National Express LLC-Acquisition of Control-Trinity, Inc., Trinity Cars, Inc., and Trinity Student Delivery, LLC, 76994-76997 [2016-26724]
Download as PDF
76994
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 214 / Friday, November 4, 2016 / Notices
and password. Matters requiring higher
assurance will require multi-factor
credentials, such as a certificate based
login.
Dated: October 26, 2016.
Lisa Aguirre,
Managing Director, Directorate of Defense
Trade Controls, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2016–26715 Filed 11–3–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice: 9779]
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Notice of Public Meeting
The Department of State will conduct
an open meeting at 9:00 a.m. on
November 9, 2016, in Room 5L18–01 of
the Douglas A. Munro Coast Guard
Headquarters Building at St. Elizabeth’s,
2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20593. The primary
purpose of the meeting is to prepare for
the one hundred and seventeenth
session of the International Maritime
Organization’s (IMO) Council to be held
at the IMO Headquarters, United
Kingdom, December 5–9, 2016.
The agenda items to be considered
include:
—Adoption of the agenda
—Report of the Secretary-General on
credentials
—Rules of Procedure of the Council
—Strategy, planning and reform
—Resource management (Human
resource matters, report on
investments, budget considerations
for 2016–2017, Results-based budget:
Outline of budgetary implications for
2018–2019)
—IMO Member State Audit Scheme
—Consideration of the report to the
Marine Environmental Protection
—Consideration of the report of the
Technical Cooperation Committee
—Technical Cooperation Fund: Report
on activities of the 2015 programme
—IMO International Maritime Law
Institute
—Report on the 38th Consultative
Meeting of Contracting Parties to the
London Convention 1972 and the
11th Meeting of Contracting Parties to
the 1996 Protocol to the London
Convention
—Protection of vital shipping lanes
—Periodic review of administrative
requirements in mandatory IMO
instruments
—Principles to be considered in the
review of existing requirements and
the development of new requirements
—External relations (With the U.N. and
the specialized agencies, Joint
Inspection Unit, relations with
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:52 Nov 03, 2016
Jkt 241001
intergovernmental organizations,
relations with non-governmental
organizations, World Maritime Day,
Report of the Day of the Seafarer, and
IMO Maritime Ambassador Scheme)
—Report on the status of the convention
and membership of the Organization
—Report on the status of conventions
and other multilateral instruments in
respect of which the Organization
performs functions
—Place, date and duration of the next
two sessions of the Council and
substantive items for inclusion in the
provisional agendas for the next two
sessions of Council (C 118 and C 119)
—Supplementary agenda items, if any
Members of the public may attend
this meeting up to the seating capacity
of the room. To facilitate the building
security process, and to request
reasonable accommodation, those who
plan to attend should contact the
meeting coordinator, LCDR Tiffany
Duffy, by email at Tiffany.A.Duffy@
uscg.mil, by phone at (202) 372–1362,
by fax at (202) 372–1925, or in writing
at 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave. SE.,
Stop 7509, Washington, DC 20593–7509
not later than November 2, 2016.
Requests made after November 2, 2016
might not be able to be accommodated.
Please note that due to security
considerations, two valid, government
issued photo identifications must be
presented to gain entrance to Coast
Guard Headquarters. It is recommended
that attendees arrive to Coast Guard
Headquarters no later than 30 minutes
ahead of the scheduled meeting for the
security screening process. Coast Guard
Headquarters is accessible by taxi and
public transportation. Parking in the
vicinity of the building is extremely
limited. Additional information
regarding this and other IMO public
meetings may be found at:
www.uscg.mil/imo.
Dated: October 21, 2016.
Jonathan W. Burby,
Coast Guard Liaison Officer, Office of Ocean
and Polar Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2016–26716 Filed 11–3–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–09–P
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
[Docket No. MCF 21073]
National Express LLC—Acquisition of
Control—Trinity, Inc., Trinity Cars, Inc.,
and Trinity Student Delivery, LLC
Surface Transportation Board.
Notice tentatively approving
and authorizing finance transaction.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
On October 7, 2016, National
Express LLC (National Express or
Applicant), a noncarrier, filed an
application under 49 U.S.C. 14303 to
acquire control of Trinity, Inc. (Trinity),
Trinity Cars, Inc. (Trinity Cars), and
Trinity Student Delivery, LLC (Trinity
Student) (collectively, Acquisition
Carriers). The Board is tentatively
approving and authorizing the
transaction, and, if no opposing
comments are timely filed, this notice
will be the final Board action. Persons
wishing to oppose the application must
follow the rules at 49 CFR 1182.5 &
1182.8.
DATES: Comments must be filed by
December 19, 2016. Applicant may file
a reply by January 3, 2017. If no
opposing comments are filed by
December 19, 2016, this notice shall be
effective on December 20, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Send an original and 10
copies of any comments referring to
Docket No. MCF 21073 to: Surface
Transportation Board, 395 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20423–0001. In
addition, send one copy of comments to
Applicant’s representative: Andrew K.
