Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions; Department of Homeland Security, United States Customs and Border Protection DHS/CBP-023 Border Patrol Enforcement Records, System of Records, 72551-72552 [2016-25209]
Download as PDF
72551
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 81, No. 203
Thursday, October 20, 2016
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov.
For
general questions please contact: Debra
L. Danisek, (202) 344–1610, Acting
Privacy Officer, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection, Washington, DC
20229. For privacy questions, please
contact: Jonathan R. Cantor, (202) 343–
1717, Acting Chief Privacy Officer,
Privacy Office, Department of Homeland
Security, Washington, DC 20528.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Office of the Secretary
6 CFR Part 5
[Docket No. DHS–2016–0070]
Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of
Exemptions; Department of Homeland
Security, United States Customs and
Border Protection DHS/CBP–023
Border Patrol Enforcement Records,
System of Records
Privacy Office, Department of
Homeland Security.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Department of Homeland
Security is giving concurrent notice of a
newly established system of records
pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974 for
the ‘‘Department of Homeland Security
(DHS)/U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP)–023 Border Patrol
Enforcement Records (BPER) System of
Records’’ and this proposed rulemaking.
In this proposed rulemaking, the
Department proposes to exempt
portions of the system of records from
one or more provisions of the Privacy
Act because of criminal, civil, and
administrative enforcement
requirements.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received on
or before November 21, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number DHS–
2016–0070, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–343–4010.
• Mail: Jonathan R. Cantor, Acting
Chief Privacy Officer, Privacy Office,
Department of Homeland Security,
Washington, DC 20528.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this notice. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:24 Oct 19, 2016
Jkt 241001
I. Background
In accordance with the Privacy Act of
1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, the Department of
Homeland Security/U.S. Customs and
Border Protection proposes to establish
a new DHS system of records titled,
‘‘DHS/CBP–023 Border Patrol
Enforcement Records (BPER) System of
Records.’’ Concurrent with this newly
issued system of records, DHS/CBP is
proposing to exempt the BPER System
of Records from certain provisions of
the Privacy Act.
The Privacy Act embodies fair
information practice principles in a
statutory framework governing the
means by which Federal Government
agencies collect, maintain, use, and
disseminate personally identifiable
information. The Privacy Act applies to
information that is maintained in a
‘‘system of records.’’ A ‘‘system of
records’’ is a group of any records under
the control of an agency from which
information is retrieved by the name of
the individual or by some identifying
number, symbol, or other identifying
particular assigned to the individual. In
the Privacy Act, an individual is defined
to encompass U.S. citizens and lawful
permanent residents. As a matter of
policy, DHS extends administrative
Privacy Act protections to all
individuals when systems of records
maintain information on U.S. citizens,
lawful permanent residents, and
visitors.
The Privacy Act permits Government
agencies to exempt certain records from
the access and amendment provisions. If
an agency claims an exemption,
however, it must issue a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking to make clear to
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the public the reasons why a particular
exemption is claimed.
DHS is claiming exemptions from
certain requirements of the Privacy Act
for BPER System of Records. Some
information in BPER System of Records
relates to official DHS national security,
law enforcement, immigration, and
intelligence activities. These
exemptions are needed to protect
information relating to DHS activities
from disclosure to subjects or others
related to these activities. Specifically,
the exemptions are required to preclude
subjects of these activities from
frustrating these processes; to avoid
disclosure of activity techniques; to
protect the identities and physical safety
of confidential informants and law
enforcement personnel; to ensure DHS’s
ability to obtain information from third
parties and other sources; to protect the
privacy of third parties; and to safeguard
classified information. Disclosure of
information to the subject of the inquiry
could also permit the subject to avoid
detection or apprehension.
The exemptions proposed here are
exercised by a large number of federal
law enforcement agencies to support
law enforcement and national security
missions. In appropriate circumstances,
when compliance would not appear to
interfere with or adversely affect the law
enforcement purposes of this system
and the overall law enforcement
process, the applicable exemptions may
be waived on a case by case basis.
A notice of system of records for
BPER System of Records is also
published in this issue of the Federal
Register.
