Wine Treating Materials and Related Regulations, 83752-83771 [2016-27581]
Download as PDF
83752
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 22, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Issued in College Park, Georgia, on
November 7, 2016.
Ryan W. Almasy,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern
Service Center, Air Traffic Organization.
[FR Doc. 2016–27859 Filed 11–21–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
TTB Authority
27 CFR Part 24
[Docket No. TTB–2016–0010; Notice No.
164]
RIN 1513–AB61
Wine Treating Materials and Related
Regulations
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
and Trade Bureau (TTB) is proposing to
amend its regulations pertaining to the
production of wine and in particular in
regard to the permissible treatments that
may be applied to wine and to juice
from which wine is made. These
proposed amendments are in response
to requests from wine industry members
to authorize certain wine treating
materials and processes not currently
authorized by TTB regulations. TTB
invites comments on the proposed
regulatory changes described in this
document, as well as on other wine
treatment issues for which regulatory
amendments are not proposed in this
document.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received by
January 23, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Please send your comments
on this document to one of the
following addresses:
• https://www.regulations.gov (via the
online comment form for this document
as posted within Docket No. TTB–2016–
0010 at Regulations.gov, the Federal erulemaking portal);
• U.S. Mail: Director, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street
NW., Box 12, Washington, DC 20005; or
• Hand delivery/courier in lieu of
mail: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street NW., Suite
400, Washington, DC 20005.
See the Public Participation section of
this document for specific instructions
and requirements for submitting
comments, and for information on how
to request a public hearing or view or
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Nov 21, 2016
Jkt 241001
Kara
Fontaine, Regulations and Rulings
Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street NW., Box
12, Washington, DC 20005; phone 202–
453–1039, ext. 103.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Background
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
DATES:
obtain copies of the petition and
supporting materials.
Chapter 51 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended (IRC), 26
U.S.C. chapter 51, contains provisions
concerning the taxation and production
of distilled spirits, wines, and beer. The
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau (TTB) has been delegated
authority to promulgate regulations
pertaining to wine under Chapter 51 of
the IRC. The statutory provisions of the
IRC related to the distilled spirits and
wine regulations that TTB promulgates
include, but are not limited to, the
following:
• Section 5002(a)(4) of the IRC (26
U.S.C. 5002(a)(4)), which defines the
term ‘‘distiller,’’ in pertinent part, as
including any person who ‘‘(A)
produces distilled spirits from any
source or substance’’ or ‘‘(C) by any
process separates alcoholic spirits from
any fermented substance * * *.’’
• Section 5171(a) of the IRC (26
U.S.C. 5171(a)), which requires that
operations ‘‘as a distiller’’ only be
conducted on the bonded premises of a
distilled spirits plant by a person who
is qualified under subchapter B of
chapter 51 of the IRC.
• Section 5373 of the IRC (26 U.S.C.
5373), which authorizes the
promulgation of regulations regarding
the type of wine spirits that may be used
in wine production.
• Section 5381 of the IRC (26 U.S.C.
5381), which provides that natural wine
is the product of the juice or must of
sound, ripe grapes or other sound, ripe
fruit, made with such cellar treatment as
may be authorized under section 5382.
• Section 5382(a) of the IRC (26
U.S.C. 5382(a)), which provides that
proper cellar treatment of natural wine
constitutes those practices and
procedures in the United States, of
using various methods and materials to
correct or stabilize the wine, or the fruit
juice from which it is made, so as to
produce a finished product acceptable
in good commercial practice as
prescribed by regulation. Section
5382(c) also authorizes the
promulgation of regulations setting forth
limitations on the preparation and use
of methods and materials for clarifying,
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
stabilizing, preserving, fermenting, and
correcting wine and juice.
• Section 5387(a) of the IRC (26
U.S.C. 5387(a)), which authorizes the
production of agricultural wine, classed
as ‘‘standard agricultural wine,’’ from
agricultural products other than the
juice of fruit. Such agricultural wine
must be made in accordance with good
commercial practice as prescribed by
regulation and may be cellar treated in
accordance with sections 5382(a) and (c)
of the IRC. Also, section 5387(b)
prohibits the addition of wine spirits,
coloring material or herbs, or other
flavoring material (except hops in the
case of honey wine) to agricultural
wine, as well as the blending together of
wines from different agricultural
commodities.
The regulations promulgated under
the IRC regarding the production of
wine are set forth in part 24 of title 27
of the Code of Federal Regulations (27
CFR part 24) and include, but are not
limited to, the following provisions:
• 27 CFR 24.10, which contains the
definitions of certain terms used in 27
CFR part 24.
• 27 CFR 24.225, which sets forth
rules under which proprietors of a
bonded wine premises may withdraw
and receive spirits without payment of
tax from the bonded premises of a
distilled spirits plant and add the spirits
to natural wine on bonded wine
premises.
• 27 CFR 24.246, which includes a
table that lists the materials authorized
for the treatment of wine and juice.
• 27 CFR 24.247, which includes a
table that lists materials authorized for
the treatment of distilling material.
• 27 CFR 24.248, which includes a
table that lists processes authorized for
the treatment of wine, juice, and
distilling materials.
TTB administers chapter 51 of the IRC
and its implementing regulations
pursuant to section 1111(d) of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002, as
codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The
Secretary has delegated various
authorities through Treasury
Department Order 120–01, dated
December 10, 2013 (superseding
Treasury Order 120–01 dated January
24, 2003), to the TTB Administrator to
perform the functions and duties in the
administration and enforcement of these
laws.
In addition, TTB consults with the
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) on whether alcohol beverages are
adulterated under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act),
including whether a substance added to
an alcohol beverage is an unapproved
food additive. Alcohol beverages are
E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM
22NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 22, 2016 / Proposed Rules
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
considered ‘‘food’’ under the FD&C Act.
A substance added to food is a food
additive unless it is otherwise excluded
from the definition of a food additive
under the FD&C Act. For example, the
use of a substance in food that is
generally recognized as safe by qualified
experts (GRAS) is excluded from the
definition of a food additive under the
FD&C Act. The use of a food additive in
food must be authorized by FDA either
through a food additive regulation or an
effective food contact notification
(FCN). FDA has listed certain GRAS
uses in its regulations. In addition, FDA
has a voluntary notification procedure
by which any person may notify FDA of
a conclusion that a use of a substance
is GRAS. FDA evaluates whether the
notice provides a sufficient basis for a
GRAS conclusion (which results in a
‘‘no questions’’ response) or whether
FDA believes there is an insufficient
basis for a GRAS conclusion (which
results in an ‘‘insufficient basis’’
response). For the purpose of this
rulemaking, we use the term ‘‘consistent
with the food additive requirements
under the FD&C Act’’ to refer to: (1)
Authorized food additive uses; (2) uses
that are GRAS under FDA’s regulations,
that are the subject of a ‘‘no questions’’
letter from FDA in response to a GRAS
notice, or that are subject to an opinion
letter from FDA stating that the use is
GRAS or otherwise permissible; or (3)
uses that are otherwise excluded from
regulation as a food additive.
Based on TTB’s experience in
administering the statutory and
regulatory provisions mentioned above,
TTB is proposing in this document a
number of amendments to the TTB
regulations and inviting comments from
the public on these proposed regulatory
changes. In addition, TTB is outlining in
this document a number of other issues
that are not the subject of proposed
regulatory changes. TTB invites
comments from the public on those
issues to assist TTB in determining
whether any of those issues warrant
specific regulatory changes.
Terms Used in This Document
TTB is providing the following
definitions to assist in the
comprehension of this final rule. The
definitions of agricultural wine,
amelioration, brix, natural wine,
standard wine, and wine spirits come
from § 24.10, the definition of essences
is derived from 27 CFR 24.85, and the
definition of special natural wine is
derived from 27 CFR 24.10 and 24.195.
The definitions of ‘‘natural wine’’ and
‘‘standard wine’’ are consistent with
statutory provisions at sections 5381
and 5392, respectively. The definitions
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Nov 21, 2016
Jkt 241001
of ‘‘agricultural wine,’’ ‘‘amelioration,’’
and ‘‘special natural wine’’ reflect
language used in statutory provisions at
sections 5387, 5383, and 5386,
respectively. The definition of ‘‘brix’’ is
derived, in part, from statutory
provisions at sections 5382 and 5393.
Definitions of industry member and
yeast nutrients also are provided,
although these terms are not specifically
defined in statutory provisions or
elsewhere in the regulations.
• Agricultural wine: Wine made from
suitable agricultural products other than
the juice of grapes, berries, or other
fruits.
• Amelioration: The addition to juice
or natural wine before, during, or after
fermentation, of either water or pure dry
sugar, or a combination of water and
sugar to adjust the acid level.
• Brix: The quantity of dissolved
solids expressed as grams of sucrose in
100 grams of solution at 68 degrees F
(20 degrees C.) (Percent by weight of
sugar). (The definition of ‘‘Brix’’ in
§ 24.10 incorrectly refers to 60 degrees
F rather than 68, which is the equivalent
of 20 degrees C; TTB is proposing to
correct this typographical error in this
document.)
• Essences: Preparations of natural
constituents extracted from fruit, herbs,
berries, etc.
• Industry member: For the purposes
of this document, a proprietor of a
bonded wine premises.
• Natural wine: The product of the
juice or must of sound, ripe grapes or
other sound, ripe fruit (including
berries) made with any cellar treatment
authorized by 27 CFR part 24, subparts
F and L, and containing not more than
21 percent by weight (21 degrees Brix
dealcoholized wine) of total solids.
• Special natural wine: A product
produced from a base of natural wine
(including heavy bodied blending wine)
to which natural flavorings are added,
and made pursuant to an approved
formula in accordance with 27 CFR part
24, subpart H. In subpart H, § 24.195
additionally explains that, among other
things, natural flavorings are added in
quantities or proportions such that the
resulting product derives character and
flavor distinctive from the base wine
and distinguishable from other natural
wine.
• Standard wine: Natural wine,
specially sweetened natural wine,
special natural wine, and standard
agricultural wine, produced in
accordance with 27 CFR part 24,
subparts F, H, and I.
• Wine spirits: Brandy or wine spirits
authorized under 26 U.S.C. 5373 for use
in wine production.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
83753
• Yeast nutrients: For the purposes of
this document, vitamins and minerals
that aid in the fermentation of juice to
wine by acting as food for yeast.
TTB Administrative Approvals of Wine
and Juice Treatments
Industry members who wish to
experiment with, or commercially use, a
treating material or process not
specifically authorized in 27 CFR part
24 must file an application with TTB
requesting authorization to use the new
material or process. TTB may approve
such requests as experiments under 27
CFR 24.249 or allow for the continual
use of the new material or process under
27 CFR 24.250.
Standards regarding approval of the
experimental use of a new treating
material or process are set forth in
§ 24.249. The provisions covering
applications for commercial use of a
new material or process are contained in
§ 24.250. Consistent with §§ 24.246 and
24.248, TTB may approve the use of
wine treating materials and processes
that are determined to be acceptable in
good commercial practice. In general,
good commercial practice includes
addressing the reasonable technological
or practical need to enhance the
keeping, stability, or other qualities of
the wine, and achieving the
winemaker’s desired effect without
creating an erroneous impression about
the character and composition of the
wine.
If TTB believes that it would be
appropriate to approve the request,
whether as an experiment under
§ 24.249 or for continued commercial
use under § 24.250, it will send a letter
to the industry member authorizing use
of the material or process and setting
forth the conditions for that use. Also,
when TTB approves the continued
commercial use of a wine treatment
material or process under § 24.250, it
will provide public notice of such
approval on its Web site at https://
www.ttb.gov/wine/wine_treating_
materials.shtml. The listing of
administrative approvals on the TTB
Web site affords all industry members
the opportunity to use an
administratively approved wine treating
material or process pending future
rulemaking.
TTB conducts rulemaking to consider
adding to or amending the materials and
processes authorized in the regulations
for treating wine, juice, and distilling
material listed in §§ 24.246 through
24.248 for several reasons. First, when
TTB administratively approves wine
treatments for continued commercial
use under § 24.250, TTB makes an
initial determination that such material
E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM
22NOP1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
83754
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 22, 2016 / Proposed Rules
or process is consistent with ‘‘good
commercial practice.’’ Administrative
approval provides a more expeditious
process than rulemaking for industry
members to obtain approval to use new
materials and processes. On the other
hand, the rulemaking process allows
industry members and the public an
opportunity to comment on, and
specifically to confirm or refute, TTB’s
initial determination that the use of a
material or process is consistent with
good commercial practice. TTB believes
that input from industry members, the
users and potential users of these
treatments commercially, should be
obtained before making a final
determination concerning the
acceptability of the treatment in good
commercial practice.
Similarly, TTB might not approve a
request for administrative approval of a
wine treatment because the Bureau is
reluctant to approve the use of that
particular wine treatment without input
from industry members and the public
concerning the treatment’s acceptability
in good commercial practice. After
obtaining information and comments
through rulemaking, TTB may
determine that the wine treatment is
consistent with good commercial
practice and approve the use of such
treatment. As discussed below, through
this document, TTB is seeking
comments on the approval of the use of
several proposed treatments that have
not been administratively approved by
the Bureau.
In addition, administrative approval
of a wine treatment under § 24.250 does
not guarantee acceptance in foreign
markets of any wine so treated, and
conducting rulemaking and adding wine
treating materials and processes to
§§ 24.246 through 24.248 results in
acceptance of the treated wines in
certain foreign jurisdictions. For
example, under Article 4.2 of the 2006
Agreement between the United States of
America and the European Community
on Trade in Wine (Wine Agreement),
the United States and the European
Union agreed not to restrict ‘‘on the
basis of either wine-making practices or
product specifications, the importation,
marketing or sale of wine originating in
the territory of the other Party that is
produced using wine-making practices
that are authorized under laws,
regulations and requirements of the
other Party listed in Annex I and
published or communicated to it by that
other Party.’’ Article 5.1 of the Wine
Agreement also contains provisions to
authorize new or modified wine-making
practices if a party to the Wine
Agreement provides public notice and
specific notice to the other Party, and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Nov 21, 2016
Jkt 241001
provides a reasonable opportunity for
comment and to have those comments
considered. For new wine treatments
administratively approved in the United
States, TTB provides such public notice
and opportunity to comment through
the regulatory rulemaking process.
TTB’s most recent amendment of
§§ 24.246 through 24.248 to reflect
treating material and process approvals
was published as Treasury Decision
(T.D.) TTB–61 in the Federal Register
(72 FR 51707) on September 11, 2007.
Since that time, TTB has received and
approved a number of applications for
experimental or commercial uses. These
include the 15 wine and juice treating
materials and the combined use of two
existing wine treatment processes,
discussed below, on which TTB
believes it has accumulated enough
analytical data or other information to
propose adding them to the list of
approved materials and processes in the
TTB regulations at §§ 24.246 and
24.248.
TTB is soliciting comments from all
interested persons on TTB’s position
that, based on the information set forth
below, the use of each of these materials
or processes is consistent with good
commercial practice.
Yeast Nutrients
Seven of the administrative approvals
mentioned above authorize the use of
additional yeast nutrients in the
treatment of wine. TTB and its
predecessor agencies have recognized
the need to supply yeast with
appropriate nutrients to facilitate
healthy fermentation and to prevent
‘‘stuck fermentation’’ (fermentation that
has halted before completion due to,
among other things, high sugar levels or
nutrient deficiencies). The following
yeast nutrients are currently listed in
§ 24.246 as authorized wine and juice
treating materials:
• Ammonium phosphate;
• Calcium pantothenate (for apple
wine);
• Soy flour (defatted);
• Thiamine hydrochloride;
• Yeast, autolyzed; and
• Yeast, cell wall/membrane of
autolyzed yeast.
In 2007, TTB received a petition from
Gusmer Enterprises Inc. (Gusmer) to
amend § 24.246 to allow the use of 19
vitamins and minerals as yeast nutrients
in the production of wine. Gusmer
provided the names, descriptions,
functional roles for yeast metabolism,
conditions of use, and suggested
maximum amounts for the proposed
vitamins and minerals. The petitioner
also provided documentation on the
regulatory status of the uses of 15 of the
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
19 proposed vitamins and minerals.
Four materials identified by the
petitioner, selenium, boron,
molybdenum, and chromium, are not
included in this proposal because no
information was provided to
demonstrate that their uses would be
consistent with the food additive
requirements under the FD&C Act.
Of the remaining 15 vitamins and
minerals proposed as yeast nutrients for
the production of wine by the
petitioner, seven have been
administratively approved by TTB for
continued commercial use as yeast
nutrients under § 24.250 in response to
industry member requests which were
received by TTB subsequent to TTB’s
receipt of the Gusmer petition. TTB is
proposing, in this document, to amend
the regulations to add six of these
vitamins and minerals to the list of
approved treating materials and expand
the approved use of a seventh that
already appears on the list. Specifically,
TTB is proposing to add biotin, folic
acid, inositol, magnesium sulfate,
niacin, and pyridoxine hydrochloride to
the list of authorized wine and juice
treating materials in § 24.246, and to
expand the current permitted use of
calcium pantothenate in that section, as
described later in this document.
For each of these seven yeast
nutrients TTB is proposing to limit the
amount of usage to the amounts
provided in the Gusmer petition. While
many of these yeast nutrients are
vitamins that are authorized for use in
food, in the recent past FDA has advised
TTB that the fortification of ‘‘alcoholic
beverages’’ with nutrients is not
consistent with FDA’s fortification
policy in 21 CFR 104.20 or the Dietary
Guidelines for Americans. In addition,
FDA has informed TTB that FDA
regulations for certain vitamins (e.g.,
folic acid and inositol) would not
authorize their use in alcohol beverages
as nutrients. Nonetheless, FDA has
stated to TTB that these vitamins could
be used for the purpose of providing
nutrients to the yeast, and not to fortify
the wine, where the levels of the
vitamin remaining in the wine would be
of a de minimis level. For these reasons,
TTB believes it is important to place
limitations on the use of these
substances that permit their use as
nutrients for yeast growth but not as
food additives for human consumption.
For reasons discussed below in the
section titled ‘‘Other Issues for Public
Comment and Possible Regulatory
Action,’’ TTB is not proposing in this
document to add the eight vitamins and
minerals that TTB has not approved
administratively under § 24.250 to the
list of authorized wine and juice treating
E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM
22NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 22, 2016 / Proposed Rules
materials in § 24.246. However, TTB is
seeking comments on whether these
eight additional vitamins and minerals
should be approved as authorized wine
treating materials.
Proposed Regulatory Amendments
Wine Treating Materials
General Comment on Yeast Nutrients
The six new yeast nutrients that TTB
is proposing for the first time, based on
the Gusmer petition described above,
and the six yeast nutrients already
authorized for use by regulation, as
listed in § 24.246 (including calcium
pantothenate), have been grouped
together in the proposed § 24.246 table
below under the heading ‘‘Yeast
nutrients.’’ This format is similar to the
one that currently exists for ‘‘Enzymatic
activity.’’ TTB is also broadening the
use of those yeast nutrients that are
currently listed in § 24.246 to allow for
their use in all juice and wine.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Blends and Other Combinations of
Approved Treating Materials
TTB notes that, while the table in
§ 24.246 includes some references to
approved materials used in combination
(see, for example, the entry for
potassium carbonate), there is no
general statement to the effect that one
or more approved materials may be used
as a blend or otherwise in combination
with another. TTB believes that such
combined uses should be permitted,
provided that the use of each material
conforms to the conditions specified for
that material (that is, the reason or
purpose for its use and the references
and limitations that apply to its use).
TTB is proposing, in this document, to
amend § 24.246 accordingly. This
revision appears in proposed
§ 24.246(b), with the current § 24.246(b)
moved to the proposed § 24.246(c).
Specific Wine Treating Materials
Acacia (gum arabic): TTB is
proposing to authorize a maximum use
rate of 8 pounds of acacia per 1,000
gallons (1.92 grams per Liter (g/L)) of
wine in the list of authorized wine and
juice treating materials in § 24.246.
Acacia is currently listed in § 24.246 as
an authorized treating material to clarify
and stabilize wine, subject to a
limitation that its use shall not exceed
2 pounds per 1,000 gallons (0.24 g/L) of
wine. TTB has administratively
approved several requests from industry
members to use acacia to treat wine at
levels exceeding the current maximum.
The current limitation in § 24.246 was
based on earlier evaluations of treated
wine and was adopted through a public
rulemaking procedure on September 24,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Nov 21, 2016
Jkt 241001
1984 (T.D. ATF–182, 49 FR 37522).
Acacia also has a long record of use at
the level prescribed in the regulation.
While the increased amounts
specified in those requests ranged as
high as 25 pounds of acacia per 1,000
gallons of wine, 16 pounds per 1,000
gallons was the highest level that TTB
approved. In those reviews and
approvals, TTB referenced FDA’s
regulation (21 CFR 184.1330) for the use
of acacia at a rate greater than the
amount listed in § 24.246, and TTB
reviewed and considered relevant
submitted data required under
§ 24.250(b). TTB notes that some of the
requests to use higher amounts of acacia
also requested approval for an
additional purpose, that is, to improve
‘‘mouthfeel’’; however, TTB’s authority
under 26 U.S.C. 5382 to authorize wine
treating materials only extends to
correcting or stabilizing the wine or the
fruit juice from which it is made. As
reflected in its implementing
regulations in § 24.246, TTB policy is to
allow for wine treating materials that
filter, clarify, or purify wine or juice as
materials that correct or stabilize wine.
Accordingly, TTB did not approve the
use of acacia for the purpose of
improving the ‘‘mouthfeel’’ of wine.
TTB’s administrative approvals
authorized the use of acacia in the
treatment of wine at a level of 16
pounds per 1,000 gallons of wine,
which is equivalent to a maximum
usage level of 2 percent. Subsequent to
those administrative approvals, TTB
learned that although the FDA
regulation cited for acacia gum in
§ 24.246 (§ 184.1330) is the correct
citation, the beverage category listed in
the table of FDA’s regulation does not
cover TTB’s intended use in wine. This
is because the FDA regulation further
cites the food category definition in 21
CFR 170.3(n)(3), which does not cover
use in wine. Accordingly, the correct
category from the table in § 184.1330 is
‘‘all other food categories.’’ This
category has a limit of one percent
acacia gum (rather than 2 percent); the
functional effects for this category
match TTB’s uses as clarifying and
stabilizing wine. TTB is correcting this
mistake in this rulemaking by proposing
to increase the maximum use rate of
acacia gum in wine to 8 pounds per
1,000 gallons of wine. TTB’s earlier
administrative approvals authorizing
the use of acacia at levels greater than
8 pounds per 1,000 gallons of wine are
revoked.
Bakers yeast mannoprotein: TTB is
proposing to add bakers yeast
mannoprotein, at a use rate of 50–400
milligram per liter (mg/L) of wine, to the
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
83755
list of approved wine and juice treating
materials contained in § 24.246.
TTB administratively approved the
use of bakers yeast mannoprotein to
stabilize wine from the precipitation of
potassium bitartrate crystals, in
response to a number of requests from
industry members. In response to GRAS
Notice No. GRN 000284, the FDA stated
that it had no questions regarding the
notifier’s conclusion that bakers yeast
mannoprotein is GRAS for use as a
stabilizing agent in wines at levels
ranging from 50–400 milligrams per liter
(mg/L), to prevent tartaric acid
precipitation. In its administrative
approval, TTB restricted the use of
bakers yeast mannoprotein to 50–400
mg/L.
Beta-glucanase having an enzyme
activity derived from Trichoderma
harzianum: TTB is proposing to add
beta-glucanase, at a use rate of 30 parts
per million (ppm) of wine, to the list of
approved wine and juice treating
materials contained in § 24.246. TTB
administratively approved the use of
beta-glucanase having an enzyme
activity derived from Trichoderma
harzianum. Several industry members
requested approval to treat wine with an
enzymatic blend consisting of pectinase
and beta-glucanase having an enzyme
activity derived from Trichoderma
harzianum. Pectinase is an approved
wine treating material listed with
carbohydrase in § 24.246. While betaglucanase is also approved as a wine
treating material listed with cellulose in
§ 24.246, that approval is limited to
beta-glucanase having an enzyme
activity derived from Trichoderma
longibrachiatum. In response to GRAS
Notice No. GRN 000149, FDA stated that
it had no questions concerning the
notifier’s conclusion that the betaglucanase enzyme preparation derived
from Trichoderma harzianum is GRAS
at the minimum levels necessary to
achieve the desired effect, typically
ranging from 1 to 3 grams per hectoliter
of wine (10–30 ppm). In its
administrative approval posted on
https://www.ttb.gov/wine/
wine_treating_materials.shtml in 2010,
TTB inadvertently stated that the
amount of beta-glucanase derived from
Trichoderma harzianum used must not
exceed 300 ppm. TTB is correcting this
mistake in this rulemaking by aligning
the proposed use rate with the rate
stated in GRAS Notice No. GRN 000149.
Accordingly, TTB is proposing to
amend the table in § 24.246 by adding
to the entry on ‘‘Enzymatic activity:
Cellulase (beta-glucanase)’’ a second
source, Trichoderma harzianum, stating
that its use must not exceed 30 ppm,
and by referencing GRAS Notice No.
E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM
22NOP1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
83756
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 22, 2016 / Proposed Rules
GRN 000149. TTB is soliciting
comments on this proposed addition,
the limitation of 30 ppm, and also on
whether beta-glucanase enzymatic
activity derived from Trichoderma
longibrachiatum is still relevant for
wine treatments.
Biotin: TTB is proposing the addition
of biotin to the list of authorized wine
and juice treating materials in § 24.246
as a yeast nutrient at a use rate not to
exceed 25 parts per billion (ppb). TTB
administratively approved an industry
member’s request to use biotin as a yeast
nutrient in the production of wine. FDA
has stated to TTB in an informal
opinion that biotin can be used for the
purpose of providing nutrients to yeast,
and not to fortify the wine, where the
levels of biotin remaining in the wine
would be of a de minimis level. The
Gusmer petition proposed a maximum
use rate for biotin of 25 ppb.
Calcium pantothenate (vitamin B5):
TTB is proposing to amend § 24.246 to
expand the current authorized use of
calcium pantothenate from use as a
yeast nutrient in just apple wine to use
as a yeast nutrient in all wine. TTB
administratively approved an industry
member’s request to use calcium
pantothenate as a yeast nutrient in the
production of wine. FDA has stated to
TTB in an informal opinion that
calcium pantothenate can be used for
the purpose of providing nutrients to
yeast, and not to fortify the wine, where
the levels of calcium pantothenate
remaining in the wine would be of a de
minimis level. TTB’s administrative
approval restricted its use to that which
is consistent with good commercial
practice. TTB is proposing to apply the
same use limit as is provided for the use
of calcium pantothenate in apple wine,
that is, a use rate of 0.1 pound of
calcium pantothenate per 25,000 gallons
(1.5 ppm), and to allow for the use of
calcium pantothenate for all juice and
wine by removing the current apple
wine limitation specified in § 24.246.
Chitosan: TTB is proposing to add
chitosan from Aspergillus niger, at a use
rate not to exceed 10 grams per 100
liters of wine, to the list of approved
wine and juice treating materials
contained in § 24.246. TTB
administratively approved several
industry member requests to use
chitosan from Aspergillus niger to
remove spoilage organisms, such as
Brettanomyces, from wine. In its
response to GRAS Notice No. GRN
000397, FDA stated that it had no
questions regarding the notifier’s
conclusion that chitosan from
Aspergillus niger is GRAS for use as a
secondary direct food ingredient in
alcoholic beverage production at levels
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Nov 21, 2016
Jkt 241001
between 10 and 500 grams per hectoliter
(100 liters). In its administrative
approvals, TTB restricted the use of
chitosan from Aspergillus niger to an
amount not to exceed 10 grams per 100
liters of wine.
Folic acid: TTB is proposing to add
folic acid to the list of authorized wine
and juice treating materials in § 24.246
for use as a yeast nutrient at a use rate
not to exceed 100 ppb. TTB
administratively approved an industry
member’s request to use folic acid as a
yeast nutrient in the production of wine.
FDA has stated to TTB in an informal
opinion, that folic acid can be used for
the purpose of providing nutrients to
the yeast, and not to fortify the wine,
where the levels of folic acid remaining
in the wine would be of a de minimis
level. In TTB’s administrative approval,
TTB limited the use of folic acid to that
which is consistent with good
commercial practice and did not
provide a specific use limit. The Gusmer
petition proposed a maximum use rate
of 100 ppb for folic acid when used as
a yeast nutrient in the production of
wine. Such a use rate will ensure that
any folic acid remaining in the wine
would be of a de minimis level.