Light, Scopelitis, Garvin, Light, Hanson
& Feary, P.C., 10 W. Market Street, Suite
1500, Indianapolis, IN 46204.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jonathon Binet (202) 245–0368. Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) for the
hearing impaired: 1–800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Applicant,
a noncarrier, states that it is a holding
company organized under the laws of
the state of Delaware that is indirectly
controlled by a British corporation,
National Express Group, PLC (Express
Group). Applicant states that Express
Group indirectly controls the following
passenger motor carriers (collectively,
National Express Affiliated Carriers):
Beck Bus Transportation Corp. (Beck);
Carrier Management Corporation (CMI);
Diamond Transportation Services, Inc.
(Diamond); Durham School Services,
L.P. (Durham); MV Student
Transportation, Inc. (MV); National
Express Transit Corporation (NETC);
National Express Transit Services
Corporation (NETSC); Petermann Ltd.
(LTD); Petermann Northeast LLC
(Northeast); Petermann Northwest LLC
(Northwest); Petermann Southwest LLC
(Southwest); Petermann STSA, LLC
(STSA); The Provider Enterprises, Inc.
(Provider); Rainbow Management
Service Inc. (Rainbow); Robertson
Transit, Inc. (Robertson); Safeway
Training and Transportation Services
Inc. (Safeway); Septran, Inc. (Septran);
Smith Bus Service, Inc. (Smith);
Suburban Paratransit Service, Inc.
(Suburban Paratransit); Trans Express,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
04NON1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 214 / Friday, November 4, 2016 / Notices
Inc. (Trans Express); and White Plains
Bus Company, Inc. (White Plains).
Applicant asserts the following facts
regarding the National Express
Affiliated Carriers held by Express
Group:
• Beck is a passenger motor carrier
primarily engaged in providing student
school bus transportation services in the
states of Illinois and Indiana under
contracts with regional and local school
jurisdictions. Beck also provides charter
passenger services to the public. It holds
interstate common carrier authority
from Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration under MC–143528.
• CMI is a passenger motor carrier
doing business as Matthews Bus
Company and is primarily engaged in
providing student school bus
transportation services in the state of
Pennsylvania under contracts with
regional and local school jurisdictions.
CMI also provides intrastate charter
passenger services to the public. CMI
does not have interstate carrier authority
as it is not required for the operations
conducted by CMI.
• Diamond is a passenger motor
carrier providing exempt interstate and
regulated intrastate paratransit and
shuttle services in the District of
Columbia metropolitan area. It does not
have interstate carrier authority.
• Durham is a passenger motor carrier
primarily engaged in providing student
school bus transportation services in
approximately 32 states under contracts
with regional and local school
jurisdictions. Durham also provides
charter passenger services to the public.
It holds interstate common carrier
authority under MC–163066.
• MV is a passenger motor carrier
primarily engaged in providing student
school bus transportation services in the
state of Missouri under contracts with
regional and local school jurisdictions.
MV also provides charter passenger
services to the public. It holds interstate
common carrier authority under MC–
148934.
• NETC is an intrastate passenger
motor carrier with its principal place of
business in Cincinnati, Ohio. NETC
does not have interstate carrier
authority.
• NETSC is a passenger motor carrier
engaged primarily in providing
intrastate transit services in the areas of
Westmoreland, PA; Arlington, VA;
Greensboro, NC; Vallejo, CA; and Yuma,
AZ. NETSC does not have interstate
carrier authority as it is not required for
the operations conducted by NETSC.
• LTD is a passenger motor carrier
primarily engaged in providing nonregulated school bus transportation
services in the state of Ohio under
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:52 Nov 03, 2016
Jkt 241001
contracts with regional and local school
jurisdictions. LTD also provides charter
passenger services to the public. It holds
interstate common carrier authority
under MC–364668.
• Northeast is a passenger motor
carrier primarily engaged in providing
student school bus transportation
services, primarily in the states of Ohio
and Pennsylvania under contracts with
regional and local school jurisdictions.
Northeast also provides charter
passenger services to the public. It holds
interstate contract carrier authority
under MC–723926.
• Northwest is a passenger motor
carrier primarily engaged in providing
non-regulated school bus transportation
services under contracts with regional
and local school jurisdictions.
Northwest does not have interstate
carrier authority as it is not required for
the operations conducted by Northwest.
• Southwest is a passenger motor
carrier primarily engaged in providing
student school bus transportation
services in the state of Texas under
contracts with regional and local school
jurisdictions. Southwest also provides
charter passenger services to the public.
It holds interstate contract carrier
authority under MC–644996.
• STSA is a passenger motor carrier
primarily engaged in providing student
school bus transportation services,
primarily in the state of Kansas under
contracts with regional and local school
jurisdictions. STSA also provides
charter passenger services to the public.
