Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH, 83182-83184 [2016-27765]
Download as PDF
83182
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 224 / Monday, November 21, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Bulletin Number 468, dated February 17,
2016.
Note 1 to paragraph (h)(1)(i) of this AD:
Gulfstream GII/IIB Customer Bulletin
Number 468, dated February 17, 2016, refers
to Gulfstream GII Aircraft Service Change
Number 300, Amendment 1, dated May 21,
1984, as an additional source of guidance for
accomplishment of the rudder modification.
(ii) Replace the rudder assembly with a
rudder assembly that has been modified as
specified in Gulfstream GII Aircraft Service
Change Number 300. Do the replacement
using a method approved in accordance with
the procedures specified in paragraph (k)(1)
of this AD.
(2) For airplanes with a two-piece hinge
installed: Re-identify the rudder assembly as
having incorporated the actions in
Gulfstream GII Aircraft Service Change
Number 300, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Gulfstream
GII/IIB Customer Bulletin Number 468, dated
February 17, 2016.
(i) Exceptions to Service Bulletin
Specifications
(1) Where Gulfstream GII/IIB Customer
Bulletin Number 468, dated February 17,
2016, specifies to record the rudder part
number and serial number on the service
reply card, that action is not required by this
AD.
(2) Where Gulfstream GII/IIB Customer
Bulletin Number 468, dated February 17,
2016, specifies to contact Gulfstream for
instructions on modifying the rudder
assembly, this AD requires modifying the
rudder assembly before further flight using a
method approved in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (k)(1) of
this AD.
comply with the AD. An AMOC is required
for any deviations to RC steps, including
substeps and identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in
accordance with the operator’s maintenance
or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the RC steps,
including substeps and identified figures, can
still be done as specified, and the airplane
can be put back in an airworthy condition.
(l) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Krista Greer, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ACE–117A, FAA, Atlanta
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1701
Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337;
phone: 404–474–5544; fax: 404–474–5606;
email: krista.greer@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Gulfstream Aerospace
Corporation, Technical Publications Dept.,
P.O. Box 2206, Savannah, GA 31402–2206;
telephone 800–810–4853; fax 912–965–3520;
email pubs@gulfstream.com; Internet https://
www.gulfstream.com/product_support/
technical_pubs/pubs/index.htm. You may
view this referenced service information at
the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
November 2, 2016.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–27309 Filed 11–18–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(j) Special Flight Permit
Special flight permits, as described in
Section 21.197 and Section 21.199 of the
Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197
and 21.199), are not allowed.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Atlanta Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in
paragraph (l)(1) of this AD.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) Except as required by paragraph (i) of
this AD: For service information that
contains steps that are labeled as Required
for Compliance (RC), the provisions of
paragraphs (k)(3)(i) and (k)(3)(ii) of this AD
apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including
substeps under an RC step and any figures
identified in an RC step, must be done to
[Docket No. FAA–2016–3257; Directorate
Identifier 2015–SW–072–AD]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:51 Nov 18, 2016
Jkt 241001
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Helicopters Deutschland GmbH
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for Airbus
Helicopters Deutschland GmbH (Airbus
Helicopters) MBB–BK 117 D–2
helicopters. This proposed AD would
require repetitively inspecting the
bushings of the inner and outer forward
trusses of both engines. This proposed
AD is prompted by reports of
delaminated and worn engine mount
bushings. The proposed actions are
intended to detect delaminated engine
mount bushings, which can lead to
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
excessive vibration, cracking, failure of
the engine mount front support pins,
and loss of helicopter control.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by January 20, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Send comments to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to the
‘‘Mail’’ address between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
3257; or in person at the Docket
Operations Office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, European
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD, the
economic evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
Office (telephone 800–647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
For service information identified in
this proposed rule, contact Airbus
Helicopters, 2701 N. Forum Drive,
Grand Prairie, TX 75052; telephone
(972) 641–0000 or (800) 232–0323; fax
(972) 641–3775; or at https://
www.airbushelicopters.com/techpub.