Inositol (myo-inositol): TTB is
proposing to add inositol to the list of
authorized wine and juice treating
materials in § 24.246 to be used as a
yeast nutrient at a use rate not to exceed
2 ppm. TTB administratively approved
an industry member’s request to use
inositol as a yeast nutrient in the
production of wine. FDA has stated to
TTB in an informal opinion that inositol
could be used for the purpose of
providing nutrients to the yeast, and not
to fortify the wine, where the levels of
inositol remaining in the wine would be
of a de minimis level. In TTB’s
administrative approval, TTB restricted
the use of inositol to that which is
consistent with good commercial
practice and did not provide a specific
use limit. The Gusmer petition proposed
a maximum use rate of 2 ppm for
inositol when used as a yeast nutrient
in the production of wine. The
maximum use rate of 2 ppm will ensure
that any inositol remaining in the wine
would be of a de minimis level.
L(+) tartaric acid: TTB
administratively approved several
industry member requests to use L(+)
tartaric acid, prepared using an enzyme
from immobilized Rhodococcus ruber
cells, to correct natural acid deficiencies
and to reduce pH when ameliorating
material is used in the production of
grape wine. Tartaric acid is currently
listed in § 24.246 as a material
authorized for the treatment of wine and
juice for these same purposes; however,
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the current reference in § 24.246 is to
the FDA regulation at 21 CFR 184.1099,
which specifies that tartaric acid with
the L configuration is obtained as a
byproduct of wine manufacturing.
In response to GRAS Notice No. GRN
000187 for L(+) tartaric acid (alternative
method) prepared using an enzyme from
immobilized Rhodococcus ruber cells,
FDA stated that it had no questions
regarding the notifiers’ conclusion that
the substance is GRAS for use as an
alternative source of L(+) tartaric acid in
food at levels not to exceed current good
manufacturing practices for use as a
firming agent, a flavor enhancer, a
flavoring agent, a humectant, and a pH
control agent, as described in 21 CFR
184.1099. The FDA also noted that the
material is chemically identical to the
tartaric acid affirmed as GRAS in 21
CFR 184.1099.
Based on the FDA response to the
GRAS notice and TTB’s analysis of wine
treated with L(+) tartaric acid, TTB is
proposing to amend the entry for
‘‘tartaric acid’’ in the table at the end of
§ 24.246 to indicate that ‘‘tartaric acid’’
may be manufactured by either the
method specified in 21 CFR 184.1099 or
the method specified in GRAS Notice
No. GRN 000187, and to add the citation
to the FDA GRAS notice in the ‘‘Specific
limitation’’ column.
Magnesium sulfate: TTB is proposing
to add magnesium sulfate to the list of
authorized wine and juice treating
materials in § 24.246 to be used as a
yeast nutrient at a use rate not to exceed
15 ppm. TTB administratively approved
an industry member’s request to use
magnesium sulfate as a yeast nutrient in
the production of wine. FDA has stated
to TTB in an informal opinion that
magnesium sulfate can be used for the
purpose of providing nutrients to yeast,
and not to fortify the wine, where the
levels of magnesium sulfate remaining
in the wine would be of a de minimis
level. In TTB’s administrative approval,
TTB restricted the use of magnesium
sulfate as a yeast nutrient to that which
is consistent with good commercial
practice and did not provide a specific
use limit. The Gusmer petition proposed
a maximum use rate of 15 ppm for
magnesium sulfate when used as a yeast
nutrient in the production of wine.
Niacin (vitamin B3): TTB is proposing
to add niacin to the list of authorized
wine and juice treating materials in
§ 24.246 to be used as a yeast nutrient
at a use rate not to exceed 1 ppm. TTB
administratively approved an industry
member’s request to use niacin as a
yeast nutrient in the production of wine.
FDA has stated to TTB in an informal
opinion that niacin can be used for the
purpose of providing nutrients to yeast,
E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM
22NOP1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 22, 2016 / Proposed Rules
and not to fortify the wine, where the
levels of niacin remaining in the wine
would be of a de minimis level. In
TTB’s administrative approval, TTB
restricted the use of niacin as a yeast
nutrient to that which is consistent with
good commercial practice and did not
provide a specific use limit. The Gusmer
petition proposed a maximum use rate
of 1 ppm for niacin when used as a
yeast nutrient in the production of wine.
Polyvinyl-pyrrolidone (PVP)/
polyvinylimadazole (PVI) polymer: In
2005, TTB began administratively
approving industry member requests to
use a polyvinyl-pyrrolidone (PVP) and
polyvinylimadazole (PVI) copolymer
(PVP/PVI) as a wine treating material to
be used for clarifying and stabilizing
alcohol beverages. PVP had once been
listed as an authorized wine treating
material in ATF regulations at 27 CFR
240.1051, Materials Authorized for
Treatment of Wine. Specifically, it was
authorized as a clarifying agent for
wine. After a 1990 recodification of 27
CFR part 240, ATF rescinded its
approval of PVP as a wine treating
material because it was no longer in use
by wine producers. See T.D. ATF–299
(55 FR 24974). However, in the past
several years TTB has received a
number of requests to use the PVP/PVI
copolymer as an authorized wine
treating material. The PVP/PVI
copolymer binds heavy metal ions and
sulfides present in juice and wine, after
which the bound materials and the PVI/
PVP can be removed from the liquid
during filtration.
On July 5, 2003, FDA allowed BASF
Corporation’s Food Contact Substance
(FCS) Notification for their PVP/PVI
copolymer to become effective (FCN No.
320). Under section 409(h)(2)(C) of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 348 (h)(2)(C)) a
food contact notification (FCN) is only
effective for the manufacturer or
supplier identified in the notification.
Persons who market a FCS based on an
effective notification must be able to
demonstrate that the notification is
effective for their food contact
substance. All persons who purchase a
food contact substance manufactured or
supplied by a manufacturer or supplier
identified in an effective notification
may rely on that notification to legally
market or use the food contact substance
for the use that is the subject of the
notification, consistent with any
limitations in that notification.
According to FDA FCN No. 320, the
blend ‘‘is intended to be added directly
to alcoholic beverages during the
maturation process . . . is to be
completely removed by filtration . . .
and is limited to single use
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Nov 21, 2016
Jkt 241001
applications.’’ The amount must not
exceed 80 grams per 100 liters of wine.
Based on FDA FCN No. 320, TTB’s
experience with the use of sulfide and
metal reducing matrix sheets (which
contain PVI and are approved wine
treating processes listed in § 24.248),
and TTB’s analysis of wine treated with
the PVP/PVI copolymer, TTB is
proposing to amend the table at the end
of § 24.246 by adding the PVP/PVI
copolymer as described by FDA FCN
No. 320 for use at a level not to exceed
80 grams per 100 liters of wine to
remove heavy metal ions and sulfides
from wine.
Potato protein isolates: TTB is
proposing to add potato protein isolates,
at a use rate of 500 ppm or 50 grams per
100 liters (50 g/hL) of wine, as a fining
agent, to the list of approved wine and
juice treating materials contained in
§ 24.246. TTB administratively
approved an industry member’s request
to use potato protein isolates as a fining
agent for wine. In response to GRAS
Notice No. GRN 000447, FDA stated that
it had no questions regarding the
notifier’s conclusion that potato protein
isolates are GRAS for various technical
effects in a variety of foods that include
alcoholic beverages at levels ranging
from 0.01 to 15 percent. In its
administrative approval, TTB restricted
the use of potato protein isolates to an
amount not to exceed 500 ppm or 50 g/
hL of wine for the purpose of fining
wine. The proposed limitation is
consistent with that of other countries.
Pyridoxine hydrochloride (vitamin
B6): TTB is proposing to add pyridoxine
hydrochloride to the list of authorized
wine and juice treating materials in
§ 24.246 to be used as a yeast nutrient
at a use rate not to exceed 150 ppb. TTB
administratively approved an industry
member’s request to use pyridoxine
hydrochloride as a yeast nutrient in the
production of wine. FDA has stated to
TTB in an informal opinion that
pyridoxine hydrochloride can be used
for the purpose of providing nutrients to
yeast, and not to fortify the wine, where
the levels of pyridoxine hydrochloride
remaining in the wine would be of a de
minimis level. In its administrative
approval, TTB restricted the use of
pyridoxine hydrochloride as a yeast
nutrient to that which is consistent with
good commercial practice and did not
provide a specific use limit. The Gusmer
petition proposed a maximum use rate
of 150 ppb for pyridoxine hydrochloride
when used as a yeast nutrient in the
production of wine.
Sodium carboxymethyl cellulose: TTB
is proposing to add sodium
carboxymethyl cellulose to the list of
authorized wine and juice treating
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
83757
materials in § 24.246, to be used to
stabilize wine from tartrate precipitation
at a level not to exceed 0.8 percent of
the wine. TTB administratively
approved several industry member
requests to use sodium carboxymethyl
cellulose to stabilize wine by preventing
tartrate precipitation. FDA regulations at
21 CFR 182.1745 state that sodium
carboxymethyl cellulose is GRAS when
used in accordance with good
manufacturing practice. In TTB’s
administrative approval, TTB restricted
the use of sodium carboxymethyl
cellulose to stabilize wine by preventing
tartrate precipitation to an amount not
to exceed 0.8 percent of the wine.
Processes for the Treatment of Wine,
Juice, and Distilling Material
TTB is proposing to amend the
regulations in § 24.248, which set forth
certain processes that TTB has approved
as being consistent with good
commercial practice for use by
proprietors in the production, cellar
treatment, or finishing of wine, juice,
and distilling materials, within the
limitations of that section. Please note
that industry members are responsible
for ensuring that any component used in
an approved process, including
materials in contact with wine or juice,
is used in a way that is consistent with
any applicable FDA regulations,
including FDA food contact regulations.
Cross Flow Filtration
TTB is proposing to expand the
authorized uses of nanofiltration and
ultrafiltration in § 24.248 to include
dealcoholization (reduction of the
alcohol content). Currently,
nanofiltration is authorized to reduce
the level of volatile acidity in wine
when used with ion exchange.
Ultrafiltration is authorized for use to
remove proteinaceous material from
wine; to reduce harsh tannic material
from white wine produced from white
skinned grapes; to remove pink color
from blanc de noir wine; and to separate
red wine into high color and low color
wine fractions for blending purposes.
Ultrafiltration has also been
administratively approved to separate
red juice into low color and high color
fractions. (The administrative approval
for ultrafiltration is discussed later in
this document.)
Both nanofiltration and ultrafiltration
are capable of reducing alcohol content
in wine, and this proposed
liberalization will provide industry
members with more tools to reduce the
alcohol content of wine. However, as
required with those processes for
dealcoholization currently authorized in
§ 24.248 (reverse osmosis, osmotic
E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM
22NOP1
83758
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 22, 2016 / Proposed Rules
transport, and spinning cone column),
ultrafiltration and nanofiltration, when
used to reduce the alcohol content of
wine, must take place on distilled
spirits plant premises. TTB also is
proposing to place nanofiltration,
ultrafiltration, and reverse osmosis
under the umbrella term ‘‘cross flow
filtration.’’ In cross flow filtration, the
wine is passed across the filter
membrane (tangentially) at positive
pressure relative to the permeate side. A
proportion of the wine which is smaller
than the membrane pore size passes
through the membrane as permeate or
filtrate; everything else is retained on
the feed side of the membrane as
retentate. TTB is adding this definition
of ‘‘cross flow filtration’’ as a footnote to
the table at the end of § 24.248.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Reverse Osmosis in Combination With
Osmotic Transport
TTB administratively approved
several requests to use reverse osmosis
in combination with osmotic transport
to reduce the ethyl alcohol content in
wine. Reverse osmosis and osmotic
transport are both separately listed in
§ 24.248 as approved wine treatment
processes to reduce the ethyl alcohol
content of wine. Under this combined
process, the wine to be treated is
separated by reverse osmosis into two
portions called permeate and
concentrate streams. The alcohol rich
permeate is then degassed, warmed, and
pumped along one side of a completely
hydrophobic microporous osmotic
transport membrane, which is used to
separate out the alcohol. The
dealcoholized permeate is then
recombined with the wine from which
it was extracted, thus lowering the
alcohol content of the wine.
TTB is proposing to amend the table
at the end of § 24.248 by revising the
listings for reverse osmosis and osmotic
transport to state that each process can
be used in combination with the other
to reduce the ethyl alcohol content of
wine. These processes, whether used
separately or in combination, must take
place on distilled spirits plant premises.
Ultrafiltration
In two separate requests, an industry
member requested to use ultrafiltration
to separate red grape juice into high and
low color fractions for blending
purposes, and to separate white grape
juice that had darkened due to oxidation
during storage into high and low color
fractions for blending purposes. As
described above, ultrafiltration is
authorized for use under § 24.248 to
remove proteinaceous material from
wine; to reduce harsh tannic material
from white wine produced from white
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Nov 21, 2016
Jkt 241001
skinned grapes; to remove pink color
from blanc de noir wine; and to separate
red wine into low color and high color
wine fractions for blending purposes.
Since ultrafiltration is currently
authorized under § 24.248 to separate
red wine into low color and high color
fractions for blending, TTB
administratively approved use of
ultrafiltration to separate red grape juice
into low and high color fractions and is
proposing to amend the table at the end
of § 24.248 accordingly. TTB did not
administratively approve the use of
ultrafiltration to separate high and low
colored fractions of discolored white
grape juice, but as discussed under the
heading ‘‘Other Issues for Public
Comment and Possible Regulatory
Action’’ in this document, invites
comments on whether this practice
constitutes good commercial practice.
Use of Wood To Treat Natural Wine
Section 24.246 currently authorizes
the use of uncharred and untreated oak
chips or particles to smooth wine. TTB’s
predecessor agency had a longstanding
policy allowing the use of ‘‘toasted’’
wood as a wine treating material, and
TTB has issued several private letter
rulings allowing this use. In addition,
wooden storage tanks used for the
addition of spirits to wine may be used
for the baking of wine under § 24.225.
TTB is proposing a new 27 CFR
24.185 to clarify TTB’s policy on the
treatment of wine with wood contact.
Section 24.185(a) would clarify that
natural wine may be treated by contact
with any wood that is consistent with
the food additive requirements under
the FD&C Act and that wood may be
toasted, but not charred. Toasted wood
refers to wood that has been heated but
has not undergone combustion (that is,
hasn’t been burned or blackened). TTB
is authorizing the use of toasted wood
in this proposal. Section 24.185(b)
would state TTB’s position on the use
of wood essences and extracts in the
production of wine.
TTB is also proposing to remove the
last sentence from § 24.225 (‘‘Wooden
storage tanks used for the addition of
spirits may be used for the baking of
wine’’) and include it in the new
§ 24.185, and to remove the reference to
oak chips from § 24.246 and include it
in new § 24.185, in an effort to maintain
in one location all regulatory provisions
pertaining to the treatment of wine with
wood.
Wine Spirits/Revision of § 24.225
TTB is proposing to amend § 24.225
by removing the last sentence as
described above, by revising the section
heading, and by dividing the text into
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
paragraph (a), covering withdrawal of
spirits, paragraph (b), covering
production and use of wine spirits, and
paragraph (c), covering spirits other
than wine spirits, and by otherwise
revising the text, in order to accomplish
the following:
• To incorporate the terms of section
5373(a) of the IRC related to standards
for the production of wine spirits,
including that portion of section 5373(a)
that reads, ‘‘where, in the production of
natural wine or special natural wine,
sugar has been used, the wine or the
residuum thereof may not be used if the
unfermented sugars therein have been
refermented.’’ The proposed text
clarifies and simplifies this statutory
language without changing the meaning
or intent, which TTB believes is to
prevent the production of wine spirits
by refermenting wine to develop alcohol
from sugar added to the wine after
fermentation.
• To allow the use of lower-proof
spirits in wine production in certain
circumstances. Section 5373(a) of the
IRC sets a general standard of 140
degrees of proof or above for wine
spirits used in wine production but also
provides for two exceptions to this rule:
(1) Distillation may be at less than 140
degrees of proof if regulations so
provide; and (2) commercial brandy
aged in wood for not less than 2 years,
and barreled at not less than 100 degrees
of proof, is deemed to be wine spirits for
purposes of section 5373(a). TTB
believes that allowing the byproducts of
alcohol reduction to be used as wine
spirits if they are 100 degrees of proof
or more is consistent with the intent of
the statute. TTB notes that these alcohol
reduction treatments, which are listed
in § 24.248, must be performed at a
qualified distilled spirits plant because
they result in a spirits byproduct. Thus,
when the wine subjected to alcohol
reduction is natural wine or special
natural wine (and is subject to the other
conditions of section 5373(a) and
§ 24.225), the alcohol-containing
byproduct would still constitute wine
spirits even though the spirits may not
have been distilled at or above 140
degrees of proof. Accordingly, TTB is
proposing, in revised § 24.225, to allow
spirits derived from authorized alcohol
reduction treatments to be used as wine
spirits if the spirits were distilled at 100
degrees of proof or more and if the
spirits conform to the other terms of
section 5373(a) as reflected in the
revised regulatory text.
• To clarify the status of wine spirits
derived from special natural wine. This
source of spirits was codified in section
5373(a) of the IRC, which also
authorized the Secretary of the Treasury
E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM
22NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 22, 2016 / Proposed Rules
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
to impose conditions on the use of
special natural wine to make wine
spirits. TTB is proposing to specify in
the revised text that wine spirits derived
from special natural wine may only be
used in the production of special
natural wine when such wine spirits
contain a distinctive flavor from the
ingredients used in the originating
special natural wine.
Within the proposed new paragraph
(b) text, subparagraphs (1) through (3)
primarily reflect the terms of section
5373(a) of the IRC that TTB believes
should be reflected in the regulatory text
as discussed above, and subparagraph
(4) primarily reflects the existing
§ 24.225 text.
Accidental Water Additions
TTB is proposing to add a new 27
CFR 24.251, to provide for the
correction of standard wine when the
wine becomes other than standard wine
due to accidental water additions in
excess of the authorized levels provided
for in 27 CFR part 24, subparts F and L.
Accidental water additions can occur
during production of wine at various
stages, for example during filtration
when water is accidentally left in a tank
that is later filled with wine. TTB has
received requests from industry
members who wish to be allowed to
take corrective action regarding these
water additions. To correct wine that
has been diluted with water is referred
to within TTB as ‘‘to salvage.’’
The most common way to salvage
wine is to remove the water accidentally
added to the wine through the use of
reverse osmosis, in combination with
distillation. The reverse osmosis creates
a colorless and flavorless permeate,
essentially consisting of alcohol and
water. The permeate is distilled to
create a high ethanol fraction and a low
ethanol fraction. The high ethanol
fraction is returned to the wine and the
low ethanol fraction is discarded.
Through the use of reverse osmosis and
distillation, the industry member
removes the accidentally added water
and raises the alcohol by volume of the
wine back to its level before the
accidental water addition, without
affecting the vinous character of the
wine.
TTB has approved the use of reverse
osmosis and distillation to remove water
from wine under TTB’s authority in
§ 24.249. In those reviews, TTB
considered how the accidental water
addition occurred, the ratio of water to
wine, and whether or not the requesting
industry member has submitted similar
requests in the past. TTB applied the
following conditions to those approvals.
The industry member must:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Nov 21, 2016
Jkt 241001
• Return the wine to its original
condition;
• Transfer the wine to and from the
distilled spirits plant for treatment in
bond;
• Not remove more water than was
accidentally added;
• Not alter the vinous character of the
wine; and
• Keep the usual and customary
records of the processing.
TTB believes that proprietors should
have the authority to remove small
amounts of accidentally added water
from wine using reverse osmosis and
distillation without first seeking TTB
approval. Proposed § 24.251 sets forth
authority and standards to allow for
removal of accidental additions of water
of not more than 10 percent of the
original volume of the wine without the
need to first seek TTB approval.
Proposed § 24.251 also allows the
appropriate TTB officer to approve other
removals of accidentally added water
upon application by a proprietor and
sets forth the requirements for
submitting an application to TTB. It also
specifies that, in evaluating any request
under this section, the appropriate TTB
officer may consider as a factor whether
the proprietor has demonstrated good
commercial practices, taking into
account the proprietor’s prior history of
accidental dilutions of water to wine
and of compliance with other
regulations in part 24.
TTB has also received requests to
allow wine to be salvaged by blending
the accidentally diluted wine with
standard wine to reduce the level of
unauthorized water addition to less than
1 percent of the volume of the blended
wine. The requesters have asserted that,
since § 24.246 provides that when a
wine or juice treating material is used
and water is added to facilitate the
solution or dispersal of the material, the
volume of water added may not exceed
1 percent of the juice or wine, reduction
of the accidentally added water to less
than 1 percent by blending wines meets
the intent of the regulations. TTB has
not approved these requests because the
accidental addition of water renders the
wine an ‘‘other than standard’’ wine,
and such wine cannot be blended with
standard wine. Also, TTB’s authority to
approve experimental or new wine
treatments under §§ 24.249 and 24.250
does not extend to blending of wine,
which is not a wine treatment or
process. Additionally, wine diluted
with water in excess of that permitted
in part 24 renders the wine ‘‘other than
standard’’ (see 27 CFR 24.218). Section
24.218 provides that other than standard
wine must be segregated from standard
wine, and accordingly the blending of
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
83759
standard and other than standard wine
generally is not permitted under TTB’s
regulations.
While TTB has not previously
approved these requests, TTB notes that
current § 24.246 permits the addition to
wine of a limited amount of water with
a wine treating material without
affecting the classification of the wine as
a standard wine. Accordingly, TTB
believes that the regulations should be
changed to recognize that the accidental
addition of water to a standard wine
that represents 1 percent or less of the
total volume of the wine does not render
the wine other than standard. TTB also
believes that blending wine should be
permitted to reduce the accidentally
added water to 1 percent or less of the
total volume of the blended wine, and
the resultant blended wine should be
considered standard wine. Accordingly,
TTB has incorporated these two
provisions into a new section, proposed
§ 24.186, with a reference to a new
§ 24.251, regarding accidental additions
of water to wine.
Other Proposed Regulatory
Amendments
In addition to the changes discussed
above, this document includes the
following proposed regulatory
amendments:
Definitions
As a consequence of the proposed
changes to § 24.225(a), discussed above,
TTB is proposing to revise the definition
of ‘‘wine spirits’’ in § 24.10 to include
a reference to that regulatory provision.
Wood Essences
TTB is proposing to amend § 24.85,
which concerns essences, by adding the
term ‘‘wood’’ as an additional example
of a source material for essences used in
the production of formula wine. (The
TTB regulations at 27 CFR 24.10 define
formula wine as special natural wine,
agricultural wine, and other than
standard wine (except for distilling
material and vinegar stock) produced on
bonded wine permises under an
approval formula.) TTB believes that it
is appropriate to add wood to this
provision to reflect a longstanding
policy that an extract of wood made
using any solvent but wine should be
treated as an essence or flavoring
material.
List of Authorized Wine and Juice
Treating Materials
TTB is proposing to amend the
heading in paragraph (a) of § 24.246 to
read ‘‘Wine and juice’’ rather than just
‘‘Wine.’’ This is a clarifying change.
TTB is also proposing numerous
E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM
22NOP1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
83760
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 22, 2016 / Proposed Rules
technical and clarifying changes to the
table in § 24.246. A significant portion
of these technical changes involves
revising the measurement references
specified for the limitation on use of the
authorized wine treating materials by
making the notation of units of
measurement consistent throughout the
chart, supplying closing parentheses
where they were absent, and removing
decimal points followed only by zeroes.
In addition, where units are only in U.S.
Common (English) units or SI
(International Standard, or metric) units,
TTB is adding the other unit of measure
for reference purposes, where
appropriate. Since the majority of the
units are expressed in U.S. Common
units first and then in SI units, TTB is
proposing to continue with that
convention. TTB is including a footnote
reference after each use of ppm and ppb
in the chart to indicate parts per million
and parts per billion, respectively. TTB
is also including a definition of the
word ‘‘stabilize’’ at the end of the chart
and footnoting every appearance of the
word ‘‘stabilize’’ with a ‘‘1’’ in the table.
TTB is also adding a third column to the
table in § 24.246 titled ‘‘FDA reference’’.
This new column contains references to
relevant FDA regulations in title 21 of
the CFR, FDA GRAS notifications, and
FDA advisory opinions. These
references have been moved to this new
column wherever such a reference
appears in the table. The ‘‘FDA
reference’’ column provides a limit or
reference where there is no ‘‘Specific
limit’’ listed for a wine treating material.
FDA recently provided TTB with a
new advisory opinion dated September
8, 2016, updating their acceptance of
TTB’s approval for certain materials as
wine and juice treating materials. This
new advisory opinion was necessary
because in some cases, TTB’s current
listing of FDA’s acceptance of the
material as a wine treating material was
not entirely accurate because those
references were not specific to the use
of wine. In other cases, references to old
advisory opinions were subsequently
revoked by FDA rulemaking. TTB is
replacing the current FDA references in
§ 24.246 with an updated reference to an
advisory opinion in which FDA stated
‘‘We have evaluated the list of
substances * * * along with their
proposed limitations for use in wine
and juice treatment and conclude that
they are safe under the conditions of
their intended use. We would not
question a conclusion that these uses of
substances added to wine would be
generally recognized as safe (GRAS).’’
Accordingly, TTB is updating the FDA
reference for: Acetaldehyde, activated
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Nov 21, 2016
Jkt 241001
carbon, albumen (egg white), casein,
potassium salt of casein, gelatin,
potassium bi-tartrate, silica gel
(colloidal silicon dioxide), and tannin.
FDA also provided TTB with an
advisory opinion dated August 29, 2016,
regarding the use of current and
proposed yeast nutrients. With regard to
current yeast nutrients, FDA indicated
that the use of yeast nutrients as a
treatment for wine is not listed in its
regulations or GRAS notices. FDA did,
however, state: ‘‘We have evaluated the
list of yeast nutrients * * * along with
their proposed limitations for use prior
to and during juice fermentations for
wine production, taking into
consideration: (1) Their likely
consumption by yeasts and bacteria [is]
likely to be largely consumed during
fermentations and (2) their likely
presence in finished wine products at
levels that would not exceed those in
unprocessed grape juice. We conclude
that [the] increase in human dietary
exposure to the substances resulting
from their addition to wine juice is de
minimis with respect to human
nutrition, [and that] they are safe under
the conditions of their intended use.
Such levels would be far below any
level that would result in a safety
concern for any of these substances.
Thus, we would not consider this very
low level exposure to be significant and
we would not question a conclusion
that these uses of substances added to
wine as yeast nutrients would be
GRAS.’’ Accordingly, TTB is updating
the FDA reference for calcium
panthothenate, soy flour, thiamine,
yeast autolyzed, and yeast cell wall/
membranes of autolyzed yeast.
Due to the large number of proposed
changes to § 24.246, this document
presents those changes as a revision of
the entire section. Finally, TTB is
proposing to make the following other
changes to the current entries in the
table:
• Activated carbon: One of the entries
in the ‘‘Materials and use’’ column
currently refers to removing color in
wine and/or juice from which the wine
was produced. TTB is proposing to refer
instead to removing color from wine
and/or juice, for clarity.
• Albumen: In the ‘‘Specific
limitation’’ column, TTB is adding the
words ‘‘of brine’’ in the second sentence
after the word ‘‘Usage’’ and removing
the words ‘‘of solution.’’
• Ammonium phosphate (mono- and
di basic): TTB is revising the name of
the material to include ‘‘diammonium
phosphate’’ and including it on the list
of yeast nutrients in the table in
§ 24.246. (TTB is also making a
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
conforming change revising the name of
the material in § 24.247.)
• Calcium carbonate: TTB is adding
the abbreviation ‘‘CaCO3’’ and, in the
‘‘Materials and use’’ column, TTB is
replacing the word ‘‘and’’ with the word
‘‘or’’ in the first use entry and replacing
the word ‘‘A’’ with the words ‘‘As a’’ in
the second use entry.
• Casein, potassium salt of casein: In
the ‘‘Specific limitation’’ column, TTB
is referring only to the citation ‘‘27 CFR
24.243’’ and removing references to
FDA’s GRAS opinions.
• Citric acid: In the ‘‘Materials and
use’’ column, TTB is adding the words
‘‘certain juice or’’ after the word ‘‘in’’ in
the first use entry. The limitations on
what types of juice or wine may be
treated with citric acid may be found in
the regulations cited in the ‘‘Specific
limitation’’ column.
• Copper sulfate: In the ‘‘Specific
limitation’’ column, TTB is removing
the word ‘‘added’’ after the word
‘‘sulfate’’ and adding the words ‘‘added
to wine’’ after the first parenthetical.
