Safety Zone; Great Egg Harbor Bay, Marmora, NJ, 83139-83141 [2016-27914]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 224 / Monday, November 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
*
*
telephone (215)271–4889, email
Tom.J.Simkins@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
*
Issued in Washington, DC, by:
Judith Starr,
General Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
COTP Captain of the Port
[FR Doc. 2016–27986 Filed 11–18–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7709–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2016–1011]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Great Egg Harbor Bay,
Marmora, NJ
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the waters of Great Egg Harbor Bay in
Marmora, NJ. The safety zone includes
all waters within 500 yards of a blasting
vessel and equipment being used to
conduct bridge pile blasting operations,
which is the final phase of the
demolition of the Route 9, Beesley Point
Bridge bascule span. This safety zone
will only be enforced during times of
explosive detonation. The safety zone
will temporarily restrict vessel traffic
from transiting or anchoring in a portion
of the Great Egg Harbor Bay while pile
blasting and removal operations are
being conducted to facilitate the
removal of bridge piles from the
demolished Route 9, Beesley Point
Bridge.
DATES: This rule is effective without
actual notice from November 21, 2016
through November 24, 2016. For the
purposes of enforcement, actual notice
will be used from November 15, 2016,
until November 21, 2016. During this
period the safety zone will only be
enforced during times of explosive
detonation.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2016–
1011 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this rule, call
or email Marine Science Technician
First Class Tom Simkins, U.S. Coast
Guard, Sector Delaware Bay, Waterways
Management Division, Coast Guard;
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:02 Nov 18, 2016
Jkt 241001
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
In June 2013, demolition work began
on the Route 9, Beesley Point Bridge
between Somers Point and Marmora, NJ.
Route 52 Construction, the company
performing this demolition work, has
completed all demolition of the bridge
and piles except the portion of the
bridge which has the bascule span
opening for the navigational channel.
The removal of the remaining piles,
which are secured to the sea floor bed,
will be completed by using explosives
after which the piles and debris will be
removed. The Captain of the Port has
determined that potential hazards
associated with pile blasting operations,
beginning on or about November 15,
2016, will be a safety concern for
anyone operating within 500 yards of
pile blasting operations during times of
explosive detonation.
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because the
final details for this event were not
received by the Coast Guard until
November 8, 2016, and the safety zone
is needed for blasting and demolition
operations which will begin November
15, 2016. It is impracticable to publish
an NPRM and consider comments due
to the short window of time until the
operation begins. Allowing this event to
go forward without a safety zone in
place would expose mariners and the
public to unnecessary dangers
associated with explosive detonation.
We are issuing this rule, and under 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds
that good cause exists for making it
effective less than 30 days after
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
83139
publication in the Federal Register for
the reasons we stated above. Delaying
the effective date of this rule would be
contrary to public interest because the
safety zone is needed to begin on
November 15, 2016, to protect the
public from safety hazards associated
with explosive detonation.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. The
Captain of the Port has determined that
potential hazards are associated with
demolition and pile blasting operations
of the Route 9, Beesley Point Bridge,
over the Great Egg Harbor Bay, in
Marmora, NJ, from November 15, 2016,
through November 24, 2016. The rule
will provide a safety buffer around the
blasting vessel during times of explosive
detonation.
The purpose of this rule is to promote
maritime safety and protect vessels from
the hazards of bridge demolition and
pile blasting operations, and to maintain
safety of navigation in the Great Egg
Harbor Bay, in the vicinity of the Route
9, Beesley Point Bridge. The rule will
provide a safety buffer around the crane
and barge while demolition operations
are conducted, and will provide a safety
buffer around the blasting vessel during
times of explosive detonation.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
On November 15, 2016, demolition
work will begin on the remaining
portion of the Route 9, Beesley Point
Bridge, over the Great Egg Harbor Bay,
in Marmora, NJ. The Captain of the Port
has determined that the hazards
associated with demolition and pile
blasting operations requires a safety
zone.
