Environmental Impact Statement for Cumberland Fossil Plant Coal Combustion Residual Management, 87648-87649 [2016-29082]
Download as PDF
87648
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 233 / Monday, December 5, 2016 / Notices
2. The proceedings in Docket No. EP
724 and Docket No. EP 724 (Sub-No. 3)
will be discontinued as described above,
effective February 2, 2017.
3. Notice of the Board’s action will be
published in the Federal Register.
Decided: November 29, 2016.
By the Board, Chairman Elliott, Vice
Chairman Miller, and Commissioner
Begeman.
Kenyatta Clay,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2016–29132 Filed 12–2–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Environmental Impact Statement for
Cumberland Fossil Plant Coal
Combustion Residual Management
Tennessee Valley Authority.
Notice of intent.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Tennessee Valley
Authority (TVA) intends to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
to address the potential environmental
effects associated with management of
coal combustion residual (CCR) material
produced at the Cumberland Fossil
Plant (CUF) located near Cumberland
City, Stewart County, Tennessee. The
purpose of the proposed EIS is to
address long-term management of CCR
produced at CUF. The project will help
TVA comply with state and federal
regulatory requirements related to CCR
production and management, including
the requirements of U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA’s) CCR Rule
and Effluent Limitations Guidelines.
TVA will evaluate the potential
environmental impacts of construction
and operation of a new bottom ash
dewatering facility and options for
management and disposal of dry CCR
produced at CUF. TVA will also
evaluate closure of the Bottom Ash and
the Main Ash Impoundments. TVA will
develop and evaluate various
alternatives to these actions, including
the No Action Alternative. Public
comments are invited concerning both
the scope of the review and
environmental issues that should be
addressed.
SUMMARY:
Comments on the scope of the
EIS must be received on or before
January 6, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be sent to Ashley Pilakowski, NEPA
Compliance Specialist, 400 West
Summit Hill Dr., WT 11D, Knoxville,
TN 37902–1499. Comments also may be
submitted online at: www.tva.gov/nepa.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:12 Dec 02, 2016
Jkt 241001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Other related questions should be sent
to Ashley A. Pilakowski, NEPA
Compliance Specialist, Tennessee
Valley Authority, at 865–632–2256 or
aapilakowski@tva.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice is provided in accordance with
the regulations promulgated by the
Council on Environmental Quality (40
CFR parts 1500 to 1508) and TVA’s
procedures implementing the National
Environmental Policy Act (https://
www.tva.com/environment/reports/pdf/
tvanepa_procedures.pdf.)
TVA Power System and CCR
Management
TVA is a corporate agency and
instrumentality of the United States
created by and existing pursuant to the
TVA Act of 1933 that provides
electricity for business customers and
local power distributors. TVA serves
more than 9 million people in parts of
seven southeastern states. TVA receives
no taxpayer funding, deriving virtually
all of its revenues from sales of
electricity. In addition to operating and
investing its revenues in its electric
system, TVA provides flood control,
navigation and land management for the
Tennessee River system and assists local
power companies and state and local
governments with economic
development and job creation.
Historically, TVA has managed its
CCRs in wet impoundments or dry
landfills. Currently, CUF consumes an
average of 5.6 million tons of coal per
year, generates approximately 16 billion
kilowatt-hours of electricity a year
(enough to supply 1.1 million homes),
and produces approximately 1.3 million
tons of CCR a year which are managed
in an existing fly ash stack, gypsum ash
stack, Bottom Ash Impoundment and
Main Ash Impoundment. CUF sells
approximately 75% of the CCRs
produced (725,000 tons gypsum and
275,000 tons of fly ash) annually for
beneficial reuse as raw manufacturing
material.
In July 2009, the TVA Board of
Directors passed a resolution for staff to
review TVA practices for storing CCRs
at its generating facilities, including
CUF, which resulted in a
recommendation to convert the wet ash
management system at CUF to a dry
storage system. On April 17, 2015, the
EPA published the final Disposal of
CCRs from Electric Utilities rule, also
known as the CCR Rule.
In June 2016, TVA issued a Final
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement (PEIS) that analyzed methods
for closing CCR impoundments TVA
fossil plants and identified specific
PO 00000
Frm 00119
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
screening and evaluation factors to help
frame its evaluation of closures at its
other facilities. A Record of Decision
was released in July 2016 that would
allow future environmental reviews of
qualifying CCR impoundment closures
to tier from the PEIS.
This EIS is intended to tier from the
2016 PEIS to evaluate the closure
alternatives for the existing CCR Bottom
Ash Impoundment and Main Ash
Impoundment. The EIS will also
evaluate construction and operation of a
new bottom ash dewatering facility and
management of dry CCR in a new lined
CCR landfill meeting Tennessee
Department of Environment and
Conservation criteria. This project
supports TVA’s Board of Directors July
2009 resolution and subsequent
recommendation to convert the wet ash
management system at CUF to dry
storage.
