Tax Return Preparer Due Diligence Penalty Under Section 6695(g), 87444-87448 [2016-28993]
Download as PDF
87444
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 233 / Monday, December 5, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
FONSI is also available to view online
at www.regulations.gov.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (entitled
‘‘Federalism’’) prohibits an agency from
publishing any rule that has federalism
implications if the rule either imposes
substantial direct compliance costs on
state and local governments or is not
required by statute, or the rule preempts
state law, unless the agency meets the
consultation and funding requirements
of section 6 of the Executive Order. This
final rule does not have federalism
implications and does not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
state and local governments nor
preempt state law within the meaning of
the Executive Order.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance number for the Public
Housing program is 14.872.
List of Subjects
24 CFR Part 965
Government procurement, Grant
programs-housing and community
development, Lead poisoning, Loan
programs-housing and community
development, Public housing, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Utilities.
24 CFR Part 966
Grant programs-housing and
community development, Public
housing, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated in
the preamble, HUD amends 24 CFR
parts 965 and 966 as follows:
PART 965—PHA-OWNED OR LEASED
PROJECTS—GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. The authority citation for 24 CFR
part 965 continues to read as follows:
■
2. Add subpart G to read as follows:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Subpart G—Smoke-Free Public Housing
Sec.
965.651 Applicability.
965.653 Smoke-free public housing.
965.655 Implementation.
Subpart G—Smoke-Free Public
Housing
§ 965.651
Applicability.
This subpart applies to public
housing units, except for dwelling units
in a mixed-finance project. Public
housing is defined as low-income
housing, and all necessary
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Dec 02, 2016
Jkt 241001
§ 965.653
Smoke-free public housing.
(a) In general. PHAs must design and
implement a policy prohibiting the use
of prohibited tobacco products in all
public housing living units and interior
areas (including but not limited to
hallways, rental and administrative
offices, community centers, day care
centers, laundry centers, and similar
structures), as well as in outdoor areas
within 25 feet from public housing and
administrative office buildings
(collectively, ‘‘restricted areas’’) in
which public housing is located.
(b) Designated smoking areas. PHAs
may limit smoking to designated
smoking areas on the grounds of the
public housing or administrative office
buildings in order to accommodate
residents who smoke. These areas must
be outside of any restricted areas, as
defined in paragraph (a) of this section,
and may include partially enclosed
structures. Alternatively, PHAs may
choose to create additional smoke-free
areas outside the restricted areas or to
make their entire grounds smoke-free.
(c) Prohibited tobacco products. A
PHA’s smoke-free policy must, at a
minimum, ban the use of all prohibited
tobacco products. Prohibited tobacco
products are defined as:
(1) Items that involve the ignition and
burning of tobacco leaves, such as (but
not limited to) cigarettes, cigars, and
pipes.
(2) To the extent not covered by
paragraph (c)(1) of this section,
waterpipes (hookahs).
§ 965.655
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1547, 1437a, 1437d,
1437g, and 3535(d). Subpart H is also issued
under 42 U.S.C. 4821–4846.
■
appurtenances (e.g., community
facilities, public housing offices, day
care centers, and laundry rooms)
thereto, assisted under the U.S. Housing
Act of 1937 (the 1937 Act), other than
assistance under section 8 of the 1937
Act.
§ 966.4
Lease requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(12) * * *
(i) To assure that no tenant, member
of the tenant’s household, or guest
engages in:
(A) Criminal activity. (1) Any criminal
activity that threatens the health, safety
or right to peaceful enjoyment of the
premises by other residents;
(2) Any drug-related criminal activity
on or off the premises; or
(B) Civil activity. For any units
covered by 24 CFR part 965, subpart G,
any smoking of prohibited tobacco
products in restricted areas, as defined
by 24 CFR 965.653(a), or in other
outdoor areas that the PHA has
designated as smoke-free.
(ii) To assure that no other person
under the tenant’s control engages in:
(A) Criminal activity. (1) Any criminal
activity that threatens the health, safety
or right to peaceful enjoyment of the
premises by other residents;
(2) Any drug-related criminal activity
on the premises; or
(B) Civil activity. For any units
covered by 24 CFR part 965, subpart G,
any smoking of prohibited tobacco
products in restricted areas, as defined
by 24 CFR 965.653(a), or in other
outdoor areas that the PHA has
designated as smoke-free.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: November 28, 2016.
´
Julian Castro,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–28986 Filed 12–2–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Implementation.
(a) Amendments. PHAs are required
to implement the requirements of this
subpart by amending each of the
following:
(1) All applicable PHA plans,
according to the provisions in 24 CFR
part 903.
(2) Tenant leases, according to the
provisions of 24 CFR 966.4.
(b) Deadline. All PHAs must be in full
compliance, with effective policy
amendments, by July 30, 2018.
PART 966—PUBLIC HOUSING LEASE
AND GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE
3. The authority section for 24 CFR
part 966 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1437d and 3535(d).
PO 00000
4. In § 966.4, revise paragraphs
(f)(12)(i) and (ii) to read as follows:
■
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Parts 1 and 602
[TD 9799]
RIN 1545–BN61
Tax Return Preparer Due Diligence
Penalty Under Section 6695(g)
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Final and temporary
regulations.
AGENCY:
This document contains
temporary regulations that modify
existing regulations related to the
penalty under section 6695(g) of the
Internal Revenue Code (Code) relating to
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\05DER1.SGM
05DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 233 / Monday, December 5, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
tax return preparer due diligence. These
temporary regulations implement recent
law changes that expand the tax return
preparer due diligence penalty under
section 6695(g) so that it applies to the
child tax credit (CTC), additional child
tax credit (ACTC), and the American
Opportunity Tax Credit (AOTC), in
addition to the earned income credit
(EIC). The temporary regulations affect
tax return preparers. The substance of
the temporary regulations is included in
the proposed regulations set forth in the
notice of proposed rulemaking on this
subject in the Proposed Rules section in
this issue of the Federal Register.
DATES: Effective Date: These regulations
are effective on December 5, 2016.
Applicability Date: For dates of
applicability, see § 1.6695–2T(e).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rachel L. Gregory, 202–317–6845 (not a
toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Paperwork Reduction Act
The collection of information
contained in these temporary and final
regulations is in §§ 1.6695–2(b) and
1.6695–2T(b) and is reported on Form
8867, ‘‘Paid Preparer’s Due Diligence
Checklist.’’ Responses to this collection
of information are mandatory. The
collection of information in current
§ 1.6695–2 was previously reviewed and
approved under control number 1545–
1570. Control number 1545–1570 was
discontinued in 2014, as the burden for
the collection of information contained
in § 1.6695–2 is reflected in the burden
on Form 8867 under control number
1545–1629.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Background
This document contains amendments
to 26 CFR parts 1 and 602 under section
6695(g) of the Code, imposing a penalty
on tax return preparers who fail to
comply with the due diligence
requirements imposed by the Secretary
by regulations with respect to
determining the eligibility for, or the
amount of, the EIC. Section 6695(g) was
added to the Code because Congress
believed more thorough efforts by tax
return preparers are important to
improving EIC compliance. H.R. Rep.
