Standard ST.26-Request for Comments on the Recommended Standard for the Presentation of Nucleotide and Amino Acid Sequence Listings Using XML (eXtensible Markup Language), 74775-74777 [2016-25968]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 208 / Thursday, October 27, 2016 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request; Patent Term
Extension
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USTPO) will submit
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for clearance the following
proposal for collection of information
under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Agency: United States Patent and
Trademark Office, Commerce.
Title: Patent Term Extension.
OMB Control Number: 0651–0020.
Form Number(s): N/A.
Type of Request: Renewal.
Number of Respondents: 1,340.
Average Hours per Response: 1 hour
to 25 hours, depending upon the
instrument used.
Burden Hours: 6,187 hours.
Cost Burden: $351,505.08.
Needs and Uses: The patent term
restoration portion of the Drug Price
Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98–
417), which is codified at 35 U.S.C. 156,
permits the United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO) to extend
the term of protection under a patent to
compensate for delay during regulatory
review and approval by the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) or
Department of Agriculture. Only patents
for drug products, medical devices, food
additives, or color additives are
potentially eligible for extension. The
maximum length that a patent may be
extended under 35 U.S.C. 156 is five
years. The USPTO administers 35 U.S.C.
156 through 37 CFR 1.710–1.791.
Separate from the extension provisions
of 35 U.S.C. 156, the USPTO may in
some cases extend the term of an
original patent due to certain delays in
the prosecution of the patent
application, including delays caused by
interference proceedings, secrecy
orders, or appellate review by the Patent
Trial and Appeal Board or a Federal
court in which the patent is issued
pursuant to a decision reversing an
adverse determination of patentability.
The patent term provisions of 35 U.S.C.
154(b), as amended by Title IV, Subtitle
D of the Intellectual Property and
Communications Omnibus Reform Act
of 1999, require the USPTO to notify the
applicant of the patent term adjustment
in the notice of allowance and give the
applicant an opportunity to request
reconsideration of the USPTO’s patent
term adjustment determination. The
USPTO administers 35 U.S.C. 154
through 37 CFR 1.701–1.705.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:43 Oct 26, 2016
Jkt 241001
The public uses this information
collection to file requests related to
patent term extensions and
reconsideration or reinstatement of
patent term adjustments. The
information in this collection is used by
the USPTO to consider whether an
applicant is eligible for a patent term
extension or reconsideration of a patent
term adjustment and, if so, to determine
the length of the patent term extension
or adjustment.
Affected Public: Businesses or other
for-profits; not-for-profit institutions.
Frequency: On occasion.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
obtain or retain benefits.
OMB Desk Officer: Kimberly R.
Keravuori, email: Kimberly_R_
Keravuori@omb.eop.gov.
Once submitted, the request will be
publicly available in electronic format
through reginfo.gov. Follow the
instructions to view Department of
Commerce collections currently under
review by OMB.
Further information can be obtained
by:
• Email: InformationCollection@
uspto.gov. Include ‘‘0651–0020 copy
request’’ in the subject line of the
message.
• Mail: Marcie Lovett, Records
Management Division Director, OCIO,
United States Patent and Trademark
Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA
22313–1450.
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent on
or before November 28, 2016 to
Kimberly R. Keravuori, OMB Desk
Officer, via email to Kimberly_R_
Keravuori@omb.eop.gov, or by fax to
202–395–5167, marked to the attention
of Kimberly R. Keravuori.
Dated: October 20, 2016.
Marcie Lovett,
Records Management Division Director,
OCIO, United States Patent and Trademark
Office.
[FR Doc. 2016–25951 Filed 10–26–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
[Docket No.: PTO–P–2016–0039]
Standard ST.26—Request for
Comments on the Recommended
Standard for the Presentation of
Nucleotide and Amino Acid Sequence
Listings Using XML (eXtensible
Markup Language)
United States Patent and
Trademark Office, Commerce.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ACTION:
74775
Request for comments.
Patent applications that
contain disclosures of nucleotide and/or
amino acid sequences must contain
sequence information in a separate part
of the disclosure in a specified manner.
