Indirect Food Additives: Paper and Paperboard Components, 83672-83674 [2016-28116]
Download as PDF
83672
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 22, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
New Stuyahok, AK, New Stuyahok,
Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Amdt 1A
Albany, GA, Southwest Georgia Rgnl,
ILS OR LOC RWY 4, Amdt 12
Chicago/Aurora, IL, Aurora Muni, ILS
OR LOC RWY 33, Orig, CANCELED
Chicago/Aurora, IL, Aurora Muni, LOC
RWY 33, Orig
Galesburg, IL, Galesburg Muni, RNAV
(GPS) RWY 3, Orig-B
Baltimore, MD, Martin State, LOC RWY
15, AMDT 3C
Santa Fe, NM, Santa Fe Muni, Takeoff
Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 4
Glens Falls, NY, Floyd Bennett
Memorial, RNAV (GPS) RWY 1, Amdt
2
Delaware, OH, Delaware Muni—Jim
Moore Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 10,
Amdt 1
Delaware, OH, Delaware Muni—Jim
Moore Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 28,
Amdt 1
Delaware, OH, Delaware Muni—Jim
Moore Field, Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle DP, Amdt 1
Delaware, OH, Delaware Muni—Jim
Moore Field, VOR RWY 28, Amdt 1
Magnum, OK, Scott Field, RNAV (GPS)
RWY 17, Amdt 2
Magnum, OK, Scott Field, RNAV (GPS)
RWY 35, Amdt 2
Gainesville, TX, Gainesville Muni,
RNAV (GPS) RWY 18, Amdt 2
Gainesville, TX, Gainesville Muni,
RNAV (GPS) RWY 36, Orig
Gainesville, TX, Gainesville Muni,
Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Amdt 1
Portage, WI, Portage Muni, Takeoff
Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 2
Rescinded: On October 26, 2016 (81
FR 74289), the FAA published an
Amendment in Docket No. 31098, Amdt
No. 3715 to Part 97 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations under section
97.31. The following entry for Midland,
TX, effective November 10, 2016, is
hereby rescinded in its entirety:
Midland, TX, Midland Intl Air & Space
Port, RADAR–1, Amdt 7
[FR Doc. 2016–27698 Filed 11–21–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 176
[Docket No. FDA–2016–F–1153]
Indirect Food Additives: Paper and
Paperboard Components
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Nov 21, 2016
Jkt 241001
ACTION:
Final rule.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or we) is
amending the food additive regulations
to no longer provide for the use of two
specific perfluoroalkyl containing
substances as oil and water repellents
for paper and paperboard for use in
contact with aqueous and fatty foods
because these uses have been
abandoned. This action is in response to
a petition filed by Keller and Heckman
LLP on behalf of 3M Corporation.
DATES: This rule is effective November
22, 2016. See section VIII for further
information on the filing of objections.
Submit either electronic or written
objections and requests for a hearing by
December 22, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit objections
and requests for a hearing as follows.
SUMMARY:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic objections in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Objections submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
objection will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
objection does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
objection, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit an objection
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the objection as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper objections
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management, FDA will post your
objection, as well as any attachments,
except for information submitted,
marked and identified, as confidential,
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
if submitted as detailed in
‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2016–F–1153 for ‘‘Indirect Food
Additives: Paper and Paperboard
Components.’’ Received objections will
be placed in the docket and, except for
those submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Division of Dockets Management
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit an objection with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
objections only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit both
copies to the Division of Dockets
Management. If you do not wish your
name and contact information to be
made publicly available, you can
provide this information on the cover
sheet and not in the body of your
comments and you must identify this
information as ‘‘confidential.’’ Any
information marked as ‘‘confidential’’
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more
information about FDA’s posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR
56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://www.fda.gov/
regulatoryinformation/dockets/
default.htm.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vanee Komolprasert, Center for Food
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS–
275), Food and Drug Administration,
5001 Campus Dr., College Park, MD
20740–3835, 240–402–1217.
