Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 3 Bars Ecosystem and Landscape Restoration Project in Eureka County, NV, 75143-75145 [2016-25978]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 209 / Friday, October 28, 2016 / Notices
Background
Ballville Dam was built in 1913 for
hydroelectric power generation. The
City of Fremont purchased the dam in
1959 from the Ohio Power Company for
the purpose of supplying water to the
city. With the construction of a raw
water reservoir, the dam is no longer
required for this purpose. Moreover, in
2007, the Ohio Department of Natural
Resources issued a Notice of Violation
to the City, stating that the dam was
being operated in violation of the law as
a result of its deteriorated condition.
Ballville Dam is currently a complete
barrier to upstream fish passage and
impedes hydrologic processes. The
purpose for the issuance of Federal
funds and preparation of this final SEIS
is to remove Ballville Dam and restore
natural hydrological processes over a
40-mile stretch of the Sandusky River,
reopen fish passage to 22 miles of
additional habitat, restore flow
conditions for fish access to habitat
above the impoundment, and improve
overall conditions for native fish
communities in the Sandusky River
system, restoring self-sustaining fish
resources.
We published a final EIS in the
Federal Register on August 1, 2014 (79
FR 44856), for the Ballville Dam Project
that addressed the environmental,
economic, cultural and historical, and
safety issues associated with the
proposed removal of the dam and a
suite of alternatives. The final EIS
analyzed four alternatives for the
removal: (1) Proposed Action—
Incremental Dam Removal with Ice
Control Structure; (2) No Federal
Action; (3) Fish Elevator Structure; and
(4) Dam Removal with Ice Control
Structure. The final EIS considered the
direct, indirect, and cumulative effects
of the alternatives, including any
measures under the Proposed Action
alternative intended to minimize and
mitigate such impacts. The final EIS
also identified additional alternatives
that were considered, but were
eliminated from consideration as
detailed in Section 2.3 of the final EIS.
We further published a draft SEIS in
the Federal Register on February 26,
2016 (81 FR 9877), that provided further
discussion of the potential significant
impacts of the proposed action and an
analysis of reasonable alternatives to the
proposed action, specifically within the
context of additional information made
available since completion of final EIS
for this project. This additional
information addressed estimates of total
quantity of sediment impounded by
Ballville Dam, the potential impacts of
the proposed alternative on harmful
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:12 Oct 27, 2016
Jkt 241001
algal blooms (HABs) in the Sandusky
River and Lake Erie due to the proposed
sediment release, the potential impacts
of the proposed alternative on
downstream habitats due to sediment
release, the accuracy of cost estimates of
sediment removal within the EIS, and
evaluation of a bypass and excavation
alternative provided in comments on
the final EIS. Although we concluded
that these topics were sufficiently
addressed in the final EIS, we provided
additional review and assessment in the
draft SEIS to help further clarify the
issues. To complete this aspect of the
draft SEIS, we consulted subject matter
experts to help review final EIS
materials and clearly articulate our
understanding of them. The resulting
additional information and explanation
was incorporated within the draft SEIS.
This final SEIS further incorporates
information received during the public
comment period for the draft SEIS, and
finalizes the analyses and conclusions
in the document.
Public Comments
Letters describing the proposed action
and soliciting comments will be sent to
appropriate Federal, State, and local
agencies, and to private organizations
and citizens who have previously
expressed or are known to have interest
in this proposal. To ensure that the full
range of issues related to this proposed
action are addressed and all significant
issues identified, comments and
suggestions are invited from all
interested parties.
We request data, comments, new
information, or suggestions from the
public, concerned governmental
agencies, the scientific community,
tribes, industry, or any other interested
party on this notice. We specifically
request comments regarding the
additional information and analyses
presented in the final SEIS.
You may submit your comments and
materials considering this notice by one
of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES
section.
Public Availability of Comments
All comments and materials we
receive in response to this request will
be available for public inspection, by
appointment, during normal business
hours at the address listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this notice.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
PO 00000
Frm 00118
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
75143
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Authority
This notice is being furnished as
provided for by NEPA and its
implementing Regulations (40 CFR
1501.7 and 1508.22). The intent of the
notice is to obtain suggestions and
additional information from other
agencies and the public on the final
SEIS. Comments and participation in
this process are solicited.