It holds interstate contract carrier
authority under MC–749360.
• Provider is a passenger motor
carrier doing business as Provider Bus,
and is primarily engaged in providing
non-regulated school bus transportation
services in the state of New Hampshire
under contracts with regional and local
school jurisdictions. Provider does not
have interstate carrier authority as it is
not required for the operations
conducted by Provider.
• Rainbow provides interstate and
intrastate charter and special party
passenger transportation services in the
state of New York. It holds interstate
passenger common carrier authority
under MC–490015.
• Robertson is a passenger motor
carrier primarily engaged in providing
non-regulated school bus transportation
services in the state of New Hampshire
under contracts with regional and local
school jurisdictions. Robertson also
provides charter passenger service to the
public. It does not have active interstate
carrier authority, though MC–176053 is
assigned to it.
• Safeway is a passenger motor
carrier primarily engaged in providing
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
76995
non-regulated school bus transportation
services in the state of New Hampshire
under contracts with regional and local
school jurisdictions. It does not have
active interstate carrier authority,
though MC–522039 is assigned to it.
• Septran is a passenger motor carrier
primarily engaged in providing nonregulated school bus transportation
services in the state of Illinois under
contracts with regional and local school
jurisdictions. It does not have active
interstate carrier authority, though MC–
795208 is assigned to it.
• Smith is a passenger motor carrier
primarily engaged in providing nonregulated school bus transportation
services in the state of Maryland and
surrounding areas under contracts with
regional and local school jurisdictions.
Smith does not have interstate carrier
authority as it is not required for the
operations conducted by Smith.
• Suburban Paratransit is a motor
carrier providing paratransit services
primarily in Westchester County and
Bronx, N.Y. Suburban Paratransit does
not have interstate carrier authority as it
is not required for the operations
conducted by Suburban Paratransit.
• Trans Express provides interstate
and intrastate passenger transportation
services in the state of New York. It
holds interstate passenger common
carrier authority under MC–187819.
• White Plains is a passenger motor
carrier doing business as Suburban
Charters, and it operates primarily as a
provider of non-regulated school bus
transportation services in the state of
New York. White Plains also operates as
a motor passenger carrier providing
charter service to the public. It holds
interstate passenger common carrier
authority under MC–160624.
Applicant asserts the following facts
with regard to the Acquisition Carriers:
• Trinity is a Michigan corporation
operating primarily as a provider of
non-regulated school bus transportation
services in southeastern Michigan, and
also operates as a passenger motor
carrier providing charter service to the
public. Trinity holds common carrier
operating authority under MC–364003.
• Trinity Cars is also a Michigan
corporation, operating as an intrastate
passenger motor carrier as a provider of
for-hire sedan and van service in
southeastern Michigan. Trinity Cars
holds interstate operating authority
under MC–632139.
• Trinity Student is a Michigan
limited liability company and a whollyowned subsidiary of Trinity. Trinity
Student operates primarily as a provider
of non-regulated school bus
transportation services in the areas of
Toledo and Cleveland, Ohio. Trinity
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
04NON1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
76996
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 214 / Friday, November 4, 2016 / Notices
Student also provides interstate charter
passenger services. For purposes of its
interstate passenger operations, Trinity
Student holds common and contract
carrier operating authority under MC–
836335.
Applicant states that all of the issued
and outstanding stock of Trinity and
Trinity Cars is owned and held by Jerry
Sheppard, Jr., Trustee of the Jerry
Sheppard, Jr. Revocable Inter-Vivos
Trust U/A/D Sept. 24, 2003, as amended
(Jerry Sheppard Trust), and Rebetha J.
Sheppard, Trustee of the Rebetha J.
Sheppard Revocable Inter-Vivos Trust
U/A/D Sept. 24, 2003, as amended
(Rebetha Sheppard Trust) (collectively,
Sellers).
Applicant asserts that there is one
affiliate of the Acquisition Carriers,
Trinity Coach, LLC, though it is not a
part of the contemplated transaction.
Applicant states that Trinity Coach,
LLC, is a Michigan limited liability
company that is a passenger motor
carrier providing interstate services
under common carrier authority under
MC–537169. Jerry Sheppard, Jr.,
individually, holds a 100% membership
interest in Trinity Coach, LLC.
Applicant further states that, other
than the National Express Affiliated
Carriers, the Acquisition Carriers, and
Trinity Coach, there are no other
affiliated carriers with regulated
interstate operations, and the Sellers
have no other direct or indirect
ownership interest in any other
interstate passenger motor carrier.
Applicant also asserts that it would
acquire direct 100% control of Trinity
and Trinity Cars through stock
ownership, and indirect control of
Trinity Student as a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Trinity.