The safety zone will be enforced
starting on or after November 15, 2016,
only during times of explosive
detonation, and encompasses all
navigable waters in the Great Egg Harbor
Bay within 500 yards of vessels and
machinery being used to conduct pile
blasting and removal operations. The
duration of the enforcement of the zone
is intended to protect personnel,
vessels, and the marine environment in
these navigable waters while explosive
detonation occurs. There will be two
blasting events occurring on consecutive
days to complete both piers. Actual
dates and times of explosive detonation
will be published with a combination of
broadcast notice to mariners, local
notice to mariners, posted warning
signs, 500 yard marine traffic safety
zone maintained by the contractors
safety boats, a 10 minute, 5 minutes,
and 1 minute warning made by the
blasting vessel via VHF–FM channel 16,
E:\FR\FM\21NOR1.SGM
21NOR1
83140
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 224 / Monday, November 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
and warning signals at 5 minutes with
3 short blasts of the air horn, and 1
minute warning of 2 short blasts of the
air horn. The schedule of the signals
will be posted along with warning signs.
The contractor will verify that all
vessels and persons are clear of safety
zone 10 minutes prior to the scheduled
shot time and will remain secured until
the blaster gives the ‘‘All Clear’’ that the
channel is clear for vessels to transit.
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within the safety zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port or his designated representative. No
vessels may transit through the safety
zone during times of explosive
detonation. During pile blasting
explosive detonation, vessels will be
required to maintain a 500 yard distance
from vessels and equipment used to
conduct pile blasting and removal
operations. This 500 yard radius will be
secured by two contractor safety boats
in the adjacent waterways.
V. Regulatory Analysis
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive order related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has not been
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
action,’’ under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed
by the Office of Management and
Budget.
This finding is based on the limited
size of the zone and that vessels will
only be affected during times of
explosive detonation. In addition, the
zone will be well publicized to allow
mariners to make alternative plans for
transiting the affected area.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:02 Nov 18, 2016
Jkt 241001
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
It is expected that there will be
minimal disruption to the maritime
community. Before the effective period,
the Coast Guard will issue maritime
advisories widely available to users of
the river to allow mariners to make
alternative plans for transiting the
affected areas. In addition, vessels may
transit the navigation channel, except
during time of explosive detonation.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety
zone encompassing all navigable waters
in the Great Egg Harbor Bay within 500
yards of vessels and machinery being
used to conduct pile blasting and
removal operations during times of
explosive detonation. It is categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the
Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
E:\FR\FM\21NOR1.SGM
21NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 224 / Monday, November 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
INFORMATION CONTACT
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add temporary § 165.T05–1011, to
read as follows:
■
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 165.T05–1011 Safety Zone; Great Egg
Harbor Bay, Marmora, NJ
(a) Regulated areas. The following
area is a safety zone: All waters within
500 yards of the blasting vessel and
equipment conducting pile blasting
operations, in Great Egg Harbor Bay, in
the vicinity of Route 9, Beesley Point
Bridge, in Marmora, NJ.
(b) Regulations. The general safety
zone regulations in § 165.23 apply to the
safety zones created by this temporary
section, § 165.T05–1011.
(1) All vessels and persons are
prohibited from entering into or moving
within the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section while they
are subject to enforcement, unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port or
by his designated representative.
(2) Persons or vessels seeking to enter
or pass through the safety zone must
contact the Captain of the Port or his
designated representative to seek
permission to transit the area. The
Captain of the Port, Delaware Bay can be
contacted at telephone number 215–
271–4807 or on Marine Band Radio VHF
Channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
(3) No vessels may transit through the
safety zone described in paragraph (a) of
this section during times of explosives
detonation. During pile blasting
detonation, vessels will be required to
maintain a 500 yard distance from the
blasting vessel and equipment. Actual
dates and times of explosive detonation
will be announced with a combination
of broadcast notice to mariners, local
notice to mariners, posted warning
signs, 500 yard marine traffic safety
zone maintained by the contractors
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:02 Nov 18, 2016
Jkt 241001
safety boats, 10 minute, 5 minutes, and
1 minute warning made by the blasting
vessel via VHF–FM channel 16, and
warning signals at 5 minutes with 3
short blasts of the air horn, and 1
minute warning of 2 short blasts of the
air horn. The schedule of the signals
will be posted along with all other
required signage.
