Endangered and Threatened Species; Take of Anadromous Fish, 87548-87550 [2016-29068]
Download as PDF
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
87548
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 233 / Monday, December 5, 2016 / Notices
(6) Alloy forged and rolled steel CTL plate
over 407 mm in actual thickness and meeting
the following requirements:
(a) Made from Electric Arc Furnace melted,
Ladle refined & vacuum degassed, alloy steel
with the following chemical composition
(expressed in weight percentages):
• Carbon 0.23–0.28,
• Silicon 0.05–0.15,
• Manganese 1.20–1.50,
• Nickel not greater than 0.4,
• Sulfur not greater than 0.010,
• Phosphorus not greater than 0.020,
• Chromium 1.20–1.50,
• Molybdenum 0.35–0.55,
• Boron 0.002–0.004,
• Oxygen not greater than 20 ppm,
• Hydrogen not greater than 2 ppm, and
• Nitrogen not greater than 60 ppm;
(b) Having cleanliness in accordance with
ASTM E45 method A (Thin and Heavy): A
not exceeding 1.5, B not exceeding 1.5, C not
exceeding 1.0, D not exceeding 1.5;
(c) Having the following mechanical
properties:
(i) With a Brinell hardness not more than
237 HBW measured in all parts of the
product including mid thickness; and having
a Yield Strength of 75ksi min and UTS 95ksi
or more, Elongation of 18% or more and
Reduction of area 35% or more; having
charpy V at ¥75 degrees F in the
longitudinal direction equal or greater than
15 ft. lbs (single value) and equal or greater
than 20 ft. lbs (average of 3 specimens) and
conforming to the requirements of NACE
MR01–75; or
(ii) With a Brinell hardness not less than
240 HBW measured in all parts of the
product including mid thickness; and having
a Yield Strength of 90 ksi min and UTS 110
ksi or more, Elongation of 15% or more and
Reduction of area 30% or more; having
charpy V at ¥40 degrees F in the
longitudinal direction equal or greater than
21 ft. lbs (single value) and equal or greater
than 31 ft. lbs (average of 3 specimens);
(d) Conforming to ASTM A578–S9
ultrasonic testing requirements with
acceptance criteria 3.2 mm flat bottom hole;
and
(e) Conforming to magnetic particle
inspection in accordance with AMS 2301;
(7) Alloy forged and rolled steel CTL plate
over 407 mm in actual thickness and meeting
the following requirements:
(a) Made from Electric Arc Furnace melted,
ladle refined & vacuum degassed, alloy steel
with the following chemical composition
(expressed in weight percentages):
• Carbon 0.25–0.30,
• Silicon not greater than 0.25,
• Manganese not greater than 0.50,
• Nickel 3.0–3.5,
• Sulfur not greater than 0.010,
• Phosphorus not greater than 0.020,
• Chromium 1.0–1.5,
• Molybdenum 0.6–0.9,
• Vanadium 0.08 to 0.12
• Boron 0.002–0.004,
• Oxygen not greater than 20 ppm,
• Hydrogen not greater than 2 ppm, and
• Nitrogen not greater than 60 ppm.
(b) Having cleanliness in accordance with
ASTM E45 method A (Thin and Heavy): A
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:12 Dec 02, 2016
Jkt 241001
not exceeding 1.0(t) and 0.5(h), B not
exceeding 1.5(t) and 1.0(h), C not exceeding
1.0(t) and 0.5(h), and D not exceeding 1.5(t)
and 1.0(h);
(c) Having the following mechanical
properties: A Brinell hardness not less than
350 HBW measured in all parts of the
product including mid thickness; and having
a Yield Strength of 145ksi or more and UTS
160ksi or more, Elongation of 15% or more
and Reduction of area 35% or more; having
charpy V at ¥40 degrees F in the transverse
direction equal or greater than 20 ft. lbs
(single value) and equal or greater than 25 ft.
lbs (average of 3 specimens);
(d) Conforming to ASTM A578–S9
ultrasonic testing requirements with
acceptance criteria 3.2 mm flat bottom hole;
and
(e) Conforming to magnetic particle
inspection in accordance with AMS 2301.