The United States Patent and Trademark
Office (Office) is seeking additional
comments to obtain views of the public
on the continuing international effort to
revise the World Intellectual Property
Organization (WIPO) standard for the
presentation of nucleotide and/or amino
acid sequences and the consequent
changes to the United States rules of
practice. The revised standard will be
known as WIPO Standard ST.26. An
interim version of WIPO Standard ST.26
was adopted in March 2016 by the
Committee on WIPO Standards (CWS),
but has not been implemented pending
further consideration by the CWS. Since
the adoption of the interim version,
efforts have been undertaken to finalize
WIPO Standard ST.26 and to improve
its effectiveness once implemented. One
aspect of that continuing effort is a
proposed guidance document annex,
which will include a variety of sequence
disclosure examples, to ensure
understanding and uniform application
of standard requirements. Comments
may be offered on any aspect of this
effort, and in particular, (a) the
comprehensiveness and clarity of WIPO
Standard ST.26 and the proposed
guidance document annex, and (b) the
proposed authoring/validation tool for
creation of a sequence listing in XML.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before December 27, 2016
to ensure consideration. No public
hearing will be held.
ADDRESSES: Comments concerning this
notice should be sent by electronic mail
message over the Internet addressed to
seq_listing_xml@uspto.gov. Comments
may also be submitted by mail
addressed to: Mail Stop Comments—
Patents, Commissioner for Patents, P.O.
Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313–1450,
marked to the attention of Susan C.
Wolski, Office of International Patent
Legal Administration, Office of the
Deputy Commissioner for International
Patent Cooperation. Although comments
may be submitted by mail, the Office
prefers to receive comments via the
Internet.
The comments will be available for
public inspection at the Office of the
Commissioner for Patents, located in
Madison East, Tenth Floor, 600 Dulany
Street, Alexandria, Virginia, and will be
available via the Internet (https://
www.uspto.gov). Because comments will
be made available for public inspection,
information that the submitter does not
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27OCN1.SGM
27OCN1
74776
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 208 / Thursday, October 27, 2016 / Notices
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
desire to make public, such as an
address or phone number, should not be
included in the comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan C. Wolski, Office of International
Patent Legal Administration, Office of
the Deputy Commissioner for
International Patent Cooperation, by
telephone at (571) 272–3304, or by mail
addressed to: Mail Stop Comments—
Patents, Commissioner for Patents, P.O.
Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313–1450,
marked to the attention of Susan C.
Wolski.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Background Information
Patent applicants are currently
required to submit biological sequence
data in a standardized electronic format
in accordance with WIPO Standard
ST.25, both within the framework of the
Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) (Annex
C of the Administrative Instructions)
and under most national and regional
provisions. The Rules of Patent Practice
in the United States (37 CFR 1.821–
1.825) were amended to implement
WIPO Standard ST.25 in July of 1998.
See Requirements for Patent
Applications Containing Nucleotide
Sequences and/or Amno Acid
Disclosures, 63 FR 29620 (June 1, 1998),
1121 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 82 (June 23,
1998).
WIPO Standard ST.25, which became
effective in 1998 and has not been
revised since that time, requires a flat
file structure of numeric identifiers
using a limited set of character codes. In
October 2010, the CWS established a
Task Force, designating the European
Patent Organization as the lead, to draft
a revised standard (WIPO Standard
ST.26) for the filing of nucleotide and/
or amino acid sequence listings in XML
format. The Office issued a first request
for comments on WIPO Standard ST.26
as drafted by the Task Force (see
Request for Comments on the
Recommendation for the Disclosure of
Sequence Listings Using XML (Proposed
ST.26), 77 FR 28541 (May 15, 2012),
1379 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 106 (June 12,
2012)), following which the draft was
revised in response to comments
received. In March 2016, the
reconvened fourth session of the CWS
adopted an interim version of WIPO
Standard ST.26, which had been
initially considered at the fourth session
of the CWS in May 2014. The interim
version of WIPO Standard ST.26
contains an editorial note requesting
that implementation be postponed until
the recommendation for the transition
from WIPO Standard ST.25 to WIPO
Standard ST.26 is agreed on by the CWS
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:43 Oct 26, 2016
Jkt 241001
at its next session to be held in 2017.
