Intent To Review a Study Data Standardization Plan Template; Notice of Availability; Establishment of a Public Docket; Request for Comments, 78602-78603 [2016-26913]
Download as PDF
78602
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 216 / Tuesday, November 8, 2016 / Notices
will be used to understand satisfaction
among individuals who receive SHIP
Medicare assistance/counseling, as well,
as how the program can be improved to
provide better service to its target
population. Eighteen (18) unique states/
territories will be surveyed in FY 2017,
with each state/territory expected to
generate 75 unique responses, for a total
of 1,350 individual responses in Year 1.
This process will then be replicated in
Year 2 (FY 2018) and Year 3 (FY 2019),
with a different unique group of 18
states and territories being surveyed
each year. By the end of FY19, SHIP
will obtain 4,050 completed surveys to
measure satisfaction at the state and
national levels (18 states/territories × 75
responses per state × 3 years). SHIP will
use the following factors to draw a
representative sample of beneficiaries
who received assistance/counseling:
• Review counseling sessions at two
points each year:
Æ One week in the spring (outside of
the annual Medicare Open Enrollment
Period)
Æ One week in the fall (during the
annual Medicare Open Enrollment
Period)
• Focus only on non-redundant
individuals (i.e., a random sample
without replacement of individuals who
receive SHIP counseling).
• Randomly select 18 states and
territories to be surveyed each year,
with the states/territories stratified by
data collection method* and the size of
the Medicare-eligible population.
* Data collection method refers to how
each state/territory collects and enters
its records of counseling sessions. The
majority of states/territories (29 of 54)
directly enter counseling records into
SHIP’s National Performance Reporting
(NPR) system, but the remaining states/
territories upload data in batches at the
end of each month. To ensure that the
batch upload states/territories will be
able to pull weekly samples twice per
year, we will limit these states/
territories to Years 2 and 3 of the survey
administration period, thereby allowing
for technical assistance to these states/
territories if necessary.
To generate a sample with a 95%
confidence level at the national level
384 responses will be required (n =
3,000,000 counseling sessions in 2015).
SHIP anticipates collecting 75
completed surveys per state/territory,
for a total collection of 4,050 completed
surveys over the 3-year period. This
larger collection will enable ACL to
make state-to-state comparisons, which
is an important feature of this survey.
Specifically, state-to-state comparisons
will allow ACL to identify which states/
territories are providing the best
services to their beneficiaries, and what
best practices can be shared across
states/territories. The larger collection
will also provide each state/territory
with sufficient information to take local
action to improve service within
budgetary constraints.
The proposed survey instrument may
be viewed on the Web site: https://
www.acl.gov/Programs/CIP/OHIC/
index.aspx.
OMB approval is requested for 3
years. There are no costs to respondents
other than their time. The average
annual burden associated with these
activities is summarized below:
Respondent type
Number of
respondents
Responses
per
respondent
Average
burden hours
per response
(hours)
Total
average
annual burden
(hours)
Stratified Random Sample ...............................................................................
1,350
1
8/60
180
Dated: October 27, 2016.
Edwin L. Walker,
Acting Administrator and Assistant Secretary
for Aging.
[FR Doc. 2016–26924 Filed 11–7–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4154–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2016–N–3362]
Intent To Review a Study Data
Standardization Plan Template; Notice
of Availability; Establishment of a
Public Docket; Request for Comments
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Notice of availability; request
for comments.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
ACTION:
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, is establishing
a public docket to collect comments
related to a proposed Study Data
Standardization Plan (SDSP) template.
As part of FDA’s ongoing collaboration
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:27 Nov 07, 2016
Jkt 241001
with the Pharmaceutical Users Software
Exchange (PhUSE), an independent,
non-profit consortium addressing
computational science issues, a PhUSE
working group developed the PhUSE
SDSP template. The purpose of this
review is to evaluate the template and
determine whether FDA will
recommend its use either as is, or in a
modified form, for regulatory
submissions of study data. FDA is
seeking public comment on the use of
the PhUSE SDSP template for regulatory
submissions.
DATES: Although you can comment on
the PhUSE SDSP template at any time,
to ensure that the Agency considers
your comments in this review, please
submit either electronic or written
comments by January 9, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
as follows:
Electronic Submissions
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM
08NON1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 216 / Tuesday, November 8, 2016 / Notices
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management, FDA will post your
comment, as well as any attachments,
except for information submitted,
marked and identified, as confidential,
if submitted as detailed in
‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2016–N–3362 for ‘‘Intent to Review a
Study Data Standardization Plan
Template.’’ Received comments will be
placed in the docket and, except for
those submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Division of Dockets Management
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit both
copies to the Division of Dockets
Management. If you do not wish your
name and contact information to be
made publicly available, you can
provide this information on the cover
sheet and not in the body of your
comments and you must identify this
information as ‘‘confidential.’’ Any
information marked as ‘‘confidential’’
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more
information about FDA’s posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR
56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://www.fda.gov/
regulatoryinformation/dockets/
default.htm.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:27 Nov 07, 2016
Jkt 241001
78603
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
all matters regarding the use of the
PhUSE SDSP template.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
II. Electronic Access
Crystal Allard, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 21, Rm. 1518,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301–
796–8856, crystal.allard@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
FDA is a participating member of
PhUSE, an independent, non-profit
consortium of academic, regulatory,
non-profit, and private sector entities.
