Proposed Addition of New Grape Variety Names for American Wines, 81023-81033 [2016-27573]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 222 / Thursday, November 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules
(g) Inspection and Corrective Actions
Within 12 months after the effective date
of this AD: Do a detailed inspection of the
area above the A2 and A3 galleys to make
sure the hardware (i.e., pin assembly or bolt
assembly) that connects the tripod mount
assembly to the applicable T53 and T52 tie
rods is installed, and do all applicable
corrective actions, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 777–25A0677, dated April
25, 2016. Do all applicable corrective actions
before further flight.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
(h) Definition of Detailed Inspection
For the purposes of this AD, a detailed
inspection is an intensive examination of a
specific item, installation, or assembly to
detect damage, failure, or irregularity.
Available lighting is normally supplemented
with a direct source of good lighting at an
intensity deemed appropriate. Inspection
aids such as mirror, magnifying lenses, etc.,
may be necessary. Surface cleaning and
elaborate procedures may be required.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in
paragraph (j)(1) of this AD. Information may
be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair,
modification, or alteration required by this
AD if it is approved by the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO, to make those findings. To be
approved, the repair method, modification
deviation, or alteration deviation must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(4) For service information that contains
steps that are labeled as Required for
Compliance (RC), the provisions of
paragraphs (i)(4)(i) and (i)(4)(ii) of this AD
apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including
substeps under an RC step and any figures
identified in an RC step, must be done to
comply with the AD. If a step or substep is
labeled ‘‘RC Exempt,’’ then the RC
requirement is removed from that step or
substep. An AMOC is required for any
deviations to RC steps, including substeps
and identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in
accordance with the operator’s maintenance
or inspection program without obtaining
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Nov 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
approval of an AMOC, provided the RC steps,
including substeps and identified figures, can
still be done as specified, and the airplane
can be put back in an airworthy condition.
(j) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Eric Brown, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems
Branch, ANM–150S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; phone: 425–
917–6476; fax: 425–917–6590; email:
eric.m.brown@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd.,
MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740;
telephone 562–797–1717; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this
referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
November 2, 2016.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–27310 Filed 11–16–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
27 CFR Part 4
[Docket No. TTB–2016–0011; Notice No.
165]
RIN 1513–AC24
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
and Trade Bureau (TTB) proposes to
amend its wine labeling regulations by
adding a number of new names to the
list of grape variety names approved for
use in designating American wines. TTB
also proposes to remove one existing
entry and replace it with a slightly
different name, and to correct the
spelling of another existing entry. The
proposed amendments would allow
wine bottlers to use these additional
approved grape variety names on wine
labels and in wine advertisements.
DATES: TTB must receive written
comments on or before January 17,
2017.
SUMMARY:
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Please send your comments
on this proposed rule to one of the
following addresses:
• Internet: https://
www.regulations.gov (via the online
comment form for this notice as posted
within Docket No. TTB–2016–0011 at
‘‘Regulations.gov,’’ the Federal erulemaking portal);
• U.S. Mail: Director, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street
NW., Box 12, Washington, DC 20005; or
• Hand delivery/courier in lieu of
mail: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street NW., Suite
400E, Washington, DC 20005.
See the Public Participation section of
this notice for specific instructions and
requirements for submitting comments,
and for information on how to request
a public hearing.
You may view copies of this proposed
rule and any comments TTB receives
about this proposal at https://
www.regulations.gov within Docket No.
TTB–2016–0011. A link to that docket is
posted on the TTB Web site at https://
www.ttb.gov/wine/winerulemaking.shtml under Notice No. 165.
You also may view copies of this
proposed rule and any comments TTB
receives about this proposal by
appointment at the TTB Information
Resource Center, 1310 G Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20005. Please call 202–
453–2270 to make an appointment.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Berry, Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau, Regulations and
Rulings Division; telephone 202–453–
1039, ext. 275.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Background
Proposed Addition of New Grape
Variety Names for American Wines
PO 00000
81023
Sfmt 4702
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol
Administration Act (FAA Act), 27
U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary
of the Treasury to prescribe regulations
for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits,
and malt beverages. The FAA Act
requires that these regulations, among
other things, prohibit consumer
deception and the use of misleading
statements on labels, and ensure that
labels provide the consumer with
adequate information as to the identity
and quality of the product.
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau (TTB) administers the
regulations promulgated under the FAA
Act pursuant to section 1111(d) of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002,
codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The
Secretary has delegated various
authorities through Treasury
Department Order 120–01 (dated
E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM
17NOP1
81024
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 222 / Thursday, November 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules
December 10, 2013, superseding
Treasury Order 120–01 (Revised),
‘‘Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau,’’ dated January 24, 2003), to the
TTB Administrator to perform the
functions and duties in the
administration and enforcement of these
laws.
Use of Grape Variety Names on Wine
Labels
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR
part 4) sets forth the standards
promulgated under the FAA Act for the
labeling and advertising of wine.
Section 4.23 of the TTB regulations (27
CFR 4.23) sets forth rules for varietal
(grape type) labeling. Paragraph (a) of
that section sets forth the general rule
that the names of one or more grape
varieties may be used as the type
designation of a grape wine only if the
wine is labeled with an appellation of
origin as defined in § 4.25. Under
paragraphs (b) and (c), a wine bottler
may use the name of a single grape
variety on a label as the type
designation of a wine if not less than 75
percent of the wine (or 51 percent in
certain limited circumstances) is
derived from grapes of that variety
grown in the labeled appellation of
origin area. Under paragraph (d), a
bottler may use two or more grape
variety names as the type designation of
a wine if all the grapes used to make the
wine are of the labeled varieties and if
the percentage of the wine derived from
each grape variety is shown on the label
(and with additional rules in the case of
multicounty and multistate appellations
of origin). Paragraph (e) of § 4.23
provides that only a grape variety name
approved by the TTB Administrator
may be used as a type designation for
an American wine and states that a list
of approved grape variety names
appears in subpart J of part 4.
Within subpart J of part 4, the list of
grape variety names and their synonyms
approved for use as type designations
for American wines appears in § 4.91
(27 CFR 4.91). Alternative grape variety
names temporarily authorized for use
are listed in § 4.92 (27 CFR 4.92).
Finally, § 4.93 (27 CFR 4.93) sets forth
rules for the approval of grape variety
names.
Approval of New Grape Variety Names
Section 4.93 provides that any
interested person may petition the TTB
Administrator for the approval of a
grape variety name and that the petition
should provide evidence of the
following:
• That the new grape variety is
accepted;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Nov 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
• That the name for identifying the
grape variety is valid;
• That the variety is used or will be
used in winemaking; and
• That the variety is grown and used
in the United States.
Section 4.93 further provides that
documentation submitted with the
petition may include:
• A reference to the publication of the
name of the variety in a scientific or
professional journal of horticulture or a
published report by a professional,
scientific, or winegrowers’ organization;
• A reference to a plant patent, if
patented; and
• Information pertaining to the
commercial potential of the variety,
such as the acreage planted and its
location or market studies.
Section 4.93 also places certain
eligibility restrictions on the approval of
grape variety names. TTB will not
approve a new name:
• If it has been used previously for a
different grape variety;
• If it contains a term or name found
to be misleading under § 4.39 (27 CFR
4.39); or
• If it contains the term ‘‘Riesling.’’
(See T.D. ATF–370, 61 FR 522,
published 1/8/96.)
Typically, if TTB determines that the
evidence submitted with a petition
supports approval of the new grape
variety name, TTB will send a letter of
approval to the petitioner advising the
petitioner that TTB will propose to add
the grape variety name to the list of
approved grape variety names in § 4.91
at a later date. Those letters are
considered administrative approvals,
and they are posted on TTB’s Web site
once a grape variety is approved. After
one or more approvals have been issued,
a notice of proposed rulemaking will be
prepared for publication in the Federal
Register proposing to add the name(s) to
the § 4.91 list, with opportunity for
public comment. In the event that one
or more comments or other information
demonstrate the inappropriateness of an
approval action, TTB will determine not
to add the grape variety name in
question to the list and will advise the
original petitioner that the name is no
longer approved.
Since the last revision of the approved
grape variety names list in § 4.91, (T.D.
TTB–95, 76 FR 66625, published
October 27, 2011), TTB has received and
administratively approved a number of
petitions for new grape variety names.
In this notice, TTB is proposing to add
a number of grape variety names to the
list of names in § 4.91 to reflect those
approvals. The evidence that the
petitioners submitted in support of each
name—and that formed the basis for the
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
TTB approval—is summarized below.
TTB is requesting comments on the
appropriateness of these names for use
on American wine labels.
TTB is also requesting comments on
one petitioned-for grape name that TTB
did not approve administratively. The
petition for this name—Phoenix—is also
discussed below. In addition, TTB has
received a petition requesting that one
grape variety name currently listed in
§ 4.91—Geneva Red 7—be removed
from the list and replaced with the
name ‘‘Geneva Red.’’ TTB is requesting
comments on this petition.
Grape Name Petitions
Amigne
White Heron Cellars, Quincy,
Washington, petitioned TTB to add
‘‘Amigne’’ to the list of approved grape
variety names. Amigne is a white Vitis
vinifera grape variety long grown in
Switzerland, but relatively new to the
United States. The petitioner stated that
it has grown the variety since the 1990s,
and submitted written verification from
a plant pathologist identifying its vines
as Amigne. As evidence of the variety’s
acceptance, name validity, and usage,
the petitioner also submitted references
to Amigne from a Swiss publication
´
´
‘‘Principaux cepages cultives en Suisse’’
(Principle Varieties Cultivated in
Switzerland), published by the Swiss
Federal Agricultural Research Station at
Changins. Based on this evidence, TTB
proposes to add Amigne to the list of
grape variety names in § 4.91.
Arandell
Jessica Lyga, Plant Varieties &
Germplasm Licensing Associate, Center
for Technology Enterprise and
Commercialization, Cornell University,
petitioned TTB to add ‘‘Arandell’’ to the
list of approved grape varieties.
Arandell, a red wine grape developed at
Cornell, is a cross between two
interspecific hybrid selections from
Cornell’s grape breeding program.
According to a Cornell University
bulletin submitted by the petitioner,
Arandell is a ‘‘grape characterized by a
high degree of natural disease resistance
and producing dark red wines with
clean, berry aromas.’’ The petitioner
also submitted Arandell’s listing in the
National Grape Registry, published by
the University of California at Davis (UC
Davis), which notes the variety is
available for sale at two commercial
nurseries in New York. Based on this
evidence, TTB proposes to add Arandell
to the list of grape variety names in
§ 4.91.
E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM
17NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 222 / Thursday, November 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Aromella
Black Spanish
Jessica Lyga, Plant Varieties &
Germplasm Licensing Associate, Center
for Technology Enterprise and
Commercialization, Cornell University,
petitioned TTB to add ‘‘Aromella’’ to
the list of approved grape varieties.
Aromella is a white wine grape
developed at Cornell from a cross
between Traminette and Ravat 34.
According to a Cornell University
bulletin submitted by the petitioner,
Aromella is ‘‘a winter-hardy white wine
grape with high potential productivity
and excellent aromatic muscat wine
characteristics.’’ The petitioner also
submitted Aromella’s listing in UC
Davis’s National Grape Registry, which
notes the variety is available for sale at
three commercial nurseries in New York
and California. Based on this evidence,
TTB proposes to add Aromella to the
list of grape variety names in § 4.91.
Majek Vineyard and Winery, San
Antonio, Texas, petitioned TTB to add
‘‘Black Spanish’’ to the list of approved
grape variety names as a synonym for
the currently listed ‘‘Lenoir.’’ Black
Spanish is a hybrid red wine grape
grown in Texas and other southern
States. As evidence of the validity of the
name ‘‘Black Spanish’’ to identify the
variety, the petitioner submitted links to
several Web sites that refer to the variety
by that name. These links include one
to UC Davis’s National Grape Registry,
which lists ‘‘Black Spanish’’ as a
common synonym for Lenoir, and three
links to nursery Web sites that list the
variety by the name ‘‘Black Spanish.’’ If
Black Spanish is approved, it will
appear as a synonym for Lenoir in
§ 4.91. TTB believes that the evidence
warrants the approval of Black Spanish
as a valid name commonly used in the
United States for this variety. However,
we welcome comments on this issue.
Based on the above evidence, TTB
proposes to add the name ‘‘Black
Spanish’’ to the list of grape variety
names in § 4.91 to be identified with its
synonym ‘‘Lenoir.’’ TTB also received a
petition for approval of the name
‘‘Jacquez,’’ another synonym for Lenoir
(see discussion below under ‘‘Jacquez’’).
Arvine
White Heron Cellars, Quincy,
Washington, petitioned TTB to add
‘‘Arvine’’ to the list of approved grape
variety names. Arvine is a white Vitis
vinifera variety originally from
Switzerland and northern Italy. The
petitioner stated that it has grown
Arvine since the 1990s, having obtained
its vines from Foundation Plant Services
(FPS) at UC Davis. FPS currently sells
the variety. As evidence of the variety’s
acceptance, name validity, and usage,
the petitioner also submitted references
to Arvine from a Swiss publication
´
´
‘‘Principaux cepages cultives en Suisse’’
(Principle Varieties Cultivated in
Switzerland), published by the Swiss
Federal Agricultural Research Station at
Changins. Based on this evidence, TTB
proposes to add Arvine to the list of
grape variety names in § 4.91.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Bianchetta trevigiana
Laraneta Winery, Templeton,
California, petitioned TTB to add
‘‘Bianchetta trevigiana’’ to the list of
approved grape variety names.
Bianchetta trevigiana is a white Vitis
vinifera variety originally from northern
Italy. To satisfy the requirements of
§ 4.93, the petitioner submitted a letter
from UC Davis’s FPS stating that DNA
testing done on one of the petitioner’s
vines showed it to be of the Bianchetta
trevigiana variety. According to UC
Davis’s National Grape Registry, the
variety is available for sale at two
California nurseries. Based on this
evidence, TTB proposes to add
Bianchetta trevigiana to the list of grape
variety names in § 4.91.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Nov 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
Bluebell
Clover Meadow Winery, Shell Lake,
Wisconsin, petitioned TTB to add
‘‘Bluebell’’ to the list of approved grape
variety names. Bluebell is an
interspecific cross developed at the
University of Minnesota in 1944. A very
cold-hardy variety, it is commonly used
for table grapes, juice, and jelly. The
petitioner, however, produces wine
from the variety. To satisfy the
requirements of § 4.93, the petitioner
submitted Web site references to
Bluebell from the University of
Minnesota and UC Davis’s National
Grape Registry, which lists five
nurseries selling the variety. Based on
this evidence, TTB proposes to add the
name ‘‘Bluebell’’ to the list of grape
variety names in § 4.91.
81025
her letter, Dr. Golino states that
Bourboulenc plant material was
imported from France to FPS, where it
was tested and found to be free of
viruses, then planted in FPS’s Russell
Ranch Foundation Vineyard. The
variety is currently available for sale to
the public at FPS. In addition to the
letter from Dr. Golino, the petitioner
also submitted several published
references to Bourboulenc. Based on
this evidence, TTB proposes to add
Bourboulenc to the list of grape variety
names in § 4.91.
Brachetto
Pete Anderson of Eusinus Vineyard
and Witch Creek Winery, Carlsbad,
California, petitioned TTB to add
‘‘Brachetto’’ to the list of approved grape
variety names. Brachetto is a red Vitis
vinifera variety originally from the
Piedmont region of Italy. The petitioner
states he has grown Brachetto for several
years at his Eusinus Vineyard and is
aware of one other California winery
growing and producing wine from the
variety. To satisfy the requirements of
§ 4.93, the petitioner submitted a letter
from FPS at UC Davis stating that its
DNA analysis of his vine sample
showed it to be a match for samples of
Brachetto held by the National Clonal
Germplasm Repository at UC Davis.
Based on this evidence, TTB proposes to
add Brachetto to the list of grape variety
names in § 4.91.
Bourboulenc
By George
Girouard Vines, Tulsa, Oklahoma,
petitioned TTB to add ‘‘By George’’ to
the list of approved grape variety names.
