Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill; Draft Louisiana Trustee Implementation Group Restoration Plan #1: Restoration of Wetlands, Coastal, and Nearshore Habitats; Habitat Projects on Federally Managed Lands; and Birds, 86337-86338 [2016-28675]
Download as PDF
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 230 / Wednesday, November 30, 2016 / Notices
program’’, Encyclopedia Britannica (2013),
(9/19/2013) https://www.britannica.com/
EBchecked/topic/130654/computer-program,
which explains, in part, that ‘‘a program is
prepared by first formulating a task and then
expressing it in an appropriate computer
language, presumably one suited to the
application.’’ While the programming
occurred in the United States, the
downloading occurred in Singapore. Given
these facts, we found that the country where
the last substantial transformation occurred
was Malaysia, namely, where the major
assembly processes were performed.
Therefore, we found that the country of
origin for purposes of U.S. Government
procurement was Malaysia.
In HQ H240199 dated March 10, 2015, four
different scenarios for the production of a
computer were presented. In the third
scenario, all of the hardware components
were assembled in Country A and imported
into Country F. The operations that occurred
in Country F were that the BIOS and the OS
were downloaded. The issue was whether the
downloading of the BIOS and OS
substantially transformed the notebook
computer. We reiterated that programming a
device that defines its use generally
constitutes a substantial transformation.
Software downloading, however, does not
amount to programming. Consistent with
previous CBP rulings cited above, we found
that the BIOS and OS downloading did not
result in a substantial transformation in
Country F. Given these facts, we found that
the country where the last substantial
transformation occurred was Country A,
where the major assembly processes were
performed.
The facts involved in this case are very
similar to the facts described in HQ H241362,
except that in the second scenario presented,
the firmware that is installed on the HDDs is
largely written in a country other than the
country where it will be installed. Although
some of the work in writing the firmware is
done in the United States, the overwhelming
majority of the time and money expended in
developing the firmware was expended in
Singapore and not in the United States. In
fact, according to the submission, in
developing the firmware, more than five
times the amount of time and money is
expended in Singapore than in the United
States. In the second scenario the only major
operation that occurs in the United States to
produce the finished HDDs, is the
installation of the largely foreign written
firmware.
For the first scenario, we find that the
country of origin of the HDDs will be the
country where the firmware is largely written
and installed onto the HDDs, Singapore for
the NS drives, and South Korea for the
Samsung Spinpoint. As in H241362, the
firmware, mostly created in either Singapore
or South Korea and downloaded in those
countries, imparts the essential character of
the HDDs. The use of the HDDs is solely
dictated by the firmware and it otherwise has
no use. However, in the second scenario, the
HDDs are assembled in one country, the
firmware is largely written in another
country, and downloaded in a third country,
the United States. While counsel contends
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Nov 29, 2016
Jkt 241001
that the country of origin of the HDDs should
similarly be the country where the firmware
is downloaded because the HDD cannot
function without the firmware being
installed, that is not the correct test used to
determine the country of origin of a product.
The country of origin of a product is
determined based on where the last
substantial transformation occurs. As the
holdings of HQ H241177 and HQ H240199
make clear, it is CBP’s position that mere
downloading of software that is written in
another country onto an information
processing device is not sufficient to be
considered a substantial transformation of
that device. While the downloading does
make the HDD functional, the country where
that occurs is not where a substantial
transformation occurs. As the entire assembly
process occurs in either [
], we find
that the country of origin of the HDDs will
either be [
]. This finding regarding
the country of origin of the HDDs will apply
both for purposes of government
procurement, as well as for country of origin
marking.
HOLDING:
Based on the facts of this case, in first
scenario, we find for purposes of U.S.
Government procurement, the country of
origin of the Notebook HDDs will either be
Singapore or South Korea, where the
firmware is both written and installed onto
the HDDs. In the second scenario, where the
firmware is written in a different country
from where it is downloaded onto the HDDs,
for purposes of U.S. Government
procurement and country of origin marking,
the country of origin of the Notebook HDDs
will be the country where the last substantial
transformation takes place, namely the
country where the device components are
finally assembled, which in this case will
either be [
].
Notice of this final determination will be
given in the Federal Register, as required by
19 CFR 177.29. Any party-at-interest other
than the party which requested this final
determination may request, pursuant to 19
CFR 177.31, that CBP reexamine the matter
anew and issue a new final determination.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 177.30, any party-atinterest may, within 30 days of publication
of the Federal Register Notice referenced
above, seek judicial review of this final
determination before the Court of
International Trade.
Sincerely,
Myles B. Harmon,
Acting Executive Director Regulations and
Rulings Office of Trade.
[FR Doc. 2016–28790 Filed 11–29–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
86337
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[FWS–R4–FHC–2016–N208;
FVHC98210408710–XXX–FF04G01000]
Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill; Draft
Louisiana Trustee Implementation
Group Restoration Plan #1:
Restoration of Wetlands, Coastal, and
Nearshore Habitats; Habitat Projects
on Federally Managed Lands; and
Birds
Department of the Interior.