The products subject to the investigation
are currently classified in the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
under item numbers: 7208.40.3030,
7208.40.3060, 7208.51.0030, 7208.51.0045,
7208.51.0060, 7208.52.0000, 7211.13.0000,
7211.14.0030, 7211.14.0045, 7225.40.1110,
7225.40.1180, 7225.40.3005, 7225.40.3050,
7226.20.0000, and 7226.91.5000.
The products subject to the investigation
may also enter under the following HTSUS
item numbers: 7208.40.6060, 7208.53.0000,
7208.90.0000, 7210.70.3000, 7210.90.9000,
7211.19.1500, 7211.19.2000, 7211.19.4500,
7211.19.6000, 7211.19.7590, 7211.90.0000,
7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000, 7212.50.0000,
7214.10.0000, 7214.30.0010, 7214.30.0080,
7214.91.0015, 7214.91.0060, 7214.91.0090,
7225.11.0000, 7225.19.0000, 7225.40.5110,
7225.40.5130, 7225.40.5160, 7225.40.7000,
7225.99.0010, 7225.99.0090, 7226.11.1000,
7226.11.9060, 7226.19.1000, 7226.19.9000,
7226.91.0500, 7226.91.1530, 7226.91.1560,
7226.91.2530, 7226.91.2560, 7226.91.7000,
7226.91.8000, and 7226.99.0180.
The HTSUS subheadings above are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes only. The written description of the
scope of the investigation is dispositive.
[FR Doc. 2016–29071 Filed 12–2–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
This notice advises the public
that six direct take permits have been
issued pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(A) of
the Endangered Species Act of 1973
(ESA) for continued operation,
monitoring, and evaluation of hatchery
program rearing and releasing salmon in
Northeast Oregon and Southeast
Washington portions of the Snake River
basin, and associated decision
documents. The permits were issued to
the Oregon Department of Fish and
Wildlife, Washington Department of
Fish and Wildlife, and the Bureau of
Indian Affairs.
DATES: The permits were issued on
October 28, 2016, subject to certain
conditions set forth therein. Subsequent
to issuance, the necessary
countersignatures by the applicants
were received. The permits expire on
December 31, 2027.
ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of the
decision documents or any of the other
associated documents should be
directed to the Sustainable Fisheries
Division, NOAA’s National Marine
Fisheries Service, 1201 NE Lloyd Blvd.,
Suite 1100, Portland, Oregon 97232. The
documents are also available online at
www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brett Farman, Portland, Oregon, at
phone number: (503) 231–6222, email:
brett.farman@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice is relevant to the following
species and evolutionarily significant
units (ESUs):
Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus
tshawytscha): Threatened, naturally
produced and artificially propagated
Snake River spring/summer.
Steelhead (O. mykiss): Threatened,
naturally produced and artificially
propagated Snake River.
SUMMARY:
Dated: November 29, 2016.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office
of Protected Resources, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–29029 Filed 12–2–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
RIN 0648–XF055
Endangered and Threatened Species;
Take of Anadromous Fish
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration,
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of decision and
availability of decision documents on
the issuance of six ESA section
10(a)(1)(A) research/enhancement
permits for take of threatened species.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XF053
Endangered and Threatened Species;
Take of Anadromous Fish
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM
05DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 233 / Monday, December 5, 2016 / Notices
Notice of determination and
availability of analysis documents on
ten hatchery programs rearing salmon
and steelhead in Hood Canal, Puget
Sound, Washington State.
ACTION:
NMFS has evaluated ten
Hatchery and Genetics Management
Plans (HGMPs) submitted to NMFS
pursuant to the limitation on take
prohibitions for actions conducted
under Limit 6 of the 4(d) Rule for
salmon and steelhead promulgated
under the Endangered Species Act
(ESA). The HGMPs specify the
propagation of Chinook, coho, pink, and
fall chum salmon and steelhead in the
Hood Canal watershed of Washington
State. This document serves to notify
the public that NMFS, by delegated
authority from the Secretary of
Commerce, has determined pursuant to
Limit 6 of the ESA 4(d) Rule for salmon
and steelhead that implementing and
enforcing the plans will not appreciably
reduce the likelihood of survival and
recovery of Puget Sound Chinook
salmon, Hood Canal summer chum, and
Puget Sound steelhead.
