Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Protection of Human Subjects: Informed Consent; Institutional Review Boards, 76596-76598 [2016-26528]
Download as PDF
76596
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 213 / Thursday, November 3, 2016 / Notices
are being conducted. Administrative
data from multiple sources are also
being collected and evaluated. A grants
management information system was
developed for grantees to use to conduct
random assignment, enroll individuals
into the project, and document service
delivery.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2013–N–0403]
DATES:
The period of support for this
supplement is September 30, 2016
through September 29, 2017.
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for Office of
Management and Budget Review;
Comment Request; Protection of
Human Subjects: Informed Consent;
Institutional Review Boards
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
AGENCY:
Elaine Sorensen, Office of Child
Support Enforcement, 330 C Street SW.,
5th Floor, Washington, DC 20201.
Telephone: 202–401–5099; Email:
Elaine.sorensen@acf.hhs.gov.
Given the
importance of child support outcomes
for the evaluation of CSPED, OCSE has
asked the Wisconsin Department of
Children and Families to expand the
child support outcomes included in the
evaluation, requiring additional
collection of child support
administrative data and additional
analyses of these data. In addition, the
Wisconsin Department of Children and
Families provided OCSE with
preliminary impact findings using child
support administrative data, which
uncovered further unexpected
complications with the child support
administrative data. OCSE has asked the
Wisconsin Department of Children and
Families to go back and collect
additional child support administrative
data to further understand these
complications and report their findings
to OCSE. Finally, given the strong focus
on child support outcomes for this
evaluation, OCSE has asked the
evaluator to add a second impact report
that focuses exclusively on child
support outcomes.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Statutory Authority: Section 1115 of the
Social Security Act authorizes funds for
experimental, pilot, or demonstration
projects that are likely to assist in promoting
the objectives of Part D of Title IV.
Christopher Beach,
Certifying Official, Senior Grants Policy
Specialist, Division of Grants Policy, Office
of Administration.
[FR Doc. 2016–26560 Filed 11–2–16; 8:45 am]
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 4184–42–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Nov 02, 2016
Jkt 241001
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing
that a proposed collection of
information has been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the
collection of information by December
5, 2016.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on
the information collection are received,
OMB recommends that written
comments be faxed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, FAX:
202–395–7285, or emailed to oira_
submission@omb.eop.gov. All
comments should be identified with the
OMB control number 0910–0755. Also
include the FDA docket number found
in brackets in the heading of this
document.
SUMMARY:
FDA
PRA Staff, Office of Operations, Food
and Drug Administration, Three White
Flint North 10A–12M, 11601
Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD
20852, PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA
has submitted the following proposed
collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Protection of Human Subjects: Informed
Consent; Institutional Review Boards
OMB Control Number 0910–0755—
Extension
Part 50 (21 CFR part 50) applies to all
clinical investigations regulated by FDA
under sections 505(i) and 520(g) of the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 355(i) and
360j(g), respectively), as well as clinical
investigations that support applications
for research or marketing permits for
products regulated by FDA, including
foods and dietary supplements that bear
a nutrient content claim or a health
claim, infant formulas, food and color
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
additives, drugs for human use, medical
devices for human use, biological
products for human use, and electronic
products. Compliance with part 50 is
intended to protect the rights and safety
of subjects involved in investigations
filed with FDA under sections 403, 406,
409, 412, 413, 502, 503, 505, 510, 513–
516, 518–520, 721, and 801 of the FD&C
Act (21 U.S.C. 343, 346, 348, 350a, 350b,
352, 353, 355, 360, 360c–360f, 360h–
360j, 379e, and 381, respectively) and
sections 351 and 354–360F of the Public
Health Service Act.
With few exceptions, no investigator
may involve a human being as a subject
in FDA-regulated research unless the
investigator has obtained the legally
effective informed consent of the subject
or the subject’s legally authorized
representative (see § 50.20). In seeking
informed consent, each subject must be
provided with certain elements of
informed consent. Those elements are
listed in § 50.25. Informed consent shall
be documented in writing as described
in § 50.27.
