Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; State of Utah; Revisions to the Utah Division of Administrative Rules, R307-300 Series; Area Source Rules for Attainment of Fine Particulate Matter Standards, 71988-71991 [2016-25148]
Download as PDF
71988
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 202 / Wednesday, October 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
CFT regime, FinCEN remains concerned
that Burma has not yet implemented its
new reforms and has not displayed
adequate effectiveness in mitigating the
risks and threats of money laundering
and terrorist financing. FinCEN also
notes that a significant portion of
financial activity in Burma relies upon
informal money transfer systems, which
remain largely unregulated and
unsupervised.
FinCEN is also concerned that Burma
has not sufficiently addressed the
corruption issues identified in the 2003
finding. Burma’s ranking on
Transparency International’s
International Corruption Perceptions
Index remains high. The U.S. State
Department’s 2016 International
Narcotics Control Strategy Report on
Burma notes that ‘‘corruption is
endemic in both business and
government. . . The rule of law remains
weak, and Burma continues to face a
significant risk of narcotics proceeds
being laundered through commercial
ventures.’’ 10
The United States also continues to
recognize Burma as a haven for
international drug trafficking. In
September 2016, under the Foreign
Relations Authorization Act, the
President determined Burma to be a
major illicit drug producing country or
major drug-transit country.11 Further,
Burma’s cooperation with U.S. law
enforcement, while improved since
2003, nonetheless remains nascent and
largely untested.
Considerations for Exceptive Relief
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
10 U.S. State Department, 2016 International
Narcotics Control Strategy Report, available at
https://www.state.gov/j/inl/rls/nrcrpt/2016/vol2/
253387.htm.
11 See Section 706(1) of the Foreign Relations
Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 2003 (Pub. L. 107–
228); 2016 Presidential Determination for Major
Drug Producing and Transit Countries, available at
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2016/
09/12/presidential-determination-major-drugtransit-or-major-illicit-drug.
13:39 Oct 18, 2016
Jkt 241001
Dated: October 13, 2016.
Jamal El Hindi,
Acting Director, Financial Crimes
Enforcement Network.
[FR Doc. 2016–25249 Filed 10–18–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–02–P
As noted in the final rule, the Section
311 action was designed to encourage
Burma to make necessary changes to its
AML/CFT regime in order to address
FinCEN’s concerns. Burma has begun to
address those concerns, but significant
work remains. FinCEN welcomes
Burma’s recent commitment to work
with FinCEN and other components of
the U.S. Department of the Treasury, as
well as with the U.S. government more
broadly, in advancing its AML/CFT
efforts. FinCEN has considered Burma’s
progress, its remaining deficiencies, and
its commitment to address those
deficiencies in deciding to issue this
exceptive relief.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
This exceptive relief also takes into
account the effect of FinCEN’s action on
U.S. national security and foreign
policy, as did the final rule.12 FinCEN’s
final rule contained an exemption at 31
CFR 1010.651(b)(3) that allowed U.S.
financial institutions to maintain
correspondent accounts for Burmese
banks if such activity was licensed
under authorities administered by the
U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office
of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). Since
2012, OFAC has, via general licenses,
authorized a broad range of financial
activity with respect to Burma that
would otherwise have been prohibited
under the Section 311 rule. On October
7, 2016, the President terminated the
national emergency with respect to
Burma and revoked all Burma sanctions
Executive orders, lifting the economic
and financial sanctions on Burma
administered by OFAC. As a result of
the termination of the Burma sanctions
program, the OFAC general licenses
referenced above are no longer in effect.
Therefore, the exemption incorporated
into FinCEN’s final rule at 31 CFR
1010.651(b)(3), which effectively
permitted U.S. correspondent account
activity with Burmese banks, no longer
has any operational effect. FinCEN has
taken this into consideration in deciding
to issue this exceptive relief.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R08–OAR–2016–0311; FRL–9954–14–
Region 8]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; State of
Utah; Revisions to the Utah Division of
Administrative Rules, R307–300
Series; Area Source Rules for
Attainment of Fine Particulate Matter
Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is finalizing approval and
finalizing the conditional approval of
portions of the fine particulate matter
(PM2.5) State Implementation Plan (SIP)
SUMMARY:
12 69
PO 00000
FR at 19094.
