture content into the dry
periods of the year or are naturally less
combustible;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:39 Dec 05, 2016
Jkt 241001
• Mechanical treatments that reduce
the height of existing vegetation to slow
fire growth and reduce flame length; or
• A combination of all the above.
Fuel breaks would be developed in a
3.6 million-acre project area within the
BLM Vale and Boise Districts and would
tie in with an existing fuel break
network in the BLM Elko and
Winnemucca Districts in Nevada. The
BLM identified approximately 1,600
miles of primary roads during
preliminary reconnaissance that may be
suitable for fuel break development.
Fuel breaks would be established
adjacent to existing roads only, focusing
on main/primary travel routes. These
routes would be maintained to the full
extent consistent with and under the
authority of current approved road
maintenance prescriptions and, when
completed, travel management
decisions would ensure suppression
resources have access to fuel breaks in
a timely manner. The proposed fuel
break system would reduce fuel loads
adjacent to these roads through
mechanical and/or chemical treatments.
Fuel breaks would be maintained over
the long term on a set schedule
(depending on the types of treatments
employed and fuel break condition
monitoring) to ensure their continued
effectiveness and to minimize the
potential for invasive species
proliferation.
The BLM has completed a
conformance review of the proposed
project, and all actions considered in
the alternatives in the draft EIS will be
in conformance with the RMPs for the
Owyhee Field Office and public lands
in the project area in southeastern
Oregon, as amended by the 2015 Greater
Sage-Grouse Approved RMP
Amendments for Idaho and Oregon.
Coordination with other Federal,
tribal, and non-Federal land owners
would occur to facilitate opportunities
to meet project objectives across all
ownerships within the landscape.
Preliminary Issues and Scoping
The purpose of the public scoping
process is to determine relevant issues
that would influence the scope of the
environmental analysis, including
alternatives, and guide the process for
developing the draft EIS. At present, the
BLM has identified the following
preliminary issues:
• What is the potential to reduce
further loss of sage-grouse and other
sagebrush-obligate species’ habitat and
increase species’ persistence through
implementation of the proposed fuel
break system?
• What is the potential for the
proposed action to effectively reduce
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
87955
the size of wildfires and reduce the rate
of spread of fires once ignited?
• What construction of new locations
or modifications to existing locations for
pre-positioning suppression resources
would be required to shorten distances
and/or response times to ignitions?
• What is the potential for the spread
of noxious weeds and invasive plants
(i.e., cheatgrass)?
• What is the potential to affect
wildlife habitat connectivity and how
would the proposed action affect animal
migration routes and prey-predator
interactions?
• How would the proposed action
affect habitat for the GRSG, migratory
birds, and pygmy rabbits?
• What would the effects of the
proposed action be to wilderness,
wilderness study areas, and lands with
wilderness characteristics?
• How would the proposed action
affect exposure of and accessibility to
cultural sites and areas of cultural
importance?
• What is the potential for the
proposed action to affect watersheds
(e.g., hydrologic function)?
Mitigation measures and project
design features would be used to
minimize impacts to sage-grouse
habitat, migratory birds, pygmy rabbits,
wilderness characteristics, cultural sites,
and watersheds and to limit
introduction and spread of invasive and
noxious vegetation. Mitigation measures
and design features would primarily
include avoidance buffers and timing
restrictions during implementation and
avoidance buffers for fuel break
placement; these will be described and
analyzed in detail in the draft EIS.
The BLM will consult with tribes on
a government-to-government basis in
accordance with Executive Order 13175
and other policies. Tribal concerns,
including impacts on Indian trust assets
and potential impacts to cultural
resources and areas of cultural
importance, will be given due
consideration.
The BLM invites and encourages
public participation through the NEPA
process to satisfy requirements under
Section 106 of the NHPA (16 U.S.C.
470(f)) pursuant to 36 CFR 800.2(d)(3).
Historic and cultural resources
information related to the area
potentially affected by the proposed
project will assist the BLM in
identifying and evaluating impacts to
these resources in the context of both
NEPA and Section 106 of the NHPA.
Federal, State, and local agencies,
along with other stakeholders interested
in or affected by the proposed project
that the BLM is evaluating are invited to
participate in the scoping process.
E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM
06DEN1
87956
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 6, 2016 / Notices
Eligible agencies may request or be
requested by the BLM to participate in
the development of the environmental
analysis as a cooperating agency.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7.
Lara Douglas,
BLM Boise District Manager.
Donald N. Gonzalez,
BLM Vale District Manager.