List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 5
Freedom of information; Privacy.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, DHS proposes to amend
chapter I of title 6, Code of Federal
Regulations, as follows:
PART 5—DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS
AND INFORMATION
1. The authority citation for part 5
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.; Public Law
107–296, 116 Stat. 2135; 5 U.S.C. 301.
Subpart A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.
Subpart B also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552a.
2. Amend appendix C to add
paragraph 74 to read as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\20OCP1.SGM
20OCP1
72552
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 203 / Thursday, October 20, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Appendix C to Part 5—DHS Systems of
Records Exempt From the Privacy Act
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
74. The DHS/CBP–023 Border Patrol
Enforcement Records (BPER) System of
Records consists of electronic and paper
records and will be used by DHS and its
components. The DHS/CBP–023 Border
Patrol Enforcement Records System of
Records is a repository of information held
by DHS in connection with its several and
varied missions and functions, including, but
not limited to the enforcement of civil and
criminal laws; investigations, inquiries, and
proceedings there under; and national
security and intelligence activities. The DHS/
CBP–023 Border Patrol Enforcement Records
System of Records contains information that
is collected by, on behalf of, in support of,
or in cooperation with DHS and its
components and may contain personally
identifiable information collected by other
federal, state, local, tribal, foreign, or
international government agencies. The
Secretary of Homeland Security, pursuant to
5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), has exempted this system
from the following provisions of the Privacy
Act: 5 U.S.C. 552a (c)(3), (c)(4); (d); (e)(1),
(e)(2), (e)(3), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(5), (e)(8);
and (g). Additionally, the Secretary of
Homeland Security, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(2), has exempted this system from
the following provisions of the Privacy Act:
5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3); (d); (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), and
(e)(4)(H). When records received from
another system have been exempted in that
source system under 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), DHS
will claim the same exemptions for those
records that are claimed for the original
primary systems of records from which they
originated, and claims any additional
exemptions set forth here. Exemptions from
these particular subsections are justified, on
a case-by-case basis to be determined at the
time a request is made, for the following
reasons:
(a) From subsection (c)(3) and (4)
(Accounting for Disclosures) because release
of the accounting of disclosures could alert
the subject of an investigation of an actual or
potential criminal, civil, or regulatory
violation to the existence of the investigation,
and reveal investigative interest on the part
of DHS as well as the recipient agency.
Disclosure of the accounting would therefore
present a serious impediment to law
enforcement efforts and/or efforts to preserve
national security. Disclosure of the
accounting would also permit the individual
who is the subject of a record to impede the
investigation, to tamper with witnesses or
evidence, and to avoid detection or
apprehension, which would undermine the
entire investigative process.
(b) From subsection (d) (Access and
Amendment to Records) because access to
the records contained in this system of
records could inform the subject of an
investigation of an actual or potential
criminal, civil, or regulatory violation, to the
existence of the investigation, and reveal
investigative interest on the part of DHS or
another agency. Access to the records could
permit the individual who is the subject of
a record to impede the investigation, to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:24 Oct 19, 2016
Jkt 241001
tamper with witnesses or evidence, and to
avoid detection or apprehension.
Amendment of the records could interfere
with ongoing investigations and law
enforcement activities and would impose an
impossible administrative burden by
requiring investigations to be continuously
reinvestigated. In addition, permitting access
and amendment to such information could
disclose security-sensitive information that
could be detrimental to homeland security.
(c) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and
Necessity of Information) because in the
course of investigations into potential
violations of Federal law, the accuracy of
information obtained or introduced
occasionally may be unclear or the
information may not be strictly relevant or
necessary to a specific investigation. In the
interests of effective law enforcement, it is
appropriate to retain all information that may
aid in establishing patterns of unlawful
activity.
(d) From subsection (e)(2) (Collection of
Information from Individuals) because
requiring that information be collected from
the subject of an investigation would alert the
subject to the nature or existence of an
investigation, thereby interfering with the
related investigation and law enforcement
activities.
(e) From subsection (e)(3) (Notice to
Subjects) because providing such detailed
information would impede law enforcement
in that it could compromise investigations
by: Revealing the existence of an otherwise
confidential investigation and thereby
provide an opportunity for the subject of an
investigation to conceal evidence, alter
patterns of behavior, or take other actions
that could thwart investigative efforts; reveal
the identity of witnesses in investigations,
thereby providing an opportunity for the
subjects of the investigations or others to
harass, intimidate, or otherwise interfere
with the collection of evidence or other
information from such witnesses; or reveal
the identity of confidential informants,
which would negatively affect the
informant’s usefulness in any ongoing or
future investigations and discourage
members of the public from cooperating as
confidential informants in any future
investigations.