An institutional review board (IRB)
may approve emergency research
without requiring the informed consent
of all research subjects provided the IRB
finds and documents that certain
criteria are met as required in § 50.24.
We estimate that about eight times per
year an IRB is requested to review
emergency research under § 50.24. We
estimate, of the 8 yearly requests for IRB
review under § 50.24, a particular IRB
will take about an hour during each of
three separate fully convened IRB
meetings to review the request under
§ 50.24 (one meeting occurring after
community consultation). The total
annual reporting burden for IRB review
of emergency research under § 50.24 is
estimated at 24 hours (see table 1).
The information requested in the
regulations for exception from the
general requirements for informed
consent for medical devices (21 CFR
812.47), and the information requested
in the regulations for exception from the
general requirements of informed
consent in § 50.23, paragraphs (a)
through (c) and (e), is currently
approved under OMB control number
0910–0586. The information requested
in the investigational new drug (IND)
regulations concerning exception from
informed consent for emergency
research under § 50.24 is currently
approved under OMB control number
0910–0014. In addition, the information
requested in the regulations for IND
safety reporting requirements for human
drug and biological products and safety
reporting requirements for
bioavailability and bioequivalence
studies in humans (21 CFR 320.31(d)
E:\FR\FM\03NON1.SGM
03NON1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 213 / Thursday, November 3, 2016 / Notices
and 21 CFR 312.32(c)(1)(ii) and (iv)) is
currently approved under OMB control
number 0910–0672.
Some clinical investigations involving
children, although otherwise not
approvable, may present an opportunity
to understand, prevent, or alleviate a
serious problem affecting the health or
welfare of children (see § 50.54). Certain
clinical investigations involving
children may proceed if the IRB finds
and documents that the clinical
investigation presents a reasonable
opportunity to further the
understanding, prevention, or
alleviation of a serious problem
affecting the health or welfare of
children and when the Commissioner of
Food and Drugs, after consultation with
a panel of experts in pertinent
disciplines and following opportunity
for public review and comment, makes
a determination that certain conditions
are met (see § 50.54(b)).
The information requested for clinical
investigations in children of FDAregulated products is covered by the
collections of information in the IND
regulations (part 312 (21 CFR part 312)),
the investigational device exemption
(IDE) regulations (part 812 (21 CFR part
812)), the IRB regulations (§ 56.115 (21
CFR 56.115)), the food additive petition
and nutrient content claim petition
regulations (21 CFR 101.69 and 101.70),
and the infant formula regulations (parts
106 and 107 (21 CFR parts 106 and
107)), all of which are approved by
OMB. Specifically, the information
collected under the IND regulations is
currently approved under OMB control
number 0910–0014. The information
collected under the IDE regulations is
currently approved under OMB control
number 0910–0078. The information
collected under the IRB regulations is
currently approved under OMB control
number 0910–0130. The information
collected in food additive and nutrient
content claim petitions is currently
approved under OMB control number
0910–0381 (general requirements) and
0910–0016 (Form FDA 3503). The
information collected under the infant
formula regulations is currently
approved under OMB control number
0910–0256 (general requirements) and
0910–0188 (infant formula recalls).
Part 56 (21 CFR part 56) contains the
general standards for the composition,
operation, and responsibility of an IRB
that reviews clinical investigations
regulated by FDA under sections 505(i)
and 520(g) of the FD&C Act, as well as
clinical investigations that support
applications for research or marketing
permits for products regulated by FDA,
including foods and dietary
supplements that bear a nutrient content
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Nov 02, 2016
Jkt 241001
claim or a health claim, infant formulas,
food and color additives, drugs for
human use, medical devices for human
use, biological products for human use,
and electronic products. Compliance
with part 56 is intended to protect the
rights and welfare of human subjects
involved in such investigations.
