Apricots Grown in Designated Counties in Washington; Increased Assessment Rate, 74659-74662 [2016-25694]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 208 / Thursday, October 27, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Access to Research Results
List of Subjects in 2 CFR Part 1800
Government financial assistance.
Manuel Quinones,
NASA Federal Register Liaison Officer.
Accordingly, 2 CFR part 1800 is
amended as follows:
■ 1. The authority citation for 2 CFR
part 1800 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 51 U.S.C. 20113(e), Pub. L. 97–
258, 96 Stat. 1003 (31 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.),
and 2 CFR part 200.
2. Revise § 1800.210 to read as
follows:
■
§ 1800.210 Information contained in a
Federal award.
NASA waives the requirement for the
inclusion of indirect cost rates on any
notice of Federal award for commercial
firms with no cost sharing requirement.
The terms and conditions for NASA
may be found at appendix B of this part
and https://prod.nais.nasa.gov/pub/
pub_library/srba.
■ 3. Amend appendix B to part 1800 by:
■ a. Under 1800.902 Technical
Publications and Reports, adding
paragraph (a)(4); and
■ b. Adding 1800.929 Indirect Costs and
1800.930 Access to Research Results.
The additions read as follows:
Appendix B to Part 1800—Terms and
Conditions
*
*
1800.902
Reports
*
*
*
*
*
Technical Publications and
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(4) For research and research-related
awards, see additional reporting
requirements at 1800.930 Access to Research
Results.
*
*
*
*
*
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
1800.929 Indirect Costs
Prescription—The Grant Officer shall
include this term and condition in all awards
with indirect costs, excluding those awards
to institutions of higher education and to
entities using the 10% de minimis rate.
Indirect Costs
Unless otherwise directed in 2 CFR part
200, if during the course of this award, the
approved indirect cost rate is revised,
changed or removed, that rate must be
applied, as allowed, to the covered direct
costs that are expended during the time
frame of that rate agreement. Any corrections,
either up or down, to the approved budget
submitted with the awarded application must
be reflected in the awardees’ records of costs
and should be audited as such.
(End of Term and Condition)
[FR Doc. 2016–26014 Filed 10–26–16; 8:45 am]
1800.930 Access to Research Results
Prescription—The Grant Officer shall
include this term and condition in all
research and research-related awards.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:32 Oct 26, 2016
Jkt 241001
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
(a) This award is subject to the
requirements of the, ‘‘NASA Plan: Increasing
Access to the Results of Scientific Research,’’
which covers public access to digital
scientific data and peer-reviewed
publications. For purposes of this term and
condition, the following definitions apply:
(1) Awardee: Any recipient of a NASA
grant or cooperative agreement, its
investigators, and subrecipient (subaward or
contract as defined in 2 CFR 200.92 and
200.22, respectively) at any level.
(2) Final Peer-Reviewed Manuscript: The
final text version of a peer-reviewed article
disclosing the results of scientific research
which is authored or co-authored by the
Awardee or funded, in whole or in part, with
funds from a NASA award, that includes all
modifications from the publishing peer
review process, and all graphics and
supplemental material prepared by Awardee.
(b) The recipient shall:
(1) Comply with their approved Data
Management Plan submitted with its
proposal, and as modified upon agreement by
the recipient and NASA from time to time
during the course of the period of
performance.
(2) Ensure that any Final Peer-Reviewed
Manuscript is submitted to the NASAdesignated repository, currently the PubMed
Central system at https://
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/. NASA will
provide instructions for completing the
submission process under separate cover.
Ensure that the Final Peer-Reviewed
Manuscript is submitted to PubMed Central
within one year of completion of the peer
review process.
(3) Ensure that any publisher’s agreements
entered into by an Awardee will allow for the
Awardee to comply with these requirements
including submission of Final Peer-Reviewed
Manuscripts to the NASA-designated
repository, as listed in paragraph (b)(2) of this
term and condition, with sufficient rights to
permit such repository to use such Final
Peer-Reviewed Manuscript in its normal
course, including rights to permit users to
download XML and plain text formats.