By George is a red wine grape developed
by George E. Girouard by crossing Ruby
Cabernet with Vitis aestivalis JG #3. As
evidence of the grape’s acceptance and
name validity, the petitioner submitted
a listing for By George from the May
2012 HortScience’s Register of New
Fruit and Nut Cultivars. The petitioner
states that the variety is currently grown
in Oklahoma and California, and it
planned to release a wine made from By
George in 2015. Based on this evidence,
TTB proposes to add By George to the
list of grape variety names in § 4.91.
Tablas Creek Vineyard, Paso Robles,
California, petitioned TTB to add
‘‘Bourboulenc’’ to the list of approved
grape variety names. Bourboulenc is a
white Vitis vinifera variety associated
ˆ
with the Rhone region of France, where
it is one of the thirteen authorized
ˆ
varieties permitted in the Chateauneufdu-Pape appellation of origin. As part of
the petition, Tablas Creek submitted a
letter of support from the director of
FPS at UC Davis, Dr. Deborah Golino. In
Caladoc
RBZ Vineyards, Templeton,
California, petitioned TTB to add
‘‘Caladoc’’ to the list of approved grape
variety names. Caladoc is a red Vitis
vinifera grape developed in France in
1958 as a crossing of Grenache and
Malbec. To satisfy the requirements of
§ 4.93, the petitioner submitted a listing
for Caladoc from UC Davis’s National
Grape Registry, which indicates that the
variety is for sale from FPS. The
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM
17NOP1
81026
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 222 / Thursday, November 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules
petitioner also submitted pages from a
California nursery catalogue indicating
that it sells the variety. Additionally, the
petitioner states that it and several other
U.S. vineyards grow Caladoc. Based on
this evidence, TTB proposes to add
Caladoc to the list of grape variety
names in § 4.91.
vineyards and wineries grow or make
wine from the variety. UC Davis’s
National Grape Registry lists three
California nurseries that sell Coda di
Volpe vines to the public. Based on this
evidence, TTB proposes to add Coda di
Volpe to the list of grape variety names
in § 4.91.
Caprettone
Belle Fiore Winery, Ashland, Oregon,
petitioned TTB to add ‘‘Caprettone’’ to
the list of approved grape variety names.
Caprettone is a white Vitis vinifera
originally from southern Italy. As
evidence of the grape’s acceptance and
name validity, the petitioner submitted
a listing for Caprettone from UC Davis’s
National Grape Registry. According to
this listing, Caprettone was initially
released by UC Davis’s FPS under the
name ‘‘Coda di Volpe’’; however,
subsequent DNA testing correctly
identified the variety as Caprettone. The
National Grape Registry currently lists
three nurseries selling the variety. Based
on this evidence, TTB proposes to add
Caprettone to the list of grape variety
names in § 4.91.
Diana
John H. Brahm III, winemaster at
Arbor Hill Winery, Naples, New York,
petitioned TTB to add ‘‘Diana’’ to the
list of approved grape variety names.
Diana is a red hybrid variety that has
grown in the Finger Lakes region since
the mid-1800s. To satisfy the
requirements of § 4.93, the petitioner
submitted an excerpt from the 1908
book ‘‘The Grapes of New York,’’ which
describes Diana as a seedling of Catawba
that ripens early and is thus good for
cold climates. The petitioner also
submitted a photo of a Widmer’s Wine
Cellars label for a Diana wine, vintage
1942. The petitioner states that Arbor
Hill has recently produced a Diana wine
which it intends to release for sale. TTB
notes that the U.S. Department of
Agriculture’s Plant Genetic Resources
Unit in Geneva, New York, maintains
Diana in its collection and distributes
the variety. Based on this evidence, TTB
proposes to add Diana to the list of
grape variety names in § 4.91.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Chisago
Wine Haven, Inc., Chisago City,
Minnesota, petitioned TTB to add
‘‘Chisago’’ to the list of approved grape
variety names. Chisago is a red wine
variety developed by the petitioner from
a crossing of St. Croix and Swenson
Red. Noteworthy for its winter
hardiness, the variety can survive
temperatures that reach minus 40
degrees Fahrenheit. To satisfy the
requirements of § 4.93, the petitioner
submitted copies of its U.S. Plant Patent
and U.S. Trademark Registration for
Chisago, along with two articles
referencing the variety and a list of wine
competition awards won by its Chisago
wine. According to the petitioner,
several other Minnesota vineyards also
are growing Chisago, and two nurseries
planned to sell the variety in 2012.
Based on this evidence, TTB proposes to
add Chisago to the list of grape variety
names in § 4.91.
Coda di Volpe
Pete Anderson of Eusinus Vineyard
and Witch Creek Winery, Carlsbad,
California, petitioned TTB to add ‘‘Coda
di Volpe’’ to the list of approved grape
variety names. Coda di Volpe is a white
Vitis vinifera variety originally from the
Campania region of Italy. To satisfy the
requirements of § 4.93, the petitioner
cited three published references to Coda
di Volpe and notes that UC Davis’s
Foundation Plant Services imported
Coda di Volpe vines in 2000. According
to the petitioner, five California
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Nov 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
Esprit
Deja Vine Vineyards & Winery,
Martelle, Iowa, petitioned TTB to add
‘‘Esprit’’ to the list of approved grape
variety names. Esprit, a white
interspecific hybrid, was developed by
Elmer Swenson as a cross between
Villard blanc and Edelweiss. To satisfy
the requirements of § 4.93, the petitioner
submitted two publications from Iowa
State University describing the
viticultural characteristics of Esprit and
the quality of its wine. Esprit is also
listed in UC Davis’s National Grape
Registry, which notes that a New York
nursery sells the variety. Based on this
evidence, TTB proposes to add Esprit to
the list of grape variety names in § 4.91.
Falanghina
Pete Anderson of Eusinus Vineyard
and Witch Creek Winery, Carlsbad,
California, petitioned TTB to add
‘‘Falanghina’’ to the list of approved
grape variety names. Falanghina is a
white Vitis vinifera grape variety
originally from the Campania region of
Italy. As evidence, the petitioner cited a
number of wine publications that
reference Falanghina. The variety is also
listed in UC Davis’s National Grape
Registry, which names four nurseries
selling the variety. According to the
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
petitioner, four California vineyards and
wineries are either growing Falanghina
or producing wine from the variety.
Based on this evidence, TTB proposes to
add Falanghina to the list of grape
variety names in § 4.91.
Geneva Red/Geneva Red 7
Jessica Lyga of Cornell University
petitioned TTB to change the currently
approved grape variety name ‘‘Geneva
Red 7’’ to ‘‘Geneva Red.’’ Geneva Red 7
was added to § 4.91 by T.D. TTB–95 as
the result of a petition from a New York
winery (see 76 FR 66625, October 27,
2011). The Geneva Red petition states
that Cornell University, the developer
and owner of the grape variety, does not
endorse the use of the name ‘‘Geneva
Red 7’’ and notes that the petition for
that name was submitted without its
approval. The petition states that
Cornell is concerned that the ‘‘7’’ in
‘‘Geneva Red 7’’ is confusing and leads
the consumer to question whether there
are similarly named grape varieties,
such as Geneva Red 1, 2, 3, etc.
As evidence for the name Geneva Red,
the petitioner submitted a 2003 Cornell
publication referencing the variety as
‘‘Geneva Red,’’ along with the variety’s
entry from UC Davis’ National Grape
Registry which lists the variety as
‘‘Geneva Red.’’ Based on this evidence,
TTB granted administrative approval to
the name ‘‘Geneva Red’’ as a valid
synonym for ‘‘Geneva Red 7,’’ but
advised the petitioner that it could not
remove the name ‘‘Geneva Red 7’’ from
§ 4.91 without rulemaking. The
petitioner has subsequently submitted a
list of four commercial vineyards and
wineries that use the name ‘‘Geneva
Red’’ for the grape variety on their Web
sites. Because the evidence indicates
that this is the name currently used in
the marketplace for the variety, TTB
proposes to remove the name ‘‘Geneva
Red 7’’ from § 4.91 and replace it with
‘‘Geneva Red.’’ However, TTB welcomes
comments on the validity of the name,
Geneva Red, as an approved name for
this grape variety.
TTB further proposes to allow the use
of the grape variety name ‘‘Geneva Red
7’’ for a period of 1 year after
publication of a final rule on this matter
if Geneva Red 7 is removed based on
sufficient evidence from comments
received. If this proposal is adopted as
a final rule, those holding a certificate
of label approval (COLA) with the name
‘‘Geneva Red 7’’ would have sufficient
time to obtain new labels. At the end of
the 1-year period, holders of approved
‘‘Geneva Red 7’’ labels would be
required to discontinue their use as
their COLA approval will be revoked by
operation of the final rule (see 27 CFR
E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM
17NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 222 / Thursday, November 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules
13.51 and 13.72(a)(2)). TTB believes the
1-year period will provide such label
holders with adequate time to use up
their supply of previously approved
‘‘Geneva Red 7’’ labels. This proposal
appears in a new paragraph (e) of 27
CFR 4.92.
Godello
California American Terroirs,
Sonoma, California, petitioned TTB to
add ‘‘Godello’’ to the list of approved
grape variety names. Godello is a white
Vitis vinifera variety native to Spain and
Portugal. To satisfy the requirements of
§ 4.93, the petitioner cited several
published references to the Godello
variety in professional journals and
wine reference books. These include the
article ‘‘Prospection and identification
of grapevine varieties cultivated in
north Portugal and northwest Spain,’’
´
J.P. MARTIN, et al., from the journal
‘‘Vitis,’’ 50 (1), pp. 29–33 (2011), and
‘‘Wine Grapes,’’ Jancis Robinson, ed.
(2012), p. 413. The petitioner also
submitted evidence that a California
nursery sells the variety. According to
the petitioner, a number of wineries in
California and Oregon grow Godello.
Based on this evidence, TTB proposes to
add Godello to the list of grape variety
names in § 4.91.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Gros Manseng
Tablas Creek Vineyard, Paso Robles,
California, petitioned TTB to add ‘‘Gros
Manseng’’ to the list of approved grape
variety names. Gros Manseng is a white
Vitis vinifera variety of French origin.
As evidence of the variety’s acceptance
and name validity, the petitioner
submitted several published references
to Gros Manseng, including the ‘‘Oxford
Companion to Wine’’ (1999 edition) and
´
Pierre Galet’s ‘‘Cepage et Vignobles de
France.’’ Tablas Creek Vineyards
imported Gros Manseng into the New
York Agricultural Experiment Station in
Geneva, New York, in 2000. After it was
indexed and declared virus free in 2003,
it was shipped bare root to the
petitioner. The petitioner states it has
provided Gros Manseng budwood to a
California nursery, and TTB is aware of
two other nurseries selling the variety.
Based on this evidence, TTB proposes to
add Gros Manseng to the list of grape
variety names in § 4.91.
Humagne Rouge
White Heron Cellars, Quincy,
Washington, petitioned TTB to add
‘‘Humagne Rouge’’ to the list of
approved grape variety names.
Humagne Rouge is a red Vitis vinifera
grape variety long grown in
Switzerland, but relatively new to the
United States. The petitioner stated that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Nov 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
it obtained its Humagne Rouge vines
from UC Davis’s FPS in the 1990s, and
the petition included an entry for the
variety from a 1997 FPS catalogue
showing that the variety was sold in the
United States. As evidence of the
variety’s acceptance, name validity, and
usage, the petitioner also submitted
references to Humagne Rouge from a
´
Swiss publication, ‘‘Principaux cepages
´
cultives en Suisse’’ (Principle Varieties
Cultivated in Switzerland), published
by the Swiss Federal Agricultural
Research Station at Changins. Based on
this evidence, TTB proposes to add
Humagne Rouge to the list of grape
variety names in § 4.91.
Jacquez
Haak Vineyards & Winery, Santa Fe,
Texas, petitioned TTB to add ‘‘Jacquez’’
to the list of approved grape variety
names as a synonym for the currently
listed ‘‘Lenoir.’’ Jacquez is a hybrid red
wine grape grown in Texas and other
southern States, where it is also known
by the name ‘‘Black Spanish.’’ The
petitioner states it has used the name
‘‘Jacquez’’ on its wine labels since 2003;
as a result, its customers identify the
wine by that name. As evidence of the
validity of the name ‘‘Jacquez’’ to
identity the variety, the petitioner
submitted an entry for Jacquez from UC
Davis’s National Grape Registry, which
lists ‘‘Black Spanish’’ and ‘‘Lenoir’’ as
synonyms. The petitioner also cites a
number of wine reference books that
refer to the variety as ‘‘Jacquez,’’
including Hugh Johnson’s ‘‘Story of
Wine’’ (2002 edition, p. 439).
TTB also received a petition for
‘‘Black Spanish.’’ (See discussion above
under ‘‘Black Spanish.’’) If Jacquez and
Black Spanish are both approved, three
names for one variety will appear in
§ 4.91. TTB believes that the evidence
warrants the approval of Jacquez and
Black Spanish as they are both valid
names commonly used in the United
States for this variety. However, we
welcome comments on this issue. Based
on the above evidence, TTB proposes to
add the name ‘‘Jacquez’’ to the list of
grape variety names in § 4.91 to be
identified with its synonyms ‘‘Black
Spanish’’ and ‘‘Lenoir.’’
Jupiter
Yamhalis Vineyard, Yamhill, Oregon,
petitioned TTB to add ‘‘Jupiter’’ to the
list of approved grape variety names.
Jupiter is a hybrid grape developed by
the University of Arkansas and released
for commercial production in 1999.
Although it is most commonly used as
a table grape, the petitioner states it
produces a good dry red wine. To satisfy
the requirements of § 4.93, the petitioner
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
81027
submitted an article on Jupiter in the
scientific journal HortScience (Vol. 43
(7)), a copy of the plant patent for
Jupiter, and a letter from Dr. John R.
Clark, one of Jupiter’s breeders.
According to UC Davis’s National Grape
Registry, the variety is available from at
least four U.S. nurseries. Based on this
evidence, TTB proposes to add the
name ‘‘Jupiter’’ to the list of grape
variety names in § 4.91.
King of the North
Clover Meadow Winery, Shell Lake,
Wisconsin, petitioned TTB to add ‘‘King
of the North’’ to the list of approved
grape variety names. A black grape,
King of the North is an interspecific
hybrid of unknown origin. Although it
is most frequently grown for table
grapes, juice, and jelly, it is also used to
produce red wine by the petitioners and
other wineries. As supporting evidence,
the petitioner submitted Web site
references to King of the North from
Iowa State University and UC Davis’s
National Grape Registry, which lists
three nurseries selling the variety. Based
on this evidence, TTB proposes to add
the name ‘‘King of the North’’ to the list
of grape variety names in § 4.91.
Lambrusca di Alessandria
Pete Anderson of Witch Creek
Winery, Carlsbad, California, petitioned
TTB to add ‘‘Lambrusca di Alessandria’’
to the list of approved grape variety
names. Lambrusca di Alessandria is a
red Vitis vinifera variety of Italian
origin. According to the petitioner,
Lambrusca di Alessandria is a different
variety from the Lambrusco currently
listed in § 4.91. He cites as evidence a
March–April 2006 article from the
Italian publication ‘‘Italus Hortus,’’
titled ‘‘Lambruschi from Piedmont:
Historical investigations, fingerprinting
and genetic relationships with other
autochthonous Italian grapes (Vitis
vinifera L.),’’ by D. Torello Marinoni; S.
Raimondi; P. Boccacci; and A.
Schneider. The petitioner also cites
`
‘‘Vitigni d’Italia,’’ by Antonio Calo,
Attilio Scienza, and Angelo Costacurta
(2001) as a reference book that names
and identifies the variety as distinctive
from other Lambruschi varieties.
Additionally, the petitioner notes that
Lambrusca di Alessandria is
maintained, by that name, in the
collection of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture’s National Clonal
Germplasm Repository in Davis,
California.