• Dimethyl dicarbonate: For purposes
of clarity, TTB is adding the
abbreviation ‘‘(DMDC)’’ after the
material name ‘‘Dimethyl dicarbonate’’
and removing the phrases
‘‘dealcoholized wine,’’ and ‘‘low alcohol
wine,’’ from the entry to reduce
redundancy.
• Ferrocyanide: TTB believes that
ferrocyanide compounds are no longer
available on the United States market
and no longer being used by the U.S.
wine industry. Accordingly, TTB is
removing ‘‘ferrocyanide’’ from the list of
authorized wine treating materials.
• Milk products: With the publication
of T.D. ATF–350 (58 FR 52222) in the
Federal Register on October 7, 1993,
ATF approved the use of milk products
as a fining agent in white grape wine or
sherry. With the publication of T.D.
TTB–17 (69 FR 67639) in the Federal
Register on November 19, 2004, TTB
extended this approval to all wines. The
listing in § 24.246 for the use of milk
products, revised in 2004, reads,
‘‘Fining agent for grape wine or sherry.’’
TTB believes this phrase may cause
confusion because under the standards
of identity in § 4.21(a) sherry is a grape
wine. Accordingly, TTB is amending the
first listed use in the ‘‘Materials and
use’’ column for this entry to read:
‘‘Fining agent for grape wine.’’
• Oxygen and compressed air: In the
‘‘Materials and use’’ column, TTB is
replacing the words ‘‘May be used in
juice and wine’’ with the words
‘‘Various uses in juice and wine.’’
• Polyvinyl-polypry-rolidone (PVPP):
In the ‘‘Materials and use’’ column, TTB
is making a technical change by
E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM
22NOP1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 22, 2016 / Proposed Rules
removing the phrase ‘‘black wine.’’ In
the ‘‘Specific limitation’’ column, TTB
is replacing the two asterisk footnote
references with a reference to footnote
‘‘3’’ after the abbreviation ‘‘AOAC.’’
• Sorbic acid and potassium salt of
sorbic acid: In the ‘‘Materials and use’’
column, TTB is adding the words
‘‘potassium sorbate’’ in parentheses
before the colon.
• Sulfur dioxide: Sulfur dioxide was
added to the list of approved materials
with the issuance of T.D. Internal
Revenue Service (IRS)–6475 (25 FR
6184) in 1960. At that time, the stated
use of sulfur dioxide was to sterilize and
preserve wine. The list of authorized
treating materials in 1960 was codified
in 26 CFR 240.1051 and was titled
‘‘Materials authorized for treatment of
wine.’’
Through the publication of T.D. ATF–
182 (49 FR 37510) in 1984, ATF retitled
the list of authorized wine treating
materials as ‘‘Materials authorized for
treatment of wine and juice.’’ In T.D.
ATF–182, the comment discussion
refers to the use of sulfur dioxide in
wine as ‘‘necessary, common to, and
historically documented in
winemaking,’’ and it is further referred
to in the use of juice for purposes of
winemaking twice on page 37513, under
the subheading Antimicrobial Agents.
Sulfur dioxide is GRAS in the FDA
regulations at 21 CFR 182.3862 as a
chemical preservative. Section 182.3862
states that sulfur dioxide cannot be
applied to fruit that is intended to be
served or sold raw to consumers. Juice
to be used in the production of wine is
not fruit to be served or sold raw to
consumers; thus, the use of sulfur
dioxide in juice that will be used in the
production of wine is GRAS. Further, 27
CFR 24.176 authorizes the use of
sterilizing agents in juice. Accordingly,
TTB is correcting the entry for sulfur
dioxide to include its use in juice.
• Thiamine hydrochloride: As noted
above, the yeast nutrient Thiamine
hydrochloride will be re-organized and
grouped under the heading, ‘‘Yeast
nutrients’’ with the other yeast
nutrients.
• Shall vs. must: Finally, to promote
the use of plain language, TTB is also
proposing to change ‘‘shall’’ to ‘‘must’’
wherever the former appears in the
affected regulations.
TTB is proposing to amend
§ 24.250(a)(4) to require that an industry
member must provide documentary
evidence from the FDA showing that the
proposed material is consistent with the
food additive requirements under the
FD&C Act for its intended purpose in
the amounts proposed for the particular
treatment contemplated. This differs
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Nov 21, 2016
Jkt 241001
from the original text in that it is not
requiring documentary evidence that
the FDA has ‘‘approved’’ the use of the
proposed material. This editorial change
is consistent with similar changes in
§§ 24.246 and 24.248.
Other Issues for Public Comment and
Possible Regulatory Action
In addition to the comments TTB is
soliciting on the proposed regulatory
changes contained in this document, as
discussed above, TTB is inviting public
comments on a number of other
regulatory issues to assist TTB in
determining whether it would be
appropriate to incorporate additional
changes to part 24 in a final rule. Most
of these issues were raised in petitions
for rulemaking or arose in connection
with wine treatment approval requests
under §§ 24.249 or 24.250, and in each
case, TTB determined that more
information would be required before a
decision could be taken on whether, and
if so how, appropriate regulatory
changes should be proposed. The issues
in question, and the specific points on
which TTB is requesting public
comments, are outlined below.
TTB requests comments and, where
appropriate, evidence supporting the
position that the particular wine
treatment is consistent with good
commercial practice. If applicable, use
rates should be recommended, and the
rationale as to why those use rates are
recommended should be stated in any
comments.
Alcoholic Oak Extract
In 2008, Oak Tannin Technologies
submitted a petition to amend the
regulations to allow ‘‘alcoholic oak
extracts for use in natural wines as a
stabilizing, enriching and integrating
agent.’’ The petitioner stated that use of
such extracts in wine is approved by the
South African Wine and Spirit Board.
However, TTB understands that South
Africa passed legislation that actually
prohibits the use of such extracts in
natural wines. In addition, TTB and its
predecessor agencies’ longstanding
policy has been to treat such materials
as essences or extracts, which, under
§ 24.85, may be used only in the
production of formula wines except
agricultural wine.
As noted earlier in this document,
TTB approves the use of wine treating
materials for, among other things, the
stabilization, clarification, and filtration
of natural wine based on the materials’
acceptance in good commercial practice.
In order to assist TTB in determining
whether it would be appropriate to
propose a specific regulatory change in
response to this petition, TTB is inviting
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
83761
comments regarding the use of an
alcoholic oak extract in the production
of natural wines, in particular, as a
material for use as a wine stabilizer, but
also for any other purpose that is
consistent with good commercial
practice. TTB also advises that a
manufacturer of alcoholic oak extract
must contact FDA and go through the
FDA pre-market review processes.
Lactic Acid
In 2007, Hyman, Philips, &
McNamara, P.C. petitioned TTB to
amend 27 CFR 24.182 and 24.246 to
allow use of lactic acid in juice, must,
and wine prior to fermentation. Lactic
acid is most commonly found in dairy
products and is a common component
in both plant and animal metabolic
processes. Under § 24.246, lactic acid is
currently authorized for use in grape
wine to correct natural acid
deficiencies. In the table in § 24.246, the
entry in the ‘‘Reference or limitation’’
column for lactic acid simply provides
a citation to 27 CFR 24.182 and 24.192.
Section 24.192 then refers back to the
limitations on the use of acid, among
other things, prescribed in § 24.182. The
regulations in § 24.182 state that acids of
the kinds occurring in grapes or other
fruit (including berries) may be added
within the limitations of § 24.246 to
juice or wine in order to correct natural
deficiencies. Section 24.182 also states
that, after fermentation is completed,
citric acid, fumaric acid, malic acid,
lactic acid, or tartaric acid, or a
combination of two or more of these
acids, may be added to correct natural
deficiencies. The petitioner noted that
lactic acid is currently allowed by
§ 24.246 for treatment of wine after
fermentation and provided evidence
that lactic acid may be added before
fermentation in certain other countries.
Further, the petitioner noted that lactic
acid is less expensive and more reliably
available than tartaric acid.
TTB is not proposing any changes to
the regulations concerning the use of
lactic acid in this document; however,
TTB invites comments regarding
whether or not the use of lactic acid
prior to fermentation is good
commercial practice in the production
of natural wine. Comments should
address whether or not lactic acid
should be authorized for use prior to the
fermentation of natural wine and
provide detailed evidence supporting
the stated position.
E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM
22NOP1
83762
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 22, 2016 / Proposed Rules
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Reverse Osmosis To Enhance the Phenol
Flavor and Characteristics of Wine and
To Reduce the Water Content of
Standard Wine
Section 24.248 currently provides for
the use of reverse osmosis to reduce the
ethyl alcohol content of wine and to
remove off flavors in wine. However, in
2014, Constellation Wines U.S. Inc.
submitted a petition to TTB requesting
an expansion of the authorized uses of
reverse osmosis in § 24.248 to include
(1) improving the phenol and flavor
character of wine, and (2) reducing the
water content in standard wine. The
petition included the following
arguments in support of this change:
• Reverse osmosis can effectively
eliminate the weak and watery character
of the retentate (which, as a product of
the reverse osmosis process, is
considered to be standard wine but with
reduced levels of alcohol and water),
resulting in a wine with improved
phenol and flavor characteristics.
• The present situation puts U.S.
winemakers at a competitive
disadvantage in the global marketplace
in two ways. First, the petitioner asserts
that many foreign countries permit the
use of reverse osmosis as an acceptable
winemaking practice to concentrate
phenols and flavors in wine and in
grape must. Exported U.S. wines, which
cannot be produced in this way under
the current regulations, would not
reflect these characteristics in those
foreign markets. Second, under the
terms of section 5382 of the IRC, most
imported wines that were subjected to
such a process would be allowed to
compete in the U.S. market against
domestic wines to which that process
may not be applied.
• Reverse osmosis benefits grape
growers, winemakers, and consumers.
The expanded use of reverse osmosis
would allow grape growers to sell more
grapes, particularly those of marginal
quality, to winemakers who could
produce better quality standard wine
with such grapes. Winemakers would be
able to produce better quality wine at
lower costs, and consumers would be
able to purchase better quality wine at
lower prices.
• The expanded use of reverse
osmosis would provide winemakers
with better ability to regulate the
alcohol content of wines.
TTB notes that the byproduct of
reverse osmosis (the retentate) is only
considered to be standard wine if the
wine that was processed with reverse
osmosis was standard wine. TTB
understands that the European Union
(EU) only authorizes the use of reverse
osmosis to remove water from wine in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Nov 21, 2016
Jkt 241001
cold and wet regions and that wine
produced with the use of reverse
osmosis in the EU must be labeled as
‘‘table wine.’’ TTB’s counterparts in
Australia indicate that while authorized,
reverse osmosis is not a process
officially recognized in the Australia
New Zealand Food Standards Code, and
is not used frequently. TTB understands
that South Africa authorizes the use of
reverse osmosis on juice but not wine.
TTB has not received other requests
from industry members to use reverse
osmosis to improve the phenol and
flavor character of wine. However, TTB
did receive a request to use reverse
osmosis to improve the ‘‘sensory
quality’’ of finished wines and to
evaluate the potential sensory benefit of
water content reduction compared to
the resultant loss of volume.
TTB has received and approved
industry member requests to use reverse
osmosis in combination with distillation
to reduce the water content of wine only
for the purpose of salvage, discussed
above, rather than as a winemaking
process to improve the character of the
wine. In salvage, the removal of water
returns the wine to its previous
condition and, as a condition of
approval, TTB strictly limited the
amount of water to be removed to no
more than the amount that had been
accidentally added to the wine.
TTB believes that it should provide
the public the opportunity to comment
before it makes a decision on whether
the removal of water from wine to
improve the characteristics of the wine
would be acceptable in good
commercial practice. To assist TTB in
deciding whether to adopt any specific
regulatory change in this regard, TTB is
inviting comments on whether the use
of reverse osmosis to reduce the water
content of wine, improve the phenol
and flavor character of wine, or to
improve the sensory quality of the wine
would be acceptable in good
commercial practice.
If you believe that the use of reverse
osmosis for these purposes is consistent
with good commercial practice, your
comments should explain your position
in detail, as well as provide guidelines/
standards concerning how much water
(maximum percentage) may be removed.
If you believe that the use of reverse
osmosis for these purposes is not
consistent with good commercial
practice, your comments should explain
your position in detail.
Ultrafiltration
As previously discussed, an industry
member requested to use ultrafiltration
to separate white grape juice that had
darkened due to oxidation during
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
storage into high and low color fractions
for blending purposes. The low color
fraction would be blended with white
wine, and the high color fraction would
be blended with red wine.
Ultrafiltration is authorized for use
under § 24.248 to separate red wine into
low color and high color wine fractions
for blending purposes; but the
regulations do not provide for the use of
ultrafiltration to separate white wine.
TTB believes it should provide the
public with the opportunity to comment
before it makes a decision on whether
the use of ultrafiltration to separate
discolored wine for blending as
described above would be acceptable in
good commercial practice. If you wish
to submit a comment on this matter,
your comment should explain in detail
your position as to why the use of
ultrafiltration in this manner is or is not
acceptable in good commercial practice.
Yeast Nutrients (Gusmer Petition)
The following list of vitamins and
minerals were proposed in the Gusmer
petition as yeast nutrients in the
production of wine but have not been
administratively approved by TTB
pursuant to § 24.250: Cobalamin
(vitamin B12), iodine (potassium
iodide), iron, manganese sulfate, nickel,
potassium chloride, riboflavin (Vitamin
B2), and zinc sulfate. With the
exception of riboflavin, TTB has not
received requests under §§ 24.249 or
24.250 to use these vitamins and
minerals as yeast nutrients in the
production of wine. TTB did not
administratively approve the use of
riboflavin as a yeast nutrient because
the evidence submitted with the request
was not sufficient to conclude that the
use of riboflavin as a yeast nutrient is
consistent with good commercial
practice. Gusmer provided information
on the FDA regulatory status, functional
roles, and use rates for the following
vitamins and minerals as yeast
nutrients. TTB is interested in receiving
comments supporting or rejecting the
argument that the use of these vitamins
and minerals as yeast nutrients in the
production of wine is consistent with
good commercial practice. Unless
otherwise noted, the information that
follows was supplied by Gusmer.
• Cobalamin (vitamin B12):
Cobalamin is used to promote growth of
yeast, and Gusmer proposed that
cobalamin be used at a rate not to
exceed 15 ppb.
• Iodine (potassium iodide): Iodine is
required for yeast growth and
fermentation, and Gusmer proposed that
iodine be used at a rate not to exceed
10 ppb.
E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM
22NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 22, 2016 / Proposed Rules
• Iron: Iron is a catalyst for oxidation
reactions, and Gusmer proposed that
iron be used at a rate not to exceed 2
ppm.
• Manganese sulfate: Manganese
sulfate is a pale pink, odorless powder
that is freely soluble in water and
insoluble in alcohol. Gusmer proposed
that manganese sulfate be used at a rate
not to exceed 100 ppb.
• Nickel: Nickel is a catalyst for
hydrogenation, and Gusmer proposed
that nickel be used at a rate not to
exceed 5 ppm.
• Potassium chloride: Potassium
chloride is a salt that disassociates into
ions that are necessary for phosphate
uptake by yeast. Gusmer proposed that
potassium chloride be used at a rate not
to exceed 100 ppm.
• Riboflavin (vitamin B2): Riboflavin
is used as a coenzyme in oxidation/
reduction reactions, and Gusmer
proposed riboflavin be used at a rate not
to exceed 600 ppb.
• Zinc sulfate: Zinc sulfate increases
alcohol tolerance, and Gusmer proposed
zinc sulfate be used at a rate not to
exceed 1.5 ppm.
Public Participation
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Comments Sought
TTB requests comments from the
public and all interested parties. TTB is
particularly interested in comments that
address the question of whether a
particular material, process, or practice
addressed in this document is
consistent with good commercial
practice. Please support your comment
with specific information about the
material, process, or practice in
question.
After TTB analyzes any comments
received in response to the regulatory
amendments TTB has proposed in this
document, we plan to issue a final rule.
If TTB receives comments and evidence
that persuade it that the use of a
particular wine treating material or
process is not consistent with good
commercial practice, TTB will not
include it in the final rule. As a result,
and as stated in previously issued
administrative approvals, if TTB has
determined that the use of a wine or
juice treating material or process is not
consistent with good commercial
practice, previous approvals of that
wine or juice treating material or
process will be rescinded by operation
of law on the effective date of the final
rule.
Additionally, if TTB has determined
that the authorized amount of a wine or
juice treating material should be
decreased because its current authorized
amount is not consistent with good
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Nov 21, 2016
Jkt 241001
commercial practice, previous approvals
authorizing the higher amount of that
wine or juice treating material will be
rescinded on the effective date of the
final rule. Wines produced using
treatments pursuant to an
administrative approval that has been
rescinded based upon this rulemaking
may nevertheless be labeled as if the
materials or processes were authorized,
provided such treatments were used
prior to the date of rescission.
Submitting Comments
You may submit comments on the
proposals described in this document by
using one of the following three
methods:
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: You
may send comments via the online
comment form linked to this document
in Docket No. TTB–2016–0010 on
‘‘Regulations.gov,’’ the Federal erulemaking portal, at https://
www.regulations.gov. Direct links to the
comment form and docket are available
under Notice No. 164 on the TTB Web
site at https://www.ttb.gov/wine/winerulemaking.shtml. Supplemental files
may be attached to comments submitted
via Regulations.gov. For information on
how to use Regulations.gov, click on the
site’s Help tab.
• U.S. Mail: You may send comments
via postal mail to the Director,
Regulations and Rulings Division,
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau, 1310 G Street NW., Box 12,
Washington, DC 20005.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: You may
hand-carry your comments or have them
hand-carried to the Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G
Street NW., Suite 400, Washington, DC
20005.
Please submit your comments by the
closing date shown above in this
document. Your comments must
reference Notice No. 164 and include
your name and mailing address. Your
comments also must be made in
English, be legible, and be written in
language acceptable for public
disclosure. TTB does not acknowledge
receipt of comments, and TTB considers
all comments as originals.
In your comment, please clearly state
if you are commenting for yourself or on
behalf of an association, business, or
other entity. If you are commenting on
behalf of an entity, your comment must
include the entity’s name, as well as
your name and position title. If you
comment via Regulations.gov, please
enter the entity’s name in the
‘‘Organization’’ blank of the online
comment form. If you comment via
postal mail or hand delivery/courier,
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
83763
please submit your entity’s comment on
letterhead.
You may also write to the
Administrator before the comment
closing date to ask for a public hearing.
The Administrator reserves the right to
determine whether to hold a public
hearing.
Confidentiality
All submitted comments and
attachments are part of the public record
and subject to disclosure. Do not
enclose any material in your comments
that you consider to be confidential or
that is inappropriate for public
disclosure.
Public Disclosure
On the Federal e-rulemaking portal,
Regulations.gov, TTB will post, and the
public may view, copies of this
document, selected supporting
materials, and any electronic or mailed
comments TTB receives about this
proposal. A direct link to the
Regulations.gov docket containing this
document and the posted comments on
it is available on the TTB Web site at
https://www.ttb.gov/wine/winerulemaking.shtml under Notice No. 164.
You may also reach the docket
containing this document and the
posted comments received on it through
the Regulations.gov search page at
https://www.regulations.gov.
All posted comments will display the
commenter’s name, organization (if
any), city, and State, and, in the case of
mailed comments, all address
information, including email addresses.
TTB may omit voluminous attachments
or material that TTB considers
unsuitable for posting.
You and other members of the public
may view copies of this document, all
supporting materials, and any electronic
or mailed comments TTB receives about
these proposals by appointment at the
TTB Information Resource Center, 1310
G Street NW., Washington, DC 20005.
You may also obtain copies at 20 cents
per 8.5- x 11-inch page. Contact TTB’s
information specialist at the above
address or by telephone at 202–453–
2270 to schedule an appointment or to
request copies of comments or other
materials.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 6), TTB certifies that these
proposed regulations, if adopted, would
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. This proposed rule provides for
the voluntary use of additional wine
and juice treating materials and
E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM
22NOP1
83764
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 22, 2016 / Proposed Rules
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
processes in the production of wine.
This authorization does not impose any
required change to current winemaking
practices, nor does it impose additional
compliance burden on small businesses.
TTB authorizes new wine treating
materials and processes by evaluating
proprietors’ requests to experiment with
such materials and processes, such
requests being made via letterhead
application to TTB. This rule, if
adopted, would allow for certain
treatments, under limited
circumstances, without the submission
of a letterhead application to TTB. TTB
estimates that the proposed regulation
will reduce the number of respondents
by approximately 10 applicants per
year, thus slightly reducing the overall
burden of the information collection.
In addition, TTB currently requires
wineries to maintain usual and
customary business records. Included in
these records are those records that
evidence the details and results of
experiments approved by TTB under
§ 24.249. This recordkeeping
requirement remains unchanged by this
proposal as wineries subject to this part
still will be required to maintain those
usual and customary records. This
proposal has a neutral effect on the
current recordkeeping requirements.
Because this proposed rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities no
regulatory flexibility analysis is
required. Pursuant to 26 U.S.C. 7805(f),
TTB will submit the proposed
regulations to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on the
impact of the proposed regulations on
small businesses.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Two collections of information
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) would be affected by
the adoption of the proposed regulatory
changes described in this document.
These collections of information,
approved in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3507), are assigned control
numbers 1513–0057, titled, ‘‘Letterhead
Applications and Notices Relating to
Wine (TTB REC 5120/2),’’ and 1513–
0115, titled ‘‘Usual and Customary
Business Records Relating to Wine (TTB
REC 5120/1).’’ An agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a valid
control number assigned by OMB.
OMB Control Number 1513–0057
TTB authorizes new wine treating
materials and processes by evaluating
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Nov 21, 2016
Jkt 241001
proprietors’ requests to experiment with
such materials and processes under
§ 24.249. Section 24.249 states, in part,
that such requests must be made in the
form of an application filed with TTB.
Under this authorization, TTB has
approved proprietors’ requests to take
corrective action when water has been
accidentally added to wine in amounts
exceeding those authorized for the
production of standard wine under 27
CFR part 24. In this notice, TTB is
proposing to add a new § 24.251 to
provide for the correction of
accidentally diluted wine under certain
circumstances without the submission
of a letterhead application to TTB. TTB
estimates that the proposed regulation
will reduce the number of respondents
by approximately 10 applicants per year
and, therefore, will slightly reduce the
information collection’s overall burden.
TTB estimates that, as a result of the
proposed amendments, the new annual
burden for control number 1513–0057
will be as follows:
• Estimated total annual reporting
and/or recordkeeping burden: 820
hours.
• Estimated average annual burden
hours per respondent: 0.5 hours (30
minutes).
• Estimated number of respondents:
1,640.
• Estimated annual frequency of
respondents: 1.
Comments on this collection of
information should be sent to OMB to
Office of Management and Budget,
Attention: Desk Officer for the
Department of the Treasury, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Washington, DC 20503; or email to
OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov. A copy
also should be sent to the Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau by any
of the methods previously described.
Comments on the information collection
should be submitted not later than
January 23, 2017.
OMB Control Number 1513–0115
Under TTB’s authority in 26 U.S.C.
5367, 5369, 5370, and 5555, TTB
requires wineries to maintain usual and
customary business records. Included in
these records are those evidencing the
details and results of experiments
approved by TTB under § 24.249. The
proposed regulations contained in this
document provide for a recordkeeping
requirement in new § 24.251 when wine
is corrected for accidental water
dilutions. The recordkeeping
requirement in this proposed section is
already accounted for under OMB
Control Number 1513–0115 because
such requests currently are treated as
experiments under § 24.249. Therefore,
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
TTB does not believe that there is a
change in the burden for this
recordkeeping requirement, even for
those wineries that are exempted from
submitting a letterhead request under
§ 24.251 because still they will be
required to maintain the currently
required usual and customary business
records.
Comments on this collection of
information should be sent to OMB to
Office of Management and Budget,
Attention: Desk Officer for the
Department of the Treasury, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Washington, DC 20503; or email to
OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov. A copy
also should be sent to the Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau by any
of the methods previously described.
Comments on the information collection
should be submitted not later than
January 23, 2017.
Executive Order 12866
Certain TTB regulations issued under
the IRC, including this one, are exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 12866, as supplemented and
reaffirmed by Executive Order 13563.
Therefore, a regulatory impact
assessment is not required.
Drafting Information
Kara Fontaine of the Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau drafted this
document.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 24
Administrative practice and
procedure, Claims, Electronic fund
transfers, Excise taxes, Exports, Food
additives, Fruit juices, Labeling,
Liquors, Packaging and containers,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Research, Scientific
equipment, Spices and flavoring, Surety
bonds, Vinegar, Warehouses, Wine.
Amendments to the Regulations
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, TTB proposes to amend 27
CFR part 24 as follows.
PART 24—WINE
1. The authority citation for 27 CFR
part 24 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 26 U.S.C. 5001,
5008, 5041, 5042, 5044, 5061, 5062, 5121,
5122–5124, 5173, 5206, 5214, 5215, 5351,
5353, 5354, 5356, 5357, 5361, 5362, 5364–
5373, 5381–5388, 5391, 5392, 5511, 5551,
5552, 5661, 5662, 5684, 6065, 6091, 6109,
6301, 6302, 6311, 6651, 6676, 7302, 7342,
7502, 7503, 7606, 7805, 7851; 31 U.S.C. 9301,
9303, 9304, 9306.
■
2. Section 24.10 is amended by:
E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM
22NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 22, 2016 / Proposed Rules
§ 24.186
a. Removing the number ‘‘60’’ in the
definition of ‘‘Brix’’ and adding, in its
place, the number ‘‘68’’; and
■ b. Revising the definition of ‘‘Wine
spirits’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 24.10
Meaning of terms.
*
*
*
*
*
Wine spirits. Brandy or wine spirits
authorized under 26 U.S.C. 5373 and
§ 24.225 of this part for use in wine
production.
§ 24.85
[Amended]
3. In § 24.85, the first sentence is
amended by adding the word ‘‘wood,’’
after the word ‘‘berries.’’
■ 4. Section 24.185 is added to read as
follows:
■
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 24.185
Use of wood to treat natural wine.
(a) Treatment by contact. Natural
wine may be treated by contact with any
wood that is consistent with the food
additive requirements under the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act for food
contact (see 21 CFR part 7). The wood
may be in the form of barrels, staves,
chips, particles, or storage tanks that
were used for the addition of wine
spirits if the tanks are used for the
baking of wine. The wood may be
toasted (that is, heated to low, medium,
or high temperature without undergoing
combustion), but not charred, and the
wood must not be otherwise treated.
(b) Use of wood essences and extracts.
A proprietor may make or purchase for
blending purposes wine that has been
heavily treated with wood; however,
wood preparations made with an
alcohol solution stronger than 24
percent alcohol by volume are essences
and must be used in accordance with
§ 24.85. If any solvent other than alcohol
or water is used to make a wood extract,
the resulting extract must be consistent
with the food additive requirements
under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act for that purpose and may
be used only in ‘‘other wine’’ in
accordance with § 24.218. This
paragraph applies to liquid extracts and
essences and to the extracts and
essences in powder form or dissolved in
water after the solvent has been
evaporated.
(c) Use of wooden storage tanks.
Wooden storage tanks used for the
addition of spirits may be used for the
baking of wine.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85–859, 72 Stat. 1383–
1384, 1386, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5382,
5386))
5. Section 24.186 is added to read as
follows:
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Nov 21, 2016
Jkt 241001
Accidental additions of water.
(a) Accidental additions of water
totaling 1 percent or less of the volume
of standard wine. When in the
production, storage, treatment, or
finishing of standard wine water is
accidentally added to a standard wine
in an amount that does not exceed 1
percent of the total volume of the wine,
such wine shall remain standard wine
and the proprietor need not take any
action to correct the wine.
(b) Correction of accidental additions
of water. When in the production,
storage, treatment, or finishing of
standard wine water is accidentally
added to a standard wine in an amount
that exceeds 1 percent of the volume of
the wine, such wine may be corrected
by either:
(1) Blending the diluted wine with a
quantity of wine of the same kind so
that the amount of water accidentally
added does not exceed 1 percent of the
total volume of the blended wine; or
(2) Removal of the accidentally added
water from the wine in accordance with
§ 24.251.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85–859, 72 Stat. 1383–
1384, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5382))
6. Section 24.225 is revised to read as
follows:
■
§ 24.225
Production and use of spirits.
(a) Withdrawal of spirits. The
proprietor of a bonded wine premises
may withdraw and receive wine spirits
without payment of tax from the bonded
premises of a distilled spirits plant for
use as provided in this section.
