Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 81766-81768 [2016-27821]

Download as PDF 81766 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 223 / Friday, November 18, 2016 / Notices Dated: November 14, 2016. Jenny R. Yang, Chair. 60-day notice of submission of information collection for approval from Office of Management and Budget. ACTION: [FR Doc. 2016–27710 Filed 11–17–16; 8:45 am] FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION Notice to All Interested Parties of Intent To Terminate the Receivership of 10400, Sun Security Bank, Ellington, Missouri Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (‘‘FDIC’’) as Receiver for Sun Security Bank, Ellington, Missouri (‘‘the Receiver’’) intends to terminate its receivership for said institution. The FDIC was appointed receiver of Sun Security Bank on October 7, 2011. The liquidation of the receivership assets has been completed. To the extent permitted by available funds and in accordance with law, the Receiver will be making a final dividend payment to proven creditors. Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the continued existence of the receivership will serve no useful purpose. Consequently, notice is given that the receivership shall be terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date of this Notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing and sent within thirty days of the date of this Notice to: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight Department 34.6, 1601 Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201. No comments concerning the termination of this receivership will be considered which are not sent within this time frame. Dated: November 15, 2016. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Valerie J. Best, Assistant Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2016–27760 Filed 11–17–16; 8:45 am] mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES BILLING CODE 6714–01–P FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY [No. 2016–N–11] Proposed Collection; Comment Request AGENCY: Federal Housing Finance Agency. VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:21 Nov 17, 2016 Jkt 241001 In accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA or the Agency) is seeking public comments concerning a new information collection known as ‘‘Contractor Workforce Inclusion Good Faith Efforts.’’ This information collection has not yet been assigned a control number by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). FHFA intends to submit the information collection to OMB for review and approval of a three-year control number. DATES: Interested persons may submit comments on or before January 17, 2017. SUMMARY: BILLING CODE 6570–01–P Submit comments to FHFA, identified by ‘‘Proposed Collection; Comment Request: ‘Contractor Workforce Inclusion Good Faith Efforts, (No. 2016–N–11)’ ’’ by any of the following methods: • Agency Web site: www.fhfa.gov/ open-for-comment-or-input. • Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. If you submit your comment to the Federal eRulemaking Portal, please also send it by email to FHFA at RegComments@fhfa.gov to ensure timely receipt by the agency. • Mail/Hand Delivery: Federal Housing Finance Agency, Eighth Floor, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20219, ATTENTION: Proposed Collection; Comment Request: ‘‘Contractor Workforce Inclusion Good Faith Efforts, (No. 2016–N–11)’’. We will post all public comments we receive without change, including any personal information you provide, such as your name and address, email address, and telephone number, on the FHFA Web site at https://www.fhfa.gov. In addition, copies of all comments received will be available for examination by the public on business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m., at the Federal Housing Finance Agency, Eighth Floor, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20219. To make an appointment to inspect comments, please call the Office of General Counsel at (202) 649–3804. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric Howard, Diversity and Inclusion Principal Advisor, Office of Minority and Women Inclusion, Eric.Howard@ fhfa.gov, (202) 649–3009; Karen Lambert, Associate General Counsel, Karen.Lambert@fhfa.gov, (202) 649– ADDRESSES: PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 3094; or Eric Raudenbush, Associate General Counsel, Eric.Raudenbush@ fhfa.gov, (202) 649–3084 (these are not toll-free numbers); Federal Housing Finance Agency, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20219. The Telecommunications Device for the Hearing Impaired is (800) 877–8339. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A. Need for and Use of the Information Collection Section 342(a)(1)(A) of the DoddFrank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act) requires FHFA and certain other Federal agencies each to establish an Office of Minority and Women Inclusion (OMWI) responsible for all matters of the agency relating to diversity in management, employment, and business activities.1 Section 342(c)(1) requires the OMWI Director at each agency to develop and implement standards and procedures to ensure, to the maximum extent possible, the fair inclusion and utilization of minorities, women, and minority- and womenowned businesses in all business and activities of the agency at all levels, including procurement, insurance, and all types of contracts. Section 342(c)(2) requires that the OMWI Director include in the agency’s procedures for evaluating contract proposals and hiring service providers a component that gives consideration to the diversity of an applicant, to the extent consistent with applicable laws. That statutory provision also requires that each agency’s procedures include a written statement that a contractor shall ensure, to the maximum extent possible, the fair inclusion of women and minorities in the workforce of the contractor and, as applicable, subcontractors. Further, section 342(c)(3)(A) of the Dodd-Frank Act requires that each agency’s standards and procedures include a procedure for determining whether an agency contractor or subcontractor has failed to make a good faith effort to include minorities and women in its workforce. If the OMWI Director determines that a contractor or subcontractor has failed to make such a good faith effort, section 342(c)(3)(B)(i) provides that the OMWI Director shall recommend to the agency administrator that the contract be terminated. Section 342(c)(3)(B)(ii) provides that, upon receipt of such a recommendation, the agency administrator may either terminate the contract, make a referral to the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) of the 1 12 