Alternatives
In addition to a No Action
Alternative, this EIS will address
alternatives that have reasonable
prospects of providing a solution to the
management and disposal of CCRs
generated at CUF. TVA has determined
that either the construction of a new onsite landfill or hauling CCR to an
existing offsite permitted landfill are the
most reasonable alternatives to address
the need for dry CCR disposal. A new
dewatering facility would dry bottom
ash prior to disposal. TVA will consider
closure alternatives for the Bottom Ash
Impoundment and the Main Ash
Impoundment in accordance with and
consistent with TVA’s PEIS and EPA’s
CCR Rule.
No decision has been made about CCR
management at CUF beyond the current
operations. TVA is preparing this EIS to
inform decision makers, other agencies
and the public about the potential for
environmental impacts associated with
the long-term management of CCR
generated at CUF.
Proposed Resources and Issues To Be
Considered
This EIS will identify the purpose and
need of the project and will contain
descriptions of the existing
environmental and socioeconomic
resources within the area that could be
affected by management of CCR at CUF.
Evaluation of potential environmental
impacts to these resources will include,
but not be limited to, water quality,
aquatic and terrestrial ecology,
threatened and endangered species,
wetlands, land use, historic and
archaeological resources, as well as
solid and hazardous waste, safety,
socioeconomic and environmental
E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM
05DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 233 / Monday, December 5, 2016 / Notices
justice issues. The final range of issues
to be addressed in the environmental
review will be determined, in part, from
scoping comments received. The
preliminary identification of reasonable
alternatives and environmental issues in
this notice is not meant to be exhaustive
or final.
Public Participation
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Dated: November 28, 2016.
M. Susan Smelley,
Director, Environmental Permitting and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016–29082 Filed 12–2–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8120–08–P
19:12 Dec 02, 2016
Federal Railroad Administration
[Safety Advisory 2016–03]
Mitigation and Investigation of
Passenger Rail Human Factor Related
Accidents and Operations in Terminals
and Stations With Stub End Tracks
Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA), U.S. Department
of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of Safety Advisory.
AGENCY:
TVA is interested in an open process
and wants to hear from the community,
interested agencies and special interest
groups about the scope of resources and
issues they would like to be considered
in this EIS.
The public is invited to submit
comments on the scope of this EIS no
later than the date identified in the
DATES section of this notice. Federal,
state and local agencies such as the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Tennessee Department
of Environmental Conservation and the
Tennessee State Historic Preservation
Officer also are invited to provide
comments.
After consideration of comments
received during the scoping period,
TVA will develop and distribute a
document that will summarize public
and agency comments that were
received and identify the schedule for
completing the EIS process. Following
analysis of the issues, TVA will prepare
a draft EIS for public review and
comment. In making its final decision,
TVA will consider the analyses in this
EIS and substantive comments that it
receives. A final decision on proceeding
with construction and operation of a
bottom ash dewatering facility,
management and final disposal of CCR
and closure of the Bottom Ash
Impoundment and Main Ash
Impoundment will depend on a number
of factors. These include results of the
EIS, requirements of the CCR Rule,
engineering and risk evaluations and
financial considerations.
TVA anticipates holding a community
meeting near the plant after releasing
the Draft EIS. Meeting details will be
posted on TVA’s Web site. TVA expects
to release the Draft EIS in summer of
2017.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Jkt 241001
FRA is issuing Safety
Advisory 2016–03 to stress to passenger
and commuter railroads the importance
of taking action to help mitigate human
factor accidents, assist in the
investigation of such accidents, and
enhance the safety of operations in
stations and terminals with stub end
tracks. This safety advisory contains
various recommendations to passenger
and commuter railroads related to
inward- and outward-facing cameras,
sleep apnea, and operating practices to
potentially mitigate the occurrence and
assist in the investigation of human
factor related accidents and to enhance
the safety of operations in terminals and
stations with stub end tracks.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christian Holt, Operating Practices
Specialist, Office of Railroad Safety,
FRA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, telephone (202)
493–0978.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. New Jersey Transit Incident
On September 29, 2016, at
approximately 8:38 a.m., New Jersey
Transit (NJT) Train 1614 travelling at 21
miles per hour (mph) impacted the
bumping block at the end of the track
No. 5 Depot, at Hoboken Terminal, in
Hoboken, New Jersey. The cab car
overrode the bumping block and struck
the wall of the terminal building, near
the ticket office in the corner of the
building. NJT Train 1614 was occupied
by three crew members and
approximately 331 passengers. The
accident resulted in the three
crewmembers and 108 passengers being
transported to four area hospitals. One
individual who was standing on the
pedestrian walkway between the tracks
and the station was fatally injured from
falling debris.