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
and other general rule revisions
submitted by the State of Utah. The
revisions affect the Utah Division of
Administrative Rules (DAR), R307–300
Series; Requirements for Specific
Locations. The revisions had
submission dates of May 9, 2013, May
20, 2014, September 8, 2015, and March
8, 2016. The March 8, 2016 submittal
contains rule revisions to address our
February 25, 2016 conditional approval
of several Utah DAR R307–300 Series
rules submitted on February 2, 2012,
May 9, 2013, and May 20, 2014. These
area source rules control emissions of
direct PM2.5 and PM2.5 precursors,
which are sulfur dioxides (SO2),
nitrogen oxides (NOX) and volatile
organic compounds (VOC).
Additionally, the EPA is finalizing to
approve the State’s reasonably available
control measure (RACM) determinations
for the rule revisions that pertain to the
PM2.5 SIP. This action is being taken
under section 110 of the Clean Air Act
(CAA or Act).
DATES: This final rule is effective on
November 18, 2016.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R08–OAR–2016–0311. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Crystal Ostigaard, Air Program, EPA,
Region 8, Mailcode 8P–AR, 1595
Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129, (303) 312–6602,
ostigaard.crystal@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On October 17, 2006 (71 FR 61144),
the EPA strengthened the level of the
24-hour PM2.5 National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS), lowering
the primary and secondary standards
from 65 micrograms per cubic meter
(mg/m3), the 1997 standard, to 35 mg/m3.
On November 13, 2009 (74 FR 58688),
the EPA designated three nonattainment
areas in Utah for the 24-hour PM2.5
NAAQS of 35 mg/m3. These are the Salt
Lake City, Utah; Provo, Utah; and
E:\FR\FM\19OCR1.SGM
19OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 202 / Wednesday, October 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Logan, Utah-Idaho nonattainment areas.
The State of Utah has made a number
of SIP submittals intended to address
the requirements under part D of title I
of the CAA for these PM2.5
nonattainment areas. Among those
requirements are those in sections
172(c)(1) and 189(a)(1)(C) regarding
RACM and reasonably available control
technology (RACT).
On August 18, 2016 (81 FR 55156),
the EPA proposed to approve and
conditionally approve a number of
RACM components in the PM2.5
Moderate area SIP submitted by the
State. Our proposed notice provides
details on the EPA’s interpretation of
the RACM requirements under part D
and our evaluation of the State’s
submittals. The submittals dated May 9,
2013, May 20, 2014, September 8, 2015,
and March 8, 2016, contained various
revisions to the Utah DAR, Title R307—
Environmental Quality, set of rules,
most of which are applicable to the Utah
SIP for PM2.5 nonattainment areas. The
rules we are addressing in this final rule
were provided by Utah in the four
different submissions listed above, and
these rules are R307–101–2, General
Requirements: Definitions; R307–302,
Solid Fuel Burning Devices in Box
Elder, Cache, Davis, Salt Lake, Tooele,
Utah, and Weber Counties; R307–312,
Aggregate Processing Operations for
PM2.5 Nonattainment Areas; and R307–
328, Gasoline Transfer and Storage.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
II. Response to Comments
The EPA did not receive any
comments on the proposed action.
III. Final Action
For the reasons stated in our proposed
notice, the EPA is finalizing approval of
revisions to Administrative Rule R307–
101–2, along with revisions in R307–
300 Series; Requirements for Specific
Locations (Within Nonattainment and
Maintenance Areas), R307–312 and
R307–328 for incorporation into the
Utah SIP as submitted by the State of
Utah on March 8, 2016. This final rule
completes the February 25, 2016 (81 FR
9343) conditional approval for R307–
101–2, R307–312, and R307–328 that
had submission dates of February 2,
2012, May 9, 2013, and May 20, 2014.
