Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Oklahoma; Disapproval of Prevention of Significant Deterioration for Particulate Matter Less Than 2.5 Micrometers-Significant Impact Levels and Significant Monitoring Concentration, 74921-74922 [2016-25982]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 209 / Friday, October 28, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Executive Orders 12866, 12988, and
13132. This rule is not a significant
regulatory action as defined in
Executive Order 12866. The rule has
been reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12988. This rule
preempts state laws that are inconsistent
with its provisions. Before a judicial
action may be brought concerning this
rule or action taken under this rule, all
administrative remedies must be
exhausted. This regulation will not have
a substantial direct effect on the states,
on the relationship between the national
government and the states, or on
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of Government. Therefore, in
accordance with E.O. 13132, it is
determined this regulation does not
have sufficient Federalism implications
to warrant the preparation of a
Federalism Assessment.
List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 20
Administrative wage garnishment,
Debt collection, Labor.
Signed at Washington, DC, on this 17th day
of October, 2016.
Thomas E. Perez,
U.S. Secretary of Labor.
PART 20—FEDERAL CLAIMS
COLLECTION
Accordingly, the interim rule
amending 29 CFR part 20 which was
published at 80 FR 60797 on October 8,
2015, is adopted as a final rule without
change.
■
[FR Doc. 2016–26093 Filed 10–27–16; 8:45 am]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document wherever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
the EPA.
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R06–OAR–2012–0263; FRL–9953–46–
Region 6]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Oklahoma;
Disapproval of Prevention of
Significant Deterioration for Particulate
Matter Less Than 2.5 Micrometers—
Significant Impact Levels and
Significant Monitoring Concentration
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R06–OAR–2012–0263. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733.
ADDRESSES:
Adina Wiley, (214) 665–2115,
wiley.adina@epa.gov.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is disapproving the
severable portions of the February 6,
2012, Oklahoma State Implementation
Plan (SIP) submittal which establish
certain de minimis thresholds for
SUMMARY:
15:21 Oct 27, 2016
This rule is effective on
November 28, 2016.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
BILLING CODE 4510–7C–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
particulate matter less than 2.5
micrometers in diameter (PM2.5) in the
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
(PSD) permitting requirements.
Specifically, we are disapproving
provisions that adopt and implement
the PM2.5 significant impact levels (SILs)
and significant monitoring
concentration (SMC); both of which
were vacated by a federal court and
subsequently removed from federal PSD
regulations. We are disapproving the
submitted provisions as inconsistent
with federal laws and regulations for the
permitting of PM2.5. The EPA is
finalizing this disapproval under section
110 and part C of the Clean Air Act
(CAA).
Jkt 241001
I. Background
The background for this action is
discussed in detail in our August 11,
2016, proposed disapproval at 81 FR
53098. In that document, we proposed
to disapprove the severable portions of
the February 6, 2012, Oklahoma SIP
submittal which establish the voluntary
PM2.5 SILs provision and SMC. We
presented our preliminary
determination that these submitted
revisions to the Oklahoma SIP must be
disapproved because they establish
permitting SIP requirements that are
inconsistent with the federal statutory
and regulatory permitting requirements
for PM2.5. We did not receive any
comments regarding our proposed
disapproval
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
74921
II. Final Action
We are disapproving the following
severable portions of the February 6,
2012, Oklahoma SIP submittal
establishing the voluntary PM2.5 SILs
provision and SMC. We are taking this
final action under section 110 and part
C of the CAA.
• Substantive revisions to the
Oklahoma SIP at OAC 252:100–8–
33(c)(1)(C) establishing the PM2.5 SMC
as submitted on February 6, 2012; and
• Substantive revisions to the
Oklahoma PSD program in OAC
252:100–8–35(a)(2) establishing the
PM2.5 PSD SILs provision as submitted
on February 6, 2012.
The EPA is disapproving the revisions
listed because the submitted provisions
are inconsistent with the federal
statutory and regulatory permitting
requirements for PM2.5. Upon the
effective date of this final disapproval,
owners or operators of a proposed
source or modification will continue to
satisfy the source impact analysis
provisions for PM2.5 as required under
the Oklahoma SIP at OAC 252:100–8–
35(a)(1). Additionally, the State of
Oklahoma will continue to have the
necessary authority to require
monitoring of PM2.5 under the
Oklahoma SIP at OAC 252:100–8–
35.1(b)(3), consistent with the
provisions of 40 CFR 52.21(m). This
final disapproval does not require the
EPA to promulgate a Federal
Implementation Plan, because the
Oklahoma PSD SIP program continues
to satisfy the Federal PSD SIP
requirements for PM2.5 monitoring and
source impact analysis. We are
finalizing this disapproval under section
110 and part C of the Act; as such, the
EPA will not impose sanctions as a
result of this final disapproval.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant
regulatory action and was therefore not
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an
information collection burden under the
PRA. There is no burden imposed under
the PRA because this action disapproves
submitted revisions that are no longer
consistent with federal laws and
regulations for the regulation and
permitting of PM2.5.
