Addition of the Wind River Indian Reservation to the List of Courts of Indian Offenses, 74675-74677 [2016-26039]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 208 / Thursday, October 27, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
• Visiting the FAA’s Regulations and
Policies Web page at https://
www.faa.gov/regulations_policies or
• Accessing the Government Publishing
Office’s Web page at https://
www.fdsys.gov
Copies may also be obtained by
sending a request (identified by docket
or amendment number of the rule) to
the Federal Aviation Administration,
Office of Rulemaking, ARM–1, 800
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20591, or by calling
(202) 267–9677.
Except for classified material, all
documents the FAA considered in
developing this rule, including
economic analyses and technical
reports, may be accessed from the
Internet through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal referenced above.
B. Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 91
Air traffic control, Aircraft, Airmen,
Airports, Aviation safety, Freight,
Ukraine.
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends chapter I of title 14, Code of
Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 91—GENERAL OPERATING AND
FLIGHT RULES
1. The authority citation for part 91
continues to read as follows:
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 1155,
40101, 40103, 40105, 40113, 40120, 44101,
44111, 44701, 44704, 44709, 44711, 44712,
44715, 44716, 44717, 44722, 46306, 46315,
46316, 46504, 46506–46507, 47122, 47508,
47528–47531, 47534, articles 12 and 29 of the
Convention on International Civil Aviation
(61 Stat. 1180), (126 Stat. 11).
2. Amend § 91.1607 by revising
paragraph (e) to read as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:32 Oct 26, 2016
Jkt 241001
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Expiration. This SFAR will remain
in effect until October 27, 2018. The
FAA may amend, rescind, or extend this
SFAR as necessary.
Issued in Washington, DC, under the
authority of 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40101(d)(1),
40105(b)(1)(A), and 44701(a)(5), on October
21, 2016.
Victoria B. Wassmer,
Acting Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2016–25962 Filed 10–24–16; 4:20 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
25 CFR Part 11
The Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
(SBREFA) requires FAA to comply with
small entity requests for information or
advice about compliance with statutes
and regulations within its jurisdiction.
A small entity with questions regarding
this document may contact its local
FAA official, or the person listed under
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
heading at the beginning of the
preamble. To find out more about
SBREFA on the Internet, visit https://
www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/
rulemaking/sbre_act/.
■
§ 91.1607 Special Federal Aviation
Regulation No. 113—Prohibition Against
Certain Flights in the Simferopol (UKFV)
and Dnipropetrovsk (UKDV) Flight
Information Regions (FIRs).
74675
Regulatory Affairs & Collaborative
Action—Indian Affairs, (202) 273–4680;
elizabeth.appel@bia.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Summary of Rule
II. Procedural Requirements
A. Regulatory Planning and Review (E.O.
12866)
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
C. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
E. Takings (E.O. 12630)
F. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
G. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
H. Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O.
13175 and Departmental policy)
I. Paperwork Reduction Act
J. National Environmental Policy Act
K. Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O.
13211)
L. Clarity of This Regulation
M. Public Availability of Comments
N. Determination To Issue an Interim Final
Rule With Immediate Effective Date
[178A2100DD/AAKC001030/
A0A501010.999900 253G]
I. Summary of Rule
RIN 1076–AF33
Courts of Indian Offenses operate in
those areas of Indian country where
tribes retain jurisdiction over Indians
exclusive of State jurisdiction, but
where tribal courts have not been
established to fully exercise that
jurisdiction. The Eastern Shoshone
Tribe and the Northern Arapaho Tribe
have a joint interest in the Wind River
Indian Reservation, however the current
tribal court operating on the reservation,
the Shoshone & Arapaho Tribal Court, is
currently operating without the support
of both tribes, and with such limited
resources, that it may cease operations
without notice. To ensure the continued
administration of justice on the
Reservation, the BIA is taking steps to
ensure that judicial services will
continue to be provided if the Shoshone
& Arapaho Tribal Court ceases
operations. Therefore, this rule revises a
section of 25 CFR part 11 to add the
Wind River Indian Reservation in
Wyoming to the list of areas in Indian
Country with established Courts of
Indian Offenses (also known as CFR
Courts). This rule inserts the Wind River
Indian Reservation into a new paragraph
(d) in 25 CFR 11.100.