The information collected under the
IRB regulations ‘‘Protection of Human
Subjects—Recordkeeping and Reporting
Requirements for Institutional Review
Boards (part 56),’’ including the
information collection activities in the
provisions in § 56.108(a)(1) and (b), is
currently approved under OMB control
number 0910–0130. The information
collected under the regulations for the
registration of IRBs in § 56.106 is
currently approved under OMB control
number 0990–0279. The information
collected for IRB review and approval
for the IDE regulations (part 812) is
currently approved under OMB control
number 0910–0078. The information
collected for premarket approval of
medical devices (part 814 (21 CFR part
814)) is currently approved under OMB
control number 0910–0231. The
information collected under the
regulations for IRB requirements for
humanitarian use devices (part 814,
subpart H) is currently approved under
OMB control number 0910–0332. The
information collected under the
regulations for IRB review and approval
of INDs (part 312) is currently approved
under OMB control number 0910–0014.
This collection of information is
limited to certain provisions in part 50,
subpart B (Informed Consent of Human
Subjects), and part 56 (Institutional
Review Boards), currently approved
under OMB control number 0910–0755.
This proposed extension applies to
the following collections of information
in part 50: §§ 50.24 (Exception from
informed consent requirements for
emergency research), 50.25 (Elements of
informed consent), and 50.27
(Documentation of informed consent).
In part 56, this proposed extension
applies to the following collections of
information: § 56.109(d) (written
statement about research when
documentation of informed consent is
waived); § 56.109(e) (IRB written
notification to approve or disapprove
research); § 56.109(f) (continuing review
of research); § 56.109(g) (IRB written
statements to the sponsor about required
public disclosures related to emergency
research under § 50.24); § 56.113
(Suspension or termination of IRB
approval of research); § 56.120(a) (IRB
response to lesser administrative actions
for noncompliance); and, § 56.123
(Reinstatement of an IRB or an
institution).
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
76597
In § 56.109(d), if an IRB has waived
documentation of consent for research
that: (1) Presents no more than minimal
risk of harm to subjects and (2) involves
no procedures for which consent is
normally required outside of the
research context, the IRB may
nevertheless require the investigator to
provide a written statement about the
research to the subjects. We estimate
that each IRB will review about two
minimal risk FDA-regulated studies
each year. Because the studies are
minimal risk, the review can be fairly
straightforward, and the written
statement for the subjects would be
brief. We estimate that IRB review of
each written statement could be
completed in less than 30 minutes (0.5
hours).
In § 56.109(f), the amount of time an
IRB spends on the continuing review of
a particular study will vary depending
on the nature and complexity of the
research, the amount and type of new
information presented to the IRB, and
whether the investigator is seeking
approval of substantive changes to the
research protocol or informed consent
document. For many studies, continuing
review can be fairly straightforward, and
the IRB should be able to complete its
deliberations and approve the research
within a brief period of time.
In § 56.109(g), an IRB is required to
provide the sponsor of a study involving
an exception from informed consent for
emergency research under § 50.24 with
a written statement of information that
has been publicly disclosed to the
communities in which the investigation
will be conducted and from which the
subjects will be drawn. Public
disclosure prior to initiation of the
investigation would include the plans
for the investigation and its risks and
expected benefits. There must also be
public disclosure of sufficient
information following completion of the
clinical investigation to apprise the
community and researchers of the
study, including the demographic
characteristics of the research
population, and its results. (See
§ 50.24(a)(7)(ii) and (iii)). The purpose
of the IRB’s written statements is to
make the sponsor aware that public
disclosure has occurred, so that the
sponsor can provide copies of the
information that has been disclosed to
FDA, as required by §§ 312.54(a) and
812.47(a).
