Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Ohio; Redesignation of the Ohio Portion of the Campbell-Clermont KY-OH Sulfur Dioxide Nonattainment Area, 83158-83160 [2016-27852]
Download as PDF
83158
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 224 / Monday, November 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA R05 OAR 2015–0599; FRL–9955–37–
Region 5]
Designation of Areas for Air Quality
Planning Purposes; Ohio;
Redesignation of the Ohio Portion of
the Campbell-Clermont KY-OH Sulfur
Dioxide Nonattainment Area
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the Clean
Air Act (CAA), the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) is
redesignating the Ohio portion of the
Campbell-Clermont KY-OH sulfur
dioxide (SO2) nonattainment area from
nonattainment to attainment. The Ohio
portion of this area consists of Pierce
Township in Clermont County, Ohio.
EPA is also approving Ohio’s
maintenance plan, submitted on August
11, 2015. The primary emission source
in the area has permanently closed, and
the air quality in the area is now
meeting the SO2 standard. EPA received
one comment in support of the
redesignation.
SUMMARY:
This final rule is effective on
November 21, 2016.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R05–OAR–2015–0599. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either through
www.regulations.gov or at the
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. This facility is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We
recommend that you telephone Mary
Portanova, Environmental Engineer, at
(312) 353–5954 before visiting the
Region 5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Portanova, Environmental
Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR–18J),
Environmental Protection Agency,
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:02 Nov 18, 2016
Jkt 241001
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353–5954,
Portanova.mary@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. Background
II. What comments were received on the
proposal?
III. How does this affect the finding of failure
to submit?
IV. What action is EPA taking?
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
On July 20, 2016 (81 FR 47144), EPA
proposed to redesignate the Ohio
portion of the Campbell-Clermont KY–
OH nonattainment area to attainment of
the 2010 SO2 National Ambient Air
Quality Standard (NAAQS), because
Ohio demonstrated that the most
culpable source had closed, because the
local SO2 monitor was now registering
attainment, and because various
additional analyses showed that no
other sources in or near the area were
causing or contributing to violations in
the area. The Ohio portion of the
nonattainment area consists of Pierce
Township in Clermont County. EPA
also proposed to approve Ohio’s
maintenance plan for this area.
II. What comments were received on
the proposal?
EPA received one comment on the
proposal. Cheri A. Budzynski
commented on August 19, 2016, on
behalf of the Ohio Utility Group and its
member companies (the Utilities). The
comment states that the Utilities
support the proposed action and believe
that it should be finalized. This was the
only comment EPA received on this
notice of proposed rulemaking.
III. How does this affect the finding of
failure to submit?
On March 18, 2016 (81 FR 14736),
EPA published a finding that Ohio had
failed to submit a nonattainment State
Implementation Plan (SIP) for the
Campbell-Clermont KY-OH SO2
nonattainment area by the required
deadline of April 4, 2015. Because the
main SO2 emission source in the
nonattainment area had closed and the
design value at the Campbell County,
Kentucky, air quality monitor was in
attainment of the SO2 standard after
2014, instead of a full nonattainment
SIP for this area, Ohio decided to submit
a redesignation request. Ohio presented
this decision in its April 3, 2015,
nonattainment SIP submittal, and
submitted its redesignation request on
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
August 11, 2015. EPA’s March 18, 2016,
finding of failure to submit would
require the imposition of sanctions if
the SIP requirements are not met within
18 months; that is, by October 18, 2017.
Since EPA is finalizing the
redesignation of the Ohio portion of the
Campbell-Clermont KY-OH SO2
nonattainment area before October 18,
2017, EPA no longer requires Ohio to
submit a nonattainment SIP for the area,
and the sanctions described in the
March 18, 2016, finding will not take
effect.
IV. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is redesignating Pierce
Township, Clermont County, Ohio, to
attainment of the 2010 SO2 NAAQS.
Pierce Township is the Ohio portion of
the Campbell-Clermont KY-OH SO2
nonattainment area. Ohio has met the
CAA requirements for redesignation.
EPA is also approving Ohio’s
maintenance plan, submitted on August
11, 2015.