Adding this reservation will allow for
BIA to constitute a Court of Indian
Offenses that can provide for the
administration of justice until such time
as the Northern Arapaho and Eastern
Shoshone Tribes put into effect a court
system that meets regulatory
requirements and is capable of serving
the entire reservation.
Addition of the Wind River Indian
Reservation to the List of Courts of
Indian Offenses
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Interim final rule.
AGENCY:
This interim final rule
establishes a Court of Indian Offenses
(also known as CFR Court) for the Wind
River Indian Reservation until the
agency can promulgate a final rule that
considers comments received.
DATES: This interim final rule is
effective on October 27, 2016. Submit
comments by November 28, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Federal rulemaking portal
www.regulations.gov. The rule is listed
under the agency name ‘‘Bureau of
Indian Affairs.’’
• Mail, Hand Delivery, or Courier: Ms.
Elizabeth Appel, Office of Regulatory
Affairs & Collaborative Action, U.S.
Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street
NW., Mail Stop 3642, Washington, DC
20240.
• We cannot ensure that comments
received after the close of the comment
period (see DATES) will be included in
the docket for this rulemaking and
considered. Comments sent to an
address other than those listed above
will not be included in the docket for
this rulemaking.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Elizabeth Appel, Director, Office of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\27OCR1.SGM
27OCR1
74676
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 208 / Thursday, October 27, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
II. Procedural Requirements
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
(E.O. 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs in the Office of Management and
Budget will review all significant rules.
The Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has determined that
this rule is not significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the
principles of E.O. 12866 while calling
for improvements in the nation’s
regulatory system to promote
predictability, reduce uncertainty, and
use the best, most innovative, and least
burdensome tools for achieving
regulatory ends. The Executive order
also directs agencies to consider
regulatory approaches that reduce
burdens and maintain flexibility and
freedom of choice for the public where
these approaches are relevant, feasible,
and consistent with regulatory
objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes
further that regulations must be based
on the best available science and that
the rulemaking process must allow for
public participation and an open
exchange of ideas. We have developed
this rule in a manner consistent with
these requirements.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule will not have a significant
economic effect on a substantial number
of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
because the rule makes adjustments for
inflation.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
C. Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule:
(a) Does not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more;
(b) Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions;
(c) Does not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S. based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. The
rule does not have a significant or
unique effect on State, local, or tribal
governments or the private sector. A
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:32 Oct 26, 2016
Jkt 241001
statement containing the information
required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not
required.
E. Takings (E.O. 12630)
This rule does not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630. A takings implication
assessment is not required.
F. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of
Executive Order 13132, this rule does
not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation
of a federalism summary impact
statement. A federalism summary
impact statement is not required.
G. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
This rule complies with the
requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a)
requiring that all regulations be
reviewed to eliminate errors and
ambiguity and be written to minimize
litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2)
requiring that all regulations be written
in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
H. Consultation With Indian Tribes
(E.O. 13175 and Departmental policy)
The Department of the Interior strives
to strengthen its government-togovernment relationship with Indian
tribes through a commitment to
consultation with Indian tribes and
recognition of their right to selfgovernance and tribal sovereignty. We
have evaluated this rule under the
Department’s consultation policy under
the criteria in Executive Order 13175
and have consulted with the affected
tribes.
(a) Tribal Summary Impact Statement:
Prior to issuing this regulation the
Department of the Interior and its
Agencies, Bureaus, and Offices have
communicated with the Eastern
Shoshone Tribe and the Northern
Arapaho Tribe repeatedly since 2015
regarding public safety concerns for the
residents of the Wind River Indian
Reservation. Following the withdrawal
of the Northern Arapaho Tribe from the
Joint Business Committee, the Shoshone
and Arapaho Tribal Court has continued
to operate, although with limited
resources and without the express
support of both tribes. Although the
Department has continued to discuss
this situation with both tribes while
allowing the joint Shoshone and
Arapaho Tribal Court to use funds
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
previously contracted to it, those funds
expired on September 30, 2016, and the
tribes have not been able to agree on the
continued operation of the Shoshone
and Arapaho Tribal Court.