Notice of availability; reopening
of public comment period.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
We are reopening the public
comment period on the Louisiana
Trustee Implementation Group Draft
Restoration Plan #1: Restoration of
Wetlands, Coastal, and Nearshore
Habitats; Habitat Projects on Federally
Managed Lands; and Birds (Draft
Restoration Plan #1). We opened the
public comment period via a November
1, 2016, notice of availability. The
public comment period closed on
November 28, 2016.
DATES: Comments Due Date: We will
consider public comments received
November 1, 2016 through December 9,
2016.
ADDRESSES:
Obtaining Documents: You may
download the Louisiana Trustee
Implementation Group Draft Restoration
Plan 1: Restoration of Wetlands, Coastal,
and Nearshore Habitats; Habitat Projects
on Federally Managed Lands; and Birds
at any of the following sites:
• https://www.gulfspillrestoration.
noaa.gov
• https://www.doi.gov/deepwaterhorizon
• https://la-dwh.com
Alternatively, you may request a CD
of the Draft Restoration Plan 1 (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). You
may also view the document at any of
the public facilities listed at https://www.
gulfspillrestoration.noaa.gov.
Submitting Comments: You may
submit comments on the draft document
by one of following methods:
• Via the Web: https://www.gulfspill
restoration.noaa.gov/restoration-areas/
louisiana.
• Via U.S. Mail: U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 49567,
Atlanta, GA 30345.
• Louisiana Coastal Protection &
Restoration Authority, ATTN: Liz
Williams, P.O. Box 44027, Baton Rouge,
LA 70804.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Liz
Williams at LATIG.la.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\30NON1.SGM
30NON1
86338
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 230 / Wednesday, November 30, 2016 / Notices
Introduction
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
In accordance with the Oil Pollution
Act of 1990 (OPA), the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the
Consent Decree, and the Final
Programmatic Damage Assessment
Restoration Plan and Final
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement, the Federal and State natural
resource trustee agencies for the
Louisiana Trustee Implementation
Group (Trustees) have prepared a Draft
Restoration Plan 1: Restoration of
Wetlands, Coastal, and Nearshore
Habitats; Habitat Projects on Federally
Managed Lands; and Birds (Draft
Restoration Plan 1). Draft Restoration
Plan 1 describes and proposes
engineering and design activities for
restoration projects intended to
continue the process of restoring natural
resources and services injured or lost as
a result of the Deepwater Horizon oil
spill, which occurred on or about April
20, 2010, in the Gulf of Mexico.
Bureau of Land Management
Background
For additional background
information, see our original Federal
Register notice, which opened the
comment period (November 1, 2016; 81
FR 75840).
Invitation To Comment
The Trustees seek public review and
comment on the proposed projects and
supporting analysis included in the
Draft Restoration Plan 1. Before
including your address, phone number,
email address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment, including your
personal identifying information, may
be made publicly available at any time.
Authority
The authority of this action is the Oil
Pollution Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 2701 et
seq.) and the implementing Natural
Resource Damage Assessment
regulations found at 15 CFR 990.
Kevin D. Reynolds,
Department of the Interior Deepwater Horizon
Case Manager.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
[FR Doc. 2016–28675 Filed 11–29–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Nov 29, 2016
Jkt 241001
[LLCON04000 L16100000.DP0000–16X]
Notice of Availability of the Record of
Decision Adopting U.S. Forest
Service’s Final Environmental Impact
Statement for Oil and Gas Leasing on
Lands Administered by the White River
National Forest, CO
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA), the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) announces the
availability of the Record of Decision
(ROD) adopting the Final United States
Forest Service’s (USFS) ‘‘White River
National Forest Oil and Gas Leasing
Final Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS),’’ which identifies the lands
available for oil and gas leasing in the
White River National Forest, including
stipulations to protect surface resources.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the ROD are
available for public inspection at the
BLM Colorado River Valley Field Office,
2300 River Frontage Road, Silt, CO
81652. Interested persons may also
review the ROD on the project Web site
at https://eplanning.blm.gov/epl-frontoffice/eplanning/nepa/nepa_register.do.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg
Larson, Project Manager, at the address
above, by telephone at 970–876–9000,
or by email at glarson@blm.gov. Persons
who use a telecommunications device
for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Relay Service (FRS) at 1–800–877–8339
to contact the above individual during
normal business hours. The FRS is
available 24 hours a day, seven days a
week, to leave a message or question
with the above individual. You will
receive a reply during normal business
hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
BLM’s ROD formally adopts the USFS,
December 2014, White River National
Forest Oil and Gas Leasing Final EIS.
The Department of the Interior (DOI)
and the BLM concur with the selection
of a combination of Alternatives B and
C as described in the USFS ROD
(December 3, 2015). As identified in 40
CFR 1506.3(a), ‘‘[a]n agency may adopt
a Federal draft or final . . . [EIS] or
portion thereof provided that the
statement or portion thereof meets the
standards for an adequate statement
under these [the Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ)]
regulations.’’ The BLM affirms that this
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Final EIS meets all requirements of the
CEQ, DOI and BLM for preparation of an
EIS.