Meanwhile, WIPO Standard ST.25
should continue to be used. The
adopted interim version of WIPO
Standard ST.26 is composed of six
documents, namely, the main body of
the standard, a first annex setting forth
the controlled vocabulary for use with
the sequence part of the standard, a
second annex setting forth the
Document Type Definition (DTD) for the
standard, a third annex containing a
sequence listing specimen, a fourth
annex setting forth the character subset
from the Unicode Basic Latin Code
Table, and a fifth annex setting forth
additional data exchange requirements
for patent offices, and can be found
here: https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/
www/standards/en/pdf/03-26-01.pdf.
Since the adoption of the interim
version, the main body, the controlled
vocabulary, and the DTD have been
further revised and updated. In
addition, a sixth annex has been
proposed; it would contain a guidance
document that aims to ensure that all
applicants and Intellectual Property
Offices (IPOs) understand and agree on
the requirements for inclusion and
representation of sequence disclosures.
In all, seven rounds of discussion have
been completed since March 2011, and
currently, the eighth round of
discussion of the documents is ongoing.
2. Request for Comments
The Office, leading the negotiations
for the United States, is seeking public
comment on WIPO Standard ST.26, as
revised subsequent to the adoption of
the interim version. To that end, the
current revisions of the main body of
the standard and its five annexes, as
well as the newly proposed sixth annex,
are available via the Office’s Web site at
https://www.uspto.gov/patent/laws-andregulations/comments-public/2016comments-standard-st26-presentationnucleotide-and.
Written comments may be offered on
any aspect of WIPO Standard ST.26, its
annexes, or the proposed authoring/
validation tool. Comments are
specifically requested on the following
issues:
(a) WIPO Standard ST.26 Main Body
Since the first request for comments,
the main body of WIPO Standard ST.26
has been revised, inter alia, to define a
‘‘nucleotide’’ to include nucleotide
analogues and to provide further
guidance on representation of
nucleotide analogue sequences and
variant sequences that have been
disclosed as a single sequence with
enumerated alternative variant residues
at one or more positions.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Office invites comments on
whether the main body of WIPO
Standard ST.26 is sufficiently
comprehensive and clear, and in
particular welcomes suggestions to add
details or clarify the language as
appropriate.
(b) Guidance Document
One goal of the development of a
WIPO Standard for sequence listings is
to allow patent applicants to draw up a
single sequence listing in a patent
application that would be acceptable for
the purposes of both international and
national or regional prosecution
worldwide. Any new standard should
represent the maximum requirements
for any sequence listing submission.
The purpose of the guidance document
is to ensure that all applicants and IPOs
understand and agree on the
requirements for inclusion and
representation of sequence disclosures,
such that this purpose is realized.
The guidance document is composed
of an introduction, examples, and a
sequence listing in XML demonstrating
representation of the exemplified
sequences. The introduction defines
terminology used in the document and
discusses the questions raised for each
example, namely, whether inclusion is
required for a particular disclosed
sequence, if inclusion of the sequence is
permitted when it is not required, and
the appropriate means of representation
of sequences included in a sequence
listing. Examples were chosen to
illustrate various paragraphs of the main
body and include 22 involving
nucleotide sequences and 19 involving
amino acid sequences. It is envisioned
that the guidance document would be
updated as necessary to include further
examples to keep pace with
technological advances.
The Office invites comments on
whether the guidance document is
sufficiently comprehensive and clear,
and in particular welcomes suggestions
to add details or further examples as
appropriate.
(c) Authoring and Validation Tool
Availability of an authoring tool in
advance of the WIPO Standard ST.26
effective date is key to a successful
transition from WIPO Standard ST.25.