You may review the referenced service
information at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region,
10101 Hillwood Pkwy, Room 6N–321,
Fort Worth, TX 76177.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt
Fuller, Senior Aviation Safety Engineer,
Safety Management Group, Rotorcraft
Directorate, FAA, 10101 Hillwood
Pkwy, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone
(817) 222–5110; email matthew.fuller@
faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to participate in this
rulemaking by submitting written
comments, data, or views. We also
invite comments relating to the
economic, environmental, energy, or
E:\FR\FM\21NOP1.SGM
21NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 224 / Monday, November 21, 2016 / Proposed Rules
federalism impacts that might result
from adopting the proposals in this
document. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the
proposal, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. To ensure the docket
does not contain duplicate comments,
commenters should send only one copy
of written comments, or if comments are
filed electronically, commenters should
submit only one time.
We will file in the docket all
comments that we receive, as well as a
report summarizing each substantive
public contact with FAA personnel
concerning this proposed rulemaking.
Before acting on this proposal, we will
consider all comments we receive on or
before the closing date for comments.
We will consider comments filed after
the comment period has closed if it is
possible to do so without incurring
expense or delay. We may change this
proposal in light of the comments we
receive.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Discussion
EASA, which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, has issued EASA AD No. 2015–
0198, dated September 30, 2015, to
correct an unsafe condition for Airbus
Helicopters Model MBB–BK 117 D–2
helicopters. EASA advises that during a
pre-flight check of an MBB–BK 117 D–
2 helicopter, an engine mount bushing
was found delaminated. More cases of
delaminated engine mount bushings
were reported following additional
investigations. According to EASA, this
condition could lead to cracks and
eventually failure of the engine mount
front support pins, possibly resulting in
loss of helicopter control.
The EASA AD consequently requires
repetitive inspections of the engine
mount bushings and depending of the
findings, repairing or replacing the
bushings.
FAA’s Determination
These helicopters have been approved
by the aviation authority of Germany
and are approved for operation in the
United States. Pursuant to our bilateral
agreement with Germany, EASA, its
technical representative, has notified us
of the unsafe condition described in its
AD. We are proposing this AD because
we evaluated all known relevant
information and determined that an
unsafe condition is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Related Service Information
We reviewed Airbus Helicopters Alert
Service Bulletin (ASB) MBB–BK117 D–
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:51 Nov 18, 2016
Jkt 241001
2–71A–002, Revision 0, dated
September 28, 2015, for Model MBB–BK
117 D–2 helicopters. The ASB
introduces repetitive visual inspections
of the engine mount bushings for
defects, deformation, separation of the
rubber, and missing rubber after reports
of delaminated engine mount bushings
and bushings with damage to the metal
inner sleeve. If there is any deformation
or separation of the rubber, the ASB
specifies performing a detailed
inspection of the bushing in accordance
with the aircraft maintenance manual.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require
within 50 hours time-in-service (TIS)
and at intervals not to exceed 50 hours
TIS thereafter, visually inspecting the
bushings of the inner and outer forward
trusses of both engines, and depending
on the outcome of the inspections,
replacing or repairing the bushings
before further flight.
Differences Between This Proposed AD
and the EASA AD
The EASA AD allows for a 10 hour
time-in-service, non-cumulative
tolerance for its required compliance
times. This proposed AD would not.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
would affect 5 helicopters of U.S.
Registry and that labor costs average $85
per work hour. Based on these
estimates, we expect the following costs:
• Inspecting the bushings would
require 1 work hour. No parts would be
needed, for a total cost of $85 per
helicopter and $425 for the U.S. fleet.
• Replacing a bushing would require
1 work hour and $373 for parts, for a
total cost of $458 per bushing.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
83183
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed, I certify
this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska to the extent that it justifies
making a regulatory distinction; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH:
Docket No. FAA–2016–3257; Directorate
Identifier 2015–SW–072–AD.
