Notice of Availability of a Final Environmental Impact Statement for Effects of Oil and Gas Activities in the Arctic Ocean, 72780-72781 [2016-25475]
Download as PDF
72780
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 204 / Friday, October 21, 2016 / Notices
6 p.m. Webinar, at https://
attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/
5214638781622248964. Additional
information about the Council’s Vision
Blueprint is available from the ‘‘Vision
Project’’ page of the Council’s Web site,
at www.safmc.net.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XE975
South Atlantic Fishery Management
Council—Public Meetings
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of informational
Webinars.
AGENCY:
The South Atlantic Fishery
Management Council (Council) will
hold two informational Webinars
pertaining to the Council’s 2016–2020
Vision Blueprint for the Snapper
Grouper Fishery.
DATES: The Webinars will be held on
November 21, 2016, to view the agenda
see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
ADDRESSES: Council address: South
Atlantic Fishery Management Council,
4055 Faber Place Drive, Suite 201, N.
Charleston, SC 29405.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kim
Iverson, Public Information Officer,
SAFMC; phone 843/571–4366 or toll
free 866/SAFMC–10; FAX 843/769–
4520; email: kim.iverson@safmc.net.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Agenda
The Council will hold two Webinars
to inform the public on progress to date
on implementation of priority items in
the 2016–2020 Vision Blueprint for the
Snapper Grouper Fishery. The Vision
Blueprint is a long-term strategic plan
for managing the snapper grouper
fishery, and has been developed with
stakeholder input. The Vision Blueprint
identifies the goals, objectives,
strategies, and actions that support the
Vision for the snapper grouper fishery
and centers around four goal areas: (1)
Science; (2) Management; (3)
Communication; and (4) Governance.
The informal Webinars are being held as
part of an annual evaluation of the
Vision Blueprint and are designed to let
the public know what the Council
accomplished during the year in terms
of addressing priority items within the
Blueprint.
The Webinars will be conducted at 10
a.m. and at 6 p.m. The Webinars will be
accessible via the Internet from the
‘‘Other Meetings’’ page of Council’s Web
site, at www.safmc.net. Registration for
the Webinars is required. Register for
the 10 a.m. Webinar, at https://
attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/
6323613905978491652. Register for the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:06 Oct 20, 2016
Jkt 241001
Special Accommodations
These Webinars are physically
accessible to people with disabilities.
Requests for auxiliary aids should be
directed to the SAFMC office (see
ADDRESSES) at least 5 business days
prior to the meeting.
Note: The times and sequence specified in
this agenda are subject to change.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: October 18, 2016.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–25488 Filed 10–20–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XE841
Notice of Availability of a Final
Environmental Impact Statement for
Effects of Oil and Gas Activities in the
Arctic Ocean
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability of a Final
Environmental Impact Statement;
request for comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS announces the
availability of the ‘‘Final Environmental
Impact Statement (FEIS) for the Effects
of Oil and Gas Activities in the Arctic
Ocean.’’ The purpose of the FEIS is to
evaluate, in compliance with the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), the potential direct, indirect,
and cumulative impacts of
implementing the alternative
approaches for authorizing take of
marine mammals incidental to oil and
gas activities in the Arctic Ocean
pursuant to the Marine Mammal
Protection Act (MMPA). The U.S.
Department of the Interior’s Bureau of
Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) was
a cooperating agency on this FEIS, and
as such, this FEIS also evaluates the
potential direct, indirect, and
cumulative impacts of implementing the
alternative approaches for authorizing
geological and geophysical (G&G)
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
surveys and concurring on ancillary
activities under the Outer Continental
Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA) in the Arctic
Ocean. The North Slope Borough (NSB)
was also a cooperating agency on this
FEIS. The Environmental Protection
Agency and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife
Service were consulting agencies, and
NMFS coordinated with the Alaska
Eskimo Whaling Commission pursuant
to our co-management agreement under
the MMPA.
DATES: Federal, State, and local
agencies, as well as other interested
parties, are invited to review this FEIS.