No. 105–148, 105th Cong. 1st Sess., p.
512 (June 24, 1997).
Enacted by section 1085(a)(2) of the
Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997, Public Law
105–34 (11 Stat. 788, 955 (1997)), and
effective for taxable years beginning
after December 31, 1996, section 6695(g)
originally imposed a $100 penalty on an
income tax return preparer who failed to
meet the EIC due diligence requirements
set forth in regulations prescribed by the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Dec 02, 2016
Jkt 241001
Secretary. Section 8246 of the Small
Business and Work Opportunity Tax
Act of 2007, Public Law 110–28 (121
Stat. 112, 200 (2007)) amended the
penalty to apply to all tax return
preparers. Section 501(a) of the United
States-Korea Free Trade Agreement
Implementation Act, Public Law 112–41
(125 Stat. 428, 459 (2011)), amended
section 6695(g) to increase the amount
of the penalty to $500, effective for
returns required to be filed after
December 31, 2011. Section 208(c), Div.
B of the Tax Increase Prevention Act of
2014, Public Law 113–295 (128 Stat.
4010, 4073 (2014)) (2014 Act), added
section 6695(h), which indexes the
penalty amount for inflation, effective
for returns or claims for refund filed
after December 31, 2014.
Section 1.6695–2 implements section
6695(g) by imposing due diligence
requirements on persons who are tax
return preparers under section
7701(a)(36) with respect to determining
eligibility for, or the amount of, the EIC.
The due diligence requirements set forth
in § 1.6695–2(b) are that the preparer
must: (1) Complete and submit Form
8867, ‘‘Paid Preparer’s Earned Income
Credit Checklist;’’ (2) complete the
Earned Income Credit Worksheet
(Worksheet), as contained in the Form
1040 instructions or record the
preparer’s computation of the credit,
including the method and information
used to make the computation; (3) not
know or have reason to know that any
information used by the preparer in
determining eligibility for, and the
amount of, the EIC is incorrect and
make reasonable inquiries when
required, documenting those inquiries
and responses contemporaneously
(knowledge requirement); and (4) retain,
for three years from the applicable date,
the Form 8867, the Worksheet (or
alternative records), and the record of
how and when the information used to
determine eligibility for, and the
amount of, the EIC was obtained by the
preparer, including the identity of any
person furnishing information and a
copy of any document relied on by the
preparer.
To comply with the knowledge
requirement under § 1.6695–2(b)(3), the
tax return preparer may not ignore the
implications of information furnished
to, or known by, the tax return preparer,
and must make reasonable inquiries if
the information furnished to the tax
return preparer appears to be incorrect,
inconsistent, or incomplete. Examples
in § 1.6695–2(b)(3)(ii) illustrate this
requirement. This knowledge
requirement is consistent with the
verification requirement imposed on all
tax return preparers with respect to
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
87445
preparation of any tax return or claim
for refund under the accuracy-related
standards set forth in § 1.6694–1(e).
A tax return preparer is required to
submit the Form 8867 to the IRS when
the preparer electronically files the tax
return. If a tax return preparer required
to complete the Form 8867 is not
electronically filing the taxpayer’s
return with the IRS, § 1.6695–2(b)(1)
provides rules for submission of the
form. If the tax return preparer required
to complete the Form 8867 is not the
signing tax return preparer, the preparer
satisfies the submission requirement by
providing a copy of the completed Form
8867 to the signing tax return preparer.
If the tax return preparer required to
complete the Form 8867 is the signing
tax return preparer but the taxpayer is
not electronically filing the return, the
preparer must provide a copy of the
completed Form 8867 to the taxpayer to
be attached to the return being filed
with the IRS.
Section 1.6695–2(c) provides that a
firm that employs a tax return preparer
subject to a penalty under section
6695(g) is also subject to a penalty if
certain conditions apply. Under this
rule, a firm will be subject to a penalty
if and only if one or more members of
principal management (or principal
officers) of the firm or branch
participated in, or prior to the time the
return was filed, knew of the failure to
comply with the due diligence
requirements; the firm failed to establish
reasonable and appropriate procedures
to ensure compliance with the due
diligence requirements; or, through
willfulness, recklessness, or gross
indifference (including ignoring facts
that would lead a person of reasonable
prudence and competence to investigate
or ascertain) the firm disregarded its
own reasonable and appropriate
compliance procedures. A firm subject
to a section 6695(g) penalty under this
section is not eligible for the exception
to the penalty in § 1.6695–2(d). Under
this exception, the penalty will not be
applied if the tax return preparer can
demonstrate to the satisfaction of the
IRS that, considering all of the facts and
circumstances, the tax return preparer’s
normal office procedures are reasonably
designed and routinely followed to
ensure compliance with the due
diligence requirements, and the failure
to meet the due diligence requirements
with respect to the particular tax return
or claim for refund was isolated and
inadvertent.
Section 207, Div. Q of the Protecting
Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015,
Public Law 114–113 (129 Stat. 2242,
3082 (2015)) (PATH Act) amended
section 6695(g) by expanding the scope
E:\FR\FM\05DER1.SGM
05DER1
87446
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 233 / Monday, December 5, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
of the due diligence requirements to
also include claims of the CTC/ACTC
under section 24 and the AOTC under
section 25A(a)(1), effective for taxable
years beginning after December 31,
2015.
These temporary regulations reflect
the changes made to section 6695(g) by
the PATH Act by expanding the due
diligence requirements to the CTC/
ACTC and the AOTC. These temporary
regulations also conform the regulation
to the 2014 Act, reflecting that the
penalty is to be adjusted for inflation.
Explanation of Provisions
The temporary regulations amend
§ 1.6695–2 to implement the changes
made by the PATH Act that extend the
preparer due diligence requirements to
returns or claims for refund including
claims of the CTC/ACTC and/or AOTC
in addition to the EIC. As a result of
these changes, one return or claim for
refund may contain claims for more
than one credit subject to the due
diligence requirements. Pursuant to the
statute, each failure to comply with the
due diligence requirements set forth in
regulations prescribed by the Secretary
results in a penalty. The section 6695(g)
requirements apply to each credit
claimed, meaning more than one
penalty could apply to a single return or
claim for refund. The temporary
regulations provide examples to show
how multiple penalties could apply
when one return or claim for refund is
filed.
The Form 8867 has been revised for
the 2016 tax year and is a single
checklist to be used for all applicable
credits (EIC, CTC/ACTC, and/or AOTC)
on the return or claim for refund subject
to the section 6695(g) due diligence
requirements. The Form 8867 was
streamlined to eliminate unnecessary
redundancy with other forms and
schedules. These changes were intended
to reduce burden while increasing the
utility of the Form 8867 as a checklist
for tax return preparers to more
accurately determine taxpayer eligibility
for credits, thereby reducing errors and
increasing compliance by preparers and
taxpayers. The temporary regulations
clarify § 1.6695–2(b)(1)(ii) to illustrate
that the completion of Form 8867 can be
based on information provided by the
taxpayer to the preparer or otherwise
reasonably obtained or previously
known by the preparer.