(4) Hereby represent and warrant that
Awardee has secured for recipient the right
to submit the Final Peer-Reviewed
Manuscript to the NASA-designated
repository for use as set forth herein.
(5) Include in annual and final reports a
list of Final Peer-Reviewed Manuscripts
covered by this term and condition.
(End of Term and Condition)
BILLING CODE 7510–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
74659
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 922
[Doc. No. AMS–SC–16–0050; SC16–922–1
FR]
Apricots Grown in Designated
Counties in Washington; Increased
Assessment Rate
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule implements a
recommendation from the Washington
Apricot Marketing Committee
(Committee) to increase the assessment
rate established for the 2016–17 and
subsequent fiscal periods from $0.75 to
$1.40 per ton of Washington apricots
handled under the marketing order. The
Committee, which is composed of
growers and handlers, locally
administers the order which regulates
the handling of apricots grown in
designated counties in Washington.
Assessments upon apricot handlers are
used by the Committee to fund
reasonable and necessary expenses of
the program. The fiscal period begins
April 1 and ends March 31. The
assessment rate would remain in effect
indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated.
DATES: Effective October 28, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dale
Novotny, Marketing Specialist, or Gary
D. Olson, Regional Director, Northwest
Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order
and Agreement Division, Specialty
Crops Program, AMS, USDA;
Telephone: (503) 326–2724, Fax: (503)
326–7440, or Email: DaleJ.Novotny@
ams.usda.gov or GaryD.Olson@
ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Richard Lower,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email:
Richard.Lower@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Agreement
and Order No. 922, both as amended (7
CFR part 922), regulating the handling
of apricots grown in designated counties
in Washington, hereinafter referred to as
the ‘‘order.’’ The order is effective under
the Agricultural Marketing Agreement
Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–
674), hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘Act.’’
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27OCR1.SGM
27OCR1
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
74660
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 208 / Thursday, October 27, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Orders
12866, 13563, and 13175.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. Under the order now in effect,
apricot handlers in designated counties
in Washington are subject to
assessments. Funds to administer the
order are derived from such
assessments. It is intended that the
assessment rate as issued herein will be
applicable to all assessable Washington
apricots beginning April 1, 2016, and
continue until amended, suspended, or
terminated.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After the
hearing, USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
This rule increases the assessment
rate established for the Committee for
the 2016–17 and subsequent fiscal
periods from $0.75 to $1.40 per ton of
Washington apricots handled under the
order.
The Washington apricot marketing
order provides authority for the
Committee, with the approval of USDA,
to formulate an annual budget of
expenses and collect assessments from
handlers to administer the program. The
members of the Committee are
producers and handlers of apricots in
designated counties in Washington.
They are familiar with the Committee’s
needs, and with the costs for goods and
services in their local area, and are thus
in a position to formulate an appropriate
budget and assessment rate. The
assessment rate is formulated and
discussed in a public meeting. Thus, all
directly affected persons have an
opportunity to participate and provide
input.
For the 2015–16 and subsequent fiscal
periods, the Committee recommended,
and the USDA approved, an assessment
rate that would continue in effect from
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:32 Oct 26, 2016
Jkt 241001
fiscal period to fiscal period unless
modified, suspended, or terminated by
USDA upon recommendation and
information submitted by the
Committee or other information
available to USDA.
The Committee met on May 11, 2016,
and unanimously recommended 2016–
17 expenditures of $7,160 and an
assessment rate of $1.40 per ton of
apricots. In comparison, the previous
fiscal period’s budgeted expenditures
were $7,610. The recommended
assessment rate of $1.40 per ton is $0.65
per ton higher than the rate currently in
effect.
