Proposed Amendment to the Third Renewed Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Assigning Certain Federal Environmental Responsibilities to the State of California, Including National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Authority for Certain Categorical Exclusions (CEs), 86376-86378 [2016-28800]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
86376
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 230 / Wednesday, November 30, 2016 / Notices
PARTICIPATING COMPANIES—Continued
Number of
respondents
Requirement
Frequency of
response
Average
burden per
response
(minutes)
Number of
responses
Total
estimated
annual burden
(hours)
Creation of file with SSN holder identification data; maintaining required documentation/forms ..............................
Using the system to upload request file, check status, and
download results file .........................................................
Storing Consent Forms ........................................................
Activities related to compliance review ................................
90
** 251
22,590
60
22,590
90
90
90
251
251
251
22,590
22,590
22,590
5
60
60
1,883
22,590
22,590
Total ..............................................................................
........................
........................
90,373
........................
69,679
* One-time registration process/approximately 14 new participating companies per year.
** Please note there are 251 Federal business days per year on which a requesting party could submit a file.
PARTICIPATING COMPANIES WHO OPT FOR EXTERNAL TESTING ENVIRONMENT (ETE)
Number of
respondents
Requirement
ETE Registration Process (includes reviewing and completing ETE User Agreement) ..........................................
Web Service Transactions ...................................................
Reporting Issues Encountered on Web service testing
(e.g., reports on application’s reliability) ..........................
Reporting changes in users’ status (e.g., termination or
changes in users’ employment status; changes in duties
of authorized users) .........................................................
Cancellation of Agreement ..................................................
Dispute Resolution ...............................................................
Total ..............................................................................
Frequency of
response
Average
burden per
response
(minutes)
Number of
responses
Total
estimated
annual burden
(hours)
20
20
1
1
1
1
180
50
60
17
20
1
1
50
17
20
20
20
1
1
1
1
1
1
60
30
120
20
10
40
20
........................
104
........................
164
PEOPLE WHOSE SSNS SSA WILL VERIFY
Number of
respondents
Requirement
Frequency of
response
Average
burden per
response
(minutes)
Number of
responses
Estimated
annual burden
(hours)
Reading and signing authorization for SSA to release SSN
verification ........................................................................
Responding to CPA re-contact ............................................
2,800,000
5,750
1
1
2,800,000
5,750
3
5
140,000
479
Total ..............................................................................
2,805,750
........................
2,805,750
........................
140,479
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
There is one CPA respondent
conducting compliance reviews and
preparing written reports of findings.
The average burden per response is
4,800 minutes for a total burden of 7,200
hours annually.
Cost Burden
The public cost burden is dependent
upon the number of companies and
transactions. SSA based the cost
estimates below upon 90 participating
companies submitting a total 2.8 million
transactions per year.
One-Time Per Company Registration
Fee—$5,000.
Estimated per SSN Transaction Fee—
$1.40.1
1 The annual costs associated with the transaction
to each company are dependent upon the number
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Nov 29, 2016
Jkt 241001
Estimated per Company Cost to Store
Consent Forms—$300.
Date: November 25, 2016.
Naomi R. Sipple,
Reports Clearance Officer, Social Security
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2016–28822 Filed 11–29–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191–02–
of SSN transactions submitted to SSA by the
company on a yearly basis. For example, if a
company anticipates submitting 1 million requests
to SSA for the year, its total transaction cost for the
year would be $1.40 × 1,000,000, or $1,400,000.
Periodically, SSA will calculate our costs to provide
CBSV services and adjust the fee charged as needed.
SSA notifies companies in writing and via Federal
Register Notice of any changes and companies have
the opportunity to cancel the agreement or continue
service using the new transaction fee.
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
[Docket No. FHWA–2016–0035]
Proposed Amendment to the Third
Renewed Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) Assigning
Certain Federal Environmental
Responsibilities to the State of
California, Including National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Authority for Certain Categorical
Exclusions (CEs)
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed amendment,
request for comments.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\30NON1.SGM
30NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 230 / Wednesday, November 30, 2016 / Notices
The FHWA and the State of
California acting by and through its
Department of Transportation (Caltrans),
propose an amendment to the
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
authorizing the State’s participation in
the 23 U.S.C. 326 program. This
program allows FHWA to assign to
States its authority and responsibility
for determining whether certain
designated activities within the
geographic boundaries of the State are
categorically excluded from preparation
of an Environmental Assessment or an
Environmental Impact Statement under
the National Environmental Policy Act.