[FR Doc. 2016–29202 Filed 12–5–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–GG–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
[S1D1S SS08011000 SX066A0067F
178S180110; S2D2D SS08011000 SX066A00
33F 17XS501520]
Notice of Proposed Information
Collection; Request for Comments for
1029–0113
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement (OSMRE) is
announcing that the information
collection request for General
Reclamation Requirements, has been
forwarded to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval. The information collection
request describes the nature of the
information collection and its expected
burden and cost.
DATES: OMB has up to 60 days to
approve or disapprove the information
collection but may respond after 30
days. Therefore, public comments
should be submitted to OMB by January
5, 2017, in order to be assured of
consideration.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
Submit comments to the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Attention: Department of the
Interior Desk Officer, by telefax at (202)
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:39 Dec 05, 2016
Jkt 241001
395–5806 or via email to OIRA_
submission@omb.eop.gov. Also, please
send a copy of your comments to John
Trelease, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, 1951
Constitution Ave. NW., Room 203–SIB,
Washington, DC 20240, or electronically
to jtrelease@osmre.gov. Please refer to
OMB control number 1029–0113 in your
correspondence.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
receive a copy of the information
collection request contact John Trelease
at (202) 208–2783 or via email at
jtrelease@osmre.gov. You may also
review the information collection
request online at https://
www.reginfo.gov. Follow the
instructions to review Department of the
Interior collections under review by
OMB.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OMB
regulations at 5 CFR 1320, which
implement provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13),
require that interested members of the
public and affected agencies have an
opportunity to comment on information
collection and recordkeeping activities
[see 5 CFR 1320.8(d)]. OSMRE has
submitted a request to OMB to renew its
approval for the collection of
information found at 30 CFR part 874.
OSMRE is requesting a 3-year term of
approval for these information
collection activities.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. The OMB control
number for this collection of
information is 1029–0113, and may be
found in OSMRE’s regulations at 874.10.
Responses are required to obtain a
benefit.
As required under 5 CFR 1320.8(d), a
Federal Register notice soliciting
comments on the collection of
information for Part 874 was published
on August 31, 2016 (81 FR 60021). No
comments were received from that
notice. This notice provides the public
with an additional 30 days in which to
comment on the following information
collection activity:
Title: 30 CFR part 874—General
Reclamation Requirements.
OMB Control Number: 1029–0113.
Summary: Part 874 establishes land
and water eligibility requirements,
reclamation objectives and priorities
and reclamation contractor
responsibility. The regulations at 30
CFR 874.17 require consultation
between the Abandoned Mine Land
(AML) agency and the appropriate Title
V regulatory authority on the likelihood
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of removing the coal under a Title V
permit and concurrences between the
AML agency and the appropriate Title V
regulatory authority on the AML project
boundary and the amount of coal that
would be extracted under the AML
reclamation project.
Bureau Form Number: None.
Frequency of Collection: Once.
Description of Respondents: 8 State
regulatory authorities and Indian Tribes.
Total Annual Responses: 8.
Total Annual Burden Hours: 664.
Send comments on the need for the
collection of information for the
performance of the functions of the
agency; the accuracy of the agency’s
burden estimates; ways to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the
information collection; and ways to
minimize the information collection
burdens on respondents, such as use of
automated means of collections of the
information, to the addresses listed
under ADDRESSES. Please refer to OMB
control number 1029–0113 in all
correspondence.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: December 1, 2016.
John A. Trelease,
Acting Chief, Division of Regulatory Support.
[FR Doc. 2016–29178 Filed 12–5–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1121–0312]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed eCollection
eComments Requested; Revision of a
Currently Approved Collection: 2014–
2016 Survey of State Criminal History
Information Systems
Bureau of Justice Statistics,
Department of Justice.
ACTION: 30-day notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Justice
(DOJ), Office of Justice Programs,
Bureau of Justice Statistics, will be
submitting the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM
06DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 6, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 87954-87956]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-29202]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[15XL LLIDB03000 LF3100000 DD0000 LFHFFR650000 241A 4500078680]
Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for
the Proposed Tri-State Fuel Breaks Project, Owyhee County, ID, and
Malheur County, OR
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended (NEPA), the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of
1976, as amended, and the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966,
as amended (NHPA), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Boise District
Office, Boise, Idaho, and the Vale District Office, Vale, Oregon, will
prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for a landscape level
fuel break project located in Owyhee County, Idaho, and Malheur County,
Oregon.
DATES: This notice initiates the public scoping process for the EIS.
Comments on issues may be submitted in writing until January 5, 2017.