(b) Production and use of wine spirits.
(1) In general. The only products
considered to be wine spirits authorized
for use in wine production under this
section are brandy or wine spirits
produced in a distilled spirits plant
(with or without the use of water to
facilitate extraction and distillation)
exclusively from:
(i) Fresh or dried fruit, or their
residues;
(ii) Natural wine or wine residues
from fresh or dried fruit, including
spirits byproducts of authorized wine
treatments to reduce alcohol; or
(iii) Special natural wine. If wine
spirits produced from special natural
wine contain any flavor characteristics
of the special natural wine, those wine
spirits may be used only in the
production of a special natural wine.
(2) Distillation proof requirements.
The proof of wine spirits at distillation
must not be reduced by the addition of
water. In addition, a product is not
considered to be wine spirits if it is
distilled at less than 140 degrees of
proof except in the following cases:
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
83765
(i) Commercial brandy aged in wood
for a period of not less than 2 years, and
barreled at not less than 100 degrees of
proof, shall be deemed wine spirits for
purposes of this section; and
(ii) Spirits byproducts of alcohol
reduction processing authorized under
§ 24.248 that are produced at a distilled
spirits plant and distilled, if necessary,
at not less than 100 degrees of proof
shall be deemed wine spirits for
purposes of this section.
(3) Addition of sugar after
fermentation. When, in the production
of natural wine or special natural wine,
sugar has been added after fermentation,
the wine may not be refermented to
develop alcohol from such added sugar
and then used in the production of wine
spirits.
(4) Addition of wine spirits to natural
wine.
(i) Wine spirits produced in the
United States may be added to natural
wine on bonded wine premises if both
the wine and the spirits are produced
from the same kind of fruit.
(ii) In the case of natural still wine,
wine spirits may be added in any State
only to wine produced by fermentation
on bonded wine premises located
within the same State.
(iii) If wine has been ameliorated,
wine spirits may be added (whether or
not wine spirits were previously added)
only if the wine contains not more than
14 percent of alcohol by volume derived
from fermentation.
(c) Spirits other than wine spirits.
Spirits other than wine spirits may be
received, stored, and used on bonded
wine premises only for the production
of nonbeverage wine and nonbeverage
wine products.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85–859, 72 Stat. 1381–
1384, as amended, and sec. 455, Pub. L. 98–
369, (26 U.S.C. 5214, 5362, 5373, 5382, 5383,
5386))
7. Section 24.246 is revised to read as
follows:
■
§ 24.246 Materials authorized for the
treatment of wine and juice.
(a) Wine and juice. Materials used in
the process of filtering, clarifying, or
purifying wine may remove cloudiness,
precipitation, and undesirable odors
and flavors, but the addition of any
substance foreign to wine that changes
the character of the wine, or the
abstraction of ingredients so as to
change the character of the wine, if not
consistent with good commercial
practice, is not permitted on bonded
wine premises. The materials listed in
this section are approved as being
consistent with good commercial
practice in the production, cellar
treatment, or finishing of wine and,
E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM
22NOP1
83766
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 22, 2016 / Proposed Rules
where applicable, in the treatment of
juice, within the ‘‘Specific TTB
limitation’’ of this section and subject to
the following conditions:
(1) If the FDA informs TTB that a
specified use or limitation of any
material listed in this section is
inconsistent with the food additive
requirements under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the appropriate
TTB officer may cancel or amend the
approval for use of the material in the
treatment of wine and juice in the
production, cellar treatment, or
finishing of wine; and
(2) Where water is added to facilitate
the solution or dispersal of a material,
the volume of water added, whether the
material is used singly or in
combination with other water-based
treating materials, may not total more
than 1 percent of the volume of the
treated wine or juice, or of both the
wine and the juice, from which the wine
is produced.
(b) Use in combination or in multiple
lots. Subject to the conditions specified
in paragraph (a) of this section, a
proprietor may use the materials listed
in this section in combination, provided
that each material is used for its
specified use and in accordance with
any limitation specified for that use. If
a proprietor uses several lots that
contain the same material, it is the
proprietor’s responsibility to ensure that
the cumulative amount of the material
does not exceed the limitation specified
in this section for that material.
(c) Formula wine. In addition to the
materials listed in this section, other
materials may be used in formula wine
if approved for such use.
MATERIALS AUTHORIZED FOR TREATMENT OF WINE AND JUICE
Materials and use
Specific TTB limitation
(if applicable)
Acacia (gum arabic): To clarify and stabilize 1
wine.
Acetaldehyde: For color stabilization of juice
prior to concentration.
The amount used must not exceed 8 pounds
per 1000 gallons (1.92 g/L) of wine.
The amount used must not exceed 300 ppm,2
and the finished concentrate must have no
detectable level of the material.
Activated carbon:
To assist precipitation during fermentation.
To clarify and purify wine ....................
To remove color from wine and/or
juice from which wine is produced.
Albumen (egg white): Fining agent for wine ......
Alumino-silicates (hydrated) e.g., Bentonite
(Wyoming clay) and Kaolin: To clarify and
stabilize 1 wine or juice.
Ascorbic acid iso-ascorbic acid (erythorbic
acid): To prevent oxidation of color and flavor
components of juice or wine.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Bakers Yeast Mannoprotein: To stabilize 1 wine
from the precipitation of potassium bitartrate
crystals.
Calcium carbonate (CaCO3) (with or without
calcium salts of tartaric and malic acids):
To reduce the excess natural acids in
high acid wine, or in juice prior to or
during fermentation.
As a fining agent for cold stabilization
Calcium sulfate (gypsum): To lower pH in sherry wine.
Carbon dioxide (including food grade dry ice):
To stabilize 1 and preserve wine.
Casein, potassium salt of casein: To clarify
wine.
Chitosan from Aspergillus niger: To remove
spoilage organisms such as Brettanomyces
from wine.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Nov 21, 2016
Jkt 241001
FDA reference
27 CFR 24.176 .................................................
The amount used to clarify and purify wine
must be included in the total amount of activated carbon used to remove excessive
color in wine. 27 CFR 24.241 and 24.242.
The amount used to treat the wine, including
the juice from which the wine was produced, must not exceed 25 pounds per
1000 gallons (3 g/L). If the amount necessary exceeds this limit, a notice is required pursuant to 27 CFR 24.242.
May be prepared in a light brine 1 ounce
(28.35 grams) potassium chloride, 2 pounds
(907.2 grams) egg white, 1 gallon (3.785 L)
of water. Usage of brine not to exceed 1.5
gallons per 1,000 gallons (1.5 milliliters per
liter) of wine.
None .................................................................
May be added to grapes, other fruit (including
berries), and other primary wine making
materials, or to the juice of such materials,
or to the wine, within limitations which do
not alter the class or type of the wine.
The amount used must not exceed 3.3
pounds per 1000 gallons (400 mg/L) of
wine.
The natural or fixed acids must not be reduced below 40 pounds per 1000 gallons (5
g/L).
The amount used must not exceed 30 pounds
per 1000 gallons (3.59 g/L) of wine.
The sulfate content of the finished wine must
not exceed 1.67 pounds per 1000 gallons
(0.2 g/L), expressed as potassium sulfate.
27 CFR 24.214.
See 27 CFR 24.245 .........................................
See 27 CFR 24.243 .........................................
The amount used must not exceed 0.8
pounds per 1000 gallons (10 g/hL) of wine.
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21 CFR 184.1330.
FDA advisory opinion dated September 8,
2016.
FDA advisory opinion dated September 8,
2016.
FDA advisory opinion dated January 26,
1979.
FDA advisory opinion dated January 26,
1979.
FDA advisory opinion dated September 8,
2016.
21 CFR 182.2727, 182.2729, 184.1155 and
186.1256.
FDA advisory opinion dated July 26, 1985.
21 CFR 182.3013 and 182.3041.
GRAS Notice No. GRN 284.
21 CFR 184.1069, 184.1099, and 184.1191.
21 CFR 184.1230.
21 CFR 184.1240.
FDA advisory opinion dated September 8,
2016.
GRAS Notice No. GRN 000397.
E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM
22NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 22, 2016 / Proposed Rules
83767
MATERIALS AUTHORIZED FOR TREATMENT OF WINE AND JUICE—Continued
Specific TTB limitation
(if applicable)
Materials and use
Citric acid:
To correct natural acid deficiencies in
certain juice or wine.
To stabilize 1 wine other than citrus
wine.
Copper sulfate: To remove hydrogen sulfide
and/or mercaptans from wine.
Defoaming agents (polyoxyethylene 40 monostearate, silicon dioxide, dimethylpoly-siloxane, sorbitan monostearate, glyceryl monooleate and glyceryl dioleate): To control
foaming, fermentation adjunct.
Dimethyl dicarbonate (DMDC): To sterilize and
stabilize 1 wine.
Enzymatic activity: Various enzymes and uses,
as shown below:
Carbohydrase (alpha-Amylase): To
convert starches to fermentable carbohydrates.
Carbohydrase (beta-Amylase): To
convert starches to fermentable carbohydrates.
Carbohydrase
(Glucoamylase,
Amylogluco-sidase): To convert
starches to fermentable carbohydrates.
Carbohydrase (pectinase, cellulase,
hemicellulase): To facilitate separation of juice from the fruit.
Catalase: To clarify and stabilize 1
wine.
Cellulase: To clarify and stabilize 1
wine and facilitate separation of the
juice from the fruit.
Cellulase (beta-glucanase): To clarify
and filter wine.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Glucose oxidase: To clarify and stabilize 1 wine
Lysozyme: To stabilize 1 wines from malolactic
acid bacterial degradation.
Pectinase: To clarify and stabilize 1 wine and to
facilitate separation of juice from the fruit.
Protease (general): To reduce or to remove
heat labile proteins.
Protease (Bromelin): To reduce or remove heat labile proteins.
Protease (Ficin): To reduce or remove
heat labile proteins.
Protease (Papain): To reduce or remove heat labile proteins.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Nov 21, 2016
Jkt 241001
FDA reference
See 27 CFR 24.182 and 24.192 ......................
21 CFR 184.1033.
The amount of citric acid must not exceed 5.8
pounds per 1000 gallons (0.7 g/L). 27 CFR
24.244.
The quantity of copper sulfate (calculated as
copper) added to wine must not exceed 6
ppm.2 The residual level of copper in the
finished wine must not exceed 0.5 ppm 2.
Defoaming agents which are 100 percent active may be used in amounts not exceeding
0.15 pounds per 1000 gallons (18 mg/L) of
wine. Defoaming agents which are 30 percent active may be used in amounts not exceeding 0.5 pounds per 1000 gallons (60
mg/L) of wine. Silicon dioxide must be completely removed by filtration. The amount of
silicon remaining in the wine must not exceed 10 ppm 2.
DMDC may be added to wine in a cumulative
amount not to exceed 200 ppm 2.
The enzyme preparation used must be prepared from nontoxic and nonpathogenic
microorganisms in accordance with good
manufacturing practice and be consistent
with FDA’s regulations.
The amylase enzyme activity must be derived
from:
Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus oryzae, Bacillus subtilis, or barley malt; or.
from Rhizopus oryzae: or .........................
from Bacillus licheniformis ........................
The amylase enzyme must be derived from
barley malt.
21 CFR 184.1033.
21 CFR 184.1261.
21 CFR 173.340 and 184.1505.
Must meet the conditions prescribed by FDA
in 21 CFR 172.133.
FDA advisory opinion of August 18, 1983.
21 CFR 173.130.
21 CFR 184.1027.
FDA advisory opinion dated August 18, 1983.
The amylase enzyme activity must be derived
from Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus oryzae,
or.
FDA advisory opinion dated August 18, 1983.
from Rhizopus oryzae, .....................................
or from Rhizopus niveus ..................................
The enzyme activity must be derived from Aspergillus aculeatus.
21 CFR 173.130.
21 CFR 173.110.
FDA advisory opinion dated December 19,
1996.
The enzyme activity must be derived from Aspergillus niger or bovine liver.
The enzyme activity must be derived from Aspergillus niger.
FDA advisory opinion dated August 18, 1983.
The enzyme activity must be derived from
Trichoderma
longibrachiatum
or
Trichoderma harzianum. The amount used
must not exceed 30 ppm 2.
The enzyme activity must be derived from Aspergillus niger.
The amount used must not exceed 500 ppm.2
For beta-gucanase derived from Trichoderma
longibrachiatum, 21 CFR 184.1250.
For beta-glucanase derived from Trichoderma
harzianum, GRAS Notice No. GRN 149.
FDA advisory opinion of August 18, 1983.
The enzyme activity used must be derived
from Aspergillus niger.
The enzyme activity must be derived from:
Aspergillus niger or Bacillus subtilis or
from;.
Bacillus licheniformis .................................
The enzyme activity must be derived from
Ananus comosus or Ananus bracteatus (L).
The enzyme activity must be derived from
Ficus spp.
The enzyme activity must be derived from
Carica papaya (L).
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
FDA advisory opinion dated August 18, 1983.
FDA advisory opinion dated December 15,
1993.
FDA advisory opinion dated August 18, 1983.
FDA advisory opinion dated August 18, 1983.
21 CFR 184.1027.
FDA advisory opinion dated August 18, 1983.
FDA advisory opinion dated August 18, 1983.
21 CFR 184.1585.
E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM
22NOP1
83768
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 22, 2016 / Proposed Rules
MATERIALS AUTHORIZED FOR TREATMENT OF WINE AND JUICE—Continued
Materials and use
Specific TTB limitation
(if applicable)
FDA reference
Protease (Pepsin): To reduce or remove heat labile proteins.
Protease (Trypsin): To reduce or remove heat labile proteins.
Urease: To reduce levels of naturally
occurring urea in wine to help prevent the formation of ethyl carbamate.
Ethyl maltol: To stabilize 1 wine .........................
The enzyme activity must be derived from
porcine or bovine stomachs.
The enzyme activity must be derived from
porcine or bovine pancreas.
The enzyme activity must be derived from
Lactobacillus fermentum. Use is limited to
not more than 200 ppm 2 and must be filtered prior to final packaging.
Use authorized at a maximum level of 100
ppm 2 in all standard wines except natural
wine produced from Vitis vinifera grapes.
The amount used must not exceed 3 ounces
per 1000 gallons (0.022 g/L) of wine.
FDA advisory opinion dated August 18, 1983.
Ferrous sulfate: To clarify and stabilize 1 wine ..
Fumaric acid:
To correct natural acid deficiencies in
grape wine.
To stabilize 1 wine ................................
Gelatin (food grade): To clarify juice or wine ....
Granular cork: To smooth wine .........................
Isinglass: To clarify wine ....................................
Lactic acid: To correct natural acid deficiencies
in grape wine.
Malic acid: To correct natural acid deficiencies
in juice or wine.
Malo-lactic bacteria: To stabilize 1 grape wine ..
Maltol: To stabilize 1 wine ..................................
Milk products (pasteurized whole, skim, or halfand-half):
Fining agent for grape wine ................
To remove off flavors in wine ..............
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Nitrogen gas: To maintain pressure during filtering and bottling or canning of wine and to
prevent oxidation of wine.
Oxygen and compressed air: Various uses in
juice and wine.
Polyvinyl-polypyr-rolidone (PVPP): To clarify
and stabilize 1 wine and to remove color from
red wine or juice.
Polyvinyl-pyrrolidone (PVP)/polyvinylimadazole
(PVI) polymer: To remove heavy metal ions
and sulfides from wine.
Potassium bitartrate: To stabilize 1 grape wine
Potassium carbonate and/or potassium bicarbonate: To reduce excess natural acidity in
wine and in juice prior to or during fermentation.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Nov 21, 2016
Jkt 241001
The fumaric acid content of the finished wine
must not exceed 25 pounds per 1000 gallons (3 g/L). 27 CFR 24.182 and 24.192.
The fumaric acid content of the finished wine
must not exceed 25 pounds per 1000 gallons (3 g/L). 27 CFR 24.244.
None .................................................................
FDA advisory opinion dated August 18, 1983.
21 CFR 184.1924.
FDA advisory opinion dated December 1,
1986.
21 CFR 184.1315.
21 CFR 172.350.
21 CFR 172.350.
27 CFR 24.182 and 24.192 .............................
FDA advisory opinion dated September 8,
2016.
FDA advisory opinion dated February 25,
1985.
FDA advisory opinion dated February 25,
1985.
21 CFR 184.1061.
27 CFR 24.182, 24.192 ...................................
21 CFR 184.1069.
Malo-lactic bacteria of the type Leuconostoc
oenos may be used in treating wine.
Use authorized at a maximum level of 2
pounds per 1000 gallons (250 mg/L) in all
standard wine except natural wine produced
from Vitis vinifera grapes.
FDA advisory opinion dated February 25,
1985.
FDA advisory opinion dated December 1,
1986.
The amount used must not exceed 10 pounds
per 1000 gallons of wine (1.2 g/L).
None .................................................................
The amount used must not exceed 2 parts of
milk products per 1,000 parts (0.2 percent
V/V) of wine.
The amount used must not exceed 10 parts of
milk products per 1,000 parts (1 percent V/
V) of wine.
None .................................................................
21 CFR 184.1540.
None.
The amount used to treat the wine, including
the juice from which the wine was produced, must not exceed 60 pounds per
1000 gallons (7.19 g/L) and must be removed during filtration. PVPP may be used
in a continuous or batch process. The finished wine must retain vinous character and
must have color of not less than 0.6
Lovibond in a one-half inch cell or not more
than 95 percent transmittance per AOAC
Method 11.003–11.004 (14th Ed.) 3.
The amount used to treat the wine must not
exceed 6.7 pounds per 1000 gallons (80 g/
hL) of wine.
The amount used must not exceed 35 pounds
per 1000 gallons (4.19 g/L) of grape wine.
The natural or fixed acids must not be reduced below 0.668 ounces per gallon (5 g/
L).
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21 CFR 173.50.
21 CFR 173.55 and FDA FCN No. 320.
FDA advisory opinion dated September 8,
2016.
21 CFR 184.1619 and 184.1613.
E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM
22NOP1
83769
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 22, 2016 / Proposed Rules
MATERIALS AUTHORIZED FOR TREATMENT OF WINE AND JUICE—Continued
Materials and use
Specific TTB limitation
(if applicable)
Potassium citrate: pH control agent and
sequestrant in the treatment of citrus wines.
The amount of potassium citrate must not exceed 25 pounds per 1000 gallons (3 g/L) of
finished wine. 27 CFR 24.182.
The sulfur dioxide content of the finished wine
must not exceed the limitations prescribed
in 27 CFR 4.22.
Use must not exceed 500 ppm 2 (50 g/hL) of
wine.
Use must not exceed the equivalent of 20
pounds colloidal silicon dioxide at a 30 percent concentration per 1000 gallons (2.4 g/
L) of wine. Silicon dioxide must be completely removed by filtration.
The amount used must not exceed 0.8% of
the wine.
The finished wine must not contain more than
300 ppm 2 of sorbic acid.
Potassium meta-bisulfite: To sterilize and preserve wine.
Potato protein isolate: Fining agent for wine .....
Silica gel (colloidal silicon dioxide): To clarify
wine or juice.
Sodium carboxymethyl cellulose: To stabilize 1
wine by preventing tartrate precipitation.
Sorbic acid and potassium salt of sorbic acid
(potassium sorbate): To sterilize and preserve wine; to inhibit mold growth and secondary fermentation.
Sulfur dioxide: To sterilize and to preserve wine
or juice.
FDA reference
21 CFR 184.1625.
21 CFR 182.3637.
GRAS Notice No. GRN 000447.
FDA advisory opinion dated September 8,
2016.
21 CFR 182.1745.
21 CFR 182.3089 and 182.3640.
The sulfur dioxide content of the finished wine
must not exceed the limitations prescribed
in 27 CFR 4.22(b)(1).
21 CFR 182.3862.
The residual amount of tannin must not exceed 24 pounds per 1000 gallons (3 g/L),
calculated as gallic acid equivalents (GAE).
Total tannin must not be increased by more
than 150 ppm 2 by the addition of tannic
acid (polygalloylglucose).
The residual amount of tannin, calculated in
GAE, must not exceed 6.4 GAE per 1000
gallons of wine (800 mg/L) in white wine
and 24 pounds per 1000 gallons (3 g/L) in
red wine. Only tannin which does not impart
color may be used in the cellar treatment of
juice or wine. Total tannin must not be increased by more than 150 ppm 2 by the addition of tannic acid (poly-galloylglucose).
FDA advisory opinion dated September 8,
2016.
Tannin:
To adjust tannin content in apple juice
or in apple wine.
To clarify, or adjust tannin content of,
juice or wine (other than apple).
Tartaric acid (L(+) tartaric acid):
To correct natural acid deficiencies in
grape juice or wine and to reduce
the pH of grape juice or wine where
ameliorating material is used in the
production of grape wine.
Yeast nutrients: To facilitate fermentation of
juice and wine
Ammonium
phosphate/diammonium
phosphate (mono- and di basic).
Biotin ....................................................
Calcium pantothenate (vitamin B5) .....
Folic acid (folate) .................................
Inositol (myo-inositol) ...........................
Magnesium sulfate ..............................
Niacin (vitamin B3) ..............................
Pyridoxine hydrochloride (vitamin B6)
Soy flour (defatted) ..............................
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Thiamine hydrochloride .......................
Yeast, autolyzed ..................................
Yeast,
cell
wall/membranes
of
autolyzed yeast.
FDA advisory opinion dated September 8,
2016.
Use as prescribed in 27 CFR 24.182 and
24.192.
21 CFR 184.1099 and
GRAS Notice No. GRN 000187.
The amount used must not exceed 8 pounds
per 1000 gallons (0.96 g/L).
The amount used must not exceed 25 ppb 4 ..
The amount used must not exceed 1.5 ppm 2
The amount used must not exceed 100 ppb 4
The amount used must not exceed 2 ppm 2 ...
The amount used must not exceed 15 ppm 2
The amount used must not exceed 1 ppm 2 ...
The amount used must not exceed 150 ppb 4
The amount used must not exceed 2 pounds
per 1000 gallons (0.24 g/L) of wine.
The amount used must not exceed 0.005
pounds per 1000 gallons (0.6 mg/L) of wine
or juice.
None .................................................................
The amount used must not exceed 3 pounds
per 1000 gallons (0.36 g/L) of wine or juice.
FDA advisory opinion dated August 29, 2016.
FDA
FDA
FDA
FDA
FDA
FDA
FDA
FDA
advisory
advisory
advisory
advisory
advisory
advisory
advisory
advisory
opinion
opinion
opinion
opinion
opinion
opinion
opinion
opinion
dated
dated
dated
dated
dated
dated
dated
dated
August
August
August
August
August
August
August
August
29,
29,
29,
29,
29,
29,
29,
29,
2016.
2016.
2016.
2016.
2016.
2016.
2016.
2016.
FDA advisory opinion dated August 29, 2016.
FDA advisory opinion dated August 29, 2016.
FDA advisory opinion dated August 29, 2016.
1 To
stabilize—To prevent or to retard unwanted alteration of chemical and/or physical properties.
per million—1 ppm = 0.128 ounces per 1000 gallons = 1 mg/L = 1000 ppb.
Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL, Volumes I & II, AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 481 North Frederick Avenue, Suite 500,
Gaithersburg, MD 20877–2417.
4 Parts per billion—1ppb = 0.000128 ounces per 1000 gallons = 1 mg/1000L.
2 Parts
3 Official
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Nov 21, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM
22NOP1
83770
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 22, 2016 / Proposed Rules
*
*
*
*
*
8. Section 24.247 is amended by:
■ a. Revising the introductory text;
■ b. Revising the entry in the table for
‘‘Ammonium phosphate (mono- and di
basic’’; and
■ c. Removing the footnote at the end of
the table.
The revisions read as follows:
■
§ 24.247 Materials authorized for the
treatment of distilling material.
The materials listed in this section as
well as the materials listed in § 24.246
are approved as being acceptable in
good commercial practice for use by
proprietors in the treatment of distilling
material within the limitations specified
in this section. If, however, the U.S.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
informs TTB that a specified use or
limitation of any material listed in this
section is inconsistent with the food
additive requirements under the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the
appropriate TTB officer may cancel or
amend the approval for use of the
material in the treatment of distilling
material.
Materials
Use
Reference or limitation
Ammonium phosphate/diammonium phosphate
(mono-and di basic).
Yeast nutrient in distilling material ....................
The amount used shall not exceed 10 pounds
per 1000 gallons (1.2 g/L). 21 CFR
184.1141a and 184.1141b.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
9. Section 24.248 is amended by:
a. Revising the introductory text;
b. Removing the entries for
‘‘Nanofiltration,’’ ‘‘Reverse osmosis,’’
and ‘‘Ultrafiltration’’;
■ c. Adding an entry for ‘‘Cross flow
filtration’’, including subentries for
‘‘Nanofiltration’’, ‘‘Reverse osmosis’’,
and ‘‘Ultrafiltration’’, at the top of the
table;
■ d. Revising the entries for ‘‘Osmotic
transport’’, ‘‘Spinning cone column’’,
and ‘‘Thin-film evaporation under
reduced pressure’’; and
*
*
e. Removing footnote 1 at the end of
the table and adding new footnotes 1
and 2.
The additions and revisions to the
table and its footnotes read as follows:
■
■
■
■
§ 24.248 Processes authorized for the
treatment of wine, juice, and distilling
material.
The processes listed in this section
are approved as being consistent with
good commercial practice for use by
proprietors in the production, cellar
treatment, or finishing of wine, juice,
and distilling material, within the
*
*
general limitations of this section. If,
however, the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) informs TTB that
a specified use or limitation of any
material listed in this section is
inconsistent with the food additive
requirements under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the appropriate
TTB officer may cancel or amend the
approval for use of the process in the
production, cellar treatment, or
finishing of wine, juice, and distilling
material.
PROCESSES AUTHORIZED FOR THE TREATMENT OF WINE, JUICE, AND DISTILLING MATERIAL
Use
Cross flow filtration ...........................................
Nanofiltration 2
Various processes and uses. 1
To reduce the level of volatile acidity in wine
(used with ion exchange), to reduce the
ethyl alcohol content of wine.
Reverse osmosis 2 .....................................
To reduce the ethyl alcohol content of wine
and to remove off flavors in wine.
Ultrafiltration 2 .............................................
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Process
To remove proteinaceous material from wine;
to reduce harsh tannic material from white
wine produced from white skinned grapes;
to remove pink color from blanc de noir
wine; to separate red juice and wine into
low color and high color fractions for blending purposes, to reduce the ethyl alcohol
content of wine.
*
*
Osmotic transport 2 ...........................................
*
*
*
For alcohol reduction ........................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Nov 21, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Reference or limitation
This process must use permeable membranes
which are selective for molecules not greater than 150 molecular weight with
transmembrane pressures of 250 psi or
less.
Permeable membranes that are selective for
molecules not greater than 500 molecular
weight with transmembrane pressures of
200 pounds per square inch (psi) and greater. The addition of water other than that
originally present prior to processing will
render standard wine ‘‘other than standard.’’
Use must not alter the vinous character of
the wine. May be used in combination with
osmotic transport.
Permeable membranes that are selective for
molecules greater than 500 and not less
than
25,000
molecular
weight
with
transmembrane pressures less than 200 psi.
Shall not alter vinous character.
*
*
(1) Use must not alter the vinous character of
the wine.
(2) None of the stripping solution may migrate
into the wine.
(3) May be used in combination with reverse
osmosis.
E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM
22NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 22, 2016 / Proposed Rules
83771
PROCESSES AUTHORIZED FOR THE TREATMENT OF WINE, JUICE, AND DISTILLING MATERIAL—Continued
Process
Use
Reference or limitation
*
*
Spinning cone column 2 ....................................
*
*
*
To reduce the ethyl alcohol content of wine
and to remove off flavors in wine.
*
*
Use shall not alter vinous character. For
standard wine, the same amount of essence
must be added back to any lot of wine as
was originally removed.
*
Thin
film
evaporation
preasure 2.
*
*
*
To separate wine into a low alcohol wine fraction and into a higher alcohol distillate.
*
*
Use shall not alter vinous character. Water
separated with alcohol during processing
may be recovered by refluxing in a closed
continuous system and returned to the wine.
The addition of water other than that originally present in the wine prior to processing,
will render standard wine other than standard wine.
*
under
reduced
1 In cross-flow filtration, the wine is passed across the filter membrane (tangentially) at positive pressure relative to the permeate side. A proportion of the wine which is smaller than the membrane pore size passes through the membrane as permeate or filtrate; everything else is retained on the feed side of the membrane as retentate.