E:\FR\FM\22NOR1.SGM
22NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 22, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
I. Background
In a document published in the
Federal Register of April 29, 2016 (81
FR 25625), we announced that we filed
a food additive petition (FAP 6B4814)
submitted on behalf of 3M Corporation
(Petitioner) by Keller and Heckman LLP,
1001 G Street NW., Suite 500 West,
Washington, DC 20001. The petition
proposed to amend § 176.170 (21 CFR
176.170) to no longer provide for the use
of two different perfluoroalkyl
containing substances as oil and water
repellents for paper and paperboard for
use in contact with aqueous and fatty
foods because these uses have been
intentionally and permanently
abandoned. The two substances that are
the subjects of the petition are as
follows:
(1) Ammonium bis (N-ethyl-2perfluoroalkylsulfonamido ethyl)
phosphates, containing not more than
15 percent ammonium mono (N-ethyl-2perfluoroalkylsulfonamido ethyl)
phosphates, where the alkyl group is
more than 95 percent C8 and the salts
have a fluorine content of 50.2 percent
to 52.8 percent as determined on a
solids basis; and
(2) Perfluoroalkyl acrylate copolymer
(CAS Reg. No. 92265–81–1) containing
35 to 40 weight percent fluorine,
produced by the copolymerization of
ethanaminium, N,N,N-trimethyl-2-[(2methyl-1-oxo-2-propenyl)-oxy]-,
chloride; 2-propenoic acid, 2-methyl-,
oxiranylmethyl ester; 2-propenoic acid,
2-ethoxyethyl ester; and 2-propenoic
acid, 2[[(heptadecafluorooctyl)sulfonyl]methyl amino]ethyl ester.
In response to food additive petitions
submitted by the Petitioner (33 FR
14544, September 27, 1968; 35 FR
14840, September 24, 1970; 37 FR 9762,
May 17, 1972; and 52 FR 3603, February
5, 1987), FDA authorized certain uses of
these two substances as food additives
under § 176.170.
II. Evaluation of Abandonment
Section 409(i) of the Federal, Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act)
(21 U.S.C. 348(i)) states that we may by
regulation establish the procedure for
amending or repealing a food additive
regulation, and that this procedure shall
conform to the procedure provided in
section 409 for the promulgation of such
regulations. FDA’s regulations specific
to the administrative actions for food
additives provide that the
Commissioner, on his own initiative or
on the petition of any interested person,
may propose the issuance of a
regulation amending or repealing a
regulation pertaining to a food additive
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Nov 21, 2016
Jkt 241001
(§ 171.130(a) (21 CFR 171.130(a))). The
regulations further provide that any
such petition must include an assertion
of facts, supported by data, showing that
new information exists with respect to
the food additive or that new uses have
been developed or old uses abandoned,
that new data are available as to toxicity
of the chemical, or that experience with
the existing regulation or exemption
may justify its amendment or appeal.
New data must be furnished in the form
specified in 21 CFR 171.1 and 171.100
for submitting petitions (§ 171.130(b)).
Under these regulations, a petitioner
may propose that we amend a food
additive regulation if the petitioner can
demonstrate that there are ‘‘old uses
abandoned’’ for the relevant food
additive. Such abandonment must be
complete and permanent for any
intended uses in the U.S. market. While
section 409 of the FD&C Act and
§ 171.130 also provide for amending or
revoking a food additive regulation
based on safety, an amendment or
revocation based on abandonment is not
based on safety of the food additive.
Instead, the amendment or revocation is
based on the fact that regulatory
authorization is no longer necessary
because the use of the food additive has
been permanently and completely
abandoned.
Abandonment may be based on the
abandonment of certain authorized food
additive uses for a substance (e.g., if a
substance is no longer used in certain
product categories) or on the
abandonment of all authorized food
additive uses of a substance (e.g., if a
substance is no longer being
manufactured). If a petition seeks to
amend the food additive regulations
based on the abandonment of certain
uses of the food additive, such uses
must be adequately defined so that both
the scope of the abandonment and any
amendment to the food additive
regulation are clear.
The petition submitted on behalf of
3M Corporation includes the following
information to support the claim that
the uses of the two substances are no
longer being introduced into interstate
commerce. The Petitioner provides a
statement that the Petitioner does not
currently manufacture the two
substances for food contact use in the
United States, and that to the best of the
Petitioner’s knowledge, the Petitioner
was the sole and exclusive domestic and
international manufacturer of the two
substances for the abandoned uses. In
addition, the Petitioner submitted
information on its May 2000 voluntary
agreement with the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency to phase out
production of perfluorooctane sulfonate
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
83673
(PFOS); which is used to produce the
two substances (https://nepis.epa.gov/
Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/P100LTG6.PDF?Dockey=
P100LTG6.PDF). According to the
petition, the Petitioner completed a
voluntary phase-out of PFOS production
in 2002. The Petitioner states that it
does not intend to manufacture or
import, nor does it maintain an
inventory for sale or distribution, of the
two substances for use in food-contact
applications in the United States in the
future.