U.S.C. 5452. E:\FR\FM\18NON1.SGM 18NON1 mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 223 / Friday, November 18, 2016 / Notices Department of Labor, or take other appropriate action. As a means of implementing the requirements of section 342(c) of the Dodd-Frank Act, FHFA developed a Minority and Women Inclusion Clause (MWI Clause) that it now includes in all Agency contracts with a dollar value greater than the ‘‘simplified acquisition threshold’’ (currently, $150,000) established in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR).2 The MWI Clause requires a contractor to confirm its commitment to equal opportunity in employment and contracting, and to implement that commitment by ensuring, to the maximum extent possible consistent with applicable law, the fair inclusion of minorities and women in its workforce. The MWI Clause also requires that a contractor include the substance of the MWI Clause in all subcontracts with a dollar value greater than $150,000 awarded under the contract. (Hereinafter subcontractors that are subject to the MWI Clause are referred to as ‘‘covered’’ subcontractors.) Finally, the MWI Clause requires a contractor to provide, when requested by FHFA, documentation demonstrating that it and any covered subcontractor has made a good faith effort to ensure the fair inclusion of minorities and women in its workforce. The MWI Clause provides that such documentation may include, but is not limited to: (1) The contractor’s total number of employees, and the number of minority and women employees, by race, ethnicity, and gender (e.g., an EEO–1 Employer Information Report (Form EEO–1)); (2) a list of the subcontracts the contractor awarded including the dollar amount, date of the award, and the ownership status of the subcontractor by race, ethnicity, and/or gender; (3) information similar to that required under item 1 above for each subcontractor; and (4) the contractor’s plan to ensure that minorities and women have appropriate opportunities to enter and advance within its workforce, including outreach efforts (hereinafter, a ‘‘workforce inclusion plan’’). A request for documentation by FHFA pursuant to this provision of the MWI Clause would constitute a ‘‘collection of information’’ within the meaning of the PRA. While FHFA has included the MWI Clause in all contracts with a dollar value greater than $150,000 consummated since November 7, 2013, the Agency has not, to this point, asked any contractor or covered subcontractor 2 See FAR 2.101. The FAR appears at 48 CFR chapter 1. VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:21 Nov 17, 2016 Jkt 241001 to provide documentation pursuant to the clause. FHFA is now developing procedures that the OMWI Director will follow in determining whether its contractors and covered subcontractors have made good faith efforts to comply with the MWI Clause. The Agency expects that, once it adopts those procedures, it will begin to request the types of documentation described in the MWI Clause from contractors and covered subcontractors. The purpose of this information collection is to fulfill the requirements of section 342(c)(3)(B) of the DoddFrank Act. The collected information will allow FHFA’s OMWI Director to determine whether contractors and covered subcontractors have complied with their obligations to make good faith efforts to ensure, to the maximum extent possible consistent with applicable law, the fair inclusion of minorities and women in their respective workforces. B. Burden Estimate FHFA estimates that the average annual burden imposed on all respondents by this information collection over the next three years will be 368 hours. All of the assumptions and calculations underlying the total burden estimate are described in detail below. Because, as explained below, the amount of burden imposed upon a contractor by this information collection will differ depending upon whether the contractor has 50 or more employees, FHFA has based its total burden estimate on two separate sets of calculations—(I) one for contractors with 50 or more employees; and (II) another for contractors with fewer than 50 employees. FHFA includes the MWI Clause in Agency contracts with a dollar value greater than $150,000. Under the MWI Clause, the FHFA may also request information about covered subcontractors’ ownership status, workforce demographics, and workforce inclusion plans. Contractors would request this information from their covered subcontractors, who, because the substance of the MWI Clause would be included in their subcontracts, would have an obligation to keep records and report data as required under the MWI Clause. FHFA data on the dollar value of contracts awarded by the Agency from the beginning of fiscal year 2013 through the third quarter of fiscal year 2016 shows that 63 contractors were subject to the MWI Clause. FHFA believes that 44 of those contractors have 50 or more employees, while 19 contractors have fewer than 50 PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 81767 employees. FHFA estimates that no more than two subcontracts with a dollar value of $150,000 or more were awarded by Agency contractors during that same time period. Both of those subcontractors have 50 or more employees each. Thus, over the preceding three years, a total of 65 contractors and subcontractors were subject to the MWI Clause—46 of which have 50 or more employees and 19 of which have fewer than 50 employees. Based on these figures, FHFA estimates that, on average over the next three years, 48 contractors and subcontractors with 50 or more employees and 20 contractors or subcontractors with fewer than 50 employees will be subject to the MWI Clause at any given time. For purposes of these burden estimates, FHFA has assumed that each contractor or subcontractor will provide documentation under the MWI Clause once per year, although it is unlikely that the Agency will actually request documentation from every contractor in every year. (In the interest of brevity, the word ‘‘contractor’’ is intended also to include covered subcontractors in the explanation of the burden estimates that follows.) I. Documentation Submitted by Contractors With 50 or More Employees FHFA estimates that the average annual burden on contractors with 50 or more employees will be 48 hours (0 recordkeeping hours + 48 reporting hours). Because Federal contractors with 50 or more employees are already required to maintain the same types of records that may be requested pursuant to the MWI Clause under regulations implementing Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 3 and Executive Order 11246 (E.O. 11246),4 this information collection will not impose new recordkeeping burdens on such contractors. FAR 52.222–26, Equal Opportunity, requires that such contractors’ contracts and subcontracts include a clause implementing E.O. 11246. OFCCP regulations require each contractor with 50 or more employees and a Federal contract or subcontract of $50,000 or more to maintain records on the race, ethnicity, gender, and EEO–1 job category of each employee.5 OFCCP regulations also require each such contractor to: (1) Demonstrate that it has made a good faith effort to remove identified barriers, expand employment 3 42 U.S.C. 2000e, et seq. Order No. 11246, 30 FR 12319 (Sept. 28, 4 Exec. 1965). 