(4) This section applies to all vessels
except those engaged in the following
operations: Enforcing laws, servicing
aids to navigation, and emergency
response vessels.
(c) Definitions. As used in this
section:
Captain of the Port means Captain of
the Port Delaware Bay. The Captain of
the Port is also the Commander, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector Delaware Bay,
Philadelphia, PA.
Captain of the Port Delaware Bay
means the Commander, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector Delaware Bay,
Philadelphia, PA.
Designated representative means any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or
petty officer who has been authorized
by the Captain of the Port Delaware Bay
to assist in enforcing the safety zone
described in paragraph (a) of this
section.
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast
Guard may be assisted by Federal, State
and local agencies in the patrol and
enforcement of the zone.
(e) Enforcement periods. This section
will be effective from November 15,
2016, through November 24, 2016.
During this period the safety zone will
only be enforced during times of
explosive detonation.
Dated: November 15, 2016.
Benjamin A. Cooper,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Delaware Bay.
[FR Doc. 2016–27914 Filed 11–18–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
83141
relocate the provisions regarding coinoperated phonorecord players from the
section of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) that contains
Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel
(CARP) regulations to the section of the
CFR that contains Copyright Royalty
Board (CRB) regulations so that the
Copyright Office may remove the
outdated CARP regulation.
DATES: Effective on November 21, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kimberly Whittle, Attorney Advisor, by
telephone at (202) 707–7658 or by email
at crb@loc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
October 3, 2016, the Copyright Office
published a proposed rulemaking that,
in part, proposes to eliminate obsolete
CARP regulations from the CFR. 81 FR
67940, 67942. One of the CARP
provisions, the regulation regarding
rates for the statutory license for
jukeboxes, is not obsolete and is
therefore the only provision that would
remain.1 See 37 CFR 254. That provision
could have been moved to the CRB
section of the CFR earlier, but because
the rates have remained unchanged for
many years, neither the Copyright Office
nor the CRB has moved the regulation.
The Copyright Royalty Judges hereby
relocate that provision by adding it to
Chapter III of title 37 of the CFR, the
chapter governing CRB activities.
List of Subjects in 37 CFR Part 388
Copyright, Jukeboxes, Rates.
Final Regulations
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, the Copyright Royalty Judges
amend 37 CFR chapter III by adding part
388 to read as follows:
PART 388—ADJUSTMENT OF
ROYALTY RATE FOR COIN–
OPERATED PHONORECORD
PLAYERS
Sec.
388.1 General.
388.2 Definition of coin-operated
phonorecord player.
388.3 Compulsory license fees for coinoperated phonorecord players.
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Royalty Board
37 CFR Part 388
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 116, 801(b)(1).
[Docket No. 16–CRB–0019–RM]
Procedural Regulations for the
Copyright Royalty Board: Rates and
Terms for Statutory Licenses;
Technical Amendment
§ 388.1
General.
AGENCY:
This part 388 establishes the
compulsory license fees for coinoperated phonorecord players beginning
on January 1, 1982, in accordance with
the provisions of 17 U.S.C. 116.
The Copyright Royalty Judges
are amending their regulations to
1 The Copyright Office proposed rulemaking
indicated that part 256 will also remain, but the
CRB recently gave notice of relocation of that part
to part 387 and has notified the Copyright Office of
that fact so it may now eliminate part 256 from
Chapter II. Id.; 81 FR 62812 (Sept. 13, 2016).
Copyright Royalty Board,
Library of Congress.