Comments must be received on or
before November 21, 2016, to be
considered for our Record of Decision.
The Record of Decision will include
information on the alternatives
considered, the preferred alternative
and why we chose it, and required
mitigation and monitoring.
ADDRESSES: The FEIS is available for
review online at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/eis/
arctic.htm. You may submit comments
on this document by:
• Email: Candace.Nachman@
noaa.gov.
• Fax: (301) 713–0376, Attn: Jolie
Harrison.
• Mail: NOAA, NMFS, Office of
Protected Resources, 1315 East-West
Highway, Room 13805, Silver Spring,
MD 20910, Attn: Jolie Harrison.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Candace Nachman, Office of Policy,
NMFS at (301) 427–8031, or Jolie
Harrison, Office of Protected Resources,
NMFS at (301) 427–8401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101 (a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct
the Secretary of Commerce to allow,
upon request, the incidental, but not
intentional taking of small numbers of
marine mammals by U.S. citizens who
engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region if certain findings
are made and either regulations are
issued or, if the taking is limited to
harassment, a notice of proposed
authorization is provided to the public
for review. The term ‘‘take’’ under the
MMPA means ‘‘to harass, hunt, capture
or kill, or attempt to harass, hunt,
capture, or kill.’’ Except with respect to
certain activities not pertinent here, the
MMPA defines ‘‘harassment’’ as ‘‘any
act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance
which (i) has the potential to injure a
marine mammal or marine mammal
stock in the wild (Level A harassment);
or (ii) has the potential to disturb a
E:\FR\FM\21OCN1.SGM
21OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 204 / Friday, October 21, 2016 / Notices
incidental take authorizations (ITAs)
under section 101(a)(5) of the MMPA for
seismic surveys, ancillary activities, and
exploratory drilling. NMFS recognizes
that the current level of oil and gas
exploration activities is lower than what
previously occurred and what was
projected when the scoping process for
this EIS began in February 2010.
However, NMFS still receives requests
for MMPA ITAs in the U.S. Beaufort and
Chukchi Seas, and this FEIS provides
decision-makers and the public with an
evaluation of the environmental, social,
and economic effects of the proposed
action and alternatives.
On December 30, 2011, NMFS
published a Notice of Availability of the
Draft EIS in the Federal Register (76 FR
82275). The 2011 Draft EIS includes an
analysis of the proposed actions
identified in the 2010 Notice of Intent
(i.e., NMFS’ issuance of MMPA ITAs for
take of marine mammals incidental to
G&G surveys, ancillary activities, and
exploratory drilling in the Chukchi and
Beaufort Seas and BOEM’s issuance of
G&G permits and concurrence on
ancillary activities in the Chukchi and
Beaufort Seas), the anticipated
environmental impacts, and measures to
minimize the impacts associated with
marine mammal or marine mammal
stock in the wild by causing disruption
of behavioral patterns, including, but
not limited to, migration, breathing,
nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
(Level B harassment).’’
Authorization for incidental takings
shall be granted if NMFS finds that the
taking will have a negligible impact on
the species or stock(s), will not have an
unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for
subsistence uses (where relevant), and if
the permissible methods of taking and
requirements pertaining to the
mitigation, monitoring and reporting of
such takings are set forth. NMFS has
defined ‘‘negligible impact’’ in 50 CFR
216.103 as ‘‘. . . an impact resulting
from the specified activity that cannot
be reasonably expected to, and is not
reasonably likely to, adversely affect the
species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival.’’
NMFS, as the lead federal agency,
prepared this FEIS to evaluate a broad
range of reasonably foreseeable levels of
exploration activities and associated
mitigation measures that may occur in
the U.S. Beaufort and Chukchi Seas. The
FEIS presents the potential impacts
associated with the issuance of
72781
these activities. On March 29, 2013,
NMFS published a Notice of
Availability of a Supplemental Draft EIS
in the Federal Register (78 FR 19212).