5 See 41 CFR 60–1.7. E:\FR\FM\18NON1.SGM 18NON1 81768 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 223 / Friday, November 18, 2016 / Notices opportunities, and produce measureable results; 6 and (2) develop and maintain a written program summary describing the policies, practices, and procedures that the contractor uses to ensure that applicants and employees received equal opportunities for employment and advancement.7 In lieu of creating and maintaining a separate workforce inclusion plan to submit in satisfaction of the MWI Clause, a contractor with 50 or more employees could submit the written program summary that it is already required to maintain under the OFCCP regulations to demonstrate its good faith efforts to ensure the fair inclusion of minorities and women in its workforce. With respect to reporting burden, FHFA estimates that it will take each contractor approximately one hour to retrieve and submit to the FHFA the documentation specified in the MWI Clause. Thus, the estimate of the annual burden upon contractors with 50 or more employees associated with reporting requirements under this information collection is 48 hours (48 contractors × 1 hour per contractor). mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES II. Documentation Submitted by Contractors With Fewer Than 50 Employees FHFA estimates that the average annual burden on contractors with fewer than 50 employees will be 320 hours (300 recordkeeping hours + 20 reporting hours). OFCCP regulations require contractors with fewer than 50 employees to maintain records on the race, ethnicity, and gender of each employee.8 FHFA believes that such contractors also keep EEO–1 job category information in the normal course of business, despite the fact that they are not required by law to do so. However, contractors with fewer than 50 employees may not have the type of written program summary that is required of larger contractors under the OFCCP regulations or any similar document that could be submitted as a workforce inclusion plan under the MWI Clause. Accordingly, such contractors may need to create a workforce inclusion plan to comply with the MWI Clause. In order to estimate the burden associated with creating a workforce inclusion plan, FHFA considered the OFCCP’s burden estimates for the time needed to develop the written program summaries required under its 6 See 41 CFR 60–2.17. 41 CFR 60–2.31. 8 See 41 CFR 60–3.4. 7 See VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:21 Nov 17, 2016 Jkt 241001 regulations.9 In its OMB Supporting Statement, the OFCCP estimated that a contractor with 1 to 100 employees would take approximately 73 burden hours to create an initial written program summary. While the OFCCP regulations require contractors to perform time-consuming quantitative analyses when developing their written program summaries, such analyses would not be required in connection with the creation of a workforce inclusion plan. For this reason, FHFA believes that a contractor could develop a workforce inclusion plan in about onethird of the time that it would take to develop the written program summary required under the OFCCP regulations. FHFA estimates that a contractor with fewer than 50 employees would spend approximately 25 hours creating a workforce inclusion plan for the first time. The Agency estimates that each contractor would then spend approximately 10 hours annually in updating and maintaining its plan. This results in an estimated average annual recordkeeping burden over the next three years on each contractor with fewer than 50 employees of 15 hours [(25 + 10 + 10)/3 years]. Thus, FHFA estimates that the average annual recordkeeping burden on all contractors with fewer than 50 employees over the next three years will be 300 hours (20 contractors × 15 hours per contractor). FHFA estimates that it will take each contractor approximately one hour to retrieve and submit to FHFA the documentation specified in the MWI Clause. Thus, the estimate of the annual burden upon contractors with fewer than 50 employees associated with reporting requirements under this information collection is 20 hours (20 contractors × 1 hour per contractor). C. Comments Request FHFA requests written comments on the following: (1) Whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of FHFA functions, including whether the information has practical utility; (2) the accuracy of FHFA’s estimates of the burdens of the collection of information; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. 9 See PRA Supporting Statement for the OFCCP Recordkeeping and Requirements-Supply and Service Program, OMB Control No. 1250–0003, at https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAView Document?ref_nbr=201602-1250-001. PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 Dated: November 14, 2016. Kevin Winkler, Chief Information Officer, Federal Housing Finance Agency. [FR Doc. 2016–27821 Filed 11–17–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8070–01–P FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM Notice of Proposals To Engage in or To Acquire Companies Engaged in Permissible Nonbanking Activities The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y, (12 CFR part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States. Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than December 13, 2016. A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690–1414: 1. West Town Bancorp, Raleigh, North Carolina; to acquire 43.5 percent of Windsor Advantage, LLC, Indianapolis, Indiana and thereby indirectly engage de novo in extending credit and servicing loans pursuant to section 225.28 (b)(1) of Regulation Y. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 15, 2016. Yao-Chin Chao, Assistant Secretary of the Board. [FR Doc. 2016–27831 Filed 11–17–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6210–01–P E:\FR\FM\18NON1.SGM 18NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 223 (Friday, November 18, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 81766-81768]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-27821]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY

[No. 2016-N-11]


Proposed Collection; Comment Request

AGENCY: Federal Housing Finance Agency.

ACTION: 60-day notice of submission of information collection for 
approval from Office of Management and Budget.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (PRA), the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA or the 
Agency) is seeking public comments concerning a new information 
collection known as ``Contractor Workforce Inclusion Good Faith 
Efforts.'' This information collection has not yet been assigned a 
control number by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). FHFA 
intends to submit the information collection to OMB for review and 
approval of a three-year control number.

DATES: Interested persons may submit comments on or before January 17, 
2017.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments to FHFA, identified by ``Proposed 
Collection; Comment Request: `Contractor Workforce Inclusion Good Faith 
Efforts, (No. 2016-N-11)' '' by any of the following methods:
     Agency Web site: www.fhfa.gov/open-for-comment-or-input.
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. If you submit your 
comment to the Federal eRulemaking Portal, please also send it by email 
to FHFA at RegComments@fhfa.gov to ensure timely receipt by the agency.
     Mail/Hand Delivery: Federal Housing Finance Agency, Eighth 
Floor, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20219, ATTENTION: 
Proposed Collection; Comment Request: ``Contractor Workforce Inclusion 
Good Faith Efforts, (No. 2016-N-11)''.
    We will post all public comments we receive without change, 
including any personal information you provide, such as your name and 
address, email address, and telephone number, on the FHFA Web site at 
https://www.fhfa.gov. In addition, copies of all comments received will 
be available for examination by the public on business days between the 
hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m., at the Federal Housing Finance Agency, 
Eighth Floor, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20219. To make an 
appointment to inspect comments, please call the Office of General 
Counsel at (202) 649-3804.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric Howard, Diversity and Inclusion 
Principal Advisor, Office of Minority and Women Inclusion, 
Eric.Howard@fhfa.gov, (202) 649-3009; Karen Lambert, Associate General 
Counsel, Karen.Lambert@fhfa.gov, (202) 649-3094; or Eric Raudenbush, 
Associate General Counsel, Eric.Raudenbush@fhfa.gov, (202) 649-3084 
(these are not toll-free numbers); Federal Housing Finance Agency, 400 
Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20219. The Telecommunications Device 
for the Hearing Impaired is (800) 877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Need for and Use of the Information Collection