(f) From subsections (e)(4)(G) and (H)
(Agency Requirements) because portions of
this system are exempt from the individual
access provisions of subsection (d) for the
reasons noted above, and therefore DHS is
not required to establish requirements, rules,
or procedures with respect to such access.
Providing notice to individuals with respect
to existence of records pertaining to them in
the system of records or otherwise
establishing procedures pursuant to which
individuals may access and view records
pertaining to themselves in the system would
undermine investigative efforts and reveal
the identities of witnesses, and potential
witnesses, and confidential informants.
(g) From subsection (e)(5) (Collection of
Information) because in the collection of
information for law enforcement purposes it
is impossible to determine in advance what
information is accurate, relevant, timely, and
complete. Compliance with (e)(5) would
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
preclude DHS agents from using their
investigative training and exercise of good
judgment to both conduct and report on
investigations.
(h) From subsection (e)(8) (Notice on
Individuals) because compliance would
interfere with DHS’s ability to obtain, serve,
and issue subpoenas, warrants, and other law
enforcement mechanisms that may be filed
under seal, and could result in disclosure of
investigative techniques, procedures, and
evidence.
(i) From subsection (g) to the extent that
the system is exempt from other specific
subsections of the Privacy Act relating to
individuals’ rights to access and amend their
records contained in the system. Therefore
DHS is not required to establish rules or
procedures pursuant to which individuals
may seek a civil remedy for the agency’s:
Refusal to amend a record; refusal to comply
with a request for access to records; failure
to maintain accurate, relevant, timely, and
complete records; or failure to otherwise
comply with an individual’s right to access
or amend records.
Dated: October 5, 2016.
Jonathan R. Cantor,
Acting Chief Privacy Officer, Department of
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2016–25209 Filed 10–19–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2016–9226; Directorate
Identifier 2016–SW–065–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; NavWorx,
Inc. Automatic Dependent Surveillance
Broadcast Universal Access
Transceiver Units
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for
NavWorx, Inc. (NavWorx) Automatic
Dependent Surveillance Broadcast
(ADS–B) Universal Access Transceiver
Units (unit). This proposed AD would
require removing the ADS–B unit and
would prohibit installing the affected
unit on any aircraft. This proposed AD
is prompted by a design change for the
unit to broadcast a Source Integrity
Level (SIL) of 3 when the uncertified
internal global positioning system (GPS)
source necessitates a SIL of 0. The
proposed actions are intended to
prevent an ADS–B unit from
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20OCP1.SGM
20OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 203 (Thursday, October 20, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 72551-72552]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-25209]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 203 / Thursday, October 20, 2016 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 72551]]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Office of the Secretary
6 CFR Part 5
[Docket No. DHS-2016-0070]
Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions; Department of
Homeland Security, United States Customs and Border Protection DHS/CBP-
023 Border Patrol Enforcement Records, System of Records
AGENCY: Privacy Office, Department of Homeland Security.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland Security is giving concurrent
notice of a newly established system of records pursuant to the Privacy
Act of 1974 for the ``Department of Homeland Security (DHS)/U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)-023 Border Patrol Enforcement
Records (BPER) System of Records'' and this proposed rulemaking. In
this proposed rulemaking, the Department proposes to exempt portions of
the system of records from one or more provisions of the Privacy Act
because of criminal, civil, and administrative enforcement
requirements.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 21, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number DHS-
2016-0070, by one of the following methods:
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-343-4010.
Mail: Jonathan R. Cantor, Acting Chief Privacy Officer,
Privacy Office, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20528.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this notice. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general questions please contact:
Debra L. Danisek, (202) 344-1610, Acting Privacy Officer, U.S. Customs
and Border Protection, Washington, DC 20229. For privacy questions,
please contact: Jonathan R. Cantor, (202) 343-1717, Acting Chief
Privacy Officer, Privacy Office, Department of Homeland Security,
Washington, DC 20528.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, the
Department of Homeland Security/U.S. Customs and Border Protection
proposes to establish a new DHS system of records titled, ``DHS/CBP-023
Border Patrol Enforcement Records (BPER) System of Records.''