Additionally, we are finalizing approval
of Utah’s determination that R307–312
constitutes RACM for the Utah PM2.5
SIP that was conditionally approved on
February 25, 2016 (81 FR 9343);
however, we are not acting at this time
to determine that Utah’s PM2.5
attainment plan has met all
requirements regarding RACM under
subparts 1 and 4 of part D, title I of the
Act. We intend to act separately on the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:39 Oct 18, 2016
Jkt 241001
remainder of Utah’s PM2.5 attainment
plan.
The EPA is finalizing the conditional
approval of revisions for R307–302
found in the May 9, 2013, May 20, 2014,
and September 8, 2015 submittals.
Additionally, the EPA is finalizing the
conditional approval of Utah’s
determination that R307–302 constitutes
RACM for the Utah PM2.5 SIP for solid
fuel burning devices. As stated earlier,
we are not determining that Utah’s
PM2.5 attainment plan has met all
requirements regarding RACM under
subparts 1 and 4 of part D, title I of the
Act. Under section 110(k)(4) of the Act,
the EPA may approve a SIP revision
based on a commitment by the state to
adopt specific enforceable measures by
a date certain, but not later than one
year after the date of approval of the
plan revision. On May 19, 2016, Utah
submitted a commitment letter to adopt
and submit specific revisions within
one year of our final action on these
submittals; specifically to add
continuous controls that extend to
startup, shutdown, and malfunction, by
establishing a prohibition on fuel types
that can’t be burned in a solid fuel
burning device at any time. Since we are
finalizing our conditional approval,
Utah must adopt and submit the specific
revisions it has committed to within one
year of our finalization. If Utah does not
submit these revisions within one year,
or if we find Utah’s revisions to be
incomplete, or we disapprove Utah’s
revisions, this conditional approval will
convert to a disapproval. If any of these
convert to a disapproval, that will
constitute a disapproval of a required
plan element under part D of title I of
the Act, which starts an 18-month clock
for sanctions, see CAA section 179(a)(2),
and the two-year clock for a federal
implementation plan (FIP) to address
the disapproved plan element, see CAA
section 110(c)(1)(B).
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
incorporation by reference of Utah
Division of Administrative Rules
described in the amendments set forth
to 40 CFR part 52 below. Therefore,
these materials have been approved by
the EPA for inclusion in the state
implementation plan, have been
incorporated by reference by the EPA
into that plan, are fully federally
enforceable under sections 110 and 113
of the CAA as of the effective date of the
final rulemaking of the EPA’s approval,
and will be incorporated by reference by
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
71989
the Director of the Federal Register in
the next update to the SIP compilation.1
The EPA has made, and will continue
to make, these materials generally
available through www.regulations.gov
and/or at the EPA Region 8 Office
(please contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this preamble for more
information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
approve state choices, provided that
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air
Act. Accordingly, this action merely
approves of state law as meeting federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this final action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
1 62
E:\FR\FM\19OCR1.SGM
FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
19OCR1
71990
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 202 / Wednesday, October 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
• does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
Rule No.
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by December 19,
2016. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Intergovernmental relations,
Incorporation by reference, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organization compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: September 26, 2016.