E:\FR\FM\28OCR1.SGM
28OCR1
74922
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 209 / Friday, October 28, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the RFA. This action will not
impose any requirements on small
entities. This action disapproves
submitted revisions that are no longer
consistent with federal laws and
regulations for the regulation and
permitting of PM2.5, and therefore will
have no impact on small entities.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
This action does not contain any
unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, and does
not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. The action imposes no
enforceable duty on any state, local or
tribal governments or the private sector.
This action disapproves submitted
revisions that are no longer consistent
with federal laws and regulations for the
regulation and permitting of PM2.5, and
therefore will have no impact on small
governments.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism
implications. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This action does not have tribal
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13175. This action disapproves
provisions of state law that are no longer
consistent with federal law for the
regulation and permitting of PM2.5; there
are no requirements or responsibilities
added or removed from Indian Tribal
Governments. Thus, Executive Order
13175 does not apply to this action.
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order
13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern
environmental health or safety risks that
the EPA has reason to believe may
disproportionately affect children, per
the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory
action’’ in section 2–202 of the
Executive Order. This action is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
because it disapproves state permitting
provisions that are inconsistent with
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:21 Oct 27, 2016
Jkt 241001
federal laws and regulations for the
regulation and permitting of PM2.5.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution or Use
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, because it is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
Dated: October 21, 2016.
Ron Curry,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTAA)
This rulemaking does not involve
technical standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes the human health or
environmental risk addressed by this
action will not have potential
disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects
on minority, low-income or indigenous
populations. This action is not subject
to Executive Order 12898 because it
disapproves state permitting provisions
that are inconsistent with federal laws
and regulations for the regulation and
permitting of PM2.5.
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA, and
the EPA will submit a rule report to
each House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United
States. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
L. Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by December 27,
2016. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See CAA
section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart LL—Oklahoma
2. Section 52.1922 is revised to read
as follows:
■
§ 52.1922
Approval status.
(a) With the exceptions set forth in
this subpart, the Administrator approves
Oklahoma’s State Implementation Plan
under section 110 of the Clean Air Act
for the attainment and maintenance of
the national standards.
(b) The EPA is disapproving the
following severable portions of the
February 6, 2012, Oklahoma SIP
submittal:
(1) Revisions establishing Minor New
Source Review Greenhouse Gas (GHG)
permitting requirements at OAC
252:100–7–2.1 as submitted on February
6, 2012.
(2) Revisions to the Oklahoma
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
(PSD) program in OAC 252:100–8–31
establishing PSD permitting
requirements for sources that are
classified as major and thus required to
obtain a PSD permit based solely on
their potential GHG emissions (‘‘Step 2
sources’’) at paragraph (E) of the
definition of ‘‘subject to regulation’’ as
submitted on February 6, 2012.
(3) Revisions to the Oklahoma PSD
Program at OAC 252:100–8–33(c)(1)(C)
establishing the PM2.5 Significant
Monitoring Concentration as submitted
on February 6, 2012.
(4) Revisions to the Oklahoma PSD
Program in OAC 252:100–8–35(a)(2)
establishing the PM2.5 PSD Significant
Impact Levels as submitted on February
6, 2012.
(c) The EPA is disapproving the
revisions to the Oklahoma State
Implementation Plan definitions of
‘‘carbon dioxide equivalent emissions’’
at OAC 252:100–1–3 and ‘‘subject to
regulation’’ at OAC 252:100–8–31 to
implement the Greenhouse Gas Biomass
Deferral as submitted on January 18,
2013.
[FR Doc. 2016–25982 Filed 10–27–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\28OCR1.SGM
28OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 209 (Friday, October 28, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 74921-74922]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-25982]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R06-OAR-2012-0263; FRL-9953-46-Region 6]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Oklahoma;
Disapproval of Prevention of Significant Deterioration for Particulate
Matter Less Than 2.5 Micrometers--Significant Impact Levels and
Significant Monitoring Concentration
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is disapproving the
severable portions of the February 6, 2012, Oklahoma State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submittal which establish certain de minimis
thresholds for particulate matter less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter
(PM2.5) in the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD)
permitting requirements. Specifically, we are disapproving provisions
that adopt and implement the PM2.5 significant impact levels
(SILs) and significant monitoring concentration (SMC); both of which
were vacated by a federal court and subsequently removed from federal
PSD regulations. We are disapproving the submitted provisions as
inconsistent with federal laws and regulations for the permitting of
PM2.5. The EPA is finalizing this disapproval under section
110 and part C of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This rule is effective on November 28, 2016.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R06-OAR-2012-0263. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through https://www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at the EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas,
Texas 75202-2733.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Adina Wiley, (214) 665-2115,
wiley.adina@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean the EPA.
