Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 84581-84583 [2016-28155]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 23, 2016 / Notices
submit your paper comment to the
Commission by courier or overnight
service.
Visit the Commission Web site at
https://www.ftc.gov to read this Notice.
The FTC Act and other laws that the
Commission administers permit the
collection of public comments to
consider and use in this proceeding as
appropriate. The Commission will
consider all timely and responsive
public comments that it receives on or
before December 23, 2016. You can find
more information, including routine
uses permitted by the Privacy Act, in
the Commission’s privacy policy, at
https://www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.shtm.
Comments on the information
collection requirements subject to
review under the PRA should also be
submitted to OMB. If sent by U.S. mail,
address comments to: Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget,
Attention: Desk Officer for the Federal
Trade Commission, New Executive
Office Building, Docket Library, Room
10102, 725 17th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20503. Comments sent
to OMB by U.S. postal mail, however,
are subject to delays due to heightened
security precautions. Thus, comments
instead should be sent by facsimile to
(202) 395–5167.
David C. Shonka,
Principal Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2016–28208 Filed 11–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
GULF COAST ECOSYSTEM
RESTORATION COUNCIL
Notice of Proposed Subaward Under a
Council-Selected Restoration
Component Award
Gulf Coast Ecosystem
Restoration Council.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Gulf Coast Ecosystem
Restoration Council (Council) publishes
notice of a proposed subaward from the
Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality (TCEQ) to the Nature
Conservancy (TNC), a nonprofit
organization, for the purpose of
acquiring three properties in the Bahia
Grande Coastal Corridor in accordance
with the Bahia Grande Coastal Corridor
Implementation Award as approved in
the Initial Funded Priority List.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Please send questions by email to
raams_pgmsupport@restorethegulf.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
1321(t)(2)(E)(ii)(III) of the RESTORE Act
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:04 Nov 22, 2016
Jkt 241001
(33 U.S.C. 1321(t)(2)(E)(ii)(III)) and
Treasury’s implementing regulation at
31 CFR 34.401(b) require that, for
purposes of awards made under the
Council-Selected Restoration
Component, a State or Federal award
recipient may make a grant or subaward
to or enter into a cooperative agreement
with a nongovernmental entity that
equals or exceeds 10 percent of the total
amount of the award provided to the
State or Federal award recipient only if
certain notice requirements are met.
Specifically, at least 30 days before the
State or Federal award recipient enters
into such an agreement, the Council
must publish in the Federal Register
and deliver to specified Congressional
Committees the name of the recipient
and subrecipient; a brief description of
the activity, including its purpose; and
the amount of the award. This notice
accomplishes the Federal Register
requirement.
Description of Proposed Action
As specified in the Initial Funded
Priority List, which is available on the
Council’s Web site at https://
www.restorethegulf.gov/councilselected-restoration-component/fundedpriorities-list, RESTORE Act funds will
support the Bahia Grande Coastal
Corridor Implementation Award (Bahia
Grande Award) to TCEQ. Through this
Award of $4,378,500, approximately
1,852 acres of land will be conserved
through fee title acquisition from
willing sellers and added to a 105,000
acre corridor of conservation lands that
includes the Laguna Atascosa National
Wildlife Refuge (NWR), Boca Chica
State Park, and the Lower Rio Grande
Valley NWR. Property acquisitions
under the Bahia Grande Award will be
accomplished through a subaward in
the amount of $4,363,391 from TCEQ to
TNC. Through the subaward, TNC will
acquire three properties in the Bahia
Grande Coastal Corridor, which are
expected to ultimately become part of
the Laguna Atascosa NWR. These
properties will connect Laguna Atascosa
NWR, Lower Rio Grande Valley NWR,
and Boca Chica State Park, as well as
over 2 million acres of intact habitat on
private ranchland with the 1.3 million
acre Rio Bravo Protected Area. The
connection provided by these properties
will provide additional protection for,
and could prevent future listing of Statethreatened species like the reddish
egret, Botteri’s sparrow, white-tailed
hawk, white-faced ibis, Texas tortoise,
Texas indigo snake and Texas horned
lizard. Conserving additional portions of
the Bahia Grande wetland system and
portions of its watershed will secure
valuable freshwater inflows and allow
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
84581
partners to complete hydrological
restoration needed to increase tidal
flows and divert freshwater inflows
needed to fully restore this system.