Todd Turner,
Assistant Regional Director, Fisheries,
Midwest Region.
[FR Doc. 2016–26101 Filed 10–27–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLNVB00000.LF3100000.DD0000.
LFHFJF500000; 13–08807; MO#
4500079713]
Notice of Availability of the Final
Environmental Impact Statement for
the 3 Bars Ecosystem and Landscape
Restoration Project in Eureka County,
NV
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended, the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) has prepared a
Final Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) for the 3 Bars Ecosystem and
Landscape Restoration Project (3 Bars
Project) and by this notice is
announcing its availability.
DATES: The BLM will not issue a final
decision on the proposal for a minimum
of 30 days from the date that the
Environmental Protection Agency
publishes its Notice of Availability in
the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the 3 Bars Project
Final EIS are available for public
inspection at the Bureau of Land
Management, Mount Lewis Field Office,
50 Bastian Road, Battle Mountain,
Nevada, during regular business hours
of 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays.
Interested persons may also view the
Final EIS at: https://on.doi.gov/1NlY62v.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Todd Erdody, Fire Ecologist 775–635–
4109, Bureau of Land Management,
Mount Lewis Field Office, 50 Bastian
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM
28OCN1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
75144
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 209 / Friday, October 28, 2016 / Notices
Road, Battle Mountain, NV 89820; or
email: 3Bars_Project@blm.gov. Persons
who use a telecommunications device
for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339 to contact the above
individual during normal business
hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a
day, 7 days a week, to leave a message
or question with the above individual.
You will receive a reply during normal
business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 3 Bars
Project area in central Eureka County,
Nevada, spans approximately 749,810
acres and includes all or portions of
three major mountain ranges (Roberts
Mountain, Simpson Park Range, and
Sulphur Spring Range). Monitoring has
indicated that resource conditions
within the project area have deteriorated
due to past land use activities, causing
the BLM to target this area for
restoration.
The BLM is proposing a
comprehensive treatment program for
improving the health of the ecosystem
in the 3 Bars Project area. The proposed
project focuses on restoration at the
landscape level. The proposed
treatments range from several acres to
several thousand acres, depending on
specific treatment and management
goals and desired objectives for each
resource. Possible treatment methods
include manual, mechanical, and
biological control treatments, prescribed
fire, or wildland fire for resource
benefit, and other management actions.
The surface landownership consists of
about 97 percent public lands
administered by the BLM and three
percent privately owned lands.
The BLM initiated the scoping period
for the Project by publication of a Notice
of Intent (75 FR 3916–3917) to prepare
an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) on January 25, 2010. The scoping
period ended on March 10, 2010. Public
scoping meetings were held in Battle
Mountain, Nevada, on February 22,
2010, and in Eureka, Nevada, on
February 23, 2010. The BLM received 24
scoping comment letters on the
proposed 3 Bars Project. During the
scoping period, 637 catalogued
individual comments were recorded for
the 3 Bars Project EIS. All comments
that were received have been
incorporated in a Scoping Summary
Report and were considered in the
subsequent preparation of the Draft EIS.
Based on the public comments
received during the scoping period for
the 3 Bars Project, the BLM developed
and analyzed four alternatives in the
Draft EIS; specifically, the All Treatment
Method Alternative; No Fire Use
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:12 Oct 27, 2016
Jkt 241001
Alternative; Minimal Land Disturbance
Alternative; and No Action Alternative.
The BLM has identified site-specific
treatment projects that it proposes to
implement to restore and manage the 3
Bars Project area. Treatment projects
were identified through an iterative
process involving the BLM and other
Federal, state and local agencies.
Treatments would focus on four priority
vegetation management concerns:
• Riparian—Treatments in riparian
habitats would focus on restoring
riparian functionality in areas where
structural integrity (incised channel,
headcuts, knickpoints, developments,
and diversions) and/or appropriate
species composition are compromised.