When the petitioner submitted a
grapevine sample that he thought was of
the Nebbiolo variety to UC Davis’s FPS
for DNA analysis, he was informed that
the sample was actually Lambrusca di
E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM
17NOP1
81028
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 222 / Thursday, November 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Alessandria. This result was
subsequently confirmed by Dr. Anna
Schneider of the Istituto di Virologia
Vegetale Sezione di Grugliasco, Torino,
Italy. The petitioner reports that seven
vineyards and wineries in California are
currently growing Lambrusca di
Alessandria or producing wine from it.
Based on this evidence, TTB proposes to
add the name ‘‘Lambrusca di
Alessandria’’ to the list of grape variety
names in § 4.91.
Loureiro
Lehrman Beverage Law petitioned
TTB to add ‘‘Loureiro’’ to the list of
approved grape variety names. Loureiro
is a white Vitis vinifera variety
originally cultivated in Spain and
Portugal. To satisfy the requirements of
§ 4.93, the petitioner submitted the
listing for Loureiro in UC Davis’s
National Grape Registry, along with
evidence that at least two California
nurseries sell the variety and a number
of California wineries produce wine
from it. Based on this evidence, TTB
proposes to add Loureiro to the list of
grape variety names in § 4.91.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Madeleine Sylvaner
Comfort Farm and Vineyard, Langley,
Washington, petitioned TTB to add
‘‘Madeleine Sylvaner’’ to the list of
approved grape variety names.
Madeleine Sylvaner is a white Vitis
vinifera variety that grows well in cooler
climates. As evidence, the petitioner
cited a Washington State University
publication entitled ‘‘Growing Grapes
for Wine and Table in the Puget Sound
Region’’ that discusses Madeleine
Sylvaner as a variety well suited to the
Puget Sound climate. The petitioner
states that it has grown the variety for
12 years and provided Madeleine
Sylvaner grapes to other wineries in the
Puget Sound region. TTB is aware of
other Washington wineries producing
wine from this variety. Based on this
evidence, TTB proposes to add
Madeleine Sylvaner to the list of grape
variety names in § 4.91.
Marquis
Wyldewood Cellars Winery, Mulvane,
Kansas, petitioned TTB to add
‘‘Marquis’’ to the list of approved grape
variety names. Marquis is a white
hybrid variety developed at Cornell
University as a cross of the Athens and
Emerald Seedless varieties. To satisfy
the requirements of § 4.93, the petitioner
submitted a copy of Cornell’s 1999 plant
patent for Marquis, a 1996 bulletin on
Marquis issued by Cornell, and an
article about the variety from the journal
HortScience (Vol. 32 (1)). Marquis is
also listed in UC Davis’s National Grape
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Nov 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
Registry and is available from at least
four commercial nurseries. Based on
this evidence, TTB proposes to add
Marquis to the list of grape variety
names in § 4.91.
Marselan
RBZ Vineyards, Templeton,
California, petitioned TTB to add
‘‘Marselan’’ to the list of approved grape
variety names. Marselan is a red Vitis
vinifera variety developed in France as
a crossing of Cabernet Sauvignon and
Grenache noir. The petitioner submitted
a listing for Marselan from UC Davis’s
National Grape Registry, which
indicates that the variety is available for
sale from FPS. The petitioner also
submitted pages from a California
nursery catalogue indicating that it also
sells the variety. Additionally, the
petitioner states that it and several other
U.S. vineyards grow Marselan. Based on
this evidence, TTB proposed to add
Marselan to the list of grape variety
names in § 4.91.
Mustang
Natalia Winery, Natalia, Texas,
petitioned TTB to add ‘‘Mustang’’ to the
list of approved grape names. Mustang
(Vitis mustangensis) is a variety native
to the United States that grows wild in
areas of Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas,
Louisiana, and Alabama. To satisfy the
requirements of § 4.93, the petitioner
cited a number of internet Web sites that
reference the Mustang variety, including
that of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture’s Natural Resources
Conservation Service and Texas A & M
University’s Department of Horticulture.
The petitioner states that it harvests 1⁄2
ton of Mustang grapes with which it
produces a 100% Mustang wine.
Additionally, TTB has found evidence
that at least one Texas nursery sells
Mustang vines. Based on this evidence,
TTB proposes to add Mustang to the list
of grape variety names in § 4.91.
Petite Pearl
Tom Plocher of Plocher Vines, Hugo,
Minnesota, petitioned TTB to add
‘‘Petite Pearl’’ to the list of approved
grape names. Petite Pearl, a red hybrid
known for its cold hardiness, was
developed by Mr. Plocher from a 1996
cross of MN 1094 and E.S. 4–7–26. To
satisfy the requirements of § 4.93, the
petitioner submitted a January 2013
article about Petite Pearl published by
Midwest Wine Press entitled ‘‘Coming
Soon: A New Red Wine That’s a Pearl,’’
along with evidence that two nurseries
(in Minnesota and Vermont) sell the
variety. He also named four wineries
producing Petite Pearl wine. Based on
this evidence, TTB proposes to add
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Petite Pearl to the list of grape variety
names in § 4.91.
Phoenix
King’s Raven Winery, Oregon City,
Oregon, petitioned TTB to add
‘‘Phoenix’’ to the list of approved grape
names. Phoenix is a white Vitis vinifera
variety developed in Germany as a cross
of Bacchus weiss and Villard blanc. The
petitioner submitted a number of
published references to Phoenix,
including a listing in UC Davis’s
National Grape Registry, along with
evidence that two other American
vineyards grow the variety.
Although TTB believes that the
petition contains sufficient evidence
under § 4.93 to approve the name
‘‘Phoenix,’’ TTB opted to propose
adding the name to the list of grape
variety names through rulemaking
action rather than approve it
administratively due to potential
conflicts with existing COLAs. An
electronic search of TTB’s COLAs
online database for the word ‘‘Phoenix’’
disclosed 174 COLAS that use the word
‘‘Phoenix’’ on a wine label as part of a
brand or fanciful name. Of these, 40
have been approved since 2012 for 12
different wineries. The use of a grape
variety name in a brand name
potentially could be misleading and
prohibited under § 4.39. If the name
Phoenix is approved as a grape variety
name, these labels potentially could be
misleading, particularly if they do not
also contain a grape varietal
designation. Because of this potential
impact on current labels, TTB believes
that the label holders should be given an
opportunity to comment on this
proposal. Those comments will better
inform TTB as to whether the grape
variety name should be approved and
thus added to the list of approved
names in § 4.91.
Picardan
Tablas Creek Vineyard, Paso Robles,
California, petitioned TTB to add
‘‘Picardan’’ to the list of approved grape
variety names. Picardan is a white Vitis
vinifera variety associated with the
ˆ
Rhone region of France, where it is one
of the thirteen authorized varieties
ˆ
permitted in the Chateauneuf-du-Pape
appellation of origin. As part of the
petition, Tablas Creek submitted a letter
of support for approval of the name
from the director of FPS, Dr. Deborah
Golino. In her letter, Dr. Golino states
that Picardan plant material was
imported from France to FPS, where it
was tested and found to be free of
viruses, then planted in FPS’s Classic
Foundation Vineyard. The variety is
currently available for sale to the public
E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM
17NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 222 / Thursday, November 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules
at FPS. In addition to the letter from Dr.
Golino, the petitioner also submitted
several published references to
Picardan. Based on this evidence, TTB
proposes to add Picardan to the list of
grape variety names in § 4.91.
Pinot Bianco
Rodrigue Molyneaux Winery,
Livermore, California, petitioned TTB to
add ‘‘Pinot bianco’’ to the list of
approved grape variety names as a
synonym for the currently listed ‘‘Pinot
blanc.’’ Pinot bianco is the Italian name
for this white wine variety, while Pinot
blanc is the French name. The
petitioner, who specializes in Italian
grape varieties, believes that it would be
confusing to customers if it labeled its
Pinot bianco wines with the French
name for the variety. As evidence of the
validity of the synonym ‘‘Pinot bianco,’’
the petitioner cited a Web site about
Italian varieties grown in California that
refers to the variety by that name (see
https://www.cal-italia.org/wine.html).
Additionally, two wine reference books
state that Pinot bianco is the Italian
name for Pinot blanc, ‘‘The Oxford
Companion to Wine’’ (Robinson, 1999
edition, p. 533) and ‘‘Oz Clarke’s
Encyclopedia of Grapes’’ (2001, p. 171).
Based on this evidence, TTB proposes to
add Pinot bianco to the list of grape
variety names in § 4.91 as a synonym of
Pinot blanc.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Plymouth
Girouard Vines, Tulsa, Oklahoma,
petitioned TTB to add ‘‘Plymouth’’ to
the list of approved grape variety names.
Plymouth is a red wine grape developed
by George E. Girouard by crossing
Merlot with Vitis aestivalis JG #3. As
evidence of the grape’s acceptance and
name validity, the petitioner submitted
a listing for Plymouth from the May
2012 HortScience’s Register of New
Fruit and Nut Cultivars. The petitioner
states that the variety is currently grown
in Oklahoma and California, and it
plans to release a wine made from
Plymouth in 2015. Based on this
evidence, TTB proposes to add
Plymouth to the list of grape variety
names in § 4.91.
Ribolla Gialla
Vare Vineyards, Napa, California,
petitioned TTB to add ‘‘Ribolla Gialla’’
to the list of approved grape variety
names. Ribolla Gialla is a white Vitis
vinifera variety that has long grown in
the Friuli region of Italy and in
Slovenia. The petitioner states it has
grown the variety and produced wine
from it since 2004. The petitioner
further states it sold grapes from the
2009 harvest to seven other wineries. As
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Nov 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
additional evidence, the petitioner cited
a number of wine reference books that
refer to the variety. Ribolla Gialla is also
listed in UC Davis’s National Grape
Registry, which at the time of the
petition listed three California nurseries
selling the variety. Based on this
evidence, TTB proposes to add Ribolla
Gialla to the list of grape variety names
in § 4.91.
Rieslaner
Mokelumne Glen Vineyards, Lodi,
California, petitioned TTB to add
‘‘Rieslaner’’ to the list of approved grape
variety names. Rieslaner is a white Vitis
vinifera variety developed in Germany
in 1921 as a cross of Riesling and
Silvaner. According to the petitioner, it
obtained its Rieslaner as cuttings from
the New York State Agricultural
Experiment Station many years ago and
has been using it in wine blends. To
satisfy the requirements of § 4.93, the
petitioner cited a number of wine
reference books that refer to Rieslaner,
including ‘‘The Oxford Companion to
Wine’’ (Robinson, 2006 edition, p. 577),
and ‘‘Production of Grapes and Wines in
Cool Climates’’ (David Jackson and
Danny Schuster, 1986, p. 108). Based on
this evidence, TTB proposes to add
Rieslaner to the list of grape variety
names in § 4.91.
Riverbank
Wild Grape Vineyards, Kindred,
North Dakota, petitioned TTB to add
‘‘Riverbank’’ to the list of approved
grape variety names. Riverbank (Vitis
riparia) is a red variety native to North
America that grows wild in the central
and northeastern sections of the United
States and Canada. To satisfy the
requirements of § 4.93, the petitioner
submitted evidence that at least one
North Dakota nursery sells Riverbank
vines and that at least one South Dakota
winery sells wine produced from the
variety. The petitioner also noted that
the University of Minnesota has used
the Riverbank variety in its grape
breeding program to breed varieties with
cold tolerance (see https://
www.arboretum.umn.edu/
grapesandwine.aspx). Based on this
evidence, TTB proposes to add
Riverbank to the list of grape variety
names in § 4.91.
Rose of Peru
Galleano Winery, Mira Loma,
California, petitioned TTB to add ‘‘Rose
of Peru’’ to the list of approved grape
variety names. Rose of Peru is a red Vitis
vinifera variety, long grown in
California, that DNA evidence has
disclosed to be identical to the Mission
variety, which is currently approved
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
81029
under § 4.91. To satisfy the
requirements of § 4.93, the petitioner
submitted a number of published
references to the name ‘‘Rose of Peru,’’
including a February 12, 2007, article
from Wine Spectator magazine entitled
‘‘Researchers Uncover Identity of
Historic California Grape’’ about the
Mission grape variety. According to this
article, DNA research conducted at the
Centro Nacional de Biotecnologia in
Spain found the Rose of Peru variety to
be identical to Mission. The results of
this research were published in the
article ‘‘Determining the Spanish Origin
of Representative Ancient American
Grapevine Varieties’’ (Tapia, et al.) from
the June 2007 American Journal of
Enology & Viticulture (vol. 58, no. 2, pp.
242–251). Based on this evidence, TTB
proposes to add Rose of Peru to the list
of grape variety names in § 4.91 as a
synonym for Mission.
Saperavi
Standing Stone Vineyards, Hector,
New York, petitioned TTB to add
‘‘Saperavi’’ to the list of approved grape
variety names. Saperavi is a red Vitis
vinifera variety that originates from the
country of Georgia. To satisfy the
requirements of § 4.93, the petitioner
cited several published references to
Saperavi. These include ‘‘The Concise
Atlas of Wine’’ (Hugh Johnson and
Jancis Robinson, 2009, pp. 227–229),
and an article from the trade journal
Vineyard & Winery Management
entitled ‘‘(The Republic of) Georgia on
Their Minds’’ (November/December
2010), which notes that a number of
vineyards in the Northeastern United
States are growing Saperavi. According
to evidence submitted by the petitioner,
three wineries in the Finger Lakes
region of New York (including the
petitioner) are growing the variety and
producing wine from it. In addition, a
New York nursery sells Saperavi, and
the variety is listed in UC Davis’s
National Grape Registry. Based on this
evidence, TTB proposes to add Saperavi
to the list of grape variety names in
§ 4.91.
¨
Schonburger
Plum Hill Vineyards, Gaston, Oregon,
¨
petitioned TTB to add ‘‘Schonburger’’ to
the list of approved grape variety names.
¨
Schonburger is a Vitis vinifera variety
with pink berries developed in Germany
in 1979 from a crossing of Pinot Noir,
´
Chasselas Rose, and Muscat Hamburg. A
cool climate variety, it is currently
grown in Germany, England, and the
U.S. and Canadian Pacific Northwest.
To satisfy the requirements of § 4.93, the
petitioner cited a number of published
¨
references to Schonburger, including
E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM
17NOP1
81030
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 222 / Thursday, November 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules
‘‘The Oxford Companion to Wine’’
(Robinson, 2006 edition, p. 622). UC
Davis’s National Grape Registry lists
¨
Schonburger and notes that two
Washington State University facilities
sell the variety to the public. The
petitioner states it has 1.5 acres of
¨
Schonburger from which it plans to
produce 600 cases of wine. Based on
this evidence, TTB proposes to add
¨
Schonburger to the list of grape variety
names in § 4.91.
Sheridan
Blackhawk Winery, Sheridan,
Indiana, petitioned TTB to add
‘‘Sheridan’’ to the list of approved grape
variety names. Sheridan, an
interspecific cross of Herbert and
Worden, was bred at the New York State
Agricultural Experiment Station and
released in 1921. Black in color, it is
often used as a table grape. Sheridan is
listed in UC Davis’s National Grape
Registry, and is available for sale at two
New York nurseries. At the time of the
petition, the petitioner was growing
Sheridan and planning to produce wine
from it. Based on this evidence, TTB
proposes to add Sheridan to the list of
grape variety names in § 4.91.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Southern Cross
Girouard Vines, Tulsa, Oklahoma,
petitioned TTB to add ‘‘Southern Cross’’
to the list of approved grape variety
names. Southern Cross is a red wine
grape developed by George E. Girouard
by crossing Merlot with Vitis aestivalis
JG #3. As evidence of the grape’s
acceptance and name validity, the
petitioner submitted a listing for
Southern Cross from the May 2012
HortScience’s Register of New Fruit and
Nut Cultivars. The petitioner stated that
the variety is currently grown in
Oklahoma and California, and it plans
to release a wine made from Southern
Cross in 2015. Based on this evidence,
TTB proposes to add Southern Cross to
the list of grape variety names in § 4.91.
Terret Noir
Tablas Creek Vineyard, Paso Robles,
California, petitioned TTB to add
‘‘Terret Noir’’ to the list of approved
grape variety names. Terret Noir is a red
Vitis vinifera variety associated with the
ˆ
Rhone region of France, where it is one
of the 13 authorized varieties permitted
ˆ
in the Chateauneuf-du-Pape appellation
of origin. As part of the petition, Tablas
Creek submitted a letter of support for
approval of the Terret Noir variety from
the director of FPS, Dr. Deborah Golino.