The National Transportation Safety
Board (NTSB) has taken the lead role in
conducting the investigation of this
accident under its legal authority. See
49 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.; 49 CFR 831.2(b).
As is customary, FRA is participating in
the NTSB’s investigation and also
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
87649
investigating the accident under its own
authority. NTSB has not issued its
formal findings. Although the NTSB has
not concluded its investigation of this
accident, FRA believes railroads should
take more robust action to address
human factors that may cause accidents
and to enhance protection of railroad
employees and the public.
II. Other Railroad Accidents
Amtrak Accident at Philadelphia, PA
On Tuesday, May 12, 2015, National
Railroad Passenger Corporation
(Amtrak) passenger train 188 (Train 188)
was traveling from Washington, DC, to
New York City. Aboard the train were
five crew members and approximately
238 passengers. Shortly after 9:20 p.m.,
the train derailed while traveling
through a curve in the track at Frankford
Junction in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
As a result of the accident, eight persons
were killed and a significant number of
persons were seriously injured.
NTSB conducted an investigation of
this accident under its legal authority
and issued its findings on May 17,
2016.1 As Train 188 approached the
curve from the west, it traveled over a
straightaway with a maximum
authorized passenger train speed of 80
mph. The maximum authorized
passenger train speed for the curve was
50 mph. NTSB determined the train was
traveling approximately 106 mph within
the curve’s 50-mph speed restriction,
exceeding the maximum authorized
speed on the straightaway by 26 mph,
and 56 mph over railroad’s maximum
authorized speed for the curve.2 NTSB
concluded the locomotive engineer
operating the train made an emergency
application of Train 188’s air brake
system, and the train slowed to
approximately 102 mph before derailing
in the curve.3 NTSB concluded that the
probable cause of the engineer
accelerating to this speed was due to his
loss of situational awareness likely
because his attention was diverted to an
emergency situation with another train.4
On July 8, 2015, NTSB sent a letter to
FRA reiterating NTSB recommendations
1 49 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.; 49 CFR 831.2(b); and
NTSB, Railroad Accident Report, RAR–16/02,
Derailment of Amtrak Passenger Train 188,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, May 12, 2015, https://
www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/
Reports/RAR1602.pdf.
2 RAR–16/02 at 1. FRA regulations provide, in
part, that it is unlawful to ‘‘[o]perate a train or
locomotive at a speed which exceeds the maximum
authorized limit by at least 10 miles per hour.’’ 49
CFR 240.305(a)(2).
3 RAR–16/02 at 4–5.
4 Id. at 44.
E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM
05DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 233 (Monday, December 5, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 87648-87649]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-29082]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Environmental Impact Statement for Cumberland Fossil Plant Coal
Combustion Residual Management
AGENCY: Tennessee Valley Authority.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) intends to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to address the potential
environmental effects associated with management of coal combustion
residual (CCR) material produced at the Cumberland Fossil Plant (CUF)
located near Cumberland City, Stewart County, Tennessee. The purpose of
the proposed EIS is to address long-term management of CCR produced at
CUF. The project will help TVA comply with state and federal regulatory
requirements related to CCR production and management, including the
requirements of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA's) CCR Rule
and Effluent Limitations Guidelines.
TVA will evaluate the potential environmental impacts of
construction and operation of a new bottom ash dewatering facility and
options for management and disposal of dry CCR produced at CUF. TVA
will also evaluate closure of the Bottom Ash and the Main Ash
Impoundments. TVA will develop and evaluate various alternatives to
these actions, including the No Action Alternative. Public comments are
invited concerning both the scope of the review and environmental
issues that should be addressed.
DATES: Comments on the scope of the EIS must be received on or before
January 6, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to Ashley Pilakowski, NEPA
Compliance Specialist, 400 West Summit Hill Dr., WT 11D, Knoxville, TN
37902-1499. Comments also may be submitted online at: www.tva.gov/nepa.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Other related questions should be sent
to Ashley A. Pilakowski, NEPA Compliance Specialist, Tennessee Valley
Authority, at 865-632-2256 or aapilakowski@tva.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is provided in accordance with
the regulations promulgated by the Council on Environmental Quality (40
CFR parts 1500 to 1508) and TVA's procedures implementing the National
Environmental Policy Act (https://www.tva.com/environment/reports/pdf/tvanepa_procedures.pdf.)
TVA Power System and CCR Management
TVA is a corporate agency and instrumentality of the United States
created by and existing pursuant to the TVA Act of 1933 that provides
electricity for business customers and local power distributors. TVA
serves more than 9 million people in parts of seven southeastern
states. TVA receives no taxpayer funding, deriving virtually all of its
revenues from sales of electricity. In addition to operating and
investing its revenues in its electric system, TVA provides flood
control, navigation and land management for the Tennessee River system
and assists local power companies and state and local governments with
economic development and job creation.