Under 49 U.S.C. 14303(b), the Board
must approve and authorize a
transaction that it finds consistent with
the public interest, taking into
consideration at least: (1) The effect of
the proposed transaction on the
adequacy of transportation to the public;
(2) the total fixed charges that result;
and (3) the interest of affected carrier
employees. Applicant submitted
information, as required by 49 CFR
1182.2, including information to
demonstrate that the proposed
transaction is consistent with the public
interest under 49 U.S.C. 14303(b), and a
statement that the aggregate gross
operating revenues of the National
Express Affiliated Carriers and the
Acquisition Carriers exceeded $2
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:52 Nov 03, 2016
Jkt 241001
million for the preceding 12-month
period. See 49 U.S.C. 14303(g).1
Applicant submits that the proposed
transaction would have no significant
impact on the adequacy of
transportation services to the public, as
the Acquisition Carriers would continue
to provide the services they currently
provide using the same names for the
foreseeable future. Applicant states that
the Acquisition Carriers ‘‘will continue
to operate, but going forward, will be
operating within the National Express
corporate family.’’ (Appl. 14.)
According to Applicant, ‘‘[t]he
addition of the Acquisition Carriers to
the carriers held by National Express is
consistent with the practices within the
passenger motor carrier industry of
strong, well-managed transportation
organizations adapting their corporate
structure to operate several different
passenger carriers within the same
market, but in different geographic
areas.’’ (Id.) Applicant asserts that the
Acquisition Carriers are experienced in
some of the same market segments
already served by some of the National
Express Affiliated Carriers. Applicant
expects the transaction to result in
operating efficiencies and cost savings
derived from economies of scale, all of
which, Applicant states, would help to
ensure the provision of adequate service
to the public. Applicant further asserts
that bringing the Acquisition Carriers
within the National Express corporate
family would serve to enhance the
viability of the overall organization and
the operations of the National Express
Affiliated Carriers, which would ensure
the continued availability of adequate
passenger transportation service for the
public. (Id.)
Applicant also claims that neither
competition nor the public interest
would be adversely affected by the
contemplated transaction. Applicant
states that the Acquisition Carriers are
‘‘relatively small carriers in the overall
markets in which they compete:
Unregulated metropolitan school bus
operations, providers of charter services,
and providers of sedan and van
services.’’ (Id.) Applicant states that
school bus operators typically occupy a
limited portion of the charter business
because (i) the equipment offered is not
as comfortable as that offered by motor
coach operators; and (ii) scheduling
demands imposed by the primary
school bus operation impose major
constraints on charter services that can
be offered. It further explains that the
sedan and van services business sector
1 Applicants with gross operating revenues
exceeding $2 million are required to meet the
requirements of 49 CFR 1182.
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
is comprised of a number of providers,
with no provider having a dominant
market share in the sector. Applicant
also explains that the charter and sedan
and van services offered by the
Acquisition Carriers are geographically
dispersed from those of the National
Express Affiliated Carriers, and that
there is limited overlap in service areas
and/or in customer bases among the
National Express Affiliated Carriers and
the Acquisition Carriers. Thus,
Applicant states that the impact of the
contemplated transaction on the
regulated motor carrier industry would
be minimal at most and that neither
competition nor the public interest
would be adversely affected.
Applicant asserts that there are no
fixed charges associated with the
contemplated transaction. Applicant
also states that it does not anticipate a
measurable reduction in force or
changes in compensation levels and/or
benefits to employees. Applicant
submits, however, that staffing
redundancies could potentially result in
limited downsizing of back-office or
managerial level personnel.
The Board finds that the acquisition
proposed in the application is
consistent with the public interest and
should be tentatively approved and
authorized. If any opposing comments
are timely filed, these findings will be
deemed vacated, and, unless a final
decision can be made on the record as
developed, a procedural schedule will
be adopted to reconsider the
application. See 49 CFR 1182.6(c). If no
opposing comments are filed by the
expiration of the comment period, this
notice will take effect automatically and
will be the final Board action.
This action is categorically excluded
from environmental review under 49
CFR 1105.6(c).
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at
‘‘WWW.STB.GOV’’.
It is ordered:
1. The proposed transaction is
approved and authorized, subject to the
filing of opposing comments.
2. If opposing comments are timely
filed, the findings made in this notice
will be deemed vacated.
3. This notice will be effective
December 20, 2016, unless opposing
comments are filed by December 19,
2016.
4. A copy of this notice will be served
on: (1) The U.S. Department of
Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590; (2)
the U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust
Division, 10th Street & Pennsylvania
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20530;
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
04NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 214 / Friday, November 4, 2016 / Notices
and (3) the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Office of the General
Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
Decided: November 1, 2016.
By the Board, Chairman Elliott, Vice
Chairman Miller, and Commissioner
Begeman.
Brendetta S. Jones,
Clearance Clerk.
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 31,
2016.
Elliott Black,
Director, Office of Airport Planning and
Programming.