Will D. Spoon,
Program Analyst, Gulf Coast Ecosystem
Restoration Council.
[FR Doc. 2016–28316 Filed 11–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–58–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality, HHS.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice.
This notice announces the
intention of the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality (AHRQ) to request
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) approve the proposed
information collection project: ‘‘The
Consumer Assessment of Healthcare
Providers and Systems (CAHPS) PatientCentered Medical Home (PCMH) Items
Demonstration Study.’’ In accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act,
AHRQ invites the public to comment on
this proposed information collection.
This proposed information collection
was previously published in the Federal
Register on August 3rd, 2016 and
allowed 60 days for public comment.
AHRQ did not receive any substantive
comments. The purpose of this notice is
to allow an additional 30 days for public
comment.
SUMMARY:
Comments on this notice must be
received by December 23, 2016.
DATES:
Written comments should
be submitted to: AHRQ’s OMB Desk
Officer by fax at (202) 395–6974
(attention: AHRQ’s desk officer) or by
email at OIRA_submission@
omb.eop.gov (attention: AHRQ’s desk
officer).
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doris Lefkowitz, AHRQ Reports
Clearance Officer, (301) 427–1477, or by
email at doris.lefkowitz@AHRQ.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\23NON1.SGM
23NON1
84582
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 23, 2016 / Notices
Proposed Project
‘‘The Consumer Assessment of
Healthcare Providers and Systems
(CAHPS) Patient-Centered Medical
Home (PCMH) Items Demonstration
Study.’’
This study is being conducted by
AHRQ through its contractor, RAND,
pursuant to AHRQ’s statutory authority
to conduct and support research on
healthcare and on systems for the
delivery of such care, including
activities with respect to the quality,
effectiveness, efficiency,
appropriateness and value of healthcare
services and with respect to quality
measurement and improvement. 42
U.S.C. 299a(a)(1) and (2).
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Method of Collection
The patient-centered medical home
(PCMH) is a model for delivering
primary care that is patient-centered,
comprehensive, coordinated, accessible,
and continuously improved through a
systems-based approach to quality and
safety.
As primary care practices across the
United States seek National Committee
for Quality Assurance (NCQA)
recognition as patient-centered medical
homes (PCMH), they can choose to
administer the Consumer Assessment of
Healthcare Providers and Systems
(CAHPS®) Clinician and Group (CG–
CAHPS) survey with or without the
PCMH supplemental item set (AHRQ,
2010; Hays et al., 2014; Ng et al., 2016;
Scholle et al., 2012). NCQA offers a
special patient experience distinction to
practices that opt to use the CAHPS
PCMH items set in their CG–CAHPS
survey tool. While over 11,000
practices, representing an estimated 15–
18% of primary care physicians, are
currently recognized for PCMH by
NCQA (NCQA, 2015), fewer than 3% of
them submit patient experience surveys
to NCQA when applying for recognition
under NCQA’s PCMH recognition
program.
Despite the rapid movement toward
PCMH primary care transformation and
the increasing use of CAHPS PCMH
items, little is known about the ways in
which practices are using these CAHPS
data and the PCMH supplemental item
information (about access,
comprehensiveness, self-management,
shared decision making, coordination of
care, and information about care and
appointments) to understand and
improve their patients’ experiences
during PCMH transformation. The
PCMH Items Demonstration Study will
investigate:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:04 Nov 22, 2016
Jkt 241001
• How practices across the U.S. use
CAHPS and the PCMH item set during
PCMH transformation,
• How practices assemble and select
items for inclusion in their patient
experience surveys (e.g. core, PCMH,
supplemental, and custom items),
• Primary care practice leaders’
perspectives on NCQA PCMH
Recognition and CAHPS Patient
Experience Distinction,
• Effects of changes made during
PCMH transformation on patient
experiences reported on CAHPS surveys
and any PCMH items, and
• Associations between PCMH
transformation and patient experience
scores.
To achieve the goals of this project the
following data collections will be
implemented:
(1) Office Manager Questions
administered via phone about the
participating practice’s characteristics to
describe the type of practices in the
study and to understand how practice
characteristics influence PCMH
transformation and patient experience.