We estimate that about eight requests
to review emergency research under
§ 50.24 are submitted each year, and the
IRBs that review those studies would
prepare two public disclosure reports:
One prior to initiation of the research
and one following the study’s
E:\FR\FM\03NON1.SGM
03NON1
76598
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 213 / Thursday, November 3, 2016 / Notices
completion. We estimate that it will take
an IRB approximately 1 hour to prepare
a written statement to the study sponsor
describing each public disclosure, for a
total of 2 hours per study. The total
annual third party disclosure burden for
IRBs to fulfill this requirement related to
emergency research under § 50.24 is
estimated at 16 hours (see table 2).
When an IRB or institution violates
the regulations, FDA issues to the IRB
or institution a noncompliance letter
(see § 56.120(a)). The IRB or institution
must respond to the noncompliance
letter describing the corrective actions
that will be taken by the IRB or
institution. FDA estimates about seven
IRBs or institutions will be issued a
noncompliance letter annually. We
estimate that the IRB’s or institution’s
response will take about 10 hours to
prepare, with an estimated total annual
burden of 70 hours.
In 2016, FDA disqualified one IRB
under § 56.121. To date, no IRB or
institution has been reinstated or
applied for reinstatement under
§ 56.123. For this reason, we estimate
the annual reporting burden for one
respondent only. We estimate a 5-hour
burden per response, with an estimated
total annual burden of 5 hours.
The regulatory provisions in parts 50
and 56 currently approved under this
collection of information, OMB control
number 0910–0755, and for which this
extension is requested, are shown in
table 1.
In the Federal Register of July 19,
2016 (81 FR 46935), FDA published a
60-day notice requesting public
comment on the proposed collection of
information. No comments were
received.
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN 1
Number of
responses per
respondent
Number of
respondents
21 CFR section
Total annual
responses
Average burden
per response
Total hours
56.109(d) Written statement about minimal risk research when documentation of informed consent is
waived.
56.109(e) IRB written notification to approve or disapprove research; 56.109(f) Continuing review;
50.25 Elements of informed consent; and 50.27
Documentation of informed consent.
50.24 Exception from informed consent requirements
for emergency research.
56.113 Suspension or termination of IRB approval of
research.
56.120(a) IRB response to lesser administrative actions for noncompliance.
56.123 Reinstatement of an IRB or an institution ........
2,520
2
5,040
.5 (30 minutes) .....
2,520
2,520
40
100,800
1 ............................
100,800
8
3
24
1 ............................
24
2,520
1
2,520
.5 (30 minutes) .....
1,260
7
1
7
10 ..........................
70
1
1
1
5 ............................
5
Total .......................................................................
........................
........................
........................
...............................
104,679
1 There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
TABLE 2—ESTIMATED ANNUAL THIRD-PARTY DISCLOSURE BURDEN 1
21 CFR section
Number of
respondents
Number of
disclosures
per
respondent
Total annual
disclosures
Average
burden per
disclosure
Total hours
56.109(g) IRB written statement about public disclosures
to sponsor of emergency research under 50.24 ..............
8
2
16
1
16
1 There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
Dated: October 28, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016–26528 Filed 11–2–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2016–N–1486]
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Authorizations of Emergency Use of In
Vitro Diagnostic Devices for Detection
of Zika Virus; Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
issuance of two Emergency Use
Authorizations (EUAs) (the
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Nov 02, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Authorizations) for in vitro diagnostic
devices for detection of the Zika virus
in response to the Zika virus outbreak
in the Americas. FDA issued these
Authorizations under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act),
as requested by Vela Diagnostics USA,
Inc. and ARUP Laboratories. The
Authorizations contain, among other
things, conditions on the emergency use
of the authorized in vitro diagnostic
devices. The Authorizations follow the
February 26, 2016, determination by the
Secretary of Health and Human Services
(HHS) that there is a significant
potential for a public health emergency
that has a significant potential to affect
national security or the health and
E:\FR\FM\03NON1.SGM
03NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 213 (Thursday, November 3, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76596-76598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-26528]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2013-N-0403]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Protection of Human
Subjects: Informed Consent; Institutional Review Boards
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by
December 5, 2016.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer,
FAX: 202-395-7285, or emailed to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. All
comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910-0755.
Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FDA PRA Staff, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North 10A-12M, 11601
Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852, PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
Protection of Human Subjects: Informed Consent; Institutional Review
Boards OMB Control Number 0910-0755--Extension
Part 50 (21 CFR part 50) applies to all clinical investigations
regulated by FDA under sections 505(i) and 520(g) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 355(i) and 360j(g),
respectively), as well as clinical investigations that support
applications for research or marketing permits for products regulated
by FDA, including foods and dietary supplements that bear a nutrient
content claim or a health claim, infant formulas, food and color
additives, drugs for human use, medical devices for human use,
biological products for human use, and electronic products. Compliance
with part 50 is intended to protect the rights and safety of subjects
involved in investigations filed with FDA under sections 403, 406, 409,
412, 413, 502, 503, 505, 510, 513-516, 518-520, 721, and 801 of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 343, 346, 348, 350a, 350b, 352, 353, 355, 360,
360c-360f, 360h-360j, 379e, and 381, respectively) and sections 351 and
354-360F of the Public Health Service Act.
With few exceptions, no investigator may involve a human being as a
subject in FDA-regulated research unless the investigator has obtained
the legally effective informed consent of the subject or the subject's
legally authorized representative (see Sec. 50.20). In seeking
informed consent, each subject must be provided with certain elements
of informed consent. Those elements are listed in Sec. 50.25. Informed
consent shall be documented in writing as described in Sec. 50.27.
An institutional review board (IRB) may approve emergency research
without requiring the informed consent of all research subjects
provided the IRB finds and documents that certain criteria are met as
required in Sec. 50.24. We estimate that about eight times per year an
IRB is requested to review emergency research under Sec. 50.24. We
estimate, of the 8 yearly requests for IRB review under Sec. 50.24, a
particular IRB will take about an hour during each of three separate
fully convened IRB meetings to review the request under Sec. 50.24
(one meeting occurring after community consultation). The total annual
reporting burden for IRB review of emergency research under Sec. 50.24
is estimated at 24 hours (see table 1).
The information requested in the regulations for exception from the
general requirements for informed consent for medical devices (21 CFR
812.47), and the information requested in the regulations for exception
from the general requirements of informed consent in Sec. 50.23,
paragraphs (a) through (c) and (e), is currently approved under OMB
control number 0910-0586. The information requested in the
investigational new drug (IND) regulations concerning exception from
informed consent for emergency research under Sec. 50.24 is currently
approved under OMB control number 0910-0014. In addition, the
information requested in the regulations for IND safety reporting
requirements for human drug and biological products and safety
reporting requirements for bioavailability and bioequivalence studies
in humans (21 CFR 320.31(d)
[[Page 76597]]
and 21 CFR 312.32(c)(1)(ii) and (iv)) is currently approved under OMB
control number 0910-0672.
Some clinical investigations involving children, although otherwise
not approvable, may present an opportunity to understand, prevent, or
alleviate a serious problem affecting the health or welfare of children
(see Sec. 50.54). Certain clinical investigations involving children
may proceed if the IRB finds and documents that the clinical
investigation presents a reasonable opportunity to further the
understanding, prevention, or alleviation of a serious problem
affecting the health or welfare of children and when the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, after consultation with a panel of experts in
pertinent disciplines and following opportunity for public review and
comment, makes a determination that certain conditions are met (see
Sec. 50.54(b)).