III. Comments on the Filing Notice
We provided 60 days for comments
on the filing notice. We received two
comments from an individual and a
consumer group. Both comments raised
two issues, which are discussed in the
paragraphs that follow. For ease of
reading, we preface each comment
discussion with a numbered
‘‘Comment,’’ and each response with
‘‘Response.’’
(Comment 1) One comment asked
why we are amending the regulations if
the substances are no longer in use.
(Response) FDA is responding to an
FAP, as required under section 409 of
the FD&C Act. Amending these food
additive regulations addresses the FAP
under the process set forth in the FD&C
Act. In the case of abandonment,
regulatory authorization is no longer
necessary for these substances because
their use as food additives has been
permanently and completely
abandoned. Our action also gives
interested parties better information
about what substances are used as food
contact substances.
(Comment 2) Another comment asked
FDA to remove the approvals of seven
effective food contact notifications for
long-chain perfluorinated compounds.
(Response) We decline to address
food contact substances that are outside
the scope of this food additive petition.
IV. Conclusion
We reviewed the data and information
in the petition and other available
relevant material to determine whether
the use of the two perfluoroalkyl
containing substances as oil and water
repellents for paper and paperboard for
use in contact with aqueous and fatty
foods has been permanently and
completely abandoned. Based on the
available information, we conclude that
the use of these substances has been
permanently and completely
abandoned. Therefore, we are amending
21 CFR part 176 as set forth in this
document. Upon the effective date (see
DATES), these food additive uses are no
longer authorized.
E:\FR\FM\22NOR1.SGM
22NOR1
83674
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 22, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
V. Public Disclosure
In accordance with § 171.1(h) (21 CFR
171.1(h)), the petition and the
documents that we considered and
relied upon in reaching our decision to
approve the petition will be made
available for public disclosure (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). As
provided in § 171.1(h), we will delete
from the documents any materials that
are not available for public disclosure.
VI. Analysis of Environmental Impact
We previously considered the
environmental effects of this rule, as
stated in the Federal Register of April
29, 2016, notice of petition for FAP
6B4814. We stated that we had
determined, under 21 CFR 25.32(m),
that this action ‘‘is of a type that does
not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment,’’ such that neither an
environmental assessment nor an
environmental impact statement is
required. We have not received any new
information or comments that would
affect our previous determination.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
VII. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final rule contains no collection
of information. Therefore, clearance by
the Office of Management and Budget
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 is not required.
VIII. Objections
If you will be adversely affected by
one or more provisions of this
regulation, you may file with the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) either electronic or written
objections. You must separately number
each objection, and within each
numbered objection you must specify
with particularity the provision(s) to
which you object, and the grounds for
your objection. Within each numbered
objection, you must specifically state
whether you are requesting a hearing on
the particular provision that you specify
in that numbered objection. If you do
not request a hearing for any particular
objection, you waive the right to a
hearing on that objection. If you request
a hearing, your objection must include
a detailed description and analysis of
the specific factual information you
intend to present in support of the
objection in the event that a hearing is
held. If you do not include such a
description and analysis for any
particular objection, you waive the right
to a hearing on the objection.
Any objections received in response
to the regulation may be seen in the
Division of Dockets Management
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, and will be posted to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Nov 21, 2016
Jkt 241001
the docket at https://
www.regulations.gov.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 176
Food additives, Food packaging.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs and re-delegated to
the Director, Center for Food Safety and
Applied Nutrition, 21 CFR part 176 is
amended as follows:
PART 176—INDIRECT FOOD
ADDITIVES: PAPER AND
PAPERBOARD COMPONENTS
1. The authority citation for part 176
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 342, 346, 348,
379e.
§ 176.170
[Amended]
2. Amend § 176.170 in the table in
paragraph (a)(5) by removing the entries
for ‘‘Ammonium bis (N-ethyl-2perfluoroalkylsulfonamido ethyl)
phosphates’’ and ‘‘Perfluoroalkyl
acrylate copolymer.’’
■
Dated: November 17, 2016.
Susan Bernard,
Director, Office of Regulations, Policy and
Social Science, Center for Food Safety and
Applied Nutrition.
