Draft Fire Island Wilderness Breach Management Plan/Environmental Impact Statement, Fire Island National Seashore, New York, 74810-74811 [2016-26009]
Download as PDF
74810
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 208 / Thursday, October 27, 2016 / Notices
§ 11.100 until either BIA and the Tribe
enter into a contract or compact for the
Tribe to provide judicial services, or
until the Tribe has put into effect a lawand-order code that meets certain
requirements.
Section 11.201(a) provides that the
Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs
appoints a magistrate subject to
confirmation by a majority vote of the
Tribal governing bodies.
The waiver will allow BIA to establish
a CFR court when necessary and to
allow the Assistant Secretary—Indian
Affairs to appoint a magistrate without
the need for confirmation by the Tribal
governing body.
Dated: October 17, 2016.
Lawrence S. Roberts,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Indian
Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2016–26041 Filed 10–26–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS–NER–FIIS–DTS–21798;
PX.P0201786a.00.1]
Draft Fire Island Wilderness Breach
Management Plan/Environmental
Impact Statement, Fire Island National
Seashore, New York
National Park Service,
Department of the Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
The National Park Service
(NPS) announces the availability of the
Draft Fire Island Wilderness Breach
Management Plan and Environmental
Impact Statement (Draft Breach Plan/
EIS) for Fire Island National Seashore,
New York. The Draft Breach Plan/EIS
presents and analyzes the potential
consequences of three alternatives that
will guide the management of the
breach that occurred in the Otis Pike
Fire Island High Dune Wilderness
during Hurricane Sandy in October,
2012.
SUMMARY:
The comment period will end on
December 12, 2016. A public meeting
will be held on November 7, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the Draft Breach
Plan/EIS will be available online for
public review at https://
parkplanning.nps.gov/
FireIslandBreachManagementPlan. A
limited number of hard copies will be
available upon request. The public
meeting will be held at the PatchogueWatch Hill Ferry Terminal at 150 West
Ave. in Patchogue, New York.
Comments can be submitted
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:43 Oct 26, 2016
Jkt 241001
electronically at https://
parkplanning.nps.gov/
FireIslandBreachManagementPlan.
Comments in hard copy (e.g., in a letter)
can be sent by U.S. Postal Service or
other mail delivery service or handdelivered to: Chris Soller,
Superintendent, Fire Island National
Seashore, 120 Laurel Street Patchogue,
NY 11772. Written comments will also
be accepted at the public meeting.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kaetlyn Jackson, Fire Island National
Seashore, 120 Laurel Street Patchogue,
NY, 11772, 631–687–4770.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
October 29, 2012, Hurricane Sandy
created three breaches in the barrier
island system off the south shore of
Long Island, New York, including one
within the Otis Pike Fire Island High
Dune Wilderness Area (Fire Island
Wilderness) which is within the
boundaries of Fire Island National
Seashore (Seashore).
The existing Breach Contingency
Plan, developed by the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers in 1996, is the only
guidance currently in effect to address
breaches along coastal Long Island from
Fire Island Inlet east to Montauk Point.
Action is needed at this time because
the Breach Contingency Plan is outdated
and does not adequately address
management of breaches in the Fire
Island Wilderness.
Managing a breach in designated
wilderness is different from managing
breaches outside wilderness areas, as
the NPS must manage federal
wilderness to preserve wilderness
character. Management of the Fire
Island Wilderness must comply with the
Wilderness Act of 1964; the 1980 Otis
Pike Fire Island High Dune Wilderness
Act (Pub. L. 96–585); and the 1983
Wilderness Management Plan, Fire
Island National Seashore, which
governs NPS actions taken in the Fire
Island Wilderness. However, while the
wilderness breach must be managed to
protect wilderness character, the Otis
Pike Fire Island High Dune Wilderness
Act does not preclude closure of a
wilderness breach if closure were
needed ‘‘to prevent loss of life, flooding,
and other severe economic and physical
damage to the Great South Bay and
surrounding areas.’’ Therefore, pursuant
to the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), the
NPS prepared this Draft Fire Island
Wilderness Breach Management Plan
and Environmental Impact Statement
(Draft Breach Plan/EIS) to develop a
management strategy for the breach in
the Fire Island Wilderness. The Draft
Breach Plan/EIS has several goals:
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Ensuring the continued integrity of
the wilderness character;
• protecting the natural and cultural
features of the Seashore and its
surrounding ecosystems;
• protecting human life; and
• managing the risk of economic and
physical damage to the surrounding
areas.