As envisioned, the authoring tool
should be capable of intake of a
sequence listing in WIPO Standard
ST.25 format, and with additional input
from applicant, create a sequence listing
in WIPO Standard ST.26 format.
Unfortunately, direct conversion from
one standard to the other is not possible,
due to numerous differences between
the two standards, including inter alia,
E:\FR\FM\27OCN1.SGM
27OCN1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 208 / Thursday, October 27, 2016 / Notices
the types of required sequences,
representation and annotation of the
sequences, and sequence data structure.
The authoring tool should also
prompt entry of all required data,
prevent entry of sequences having fewer
than ten specifically defined
nucleotides or fewer than four
specifically defined amino acids, inform
as to the possibility of optional
annotations, and allow use of only
acceptable values or formats where
applicable, thereby enhancing
submission quality. A sequence listing
in WIPO Standard ST.26 XML format is
not as easily human-readable as its
ST.25 counterpart; therefore, the tool
should also provide a means for easily
viewing both the in-progress and
completed sequence listing.
Because the authoring tool is expected
to prompt entry of all required data and
to allow use of only acceptable values
or formats where applicable, a certain
level of validation occurs as data is
entered. The tool is further expected to
include a separate validation function
for use by both applicants and IPOs.
WIPO Standard ST.25 provides for a
single numeric identifier <223> per
sequence to contain ‘‘free text’’ to
describe sequence characteristics using
non-language neutral vocabulary. Such
‘‘free text’’ is required to be repeated in
the main part of the application
description in the language thereof in a
specific recommended section entitled
‘‘Sequence Listing Free Text.’’ Such
repetition ensures that any ‘‘free text’’
will be translated together with the
application description, precluding the
need for separate translation of the
sequence listing itself. In contrast, WIPO
Standard ST.26 allows use of ‘‘free text’’
as the value for multiple different
annotation qualifiers per sequence, and
due to the absence of procedural
requirements, repetition in the
application is not required, although
such a requirement under the PCT and
by various IPOs is possible. In WIPO
Standard ST.26, ‘‘free text’’ is limited to
a few short terms indispensable for
understanding a characteristic of a
sequence, is preferably in the English
language, and as part of the sequence
data part of the sequence listing, must
not exceed 1000 characters composed of
printable characters from the Unicode
Basic Latin code table. It is expected
that most inventors providing sequence
information are capable of providing
‘‘free text’’ in the English language.
The Office invites comments on any
aspect of the authoring tool, and in
particular welcomes feedback on
whether it is deemed necessary for the
authoring tool to include a mechanism
for automatic identification and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:43 Oct 26, 2016
Jkt 241001
extraction of any ‘‘free text’’ from
sequence annotations to facilitate
inclusion in the application description.
Dated: October 21, 2016.
Michelle K. Lee,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual
Property and Director of the United States
Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 2016–25968 Filed 10–26–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[Docket No.: ED–2016–ICCD–0116]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Comment Request; Student
Assistance General Provisions—
Satisfactory Academic Progress Policy
Department of Education (ED),
Federal Student Aid (FSA)
ACTION: Notice
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. chapter 3501 et seq.), ED is
proposing a revision of an existing
information collection.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before
December 27, 2016.
ADDRESSES: To access and review all the
documents related to the information
collection listed in this notice, please
use https://www.regulations.gov by
searching the Docket ID number ED–
2016–ICCD–0116. Comments submitted
in response to this notice should be
submitted electronically through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov by selecting the
Docket ID number or via postal mail,
commercial delivery, or hand delivery.