Concurrent with this newly issued system of records, DHS/CBP is
proposing to exempt the BPER System of Records from certain provisions
of the Privacy Act.
The Privacy Act embodies fair information practice principles in a
statutory framework governing the means by which Federal Government
agencies collect, maintain, use, and disseminate personally
identifiable information. The Privacy Act applies to information that
is maintained in a ``system of records.'' A ``system of records'' is a
group of any records under the control of an agency from which
information is retrieved by the name of the individual or by some
identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to
the individual. In the Privacy Act, an individual is defined to
encompass U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents. As a matter of
policy, DHS extends administrative Privacy Act protections to all
individuals when systems of records maintain information on U.S.
citizens, lawful permanent residents, and visitors.
The Privacy Act permits Government agencies to exempt certain
records from the access and amendment provisions. If an agency claims
an exemption, however, it must issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to
make clear to the public the reasons why a particular exemption is
claimed.
DHS is claiming exemptions from certain requirements of the Privacy
Act for BPER System of Records. Some information in BPER System of
Records relates to official DHS national security, law enforcement,
immigration, and intelligence activities. These exemptions are needed
to protect information relating to DHS activities from disclosure to
subjects or others related to these activities. Specifically, the
exemptions are required to preclude subjects of these activities from
frustrating these processes; to avoid disclosure of activity
techniques; to protect the identities and physical safety of
confidential informants and law enforcement personnel; to ensure DHS's
ability to obtain information from third parties and other sources; to
protect the privacy of third parties; and to safeguard classified
information. Disclosure of information to the subject of the inquiry
could also permit the subject to avoid detection or apprehension.
The exemptions proposed here are exercised by a large number of
federal law enforcement agencies to support law enforcement and
national security missions. In appropriate circumstances, when
compliance would not appear to interfere with or adversely affect the
law enforcement purposes of this system and the overall law enforcement
process, the applicable exemptions may be waived on a case by case
basis.
A notice of system of records for BPER System of Records is also
published in this issue of the Federal Register.
List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 5
Freedom of information; Privacy.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, DHS proposes to amend
chapter I of title 6, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 5--DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS AND INFORMATION
0
1. The authority citation for part 5 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.; Public Law 107-296, 116 Stat.
2135; 5 U.S.C. 301. Subpart A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.
Subpart B also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552a.
0
2. Amend appendix C to add paragraph 74 to read as follows:
[[Page 72552]]
Appendix C to Part 5--DHS Systems of Records Exempt From the Privacy
Act
* * * * *
74. The DHS/CBP-023 Border Patrol Enforcement Records (BPER)
System of Records consists of electronic and paper records and will
be used by DHS and its components. The DHS/CBP-023 Border Patrol
Enforcement Records System of Records is a repository of information
held by DHS in connection with its several and varied missions and
functions, including, but not limited to the enforcement of civil
and criminal laws; investigations, inquiries, and proceedings there
under; and national security and intelligence activities. The DHS/
CBP-023 Border Patrol Enforcement Records System of Records contains
information that is collected by, on behalf of, in support of, or in
cooperation with DHS and its components and may contain personally
identifiable information collected by other federal, state, local,
tribal, foreign, or international government agencies. The Secretary
of Homeland Security, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), has exempted
this system from the following provisions of the Privacy Act: 5
U.S.C. 552a (c)(3), (c)(4); (d); (e)(1), (e)(2), (e)(3), (e)(4)(G),
(e)(4)(H), (e)(5), (e)(8); and (g). Additionally, the Secretary of
Homeland Security, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), has exempted
this system from the following provisions of the Privacy Act: 5
U.S.C. 552a(c)(3); (d); (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), and (e)(4)(H). When
records received from another system have been exempted in that
source system under 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), DHS will claim the same
exemptions for those records that are claimed for the original
primary systems of records from which they originated, and claims
any additional exemptions set forth here. Exemptions from these
particular subsections are justified, on a case-by-case basis to be
determined at the time a request is made, for the following reasons:
(a) From subsection (c)(3) and (4) (Accounting for Disclosures)
because release of the accounting of disclosures could alert the
subject of an investigation of an actual or potential criminal,
civil, or regulatory violation to the existence of the
investigation, and reveal investigative interest on the part of DHS
as well as the recipient agency. Disclosure of the accounting would
therefore present a serious impediment to law enforcement efforts
and/or efforts to preserve national security. Disclosure of the
accounting would also permit the individual who is the subject of a
record to impede the investigation, to tamper with witnesses or
evidence, and to avoid detection or apprehension, which would
undermine the entire investigative process.