Last year at the May 12, 2015,
meeting, Committee members voted to
moderately increase the budget from
$7,095 to $7,610, and to decrease the
assessment rate from $1.50 to $0.75 per
ton of apricots handled. The Committee
was attempting to lower their excess
reserve funds to approximately one
fiscal period’s operating expenses to
remain in compliance with
§ 922.42(a)(2) of the order. The
Committee based its recommendation
on a crop estimate of 5,800 tons for the
2015–16 crop year. The actual crop
yield for that period was 4,795 tons,
1,005 tons less than the 5,800 ton
estimate used by the Committee for
budgeting purposes. Low water supply
and higher than average temperatures
were reported by the industry at the
May 11, 2016, meeting as the major
factors for the short 2015–16 crop. As a
result of the reduced crop size and
related lower assessment revenue, the
Committee was forced to use more
funds from its reserve than previously
anticipated. The Committee intends to
fully fund ongoing operations and
maintain adequate reserve funds
through the implementation of the
assessment rate increase for the 2016–17
and future fiscal periods.
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2016–17 fiscal period include $3,000 for
the contracted management fee to the
Washington State Fruit Commission,
$1,200 for Committee travel, $2,000 for
the annual audit, $500 for computer and
technical services, and $250 for office
supplies. Budgeted expenses for these
items in the 2015–2016 fiscal period
were $3,000 for the management fee,
$1,200 for Committee travel, $2,500 for
the annual audit, and $500 for office
supplies, respectively.
The assessment rate recommended by
the Committee was derived by dividing
anticipated expenses by expected
shipments of Washington apricots,
while also taking into account the
Committee’s monetary reserve.
Washington apricot shipments for the
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
year are estimated at 5,000 tons which
should provide $7,000 in assessment
income at the rate of $1.40 per ton of
Washington apricots handled. Income
derived from handler assessments, along
with interest income and funds from the
Committee’s authorized reserve, would
be adequate to cover budgeted expenses
for the 2016–17 fiscal period. Funds in
the reserve (currently $7,301) would be
kept within the maximum amount
permitted by the order of approximately
one fiscal period’s operational expenses.
Authority for maintaining a financial
reserve is found in § 922.42(a)(2) of the
order. The Committee expects its
monetary reserve to decrease from
$7,301 at the beginning of the 2016–17
fiscal period to approximately $7,141 at
the end of the 2016–17 fiscal period.
That amount would be within the
provisions of the order and should
provide the Committee with the ability
to absorb fluctuations in assessment
income and expenses into the future.
The assessment rate will continue in
effect indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information
submitted by the Committee or other
available information.
Although this assessment rate will be
in effect for an indefinite period, the
Committee will continue to meet prior
to or during each fiscal period to
recommend a budget of expenses and
consider recommendations for
modification of the assessment rate. The
dates and times of the Committee
meetings are available from the
Committee or the USDA. Committee
meetings are open to the public and
interested persons may express their
views at these meetings. USDA will
evaluate Committee recommendations
and other available information to
determine whether modification of the
assessment rate is needed. Further
rulemaking will be undertaken as
necessary. The Committee’s 2016–17
budget and those for subsequent fiscal
periods will be reviewed and, as
appropriate, approved by USDA.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
rule on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this final regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in
order that small businesses will not be
unduly or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
E:\FR\FM\27OCR1.SGM
27OCR1
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 208 / Thursday, October 27, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 100 growers
and 17 handlers of Washington apricots
subject to regulation under the
marketing order in the regulated area.
Most apricot producers and all handlers
accounted for in the regulated area are
engaged in the production of other crops
in addition to apricots. Small
agricultural producers are defined by
the Small Business Administration
(SBA) as those having annual receipts of
less than $750,000, and small
agricultural service firms are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less
than $7,500,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
The National Agricultural Statistics
Service (NASS) reports that the 2015
total production and utilization
(including both fresh and processed
markets) of Washington apricots was
approximately 8,000 tons, the average
price was $1,050 per ton, and the total
farm-gate value was approximately
$8,400,000. Based on these reports and
the number of apricot growers within
the production area, it is estimated that
the 2015 average revenue from the sale
of apricots was approximately $84,000.