[FR Doc. 2016–26630 Filed 11–3–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
[FR Doc. 2016–26724 Filed 11–3–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Notice of Cancellation of
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Norfolk International Airport,
Norfolk, Virginia
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of cancellation of
preparation of environmental impact
statement.
AGENCY:
Federal Aviation Administration
[Docket No. FAA–2016–9346]
Passenger Facility Charge (PFC)
Program; Draft FAA Order 5500.1B
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice of withdrawal.
FAA is rescinding the draft
FAA Order 5500.1B, Passenger Facility
Charge published on August 5, 2016,
and withdrawing its request for public
review and comment.
SUMMARY:
The FAA previously extended
the comment period to October 31,
2016. FAA subsequently established a
public Docket FAA 2016–9346 and
comments received will be entered into
the public Docket.
DATES:
Joe
Hebert, Manager, Financial Analysis
and Passenger Facility Charge Branch,
APP–510, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591,
telephone (202) 267–8375; facsimile
(202) 267–5302.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
On August
5, 2016, the FAA published a notice and
request for comments titled ‘‘Passenger
Facility Charge (PFC) Program; Draft
FAA Order 5500.1B’’ (81 FR 51963). The
notice requested interested parties
submit written comments by September
30, 2016. On September 21, 2016, the
FAA extended the original comment
period by 31 days, from September 30,
2016, to October 31, 2016.
After careful consideration, the FAA
has decided to rescind the draft Order
and cancel the public review process.
The FAA will issue a revised draft in
the near future for public review and
comment.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:52 Nov 03, 2016
Jkt 241001
The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) announces that it
has discontinued preparation of an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for the proposed construction of new
Runway 5R/23L and associated
development at Norfolk International
Airport, Norfolk, Virginia. The FAA’s
discontinued preparation of the EIS is
based upon the completion of the first
phase of the EIS. Based on the results of
the first phase (Scoping and Purpose &
Need development), the FAA has
determined that the fundamental
purpose and need is not supported by
the current or anticipated development
needs of the Airport at this time.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marcus Brundage, Environmental
Protection Specialist, Federal Aviation
Administration, Washington Airports
District Office, 23723 Air Freight Lane,
Suite 210, Dulles, Virginia 20166;
Telephone (703) 661–1365.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June
12, 2015, the FAA, published in the
Federal Register a Notice of Intent (NOI)
to prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) and hold two public
scoping meetings in Norfolk and
Virginia Beach, Virginia (Volume 80,
Number 113, FR 33582–33583). The
public meetings were held at the
Bayside High School and at the Holiday
Inn Norfolk Airport on July 22 and 23,
2015, respectively.
The stated purpose of the project was
to ‘‘meet relevant FAA airfield safety
standards and enhance airfield safety
without reducing runway availability.’’
The proposed project included the
decommissioning and demolition of
Runway 14/32, the construction of new
Runway 5R/23L and associated
development at the airport, and
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
76997
improvement of roadway access to the
airport by realigning Robin Hood Road.
Other associated infrastructure was
proposed for construction or demolition
or relocation including taxiways,
lighting, hangers, maintenance facilities,
runway safety areas and runway
protection zones.
In 2001, the FAA began preparing an
EIS for similar projects based on the
need to accommodate additional
operations at the airport. During the first
EIS process, the needs of the airport
changed and it was determined that the
projects were no longer justified based
on the stated need and the preparation
of the first EIS was cancelled. In 2013,
the FAA agreed to proceed with a
phased second EIS preparation to
review a similar project proposed by the
Norfolk Airport Authority. The first
phase of the project consisted of
consultant selection, EIS scoping, and
an analysis of the proposed project’s
purpose and need to determine if the
FAA should continue to the second
phase, which would be completion of
the EIS and determination.
At the conclusion of the first phase of
the second EIS, the FAA determined
that the fundamental purpose and need
of the projects were not supported by
the current or anticipated needs of the
airport. The FAA is now terminating the
second EIS process. However, the FAA
recognizes the importance of ORF to the
greater Norfolk/Hampton Roads region
and to the Commonwealth of Virginia.
Moreover, the FAA agrees that a parallel
runway may still be a viable long-term
plan for the future, if and when
operational demand warrants.
Therefore, the FAA continues to support
the proposed runway remaining on the
approved Airport Layout Plan, as
conditionally approved pending
environmental review on October 5,
2011, and protecting the associated
airspace.
Issued in Dulles, Virginia on October 28,
2016.
Matthew J. Thys,
Manager, Washington Airports District Office,
Eastern Region.
[FR Doc. 2016–26631 Filed 11–3–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
[Docket No. FTA–2016–0036]
Notice of Proposed Buy America
Waiver for Replacement Parts on
Diesel Multiple Unit Rail Vehicles
AGENCY:
Federal Transit Administration,
DOT.
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
04NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 214 (Friday, November 4, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76994-76997]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-26724]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
[Docket No. MCF 21073]
National Express LLC--Acquisition of Control--Trinity, Inc.,
Trinity Cars, Inc., and Trinity Student Delivery, LLC
AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.
