Raisins Produced From Grapes Grown in California and Imported Raisins; Removal of Language, 84401-84403 [2016-28251]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 23, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
coverage if such additional coverage is
specified in the actuarial documents.
■ 23. Amend § 457.161 as follows:
■ a. Revise the first sentence of the
introductory text; and
■ b. Revise section 14.
The revisions read as follows:
§ 457.161 Canola and rapeseed crop
insurance provisions.
The Canola and Rapeseed Crop
Insurance Provisions for the 2017 and
succeeding crop years in counties with
a contract change date of November 30,
and for the 2018 and succeeding crop
years in counties with a contract change
date of June 30, are as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
14. Prevented Planting
Your prevented planting coverage will
be a percentage specified in the
actuarial documents of your production
guarantee for timely planted acreage. If
you have additional coverage and pay
an additional premium, you may
increase your prevented planting
coverage if such additional coverage is
specified in the actuarial documents.
■ 24. Amend § 457.165 as follows:
■ a. Revise the first sentence of the
introductory text; and
■ b. Revise section 12.
The revisions read as follows:
§ 457.165
Millet crop insurance provisions.
The Millet Crop Insurance Provisions
for the 2017 and succeeding crop years
are as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
12. Prevented Planting
Your prevented planting coverage will
be a percentage specified in the
actuarial documents of your production
guarantee for timely planted acreage. If
you have additional levels of coverage
and pay an additional premium, you
may increase your prevented planting
coverage if such additional coverage is
specified in the actuarial documents.
■ 25. Amend § 457.168 as follows:
■ a. Revise the first sentence of the
introductory text; and
■ b. Revise section 15.
The revisions read as follows:
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
§ 457.168 Mustard crop insurance
provisions.
The Mustard Crop Insurance
Provisions for the 2017 and succeeding
crop years are as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
15. Prevented Planting
Your prevented planting coverage will
be a percentage specified in the
actuarial documents of your production
guarantee for timely planted acreage.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:26 Nov 22, 2016
Jkt 241001
When a portion of the insurable acreage
within the unit is prevented from being
planted, and there is more than one base
contract price applicable to acreage in
the unit, the lowest base contract price
will be used in calculating any
prevented planting payment. If you have
additional levels of coverage and pay an
additional premium, you may increase
your prevented planting coverage if
such additional coverage is specified in
the actuarial documents.
Dated: November 10, 2016.
Brandon Willis,
Manager, Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2016–27720 Filed 11–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Parts 989 and 999
[Doc. No. AMS–SC–16–0065; SC16–989–2
FR]
Raisins Produced From Grapes Grown
in California and Imported Raisins;
Removal of Language
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule removes language
from the California raisin marketing
order’s minimum grade standards and
the import regulations’ grade and size
requirements. The marketing order
regulates the handling of raisins
produced from grapes grown in
California, and is administered locally
by the Raisin Administrative Committee
(committee). The change to the import
regulations is required under section 8e
of the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended.
Recently, the U.S. Standards for Grades
of Processed Raisins (standards) were
amended to remove the word ‘‘midget.’’
This rule makes the marketing order and
the import regulations consistent with
the amended standards.
DATES: Effective November 25, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maria Stobbe, Marketing Specialist, or
Jeffrey Smutny, Regional Director,
California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or Email:
Maria.Stobbe@ams.usda.gov or
Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
84401
regulation by contacting Richard Lower,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email:
Richard.Lower@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Agreement
and Order No. 989, both as amended (7
CFR part 989), regulating the handling
of raisins produced from grapes grown
in California, hereinafter referred to as
the ‘‘order.’’ The order is effective under
the Agricultural Marketing Agreement
Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–
674), hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘Act.’’
This rule is also issued under section
8e of the Act, which provides that
whenever certain specified
commodities, including raisins, are
regulated under a Federal marketing
order, imports of these commodities
into the United States are prohibited
unless they meet the same or
comparable grade, size, quality, or
maturity requirements as those in effect
for the domestically-produced
commodities.
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Orders
12866, 13563, and 13175.
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended
to have retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
There are no administrative
procedures which must be exhausted
prior to any judicial challenge to the
provisions of import regulations issued
under section 8e of the Act.
This rule removes the term ‘‘midget’’
from § 989.702(a) of the order and
E:\FR\FM\23NOR1.SGM
23NOR1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
84402
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 23, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
§ 999.300(b)(1) of the import
regulations. This will make the order
and the import regulations consistent
with the recent changes to the
standards.