Debra H. Thomas,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
State
effective
date
*
*
*
2. Section 52.2320, the table in
paragraph (c) is amended as follows:
■ a. Under ‘‘R307–101. General
Requirements’’ by revising the entry for
‘‘R307–101–2’’;
■ b. Under ‘‘R307–302. Davis, Salt Lake,
and Utah Counties: Residential
Fireplaces and Stoves’’ by revising the
entries ‘‘R307–302–1’’, ‘‘R307–302–2’’,
‘‘R307–302–3’’, ‘‘R307–302–4’’;
■ c. Under ‘‘R307–302. Davis, Salt Lake,
and Utah Counties: Residential
Fireplaces and Stoves’’ by adding the
entries ‘‘R307–302–05’’, ‘‘R307–302–
06’’;
■ d. Under ‘‘R307–312. Aggregate
Processing Operations for PM2.5;
Nonattainment Areas’’ by revising the
entry for ‘‘R307–312’’;
■ e. Under ‘‘R307–312. Aggregate
Processing Operations for PM2.5;
Nonattainment Areas’’ by removing the
entry for ‘‘R307–312–5(2)(a)’’;
■ f. Under ‘‘R307–328. Ozone
Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas
and Utah and Weber Counties: Gasoline
Transfer and Storage’’ by revising the
entry for ‘‘R307–328’’; and
■ g. Under ‘‘R307–328. Ozone
Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas
and Utah and Weber Counties: Gasoline
Transfer and Storage’’ by removing the
entry for ‘‘307–328–4(6)’’.
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
§ 52.2320
*
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Rule title
Subpart TT—Utah
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
Final rule citation, date
*
*
Comments
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
R307–101. General Requirements
*
R307–101–2 ......
*
*
*
Definitions .....................................
*
*
3/3/2016
*
*
[Insert Federal Register citation],
10/19/2016.
*
*
R307–302. Davis, Salt Lake, and Utah Counties: Residential Fireplaces and Stoves
Definitions .....................................
2/4/2015
R307–302–02 ....
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
R307–302–01 ....
No-Burn Periods for PM10 .............
2/4/2015
R307–302–03 ....
No-Burn Periods for Carbon Monoxide.
Violations .......................................
3/6/2014
R307–302–04 ....
R307–302–05 ....
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Opacity and other Controls for
Heating Appliances.
15:56 Oct 18, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00014
3/6/2014
3/6/2014
Fmt 4700
[Insert Federal
10/19/2016.
[Insert Federal
10/19/2016.
[Insert Federal
10/19/2016.
[Insert Federal
10/19/2016.
[Insert Federal
10/19/2016.
Sfmt 4700
Register citation],
Register citation],
Register citation],
Register citation],
Register citation],
E:\FR\FM\19OCR1.SGM
Conditionally
10/19/2017.
Conditionally
10/19/2017.
Conditionally
10/19/2017.
Conditionally
10/19/2017.
Conditionally
10/19/2017.
19OCR1
approved
through
approved
through
approved
through
approved
through
approved
through
71991
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 202 / Wednesday, October 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
State
effective
date
Rule No.
Rule title
R307–302–06 ....
Prohibition .....................................
*
*
Final rule citation, date
1/1/2013
*
Comments
[Insert Federal Register citation],
10/19/2016.
*
Conditionally approved
10/19/2017.
*
*
*
*
through
*
R307–312. Aggregate Processing Operations for PM2.5; Nonattainment Areas
R307–312 ..........
Aggregate Processing Operations
for PM2.5 Nonattainment Areas.
*
*
2/4/2016
*
[Insert Federal Register citation],
10/19/2016.
*
*
R307–328. Ozone Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas and Utah and Weber Counties: Gasoline Transfer and Storage
R307–328 ..........
Ozone Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas and Utah and
Weber
Counties:
Gasoline
Transfer and Storage.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[Insert Federal Register citation],
10/19/2016.
*
*
to protect visibility (prong 4).
Specifically, the EPA is approving
interstate transport prongs 1, 2 and 4 for
the 2008 Pb NAAQS, approving prong 4
for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS, disapproving
prong 4 for the 2006 PM2.5, 2008 ozone,
2010 NO2 and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS, and
disapproving prong 2 for the 2008 ozone
NAAQS.