The examples provided in § 1.6695–
2(b)(3)(ii) have been updated to provide
more insight into when a tax return
preparer has satisfied the due diligence
knowledge requirement, including for
purposes of the CTC and AOTC. The
updates to the examples in § 1.6695–
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Dec 02, 2016
Jkt 241001
2T(b)(3)(ii) illustrate that the knowledge
requirement for purposes of due
diligence can be satisfied in conjunction
with a tax return preparer’s informationgathering activities done for the purpose
of accurately completing other aspects
of a tax return or claim for refund. New
examples, Example 2 and Example 4,
have also been added to illustrate that
in certain circumstances a tax return
preparer may satisfy the knowledge
requirement based on existing
knowledge without having to make
additional reasonable inquiries. Another
new example, Example 7, provides an
example of due diligence for purposes
of the AOTC.
Section 1.6695–2(a) is amended by
the temporary regulations to reflect the
changes made by section 208(c) of the
2014 Act, requiring the IRS to index the
penalty for inflation for returns or
claims for refund filed after December
31, 2014. In addition, § 1.6695–2T(c)(3)
clarifies the parenthetical therein by
removing the words ‘‘or ascertained.’’
Special Analyses
Certain IRS regulations, including this
one, are exempt from the requirements
of Executive Order 12866, as
supplemented and reaffirmed by
Executive Order 13563. Therefore, a
regulatory assessment is not required.
For applicability of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, please refer to the crossreference notice of proposed rulemaking
published elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register. Pursuant to section
7805(f) of the Code, these regulations
have been submitted to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration for comment
on the impact on small businesses.
Drafting Information
The principal author of this regulation
is Rachel L. Gregory, Office of the
Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure &
Administration).
List of Subjects
26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
26 CFR Part 602
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Adoption of Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR parts 1 and 602
are amended as follows:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 is amended by adding a new
■
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
entry in numerical order to read in part
as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 1.6695–2T is also issued under 26
U.S.C. 6695(g).
*
*
*
*
*
Par. 2. Section 1.6695–2 is amended
by revising the section heading and
paragraphs (a), (b)(1)(i) introductory
text, (b)(1)(ii), (b)(2), (b)(3)(i) and (ii),
(b)(4)(i)(B) and (C), and (c)(3) to read as
follows:
■
§ 1.6695–2 Tax return preparer due
diligence requirements for certain credits.
(a) [Reserved]. For further guidance
regarding the penalty for failure to meet
due diligence requirements with respect
to certain credits, see § 1.6695–2T(a).
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) [Reserved]. For further guidance
regarding the completion of Form 8867,
see § 1.6695–2T(b)(1)(i).
*
*
*
*
*
(ii) [Reserved]. For further guidance
regarding the information used to
complete the Form 8867, see 1.6695–
2T(b)(1)(ii).
(2) [Reserved]. For further guidance
regarding computation, see § 1.6695–
2T(b)(2).
(3) * * *
(i) [Reserved]. For further guidance
regarding the knowledge requirement,
see § 1.6695–2T(b)(3)(i).
(ii) [Reserved]. For current examples,
see § 1.6695–2T(b)(3)(ii).
(4) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) [Reserved]. For further guidance
on the retention of records, see
§ 1.6695–2T(b)(4)(i)(B).
(C) [Reserved]. For further guidance
on the retention of records, see
§ 1.6695–2T(b)(4)(i)(C).
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) [Reserved]. For further guidance
on the special rule for firms, see
§ 1.6695–2T(c)(3).
*
*
*
*
*
■ Par. 3. Section 1.6695–2T is added to
read as follows:
§ 1.6695–2T Tax return preparer due
diligence requirements for certain credits
(Temporary).
(a) Penalty for failure to meet due
diligence requirements—(1) In general.
A person who is a tax return preparer
(as defined in section 7701(a)(36)) of a
tax return or claim for refund under the
Internal Revenue Code with respect to
determining the eligibility for, or the
amount of, the child tax credit (CTC)
and additional child tax credit (ACTC)
under section 24, the American
E:\FR\FM\05DER1.SGM
05DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 233 / Monday, December 5, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
opportunity tax credit (AOTC) under
section 25A(i), or the earned income
credit (EIC) under section 32 and who
fails to satisfy the due diligence
requirements of paragraph (b) of this
section will be subject to a penalty as
prescribed in section 6695(g) (indexed
for inflation under section 6695(h)) for
each failure. A separate penalty applies
with respect to each credit claimed on
a return or claim for refund for which
the due diligence requirements of this
section are not satisfied and for which
the exception to penalty provided by
paragraph (d) of this section does not
apply.
(2) Examples. The provisions of
paragraph (a)(1) of this section are
illustrated by the following examples:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Example 1. Preparer A prepares a federal
income tax return for a taxpayer claiming the
CTC and the AOTC. Preparer A did not meet
the due diligence requirements under this
section with respect to the CTC or the AOTC
claimed on the taxpayer’s return. Unless the
exception to penalty provided by paragraph
(d) of this section applies, Preparer A is
subject to two penalties under section
6695(g): One for failure to meet the due
diligence requirements for the CTC and a
second penalty for failure to meet the due
diligence requirements for the AOTC.
Example 2. Preparer B prepares a federal
income tax return for a taxpayer claiming the
CTC and the AOTC. Preparer B did not meet
the due diligence requirements under this
section with respect to the CTC claimed on
the taxpayer’s return, but Preparer B did meet
the due diligence requirements under this
section with respect to the AOTC claimed on
the taxpayer’s return. Unless the exception to
penalty provided by paragraph (d) of this
section applies, Preparer B is subject to one
penalty under section 6695(g) for the failure
to meet the due diligence requirements for
the CTC. Preparer B is not subject to a
penalty under section 6695(g) for failure to
meet the due diligence requirements for the
AOTC.
(b) [Reserved]. For further guidance,
see § 1.6695–2(b).
(1) Completion and submission of
Form 8867. (i) The tax return preparer
must complete Form 8867, ‘‘Paid
Preparer’s Due Diligence Checklist,’’ or
such other form and such other
information as may be prescribed by the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and—
(A) through (C) [Reserved]. For further
guidance, see § 1.6695–2(b)(1)(i)(A)
through (C).
(ii) The tax return preparer’s
completion of Form 8867 must be based
on information provided by the taxpayer
to the tax return preparer or otherwise
reasonably obtained or known by the tax
return preparer.
(2) Computation of credit or credits.
(i) When computing the amount of a
credit described in paragraph (a) of this
section to be claimed on a return or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Dec 02, 2016
Jkt 241001
claim for refund, the tax return preparer
must either—
(A) Complete the worksheet in the
Form 1040, 1040A, 1040EZ, and/or
Form 8863 instructions or such other
form including such other information
as may be prescribed by the IRS
applicable to each credit described in
paragraph (a) of this section claimed on
the return or claim for refund; or
(B) Otherwise record in one or more
documents in the tax return preparer’s
paper or electronic files the tax return
preparer’s computation of the credit or
credits claimed on the return or claim
for refund, including the method and
information used to make the
computations.