The parties propose to amend the MOU
to make the litigation provisions
consistent with the 23 U.S.C. 327
program MOU and to allow a 90 day
suspension of the program, giving the
State an opportunity to renew its waiver
of sovereign immunity and acceptance
of Federal court jurisdiction. The
program will resume upon the State’s
recertification that the sovereign
immunity waiver and acceptance of
Federal court jurisdiction is in place.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before December 30, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the methods described below.
To ensure that you do not duplicate
your submissions, please submit them
by only one of the means below.
Electronic or facsimile comments are
preferred because Federal offices
experience intermittent mail delays due
to security screening.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
Web site: https://www.regulations.gov/.
Follow the instructions for submitting
comments on the DOT electronic docket
site (FHWA–2016–0035).
Facsimile (Fax): 1–202–493–2251.
Mail: Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For access to the docket to view a
complete copy of the proposed MOU, or
to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov/ at any time or to
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday
through Friday, except for Federal
holidays.
Instructions: You must include the
agency name and docket number at the
beginning of your comments. All
comments received will be posted
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Nov 29, 2016
Jkt 241001
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
FHWA: Shawn Oliver; by email at
shawn.oliver@dot.gov or by telephone at
916–498–5048. The FHWA California
Division Office’s normal business hours
are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. (Pacific Time),
Monday–Friday, except for Federal
holidays. For the State of California:
Tammy Massengale; by email at
tammy.massengale@dot.ca.gov or by
telephone at 916–653–5157. State
business hours are the same as above
although State holidays may not
completely coincide with Federal
holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
Internet users may reach the Office of
the Federal Register’s home page at:
https://www.archives.gov/ and the
Government Printing Office’s database:
https://www.fdsys.gov/. An electronic
version of the proposed MOU may be
downloaded by accessing the DOT DMS
docket, as described above, at https://
www.regulations.gov/.
Background
Section 326 of Title 23 U.S. Code,
creates a program that allows the
Secretary of the U.S. Department of
Transportation (Secretary) to assign, and
a State to assume, responsibility for
determining whether certain Federal
highway projects are included within
classes of action that are categorically
excluded (CE) from requirements for
Environmental Assessments or
Environmental Impact Statements
pursuant to the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq. In addition, this program
allows the assignment of other
environmental review requirements
applicable to Federal highway projects,
except with respect to government-togovernment consultations with federally
recognized Indian tribes (23 U.S.C.
326(b)(1)). The FHWA retains
responsibility for conducting formal
government-to-government consultation
with federally recognized Indian tribes,
which is required under some of the
above-listed laws and Executive Orders.
The State may assist FHWA with formal
consultations, with consent of a tribe,
but FHWA remains responsible for the
consultation. The Secretary delegated
his authority to FHWA, which acts on
behalf of the Secretary with respect to
these matters.
The FHWA renewed California’s
participation in this program for a third
time on May 31, 2016. The original
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
86377
MOU became effective on June 7, 2007,
for an initial term of three (3) years. The
first renewal followed on June 7, 2010,
and the second renewal followed on
June 7, 2013. The third MOU renewal
has an expiration date on May 31, 2019.
The FHWA and Caltrans propose
three modifications to the MOU. First,
the parties propose to modify
Stipulations IV.G.5 and IV.G.9 with
regards to coordination on settlements
and appeals to make them consistent
with the draft MOU for participation in
the 23 U.S.C. 327 Surface
Transportation Project Delivery
Program. The draft MOU for that
Program can be accessed in Docket No.
FHWA–2016–0019.
Second, Stipulation V.B. of the MOU
contains a termination clause stating
that the State’s authority to participate
in the program will end on January 1,
2017, unless the California Legislature
takes affirmative action to extend the
sovereign immunity waiver under the
Eleventh Amendment of the U.S.
