Law Enforcement Operations and Investigations, 78951-78952 [2016-27163]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 218 / Thursday, November 10, 2016 / Proposed Rules
(Lat. 35°40′22″ N., long. 120°37′38″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 10.5-mile
radius of Paso Robles Municipal Airport from
the 351° bearing of the airport clockwise to
the 040° bearing, and within a 5.7-mile
radius from the 040° bearing of the airport
clockwise to the 128° bearing, and within a
9-mile radius from the 128° bearing of the
airport clockwise to the 168° bearing, and
within a 7-mile radius from the 168° bearing
of the airport clockwise to the 209° bearing,
and within a 5.7-mile radius from the 209°
bearing of the airport clockwise to the 323°
bearing, and within 1.8 miles each side of the
341° bearing from the airport extending to 9.6
miles northwest of the airport.
Paragraph 6006
Class E En Route Airspace.
*
*
*
*
*
AWP CA E6 Paso Robles, CA [New]
Paso Robles Municipal Airport, CA
(Lat. 35°40′22″ N., long. 120°37′38″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from
1,200 feet above the surface within the area
bounded by lat. 35°34′54″ N., long. 120°4′52″
W.; to lat. 35°43′55″ N., long. 120°4′52″ W.;
to lat. 35°43′58″ N., long. 120°20′49″ W.; to
lat. 36°8′51″ N., long. 120°39′41″ W.; to lat.
36°23′8″ N., long. 120°42′26″ W.; to lat.
36°23′13″ N., long. 121°3′25″ W.; to lat.
36°0′42″ N., long. 121°33′30″ W.; to lat.
35°37′48″ N., long. 121°21′48″ W.; to lat.
35°25′55″ N., long. 121°2′47″ W.; to lat.
35°32′43″ N., long. 121°2′47″ W.; to lat.
35°32′52″ N., long. 120°40′42″ W.; to lat.
35°22′10″ N., long. 120°32′00″ W; to lat.
35°31′44″ N., long. 120°14′50″ W.; to lat.
35°35″25″ N., long. 120°17′41″ W.; to the
point of beginning.
Issued in Seattle, Washington, on
November 1, 2016.
Tracey Johnson,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Western
Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2016–27109 Filed 11–9–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
32 CFR Part 637
RIN 0702–AA72
[Docket No. USA–2016–HQ–0017]
Law Enforcement Operations and
Investigations
Department of the Army, DoD.
Proposed rule.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of the Army
proposes to revise its regulation
concerning policies and procedures for
the conduct of Army law enforcement
operations and investigations. This
regulation was last published in the
Federal Register on June 22, 2005 (70
FR 36029). At that time, the entire
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:02 Nov 09, 2016
Jkt 241001
regulation was codified. The proposed
revisions remove a large portion of the
currently codified part that does not
apply to the public and is now included
in DoD internal guidance. The proposed
revision also adds guidance on the
requirements for the detention of
civilians by Army law enforcement to
fill a void in published guidance.
DATES: Consideration will be given to all
comments received by: January 9, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by 32 CFR part 637, Docket
No. USA–2016–HQ–0017 and or RIN
0702–AA72, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Department of Defense, Office
of the Deputy Chief Management
Officer, Directorate of Oversight and
Compliance, 4800 Mark Center Drive,
Mailbox #24, Alexandria, VA 22350–
1700.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) for this
Federal Register document. The general
policy for comments and other
submissions from members of the public
is to make these submissions available
for public viewing on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Jeff Pearce, (703) 695–8499.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This regulation applies to the active
component Army and U.S. Army
Reserve, Department of the Army
Civilian Police, Department of the Army
Civilian Detectives, Department of the
Army Security Guards, contracted or
contractor security force operations
(such as detector dog support), Family
members, Department of the Army
Civilians, and other personnel on Army
installations. It also applies to the Army
National Guard of the United States
when Federalized under Title 10,
United States Code. This regulation is
required for unit personnel preparing
for mobilization and deployment.