In her letter, Dr. Golino states that Terret
Noir plant material was imported from
France to FPS, where it was tested and
found to be free of viruses, then planted
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Nov 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
in FPS’s vineyards. The variety is
currently available for sale to the public
at FPS. In addition to the letter from Dr.
Golino, the petitioner also submitted
several published references to Terret
Noir as evidence of the variety’s
acceptance and name validity. Based on
this evidence, TTB proposes to add
Terret Noir to the list of grape variety
names in § 4.91.
Tinta Amarela
Abacela Winery, Roseburg, Oregon,
petitioned TTB to add ‘‘Tinta Amarela’’
to the list of approved grape variety
names. Tinta Amarela is a black Vitis
vinifera grape that originated in
Portugal, where it is commonly used in
port. To satisfy the requirements of
§ 4.93, the petitioner submitted several
published references to Tinta Amarela
from wine reference books and wine
Web sites. The petitioner also noted that
the entry for Tinta Amarela in UC
Davis’s National Grape Registry lists
eight U.S. nurseries that sell the variety.
Based on this evidence, TTB proposes to
add Tinta Amarela to the list of grape
variety names in § 4.91.
Tinta Cao
Cypher Winery, Paso Robles,
California, petitioned TTB to add ‘‘Tinta
Cao’’ to the list of approved grape
variety names. Tinta Cao is a synonym
˜
for ‘‘Tinto cao,’’ a name already listed in
§ 4.91. As evidence that Tinta Cao is a
valid name for the variety, the petitioner
submitted a copy of the 2008 California
Grape Crush Report, issued by the
California Department of Food and
Agriculture. The publication, referring
to ‘‘Tinta Cao,’’ reports that 408.6 tons
of the grape were crushed in California
that year. Additionally, UC Davis’s
National Grape Register lists ‘‘Tinta
˜
Cao’’ as a synonym for Tinto cao and
TTB is aware of at least one California
vineyard selling the variety by the
proposed name. Based on this evidence,
TTB proposes to add Tinta Cao to the
list of grape variety names in § 4.91 as
˜
a synonym for Tinto cao.
Tinta Roriz
Cypher Winery, Paso Robles,
California, petitioned TTB to add ‘‘Tinta
Roriz’’ to the list of approved grape
variety names. Tinta Roriz is a synonym
˜
for ‘‘Tempranillo’’ and ‘‘Valdepenas,’’
names already listed in § 4.91. As
evidence that Tinta Roriz is a valid
name for the variety, the petitioner
submitted a copy of the 2008 California
Grape Crush Report, which refers to
Tinta Roriz as a synonym for
˜
Tempranillo and Valdepenas. UC
Davis’s National Grape Registry contains
a separate listing for Tinta Roriz, but
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
notes that it is a Portuguese name for the
grape variety known in Spain as
Tempranillo. If the name ‘‘Tinta Roriz’’
is approved, three names for this variety
will appear in § 4.91. TTB believes that
the evidence warrants the approval of
Tinta Roriz. However, we welcome
comments on this issue. Based on the
above evidence, TTB proposes to add
Tinta Roriz to the list of grape variety
names in § 4.91.
Touriga Nacional
Cypher Winery, Paso Robles,
California, petitioned TTB to add
‘‘Touriga Nacional’’ to the list of
approved grape variety names. Touriga
Nacional is a black Vitis vinifera grape
variety originally from Portugal. To
satisfy the requirements of § 4.93, the
petitioner submitted a copy of the 2008
California Grape Crush Report, issued
by the California Department of Food
and Agriculture. This publication
reports that 914.5 tons of Touriga
Nacional were crushed in California that
year. Also, UC Davis’s National Grape
Registry contains an entry for Touriga
Nacional, and it lists 12 nurseries
selling the variety. Based on this
evidence, TTB proposes to add Touriga
Nacional to the list of grape variety
names in § 4.91.
The name ‘‘Touriga’’ is currently
listed in § 4.91, which the petitioner
contends is similar to listing ‘‘Cabernet
Sauvignon’’ as ‘‘Cabernet.’’ However,
the petitioner did not request the
removal of ‘‘Touriga’’ from the list, nor
did it submit any evidence for such a
removal. TTB is aware that there are
other grape variety names that include
‘‘Touriga’’ as part of the name (the
National Grape Registry also lists
‘‘Touriga Franca’’ and ‘‘Touriga
Brasileira’’). Because bottlers of wines
produced from these grapes may be
utilizing the name ‘‘Touriga,’’ TTB
proposes to keep the name on the list for
now. However, we welcome comments
regarding the accuracy of the name
‘‘Touriga.’’
`
Vaccarese
Tablas Creek Vineyard, Paso Robles,
California, petitioned TTB to add
`
‘‘Vaccarese’’ to the list of approved
`
grape variety names. Vaccarese is a red
Vitis vinifera variety associated with the
ˆ
Rhone region of France, where it is one
of the 13 authorized varieties permitted
ˆ
in the Chateauneuf-du-Pape appellation
of origin. As part of the petition, Tablas
Creek submitted a letter of support from
the director of FPS, Dr. Deborah Golino.
In her letter, Dr. Golino states that
`
Vaccarese plant material was imported
from France to FPS, where it was tested
and found to be free of viruses, then
E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM
17NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 222 / Thursday, November 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules
planted in FPS’s Russell Ranch
Foundation Vineyard. The variety is
currently available for sale to the public
at FPS. In addition to the letter from Dr.
Golino, the petitioner also submitted
several published references to
`
Vaccarese. Based on this evidence, TTB
`
proposes to add Vaccarese to the list of
grape variety names in § 4.91.
Valjohn
Girouard Vines, Tulsa, Oklahoma,
petitioned TTB to add ‘‘Valjohn’’ to the
list of approved grape variety names.
Valjohn is a red wine grape developed
by George E. Girouard by crossing
Cabernet Franc with Vitis aestivalis JG
# 3. To satisfy the requirements of
§ 4.93, the petitioner submitted a listing
for Valjohn from the May 2012
HortScience’s Register of New Fruit and
Nut Cultivars. The petitioner stated that
the variety is currently grown in
Oklahoma and California, and that it
plans to release a wine made from
Valjohn in 2015. Based on this
evidence, TTB proposes to add Valjohn
to the list of grape variety names in
§ 4.91.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Verdejo
Berryessa Gap Vineyards, Winters,
California, petitioned TTB to add
‘‘Verdejo’’ to the list of approved grape
variety names. Verdejo is a white Vitis
vinifera variety that has grown for
centuries in the Rueda region of Spain.
To satisfy the requirements of § 4.93, the
petitioner cites a number of published
references to Verdejo, including in ‘‘The
Oxford Companion to Wine’’ (Robinson,
2006 edition) and the American Journal
of Enology and Viticulture. Separately,
TTB received a letter of support for the
petition from the director of FPS, Dr.
Deborah Golino. She reports that FPS
imported the variety in 2000 and since
2006 has distributed more than 750
Verdejo cuttings or plants to California
vineyards. According to UC Davis’s
National Grape Registry, five nurseries
sell Verdejo to the public. Based on this
evidence, TTB proposes to add Verdejo
to the list of grape variety names in
§ 4.91.
Technical Correction
TTB has become aware of a technical
error in § 4.91 in that the grape variety
name ‘‘Madeleine Angevine’’ is
currently misspelled as ‘‘Madeline
Angevine.’’ TTB proposes to correct this
error in this document. TTB also
proposes to allow the use of the spelling
‘‘Madeline Angevine’’ for a period of 1
year after publication of a final rule on
this matter so that anyone holding a
COLA with the misspelling has
sufficient time to obtain new labels. If
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Nov 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
this proposal is adopted as a final rule,
at the end of the 1-year period, holders
of approved ‘‘Madeline Angevine’’
labels must discontinue their use as
their certificates of label approval will
be revoked by operation of the final rule
(see 27 CFR 13.51 and 13.72(a)(2)). TTB
believes the 1-year period will provide
such label holders with adequate time to
use up their supply of previously
approved ‘‘Madeline Angevine’’ labels.
This proposal appears in a new
paragraph (e) of 27 CFR 4.92.
Public Participation
Comments Sought
TTB requests comments from
members of the public, particularly any
person whose use of an approved label
might be impacted by final approval of
the grape variety names that are the
subject of this proposed rule. TTB is
also interested in comments that might
bring into question whether an added
grape name is accurate and appropriate
for the designation of American wines.
TTB is particularly interested in
comments concerning the grape name
discussed above that TTB did not
approve by letter, Phoenix, as well as
Geneva Red 7, the grape name we are
proposing to replace with the name
‘‘Geneva Red.’’ Finally, TTB invites
comment on any other issue raised by
this notice of proposed rulemaking.
Please support your comment with
specific information about the grape
varietal name in question.
Submitting Comments
You may submit comments on this
notice by using one of the following
three methods:
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: You
may send comments via the online
comment form posted with this
proposed rule within Docket No. TTB–
2016–0011 on ‘‘Regulations.gov,’’ the
Federal e-rulemaking portal, at https://
www.regulations.gov. A direct link to
that docket is available under Notice
No. 165 on the TTB Web site at https://
www.ttb.gov/wine/winerulemaking.shtml. Supplemental files
may be attached to comments submitted
via Regulations.gov. For complete
instructions on how to use
Regulations.gov, click on the site’s
‘‘Help’’ tab.
• U.S. Mail: You may send comments
via postal mail to the Director,
Regulations and Rulings Division,
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau, 1310 G Street NW., Box 12,
Washington, DC 20005.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: You may
hand-carry your comments or have them
hand-carried to the Alcohol and
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
81031
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G
Street NW., Suite 400E, Washington, DC
20005.
Please submit your comments by the
closing date shown above in this
proposed rule. Your comments must
reference Notice No. 165 and include
your name and mailing address. Your
comments also must be made in
English, be legible, and be written in
language acceptable for public
disclosure. TTB does not acknowledge
receipt of comments and considers all
comments as originals.
In your comment, please clearly state
if you are commenting for yourself or on
behalf of an association, business, or
other entity. If you are commenting on
behalf of an entity, your comment must
include the entity’s name as well as
your name and position title. In your
comment via Regulations.gov, please
enter the entity’s name in the
‘‘Organization’’ blank of the online
comment form. If you comment via
postal mail or hand delivery/courier,
please submit your entity’s comment on
letterhead.
You may also write to the
Administrator before the comment
closing date to ask for a public hearing.
The Administrator reserves the right to
determine whether to hold a public
hearing.
Confidentiality
All submitted comments and
attachments are part of the public record
and subject to disclosure. Do not
enclose any material in your comments
that you consider to be confidential or
inappropriate for public disclosure.
Public Disclosure
TTB will post, and you may view,
copies of this proposed rule and any
online or mailed comments received
about this proposal within Docket No.
TTB–2016–0011 on the Federal erulemaking portal. A direct link to that
docket is available on the TTB Web site
at https://www.ttb.gov/wine/winerulemaking.shtml under Notice No. 165.
You may also reach the relevant docket
through the Regulations.gov search page
at https://www.regulations.gov. For
information on how to use
Regulations.gov, click on the site’s
‘‘Help’’ tab.
All posted comments will display the
commenter’s name, organization (if
any), city, and State, and, in the case of
mailed comments, all address
information, including email addresses.
TTB may omit voluminous attachments
or material that it considers unsuitable
for posting.
You may view copies of this proposed
rule and any electronic or mailed
E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM
17NOP1
81032
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 222 / Thursday, November 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules
comments TTB receives about this
proposal by appointment at the TTB
Information Resource Center, 1310G
Street NW., Washington, DC 20005. You
may also obtain copies for 20 cents per
8.5- x 11-inch page. Contact TTB’s
information specialist at the above
address or by telephone at 202–453–
2270 to schedule an appointment or to
request copies of comments or other
materials.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
TTB certifies that this proposed
regulation, if adopted, will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The decision of a grape grower to
petition for a grape variety name
approval, or the decision of a wine
bottler to use an approved name on a
label, is entirely at the discretion of the
grower or bottler. This proposed
regulation does not impose any new
reporting, recordkeeping, or other
administrative requirements.
Accordingly, a regulatory flexibility
analysis is not required.
Executive Order 12866
It has been determined that this
proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action as defined by
Executive Order 12866 of September 30,
1993. Therefore, no regulatory
assessment is required.
Drafting Information
Jennifer Berry of the Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau, drafted this
document.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 4
Administrative practice and
procedure, Advertising, Customs duties
and inspection, Imports, Labeling,
Packaging and containers, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Trade
practices, Wine.
Proposed Regulatory Amendment
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, TTB proposes to amend 27
CFR, chapter I, part 4 as set forth below:
PART 4—LABELING AND
ADVERTISING OF WINE
1. The authority citation for 27 CFR
part 4 continues to read as follows:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
■
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205, unless otherwise
noted.
2. In § 4.91, the list of grape variety
names following the introductory text is
amended by removing the entries for
‘‘Geneva Red 7,’’ ‘‘Lenoir,’’ ‘‘Madeline
Angevine,’’ ‘‘Mission,’’ ‘‘Pinot blanc,’’
˜
‘‘Tempranillo (Valdepenas),’’ ‘‘Tinto
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Nov 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
˜
˜
cao,’’ and ‘‘Valdepenas (Tempranillo),’’
and by adding new entries in
alphabetical order to read as follows:
§ 4.91
List of approved names.
*
*
*
*
*
Amigne
Arandell
*
*
*
*
*
Aromella
Arvine
*
*
*
*
*
Bianchetta trevigiana
*
*
*
*
*
Black Spanish (Jacquez, Lenoir)
*
*
*
*
*
Bluebell
*
*
*
*
*
Bourboulenc
Brachetto
*
*
*
*
*
By George
*
*
*
*
*
Caladoc
*
*
*
*
*
Caprettone
*
*
*
*
*
Chisago
*
*
*
*
*
Coda di Volpe
*
*
*
*
*
Diana
*
*
*
*
*
Esprit
Falanghina
*
*
*
*
*
Geneva Red
*
*
*
*
*
Godello
*
*
*
*
*
Gros Manseng
*
*
*
*
*
Humagne Rouge
*
*
*
*
*
Jacquez (Black Spanish, Lenoir)
*
*
*
*
*
Jupiter
*
*
*
*
*
King of the North
*
*
*
*
*
Lambrusca di Alessandria
*
*
*
*
*
Lenoir (Black Spanish, Jacquez)
*
*
*
*
*
Loureiro
*
*
*
*
*
Madeleine Angevine
Madeleine Sylvaner
*
*
*
*
*
Marquis
*
*
*
*
*
Marselan
*
*
*
*
*
Mission (Rose of Peru)
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Mustang
*
*
*
*
*
Petite Pearl
*
*
*
*
*
Phoenix
Picardan
*
*
*
*
*
Pinot bianco (Pinot blanc)
Pinot blanc (Pinot bianco)
*
*
*
*
*
Plymouth
*
*
*
*
*
Ribolla Gialla
Rieslaner
*
*
*
*
*
Riverbank
*
*
*
*
*
Rose of Peru (Mission)
*
*
*
*
*
Saperavi
*
*
*
*
*
¨
Schonburger
*
*
*
*
*
Sheridan
*
*
*
*
*
Southern Cross
*
*
*
*
*
˜
Tempranillo (Tinta Roriz, Valdepenas)
Terret Noir
*
*
*
*
*
Tinta Amarela
˜
Tinta Cao (Tinto cao)
*
*
*
*
*
˜
Tinta Roriz (Tempranillo, Valdepenas)
˜
Tinto cao (Tinta Cao)
*
*
*
*
*
Touriga Nacional
*
*
*
*
*
`
Vaccarese
˜
Valdepenas (Tempranillo, Tinta Roriz)
*
*
*
*
*
Valjohn
*
*
*
*
*
Verdejo
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Section 4.92 is amended by adding
paragraph (e) to read as follows:
§ 4.92 Alternative names permitted for
temporary use.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Wines bottled prior to [date 1 year
after publication of the final rule in the
Federal Register].