Constitution. The parties propose an
amendment that establishes a process to
address a possible temporary lapse in
the State’s statutory consent to Federal
jurisdiction and waiver of sovereign
immunity. If the State does not provide
consent to Federal court jurisdiction
and waive sovereign immunity by
December 31, 2016, this MOU will be
suspended and Caltrans will not be able
to make any NEPA decisions or
implement any of the environmental
review responsibilities assigned under
the MOU. The FHWA and Caltrans
propose a temporary suspension not to
exceed 90 days to provide time for the
State to address the deficiency. In the
event that the State does not take the
necessary action and Caltrans does not
provide adequate certification within
the time period provided, the State’s
participation in the Program will be
terminated. This language is the same as
the one proposed in the draft MOU for
the Surface Transportation Project
Delivery Program (Docket No. FHWA–
2016–0019).
Third, the parties propose an
amendment to Stipulation language to
eliminate unnecessary paperwork. The
current MOU requires a Federal
Register notice that announces the
agency’s decision and execution of the
MOU. The parties believe that requiring
publication in the Federal Register of
the decision is unnecessary. Publication
of the final MOU through other means,
such as in the State’s public Web site,
would be a more effective means of
disseminating the outcome of this
process.
The FHWA will consider the
comments submitted on the proposed
E:\FR\FM\30NON1.SGM
30NON1
86378
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 230 / Wednesday, November 30, 2016 / Notices
MOU when making its decision on
whether to execute this renewal MOU.
The FHWA will make the final,
executed MOU publicly available.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning
and Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this
program)
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 326; 42 U.S.C. 4331,
4332; 23 CFR 771.117; 49 CFR 1.85; 40 CFR
1507.3, 1508.4.
Issued on: November 23, 2016.
Vincent Mammano,
California Division Administrator, Federal
Highway Administration.
[FR Doc. 2016–28800 Filed 11–29–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary of
Transportation
[DOT–OST–2016–0227]
Positioning, Navigation, and Timing
(PNT) Service for National Critical
Infrastructure Resiliency
Office of the Secretary (OST),
U.S. Department of Transportation
(DOT).
ACTION: Request for information (RFI).
AGENCY:
This RFI provides an outline
for the potential use by the Federal
Government of one or more Positioning,
Navigation, and Timing (PNT)
technologies to back up signals from the
Global Positioning System (GPS) and to
ensure resiliency of PNT for U.S.
Critical Infrastructure (CI) operations.
As a co-chair and member of the
National Executive Committee for
Space-based PNT, and a provider and
user of U.S. critical infrastructure
services, the Department of
Transportation is investigating
opportunities by which the Federal
Government may make use of service(s)
which can provide the necessary backup
capability or capabilities to ensure PNT
continuity for U.S. CI in the event of a
temporary disruption in GPS
availability. Further, as the lead civil
agency for PNT in the Federal
Government, the Department of
Transportation is interested in
leveraging PNT service technology
initiatives under consideration or
currently undertaken by industry.
The Federal Government is presently
documenting civil requirements for PNT
capabilities to serve as the basis for
potential future acquisition activity. The
initial objective is to support
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Nov 29, 2016
Jkt 241001
sustainment of domestic CI timing
continuity with the capability to extend
service(s) in the future to provide
positioning/navigation continuity as
well.
DATES: Responses should be filed by
January 30, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may file responses
identified by the docket number DOT–
OST–2016–0227 by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Ave. SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., between 9:00
a.m. and 5:00 p.m. ET, Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
Instructions: You must include the
agency name and docket number DOT–
OST–2016–0227 at the beginning of
your submission. All submissions
received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all submissions
received in any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
document (or signing the submission, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78), or you may visit https://
DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Docket: For access to the docket and
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov or to the street
address listed above. Follow the online
instructions for accessing the docket.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen L. Van Dyke, Director,
Positioning, Navigation, and Timing &
Spectrum Management, Office of the
Assistant Secretary for Research and
Technology, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave.