(a) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Helicopters
Deutschland GmbH Model MBB–BK 117 D–
2 helicopters with a bushing part number
105–60386 installed, certificated in any
category.
(b) Unsafe Condition
This AD defines the unsafe condition as a
delaminated engine mount bushing. This
E:\FR\FM\21NOP1.SGM
21NOP1
83184
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 224 / Monday, November 21, 2016 / Proposed Rules
condition could result in excessive vibration,
which could lead to cracking and failure of
the engine mount front support pins, and loss
of helicopter control.
(c) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by January 20,
2017.
(d) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each
action required by this AD within the
specified compliance time unless it has
already been accomplished prior to that time.
(e) Required Actions
Within 50 hours time-in-service (TIS) and
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 50 hours
TIS:
(1) Visually inspect each engine mount
bushing (bushing) for separation of the
rubber from the metal or missing rubber.
(2) If any rubber has separated from the
metal or if there is missing rubber, inspect
the bushing for deformation, corrosion, and
mechanical damage.
(i) Replace the bushing with an airworthy
bushing if there is any deformation,
separation of the rubber from the metal,
corrosion, or mechanical damage, or repair
the bushing if the deformation, separation of
the rubber, corrosion, or mechanical damage
is within the maximum repair damage
limitations.
(ii) If the inner and outer parts of the
bushing are separated with missing rubber,
replace the bushing with an airworthy
bushing.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Safety Management
Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs for this
AD. Send your proposal to: Matt Fuller,
Senior Aviation Safety Engineer, Safety
Management Group, Rotorcraft Directorate,
FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy, Fort Worth, TX
76177; telephone (817) 222–5110; email 9ASW-FTW-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a 14
CFR part 119 operating certificate or under
14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that
you notify your principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office before
operating any aircraft complying with this
AD through an AMOC.
(g) Additional Information
(1) Airbus Helicopters Alert Service
Bulletin ASB MBB–BK117 D–2–71A–002,
Revision 0, dated September 28, 2015, which
is not incorporated by reference, contains
additional information about the subject of
this proposed rule. For service information
identified in this proposed rule, contact
Airbus Helicopters, 2701 N. Forum Drive,
Grand Prairie, TX 75052; telephone (972)
641–0000 or (800) 232–0323; fax (972) 641–
3775; or at https://
www.airbushelicopters.com/techpub. You
may review the referenced service
information at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101
Hillwood Pkwy, Room 6N–321, Fort Worth,
TX 76177.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:51 Nov 18, 2016
Jkt 241001
(2) The subject of this AD is addressed in
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
No. 2015–0198, dated September 30, 2015.
You may view the EASA AD on the Internet
at https://www.regulations.gov in the AD
Docket.
(h) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC)
Code: 7200, Engine (Turbine, Turboprop).
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on November
10, 2016.
Lance T. Gant,
Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–27765 Filed 11–18–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R06–OAR–2015–0142; FRL–9954–66–
Region 6]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Oklahoma; Infrastructure and
Interstate Transport for the 2012 Fine
Particulate Matter and Interstate
Transport for the 2010 Sulfur Dioxide
National Ambient Air Quality
Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
and disapprove elements of State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submissions
from the State of Oklahoma for the 2012
Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) National
Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS
or standard) and the 2010 Sulfur
Dioxide (SO2) NAAQS. The 2012 PM2.5
submission addresses how the existing
SIP provides for implementation,
maintenance, and enforcement of this
NAAQS (infrastructure SIP or i-SIP).
The i-SIP ensures that the Oklahoma SIP
is adequate to meet the State’s
responsibilities under the Federal Clean
Air Act (CAA). The majority of the 2010
SO2 submission was addressed in a
separate rulemaking, only the visibility
component listed in 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) is
being addressed in this action.