The Supplemental Draft EIS included
one new alternative not contained in the
2011 Draft EIS and a few other
substantive changes. Please refer to the
Notices of Availability for the Draft and
Supplemental Draft EISs for that
information.
Alternatives
NMFS evaluated a preferred
alternative (Alternative 2) and five
others in the FEIS. Each alternative
includes an analysis of a suite of
standard and additional mitigation
measures that have been identified to
help reduce impacts to marine
mammals and to ensure no unmitigable
adverse impact on the availability of
marine mammals for subsistence uses.
Each alternative also considers a
reasonable range of oil and gas
exploration activities for which MMPA
ITAs could be issued. Table 1 outlines
the activity levels considered in each
alternative. Activity levels noted are a
maximum for each alternative.
TABLE 1—LEVELS OF G&G, ANCILLARY, AND EXPLORATORY DRILLING ACTIVITIES PROPOSED FOR CONSIDERATION IN THE
ALTERNATIVES IN THE FEIS ON THE EFFECTS OF OIL AND GAS ACTIVITIES IN THE ARCTIC OCEAN. ACTIVITY LEVELS
NOTED ARE A MAXIMUM, AND ANY COMBINATION UP TO THAT AMOUNT COULD BE ALLOWED UNDER EACH ALTERNATIVE
Site clearance and
shallow hazards
surveys
2D/3D Seismic
surveys
Alternative 1 (No Action) ................................
Alternative 2—Preferred Alternative (Level 1)
Alternative 3 (Level 2) ....................................
Alternative 4 (Level 3) ....................................
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Alternative 5 (Level 3 with required time/area
closures).
Alternative 6 (any level with required use of
alternative technologies).
Alternatives 5 and 6 differ from
Alternatives 2, 3, and 4 in the fact that
each one considers required mitigation
measures not contemplated in the other
action alternatives. Certain time/area
closures considered for mitigation on a
case-by-case basis under the other
action alternatives would be required
under Alternative 5. The time/area
closures would be for specific areas
important to biological productivity, life
history functions for specific species of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:06 Oct 20, 2016
Jkt 241001
0
4
3
6
5
6
5
6
5
6
5
.................................
in Beaufort ..............
in Chukchi ...............
in Beaufort ..............
in Chukchi ...............
in Beaufort ..............
in Chukchi ...............
in Beaufort ..............
in Chukchi ...............
in Beaufort ..............
in Chukchi ...............
0
3
3
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
.................................
in Beaufort ..............
in Chukchi ...............
in Beaufort ..............
in Chukchi ...............
in Beaufort ..............
in Chukchi ...............
in Beaufort ..............
in Chukchi ...............
in Beaufort ..............
in Chukchi ...............
concern, and subsistence activities.
Activities would not be permitted to
occur in any of the time/area closures
during the specific identified periods.
Additionally, buffer zones around these
time/area closures could potentially be
included.
In addition to contemplating the same
suite of standard and additional
mitigation measures analyzed in the
other action alternatives, Alternative 6
also includes specific additional
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
On-ice seismic
surveys
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
.................................
in Beaufort ..............
in Chukchi ...............
in Beaufort ..............
in Chukchi ...............
in Beaufort ..............
in Chukchi ...............
in Beaufort ..............
in Chukchi ...............
in Beaufort ..............
in Chukchi ...............
Exploratory drilling
0.
1 in Beaufort
1 in Chukchi.
2 in Beaufort
2 in Chukchi.
4 in Beaufort
4 in Chukchi.
4 in Beaufort
4 in Chukchi.
Any level up to the
maximum, as the
technology only relates to seismic surveys.
mitigation measures that focus on the
use of alternative technologies that have
the potential to augment or replace
traditional airgun-based seismic
exploration activities in the future.
Dated: October 17, 2016.