The Shoshone and Arapaho Tribal
Court is exercising some jurisdiction,
however, it has no dedicated funding,
no right to remain in its current physical
location, and may cease or suspend
operations at any time. To ensure there
is not a lapse in public safety, if the
Shoshone and Arapaho Tribal Court
ceases or suspends operations, it will be
necessary to establish a Court of Indian
Offenses until such time as the Eastern
Shoshone Tribe and the Northern
Arapaho Tribe can agree on the
operation and funding of a court system
which is capable of serving the entire
population of the Wind River Indian
Reservation. Furthermore the Eastern
Shoshone Business Committee has
requested the Department to establish
and operate a Court of Indian Offenses
for the Wind River Indian Reservation.
To effectuate the immediate
establishment and operation of the
Court of Indian Offenses on the Wind
River Reservation in the event that the
Shoshone & Arapaho Tribal Court
ceases or suspends operations, the Wind
River Indian Reservation is hereby
added to the list of jurisdictions served
by the Courts of Indian Offenses.
I. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain
information collection requirements,
and a submission to the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.) is not required. We may
not conduct or sponsor, and you are not
required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
J. National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not constitute a major
Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment. A
detailed statement under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) is not required because the rule
is covered by a categorical exclusion.
This rule is excluded from the
requirement to prepare a detailed
statement because it is a regulation of an
administrative nature (for further
information, see 43 CFR 46.210(i)). We
have also determined that the rule does
not involve any of the extraordinary
circumstances listed in 43 CFR 46.215
that would require further analysis
under NEPA.
E:\FR\FM\27OCR1.SGM
27OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 208 / Thursday, October 27, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
K. Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O.
13211)
This rule is not a significant energy
action under the definition in Executive
Order 13211. A Statement of Energy
Effects is not required.
L. Clarity of This Regulation
We are required by Executive Orders
12866 (section 1(b)(12)), and 12988
(section 3(b)(1)(B)), and 13563 (section
1(a)), and by the Presidential
Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write
all rules in plain language. This means
that each rule we publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address
readers directly;
(c) Use common, everyday words and
clear language rather than jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and
sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever
possible.
If you feel that we have not met these
requirements, send us comments by one
of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES
section. To better help us revise the
rule, your comments should be as
specific as possible. For example, you
should tell us the numbers of the
sections or paragraphs that you find
unclear, which sections or sentences are
too long, the sections where you think
lists or tables would be useful, etc.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
M. Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
N. Determination To Issue an Interim
Final Rule With Immediate Effective
Date
We are publishing this interim final
rule with a request for comment without
prior notice and comment, as allowed
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b). Under section
553(b) we find that there is good cause
to effectuate this rule without prior
notice, and comments are unnecessary
and would be contrary to the public
interest. This rule is necessary to ensure
that a court is immediately available to
administer justice on land within the
Wind River Indian Reservation. If the
Tribal Court were to cease or suspend
operations, this would affect, among
others, child and adult protection, and
supervised Individual Indian Money
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:32 Oct 26, 2016
Jkt 241001
account clients (vulnerable individuals).
Accordingly, a gap in the provision of
judicial services on the Reservation
would harm the tribes and their
members.
As allowed under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3),
the effective date of this rule is the date
of publication in the Federal Register.
Good cause for an immediate effective
date exists because the delay in
publishing this rule would inhibit
access to justice for tribal members and
likely obstruct speedy trial rights for
members of those tribes coming under
the jurisdiction of the CFR court. We are
requesting comments on this interim
final rule. We will review any
comments received and, by a future
publication in the Federal Register,
address any comments received.
List of Subjects in 25 CFR Part 11
Courts, Indians—law.