Any scoping meetings will be announced at least 15 days in advance
through local media, and online at www.blm.gov/id and at www.blm.gov/or. To be most helpful in the preparation of the Draft EIS, comments
must be postmarked, faxed, or submitted electronically by the close of
the 30-day scoping period or 15 days after the last public meeting,
whichever is later. The BLM will provide additional opportunities for
public involvement upon publication of the Draft EIS.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments related to the Tri-state Fuel Breaks Project
by any of the following methods:
Email: blm_id_tristate@blm.gov
Fax: 208-384-3489
Mail: 3948 South Development Ave., Boise, ID 83705
Documents pertinent to this proposal may be examined at the BLM Boise
District Office located at the above address and the BLM Vale District
Office, 100 Oregon Street, Vale, OR 97918.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lance Okeson, Project Lead, Fuels
Assistant Fire Management Officer; telephone: 208-384-3300; address:
3948 South Development Ave., Boise, ID 83705; email:
blm_id_tristate@blm.gov. Contact Mr. Okeson to add your name to our
mailing list. Persons using a telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at (800) 877-8339. The
FIRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or
question for Mr. Okeson. You will receive a reply during normal
business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Southwest Idaho, southeast Oregon, and
northern Nevada (the Tri-state area) comprise one of the largest intact
areas of Greater Sage-grouse (GRSG) habitat in the Northern Great
Basin. The shrub-steppe ecosystem within this area is also one of the
most imperiled ecosystems in the United States. The U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service identified the Northern Great Basin as a Priority Area
for Conservation (PAC) in its 2013 Conservation Objectives Team Report
due to the threat of wildfire, invasive annual grasses, and conifer
expansion. Management of wildfire has been identified as one of the key
issues for maintaining sage-grouse populations in sagebrush-dominated
landscapes. Secretarial Order 3336 calls for ``. . . an increased focus
to suppressing wildfire in highly valuable portions of sagebrush steppe
ecosystem to reduce the loss of critically important greater sage-
grouse habitat . . . .'' The 2010 Rapid Eco-regional Assessment of the
Northern Basin and Range and Snake River Plain identified the Tri-state
area as being at high risk for large-scale wildfires.
Wildfires in this remote area can grow quickly and affect hundreds
of thousands of acres of sage-grouse habitat within a matter of days.
The 2012 Long Draw Fire (558,198 acres), the 2014 Buzzard Complex Fire
(395,747 acres), and the 2015 Soda Fire (285,360 acres), all in or near
the project area, each had multiple hundred thousand-acre runs in a
single burning period, at rates of spread between 10 and 15 miles per
hour.
Tri-State Strategy
The Tri-state Strategy is being developed as an integrated approach
to protecting valuable, intact sage-grouse habitat from the threat of
wildfire in the Tri-state area. There are several components to the
strategy: Coordinating wildfire suppression per the Idaho-Oregon-Nevada
Tri-state Local Operating Plan; applying existing and future travel
management planning decisions for road access and maintenance, which
are essential for fire suppression operations; applying national and
local wildfire suppression policies and directives that prioritize
protection of important habitats; assessing strategic pre-positioning
locations of suppression resources, necessary infrastructure additions
and funding sources needed to shorten response times; and implementing
the Tri-state Fuel Breaks Project, which is the subject of this notice.
Purpose and Need
The Tri-state area provides important sage-grouse habitat. There is
a high potential for large wildfires in the Tri-state area due to its
remoteness, continuous fuels (i.e., intact sagebrush and understory),
and limited sites for firefighters to establish safe anchor points
(i.e., secure locations for firefighters to engage a fire without the
chance of being outflanked by the fire).
[[Page 87955]]
Therefore, strategic measures must be taken to protect habitat in this
area.
Lightning-caused wildfires in the Tri-state area generally involve
multiple, simultaneous ignitions, which exhaust fire suppression
resources quickly. Constructing fuel breaks--gaps in combustible
material (i.e., vegetation) that slow or stop progress of a wildfire--
by manipulating vegetation strategically along roads is a proactive
measure to protect this important area for species' habitat.
Strategically placed fuel breaks across district and State boundaries
enhance fire suppression efforts by providing tactical and logistical
opportunities, compartmentalizing areas between fuel breaks to
constrain wildfires into more manageable units, and minimizing fire
spread. Fuel breaks provide fire suppression resources with
opportunities to safely engage wildfires and to be more effective
across a larger area with fewer resources.
Goals of the Tri-State Fuel Breaks Project
Develop, maintain, and utilize fuel breaks to conserve and
protect sage-grouse and sagebrush-obligate species' habitat across
southwest Idaho and southeast Oregon, and to integrate with similar,
existing fuel breaks in northern Nevada;
Compartmentalize areas between fuel breaks to help contain
large wildfires across the Tri-state landscape and district boundaries;
Provide optimal anchor points for firefighters to safely
engage wildfires;
Reduce the risk of sagebrush community conversion to
annual grasslands from repeated wildfire;
Reduce spread of invasive plant species along fuel break/
transportation corridors; and
Coordinate with current and ongoing travel management
planning and implementation to ensure fire personnel have access to
fuel breaks.
