Competitive Postal Products, 85906-85907 [2016-28603]
Download as PDF
85906
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 81, No. 229
Tuesday, November 29, 2016
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
14 CFR Part 259
[Docket No. DOT–OST–2016–0208]
RIN 2105–AE53
Refunding Baggage Fees for Delayed
Checked Bags
Office of the Secretary (OST),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Extension of comment period on
advance notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
This action extends the
comment period for an Advance Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking on refunding
baggage fees for delayed checked bags
that was published in the Federal
Register on October 31, 2016. The
Department of Transportation is
extending the period for persons to
submit comments on this rulemaking
from November 30, 2016, to January 17,
2017. This extension is in response to a
petition by Airlines for America.
DATES: Comments should be filed by
January 17, 2017. Late-filed comments
will be considered to the extent
practicable.
SUMMARY:
You may file comments
identified by the docket number DOT–
OST–2016–0208 by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Ave. SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., between 9:00
a.m. and 5:00 p.m. ET, Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
Instructions: You must include the
agency name and docket number DOT–
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:57 Nov 28, 2016
Jkt 241001
OST–2016–0208 or the Regulatory
Identification Number (RIN) for the
rulemaking at the beginning of your
comment. All comments received will
be posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received in any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78), or you may visit https://
DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents and
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov or to the street
address listed above. Follow the online
instructions for accessing the docket.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Clereece Kroha, Senior Trial Attorney,
Office of Aviation Enforcement and
Proceedings, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave.
SE., Washington, DC 20590, 202–366–
9342, 202–366–7152 (fax),
clereece.kroha@dot.gov (email).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
October 31, 2016, the Department of
Transportation published an Advance
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(ANPRM) to solicit public comment on
how to appropriately implement a
statutory requirement in recent
legislation for airlines to refund checked
baggage fees when they fail to deliver
the bags in a timely manner.
Specifically, the Department seeks
comment on how to define a baggage
delay, and the appropriate method for
providing the refund for delayed
baggage. See 81 FR 75347 (October 31,
2016). Comments on the matters
discussed in the ANPRM were to be
received 30 days after publication or by
November 30, 2016.
On November 15, 2016, we received
a petition from Airlines for America
(A4A) for a 48-day extension of the
comment period for this rulemaking.
According to the petition, the extension
is appropriate because the ANPRM
concerns a requirement that implicates
several operational and financial
disciplines within the airlines, which
will require the assessment of how
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
internal information systems should be
re-worked. A4A also indicates that
additional time is needed in order to
coordinate comments from different
member carriers. Further, A4A points
out that the current comment period is
effectively diminished by the
Thanksgiving holiday and an extension
into December would be similarly
diminished by the Christmas holiday
season because many personnel would
take extended vacations during these
time periods. We received no comments
on A4A’s petition for extension.
After carefully considering A4A’s
petition, we have decided to grant the
extension of 48 days (January 17, 2017),
for the public to comment on the
ANPRM.
Issued this 18th day of November, 2016, in
Washington, DC.
Judith S. Kaleta,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2016–28681 Filed 11–28–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
39 CFR Part 3015
[Docket No. RM2017–1; Order No. 3624]
Competitive Postal Products
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Advance notice of proposed
rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is initiating
a review to determine whether
competitive products provide the
appropriate minimum contribution to
the Postal Service’s institutional costs.
This advance notice informs the public
of the docket’s initiation, invites public
comment, and takes other
administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: January 23,
2017. Reply Comments are due: March
9, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
comments electronically should contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6820.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29NOP1.SGM
29NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Background
III. Invitation to Comment
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
The Commission initiates this
rulemaking to seek comments and
facilitate the Commission’s examination
of the appropriate minimum
contribution to the Postal Service’s
institutional costs that competitive
products must provide, pursuant to 39
U.S.C. 3633(b).
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
II. Background
The Postal Accountability and
Enhancement Act (PAEA) directed the
Commission to promulgate regulations
to ensure that competitive products,
collectively, cover an appropriate share
of the Postal Service’s institutional
costs.1 In the initial rulemaking setting
the appropriate share, the Commission
gave considerable weight to the
historical contribution made by items
categorized as competitive products by
the PAEA and set the minimum
contribution level for competitive
products at 5.5 percent of total
institutional costs.2 The 5.5 percent
minimum contribution level was set in
line with the competitive products’
estimated contribution to institutional
costs of 5.4 percent in Fiscal Year (FY)
2005 and 5.7 percent in FY 2006.3
The PAEA further directs the
Commission to revisit competitive
products’ minimum contribution level
every 5 years and determine whether
the institutional cost contribution
requirement of 39 U.S.C. 3633(a)(3)
should be retained in its current form,
modified, or eliminated. See 39 U.S.C.