(2) Physician Interviews administered
via phone with the lead PCMH clinical
expert about the details, decisions and
processes of PCMH transformation,
NCQA PCMH Recognition and CAHPS
Patient Experience Distinction and their
use of patient experience data during
the transformation process.
(3) PCMH–A Assessment Tool to be
completed by the lead PCMH clinical
expert (before or after the interview on
the standardized form via fax or email)
to collect validated metrics on the
‘‘PCMH-ness’’ of the practice.
(4) CAHPS Patient Experience Data
Files, which are patient-level deidentified CAHPS patient experience
data covering the period of PCMH
transformation for the participating
practice. These data are collected
independently of this study by the
practice (or network) via their current
vendor. We will work with the PCMH
clinical expert (or a person they
designate who handles their data) in
each of the participating practices to
submit these CAHPS data files securely
to RAND to understand practices’
CAHPS patient experience trends and
associations with PCMH
implementation during practices’ PCMH
journey.
Characterizing primary care practices’
use of CAHPS and PCMH items will
provide important insight into the
activities practices conduct during
PCMH transformation to improve
patient experience scores. This
information may be useful in supporting
practices that lag behind their peers,
learning from practices with
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
outstanding records of patient
experience, and providing
recommendations that may be used to
refine the content of the CAHPS survey
items.
Estimated Annual Respondent Burden
Table 1 shows the estimated
annualized burden and cost for the
respondents’ time to participate in this
data collection. These burden estimates
are based on tests of data collection
conducted on nine or fewer entities. As
indicated below, the annual total
burden hours are estimated to be 179
hours. The annual total cost associated
with the annual total burden hours is
estimated to be $16,899.
Table 1 shows the estimated
annualized burden for the respondents’
time to participate in this data
collection. The PCMH Items
Demonstration Study will recruit 150
practices including the participating
practices’ office managers and one
physician/lead PCMH clinical expert.
We will recruit and administer the
Office Manager Questions by phone to
150 office managers, recruit all sampled
physicians by sending them a
recruitment packet that includes a cover
letter, an AHRQ endorsement letter and
an info sheet, and then administer the
Physician Interview protocol questions
by phone to 150 physicians, and 150
physicians will self-administer the
PCMH–A Assessment Tool.
We have calculated our burden
estimate for Office Manager Questions
asked during physician recruitment
using an estimate of 3–5 questions a
minute as the Office Manager Questions
are closed-ended survey questions. The
Office Manager Questions contains 17
questions and is estimated to require an
average of 5 minutes; this estimate is
supported by the information gathered
during a pilot of these questions. For the
Physician Interview, we have calculated
the burden estimate to require an
average of 40 minutes per interview. For
the PCMH–A Assessment Tool, we
calculated our burden using a
conservative estimate of 4.5 items per
minute. Prior work suggests that 3–5
items on an assessment tool can
typically be completed per minute,
depending on item complexity and
respondent characteristics (Berry, 2009;
Hays & Reeve, 2010). The PCMH–A
Assessment tool contains 36 items and
is estimated to require an average
completion time of 8–10 minutes.
Participating practices will be asked
to submit any available CAHPS Patient
Experience data files (e.g. submission of
de-identified data including a data
dictionary via encrypted transfer) for the
period of time covering their NCQA
E:\FR\FM\23NON1.SGM
23NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 23, 2016 / Notices
PCMH Recognition history. Each
practice will have an average estimate of
3 CAHPS Patient Experience data files
to submit per one submission, which we
based on the average number of years of
PCMH history of the sample. In
addition, we conservatively estimate
that half of the control practices (25/50)
administer CG–CAHPS data, as this
percentage is unknown; while 90% of
the participating current and past
CAHPS practices (90/100) will submit
84583
CAHPS data, yielding 115 submissions
of CAHPS patient experience data files.
As indicated below, the annual total
burden is estimated to be 179 hours.
EXHIBIT 1—ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Data collection task
Number of respondents
Number of responses per
respondent
Office Manager Questions ..........................................
Physician Interview ......................................................
PCMH–A Assessment Tool .........................................
150 ...................................
150 ...................................
150 (Same Physicians as
above).
115 ...................................
415 ...................................
1 .......................................
1 .......................................