For the reason stated in the preamble
the Department of the interior, Bureau
of Indian Affairs amends part 11 in title
25 of the Code of Federal Regulations as
follows:
PART 11—COURTS OF INDIAN
OFFENSES AND LAW AND ORDER
CODE
1. The authority for part 11 continues
to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; R.S. 463, 25
U.S.C. 2; R.S. 465, 25 U.S.C. 9; 42 Stat. 208,
25 U.S.C. 13; 38 Stat. 586, 25 U.S.C. 200.
Subpart A—Application; Jurisdiction
74677
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB–2016–0003; T.D. TTB–144;
Ref: Notice No. 158]
RIN 1513–AC25
Establishment of the Appalachian High
Country Viticultural Area
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
AGENCY:
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
and Trade Bureau (TTB) establishes the
approximately 2,400-square mile
‘‘Appalachian High Country’’
viticultural area in all or portions of the
following counties: Alleghany, Ashe,
Avery, Mitchell, and Watauga Counties
in North Carolina; Carter and Johnson
Counties in Tennessee; and Grayson
County in Virginia. The viticultural area
is not located within any other
viticultural area. TTB designates
viticultural areas to allow vintners to
better describe the origin of their wines
and to allow consumers to better
identify wines they may purchase.
DATES: This final rule is effective
November 28, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen A. Thornton, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street
NW., Box 12, Washington, DC 20005;
phone 202–453–1039, ext. 175.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
2. In § 11.100, add paragraph (d) to
read as follows:
Background on Viticultural Areas
§ 11.100 Where are Courts of Indian
Offenses established?
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol
Administration Act (FAA Act), 27
U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary
of the Treasury to prescribe regulations
for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits,
and malt beverages. The FAA Act
provides that these regulations should,
among other things, prohibit consumer
deception and the use of misleading
statements on labels and ensure that
labels provide the consumer with
adequate information as to the identity
and quality of the product. The Alcohol
and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
(TTB) administers the FAA Act
pursuant to section 1111(d) of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002,
codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The
Secretary has delegated various
authorities through Treasury
Department Order 120–01, dated
December 10, 2013 (superseding
■
*
*
*
*
*
(d) This part applies to the Indian
country (as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151
and by Federal precedent) within the
exterior boundaries of the Wind River
Reservation in Wyoming.
Dated: October 17, 2016.
Lawrence S. Roberts,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian
Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2016–26039 Filed 10–26–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337–15–P
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
TTB Authority
E:\FR\FM\27OCR1.SGM
27OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 208 (Thursday, October 27, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 74675-74677]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-26039]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
25 CFR Part 11
[178A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900 253G]
RIN 1076-AF33
Addition of the Wind River Indian Reservation to the List of
Courts of Indian Offenses
AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.
ACTION: Interim final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This interim final rule establishes a Court of Indian Offenses
(also known as CFR Court) for the Wind River Indian Reservation until
the agency can promulgate a final rule that considers comments
received.
DATES: This interim final rule is effective on October 27, 2016. Submit
comments by November 28, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
Federal rulemaking portal www.regulations.gov. The rule is
listed under the agency name ``Bureau of Indian Affairs.''
Mail, Hand Delivery, or Courier: Ms. Elizabeth Appel,
Office of Regulatory Affairs & Collaborative Action, U.S. Department of
the Interior, 1849 C Street NW., Mail Stop 3642, Washington, DC 20240.