(ii) The tax return preparer’s
completion of an applicable worksheet
described in paragraph (b)(2)(i)(A) of
this section (or other record of the tax
return preparer’s computation of the
credit or credits permitted under
paragraph (b)(2)(i)(B) of this section)
must be based on information provided
by the taxpayer to the tax return
preparer or otherwise reasonably
obtained or known by the tax return
preparer.
(3) Knowledge—(i) In general. The tax
return preparer must not know, or have
reason to know, that any information
used by the tax return preparer in
determining the taxpayer’s eligibility
for, or the amount of, any credit
described in paragraph (a) of this
section and claimed on the return or
claim for refund is incorrect. The tax
return preparer may not ignore the
implications of information furnished
to, or known by, the tax return preparer,
and must make reasonable inquiries if a
reasonable and well-informed tax return
preparer knowledgeable in the law
would conclude that the information
furnished to the tax return preparer
appears to be incorrect, inconsistent, or
incomplete. The tax return preparer
must also contemporaneously document
in the files any inquiries made and the
responses to those inquiries.
(ii) Examples. The provisions of
paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section are
illustrated by the following examples:
Example 1. In 2018, Q, a 22 year-old
taxpayer, engages Preparer C to prepare Q’s
2017 federal income tax return. Q completes
Preparer C’s standard intake questionnaire
and states that she has never been married
and has two sons, ages 10 and 11. Based on
the intake sheet and other information that Q
provides, including information that shows
that the boys lived with Q throughout 2017,
Preparer C believes that Q may be eligible to
claim each boy as a qualifying child for
purposes of the EIC and the CTC. However,
Q provides no information to Preparer C, and
Preparer C does not have any information
from other sources, to verify the relationship
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
87447
between Q and the boys. To meet the
knowledge requirement in paragraph (b)(3) of
this section, Preparer C must make
reasonable inquiries to determine whether
each boy is a qualifying child of Q for
purposes of the EIC and the CTC, including
reasonable inquiries to verify Q’s relationship
to the boys, and Preparer C must
contemporaneously document these inquiries
and the responses.
Example 2. Assume the same facts as in
Example 1 of this paragraph (b)(3)(ii). In
addition, as part of preparing Q’s 2017
federal income tax return, Preparer C made
sufficient reasonable inquiries to verify that
the boys were Q’s legally adopted children.
In 2019, Q engages Preparer C to prepare her
2018 federal income tax return. When
preparing Q’s 2018 federal income tax return,
Preparer C is not required to make additional
inquiries to determine the boys relationship
to Q for purposes of the knowledge
requirement in paragraph (b)(3) of this
section.
Example 3. In 2018, R, an 18 year-old
taxpayer, engages Preparer D to prepare R’s
2017 federal income tax return. R completes
Preparer D’s standard intake questionnaire
and states that she has never been married,
has one child, an infant, and that she and her
infant lived with R’s parents during part of
the 2017 tax year. R also provides Preparer
D with a Form W–2 showing that she earned
$10,000 during 2017. R provides no other
documents or information showing that R
earned any other income during the tax year.
Based on the intake sheet and other
information that R provides, Preparer D
believes that R may be eligible to claim the
infant as a qualifying child for the EIC and
the CTC. To meet the knowledge requirement
in paragraph (b)(3) of this section, Preparer
D must make reasonable inquiries to
determine whether R is eligible to claim
these credits, including reasonable inquiries
to verify that R is not a qualifying child of
her parents (which would make R ineligible
to claim the EIC) or a dependent of her
parents (which would make R ineligible to
claim the CTC), and Preparer D must
contemporaneously document these inquiries
and the responses.
Example 4. The facts are the same as the
facts in Example 3 of this paragraph (b)(3)(ii).
In addition, Preparer D previously prepared
the 2017 joint federal income tax return for
R’s parents. Based on information provided
by R’s parents, Preparer D has determined
that R is not eligible to be claimed as a
dependent or as a qualifying child for
purposes of the EIC or CTC on R’s parents’
return. Therefore, for purposes of the
knowledge requirement in paragraph (b)(3) of
this section, Preparer D is not required to
make additional inquiries to determine that
R is not her parents’ qualifying child or
dependent.
Example 5. In 2018, S engages Preparer E
to prepare his 2017 federal income tax return.
During Preparer E’s standard intake
interview, S states that he has never been
married and his niece and nephew lived with
him for part of the 2017 tax year. Preparer E
believes S may be eligible to claim each of
these children as a qualifying child for
purposes of the EIC and the CTC. To meet the
E:\FR\FM\05DER1.SGM
05DER1
87448
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 233 / Monday, December 5, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
knowledge requirement in paragraph (b)(3) of
this section, Preparer E must make
reasonable inquiries to determine whether
each child is a qualifying child for purposes
of the EIC and the CTC, including reasonable
inquiries about the children’s parents and the
children’s residency, and Preparer E must
contemporaneously document these inquiries
and the responses.
Example 6. W engages Preparer F to
prepare her federal income tax return. During
Preparer F’s standard intake interview, W
states that she is 50 years old, has never been
married, and has no children. W further
states to Preparer F that during the tax year
she was self-employed, earned $10,000 from
her business, and had no business expenses
or other income. Preparer F believes W may
be eligible for the EIC. To meet the
knowledge requirement in paragraph (b)(3) of
this section, Preparer F must make
reasonable inquiries to determine whether W
is eligible for the EIC, including reasonable
inquiries to determine whether W’s business
income and expenses are correct, and
Preparer F must contemporaneously
document these inquiries and the responses.
Example 7. Y, who is 32 years old, engages
Preparer G to prepare his federal income tax
return. Y completes Preparer G’s standard
intake questionnaire and states that he has
never been married. As part of Preparer G’s
client intake process, Y provides Preparer G
with a copy of the Form 1098–T Y received
showing that University M billed $4,000 of
qualified tuition and related expenses for Y’s
enrollment or attendance at the university
and that Y was at least a half-time
undergraduate student. Preparer G believes
that Y may be eligible for the AOTC. To meet
the knowledge requirements in paragraph
(b)(3) of this section, Preparer G must make
reasonable inquiries to determine whether Y
is eligible for the AOTC, as Form 1098–T
does not contain all the information needed
to determine eligibility for the AOTC or to
calculate the amount of the credit if Y is
eligible, and contemporaneously document
these inquiries and the responses.
complete Form 8867 and/or an
applicable worksheet required under
paragraph (b)(2)(i)(A) of this section (or
other record of the tax return preparer’s
computation permitted under paragraph
(b)(2)(i)(B) of this section).
(ii) through (iii) [Reserved]. For
further guidance, see § 1.6695–2(b)(4)(ii)
through (iii).
(c) [Reserved]. For further guidance,
see § 1.6695–2(c).
(1) through (2) [Reserved]. For further
guidance, see § 1.6695–2(c)(1) through
(2).