    Section 342(a)(1)(A) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and 
Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act) requires FHFA and 
certain other Federal agencies each to establish an Office of Minority 
and Women Inclusion (OMWI) responsible for all matters of the agency 
relating to diversity in management, employment, and business 
activities.\1\ Section 342(c)(1) requires the OMWI Director at each 
agency to develop and implement standards and procedures to ensure, to 
the maximum extent possible, the fair inclusion and utilization of 
minorities, women, and minority- and women-owned businesses in all 
business and activities of the agency at all levels, including 
procurement, insurance, and all types of contracts. Section 342(c)(2) 
requires that the OMWI Director include in the agency's procedures for 
evaluating contract proposals and hiring service providers a component 
that gives consideration to the diversity of an applicant, to the 
extent consistent with applicable laws. That statutory provision also 
requires that each agency's procedures include a written statement that 
a contractor shall ensure, to the maximum extent possible, the fair 
inclusion of women and minorities in the workforce of the contractor 
and, as applicable, subcontractors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 12 U.S.C. 5452.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, section 342(c)(3)(A) of the Dodd-Frank Act requires that 
each agency's standards and procedures include a procedure for 
determining whether an agency contractor or subcontractor has failed to 
make a good faith effort to include minorities and women in its 
workforce. If the OMWI Director determines that a contractor or 
subcontractor has failed to make such a good faith effort, section 
342(c)(3)(B)(i) provides that the OMWI Director shall recommend to the 
agency administrator that the contract be terminated. Section 
342(c)(3)(B)(ii) provides that, upon receipt of such a recommendation, 
the agency administrator may either terminate the contract, make a 
referral to the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) 
of the

[[Page 81767]]

Department of Labor, or take other appropriate action.
    As a means of implementing the requirements of section 342(c) of 
the Dodd-Frank Act, FHFA developed a Minority and Women Inclusion 
Clause (MWI Clause) that it now includes in all Agency contracts with a 
dollar value greater than the ``simplified acquisition threshold'' 
(currently, $150,000) established in the Federal Acquisition Regulation 
(FAR).\2\ The MWI Clause requires a contractor to confirm its 
commitment to equal opportunity in employment and contracting, and to 
implement that commitment by ensuring, to the maximum extent possible 
consistent with applicable law, the fair inclusion of minorities and 
women in its workforce. The MWI Clause also requires that a contractor 
include the substance of the MWI Clause in all subcontracts with a 
dollar value greater than $150,000 awarded under the contract. 
(Hereinafter subcontractors that are subject to the MWI Clause are 
referred to as ``covered'' subcontractors.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See FAR 2.101. The FAR appears at 48 CFR chapter 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, the MWI Clause requires a contractor to provide, when 
requested by FHFA, documentation demonstrating that it and any covered 
subcontractor has made a good faith effort to ensure the fair inclusion 
of minorities and women in its workforce. The MWI Clause provides that 
such documentation may include, but is not limited to: (1) The 
contractor's total number of employees, and the number of minority and 
women employees, by race, ethnicity, and gender (e.g., an EEO-1 
Employer Information Report (Form EEO-1)); (2) a list of the 
subcontracts the contractor awarded including the dollar amount, date 
of the award, and the ownership status of the subcontractor by race, 
ethnicity, and/or gender; (3) information similar to that required 
under item 1 above for each subcontractor; and (4) the contractor's 
plan to ensure that minorities and women have appropriate opportunities 
to enter and advance within its workforce, including outreach efforts 
(hereinafter, a ``workforce inclusion plan''). A request for 
documentation by FHFA pursuant to this provision of the MWI Clause 
would constitute a ``collection of information'' within the meaning of 
the PRA.
    While FHFA has included the MWI Clause in all contracts with a 
dollar value greater than $150,000 consummated since November 7, 2013, 
the Agency has not, to this point, asked any contractor or covered 
subcontractor to provide documentation pursuant to the clause. FHFA is 
now developing procedures that the OMWI Director will follow in 
determining whether its contractors and covered subcontractors have 
made good faith efforts to comply with the MWI Clause. The Agency 
expects that, once it adopts those procedures, it will begin to request 
the types of documentation described in the MWI Clause from contractors 
and covered subcontractors.
    The purpose of this information collection is to fulfill the 
requirements of section 342(c)(3)(B) of the Dodd-Frank Act. The 
collected information will allow FHFA's OMWI Director to determine 
whether contractors and covered subcontractors have complied with their 
obligations to make good faith efforts to ensure, to the maximum extent 
possible consistent with applicable law, the fair inclusion of 
minorities and women in their respective workforces.