In addition, based on information from
the USDA’s Market News Service, 2015
f.o.b. prices for Washington No.1
apricots ranged from $20.00 to $26.00
per 24-pound container for both loose
pack and 2-layer tray-pack containers.
Using average prices and shipment
information provided by the Committee,
it is determined that each of the
Washington apricot handlers currently
ship less than $7,500,000 worth of
apricots on an annual basis. In view of
the foregoing, it is concluded that the
majority of handlers and growers of
Washington apricots may be classified
as small entities.
This rule increases the assessment
rate established for the Committee, and
collected from handlers, for the 2016–17
and subsequent fiscal periods from
$0.75 to $1.40 per ton of Washington
apricots handled. The new assessment
rate of $1.40 is $0.65 higher than the
2015–16 rate. The quantity of assessable
apricots for the 2016–17 fiscal period is
estimated at 5,000 tons. Thus, the $1.40
rate should provide $7,000 in
assessment income and, combined with
the existing reserve fund, should be
adequate to meet this year’s budgeted
expenses.
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2016–17 fiscal period include $3,000 for
the contracted management fee to the
Washington State Fruit Commission,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:32 Oct 26, 2016
Jkt 241001
$1,200 for Committee travel, $2,000 for
the annual audit, $500 for computer and
technical services, and $250 for office
supplies. Budgeted expenses for these
items in the 2015–2016 fiscal period
were $3,000 for the management fee,
$1,200 for Committee travel, $2,500 for
the annual audit, and $500 for office
supplies.
The Committee discussed alternatives
to this action, including recommending
alternative expenditure levels and
assessment rates. Although lower
assessment rates were considered, none
were selected because they would not
have generated sufficient income to
administer the order.
A review of historical data and
preliminary information pertaining to
the 2016–17 season indicates that the
grower price for Washington apricots
could range between $1,050 and $1,300
per ton. Therefore, the assessment
revenue for the 2016–17 fiscal period, as
a percentage of total grower revenue,
could range between 0.133 and 0.108
percent.
This action increases the assessment
obligation imposed on handlers. While
assessments impose some additional
costs on handlers, the costs are minimal
and uniform on all handlers. Some of
the additional costs may be passed on
to producers. However, these costs are
offset by the benefits derived by the
operation of the order. In addition, the
Committee’s meeting was widely
publicized throughout the Washington
apricot industry and all interested
persons were invited to attend the
meeting and participate in Committee
deliberations on all issues. Like all
Committee meetings, the May 11, 2016,
meeting was a public meeting and all
entities, both large and small, were able
to express views on this issue. Finally,
interested persons were invited to
submit comments on this rule,
including the regulatory and
informational impacts of this action on
small businesses.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0189. No
changes in those requirements as a
result of this action are necessary.
Should any changes become necessary,
they would be submitted to OMB for
approval.
This rule imposes no additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on either small or large Washington
apricot handlers. As with all Federal
marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
74661
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies. As noted in the initial
regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA
has not identified any relevant Federal
rules that duplicate, overlap or conflict
with this final rule.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
A proposed rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on August 23, 2016 (81 FR
57493). Copies of the proposed rule
were also mailed or sent via facsimile to
all apricot handlers. Finally, the
proposal was made available through
the internet by USDA and the Office of
the Federal Register. A 30-day comment
period ending September 22, 2016, was
provided for interested persons to
respond to the proposal. No comments
were received.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Richard Lower
at the previously-mentioned address in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also
found and determined that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register
because: (1) The 2016–17 fiscal period
began on April 1, 2016, and the
marketing order requires that the rate of
assessment for each fiscal period apply
to all assessable Washington apricots
handled during such fiscal period; (2)
the Committee needs to have sufficient
funds to pay its expenses, which are
incurred on a continuous basis; (3)
handlers are already shipping
Washington apricots from the 2016
crop; and (4) handlers are aware of this
action, which was unanimously
recommended by the Committee at a
public meeting and is similar to other
assessment rate actions issued in past
years. Further, handlers are aware of
this rule which was recommended at a
public meeting. Also, a 30-day comment
E:\FR\FM\27OCR1.SGM
27OCR1
74662
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 208 / Thursday, October 27, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
period was provided for in the proposed
rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 922
Apricots, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 922 is amended as
follows:
PART 922—APRICOTS GROWN IN
DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN
WASHINGTON
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 922 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 922.235 is revised to read
as follows:
■
§ 922.235
Assessment rate.