(3) The firm disregarded its
reasonable and appropriate compliance
procedures through willfulness,
recklessness, or gross indifference
(including ignoring facts that would
lead a person of reasonable prudence
and competence to investigate) in the
preparation of the tax return or claim for
refund with respect to which the
penalty is imposed.
(d) [Reserved]. For further guidance,
see § 1.6695–2(d).
(e) Applicability date. This section
applies to tax returns and claims for
refund prepared on or after December 5,
2016 with respect to tax years beginning
after December 31, 2015. For returns
and claims for refund prepared before
December 5, 2016 with respect to tax
years beginning before January 1, 2016,
the rules that apply are contained in
§ 1.6695–2 in effect prior to December 5,
2016. (See 26 CFR part 1 revised as of
April 2016).
(f) Expiration date. This section will
expire on December 5, 2019.
(4) Retention of records. (i)
[Reserved]. For further guidance, see
§ 1.6695–2(b)(4)(i).
(A) [Reserved]. For further guidance,
see § 1.6695–2(b)(4)(i)(A).
(B) A copy of each completed
worksheet required under paragraph
(b)(2)(i)(A) of this section (or other
record of the tax return preparer’s
computation permitted under paragraph
(b)(2)(i)(B) of this section); and
(C) A record of how and when the
information used to complete Form
8867 and the applicable worksheets
required under paragraph (b)(2)(i)(A) of
this section (or other record of the tax
return preparer’s computation permitted
under paragraph (b)(2)(i)(B) of this
section) was obtained by the tax return
preparer, including the identity of any
person furnishing the information, as
well as a copy of any document that was
provided by the taxpayer and on which
the tax return preparer relied to
PART 602—OMB CONTROL NUMBERS
UNDER THE PAPERWORK
REDUCTION ACT
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Dec 02, 2016
Jkt 241001
■ Par. 4. The authority citation for part
602 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805.
§ 602.101
[Amended]
Par. 5. In § 602.101, paragraph (b) is
amended by removing the entry for
§ 1.6695–2 from the table.
■
John M. Dalrymple,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
Approved: November 21, 2016.
Mark J. Mazur,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax
Policy).
[FR Doc. 2016–28993 Filed 12–2–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 208
[Docket ID: DOD–2013–OS–0021]
RIN 0790–AJ01
National Security Education Program
(NSEP) and NSEP Service Agreement
Under Secretary of Defense for
Personnel and Readiness, DoD.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule implements
the responsibilities of the Secretary of
Defense for administering the National
Security Education Program (NSEP) and
explains the responsibilities of the
Under Secretary of Defense for
Personnel and Readiness (USD(P&R)) for
policy and funding oversight for NSEP.
It discusses requirements for
administering and executing the NSEP
service agreement and; and assigns
oversight of NSEP to the Defense
Language and National Security
Education Office (DLNSEO).
DATES: This final rule is effective on
January 4, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alison Patz, 571–256–0771.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
November 9, 2015, the Department of
Defense published a proposed rule
titled, ‘‘National Security Education
Program (NSEP) and NSEP Service
Agreement,’’ (80 FR 69166–69171) for a
60-day public comment period. The
public comment period closed on
January 8, 2016. No public comments
were received.
After the 60-day public comment
period for the proposed rule, minor
administrative edits were made to
provide clarity or remove outdated,
unnecessary, or confusing language in
the regulatory text due to an internal
DoD re-organization. Offices and
symbols have been updated to reflect
the most current organizational
structure.
SUMMARY:
Background
The David L. Boren National Security
Education Act of 1991 (Title VIII, Pub.
L. 102–183), as amended, codified at 50
U.S.C. 1901 et seq. (NSEA), mandated
that the Secretary of Defense create and
sustain a program to award scholarships
to U.S. undergraduate students,
fellowships to U.S. graduate students,
and grants to U.S. institutions of higher
education.
The NSEP is authorized through 50
U.S.C. 1901–1912 to award
scholarships, fellowships, and grants to
E:\FR\FM\05DER1.SGM
05DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 233 (Monday, December 5, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 87444-87448]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-28993]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Parts 1 and 602
[TD 9799]
RIN 1545-BN61
Tax Return Preparer Due Diligence Penalty Under Section 6695(g)
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Final and temporary regulations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains temporary regulations that modify
existing regulations related to the penalty under section 6695(g) of
the Internal Revenue Code (Code) relating to
[[Page 87445]]
tax return preparer due diligence. These temporary regulations
implement recent law changes that expand the tax return preparer due
diligence penalty under section 6695(g) so that it applies to the child
tax credit (CTC), additional child tax credit (ACTC), and the American
Opportunity Tax Credit (AOTC), in addition to the earned income credit
(EIC). The temporary regulations affect tax return preparers. The
substance of the temporary regulations is included in the proposed
regulations set forth in the notice of proposed rulemaking on this
subject in the Proposed Rules section in this issue of the Federal
Register.
DATES: Effective Date: These regulations are effective on December 5,
2016.
Applicability Date: For dates of applicability, see Sec. 1.6695-
2T(e).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rachel L. Gregory, 202-317-6845 (not a
toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Paperwork Reduction Act
The collection of information contained in these temporary and
final regulations is in Sec. Sec. 1.6695-2(b) and 1.6695-2T(b) and is
reported on Form 8867, ``Paid Preparer's Due Diligence Checklist.''
Responses to this collection of information are mandatory. The
collection of information in current Sec. 1.6695-2 was previously
reviewed and approved under control number 1545-1570. Control number
1545-1570 was discontinued in 2014, as the burden for the collection of
information contained in Sec. 1.6695-2 is reflected in the burden on
Form 8867 under control number 1545-1629.
Background
This document contains amendments to 26 CFR parts 1 and 602 under
section 6695(g) of the Code, imposing a penalty on tax return preparers
who fail to comply with the due diligence requirements imposed by the
Secretary by regulations with respect to determining the eligibility
for, or the amount of, the EIC. Section 6695(g) was added to the Code
because Congress believed more thorough efforts by tax return preparers
are important to improving EIC compliance. H.R. Rep. No. 105-148, 105th
Cong. 1st Sess., p. 512 (June 24, 1997).
Enacted by section 1085(a)(2) of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997,
Public Law 105-34 (11 Stat. 788, 955 (1997)), and effective for taxable
years beginning after December 31, 1996, section 6695(g) originally
imposed a $100 penalty on an income tax return preparer who failed to
meet the EIC due diligence requirements set forth in regulations
prescribed by the Secretary. Section 8246 of the Small Business and
Work Opportunity Tax Act of 2007, Public Law 110-28 (121 Stat. 112, 200
(2007)) amended the penalty to apply to all tax return preparers.
Section 501(a) of the United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement
Implementation Act, Public Law 112-41 (125 Stat. 428, 459 (2011)),
amended section 6695(g) to increase the amount of the penalty to $500,
effective for returns required to be filed after December 31, 2011.