ACTION: Final rule; technical
amendment.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\21NOR1.SGM
21NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 224 (Monday, November 21, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 83139-83141]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-27914]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2016-1011]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Great Egg Harbor Bay, Marmora, NJ
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the
waters of Great Egg Harbor Bay in Marmora, NJ. The safety zone includes
all waters within 500 yards of a blasting vessel and equipment being
used to conduct bridge pile blasting operations, which is the final
phase of the demolition of the Route 9, Beesley Point Bridge bascule
span. This safety zone will only be enforced during times of explosive
detonation. The safety zone will temporarily restrict vessel traffic
from transiting or anchoring in a portion of the Great Egg Harbor Bay
while pile blasting and removal operations are being conducted to
facilitate the removal of bridge piles from the demolished Route 9,
Beesley Point Bridge.
DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from November 21,
2016 through November 24, 2016. For the purposes of enforcement, actual
notice will be used from November 15, 2016, until November 21, 2016.
During this period the safety zone will only be enforced during times
of explosive detonation.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2016-1011 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this rule,
call or email Marine Science Technician First Class Tom Simkins, U.S.
Coast Guard, Sector Delaware Bay, Waterways Management Division, Coast
Guard; telephone (215)271-4889, email Tom.J.Simkins@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
COTP Captain of the Port
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
In June 2013, demolition work began on the Route 9, Beesley Point
Bridge between Somers Point and Marmora, NJ. Route 52 Construction, the
company performing this demolition work, has completed all demolition
of the bridge and piles except the portion of the bridge which has the
bascule span opening for the navigational channel. The removal of the
remaining piles, which are secured to the sea floor bed, will be
completed by using explosives after which the piles and debris will be
removed. The Captain of the Port has determined that potential hazards
associated with pile blasting operations, beginning on or about
November 15, 2016, will be a safety concern for anyone operating within
500 yards of pile blasting operations during times of explosive
detonation.
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because the final details for this event were
not received by the Coast Guard until November 8, 2016, and the safety
zone is needed for blasting and demolition operations which will begin
November 15, 2016. It is impracticable to publish an NPRM and consider
comments due to the short window of time until the operation begins.
Allowing this event to go forward without a safety zone in place would
expose mariners and the public to unnecessary dangers associated with
explosive detonation.
We are issuing this rule, and under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for making it effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal Register for the reasons we
stated above. Delaying the effective date of this rule would be
contrary to public interest because the safety zone is needed to begin
on November 15, 2016, to protect the public from safety hazards
associated with explosive detonation.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C.
1231. The Captain of the Port has determined that potential hazards are
associated with demolition and pile blasting operations of the Route 9,
Beesley Point Bridge, over the Great Egg Harbor Bay, in Marmora, NJ,
from November 15, 2016, through November 24, 2016. The rule will
provide a safety buffer around the blasting vessel during times of
explosive detonation.
The purpose of this rule is to promote maritime safety and protect
vessels from the hazards of bridge demolition and pile blasting
operations, and to maintain safety of navigation in the Great Egg
Harbor Bay, in the vicinity of the Route 9, Beesley Point Bridge. The
rule will provide a safety buffer around the crane and barge while
demolition operations are conducted, and will provide a safety buffer
around the blasting vessel during times of explosive detonation.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
On November 15, 2016, demolition work will begin on the remaining
portion of the Route 9, Beesley Point Bridge, over the Great Egg Harbor
Bay, in Marmora, NJ. The Captain of the Port has determined that the
hazards associated with demolition and pile blasting operations
requires a safety zone.
The safety zone will be enforced starting on or after November 15,
2016, only during times of explosive detonation, and encompasses all
navigable waters in the Great Egg Harbor Bay within 500 yards of
vessels and machinery being used to conduct pile blasting and removal
operations. The duration of the enforcement of the zone is intended to
protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in these
navigable waters while explosive detonation occurs. There will be two
blasting events occurring on consecutive days to complete both piers.