On or after April 1, 2016, an
assessment rate of $1.40 per ton is
established for Washington apricots
handled in the production area.
Dated: October 19, 2016.
Elanor Starmer,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–25694 Filed 10–26–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2016–5306; Directorate
Identifier 2015–SW–010–AD; Amendment
39–18697; AD 2016–22–08]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Helicopters Deutschland GmbH
Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for Airbus
Helicopters Deutschland GmbH (Airbus
Helicopters) Model MBB–BK 117 C–2
helicopters. This AD requires inspecting
each terminal lug and replacing any lug
that has discoloration, corrosion,
incorrect crimping, or incorrect
installation. This AD was prompted by
the discovery that terminal lugs with
incorrect crimping may have been
installed on these helicopters. The
actions of this AD are intended to detect
incorrectly installed or crimped
terminal lugs and prevent contact
resistance and reduced gastightness
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:32 Oct 26, 2016
Jkt 241001
between the wire and terminal lug,
subsequent loss of electrical power, and
an electrical fire.
DATES: This AD is effective December 1,
2016.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain document listed in this AD
as of December 1, 2016.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this final rule, contact
Airbus Helicopters, 2701 N. Forum
Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75052;
telephone (972) 641–0000 or (800) 232–
0323; fax (972) 641–3775; or at https://
www.airbushelicopters.com/techpub.
You may review the referenced service
information at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region,
10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N–321,
Fort Worth, TX 76177. It is also
available on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
5306.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
5306; or in person at the Docket
Operations Office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) AD, any
incorporated-by-reference service
information, the economic evaluation,
any comments received, and other
information. The street address for the
Docket Operations Office (phone: 800–
647–5527) is U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations
Office, M–30, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
George Schwab, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Safety Management Group,
Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, 10101
Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177;
telephone (817) 222–5110; email
george.schwab@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
On April 22, 2016, at 81 FR 23656, the
Federal Register published our notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM), which
proposed to amend 14 CFR part 39 by
adding an AD that would apply to
certain serial-numbered Model MBB–BK
117 C–2 helicopters. The NPRM
proposed to require inspecting each
terminal lug and replacing any lug that
has discoloration, corrosion, incorrect
crimping, or incorrect installation. The
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
proposed requirements were intended to
detect incorrectly installed or crimped
terminal lugs and prevent contact
resistance and reduced gastightness
between the wire and terminal lug,
subsequent loss of electrical power, and
an electrical fire.
The NPRM was prompted by AD No.
2015–0044, dated March 13, 2015,
issued by EASA, which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, to correct an unsafe
condition for certain serial-numbered
Airbus Helicopters Model MBB–BK117
C–2 helicopters. EASA advises that
terminal lugs with incorrect crimping,
which can adversely affect contact
resistance and gastightness of the
contact between the wire and the
terminal lug, may have been installed
on some helicopters in production.
EASA advises that this condition, if not
detected and corrected, could lead to
the loss of electrical power during flight.
Because of this, the EASA AD requires
a one-time visual inspection of the
terminal lugs and replacement of
affected lugs if incorrect crimping is
found.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD, but
we received no comments on the NPRM
(81 FR 23656, April 22, 2016).