ACTION: Notice tentatively approving and authorizing finance
transaction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On October 7, 2016, National Express LLC (National Express or
Applicant), a noncarrier, filed an application under 49 U.S.C. 14303 to
acquire control of Trinity, Inc. (Trinity), Trinity Cars, Inc. (Trinity
Cars), and Trinity Student Delivery, LLC (Trinity Student)
(collectively, Acquisition Carriers). The Board is tentatively
approving and authorizing the transaction, and, if no opposing comments
are timely filed, this notice will be the final Board action. Persons
wishing to oppose the application must follow the rules at 49 CFR
1182.5 & 1182.8.
DATES: Comments must be filed by December 19, 2016. Applicant may file
a reply by January 3, 2017. If no opposing comments are filed by
December 19, 2016, this notice shall be effective on December 20, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Send an original and 10 copies of any comments referring to
Docket No. MCF 21073 to: Surface Transportation Board, 395 E Street
SW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, send one copy of comments
to Applicant's representative: Andrew K. Light, Scopelitis, Garvin,
Light, Hanson & Feary, P.C., 10 W. Market Street, Suite 1500,
Indianapolis, IN 46204.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathon Binet (202) 245-0368. Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) for the hearing impaired: 1-800-877-
8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Applicant, a noncarrier, states that it is a
holding company organized under the laws of the state of Delaware that
is indirectly controlled by a British corporation, National Express
Group, PLC (Express Group). Applicant states that Express Group
indirectly controls the following passenger motor carriers
(collectively, National Express Affiliated Carriers): Beck Bus
Transportation Corp. (Beck); Carrier Management Corporation (CMI);
Diamond Transportation Services, Inc. (Diamond); Durham School
Services, L.P. (Durham); MV Student Transportation, Inc. (MV); National
Express Transit Corporation (NETC); National Express Transit Services
Corporation (NETSC); Petermann Ltd. (LTD); Petermann Northeast LLC
(Northeast); Petermann Northwest LLC (Northwest); Petermann Southwest
LLC (Southwest); Petermann STSA, LLC (STSA); The Provider Enterprises,
Inc. (Provider); Rainbow Management Service Inc. (Rainbow); Robertson
Transit, Inc. (Robertson); Safeway Training and Transportation Services
Inc. (Safeway); Septran, Inc. (Septran); Smith Bus Service, Inc.
(Smith); Suburban Paratransit Service, Inc. (Suburban Paratransit);
Trans Express,
[[Page 76995]]
Inc. (Trans Express); and White Plains Bus Company, Inc. (White
Plains).
Applicant asserts the following facts regarding the National
Express Affiliated Carriers held by Express Group:
Beck is a passenger motor carrier primarily engaged in
providing student school bus transportation services in the states of
Illinois and Indiana under contracts with regional and local school
jurisdictions. Beck also provides charter passenger services to the
public. It holds interstate common carrier authority from Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Administration under MC-143528.
CMI is a passenger motor carrier doing business as
Matthews Bus Company and is primarily engaged in providing student
school bus transportation services in the state of Pennsylvania under
contracts with regional and local school jurisdictions. CMI also
provides intrastate charter passenger services to the public. CMI does
not have interstate carrier authority as it is not required for the
operations conducted by CMI.
Diamond is a passenger motor carrier providing exempt
interstate and regulated intrastate paratransit and shuttle services in
the District of Columbia metropolitan area. It does not have interstate
carrier authority.
Durham is a passenger motor carrier primarily engaged in
providing student school bus transportation services in approximately
32 states under contracts with regional and local school jurisdictions.
Durham also provides charter passenger services to the public. It holds
interstate common carrier authority under MC-163066.
MV is a passenger motor carrier primarily engaged in
providing student school bus transportation services in the state of
Missouri under contracts with regional and local school jurisdictions.
MV also provides charter passenger services to the public. It holds
interstate common carrier authority under MC-148934.
NETC is an intrastate passenger motor carrier with its
principal place of business in Cincinnati, Ohio. NETC does not have
interstate carrier authority.
NETSC is a passenger motor carrier engaged primarily in
providing intrastate transit services in the areas of Westmoreland, PA;
Arlington, VA; Greensboro, NC; Vallejo, CA; and Yuma, AZ. NETSC does
not have interstate carrier authority as it is not required for the
operations conducted by NETSC.
LTD is a passenger motor carrier primarily engaged in
providing non-regulated school bus transportation services in the state
of Ohio under contracts with regional and local school jurisdictions.
LTD also provides charter passenger services to the public. It holds
interstate common carrier authority under MC-364668.
Northeast is a passenger motor carrier primarily engaged
in providing student school bus transportation services, primarily in
the states of Ohio and Pennsylvania under contracts with regional and
local school jurisdictions. Northeast also provides charter passenger
services to the public. It holds interstate contract carrier authority
under MC-723926.