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(d),
EPA finds there is good cause for this
action to become effective immediately
upon publication. This is because a
delayed effective date is unnecessary
due to the nature of a redesignation to
attainment, which relieves the area from
certain CAA requirements that would
otherwise apply to it. The immediate
effective date for this action is
authorized under both 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(1), which provides that
rulemaking actions may become
effective less than 30 days after
publication if the rule grants or
recognizes an exemption or relieves a
restriction, and section 553(d)(3), which
allows an effective date less than 30
days after publication as otherwise
provided by the agency for good cause
found and published with the rule. The
purpose of the 30-day waiting period
prescribed in section 553(d) is to give
affected parties a reasonable time to
adjust their behavior and prepare before
the final rule takes effect. This rule,
however, does not create any new
regulatory requirements such that
affected parties would need time to
prepare before the rule takes effect.
Rather, this rule relieves Ohio of various
requirements for the Ohio portion of the
Campbell-Clermont area. For these
reasons, EPA finds good cause under 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3) for this action to
become effective on the date of
publication of this action.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, redesignation of an
area to attainment and the
accompanying approval of the
E:\FR\FM\21NOR1.SGM
21NOR1
83159
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 224 / Monday, November 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
maintenance plan under CAA section
107(d)(3)(E) are actions that affect the
status of a geographical area and do not
impose any additional regulatory
requirements on sources beyond those
required by state law. A redesignation to
attainment does not in and of itself
impose any new requirements, but
rather results in the application of
requirements contained in the CAA for
areas that have been redesignated to
attainment. Moreover, the Administrator
is required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by January 20, 2017. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides.
40 CFR Part 81
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, National parks,
Wilderness areas.
Dated: November 9, 2016.
Robert A. Kaplan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR parts 52 and 81 are amended
as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. In § 52.1870 the table in paragraph
(e) is amended by adding an entry for
‘‘SO2 (2010)’’ in alphabetical order
under ‘‘Summary of Criteria Pollutant
Maintenance Plan’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 52.1870
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED OHIO NONREGULATORY AND QUASI-REGULATORY PROVISIONS
Applicable geographical or non-attainment
area
Title
*
*
State date
*
EPA approval
*
*
Comments
*
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Summary of Criteria Pollutant Maintenance Plan
SO2 (2010) ........
*
*
Campbell-Clermont (Pierce
Clermont County).
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:02 Nov 18, 2016
Township
*
Jkt 241001
*
in
8/11/2015
*
PO 00000
Frm 00053
*
*
*
11/21/2016, [insert Federal Register citation].
*
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
E:\FR\FM\21NOR1.SGM
*
21NOR1
83160
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 224 / Monday, November 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
3. Section 52.1881 is amended by
adding paragraph (a)(16) to read as
follows:
has been approved as submitted on
August 11, 2015.
*
*
*
*
*
■
§ 52.1881 Control strategy: Sulfur oxides
(sulfur dioxide).
PART 81–-DESIGNATION OF AREAS
FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING
PURPOSES
(a) * * *
(16) Approval—The 2010 SO2
maintenance plan for the Ohio portion
of the Campbell-Clermont KY-OH
(Pierce Township, Clermont County),
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
5. Section 81.336 is amended by
revising the entry for ‘‘CampbellClermont Counties, KY-OH’’ in the table
entitled ‘‘Ohio—2010 Sulfur Dioxide
NAAQS [Primary]’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 81.336
4. The authority citation for part 81
continues to read as follows:
■
*
*
Ohio.
*
*
*
OHIO—2010 SULFUR DIOXIDE NAAQS
[Primary]
Designation
Designated area
Date
Campbell-Clermont Counties, KY-OH 1 ................................................................................................................
Clermont County (part):
Pierce Township
*
1 Excludes
*
*
*
*
11/21/16
*
Attainment.
*
Indian country located in each area, if any, unless otherwise specified.
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2016–27852 Filed 11–18–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 60
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2016–0382; FRL–9955–20–
OAR]
RIN 2060–AT15
Revisions to Procedure 2—Quality
Assurance Requirements for
Particulate Matter Continuous
Emission Monitoring Systems at
Stationary Sources
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:02 Nov 18, 2016
Jkt 241001
facilities are unable to meet the criteria
for passing their annual QA/QC test
because their emissions are now lower
than the range previously set during
their correlation testing. We are
modifying the procedure to allow
facilities to extend their PM CEMS
correlation regression line to the lowest
PM CEMS response obtained during the
annual RCA or RRA, when these PM
CEMS responses are less than the lowest
response used to develop the existing
correlation curve. This change will
ensure that facilities that have reduced
their emissions since completing their
correlation testing will no longer be
penalized because their lower emissions
fall outside their initial response range.
