Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review, 86330-86332 [2016-28797]

Download as PDF 86330 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 230 / Wednesday, November 30, 2016 / Notices Applicants: National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation. Description: Compliance filing TSCA Informational Filing (11–22–16). Filed Date: 11/22/16. Accession Number: 20161122–5173. Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/5/16. The filings are accessible in the Commission’s eLibrary system by clicking on the links or querying the docket number. Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission’s Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding. eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/ docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659. Dated November 23, 2016. Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2016–28810 Filed 11–29–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES Combined Notice of Filings #1 Take notice that the Commission received the following electric rate filings: Docket Numbers: ER10–1874–004; ER10–2881–030; ER10–2882–031; ER10–2883–030; ER10–2884–030. Applicants: Mankato Energy Center, LLC, Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company, Gulf Power Company, Mississippi Power Company. Description: Notification of NonMaterial of Change in Status of Mankato Energy Center, LLC, et al. Filed Date: 11/22/16. Accession Number: 20161122–5246. Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/13/16. Docket Numbers: ER12–1266–007. Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. Description: Compliance filing: 2016– 11–23_Order 745 Compliance Filing to be effective 6/12/2012. Filed Date: 11/23/16. Accession Number: 20161123–5082. Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/14/16. Docket Numbers: ER13–1944–005. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:51 Nov 29, 2016 Jkt 241001 Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. Description: Compliance filing: Compliance filing per 10/28/2016 order in Docket No. ER13–1944 to be effective 1/1/2014. Filed Date: 11/22/16. Accession Number: 20161122–5198. Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/13/16. Docket Numbers: ER17–392–000. Applicants: City of Pasadena, California. Description: City of Pasadena, California tariff filing (Work Paper Filings—Parts 1 and 2). Filed Date: 11/22/16. Accession Number: 20161122–5245, 20161122–5244. Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/13/16. Docket Numbers: ER17–412–000. Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing: 2016–11–22_SA 2898 Termination of Ameren-Ford County Wind Farm GIA (J375) to be effective 1/23/2017. Filed Date: 11/22/16. Accession Number: 20161122–5195. Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/13/16. Docket Numbers: ER17–413–000. Applicants: Southern California Edison Company. Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing: SCE Amendments to WDAT GIP—Smart Inverter & Interconnection Process to be effective 1/23/2017. Filed Date: 11/23/16. Accession Number: 20161123–5081. Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/14/16. The filings are accessible in the Commission’s eLibrary system by clicking on the links or querying the docket number. Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission’s Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding. eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/ docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659. Dated: November 23, 2016. Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2016–28815 Filed 11–29–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION Sunshine Act Notice November 28, 2016. 10:00 a.m., Thursday, December 8, 2016. PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20004 (enter from F Street entrance). STATUS: Open. MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open session: Secretary of Labor v. Portable, Inc., Docket No. EAJA 2015–1–M. (Issues include whether the Judge erred by ruling that the Secretary’s position was not substantially justified.) Any person attending this meeting who requires special accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d). CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434–9935/(202) 708–9300 for TDD Relay/1–800–877– 8339 for toll free. TIME AND DATE: PHONE NUMBER FOR LISTENING TO MEETING: 1–(866) 867–4769, Passcode: 129–339. Sarah L. Stewart, Deputy General Counsel. [FR Doc. 2016–28864 Filed 11–28–16; 4:15 pm] BILLING CODE 6735–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [30Day–17–16AQM] Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has submitted the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The notice for the proposed information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address any of the following: (a) Evaluate whether the E:\FR\FM\30NON1.SGM 30NON1 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 230 / Wednesday, November 30, 2016 / Notices proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; (d) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses; and (e) Assess information collection costs. To request additional information on the proposed project or to obtain a copy of the information collection plan and instruments, call (404) 639–7570 or send an email to omb@cdc.gov. Written comments and/or suggestions regarding the items contained in this notice should be directed to the Attention: CDC Desk