Please note that comments submitted by
fax or email and those submitted after
the comment period will not be
accepted. Written requests for
information or comments submitted by
postal mail or delivery should be
addressed to the Director of the
Information Collection Clearance
Division, U.S. Department of Education,
400 Maryland Avenue SW., LBJ, Room
2E–347, Washington, DC 20202–4537.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
specific questions related to collection
activities, please contact Beth
Grebeldinger, 202–377–4018.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Department of Education (ED), in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)), provides the general
public and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed,
revised, and continuing collections of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
74777
information. This helps the Department
assess the impact of its information
collection requirements and minimize
the public’s reporting burden. It also
helps the public understand the
Department’s information collection
requirements and provide the requested
data in the desired format. ED is
soliciting comments on the proposed
information collection request (ICR) that
is described below. The Department of
Education is especially interested in
public comment addressing the
following issues: (1) Is this collection
necessary to the proper functions of the
Department; (2) will this information be
processed and used in a timely manner;
(3) is the estimate of burden accurate;
(4) how might the Department enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (5) how
might the Department minimize the
burden of this collection on the
respondents, including through the use
of information technology. Please note
that written comments received in
response to this notice will be
considered public records.
Title of Collection: Student Assistance
General Provisions—Satisfactory
Academic Progress Policy.
OMB Control Number: 1845–0108.
Type of Review: A revision of an
existing information collection.
Respondents/Affected Public: State,
Local, and Tribal Governments;
Individuals or Households; Private
Sector.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 33,543,341.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 1,470,256.
Abstract: The Department of
Education (the Department) is making
this request is for an extension of the
current approval of the policies and
procedures for determining satisfactory
academic progress (SAP) as required in
Section 484 of the Higher Education Act
of 1965, as amended (HEA). These
regulations identify the policies and
procedures to ensure that students are
making satisfactory academic progress
in their program at a pace and a level
to receive or continue to receive Title
IV, HEA program funds. If there is lapse
in progress, the policy must identify
how the student will be notified and
what steps are available to a student not
making satisfactory academic progress
toward the completion of their program,
and under what conditions a student
who is not making satisfactory academic
progress may continue to receive Title
IV, HEA program funds.
E:\FR\FM\27OCN1.SGM
27OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 208 (Thursday, October 27, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74775-74777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-25968]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
[Docket No.: PTO-P-2016-0039]
Standard ST.26--Request for Comments on the Recommended Standard
for the Presentation of Nucleotide and Amino Acid Sequence Listings
Using XML (eXtensible Markup Language)
AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION: Request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Patent applications that contain disclosures of nucleotide
and/or amino acid sequences must contain sequence information in a
separate part of the disclosure in a specified manner. The United
States Patent and Trademark Office (Office) is seeking additional
comments to obtain views of the public on the continuing international
effort to revise the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)
standard for the presentation of nucleotide and/or amino acid sequences
and the consequent changes to the United States rules of practice. The
revised standard will be known as WIPO Standard ST.26. An interim
version of WIPO Standard ST.26 was adopted in March 2016 by the
Committee on WIPO Standards (CWS), but has not been implemented pending
further consideration by the CWS. Since the adoption of the interim
version, efforts have been undertaken to finalize WIPO Standard ST.26
and to improve its effectiveness once implemented. One aspect of that
continuing effort is a proposed guidance document annex, which will
include a variety of sequence disclosure examples, to ensure
understanding and uniform application of standard requirements.
Comments may be offered on any aspect of this effort, and in
particular, (a) the comprehensiveness and clarity of WIPO Standard
ST.26 and the proposed guidance document annex, and (b) the proposed
authoring/validation tool for creation of a sequence listing in XML.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before December 27, 2016
to ensure consideration. No public hearing will be held.
ADDRESSES: Comments concerning this notice should be sent by electronic
mail message over the Internet addressed to seq_listing_xml@uspto.gov.
Comments may also be submitted by mail addressed to: Mail Stop
Comments--Patents, Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria,
VA 22313-1450, marked to the attention of Susan C. Wolski, Office of
International Patent Legal Administration, Office of the Deputy
Commissioner for International Patent Cooperation. Although comments
may be submitted by mail, the Office prefers to receive comments via
the Internet.