E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM
17NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 222 / Thursday, November 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Alternative Name/Name
Geneva Red 7—Geneva Red
Madeline Angevine—Madeleine
Angevine
Signed: September 29, 2016.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
Approved: November 3, 2016.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and
Tariff Policy).
[FR Doc. 2016–27573 Filed 11–16–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Safety and Environmental
Enforcement
30 CFR Part 250
[Docket ID: BSEE–2016–0003; 17XE1700DX
EEEE500000 EX1SF0000.DAQ000]
RIN 1014–AA31
Adjustments to Cost Recovery Fees
Relating to the Regulation of Oil, Gas,
and Sulfur Activities on the Outer
Continental Shelf
Bureau of Safety and
Environmental Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Safety and
Environmental Enforcement (BSEE)
currently charges a fee for 31 different
services (hereafter ‘‘cost recovery fees’’)
it provides to non-Federal recipients.
The services were identified by BSEE’s
predecessor agency, the Minerals
Management Service (MMS). This
proposed rule would revise and clarify
the existing fees; add new fees for
certain services; revise and codify the
existing conditions for refunding fees;
and clarify the acceptable methods of
fee payment. This proposed rule would
enable BSEE to recover its full costs
associated with providing these services
to recipients of special benefits beyond
those accruing to the general public.
DATES: BSEE will consider all comments
received by January 17, 2017. BSEE may
not consider comments received after
this date. Submit comments to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) on the information collection
burden in this proposed rule by
December 19, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on the proposed rule by any of the
following methods. Please use the
Regulatory Identifier Number (RIN)
1014–AA31 as an identifier to your
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Nov 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
message. See also Public Availability of
Comments under Procedural Matters.
• Submit comments electronically. Go
to https://www.regulations.gov and
search for ‘‘BSEE–2016–0003.’’ Follow
the instructions to submit public
comments and view supporting and
related materials available for this
rulemaking. BSEE will post all relevant
comments.
• Mail or hand-carry comments to the
Department of the Interior (DOI); Bureau
of Safety and Environmental
Enforcement; Attention: Regulations
and Standards Branch; 45600 Woodland
Road, Sterling, VA 20166. Please
reference Adjustment of Service Fees
Relating to the Regulation of Oil, Gas,
and Sulfur Activities on the Outer
Continental Shelf, AA31 in your
comments and include your name and
return address.
• Comments on the information
collection contained in this proposed
rule are separate from those on the
substance of the proposed rule. Send
comments on the information collection
burden in this rule to: OMB, Interior
Desk Officer, 202–395–5806 (fax); email
OIRA_submissions@omb.eop.gov. Please
also send a copy to BSEE at
regs@bsee.gov, fax number (703) 787–
1546, or by the address listed above.
• Public Availability of Comments—
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kimberly Monaco, Budget Analyst,
Office of Budget at (703) 787–1658,
Kimberly.Monaco@bsee.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background
A. BSEE Statutory and Regulatory
Authority
B. Summary of Existing Cost Recovery Fees
Regulations and Basis for Proposed
Amendments
C. Request for Comments on Potential
Future Fees
II. Procedural Matters
I. Background
A. BSEE Statutory and Regulatory
Authority
In accordance with the Independent
Offices Appropriation Act, 1952, 31
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
81033
U.S.C. 9701 and the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
Circular A–25,1 BSEE is required to
assess a charge against each identifiable
non-Federal recipient of special benefits
derived from BSEE services beyond
those received by the public at large.
The charge BSEE assesses is legally
sufficient if it recovers BSEE’s full cost
to provide the service.
OMB Circular A–25 requires a Federal
agency to conduct a biennial review of
its user charges to determine whether
adjustments are necessary and to review
other agency programs to determine
whether new fees should be established
for any services it provides. BSEE
reviewed its 31 services and preproduction site visits along with the
associated cost recovery fees to
determine whether the cost of providing
each of the services supports the
existing fee structure in the existing
regulations. BSEE’s methodology for
calculating its direct and indirect costs
to perform the 31 services and the preproduction site visits is found later in
this document. Results from the direct
and indirect cost calculations indicate
that 17 fees should be increased, eight
fees reduced, and six fees subdivided
into two tiers by complexity, with six of
the subdivided fees increasing above the
existing undivided fee, and six
decreasing. The results also indicate
that the existing pre-production site
visit fees for two of the facility
production safety system applications
should be decreased for visits to
facilities offshore and increased for
visits to facilities while in a shipyard.
Finally, the results suggest that new preproduction site visit fees should be
implemented for the four facility
production safety system applications
that did not previously include site visit
fees. The details of these proposed fees
are shown in the Service Fee Table later
in this document.
The fees are codified in BSEE’s
regulations at 30 CFR 250.125(a). This
proposed rule would: (1) Amend 31 of
the cost recovery fees in existing
§ 250.125; (2) establish two tiers of fees
within the Deepwater Operations Plans
(DWOPs), New Pipeline Applications,
Pipeline Modification Applications for
both Lease Term and Right-of-way
(ROW) Pipelines, ROW Pipeline Grant
Applications, and Unitization Revisions
fee categories; (3) add four new preproduction site visit cost recovery fees
to the existing two pre-production site
visit fees to support the review and
approval, if necessary, of production
1 Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
Circular A–25 Revised, User Charges, July 8, 1993,
and Transmittal Memorandum 1.
E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM
17NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 222 (Thursday, November 17, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 81023-81033]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-27573]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
27 CFR Part 4
[Docket No. TTB-2016-0011; Notice No. 165]
RIN 1513-AC24
Proposed Addition of New Grape Variety Names for American Wines
AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) proposes to
amend its wine labeling regulations by adding a number of new names to
the list of grape variety names approved for use in designating
American wines. TTB also proposes to remove one existing entry and
replace it with a slightly different name, and to correct the spelling
of another existing entry. The proposed amendments would allow wine
bottlers to use these additional approved grape variety names on wine
labels and in wine advertisements.
DATES: TTB must receive written comments on or before January 17, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Please send your comments on this proposed rule to one of
the following addresses:
Internet: https://www.regulations.gov (via the online
comment form for this notice as posted within Docket No. TTB-2016-0011
at ``Regulations.gov,'' the Federal e-rulemaking portal);
U.S. Mail: Director, Regulations and Rulings Division,
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street NW., Box 12,
Washington, DC 20005; or
Hand delivery/courier in lieu of mail: Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street NW., Suite 400E, Washington, DC
20005.
See the Public Participation section of this notice for specific
instructions and requirements for submitting comments, and for
information on how to request a public hearing.
You may view copies of this proposed rule and any comments TTB
receives about this proposal at https://www.regulations.gov within
Docket No. TTB-2016-0011. A link to that docket is posted on the TTB
Web site at https://www.ttb.gov/wine/wine-rulemaking.shtml under Notice
No. 165. You also may view copies of this proposed rule and any
comments TTB receives about this proposal by appointment at the TTB
Information Resource Center, 1310 G Street NW., Washington, DC 20005.
Please call 202-453-2270 to make an appointment.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Berry, Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau, Regulations and Rulings Division; telephone 202-
453-1039, ext. 275.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act (FAA Act),
27 U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to prescribe
regulations for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits, and malt
beverages. The FAA Act requires that these regulations, among other
things, prohibit consumer deception and the use of misleading
statements on labels, and ensure that labels provide the consumer with
adequate information as to the identity and quality of the product.
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) administers the
regulations promulgated under the FAA Act pursuant to section 1111(d)
of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The
Secretary has delegated various authorities through Treasury Department
Order 120-01 (dated
[[Page 81024]]
December 10, 2013, superseding Treasury Order 120-01 (Revised),
``Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau,'' dated January 24, 2003),
to the TTB Administrator to perform the functions and duties in the
administration and enforcement of these laws.
Use of Grape Variety Names on Wine Labels
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 4) sets forth the
standards promulgated under the FAA Act for the labeling and
advertising of wine. Section 4.23 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.23)
sets forth rules for varietal (grape type) labeling. Paragraph (a) of
that section sets forth the general rule that the names of one or more
grape varieties may be used as the type designation of a grape wine
only if the wine is labeled with an appellation of origin as defined in
Sec. 4.25. Under paragraphs (b) and (c), a wine bottler may use the
name of a single grape variety on a label as the type designation of a
wine if not less than 75 percent of the wine (or 51 percent in certain
limited circumstances) is derived from grapes of that variety grown in
the labeled appellation of origin area. Under paragraph (d), a bottler
may use two or more grape variety names as the type designation of a
wine if all the grapes used to make the wine are of the labeled
varieties and if the percentage of the wine derived from each grape
variety is shown on the label (and with additional rules in the case of
multicounty and multistate appellations of origin). Paragraph (e) of
Sec. 4.23 provides that only a grape variety name approved by the TTB
Administrator may be used as a type designation for an American wine
and states that a list of approved grape variety names appears in
subpart J of part 4.
Within subpart J of part 4, the list of grape variety names and
their synonyms approved for use as type designations for American wines
appears in Sec. 4.91 (27 CFR 4.91). Alternative grape variety names
temporarily authorized for use are listed in Sec. 4.92 (27 CFR 4.92).
Finally, Sec. 4.93 (27 CFR 4.93) sets forth rules for the approval of
grape variety names.
Approval of New Grape Variety Names
Section 4.93 provides that any interested person may petition the
TTB Administrator for the approval of a grape variety name and that the
petition should provide evidence of the following:
That the new grape variety is accepted;
That the name for identifying the grape variety is valid;
That the variety is used or will be used in winemaking;
and
That the variety is grown and used in the United States.
Section 4.93 further provides that documentation submitted with the
petition may include:
A reference to the publication of the name of the variety
in a scientific or professional journal of horticulture or a published
report by a professional, scientific, or winegrowers' organization;
A reference to a plant patent, if patented; and
Information pertaining to the commercial potential of the
variety, such as the acreage planted and its location or market
studies.
Section 4.93 also places certain eligibility restrictions on the
approval of grape variety names. TTB will not approve a new name:
If it has been used previously for a different grape
variety;
If it contains a term or name found to be misleading under
Sec. 4.39 (27 CFR 4.39); or
If it contains the term ``Riesling.'' (See T.D. ATF-370,
61 FR 522, published 1/8/96.)
Typically, if TTB determines that the evidence submitted with a
petition supports approval of the new grape variety name, TTB will send
a letter of approval to the petitioner advising the petitioner that TTB
will propose to add the grape variety name to the list of approved
grape variety names in Sec. 4.91 at a later date. Those letters are
considered administrative approvals, and they are posted on TTB's Web
site once a grape variety is approved. After one or more approvals have
been issued, a notice of proposed rulemaking will be prepared for
publication in the Federal Register proposing to add the name(s) to the
Sec. 4.91 list, with opportunity for public comment. In the event that
one or more comments or other information demonstrate the
inappropriateness of an approval action, TTB will determine not to add
the grape variety name in question to the list and will advise the
original petitioner that the name is no longer approved.
Since the last revision of the approved grape variety names list in
Sec. 4.91, (T.D. TTB-95, 76 FR 66625, published October 27, 2011), TTB
has received and administratively approved a number of petitions for
new grape variety names. In this notice, TTB is proposing to add a
number of grape variety names to the list of names in Sec. 4.91 to
reflect those approvals. The evidence that the petitioners submitted in
support of each name--and that formed the basis for the TTB approval--
is summarized below. TTB is requesting comments on the appropriateness
of these names for use on American wine labels.
TTB is also requesting comments on one petitioned-for grape name
that TTB did not approve administratively. The petition for this name--
Phoenix--is also discussed below. In addition, TTB has received a
petition requesting that one grape variety name currently listed in
Sec. 4.91--Geneva Red 7--be removed from the list and replaced with
the name ``Geneva Red.'' TTB is requesting comments on this petition.
Grape Name Petitions
Amigne
White Heron Cellars, Quincy, Washington, petitioned TTB to add
``Amigne'' to the list of approved grape variety names. Amigne is a
white Vitis vinifera grape variety long grown in Switzerland, but
relatively new to the United States. The petitioner stated that it has
grown the variety since the 1990s, and submitted written verification
from a plant pathologist identifying its vines as Amigne. As evidence
of the variety's acceptance, name validity, and usage, the petitioner
also submitted references to Amigne from a Swiss publication
``Principaux c[eacute]pages cultiv[eacute]s en Suisse'' (Principle
Varieties Cultivated in Switzerland), published by the Swiss Federal
Agricultural Research Station at Changins. Based on this evidence, TTB
proposes to add Amigne to the list of grape variety names in Sec.
4.91.
Arandell
Jessica Lyga, Plant Varieties & Germplasm Licensing Associate,
Center for Technology Enterprise and Commercialization, Cornell
University, petitioned TTB to add ``Arandell'' to the list of approved
grape varieties. Arandell, a red wine grape developed at Cornell, is a
cross between two interspecific hybrid selections from Cornell's grape
breeding program. According to a Cornell University bulletin submitted
by the petitioner, Arandell is a ``grape characterized by a high degree
of natural disease resistance and producing dark red wines with clean,
berry aromas.'' The petitioner also submitted Arandell's listing in the
National Grape Registry, published by the University of California at
Davis (UC Davis), which notes the variety is available for sale at two
commercial nurseries in New York. Based on this evidence, TTB proposes
to add Arandell to the list of grape variety names in Sec. 4.91.
[[Page 81025]]
Aromella
Jessica Lyga, Plant Varieties & Germplasm Licensing Associate,
Center for Technology Enterprise and Commercialization, Cornell
University, petitioned TTB to add ``Aromella'' to the list of approved
grape varieties. Aromella is a white wine grape developed at Cornell
from a cross between Traminette and Ravat 34. According to a Cornell
University bulletin submitted by the petitioner, Aromella is ``a
winter-hardy white wine grape with high potential productivity and
excellent aromatic muscat wine characteristics.'' The petitioner also
submitted Aromella's listing in UC Davis's National Grape Registry,
which notes the variety is available for sale at three commercial
nurseries in New York and California. Based on this evidence, TTB
proposes to add Aromella to the list of grape variety names in Sec.
4.91.
Arvine
White Heron Cellars, Quincy, Washington, petitioned TTB to add
``Arvine'' to the list of approved grape variety names. Arvine is a
white Vitis vinifera variety originally from Switzerland and northern
Italy. The petitioner stated that it has grown Arvine since the 1990s,
having obtained its vines from Foundation Plant Services (FPS) at UC
Davis. FPS currently sells the variety. As evidence of the variety's
acceptance, name validity, and usage, the petitioner also submitted
references to Arvine from a Swiss publication ``Principaux
c[eacute]pages cultiv[eacute]s en Suisse'' (Principle Varieties
Cultivated in Switzerland), published by the Swiss Federal Agricultural
Research Station at Changins. Based on this evidence, TTB proposes to
add Arvine to the list of grape variety names in Sec. 4.91.
Bianchetta trevigiana
Laraneta Winery, Templeton, California, petitioned TTB to add
``Bianchetta trevigiana'' to the list of approved grape variety names.
Bianchetta trevigiana is a white Vitis vinifera variety originally from
northern Italy. To satisfy the requirements of Sec. 4.93, the
petitioner submitted a letter from UC Davis's FPS stating that DNA
testing done on one of the petitioner's vines showed it to be of the
Bianchetta trevigiana variety. According to UC Davis's National Grape
Registry, the variety is available for sale at two California
nurseries. Based on this evidence, TTB proposes to add Bianchetta
trevigiana to the list of grape variety names in Sec. 4.91.
Black Spanish
Majek Vineyard and Winery, San Antonio, Texas, petitioned TTB to
add ``Black Spanish'' to the list of approved grape variety names as a
synonym for the currently listed ``Lenoir.'' Black Spanish is a hybrid
red wine grape grown in Texas and other southern States. As evidence of
the validity of the name ``Black Spanish'' to identify the variety, the
petitioner submitted links to several Web sites that refer to the
variety by that name. These links include one to UC Davis's National
Grape Registry, which lists ``Black Spanish'' as a common synonym for
Lenoir, and three links to nursery Web sites that list the variety by
the name ``Black Spanish.'' If Black Spanish is approved, it will
appear as a synonym for Lenoir in Sec. 4.91. TTB believes that the
evidence warrants the approval of Black Spanish as a valid name
commonly used in the United States for this variety. However, we
welcome comments on this issue. Based on the above evidence, TTB
proposes to add the name ``Black Spanish'' to the list of grape variety
names in Sec. 4.91 to be identified with its synonym ``Lenoir.'' TTB
also received a petition for approval of the name ``Jacquez,'' another
synonym for Lenoir (see discussion below under ``Jacquez'').