Officer, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503 or by fax to (202) 395–5806. Written comments should be received within 30 days of this notice. sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES Proposed Project Presidential Youth Fitness Program Evaluation—New—National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Background and Brief Description In 2013, the Presidential Youth Fitness Program began its first round of funding to elementary, middle and high school PE teachers who applied to the program. A second round of funding began in 2014 and a third in 2015. Each participating school receives support to implement the PYFP for three years. The resources provided to PE teachers include: professional development training, awards for student recognition of fitness achievements, access to a professional learning community and access to FitnessGram® fitness assessment software. For the schools selected to receive PYFP support, the requirements include: (1) Information Technology (IT) manager and PE teacher participation in the FitnessGram® software training, (2) PE teacher participation in PYFP professional development training, (3) conducting FitnessGram® assessments according to VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:51 Nov 29, 2016 Jkt 241001 the training, (4) recognizing student achievement in fitness and physical activity, (5) confirming continued participation in the program at the end of Years 1 and 2, and (6) participating in evaluation activities, including the submission of required data on an annual basis. The PYFP is designed to supplement the traditional PE course and support physical education (PE) teachers in laying the foundation for students to lead an active life. CDC plans to conduct the first rigorous evaluation of the PYFP. The evaluation will assess the impact of the program on student, PE teacher and school level outcomes (outcome evaluation) as well as barriers and facilitators to program implementation (process evaluation). Evaluation activities will take place in 11 schools implementing the PYFP and 11 match comparison schools, contributing a total of 82 sixth grade PE classes. Information collection will be conducted in 6 PYFP and 6 match comparison schools in Spring 2017 and 5 PYFP and 5 match comparison schools in Fall 2017. The PYFP schools recruited to participate in the PYFP Evaluation will be identified from a list of schools receiving Round 2 or Round 3 PYFP funding and meeting the following inclusion criteria: (1) Middle school with a sixth grade, (2) sixth grade enrollment of 150 or higher, (3) 50% or more of students receiving free or reduced lunch, and (4) documented completion of PYFP professional development training. Comparison schools will be matched based on criteria 1–3 above as well as location to ensure similar PE policies and standards. The process and outcome evaluation will involve data collection activities with four respondent groups: (1) Students, (2) PE teachers, (3) parents, and (4) school administrators. The specific aims of the outcome evaluation are to examine how the PYFP impacts student fitness and physical activity, particularly how the program impacts student: (1) Fitness knowledge and health knowledge, (2) attitudes toward physical activity, (3) motivation to be physically active, (4) physical activity levels and (5) fitness. Surveys to be conducted at all schools include the: (1) Paper-based PYFP Student Survey, (2) online PYFP PE Teacher Survey, and (3) online PYFP School Administrator Survey. There are minor differences in the survey instruments depending on whether the school is a PYFP participant or a non-PYFP school. The outcome evaluation will also determine PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 86331 the changes made as a result of the PYFP such as changes at the school level (e.g., improved PE and physical activity policies and practices, increased parent awareness of school PE and physical activity) and changes in PE teaching practices (e.g., integration of fitness education, increased use of fitness assessment tools and improved practices for fitness testing). The outcome evaluation will include fitness assessments with approximately 2,460 students as part of the standard PE program (1,230 PYFP sixth grade students and 1,230 non-PYFP sixth grade students). Fitness assessments will be conducted at both the beginning and end of the semester using FitnessGram®’s pacer and body composition assessments. Finally, a subset of 6 PYFP and 6 match comparison schools will assess students’ physical activity levels by collecting student accelerometry data. Accelerometry will be conducted in a subset of 25 PYFP and 25 non-PYFP classes to capture data from approximately 500 students (250 students from PYFP schools and 250 students from match comparison schools). Accelerometry data collection will involve wearing the device for a week at the beginning and a week at the end of semester and noting hours of wear time and class schedule. Information collection for the process evaluation will be conducted only in the 11 PYFP schools. The aims of the process evaluation are to describe how PYFP resources were used by teachers and schools, the strategies used by teachers and schools to integrate fitness education and student recognition of fitness achievement into the schools, and barriers and facilitators relevant to PYFP implementation. All PYFP schools will complete cost and time use worksheets. In