2 When used to remove ethyl alcohol (dealcoholization), this process must be done on distilled spirits plant premises. However, reverse osmosis and nanofilitration, under certain limited conditions, may be used on bonded winery premises if ethyl alcohol is only temporarily created within
a closed system.
*
*
*
*
*
10. Paragraph (b) of § 24.250 is
amended to read as follows:
■
§ 24.250 Application for use of new
treating material or process.
(b) Documentary evidence from the
U.S. Food and Drug Administration that
the material is consistent with the food
additive requirements under the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act for its
intended purpose in the amounts
proposed for the particular treatment
contemplated;
*
*
*
*
*
■ 11. Section 24.251 is added to read as
follows:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 24.251
wine.
Salvaging accidentally diluted
(a) Removal of accidentally added
water without prior TTB approval. If a
proprietor accidentally adds to standard
wine water in excess of limitations
specified in subparts F and L of this
part, the accidentally diluted wine may
be returned to its original condition
through the use of reverse osmosis and
distillation without prior application to
TTB provided that:
(1) The accidentally added water
represents no more than 10 percent of
the original volume of the wine;
(2) The wine is returned to its original
condition by removing an amount of
water equal to the amount that was
accidentally added to the wine;
(3) The vinous character of the wine
is not altered;
(4) The proprietor transfers the wine
in bond to a distilled spirits plant for
treatment; and
(5) Records are maintained in
accordance with paragraph (c) of this
section.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Nov 21, 2016
Jkt 241001
(b) Removal of accidentally added
water with TTB approval. If a proprietor
accidentally adds water to standard
wine and the accidentally added water
represents more than 10 percent of the
original volume of the wine, then the
proprietor must request permission from
TTB prior to treating the wine. A
proprietor may submit an application
requesting permission to treat the wine
to remove the water and return the wine
to its original condition. The removal of
water may not be conducted until the
appropriate TTB officer has approved
the request. The application, which is to
be submitted to the appropriate TTB
officer, must be in writing, must provide
evidence of the exact amount of water
accidentally added to the wine and an
explanation of how the water was
accidentally added, and must specify
the method the proprietor will use to
remove the water from the wine. In
approving any request under this
section, the appropriate TTB officer may
require the proprietor to take steps to
prevent future accidental additions of
water to wine. In evaluating any request
under this section, the appropriate TTB
officer may consider as a factor whether
the proprietor has demonstrated good
commercial practices, taking into
account the proprietor’s prior history of
accidental addition of water to wine and
of compliance with other regulations in
part 24.
(c) Records. The proprietor must, with
respect to removals of water from wine
authorized under this section, maintain
records that document the accidental
addition of water, the use of any
treatment or process to remove the
water from the wine, and the fact that
only the amount of water that was
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
accidentally added to the wine was
removed as a result of the treatment or
process.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85–859, 72 Stat. 1383–
1384, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5382))
Signed: June 16, 2016.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
Approved: October 25, 2016.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary. (Tax, Trade, and
Tariff Policy).
[FR Doc. 2016–27581 Filed 11–21–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R06–OAR–2016–0206; FRL–9954–83–
Region 6]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Louisiana;
Revisions to the New Source Review
State Implementation Plan; Air Permit
Procedure Revisions
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to partially
approve and partially disapprove
severable portions of four revisions to
the Louisiana New Source Review
(NSR) State Implementation Plan (SIP)
submitted by the Louisiana Department
of Environmental Quality (LDEQ).
Specifically, we are proposing to
partially approve and partially
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM
22NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 22, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 83752-83771]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-27581]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
27 CFR Part 24
[Docket No. TTB-2016-0010; Notice No. 164]
RIN 1513-AB61
Wine Treating Materials and Related Regulations
AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) is
proposing to amend its regulations pertaining to the production of wine
and in particular in regard to the permissible treatments that may be
applied to wine and to juice from which wine is made. These proposed
amendments are in response to requests from wine industry members to
authorize certain wine treating materials and processes not currently
authorized by TTB regulations. TTB invites comments on the proposed
regulatory changes described in this document, as well as on other wine
treatment issues for which regulatory amendments are not proposed in
this document.
DATES: Comments must be received by January 23, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Please send your comments on this document to one of the
following addresses:
https://www.regulations.gov (via the online comment form
for this document as posted within Docket No. TTB-2016-0010 at
Regulations.gov, the Federal e-rulemaking portal);
U.S. Mail: Director, Regulations and Rulings Division,
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street NW., Box 12,
Washington, DC 20005; or
Hand delivery/courier in lieu of mail: Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street NW., Suite 400, Washington, DC
20005.
See the Public Participation section of this document for specific
instructions and requirements for submitting comments, and for
information on how to request a public hearing or view or obtain copies
of the petition and supporting materials.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kara Fontaine, Regulations and Rulings
Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street NW.,
Box 12, Washington, DC 20005; phone 202-453-1039, ext. 103.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
TTB Authority
Chapter 51 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (IRC),
26 U.S.C. chapter 51, contains provisions concerning the taxation and
production of distilled spirits, wines, and beer. The Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) has been delegated authority to
promulgate regulations pertaining to wine under Chapter 51 of the IRC.
The statutory provisions of the IRC related to the distilled spirits
and wine regulations that TTB promulgates include, but are not limited
to, the following:
Section 5002(a)(4) of the IRC (26 U.S.C. 5002(a)(4)),
which defines the term ``distiller,'' in pertinent part, as including
any person who ``(A) produces distilled spirits from any source or
substance'' or ``(C) by any process separates alcoholic spirits from
any fermented substance * * *.''
Section 5171(a) of the IRC (26 U.S.C. 5171(a)), which
requires that operations ``as a distiller'' only be conducted on the
bonded premises of a distilled spirits plant by a person who is
qualified under subchapter B of chapter 51 of the IRC.
Section 5373 of the IRC (26 U.S.C. 5373), which authorizes
the promulgation of regulations regarding the type of wine spirits that
may be used in wine production.
Section 5381 of the IRC (26 U.S.C. 5381), which provides
that natural wine is the product of the juice or must of sound, ripe
grapes or other sound, ripe fruit, made with such cellar treatment as
may be authorized under section 5382.
Section 5382(a) of the IRC (26 U.S.C. 5382(a)), which
provides that proper cellar treatment of natural wine constitutes those
practices and procedures in the United States, of using various methods
and materials to correct or stabilize the wine, or the fruit juice from
which it is made, so as to produce a finished product acceptable in
good commercial practice as prescribed by regulation. Section 5382(c)
also authorizes the promulgation of regulations setting forth
limitations on the preparation and use of methods and materials for
clarifying, stabilizing, preserving, fermenting, and correcting wine
and juice.
Section 5387(a) of the IRC (26 U.S.C. 5387(a)), which
authorizes the production of agricultural wine, classed as ``standard
agricultural wine,'' from agricultural products other than the juice of
fruit. Such agricultural wine must be made in accordance with good
commercial practice as prescribed by regulation and may be cellar
treated in accordance with sections 5382(a) and (c) of the IRC. Also,
section 5387(b) prohibits the addition of wine spirits, coloring
material or herbs, or other flavoring material (except hops in the case
of honey wine) to agricultural wine, as well as the blending together
of wines from different agricultural commodities.
The regulations promulgated under the IRC regarding the production
of wine are set forth in part 24 of title 27 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (27 CFR part 24) and include, but are not limited to, the
following provisions:
27 CFR 24.10, which contains the definitions of certain
terms used in 27 CFR part 24.
27 CFR 24.225, which sets forth rules under which
proprietors of a bonded wine premises may withdraw and receive spirits
without payment of tax from the bonded premises of a distilled spirits
plant and add the spirits to natural wine on bonded wine premises.
27 CFR 24.246, which includes a table that lists the
materials authorized for the treatment of wine and juice.
27 CFR 24.247, which includes a table that lists materials
authorized for the treatment of distilling material.
27 CFR 24.248, which includes a table that lists processes
authorized for the treatment of wine, juice, and distilling materials.
TTB administers chapter 51 of the IRC and its implementing
regulations pursuant to section 1111(d) of the Homeland Security Act of
2002, as codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The Secretary has delegated
various authorities through Treasury Department Order 120-01, dated
December 10, 2013 (superseding Treasury Order 120-01 dated January 24,
2003), to the TTB Administrator to perform the functions and duties in
the administration and enforcement of these laws.
In addition, TTB consults with the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) on whether alcohol beverages are adulterated under
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), including whether
a substance added to an alcohol beverage is an unapproved food
additive. Alcohol beverages are
[[Page 83753]]
considered ``food'' under the FD&C Act. A substance added to food is a
food additive unless it is otherwise excluded from the definition of a
food additive under the FD&C Act. For example, the use of a substance
in food that is generally recognized as safe by qualified experts
(GRAS) is excluded from the definition of a food additive under the
FD&C Act. The use of a food additive in food must be authorized by FDA
either through a food additive regulation or an effective food contact
notification (FCN). FDA has listed certain GRAS uses in its
regulations. In addition, FDA has a voluntary notification procedure by
which any person may notify FDA of a conclusion that a use of a
substance is GRAS. FDA evaluates whether the notice provides a
sufficient basis for a GRAS conclusion (which results in a ``no
questions'' response) or whether FDA believes there is an insufficient
basis for a GRAS conclusion (which results in an ``insufficient basis''
response). For the purpose of this rulemaking, we use the term
``consistent with the food additive requirements under the FD&C Act''
to refer to: (1) Authorized food additive uses; (2) uses that are GRAS
under FDA's regulations, that are the subject of a ``no questions''
letter from FDA in response to a GRAS notice, or that are subject to an
opinion letter from FDA stating that the use is GRAS or otherwise
permissible; or (3) uses that are otherwise excluded from regulation as
a food additive.
Based on TTB's experience in administering the statutory and
regulatory provisions mentioned above, TTB is proposing in this
document a number of amendments to the TTB regulations and inviting
comments from the public on these proposed regulatory changes. In
addition, TTB is outlining in this document a number of other issues
that are not the subject of proposed regulatory changes. TTB invites
comments from the public on those issues to assist TTB in determining
whether any of those issues warrant specific regulatory changes.
Terms Used in This Document
TTB is providing the following definitions to assist in the
comprehension of this final rule. The definitions of agricultural wine,
amelioration, brix, natural wine, standard wine, and wine spirits come
from Sec. 24.10, the definition of essences is derived from 27 CFR
24.85, and the definition of special natural wine is derived from 27
CFR 24.10 and 24.195. The definitions of ``natural wine'' and
``standard wine'' are consistent with statutory provisions at sections
5381 and 5392, respectively. The definitions of ``agricultural wine,''
``amelioration,'' and ``special natural wine'' reflect language used in
statutory provisions at sections 5387, 5383, and 5386, respectively.
The definition of ``brix'' is derived, in part, from statutory
provisions at sections 5382 and 5393. Definitions of industry member
and yeast nutrients also are provided, although these terms are not
specifically defined in statutory provisions or elsewhere in the
regulations.
Agricultural wine: Wine made from suitable agricultural
products other than the juice of grapes, berries, or other fruits.
Amelioration: The addition to juice or natural wine
before, during, or after fermentation, of either water or pure dry
sugar, or a combination of water and sugar to adjust the acid level.
Brix: The quantity of dissolved solids expressed as grams
of sucrose in 100 grams of solution at 68 degrees F (20 degrees C.)
(Percent by weight of sugar). (The definition of ``Brix'' in Sec.
24.10 incorrectly refers to 60 degrees F rather than 68, which is the
equivalent of 20 degrees C; TTB is proposing to correct this
typographical error in this document.)
Essences: Preparations of natural constituents extracted
from fruit, herbs, berries, etc.
Industry member: For the purposes of this document, a
proprietor of a bonded wine premises.
Natural wine: The product of the juice or must of sound,
ripe grapes or other sound, ripe fruit (including berries) made with
any cellar treatment authorized by 27 CFR part 24, subparts F and L,
and containing not more than 21 percent by weight (21 degrees Brix
dealcoholized wine) of total solids.
Special natural wine: A product produced from a base of
natural wine (including heavy bodied blending wine) to which natural
flavorings are added, and made pursuant to an approved formula in
accordance with 27 CFR part 24, subpart H. In subpart H, Sec. 24.195
additionally explains that, among other things, natural flavorings are
added in quantities or proportions such that the resulting product
derives character and flavor distinctive from the base wine and
distinguishable from other natural wine.
Standard wine: Natural wine, specially sweetened natural
wine, special natural wine, and standard agricultural wine, produced in
accordance with 27 CFR part 24, subparts F, H, and I.
Wine spirits: Brandy or wine spirits authorized under 26
U.S.C. 5373 for use in wine production.
Yeast nutrients: For the purposes of this document,
vitamins and minerals that aid in the fermentation of juice to wine by
acting as food for yeast.
TTB Administrative Approvals of Wine and Juice Treatments
Industry members who wish to experiment with, or commercially use,
a treating material or process not specifically authorized in 27 CFR
part 24 must file an application with TTB requesting authorization to
use the new material or process. TTB may approve such requests as
experiments under 27 CFR 24.249 or allow for the continual use of the
new material or process under 27 CFR 24.250.
Standards regarding approval of the experimental use of a new
treating material or process are set forth in Sec. 24.249. The
provisions covering applications for commercial use of a new material
or process are contained in Sec. 24.250. Consistent with Sec. Sec.
24.246 and 24.248, TTB may approve the use of wine treating materials
and processes that are determined to be acceptable in good commercial
practice. In general, good commercial practice includes addressing the
reasonable technological or practical need to enhance the keeping,
stability, or other qualities of the wine, and achieving the
winemaker's desired effect without creating an erroneous impression
about the character and composition of the wine.
If TTB believes that it would be appropriate to approve the
request, whether as an experiment under Sec. 24.249 or for continued
commercial use under Sec. 24.250, it will send a letter to the
industry member authorizing use of the material or process and setting
forth the conditions for that use. Also, when TTB approves the
continued commercial use of a wine treatment material or process under
Sec. 24.250, it will provide public notice of such approval on its Web
site at https://www.ttb.gov/wine/wine_treating_materials.shtml. The
listing of administrative approvals on the TTB Web site affords all
industry members the opportunity to use an administratively approved
wine treating material or process pending future rulemaking.
TTB conducts rulemaking to consider adding to or amending the
materials and processes authorized in the regulations for treating
wine, juice, and distilling material listed in Sec. Sec. 24.246
through 24.248 for several reasons. First, when TTB administratively
approves wine treatments for continued commercial use under Sec.
24.250, TTB makes an initial determination that such material
[[Page 83754]]
or process is consistent with ``good commercial practice.''
Administrative approval provides a more expeditious process than
rulemaking for industry members to obtain approval to use new materials
and processes. On the other hand, the rulemaking process allows
industry members and the public an opportunity to comment on, and
specifically to confirm or refute, TTB's initial determination that the
use of a material or process is consistent with good commercial
practice. TTB believes that input from industry members, the users and
potential users of these treatments commercially, should be obtained
before making a final determination concerning the acceptability of the
treatment in good commercial practice.
Similarly, TTB might not approve a request for administrative
approval of a wine treatment because the Bureau is reluctant to approve
the use of that particular wine treatment without input from industry
members and the public concerning the treatment's acceptability in good
commercial practice. After obtaining information and comments through
rulemaking, TTB may determine that the wine treatment is consistent
with good commercial practice and approve the use of such treatment. As
discussed below, through this document, TTB is seeking comments on the
approval of the use of several proposed treatments that have not been
administratively approved by the Bureau.
In addition, administrative approval of a wine treatment under
Sec. 24.250 does not guarantee acceptance in foreign markets of any
wine so treated, and conducting rulemaking and adding wine treating
materials and processes to Sec. Sec. 24.246 through 24.248 results in
acceptance of the treated wines in certain foreign jurisdictions. For
example, under Article 4.2 of the 2006 Agreement between the United
States of America and the European Community on Trade in Wine (Wine
Agreement), the United States and the European Union agreed not to
restrict ``on the basis of either wine-making practices or product
specifications, the importation, marketing or sale of wine originating
in the territory of the other Party that is produced using wine-making
practices that are authorized under laws, regulations and requirements
of the other Party listed in Annex I and published or communicated to
it by that other Party.'' Article 5.1 of the Wine Agreement also
contains provisions to authorize new or modified wine-making practices
if a party to the Wine Agreement provides public notice and specific
notice to the other Party, and provides a reasonable opportunity for
comment and to have those comments considered. For new wine treatments
administratively approved in the United States, TTB provides such
public notice and opportunity to comment through the regulatory
rulemaking process.
TTB's most recent amendment of Sec. Sec. 24.246 through 24.248 to
reflect treating material and process approvals was published as
Treasury Decision (T.D.) TTB-61 in the Federal Register (72 FR 51707)
on September 11, 2007. Since that time, TTB has received and approved a
number of applications for experimental or commercial uses. These
include the 15 wine and juice treating materials and the combined use
of two existing wine treatment processes, discussed below, on which TTB
believes it has accumulated enough analytical data or other information
to propose adding them to the list of approved materials and processes
in the TTB regulations at Sec. Sec. 24.246 and 24.248.
TTB is soliciting comments from all interested persons on TTB's
position that, based on the information set forth below, the use of
each of these materials or processes is consistent with good commercial
practice.
Yeast Nutrients
Seven of the administrative approvals mentioned above authorize the
use of additional yeast nutrients in the treatment of wine. TTB and its
predecessor agencies have recognized the need to supply yeast with
appropriate nutrients to facilitate healthy fermentation and to prevent
``stuck fermentation'' (fermentation that has halted before completion
due to, among other things, high sugar levels or nutrient
deficiencies). The following yeast nutrients are currently listed in
Sec. 24.246 as authorized wine and juice treating materials:
Ammonium phosphate;
Calcium pantothenate (for apple wine);
Soy flour (defatted);
Thiamine hydrochloride;
Yeast, autolyzed; and
Yeast, cell wall/membrane of autolyzed yeast.
In 2007, TTB received a petition from Gusmer Enterprises Inc.
(Gusmer) to amend Sec. 24.246 to allow the use of 19 vitamins and
minerals as yeast nutrients in the production of wine. Gusmer provided
the names, descriptions, functional roles for yeast metabolism,
conditions of use, and suggested maximum amounts for the proposed
vitamins and minerals. The petitioner also provided documentation on
the regulatory status of the uses of 15 of the 19 proposed vitamins and
minerals. Four materials identified by the petitioner, selenium, boron,
molybdenum, and chromium, are not included in this proposal because no
information was provided to demonstrate that their uses would be
consistent with the food additive requirements under the FD&C Act.
Of the remaining 15 vitamins and minerals proposed as yeast
nutrients for the production of wine by the petitioner, seven have been
administratively approved by TTB for continued commercial use as yeast
nutrients under Sec. 24.250 in response to industry member requests
which were received by TTB subsequent to TTB's receipt of the Gusmer
petition. TTB is proposing, in this document, to amend the regulations
to add six of these vitamins and minerals to the list of approved
treating materials and expand the approved use of a seventh that
already appears on the list. Specifically, TTB is proposing to add
biotin, folic acid, inositol, magnesium sulfate, niacin, and pyridoxine
hydrochloride to the list of authorized wine and juice treating
materials in Sec. 24.246, and to expand the current permitted use of
calcium pantothenate in that section, as described later in this
document.
For each of these seven yeast nutrients TTB is proposing to limit
the amount of usage to the amounts provided in the Gusmer petition.
While many of these yeast nutrients are vitamins that are authorized
for use in food, in the recent past FDA has advised TTB that the
fortification of ``alcoholic beverages'' with nutrients is not
consistent with FDA's fortification policy in 21 CFR 104.20 or the
Dietary Guidelines for Americans. In addition, FDA has informed TTB
that FDA regulations for certain vitamins (e.g., folic acid and
inositol) would not authorize their use in alcohol beverages as
nutrients. Nonetheless, FDA has stated to TTB that these vitamins could
be used for the purpose of providing nutrients to the yeast, and not to
fortify the wine, where the levels of the vitamin remaining in the wine
would be of a de minimis level. For these reasons, TTB believes it is
important to place limitations on the use of these substances that
permit their use as nutrients for yeast growth but not as food
additives for human consumption.
For reasons discussed below in the section titled ``Other Issues
for Public Comment and Possible Regulatory Action,'' TTB is not
proposing in this document to add the eight vitamins and minerals that
TTB has not approved administratively under Sec. 24.250 to the list of
authorized wine and juice treating
[[Page 83755]]
materials in Sec. 24.246. However, TTB is seeking comments on whether
these eight additional vitamins and minerals should be approved as
authorized wine treating materials.
Proposed Regulatory Amendments
Wine Treating Materials
General Comment on Yeast Nutrients
The six new yeast nutrients that TTB is proposing for the first
time, based on the Gusmer petition described above, and the six yeast
nutrients already authorized for use by regulation, as listed in Sec.
24.246 (including calcium pantothenate), have been grouped together in
the proposed Sec. 24.246 table below under the heading ``Yeast
nutrients.'' This format is similar to the one that currently exists
for ``Enzymatic activity.'' TTB is also broadening the use of those
yeast nutrients that are currently listed in Sec. 24.246 to allow for
their use in all juice and wine.
Blends and Other Combinations of Approved Treating Materials
TTB notes that, while the table in Sec. 24.246 includes some
references to approved materials used in combination (see, for example,
the entry for potassium carbonate), there is no general statement to
the effect that one or more approved materials may be used as a blend
or otherwise in combination with another. TTB believes that such
combined uses should be permitted, provided that the use of each
material conforms to the conditions specified for that material (that
is, the reason or purpose for its use and the references and
limitations that apply to its use). TTB is proposing, in this document,
to amend Sec. 24.246 accordingly. This revision appears in proposed
Sec. 24.246(b), with the current Sec. 24.246(b) moved to the proposed
Sec. 24.246(c).
Specific Wine Treating Materials
Acacia (gum arabic): TTB is proposing to authorize a maximum use
rate of 8 pounds of acacia per 1,000 gallons (1.92 grams per Liter (g/
L)) of wine in the list of authorized wine and juice treating materials
in Sec. 24.246. Acacia is currently listed in Sec. 24.246 as an
authorized treating material to clarify and stabilize wine, subject to
a limitation that its use shall not exceed 2 pounds per 1,000 gallons
(0.24 g/L) of wine. TTB has administratively approved several requests
from industry members to use acacia to treat wine at levels exceeding
the current maximum. The current limitation in Sec. 24.246 was based
on earlier evaluations of treated wine and was adopted through a public
rulemaking procedure on September 24, 1984 (T.D. ATF-182, 49 FR 37522).
Acacia also has a long record of use at the level prescribed in the
regulation.
While the increased amounts specified in those requests ranged as
high as 25 pounds of acacia per 1,000 gallons of wine, 16 pounds per
1,000 gallons was the highest level that TTB approved. In those reviews
and approvals, TTB referenced FDA's regulation (21 CFR 184.1330) for
the use of acacia at a rate greater than the amount listed in Sec.
24.246, and TTB reviewed and considered relevant submitted data
required under Sec. 24.250(b). TTB notes that some of the requests to
use higher amounts of acacia also requested approval for an additional
purpose, that is, to improve ``mouthfeel''; however, TTB's authority
under 26 U.S.C. 5382 to authorize wine treating materials only extends
to correcting or stabilizing the wine or the fruit juice from which it
is made. As reflected in its implementing regulations in Sec. 24.246,
TTB policy is to allow for wine treating materials that filter,
clarify, or purify wine or juice as materials that correct or stabilize
wine. Accordingly, TTB did not approve the use of acacia for the
purpose of improving the ``mouthfeel'' of wine.
TTB's administrative approvals authorized the use of acacia in the
treatment of wine at a level of 16 pounds per 1,000 gallons of wine,
which is equivalent to a maximum usage level of 2 percent. Subsequent
to those administrative approvals, TTB learned that although the FDA
regulation cited for acacia gum in Sec. 24.246 (Sec. 184.1330) is the
correct citation, the beverage category listed in the table of FDA's
regulation does not cover TTB's intended use in wine. This is because
the FDA regulation further cites the food category definition in 21 CFR
170.3(n)(3), which does not cover use in wine. Accordingly, the correct
category from the table in Sec. 184.1330 is ``all other food
categories.'' This category has a limit of one percent acacia gum
(rather than 2 percent); the functional effects for this category match
TTB's uses as clarifying and stabilizing wine. TTB is correcting this
mistake in this rulemaking by proposing to increase the maximum use
rate of acacia gum in wine to 8 pounds per 1,000 gallons of wine. TTB's
earlier administrative approvals authorizing the use of acacia at
levels greater than 8 pounds per 1,000 gallons of wine are revoked.
Bakers yeast mannoprotein: TTB is proposing to add bakers yeast
mannoprotein, at a use rate of 50-400 milligram per liter (mg/L) of
wine, to the list of approved wine and juice treating materials
contained in Sec. 24.246.
TTB administratively approved the use of bakers yeast mannoprotein
to stabilize wine from the precipitation of potassium bitartrate
crystals, in response to a number of requests from industry members. In
response to GRAS Notice No. GRN 000284, the FDA stated that it had no
questions regarding the notifier's conclusion that bakers yeast
mannoprotein is GRAS for use as a stabilizing agent in wines at levels
ranging from 50-400 milligrams per liter (mg/L), to prevent tartaric
acid precipitation. In its administrative approval, TTB restricted the
use of bakers yeast mannoprotein to 50-400 mg/L.
Beta-glucanase having an enzyme activity derived from Trichoderma
harzianum: TTB is proposing to add beta-glucanase, at a use rate of 30
parts per million (ppm) of wine, to the list of approved wine and juice
treating materials contained in Sec. 24.246. TTB administratively
approved the use of beta-glucanase having an enzyme activity derived
from Trichoderma harzianum. Several industry members requested approval
to treat wine with an enzymatic blend consisting of pectinase and beta-
glucanase having an enzyme activity derived from Trichoderma harzianum.
Pectinase is an approved wine treating material listed with
carbohydrase in Sec. 24.246. While beta-glucanase is also approved as
a wine treating material listed with cellulose in Sec. 24.246, that
approval is limited to beta-glucanase having an enzyme activity derived
from Trichoderma longibrachiatum. In response to GRAS Notice No. GRN
000149, FDA stated that it had no questions concerning the notifier's
conclusion that the beta-glucanase enzyme preparation derived from
Trichoderma harzianum is GRAS at the minimum levels necessary to
achieve the desired effect, typically ranging from 1 to 3 grams per
hectoliter of wine (10-30 ppm). In its administrative approval posted
on https://www.ttb.gov/wine/wine_treating_materials.shtml in 2010, TTB
inadvertently stated that the amount of beta-glucanase derived from
Trichoderma harzianum used must not exceed 300 ppm. TTB is correcting
this mistake in this rulemaking by aligning the proposed use rate with
the rate stated in GRAS Notice No. GRN 000149. Accordingly, TTB is
proposing to amend the table in Sec. 24.246 by adding to the entry on
``Enzymatic activity: Cellulase (beta-glucanase)'' a second source,
Trichoderma harzianum, stating that its use must not exceed 30 ppm, and
by referencing GRAS Notice No.
[[Page 83756]]
GRN 000149. TTB is soliciting comments on this proposed addition, the
limitation of 30 ppm, and also on whether beta-glucanase enzymatic
activity derived from Trichoderma longibrachiatum is still relevant for
wine treatments.
Biotin: TTB is proposing the addition of biotin to the list of
authorized wine and juice treating materials in Sec. 24.246 as a yeast
nutrient at a use rate not to exceed 25 parts per billion (ppb). TTB
administratively approved an industry member's request to use biotin as
a yeast nutrient in the production of wine. FDA has stated to TTB in an
informal opinion that biotin can be used for the purpose of providing
nutrients to yeast, and not to fortify the wine, where the levels of
biotin remaining in the wine would be of a de minimis level. The Gusmer
petition proposed a maximum use rate for biotin of 25 ppb.
Calcium pantothenate (vitamin B5): TTB is proposing to amend Sec.
24.246 to expand the current authorized use of calcium pantothenate
from use as a yeast nutrient in just apple wine to use as a yeast
nutrient in all wine. TTB administratively approved an industry
member's request to use calcium pantothenate as a yeast nutrient in the
production of wine. FDA has stated to TTB in an informal opinion that
calcium pantothenate can be used for the purpose of providing nutrients
to yeast, and not to fortify the wine, where the levels of calcium
pantothenate remaining in the wine would be of a de minimis level.