Donna S. Wieting,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–25475 Filed 10–20–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\21OCN1.SGM
21OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 204 (Friday, October 21, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72780-72781]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-25475]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XE841
Notice of Availability of a Final Environmental Impact Statement
for Effects of Oil and Gas Activities in the Arctic Ocean
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability of a Final Environmental Impact
Statement; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS announces the availability of the ``Final Environmental
Impact Statement (FEIS) for the Effects of Oil and Gas Activities in
the Arctic Ocean.'' The purpose of the FEIS is to evaluate, in
compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the
potential direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of implementing the
alternative approaches for authorizing take of marine mammals
incidental to oil and gas activities in the Arctic Ocean pursuant to
the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA). The U.S. Department of the
Interior's Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) was a cooperating
agency on this FEIS, and as such, this FEIS also evaluates the
potential direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of implementing the
alternative approaches for authorizing geological and geophysical (G&G)
surveys and concurring on ancillary activities under the Outer
Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA) in the Arctic Ocean. The North
Slope Borough (NSB) was also a cooperating agency on this FEIS. The
Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
were consulting agencies, and NMFS coordinated with the Alaska Eskimo
Whaling Commission pursuant to our co-management agreement under the
MMPA.
DATES: Federal, State, and local agencies, as well as other interested
parties, are invited to review this FEIS. Comments must be received on
or before November 21, 2016, to be considered for our Record of
Decision. The Record of Decision will include information on the
alternatives considered, the preferred alternative and why we chose it,
and required mitigation and monitoring.
ADDRESSES: The FEIS is available for review online at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/eis/arctic.htm. You may submit comments on
this document by:
Email: Candace.Nachman@noaa.gov.
Fax: (301) 713-0376, Attn: Jolie Harrison.
Mail: NOAA, NMFS, Office of Protected Resources, 1315
East-West Highway, Room 13805, Silver Spring, MD 20910, Attn: Jolie
Harrison.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Candace Nachman, Office of Policy,
NMFS at (301) 427-8031, or Jolie Harrison, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS at (301) 427-8401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101 (a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.)
direct the Secretary of Commerce to allow, upon request, the
incidental, but not intentional taking of small numbers of marine
mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified geographical region if certain
findings are made and either regulations are issued or, if the taking
is limited to harassment, a notice of proposed authorization is
provided to the public for review. The term ``take'' under the MMPA
means ``to harass, hunt, capture or kill, or attempt to harass, hunt,
capture, or kill.'' Except with respect to certain activities not
pertinent here, the MMPA defines ``harassment'' as ``any act of
pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i) has the potential to injure a
marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild (Level A harassment);
or (ii) has the potential to disturb a
[[Page 72781]]
marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild by causing disruption
of behavioral patterns, including, but not limited to, migration,
breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering (Level B
harassment).''
Authorization for incidental takings shall be granted if NMFS finds
that the taking will have a negligible impact on the species or
stock(s), will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for subsistence uses (where
relevant), and if the permissible methods of taking and requirements
pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring and reporting of such takings
are set forth. NMFS has defined ``negligible impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103
as ``. . . an impact resulting from the specified activity that cannot
be reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely
affect the species or stock through effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival.''
NMFS, as the lead federal agency, prepared this FEIS to evaluate a
broad range of reasonably foreseeable levels of exploration activities
and associated mitigation measures that may occur in the U.S. Beaufort
and Chukchi Seas. The FEIS presents the potential impacts associated
with the issuance of incidental take authorizations (ITAs) under
section 101(a)(5) of the MMPA for seismic surveys, ancillary
activities, and exploratory drilling. NMFS recognizes that the current
level of oil and gas exploration activities is lower than what
previously occurred and what was projected when the scoping process for
this EIS began in February 2010. However, NMFS still receives requests
for MMPA ITAs in the U.S. Beaufort and Chukchi Seas, and this FEIS
provides decision-makers and the public with an evaluation of the
environmental, social, and economic effects of the proposed action and
alternatives.