addition, focus groups with PE teachers, students, and parents will be conducted in a subset of 6 PYFP schools. Focus groups will take place on school grounds during or outside of the school day, depending on availability of a given respondent group. The information collected for the PYFP evaluation will allow the CDC and partners to assess the impact of the PYFP compared with a traditional PE curriculum and gather information critical for program improvement. OMB approval is requested for two years. Participation in the PYFP Evaluation is voluntary and there are no costs to respondents other than their time. E:\FR\FM\30NON1.SGM 30NON1 86332 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 230 / Wednesday, November 30, 2016 / Notices ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS Number of respondents Number of responses per respondent Average burden per response (in hrs) Type of respondents Form name 6th grade students in PYFP Schools ............. FitnessGram® Data Collection Form ............. Accelerometry Log ......................................... Student Survey (PYFP Schools) .................... Student Focus Group Moderator Guide ........ PE Teacher Survey (PYFP Schools) ............. PE Teacher Focus Group Moderator Guide .. PYFP Time Use Worksheet ........................... School Administrator Survey (PYFP Schools) PYFP Cost Worksheet ................................... Parent Focus Group Moderator Guide .......... 615 125 615 30 22 12 6 6 6 30 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 15/60 30/60 15/60 1 25/60 1 30/60 20/60 1 1 FitnessGram® Data Collection Form ............. Accelerometry Log ......................................... Student Survey (non-PYFP Schools) ............ PE Teacher Survey (non-PYFP Schools) ...... School Administrator Survey (non-PYFP Schools). 615 125 615 22 6 2 2 1 1 1 15/60 30/60 15/60 25/60 20/60 PE teachers in PYFP Schools ........................ School administrators in PYFP Schools ......... Parents of 6th graders enrolled in PE at PYFP Schools. 6th grade students in non-PYFP Schools ...... PE teachers in non-PYFP Schools ................. School Administrators in non-PYFP Schools Leroy A. Richardson, Chief, Information Collection Review Office, Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of the Associate Director for Science, Office of the Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [FR Doc. 2016–28797 Filed 11–29–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4163–18–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [60Day–17–16BCY; Docket No. CDC–2016– 0112] Proposed Data Collection Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). ACTION: Notice with comment period. AGENCY: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as part of its continuing efforts to reduce public burden and maximize the utility of government information, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This notice invites comment on a proposed information collection project entitled ‘‘Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices related to a Domestic Readiness Initiative on Zika Virus Disease.’’ This project consists of telephone interviews with participants in Puerto Rico and the domestic U.S. sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:51 Nov 29, 2016 Jkt 241001 Written comments must be received on or before January 30, 2017. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. CDC–2016– 0112 by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Mail: Leroy A. Richardson, Information Collection Review Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE., MS– D74, Atlanta, Georgia 30329. Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name and Docket Number. All relevant comments received will be posted without change to Regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to Regulations.gov. Please note: All public comment should be submitted through the Federal eRulemaking portal (Regulations.gov) or by U.S. mail to the address listed above. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request more information on the proposed project or to obtain a copy of the information collection plan and instruments, contact the Information Collection Review Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE., MS–D74, Atlanta, Georgia 30329; phone: 404–639–7570; Email: omb@cdc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor. In addition, the PRA also DATES: PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 requires Federal agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including each new proposed collection, each proposed extension of existing collection of information, and each reinstatement of previously approved information collection before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with this requirement, we are publishing this notice of a proposed data collection as described below. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and (e) estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; to develop, acquire, install and utilize technology and systems for the purpose of collecting, validating and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; to train E:\FR\FM\30NON1.SGM 30NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 230 (Wednesday, November 30, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 86330-86332]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-28797]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