DATES: The final determination on the
HGMPs was made on October 17, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of the
decision documents or any of the other
associated documents should be
directed to the Sustainable Fisheries
Division, NOAA’s National Marine
Fisheries Service, 1201 NE Lloyd Blvd.,
Suite 1100, Portland, Oregon 97232. The
documents are also available on the
Internet at www.westcoast.fisheries
.noaa.gov.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charlene Hurst, Portland, Oregon, at
phone number: (503) 230–230–5409,
email: charlene.hurst@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ESA-Listed Species Covered in This
Notice
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus
tshawytscha): Threatened, Puget Sound,
naturally produced and artificially
propagated.
Steelhead (O. mykiss): Threatened,
Puget Sound, naturally produced and
artificially propagated.
Chum salmon (O. keta): Threatened,
naturally produced and artificially
propagated Hood Canal summer-run.
Background
The Washington Department of Fish
and Wildlife (WDFW), the Port Gamble
S’Klallam Tribe, The Skokomish Tribe,
the United States Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS), and NOAA’s National
Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)
Northwest Fisheries Science Center
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:12 Dec 02, 2016
Jkt 241001
submitted ten Hatchery and Genetics
Management Plans (HGMP) for salmon
and steelhead hatchery programs in
Hood Canal. The ten HGMPs were
submitted for review and determination
under Limit 6 of the ESA 4(d) Rule, 50
CPR 223.203(b)(6) (65 FR 42422; July 10,
2000, as amended 70 FR 37160; June 28,
2012).
Two of these programs are designed to
preserve and bolster the natural
spawning abundance of the native Hood
Canal populations and contribute to
recovery of the listed species. The
remaining eights programs are operated
for harvest augmentation purposes.
As required by § 223.203(b)(6) of the
ESA 4(d) rule, NMFS must determine
pursuant to 50 CFR 223.209 and
pursuant to the government-togovernment processes therein whether
the ten plans for Hood Canal salmon
and steelhead hatchery programs would
appreciably reduce the likelihood of
survival and recovery of the Puget
Sound Chinook Salmon ESU, Hood
Canal Summer Chum ESU, or Puget
Sound Steelhead DPS. NMFS must take
comments on how the plans address the
criteria in § 223.203(b)(5) in making that
determination.
Discussion of the Biological Analysis
Underlying the Determination
Two of the programs, the Hamma
Hamma Chinook salmon and Hood
Canal Steelhead Supplementation
programs, provide conservation benefits
for species listed under the Endangered
Species Act (ESA). The remaining eight
programs are implemented to help meet
tribal fishery harvest allocations
guaranteed through treaties, as affirmed
in United States v. Washington (1974)
and through Pacific Salmon Treaty
harvest sharing agreements with
Canada.
The programs are intended to
conserve native, ESA-listed and nonlisted populations of salmon and
steelhead in Hood Canal. NMFS’
Sustainable Fisheries Division prepared,
pursuant to section 7 of the ESA, a
biological opinion to evaluate the effects
of the action on listed salmonids. As
described in SFD’s biological opinion,
the approval of the HGMPs is not likely
to jeopardize the continued existence or
recovery of listed Puget Sound Chinook
salmon, Hood Canal Summer Chum
Salmon, or Puget Sound steelhead, nor
result in the destruction or adverse
modification of their critical habitat.
The programs may also help attenuate
impacts associated with climate change
over the short-term by providing a
refuge from adverse effects for the
propagated species through
circumvention of potentially adverse
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
87549
migration, natural spawning,
incubation, and rearing conditions.
The HGMPs include provisions for
annual reports that will assess
compliance with performance standards
established through the HGMPs.
Reporting and inclusion of new
information derived from HGMP
research, monitoring, and evaluation
activities provides assurance that
performance standards will be achieved
in future seasons. NMFS’ evaluation is
available on the West Coast Region Web
site at https://www.westcoast.fisheries
.noaa.gov.