• Aspen—Treatments in quaking
aspen habitats would focus on
improving the health of aspen stands by
stimulating aspen regeneration.
• Pinyon-juniper—Treatments in
singleleaf pinyon pine and Utah juniper
habitats would focus on thinning
pinyon-juniper communities to promote
woodland health and removing pinyonjuniper where it encroaches into
riparian areas and upland habitats,
including sagebrush habitat.
• Sagebrush—Treatments in
sagebrush habitats would focus on
restoring the sagebrush community by
removing encroaching pinyon-juniper,
promoting the reestablishment of native
forbs and grasses in sagebrush
communities, and promoting the
development of sagebrush in areas
where it occurred historically.
In addition to the All Available Methods
Alternative, three other alternatives are
analyzed in the Final EIS. The No Fire
Use Alternative would target the same
treatment areas, but the methods of
treatment would not include prescribed
fire or wildland fire for resource benefit.
The Minimal Land Disturbance
Alternative targets the same areas for
treatment, but further limits the
methods of treatment to exclude fire
use, mechanical treatments, and nonclassical biological controls. A No
Action Alternative has also been
included to provide a baseline against
which all other alternatives can be
measured. Three additional alternatives
were considered, but eliminated from
detailed analysis.
The BLM has prepared the Final EIS
in coordination with its three
Cooperating Agencies: the Nevada
Department of Wildlife, Eureka County
Board of Commissioners, and the
National Park Service—National Trails
Intermountain Region.
On September 27, 2013, a Notice of
Availability of the Draft EIS was
published in the Federal Register (78
FR 59712), providing a 45-day public
PO 00000
Frm 00119
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
comment period. One public comment
meeting was held on November 7, 2013,
in Eureka, Nevada. A second Notice was
published in the Federal Register (78
FR 67392) entitled ‘‘New Dates for Close
of Public Comment and Protest Periods
Due to Federal Government Shutdown
extending the comment period to
November 29, 2013.’’ No preferred
alternative for this Project was chosen in
the Draft EIS.
More than 6,800 comments were
received, of which 6,530 were form
letters containing identical or similar
comments. The BLM identified 23
substantive issues as a result of the
review process. Comments primarily
pertained to potential impacts to wild
horses, preservation of old growth
woodlands, and protection of habitat for
wildlife and special status species,
including Greater Sage-Grouse.
Substantive comments were considered
by the BLM and changes to the Final EIS
made accordingly.
The Final EIS has identified the All
Available Methods Alternative as the
preferred alternative, with treatments
and treatment objectives that meet
previously identified resource
management goals. These goals are
consistent with the 1986 ShoshoneEureka Resource Management Plan, as
amended by the BLM Nevada and
Northeastern California Greater SageGrouse Approved Resource
Management Plan Amendment and
Record of Decision, which currently
guides land management activities
within the 3 Bars Project area. These
goals focus primarily on wildlife and
habitat enhancement, fire and fuels
management, woodland and rangeland
values, wetland and riparian restoration,
wild horse management, and protection
of traditional edible and medicinal
plants and cultural resources.
The 3 Bars ecosystem provides habitat
for Greater Sage-Grouse, a BLM special
status species. The proposed 3 Bars
Project is fully in conformance with the
September 2015 BLM Nevada and
Northeastern California Greater SageGrouse Approved Resource
Management Plan Amendment and
Record of Decision (ARMPA).
To ensure that treatments benefit
Greater Sage-Grouse, sagebrush
restoration treatments would adhere to
ARMPA Required Design Features
(RDFs). These include avoiding
treatments near Greater Sage-Grouse
leks and avoiding treatments in
breeding, brood-rearing, and wintering
habitats during those times of the year
when Greater Sage-Grouse are using
these habitats. The BLM will ensure
proper livestock management is in place
prior to treatments when necessary in
E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM
28OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 209 / Friday, October 28, 2016 / Notices
order to meet project goals and
objectives, which would benefit Greater
Sage-Grouse habitat.
Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10
Jon D. Sherve,
Field Manager, Mount Lewis Field Office.