Scoping and early engagement with
other agencies, tribes, stakeholders, and
the public began in late 2014 and
continued through 2015. Formal public
scoping was initiated with the
publication of a Notice of Intent to
Prepare an EIS in the Federal Register
(80 FR 53886, Sept. 8, 2015). Early in
the scoping period, the US Army Corps
of Engineers, New York district and the
State of New York, Department of
Environmental Conservation agreed to
be cooperating agencies in development
of the Breach Plan/EIS.
The Draft Breach Plan/EIS evaluates
two action alternatives and the noaction alternative.
Alternative 1—Mechanical closure of
the wilderness breach as soon as
possible.
Alternative 2 (no action)—The
evolution, growth, and/or closure of the
wilderness breach would be determined
by natural barrier island processes and
no human intervention would occur to
close the breach or to reopen the breach
if it were to close by natural processes.
Alternative 3 (proposed action and
NPS preferred alternative)—The
evolution, growth, and/or closure of the
breach would be determined by natural
barrier island processes, and human
intervention to close the breach would
occur only ‘‘to prevent loss of life,
flooding, and other severe economic and
physical damage to the Great South Bay
and surrounding areas.’’ The NPS would
develop criteria that indicate the breach
poses a threat to life and/or property. As
long as monitoring data show that the
established criteria have not been
exceeded, the NPS would allow the
breach to be shaped entirely by natural
processes with no human intervention.
The breach may remain open or it may
close naturally. If monitoring data
indicate that the established criteria
have been exceeded, the breach would
be mechanically closed as soon as
practicable.
Alternative 3 is identified as the NPS
preferred alternative because it allows
the breach to be managed according to
NPS resource management policies and
wilderness directives while allowing
closure if necessary to prevent ‘‘loss of
life, flooding, and other severe
economic and physical damage to the
Great South Bay and surrounding
areas.’’
E:\FR\FM\27OCN1.SGM
27OCN1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 208 / Thursday, October 27, 2016 / Notices
The Draft Breach Plan/EIS analyzes
the impacts of these three alternatives
on the human environment by
examining five key issues:
(1) The wilderness breach is
geologically bound by erosion-resistant
clay in the geological record to the east
and west of the breach; however, there
is uncertainty regarding how the breach
will evolve in the future (narrow or
widen from existing conditions), how
far it might migrate along the coast, and
how it affects sediment transport.
(2) There is concern that the presence
of the wilderness breach increases the
potential for flooding on the mainland
of Long Island during storm events,
increasing the potential risk to life and
property.
(3) The wilderness breach has altered
the physical characteristics of the Fire
Island Wilderness and Great South Bay,
which has led to changes in the
ecological communities.
(4) The wilderness breach resulted in
the creation of a marine wilderness area
that did not previously exist. The
mechanical closure of the breach would
alter the existing wilderness qualities of
the area.
(5) Driving access has changed since
formation of the wilderness breach.
There is concern that changes in driving
access for emergency response could
increase risks to public health and
safety in several Fire Island
communities.
To examine these issues, the
environmental analysis focuses on the
following resources:
• Wilderness character;
• sediment transport and
geomorphology;
• water quality;
• ecosystem structure and processes;
• benthic communities;
• finfish and decapod crustaceans;
• socioeconomics; and
• public health and safety.
The NPS encourages commenting
electronically through the NPS
Planning, Environment, and Public
Comment Web site. If you wish to
comment electronically, you may
submit your comments online at https://
parkplanning.nps.gov/
FireIslandBreachManagementPlan.