3633(b).
The Commission’s first 5-year review
occurred in Docket No. RM2012–3.4 In
that docket, the Commission found the
minimum contribution level of 5.5
percent for competitive products should
be retained.5
1 Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act
(PAEA), Public Law 109–435, 120 Stat. 3198 (2006);
See 39 U.S.C. 3633(a)(3). See also 39 CFR 3015.7(c).
2 Docket No. RM2007–1, Order No. 43, Order
Establishing Ratemaking Regulations for Market
Dominant and Competitive Products, October 29,
2007, ¶¶ 3040–47.
3 See Docket No. RM2007–1, Order No. 26, Order
Proposing Regulations to Establish a System of
Ratemaking, August 15, 2007, at ¶ 3059.
4 Docket No. RM2012–3, Order Reviewing
Competitive Products’ Appropriate Share
Contributions to Institutional Costs, August 23,
2012 (Order No. 1449).
5 Order No. 1449 at 24–26. The Commission
considered circumstances such as a lack of
evidence of a Postal Service competitive advantage;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:57 Nov 28, 2016
Jkt 241001
Five years have passed since the
Commission’s previous review. As such,
the Commission initiates Docket No.
RM2017–1 to conduct its second review
of the competitive products’ appropriate
share contribution requirement. The
Commission will decide whether 39
CFR 3015.7(c) should be retained in its
current form, modified, or eliminated.
See 39 CFR 3015.7(c).
85907
represent the interests of the general
public in this docket.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this Notice in the Federal
Register.
By the Commission.
Stacy L. Ruble,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–28603 Filed 11–28–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
III. Invitation To Comment
Interested persons are invited to
provide written comments to facilitate
the Commission in its examination of
the appropriateness of the current
contribution level for competitive
products. Only comments filed in the
instant docket will be considered as part
of the Commission’s review. Comments
related to the Commission’s 5-year
review and competitive products’
appropriate share of institutional costs
filed in other dockets will not be
considered.6
Comments are due no later than
January 23, 2017. Reply comments are
due no later than March 9, 2017. All
comments and suggestions received will
be available for review on the
Commission’s Web site, https://
www.prc.gov.
Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Kenneth R.
Moeller is appointed to serve as an
officer of the Commission (Public
Representative) to represent the
interests of the general public in the
above-captioned docket.
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket
No. RM2017–1, in compliance with 39
U.S.C. 3633(b).
2. Comments are due no later than
January 23, 2017. Reply comments are
due no later than March 9, 2017.
3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, the
Commission appoints Kenneth R.
Moeller to serve as an officer of the
Commission (Public Representative) to
the market share analysis; changes to the market
and competitors; historical competitive
contribution levels; changes to competitive product
offers and the mail mix; and uncertainties raised in
the proceeding. Id. at 24.
6 In Docket No. RM2016–2, as part of Proposal
Three, UPS petitioned for a review of competitive
products’ share of institutional costs. Docket No
RM2016–2, Petition of United Parcel Service, Inc.
for the Initiation of Proceedings to Make Changes
to Postal Service Costing Methodologies, October 8,
2015, at Proposal Three. In its final order in that
docket, the Commission declined to consider
Proposal Three but stated it will conduct its review
as required by section 3633(b). Docket No.
RM2016–2, Order No. 3506, Order Concerning
United Parcel Service, Inc.’s Proposed Changes to
Postal Service Costing Methodologies (UPS
Proposals One, Two, and Three), September 9,
2016.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R06–OAR–2007–0989; FRL–9955–03–
Region 6]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Oklahoma;
Revisions to Minor New Source Review
Permitting Program
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
severable portions of revisions to the
Oklahoma New Source Review (NSR)
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
submitted by the State of Oklahoma on
February 14, 2002 (the February 14,
2002, SIP submittal). This action
addresses revisions to the Oklahoma
Administrative Code (OAC), Title 252,
Chapters 4 and 100, concerning the
State’s Minor New Source Review air
permitting program. Many revisions are
administrative in nature and modify
redundant or incorrect text within the
SIP. The revisions also include
renumbered or codified portions of the
SIP and new sections that incorporate
Federal rules. This rulemaking is being
taken in accordance with section 110 of
the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before December 29,
2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket No. EPA–R06–
OAR–2007–0989, at https://
www.regulations.gov or via email to
barrett.richard@epa.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish
any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29NOP1.SGM
29NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 29, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 85906-85907]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-28603]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
39 CFR Part 3015
[Docket No. RM2017-1; Order No. 3624]
Competitive Postal Products
AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission is initiating a review to determine whether
competitive products provide the appropriate minimum contribution to
the Postal Service's institutional costs. This advance notice informs
the public of the docket's initiation, invites public comment, and
takes other administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: January 23, 2017. Reply Comments are due:
March 9, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically via the Commission's Filing
Online system at https://www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit comments
electronically should contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202-789-6820.