We are proposing to disapprove the
visibility component of
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II), often referred to as
prong 4. We are also proposing to
disapprove the portion of the January
28, 2015 SIP submission from Oklahoma
for the 2010 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)
NAAQS only as it addresses Section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) for visibility
protection.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Written comments must be
received on or before December 21,
2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket No. EPA–R06–
OAR–2015–0142, at https://
www.regulations.gov or via email to
Donaldson.tracie@epa.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission
methods, please contact Tracie
Donaldson, (214) 665–6633,
Donaldson.tracie@epa.gov. For the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
Docket: The docket index and
publicly available docket materials for
this action are available electronically at
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas. While all
documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available at
either location (e.g., CBI).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tracie Donaldson, 214–665–6633,
Donaldson.tracie@epa.gov. To inspect
the hard copy materials, please schedule
an appointment with her or Bill Deese
at 214–665–7253.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In this
document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ means
the EPA.
DATES:
I. Background
On October 17, 2006, following a
periodic review of the NAAQS for
PM2.5, EPA revised the PM2.5 NAAQS.
The 24-hour standard was revised to 35
micrograms per cubic meter (mg/m3),
and the annual standard was revised to
15 mg/m3 (71 FR 61144). On December
14, 2012, we promulgated a revised
E:\FR\FM\21NOP1.SGM
21NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 224 (Monday, November 21, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 83182-83184]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-27765]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2016-3257; Directorate Identifier 2015-SW-072-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH (Airbus Helicopters) MBB-BK 117 D-2
helicopters. This proposed AD would require repetitively inspecting the
bushings of the inner and outer forward trusses of both engines. This
proposed AD is prompted by reports of delaminated and worn engine mount
bushings. The proposed actions are intended to detect delaminated
engine mount bushings, which can lead to excessive vibration, cracking,
failure of the engine mount front support pins, and loss of helicopter
control.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by January 20,
2017.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: Send comments to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to the ``Mail'' address between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
3257; or in person at the Docket Operations Office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD,
the economic evaluation, any comments received, and other information.
The street address for the Docket Operations Office (telephone 800-647-
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
For service information identified in this proposed rule, contact
Airbus Helicopters, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75052;
telephone (972) 641-0000 or (800) 232-0323; fax (972) 641-3775; or at
https://www.airbushelicopters.com/techpub. You may review the referenced
service information at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy, Room 6N-321, Fort Worth, TX
76177.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Fuller, Senior Aviation Safety
Engineer, Safety Management Group, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, 10101
Hillwood Pkwy, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone (817) 222-5110; email
matthew.fuller@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
written comments, data, or views. We also invite comments relating to
the economic, environmental, energy, or
[[Page 83183]]
federalism impacts that might result from adopting the proposals in
this document. The most helpful comments reference a specific portion
of the proposal, explain the reason for any recommended change, and
include supporting data. To ensure the docket does not contain
duplicate comments, commenters should send only one copy of written
comments, or if comments are filed electronically, commenters should
submit only one time.
We will file in the docket all comments that we receive, as well as
a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel
concerning this proposed rulemaking. Before acting on this proposal, we
will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments filed after the comment period has
closed if it is possible to do so without incurring expense or delay.
We may change this proposal in light of the comments we receive.
Discussion
EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD No. 2015-0198, dated September 30,
2015, to correct an unsafe condition for Airbus Helicopters Model MBB-
BK 117 D-2 helicopters. EASA advises that during a pre-flight check of
an MBB-BK 117 D-2 helicopter, an engine mount bushing was found
delaminated. More cases of delaminated engine mount bushings were
reported following additional investigations. According to EASA, this
condition could lead to cracks and eventually failure of the engine
mount front support pins, possibly resulting in loss of helicopter
control.
The EASA AD consequently requires repetitive inspections of the
engine mount bushings and depending of the findings, repairing or
replacing the bushings.
FAA's Determination
These helicopters have been approved by the aviation authority of
Germany and are approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with Germany, EASA, its technical
representative, has notified us of the unsafe condition described in
its AD. We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all known
relevant information and determined that an unsafe condition is likely
to exist or develop on other products of the same type design.