On December 30, 2011, NMFS published a Notice of Availability of
the Draft EIS in the Federal Register (76 FR 82275). The 2011 Draft EIS
includes an analysis of the proposed actions identified in the 2010
Notice of Intent (i.e., NMFS' issuance of MMPA ITAs for take of marine
mammals incidental to G&G surveys, ancillary activities, and
exploratory drilling in the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas and BOEM's
issuance of G&G permits and concurrence on ancillary activities in the
Chukchi and Beaufort Seas), the anticipated environmental impacts, and
measures to minimize the impacts associated with these activities. On
March 29, 2013, NMFS published a Notice of Availability of a
Supplemental Draft EIS in the Federal Register (78 FR 19212). The
Supplemental Draft EIS included one new alternative not contained in
the 2011 Draft EIS and a few other substantive changes. Please refer to
the Notices of Availability for the Draft and Supplemental Draft EISs
for that information.
Alternatives
NMFS evaluated a preferred alternative (Alternative 2) and five
others in the FEIS. Each alternative includes an analysis of a suite of
standard and additional mitigation measures that have been identified
to help reduce impacts to marine mammals and to ensure no unmitigable
adverse impact on the availability of marine mammals for subsistence
uses. Each alternative also considers a reasonable range of oil and gas
exploration activities for which MMPA ITAs could be issued. Table 1
outlines the activity levels considered in each alternative. Activity
levels noted are a maximum for each alternative.
Table 1--Levels of G&G, Ancillary, and Exploratory Drilling Activities Proposed for Consideration in the
Alternatives in the FEIS on the Effects of Oil and Gas Activities in the Arctic Ocean. Activity Levels Noted are
a Maximum, and Any Combination Up to That Amount Could Be Allowed Under Each Alternative
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site clearance and
2D/3D Seismic shallow hazards On-ice seismic Exploratory
surveys surveys surveys drilling
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alternative 1 (No Action)....... 0................. 0................. 0................. 0.
Alternative 2--Preferred 4 in Beaufort..... 3 in Beaufort..... 1 in Beaufort..... 1 in Beaufort
Alternative (Level 1). 3 in Chukchi...... 3 in Chukchi...... 0 in Chukchi...... 1 in Chukchi.
Alternative 3 (Level 2)......... 6 in Beaufort..... 5 in Beaufort..... 1 in Beaufort..... 2 in Beaufort
5 in Chukchi...... 5 in Chukchi...... 0 in Chukchi...... 2 in Chukchi.
Alternative 4 (Level 3)......... 6 in Beaufort..... 5 in Beaufort..... 1 in Beaufort..... 4 in Beaufort
5 in Chukchi...... 5 in Chukchi...... 0 in Chukchi...... 4 in Chukchi.
Alternative 5 (Level 3 with 6 in Beaufort..... 5 in Beaufort..... 1 in Beaufort..... 4 in Beaufort
required time/area closures). 5 in Chukchi...... 5 in Chukchi...... 0 in Chukchi...... 4 in Chukchi.
Alternative 6 (any level with 6 in Beaufort..... 5 in Beaufort..... 1 in Beaufort..... Any level up to
required use of alternative 5 in Chukchi...... 5 in Chukchi...... 0 in Chukchi...... the maximum, as
technologies). the technology
only relates to
seismic surveys.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alternatives 5 and 6 differ from Alternatives 2, 3, and 4 in the
fact that each one considers required mitigation measures not
contemplated in the other action alternatives. Certain time/area
closures considered for mitigation on a case-by-case basis under the
other action alternatives would be required under Alternative 5. The
time/area closures would be for specific areas important to biological
productivity, life history functions for specific species of concern,
and subsistence activities. Activities would not be permitted to occur
in any of the time/area closures during the specific identified
periods. Additionally, buffer zones around these time/area closures
could potentially be included.
In addition to contemplating the same suite of standard and
additional mitigation measures analyzed in the other action
alternatives, Alternative 6 also includes specific additional
mitigation measures that focus on the use of alternative technologies
that have the potential to augment or replace traditional airgun-based
seismic exploration activities in the future.
Dated: October 17, 2016.
Donna S. Wieting,
Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-25475 Filed 10-20-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P