Bluebell
Clover Meadow Winery, Shell Lake, Wisconsin, petitioned TTB to add
``Bluebell'' to the list of approved grape variety names. Bluebell is
an interspecific cross developed at the University of Minnesota in
1944. A very cold-hardy variety, it is commonly used for table grapes,
juice, and jelly. The petitioner, however, produces wine from the
variety. To satisfy the requirements of Sec. 4.93, the petitioner
submitted Web site references to Bluebell from the University of
Minnesota and UC Davis's National Grape Registry, which lists five
nurseries selling the variety. Based on this evidence, TTB proposes to
add the name ``Bluebell'' to the list of grape variety names in Sec.
4.91.
Bourboulenc
Tablas Creek Vineyard, Paso Robles, California, petitioned TTB to
add ``Bourboulenc'' to the list of approved grape variety names.
Bourboulenc is a white Vitis vinifera variety associated with the
Rh[ocirc]ne region of France, where it is one of the thirteen
authorized varieties permitted in the Ch[acirc]teauneuf-du-Pape
appellation of origin. As part of the petition, Tablas Creek submitted
a letter of support from the director of FPS at UC Davis, Dr. Deborah
Golino. In her letter, Dr. Golino states that Bourboulenc plant
material was imported from France to FPS, where it was tested and found
to be free of viruses, then planted in FPS's Russell Ranch Foundation
Vineyard. The variety is currently available for sale to the public at
FPS. In addition to the letter from Dr. Golino, the petitioner also
submitted several published references to Bourboulenc. Based on this
evidence, TTB proposes to add Bourboulenc to the list of grape variety
names in Sec. 4.91.
Brachetto
Pete Anderson of Eusinus Vineyard and Witch Creek Winery, Carlsbad,
California, petitioned TTB to add ``Brachetto'' to the list of approved
grape variety names. Brachetto is a red Vitis vinifera variety
originally from the Piedmont region of Italy. The petitioner states he
has grown Brachetto for several years at his Eusinus Vineyard and is
aware of one other California winery growing and producing wine from
the variety. To satisfy the requirements of Sec. 4.93, the petitioner
submitted a letter from FPS at UC Davis stating that its DNA analysis
of his vine sample showed it to be a match for samples of Brachetto
held by the National Clonal Germplasm Repository at UC Davis. Based on
this evidence, TTB proposes to add Brachetto to the list of grape
variety names in Sec. 4.91.
By George
Girouard Vines, Tulsa, Oklahoma, petitioned TTB to add ``By
George'' to the list of approved grape variety names. By George is a
red wine grape developed by George E. Girouard by crossing Ruby
Cabernet with Vitis aestivalis JG #3. As evidence of the grape's
acceptance and name validity, the petitioner submitted a listing for By
George from the May 2012 HortScience's Register of New Fruit and Nut
Cultivars. The petitioner states that the variety is currently grown in
Oklahoma and California, and it planned to release a wine made from By
George in 2015. Based on this evidence, TTB proposes to add By George
to the list of grape variety names in Sec. 4.91.
Caladoc
RBZ Vineyards, Templeton, California, petitioned TTB to add
``Caladoc'' to the list of approved grape variety names. Caladoc is a
red Vitis vinifera grape developed in France in 1958 as a crossing of
Grenache and Malbec. To satisfy the requirements of Sec. 4.93, the
petitioner submitted a listing for Caladoc from UC Davis's National
Grape Registry, which indicates that the variety is for sale from FPS.
The
[[Page 81026]]
petitioner also submitted pages from a California nursery catalogue
indicating that it sells the variety. Additionally, the petitioner
states that it and several other U.S. vineyards grow Caladoc. Based on
this evidence, TTB proposes to add Caladoc to the list of grape variety
names in Sec. 4.91.
Caprettone
Belle Fiore Winery, Ashland, Oregon, petitioned TTB to add
``Caprettone'' to the list of approved grape variety names. Caprettone
is a white Vitis vinifera originally from southern Italy. As evidence
of the grape's acceptance and name validity, the petitioner submitted a
listing for Caprettone from UC Davis's National Grape Registry.
According to this listing, Caprettone was initially released by UC
Davis's FPS under the name ``Coda di Volpe''; however, subsequent DNA
testing correctly identified the variety as Caprettone. The National
Grape Registry currently lists three nurseries selling the variety.
Based on this evidence, TTB proposes to add Caprettone to the list of
grape variety names in Sec. 4.91.
Chisago
Wine Haven, Inc., Chisago City, Minnesota, petitioned TTB to add
``Chisago'' to the list of approved grape variety names. Chisago is a
red wine variety developed by the petitioner from a crossing of St.
Croix and Swenson Red. Noteworthy for its winter hardiness, the variety
can survive temperatures that reach minus 40 degrees Fahrenheit. To
satisfy the requirements of Sec. 4.93, the petitioner submitted copies
of its U.S. Plant Patent and U.S. Trademark Registration for Chisago,
along with two articles referencing the variety and a list of wine
competition awards won by its Chisago wine. According to the
petitioner, several other Minnesota vineyards also are growing Chisago,
and two nurseries planned to sell the variety in 2012. Based on this
evidence, TTB proposes to add Chisago to the list of grape variety
names in Sec. 4.91.
Coda di Volpe
Pete Anderson of Eusinus Vineyard and Witch Creek Winery, Carlsbad,
California, petitioned TTB to add ``Coda di Volpe'' to the list of
approved grape variety names. Coda di Volpe is a white Vitis vinifera
variety originally from the Campania region of Italy. To satisfy the
requirements of Sec. 4.93, the petitioner cited three published
references to Coda di Volpe and notes that UC Davis's Foundation Plant
Services imported Coda di Volpe vines in 2000. According to the
petitioner, five California vineyards and wineries grow or make wine
from the variety. UC Davis's National Grape Registry lists three
California nurseries that sell Coda di Volpe vines to the public. Based
on this evidence, TTB proposes to add Coda di Volpe to the list of
grape variety names in Sec. 4.91.
Diana
John H. Brahm III, winemaster at Arbor Hill Winery, Naples, New
York, petitioned TTB to add ``Diana'' to the list of approved grape
variety names. Diana is a red hybrid variety that has grown in the
Finger Lakes region since the mid-1800s. To satisfy the requirements of
Sec. 4.93, the petitioner submitted an excerpt from the 1908 book
``The Grapes of New York,'' which describes Diana as a seedling of
Catawba that ripens early and is thus good for cold climates. The
petitioner also submitted a photo of a Widmer's Wine Cellars label for
a Diana wine, vintage 1942. The petitioner states that Arbor Hill has
recently produced a Diana wine which it intends to release for sale.
TTB notes that the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Plant Genetic
Resources Unit in Geneva, New York, maintains Diana in its collection
and distributes the variety. Based on this evidence, TTB proposes to
add Diana to the list of grape variety names in Sec. 4.91.
Esprit
Deja Vine Vineyards & Winery, Martelle, Iowa, petitioned TTB to add
``Esprit'' to the list of approved grape variety names. Esprit, a white
interspecific hybrid, was developed by Elmer Swenson as a cross between
Villard blanc and Edelweiss. To satisfy the requirements of Sec. 4.93,
the petitioner submitted two publications from Iowa State University
describing the viticultural characteristics of Esprit and the quality
of its wine. Esprit is also listed in UC Davis's National Grape
Registry, which notes that a New York nursery sells the variety. Based
on this evidence, TTB proposes to add Esprit to the list of grape
variety names in Sec. 4.91.
Falanghina
Pete Anderson of Eusinus Vineyard and Witch Creek Winery, Carlsbad,
California, petitioned TTB to add ``Falanghina'' to the list of
approved grape variety names. Falanghina is a white Vitis vinifera
grape variety originally from the Campania region of Italy. As
evidence, the petitioner cited a number of wine publications that
reference Falanghina. The variety is also listed in UC Davis's National
Grape Registry, which names four nurseries selling the variety.
According to the petitioner, four California vineyards and wineries are
either growing Falanghina or producing wine from the variety. Based on
this evidence, TTB proposes to add Falanghina to the list of grape
variety names in Sec. 4.91.
Geneva Red/Geneva Red 7
Jessica Lyga of Cornell University petitioned TTB to change the
currently approved grape variety name ``Geneva Red 7'' to ``Geneva
Red.'' Geneva Red 7 was added to Sec. 4.91 by T.D. TTB-95 as the
result of a petition from a New York winery (see 76 FR 66625, October
27, 2011). The Geneva Red petition states that Cornell University, the
developer and owner of the grape variety, does not endorse the use of
the name ``Geneva Red 7'' and notes that the petition for that name was
submitted without its approval. The petition states that Cornell is
concerned that the ``7'' in ``Geneva Red 7'' is confusing and leads the
consumer to question whether there are similarly named grape varieties,
such as Geneva Red 1, 2, 3, etc.
As evidence for the name Geneva Red, the petitioner submitted a
2003 Cornell publication referencing the variety as ``Geneva Red,''
along with the variety's entry from UC Davis' National Grape Registry
which lists the variety as ``Geneva Red.'' Based on this evidence, TTB
granted administrative approval to the name ``Geneva Red'' as a valid
synonym for ``Geneva Red 7,'' but advised the petitioner that it could
not remove the name ``Geneva Red 7'' from Sec. 4.91 without
rulemaking. The petitioner has subsequently submitted a list of four
commercial vineyards and wineries that use the name ``Geneva Red'' for
the grape variety on their Web sites. Because the evidence indicates
that this is the name currently used in the marketplace for the
variety, TTB proposes to remove the name ``Geneva Red 7'' from Sec.
4.91 and replace it with ``Geneva Red.'' However, TTB welcomes comments
on the validity of the name, Geneva Red, as an approved name for this
grape variety.
TTB further proposes to allow the use of the grape variety name
``Geneva Red 7'' for a period of 1 year after publication of a final
rule on this matter if Geneva Red 7 is removed based on sufficient
evidence from comments received. If this proposal is adopted as a final
rule, those holding a certificate of label approval (COLA) with the
name ``Geneva Red 7'' would have sufficient time to obtain new labels.
At the end of the 1-year period, holders of approved ``Geneva Red 7''
labels would be required to discontinue their use as their COLA
approval will be revoked by operation of the final rule (see 27 CFR
[[Page 81027]]
13.51 and 13.72(a)(2)). TTB believes the 1-year period will provide
such label holders with adequate time to use up their supply of
previously approved ``Geneva Red 7'' labels. This proposal appears in a
new paragraph (e) of 27 CFR 4.92.
Godello
California American Terroirs, Sonoma, California, petitioned TTB to
add ``Godello'' to the list of approved grape variety names. Godello is
a white Vitis vinifera variety native to Spain and Portugal. To satisfy
the requirements of Sec. 4.93, the petitioner cited several published
references to the Godello variety in professional journals and wine
reference books. These include the article ``Prospection and
identification of grapevine varieties cultivated in north Portugal and
northwest Spain,'' J.P. MART[Iacute]N, et al., from the journal
``Vitis,'' 50 (1), pp. 29-33 (2011), and ``Wine Grapes,'' Jancis
Robinson, ed. (2012), p. 413. The petitioner also submitted evidence
that a California nursery sells the variety. According to the
petitioner, a number of wineries in California and Oregon grow Godello.
Based on this evidence, TTB proposes to add Godello to the list of
grape variety names in Sec. 4.91.
Gros Manseng
Tablas Creek Vineyard, Paso Robles, California, petitioned TTB to
add ``Gros Manseng'' to the list of approved grape variety names. Gros
Manseng is a white Vitis vinifera variety of French origin. As evidence
of the variety's acceptance and name validity, the petitioner submitted
several published references to Gros Manseng, including the ``Oxford
Companion to Wine'' (1999 edition) and Pierre Galet's ``C[eacute]page
et Vignobles de France.'' Tablas Creek Vineyards imported Gros Manseng
into the New York Agricultural Experiment Station in Geneva, New York,
in 2000. After it was indexed and declared virus free in 2003, it was
shipped bare root to the petitioner. The petitioner states it has
provided Gros Manseng budwood to a California nursery, and TTB is aware
of two other nurseries selling the variety. Based on this evidence, TTB
proposes to add Gros Manseng to the list of grape variety names in
Sec. 4.91.
Humagne Rouge
White Heron Cellars, Quincy, Washington, petitioned TTB to add
``Humagne Rouge'' to the list of approved grape variety names. Humagne
Rouge is a red Vitis vinifera grape variety long grown in Switzerland,
but relatively new to the United States. The petitioner stated that it
obtained its Humagne Rouge vines from UC Davis's FPS in the 1990s, and
the petition included an entry for the variety from a 1997 FPS
catalogue showing that the variety was sold in the United States. As
evidence of the variety's acceptance, name validity, and usage, the
petitioner also submitted references to Humagne Rouge from a Swiss
publication, ``Principaux c[eacute]pages cultiv[eacute]s en Suisse''
(Principle Varieties Cultivated in Switzerland), published by the Swiss
Federal Agricultural Research Station at Changins. Based on this
evidence, TTB proposes to add Humagne Rouge to the list of grape
variety names in Sec. 4.91.
Jacquez
Haak Vineyards & Winery, Santa Fe, Texas, petitioned TTB to add
``Jacquez'' to the list of approved grape variety names as a synonym
for the currently listed ``Lenoir.'' Jacquez is a hybrid red wine grape
grown in Texas and other southern States, where it is also known by the
name ``Black Spanish.'' The petitioner states it has used the name
``Jacquez'' on its wine labels since 2003; as a result, its customers
identify the wine by that name. As evidence of the validity of the name
``Jacquez'' to identity the variety, the petitioner submitted an entry
for Jacquez from UC Davis's National Grape Registry, which lists
``Black Spanish'' and ``Lenoir'' as synonyms. The petitioner also cites
a number of wine reference books that refer to the variety as
``Jacquez,'' including Hugh Johnson's ``Story of Wine'' (2002 edition,
p. 439).
TTB also received a petition for ``Black Spanish.'' (See discussion
above under ``Black Spanish.'') If Jacquez and Black Spanish are both
approved, three names for one variety will appear in Sec. 4.91. TTB
believes that the evidence warrants the approval of Jacquez and Black
Spanish as they are both valid names commonly used in the United States
for this variety. However, we welcome comments on this issue. Based on
the above evidence, TTB proposes to add the name ``Jacquez'' to the
list of grape variety names in Sec. 4.91 to be identified with its
synonyms ``Black Spanish'' and ``Lenoir.''
Jupiter
Yamhalis Vineyard, Yamhill, Oregon, petitioned TTB to add
``Jupiter'' to the list of approved grape variety names. Jupiter is a
hybrid grape developed by the University of Arkansas and released for
commercial production in 1999. Although it is most commonly used as a
table grape, the petitioner states it produces a good dry red wine. To
satisfy the requirements of Sec. 4.93, the petitioner submitted an
article on Jupiter in the scientific journal HortScience (Vol. 43 (7)),
a copy of the plant patent for Jupiter, and a letter from Dr. John R.
Clark, one of Jupiter's breeders. According to UC Davis's National
Grape Registry, the variety is available from at least four U.S.
nurseries. Based on this evidence, TTB proposes to add the name
``Jupiter'' to the list of grape variety names in Sec. 4.91.
King of the North
Clover Meadow Winery, Shell Lake, Wisconsin, petitioned TTB to add
``King of the North'' to the list of approved grape variety names. A
black grape, King of the North is an interspecific hybrid of unknown
origin. Although it is most frequently grown for table grapes, juice,
and jelly, it is also used to produce red wine by the petitioners and
other wineries. As supporting evidence, the petitioner submitted Web
site references to King of the North from Iowa State University and UC
Davis's National Grape Registry, which lists three nurseries selling
the variety. Based on this evidence, TTB proposes to add the name
``King of the North'' to the list of grape variety names in Sec. 4.91.