The committee unanimously
recommended that the term ‘‘midget’’ be
removed from the order at a meeting on
June 26, 2014. At a subsequent meeting
on August 14, 2014, the committee also
unanimously recommended that the
word ‘‘midget’’ be removed from the
standards. As required under the Act,
the import regulations must be
consistent with the changes to the order.
In this instance, the order must also be
consistent with changes to the
standards.
Paragraph (a) of section 989.702 of the
order specifies minimum grade
standards for packed Natural (sun-dried)
Seedless (NS) raisins, requiring that
‘‘small (midget)’’ sizes of raisins shall
meet U.S. Grade C tolerances with
respect to pieces of stem, and
underdeveloped and substandard
raisins. The word ‘‘midget’’ is
redundant with the term ‘‘small,’’ and
its removal is insignificant.
Pursuant to the recommendation of
the committee and consistent with the
recent amendment of the standards, the
word ‘‘midget’’ is removed from the
order language.
The committee’s recommendations to
delete the word ‘‘midget’’ from the order
and the standards necessitates a
corresponding change to the import
requirements.
Under the raisin import regulations,
in paragraph (b)(1) of section 999.300,
raisins imported into the United States
are required to meet the same or
comparable grade, size, quality, or
maturity requirements as those in effect
for the domestically-produced
commodities, when such commodities
are regulated under an order. With the
removal of the word ‘‘midget’’ from both
the standards and the order, removal of
‘‘midget’’ is required under the import
regulations.
Removal of the word ‘‘midget’’ should
not impact the application of the order
or the import regulations, since the
word ‘‘midget’’ is redundant and
appears in parentheses after the word
‘‘small.’’ Thus, removing the word
‘‘midget’’ has no effect on interpretation
of the order or the import regulations;
and, therefore, has no effect on raisin
importers.
The final rule removing the word
‘‘midget’’ from the standards was
published in the Federal Register on
June 23, 2016 (81 FR 40779). Thus, this
rule will make the order and the import
regulations consistent with the
standards, as recently revised.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:26 Nov 22, 2016
Jkt 241001
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of
this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this
final regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in
order that small businesses will not be
unduly or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 3,000
producers of California raisins and
approximately 24 handlers subject to
regulation under the marketing order.
There are approximately 52 importers of
raisins as well.
The Small Business Administration
defines small agricultural producers as
those having annual receipts less than
$750,000, and defines small agricultural
service firms, such as handlers and
importers, as those whose annual
receipts are less than $7,500,000. (13
CFR 121.201.)
There are approximately 3,000
California raisin producers and 24
handlers subject to regulation under the
marketing order. The Small Business
Administration defines small
agricultural producers as those having
annual receipts less than $750,000, and
defines small agricultural service firms,
such as handlers and importers, as those
whose annual receipts are less than
$7,500,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
Based on shipment data and other
information provided by the committee,
most producers and approximately 13
handlers of California raisins may be
classified as small entities. This action
should not have any impact on
handlers’ or growers’ benefits or costs.
There is very limited information on
the 52 importers. This action should not
have any impact on importers’ costs.
This rule removes the word ‘‘midget’’
from the order regulations in section
989.702(a) and from the import
regulations in section 999.300(b)(1),
bringing the order and the import
regulations into conformance with the
recent amendment to the standards.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0178,
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
‘‘Vegetable and Specialty Crops.’’ No
changes in those requirements as a
result of this action are necessary.
Should any changes become necessary,
they would be submitted to OMB for
approval.
This rule will not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either large or small
raisin handlers or on raisin importers.
As with all Federal marketing order
programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies. In addition, USDA has
not identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap or conflict with
this final rule.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
Further, the committee’s meetings
were widely publicized throughout the
California raisin industry and all
interested persons were invited to
attend the meetings and encouraged to
participate in committee deliberations
on all issues. Like all committee
meetings, the June 26, 2014, and August
14, 2014, meetings were public meetings
and all entities, both large and small,
were encouraged to express their views
on this issue.