FAA’s Determination
These helicopters have been approved
by the aviation authority of Germany
and are approved for operation in the
United States. Pursuant to our bilateral
agreement with Germany, EASA, its
technical representative, has notified us
of the unsafe condition described in the
EASA AD. We are issuing this AD
because we evaluated all information
provided by EASA and determined the
unsafe condition exists and is likely to
exist or develop on other helicopters of
these same type designs and that air
safety and the public interest require
adopting the AD requirements as
proposed.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
We reviewed Airbus Helicopters Alert
Service Bulletin ASB MBB–BK117 C–2–
24A–013, Revision 1, dated November
25, 2014 (ASB). The ASB specifies a
visual inspection of the terminal lugs in
the distribution and diode boxes for
correct crimping, damage, discoloration,
corrosion, and correct installation. If
any deviation is detected, the terminal
lug must be replaced. The ASB also
specifies reporting certain information
to Airbus Helicopters.
E:\FR\FM\27OCR1.SGM
27OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 208 (Thursday, October 27, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 74659-74662]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-25694]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 922
[Doc. No. AMS-SC-16-0050; SC16-922-1 FR]
Apricots Grown in Designated Counties in Washington; Increased
Assessment Rate
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule implements a recommendation from the Washington
Apricot Marketing Committee (Committee) to increase the assessment rate
established for the 2016-17 and subsequent fiscal periods from $0.75 to
$1.40 per ton of Washington apricots handled under the marketing order.
The Committee, which is composed of growers and handlers, locally
administers the order which regulates the handling of apricots grown in
designated counties in Washington. Assessments upon apricot handlers
are used by the Committee to fund reasonable and necessary expenses of
the program. The fiscal period begins April 1 and ends March 31. The
assessment rate would remain in effect indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated.
DATES: Effective October 28, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dale Novotny, Marketing Specialist, or
Gary D. Olson, Regional Director, Northwest Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS,
USDA; Telephone: (503) 326-2724, Fax: (503) 326-7440, or Email:
DaleJ.Novotny@ams.usda.gov or GaryD.Olson@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Richard Lower, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491,
Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email: Richard.Lower@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement and Order No. 922, both as amended (7 CFR part 922),
regulating the handling of apricots grown in designated counties in
Washington, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.'' The order is
effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
[[Page 74660]]
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13175.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. Under the order now in effect, apricot handlers in
designated counties in Washington are subject to assessments. Funds to
administer the order are derived from such assessments. It is intended
that the assessment rate as issued herein will be applicable to all
assessable Washington apricots beginning April 1, 2016, and continue
until amended, suspended, or terminated.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule increases the assessment rate established for the
Committee for the 2016-17 and subsequent fiscal periods from $0.75 to
$1.40 per ton of Washington apricots handled under the order.
The Washington apricot marketing order provides authority for the
Committee, with the approval of USDA, to formulate an annual budget of
expenses and collect assessments from handlers to administer the
program. The members of the Committee are producers and handlers of
apricots in designated counties in Washington. They are familiar with
the Committee's needs, and with the costs for goods and services in
their local area, and are thus in a position to formulate an
appropriate budget and assessment rate. The assessment rate is
formulated and discussed in a public meeting. Thus, all directly
affected persons have an opportunity to participate and provide input.
For the 2015-16 and subsequent fiscal periods, the Committee
recommended, and the USDA approved, an assessment rate that would
continue in effect from fiscal period to fiscal period unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation and information
submitted by the Committee or other information available to USDA.
The Committee met on May 11, 2016, and unanimously recommended
2016-17 expenditures of $7,160 and an assessment rate of $1.40 per ton
of apricots. In comparison, the previous fiscal period's budgeted
expenditures were $7,610. The recommended assessment rate of $1.40 per
ton is $0.65 per ton higher than the rate currently in effect.
Last year at the May 12, 2015, meeting, Committee members voted to
moderately increase the budget from $7,095 to $7,610, and to decrease
the assessment rate from $1.50 to $0.75 per ton of apricots handled.