We cannot ensure that comments received after the close of
the comment period (see DATES) will be included in the docket for this
rulemaking and considered. Comments sent to an address other than those
listed above will not be included in the docket for this rulemaking.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Elizabeth Appel, Director, Office
of Regulatory Affairs & Collaborative Action--Indian Affairs, (202)
273-4680; elizabeth.appel@bia.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Summary of Rule
II. Procedural Requirements
A. Regulatory Planning and Review (E.O. 12866)
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
C. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
E. Takings (E.O. 12630)
F. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
G. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
H. Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O. 13175 and Departmental
policy)
I. Paperwork Reduction Act
J. National Environmental Policy Act
K. Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O. 13211)
L. Clarity of This Regulation
M. Public Availability of Comments
N. Determination To Issue an Interim Final Rule With Immediate
Effective Date
I. Summary of Rule
Courts of Indian Offenses operate in those areas of Indian country
where tribes retain jurisdiction over Indians exclusive of State
jurisdiction, but where tribal courts have not been established to
fully exercise that jurisdiction. The Eastern Shoshone Tribe and the
Northern Arapaho Tribe have a joint interest in the Wind River Indian
Reservation, however the current tribal court operating on the
reservation, the Shoshone & Arapaho Tribal Court, is currently
operating without the support of both tribes, and with such limited
resources, that it may cease operations without notice. To ensure the
continued administration of justice on the Reservation, the BIA is
taking steps to ensure that judicial services will continue to be
provided if the Shoshone & Arapaho Tribal Court ceases operations.
Therefore, this rule revises a section of 25 CFR part 11 to add the
Wind River Indian Reservation in Wyoming to the list of areas in Indian
Country with established Courts of Indian Offenses (also known as CFR
Courts). This rule inserts the Wind River Indian Reservation into a new
paragraph (d) in 25 CFR 11.100.
Adding this reservation will allow for BIA to constitute a Court of
Indian Offenses that can provide for the administration of justice
until such time as the Northern Arapaho and Eastern Shoshone Tribes put
into effect a court system that meets regulatory requirements and is
capable of serving the entire reservation.
[[Page 74676]]
II. Procedural Requirements
A. Regulatory Planning and Review (E.O. 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs in the Office of Management and Budget will review
all significant rules. The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has determined that this rule is not significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the principles of E.O. 12866 while
calling for improvements in the nation's regulatory system to promote
predictability, reduce uncertainty, and use the best, most innovative,
and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory ends. The Executive
order also directs agencies to consider regulatory approaches that
reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of choice for the
public where these approaches are relevant, feasible, and consistent
with regulatory objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes further that
regulations must be based on the best available science and that the
rulemaking process must allow for public participation and an open
exchange of ideas. We have developed this rule in a manner consistent
with these requirements.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule will not have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) because the rule makes adjustments for
inflation.
C. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule:
(a) Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
or more;
(b) Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions;
(c) Does not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S. based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per
year. The rule does not have a significant or unique effect on State,
local, or tribal governments or the private sector. A statement
containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
E. Takings (E.O. 12630)
This rule does not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630. A takings
implication assessment is not required.
F. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of Executive Order 13132, this rule
does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. A federalism
summary impact statement is not required.
G. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
This rule complies with the requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all
regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and be
written to minimize litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all
regulations be written in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
H. Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O. 13175 and Departmental policy)
The Department of the Interior strives to strengthen its
government-to-government relationship with Indian tribes through a
commitment to consultation with Indian tribes and recognition of their
right to self-governance and tribal sovereignty. We have evaluated this
rule under the Department's consultation policy under the criteria in
Executive Order 13175 and have consulted with the affected tribes.
(a) Tribal Summary Impact Statement: Prior to issuing this
regulation the Department of the Interior and its Agencies, Bureaus,
and Offices have communicated with the Eastern Shoshone Tribe and the
Northern Arapaho Tribe repeatedly since 2015 regarding public safety
concerns for the residents of the Wind River Indian Reservation.
Following the withdrawal of the Northern Arapaho Tribe from the Joint
Business Committee, the Shoshone and Arapaho Tribal Court has continued
to operate, although with limited resources and without the express
support of both tribes. Although the Department has continued to
discuss this situation with both tribes while allowing the joint
Shoshone and Arapaho Tribal Court to use funds previously contracted to
it, those funds expired on September 30, 2016, and the tribes have not
been able to agree on the continued operation of the Shoshone and
Arapaho Tribal Court.