[[Page 85907]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Background
III. Invitation to Comment
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
The Commission initiates this rulemaking to seek comments and
facilitate the Commission's examination of the appropriate minimum
contribution to the Postal Service's institutional costs that
competitive products must provide, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3633(b).
II. Background
The Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act (PAEA) directed the
Commission to promulgate regulations to ensure that competitive
products, collectively, cover an appropriate share of the Postal
Service's institutional costs.\1\ In the initial rulemaking setting the
appropriate share, the Commission gave considerable weight to the
historical contribution made by items categorized as competitive
products by the PAEA and set the minimum contribution level for
competitive products at 5.5 percent of total institutional costs.\2\
The 5.5 percent minimum contribution level was set in line with the
competitive products' estimated contribution to institutional costs of
5.4 percent in Fiscal Year (FY) 2005 and 5.7 percent in FY 2006.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act (PAEA), Public Law
109-435, 120 Stat. 3198 (2006); See 39 U.S.C. 3633(a)(3). See also
39 CFR 3015.7(c).
\2\ Docket No. RM2007-1, Order No. 43, Order Establishing
Ratemaking Regulations for Market Dominant and Competitive Products,
October 29, 2007, ]] 3040-47.
\3\ See Docket No. RM2007-1, Order No. 26, Order Proposing
Regulations to Establish a System of Ratemaking, August 15, 2007, at
] 3059.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The PAEA further directs the Commission to revisit competitive
products' minimum contribution level every 5 years and determine
whether the institutional cost contribution requirement of 39 U.S.C.
3633(a)(3) should be retained in its current form, modified, or
eliminated. See 39 U.S.C. 3633(b).
The Commission's first 5-year review occurred in Docket No. RM2012-
3.\4\ In that docket, the Commission found the minimum contribution
level of 5.5 percent for competitive products should be retained.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Docket No. RM2012-3, Order Reviewing Competitive Products'
Appropriate Share Contributions to Institutional Costs, August 23,
2012 (Order No. 1449).
\5\ Order No. 1449 at 24-26. The Commission considered
circumstances such as a lack of evidence of a Postal Service
competitive advantage; the market share analysis; changes to the
market and competitors; historical competitive contribution levels;
changes to competitive product offers and the mail mix; and
uncertainties raised in the proceeding. Id. at 24.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Five years have passed since the Commission's previous review. As
such, the Commission initiates Docket No. RM2017-1 to conduct its
second review of the competitive products' appropriate share
contribution requirement. The Commission will decide whether 39 CFR
3015.7(c) should be retained in its current form, modified, or
eliminated. See 39 CFR 3015.7(c).
III. Invitation To Comment
Interested persons are invited to provide written comments to
facilitate the Commission in its examination of the appropriateness of
the current contribution level for competitive products. Only comments
filed in the instant docket will be considered as part of the
Commission's review. Comments related to the Commission's 5-year review
and competitive products' appropriate share of institutional costs
filed in other dockets will not be considered.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ In Docket No. RM2016-2, as part of Proposal Three, UPS
petitioned for a review of competitive products' share of
institutional costs. Docket No RM2016-2, Petition of United Parcel
Service, Inc. for the Initiation of Proceedings to Make Changes to
Postal Service Costing Methodologies, October 8, 2015, at Proposal
Three. In its final order in that docket, the Commission declined to
consider Proposal Three but stated it will conduct its review as
required by section 3633(b). Docket No. RM2016-2, Order No. 3506,
Order Concerning United Parcel Service, Inc.'s Proposed Changes to
Postal Service Costing Methodologies (UPS Proposals One, Two, and
Three), September 9, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments are due no later than January 23, 2017. Reply comments are
due no later than March 9, 2017. All comments and suggestions received
will be available for review on the Commission's Web site, https://www.prc.gov.
Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Kenneth R. Moeller is appointed to serve
as an officer of the Commission (Public Representative) to represent
the interests of the general public in the above-captioned docket.
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket No. RM2017-1, in compliance
with 39 U.S.C. 3633(b).
2. Comments are due no later than January 23, 2017. Reply comments
are due no later than March 9, 2017.
3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, the Commission appoints Kenneth R.
Moeller to serve as an officer of the Commission (Public
Representative) to represent the interests of the general public in
this docket.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this Notice in
the Federal Register.
By the Commission.
Stacy L. Ruble,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-28603 Filed 11-28-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P