Northwest is a passenger motor carrier primarily engaged
in providing non-regulated school bus transportation services under
contracts with regional and local school jurisdictions. Northwest does
not have interstate carrier authority as it is not required for the
operations conducted by Northwest.
Southwest is a passenger motor carrier primarily engaged
in providing student school bus transportation services in the state of
Texas under contracts with regional and local school jurisdictions.
Southwest also provides charter passenger services to the public. It
holds interstate contract carrier authority under MC-644996.
STSA is a passenger motor carrier primarily engaged in
providing student school bus transportation services, primarily in the
state of Kansas under contracts with regional and local school
jurisdictions. STSA also provides charter passenger services to the
public. It holds interstate contract carrier authority under MC-749360.
Provider is a passenger motor carrier doing business as
Provider Bus, and is primarily engaged in providing non-regulated
school bus transportation services in the state of New Hampshire under
contracts with regional and local school jurisdictions. Provider does
not have interstate carrier authority as it is not required for the
operations conducted by Provider.
Rainbow provides interstate and intrastate charter and
special party passenger transportation services in the state of New
York. It holds interstate passenger common carrier authority under MC-
490015.
Robertson is a passenger motor carrier primarily engaged
in providing non-regulated school bus transportation services in the
state of New Hampshire under contracts with regional and local school
jurisdictions. Robertson also provides charter passenger service to the
public. It does not have active interstate carrier authority, though
MC-176053 is assigned to it.
Safeway is a passenger motor carrier primarily engaged in
providing non-regulated school bus transportation services in the state
of New Hampshire under contracts with regional and local school
jurisdictions. It does not have active interstate carrier authority,
though MC-522039 is assigned to it.
Septran is a passenger motor carrier primarily engaged in
providing non-regulated school bus transportation services in the state
of Illinois under contracts with regional and local school
jurisdictions. It does not have active interstate carrier authority,
though MC-795208 is assigned to it.
Smith is a passenger motor carrier primarily engaged in
providing non-regulated school bus transportation services in the state
of Maryland and surrounding areas under contracts with regional and
local school jurisdictions. Smith does not have interstate carrier
authority as it is not required for the operations conducted by Smith.
Suburban Paratransit is a motor carrier providing
paratransit services primarily in Westchester County and Bronx, N.Y.
Suburban Paratransit does not have interstate carrier authority as it
is not required for the operations conducted by Suburban Paratransit.
Trans Express provides interstate and intrastate passenger
transportation services in the state of New York. It holds interstate
passenger common carrier authority under MC-187819.
White Plains is a passenger motor carrier doing business
as Suburban Charters, and it operates primarily as a provider of non-
regulated school bus transportation services in the state of New York.
White Plains also operates as a motor passenger carrier providing
charter service to the public. It holds interstate passenger common
carrier authority under MC-160624.
Applicant asserts the following facts with regard to the
Acquisition Carriers:
Trinity is a Michigan corporation operating primarily as a
provider of non-regulated school bus transportation services in
southeastern Michigan, and also operates as a passenger motor carrier
providing charter service to the public. Trinity holds common carrier
operating authority under MC-364003.
Trinity Cars is also a Michigan corporation, operating as
an intrastate passenger motor carrier as a provider of for-hire sedan
and van service in southeastern Michigan. Trinity Cars holds interstate
operating authority under MC-632139.
Trinity Student is a Michigan limited liability company
and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Trinity. Trinity Student operates
primarily as a provider of non-regulated school bus transportation
services in the areas of Toledo and Cleveland, Ohio. Trinity
[[Page 76996]]
Student also provides interstate charter passenger services. For
purposes of its interstate passenger operations, Trinity Student holds
common and contract carrier operating authority under MC-836335.
Applicant states that all of the issued and outstanding stock of
Trinity and Trinity Cars is owned and held by Jerry Sheppard, Jr.,
Trustee of the Jerry Sheppard, Jr. Revocable Inter-Vivos Trust U/A/D
Sept. 24, 2003, as amended (Jerry Sheppard Trust), and Rebetha J.
Sheppard, Trustee of the Rebetha J. Sheppard Revocable Inter-Vivos
Trust U/A/D Sept. 24, 2003, as amended (Rebetha Sheppard Trust)
(collectively, Sellers).
Applicant asserts that there is one affiliate of the Acquisition
Carriers, Trinity Coach, LLC, though it is not a part of the
contemplated transaction. Applicant states that Trinity Coach, LLC, is
a Michigan limited liability company that is a passenger motor carrier
providing interstate services under common carrier authority under MC-
537169. Jerry Sheppard, Jr., individually, holds a 100% membership
interest in Trinity Coach, LLC.