(b) From subsection (d) (Access and Amendment to Records)
because access to the records contained in this system of records
could inform the subject of an investigation of an actual or
potential criminal, civil, or regulatory violation, to the existence
of the investigation, and reveal investigative interest on the part
of DHS or another agency. Access to the records could permit the
individual who is the subject of a record to impede the
investigation, to tamper with witnesses or evidence, and to avoid
detection or apprehension. Amendment of the records could interfere
with ongoing investigations and law enforcement activities and would
impose an impossible administrative burden by requiring
investigations to be continuously reinvestigated. In addition,
permitting access and amendment to such information could disclose
security-sensitive information that could be detrimental to homeland
security.
(c) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and Necessity of
Information) because in the course of investigations into potential
violations of Federal law, the accuracy of information obtained or
introduced occasionally may be unclear or the information may not be
strictly relevant or necessary to a specific investigation. In the
interests of effective law enforcement, it is appropriate to retain
all information that may aid in establishing patterns of unlawful
activity.
(d) From subsection (e)(2) (Collection of Information from
Individuals) because requiring that information be collected from
the subject of an investigation would alert the subject to the
nature or existence of an investigation, thereby interfering with
the related investigation and law enforcement activities.
(e) From subsection (e)(3) (Notice to Subjects) because
providing such detailed information would impede law enforcement in
that it could compromise investigations by: Revealing the existence
of an otherwise confidential investigation and thereby provide an
opportunity for the subject of an investigation to conceal evidence,
alter patterns of behavior, or take other actions that could thwart
investigative efforts; reveal the identity of witnesses in
investigations, thereby providing an opportunity for the subjects of
the investigations or others to harass, intimidate, or otherwise
interfere with the collection of evidence or other information from
such witnesses; or reveal the identity of confidential informants,
which would negatively affect the informant's usefulness in any
ongoing or future investigations and discourage members of the
public from cooperating as confidential informants in any future
investigations.
(f) From subsections (e)(4)(G) and (H) (Agency Requirements)
because portions of this system are exempt from the individual
access provisions of subsection (d) for the reasons noted above, and
therefore DHS is not required to establish requirements, rules, or
procedures with respect to such access. Providing notice to
individuals with respect to existence of records pertaining to them
in the system of records or otherwise establishing procedures
pursuant to which individuals may access and view records pertaining
to themselves in the system would undermine investigative efforts
and reveal the identities of witnesses, and potential witnesses, and
confidential informants.
(g) From subsection (e)(5) (Collection of Information) because
in the collection of information for law enforcement purposes it is
impossible to determine in advance what information is accurate,
relevant, timely, and complete. Compliance with (e)(5) would
preclude DHS agents from using their investigative training and
exercise of good judgment to both conduct and report on
investigations.
(h) From subsection (e)(8) (Notice on Individuals) because
compliance would interfere with DHS's ability to obtain, serve, and
issue subpoenas, warrants, and other law enforcement mechanisms that
may be filed under seal, and could result in disclosure of
investigative techniques, procedures, and evidence.
(i) From subsection (g) to the extent that the system is exempt
from other specific subsections of the Privacy Act relating to
individuals' rights to access and amend their records contained in
the system. Therefore DHS is not required to establish rules or
procedures pursuant to which individuals may seek a civil remedy for
the agency's: Refusal to amend a record; refusal to comply with a
request for access to records; failure to maintain accurate,
relevant, timely, and complete records; or failure to otherwise
comply with an individual's right to access or amend records.
Dated: October 5, 2016.
Jonathan R. Cantor,
Acting Chief Privacy Officer, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2016-25209 Filed 10-19-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P