The information requested for clinical investigations in children
of FDA-regulated products is covered by the collections of information
in the IND regulations (part 312 (21 CFR part 312)), the
investigational device exemption (IDE) regulations (part 812 (21 CFR
part 812)), the IRB regulations (Sec. 56.115 (21 CFR 56.115)), the
food additive petition and nutrient content claim petition regulations
(21 CFR 101.69 and 101.70), and the infant formula regulations (parts
106 and 107 (21 CFR parts 106 and 107)), all of which are approved by
OMB. Specifically, the information collected under the IND regulations
is currently approved under OMB control number 0910-0014. The
information collected under the IDE regulations is currently approved
under OMB control number 0910-0078. The information collected under the
IRB regulations is currently approved under OMB control number 0910-
0130. The information collected in food additive and nutrient content
claim petitions is currently approved under OMB control number 0910-
0381 (general requirements) and 0910-0016 (Form FDA 3503). The
information collected under the infant formula regulations is currently
approved under OMB control number 0910-0256 (general requirements) and
0910-0188 (infant formula recalls).
Part 56 (21 CFR part 56) contains the general standards for the
composition, operation, and responsibility of an IRB that reviews
clinical investigations regulated by FDA under sections 505(i) and
520(g) of the FD&C Act, as well as clinical investigations that support
applications for research or marketing permits for products regulated
by FDA, including foods and dietary supplements that bear a nutrient
content claim or a health claim, infant formulas, food and color
additives, drugs for human use, medical devices for human use,
biological products for human use, and electronic products. Compliance
with part 56 is intended to protect the rights and welfare of human
subjects involved in such investigations.
The information collected under the IRB regulations ``Protection of
Human Subjects--Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements for
Institutional Review Boards (part 56),'' including the information
collection activities in the provisions in Sec. 56.108(a)(1) and (b),
is currently approved under OMB control number 0910-0130. The
information collected under the regulations for the registration of
IRBs in Sec. 56.106 is currently approved under OMB control number
0990-0279. The information collected for IRB review and approval for
the IDE regulations (part 812) is currently approved under OMB control
number 0910-0078. The information collected for premarket approval of
medical devices (part 814 (21 CFR part 814)) is currently approved
under OMB control number 0910-0231. The information collected under the
regulations for IRB requirements for humanitarian use devices (part
814, subpart H) is currently approved under OMB control number 0910-
0332. The information collected under the regulations for IRB review
and approval of INDs (part 312) is currently approved under OMB control
number 0910-0014.
This collection of information is limited to certain provisions in
part 50, subpart B (Informed Consent of Human Subjects), and part 56
(Institutional Review Boards), currently approved under OMB control
number 0910-0755.
This proposed extension applies to the following collections of
information in part 50: Sec. Sec. 50.24 (Exception from informed
consent requirements for emergency research), 50.25 (Elements of
informed consent), and 50.27 (Documentation of informed consent).
In part 56, this proposed extension applies to the following
collections of information: Sec. 56.109(d) (written statement about
research when documentation of informed consent is waived); Sec.
56.109(e) (IRB written notification to approve or disapprove research);
Sec. 56.109(f) (continuing review of research); Sec. 56.109(g) (IRB
written statements to the sponsor about required public disclosures
related to emergency research under Sec. 50.24); Sec. 56.113
(Suspension or termination of IRB approval of research); Sec.
56.120(a) (IRB response to lesser administrative actions for
noncompliance); and, Sec. 56.123 (Reinstatement of an IRB or an
institution).
In Sec. 56.109(d), if an IRB has waived documentation of consent
for research that: (1) Presents no more than minimal risk of harm to
subjects and (2) involves no procedures for which consent is normally
required outside of the research context, the IRB may nevertheless
require the investigator to provide a written statement about the
research to the subjects. We estimate that each IRB will review about
two minimal risk FDA-regulated studies each year. Because the studies
are minimal risk, the review can be fairly straightforward, and the
written statement for the subjects would be brief. We estimate that IRB
review of each written statement could be completed in less than 30
minutes (0.5 hours).