This action also corrects a typographical
error in the procedure.
This rule is effective on February
21, 2017 without further notice, unless
the EPA receives adverse comment by
December 21, 2016. If the EPA receives
adverse comment, we will publish a
timely withdrawal in the Federal
Register informing the public that the
rule will not take effect.
DATES:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final
action to update a procedure in the New
Source Performance Standards (NSPS).
The procedure provides the ongoing
quality assurance/quality control (QA/
QC) procedures for assessing the
acceptability of particulate matter (PM)
continuous emissions monitoring
systems (CEMS). The procedure
explains the criteria for passing an
annual response correlation audit (RCA)
and the criteria for passing an annual
relative response audit (RRA). The
procedure currently contains a
requirement that the annual QA/QC test
results for affected facilities must fall
within the same response range that was
used to develop the existing PM CEMS
correlation curve. As a result, some
SUMMARY:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
Type
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2016–0382, to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or withdrawn. The EPA may
publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or
comment contents located outside of the
primary submission (e.g., on the Web,
Cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions concerning this direct final
rule should be addressed to Ms.
Kimberly Garnett, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards, Air Quality
Assessment Division, Measurement
Technology Group (E143–02), Research
Triangle Park, NC 27711; telephone
number: (919) 541–1158; fax number:
(919) 541-0516; email address:
garnett.kim@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
information in this SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this preamble
is
organized as follows:
I. General Information
A. Why is the EPA using a direct final rule?
B. Does this action apply to me?
C. Where can I obtain a copy of this action?
D. Judicial Review
II. This Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
E:\FR\FM\21NOR1.SGM
21NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 224 (Monday, November 21, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 83158-83160]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-27852]
[[Page 83158]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA R05 OAR 2015-0599; FRL-9955-37-Region 5]
Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Ohio;
Redesignation of the Ohio Portion of the Campbell-Clermont KY-OH Sulfur
Dioxide Nonattainment Area
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) is redesignating the Ohio portion of the
Campbell-Clermont KY-OH sulfur dioxide (SO2) nonattainment
area from nonattainment to attainment. The Ohio portion of this area
consists of Pierce Township in Clermont County, Ohio. EPA is also
approving Ohio's maintenance plan, submitted on August 11, 2015. The
primary emission source in the area has permanently closed, and the air
quality in the area is now meeting the SO2 standard. EPA
received one comment in support of the redesignation.
DATES: This final rule is effective on November 21, 2016.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R05-OAR-2015-0599. All documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
through www.regulations.gov or at the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We recommend
that you telephone Mary Portanova, Environmental Engineer, at (312)
353-5954 before visiting the Region 5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Portanova, Environmental
Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J),
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353-5954, Portanova.mary@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. Background
II. What comments were received on the proposal?
III. How does this affect the finding of failure to submit?
IV. What action is EPA taking?
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
On July 20, 2016 (81 FR 47144), EPA proposed to redesignate the
Ohio portion of the Campbell-Clermont KY-OH nonattainment area to
attainment of the 2010 SO2 National Ambient Air Quality
Standard (NAAQS), because Ohio demonstrated that the most culpable
source had closed, because the local SO2 monitor was now
registering attainment, and because various additional analyses showed
that no other sources in or near the area were causing or contributing
to violations in the area. The Ohio portion of the nonattainment area
consists of Pierce Township in Clermont County. EPA also proposed to
approve Ohio's maintenance plan for this area.
II. What comments were received on the proposal?
EPA received one comment on the proposal. Cheri A. Budzynski
commented on August 19, 2016, on behalf of the Ohio Utility Group and
its member companies (the Utilities). The comment states that the
Utilities support the proposed action and believe that it should be
finalized. This was the only comment EPA received on this notice of
proposed rulemaking.