1 (same person as
above).
1 per practice ...................
1 .......................................
CAHPS Patient Experience Data Files .......................
Total ..............................................................
Hours per
response
Total burden
hours
5/60
40/60
15/60
12.5
100
37.5
15/60
75/60
28.75
178.75
+ The same respondent completes the Physician Interview and PCMH–A Assessment Tool and submits the CAHPS Patient Experience Data
Files.
EXHIBIT 2—ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST BURDEN
Number of
requests
Data collection task
Office Manager Questions ...........................................................................
Physician Interview ......................................................................................
PCMH–A Assessment Tool .........................................................................
CAHPS Patient Experience Data Files ........................................................
Total .............................................................................................................
Total burden
hours
150
150
150
115
300
Average hourly
wage rate *
12.5
100
37.5
28.75
178.75
$57.44 a
97.33 b
97.33 b
97.33 b
55.48
Total cost
burden
$718.00
9,733.00
3,649.88
2,798.24
16,899.12
+ The same respondent completes the Physician Interview and PCMH–A Assessment Tool and submits the CAHPS Patient Experience Data
Files.
* Occupational Employment Statistics, May 2015 National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates United States, U.S. Department of
Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_nat.htm
aBased on the mean wages for General and Operations Managers, 11–1021 within Healthcare Support Occupations, the occupational group
most likely tasked with completing the Office Manager Questions.
aBased on the mean wages for Physicians and Surgeons, 29–1060, the occupational group most likely tasked with completing the Physician
Interview, PCMH–A Assessment Tool, and submitting the CAHPS Patient Experience Data Files.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Request for Comments
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act, comments on AHRQ’s
information collection are requested
with regard to any of the following: (a)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of AHRQ health care
research and health care information
dissemination functions, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of
AHRQ’s estimate of burden (including
hours and costs) of the proposed
collection(s) of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information upon the
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and
included in the Agency’s subsequent
request for OMB approval of the
proposed information collection. All
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:04 Nov 22, 2016
Jkt 241001
comments will become a matter of
public record.
Sharon B. Arnold,
Deputy Director.
[FR Doc. 2016–28155 Filed 11–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–90–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
Statement of Organization, Functions,
and Delegations of Authority
Part C (Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention) of the Statement of
Organization, Functions, and
Delegations of Authority of the
Department of Health and Human
Services (45 FR 67772–76, dated
October 14, 1980, and corrected at 45 FR
69296, October 20, 1980, as amended
most recently at 81 FR 66284–66285,
dated September 27, 2016) is amended
to reflect the reorganization of the
Human Resources Office, Office of the
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Chief Operating Officer, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention.
Section C–B, Organization and
Functions, is hereby amended as
follows:
Delete in its entirety the title and the
mission and function statements for the
Human Resources Office (CAJQ) and
insert the following:
Human Resources Office (CAJQ). (1)
Provides leadership, policy formation,
oversight, guidance, service, and
advisory support and assistance to the
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) and the Agency for
Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
(ATSDR); (2) collaborates as
appropriate, with the CDC Office of the
Director (OD), Centers/Institute/Offices
(CIOs), domestic and international
agencies and organizations; and
provides a focus for short- and longterm planning within the Human
Resource Office (HRO); (3) develops and
administers human capital and human
resource management policies; (4)
serves as the business steward for all
CDC developed human capital and
human resources management systems
and applications; (5) develops,
E:\FR\FM\23NON1.SGM
23NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 23, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 84581-84583]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-28155]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
AGENCY: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the intention of the Agency for
Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to request that the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approve the proposed information collection
project: ``The Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems
(CAHPS) Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) Items Demonstration
Study.'' In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, AHRQ invites
the public to comment on this proposed information collection.
This proposed information collection was previously published in
the Federal Register on August 3rd, 2016 and allowed 60 days for public
comment. AHRQ did not receive any substantive comments. The purpose of
this notice is to allow an additional 30 days for public comment.
DATES: Comments on this notice must be received by December 23, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be submitted to: AHRQ's OMB Desk
Officer by fax at (202) 395-6974 (attention: AHRQ's desk officer) or by
email at OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov (attention: AHRQ's desk officer).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doris Lefkowitz, AHRQ Reports
Clearance Officer, (301) 427-1477, or by email at
doris.lefkowitz@AHRQ.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 84582]]
Proposed Project
``The Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS)
Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) Items Demonstration Study.''