If you wish to submit your comments
in hard copy (e.g., in a letter), you may
send them by U.S. Postal Service or
other mail delivery service or handdeliver them to: Chris Soller,
Superintendent, Fire Island National
Seashore, 120 Laurel Street Patchogue,
NY 11772.
A public meeting will be held on
November 7th from 7:00 to 8:30 p.m. at
the Patchogue-Watch Hill Ferry
Terminal at 150 West Ave. in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:43 Oct 26, 2016
Jkt 241001
Patchogue, New York. The public
meeting will provide an opportunity to
learn more about the plan and to ask
questions about the plan. Written
comments will be accepted during the
public meeting.
Comments will not be accepted by
fax, email, or in any form other than
those specified above. All comments
received on the Draft Breach Plan/EIS
will be reviewed and considered. An
analysis of substantive comments with
NPS responses will be provided in a
comment analysis report that will be
included in the Final Breach Plan/EIS.
A comment is considered to be
substantive if it raises, debates, or
questions a point of fact or policy
discussed in the Draft Breach Plan/EIS.
Comments that merely state support for
or opposition to the proposed action,
alternatives, or NPS policy, without
providing supporting information, will
not be considered substantive. Although
all comments will be read and
considered in shaping the Final Breach
Plan/EIS, only those that are determined
to be substantive will be explicitly
addressed by the NPS response.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: August 22, 2016.
Jonathan Meade,
Deputy Regional Director, National Park
Service, Northeast Region.
[FR Doc. 2016–26009 Filed 10–26–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–52–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS–MWR–HOCU–21607;
PS.SHOCU0001.01.1]
74811
federal parcel within the park. The
federal parcel will be conveyed subject
to restrictions to ensure continued
compatible use of the property within
the park. Both parcels are located in
Ross County, Ohio.
DATES: The effective date of this
boundary adjustment is October 27,
2016.
The map depicting this
boundary adjustment is available for
inspection at the following locations:
National Park Service, Land Resources
Program Center, Midwest Region, 601
Riverfront Drive, Omaha, NE 68102 and
National Park Service, Department of
the Interior, 1849 C Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20240.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Superintendent Dean Alexander,
Hopewell Culture National Historical
Park, 16062 State Route 104,
Chillicothe, OH 45601–8694, telephone
(740) 774–1126.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that, pursuant to 16 U.S.C.
410uu–1(c), the boundary of Hopewell
Culture National Historical Park is
adjusted to include an additional 4.03
acres. This boundary adjustment is
depicted on Map No. 353/132767 dated
May 2016.
16 U.S.C. 410uu–1(c) states that the
Secretary of the Interior may, by
publication of notice in the Federal
Register after receipt of public
comment, make minor adjustments to
the boundary of Hopewell Culture
National Historical Park, provided that
such adjustments cumulatively do not
exceed a limit presently calculated to be
165.16 acres. To date, 114.58 acres have
been added to the park under such
authority; an additional 50.58 acres
remain authorized for inclusion in the
park. This boundary adjustment will
include an additional 4.03 acres needed
for trail development.
ADDRESSES:
Dated: September 2, 2016.
Cameron H. Sholly,
Regional Director, Midwest Region.
[FR Doc. 2016–26013 Filed 10–26–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–52–P
Boundary Adjustment at Hopewell
Culture National Historical Park
National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notification of boundary
adjustment.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
AGENCY:
The boundary of Hopewell
Culture National Historical Park is
adjusted to include an adjacent
nonfederal parcel of land containing
4.03 acres. Upon completion of this
adjustment, fee simple interest in the
land will be acquired by exchange for a
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
National Park Service
[NPS–WASO–NAGPRA–22121;
PPWOCRADN0–PCU00RP14.R50000]
Notice of Inventory Completion: San
Diego Museum of Man, San Diego, CA
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
E:\FR\FM\27OCN1.SGM
27OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 208 (Thursday, October 27, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74810-74811]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-26009]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS-NER-FIIS-DTS-21798; PX.P0201786a.00.1]
Draft Fire Island Wilderness Breach Management Plan/Environmental
Impact Statement, Fire Island National Seashore, New York
AGENCY: National Park Service, Department of the Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Park Service (NPS) announces the availability of
the Draft Fire Island Wilderness Breach Management Plan and
Environmental Impact Statement (Draft Breach Plan/EIS) for Fire Island
National Seashore, New York. The Draft Breach Plan/EIS presents and
analyzes the potential consequences of three alternatives that will
guide the management of the breach that occurred in the Otis Pike Fire
Island High Dune Wilderness during Hurricane Sandy in October, 2012.