Proposed Action
The BLM Boise and Vale Districts propose to create a strategic
system of fuel breaks spanning State and BLM District boundaries by
manipulating vegetation adjacent to existing roads. Proposed fuel break
design considerations for this draft EIS will include:
Reduction of highly combustible vegetation such as
invasive annual grasses through chemical and/or mechanical treatments;
Seeding areas with native and/or non-native plant species
that retain a higher moisture content into the dry periods of the year
or are naturally less combustible;
Mechanical treatments that reduce the height of existing
vegetation to slow fire growth and reduce flame length; or
A combination of all the above.
Fuel breaks would be developed in a 3.6 million-acre project area
within the BLM Vale and Boise Districts and would tie in with an
existing fuel break network in the BLM Elko and Winnemucca Districts in
Nevada. The BLM identified approximately 1,600 miles of primary roads
during preliminary reconnaissance that may be suitable for fuel break
development.
Fuel breaks would be established adjacent to existing roads only,
focusing on main/primary travel routes. These routes would be
maintained to the full extent consistent with and under the authority
of current approved road maintenance prescriptions and, when completed,
travel management decisions would ensure suppression resources have
access to fuel breaks in a timely manner. The proposed fuel break
system would reduce fuel loads adjacent to these roads through
mechanical and/or chemical treatments. Fuel breaks would be maintained
over the long term on a set schedule (depending on the types of
treatments employed and fuel break condition monitoring) to ensure
their continued effectiveness and to minimize the potential for
invasive species proliferation.
The BLM has completed a conformance review of the proposed project,
and all actions considered in the alternatives in the draft EIS will be
in conformance with the RMPs for the Owyhee Field Office and public
lands in the project area in southeastern Oregon, as amended by the
2015 Greater Sage-Grouse Approved RMP Amendments for Idaho and Oregon.
Coordination with other Federal, tribal, and non-Federal land
owners would occur to facilitate opportunities to meet project
objectives across all ownerships within the landscape.
Preliminary Issues and Scoping
The purpose of the public scoping process is to determine relevant
issues that would influence the scope of the environmental analysis,
including alternatives, and guide the process for developing the draft
EIS. At present, the BLM has identified the following preliminary
issues:
What is the potential to reduce further loss of sage-
grouse and other sagebrush-obligate species' habitat and increase
species' persistence through implementation of the proposed fuel break
system?
What is the potential for the proposed action to
effectively reduce the size of wildfires and reduce the rate of spread
of fires once ignited?
What construction of new locations or modifications to
existing locations for pre-positioning suppression resources would be
required to shorten distances and/or response times to ignitions?
What is the potential for the spread of noxious weeds and
invasive plants (i.e., cheatgrass)?
What is the potential to affect wildlife habitat
connectivity and how would the proposed action affect animal migration
routes and prey-predator interactions?
How would the proposed action affect habitat for the GRSG,
migratory birds, and pygmy rabbits?
What would the effects of the proposed action be to
wilderness, wilderness study areas, and lands with wilderness
characteristics?
How would the proposed action affect exposure of and
accessibility to cultural sites and areas of cultural importance?
What is the potential for the proposed action to affect
watersheds (e.g., hydrologic function)?
Mitigation measures and project design features would be used to
minimize impacts to sage-grouse habitat, migratory birds, pygmy
rabbits, wilderness characteristics, cultural sites, and watersheds and
to limit introduction and spread of invasive and noxious vegetation.
Mitigation measures and design features would primarily include
avoidance buffers and timing restrictions during implementation and
avoidance buffers for fuel break placement; these will be described and
analyzed in detail in the draft EIS.
The BLM will consult with tribes on a government-to-government
basis in accordance with Executive Order 13175 and other policies.
Tribal concerns, including impacts on Indian trust assets and potential
impacts to cultural resources and areas of cultural importance, will be
given due consideration.
The BLM invites and encourages public participation through the
NEPA process to satisfy requirements under Section 106 of the NHPA (16
U.S.C. 470(f)) pursuant to 36 CFR 800.2(d)(3). Historic and cultural
resources information related to the area potentially affected by the
proposed project will assist the BLM in identifying and evaluating
impacts to these resources in the context of both NEPA and Section 106
of the NHPA.
Federal, State, and local agencies, along with other stakeholders
interested in or affected by the proposed project that the BLM is
evaluating are invited to participate in the scoping process.
[[Page 87956]]
Eligible agencies may request or be requested by the BLM to participate
in the development of the environmental analysis as a cooperating
agency.
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7.
Lara Douglas,
BLM Boise District Manager.
Donald N. Gonzalez,
BLM Vale District Manager.
[FR Doc. 2016-29202 Filed 12-5-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P