The internal guidance is available in
AR 190–30, Military Police
Investigations, and can be found at
https://www.apd.army.mil/Search/
ePubsSearch/
ePubsSearchForm.aspx?x=AR. This
regulation discusses policies for
conducting law enforcement and
specified security operations on Army
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
78951
installations, facilities and activities.
Compliance with this regulation assures
consistent delivery of protection, law
enforcement, and safety assistance to
Soldiers, Family members, Department
of the Army Civilians, and other
personnel on Army installations.
The Army recognized there is a void
in internal guidance concerning the
conduct of law enforcement operations
on installations. As a result, the Army
revised AR 190–30, which includes
guidance on the operation of detention
cells and detention of civilians. Due to
the subject matter’s impact on the
public, the Army is proposing to add
provisions in the CFR concerning
Detention Cell Operations which
provide guidance on the detention of
military and civilian personnel by Army
law enforcement.
This rule will be included in DoD’s
retrospective plan, completed in August
2011, and will be reported in future
status updates of DoD’s retrospective
review in accordance with the
requirements in Executive Order 13563.
DoD’s full plan can be accessed at:
https://www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=DOD-2011-OS-0036.
Authority for This Regulation
The legal authority for this action is
10 U.S.C. 807—Article 7, Apprehension.
This article specifically covers the
authority for apprehension or taking of
a person into custody.
Costs and Benefits
This rule will have no monetary effect
upon the public as it only directs Army
law enforcement and installation
leadership’s efforts in the conduct of
their operations. Their efforts under this
guidance ensure the effective
employment of police and security
forces to assist, protect, and defend the
communities they serve on Army
installations.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Army certifies
that the proposed rule is not subject to
the Regulatory Flexibility Act because
the rule does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Department of the Army
determined that this rule does not
include a mandate that may result in
estimated costs to State, local or tribal
governments in the aggregate, or the
private sector, of $100 million or more.
E:\FR\FM\10NOP1.SGM
10NOP1
78952
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 218 / Thursday, November 10, 2016 / Proposed Rules
National Environmental Policy Act
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 637
The Department of the Army has
determined that this rule is not covered
under the National Environmental
Policy Act because the rule does not
have a significant impact on the
environment.
Law enforcement, Law enforcement
officers, Law enforcement operations,
Detention operations.
The Department of the Army has
determined that the Paperwork
Reduction Act does not apply because
the rule does not involve collection of
information from the public.
PART 637—LAW ENFORCEMENT
OPERATIONS AND INVESTIGATIONS
Subpart A—Detention Cell Operations
Sec.
637.1 Objective and policy.
Executive Order 12630 (Government
Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights)
Subpart B—[Reserved]
The Department of the Army has
determined that Executive Order 12630
does not apply because the rule does not
impair private property rights.
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review) and Executive
Order 13563 (Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review)
Although this rule is not
‘‘economically significant’’ because it
does not have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy, it has been deemed ‘‘other
significant’’ for raising novel legal or
policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in these
Executive Orders. For that reason, it has
been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
Executive Order 13045 (Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risk and Safety Risks)
The Department of the Army has
determined that Executive Order 13045
does not apply because this substantive
action in rulemaking is neither
economically significant nor does the
action concern the environmental health
or safety risks to children.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
The Department of the Army has
determined that according to the criteria
defined in Executive Order 13132 this
rule does not apply because it will not
have a substantial effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
17:02 Nov 09, 2016
For reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Department of the Army
proposes to revise 32 CFR part 637 as
follows:
■
Paperwork Reduction Act
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Thomas S. Blair,
Chief, Law Enforcement Branch.
Jkt 241001
Authority: 10 U.S.C. 807.
Subpart B—[Reserved]
[FR Doc. 2016–27163 Filed 11–9–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 500–03–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2016–0523]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Rice
Creek, Putnam County, FL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
Subpart A—Detention Cell Operations
ACTION:
§ 637.1
The Coast Guard proposes to
modify the operating schedule that
governs the CSX Railroad Bridge across
the Rice Creek, mile 0.8, in Palatka,
Putnam County, FL.