Lambrusca di Alessandria
Pete Anderson of Witch Creek Winery, Carlsbad, California,
petitioned TTB to add ``Lambrusca di Alessandria'' to the list of
approved grape variety names. Lambrusca di Alessandria is a red Vitis
vinifera variety of Italian origin. According to the petitioner,
Lambrusca di Alessandria is a different variety from the Lambrusco
currently listed in Sec. 4.91. He cites as evidence a March-April 2006
article from the Italian publication ``Italus Hortus,'' titled
``Lambruschi from Piedmont: Historical investigations, fingerprinting
and genetic relationships with other autochthonous Italian grapes
(Vitis vinifera L.),'' by D. Torello Marinoni; S. Raimondi; P.
Boccacci; and A. Schneider. The petitioner also cites ``Vitigni
d'Italia,'' by Antonio Cal[ograve], Attilio Scienza, and Angelo
Costacurta (2001) as a reference book that names and identifies the
variety as distinctive from other Lambruschi varieties. Additionally,
the petitioner notes that Lambrusca di Alessandria is maintained, by
that name, in the collection of the U.S. Department of Agriculture's
National Clonal Germplasm Repository in Davis, California.
When the petitioner submitted a grapevine sample that he thought
was of the Nebbiolo variety to UC Davis's FPS for DNA analysis, he was
informed that the sample was actually Lambrusca di
[[Page 81028]]
Alessandria. This result was subsequently confirmed by Dr. Anna
Schneider of the Istituto di Virologia Vegetale Sezione di Grugliasco,
Torino, Italy. The petitioner reports that seven vineyards and wineries
in California are currently growing Lambrusca di Alessandria or
producing wine from it. Based on this evidence, TTB proposes to add the
name ``Lambrusca di Alessandria'' to the list of grape variety names in
Sec. 4.91.
Loureiro
Lehrman Beverage Law petitioned TTB to add ``Loureiro'' to the list
of approved grape variety names. Loureiro is a white Vitis vinifera
variety originally cultivated in Spain and Portugal. To satisfy the
requirements of Sec. 4.93, the petitioner submitted the listing for
Loureiro in UC Davis's National Grape Registry, along with evidence
that at least two California nurseries sell the variety and a number of
California wineries produce wine from it. Based on this evidence, TTB
proposes to add Loureiro to the list of grape variety names in Sec.
4.91.
Madeleine Sylvaner
Comfort Farm and Vineyard, Langley, Washington, petitioned TTB to
add ``Madeleine Sylvaner'' to the list of approved grape variety names.
Madeleine Sylvaner is a white Vitis vinifera variety that grows well in
cooler climates. As evidence, the petitioner cited a Washington State
University publication entitled ``Growing Grapes for Wine and Table in
the Puget Sound Region'' that discusses Madeleine Sylvaner as a variety
well suited to the Puget Sound climate. The petitioner states that it
has grown the variety for 12 years and provided Madeleine Sylvaner
grapes to other wineries in the Puget Sound region. TTB is aware of
other Washington wineries producing wine from this variety. Based on
this evidence, TTB proposes to add Madeleine Sylvaner to the list of
grape variety names in Sec. 4.91.
Marquis
Wyldewood Cellars Winery, Mulvane, Kansas, petitioned TTB to add
``Marquis'' to the list of approved grape variety names. Marquis is a
white hybrid variety developed at Cornell University as a cross of the
Athens and Emerald Seedless varieties. To satisfy the requirements of
Sec. 4.93, the petitioner submitted a copy of Cornell's 1999 plant
patent for Marquis, a 1996 bulletin on Marquis issued by Cornell, and
an article about the variety from the journal HortScience (Vol. 32
(1)). Marquis is also listed in UC Davis's National Grape Registry and
is available from at least four commercial nurseries. Based on this
evidence, TTB proposes to add Marquis to the list of grape variety
names in Sec. 4.91.
Marselan
RBZ Vineyards, Templeton, California, petitioned TTB to add
``Marselan'' to the list of approved grape variety names. Marselan is a
red Vitis vinifera variety developed in France as a crossing of
Cabernet Sauvignon and Grenache noir. The petitioner submitted a
listing for Marselan from UC Davis's National Grape Registry, which
indicates that the variety is available for sale from FPS. The
petitioner also submitted pages from a California nursery catalogue
indicating that it also sells the variety. Additionally, the petitioner
states that it and several other U.S. vineyards grow Marselan. Based on
this evidence, TTB proposed to add Marselan to the list of grape
variety names in Sec. 4.91.
Mustang
Natalia Winery, Natalia, Texas, petitioned TTB to add ``Mustang''
to the list of approved grape names. Mustang (Vitis mustangensis) is a
variety native to the United States that grows wild in areas of Texas,
Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana, and Alabama. To satisfy the requirements
of Sec. 4.93, the petitioner cited a number of internet Web sites that
reference the Mustang variety, including that of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture's Natural Resources Conservation Service and Texas A & M
University's Department of Horticulture. The petitioner states that it
harvests \1/2\ ton of Mustang grapes with which it produces a 100%
Mustang wine. Additionally, TTB has found evidence that at least one
Texas nursery sells Mustang vines. Based on this evidence, TTB proposes
to add Mustang to the list of grape variety names in Sec. 4.91.
Petite Pearl
Tom Plocher of Plocher Vines, Hugo, Minnesota, petitioned TTB to
add ``Petite Pearl'' to the list of approved grape names. Petite Pearl,
a red hybrid known for its cold hardiness, was developed by Mr. Plocher
from a 1996 cross of MN 1094 and E.S. 4-7-26. To satisfy the
requirements of Sec. 4.93, the petitioner submitted a January 2013
article about Petite Pearl published by Midwest Wine Press entitled
``Coming Soon: A New Red Wine That's a Pearl,'' along with evidence
that two nurseries (in Minnesota and Vermont) sell the variety. He also
named four wineries producing Petite Pearl wine. Based on this
evidence, TTB proposes to add Petite Pearl to the list of grape variety
names in Sec. 4.91.
Phoenix
King's Raven Winery, Oregon City, Oregon, petitioned TTB to add
``Phoenix'' to the list of approved grape names. Phoenix is a white
Vitis vinifera variety developed in Germany as a cross of Bacchus weiss
and Villard blanc. The petitioner submitted a number of published
references to Phoenix, including a listing in UC Davis's National Grape
Registry, along with evidence that two other American vineyards grow
the variety.
Although TTB believes that the petition contains sufficient
evidence under Sec. 4.93 to approve the name ``Phoenix,'' TTB opted to
propose adding the name to the list of grape variety names through
rulemaking action rather than approve it administratively due to
potential conflicts with existing COLAs. An electronic search of TTB's
COLAs online database for the word ``Phoenix'' disclosed 174 COLAS that
use the word ``Phoenix'' on a wine label as part of a brand or fanciful
name. Of these, 40 have been approved since 2012 for 12 different
wineries. The use of a grape variety name in a brand name potentially
could be misleading and prohibited under Sec. 4.39. If the name
Phoenix is approved as a grape variety name, these labels potentially
could be misleading, particularly if they do not also contain a grape
varietal designation. Because of this potential impact on current
labels, TTB believes that the label holders should be given an
opportunity to comment on this proposal. Those comments will better
inform TTB as to whether the grape variety name should be approved and
thus added to the list of approved names in Sec. 4.91.
Picardan
Tablas Creek Vineyard, Paso Robles, California, petitioned TTB to
add ``Picardan'' to the list of approved grape variety names. Picardan
is a white Vitis vinifera variety associated with the Rh[ocirc]ne
region of France, where it is one of the thirteen authorized varieties
permitted in the Ch[acirc]teauneuf-du-Pape appellation of origin. As
part of the petition, Tablas Creek submitted a letter of support for
approval of the name from the director of FPS, Dr. Deborah Golino. In
her letter, Dr. Golino states that Picardan plant material was imported
from France to FPS, where it was tested and found to be free of
viruses, then planted in FPS's Classic Foundation Vineyard. The variety
is currently available for sale to the public
[[Page 81029]]
at FPS. In addition to the letter from Dr. Golino, the petitioner also
submitted several published references to Picardan. Based on this
evidence, TTB proposes to add Picardan to the list of grape variety
names in Sec. 4.91.
Pinot Bianco
Rodrigue Molyneaux Winery, Livermore, California, petitioned TTB to
add ``Pinot bianco'' to the list of approved grape variety names as a
synonym for the currently listed ``Pinot blanc.'' Pinot bianco is the
Italian name for this white wine variety, while Pinot blanc is the
French name. The petitioner, who specializes in Italian grape
varieties, believes that it would be confusing to customers if it
labeled its Pinot bianco wines with the French name for the variety. As
evidence of the validity of the synonym ``Pinot bianco,'' the
petitioner cited a Web site about Italian varieties grown in California
that refers to the variety by that name (see https://www.cal-italia.org/wine.html). Additionally, two wine reference books state that Pinot
bianco is the Italian name for Pinot blanc, ``The Oxford Companion to
Wine'' (Robinson, 1999 edition, p. 533) and ``Oz Clarke's Encyclopedia
of Grapes'' (2001, p. 171). Based on this evidence, TTB proposes to add
Pinot bianco to the list of grape variety names in Sec. 4.91 as a
synonym of Pinot blanc.
Plymouth
Girouard Vines, Tulsa, Oklahoma, petitioned TTB to add ``Plymouth''
to the list of approved grape variety names. Plymouth is a red wine
grape developed by George E. Girouard by crossing Merlot with Vitis
aestivalis JG #3. As evidence of the grape's acceptance and name
validity, the petitioner submitted a listing for Plymouth from the May
2012 HortScience's Register of New Fruit and Nut Cultivars. The
petitioner states that the variety is currently grown in Oklahoma and
California, and it plans to release a wine made from Plymouth in 2015.
Based on this evidence, TTB proposes to add Plymouth to the list of
grape variety names in Sec. 4.91.
Ribolla Gialla
Vare Vineyards, Napa, California, petitioned TTB to add ``Ribolla
Gialla'' to the list of approved grape variety names. Ribolla Gialla is
a white Vitis vinifera variety that has long grown in the Friuli region
of Italy and in Slovenia. The petitioner states it has grown the
variety and produced wine from it since 2004. The petitioner further
states it sold grapes from the 2009 harvest to seven other wineries. As
additional evidence, the petitioner cited a number of wine reference
books that refer to the variety. Ribolla Gialla is also listed in UC
Davis's National Grape Registry, which at the time of the petition
listed three California nurseries selling the variety. Based on this
evidence, TTB proposes to add Ribolla Gialla to the list of grape
variety names in Sec. 4.91.
Rieslaner
Mokelumne Glen Vineyards, Lodi, California, petitioned TTB to add
``Rieslaner'' to the list of approved grape variety names. Rieslaner is
a white Vitis vinifera variety developed in Germany in 1921 as a cross
of Riesling and Silvaner. According to the petitioner, it obtained its
Rieslaner as cuttings from the New York State Agricultural Experiment
Station many years ago and has been using it in wine blends. To satisfy
the requirements of Sec. 4.93, the petitioner cited a number of wine
reference books that refer to Rieslaner, including ``The Oxford
Companion to Wine'' (Robinson, 2006 edition, p. 577), and ``Production
of Grapes and Wines in Cool Climates'' (David Jackson and Danny
Schuster, 1986, p. 108). Based on this evidence, TTB proposes to add
Rieslaner to the list of grape variety names in Sec. 4.91.
Riverbank
Wild Grape Vineyards, Kindred, North Dakota, petitioned TTB to add
``Riverbank'' to the list of approved grape variety names. Riverbank
(Vitis riparia) is a red variety native to North America that grows
wild in the central and northeastern sections of the United States and
Canada. To satisfy the requirements of Sec. 4.93, the petitioner
submitted evidence that at least one North Dakota nursery sells
Riverbank vines and that at least one South Dakota winery sells wine
produced from the variety. The petitioner also noted that the
University of Minnesota has used the Riverbank variety in its grape
breeding program to breed varieties with cold tolerance (see https://www.arboretum.umn.edu/grapesandwine.aspx). Based on this evidence, TTB
proposes to add Riverbank to the list of grape variety names in Sec.
4.91.
Rose of Peru
Galleano Winery, Mira Loma, California, petitioned TTB to add
``Rose of Peru'' to the list of approved grape variety names. Rose of
Peru is a red Vitis vinifera variety, long grown in California, that
DNA evidence has disclosed to be identical to the Mission variety,
which is currently approved under Sec. 4.91. To satisfy the
requirements of Sec. 4.93, the petitioner submitted a number of
published references to the name ``Rose of Peru,'' including a February
12, 2007, article from Wine Spectator magazine entitled ``Researchers
Uncover Identity of Historic California Grape'' about the Mission grape
variety. According to this article, DNA research conducted at the
Centro Nacional de Biotecnologia in Spain found the Rose of Peru
variety to be identical to Mission. The results of this research were
published in the article ``Determining the Spanish Origin of
Representative Ancient American Grapevine Varieties'' (Tapia, et al.)
from the June 2007 American Journal of Enology & Viticulture (vol. 58,
no. 2, pp. 242-251). Based on this evidence, TTB proposes to add Rose
of Peru to the list of grape variety names in Sec. 4.91 as a synonym
for Mission.
Saperavi
Standing Stone Vineyards, Hector, New York, petitioned TTB to add
``Saperavi'' to the list of approved grape variety names. Saperavi is a
red Vitis vinifera variety that originates from the country of Georgia.
To satisfy the requirements of Sec. 4.93, the petitioner cited several
published references to Saperavi. These include ``The Concise Atlas of
Wine'' (Hugh Johnson and Jancis Robinson, 2009, pp. 227-229), and an
article from the trade journal Vineyard & Winery Management entitled
``(The Republic of) Georgia on Their Minds'' (November/December 2010),
which notes that a number of vineyards in the Northeastern United
States are growing Saperavi. According to evidence submitted by the
petitioner, three wineries in the Finger Lakes region of New York
(including the petitioner) are growing the variety and producing wine
from it. In addition, a New York nursery sells Saperavi, and the
variety is listed in UC Davis's National Grape Registry. Based on this
evidence, TTB proposes to add Saperavi to the list of grape variety
names in Sec. 4.91.
Sch[ouml]nburger
Plum Hill Vineyards, Gaston, Oregon, petitioned TTB to add
``Sch[ouml]nburger'' to the list of approved grape variety names.
Sch[ouml]nburger is a Vitis vinifera variety with pink berries
developed in Germany in 1979 from a crossing of Pinot Noir, Chasselas
Ros[eacute], and Muscat Hamburg. A cool climate variety, it is
currently grown in Germany, England, and the U.S. and Canadian Pacific
Northwest. To satisfy the requirements of Sec. 4.93, the petitioner
cited a number of published references to Sch[ouml]nburger, including
[[Page 81030]]
``The Oxford Companion to Wine'' (Robinson, 2006 edition, p. 622). UC
Davis's National Grape Registry lists Sch[ouml]nburger and notes that
two Washington State University facilities sell the variety to the
public. The petitioner states it has 1.5 acres of Sch[ouml]nburger from
which it plans to produce 600 cases of wine. Based on this evidence,
TTB proposes to add Sch[ouml]nburger to the list of grape variety names
in Sec. 4.91.
Sheridan
Blackhawk Winery, Sheridan, Indiana, petitioned TTB to add
``Sheridan'' to the list of approved grape variety names. Sheridan, an
interspecific cross of Herbert and Worden, was bred at the New York
State Agricultural Experiment Station and released in 1921. Black in
color, it is often used as a table grape. Sheridan is listed in UC
Davis's National Grape Registry, and is available for sale at two New
York nurseries. At the time of the petition, the petitioner was growing
Sheridan and planning to produce wine from it. Based on this evidence,
TTB proposes to add Sheridan to the list of grape variety names in
Sec. 4.91.