The comments will be available for public inspection at the Office
of the Commissioner for Patents, located in Madison East, Tenth Floor,
600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia, and will be available via the
Internet (https://www.uspto.gov). Because comments will be made
available for public inspection, information that the submitter does
not
[[Page 74776]]
desire to make public, such as an address or phone number, should not
be included in the comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan C. Wolski, Office of
International Patent Legal Administration, Office of the Deputy
Commissioner for International Patent Cooperation, by telephone at
(571) 272-3304, or by mail addressed to: Mail Stop Comments--Patents,
Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450,
marked to the attention of Susan C. Wolski.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Background Information
Patent applicants are currently required to submit biological
sequence data in a standardized electronic format in accordance with
WIPO Standard ST.25, both within the framework of the Patent
Cooperation Treaty (PCT) (Annex C of the Administrative Instructions)
and under most national and regional provisions. The Rules of Patent
Practice in the United States (37 CFR 1.821-1.825) were amended to
implement WIPO Standard ST.25 in July of 1998. See Requirements for
Patent Applications Containing Nucleotide Sequences and/or Amno Acid
Disclosures, 63 FR 29620 (June 1, 1998), 1121 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 82
(June 23, 1998).
WIPO Standard ST.25, which became effective in 1998 and has not
been revised since that time, requires a flat file structure of numeric
identifiers using a limited set of character codes. In October 2010,
the CWS established a Task Force, designating the European Patent
Organization as the lead, to draft a revised standard (WIPO Standard
ST.26) for the filing of nucleotide and/or amino acid sequence listings
in XML format. The Office issued a first request for comments on WIPO
Standard ST.26 as drafted by the Task Force (see Request for Comments
on the Recommendation for the Disclosure of Sequence Listings Using XML
(Proposed ST.26), 77 FR 28541 (May 15, 2012), 1379 Off. Gaz. Pat.
Office 106 (June 12, 2012)), following which the draft was revised in
response to comments received. In March 2016, the reconvened fourth
session of the CWS adopted an interim version of WIPO Standard ST.26,
which had been initially considered at the fourth session of the CWS in
May 2014. The interim version of WIPO Standard ST.26 contains an
editorial note requesting that implementation be postponed until the
recommendation for the transition from WIPO Standard ST.25 to WIPO
Standard ST.26 is agreed on by the CWS at its next session to be held
in 2017. Meanwhile, WIPO Standard ST.25 should continue to be used. The
adopted interim version of WIPO Standard ST.26 is composed of six
documents, namely, the main body of the standard, a first annex setting
forth the controlled vocabulary for use with the sequence part of the
standard, a second annex setting forth the Document Type Definition
(DTD) for the standard, a third annex containing a sequence listing
specimen, a fourth annex setting forth the character subset from the
Unicode Basic Latin Code Table, and a fifth annex setting forth
additional data exchange requirements for patent offices, and can be
found here: https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/standards/en/pdf/03-26-01.pdf. Since the adoption of the interim version, the main body,
the controlled vocabulary, and the DTD have been further revised and
updated. In addition, a sixth annex has been proposed; it would contain
a guidance document that aims to ensure that all applicants and
Intellectual Property Offices (IPOs) understand and agree on the
requirements for inclusion and representation of sequence disclosures.
In all, seven rounds of discussion have been completed since March
2011, and currently, the eighth round of discussion of the documents is
ongoing.
2. Request for Comments
The Office, leading the negotiations for the United States, is
seeking public comment on WIPO Standard ST.26, as revised subsequent to
the adoption of the interim version. To that end, the current revisions
of the main body of the standard and its five annexes, as well as the
newly proposed sixth annex, are available via the Office's Web site at
https://www.uspto.gov/patent/laws-and-regulations/comments-public/2016-comments-standard-st26-presentation-nucleotide-and.
Written comments may be offered on any aspect of WIPO Standard
ST.26, its annexes, or the proposed authoring/validation tool. Comments
are specifically requested on the following issues:
(a) WIPO Standard ST.26 Main Body
Since the first request for comments, the main body of WIPO
Standard ST.26 has been revised, inter alia, to define a ``nucleotide''
to include nucleotide analogues and to provide further guidance on
representation of nucleotide analogue sequences and variant sequences
that have been disclosed as a single sequence with enumerated
alternative variant residues at one or more positions.