This proposed rule would change the
existing open on demand during the day
and 24 hour advance notice for a bridge
opening during the night, to 24 hour
advance notice for an opening at all
times. This proposal is being made due
to the minimal drawbridge openings
requested over the past several years.
This modification would allow the
bridge owner to leave the bridge
unmanned other than when an opening
is requested and it would have little to
no effect on navigation.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
January 9, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2016–0523 using Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
SUMMARY:
Objective and policy.
(a) Objective. Every effort will be
taken to ensure that detained personnel
remain in custody only when necessary.
Persons will remain in custody for
minimum periods, under proper
supervision. All persons in custody are
treated in a humane manner and in an
environment which will not impair
their health or subject the detainee to
unreasonable discomfort.
(b) Policy. Military and civilian
personnel apprehended by military
police may be detained in a military
police detention cell (D-cell) only when
necessary to prevent escape or to ensure
safety of the detainee or others.
(1) Detention of civilian personnel not
subject to the UCMJ is authorized only
while the civilian personnel are pending
release to civilian authorities. Detention
of civilian personnel will be done only
in the case of a serious felony and when
the individual is a flight risk, or is a risk
to self or others, and must be approved
by a commissioned officer designated by
the senior commander. In no case will
detention exceed 12 hours.
(2) Male and female personnel will
not be detained in the same cell
simultaneously.
(3) The use of other military service
or civilian detention facilities to detain
personnel in police custody is
authorized. When other military service
facilities are used, the time limitations
and other procedures described above
apply. Only those civilian facilities that
have been evaluated by the U.S. Marshal
Service and deemed appropriate for use
will be utilized.
(4) Juveniles will not be detained in
Army LE D-cells.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Mr. Rod Elkins with
the Coast Guard; telephone 305–415–
6989, email rodney.j.elkins@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
E:\FR\FM\10NOP1.SGM
10NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 218 (Thursday, November 10, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 78951-78952]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-27163]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
32 CFR Part 637
RIN 0702-AA72
[Docket No. USA-2016-HQ-0017]
Law Enforcement Operations and Investigations
AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Army proposes to revise its regulation
concerning policies and procedures for the conduct of Army law
enforcement operations and investigations. This regulation was last
published in the Federal Register on June 22, 2005 (70 FR 36029). At
that time, the entire regulation was codified. The proposed revisions
remove a large portion of the currently codified part that does not
apply to the public and is now included in DoD internal guidance. The
proposed revision also adds guidance on the requirements for the
detention of civilians by Army law enforcement to fill a void in
published guidance.
DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by: January
9, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by 32 CFR part 637,
Docket No. USA-2016-HQ-0017 and or RIN 0702-AA72, by any of the
following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Department of Defense, Office of the Deputy Chief
Management Officer, Directorate of Oversight and Compliance, 4800 Mark
Center Drive, Mailbox #24, Alexandria, VA 22350-1700.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) for this
Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other
submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions
available for public viewing on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jeff Pearce, (703) 695-8499.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This regulation applies to the active component Army and U.S. Army
Reserve, Department of the Army Civilian Police, Department of the Army
Civilian Detectives, Department of the Army Security Guards, contracted
or contractor security force operations (such as detector dog support),
Family members, Department of the Army Civilians, and other personnel
on Army installations. It also applies to the Army National Guard of
the United States when Federalized under Title 10, United States Code.
This regulation is required for unit personnel preparing for
mobilization and deployment.
The internal guidance is available in AR 190-30, Military Police
Investigations, and can be found at https://www.apd.army.mil/Search/ePubsSearch/ePubsSearchForm.aspx?x=AR. This regulation discusses
policies for conducting law enforcement and specified security
operations on Army installations, facilities and activities. Compliance
with this regulation assures consistent delivery of protection, law
enforcement, and safety assistance to Soldiers, Family members,
Department of the Army Civilians, and other personnel on Army
installations.
The Army recognized there is a void in internal guidance concerning
the conduct of law enforcement operations on installations. As a
result, the Army revised AR 190-30, which includes guidance on the
operation of detention cells and detention of civilians. Due to the
subject matter's impact on the public, the Army is proposing to add
provisions in the CFR concerning Detention Cell Operations which
provide guidance on the detention of military and civilian personnel by
Army law enforcement.