Southern Cross
Girouard Vines, Tulsa, Oklahoma, petitioned TTB to add ``Southern
Cross'' to the list of approved grape variety names. Southern Cross is
a red wine grape developed by George E. Girouard by crossing Merlot
with Vitis aestivalis JG #3. As evidence of the grape's acceptance and
name validity, the petitioner submitted a listing for Southern Cross
from the May 2012 HortScience's Register of New Fruit and Nut
Cultivars. The petitioner stated that the variety is currently grown in
Oklahoma and California, and it plans to release a wine made from
Southern Cross in 2015. Based on this evidence, TTB proposes to add
Southern Cross to the list of grape variety names in Sec. 4.91.
Terret Noir
Tablas Creek Vineyard, Paso Robles, California, petitioned TTB to
add ``Terret Noir'' to the list of approved grape variety names. Terret
Noir is a red Vitis vinifera variety associated with the Rh[ocirc]ne
region of France, where it is one of the 13 authorized varieties
permitted in the Ch[acirc]teauneuf-du-Pape appellation of origin. As
part of the petition, Tablas Creek submitted a letter of support for
approval of the Terret Noir variety from the director of FPS, Dr.
Deborah Golino. In her letter, Dr. Golino states that Terret Noir plant
material was imported from France to FPS, where it was tested and found
to be free of viruses, then planted in FPS's vineyards. The variety is
currently available for sale to the public at FPS. In addition to the
letter from Dr. Golino, the petitioner also submitted several published
references to Terret Noir as evidence of the variety's acceptance and
name validity. Based on this evidence, TTB proposes to add Terret Noir
to the list of grape variety names in Sec. 4.91.
Tinta Amarela
Abacela Winery, Roseburg, Oregon, petitioned TTB to add ``Tinta
Amarela'' to the list of approved grape variety names. Tinta Amarela is
a black Vitis vinifera grape that originated in Portugal, where it is
commonly used in port. To satisfy the requirements of Sec. 4.93, the
petitioner submitted several published references to Tinta Amarela from
wine reference books and wine Web sites. The petitioner also noted that
the entry for Tinta Amarela in UC Davis's National Grape Registry lists
eight U.S. nurseries that sell the variety. Based on this evidence, TTB
proposes to add Tinta Amarela to the list of grape variety names in
Sec. 4.91.
Tinta Cao
Cypher Winery, Paso Robles, California, petitioned TTB to add
``Tinta Cao'' to the list of approved grape variety names. Tinta Cao is
a synonym for ``Tinto c[atilde]o,'' a name already listed in Sec.
4.91. As evidence that Tinta Cao is a valid name for the variety, the
petitioner submitted a copy of the 2008 California Grape Crush Report,
issued by the California Department of Food and Agriculture. The
publication, referring to ``Tinta Cao,'' reports that 408.6 tons of the
grape were crushed in California that year. Additionally, UC Davis's
National Grape Register lists ``Tinta Cao'' as a synonym for Tinto
c[atilde]o and TTB is aware of at least one California vineyard selling
the variety by the proposed name. Based on this evidence, TTB proposes
to add Tinta Cao to the list of grape variety names in Sec. 4.91 as a
synonym for Tinto c[atilde]o.
Tinta Roriz
Cypher Winery, Paso Robles, California, petitioned TTB to add
``Tinta Roriz'' to the list of approved grape variety names. Tinta
Roriz is a synonym for ``Tempranillo'' and ``Valdepe[ntilde]as,'' names
already listed in Sec. 4.91. As evidence that Tinta Roriz is a valid
name for the variety, the petitioner submitted a copy of the 2008
California Grape Crush Report, which refers to Tinta Roriz as a synonym
for Tempranillo and Valdepe[ntilde]as. UC Davis's National Grape
Registry contains a separate listing for Tinta Roriz, but notes that it
is a Portuguese name for the grape variety known in Spain as
Tempranillo. If the name ``Tinta Roriz'' is approved, three names for
this variety will appear in Sec. 4.91. TTB believes that the evidence
warrants the approval of Tinta Roriz. However, we welcome comments on
this issue. Based on the above evidence, TTB proposes to add Tinta
Roriz to the list of grape variety names in Sec. 4.91.
Touriga Nacional
Cypher Winery, Paso Robles, California, petitioned TTB to add
``Touriga Nacional'' to the list of approved grape variety names.
Touriga Nacional is a black Vitis vinifera grape variety originally
from Portugal. To satisfy the requirements of Sec. 4.93, the
petitioner submitted a copy of the 2008 California Grape Crush Report,
issued by the California Department of Food and Agriculture. This
publication reports that 914.5 tons of Touriga Nacional were crushed in
California that year. Also, UC Davis's National Grape Registry contains
an entry for Touriga Nacional, and it lists 12 nurseries selling the
variety. Based on this evidence, TTB proposes to add Touriga Nacional
to the list of grape variety names in Sec. 4.91.
The name ``Touriga'' is currently listed in Sec. 4.91, which the
petitioner contends is similar to listing ``Cabernet Sauvignon'' as
``Cabernet.'' However, the petitioner did not request the removal of
``Touriga'' from the list, nor did it submit any evidence for such a
removal. TTB is aware that there are other grape variety names that
include ``Touriga'' as part of the name (the National Grape Registry
also lists ``Touriga Franca'' and ``Touriga Brasileira''). Because
bottlers of wines produced from these grapes may be utilizing the name
``Touriga,'' TTB proposes to keep the name on the list for now.
However, we welcome comments regarding the accuracy of the name
``Touriga.''
Vaccar[egrave]se
Tablas Creek Vineyard, Paso Robles, California, petitioned TTB to
add ``Vaccar[egrave]se'' to the list of approved grape variety names.
Vaccar[egrave]se is a red Vitis vinifera variety associated with the
Rh[ocirc]ne region of France, where it is one of the 13 authorized
varieties permitted in the Ch[acirc]teauneuf-du-Pape appellation of
origin. As part of the petition, Tablas Creek submitted a letter of
support from the director of FPS, Dr. Deborah Golino. In her letter,
Dr. Golino states that Vaccar[egrave]se plant material was imported
from France to FPS, where it was tested and found to be free of
viruses, then
[[Page 81031]]
planted in FPS's Russell Ranch Foundation Vineyard. The variety is
currently available for sale to the public at FPS. In addition to the
letter from Dr. Golino, the petitioner also submitted several published
references to Vaccar[egrave]se. Based on this evidence, TTB proposes to
add Vaccar[egrave]se to the list of grape variety names in Sec. 4.91.
Valjohn
Girouard Vines, Tulsa, Oklahoma, petitioned TTB to add ``Valjohn''
to the list of approved grape variety names. Valjohn is a red wine
grape developed by George E. Girouard by crossing Cabernet Franc with
Vitis aestivalis JG # 3. To satisfy the requirements of Sec. 4.93, the
petitioner submitted a listing for Valjohn from the May 2012
HortScience's Register of New Fruit and Nut Cultivars. The petitioner
stated that the variety is currently grown in Oklahoma and California,
and that it plans to release a wine made from Valjohn in 2015. Based on
this evidence, TTB proposes to add Valjohn to the list of grape variety
names in Sec. 4.91.
Verdejo
Berryessa Gap Vineyards, Winters, California, petitioned TTB to add
``Verdejo'' to the list of approved grape variety names. Verdejo is a
white Vitis vinifera variety that has grown for centuries in the Rueda
region of Spain. To satisfy the requirements of Sec. 4.93, the
petitioner cites a number of published references to Verdejo, including
in ``The Oxford Companion to Wine'' (Robinson, 2006 edition) and the
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture. Separately, TTB received a
letter of support for the petition from the director of FPS, Dr.
Deborah Golino. She reports that FPS imported the variety in 2000 and
since 2006 has distributed more than 750 Verdejo cuttings or plants to
California vineyards. According to UC Davis's National Grape Registry,
five nurseries sell Verdejo to the public. Based on this evidence, TTB
proposes to add Verdejo to the list of grape variety names in Sec.
4.91.
Technical Correction
TTB has become aware of a technical error in Sec. 4.91 in that the
grape variety name ``Madeleine Angevine'' is currently misspelled as
``Madeline Angevine.'' TTB proposes to correct this error in this
document. TTB also proposes to allow the use of the spelling ``Madeline
Angevine'' for a period of 1 year after publication of a final rule on
this matter so that anyone holding a COLA with the misspelling has
sufficient time to obtain new labels. If this proposal is adopted as a
final rule, at the end of the 1-year period, holders of approved
``Madeline Angevine'' labels must discontinue their use as their
certificates of label approval will be revoked by operation of the
final rule (see 27 CFR 13.51 and 13.72(a)(2)). TTB believes the 1-year
period will provide such label holders with adequate time to use up
their supply of previously approved ``Madeline Angevine'' labels. This
proposal appears in a new paragraph (e) of 27 CFR 4.92.
Public Participation
Comments Sought
TTB requests comments from members of the public, particularly any
person whose use of an approved label might be impacted by final
approval of the grape variety names that are the subject of this
proposed rule. TTB is also interested in comments that might bring into
question whether an added grape name is accurate and appropriate for
the designation of American wines. TTB is particularly interested in
comments concerning the grape name discussed above that TTB did not
approve by letter, Phoenix, as well as Geneva Red 7, the grape name we
are proposing to replace with the name ``Geneva Red.'' Finally, TTB
invites comment on any other issue raised by this notice of proposed
rulemaking. Please support your comment with specific information about
the grape varietal name in question.
Submitting Comments
You may submit comments on this notice by using one of the
following three methods:
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: You may send comments via the
online comment form posted with this proposed rule within Docket No.
TTB-2016-0011 on ``Regulations.gov,'' the Federal e-rulemaking portal,
at https://www.regulations.gov. A direct link to that docket is
available under Notice No. 165 on the TTB Web site at https://www.ttb.gov/wine/wine-rulemaking.shtml. Supplemental files may be
attached to comments submitted via Regulations.gov. For complete
instructions on how to use Regulations.gov, click on the site's
``Help'' tab.
U.S. Mail: You may send comments via postal mail to the
Director, Regulations and Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street NW., Box 12, Washington, DC 20005.
Hand Delivery/Courier: You may hand-carry your comments or
have them hand-carried to the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau,
1310 G Street NW., Suite 400E, Washington, DC 20005.
Please submit your comments by the closing date shown above in this
proposed rule. Your comments must reference Notice No. 165 and include
your name and mailing address. Your comments also must be made in
English, be legible, and be written in language acceptable for public
disclosure. TTB does not acknowledge receipt of comments and considers
all comments as originals.
In your comment, please clearly state if you are commenting for
yourself or on behalf of an association, business, or other entity. If
you are commenting on behalf of an entity, your comment must include
the entity's name as well as your name and position title. In your
comment via Regulations.gov, please enter the entity's name in the
``Organization'' blank of the online comment form. If you comment via
postal mail or hand delivery/courier, please submit your entity's
comment on letterhead.
You may also write to the Administrator before the comment closing
date to ask for a public hearing. The Administrator reserves the right
to determine whether to hold a public hearing.
Confidentiality
All submitted comments and attachments are part of the public
record and subject to disclosure. Do not enclose any material in your
comments that you consider to be confidential or inappropriate for
public disclosure.
Public Disclosure
TTB will post, and you may view, copies of this proposed rule and
any online or mailed comments received about this proposal within
Docket No. TTB-2016-0011 on the Federal e-rulemaking portal. A direct
link to that docket is available on the TTB Web site at https://www.ttb.gov/wine/wine-rulemaking.shtml under Notice No. 165. You may
also reach the relevant docket through the Regulations.gov search page
at https://www.regulations.gov. For information on how to use
Regulations.gov, click on the site's ``Help'' tab.
All posted comments will display the commenter's name, organization
(if any), city, and State, and, in the case of mailed comments, all
address information, including email addresses. TTB may omit voluminous
attachments or material that it considers unsuitable for posting.
You may view copies of this proposed rule and any electronic or
mailed
[[Page 81032]]
comments TTB receives about this proposal by appointment at the TTB
Information Resource Center, 1310G Street NW., Washington, DC 20005.
You may also obtain copies for 20 cents per 8.5- x 11-inch page.
Contact TTB's information specialist at the above address or by
telephone at 202-453-2270 to schedule an appointment or to request
copies of comments or other materials.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
TTB certifies that this proposed regulation, if adopted, will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The decision of a grape grower to petition for a grape
variety name approval, or the decision of a wine bottler to use an
approved name on a label, is entirely at the discretion of the grower
or bottler. This proposed regulation does not impose any new reporting,
recordkeeping, or other administrative requirements. Accordingly, a
regulatory flexibility analysis is not required.
Executive Order 12866
It has been determined that this proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action as defined by Executive Order 12866 of September 30,
1993. Therefore, no regulatory assessment is required.
Drafting Information
Jennifer Berry of the Regulations and Rulings Division, Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, drafted this document.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 4
Administrative practice and procedure, Advertising, Customs duties
and inspection, Imports, Labeling, Packaging and containers, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Trade practices, Wine.
Proposed Regulatory Amendment
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, TTB proposes to amend 27
CFR, chapter I, part 4 as set forth below:
PART 4--LABELING AND ADVERTISING OF WINE
0
1. The authority citation for 27 CFR part 4 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205, unless otherwise noted.
0
2. In Sec. 4.91, the list of grape variety names following the
introductory text is amended by removing the entries for ``Geneva Red
7,'' ``Lenoir,'' ``Madeline Angevine,'' ``Mission,'' ``Pinot blanc,''
``Tempranillo (Valdepe[ntilde]as),'' ``Tinto c[atilde]o,'' and
``Valdepe[ntilde]as (Tempranillo),'' and by adding new entries in
alphabetical order to read as follows:
Sec. 4.91 List of approved names.
* * * * *
Amigne
Arandell
* * * * *
Aromella
Arvine
* * * * *
Bianchetta trevigiana
* * * * *
Black Spanish (Jacquez, Lenoir)
* * * * *
Bluebell
* * * * *
Bourboulenc
Brachetto
* * * * *
By George
* * * * *
Caladoc
* * * * *
Caprettone
* * * * *
Chisago
* * * * *
Coda di Volpe
* * * * *
Diana
* * * * *
Esprit
Falanghina
* * * * *
Geneva Red
* * * * *
Godello
* * * * *
Gros Manseng
* * * * *
Humagne Rouge
* * * * *
Jacquez (Black Spanish, Lenoir)
* * * * *
Jupiter
* * * * *
King of the North
* * * * *
Lambrusca di Alessandria
* * * * *
Lenoir (Black Spanish, Jacquez)
* * * * *
Loureiro
* * * * *
Madeleine Angevine
Madeleine Sylvaner
* * * * *
Marquis
* * * * *
Marselan
* * * * *
Mission (Rose of Peru)
* * * * *
Mustang
* * * * *
Petite Pearl
* * * * *
Phoenix
Picardan
* * * * *
Pinot bianco (Pinot blanc)
Pinot blanc (Pinot bianco)
* * * * *
Plymouth
* * * * *
Ribolla Gialla
Rieslaner
* * * * *
Riverbank
* * * * *
Rose of Peru (Mission)
* * * * *
Saperavi
* * * * *
Sch[ouml]nburger
* * * * *
Sheridan
* * * * *
Southern Cross
* * * * *
Tempranillo (Tinta Roriz, Valdepe[ntilde]as)
Terret Noir
* * * * *
Tinta Amarela
Tinta Cao (Tinto c[atilde]o)
* * * * *
Tinta Roriz (Tempranillo, Valdepe[ntilde]as)
Tinto c[atilde]o (Tinta Cao)
* * * * *
Touriga Nacional
* * * * *
Vaccar[egrave]se
Valdepe[ntilde]as (Tempranillo, Tinta Roriz)
* * * * *
Valjohn
* * * * *
Verdejo
* * * * *
0
3. Section 4.92 is amended by adding paragraph (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 4.92 Alternative names permitted for temporary use.
* * * * *
(e) Wines bottled prior to [date 1 year after publication of the
final rule in the Federal Register].
[[Page 81033]]
Alternative Name/Name
Geneva Red 7--Geneva Red
Madeline Angevine--Madeleine Angevine
Signed: September 29, 2016.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
Approved: November 3, 2016.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and Tariff Policy).
[FR Doc. 2016-27573 Filed 11-16-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P