A proposed rule was published in the
Federal Register on September 16, 2016
(81 FR 63723). Copies of the rule were
provided to California raisin handlers
and committee members. Finally, the
rule was made available through the
Internet by USDA and the Office of the
Federal Register. A 30-day comment
period ending October 17, 2016, was
provided for interested persons to
respond to the proposal. One supportive
comment was received. Accordingly, no
changes are being made to the rule.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Richard Lower
at the previously-mentioned address in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
In accordance with section 8e of the
Act, the United States Trade
Representative has concurred with this
action.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the committee and other
E:\FR\FM\23NOR1.SGM
23NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 23, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also
found and determined that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register
because removal of the word ‘‘midget’’
should not impact the application of the
order or the import regulations, since
the word ‘‘midget’’ is redundant and
appears in parentheses after the word
‘‘small.’’ Thus, removing the word
‘‘midget’’ has no effect on interpretation
of the order or the import regulations;
and, therefore, has no effect on handlers
or raisin importers. Further, handlers
are aware of this rule, which was
recommended at two public meetings.
Also, a 30-day comment period was
provided for in the proposed rule.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 989
7 CFR Part 999
Dates, Filberts, Food grades and
standards, Imports, Nuts, Prunes,
Raisins, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Walnuts.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR parts 989 and 999 are
amended as follows:
PART 989—RAISINS PRODUCED
FROM GRAPES GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
[Amended]
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
PART 999—SPECIALTY CROPS;
IMPORT REGULATIONS
3. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 999 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
4. Paragraph (b)(1) of § 999.300 is
amended by removing ’’ small (midget)
sized’’ and adding ‘‘small sized’’ in its
place.
■
Jkt 241001
One of APEC’s business facilitation
initiatives is the APEC Business Travel
Card (ABTC) Program. The operating
procedures for the ABTC Program are
set out in the APEC Business Travel
Card Operating Framework (APEC
Framework).2 Under the ABTC Program,
APEC members can issue cards to
business travelers and senior
government officials who meet certain
criteria. The cards provide simpler,
short-term entry procedures within the
APEC region.
8 CFR Parts 103 and 235
B. U.S. Participation in ABTC
[Docket No. USCBP–2013–0029; CBP
Decision No. 16–20]
On November 12, 2011, President
Obama signed the Asia-Pacific
Economic Cooperation Business Travel
Cards Act of 2011 (APEC Act). Public
Law 112–54, 125 Stat. 550. The APEC
Act authorizes the Secretary of
Homeland Security, in coordination
with the Secretary of State, to issue
ABTCs through September 30, 2018 to
any eligible person, including business
persons and U.S. Government officials
actively engaged in APEC business. On
May 13, 2014, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) published an interim
final rule (IFR) in the Federal Register
(79 FR 27161) amending the DHS
regulations to establish the U.S. ABTC
Program and an application fee. See 8
CFR 235.13 and 8 CFR 103.7.
The IFR became effective on June 12,
2014 and on that date CBP began issuing
its own ABTCs (U.S. ABTCs) to
qualified U.S. citizens. As provided in
the IFR, the U.S. ABTC Program is a
voluntary program designed to facilitate
travel for bona fide U.S. business
persons engaged in business in the
APEC region and U.S. government
officials actively engaged in APEC
business within the APEC region. To
participate in the program, an
individual must be an existing member,
in good standing, of an eligible CBP
trusted traveler program or be approved
for membership in an eligible CBP
trusted traveler program during the U.S.
ABTC application process.3 The
application process requires the
applicant to self-certify that he or she is
a bona fide business person who is
engaged in the trade of goods, the
provision of services or the conduct of
investment activities, or is a U.S.
Government official actively engaged in
RIN 1651–AB01
The U.S. Asia-Pacific Economic
Cooperation Business Travel Card
Program
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection; Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule adopts as final, with
two changes, interim amendments to the
Department of Homeland Security’s
(DHS) regulations published in the
Federal Register on May 13, 2014
establishing the U.S. Asia-Pacific
Economic Cooperation (APEC) Business
Travel Card Program. The U.S. APEC
Business Travel Card Program provides
qualified U.S. business travelers
engaged in business in the APEC region,
or U.S. Government officials actively
engaged in APEC business, the ability to
access fast-track immigration lanes at
participating airports in foreign APEC
economies.
I. Background
2. Paragraph (a) of § 989.702 is
amended by removing ‘‘small (midgetsized)’’ and adding ‘‘small sized’’ in its
place.