TTB's administrative approval restricted its use to that which is
consistent with good commercial practice. TTB is proposing to apply the
same use limit as is provided for the use of calcium pantothenate in
apple wine, that is, a use rate of 0.1 pound of calcium pantothenate
per 25,000 gallons (1.5 ppm), and to allow for the use of calcium
pantothenate for all juice and wine by removing the current apple wine
limitation specified in Sec. 24.246.
Chitosan: TTB is proposing to add chitosan from Aspergillus niger,
at a use rate not to exceed 10 grams per 100 liters of wine, to the
list of approved wine and juice treating materials contained in Sec.
24.246. TTB administratively approved several industry member requests
to use chitosan from Aspergillus niger to remove spoilage organisms,
such as Brettanomyces, from wine. In its response to GRAS Notice No.
GRN 000397, FDA stated that it had no questions regarding the
notifier's conclusion that chitosan from Aspergillus niger is GRAS for
use as a secondary direct food ingredient in alcoholic beverage
production at levels between 10 and 500 grams per hectoliter (100
liters). In its administrative approvals, TTB restricted the use of
chitosan from Aspergillus niger to an amount not to exceed 10 grams per
100 liters of wine.
Folic acid: TTB is proposing to add folic acid to the list of
authorized wine and juice treating materials in Sec. 24.246 for use as
a yeast nutrient at a use rate not to exceed 100 ppb. TTB
administratively approved an industry member's request to use folic
acid as a yeast nutrient in the production of wine. FDA has stated to
TTB in an informal opinion, that folic acid can be used for the purpose
of providing nutrients to the yeast, and not to fortify the wine, where
the levels of folic acid remaining in the wine would be of a de minimis
level. In TTB's administrative approval, TTB limited the use of folic
acid to that which is consistent with good commercial practice and did
not provide a specific use limit. The Gusmer petition proposed a
maximum use rate of 100 ppb for folic acid when used as a yeast
nutrient in the production of wine. Such a use rate will ensure that
any folic acid remaining in the wine would be of a de minimis level.
Inositol (myo-inositol): TTB is proposing to add inositol to the
list of authorized wine and juice treating materials in Sec. 24.246 to
be used as a yeast nutrient at a use rate not to exceed 2 ppm. TTB
administratively approved an industry member's request to use inositol
as a yeast nutrient in the production of wine. FDA has stated to TTB in
an informal opinion that inositol could be used for the purpose of
providing nutrients to the yeast, and not to fortify the wine, where
the levels of inositol remaining in the wine would be of a de minimis
level. In TTB's administrative approval, TTB restricted the use of
inositol to that which is consistent with good commercial practice and
did not provide a specific use limit. The Gusmer petition proposed a
maximum use rate of 2 ppm for inositol when used as a yeast nutrient in
the production of wine. The maximum use rate of 2 ppm will ensure that
any inositol remaining in the wine would be of a de minimis level.
L(+) tartaric acid: TTB administratively approved several industry
member requests to use L(+) tartaric acid, prepared using an enzyme
from immobilized Rhodococcus ruber cells, to correct natural acid
deficiencies and to reduce pH when ameliorating material is used in the
production of grape wine. Tartaric acid is currently listed in Sec.
24.246 as a material authorized for the treatment of wine and juice for
these same purposes; however, the current reference in Sec. 24.246 is
to the FDA regulation at 21 CFR 184.1099, which specifies that tartaric
acid with the L configuration is obtained as a byproduct of wine
manufacturing.
In response to GRAS Notice No. GRN 000187 for L(+) tartaric acid
(alternative method) prepared using an enzyme from immobilized
Rhodococcus ruber cells, FDA stated that it had no questions regarding
the notifiers' conclusion that the substance is GRAS for use as an
alternative source of L(+) tartaric acid in food at levels not to
exceed current good manufacturing practices for use as a firming agent,
a flavor enhancer, a flavoring agent, a humectant, and a pH control
agent, as described in 21 CFR 184.1099. The FDA also noted that the
material is chemically identical to the tartaric acid affirmed as GRAS
in 21 CFR 184.1099.
Based on the FDA response to the GRAS notice and TTB's analysis of
wine treated with L(+) tartaric acid, TTB is proposing to amend the
entry for ``tartaric acid'' in the table at the end of Sec. 24.246 to
indicate that ``tartaric acid'' may be manufactured by either the
method specified in 21 CFR 184.1099 or the method specified in GRAS
Notice No. GRN 000187, and to add the citation to the FDA GRAS notice
in the ``Specific limitation'' column.
Magnesium sulfate: TTB is proposing to add magnesium sulfate to the
list of authorized wine and juice treating materials in Sec. 24.246 to
be used as a yeast nutrient at a use rate not to exceed 15 ppm. TTB
administratively approved an industry member's request to use magnesium
sulfate as a yeast nutrient in the production of wine. FDA has stated
to TTB in an informal opinion that magnesium sulfate can be used for
the purpose of providing nutrients to yeast, and not to fortify the
wine, where the levels of magnesium sulfate remaining in the wine would
be of a de minimis level. In TTB's administrative approval, TTB
restricted the use of magnesium sulfate as a yeast nutrient to that
which is consistent with good commercial practice and did not provide a
specific use limit. The Gusmer petition proposed a maximum use rate of
15 ppm for magnesium sulfate when used as a yeast nutrient in the
production of wine.
Niacin (vitamin B3): TTB is proposing to add niacin to the list of
authorized wine and juice treating materials in Sec. 24.246 to be used
as a yeast nutrient at a use rate not to exceed 1 ppm. TTB
administratively approved an industry member's request to use niacin as
a yeast nutrient in the production of wine. FDA has stated to TTB in an
informal opinion that niacin can be used for the purpose of providing
nutrients to yeast,
[[Page 83757]]
and not to fortify the wine, where the levels of niacin remaining in
the wine would be of a de minimis level. In TTB's administrative
approval, TTB restricted the use of niacin as a yeast nutrient to that
which is consistent with good commercial practice and did not provide a
specific use limit. The Gusmer petition proposed a maximum use rate of
1 ppm for niacin when used as a yeast nutrient in the production of
wine.
Polyvinyl-pyrrolidone (PVP)/polyvinylimadazole (PVI) polymer: In
2005, TTB began administratively approving industry member requests to
use a polyvinyl-pyrrolidone (PVP) and polyvinylimadazole (PVI)
copolymer (PVP/PVI) as a wine treating material to be used for
clarifying and stabilizing alcohol beverages. PVP had once been listed
as an authorized wine treating material in ATF regulations at 27 CFR
240.1051, Materials Authorized for Treatment of Wine. Specifically, it
was authorized as a clarifying agent for wine. After a 1990
recodification of 27 CFR part 240, ATF rescinded its approval of PVP as
a wine treating material because it was no longer in use by wine
producers. See T.D. ATF-299 (55 FR 24974). However, in the past several
years TTB has received a number of requests to use the PVP/PVI
copolymer as an authorized wine treating material. The PVP/PVI
copolymer binds heavy metal ions and sulfides present in juice and
wine, after which the bound materials and the PVI/PVP can be removed
from the liquid during filtration.
On July 5, 2003, FDA allowed BASF Corporation's Food Contact
Substance (FCS) Notification for their PVP/PVI copolymer to become
effective (FCN No. 320). Under section 409(h)(2)(C) of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 348 (h)(2)(C)) a food contact notification (FCN) is only
effective for the manufacturer or supplier identified in the
notification. Persons who market a FCS based on an effective
notification must be able to demonstrate that the notification is
effective for their food contact substance. All persons who purchase a
food contact substance manufactured or supplied by a manufacturer or
supplier identified in an effective notification may rely on that
notification to legally market or use the food contact substance for
the use that is the subject of the notification, consistent with any
limitations in that notification. According to FDA FCN No. 320, the
blend ``is intended to be added directly to alcoholic beverages during
the maturation process . . . is to be completely removed by filtration
. . . and is limited to single use applications.'' The amount must not
exceed 80 grams per 100 liters of wine.
Based on FDA FCN No. 320, TTB's experience with the use of sulfide
and metal reducing matrix sheets (which contain PVI and are approved
wine treating processes listed in Sec. 24.248), and TTB's analysis of
wine treated with the PVP/PVI copolymer, TTB is proposing to amend the
table at the end of Sec. 24.246 by adding the PVP/PVI copolymer as
described by FDA FCN No. 320 for use at a level not to exceed 80 grams
per 100 liters of wine to remove heavy metal ions and sulfides from
wine.
Potato protein isolates: TTB is proposing to add potato protein
isolates, at a use rate of 500 ppm or 50 grams per 100 liters (50 g/hL)
of wine, as a fining agent, to the list of approved wine and juice
treating materials contained in Sec. 24.246. TTB administratively
approved an industry member's request to use potato protein isolates as
a fining agent for wine. In response to GRAS Notice No. GRN 000447, FDA
stated that it had no questions regarding the notifier's conclusion
that potato protein isolates are GRAS for various technical effects in
a variety of foods that include alcoholic beverages at levels ranging
from 0.01 to 15 percent. In its administrative approval, TTB restricted
the use of potato protein isolates to an amount not to exceed 500 ppm
or 50 g/hL of wine for the purpose of fining wine. The proposed
limitation is consistent with that of other countries.
Pyridoxine hydrochloride (vitamin B6): TTB is proposing to add
pyridoxine hydrochloride to the list of authorized wine and juice
treating materials in Sec. 24.246 to be used as a yeast nutrient at a
use rate not to exceed 150 ppb. TTB administratively approved an
industry member's request to use pyridoxine hydrochloride as a yeast
nutrient in the production of wine. FDA has stated to TTB in an
informal opinion that pyridoxine hydrochloride can be used for the
purpose of providing nutrients to yeast, and not to fortify the wine,
where the levels of pyridoxine hydrochloride remaining in the wine
would be of a de minimis level. In its administrative approval, TTB
restricted the use of pyridoxine hydrochloride as a yeast nutrient to
that which is consistent with good commercial practice and did not
provide a specific use limit. The Gusmer petition proposed a maximum
use rate of 150 ppb for pyridoxine hydrochloride when used as a yeast
nutrient in the production of wine.
Sodium carboxymethyl cellulose: TTB is proposing to add sodium
carboxymethyl cellulose to the list of authorized wine and juice
treating materials in Sec. 24.246, to be used to stabilize wine from
tartrate precipitation at a level not to exceed 0.8 percent of the
wine. TTB administratively approved several industry member requests to
use sodium carboxymethyl cellulose to stabilize wine by preventing
tartrate precipitation. FDA regulations at 21 CFR 182.1745 state that
sodium carboxymethyl cellulose is GRAS when used in accordance with
good manufacturing practice. In TTB's administrative approval, TTB
restricted the use of sodium carboxymethyl cellulose to stabilize wine
by preventing tartrate precipitation to an amount not to exceed 0.8
percent of the wine.
Processes for the Treatment of Wine, Juice, and Distilling Material
TTB is proposing to amend the regulations in Sec. 24.248, which
set forth certain processes that TTB has approved as being consistent
with good commercial practice for use by proprietors in the production,
cellar treatment, or finishing of wine, juice, and distilling
materials, within the limitations of that section. Please note that
industry members are responsible for ensuring that any component used
in an approved process, including materials in contact with wine or
juice, is used in a way that is consistent with any applicable FDA
regulations, including FDA food contact regulations.
Cross Flow Filtration
TTB is proposing to expand the authorized uses of nanofiltration
and ultrafiltration in Sec. 24.248 to include dealcoholization
(reduction of the alcohol content). Currently, nanofiltration is
authorized to reduce the level of volatile acidity in wine when used
with ion exchange. Ultrafiltration is authorized for use to remove
proteinaceous material from wine; to reduce harsh tannic material from
white wine produced from white skinned grapes; to remove pink color
from blanc de noir wine; and to separate red wine into high color and
low color wine fractions for blending purposes. Ultrafiltration has
also been administratively approved to separate red juice into low
color and high color fractions. (The administrative approval for
ultrafiltration is discussed later in this document.)
Both nanofiltration and ultrafiltration are capable of reducing
alcohol content in wine, and this proposed liberalization will provide
industry members with more tools to reduce the alcohol content of wine.
However, as required with those processes for dealcoholization
currently authorized in Sec. 24.248 (reverse osmosis, osmotic
[[Page 83758]]
transport, and spinning cone column), ultrafiltration and
nanofiltration, when used to reduce the alcohol content of wine, must
take place on distilled spirits plant premises. TTB also is proposing
to place nanofiltration, ultrafiltration, and reverse osmosis under the
umbrella term ``cross flow filtration.'' In cross flow filtration, the
wine is passed across the filter membrane (tangentially) at positive
pressure relative to the permeate side. A proportion of the wine which
is smaller than the membrane pore size passes through the membrane as
permeate or filtrate; everything else is retained on the feed side of
the membrane as retentate. TTB is adding this definition of ``cross
flow filtration'' as a footnote to the table at the end of Sec.
24.248.
Reverse Osmosis in Combination With Osmotic Transport
TTB administratively approved several requests to use reverse
osmosis in combination with osmotic transport to reduce the ethyl
alcohol content in wine. Reverse osmosis and osmotic transport are both
separately listed in Sec. 24.248 as approved wine treatment processes
to reduce the ethyl alcohol content of wine. Under this combined
process, the wine to be treated is separated by reverse osmosis into
two portions called permeate and concentrate streams. The alcohol rich
permeate is then degassed, warmed, and pumped along one side of a
completely hydrophobic microporous osmotic transport membrane, which is
used to separate out the alcohol. The dealcoholized permeate is then
recombined with the wine from which it was extracted, thus lowering the
alcohol content of the wine.
TTB is proposing to amend the table at the end of Sec. 24.248 by
revising the listings for reverse osmosis and osmotic transport to
state that each process can be used in combination with the other to
reduce the ethyl alcohol content of wine. These processes, whether used
separately or in combination, must take place on distilled spirits
plant premises.
Ultrafiltration
In two separate requests, an industry member requested to use
ultrafiltration to separate red grape juice into high and low color
fractions for blending purposes, and to separate white grape juice that
had darkened due to oxidation during storage into high and low color
fractions for blending purposes. As described above, ultrafiltration is
authorized for use under Sec. 24.248 to remove proteinaceous material
from wine; to reduce harsh tannic material from white wine produced
from white skinned grapes; to remove pink color from blanc de noir
wine; and to separate red wine into low color and high color wine
fractions for blending purposes. Since ultrafiltration is currently
authorized under Sec. 24.248 to separate red wine into low color and
high color fractions for blending, TTB administratively approved use of
ultrafiltration to separate red grape juice into low and high color
fractions and is proposing to amend the table at the end of Sec.
24.248 accordingly. TTB did not administratively approve the use of
ultrafiltration to separate high and low colored fractions of
discolored white grape juice, but as discussed under the heading
``Other Issues for Public Comment and Possible Regulatory Action'' in
this document, invites comments on whether this practice constitutes
good commercial practice.
Use of Wood To Treat Natural Wine
Section 24.246 currently authorizes the use of uncharred and
untreated oak chips or particles to smooth wine. TTB's predecessor
agency had a longstanding policy allowing the use of ``toasted'' wood
as a wine treating material, and TTB has issued several private letter
rulings allowing this use. In addition, wooden storage tanks used for
the addition of spirits to wine may be used for the baking of wine
under Sec. 24.225.
TTB is proposing a new 27 CFR 24.185 to clarify TTB's policy on the
treatment of wine with wood contact. Section 24.185(a) would clarify
that natural wine may be treated by contact with any wood that is
consistent with the food additive requirements under the FD&C Act and
that wood may be toasted, but not charred. Toasted wood refers to wood
that has been heated but has not undergone combustion (that is, hasn't
been burned or blackened). TTB is authorizing the use of toasted wood
in this proposal. Section 24.185(b) would state TTB's position on the
use of wood essences and extracts in the production of wine.
TTB is also proposing to remove the last sentence from Sec. 24.225
(``Wooden storage tanks used for the addition of spirits may be used
for the baking of wine'') and include it in the new Sec. 24.185, and
to remove the reference to oak chips from Sec. 24.246 and include it
in new Sec. 24.185, in an effort to maintain in one location all
regulatory provisions pertaining to the treatment of wine with wood.
Wine Spirits/Revision of Sec. 24.225
TTB is proposing to amend Sec. 24.225 by removing the last
sentence as described above, by revising the section heading, and by
dividing the text into paragraph (a), covering withdrawal of spirits,
paragraph (b), covering production and use of wine spirits, and
paragraph (c), covering spirits other than wine spirits, and by
otherwise revising the text, in order to accomplish the following:
To incorporate the terms of section 5373(a) of the IRC
related to standards for the production of wine spirits, including that
portion of section 5373(a) that reads, ``where, in the production of
natural wine or special natural wine, sugar has been used, the wine or
the residuum thereof may not be used if the unfermented sugars therein
have been refermented.'' The proposed text clarifies and simplifies
this statutory language without changing the meaning or intent, which
TTB believes is to prevent the production of wine spirits by
refermenting wine to develop alcohol from sugar added to the wine after
fermentation.
To allow the use of lower-proof spirits in wine production
in certain circumstances. Section 5373(a) of the IRC sets a general
standard of 140 degrees of proof or above for wine spirits used in wine
production but also provides for two exceptions to this rule: (1)
Distillation may be at less than 140 degrees of proof if regulations so
provide; and (2) commercial brandy aged in wood for not less than 2
years, and barreled at not less than 100 degrees of proof, is deemed to
be wine spirits for purposes of section 5373(a). TTB believes that
allowing the byproducts of alcohol reduction to be used as wine spirits
if they are 100 degrees of proof or more is consistent with the intent
of the statute. TTB notes that these alcohol reduction treatments,
which are listed in Sec. 24.248, must be performed at a qualified
distilled spirits plant because they result in a spirits byproduct.
Thus, when the wine subjected to alcohol reduction is natural wine or
special natural wine (and is subject to the other conditions of section
5373(a) and Sec. 24.225), the alcohol-containing byproduct would still
constitute wine spirits even though the spirits may not have been
distilled at or above 140 degrees of proof. Accordingly, TTB is
proposing, in revised Sec. 24.225, to allow spirits derived from
authorized alcohol reduction treatments to be used as wine spirits if
the spirits were distilled at 100 degrees of proof or more and if the
spirits conform to the other terms of section 5373(a) as reflected in
the revised regulatory text.
To clarify the status of wine spirits derived from special
natural wine. This source of spirits was codified in section 5373(a) of
the IRC, which also authorized the Secretary of the Treasury
[[Page 83759]]
to impose conditions on the use of special natural wine to make wine
spirits. TTB is proposing to specify in the revised text that wine
spirits derived from special natural wine may only be used in the
production of special natural wine when such wine spirits contain a
distinctive flavor from the ingredients used in the originating special
natural wine.
Within the proposed new paragraph (b) text, subparagraphs (1)
through (3) primarily reflect the terms of section 5373(a) of the IRC
that TTB believes should be reflected in the regulatory text as
discussed above, and subparagraph (4) primarily reflects the existing
Sec. 24.225 text.
Accidental Water Additions
TTB is proposing to add a new 27 CFR 24.251, to provide for the
correction of standard wine when the wine becomes other than standard
wine due to accidental water additions in excess of the authorized
levels provided for in 27 CFR part 24, subparts F and L. Accidental
water additions can occur during production of wine at various stages,
for example during filtration when water is accidentally left in a tank
that is later filled with wine. TTB has received requests from industry
members who wish to be allowed to take corrective action regarding
these water additions. To correct wine that has been diluted with water
is referred to within TTB as ``to salvage.''
The most common way to salvage wine is to remove the water
accidentally added to the wine through the use of reverse osmosis, in
combination with distillation. The reverse osmosis creates a colorless
and flavorless permeate, essentially consisting of alcohol and water.
The permeate is distilled to create a high ethanol fraction and a low
ethanol fraction. The high ethanol fraction is returned to the wine and
the low ethanol fraction is discarded. Through the use of reverse
osmosis and distillation, the industry member removes the accidentally
added water and raises the alcohol by volume of the wine back to its
level before the accidental water addition, without affecting the
vinous character of the wine.
TTB has approved the use of reverse osmosis and distillation to
remove water from wine under TTB's authority in Sec. 24.249. In those
reviews, TTB considered how the accidental water addition occurred, the
ratio of water to wine, and whether or not the requesting industry
member has submitted similar requests in the past. TTB applied the
following conditions to those approvals. The industry member must:
Return the wine to its original condition;
Transfer the wine to and from the distilled spirits plant
for treatment in bond;
Not remove more water than was accidentally added;
Not alter the vinous character of the wine; and
Keep the usual and customary records of the processing.
TTB believes that proprietors should have the authority to remove
small amounts of accidentally added water from wine using reverse
osmosis and distillation without first seeking TTB approval. Proposed
Sec. 24.251 sets forth authority and standards to allow for removal of
accidental additions of water of not more than 10 percent of the
original volume of the wine without the need to first seek TTB
approval. Proposed Sec. 24.251 also allows the appropriate TTB officer
to approve other removals of accidentally added water upon application
by a proprietor and sets forth the requirements for submitting an
application to TTB. It also specifies that, in evaluating any request
under this section, the appropriate TTB officer may consider as a
factor whether the proprietor has demonstrated good commercial
practices, taking into account the proprietor's prior history of
accidental dilutions of water to wine and of compliance with other
regulations in part 24.
TTB has also received requests to allow wine to be salvaged by
blending the accidentally diluted wine with standard wine to reduce the
level of unauthorized water addition to less than 1 percent of the
volume of the blended wine. The requesters have asserted that, since
Sec. 24.246 provides that when a wine or juice treating material is
used and water is added to facilitate the solution or dispersal of the
material, the volume of water added may not exceed 1 percent of the
juice or wine, reduction of the accidentally added water to less than 1
percent by blending wines meets the intent of the regulations. TTB has
not approved these requests because the accidental addition of water
renders the wine an ``other than standard'' wine, and such wine cannot
be blended with standard wine. Also, TTB's authority to approve
experimental or new wine treatments under Sec. Sec. 24.249 and 24.250
does not extend to blending of wine, which is not a wine treatment or
process. Additionally, wine diluted with water in excess of that
permitted in part 24 renders the wine ``other than standard'' (see 27
CFR 24.218). Section 24.218 provides that other than standard wine must
be segregated from standard wine, and accordingly the blending of
standard and other than standard wine generally is not permitted under
TTB's regulations.
While TTB has not previously approved these requests, TTB notes
that current Sec. 24.246 permits the addition to wine of a limited
amount of water with a wine treating material without affecting the
classification of the wine as a standard wine. Accordingly, TTB
believes that the regulations should be changed to recognize that the
accidental addition of water to a standard wine that represents 1
percent or less of the total volume of the wine does not render the
wine other than standard. TTB also believes that blending wine should
be permitted to reduce the accidentally added water to 1 percent or
less of the total volume of the blended wine, and the resultant blended
wine should be considered standard wine. Accordingly, TTB has
incorporated these two provisions into a new section, proposed Sec.
24.186, with a reference to a new Sec. 24.251, regarding accidental
additions of water to wine.
Other Proposed Regulatory Amendments
In addition to the changes discussed above, this document includes
the following proposed regulatory amendments:
Definitions
As a consequence of the proposed changes to Sec. 24.225(a),
discussed above, TTB is proposing to revise the definition of ``wine
spirits'' in Sec. 24.10 to include a reference to that regulatory
provision.
Wood Essences
TTB is proposing to amend Sec. 24.85, which concerns essences, by
adding the term ``wood'' as an additional example of a source material
for essences used in the production of formula wine. (The TTB
regulations at 27 CFR 24.10 define formula wine as special natural
wine, agricultural wine, and other than standard wine (except for
distilling material and vinegar stock) produced on bonded wine permises
under an approval formula.) TTB believes that it is appropriate to add
wood to this provision to reflect a longstanding policy that an extract
of wood made using any solvent but wine should be treated as an essence
or flavoring material.
List of Authorized Wine and Juice Treating Materials
TTB is proposing to amend the heading in paragraph (a) of Sec.
24.246 to read ``Wine and juice'' rather than just ``Wine.'' This is a
clarifying change. TTB is also proposing numerous
[[Page 83760]]
technical and clarifying changes to the table in Sec. 24.246. A
significant portion of these technical changes involves revising the
measurement references specified for the limitation on use of the
authorized wine treating materials by making the notation of units of
measurement consistent throughout the chart, supplying closing
parentheses where they were absent, and removing decimal points
followed only by zeroes. In addition, where units are only in U.S.
Common (English) units or SI (International Standard, or metric) units,
TTB is adding the other unit of measure for reference purposes, where
appropriate. Since the majority of the units are expressed in U.S.
Common units first and then in SI units, TTB is proposing to continue
with that convention. TTB is including a footnote reference after each
use of ppm and ppb in the chart to indicate parts per million and parts
per billion, respectively. TTB is also including a definition of the
word ``stabilize'' at the end of the chart and footnoting every
appearance of the word ``stabilize'' with a ``1'' in the table. TTB is
also adding a third column to the table in Sec. 24.246 titled ``FDA
reference''. This new column contains references to relevant FDA
regulations in title 21 of the CFR, FDA GRAS notifications, and FDA
advisory opinions. These references have been moved to this new column
wherever such a reference appears in the table. The ``FDA reference''
column provides a limit or reference where there is no ``Specific
limit'' listed for a wine treating material.
FDA recently provided TTB with a new advisory opinion dated
September 8, 2016, updating their acceptance of TTB's approval for
certain materials as wine and juice treating materials. This new
advisory opinion was necessary because in some cases, TTB's current
listing of FDA's acceptance of the material as a wine treating material
was not entirely accurate because those references were not specific to
the use of wine. In other cases, references to old advisory opinions
were subsequently revoked by FDA rulemaking. TTB is replacing the
current FDA references in Sec. 24.246 with an updated reference to an
advisory opinion in which FDA stated ``We have evaluated the list of
substances * * * along with their proposed limitations for use in wine
and juice treatment and conclude that they are safe under the
conditions of their intended use. We would not question a conclusion
that these uses of substances added to wine would be generally
recognized as safe (GRAS).'' Accordingly, TTB is updating the FDA
reference for: Acetaldehyde, activated carbon, albumen (egg white),
casein, potassium salt of casein, gelatin, potassium bi-tartrate,
silica gel (colloidal silicon dioxide), and tannin.
FDA also provided TTB with an advisory opinion dated August 29,
2016, regarding the use of current and proposed yeast nutrients. With
regard to current yeast nutrients, FDA indicated that the use of yeast
nutrients as a treatment for wine is not listed in its regulations or
GRAS notices. FDA did, however, state: ``We have evaluated the list of
yeast nutrients * * * along with their proposed limitations for use
prior to and during juice fermentations for wine production, taking
into consideration: (1) Their likely consumption by yeasts and bacteria
[is] likely to be largely consumed during fermentations and (2) their
likely presence in finished wine products at levels that would not
exceed those in unprocessed grape juice. We conclude that [the]
increase in human dietary exposure to the substances resulting from
their addition to wine juice is de minimis with respect to human
nutrition, [and that] they are safe under the conditions of their
intended use. Such levels would be far below any level that would
result in a safety concern for any of these substances. Thus, we would
not consider this very low level exposure to be significant and we
would not question a conclusion that these uses of substances added to
wine as yeast nutrients would be GRAS.'' Accordingly, TTB is updating
the FDA reference for calcium panthothenate, soy flour, thiamine, yeast
autolyzed, and yeast cell wall/membranes of autolyzed yeast.
Due to the large number of proposed changes to Sec. 24.246, this
document presents those changes as a revision of the entire section.
Finally, TTB is proposing to make the following other changes to the
current entries in the table:
Activated carbon: One of the entries in the ``Materials
and use'' column currently refers to removing color in wine and/or
juice from which the wine was produced. TTB is proposing to refer
instead to removing color from wine and/or juice, for clarity.
Albumen: In the ``Specific limitation'' column, TTB is
adding the words ``of brine'' in the second sentence after the word
``Usage'' and removing the words ``of solution.''
Ammonium phosphate (mono- and di basic): TTB is revising
the name of the material to include ``diammonium phosphate'' and
including it on the list of yeast nutrients in the table in Sec.
24.246. (TTB is also making a conforming change revising the name of
the material in Sec. 24.247.)
Calcium carbonate: TTB is adding the abbreviation
``CaCO3'' and, in the ``Materials and use'' column, TTB is
replacing the word ``and'' with the word ``or'' in the first use entry
and replacing the word ``A'' with the words ``As a'' in the second use
entry.
Casein, potassium salt of casein: In the ``Specific
limitation'' column, TTB is referring only to the citation ``27 CFR
24.243'' and removing references to FDA's GRAS opinions.