PhUSE provides a global platform for
the discussion of topics encompassing
the work of biostatisticians, data
managers, statistical programmers, and
e-clinical information technology
professionals, with the mission of
providing an open, transparent, and
collaborative forum to address
computational science issues. As part of
this collaboration, PhUSE working
groups develop and periodically publish
proposals for enhancing the review and
analysis of human and animal study
data submitted to regulatory agencies.
You can learn more about PhUSE
working groups at https://www.phuse.eu/
cs-working-groups.aspx. (FDA has
verified the Web site addresses as of the
date this document publishes in the
Federal Register, but Web sites are
subject to change over time.)
In December 2014, FDA published the
Study Data Technical Conformance
Guide (the ‘‘Guide,’’ available at https://
www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/
DataStandards/StudyDataStandards/
default.htm), which contains technical
recommendations to sponsors for the
submission of animal and human study
data and related information in a
standardized electronic format. In
section 2.1 of the Guide, FDA
recommends that sponsors should
include a plan (e.g., in the IND)
describing the submission of
standardized study data to FDA. FDA’s
Study Data Standards Resources Web
page provides recommendations for
preparing an SDSP (https://www.fda.gov/
downloads/ForIndustry/DataStandards/
StudyDataStandards/UCM447119.pdf).
FDA now intends to review the
PhUSE SDSP template, a deliverable of
the working group effort described
previously in this document, with the
potential result that FDA could
recommend the use of the template in
its current form, or in a modified form,
for use in the regulatory submission of
study data in conformance with the
Guide. FDA invites public comment on
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Dated: November 2, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016–26913 Filed 11–7–16; 8:45 am]
I. Background
PO 00000
The PhUSE SDSP template is
available at: https://www.phusewiki.org/
wiki/images/e/ea/SDSP_Template.pdf.
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2013–D–0743]
Medical Device Reporting for
Manufacturers; Guidance for Industry
and Food and Drug Administration
Staff; Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice of availability.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of the guidance entitled
‘‘Medical Device Reporting for
Manufacturers; Guidance for Industry
and Food and Drug Administration
Staff.’’ This guidance document is
intended to assist medical device
manufacturers meet applicable reporting
and recordkeeping requirements for
certain device-related adverse events
and malfunctions.
DATES: Submit either electronic or
written comments on this guidance at
any time. General comments on Agency
guidance documents are welcome at any
time.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
as follows:
SUMMARY:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov/ will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM
08NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 216 (Tuesday, November 8, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78602-78603]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-26913]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2016-N-3362]
Intent To Review a Study Data Standardization Plan Template;
Notice of Availability; Establishment of a Public Docket; Request for
Comments
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, is establishing a public docket to collect
comments related to a proposed Study Data Standardization Plan (SDSP)
template. As part of FDA's ongoing collaboration with the
Pharmaceutical Users Software Exchange (PhUSE), an independent, non-
profit consortium addressing computational science issues, a PhUSE
working group developed the PhUSE SDSP template. The purpose of this
review is to evaluate the template and determine whether FDA will
recommend its use either as is, or in a modified form, for regulatory
submissions of study data. FDA is seeking public comment on the use of
the PhUSE SDSP template for regulatory submissions.
DATES: Although you can comment on the PhUSE SDSP template at any time,
to ensure that the Agency considers your comments in this review,
please submit either electronic or written comments by January 9, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food
[[Page 78603]]
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD
20852.
For written/paper comments submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2016-N-3362 for ``Intent to Review a Study Data Standardization
Plan Template.'' Received comments will be placed in the docket and,
except for those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly
viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Division of Dockets Management. If you do not
wish your name and contact information to be made publicly available,
you can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body
of your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/dockets/default.htm.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Crystal Allard, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 21, Rm. 1518, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-8856, crystal.allard@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FDA is a participating member of PhUSE, an independent, non-profit
consortium of academic, regulatory, non-profit, and private sector
entities. PhUSE provides a global platform for the discussion of topics
encompassing the work of biostatisticians, data managers, statistical
programmers, and e-clinical information technology professionals, with
the mission of providing an open, transparent, and collaborative forum
to address computational science issues. As part of this collaboration,
PhUSE working groups develop and periodically publish proposals for
enhancing the review and analysis of human and animal study data
submitted to regulatory agencies. You can learn more about PhUSE
working groups at https://www.phuse.eu/cs-working-groups.aspx. (FDA has
verified the Web site addresses as of the date this document publishes
in the Federal Register, but Web sites are subject to change over
time.)
In December 2014, FDA published the Study Data Technical
Conformance Guide (the ``Guide,'' available at https://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/DataStandards/StudyDataStandards/default.htm), which
contains technical recommendations to sponsors for the submission of
animal and human study data and related information in a standardized
electronic format. In section 2.1 of the Guide, FDA recommends that
sponsors should include a plan (e.g., in the IND) describing the
submission of standardized study data to FDA. FDA's Study Data
Standards Resources Web page provides recommendations for preparing an
SDSP (https://www.fda.gov/downloads/ForIndustry/DataStandards/StudyDataStandards/UCM447119.pdf).
FDA now intends to review the PhUSE SDSP template, a deliverable of
the working group effort described previously in this document, with
the potential result that FDA could recommend the use of the template
in its current form, or in a modified form, for use in the regulatory
submission of study data in conformance with the Guide. FDA invites
public comment on all matters regarding the use of the PhUSE SDSP
template.
II. Electronic Access
The PhUSE SDSP template is available at: https://www.phusewiki.org/wiki/images/e/ea/SDSP_Template.pdf.
Dated: November 2, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-26913 Filed 11-7-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P