I. Background
The background for this action is discussed in detail in our August
11, 2016, proposed disapproval at 81 FR 53098. In that document, we
proposed to disapprove the severable portions of the February 6, 2012,
Oklahoma SIP submittal which establish the voluntary PM2.5
SILs provision and SMC. We presented our preliminary determination that
these submitted revisions to the Oklahoma SIP must be disapproved
because they establish permitting SIP requirements that are
inconsistent with the federal statutory and regulatory permitting
requirements for PM2.5. We did not receive any comments
regarding our proposed disapproval
II. Final Action
We are disapproving the following severable portions of the
February 6, 2012, Oklahoma SIP submittal establishing the voluntary
PM2.5 SILs provision and SMC. We are taking this final
action under section 110 and part C of the CAA.
Substantive revisions to the Oklahoma SIP at OAC 252:100-
8-33(c)(1)(C) establishing the PM2.5 SMC as submitted on
February 6, 2012; and
Substantive revisions to the Oklahoma PSD program in OAC
252:100-8-35(a)(2) establishing the PM2.5 PSD SILs provision
as submitted on February 6, 2012.
The EPA is disapproving the revisions listed because the submitted
provisions are inconsistent with the federal statutory and regulatory
permitting requirements for PM2.5. Upon the effective date
of this final disapproval, owners or operators of a proposed source or
modification will continue to satisfy the source impact analysis
provisions for PM2.5 as required under the Oklahoma SIP at
OAC 252:100-8-35(a)(1). Additionally, the State of Oklahoma will
continue to have the necessary authority to require monitoring of
PM2.5 under the Oklahoma SIP at OAC 252:100-8-35.1(b)(3),
consistent with the provisions of 40 CFR 52.21(m). This final
disapproval does not require the EPA to promulgate a Federal
Implementation Plan, because the Oklahoma PSD SIP program continues to
satisfy the Federal PSD SIP requirements for PM2.5
monitoring and source impact analysis. We are finalizing this
disapproval under section 110 and part C of the Act; as such, the EPA
will not impose sanctions as a result of this final disapproval.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant regulatory action and was
therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the PRA. There is no burden imposed under the PRA because this action
disapproves submitted revisions that are no longer consistent with
federal laws and regulations for the regulation and permitting of
PM2.5.
[[Page 74922]]
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This
action will not impose any requirements on small entities. This action
disapproves submitted revisions that are no longer consistent with
federal laws and regulations for the regulation and permitting of
PM2.5, and therefore will have no impact on small entities.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any state,
local or tribal governments or the private sector. This action
disapproves submitted revisions that are no longer consistent with
federal laws and regulations for the regulation and permitting of
PM2.5, and therefore will have no impact on small
governments.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications as specified in
Executive Order 13175. This action disapproves provisions of state law
that are no longer consistent with federal law for the regulation and
permitting of PM2.5; there are no requirements or
responsibilities added or removed from Indian Tribal Governments. Thus,
Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in
section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it disapproves state permitting
provisions that are inconsistent with federal laws and regulations for
the regulation and permitting of PM2.5.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes the human health or environmental risk addressed
by this action will not have potential disproportionately high and
adverse human health or environmental effects on minority, low-income
or indigenous populations. This action is not subject to Executive
Order 12898 because it disapproves state permitting provisions that are
inconsistent with federal laws and regulations for the regulation and
permitting of PM2.5.
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA, and the EPA will submit a rule
report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of
the United States. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
L. Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by December 27, 2016. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See CAA section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: October 21, 2016.
Ron Curry,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart LL--Oklahoma
0
2. Section 52.1922 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1922 Approval status.
(a) With the exceptions set forth in this subpart, the
Administrator approves Oklahoma's State Implementation Plan under
section 110 of the Clean Air Act for the attainment and maintenance of
the national standards.
(b) The EPA is disapproving the following severable portions of the
February 6, 2012, Oklahoma SIP submittal:
(1) Revisions establishing Minor New Source Review Greenhouse Gas
(GHG) permitting requirements at OAC 252:100-7-2.1 as submitted on
February 6, 2012.
(2) Revisions to the Oklahoma Prevention of Significant
Deterioration (PSD) program in OAC 252:100-8-31 establishing PSD
permitting requirements for sources that are classified as major and
thus required to obtain a PSD permit based solely on their potential
GHG emissions (``Step 2 sources'') at paragraph (E) of the definition
of ``subject to regulation'' as submitted on February 6, 2012.
(3) Revisions to the Oklahoma PSD Program at OAC 252:100-8-
33(c)(1)(C) establishing the PM2.5 Significant Monitoring
Concentration as submitted on February 6, 2012.
(4) Revisions to the Oklahoma PSD Program in OAC 252:100-8-35(a)(2)
establishing the PM2.5 PSD Significant Impact Levels as
submitted on February 6, 2012.
(c) The EPA is disapproving the revisions to the Oklahoma State
Implementation Plan definitions of ``carbon dioxide equivalent
emissions'' at OAC 252:100-1-3 and ``subject to regulation'' at OAC
252:100-8-31 to implement the Greenhouse Gas Biomass Deferral as
submitted on January 18, 2013.
[FR Doc. 2016-25982 Filed 10-27-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P