■
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
This rule is effective December
23, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Garret Conover, Office of Field
Operations, (202) 325–4062,
Garret.A.Conover@cbp.dhs.gov.
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 989 continues to read as follows:
16:26 Nov 22, 2016
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DATES:
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
[FR Doc. 2016–28251 Filed 11–22–16; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY:
Grapes, Marketing agreements,
Raisins, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
§ 989.702
Dated: November 18, 2016.
Elanor Starmer,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
84403
A. The Asia-Pacific Economic
Cooperation Business Travel Card
Program
The United States is a member of
APEC, which is an economic forum
comprised of twenty-one members
whose primary goal is to support
sustainable economic growth and
prosperity in the Asia-Pacific region.1
1 APEC members are also referred to as
‘economies’ since the APEC process is primarily
concerned with trade and economic issues with the
members engaging each other as economic entities.
The most recently updated list of members is
available at the APEC Web site at www.apec.org/
About-Us/About-APEC/Member-Economies.aspx.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
For simplicity, CBP will generally refer to them in
the preamble of this document as APEC members.
2 Although participating members intend to
follow the operating principles and procedures
outlined, the document is not legally binding. The
most recent version of the APEC Framework is
Version 19, dated July 7, 2015.
3 For purposes of the U.S. ABTC Program, eligible
CBP trusted traveler programs include Global Entry,
NEXUS, and SENTRI.
E:\FR\FM\23NOR1.SGM
23NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 23, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 84401-84403]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-28251]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Parts 989 and 999
[Doc. No. AMS-SC-16-0065; SC16-989-2 FR]
Raisins Produced From Grapes Grown in California and Imported
Raisins; Removal of Language
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule removes language from the California raisin
marketing order's minimum grade standards and the import regulations'
grade and size requirements. The marketing order regulates the handling
of raisins produced from grapes grown in California, and is
administered locally by the Raisin Administrative Committee
(committee). The change to the import regulations is required under
section 8e of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended. Recently, the U.S. Standards for Grades of Processed Raisins
(standards) were amended to remove the word ``midget.'' This rule makes
the marketing order and the import regulations consistent with the
amended standards.
DATES: Effective November 25, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maria Stobbe, Marketing Specialist, or
Jeffrey Smutny, Regional Director, California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS,
USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906, or Email:
Maria.Stobbe@ams.usda.gov or Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Richard Lower, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491,
Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email: Richard.Lower@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement and Order No. 989, both as amended (7 CFR part 989),
regulating the handling of raisins produced from grapes grown in
California, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.'' The order is
effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
This rule is also issued under section 8e of the Act, which
provides that whenever certain specified commodities, including
raisins, are regulated under a Federal marketing order, imports of
these commodities into the United States are prohibited unless they
meet the same or comparable grade, size, quality, or maturity
requirements as those in effect for the domestically-produced
commodities.
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13175.
This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive
effect.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
There are no administrative procedures which must be exhausted
prior to any judicial challenge to the provisions of import regulations
issued under section 8e of the Act.
This rule removes the term ``midget'' from Sec. 989.702(a) of the
order and
[[Page 84402]]
Sec. 999.300(b)(1) of the import regulations. This will make the order
and the import regulations consistent with the recent changes to the
standards.
The committee unanimously recommended that the term ``midget'' be
removed from the order at a meeting on June 26, 2014. At a subsequent
meeting on August 14, 2014, the committee also unanimously recommended
that the word ``midget'' be removed from the standards. As required
under the Act, the import regulations must be consistent with the
changes to the order. In this instance, the order must also be
consistent with changes to the standards.
Paragraph (a) of section 989.702 of the order specifies minimum
grade standards for packed Natural (sun-dried) Seedless (NS) raisins,
requiring that ``small (midget)'' sizes of raisins shall meet U.S.
Grade C tolerances with respect to pieces of stem, and underdeveloped
and substandard raisins. The word ``midget'' is redundant with the term
``small,'' and its removal is insignificant.
Pursuant to the recommendation of the committee and consistent with
the recent amendment of the standards, the word ``midget'' is removed
from the order language.
The committee's recommendations to delete the word ``midget'' from
the order and the standards necessitates a corresponding change to the
import requirements.
Under the raisin import regulations, in paragraph (b)(1) of section
999.300, raisins imported into the United States are required to meet
the same or comparable grade, size, quality, or maturity requirements
as those in effect for the domestically-produced commodities, when such
commodities are regulated under an order. With the removal of the word
``midget'' from both the standards and the order, removal of ``midget''
is required under the import regulations.