[FR Doc. 2016–25978 Filed 10–27–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–HC–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLMT929000/L14400000.BJ0000;
17X1109AF; MO#4500100894]
Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey;
Montana
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of filing of plats of
survey.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) will file the plat of
survey of the lands described below in
the BLM Montana State Office, Billings,
Montana, on November 28, 2016.
DATES: A notice of protest of the survey
must be filed before November 28, 2016
to be considered. A statement of reasons
for a protest may be filed with the notice
of protest and must filed within thirty
days after the notice of protest is filed.
ADDRESSES: Protests of the survey
should be sent to the Branch of
Cadastral Survey, Bureau of Land
Management, 5001 Southgate Drive,
Billings, Montana 59101–4669.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Blaise Lodermeier, Cadastral Surveyor,
Branch of Cadastral Survey, Bureau of
Land Management, 5001 Southgate
Drive, Billings, Montana 59101–4669,
telephone (406) 896–5128 or (406) 896–
5003, bloderme@blm.gov. Persons who
use a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339 to contact the above
individual during normal business
hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a
day, 7 days a week, to leave a message
or question with the above individual.
You will receive a reply during normal
business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
survey was executed at the request of
the Chief, Branch of Realty, Lands and
Renewable Energy, Bureau of Land
Management, Billings, Montana, and
was necessary to create Tracts of land to
be transferred to the State of Montana
through the indemnity selection
process.
The lands we surveyed are:
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:12 Oct 27, 2016
Jkt 241001
Principal Meridian, Montana
Tps. 7 and 8 N., R. 47 E.
The plat, in two sheets, representing
the dependent resurvey of Tract O, Tract
Z, and a portion of Tract N (Tps. 7 and
8 N., R. 47 E.), and the subdivision of
Tract O and Tract Z into Tract CC, Tract
DD, Tract EE, and Tract FF, Township
7 North, Range 47 East, Principal
Meridian, Montana, was accepted
March 17, 2016.
We will place a copy of the plat, in
two sheets, in the open files. They will
be available to the public as a matter of
information. If the BLM receives a
protest against this survey, as shown on
this plat, in two sheets, prior to the date
of the official filing, we will stay the
filing pending our consideration of the
protest. We will not officially file this
plat, in two sheets, until the day after
we have accepted or dismissed all
protests and they have become final,
including decisions or appeals. Before
including your address, phone number,
email address, or other personally
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personally identifying information—
may be made publicly available at any
time. While you can ask us in your
comment to withhold your personally
identifying information from public
review, we cannot guarantee that we
will be able to do so.
Authority: 43 U.S.C. Chap. 3.
[FR Doc. 2016–26102 Filed 10–27–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–DN–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS–WASO–NRNHL–22126;
PPWOCRADI0, PCU00RP14.R50000]
National Register of Historic Places;
Notification of Pending Nominations
and Related Actions
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice.
AGENCY:
The National Park Service is
soliciting comments on the significance
of properties nominated before October
1, 2016, for listing or related actions in
the National Register of Historic Places.
DATES: Comments should be submitted
by November 14, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent via
U.S. Postal Service to the National
Register of Historic Places, National
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Park Service, 1849 C St. NW., MS 2280,
Washington, DC 20240; by all other
carriers, National Register of Historic
Places, National Park Service, 1201 Eye
St. NW., 8th floor, Washington, DC
20005; or by fax, 202–371–6447.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
properties listed in this notice are being
considered for listing or related actions
in the National Register of Historic
Places. Nominations for their
consideration were received by the
National Park Service before October 1,
2016. Pursuant to section 60.13 of 36
CFR part 60, written comments are
being accepted concerning the
significance of the nominated properties
under the National Register criteria for
evaluation.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
GEORGIA
Fulton County
Sears, Roebuck and Co. Mail-Order
Warehouse and Retail Store, 675 Ponce de
Leon Ave. NE., Atlanta, 16000769
MASSACHUSETTS
Joshua F. Alexander,
Chief, Branch of Cadastral Survey, Division
of Energy, Minerals, and Realty.