This rule will be included in DoD's retrospective plan, completed
in August 2011, and will be reported in future status updates of DoD's
retrospective review in accordance with the requirements in Executive
Order 13563. DoD's full plan can be accessed at: https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=DOD-2011-OS-0036.
Authority for This Regulation
The legal authority for this action is 10 U.S.C. 807--Article 7,
Apprehension. This article specifically covers the authority for
apprehension or taking of a person into custody.
Costs and Benefits
This rule will have no monetary effect upon the public as it only
directs Army law enforcement and installation leadership's efforts in
the conduct of their operations. Their efforts under this guidance
ensure the effective employment of police and security forces to
assist, protect, and defend the communities they serve on Army
installations.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Army certifies that the proposed rule is not
subject to the Regulatory Flexibility Act because the rule does not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C.
601-612.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Department of the Army determined that this rule does not
include a mandate that may result in estimated costs to State, local or
tribal governments in the aggregate, or the private sector, of $100
million or more.
[[Page 78952]]
National Environmental Policy Act
The Department of the Army has determined that this rule is not
covered under the National Environmental Policy Act because the rule
does not have a significant impact on the environment.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Department of the Army has determined that the Paperwork
Reduction Act does not apply because the rule does not involve
collection of information from the public.
Executive Order 12630 (Government Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property Rights)
The Department of the Army has determined that Executive Order
12630 does not apply because the rule does not impair private property
rights.
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) and Executive
Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review)
Although this rule is not ``economically significant'' because it
does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more
or adversely affect in a material way the economy, it has been deemed
``other significant'' for raising novel legal or policy issues arising
out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles
set forth in these Executive Orders. For that reason, it has been
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
Executive Order 13045 (Protection of Children From Environmental Health
Risk and Safety Risks)
The Department of the Army has determined that Executive Order
13045 does not apply because this substantive action in rulemaking is
neither economically significant nor does the action concern the
environmental health or safety risks to children.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
The Department of the Army has determined that according to the
criteria defined in Executive Order 13132 this rule does not apply
because it will not have a substantial effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 637
Law enforcement, Law enforcement officers, Law enforcement
operations, Detention operations.
Thomas S. Blair,
Chief, Law Enforcement Branch.
0
For reasons discussed in the preamble, the Department of the Army
proposes to revise 32 CFR part 637 as follows:
PART 637--LAW ENFORCEMENT OPERATIONS AND INVESTIGATIONS
Subpart A--Detention Cell Operations
Sec.
637.1 Objective and policy.
Subpart B--[Reserved]
Authority: 10 U.S.C. 807.
Subpart A--Detention Cell Operations
Sec. 637.1 Objective and policy.
(a) Objective. Every effort will be taken to ensure that detained
personnel remain in custody only when necessary. Persons will remain in
custody for minimum periods, under proper supervision. All persons in
custody are treated in a humane manner and in an environment which will
not impair their health or subject the detainee to unreasonable
discomfort.
(b) Policy. Military and civilian personnel apprehended by military
police may be detained in a military police detention cell (D-cell)
only when necessary to prevent escape or to ensure safety of the
detainee or others.
(1) Detention of civilian personnel not subject to the UCMJ is
authorized only while the civilian personnel are pending release to
civilian authorities. Detention of civilian personnel will be done only
in the case of a serious felony and when the individual is a flight
risk, or is a risk to self or others, and must be approved by a
commissioned officer designated by the senior commander. In no case
will detention exceed 12 hours.
(2) Male and female personnel will not be detained in the same cell
simultaneously.
(3) The use of other military service or civilian detention
facilities to detain personnel in police custody is authorized. When
other military service facilities are used, the time limitations and
other procedures described above apply. Only those civilian facilities
that have been evaluated by the U.S. Marshal Service and deemed
appropriate for use will be utilized.
(4) Juveniles will not be detained in Army LE D-cells.
Subpart B--[Reserved]
[FR Doc. 2016-27163 Filed 11-9-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 500-03-P