SE., Washington, DC, 20590, 202–366–
3180, karen.vandyke@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Overview
This RFI provides an outline for the
potential use by the Federal
Government of one or more PNT
technologies to back up signals from
GPS and to ensure resiliency of PNT for
U.S. critical infrastructure operations.
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The national policy requirement to
ensure resilient PNT capabilities is
expressed in two Presidential policy
documents. The National Space Policy
of the United States of America, dated
June 28, 2010, states, ‘‘. . . the United
States shall . . . Invest in domestic
capabilities and support international
activities to detect, mitigate, and
increase resiliency to harmful
interference to GPS, and identify and
implement, as necessary and
appropriate, redundant and back-up
systems or approaches for critical
infrastructure, key resources, and
mission-essential functions.’’ This
follows a statement in U.S. Space-based
PNT Policy dated December 15, 2004
(National Security Presidential Directive
(NSPD)–39) that, ‘‘. . . the United States
Government shall . . . Improve the
performance of space-based positioning,
navigation, and timing services,
including more robust resistance to
interference for, and consistent with,
U.S. and allied national security
purposes, homeland security, and civil,
commercial, and scientific users
worldwide . . . and, Promote the use of
U.S. space-based positioning,
navigation, and timing services and
capabilities for applications at the
Federal, State, and local level, to the
maximum practical extent.’’
As defined in NSPD–39, the
responsibility to ‘‘. . . advise and
coordinate with and among the
Departments and Agencies responsible
for the strategic decisions regarding
policies, architectures, requirements,
and resource allocation for maintaining
and improving U.S. space-based PNT
infrastructures, including the GPS, its
augmentations, [and] security for these
services . . .’’ rests with the National
Space-Based PNT Executive Committee,
co-chaired by the Deputy Secretaries of
the Department of Defense and the
Department of Transportation. NSPD–39
also specifically requires that the
Secretary of Transportation, in
coordination with the Secretary of
Homeland Security, ‘‘. . . develop,
acquire, operate, and maintain backup
position, navigation, and timing
capabilities that can support critical
transportation, homeland security, and
other critical civil and commercial
infrastructure applications within the
United States, in the event of a
disruption of the GPS or other spacebased positioning, navigation, and
timing services . . .’’
As a co-chair and member of the
National Executive Committee for
Space-based PNT, and a provider and
user of U.S. CI services, the Department
of Transportation is investigating
opportunities by which the Federal
E:\FR\FM\30NON1.SGM
30NON1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 230 (Wednesday, November 30, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 86376-86378]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-28800]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
[Docket No. FHWA-2016-0035]
Proposed Amendment to the Third Renewed Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) Assigning Certain Federal Environmental
Responsibilities to the State of California, Including National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Authority for Certain Categorical
Exclusions (CEs)
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed amendment, request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 86377]]
SUMMARY: The FHWA and the State of California acting by and through its
Department of Transportation (Caltrans), propose an amendment to the
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) authorizing the State's participation
in the 23 U.S.C. 326 program. This program allows FHWA to assign to
States its authority and responsibility for determining whether certain
designated activities within the geographic boundaries of the State are
categorically excluded from preparation of an Environmental Assessment
or an Environmental Impact Statement under the National Environmental
Policy Act. The parties propose to amend the MOU to make the litigation
provisions consistent with the 23 U.S.C. 327 program MOU and to allow a
90 day suspension of the program, giving the State an opportunity to
renew its waiver of sovereign immunity and acceptance of Federal court
jurisdiction. The program will resume upon the State's recertification
that the sovereign immunity waiver and acceptance of Federal court
jurisdiction is in place.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 30, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the methods described
below. To ensure that you do not duplicate your submissions, please
submit them by only one of the means below. Electronic or facsimile
comments are preferred because Federal offices experience intermittent
mail delays due to security screening.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to Web site: https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the instructions for submitting comments
on the DOT electronic docket site (FHWA-2016-0035).
Facsimile (Fax): 1-202-493-2251.
Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For access to the docket to view a complete copy of the proposed
MOU, or to read background documents or comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov/ at any time or to 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday
through Friday, except for Federal holidays.