DATES: The comment period will end on December 12, 2016. A public
meeting will be held on November 7, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the Draft Breach Plan/EIS will be available online
for public review at https://parkplanning.nps.gov/FireIslandBreachManagementPlan. A limited number of hard copies will be
available upon request. The public meeting will be held at the
Patchogue-Watch Hill Ferry Terminal at 150 West Ave. in Patchogue, New
York. Comments can be submitted electronically at https://parkplanning.nps.gov/FireIslandBreachManagementPlan. Comments in hard
copy (e.g., in a letter) can be sent by U.S. Postal Service or other
mail delivery service or hand-delivered to: Chris Soller,
Superintendent, Fire Island National Seashore, 120 Laurel Street
Patchogue, NY 11772. Written comments will also be accepted at the
public meeting.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kaetlyn Jackson, Fire Island National
Seashore, 120 Laurel Street Patchogue, NY, 11772, 631-687-4770.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 29, 2012, Hurricane Sandy created
three breaches in the barrier island system off the south shore of Long
Island, New York, including one within the Otis Pike Fire Island High
Dune Wilderness Area (Fire Island Wilderness) which is within the
boundaries of Fire Island National Seashore (Seashore).
The existing Breach Contingency Plan, developed by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers in 1996, is the only guidance currently in effect to
address breaches along coastal Long Island from Fire Island Inlet east
to Montauk Point. Action is needed at this time because the Breach
Contingency Plan is outdated and does not adequately address management
of breaches in the Fire Island Wilderness.
Managing a breach in designated wilderness is different from
managing breaches outside wilderness areas, as the NPS must manage
federal wilderness to preserve wilderness character. Management of the
Fire Island Wilderness must comply with the Wilderness Act of 1964; the
1980 Otis Pike Fire Island High Dune Wilderness Act (Pub. L. 96-585);
and the 1983 Wilderness Management Plan, Fire Island National Seashore,
which governs NPS actions taken in the Fire Island Wilderness. However,
while the wilderness breach must be managed to protect wilderness
character, the Otis Pike Fire Island High Dune Wilderness Act does not
preclude closure of a wilderness breach if closure were needed ``to
prevent loss of life, flooding, and other severe economic and physical
damage to the Great South Bay and surrounding areas.'' Therefore,
pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.), the NPS prepared this Draft Fire Island Wilderness
Breach Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement (Draft Breach
Plan/EIS) to develop a management strategy for the breach in the Fire
Island Wilderness. The Draft Breach Plan/EIS has several goals:
Ensuring the continued integrity of the wilderness
character;
protecting the natural and cultural features of the
Seashore and its surrounding ecosystems;
protecting human life; and
managing the risk of economic and physical damage to the
surrounding areas.
Scoping and early engagement with other agencies, tribes,
stakeholders, and the public began in late 2014 and continued through
2015. Formal public scoping was initiated with the publication of a
Notice of Intent to Prepare an EIS in the Federal Register (80 FR
53886, Sept. 8, 2015). Early in the scoping period, the US Army Corps
of Engineers, New York district and the State of New York, Department
of Environmental Conservation agreed to be cooperating agencies in
development of the Breach Plan/EIS.
The Draft Breach Plan/EIS evaluates two action alternatives and the
no-action alternative.
Alternative 1--Mechanical closure of the wilderness breach as soon
as possible.