Historically, TVA has managed its CCRs in wet impoundments or dry
landfills. Currently, CUF consumes an average of 5.6 million tons of
coal per year, generates approximately 16 billion kilowatt-hours of
electricity a year (enough to supply 1.1 million homes), and produces
approximately 1.3 million tons of CCR a year which are managed in an
existing fly ash stack, gypsum ash stack, Bottom Ash Impoundment and
Main Ash Impoundment. CUF sells approximately 75% of the CCRs produced
(725,000 tons gypsum and 275,000 tons of fly ash) annually for
beneficial reuse as raw manufacturing material.
In July 2009, the TVA Board of Directors passed a resolution for
staff to review TVA practices for storing CCRs at its generating
facilities, including CUF, which resulted in a recommendation to
convert the wet ash management system at CUF to a dry storage system.
On April 17, 2015, the EPA published the final Disposal of CCRs from
Electric Utilities rule, also known as the CCR Rule.
In June 2016, TVA issued a Final Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement (PEIS) that analyzed methods for closing CCR impoundments TVA
fossil plants and identified specific screening and evaluation factors
to help frame its evaluation of closures at its other facilities. A
Record of Decision was released in July 2016 that would allow future
environmental reviews of qualifying CCR impoundment closures to tier
from the PEIS.
This EIS is intended to tier from the 2016 PEIS to evaluate the
closure alternatives for the existing CCR Bottom Ash Impoundment and
Main Ash Impoundment. The EIS will also evaluate construction and
operation of a new bottom ash dewatering facility and management of dry
CCR in a new lined CCR landfill meeting Tennessee Department of
Environment and Conservation criteria. This project supports TVA's
Board of Directors July 2009 resolution and subsequent recommendation
to convert the wet ash management system at CUF to dry storage.
Alternatives
In addition to a No Action Alternative, this EIS will address
alternatives that have reasonable prospects of providing a solution to
the management and disposal of CCRs generated at CUF. TVA has
determined that either the construction of a new on-site landfill or
hauling CCR to an existing offsite permitted landfill are the most
reasonable alternatives to address the need for dry CCR disposal. A new
dewatering facility would dry bottom ash prior to disposal. TVA will
consider closure alternatives for the Bottom Ash Impoundment and the
Main Ash Impoundment in accordance with and consistent with TVA's PEIS
and EPA's CCR Rule.
No decision has been made about CCR management at CUF beyond the
current operations. TVA is preparing this EIS to inform decision
makers, other agencies and the public about the potential for
environmental impacts associated with the long-term management of CCR
generated at CUF.
Proposed Resources and Issues To Be Considered
This EIS will identify the purpose and need of the project and will
contain descriptions of the existing environmental and socioeconomic
resources within the area that could be affected by management of CCR
at CUF. Evaluation of potential environmental impacts to these
resources will include, but not be limited to, water quality, aquatic
and terrestrial ecology, threatened and endangered species, wetlands,
land use, historic and archaeological resources, as well as solid and
hazardous waste, safety, socioeconomic and environmental
[[Page 87649]]
justice issues. The final range of issues to be addressed in the
environmental review will be determined, in part, from scoping comments
received. The preliminary identification of reasonable alternatives and
environmental issues in this notice is not meant to be exhaustive or
final.
Public Participation
TVA is interested in an open process and wants to hear from the
community, interested agencies and special interest groups about the
scope of resources and issues they would like to be considered in this
EIS.
The public is invited to submit comments on the scope of this EIS
no later than the date identified in the DATES section of this notice.
Federal, state and local agencies such as the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Tennessee Department of
Environmental Conservation and the Tennessee State Historic
Preservation Officer also are invited to provide comments.
After consideration of comments received during the scoping period,
TVA will develop and distribute a document that will summarize public
and agency comments that were received and identify the schedule for
completing the EIS process. Following analysis of the issues, TVA will
prepare a draft EIS for public review and comment. In making its final
decision, TVA will consider the analyses in this EIS and substantive
comments that it receives. A final decision on proceeding with
construction and operation of a bottom ash dewatering facility,
management and final disposal of CCR and closure of the Bottom Ash
Impoundment and Main Ash Impoundment will depend on a number of
factors. These include results of the EIS, requirements of the CCR
Rule, engineering and risk evaluations and financial considerations.
TVA anticipates holding a community meeting near the plant after
releasing the Draft EIS. Meeting details will be posted on TVA's Web
site. TVA expects to release the Draft EIS in summer of 2017.
Dated: November 28, 2016.
M. Susan Smelley,
Director, Environmental Permitting and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016-29082 Filed 12-2-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8120-08-P