The Shoshone and Arapaho Tribal Court is exercising some
jurisdiction, however, it has no dedicated funding, no right to remain
in its current physical location, and may cease or suspend operations
at any time. To ensure there is not a lapse in public safety, if the
Shoshone and Arapaho Tribal Court ceases or suspends operations, it
will be necessary to establish a Court of Indian Offenses until such
time as the Eastern Shoshone Tribe and the Northern Arapaho Tribe can
agree on the operation and funding of a court system which is capable
of serving the entire population of the Wind River Indian Reservation.
Furthermore the Eastern Shoshone Business Committee has requested the
Department to establish and operate a Court of Indian Offenses for the
Wind River Indian Reservation.
To effectuate the immediate establishment and operation of the
Court of Indian Offenses on the Wind River Reservation in the event
that the Shoshone & Arapaho Tribal Court ceases or suspends operations,
the Wind River Indian Reservation is hereby added to the list of
jurisdictions served by the Courts of Indian Offenses.
I. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain information collection requirements, and
a submission to the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) is not required. We may not
conduct or sponsor, and you are not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
J. National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not constitute a major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human environment. A detailed statement
under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) is not
required because the rule is covered by a categorical exclusion. This
rule is excluded from the requirement to prepare a detailed statement
because it is a regulation of an administrative nature (for further
information, see 43 CFR 46.210(i)). We have also determined that the
rule does not involve any of the extraordinary circumstances listed in
43 CFR 46.215 that would require further analysis under NEPA.
[[Page 74677]]
K. Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O. 13211)
This rule is not a significant energy action under the definition
in Executive Order 13211. A Statement of Energy Effects is not
required.
L. Clarity of This Regulation
We are required by Executive Orders 12866 (section 1(b)(12)), and
12988 (section 3(b)(1)(B)), and 13563 (section 1(a)), and by the
Presidential Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain
language. This means that each rule we publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address readers directly;
(c) Use common, everyday words and clear language rather than
jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever possible.
If you feel that we have not met these requirements, send us
comments by one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. To
better help us revise the rule, your comments should be as specific as
possible. For example, you should tell us the numbers of the sections
or paragraphs that you find unclear, which sections or sentences are
too long, the sections where you think lists or tables would be useful,
etc.
M. Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
N. Determination To Issue an Interim Final Rule With Immediate
Effective Date
We are publishing this interim final rule with a request for
comment without prior notice and comment, as allowed under 5 U.S.C.
553(b). Under section 553(b) we find that there is good cause to
effectuate this rule without prior notice, and comments are unnecessary
and would be contrary to the public interest. This rule is necessary to
ensure that a court is immediately available to administer justice on
land within the Wind River Indian Reservation. If the Tribal Court were
to cease or suspend operations, this would affect, among others, child
and adult protection, and supervised Individual Indian Money account
clients (vulnerable individuals). Accordingly, a gap in the provision
of judicial services on the Reservation would harm the tribes and their
members.
As allowed under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the effective date of this
rule is the date of publication in the Federal Register. Good cause for
an immediate effective date exists because the delay in publishing this
rule would inhibit access to justice for tribal members and likely
obstruct speedy trial rights for members of those tribes coming under
the jurisdiction of the CFR court. We are requesting comments on this
interim final rule. We will review any comments received and, by a
future publication in the Federal Register, address any comments
received.
List of Subjects in 25 CFR Part 11
Courts, Indians--law.
For the reason stated in the preamble the Department of the
interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs amends part 11 in title 25 of the
Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 11--COURTS OF INDIAN OFFENSES AND LAW AND ORDER CODE
0
1. The authority for part 11 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; R.S. 463, 25 U.S.C. 2; R.S. 465, 25
U.S.C. 9; 42 Stat. 208, 25 U.S.C. 13; 38 Stat. 586, 25 U.S.C. 200.
Subpart A--Application; Jurisdiction
0
2. In Sec. 11.100, add paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 11.100 Where are Courts of Indian Offenses established?
* * * * *
(d) This part applies to the Indian country (as defined in 18
U.S.C. 1151 and by Federal precedent) within the exterior boundaries of
the Wind River Reservation in Wyoming.
Dated: October 17, 2016.
Lawrence S. Roberts,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2016-26039 Filed 10-26-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337-15-P