Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia; Removal of Stage II Gasoline Vapor Recovery Requirements for Gasoline Dispensing Facilities, 72757-72758 [2016-25297]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 204 / Friday, October 21, 2016 / Proposed Rules
B. Subpart 1 RACM Requirements
Subpart 1 requires that each
attainment plan ‘‘provide for the
implementation of all reasonably
available control measures as
expeditiously as practicable (including
such reductions in emission from the
existing sources in the area as may be
obtained through the adoption, at a
minimum, of reasonably available
control technology), and shall provide
for attainment of the national primary
ambient air quality standards.’’ See CAA
section 172(c)(1). EPA has consistently
interpreted this provision to require
only implementation of potential RACM
measures that could advance
attainment.5 Thus, when an area is
already attaining the standard, no
additional RACM measures are
required. EPA’s interpretation that
Subpart 1 requires only the
implementation of RACM measures that
would advance attainment was upheld
by the United States Court of Appeals in
the Fifth Circuit 6 and by the United
States Court of Appeals for the D.C.
Circuit.7
C. Proposed Action
In its August 9, 2016, SIP submission,
the Commonwealth determined that no
additional control measures are
necessary in the Area to satisfy the CAA
section 172(c)(1) RACM requirement
because the Area has attained the 1997
Annual PM2.5 NAAQS. As noted above,
EPA has determined that the Area
attained the standard by the April 5,
2010, attainment date and that no
additional measures are required to
satisfy Subpart 1 RACM when an area
is attaining the standard. Therefore, EPA
proposes to agree with the
Commonwealth’s analysis, to approve
Kentucky’s SIP revision, and to
incorporate the section 172(c)(1) RACM
determination into the SIP.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable federal regulations.
See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
This memorandum is not required to satisfy EPA’s
regional consistency regulations. See 40 CFR
56.5(b)(1); 81 FR 51102 (August 3, 2016).
5 This interpretation was adopted in the General
Preamble, see 57 FR 13498 (April 16, 1992), and has
been upheld as applied to the Clean Data Policy, as
well as to nonattainment SIP submissions. See
NRDC v. EPA, 571 F.3d 1245 (D.C. Cir. 2009); Sierra
Club v. EPA, 294 F.3d 155 (D.C. Cir. 2002).
6 Sierra Club v. EPA, 314 F.3d 735, 743–745 (5th
Cir. 2002).
7 Sierra Club v. EPA, 294 F.3d 155, 162–163 (D.C.
Cir. 2002); NRDC v. EPA, 571 F.3d 1245, 1252 (D.C.
Cir. 2009).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Oct 20, 2016
Jkt 241001
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this proposed
action merely proposes to approve state
law as meeting federal requirements and
does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. For that reason, this proposed
action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), nor will it impose substantial
direct costs on tribal governments or
preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
72757
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: October 11, 2016.
Heather McTeer Toney,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2016–25433 Filed 10–20–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2016–0308; FRL–9954–17–
Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia;
Removal of Stage II Gasoline Vapor
Recovery Requirements for Gasoline
Dispensing Facilities
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) proposes to approve the
state implementation plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the Commonwealth of
Virginia for the purpose of removing the
requirement for gasoline vapor recovery
equipment on gasoline dispensing
pumps (otherwise referred to as Stage II
vapor recovery, or simply as Stage II) in
Virginia area facilities formerly required
to have installed and operated Stage II
vapor recovery controls under the prior,
approved Virginia SIP. In the Rules and
Regulations section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving the
Commonwealth’s SIP submittal as a
direct final rule without prior proposal
because the Agency views this as a
noncontroversial submittal and
anticipates no adverse comments. A
detailed rationale for EPA’s approval of
Virginia’s Stage II-related SIP revision
with amended regulations addressing
vapor recovery is set forth in the direct
final rule. If no adverse comments are
received in response to this action, no
further activity is contemplated. If EPA
receives adverse comments, the direct
final rule will be withdrawn and all
public comments received will be
addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on this proposed rule. EPA will
not institute a second comment period.
Any parties interested in commenting
on this action should do so at this time.
DATES: Comments must be received in
writing by November 21, 2016.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21OCP1.SGM
21OCP1
72758
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 204 / Friday, October 21, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R03–
OAR–2016–0308 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
pino.maria@epa.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. For either manner of
submission, the EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
confidential business information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the ‘‘For
Further Information Contact’’ section.
For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Rehn, (215) 814–2176, or by email
at rehn.brian@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For
further information, please see the
information provided in the direct final
action, with the same title, that is
located in the Rules and Regulations
section of this issue of the Federal
Register.
ADDRESSES:
Dated: September 29, 2016.
Shawn M. Garvin,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2016–25297 Filed 10–20–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
40 CFR Parts 271 and 272
[EPA–R06–RCRA–2015–0664; FRL–9951–
20–Region 6]
Louisiana: Final Authorization of StateInitiated Changes and Incorporation by
Reference of State Hazardous Waste
Management Program
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Oct 20, 2016
Jkt 241001
ACTION:
Proposed rule.