Related Service Information
We reviewed Airbus Helicopters Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) MBB-
BK117 D-2-71A-002, Revision 0, dated September 28, 2015, for Model MBB-
BK 117 D-2 helicopters. The ASB introduces repetitive visual
inspections of the engine mount bushings for defects, deformation,
separation of the rubber, and missing rubber after reports of
delaminated engine mount bushings and bushings with damage to the metal
inner sleeve. If there is any deformation or separation of the rubber,
the ASB specifies performing a detailed inspection of the bushing in
accordance with the aircraft maintenance manual.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require within 50 hours time-in-service
(TIS) and at intervals not to exceed 50 hours TIS thereafter, visually
inspecting the bushings of the inner and outer forward trusses of both
engines, and depending on the outcome of the inspections, replacing or
repairing the bushings before further flight.
Differences Between This Proposed AD and the EASA AD
The EASA AD allows for a 10 hour time-in-service, non-cumulative
tolerance for its required compliance times. This proposed AD would
not.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 5 helicopters of
U.S. Registry and that labor costs average $85 per work hour. Based on
these estimates, we expect the following costs:
Inspecting the bushings would require 1 work hour. No
parts would be needed, for a total cost of $85 per helicopter and $425
for the U.S. fleet.
Replacing a bushing would require 1 work hour and $373 for
parts, for a total cost of $458 per bushing.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed, I certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent that
it justifies making a regulatory distinction; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply
with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH: Docket No. FAA-2016-3257;
Directorate Identifier 2015-SW-072-AD.
(a) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH Model
MBB-BK 117 D-2 helicopters with a bushing part number 105-60386
installed, certificated in any category.
(b) Unsafe Condition
This AD defines the unsafe condition as a delaminated engine
mount bushing. This
[[Page 83184]]
condition could result in excessive vibration, which could lead to
cracking and failure of the engine mount front support pins, and
loss of helicopter control.
(c) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by January 20, 2017.
(d) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each action required by this
AD within the specified compliance time unless it has already been
accomplished prior to that time.
(e) Required Actions
Within 50 hours time-in-service (TIS) and thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 50 hours TIS:
(1) Visually inspect each engine mount bushing (bushing) for
separation of the rubber from the metal or missing rubber.
(2) If any rubber has separated from the metal or if there is
missing rubber, inspect the bushing for deformation, corrosion, and
mechanical damage.
(i) Replace the bushing with an airworthy bushing if there is
any deformation, separation of the rubber from the metal, corrosion,
or mechanical damage, or repair the bushing if the deformation,
separation of the rubber, corrosion, or mechanical damage is within
the maximum repair damage limitations.
(ii) If the inner and outer parts of the bushing are separated
with missing rubber, replace the bushing with an airworthy bushing.
(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Safety Management Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs
for this AD. Send your proposal to: Matt Fuller, Senior Aviation
Safety Engineer, Safety Management Group, Rotorcraft Directorate,
FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone (817) 222-
5110; email 9-ASW-FTW-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a 14 CFR part 119 operating
certificate or under 14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that you
notify your principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office before operating any aircraft
complying with this AD through an AMOC.
(g) Additional Information
(1) Airbus Helicopters Alert Service Bulletin ASB MBB-BK117 D-2-
71A-002, Revision 0, dated September 28, 2015, which is not
incorporated by reference, contains additional information about the
subject of this proposed rule. For service information identified in
this proposed rule, contact Airbus Helicopters, 2701 N. Forum Drive,
Grand Prairie, TX 75052; telephone (972) 641-0000 or (800) 232-0323;
fax (972) 641-3775; or at https://www.airbushelicopters.com/techpub.
You may review the referenced service information at the FAA, Office
of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy, Room
6N-321, Fort Worth, TX 76177.
(2) The subject of this AD is addressed in European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) AD No. 2015-0198, dated September 30, 2015. You
may view the EASA AD on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov
in the AD Docket.
(h) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 7200, Engine
(Turbine, Turboprop).
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on November 10, 2016.
Lance T. Gant,
Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-27765 Filed 11-18-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P