[30Day-17-16AQM]


Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review

    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has submitted 
the following information collection request to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The notice for the proposed 
information collection is published to obtain comments from the public 
and affected agencies.
    Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected 
agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are 
encouraged. Your comments should address any of the following: (a) 
Evaluate whether the

[[Page 86331]]

proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper 
performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the 
information will have practical utility; (b) Evaluate the accuracy of 
the agencies estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of 
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions 
used; (c) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information 
to be collected; (d) Minimize the burden of the collection of 
information on those who are to respond, including through the use of 
appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological 
collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., 
permitting electronic submission of responses; and (e) Assess 
information collection costs.
    To request additional information on the proposed project or to 
obtain a copy of the information collection plan and instruments, call 
(404) 639-7570 or send an email to omb@cdc.gov. Written comments and/or 
suggestions regarding the items contained in this notice should be 
directed to the Attention: CDC Desk Officer, Office of Management and 
Budget, Washington, DC 20503 or by fax to (202) 395-5806. Written 
comments should be received within 30 days of this notice.

Proposed Project

    Presidential Youth Fitness Program Evaluation--New--National Center 
for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP), Centers 
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Background and Brief Description

    In 2013, the Presidential Youth Fitness Program began its first 
round of funding to elementary, middle and high school PE teachers who 
applied to the program. A second round of funding began in 2014 and a 
third in 2015. Each participating school receives support to implement 
the PYFP for three years. The resources provided to PE teachers 
include: professional development training, awards for student 
recognition of fitness achievements, access to a professional learning 
community and access to FitnessGram[supreg] fitness assessment 
software. For the schools selected to receive PYFP support, the 
requirements include: (1) Information Technology (IT) manager and PE 
teacher participation in the FitnessGram[supreg] software training, (2) 
PE teacher participation in PYFP professional development training, (3) 
conducting FitnessGram[supreg] assessments according to the training, 
(4) recognizing student achievement in fitness and physical activity, 
(5) confirming continued participation in the program at the end of 
Years 1 and 2, and (6) participating in evaluation activities, 
including the submission of required data on an annual basis. The PYFP 
is designed to supplement the traditional PE course and support 
physical education (PE) teachers in laying the foundation for students 
to lead an active life.
    CDC plans to conduct the first rigorous evaluation of the PYFP. The 
evaluation will assess the impact of the program on student, PE teacher 
and school level outcomes (outcome evaluation) as well as barriers and 
facilitators to program implementation (process evaluation). Evaluation 
activities will take place in 11 schools implementing the PYFP and 11 
match comparison schools, contributing a total of 82 sixth grade PE 
classes. Information collection will be conducted in 6 PYFP and 6 match 
comparison schools in Spring 2017 and 5 PYFP and 5 match comparison 
schools in Fall 2017. The PYFP schools recruited to participate in the 
PYFP Evaluation will be identified from a list of schools receiving 
Round 2 or Round 3 PYFP funding and meeting the following inclusion 
criteria: (1) Middle school with a sixth grade, (2) sixth grade 
enrollment of 150 or higher, (3) 50% or more of students receiving free 
or reduced lunch, and (4) documented completion of PYFP professional 
development training. Comparison schools will be matched based on 
criteria 1-3 above as well as location to ensure similar PE policies 
and standards. The process and outcome evaluation will involve data 
collection activities with four respondent groups: (1) Students, (2) PE 
teachers, (3) parents, and (4) school administrators.
    The specific aims of the outcome evaluation are to examine how the 
PYFP impacts student fitness and physical activity, particularly how 
the program impacts student: (1) Fitness knowledge and health 
knowledge, (2) attitudes toward physical activity, (3) motivation to be 
physically active, (4) physical activity levels and (5) fitness. 
Surveys to be conducted at all schools include the: (1) Paper-based 
PYFP Student Survey, (2) online PYFP PE Teacher Survey, and (3) online 
PYFP School Administrator Survey. There are minor differences in the 
survey instruments depending on whether the school is a PYFP 
participant or a non-PYFP school. The outcome evaluation will also 
determine the changes made as a result of the PYFP such as changes at 
the school level (e.g., improved PE and physical activity policies and 
practices, increased parent awareness of school PE and physical 
activity) and changes in PE teaching practices (e.g., integration of 
fitness education, increased use of fitness assessment tools and 
improved practices for fitness testing).
    The outcome evaluation will include fitness assessments with 
approximately 2,460 students as part of the standard PE program (1,230 
PYFP sixth grade students and 1,230 non-PYFP sixth grade students). 
Fitness assessments will be conducted at both the beginning and end of 
the semester using FitnessGram[supreg]'s pacer and body composition 
assessments. Finally, a subset of 6 PYFP and 6 match comparison schools 
will assess students' physical activity levels by collecting student 
accelerometry data. Accelerometry will be conducted in a subset of 25 
PYFP and 25 non-PYFP classes to capture data from approximately 500 
students (250 students from PYFP schools and 250 students from match 
comparison schools). Accelerometry data collection will involve wearing 
the device for a week at the beginning and a week at the end of 
semester and noting hours of wear time and class schedule.
    Information collection for the process evaluation will be conducted 
only in the 11 PYFP schools. The aims of the process evaluation are to 
describe how PYFP resources were used by teachers and schools, the 
strategies used by teachers and schools to integrate fitness education 
and student recognition of fitness achievement into the schools, and 
barriers and facilitators relevant to PYFP implementation. All PYFP 
schools will complete cost and time use worksheets. In addition, focus 
groups with PE teachers, students, and parents will be conducted in a 
subset of 6 PYFP schools. Focus groups will take place on school 
grounds during or outside of the school day, depending on availability 
of a given respondent group.
    The information collected for the PYFP evaluation will allow the 
CDC and partners to assess the impact of the PYFP compared with a 
traditional PE curriculum and gather information critical for program 
improvement.
    OMB approval is requested for two years. Participation in the PYFP 
Evaluation is voluntary and there are no costs to respondents other 
than their time.