Oil and gas leasing on National Forest
System Lands is a collaborative process
between the USFS and the BLM. The
USFS is responsible for making land
availability decisions, while the BLM is
responsible for issuing and managing oil
and gas leases, as described in the
Federal Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing
Reform Act.
The BLM was a Cooperating Agency
in the preparation of the USFS’s Final
EIS. Per 40 CFR 1506.3(c), the BLM
adopts the Final EIS without recirculating, as the BLM has concluded
that its comments and suggestions were
incorporated during the NEPA process.
This decision is approved by the
Deputy Secretary of DOI; therefore, it is
not subject to administrative appeal (43
CFR 4.410(a)(3)).
Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR
1506.10.
Ruth Welch,
BLM Colorado State Director.
[FR Doc. 2016–28806 Filed 11–29–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–JB–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLCON04000 L16100000.DP0000–16X]
Notice of Availability of the Record of
Decision for the Previously Issued Oil
and Gas Leases in the White River
National Forest, CO
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) has prepared a
Record of Decision (ROD) based on the
analysis in the ‘‘Previously Issued Oil
and Gas Leases in the White River
National Forest Final Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS).’’ That EIS
addressed the treatment of 65
previously issued oil and gas leases on
lands within the White River National
Forest (WRNF). By this notice the BLM
is announcing the availability of the
ROD. On November 17, 2016, the BLM
Colorado State Director signed and the
Deputy Secretary of the Department of
the Interior approved the ROD.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the ROD are
available for public inspection at the
BLM Colorado River Valley Field Office,
2300 River Frontage Road, Silt, CO
81652. Interested persons may also
review the ROD on the project Web site
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\30NON1.SGM
30NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 230 (Wednesday, November 30, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 86337-86338]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-28675]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[FWS-R4-FHC-2016-N208; FVHC98210408710-XXX-FF04G01000]
Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill; Draft Louisiana Trustee
Implementation Group Restoration Plan #1: Restoration of Wetlands,
Coastal, and Nearshore Habitats; Habitat Projects on Federally Managed
Lands; and Birds
AGENCY: Department of the Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; reopening of public comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are reopening the public comment period on the Louisiana
Trustee Implementation Group Draft Restoration Plan #1: Restoration of
Wetlands, Coastal, and Nearshore Habitats; Habitat Projects on
Federally Managed Lands; and Birds (Draft Restoration Plan #1). We
opened the public comment period via a November 1, 2016, notice of
availability. The public comment period closed on November 28, 2016.
DATES: Comments Due Date: We will consider public comments received
November 1, 2016 through December 9, 2016.
ADDRESSES:
Obtaining Documents: You may download the Louisiana Trustee
Implementation Group Draft Restoration Plan 1: Restoration of Wetlands,
Coastal, and Nearshore Habitats; Habitat Projects on Federally Managed
Lands; and Birds at any of the following sites:
https://www.gulfspillrestoration.noaa.gov
https://www.doi.gov/deepwaterhorizon
https://la-dwh.com
Alternatively, you may request a CD of the Draft Restoration Plan 1
(see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). You may also view the document
at any of the public facilities listed at https://www.gulfspillrestoration.noaa.gov.
Submitting Comments: You may submit comments on the draft document
by one of following methods:
Via the Web: https://www.gulfspillrestoration.noaa.gov/restoration-areas/louisiana.
Via U.S. Mail: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, P.O. Box
49567, Atlanta, GA 30345.
Louisiana Coastal Protection & Restoration Authority,
ATTN: Liz Williams, P.O. Box 44027, Baton Rouge, LA 70804.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Liz Williams at LATIG.la.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 86338]]
Introduction
In accordance with the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA), the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Consent Decree, and the
Final Programmatic Damage Assessment Restoration Plan and Final
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement, the Federal and State
natural resource trustee agencies for the Louisiana Trustee
Implementation Group (Trustees) have prepared a Draft Restoration Plan
1: Restoration of Wetlands, Coastal, and Nearshore Habitats; Habitat
Projects on Federally Managed Lands; and Birds (Draft Restoration Plan
1). Draft Restoration Plan 1 describes and proposes engineering and
design activities for restoration projects intended to continue the
process of restoring natural resources and services injured or lost as
a result of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, which occurred on or about
April 20, 2010, in the Gulf of Mexico.
Background
For additional background information, see our original Federal
Register notice, which opened the comment period (November 1, 2016; 81
FR 75840).
Invitation To Comment
The Trustees seek public review and comment on the proposed
projects and supporting analysis included in the Draft Restoration Plan
1. Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware
that your entire comment, including your personal identifying
information, may be made publicly available at any time.
Authority
The authority of this action is the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (33
U.S.C. 2701 et seq.) and the implementing Natural Resource Damage
Assessment regulations found at 15 CFR 990.
Kevin D. Reynolds,
Department of the Interior Deepwater Horizon Case Manager.
[FR Doc. 2016-28675 Filed 11-29-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P