B. Burden Estimate

    FHFA estimates that the average annual burden imposed on all 
respondents by this information collection over the next three years 
will be 368 hours. All of the assumptions and calculations underlying 
the total burden estimate are described in detail below.
    Because, as explained below, the amount of burden imposed upon a 
contractor by this information collection will differ depending upon 
whether the contractor has 50 or more employees, FHFA has based its 
total burden estimate on two separate sets of calculations--(I) one for 
contractors with 50 or more employees; and (II) another for contractors 
with fewer than 50 employees.
    FHFA includes the MWI Clause in Agency contracts with a dollar 
value greater than $150,000. Under the MWI Clause, the FHFA may also 
request information about covered subcontractors' ownership status, 
workforce demographics, and workforce inclusion plans. Contractors 
would request this information from their covered subcontractors, who, 
because the substance of the MWI Clause would be included in their 
subcontracts, would have an obligation to keep records and report data 
as required under the MWI Clause.
    FHFA data on the dollar value of contracts awarded by the Agency 
from the beginning of fiscal year 2013 through the third quarter of 
fiscal year 2016 shows that 63 contractors were subject to the MWI 
Clause. FHFA believes that 44 of those contractors have 50 or more 
employees, while 19 contractors have fewer than 50 employees. FHFA 
estimates that no more than two subcontracts with a dollar value of 
$150,000 or more were awarded by Agency contractors during that same 
time period. Both of those subcontractors have 50 or more employees 
each. Thus, over the preceding three years, a total of 65 contractors 
and subcontractors were subject to the MWI Clause--46 of which have 50 
or more employees and 19 of which have fewer than 50 employees.
    Based on these figures, FHFA estimates that, on average over the 
next three years, 48 contractors and subcontractors with 50 or more 
employees and 20 contractors or subcontractors with fewer than 50 
employees will be subject to the MWI Clause at any given time. For 
purposes of these burden estimates, FHFA has assumed that each 
contractor or subcontractor will provide documentation under the MWI 
Clause once per year, although it is unlikely that the Agency will 
actually request documentation from every contractor in every year. (In 
the interest of brevity, the word ``contractor'' is intended also to 
include covered subcontractors in the explanation of the burden 
estimates that follows.)

I. Documentation Submitted by Contractors With 50 or More Employees

    FHFA estimates that the average annual burden on contractors with 
50 or more employees will be 48 hours (0 recordkeeping hours + 48 
reporting hours).
    Because Federal contractors with 50 or more employees are already 
required to maintain the same types of records that may be requested 
pursuant to the MWI Clause under regulations implementing Title VII of 
the Civil Rights Act of 1964 \3\ and Executive Order 11246 (E.O. 
11246),\4\ this information collection will not impose new 
recordkeeping burdens on such contractors. FAR 52.222-26, Equal 
Opportunity, requires that such contractors' contracts and subcontracts 
include a clause implementing E.O. 11246. OFCCP regulations require 
each contractor with 50 or more employees and a Federal contract or 
subcontract of $50,000 or more to maintain records on the race, 
ethnicity, gender, and EEO-1 job category of each employee.\5\ OFCCP 
regulations also require each such contractor to: (1) Demonstrate that 
it has made a good faith effort to remove identified barriers, expand 
employment