During a review of
Louisiana’s regulations, the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
identified a variety of State-initiated
changes to Louisiana’s hazardous waste
program under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA),
as amended, for which the State had not
previously sought authorization. EPA
proposes to authorize the State for the
program changes. In addition, EPA
proposes to codify in the regulations
entitled ‘‘Approved State Hazardous
Waste Management Programs’’,
Louisiana’s authorized hazardous waste
program. The EPA will incorporate by
reference into the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) those provisions of
the State regulations that are authorized
and that EPA will enforce under RCRA.
DATES: Send written comments by
November 21, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit any comments
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R06–
RCRA–2015–0664, by one of the
following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
2. Email: patterson.alima@epa.gov or
banks.julia@epa.gov.
3. Mail: Alima Patterson, Region 6,
Regional Authorization Coordinator, or
Julia Banks, Codification Coordinator,
Permit Section (RPM), Multimedia
Planning and Permitting Division, EPA
Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas,
Texas 75202–2733.
4. Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver
your comments to Alima Patterson,
Region 6, Regional Authorization
Coordinator, or Julia Banks, Codification
Coordinator, Permit Section (RPM),
Multimedia Planning and Permitting
Division, EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross
Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733.
Instructions: Do not submit
information that you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or otherwise protected through
regulations.gov, or email. Direct your
comments to Docket ID No. EPA–R06–
RCRA–2015–0664. The Federal
regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means the EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
comment directly to the EPA without
going through regulations.gov, your
email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public
docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, the EPA recommends that
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
you include your name and other
contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If the EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
the EPA may not be able to consider
your comment. Electronic files should
avoid the use of special characters, any
form of encryption, and be free of any
defects or viruses. You can view and
copy the documents that form the basis
for this authorization and codification
and associated publicly available
materials from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.
Monday through Friday at the following
location: EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross
Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733,
phone number: (214) 665–8533 or (214)
665–8178. Interested persons wanting to
examine these documents should make
an appointment with the office at least
two weeks in advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alima Patterson, Region 6, Regional
Authorization Coordinator or Julia
Banks, Codification Coordinator, Permit
Section (RPM), Multimedia Planning
and Permitting Division, EPA Region 6,
1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202–
2733, Phone number: (214) 665–8533 or
(214) 665–8178, and Email address:
patterson.alima@epa.gov or
banks.julia@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For
additional information, please see the
direct final rule published in the ‘‘Rules
and Regulations’’ section of this Federal
Register. EPA did not make a proposal
prior to the direct final rule because we
believe this action is not controversial
and do not expect comments that
oppose it. We have explained the
reasons for this authorization in the
preamble to the direct final rule. Unless
we get written comments which oppose
this authorization during the comment
period, the direct final rule will become
effective 60 days after publication and
we will not take further action on this
proposal. If we receive comments that
oppose this action, we will withdraw
the direct final rule and it will not take
effect. We will then respond to public
comments in a later final rule based on
this proposal. You may not have another
opportunity for comment. If you want to
comment on this action, you must do so
at this time.
The purpose of this Federal Register
document is to codify Louisiana’s base
hazardous waste management program
and its revisions to that program
through RCRA Clusters XXI, XXII
including RCRA Cluster XXIII Checklist
229 Exclusions for Solvent
Contaminated Wipes. (See 80 FR 55032)
September 14, 2015. The EPA provided
E:\FR\FM\21OCP1.SGM
21OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 204 (Friday, October 21, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 72757-72758]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-25297]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2016-0308; FRL-9954-17-Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Virginia; Removal of Stage II Gasoline Vapor Recovery Requirements for
Gasoline Dispensing Facilities
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposes to approve
the state implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted by the
Commonwealth of Virginia for the purpose of removing the requirement
for gasoline vapor recovery equipment on gasoline dispensing pumps
(otherwise referred to as Stage II vapor recovery, or simply as Stage
II) in Virginia area facilities formerly required to have installed and
operated Stage II vapor recovery controls under the prior, approved
Virginia SIP. In the Rules and Regulations section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving the Commonwealth's SIP submittal as a direct
final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a
noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A
detailed rationale for EPA's approval of Virginia's Stage II-related
SIP revision with amended regulations addressing vapor recovery is set
forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse comments are received in
response to this action, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA
receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and
all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final
rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second
comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action
should do so at this time.
DATES: Comments must be received in writing by November 21, 2016.
[[Page 72758]]
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R03-
OAR-2016-0308 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
pino.maria@epa.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow
the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be confidential business information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the ``For Further Information Contact'' section. For the
full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Rehn, (215) 814-2176, or by
email at rehn.brian@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For further information, please see the
information provided in the direct final action, with the same title,
that is located in the Rules and Regulations section of this issue of
the Federal Register.
Dated: September 29, 2016.
Shawn M. Garvin,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2016-25297 Filed 10-20-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P