ACTION:
75145
Middlesex County
Reeves Tavern, 126 Old Connecticut Path,
Wayland, 16000770
MISSOURI
Jackson County
West Bottoms—North Historic District,
(Railroad Related Historic Commercial and
Industrial Resources in Kansas City,
Missouri MPS), W. 9th St., St. Louis Ave.,
Union Ave. from Wyoming to W. of
Mulberry Sts., Kansas City, 16000771
MONTANA
Glacier County
Rising Wolf, (Glacier National Park MPS),
Glacier National Park, St. Mary, 16000772
NEBRASKA
Douglas County
Hanscom Apartments, (Apartments, Flats and
Tenements in Omaha, Nebraska from
1880–1962 MPS), 1029 Park Ave., Omaha,
16000773
Holy Sepulchre Cemetery, 4912 Leavenworth
St., Omaha, 16000774
Scott—Omaha Tent and Awning Company,
1501 Howard St., Omaha, 16000775
Keith County
Alkali Station, (Conflict & Warfare in the
North & South Platte Valleys of Nebraska,
E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM
28OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 209 (Friday, October 28, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75143-75145]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-25978]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLNVB00000.LF3100000.DD0000.LFHFJF500000; 13-08807; MO# 4500079713]
Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact
Statement for the 3 Bars Ecosystem and Landscape Restoration Project in
Eureka County, NV
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has prepared a
Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the 3 Bars Ecosystem and
Landscape Restoration Project (3 Bars Project) and by this notice is
announcing its availability.
DATES: The BLM will not issue a final decision on the proposal for a
minimum of 30 days from the date that the Environmental Protection
Agency publishes its Notice of Availability in the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the 3 Bars Project Final EIS are available for
public inspection at the Bureau of Land Management, Mount Lewis Field
Office, 50 Bastian Road, Battle Mountain, Nevada, during regular
business hours of 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
holidays. Interested persons may also view the Final EIS at: https://on.doi.gov/1NlY62v.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd Erdody, Fire Ecologist 775-635-
4109, Bureau of Land Management, Mount Lewis Field Office, 50 Bastian
[[Page 75144]]
Road, Battle Mountain, NV 89820; or email: 3Bars_Project@blm.gov.
Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call
the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to
contact the above individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is
available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question
with the above individual. You will receive a reply during normal
business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 3 Bars Project area in central Eureka
County, Nevada, spans approximately 749,810 acres and includes all or
portions of three major mountain ranges (Roberts Mountain, Simpson Park
Range, and Sulphur Spring Range). Monitoring has indicated that
resource conditions within the project area have deteriorated due to
past land use activities, causing the BLM to target this area for
restoration.
The BLM is proposing a comprehensive treatment program for
improving the health of the ecosystem in the 3 Bars Project area. The
proposed project focuses on restoration at the landscape level. The
proposed treatments range from several acres to several thousand acres,
depending on specific treatment and management goals and desired
objectives for each resource. Possible treatment methods include
manual, mechanical, and biological control treatments, prescribed fire,
or wildland fire for resource benefit, and other management actions.
The surface landownership consists of about 97 percent public lands
administered by the BLM and three percent privately owned lands.
The BLM initiated the scoping period for the Project by publication
of a Notice of Intent (75 FR 3916-3917) to prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) on January 25, 2010. The scoping period ended on
March 10, 2010. Public scoping meetings were held in Battle Mountain,
Nevada, on February 22, 2010, and in Eureka, Nevada, on February 23,
2010. The BLM received 24 scoping comment letters on the proposed 3
Bars Project. During the scoping period, 637 catalogued individual
comments were recorded for the 3 Bars Project EIS. All comments that
were received have been incorporated in a Scoping Summary Report and
were considered in the subsequent preparation of the Draft EIS.
Based on the public comments received during the scoping period for
the 3 Bars Project, the BLM developed and analyzed four alternatives in
the Draft EIS; specifically, the All Treatment Method Alternative; No
Fire Use Alternative; Minimal Land Disturbance Alternative; and No
Action Alternative.
The BLM has identified site-specific treatment projects that it
proposes to implement to restore and manage the 3 Bars Project area.
Treatment projects were identified through an iterative process
involving the BLM and other Federal, state and local agencies.