Summary of Comments Received in
Response to the Proposed Evaluation
and Pending Determination
NMFS published notice of its
proposed evaluation and pending
determination on the plans for public
review and comment on March 3, 2016
(81 FR 11192). The proposed evaluation
and pending determination and an
associated draft environmental
assessment were available for public
review and comment for 30 days.
During the public comment period,
NMFS received one comment letter.
None of the comments raised issues that
required substantive modification of the
NMFS 4(d) or NEPA documents. The
comments and NMFS’ detailed
responses are available on the West
Coast Region Web site, as an appendix
to the environmental assessment. Based
on its evaluation and recommended
determination and taking into account
the public comments, NMFS issued its
final determination on the Hood Canal
salmon and steelhead hatchery plans.
Authority
Under section 4 of the ESA, the
Secretary of Commerce is required to
adopt such regulations as he deems
necessary and advisable for the
conservation of species listed as
threatened. The ESA salmon and
steelhead 4(d) rule (65 FR 42422; July
10, 2000) specifies categories of
activities that contribute to the
conservation of listed salmonids and
sets out the criteria for such activities.
The rule further provides that the
prohibitions of paragraph (a) of the rule
do not apply to actions undertaken in
compliance with a plan developed
jointly by a state and a tribe and
determined by NMFS to be in
accordance with the salmon and
steelhead 4(d) rule (65 FR 42422; July
10, 2000).
E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM
05DEN1
87550
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 233 / Monday, December 5, 2016 / Notices
Dated: November 30, 2016.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office
of Protected Resources, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–29068 Filed 12–2–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
Native American Tribal Insignia
Database
ACTION:
Proposed collection; comment
request.
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO), as required
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A), is
proposing an extension of an existing
information collection; the Native
American Tribal Insignia Database.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before February 3, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Email: InformationCollection@
uspto.gov. Include ‘‘0651–0048
comment’’ in the subject line of the
message.
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
• Mail: Marcie Lovett, Records
Management Division Director, Office of
the Chief Information Officer, United
States Patent and Trademark Office,
P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313–
1450.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information
should be directed to Catherine Cain,
Attorney Advisor, Office of the Deputy
Commissioner for Trademark
Examination Policy, United States
Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box
1451, Alexandria, VA 22313–1451; by
telephone at 571–272–8946; or by email
to Catherine.Cain@uspto.gov.
Additional information about this
collection is also available at https://
www.reginfo.gov under ‘‘Information
Collection Review.’’
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
I. Abstract
The Trademark Law Treaty
Implementation Act of 1998 (Pub. L.
105–330, 302, 112 Stat. 3071) required
the United States Patent and Trademark
Office (USPTO) to study issues
surrounding the protection of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:12 Dec 02, 2016
Jkt 241001
official insignia of federally and staterecognized Native American tribes
under trademark law. The USPTO
conducted the study and presented a
report to the House and Senate Judiciary
Committees on November 30, 1999. One
of the recommendations made in the
report was that the USPTO create and
maintain an accurate and
comprehensive database containing the
official insignia of all federally and
state-recognized Native American tribes.
In accordance with this
recommendation, the Senate Committee
on Appropriations directed the USPTO
to create this database.
The USPTO database of official tribal
insignias provides evidence of what a
federally or state-recognized Native
American tribe considers to be its
official insignia. The database thereby
assists trademark examining attorneys
in their examination of applications for
trademark registration by serving as a
reference for determining the
registrability of a mark that may falsely
suggest a connection to the official
insignia of a Native American tribe. The
database is also available to the public
on the USPTO Web site at https://
www.uspto.gov.
Tribes are not required to request that
their official insignia be included in the
database. The entry of an official
insignia into the database does not
confer any rights to the tribe that
submitted the insignia, and entry is not
the legal equivalent of registering the
insignia as a trademark under 15 U.S.C.
1051 et seq. The inclusion of an official
tribal insignia in the database does not
create any legal presumption of validity
or priority, does not carry any of the
benefits of federal trademark
registration, and is not a determination
as to whether a particular insignia
would be refused registration as a
trademark pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1051 et
seq.