Instructions: You must include the agency name and docket number at
the beginning of your comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For FHWA: Shawn Oliver; by email at
shawn.oliver@dot.gov or by telephone at 916-498-5048. The FHWA
California Division Office's normal business hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30
p.m. (Pacific Time), Monday-Friday, except for Federal holidays. For
the State of California: Tammy Massengale; by email at
tammy.massengale@dot.ca.gov or by telephone at 916-653-5157. State
business hours are the same as above although State holidays may not
completely coincide with Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
Internet users may reach the Office of the Federal Register's home
page at: https://www.archives.gov/ and the Government Printing Office's
database: https://www.fdsys.gov/. An electronic version of the proposed
MOU may be downloaded by accessing the DOT DMS docket, as described
above, at https://www.regulations.gov/.
Background
Section 326 of Title 23 U.S. Code, creates a program that allows
the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Transportation (Secretary) to
assign, and a State to assume, responsibility for determining whether
certain Federal highway projects are included within classes of action
that are categorically excluded (CE) from requirements for
Environmental Assessments or Environmental Impact Statements pursuant
to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4321
et seq. In addition, this program allows the assignment of other
environmental review requirements applicable to Federal highway
projects, except with respect to government-to-government consultations
with federally recognized Indian tribes (23 U.S.C. 326(b)(1)). The FHWA
retains responsibility for conducting formal government-to-government
consultation with federally recognized Indian tribes, which is required
under some of the above-listed laws and Executive Orders. The State may
assist FHWA with formal consultations, with consent of a tribe, but
FHWA remains responsible for the consultation. The Secretary delegated
his authority to FHWA, which acts on behalf of the Secretary with
respect to these matters.
The FHWA renewed California's participation in this program for a
third time on May 31, 2016. The original MOU became effective on June
7, 2007, for an initial term of three (3) years. The first renewal
followed on June 7, 2010, and the second renewal followed on June 7,
2013. The third MOU renewal has an expiration date on May 31, 2019.
The FHWA and Caltrans propose three modifications to the MOU.
First, the parties propose to modify Stipulations IV.G.5 and IV.G.9
with regards to coordination on settlements and appeals to make them
consistent with the draft MOU for participation in the 23 U.S.C. 327
Surface Transportation Project Delivery Program. The draft MOU for that
Program can be accessed in Docket No. FHWA-2016-0019.
Second, Stipulation V.B. of the MOU contains a termination clause
stating that the State's authority to participate in the program will
end on January 1, 2017, unless the California Legislature takes
affirmative action to extend the sovereign immunity waiver under the
Eleventh Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The parties propose an
amendment that establishes a process to address a possible temporary
lapse in the State's statutory consent to Federal jurisdiction and
waiver of sovereign immunity. If the State does not provide consent to
Federal court jurisdiction and waive sovereign immunity by December 31,
2016, this MOU will be suspended and Caltrans will not be able to make
any NEPA decisions or implement any of the environmental review
responsibilities assigned under the MOU. The FHWA and Caltrans propose
a temporary suspension not to exceed 90 days to provide time for the
State to address the deficiency. In the event that the State does not
take the necessary action and Caltrans does not provide adequate
certification within the time period provided, the State's
participation in the Program will be terminated. This language is the
same as the one proposed in the draft MOU for the Surface
Transportation Project Delivery Program (Docket No. FHWA-2016-0019).
Third, the parties propose an amendment to Stipulation language to
eliminate unnecessary paperwork. The current MOU requires a Federal
Register notice that announces the agency's decision and execution of
the MOU. The parties believe that requiring publication in the Federal
Register of the decision is unnecessary. Publication of the final MOU
through other means, such as in the State's public Web site, would be a
more effective means of disseminating the outcome of this process.
The FHWA will consider the comments submitted on the proposed
[[Page 86378]]
MOU when making its decision on whether to execute this renewal MOU.
The FHWA will make the final, executed MOU publicly available.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205,
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this program)
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 326; 42 U.S.C. 4331, 4332; 23 CFR 771.117;
49 CFR 1.85; 40 CFR 1507.3, 1508.4.
Issued on: November 23, 2016.
Vincent Mammano,
California Division Administrator, Federal Highway Administration.
[FR Doc. 2016-28800 Filed 11-29-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P