[FR Doc. 2016–28116 Filed 11–21–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Part 1000
[Docket No. FR–5650–F–14]
RIN 2577–AC90
Native American Housing Assistance
and Self-Determination Act; Revisions
to the Indian Housing Block Grant
Program Formula
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Public and Indian
Housing, HUD.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule revises the
Indian Housing Block Grant (IHBG)
Program allocation formula authorized
by section 302 of the Native American
Housing Assistance and SelfDetermination Act of 1996, as amended
(NAHASDA). Through the IHBG
Program, HUD provides federal housing
assistance for Indian tribes in a manner
that recognizes the right of Indian selfdetermination and tribal selfgovernment. HUD negotiated this final
rule with active tribal participation and
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
using the procedures of the Negotiated
Rulemaking Act of 1990. The regulatory
changes reflect the consensus decisions
reached by HUD and the tribal
representatives on ways to improve and
clarify the current regulations governing
the IHBG Program formula.
DATES: Effective Date: December 22,
2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Heidi J. Frechette, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Native American
Programs, Office of Public and Indian
Housing, Department of Housing and
Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street
SW., Room 4126, Washington, DC
20410, telephone number 202–401–7914
(this is not a toll-free number). Hearingor speech-impaired individuals may
access this number via TTY by calling
the toll-free Federal Relay Service at 1–
800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Native American Housing
Assistance and Self-Determination Act
of 1996 (25 U.S.C. 4101 et seq.)
(NAHASDA) changed the way that
housing assistance is provided to Native
Americans. NAHASDA eliminated
several separate assistance programs
and replaced them with a single block
grant program, known as the Indian
Housing Block Grant (IHBG) Program.
NAHASDA and its implementing
regulations, codified at 24 CFR part
1000, recognize tribal self-determination
and self-governance while establishing
reasonable standards of accountability.
Reflective of this, section 106 of
NAHASDA provides that HUD shall
develop implementing regulations with
active tribal participation and using the
procedures of the Negotiated
Rulemaking Act of 1990 (5 U.S.C. 561–
570).
Under the IHBG program, HUD makes
assistance available to eligible Indian
tribes for affordable housing activities.
The amount of assistance made
available to each Indian tribe is
determined using a formula developed
as part of the NAHASDA negotiated
process. Based on the amount of
funding appropriated for the IHBG
program, HUD calculates the annual
grant for each Indian tribe and provides
this information to the Indian tribes.
Indian tribes are required to submit to
HUD an Indian Housing plan that
includes, among other things, a
description of planned activities and
statement of needs. If the Indian
Housing Plan complies with statutory
and regulatory requirements, the grant is
awarded.
E:\FR\FM\22NOR1.SGM
22NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 22, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 83672-83674]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-28116]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 176
[Docket No. FDA-2016-F-1153]
Indirect Food Additives: Paper and Paperboard Components
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is amending the
food additive regulations to no longer provide for the use of two
specific perfluoroalkyl containing substances as oil and water
repellents for paper and paperboard for use in contact with aqueous and
fatty foods because these uses have been abandoned. This action is in
response to a petition filed by Keller and Heckman LLP on behalf of 3M
Corporation.
DATES: This rule is effective November 22, 2016. See section VIII for
further information on the filing of objections. Submit either
electronic or written objections and requests for a hearing by December
22, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit objections and requests for a hearing as
follows.
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic objections in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Objections submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your objection will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your
objection does not include any confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted, such as medical information,
your or anyone else's Social Security number, or confidential business
information, such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you
include your name, contact information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your objection, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit an objection with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the objection as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper objections submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management, FDA will post your objection, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2016-F-1153 for ``Indirect Food Additives: Paper and Paperboard
Components.'' Received objections will be placed in the docket and,
except for those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly
viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Confidential Submissions--To submit an objection with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your objections only as a written/paper submission.