Actual dates and times of explosive detonation will be published with a
combination of broadcast notice to mariners, local notice to mariners,
posted warning signs, 500 yard marine traffic safety zone maintained by
the contractors safety boats, a 10 minute, 5 minutes, and 1 minute
warning made by the blasting vessel via VHF-FM channel 16,
[[Page 83140]]
and warning signals at 5 minutes with 3 short blasts of the air horn,
and 1 minute warning of 2 short blasts of the air horn. The schedule of
the signals will be posted along with warning signs. The contractor
will verify that all vessels and persons are clear of safety zone 10
minutes prior to the scheduled shot time and will remain secured until
the blaster gives the ``All Clear'' that the channel is clear for
vessels to transit.
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or his
designated representative. No vessels may transit through the safety
zone during times of explosive detonation. During pile blasting
explosive detonation, vessels will be required to maintain a 500 yard
distance from vessels and equipment used to conduct pile blasting and
removal operations. This 500 yard radius will be secured by two
contractor safety boats in the adjacent waterways.
V. Regulatory Analysis
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive order related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule has not been designated
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and
Budget.
This finding is based on the limited size of the zone and that
vessels will only be affected during times of explosive detonation. In
addition, the zone will be well publicized to allow mariners to make
alternative plans for transiting the affected area.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
It is expected that there will be minimal disruption to the
maritime community. Before the effective period, the Coast Guard will
issue maritime advisories widely available to users of the river to
allow mariners to make alternative plans for transiting the affected
areas. In addition, vessels may transit the navigation channel, except
during time of explosive detonation.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule involves a safety zone encompassing all navigable waters in the
Great Egg Harbor Bay within 500 yards of vessels and machinery being
used to conduct pile blasting and removal operations during times of
explosive detonation. It is categorically excluded from further review
under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this
rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
[[Page 83141]]
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add temporary Sec. 165.T05-1011, to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T05-1011 Safety Zone; Great Egg Harbor Bay, Marmora, NJ
(a) Regulated areas. The following area is a safety zone: All
waters within 500 yards of the blasting vessel and equipment conducting
pile blasting operations, in Great Egg Harbor Bay, in the vicinity of
Route 9, Beesley Point Bridge, in Marmora, NJ.
(b) Regulations. The general safety zone regulations in Sec.
165.23 apply to the safety zones created by this temporary section,
Sec. 165.T05-1011.
(1) All vessels and persons are prohibited from entering into or
moving within the safety zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section while they are subject to enforcement, unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port or by his designated representative.
(2) Persons or vessels seeking to enter or pass through the safety
zone must contact the Captain of the Port or his designated
representative to seek permission to transit the area. The Captain of
the Port, Delaware Bay can be contacted at telephone number 215-271-
4807 or on Marine Band Radio VHF Channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
(3) No vessels may transit through the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section during times of explosives detonation.
During pile blasting detonation, vessels will be required to maintain a
500 yard distance from the blasting vessel and equipment. Actual dates
and times of explosive detonation will be announced with a combination
of broadcast notice to mariners, local notice to mariners, posted
warning signs, 500 yard marine traffic safety zone maintained by the
contractors safety boats, 10 minute, 5 minutes, and 1 minute warning
made by the blasting vessel via VHF-FM channel 16, and warning signals
at 5 minutes with 3 short blasts of the air horn, and 1 minute warning
of 2 short blasts of the air horn. The schedule of the signals will be
posted along with all other required signage.
(4) This section applies to all vessels except those engaged in the
following operations: Enforcing laws, servicing aids to navigation, and
emergency response vessels.
(c) Definitions. As used in this section:
Captain of the Port means Captain of the Port Delaware Bay. The
Captain of the Port is also the Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Delaware Bay, Philadelphia, PA.
Captain of the Port Delaware Bay means the Commander, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector Delaware Bay, Philadelphia, PA.
Designated representative means any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the
Port Delaware Bay to assist in enforcing the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section.
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted by Federal,
State and local agencies in the patrol and enforcement of the zone.
(e) Enforcement periods. This section will be effective from
November 15, 2016, through November 24, 2016. During this period the
safety zone will only be enforced during times of explosive detonation.
Dated: November 15, 2016.
Benjamin A. Cooper,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Delaware Bay.
[FR Doc. 2016-27914 Filed 11-18-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P