The Office invites comments on whether the main body of WIPO
Standard ST.26 is sufficiently comprehensive and clear, and in
particular welcomes suggestions to add details or clarify the language
as appropriate.
(b) Guidance Document
One goal of the development of a WIPO Standard for sequence
listings is to allow patent applicants to draw up a single sequence
listing in a patent application that would be acceptable for the
purposes of both international and national or regional prosecution
worldwide. Any new standard should represent the maximum requirements
for any sequence listing submission. The purpose of the guidance
document is to ensure that all applicants and IPOs understand and agree
on the requirements for inclusion and representation of sequence
disclosures, such that this purpose is realized.
The guidance document is composed of an introduction, examples, and
a sequence listing in XML demonstrating representation of the
exemplified sequences. The introduction defines terminology used in the
document and discusses the questions raised for each example, namely,
whether inclusion is required for a particular disclosed sequence, if
inclusion of the sequence is permitted when it is not required, and the
appropriate means of representation of sequences included in a sequence
listing. Examples were chosen to illustrate various paragraphs of the
main body and include 22 involving nucleotide sequences and 19
involving amino acid sequences. It is envisioned that the guidance
document would be updated as necessary to include further examples to
keep pace with technological advances.
The Office invites comments on whether the guidance document is
sufficiently comprehensive and clear, and in particular welcomes
suggestions to add details or further examples as appropriate.
(c) Authoring and Validation Tool
Availability of an authoring tool in advance of the WIPO Standard
ST.26 effective date is key to a successful transition from WIPO
Standard ST.25. As envisioned, the authoring tool should be capable of
intake of a sequence listing in WIPO Standard ST.25 format, and with
additional input from applicant, create a sequence listing in WIPO
Standard ST.26 format. Unfortunately, direct conversion from one
standard to the other is not possible, due to numerous differences
between the two standards, including inter alia,
[[Page 74777]]
the types of required sequences, representation and annotation of the
sequences, and sequence data structure.
The authoring tool should also prompt entry of all required data,
prevent entry of sequences having fewer than ten specifically defined
nucleotides or fewer than four specifically defined amino acids, inform
as to the possibility of optional annotations, and allow use of only
acceptable values or formats where applicable, thereby enhancing
submission quality. A sequence listing in WIPO Standard ST.26 XML
format is not as easily human-readable as its ST.25 counterpart;
therefore, the tool should also provide a means for easily viewing both
the in-progress and completed sequence listing.
Because the authoring tool is expected to prompt entry of all
required data and to allow use of only acceptable values or formats
where applicable, a certain level of validation occurs as data is
entered. The tool is further expected to include a separate validation
function for use by both applicants and IPOs.
WIPO Standard ST.25 provides for a single numeric identifier <223>
per sequence to contain ``free text'' to describe sequence
characteristics using non-language neutral vocabulary. Such ``free
text'' is required to be repeated in the main part of the application
description in the language thereof in a specific recommended section
entitled ``Sequence Listing Free Text.'' Such repetition ensures that
any ``free text'' will be translated together with the application
description, precluding the need for separate translation of the
sequence listing itself. In contrast, WIPO Standard ST.26 allows use of
``free text'' as the value for multiple different annotation qualifiers
per sequence, and due to the absence of procedural requirements,
repetition in the application is not required, although such a
requirement under the PCT and by various IPOs is possible. In WIPO
Standard ST.26, ``free text'' is limited to a few short terms
indispensable for understanding a characteristic of a sequence, is
preferably in the English language, and as part of the sequence data
part of the sequence listing, must not exceed 1000 characters composed
of printable characters from the Unicode Basic Latin code table. It is
expected that most inventors providing sequence information are capable
of providing ``free text'' in the English language.
The Office invites comments on any aspect of the authoring tool,
and in particular welcomes feedback on whether it is deemed necessary
for the authoring tool to include a mechanism for automatic
identification and extraction of any ``free text'' from sequence
annotations to facilitate inclusion in the application description.
Dated: October 21, 2016.
Michelle K. Lee,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of
the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 2016-25968 Filed 10-26-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P