Removal of the word ``midget'' should not impact the application of
the order or the import regulations, since the word ``midget'' is
redundant and appears in parentheses after the word ``small.'' Thus,
removing the word ``midget'' has no effect on interpretation of the
order or the import regulations; and, therefore, has no effect on
raisin importers.
The final rule removing the word ``midget'' from the standards was
published in the Federal Register on June 23, 2016 (81 FR 40779). Thus,
this rule will make the order and the import regulations consistent
with the standards, as recently revised.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that
they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 3,000 producers of California raisins and
approximately 24 handlers subject to regulation under the marketing
order. There are approximately 52 importers of raisins as well.
The Small Business Administration defines small agricultural
producers as those having annual receipts less than $750,000, and
defines small agricultural service firms, such as handlers and
importers, as those whose annual receipts are less than $7,500,000. (13
CFR 121.201.)
There are approximately 3,000 California raisin producers and 24
handlers subject to regulation under the marketing order. The Small
Business Administration defines small agricultural producers as those
having annual receipts less than $750,000, and defines small
agricultural service firms, such as handlers and importers, as those
whose annual receipts are less than $7,500,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
Based on shipment data and other information provided by the
committee, most producers and approximately 13 handlers of California
raisins may be classified as small entities. This action should not
have any impact on handlers' or growers' benefits or costs.
There is very limited information on the 52 importers. This action
should not have any impact on importers' costs.
This rule removes the word ``midget'' from the order regulations in
section 989.702(a) and from the import regulations in section
999.300(b)(1), bringing the order and the import regulations into
conformance with the recent amendment to the standards.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order's information collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581-0178, ``Vegetable and Specialty Crops.'' No
changes in those requirements as a result of this action are necessary.
Should any changes become necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for
approval.
This rule will not impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either large or small raisin handlers or on raisin
importers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. In addition, USDA
has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap
or conflict with this final rule.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
Further, the committee's meetings were widely publicized throughout
the California raisin industry and all interested persons were invited
to attend the meetings and encouraged to participate in committee
deliberations on all issues. Like all committee meetings, the June 26,
2014, and August 14, 2014, meetings were public meetings and all
entities, both large and small, were encouraged to express their views
on this issue.
A proposed rule was published in the Federal Register on September
16, 2016 (81 FR 63723). Copies of the rule were provided to California
raisin handlers and committee members. Finally, the rule was made
available through the Internet by USDA and the Office of the Federal
Register. A 30-day comment period ending October 17, 2016, was provided
for interested persons to respond to the proposal. One supportive
comment was received. Accordingly, no changes are being made to the
rule.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses. Any questions
about the compliance guide should be sent to Richard Lower at the
previously-mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
In accordance with section 8e of the Act, the United States Trade
Representative has concurred with this action.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the information and recommendation submitted by the committee and other
[[Page 84403]]
available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as
hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also found and determined that good
cause exists for not postponing the effective date of this rule until
30 days after publication in the Federal Register because removal of
the word ``midget'' should not impact the application of the order or
the import regulations, since the word ``midget'' is redundant and
appears in parentheses after the word ``small.'' Thus, removing the
word ``midget'' has no effect on interpretation of the order or the
import regulations; and, therefore, has no effect on handlers or raisin
importers. Further, handlers are aware of this rule, which was
recommended at two public meetings. Also, a 30-day comment period was
provided for in the proposed rule.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 989
Grapes, Marketing agreements, Raisins, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
7 CFR Part 999
Dates, Filberts, Food grades and standards, Imports, Nuts, Prunes,
Raisins, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Walnuts.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR parts 989 and 999
are amended as follows:
PART 989--RAISINS PRODUCED FROM GRAPES GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 989 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
Sec. 989.702 [Amended]
0
2. Paragraph (a) of Sec. 989.702 is amended by removing ``small
(midget-sized)'' and adding ``small sized'' in its place.
PART 999--SPECIALTY CROPS; IMPORT REGULATIONS
0
3. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 999 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
4. Paragraph (b)(1) of Sec. 999.300 is amended by removing '' small
(midget) sized'' and adding ``small sized'' in its place.
Dated: November 18, 2016.
Elanor Starmer,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-28251 Filed 11-22-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P