Requests from federally recognized
tribes to enter an official insignia into
the database must be submitted in
writing and include: (1) A depiction of
the insignia, including the name of the
tribe and the address for
correspondence; (2) a copy of the tribal
resolution adopting the insignia in
question as the official insignia of the
tribe; and (3) a statement, signed by an
official with authority to bind the tribe,
confirming that the insignia included
with the request is identical to the
official insignia adopted by the tribal
resolution.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Requests from state-recognized tribes
must also be in writing and include
each of the three items described above
that are submitted by federally
recognized tribes. Additionally, requests
from state-recognized tribes must
include either: (a) A document issued
by a state official that evidences the
state’s determination that the entity is a
Native American tribe; or (b) a citation
to a state statute designating the entity
as a Native American tribe.
The USPTO enters insignia that have
been properly submitted by federally or
state-recognized Native American tribes
into the database and does not
investigate whether the insignia is
actually the official insignia of the tribe
making the request.
This collection includes the
information needed by the USPTO to
enter an official insignia for a federally
or state-recognized Native American
tribe into a database of such insignia. No
forms are associated with this
collection.
II. Method of Collection
By mail, facsimile, or hand delivery to
the USPTO.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0651–0048.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Tribal governments.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 4
responses per year.
Estimated Time per Response: The
USPTO estimates that a federally or
state-recognized Native American tribe
will require an average of 45 minutes
(0.75 hours) to complete a request to
record an official insignia, including
time to prepare the appropriate
documents and submit the completed
request to the USPTO.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent
Burden Hours: 3 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent
Cost Burden: $256.50. The USPTO
expects that the information in this
collection will be prepared by both
paraprofessionals and administrative
staff. The estimated rate of $85.50 per
hour used in this submission is an
average of the paraprofessional rate of
$141 per hour and the administrative
rate of $30 per hour. Therefore, the
USPTO estimates that the respondent
cost burden for this collection will be
approximately $256.50 per year.
E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM
05DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 233 (Monday, December 5, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 87548-87550]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-29068]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XF053
Endangered and Threatened Species; Take of Anadromous Fish
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
[[Page 87549]]
ACTION: Notice of determination and availability of analysis documents
on ten hatchery programs rearing salmon and steelhead in Hood Canal,
Puget Sound, Washington State.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS has evaluated ten Hatchery and Genetics Management Plans
(HGMPs) submitted to NMFS pursuant to the limitation on take
prohibitions for actions conducted under Limit 6 of the 4(d) Rule for
salmon and steelhead promulgated under the Endangered Species Act
(ESA). The HGMPs specify the propagation of Chinook, coho, pink, and
fall chum salmon and steelhead in the Hood Canal watershed of
Washington State. This document serves to notify the public that NMFS,
by delegated authority from the Secretary of Commerce, has determined
pursuant to Limit 6 of the ESA 4(d) Rule for salmon and steelhead that
implementing and enforcing the plans will not appreciably reduce the
likelihood of survival and recovery of Puget Sound Chinook salmon, Hood
Canal summer chum, and Puget Sound steelhead.
DATES: The final determination on the HGMPs was made on October 17,
2016.
ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of the decision documents or any of the
other associated documents should be directed to the Sustainable
Fisheries Division, NOAA's National Marine Fisheries Service, 1201 NE
Lloyd Blvd., Suite 1100, Portland, Oregon 97232. The documents are also
available on the Internet at www.westcoast.fisheries .noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charlene Hurst, Portland, Oregon, at
phone number: (503) 230-230-5409, email: charlene.hurst@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ESA-Listed Species Covered in This Notice
Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha): Threatened, Puget Sound,
naturally produced and artificially propagated.
Steelhead (O. mykiss): Threatened, Puget Sound, naturally produced
and artificially propagated.
Chum salmon (O. keta): Threatened, naturally produced and
artificially propagated Hood Canal summer-run.