Section 208(c), Div. B of the Tax Increase Prevention Act of 2014,
Public Law 113-295 (128 Stat. 4010, 4073 (2014)) (2014 Act), added
section 6695(h), which indexes the penalty amount for inflation,
effective for returns or claims for refund filed after December 31,
2014.
Section 1.6695-2 implements section 6695(g) by imposing due
diligence requirements on persons who are tax return preparers under
section 7701(a)(36) with respect to determining eligibility for, or the
amount of, the EIC. The due diligence requirements set forth in Sec.
1.6695-2(b) are that the preparer must: (1) Complete and submit Form
8867, ``Paid Preparer's Earned Income Credit Checklist;'' (2) complete
the Earned Income Credit Worksheet (Worksheet), as contained in the
Form 1040 instructions or record the preparer's computation of the
credit, including the method and information used to make the
computation; (3) not know or have reason to know that any information
used by the preparer in determining eligibility for, and the amount of,
the EIC is incorrect and make reasonable inquiries when required,
documenting those inquiries and responses contemporaneously (knowledge
requirement); and (4) retain, for three years from the applicable date,
the Form 8867, the Worksheet (or alternative records), and the record
of how and when the information used to determine eligibility for, and
the amount of, the EIC was obtained by the preparer, including the
identity of any person furnishing information and a copy of any
document relied on by the preparer.
To comply with the knowledge requirement under Sec. 1.6695-
2(b)(3), the tax return preparer may not ignore the implications of
information furnished to, or known by, the tax return preparer, and
must make reasonable inquiries if the information furnished to the tax
return preparer appears to be incorrect, inconsistent, or incomplete.
Examples in Sec. 1.6695-2(b)(3)(ii) illustrate this requirement. This
knowledge requirement is consistent with the verification requirement
imposed on all tax return preparers with respect to preparation of any
tax return or claim for refund under the accuracy-related standards set
forth in Sec. 1.6694-1(e).
A tax return preparer is required to submit the Form 8867 to the
IRS when the preparer electronically files the tax return. If a tax
return preparer required to complete the Form 8867 is not
electronically filing the taxpayer's return with the IRS, Sec. 1.6695-
2(b)(1) provides rules for submission of the form. If the tax return
preparer required to complete the Form 8867 is not the signing tax
return preparer, the preparer satisfies the submission requirement by
providing a copy of the completed Form 8867 to the signing tax return
preparer. If the tax return preparer required to complete the Form 8867
is the signing tax return preparer but the taxpayer is not
electronically filing the return, the preparer must provide a copy of
the completed Form 8867 to the taxpayer to be attached to the return
being filed with the IRS.
Section 1.6695-2(c) provides that a firm that employs a tax return
preparer subject to a penalty under section 6695(g) is also subject to
a penalty if certain conditions apply. Under this rule, a firm will be
subject to a penalty if and only if one or more members of principal
management (or principal officers) of the firm or branch participated
in, or prior to the time the return was filed, knew of the failure to
comply with the due diligence requirements; the firm failed to
establish reasonable and appropriate procedures to ensure compliance
with the due diligence requirements; or, through willfulness,
recklessness, or gross indifference (including ignoring facts that
would lead a person of reasonable prudence and competence to
investigate or ascertain) the firm disregarded its own reasonable and
appropriate compliance procedures. A firm subject to a section 6695(g)
penalty under this section is not eligible for the exception to the
penalty in Sec. 1.6695-2(d). Under this exception, the penalty will
not be applied if the tax return preparer can demonstrate to the
satisfaction of the IRS that, considering all of the facts and
circumstances, the tax return preparer's normal office procedures are
reasonably designed and routinely followed to ensure compliance with
the due diligence requirements, and the failure to meet the due
diligence requirements with respect to the particular tax return or
claim for refund was isolated and inadvertent.
Section 207, Div. Q of the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act
of 2015, Public Law 114-113 (129 Stat. 2242, 3082 (2015)) (PATH Act)
amended section 6695(g) by expanding the scope
[[Page 87446]]
of the due diligence requirements to also include claims of the CTC/
ACTC under section 24 and the AOTC under section 25A(a)(1), effective
for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2015.
These temporary regulations reflect the changes made to section
6695(g) by the PATH Act by expanding the due diligence requirements to
the CTC/ACTC and the AOTC. These temporary regulations also conform the
regulation to the 2014 Act, reflecting that the penalty is to be
adjusted for inflation.
Explanation of Provisions
The temporary regulations amend Sec. 1.6695-2 to implement the
changes made by the PATH Act that extend the preparer due diligence
requirements to returns or claims for refund including claims of the
CTC/ACTC and/or AOTC in addition to the EIC. As a result of these
changes, one return or claim for refund may contain claims for more
than one credit subject to the due diligence requirements. Pursuant to
the statute, each failure to comply with the due diligence requirements
set forth in regulations prescribed by the Secretary results in a
penalty. The section 6695(g) requirements apply to each credit claimed,
meaning more than one penalty could apply to a single return or claim
for refund. The temporary regulations provide examples to show how
multiple penalties could apply when one return or claim for refund is
filed.
The Form 8867 has been revised for the 2016 tax year and is a
single checklist to be used for all applicable credits (EIC, CTC/ACTC,
and/or AOTC) on the return or claim for refund subject to the section
6695(g) due diligence requirements. The Form 8867 was streamlined to
eliminate unnecessary redundancy with other forms and schedules. These
changes were intended to reduce burden while increasing the utility of
the Form 8867 as a checklist for tax return preparers to more
accurately determine taxpayer eligibility for credits, thereby reducing
errors and increasing compliance by preparers and taxpayers. The
temporary regulations clarify Sec. 1.6695-2(b)(1)(ii) to illustrate
that the completion of Form 8867 can be based on information provided
by the taxpayer to the preparer or otherwise reasonably obtained or
previously known by the preparer.
The examples provided in Sec. 1.6695-2(b)(3)(ii) have been updated
to provide more insight into when a tax return preparer has satisfied
the due diligence knowledge requirement, including for purposes of the
CTC and AOTC. The updates to the examples in Sec. 1.6695-2T(b)(3)(ii)
illustrate that the knowledge requirement for purposes of due diligence
can be satisfied in conjunction with a tax return preparer's
information-gathering activities done for the purpose of accurately
completing other aspects of a tax return or claim for refund. New
examples, Example 2 and Example 4, have also been added to illustrate
that in certain circumstances a tax return preparer may satisfy the
knowledge requirement based on existing knowledge without having to
make additional reasonable inquiries. Another new example, Example 7,
provides an example of due diligence for purposes of the AOTC.
Section 1.6695-2(a) is amended by the temporary regulations to
reflect the changes made by section 208(c) of the 2014 Act, requiring
the IRS to index the penalty for inflation for returns or claims for
refund filed after December 31, 2014. In addition, Sec. 1.6695-
2T(c)(3) clarifies the parenthetical therein by removing the words ``or
ascertained.''