Citric acid: In the ``Materials and use'' column, TTB is
adding the words ``certain juice or'' after the word ``in'' in the
first use entry. The limitations on what types of juice or wine may be
treated with citric acid may be found in the regulations cited in the
``Specific limitation'' column.
Copper sulfate: In the ``Specific limitation'' column, TTB
is removing the word ``added'' after the word ``sulfate'' and adding
the words ``added to wine'' after the first parenthetical.
Dimethyl dicarbonate: For purposes of clarity, TTB is
adding the abbreviation ``(DMDC)'' after the material name ``Dimethyl
dicarbonate'' and removing the phrases ``dealcoholized wine,'' and
``low alcohol wine,'' from the entry to reduce redundancy.
Ferrocyanide: TTB believes that ferrocyanide compounds are
no longer available on the United States market and no longer being
used by the U.S. wine industry. Accordingly, TTB is removing
``ferrocyanide'' from the list of authorized wine treating materials.
Milk products: With the publication of T.D. ATF-350 (58 FR
52222) in the Federal Register on October 7, 1993, ATF approved the use
of milk products as a fining agent in white grape wine or sherry. With
the publication of T.D. TTB-17 (69 FR 67639) in the Federal Register on
November 19, 2004, TTB extended this approval to all wines. The listing
in Sec. 24.246 for the use of milk products, revised in 2004, reads,
``Fining agent for grape wine or sherry.'' TTB believes this phrase may
cause confusion because under the standards of identity in Sec.
4.21(a) sherry is a grape wine. Accordingly, TTB is amending the first
listed use in the ``Materials and use'' column for this entry to read:
``Fining agent for grape wine.''
Oxygen and compressed air: In the ``Materials and use''
column, TTB is replacing the words ``May be used in juice and wine''
with the words ``Various uses in juice and wine.''
Polyvinyl-polypry-rolidone (PVPP): In the ``Materials and
use'' column, TTB is making a technical change by
[[Page 83761]]
removing the phrase ``black wine.'' In the ``Specific limitation''
column, TTB is replacing the two asterisk footnote references with a
reference to footnote ``3'' after the abbreviation ``AOAC.''
Sorbic acid and potassium salt of sorbic acid: In the
``Materials and use'' column, TTB is adding the words ``potassium
sorbate'' in parentheses before the colon.
Sulfur dioxide: Sulfur dioxide was added to the list of
approved materials with the issuance of T.D. Internal Revenue Service
(IRS)-6475 (25 FR 6184) in 1960. At that time, the stated use of sulfur
dioxide was to sterilize and preserve wine. The list of authorized
treating materials in 1960 was codified in 26 CFR 240.1051 and was
titled ``Materials authorized for treatment of wine.''
Through the publication of T.D. ATF-182 (49 FR 37510) in 1984, ATF
retitled the list of authorized wine treating materials as ``Materials
authorized for treatment of wine and juice.'' In T.D. ATF-182, the
comment discussion refers to the use of sulfur dioxide in wine as
``necessary, common to, and historically documented in winemaking,''
and it is further referred to in the use of juice for purposes of
winemaking twice on page 37513, under the subheading Antimicrobial
Agents. Sulfur dioxide is GRAS in the FDA regulations at 21 CFR
182.3862 as a chemical preservative. Section 182.3862 states that
sulfur dioxide cannot be applied to fruit that is intended to be served
or sold raw to consumers. Juice to be used in the production of wine is
not fruit to be served or sold raw to consumers; thus, the use of
sulfur dioxide in juice that will be used in the production of wine is
GRAS. Further, 27 CFR 24.176 authorizes the use of sterilizing agents
in juice. Accordingly, TTB is correcting the entry for sulfur dioxide
to include its use in juice.
Thiamine hydrochloride: As noted above, the yeast nutrient
Thiamine hydrochloride will be re-organized and grouped under the
heading, ``Yeast nutrients'' with the other yeast nutrients.
Shall vs. must: Finally, to promote the use of plain
language, TTB is also proposing to change ``shall'' to ``must''
wherever the former appears in the affected regulations.
TTB is proposing to amend Sec. 24.250(a)(4) to require that an
industry member must provide documentary evidence from the FDA showing
that the proposed material is consistent with the food additive
requirements under the FD&C Act for its intended purpose in the amounts
proposed for the particular treatment contemplated. This differs from
the original text in that it is not requiring documentary evidence that
the FDA has ``approved'' the use of the proposed material. This
editorial change is consistent with similar changes in Sec. Sec.
24.246 and 24.248.
Other Issues for Public Comment and Possible Regulatory Action
In addition to the comments TTB is soliciting on the proposed
regulatory changes contained in this document, as discussed above, TTB
is inviting public comments on a number of other regulatory issues to
assist TTB in determining whether it would be appropriate to
incorporate additional changes to part 24 in a final rule. Most of
these issues were raised in petitions for rulemaking or arose in
connection with wine treatment approval requests under Sec. Sec.
24.249 or 24.250, and in each case, TTB determined that more
information would be required before a decision could be taken on
whether, and if so how, appropriate regulatory changes should be
proposed. The issues in question, and the specific points on which TTB
is requesting public comments, are outlined below.
TTB requests comments and, where appropriate, evidence supporting
the position that the particular wine treatment is consistent with good
commercial practice. If applicable, use rates should be recommended,
and the rationale as to why those use rates are recommended should be
stated in any comments.
Alcoholic Oak Extract
In 2008, Oak Tannin Technologies submitted a petition to amend the
regulations to allow ``alcoholic oak extracts for use in natural wines
as a stabilizing, enriching and integrating agent.'' The petitioner
stated that use of such extracts in wine is approved by the South
African Wine and Spirit Board. However, TTB understands that South
Africa passed legislation that actually prohibits the use of such
extracts in natural wines. In addition, TTB and its predecessor
agencies' longstanding policy has been to treat such materials as
essences or extracts, which, under Sec. 24.85, may be used only in the
production of formula wines except agricultural wine.
As noted earlier in this document, TTB approves the use of wine
treating materials for, among other things, the stabilization,
clarification, and filtration of natural wine based on the materials'
acceptance in good commercial practice. In order to assist TTB in
determining whether it would be appropriate to propose a specific
regulatory change in response to this petition, TTB is inviting
comments regarding the use of an alcoholic oak extract in the
production of natural wines, in particular, as a material for use as a
wine stabilizer, but also for any other purpose that is consistent with
good commercial practice. TTB also advises that a manufacturer of
alcoholic oak extract must contact FDA and go through the FDA pre-
market review processes.
Lactic Acid
In 2007, Hyman, Philips, & McNamara, P.C. petitioned TTB to amend
27 CFR 24.182 and 24.246 to allow use of lactic acid in juice, must,
and wine prior to fermentation. Lactic acid is most commonly found in
dairy products and is a common component in both plant and animal
metabolic processes. Under Sec. 24.246, lactic acid is currently
authorized for use in grape wine to correct natural acid deficiencies.
In the table in Sec. 24.246, the entry in the ``Reference or
limitation'' column for lactic acid simply provides a citation to 27
CFR 24.182 and 24.192. Section 24.192 then refers back to the
limitations on the use of acid, among other things, prescribed in Sec.
24.182. The regulations in Sec. 24.182 state that acids of the kinds
occurring in grapes or other fruit (including berries) may be added
within the limitations of Sec. 24.246 to juice or wine in order to
correct natural deficiencies. Section 24.182 also states that, after
fermentation is completed, citric acid, fumaric acid, malic acid,
lactic acid, or tartaric acid, or a combination of two or more of these
acids, may be added to correct natural deficiencies. The petitioner
noted that lactic acid is currently allowed by Sec. 24.246 for
treatment of wine after fermentation and provided evidence that lactic
acid may be added before fermentation in certain other countries.
Further, the petitioner noted that lactic acid is less expensive and
more reliably available than tartaric acid.
TTB is not proposing any changes to the regulations concerning the
use of lactic acid in this document; however, TTB invites comments
regarding whether or not the use of lactic acid prior to fermentation
is good commercial practice in the production of natural wine. Comments
should address whether or not lactic acid should be authorized for use
prior to the fermentation of natural wine and provide detailed evidence
supporting the stated position.
[[Page 83762]]
Reverse Osmosis To Enhance the Phenol Flavor and Characteristics of
Wine and To Reduce the Water Content of Standard Wine
Section 24.248 currently provides for the use of reverse osmosis to
reduce the ethyl alcohol content of wine and to remove off flavors in
wine. However, in 2014, Constellation Wines U.S. Inc. submitted a
petition to TTB requesting an expansion of the authorized uses of
reverse osmosis in Sec. 24.248 to include (1) improving the phenol and
flavor character of wine, and (2) reducing the water content in
standard wine. The petition included the following arguments in support
of this change:
Reverse osmosis can effectively eliminate the weak and
watery character of the retentate (which, as a product of the reverse
osmosis process, is considered to be standard wine but with reduced
levels of alcohol and water), resulting in a wine with improved phenol
and flavor characteristics.
The present situation puts U.S. winemakers at a
competitive disadvantage in the global marketplace in two ways. First,
the petitioner asserts that many foreign countries permit the use of
reverse osmosis as an acceptable winemaking practice to concentrate
phenols and flavors in wine and in grape must. Exported U.S. wines,
which cannot be produced in this way under the current regulations,
would not reflect these characteristics in those foreign markets.
Second, under the terms of section 5382 of the IRC, most imported wines
that were subjected to such a process would be allowed to compete in
the U.S. market against domestic wines to which that process may not be
applied.
Reverse osmosis benefits grape growers, winemakers, and
consumers. The expanded use of reverse osmosis would allow grape
growers to sell more grapes, particularly those of marginal quality, to
winemakers who could produce better quality standard wine with such
grapes. Winemakers would be able to produce better quality wine at
lower costs, and consumers would be able to purchase better quality
wine at lower prices.
The expanded use of reverse osmosis would provide
winemakers with better ability to regulate the alcohol content of
wines.
TTB notes that the byproduct of reverse osmosis (the retentate) is
only considered to be standard wine if the wine that was processed with
reverse osmosis was standard wine. TTB understands that the European
Union (EU) only authorizes the use of reverse osmosis to remove water
from wine in cold and wet regions and that wine produced with the use
of reverse osmosis in the EU must be labeled as ``table wine.'' TTB's
counterparts in Australia indicate that while authorized, reverse
osmosis is not a process officially recognized in the Australia New
Zealand Food Standards Code, and is not used frequently. TTB
understands that South Africa authorizes the use of reverse osmosis on
juice but not wine.
TTB has not received other requests from industry members to use
reverse osmosis to improve the phenol and flavor character of wine.
However, TTB did receive a request to use reverse osmosis to improve
the ``sensory quality'' of finished wines and to evaluate the potential
sensory benefit of water content reduction compared to the resultant
loss of volume.
TTB has received and approved industry member requests to use
reverse osmosis in combination with distillation to reduce the water
content of wine only for the purpose of salvage, discussed above,
rather than as a winemaking process to improve the character of the
wine. In salvage, the removal of water returns the wine to its previous
condition and, as a condition of approval, TTB strictly limited the
amount of water to be removed to no more than the amount that had been
accidentally added to the wine.
TTB believes that it should provide the public the opportunity to
comment before it makes a decision on whether the removal of water from
wine to improve the characteristics of the wine would be acceptable in
good commercial practice. To assist TTB in deciding whether to adopt
any specific regulatory change in this regard, TTB is inviting comments
on whether the use of reverse osmosis to reduce the water content of
wine, improve the phenol and flavor character of wine, or to improve
the sensory quality of the wine would be acceptable in good commercial
practice.
If you believe that the use of reverse osmosis for these purposes
is consistent with good commercial practice, your comments should
explain your position in detail, as well as provide guidelines/
standards concerning how much water (maximum percentage) may be
removed. If you believe that the use of reverse osmosis for these
purposes is not consistent with good commercial practice, your comments
should explain your position in detail.
Ultrafiltration
As previously discussed, an industry member requested to use
ultrafiltration to separate white grape juice that had darkened due to
oxidation during storage into high and low color fractions for blending
purposes. The low color fraction would be blended with white wine, and
the high color fraction would be blended with red wine. Ultrafiltration
is authorized for use under Sec. 24.248 to separate red wine into low
color and high color wine fractions for blending purposes; but the
regulations do not provide for the use of ultrafiltration to separate
white wine.
TTB believes it should provide the public with the opportunity to
comment before it makes a decision on whether the use of
ultrafiltration to separate discolored wine for blending as described
above would be acceptable in good commercial practice. If you wish to
submit a comment on this matter, your comment should explain in detail
your position as to why the use of ultrafiltration in this manner is or
is not acceptable in good commercial practice.
Yeast Nutrients (Gusmer Petition)
The following list of vitamins and minerals were proposed in the
Gusmer petition as yeast nutrients in the production of wine but have
not been administratively approved by TTB pursuant to Sec. 24.250:
Cobalamin (vitamin B12), iodine (potassium iodide), iron, manganese
sulfate, nickel, potassium chloride, riboflavin (Vitamin B2), and zinc
sulfate. With the exception of riboflavin, TTB has not received
requests under Sec. Sec. 24.249 or 24.250 to use these vitamins and
minerals as yeast nutrients in the production of wine. TTB did not
administratively approve the use of riboflavin as a yeast nutrient
because the evidence submitted with the request was not sufficient to
conclude that the use of riboflavin as a yeast nutrient is consistent
with good commercial practice. Gusmer provided information on the FDA
regulatory status, functional roles, and use rates for the following
vitamins and minerals as yeast nutrients. TTB is interested in
receiving comments supporting or rejecting the argument that the use of
these vitamins and minerals as yeast nutrients in the production of
wine is consistent with good commercial practice. Unless otherwise
noted, the information that follows was supplied by Gusmer.
Cobalamin (vitamin B12): Cobalamin is used to promote
growth of yeast, and Gusmer proposed that cobalamin be used at a rate
not to exceed 15 ppb.
Iodine (potassium iodide): Iodine is required for yeast
growth and fermentation, and Gusmer proposed that iodine be used at a
rate not to exceed 10 ppb.
[[Page 83763]]
Iron: Iron is a catalyst for oxidation reactions, and
Gusmer proposed that iron be used at a rate not to exceed 2 ppm.
Manganese sulfate: Manganese sulfate is a pale pink,
odorless powder that is freely soluble in water and insoluble in
alcohol. Gusmer proposed that manganese sulfate be used at a rate not
to exceed 100 ppb.
Nickel: Nickel is a catalyst for hydrogenation, and Gusmer
proposed that nickel be used at a rate not to exceed 5 ppm.
Potassium chloride: Potassium chloride is a salt that
disassociates into ions that are necessary for phosphate uptake by
yeast. Gusmer proposed that potassium chloride be used at a rate not to
exceed 100 ppm.
Riboflavin (vitamin B2): Riboflavin is used as a coenzyme
in oxidation/reduction reactions, and Gusmer proposed riboflavin be
used at a rate not to exceed 600 ppb.
Zinc sulfate: Zinc sulfate increases alcohol tolerance,
and Gusmer proposed zinc sulfate be used at a rate not to exceed 1.5
ppm.
Public Participation
Comments Sought
TTB requests comments from the public and all interested parties.
TTB is particularly interested in comments that address the question of
whether a particular material, process, or practice addressed in this
document is consistent with good commercial practice. Please support
your comment with specific information about the material, process, or
practice in question.
After TTB analyzes any comments received in response to the
regulatory amendments TTB has proposed in this document, we plan to
issue a final rule. If TTB receives comments and evidence that persuade
it that the use of a particular wine treating material or process is
not consistent with good commercial practice, TTB will not include it
in the final rule. As a result, and as stated in previously issued
administrative approvals, if TTB has determined that the use of a wine
or juice treating material or process is not consistent with good
commercial practice, previous approvals of that wine or juice treating
material or process will be rescinded by operation of law on the
effective date of the final rule.
Additionally, if TTB has determined that the authorized amount of a
wine or juice treating material should be decreased because its current
authorized amount is not consistent with good commercial practice,
previous approvals authorizing the higher amount of that wine or juice
treating material will be rescinded on the effective date of the final
rule. Wines produced using treatments pursuant to an administrative
approval that has been rescinded based upon this rulemaking may
nevertheless be labeled as if the materials or processes were
authorized, provided such treatments were used prior to the date of
rescission.
Submitting Comments
You may submit comments on the proposals described in this document
by using one of the following three methods:
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: You may send comments via the
online comment form linked to this document in Docket No. TTB-2016-0010
on ``Regulations.gov,'' the Federal e-rulemaking portal, at https://www.regulations.gov. Direct links to the comment form and docket are
available under Notice No. 164 on the TTB Web site at https://www.ttb.gov/wine/wine-rulemaking.shtml. Supplemental files may be
attached to comments submitted via Regulations.gov. For information on
how to use Regulations.gov, click on the site's Help tab.
U.S. Mail: You may send comments via postal mail to the
Director, Regulations and Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street NW., Box 12, Washington, DC 20005.
Hand Delivery/Courier: You may hand-carry your comments or
have them hand-carried to the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau,
1310 G Street NW., Suite 400, Washington, DC 20005.
Please submit your comments by the closing date shown above in this
document. Your comments must reference Notice No. 164 and include your
name and mailing address. Your comments also must be made in English,
be legible, and be written in language acceptable for public
disclosure. TTB does not acknowledge receipt of comments, and TTB
considers all comments as originals.
In your comment, please clearly state if you are commenting for
yourself or on behalf of an association, business, or other entity. If
you are commenting on behalf of an entity, your comment must include
the entity's name, as well as your name and position title. If you
comment via Regulations.gov, please enter the entity's name in the
``Organization'' blank of the online comment form. If you comment via
postal mail or hand delivery/courier, please submit your entity's
comment on letterhead.
You may also write to the Administrator before the comment closing
date to ask for a public hearing. The Administrator reserves the right
to determine whether to hold a public hearing.
Confidentiality
All submitted comments and attachments are part of the public
record and subject to disclosure. Do not enclose any material in your
comments that you consider to be confidential or that is inappropriate
for public disclosure.
Public Disclosure
On the Federal e-rulemaking portal, Regulations.gov, TTB will post,
and the public may view, copies of this document, selected supporting
materials, and any electronic or mailed comments TTB receives about
this proposal. A direct link to the Regulations.gov docket containing
this document and the posted comments on it is available on the TTB Web
site at https://www.ttb.gov/wine/wine-rulemaking.shtml under Notice No.
164. You may also reach the docket containing this document and the
posted comments received on it through the Regulations.gov search page
at https://www.regulations.gov.
All posted comments will display the commenter's name, organization
(if any), city, and State, and, in the case of mailed comments, all
address information, including email addresses. TTB may omit voluminous
attachments or material that TTB considers unsuitable for posting.
You and other members of the public may view copies of this
document, all supporting materials, and any electronic or mailed
comments TTB receives about these proposals by appointment at the TTB
Information Resource Center, 1310 G Street NW., Washington, DC 20005.
You may also obtain copies at 20 cents per 8.5- x 11-inch page. Contact
TTB's information specialist at the above address or by telephone at
202-453-2270 to schedule an appointment or to request copies of
comments or other materials.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. chapter 6), TTB certifies that these proposed regulations, if
adopted, would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed rule provides for the voluntary
use of additional wine and juice treating materials and
[[Page 83764]]
processes in the production of wine. This authorization does not impose
any required change to current winemaking practices, nor does it impose
additional compliance burden on small businesses. TTB authorizes new
wine treating materials and processes by evaluating proprietors'
requests to experiment with such materials and processes, such requests
being made via letterhead application to TTB. This rule, if adopted,
would allow for certain treatments, under limited circumstances,
without the submission of a letterhead application to TTB. TTB
estimates that the proposed regulation will reduce the number of
respondents by approximately 10 applicants per year, thus slightly
reducing the overall burden of the information collection.
In addition, TTB currently requires wineries to maintain usual and
customary business records. Included in these records are those records
that evidence the details and results of experiments approved by TTB
under Sec. 24.249. This recordkeeping requirement remains unchanged by
this proposal as wineries subject to this part still will be required
to maintain those usual and customary records. This proposal has a
neutral effect on the current recordkeeping requirements.
Because this proposed rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities no regulatory
flexibility analysis is required. Pursuant to 26 U.S.C. 7805(f), TTB
will submit the proposed regulations to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy
of the Small Business Administration for comment on the impact of the
proposed regulations on small businesses.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Two collections of information approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) would be affected by the adoption of the proposed
regulatory changes described in this document. These collections of
information, approved in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507), are assigned control numbers 1513-0057, titled,
``Letterhead Applications and Notices Relating to Wine (TTB REC 5120/
2),'' and 1513-0115, titled ``Usual and Customary Business Records
Relating to Wine (TTB REC 5120/1).'' An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a valid control number assigned by OMB.
OMB Control Number 1513-0057
TTB authorizes new wine treating materials and processes by
evaluating proprietors' requests to experiment with such materials and
processes under Sec. 24.249. Section 24.249 states, in part, that such
requests must be made in the form of an application filed with TTB.
Under this authorization, TTB has approved proprietors' requests to
take corrective action when water has been accidentally added to wine
in amounts exceeding those authorized for the production of standard
wine under 27 CFR part 24. In this notice, TTB is proposing to add a
new Sec. 24.251 to provide for the correction of accidentally diluted
wine under certain circumstances without the submission of a letterhead
application to TTB. TTB estimates that the proposed regulation will
reduce the number of respondents by approximately 10 applicants per
year and, therefore, will slightly reduce the information collection's
overall burden.
TTB estimates that, as a result of the proposed amendments, the new
annual burden for control number 1513-0057 will be as follows:
Estimated total annual reporting and/or recordkeeping
burden: 820 hours.
Estimated average annual burden hours per respondent: 0.5
hours (30 minutes).
Estimated number of respondents: 1,640.
Estimated annual frequency of respondents: 1.
Comments on this collection of information should be sent to OMB to
Office of Management and Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for the
Department of the Treasury, Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Washington, DC 20503; or email to OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov.
A copy also should be sent to the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau by any of the methods previously described. Comments on the
information collection should be submitted not later than January 23,
2017.
OMB Control Number 1513-0115
Under TTB's authority in 26 U.S.C. 5367, 5369, 5370, and 5555, TTB
requires wineries to maintain usual and customary business records.
Included in these records are those evidencing the details and results
of experiments approved by TTB under Sec. 24.249. The proposed
regulations contained in this document provide for a recordkeeping
requirement in new Sec. 24.251 when wine is corrected for accidental
water dilutions. The recordkeeping requirement in this proposed section
is already accounted for under OMB Control Number 1513-0115 because
such requests currently are treated as experiments under Sec. 24.249.
Therefore, TTB does not believe that there is a change in the burden
for this recordkeeping requirement, even for those wineries that are
exempted from submitting a letterhead request under Sec. 24.251
because still they will be required to maintain the currently required
usual and customary business records.
Comments on this collection of information should be sent to OMB to
Office of Management and Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for the
Department of the Treasury, Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Washington, DC 20503; or email to OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov.
A copy also should be sent to the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau by any of the methods previously described. Comments on the
information collection should be submitted not later than January 23,
2017.
Executive Order 12866
Certain TTB regulations issued under the IRC, including this one,
are exempt from the requirements of Executive Order 12866, as
supplemented and reaffirmed by Executive Order 13563. Therefore, a
regulatory impact assessment is not required.
Drafting Information
Kara Fontaine of the Regulations and Rulings Division, Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau drafted this document.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 24
Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Electronic fund
transfers, Excise taxes, Exports, Food additives, Fruit juices,
Labeling, Liquors, Packaging and containers, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Research, Scientific equipment, Spices and
flavoring, Surety bonds, Vinegar, Warehouses, Wine.
Amendments to the Regulations
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, TTB proposes to amend 27
CFR part 24 as follows.
PART 24--WINE
0
1. The authority citation for 27 CFR part 24 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 26 U.S.C. 5001, 5008, 5041, 5042,
5044, 5061, 5062, 5121, 5122-5124, 5173, 5206, 5214, 5215, 5351,
5353, 5354, 5356, 5357, 5361, 5362, 5364-5373, 5381-5388, 5391,
5392, 5511, 5551, 5552, 5661, 5662, 5684, 6065, 6091, 6109, 6301,
6302, 6311, 6651, 6676, 7302, 7342, 7502, 7503, 7606, 7805, 7851; 31
U.S.C. 9301, 9303, 9304, 9306.
0
2. Section 24.10 is amended by:
[[Page 83765]]
0
a. Removing the number ``60'' in the definition of ``Brix'' and adding,
in its place, the number ``68''; and
0
b. Revising the definition of ``Wine spirits'' to read as follows:
Sec. 24.10 Meaning of terms.
* * * * *
Wine spirits. Brandy or wine spirits authorized under 26 U.S.C.
5373 and Sec. 24.225 of this part for use in wine production.
Sec. 24.85 [Amended]
0
3. In Sec. 24.85, the first sentence is amended by adding the word
``wood,'' after the word ``berries.''
0
4. Section 24.185 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 24.185 Use of wood to treat natural wine.
(a) Treatment by contact. Natural wine may be treated by contact
with any wood that is consistent with the food additive requirements
under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act for food contact (see 21
CFR part 7). The wood may be in the form of barrels, staves, chips,
particles, or storage tanks that were used for the addition of wine
spirits if the tanks are used for the baking of wine. The wood may be
toasted (that is, heated to low, medium, or high temperature without
undergoing combustion), but not charred, and the wood must not be
otherwise treated.
(b) Use of wood essences and extracts. A proprietor may make or
purchase for blending purposes wine that has been heavily treated with
wood; however, wood preparations made with an alcohol solution stronger
than 24 percent alcohol by volume are essences and must be used in
accordance with Sec. 24.85. If any solvent other than alcohol or water
is used to make a wood extract, the resulting extract must be
consistent with the food additive requirements under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act for that purpose and may be used only in ``other
wine'' in accordance with Sec. 24.218. This paragraph applies to
liquid extracts and essences and to the extracts and essences in powder
form or dissolved in water after the solvent has been evaporated.
(c) Use of wooden storage tanks. Wooden storage tanks used for the
addition of spirits may be used for the baking of wine.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1383-1384, 1386, as amended (26
U.S.C. 5382, 5386))
0
5. Section 24.186 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 24.186 Accidental additions of water.
(a) Accidental additions of water totaling 1 percent or less of the
volume of standard wine. When in the production, storage, treatment, or
finishing of standard wine water is accidentally added to a standard
wine in an amount that does not exceed 1 percent of the total volume of
the wine, such wine shall remain standard wine and the proprietor need
not take any action to correct the wine.
(b) Correction of accidental additions of water. When in the
production, storage, treatment, or finishing of standard wine water is
accidentally added to a standard wine in an amount that exceeds 1
percent of the volume of the wine, such wine may be corrected by
either:
(1) Blending the diluted wine with a quantity of wine of the same
kind so that the amount of water accidentally added does not exceed 1
percent of the total volume of the blended wine; or
(2) Removal of the accidentally added water from the wine in
accordance with Sec. 24.251.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1383-1384, as amended (26 U.S.C.
5382))
0
6. Section 24.225 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 24.225 Production and use of spirits.
(a) Withdrawal of spirits. The proprietor of a bonded wine premises
may withdraw and receive wine spirits without payment of tax from the
bonded premises of a distilled spirits plant for use as provided in
this section.
(b) Production and use of wine spirits.
(1) In general. The only products considered to be wine spirits
authorized for use in wine production under this section are brandy or
wine spirits produced in a distilled spirits plant (with or without the
use of water to facilitate extraction and distillation) exclusively
from:
(i) Fresh or dried fruit, or their residues;
(ii) Natural wine or wine residues from fresh or dried fruit,
including spirits byproducts of authorized wine treatments to reduce
alcohol; or
(iii) Special natural wine. If wine spirits produced from special
natural wine contain any flavor characteristics of the special natural
wine, those wine spirits may be used only in the production of a
special natural wine.
(2) Distillation proof requirements. The proof of wine spirits at
distillation must not be reduced by the addition of water. In addition,
a product is not considered to be wine spirits if it is distilled at
less than 140 degrees of proof except in the following cases:
(i) Commercial brandy aged in wood for a period of not less than 2
years, and barreled at not less than 100 degrees of proof, shall be
deemed wine spirits for purposes of this section; and
(ii) Spirits byproducts of alcohol reduction processing authorized
under Sec. 24.248 that are produced at a distilled spirits plant and
distilled, if necessary, at not less than 100 degrees of proof shall be
deemed wine spirits for purposes of this section.
(3) Addition of sugar after fermentation. When, in the production
of natural wine or special natural wine, sugar has been added after
fermentation, the wine may not be refermented to develop alcohol from
such added sugar and then used in the production of wine spirits.