You should submit two copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note
that states ``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The
Agency will review this copy, including the claimed confidential
information, in its consideration of comments. The second copy, which
will have the claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out,
will be available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov. Submit both copies to the Division of Dockets
Management. If you do not wish your name and contact information to be
made publicly available, you can provide this information on the cover
sheet and not in the body of your comments and you must identify this
information as ``confidential.'' Any information marked as
``confidential'' will not be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR
10.20 and other applicable disclosure law. For more information about
FDA's posting of comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September
18, 2015, or access the information at: https://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/dockets/default.htm.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vanee Komolprasert, Center for Food
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-275), Food and Drug Administration,
5001 Campus Dr., College Park, MD 20740-3835, 240-402-1217.
[[Page 83673]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In a document published in the Federal Register of April 29, 2016
(81 FR 25625), we announced that we filed a food additive petition (FAP
6B4814) submitted on behalf of 3M Corporation (Petitioner) by Keller
and Heckman LLP, 1001 G Street NW., Suite 500 West, Washington, DC
20001. The petition proposed to amend Sec. 176.170 (21 CFR 176.170) to
no longer provide for the use of two different perfluoroalkyl
containing substances as oil and water repellents for paper and
paperboard for use in contact with aqueous and fatty foods because
these uses have been intentionally and permanently abandoned. The two
substances that are the subjects of the petition are as follows:
(1) Ammonium bis (N-ethyl-2-perfluoroalkylsulfonamido ethyl)
phosphates, containing not more than 15 percent ammonium mono (N-ethyl-
2-perfluoroalkylsulfonamido ethyl) phosphates, where the alkyl group is
more than 95 percent C8 and the salts have a fluorine
content of 50.2 percent to 52.8 percent as determined on a solids
basis; and
(2) Perfluoroalkyl acrylate copolymer (CAS Reg. No. 92265-81-1)
containing 35 to 40 weight percent fluorine, produced by the
copolymerization of ethanaminium, N,N,N-trimethyl-2-[(2-methyl-1-oxo-2-
propenyl)-oxy]-, chloride; 2-propenoic acid, 2-methyl-, oxiranylmethyl
ester; 2-propenoic acid, 2-ethoxyethyl ester; and 2-propenoic acid,
2[[(heptadecafluoro-octyl)sulfonyl]methyl amino]ethyl ester.
In response to food additive petitions submitted by the Petitioner
(33 FR 14544, September 27, 1968; 35 FR 14840, September 24, 1970; 37
FR 9762, May 17, 1972; and 52 FR 3603, February 5, 1987), FDA
authorized certain uses of these two substances as food additives under
Sec. 176.170.
II. Evaluation of Abandonment
Section 409(i) of the Federal, Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the
FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 348(i)) states that we may by regulation establish
the procedure for amending or repealing a food additive regulation, and
that this procedure shall conform to the procedure provided in section
409 for the promulgation of such regulations. FDA's regulations
specific to the administrative actions for food additives provide that
the Commissioner, on his own initiative or on the petition of any
interested person, may propose the issuance of a regulation amending or
repealing a regulation pertaining to a food additive (Sec. 171.130(a)
(21 CFR 171.130(a))). The regulations further provide that any such
petition must include an assertion of facts, supported by data, showing
that new information exists with respect to the food additive or that
new uses have been developed or old uses abandoned, that new data are
available as to toxicity of the chemical, or that experience with the
existing regulation or exemption may justify its amendment or appeal.
New data must be furnished in the form specified in 21 CFR 171.1 and
171.100 for submitting petitions (Sec. 171.130(b)). Under these
regulations, a petitioner may propose that we amend a food additive
regulation if the petitioner can demonstrate that there are ``old uses
abandoned'' for the relevant food additive. Such abandonment must be
complete and permanent for any intended uses in the U.S. market. While
section 409 of the FD&C Act and Sec. 171.130 also provide for amending
or revoking a food additive regulation based on safety, an amendment or
revocation based on abandonment is not based on safety of the food
additive. Instead, the amendment or revocation is based on the fact
that regulatory authorization is no longer necessary because the use of
the food additive has been permanently and completely abandoned.
Abandonment may be based on the abandonment of certain authorized
food additive uses for a substance (e.g., if a substance is no longer
used in certain product categories) or on the abandonment of all
authorized food additive uses of a substance (e.g., if a substance is
no longer being manufactured). If a petition seeks to amend the food
additive regulations based on the abandonment of certain uses of the
food additive, such uses must be adequately defined so that both the
scope of the abandonment and any amendment to the food additive
regulation are clear.