In Sec. 56.109(f), the amount of time an IRB spends on the
continuing review of a particular study will vary depending on the
nature and complexity of the research, the amount and type of new
information presented to the IRB, and whether the investigator is
seeking approval of substantive changes to the research protocol or
informed consent document. For many studies, continuing review can be
fairly straightforward, and the IRB should be able to complete its
deliberations and approve the research within a brief period of time.
In Sec. 56.109(g), an IRB is required to provide the sponsor of a
study involving an exception from informed consent for emergency
research under Sec. 50.24 with a written statement of information that
has been publicly disclosed to the communities in which the
investigation will be conducted and from which the subjects will be
drawn. Public disclosure prior to initiation of the investigation would
include the plans for the investigation and its risks and expected
benefits. There must also be public disclosure of sufficient
information following completion of the clinical investigation to
apprise the community and researchers of the study, including the
demographic characteristics of the research population, and its
results. (See Sec. 50.24(a)(7)(ii) and (iii)). The purpose of the
IRB's written statements is to make the sponsor aware that public
disclosure has occurred, so that the sponsor can provide copies of the
information that has been disclosed to FDA, as required by Sec. Sec.
312.54(a) and 812.47(a).
We estimate that about eight requests to review emergency research
under Sec. 50.24 are submitted each year, and the IRBs that review
those studies would prepare two public disclosure reports: One prior to
initiation of the research and one following the study's
[[Page 76598]]
completion. We estimate that it will take an IRB approximately 1 hour
to prepare a written statement to the study sponsor describing each
public disclosure, for a total of 2 hours per study. The total annual
third party disclosure burden for IRBs to fulfill this requirement
related to emergency research under Sec. 50.24 is estimated at 16
hours (see table 2).
When an IRB or institution violates the regulations, FDA issues to
the IRB or institution a noncompliance letter (see Sec. 56.120(a)).
The IRB or institution must respond to the noncompliance letter
describing the corrective actions that will be taken by the IRB or
institution. FDA estimates about seven IRBs or institutions will be
issued a noncompliance letter annually. We estimate that the IRB's or
institution's response will take about 10 hours to prepare, with an
estimated total annual burden of 70 hours.
In 2016, FDA disqualified one IRB under Sec. 56.121. To date, no
IRB or institution has been reinstated or applied for reinstatement
under Sec. 56.123. For this reason, we estimate the annual reporting
burden for one respondent only. We estimate a 5-hour burden per
response, with an estimated total annual burden of 5 hours.
The regulatory provisions in parts 50 and 56 currently approved
under this collection of information, OMB control number 0910-0755, and
for which this extension is requested, are shown in table 1.
In the Federal Register of July 19, 2016 (81 FR 46935), FDA
published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed
collection of information. No comments were received.
FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:
Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
21 CFR section Number of responses per Total annual Average burden Total hours
respondents respondent responses per response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
56.109(d) Written statement 2,520 2 5,040 .5 (30 minutes). 2,520
about minimal risk research
when documentation of
informed consent is waived.
56.109(e) IRB written 2,520 40 100,800 1............... 100,800
notification to approve or
disapprove research;
56.109(f) Continuing review;
50.25 Elements of informed
consent; and 50.27
Documentation of informed
consent.
50.24 Exception from informed 8 3 24 1............... 24
consent requirements for
emergency research.
56.113 Suspension or 2,520 1 2,520 .5 (30 minutes). 1,260
termination of IRB approval
of research.
56.120(a) IRB response to 7 1 7 10.............. 70
lesser administrative actions
for noncompliance.
56.123 Reinstatement of an IRB 1 1 1 5............... 5
or an institution.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total..................... .............. .............. .............. ................ 104,679
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
information.
Table 2--Estimated Annual Third-Party Disclosure Burden \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
21 CFR section Number of disclosures per Total annual Average burden Total hours
respondents respondent disclosures per disclosure
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
56.109(g) IRB written statement about public disclosures to sponsor 8 2 16 1 16
of emergency research under 50.24.................................
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
Dated: October 28, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-26528 Filed 11-2-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P