[[Page 86332]]



                                        Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                     Number of    Average burden
          Type of respondents                   Form name            Number of     responses per   per response
                                                                    respondents     respondent       (in hrs)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6th grade students in PYFP Schools....  FitnessGram[supreg] Data             615               2           15/60
                                         Collection Form.
                                        Accelerometry Log.......             125               2           30/60
                                        Student Survey (PYFP                 615               1           15/60
                                         Schools).
                                        Student Focus Group                   30               1               1
                                         Moderator Guide.
PE teachers in PYFP Schools...........  PE Teacher Survey (PYFP               22               1           25/60
                                         Schools).
                                        PE Teacher Focus Group                12               1               1
                                         Moderator Guide.
                                        PYFP Time Use Worksheet.               6               1           30/60
School administrators in PYFP Schools.  School Administrator                   6               1           20/60
                                         Survey (PYFP Schools).
                                        PYFP Cost Worksheet.....               6               1               1
Parents of 6th graders enrolled in PE   Parent Focus Group                    30               1               1
 at PYFP Schools.                        Moderator Guide.
6th grade students in non-PYFP Schools  FitnessGram[supreg] Data             615               2           15/60
                                         Collection Form.
                                        Accelerometry Log.......             125               2           30/60
                                        Student Survey (non-PYFP             615               1           15/60
                                         Schools).
PE teachers in non-PYFP Schools.......  PE Teacher Survey (non-               22               1           25/60
                                         PYFP Schools).
School Administrators in non-PYFP       School Administrator                   6               1           20/60
 Schools.                                Survey (non-PYFP
                                         Schools).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Leroy A. Richardson,
Chief, Information Collection Review Office, Office of Scientific 
Integrity, Office of the Associate Director for Science, Office of the 
Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2016-28797 Filed 11-29-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4163-18-P