The Committee was attempting to lower their excess reserve funds to
approximately one fiscal period's operating expenses to remain in
compliance with Sec. 922.42(a)(2) of the order. The Committee based
its recommendation on a crop estimate of 5,800 tons for the 2015-16
crop year. The actual crop yield for that period was 4,795 tons, 1,005
tons less than the 5,800 ton estimate used by the Committee for
budgeting purposes. Low water supply and higher than average
temperatures were reported by the industry at the May 11, 2016, meeting
as the major factors for the short 2015-16 crop. As a result of the
reduced crop size and related lower assessment revenue, the Committee
was forced to use more funds from its reserve than previously
anticipated. The Committee intends to fully fund ongoing operations and
maintain adequate reserve funds through the implementation of the
assessment rate increase for the 2016-17 and future fiscal periods.
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2016-17
fiscal period include $3,000 for the contracted management fee to the
Washington State Fruit Commission, $1,200 for Committee travel, $2,000
for the annual audit, $500 for computer and technical services, and
$250 for office supplies. Budgeted expenses for these items in the
2015-2016 fiscal period were $3,000 for the management fee, $1,200 for
Committee travel, $2,500 for the annual audit, and $500 for office
supplies, respectively.
The assessment rate recommended by the Committee was derived by
dividing anticipated expenses by expected shipments of Washington
apricots, while also taking into account the Committee's monetary
reserve. Washington apricot shipments for the year are estimated at
5,000 tons which should provide $7,000 in assessment income at the rate
of $1.40 per ton of Washington apricots handled. Income derived from
handler assessments, along with interest income and funds from the
Committee's authorized reserve, would be adequate to cover budgeted
expenses for the 2016-17 fiscal period. Funds in the reserve (currently
$7,301) would be kept within the maximum amount permitted by the order
of approximately one fiscal period's operational expenses. Authority
for maintaining a financial reserve is found in Sec. 922.42(a)(2) of
the order. The Committee expects its monetary reserve to decrease from
$7,301 at the beginning of the 2016-17 fiscal period to approximately
$7,141 at the end of the 2016-17 fiscal period. That amount would be
within the provisions of the order and should provide the Committee
with the ability to absorb fluctuations in assessment income and
expenses into the future.
The assessment rate will continue in effect indefinitely unless
modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation and
information submitted by the Committee or other available information.
Although this assessment rate will be in effect for an indefinite
period, the Committee will continue to meet prior to or during each
fiscal period to recommend a budget of expenses and consider
recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and
times of the Committee meetings are available from the Committee or the
USDA. Committee meetings are open to the public and interested persons
may express their views at these meetings. USDA will evaluate Committee
recommendations and other available information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate is needed. Further rulemaking will
be undertaken as necessary. The Committee's 2016-17 budget and those
for subsequent fiscal periods will be reviewed and, as appropriate,
approved by USDA.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this rule on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the
[[Page 74661]]
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in that they are
brought about through group action of essentially small entities acting
on their own behalf.
There are approximately 100 growers and 17 handlers of Washington
apricots subject to regulation under the marketing order in the
regulated area. Most apricot producers and all handlers accounted for
in the regulated area are engaged in the production of other crops in
addition to apricots. Small agricultural producers are defined by the
Small Business Administration (SBA) as those having annual receipts of
less than $750,000, and small agricultural service firms are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less than $7,500,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
The National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) reports that
the 2015 total production and utilization (including both fresh and
processed markets) of Washington apricots was approximately 8,000 tons,
the average price was $1,050 per ton, and the total farm-gate value was
approximately $8,400,000. Based on these reports and the number of
apricot growers within the production area, it is estimated that the
2015 average revenue from the sale of apricots was approximately
$84,000. In addition, based on information from the USDA's Market News
Service, 2015 f.o.b. prices for Washington No.1 apricots ranged from
$20.00 to $26.00 per 24-pound container for both loose pack and 2-layer
tray-pack containers. Using average prices and shipment information
provided by the Committee, it is determined that each of the Washington
apricot handlers currently ship less than $7,500,000 worth of apricots
on an annual basis. In view of the foregoing, it is concluded that the
majority of handlers and growers of Washington apricots may be
classified as small entities.