Special Analyses
Certain IRS regulations, including this one, are exempt from the
requirements of Executive Order 12866, as supplemented and reaffirmed
by Executive Order 13563. Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not
required. For applicability of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, please
refer to the cross-reference notice of proposed rulemaking published
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register. Pursuant to section
7805(f) of the Code, these regulations have been submitted to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment
on the impact on small businesses.
Drafting Information
The principal author of this regulation is Rachel L. Gregory,
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure & Administration).
List of Subjects
26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
26 CFR Part 602
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Adoption of Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR parts 1 and 602 are amended as follows:
PART 1--INCOME TAXES
0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 is amended by adding a
new entry in numerical order to read in part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 1.6695-2T is also issued under 26 U.S.C. 6695(g).
* * * * *
0
Par. 2. Section 1.6695-2 is amended by revising the section heading and
paragraphs (a), (b)(1)(i) introductory text, (b)(1)(ii), (b)(2),
(b)(3)(i) and (ii), (b)(4)(i)(B) and (C), and (c)(3) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1.6695-2 Tax return preparer due diligence requirements for
certain credits.
(a) [Reserved]. For further guidance regarding the penalty for
failure to meet due diligence requirements with respect to certain
credits, see Sec. 1.6695-2T(a).
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) [Reserved]. For further guidance regarding the completion of
Form 8867, see Sec. 1.6695-2T(b)(1)(i).
* * * * *
(ii) [Reserved]. For further guidance regarding the information
used to complete the Form 8867, see 1.6695-2T(b)(1)(ii).
(2) [Reserved]. For further guidance regarding computation, see
Sec. 1.6695-2T(b)(2).
(3) * * *
(i) [Reserved]. For further guidance regarding the knowledge
requirement, see Sec. 1.6695-2T(b)(3)(i).
(ii) [Reserved]. For current examples, see Sec. 1.6695-
2T(b)(3)(ii).
(4) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) [Reserved]. For further guidance on the retention of records,
see Sec. 1.6695-2T(b)(4)(i)(B).
(C) [Reserved]. For further guidance on the retention of records,
see Sec. 1.6695-2T(b)(4)(i)(C).
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) [Reserved]. For further guidance on the special rule for firms,
see Sec. 1.6695-2T(c)(3).
* * * * *
0
Par. 3. Section 1.6695-2T is added to read as follows:
Sec. 1.6695-2T Tax return preparer due diligence requirements for
certain credits (Temporary).
(a) Penalty for failure to meet due diligence requirements--(1) In
general. A person who is a tax return preparer (as defined in section
7701(a)(36)) of a tax return or claim for refund under the Internal
Revenue Code with respect to determining the eligibility for, or the
amount of, the child tax credit (CTC) and additional child tax credit
(ACTC) under section 24, the American
[[Page 87447]]
opportunity tax credit (AOTC) under section 25A(i), or the earned
income credit (EIC) under section 32 and who fails to satisfy the due
diligence requirements of paragraph (b) of this section will be subject
to a penalty as prescribed in section 6695(g) (indexed for inflation
under section 6695(h)) for each failure. A separate penalty applies
with respect to each credit claimed on a return or claim for refund for
which the due diligence requirements of this section are not satisfied
and for which the exception to penalty provided by paragraph (d) of
this section does not apply.
(2) Examples. The provisions of paragraph (a)(1) of this section
are illustrated by the following examples:
Example 1. Preparer A prepares a federal income tax return for
a taxpayer claiming the CTC and the AOTC. Preparer A did not meet
the due diligence requirements under this section with respect to
the CTC or the AOTC claimed on the taxpayer's return. Unless the
exception to penalty provided by paragraph (d) of this section
applies, Preparer A is subject to two penalties under section
6695(g): One for failure to meet the due diligence requirements for
the CTC and a second penalty for failure to meet the due diligence
requirements for the AOTC.
Example 2. Preparer B prepares a federal income tax return for
a taxpayer claiming the CTC and the AOTC. Preparer B did not meet
the due diligence requirements under this section with respect to
the CTC claimed on the taxpayer's return, but Preparer B did meet
the due diligence requirements under this section with respect to
the AOTC claimed on the taxpayer's return. Unless the exception to
penalty provided by paragraph (d) of this section applies, Preparer
B is subject to one penalty under section 6695(g) for the failure to
meet the due diligence requirements for the CTC. Preparer B is not
subject to a penalty under section 6695(g) for failure to meet the
due diligence requirements for the AOTC.
(b) [Reserved]. For further guidance, see Sec. 1.6695-2(b).
(1) Completion and submission of Form 8867. (i) The tax return
preparer must complete Form 8867, ``Paid Preparer's Due Diligence
Checklist,'' or such other form and such other information as may be
prescribed by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and--
(A) through (C) [Reserved]. For further guidance, see Sec. 1.6695-
2(b)(1)(i)(A) through (C).
(ii) The tax return preparer's completion of Form 8867 must be
based on information provided by the taxpayer to the tax return
preparer or otherwise reasonably obtained or known by the tax return
preparer.
(2) Computation of credit or credits. (i) When computing the amount
of a credit described in paragraph (a) of this section to be claimed on
a return or claim for refund, the tax return preparer must either--
(A) Complete the worksheet in the Form 1040, 1040A, 1040EZ, and/or
Form 8863 instructions or such other form including such other
information as may be prescribed by the IRS applicable to each credit
described in paragraph (a) of this section claimed on the return or
claim for refund; or
(B) Otherwise record in one or more documents in the tax return
preparer's paper or electronic files the tax return preparer's
computation of the credit or credits claimed on the return or claim for
refund, including the method and information used to make the
computations.
(ii) The tax return preparer's completion of an applicable
worksheet described in paragraph (b)(2)(i)(A) of this section (or other
record of the tax return preparer's computation of the credit or
credits permitted under paragraph (b)(2)(i)(B) of this section) must be
based on information provided by the taxpayer to the tax return
preparer or otherwise reasonably obtained or known by the tax return
preparer.
(3) Knowledge--(i) In general. The tax return preparer must not
know, or have reason to know, that any information used by the tax
return preparer in determining the taxpayer's eligibility for, or the
amount of, any credit described in paragraph (a) of this section and
claimed on the return or claim for refund is incorrect. The tax return
preparer may not ignore the implications of information furnished to,
or known by, the tax return preparer, and must make reasonable
inquiries if a reasonable and well-informed tax return preparer
knowledgeable in the law would conclude that the information furnished
to the tax return preparer appears to be incorrect, inconsistent, or
incomplete. The tax return preparer must also contemporaneously
document in the files any inquiries made and the responses to those
inquiries.
(ii) Examples. The provisions of paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this
section are illustrated by the following examples:
Example 1. In 2018, Q, a 22 year-old taxpayer, engages Preparer
C to prepare Q's 2017 federal income tax return. Q completes
Preparer C's standard intake questionnaire and states that she has
never been married and has two sons, ages 10 and 11. Based on the
intake sheet and other information that Q provides, including
information that shows that the boys lived with Q throughout 2017,
Preparer C believes that Q may be eligible to claim each boy as a
qualifying child for purposes of the EIC and the CTC. However, Q
provides no information to Preparer C, and Preparer C does not have
any information from other sources, to verify the relationship
between Q and the boys. To meet the knowledge requirement in
paragraph (b)(3) of this section, Preparer C must make reasonable
inquiries to determine whether each boy is a qualifying child of Q
for purposes of the EIC and the CTC, including reasonable inquiries
to verify Q's relationship to the boys, and Preparer C must
contemporaneously document these inquiries and the responses.