This study is being conducted by AHRQ through its contractor, RAND,
pursuant to AHRQ's statutory authority to conduct and support research
on healthcare and on systems for the delivery of such care, including
activities with respect to the quality, effectiveness, efficiency,
appropriateness and value of healthcare services and with respect to
quality measurement and improvement. 42 U.S.C. 299a(a)(1) and (2).
Method of Collection
The patient-centered medical home (PCMH) is a model for delivering
primary care that is patient-centered, comprehensive, coordinated,
accessible, and continuously improved through a systems-based approach
to quality and safety.
As primary care practices across the United States seek National
Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) recognition as patient-centered
medical homes (PCMH), they can choose to administer the Consumer
Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS[supreg])
Clinician and Group (CG-CAHPS) survey with or without the PCMH
supplemental item set (AHRQ, 2010; Hays et al., 2014; Ng et al., 2016;
Scholle et al., 2012). NCQA offers a special patient experience
distinction to practices that opt to use the CAHPS PCMH items set in
their CG-CAHPS survey tool. While over 11,000 practices, representing
an estimated 15-18% of primary care physicians, are currently
recognized for PCMH by NCQA (NCQA, 2015), fewer than 3% of them submit
patient experience surveys to NCQA when applying for recognition under
NCQA's PCMH recognition program.
Despite the rapid movement toward PCMH primary care transformation
and the increasing use of CAHPS PCMH items, little is known about the
ways in which practices are using these CAHPS data and the PCMH
supplemental item information (about access, comprehensiveness, self-
management, shared decision making, coordination of care, and
information about care and appointments) to understand and improve
their patients' experiences during PCMH transformation. The PCMH Items
Demonstration Study will investigate:
How practices across the U.S. use CAHPS and the PCMH item
set during PCMH transformation,
How practices assemble and select items for inclusion in
their patient experience surveys (e.g. core, PCMH, supplemental, and
custom items),
Primary care practice leaders' perspectives on NCQA PCMH
Recognition and CAHPS Patient Experience Distinction,
Effects of changes made during PCMH transformation on
patient experiences reported on CAHPS surveys and any PCMH items, and
Associations between PCMH transformation and patient
experience scores.
To achieve the goals of this project the following data collections
will be implemented:
(1) Office Manager Questions administered via phone about the
participating practice's characteristics to describe the type of
practices in the study and to understand how practice characteristics
influence PCMH transformation and patient experience.
(2) Physician Interviews administered via phone with the lead PCMH
clinical expert about the details, decisions and processes of PCMH
transformation, NCQA PCMH Recognition and CAHPS Patient Experience
Distinction and their use of patient experience data during the
transformation process.
(3) PCMH-A Assessment Tool to be completed by the lead PCMH
clinical expert (before or after the interview on the standardized form
via fax or email) to collect validated metrics on the ``PCMH-ness'' of
the practice.
(4) CAHPS Patient Experience Data Files, which are patient-level
de-identified CAHPS patient experience data covering the period of PCMH
transformation for the participating practice. These data are collected
independently of this study by the practice (or network) via their
current vendor. We will work with the PCMH clinical expert (or a person
they designate who handles their data) in each of the participating
practices to submit these CAHPS data files securely to RAND to
understand practices' CAHPS patient experience trends and associations
with PCMH implementation during practices' PCMH journey.
Characterizing primary care practices' use of CAHPS and PCMH items
will provide important insight into the activities practices conduct
during PCMH transformation to improve patient experience scores. This
information may be useful in supporting practices that lag behind their
peers, learning from practices with outstanding records of patient
experience, and providing recommendations that may be used to refine
the content of the CAHPS survey items.
Estimated Annual Respondent Burden
Table 1 shows the estimated annualized burden and cost for the
respondents' time to participate in this data collection. These burden
estimates are based on tests of data collection conducted on nine or
fewer entities. As indicated below, the annual total burden hours are
estimated to be 179 hours. The annual total cost associated with the
annual total burden hours is estimated to be $16,899.