Alternative 2 (no action)--The evolution, growth, and/or closure of
the wilderness breach would be determined by natural barrier island
processes and no human intervention would occur to close the breach or
to reopen the breach if it were to close by natural processes.
Alternative 3 (proposed action and NPS preferred alternative)--The
evolution, growth, and/or closure of the breach would be determined by
natural barrier island processes, and human intervention to close the
breach would occur only ``to prevent loss of life, flooding, and other
severe economic and physical damage to the Great South Bay and
surrounding areas.'' The NPS would develop criteria that indicate the
breach poses a threat to life and/or property. As long as monitoring
data show that the established criteria have not been exceeded, the NPS
would allow the breach to be shaped entirely by natural processes with
no human intervention. The breach may remain open or it may close
naturally. If monitoring data indicate that the established criteria
have been exceeded, the breach would be mechanically closed as soon as
practicable.
Alternative 3 is identified as the NPS preferred alternative
because it allows the breach to be managed according to NPS resource
management policies and wilderness directives while allowing closure if
necessary to prevent ``loss of life, flooding, and other severe
economic and physical damage to the Great South Bay and surrounding
areas.''
[[Page 74811]]
The Draft Breach Plan/EIS analyzes the impacts of these three
alternatives on the human environment by examining five key issues:
(1) The wilderness breach is geologically bound by erosion-
resistant clay in the geological record to the east and west of the
breach; however, there is uncertainty regarding how the breach will
evolve in the future (narrow or widen from existing conditions), how
far it might migrate along the coast, and how it affects sediment
transport.
(2) There is concern that the presence of the wilderness breach
increases the potential for flooding on the mainland of Long Island
during storm events, increasing the potential risk to life and
property.
(3) The wilderness breach has altered the physical characteristics
of the Fire Island Wilderness and Great South Bay, which has led to
changes in the ecological communities.
(4) The wilderness breach resulted in the creation of a marine
wilderness area that did not previously exist. The mechanical closure
of the breach would alter the existing wilderness qualities of the
area.
(5) Driving access has changed since formation of the wilderness
breach. There is concern that changes in driving access for emergency
response could increase risks to public health and safety in several
Fire Island communities.
To examine these issues, the environmental analysis focuses on the
following resources:
Wilderness character;
sediment transport and geomorphology;
water quality;
ecosystem structure and processes;
benthic communities;
finfish and decapod crustaceans;
socioeconomics; and
public health and safety.
The NPS encourages commenting electronically through the NPS
Planning, Environment, and Public Comment Web site. If you wish to
comment electronically, you may submit your comments online at https://parkplanning.nps.gov/FireIslandBreachManagementPlan.
If you wish to submit your comments in hard copy (e.g., in a
letter), you may send them by U.S. Postal Service or other mail
delivery service or hand-deliver them to: Chris Soller, Superintendent,
Fire Island National Seashore, 120 Laurel Street Patchogue, NY 11772.
A public meeting will be held on November 7th from 7:00 to 8:30
p.m. at the Patchogue-Watch Hill Ferry Terminal at 150 West Ave. in
Patchogue, New York. The public meeting will provide an opportunity to
learn more about the plan and to ask questions about the plan. Written
comments will be accepted during the public meeting.
Comments will not be accepted by fax, email, or in any form other
than those specified above. All comments received on the Draft Breach
Plan/EIS will be reviewed and considered. An analysis of substantive
comments with NPS responses will be provided in a comment analysis
report that will be included in the Final Breach Plan/EIS. A comment is
considered to be substantive if it raises, debates, or questions a
point of fact or policy discussed in the Draft Breach Plan/EIS.
Comments that merely state support for or opposition to the proposed
action, alternatives, or NPS policy, without providing supporting
information, will not be considered substantive. Although all comments
will be read and considered in shaping the Final Breach Plan/EIS, only
those that are determined to be substantive will be explicitly
addressed by the NPS response.
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Dated: August 22, 2016.
Jonathan Meade,
Deputy Regional Director, National Park Service, Northeast Region.
[FR Doc. 2016-26009 Filed 10-26-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-52-P