Example 2. Assume the same facts as in Example 1 of this
paragraph (b)(3)(ii). In addition, as part of preparing Q's 2017
federal income tax return, Preparer C made sufficient reasonable
inquiries to verify that the boys were Q's legally adopted children.
In 2019, Q engages Preparer C to prepare her 2018 federal income tax
return. When preparing Q's 2018 federal income tax return, Preparer
C is not required to make additional inquiries to determine the boys
relationship to Q for purposes of the knowledge requirement in
paragraph (b)(3) of this section.
Example 3. In 2018, R, an 18 year-old taxpayer, engages
Preparer D to prepare R's 2017 federal income tax return. R
completes Preparer D's standard intake questionnaire and states that
she has never been married, has one child, an infant, and that she
and her infant lived with R's parents during part of the 2017 tax
year. R also provides Preparer D with a Form W-2 showing that she
earned $10,000 during 2017. R provides no other documents or
information showing that R earned any other income during the tax
year. Based on the intake sheet and other information that R
provides, Preparer D believes that R may be eligible to claim the
infant as a qualifying child for the EIC and the CTC. To meet the
knowledge requirement in paragraph (b)(3) of this section, Preparer
D must make reasonable inquiries to determine whether R is eligible
to claim these credits, including reasonable inquiries to verify
that R is not a qualifying child of her parents (which would make R
ineligible to claim the EIC) or a dependent of her parents (which
would make R ineligible to claim the CTC), and Preparer D must
contemporaneously document these inquiries and the responses.
Example 4. The facts are the same as the facts in Example 3 of
this paragraph (b)(3)(ii). In addition, Preparer D previously
prepared the 2017 joint federal income tax return for R's parents.
Based on information provided by R's parents, Preparer D has
determined that R is not eligible to be claimed as a dependent or as
a qualifying child for purposes of the EIC or CTC on R's parents'
return. Therefore, for purposes of the knowledge requirement in
paragraph (b)(3) of this section, Preparer D is not required to make
additional inquiries to determine that R is not her parents'
qualifying child or dependent.
Example 5. In 2018, S engages Preparer E to prepare his 2017
federal income tax return. During Preparer E's standard intake
interview, S states that he has never been married and his niece and
nephew lived with him for part of the 2017 tax year. Preparer E
believes S may be eligible to claim each of these children as a
qualifying child for purposes of the EIC and the CTC. To meet the
[[Page 87448]]
knowledge requirement in paragraph (b)(3) of this section, Preparer
E must make reasonable inquiries to determine whether each child is
a qualifying child for purposes of the EIC and the CTC, including
reasonable inquiries about the children's parents and the children's
residency, and Preparer E must contemporaneously document these
inquiries and the responses.
Example 6. W engages Preparer F to prepare her federal income
tax return. During Preparer F's standard intake interview, W states
that she is 50 years old, has never been married, and has no
children. W further states to Preparer F that during the tax year
she was self-employed, earned $10,000 from her business, and had no
business expenses or other income. Preparer F believes W may be
eligible for the EIC. To meet the knowledge requirement in paragraph
(b)(3) of this section, Preparer F must make reasonable inquiries to
determine whether W is eligible for the EIC, including reasonable
inquiries to determine whether W's business income and expenses are
correct, and Preparer F must contemporaneously document these
inquiries and the responses.
Example 7. Y, who is 32 years old, engages Preparer G to
prepare his federal income tax return. Y completes Preparer G's
standard intake questionnaire and states that he has never been
married. As part of Preparer G's client intake process, Y provides
Preparer G with a copy of the Form 1098-T Y received showing that
University M billed $4,000 of qualified tuition and related expenses
for Y's enrollment or attendance at the university and that Y was at
least a half-time undergraduate student. Preparer G believes that Y
may be eligible for the AOTC. To meet the knowledge requirements in
paragraph (b)(3) of this section, Preparer G must make reasonable
inquiries to determine whether Y is eligible for the AOTC, as Form
1098-T does not contain all the information needed to determine
eligibility for the AOTC or to calculate the amount of the credit if
Y is eligible, and contemporaneously document these inquiries and
the responses.
(4) Retention of records. (i) [Reserved]. For further guidance, see
Sec. 1.6695-2(b)(4)(i).
(A) [Reserved]. For further guidance, see Sec. 1.6695-
2(b)(4)(i)(A).
(B) A copy of each completed worksheet required under paragraph
(b)(2)(i)(A) of this section (or other record of the tax return
preparer's computation permitted under paragraph (b)(2)(i)(B) of this
section); and
(C) A record of how and when the information used to complete Form
8867 and the applicable worksheets required under paragraph
(b)(2)(i)(A) of this section (or other record of the tax return
preparer's computation permitted under paragraph (b)(2)(i)(B) of this
section) was obtained by the tax return preparer, including the
identity of any person furnishing the information, as well as a copy of
any document that was provided by the taxpayer and on which the tax
return preparer relied to complete Form 8867 and/or an applicable
worksheet required under paragraph (b)(2)(i)(A) of this section (or
other record of the tax return preparer's computation permitted under
paragraph (b)(2)(i)(B) of this section).
(ii) through (iii) [Reserved]. For further guidance, see Sec.
1.6695-2(b)(4)(ii) through (iii).
(c) [Reserved]. For further guidance, see Sec. 1.6695-2(c).
(1) through (2) [Reserved]. For further guidance, see Sec. 1.6695-
2(c)(1) through (2).
(3) The firm disregarded its reasonable and appropriate compliance
procedures through willfulness, recklessness, or gross indifference
(including ignoring facts that would lead a person of reasonable
prudence and competence to investigate) in the preparation of the tax
return or claim for refund with respect to which the penalty is
imposed.
(d) [Reserved]. For further guidance, see Sec. 1.6695-2(d).
(e) Applicability date. This section applies to tax returns and
claims for refund prepared on or after December 5, 2016 with respect to
tax years beginning after December 31, 2015. For returns and claims for
refund prepared before December 5, 2016 with respect to tax years
beginning before January 1, 2016, the rules that apply are contained in
Sec. 1.6695-2 in effect prior to December 5, 2016. (See 26 CFR part 1
revised as of April 2016).
(f) Expiration date. This section will expire on December 5, 2019.
PART 602--OMB CONTROL NUMBERS UNDER THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT
0
Par. 4. The authority citation for part 602 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805.
Sec. 602.101 [Amended]
0
Par. 5. In Sec. 602.101, paragraph (b) is amended by removing the
entry for Sec. 1.6695-2 from the table.
John M. Dalrymple,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
Approved: November 21, 2016.
Mark J. Mazur,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 2016-28993 Filed 12-2-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P