Background
The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), the Port
Gamble S'Klallam Tribe, The Skokomish Tribe, the United States Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS), and NOAA's National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) Northwest Fisheries Science Center submitted ten Hatchery and
Genetics Management Plans (HGMP) for salmon and steelhead hatchery
programs in Hood Canal. The ten HGMPs were submitted for review and
determination under Limit 6 of the ESA 4(d) Rule, 50 CPR 223.203(b)(6)
(65 FR 42422; July 10, 2000, as amended 70 FR 37160; June 28, 2012).
Two of these programs are designed to preserve and bolster the
natural spawning abundance of the native Hood Canal populations and
contribute to recovery of the listed species. The remaining eights
programs are operated for harvest augmentation purposes.
As required by Sec. 223.203(b)(6) of the ESA 4(d) rule, NMFS must
determine pursuant to 50 CFR 223.209 and pursuant to the government-to-
government processes therein whether the ten plans for Hood Canal
salmon and steelhead hatchery programs would appreciably reduce the
likelihood of survival and recovery of the Puget Sound Chinook Salmon
ESU, Hood Canal Summer Chum ESU, or Puget Sound Steelhead DPS. NMFS
must take comments on how the plans address the criteria in Sec.
223.203(b)(5) in making that determination.
Discussion of the Biological Analysis Underlying the Determination
Two of the programs, the Hamma Hamma Chinook salmon and Hood Canal
Steelhead Supplementation programs, provide conservation benefits for
species listed under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The remaining
eight programs are implemented to help meet tribal fishery harvest
allocations guaranteed through treaties, as affirmed in United States
v. Washington (1974) and through Pacific Salmon Treaty harvest sharing
agreements with Canada.
The programs are intended to conserve native, ESA-listed and non-
listed populations of salmon and steelhead in Hood Canal. NMFS'
Sustainable Fisheries Division prepared, pursuant to section 7 of the
ESA, a biological opinion to evaluate the effects of the action on
listed salmonids. As described in SFD's biological opinion, the
approval of the HGMPs is not likely to jeopardize the continued
existence or recovery of listed Puget Sound Chinook salmon, Hood Canal
Summer Chum Salmon, or Puget Sound steelhead, nor result in the
destruction or adverse modification of their critical habitat.
The programs may also help attenuate impacts associated with
climate change over the short-term by providing a refuge from adverse
effects for the propagated species through circumvention of potentially
adverse migration, natural spawning, incubation, and rearing
conditions.
The HGMPs include provisions for annual reports that will assess
compliance with performance standards established through the HGMPs.
Reporting and inclusion of new information derived from HGMP research,
monitoring, and evaluation activities provides assurance that
performance standards will be achieved in future seasons. NMFS'
evaluation is available on the West Coast Region Web site at https://www.westcoast.fisheries .noaa.gov.
Summary of Comments Received in Response to the Proposed Evaluation and
Pending Determination
NMFS published notice of its proposed evaluation and pending
determination on the plans for public review and comment on March 3,
2016 (81 FR 11192). The proposed evaluation and pending determination
and an associated draft environmental assessment were available for
public review and comment for 30 days.
During the public comment period, NMFS received one comment letter.
None of the comments raised issues that required substantive
modification of the NMFS 4(d) or NEPA documents. The comments and NMFS'
detailed responses are available on the West Coast Region Web site, as
an appendix to the environmental assessment. Based on its evaluation
and recommended determination and taking into account the public
comments, NMFS issued its final determination on the Hood Canal salmon
and steelhead hatchery plans.
Authority
Under section 4 of the ESA, the Secretary of Commerce is required
to adopt such regulations as he deems necessary and advisable for the
conservation of species listed as threatened. The ESA salmon and
steelhead 4(d) rule (65 FR 42422; July 10, 2000) specifies categories
of activities that contribute to the conservation of listed salmonids
and sets out the criteria for such activities. The rule further
provides that the prohibitions of paragraph (a) of the rule do not
apply to actions undertaken in compliance with a plan developed jointly
by a state and a tribe and determined by NMFS to be in accordance with
the salmon and steelhead 4(d) rule (65 FR 42422; July 10, 2000).
[[Page 87550]]
Dated: November 30, 2016.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-29068 Filed 12-2-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P