Table 1 shows the estimated annualized burden for the respondents'
time to participate in this data collection. The PCMH Items
Demonstration Study will recruit 150 practices including the
participating practices' office managers and one physician/lead PCMH
clinical expert. We will recruit and administer the Office Manager
Questions by phone to 150 office managers, recruit all sampled
physicians by sending them a recruitment packet that includes a cover
letter, an AHRQ endorsement letter and an info sheet, and then
administer the Physician Interview protocol questions by phone to 150
physicians, and 150 physicians will self-administer the PCMH-A
Assessment Tool.
We have calculated our burden estimate for Office Manager Questions
asked during physician recruitment using an estimate of 3-5 questions a
minute as the Office Manager Questions are closed-ended survey
questions. The Office Manager Questions contains 17 questions and is
estimated to require an average of 5 minutes; this estimate is
supported by the information gathered during a pilot of these
questions. For the Physician Interview, we have calculated the burden
estimate to require an average of 40 minutes per interview. For the
PCMH-A Assessment Tool, we calculated our burden using a conservative
estimate of 4.5 items per minute. Prior work suggests that 3-5 items on
an assessment tool can typically be completed per minute, depending on
item complexity and respondent characteristics (Berry, 2009; Hays &
Reeve, 2010). The PCMH-A Assessment tool contains 36 items and is
estimated to require an average completion time of 8-10 minutes.
Participating practices will be asked to submit any available CAHPS
Patient Experience data files (e.g. submission of de-identified data
including a data dictionary via encrypted transfer) for the period of
time covering their NCQA
[[Page 84583]]
PCMH Recognition history. Each practice will have an average estimate
of 3 CAHPS Patient Experience data files to submit per one submission,
which we based on the average number of years of PCMH history of the
sample. In addition, we conservatively estimate that half of the
control practices (25/50) administer CG-CAHPS data, as this percentage
is unknown; while 90% of the participating current and past CAHPS
practices (90/100) will submit CAHPS data, yielding 115 submissions of
CAHPS patient experience data files. As indicated below, the annual
total burden is estimated to be 179 hours.
Exhibit 1--Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of responses Hours per Total burden
Data collection task Number of respondents per respondent response hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Manager Questions.......... 150.................. 1.................... 5/60 12.5
Physician Interview............... 150.................. 1.................... 40/60 100
PCMH-A Assessment Tool............ 150 (Same Physicians 1 (same person as 15/60 37.5
as above). above).
CAHPS Patient Experience Data 115.................. 1 per practice....... 15/60 28.75
Files.
Total..................... 415.................. 1.................... 75/60 178.75
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ The same respondent completes the Physician Interview and PCMH-A Assessment Tool and submits the CAHPS Patient
Experience Data Files.
Exhibit 2--Estimated Annualized Cost Burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Total burden Average hourly Total cost
Data collection task requests hours wage rate * burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Manager Questions...................... 150 12.5 $57.44 \a\ $718.00
Physician Interview........................... 150 100 97.33 \b\ 9,733.00
PCMH-A Assessment Tool........................ 150 37.5 97.33 \b\ 3,649.88
CAHPS Patient Experience Data Files........... 115 28.75 97.33 \b\ 2,798.24
Total......................................... 300 178.75 55.48 16,899.12
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ The same respondent completes the Physician Interview and PCMH-A Assessment Tool and submits the CAHPS Patient
Experience Data Files.
* Occupational Employment Statistics, May 2015 National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates United
States, U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_nat.htm
\a\Based on the mean wages for General and Operations Managers, 11-1021 within Healthcare Support Occupations,
the occupational group most likely tasked with completing the Office Manager Questions.
\a\Based on the mean wages for Physicians and Surgeons, 29-1060, the occupational group most likely tasked with
completing the Physician Interview, PCMH-A Assessment Tool, and submitting the CAHPS Patient Experience Data
Files.
Request for Comments
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, comments on AHRQ's
information collection are requested with regard to any of the
following: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of AHRQ health care research and
health care information dissemination functions, including whether the
information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of AHRQ's
estimate of burden (including hours and costs) of the proposed
collection(s) of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information upon the
respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and included in the Agency's subsequent request for OMB approval of the
proposed information collection. All comments will become a matter of
public record.
Sharon B. Arnold,
Deputy Director.
[FR Doc. 2016-28155 Filed 11-22-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-P