(4) Addition of wine spirits to natural wine.
(i) Wine spirits produced in the United States may be added to
natural wine on bonded wine premises if both the wine and the spirits
are produced from the same kind of fruit.
(ii) In the case of natural still wine, wine spirits may be added
in any State only to wine produced by fermentation on bonded wine
premises located within the same State.
(iii) If wine has been ameliorated, wine spirits may be added
(whether or not wine spirits were previously added) only if the wine
contains not more than 14 percent of alcohol by volume derived from
fermentation.
(c) Spirits other than wine spirits. Spirits other than wine
spirits may be received, stored, and used on bonded wine premises only
for the production of nonbeverage wine and nonbeverage wine products.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1381-1384, as amended, and sec.
455, Pub. L. 98-369, (26 U.S.C. 5214, 5362, 5373, 5382, 5383, 5386))
0
7. Section 24.246 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 24.246 Materials authorized for the treatment of wine and
juice.
(a) Wine and juice. Materials used in the process of filtering,
clarifying, or purifying wine may remove cloudiness, precipitation, and
undesirable odors and flavors, but the addition of any substance
foreign to wine that changes the character of the wine, or the
abstraction of ingredients so as to change the character of the wine,
if not consistent with good commercial practice, is not permitted on
bonded wine premises. The materials listed in this section are approved
as being consistent with good commercial practice in the production,
cellar treatment, or finishing of wine and,
[[Page 83766]]
where applicable, in the treatment of juice, within the ``Specific TTB
limitation'' of this section and subject to the following conditions:
(1) If the FDA informs TTB that a specified use or limitation of
any material listed in this section is inconsistent with the food
additive requirements under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act,
the appropriate TTB officer may cancel or amend the approval for use of
the material in the treatment of wine and juice in the production,
cellar treatment, or finishing of wine; and
(2) Where water is added to facilitate the solution or dispersal of
a material, the volume of water added, whether the material is used
singly or in combination with other water-based treating materials, may
not total more than 1 percent of the volume of the treated wine or
juice, or of both the wine and the juice, from which the wine is
produced.
(b) Use in combination or in multiple lots. Subject to the
conditions specified in paragraph (a) of this section, a proprietor may
use the materials listed in this section in combination, provided that
each material is used for its specified use and in accordance with any
limitation specified for that use. If a proprietor uses several lots
that contain the same material, it is the proprietor's responsibility
to ensure that the cumulative amount of the material does not exceed
the limitation specified in this section for that material.
(c) Formula wine. In addition to the materials listed in this
section, other materials may be used in formula wine if approved for
such use.
Materials Authorized for Treatment of Wine and Juice
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specific TTB
Materials and use limitation (if FDA reference
applicable)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Acacia (gum arabic): To clarify The amount used 21 CFR 184.1330.
and stabilize \1\ wine. must not exceed 8
pounds per 1000
gallons (1.92 g/
L) of wine.
Acetaldehyde: For color The amount used FDA advisory
stabilization of juice prior to must not exceed opinion dated
concentration. 300 ppm,\2\ and September 8,
the finished 2016.
concentrate must
have no
detectable level
of the material.
Activated carbon:
To assist precipitation 27 CFR 24.176..... FDA advisory
during fermentation. opinion dated
September 8,
2016.
To clarify and purify wine.. The amount used to FDA advisory
clarify and opinion dated
purify wine must January 26, 1979.
be included in
the total amount
of activated
carbon used to
remove excessive
color in wine. 27
CFR 24.241 and
24.242.
To remove color from wine The amount used to FDA advisory
and/or juice from which treat the wine, opinion dated
wine is produced. including the January 26, 1979.
juice from which
the wine was
produced, must
not exceed 25
pounds per 1000
gallons (3 g/L).
If the amount
necessary exceeds
this limit, a
notice is
required pursuant
to 27 CFR 24.242.
Albumen (egg white): Fining May be prepared in FDA advisory
agent for wine. a light brine 1 opinion dated
ounce (28.35 September 8,
grams) potassium 2016.
chloride, 2
pounds (907.2
grams) egg white,
1 gallon (3.785
L) of water.
Usage of brine
not to exceed 1.5
gallons per 1,000
gallons (1.5
milliliters per
liter) of wine.
Alumino-silicates (hydrated) None.............. 21 CFR 182.2727,
e.g., Bentonite (Wyoming clay) 182.2729,
and Kaolin: To clarify and 184.1155 and
stabilize \1\ wine or juice. 186.1256.
FDA advisory
opinion dated
July 26, 1985.
Ascorbic acid iso-ascorbic acid May be added to 21 CFR 182.3013
(erythorbic acid): To prevent grapes, other and 182.3041.
oxidation of color and flavor fruit (including
components of juice or wine. berries), and
other primary
wine making
materials, or to
the juice of such
materials, or to
the wine, within
limitations which
do not alter the
class or type of
the wine.
Bakers Yeast Mannoprotein: To The amount used GRAS Notice No.
stabilize \1\ wine from the must not exceed GRN 284.
precipitation of potassium 3.3 pounds per
bitartrate crystals. 1000 gallons (400
mg/L) of wine.
Calcium carbonate (CaCO3) (with
or without calcium salts of
tartaric and malic acids):
To reduce the excess natural The natural or 21 CFR 184.1069,
acids in high acid wine, or fixed acids must 184.1099, and
in juice prior to or during not be reduced 184.1191.
fermentation. below 40 pounds
per 1000 gallons
(5 g/L).
As a fining agent for cold The amount used ..................
stabilization. must not exceed
30 pounds per
1000 gallons
(3.59 g/L) of
wine.
Calcium sulfate (gypsum): To The sulfate 21 CFR 184.1230.
lower pH in sherry wine. content of the
finished wine
must not exceed
1.67 pounds per
1000 gallons (0.2
g/L), expressed
as potassium
sulfate. 27 CFR
24.214.
Carbon dioxide (including food See 27 CFR 24.245. 21 CFR 184.1240.
grade dry ice): To stabilize
\1\ and preserve wine.
Casein, potassium salt of See 27 CFR 24.243. FDA advisory
casein: To clarify wine. opinion dated
September 8,
2016.
Chitosan from Aspergillus niger: The amount used GRAS Notice No.
To remove spoilage organisms must not exceed GRN 000397.
such as Brettanomyces from wine. 0.8 pounds per
1000 gallons (10
g/hL) of wine.
[[Page 83767]]
Citric acid:
To correct natural acid See 27 CFR 24.182 21 CFR 184.1033.
deficiencies in certain and 24.192.
juice or wine.
To stabilize \1\ wine other The amount of 21 CFR 184.1033.
than citrus wine. citric acid must
not exceed 5.8
pounds per 1000
gallons (0.7 g/
L). 27 CFR 24.244.
Copper sulfate: To remove The quantity of 21 CFR 184.1261.
hydrogen sulfide and/or copper sulfate
mercaptans from wine. (calculated as
copper) added to
wine must not
exceed 6 ppm.\2\
The residual
level of copper
in the finished
wine must not
exceed 0.5 ppm
\2\.
Defoaming agents Defoaming agents 21 CFR 173.340 and
(polyoxyethylene 40 which are 100 184.1505.
monostearate, silicon dioxide, percent active
dimethylpoly-siloxane, sorbitan may be used in
monostearate, glyceryl mono- amounts not
oleate and glyceryl dioleate): exceeding 0.15
To control foaming, pounds per 1000
fermentation adjunct. gallons (18 mg/L)
of wine.
Defoaming agents
which are 30
percent active
may be used in
amounts not
exceeding 0.5
pounds per 1000
gallons (60 mg/L)
of wine. Silicon
dioxide must be
completely
removed by
filtration. The
amount of silicon
remaining in the
wine must not
exceed 10 ppm \2\.
Dimethyl dicarbonate (DMDC): To DMDC may be added Must meet the
sterilize and stabilize \1\ to wine in a conditions
wine. cumulative amount prescribed by FDA
not to exceed 200 in 21 CFR
ppm \2\. 172.133.
Enzymatic activity: Various The enzyme
enzymes and uses, as shown preparation used
below: must be prepared
from nontoxic and
nonpathogenic
microorganisms in
accordance with
good
manufacturing
practice and be
consistent with
FDA's regulations.
Carbohydrase (alpha- The amylase enzyme FDA advisory
Amylase): To convert activity must be opinion of August
starches to fermentable derived from: 18, 1983.
carbohydrates. Aspergillus niger, ..................
Aspergillus ..................
oryzae, Bacillus
subtilis, or
barley malt; or.
from Rhizopus 21 CFR 173.130.
oryzae: or.
from Bacillus 21 CFR 184.1027.
licheniformis.
Carbohydrase (beta-Amylase): The amylase enzyme FDA advisory
To convert starches to must be derived opinion dated
fermentable carbohydrates. from barley malt. August 18, 1983.
Carbohydrase (Glucoamylase, The amylase enzyme FDA advisory
Amylogluco-sidase): To activity must be opinion dated
convert starches to derived from August 18, 1983.
fermentable carbohydrates. Aspergillus
niger,
Aspergillus
oryzae, or.
from Rhizopus 21 CFR 173.130.
oryzae,.
or from Rhizopus 21 CFR 173.110.
niveus.
Carbohydrase (pectinase, The enzyme FDA advisory
cellulase, hemicellulase): activity must be opinion dated
To facilitate separation of derived from December 19,
juice from the fruit. Aspergillus 1996.
aculeatus.
Catalase: To clarify and The enzyme FDA advisory
stabilize \1\ wine. activity must be opinion dated
derived from August 18, 1983.
Aspergillus niger
or bovine liver.
Cellulase: To clarify and The enzyme FDA advisory
stabilize \1\ wine and activity must be opinion dated
facilitate separation of derived from August 18, 1983.
the juice from the fruit. Aspergillus niger.
Cellulase (beta-glucanase): The enzyme For beta-gucanase
To clarify and filter wine. activity must be derived from
derived from Trichoderma
Trichoderma longibrachiatum,
longibrachiatum 21 CFR 184.1250.
or Trichoderma For beta-glucanase
harzianum. The derived from
amount used must Trichoderma
not exceed 30 ppm harzianum, GRAS
\2\. Notice No. GRN
149.
Glucose oxidase: To clarify and The enzyme FDA advisory
stabilize \1\ wine. activity must be opinion of August
derived from 18, 1983.
Aspergillus niger.
Lysozyme: To stabilize \1\ wines The amount used FDA advisory
from malolactic acid bacterial must not exceed opinion dated
degradation. 500 ppm.\2\. December 15,
1993.
Pectinase: To clarify and The enzyme FDA advisory
stabilize \1\ wine and to activity used opinion dated
facilitate separation of juice must be derived August 18, 1983.
from the fruit. from Aspergillus
niger.
Protease (general): To reduce or The enzyme FDA advisory
to remove heat labile proteins. activity must be opinion dated
derived from: August 18, 1983.
Aspergillus niger
or Bacillus
subtilis or from;.
Bacillus 21 CFR 184.1027.
licheniformis.
Protease (Bromelin): To The enzyme FDA advisory
reduce or remove heat activity must be opinion dated
labile proteins. derived from August 18, 1983.
Ananus comosus or
Ananus bracteatus
(L).
Protease (Ficin): To reduce The enzyme FDA advisory
or remove heat labile activity must be opinion dated
proteins. derived from August 18, 1983.
Ficus spp.
Protease (Papain): To reduce The enzyme 21 CFR 184.1585.
or remove heat labile activity must be
proteins. derived from
Carica papaya (L).
[[Page 83768]]
Protease (Pepsin): To reduce The enzyme FDA advisory
or remove heat labile activity must be opinion dated
proteins. derived from August 18, 1983.
porcine or bovine
stomachs.
Protease (Trypsin): To The enzyme FDA advisory
reduce or remove heat activity must be opinion dated
labile proteins. derived from August 18, 1983.
porcine or bovine
pancreas.
Urease: To reduce levels of The enzyme 21 CFR 184.1924.
naturally occurring urea in activity must be
wine to help prevent the derived from
formation of ethyl Lactobacillus
carbamate. fermentum. Use is
limited to not
more than 200 ppm
\2\ and must be
filtered prior to
final packaging.
Ethyl maltol: To stabilize \1\ Use authorized at FDA advisory
wine. a maximum level opinion dated
of 100 ppm \2\ in December 1, 1986.
all standard
wines except
natural wine
produced from
Vitis vinifera
grapes.
Ferrous sulfate: To clarify and The amount used 21 CFR 184.1315.
stabilize \1\ wine. must not exceed 3
ounces per 1000
gallons (0.022 g/
L) of wine.
Fumaric acid:
To correct natural acid The fumaric acid 21 CFR 172.350.
deficiencies in grape wine. content of the
finished wine
must not exceed
25 pounds per
1000 gallons (3 g/
L). 27 CFR 24.182
and 24.192.
To stabilize \1\ wine....... The fumaric acid 21 CFR 172.350.
content of the
finished wine
must not exceed
25 pounds per
1000 gallons (3 g/
L). 27 CFR 24.244.
Gelatin (food grade): To clarify None.............. FDA advisory
juice or wine. opinion dated
September 8,
2016.
Granular cork: To smooth wine... The amount used FDA advisory
must not exceed opinion dated
10 pounds per February 25,
1000 gallons of 1985.
wine (1.2 g/L).
Isinglass: To clarify wine...... None.............. FDA advisory
opinion dated
February 25,
1985.
Lactic acid: To correct natural 27 CFR 24.182 and 21 CFR 184.1061.
acid deficiencies in grape wine. 24.192.
Malic acid: To correct natural 27 CFR 24.182, 21 CFR 184.1069.
acid deficiencies in juice or 24.192.
wine.
Malo-lactic bacteria: To Malo-lactic FDA advisory
stabilize \1\ grape wine. bacteria of the opinion dated
type Leuconostoc February 25,
oenos may be used 1985.
in treating wine.
Maltol: To stabilize \1\ wine... Use authorized at FDA advisory
a maximum level opinion dated
of 2 pounds per December 1, 1986.
1000 gallons (250
mg/L) in all
standard wine
except natural
wine produced
from Vitis
vinifera grapes.
Milk products (pasteurized
whole, skim, or half-and-half):
Fining agent for grape wine. The amount used
must not exceed 2
parts of milk
products per
1,000 parts (0.2
percent V/V) of
wine.
To remove off flavors in The amount used
wine. must not exceed
10 parts of milk
products per
1,000 parts (1
percent V/V) of
wine.
Nitrogen gas: To maintain None.............. 21 CFR 184.1540.
pressure during filtering and
bottling or canning of wine and
to prevent oxidation of wine.
Oxygen and compressed air: None..............
Various uses in juice and wine.
Polyvinyl-polypyr-rolidone The amount used to 21 CFR 173.50.
(PVPP): To clarify and treat the wine,
stabilize \1\ wine and to including the
remove color from red wine or juice from which
juice. the wine was
produced, must
not exceed 60
pounds per 1000
gallons (7.19 g/
L) and must be
removed during
filtration. PVPP
may be used in a
continuous or
batch process.
The finished wine
must retain
vinous character
and must have
color of not less
than 0.6 Lovibond
in a one-half
inch cell or not
more than 95
percent
transmittance per
AOAC Method
11.003-11.004
(14th Ed.) \3\.
Polyvinyl-pyrrolidone (PVP)/ The amount used to 21 CFR 173.55 and
polyvinylimadazole (PVI) treat the wine FDA FCN No. 320.
polymer: To remove heavy metal must not exceed
ions and sulfides from wine. 6.7 pounds per
1000 gallons (80
g/hL) of wine.
Potassium bitartrate: To The amount used FDA advisory
stabilize \1\ grape wine. must not exceed opinion dated
35 pounds per September 8,
1000 gallons 2016.
(4.19 g/L) of
grape wine.
Potassium carbonate and/or The natural or 21 CFR 184.1619
potassium bicarbonate: To fixed acids must and 184.1613.
reduce excess natural acidity not be reduced
in wine and in juice prior to below 0.668
or during fermentation. ounces per gallon
(5 g/L).
[[Page 83769]]
Potassium citrate: pH control The amount of 21 CFR 184.1625.
agent and sequestrant in the potassium citrate
treatment of citrus wines. must not exceed
25 pounds per
1000 gallons (3 g/
L) of finished
wine. 27 CFR
24.182.
Potassium meta-bisulfite: To The sulfur dioxide 21 CFR 182.3637.
sterilize and preserve wine. content of the
finished wine
must not exceed
the limitations
prescribed in 27
CFR 4.22.
Potato protein isolate: Fining Use must not GRAS Notice No.
agent for wine. exceed 500 ppm GRN 000447.
\2\ (50 g/hL) of
wine.
Silica gel (colloidal silicon Use must not FDA advisory
dioxide): To clarify wine or exceed the opinion dated
juice. equivalent of 20 September 8,
pounds colloidal 2016.
silicon dioxide
at a 30 percent
concentration per
1000 gallons (2.4
g/L) of wine.
Silicon dioxide
must be
completely
removed by
filtration.
Sodium carboxymethyl cellulose: The amount used 21 CFR 182.1745.
To stabilize \1\ wine by must not exceed
preventing tartrate 0.8% of the wine.
precipitation.
Sorbic acid and potassium salt The finished wine 21 CFR 182.3089
of sorbic acid (potassium must not contain and 182.3640.
sorbate): To sterilize and more than 300 ppm
preserve wine; to inhibit mold \2\ of sorbic
growth and secondary acid.
fermentation.
Sulfur dioxide: To sterilize and The sulfur dioxide 21 CFR 182.3862.
to preserve wine or juice. content of the
finished wine
must not exceed
the limitations
prescribed in 27
CFR 4.22(b)(1).
Tannin:
To adjust tannin content in The residual FDA advisory
apple juice or in apple amount of tannin opinion dated
wine. must not exceed September 8,
24 pounds per 2016.
1000 gallons (3 g/
L), calculated as
gallic acid
equivalents
(GAE). Total
tannin must not
be increased by
more than 150 ppm
\2\ by the
addition of
tannic acid
(polygalloylgluco
se).
To clarify, or adjust tannin The residual FDA advisory
content of, juice or wine amount of tannin, opinion dated
(other than apple). calculated in September 8,
GAE, must not 2016.
exceed 6.4 GAE
per 1000 gallons
of wine (800 mg/
L) in white wine
and 24 pounds per
1000 gallons (3 g/
L) in red wine.
Only tannin which
does not impart
color may be used
in the cellar
treatment of
juice or wine.
Total tannin must
not be increased
by more than 150
ppm \2\ by the
addition of
tannic acid (poly-
galloylglucose).
Tartaric acid (L(+) tartaric
acid):
To correct natural acid Use as prescribed 21 CFR 184.1099
deficiencies in grape juice in 27 CFR 24.182 and
or wine and to reduce the and 24.192. GRAS Notice No.
pH of grape juice or wine GRN 000187.
where ameliorating material
is used in the production
of grape wine.
Yeast nutrients: To facilitate
fermentation of juice and wine
Ammonium phosphate/ The amount used FDA advisory
diammonium phosphate (mono- must not exceed 8 opinion dated
and di basic). pounds per 1000 August 29, 2016.
gallons (0.96 g/
L).
Biotin...................... The amount used FDA advisory
must not exceed opinion dated
25 ppb \4\. August 29, 2016.
Calcium pantothenate The amount used FDA advisory
(vitamin B5). must not exceed opinion dated
1.5 ppm \2\. August 29, 2016.
Folic acid (folate)......... The amount used FDA advisory
must not exceed opinion dated
100 ppb \4\. August 29, 2016.
Inositol (myo-inositol)..... The amount used FDA advisory
must not exceed 2 opinion dated
ppm \2\. August 29, 2016.
Magnesium sulfate........... The amount used FDA advisory
must not exceed opinion dated
15 ppm \2\. August 29, 2016.
Niacin (vitamin B3)......... The amount used FDA advisory
must not exceed 1 opinion dated
ppm \2\. August 29, 2016.
Pyridoxine hydrochloride The amount used FDA advisory
(vitamin B6). must not exceed opinion dated
150 ppb \4\. August 29, 2016.
Soy flour (defatted)........ The amount used FDA advisory
must not exceed 2 opinion dated
pounds per 1000 August 29, 2016.
gallons (0.24 g/
L) of wine.
Thiamine hydrochloride...... The amount used FDA advisory
must not exceed opinion dated
0.005 pounds per August 29, 2016.
1000 gallons (0.6
mg/L) of wine or
juice.
Yeast, autolyzed............ None.............. FDA advisory
opinion dated
August 29, 2016.
Yeast, cell wall/membranes The amount used FDA advisory
of autolyzed yeast. must not exceed 3 opinion dated
pounds per 1000 August 29, 2016.
gallons (0.36 g/
L) of wine or
juice.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ To stabilize--To prevent or to retard unwanted alteration of
chemical and/or physical properties.
\2\ Parts per million--1 ppm = 0.128 ounces per 1000 gallons = 1 mg/L =
1000 ppb.
\3\ Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL, Volumes I & II,
AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 481 North Frederick Avenue, Suite 500,
Gaithersburg, MD 20877-2417.
\4\ Parts per billion--1ppb = 0.000128 ounces per 1000 gallons = 1 mg/
1000L.
[[Page 83770]]
* * * * *
0
8. Section 24.247 is amended by:
0
a. Revising the introductory text;
0
b. Revising the entry in the table for ``Ammonium phosphate (mono- and
di basic''; and
0
c. Removing the footnote at the end of the table.
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 24.247 Materials authorized for the treatment of distilling
material.
The materials listed in this section as well as the materials
listed in Sec. 24.246 are approved as being acceptable in good
commercial practice for use by proprietors in the treatment of
distilling material within the limitations specified in this section.
If, however, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) informs TTB
that a specified use or limitation of any material listed in this
section is inconsistent with the food additive requirements under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the appropriate TTB officer may
cancel or amend the approval for use of the material in the treatment
of distilling material.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reference or
Materials Use limitation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ammonium phosphate/diammonium Yeast nutrient in The amount used
phosphate (mono-and di basic). distilling shall not exceed
material. 10 pounds per
1000 gallons (1.2
g/L). 21 CFR
184.1141a and
184.1141b.
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
0
9. Section 24.248 is amended by:
0
a. Revising the introductory text;
0
b. Removing the entries for ``Nanofiltration,'' ``Reverse osmosis,''
and ``Ultrafiltration'';
0
c. Adding an entry for ``Cross flow filtration'', including subentries
for ``Nanofiltration'', ``Reverse osmosis'', and ``Ultrafiltration'',
at the top of the table;
0
d. Revising the entries for ``Osmotic transport'', ``Spinning cone
column'', and ``Thin-film evaporation under reduced pressure''; and
0
e. Removing footnote 1 at the end of the table and adding new footnotes
1 and 2.
The additions and revisions to the table and its footnotes read as
follows:
Sec. 24.248 Processes authorized for the treatment of wine, juice,
and distilling material.
The processes listed in this section are approved as being
consistent with good commercial practice for use by proprietors in the
production, cellar treatment, or finishing of wine, juice, and
distilling material, within the general limitations of this section.
If, however, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) informs TTB
that a specified use or limitation of any material listed in this
section is inconsistent with the food additive requirements under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the appropriate TTB officer may
cancel or amend the approval for use of the process in the production,
cellar treatment, or finishing of wine, juice, and distilling material.
Processes Authorized for the Treatment of Wine, Juice, and Distilling
Material
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reference or
Process Use limitation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross flow filtration........... Various processes
and uses. \1\
Nanofiltration \2\ To reduce the This process must
level of volatile use permeable
acidity in wine membranes which
(used with ion are selective for
exchange), to molecules not
reduce the ethyl greater than 150
alcohol content molecular weight
of wine. with
transmembrane
pressures of 250
psi or less.
Reverse osmosis \2\......... To reduce the Permeable
ethyl alcohol membranes that
content of wine are selective for
and to remove off molecules not
flavors in wine. greater than 500
molecular weight
with
transmembrane
pressures of 200
pounds per square
inch (psi) and
greater. The
addition of water
other than that
originally
present prior to
processing will
render standard
wine ``other than
standard.'' Use
must not alter
the vinous
character of the
wine. May be used
in combination
with osmotic
transport.
Ultrafiltration \2\......... To remove Permeable
proteinaceous membranes that
material from are selective for
wine; to reduce molecules greater
harsh tannic than 500 and not
material from less than 25,000
white wine molecular weight
produced from with
white skinned transmembrane
grapes; to remove pressures less
pink color from than 200 psi.
blanc de noir Shall not alter
wine; to separate vinous character.
red juice and
wine into low
color and high
color fractions
for blending
purposes, to
reduce the ethyl
alcohol content
of wine.
* * * * * * *
Osmotic transport \2\........... For alcohol (1) Use must not
reduction. alter the vinous
character of the
wine.
(2) None of the
stripping
solution may
migrate into the
wine.
(3) May be used in
combination with
reverse osmosis.
[[Page 83771]]
* * * * * * *
Spinning cone column \2\........ To reduce the Use shall not
ethyl alcohol alter vinous
content of wine character. For
and to remove off standard wine,
flavors in wine. the same amount
of essence must
be added back to
any lot of wine
as was originally
removed.
* * * * * * *
Thin film evaporation under To separate wine Use shall not
reduced preasure \2\. into a low alter vinous
alcohol wine character. Water
fraction and into separated with
a higher alcohol alcohol during
distillate. processing may be
recovered by
refluxing in a
closed continuous
system and
returned to the
wine. The
addition of water
other than that
originally
present in the
wine prior to
processing, will
render standard
wine other than
standard wine.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ In cross-flow filtration, the wine is passed across the filter
membrane (tangentially) at positive pressure relative to the permeate
side. A proportion of the wine which is smaller than the membrane pore
size passes through the membrane as permeate or filtrate; everything
else is retained on the feed side of the membrane as retentate.
\2\ When used to remove ethyl alcohol (dealcoholization), this process
must be done on distilled spirits plant premises. However, reverse
osmosis and nanofilitration, under certain limited conditions, may be
used on bonded winery premises if ethyl alcohol is only temporarily
created within a closed system.
* * * * *
0
10. Paragraph (b) of Sec. 24.250 is amended to read as follows:
Sec. 24.250 Application for use of new treating material or process.
(b) Documentary evidence from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
that the material is consistent with the food additive requirements
under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act for its intended purpose
in the amounts proposed for the particular treatment contemplated;
* * * * *
0
11. Section 24.251 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 24.251 Salvaging accidentally diluted wine.
(a) Removal of accidentally added water without prior TTB approval.
If a proprietor accidentally adds to standard wine water in excess of
limitations specified in subparts F and L of this part, the
accidentally diluted wine may be returned to its original condition
through the use of reverse osmosis and distillation without prior
application to TTB provided that:
(1) The accidentally added water represents no more than 10 percent
of the original volume of the wine;
(2) The wine is returned to its original condition by removing an
amount of water equal to the amount that was accidentally added to the
wine;
(3) The vinous character of the wine is not altered;
(4) The proprietor transfers the wine in bond to a distilled
spirits plant for treatment; and
(5) Records are maintained in accordance with paragraph (c) of this
section.
(b) Removal of accidentally added water with TTB approval. If a
proprietor accidentally adds water to standard wine and the
accidentally added water represents more than 10 percent of the
original volume of the wine, then the proprietor must request
permission from TTB prior to treating the wine. A proprietor may submit
an application requesting permission to treat the wine to remove the
water and return the wine to its original condition. The removal of
water may not be conducted until the appropriate TTB officer has
approved the request. The application, which is to be submitted to the
appropriate TTB officer, must be in writing, must provide evidence of
the exact amount of water accidentally added to the wine and an
explanation of how the water was accidentally added, and must specify
the method the proprietor will use to remove the water from the wine.
In approving any request under this section, the appropriate TTB
officer may require the proprietor to take steps to prevent future
accidental additions of water to wine. In evaluating any request under
this section, the appropriate TTB officer may consider as a factor
whether the proprietor has demonstrated good commercial practices,
taking into account the proprietor's prior history of accidental
addition of water to wine and of compliance with other regulations in
part 24.
(c) Records. The proprietor must, with respect to removals of water
from wine authorized under this section, maintain records that document
the accidental addition of water, the use of any treatment or process
to remove the water from the wine, and the fact that only the amount of
water that was accidentally added to the wine was removed as a result
of the treatment or process.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1383-1384, as amended (26
U.S.C. 5382))
Signed: June 16, 2016.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
Approved: October 25, 2016.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary. (Tax, Trade, and Tariff Policy).
[FR Doc. 2016-27581 Filed 11-21-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P