Treatments would focus on four priority vegetation management concerns:
Riparian--Treatments in riparian habitats would focus on
restoring riparian functionality in areas where structural integrity
(incised channel, headcuts, knickpoints, developments, and diversions)
and/or appropriate species composition are compromised.
Aspen--Treatments in quaking aspen habitats would focus on
improving the health of aspen stands by stimulating aspen regeneration.
Pinyon-juniper--Treatments in singleleaf pinyon pine and
Utah juniper habitats would focus on thinning pinyon-juniper
communities to promote woodland health and removing pinyon-juniper
where it encroaches into riparian areas and upland habitats, including
sagebrush habitat.
Sagebrush--Treatments in sagebrush habitats would focus on
restoring the sagebrush community by removing encroaching pinyon-
juniper, promoting the reestablishment of native forbs and grasses in
sagebrush communities, and promoting the development of sagebrush in
areas where it occurred historically.
In addition to the All Available Methods Alternative, three other
alternatives are analyzed in the Final EIS. The No Fire Use Alternative
would target the same treatment areas, but the methods of treatment
would not include prescribed fire or wildland fire for resource
benefit. The Minimal Land Disturbance Alternative targets the same
areas for treatment, but further limits the methods of treatment to
exclude fire use, mechanical treatments, and non-classical biological
controls. A No Action Alternative has also been included to provide a
baseline against which all other alternatives can be measured. Three
additional alternatives were considered, but eliminated from detailed
analysis.
The BLM has prepared the Final EIS in coordination with its three
Cooperating Agencies: the Nevada Department of Wildlife, Eureka County
Board of Commissioners, and the National Park Service--National Trails
Intermountain Region.
On September 27, 2013, a Notice of Availability of the Draft EIS
was published in the Federal Register (78 FR 59712), providing a 45-day
public comment period. One public comment meeting was held on November
7, 2013, in Eureka, Nevada. A second Notice was published in the
Federal Register (78 FR 67392) entitled ``New Dates for Close of Public
Comment and Protest Periods Due to Federal Government Shutdown
extending the comment period to November 29, 2013.'' No preferred
alternative for this Project was chosen in the Draft EIS.
More than 6,800 comments were received, of which 6,530 were form
letters containing identical or similar comments. The BLM identified 23
substantive issues as a result of the review process. Comments
primarily pertained to potential impacts to wild horses, preservation
of old growth woodlands, and protection of habitat for wildlife and
special status species, including Greater Sage-Grouse. Substantive
comments were considered by the BLM and changes to the Final EIS made
accordingly.
The Final EIS has identified the All Available Methods Alternative
as the preferred alternative, with treatments and treatment objectives
that meet previously identified resource management goals. These goals
are consistent with the 1986 Shoshone-Eureka Resource Management Plan,
as amended by the BLM Nevada and Northeastern California Greater Sage-
Grouse Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment and Record of
Decision, which currently guides land management activities within the
3 Bars Project area. These goals focus primarily on wildlife and
habitat enhancement, fire and fuels management, woodland and rangeland
values, wetland and riparian restoration, wild horse management, and
protection of traditional edible and medicinal plants and cultural
resources.
The 3 Bars ecosystem provides habitat for Greater Sage-Grouse, a
BLM special status species. The proposed 3 Bars Project is fully in
conformance with the September 2015 BLM Nevada and Northeastern
California Greater Sage-Grouse Approved Resource Management Plan
Amendment and Record of Decision (ARMPA).
To ensure that treatments benefit Greater Sage-Grouse, sagebrush
restoration treatments would adhere to ARMPA Required Design Features
(RDFs). These include avoiding treatments near Greater Sage-Grouse leks
and avoiding treatments in breeding, brood-rearing, and wintering
habitats during those times of the year when Greater Sage-Grouse are
using these habitats. The BLM will ensure proper livestock management
is in place prior to treatments when necessary in
[[Page 75145]]
order to meet project goals and objectives, which would benefit Greater
Sage-Grouse habitat.
Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10
Jon D. Sherve,
Field Manager, Mount Lewis Field Office.
[FR Doc. 2016-25978 Filed 10-27-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-HC-P