Applicant further states that, other than the National Express
Affiliated Carriers, the Acquisition Carriers, and Trinity Coach, there
are no other affiliated carriers with regulated interstate operations,
and the Sellers have no other direct or indirect ownership interest in
any other interstate passenger motor carrier.
Applicant also asserts that it would acquire direct 100% control of
Trinity and Trinity Cars through stock ownership, and indirect control
of Trinity Student as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Trinity.
Under 49 U.S.C. 14303(b), the Board must approve and authorize a
transaction that it finds consistent with the public interest, taking
into consideration at least: (1) The effect of the proposed transaction
on the adequacy of transportation to the public; (2) the total fixed
charges that result; and (3) the interest of affected carrier
employees. Applicant submitted information, as required by 49 CFR
1182.2, including information to demonstrate that the proposed
transaction is consistent with the public interest under 49 U.S.C.
14303(b), and a statement that the aggregate gross operating revenues
of the National Express Affiliated Carriers and the Acquisition
Carriers exceeded $2 million for the preceding 12-month period. See 49
U.S.C. 14303(g).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Applicants with gross operating revenues exceeding $2
million are required to meet the requirements of 49 CFR 1182.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicant submits that the proposed transaction would have no
significant impact on the adequacy of transportation services to the
public, as the Acquisition Carriers would continue to provide the
services they currently provide using the same names for the
foreseeable future. Applicant states that the Acquisition Carriers
``will continue to operate, but going forward, will be operating within
the National Express corporate family.'' (Appl. 14.)
According to Applicant, ``[t]he addition of the Acquisition
Carriers to the carriers held by National Express is consistent with
the practices within the passenger motor carrier industry of strong,
well-managed transportation organizations adapting their corporate
structure to operate several different passenger carriers within the
same market, but in different geographic areas.'' (Id.) Applicant
asserts that the Acquisition Carriers are experienced in some of the
same market segments already served by some of the National Express
Affiliated Carriers. Applicant expects the transaction to result in
operating efficiencies and cost savings derived from economies of
scale, all of which, Applicant states, would help to ensure the
provision of adequate service to the public. Applicant further asserts
that bringing the Acquisition Carriers within the National Express
corporate family would serve to enhance the viability of the overall
organization and the operations of the National Express Affiliated
Carriers, which would ensure the continued availability of adequate
passenger transportation service for the public. (Id.)
Applicant also claims that neither competition nor the public
interest would be adversely affected by the contemplated transaction.
Applicant states that the Acquisition Carriers are ``relatively small
carriers in the overall markets in which they compete: Unregulated
metropolitan school bus operations, providers of charter services, and
providers of sedan and van services.'' (Id.) Applicant states that
school bus operators typically occupy a limited portion of the charter
business because (i) the equipment offered is not as comfortable as
that offered by motor coach operators; and (ii) scheduling demands
imposed by the primary school bus operation impose major constraints on
charter services that can be offered. It further explains that the
sedan and van services business sector is comprised of a number of
providers, with no provider having a dominant market share in the
sector. Applicant also explains that the charter and sedan and van
services offered by the Acquisition Carriers are geographically
dispersed from those of the National Express Affiliated Carriers, and
that there is limited overlap in service areas and/or in customer bases
among the National Express Affiliated Carriers and the Acquisition
Carriers. Thus, Applicant states that the impact of the contemplated
transaction on the regulated motor carrier industry would be minimal at
most and that neither competition nor the public interest would be
adversely affected.
Applicant asserts that there are no fixed charges associated with
the contemplated transaction. Applicant also states that it does not
anticipate a measurable reduction in force or changes in compensation
levels and/or benefits to employees. Applicant submits, however, that
staffing redundancies could potentially result in limited downsizing of
back-office or managerial level personnel.
The Board finds that the acquisition proposed in the application is
consistent with the public interest and should be tentatively approved
and authorized. If any opposing comments are timely filed, these
findings will be deemed vacated, and, unless a final decision can be
made on the record as developed, a procedural schedule will be adopted
to reconsider the application. See 49 CFR 1182.6(c). If no opposing
comments are filed by the expiration of the comment period, this notice
will take effect automatically and will be the final Board action.
This action is categorically excluded from environmental review
under 49 CFR 1105.6(c).
Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at
``WWW.STB.GOV''.
It is ordered:
1. The proposed transaction is approved and authorized, subject to
the filing of opposing comments.
2. If opposing comments are timely filed, the findings made in this
notice will be deemed vacated.
3. This notice will be effective December 20, 2016, unless opposing
comments are filed by December 19, 2016.
4. A copy of this notice will be served on: (1) The U.S. Department
of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590; (2) the U.S. Department of
Justice, Antitrust Division, 10th Street & Pennsylvania Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20530;
[[Page 76997]]
and (3) the U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the General
Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Decided: November 1, 2016.
By the Board, Chairman Elliott, Vice Chairman Miller, and
Commissioner Begeman.
Brendetta S. Jones,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2016-26724 Filed 11-3-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P