The petition submitted on behalf of 3M Corporation includes the
following information to support the claim that the uses of the two
substances are no longer being introduced into interstate commerce. The
Petitioner provides a statement that the Petitioner does not currently
manufacture the two substances for food contact use in the United
States, and that to the best of the Petitioner's knowledge, the
Petitioner was the sole and exclusive domestic and international
manufacturer of the two substances for the abandoned uses. In addition,
the Petitioner submitted information on its May 2000 voluntary
agreement with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to phase out
production of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS); which is used to
produce the two substances (https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/P100LTG6.PDF?Dockey=P100LTG6.PDF). According to the petition, the
Petitioner completed a voluntary phase-out of PFOS production in 2002.
The Petitioner states that it does not intend to manufacture or import,
nor does it maintain an inventory for sale or distribution, of the two
substances for use in food-contact applications in the United States in
the future.
III. Comments on the Filing Notice
We provided 60 days for comments on the filing notice. We received
two comments from an individual and a consumer group. Both comments
raised two issues, which are discussed in the paragraphs that follow.
For ease of reading, we preface each comment discussion with a numbered
``Comment,'' and each response with ``Response.''
(Comment 1) One comment asked why we are amending the regulations
if the substances are no longer in use.
(Response) FDA is responding to an FAP, as required under section
409 of the FD&C Act. Amending these food additive regulations addresses
the FAP under the process set forth in the FD&C Act. In the case of
abandonment, regulatory authorization is no longer necessary for these
substances because their use as food additives has been permanently and
completely abandoned. Our action also gives interested parties better
information about what substances are used as food contact substances.
(Comment 2) Another comment asked FDA to remove the approvals of
seven effective food contact notifications for long-chain
perfluorinated compounds.
(Response) We decline to address food contact substances that are
outside the scope of this food additive petition.
IV. Conclusion
We reviewed the data and information in the petition and other
available relevant material to determine whether the use of the two
perfluoroalkyl containing substances as oil and water repellents for
paper and paperboard for use in contact with aqueous and fatty foods
has been permanently and completely abandoned. Based on the available
information, we conclude that the use of these substances has been
permanently and completely abandoned. Therefore, we are amending 21 CFR
part 176 as set forth in this document. Upon the effective date (see
DATES), these food additive uses are no longer authorized.
[[Page 83674]]
V. Public Disclosure
In accordance with Sec. 171.1(h) (21 CFR 171.1(h)), the petition
and the documents that we considered and relied upon in reaching our
decision to approve the petition will be made available for public
disclosure (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). As provided in Sec.
171.1(h), we will delete from the documents any materials that are not
available for public disclosure.
VI. Analysis of Environmental Impact
We previously considered the environmental effects of this rule, as
stated in the Federal Register of April 29, 2016, notice of petition
for FAP 6B4814. We stated that we had determined, under 21 CFR
25.32(m), that this action ``is of a type that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment,'' such
that neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact
statement is required. We have not received any new information or
comments that would affect our previous determination.
VII. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final rule contains no collection of information. Therefore,
clearance by the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 is not required.
VIII. Objections
If you will be adversely affected by one or more provisions of this
regulation, you may file with the Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) either electronic or written objections. You must separately
number each objection, and within each numbered objection you must
specify with particularity the provision(s) to which you object, and
the grounds for your objection. Within each numbered objection, you
must specifically state whether you are requesting a hearing on the
particular provision that you specify in that numbered objection. If
you do not request a hearing for any particular objection, you waive
the right to a hearing on that objection. If you request a hearing,
your objection must include a detailed description and analysis of the
specific factual information you intend to present in support of the
objection in the event that a hearing is held. If you do not include
such a description and analysis for any particular objection, you waive
the right to a hearing on the objection.
Any objections received in response to the regulation may be seen
in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, and will be posted to the docket at https://www.regulations.gov.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 176
Food additives, Food packaging.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs and re-
delegated to the Director, Center for Food Safety and Applied
Nutrition, 21 CFR part 176 is amended as follows:
PART 176--INDIRECT FOOD ADDITIVES: PAPER AND PAPERBOARD COMPONENTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 176 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 342, 346, 348, 379e.
Sec. 176.170 [Amended]
0
2. Amend Sec. 176.170 in the table in paragraph (a)(5) by removing the
entries for ``Ammonium bis (N-ethyl-2-perfluoroalkylsulfonamido ethyl)
phosphates'' and ``Perfluoroalkyl acrylate copolymer.''
Dated: November 17, 2016.
Susan Bernard,
Director, Office of Regulations, Policy and Social Science, Center for
Food Safety and Applied Nutrition.
[FR Doc. 2016-28116 Filed 11-21-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P