III. How does this affect the finding of failure to submit?
On March 18, 2016 (81 FR 14736), EPA published a finding that Ohio
had failed to submit a nonattainment State Implementation Plan (SIP)
for the Campbell-Clermont KY-OH SO2 nonattainment area by
the required deadline of April 4, 2015. Because the main SO2
emission source in the nonattainment area had closed and the design
value at the Campbell County, Kentucky, air quality monitor was in
attainment of the SO2 standard after 2014, instead of a full
nonattainment SIP for this area, Ohio decided to submit a redesignation
request. Ohio presented this decision in its April 3, 2015,
nonattainment SIP submittal, and submitted its redesignation request on
August 11, 2015. EPA's March 18, 2016, finding of failure to submit
would require the imposition of sanctions if the SIP requirements are
not met within 18 months; that is, by October 18, 2017. Since EPA is
finalizing the redesignation of the Ohio portion of the Campbell-
Clermont KY-OH SO2 nonattainment area before October 18,
2017, EPA no longer requires Ohio to submit a nonattainment SIP for the
area, and the sanctions described in the March 18, 2016, finding will
not take effect.
IV. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is redesignating Pierce Township, Clermont County, Ohio, to
attainment of the 2010 SO2 NAAQS. Pierce Township is the
Ohio portion of the Campbell-Clermont KY-OH SO2
nonattainment area. Ohio has met the CAA requirements for
redesignation. EPA is also approving Ohio's maintenance plan, submitted
on August 11, 2015.
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(d), EPA finds there is good cause
for this action to become effective immediately upon publication. This
is because a delayed effective date is unnecessary due to the nature of
a redesignation to attainment, which relieves the area from certain CAA
requirements that would otherwise apply to it. The immediate effective
date for this action is authorized under both 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1), which
provides that rulemaking actions may become effective less than 30 days
after publication if the rule grants or recognizes an exemption or
relieves a restriction, and section 553(d)(3), which allows an
effective date less than 30 days after publication as otherwise
provided by the agency for good cause found and published with the
rule. The purpose of the 30-day waiting period prescribed in section
553(d) is to give affected parties a reasonable time to adjust their
behavior and prepare before the final rule takes effect. This rule,
however, does not create any new regulatory requirements such that
affected parties would need time to prepare before the rule takes
effect. Rather, this rule relieves Ohio of various requirements for the
Ohio portion of the Campbell-Clermont area. For these reasons, EPA
finds good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) for this action to become
effective on the date of publication of this action.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, redesignation of an area to attainment and the
accompanying approval of the
[[Page 83159]]
maintenance plan under CAA section 107(d)(3)(E) are actions that affect
the status of a geographical area and do not impose any additional
regulatory requirements on sources beyond those required by state law.
A redesignation to attainment does not in and of itself impose any new
requirements, but rather results in the application of requirements
contained in the CAA for areas that have been redesignated to
attainment. Moreover, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by January 20, 2017. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides.
40 CFR Part 81
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, National parks,
Wilderness areas.
Dated: November 9, 2016.
Robert A. Kaplan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR parts 52 and 81 are amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 52.1870 the table in paragraph (e) is amended by adding an
entry for ``SO2 (2010)'' in alphabetical order under
``Summary of Criteria Pollutant Maintenance Plan'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1870 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
EPA-Approved Ohio Nonregulatory And Quasi-Regulatory Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicable geographical
Title or non-attainment area State date EPA approval Comments
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of Criteria Pollutant Maintenance Plan
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * *
SO2 (2010)................... Campbell-Clermont 8/11/2015 11/21/2016, [insert
(Pierce Township in Federal Register
Clermont County). citation].
* * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 83160]]
0
3. Section 52.1881 is amended by adding paragraph (a)(16) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.1881 Control strategy: Sulfur oxides (sulfur dioxide).
(a) * * *
(16) Approval--The 2010 SO2 maintenance plan for the
Ohio portion of the Campbell-Clermont KY-OH (Pierce Township, Clermont
County), has been approved as submitted on August 11, 2015.
* * * * *
PART 81--DESIGNATION OF AREAS FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING PURPOSES
0
4. The authority citation for part 81 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
0
5. Section 81.336 is amended by revising the entry for ``Campbell-
Clermont Counties, KY-OH'' in the table entitled ``Ohio--2010 Sulfur
Dioxide NAAQS [Primary]'' to read as follows:
Sec. 81.336 Ohio.
* * * * *
Ohio--2010 Sulfur Dioxide NAAQS
[Primary]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Designation
Designated area ----------------------------------------
Date Type
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Campbell-Clermont Counties, KY- 11/21/16 Attainment.
OH \1\.
Clermont County (part):
Pierce Township
* * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Excludes Indian country located in each area, if any, unless
otherwise specified.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2016-27852 Filed 11-18-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P