This rule increases the assessment rate established for the
Committee, and collected from handlers, for the 2016-17 and subsequent
fiscal periods from $0.75 to $1.40 per ton of Washington apricots
handled. The new assessment rate of $1.40 is $0.65 higher than the
2015-16 rate. The quantity of assessable apricots for the 2016-17
fiscal period is estimated at 5,000 tons. Thus, the $1.40 rate should
provide $7,000 in assessment income and, combined with the existing
reserve fund, should be adequate to meet this year's budgeted expenses.
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2016-17
fiscal period include $3,000 for the contracted management fee to the
Washington State Fruit Commission, $1,200 for Committee travel, $2,000
for the annual audit, $500 for computer and technical services, and
$250 for office supplies. Budgeted expenses for these items in the
2015-2016 fiscal period were $3,000 for the management fee, $1,200 for
Committee travel, $2,500 for the annual audit, and $500 for office
supplies.
The Committee discussed alternatives to this action, including
recommending alternative expenditure levels and assessment rates.
Although lower assessment rates were considered, none were selected
because they would not have generated sufficient income to administer
the order.
A review of historical data and preliminary information pertaining
to the 2016-17 season indicates that the grower price for Washington
apricots could range between $1,050 and $1,300 per ton. Therefore, the
assessment revenue for the 2016-17 fiscal period, as a percentage of
total grower revenue, could range between 0.133 and 0.108 percent.
This action increases the assessment obligation imposed on
handlers. While assessments impose some additional costs on handlers,
the costs are minimal and uniform on all handlers. Some of the
additional costs may be passed on to producers. However, these costs
are offset by the benefits derived by the operation of the order. In
addition, the Committee's meeting was widely publicized throughout the
Washington apricot industry and all interested persons were invited to
attend the meeting and participate in Committee deliberations on all
issues. Like all Committee meetings, the May 11, 2016, meeting was a
public meeting and all entities, both large and small, were able to
express views on this issue. Finally, interested persons were invited
to submit comments on this rule, including the regulatory and
informational impacts of this action on small businesses.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order's information collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581-0189. No changes in those requirements as a
result of this action are necessary. Should any changes become
necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for approval.
This rule imposes no additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large Washington apricot handlers. As
with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. As noted in the
initial regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA has not identified any
relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or conflict with this
final rule.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal
Register on August 23, 2016 (81 FR 57493). Copies of the proposed rule
were also mailed or sent via facsimile to all apricot handlers.
Finally, the proposal was made available through the internet by USDA
and the Office of the Federal Register. A 30-day comment period ending
September 22, 2016, was provided for interested persons to respond to
the proposal. No comments were received.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses. Any questions
about the compliance guide should be sent to Richard Lower at the
previously-mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the information and recommendation submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as
hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also found and determined that good
cause exists for not postponing the effective date of this rule until
30 days after publication in the Federal Register because: (1) The
2016-17 fiscal period began on April 1, 2016, and the marketing order
requires that the rate of assessment for each fiscal period apply to
all assessable Washington apricots handled during such fiscal period;
(2) the Committee needs to have sufficient funds to pay its expenses,
which are incurred on a continuous basis; (3) handlers are already
shipping Washington apricots from the 2016 crop; and (4) handlers are
aware of this action, which was unanimously recommended by the
Committee at a public meeting and is similar to other assessment rate
actions issued in past years. Further, handlers are aware of this rule
which was recommended at a public meeting. Also, a 30-day comment
[[Page 74662]]
period was provided for in the proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 922
Apricots, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 922 is
amended as follows:
PART 922--APRICOTS GROWN IN DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN WASHINGTON
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 922 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. Section 922.235 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 922.235 Assessment rate.
On or after April 1, 2016, an assessment rate of $1.40 per ton is
established for Washington apricots handled in the production area.
Dated: October 19, 2016.
Elanor Starmer,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-25694 Filed 10-26-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P