[[Page 81768]]

opportunities, and produce measureable results; \6\ and (2) develop and 
maintain a written program summary describing the policies, practices, 
and procedures that the contractor uses to ensure that applicants and 
employees received equal opportunities for employment and 
advancement.\7\ In lieu of creating and maintaining a separate 
workforce inclusion plan to submit in satisfaction of the MWI Clause, a 
contractor with 50 or more employees could submit the written program 
summary that it is already required to maintain under the OFCCP 
regulations to demonstrate its good faith efforts to ensure the fair 
inclusion of minorities and women in its workforce.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 42 U.S.C. 2000e, et seq.
    \4\ Exec. Order No. 11246, 30 FR 12319 (Sept. 28, 1965).
    \5\ See 41 CFR 60-1.7.
    \6\ See 41 CFR 60-2.17.
    \7\ See 41 CFR 60-2.31.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With respect to reporting burden, FHFA estimates that it will take 
each contractor approximately one hour to retrieve and submit to the 
FHFA the documentation specified in the MWI Clause. Thus, the estimate 
of the annual burden upon contractors with 50 or more employees 
associated with reporting requirements under this information 
collection is 48 hours (48 contractors x 1 hour per contractor).

II. Documentation Submitted by Contractors With Fewer Than 50 Employees

    FHFA estimates that the average annual burden on contractors with 
fewer than 50 employees will be 320 hours (300 recordkeeping hours + 20 
reporting hours).
    OFCCP regulations require contractors with fewer than 50 employees 
to maintain records on the race, ethnicity, and gender of each 
employee.\8\ FHFA believes that such contractors also keep EEO-1 job 
category information in the normal course of business, despite the fact 
that they are not required by law to do so. However, contractors with 
fewer than 50 employees may not have the type of written program 
summary that is required of larger contractors under the OFCCP 
regulations or any similar document that could be submitted as a 
workforce inclusion plan under the MWI Clause. Accordingly, such 
contractors may need to create a workforce inclusion plan to comply 
with the MWI Clause.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See 41 CFR 60-3.4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In order to estimate the burden associated with creating a 
workforce inclusion plan, FHFA considered the OFCCP's burden estimates 
for the time needed to develop the written program summaries required 
under its regulations.\9\ In its OMB Supporting Statement, the OFCCP 
estimated that a contractor with 1 to 100 employees would take 
approximately 73 burden hours to create an initial written program 
summary. While the OFCCP regulations require contractors to perform 
time-consuming quantitative analyses when developing their written 
program summaries, such analyses would not be required in connection 
with the creation of a workforce inclusion plan. For this reason, FHFA 
believes that a contractor could develop a workforce inclusion plan in 
about one-third of the time that it would take to develop the written 
program summary required under the OFCCP regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See PRA Supporting Statement for the OFCCP Recordkeeping and 
Requirements-Supply and Service Program, OMB Control No. 1250-0003, 
at https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAViewDocument?ref_nbr=201602-1250-001.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FHFA estimates that a contractor with fewer than 50 employees would 
spend approximately 25 hours creating a workforce inclusion plan for 
the first time. The Agency estimates that each contractor would then 
spend approximately 10 hours annually in updating and maintaining its 
plan. This results in an estimated average annual recordkeeping burden 
over the next three years on each contractor with fewer than 50 
employees of 15 hours [(25 + 10 + 10)/3 years]. Thus, FHFA estimates 
that the average annual recordkeeping burden on all contractors with 
fewer than 50 employees over the next three years will be 300 hours (20 
contractors x 15 hours per contractor).
    FHFA estimates that it will take each contractor approximately one 
hour to retrieve and submit to FHFA the documentation specified in the 
MWI Clause. Thus, the estimate of the annual burden upon contractors 
with fewer than 50 employees associated with reporting requirements 
under this information collection is 20 hours (20 contractors x 1 hour 
per contractor).

C. Comments Request

    FHFA requests written comments on the following: (1) Whether the 
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
FHFA functions, including whether the information has practical 
utility; (2) the accuracy of FHFA's estimates of the burdens of the 
collection of information; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, 
and clarity of the information collected; and (4) ways to minimize the 
burden of the collection of information on respondents, including 
through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of 
information technology.

    Dated: November 14, 2016.
Kevin Winkler,
Chief Information Officer, Federal Housing Finance Agency.
[FR Doc. 2016-27821 Filed 11-17-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8070-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.