*
[FR Doc. 2016–25148 Filed 10–18–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R08–OAR–2016–0107; FRL–9954–13Region 8]
DATES:
Approval and Disapproval and
Promulgation of Air Quality
Implementation Plans; Interstate
Transport for Utah
ADDRESSES:
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action on
portions of six submissions from the
State of Utah that are intended to
demonstrate that the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) meets certain
interstate transport requirements of the
Clean Air Act (Act or CAA). These
submissions address the 2006 and 2012
fine particulate matter (PM2.5) National
Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS), 2008 ozone NAAQS, 2008
lead (Pb) NAAQS, 2010 sulfur dioxide
(SO2) NAAQS and 2010 nitrogen
dioxide (NO2) NAAQS. The interstate
transport requirements under the CAA
consist of four elements: Significant
contribution to nonattainment (prong 1)
and interference with maintenance
(prong 2) of the NAAQS in other states;
and interference with measures required
to be included in the plan for other
states to prevent significant
deterioration of air quality (prong 3) or
SUMMARY:
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
2/4/2016
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:39 Oct 18, 2016
Jkt 241001
This final rule is effective on
November 18, 2016.
EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
Identification Number EPA–R08–OAR–
2016–0107. All documents in the docket
are listed on the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information
may not be publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Program, Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8,
1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129. The EPA requests that you
contact the individual listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
view the hard copy of the docket. You
may view the hard copy of the docket
Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to
4:00 p.m., excluding federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Adam Clark, Air Program, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 8, Mailcode 8P–AR, 1595
Wynkoop, Denver, Colorado 80202–
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
1129, (303) 312–7104, clark.adam@
epa.gov.
I. Background
On May 10, 2016, the EPA proposed
action on two submittals from Utah for
the interstate transport requirements of
CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the
2008 Pb and 2008 ozone NAAQS. 81 FR
28807. An explanation of the CAA
requirements, a detailed analysis of the
state’s submittals, and the EPA’s
rationale for approval of a portion of the
2008 Pb submittal and disapproval of a
portion of the 2008 ozone submittal
were all provided in the notice of
proposed rulemaking, and will not be
restated here. The public comment
period for this proposed rule ended on
June 9, 2016. The EPA received four
comments on the proposal, which will
be addressed in the ‘‘Response to
Comments’’ section, below.
In the May 10, 2016 proposed action,
the EPA proposed to disapprove the
Utah SIP for prongs 1 and 2 of CAA
section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008
ozone NAAQS. In that document, the
EPA cited to air quality modeling
conducted to support the promulgation
of an update to the Cross-State Air
Pollution Rule to address interstate
transport with respect to the 2008 ozone
NAAQS (CSAPR Update). The air
quality modeling (1) identified locations
in the U.S. where the EPA anticipates
nonattainment or maintenance issues in
2017 for the 2008 ozone NAAQS (these
are identified as nonattainment and
maintenance receptors), and (2)
quantified the projected contributions
from emissions from upwind states to
downwind ozone concentrations at the
nonattainment and maintenance
receptors in 2017. The document also
E:\FR\FM\19OCR1.SGM
19OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 19, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 71988-71991]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-25148]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R08-OAR-2016-0311; FRL-9954-14-Region 8]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
State of Utah; Revisions to the Utah Division of Administrative Rules,
R307-300 Series; Area Source Rules for Attainment of Fine Particulate
Matter Standards
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing
approval and finalizing the conditional approval of portions of the
fine particulate matter (PM2.5) State Implementation Plan
(SIP) and other general rule revisions submitted by the State of Utah.
The revisions affect the Utah Division of Administrative Rules (DAR),
R307-300 Series; Requirements for Specific Locations. The revisions had
submission dates of May 9, 2013, May 20, 2014, September 8, 2015, and
March 8, 2016. The March 8, 2016 submittal contains rule revisions to
address our February 25, 2016 conditional approval of several Utah DAR
R307-300 Series rules submitted on February 2, 2012, May 9, 2013, and
May 20, 2014. These area source rules control emissions of direct
PM2.5 and PM2.5 precursors, which are sulfur
dioxides (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOX) and
volatile organic compounds (VOC). Additionally, the EPA is finalizing
to approve the State's reasonably available control measure (RACM)
determinations for the rule revisions that pertain to the
PM2.5 SIP. This action is being taken under section 110 of
the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act).
DATES: This final rule is effective on November 18, 2016.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R08-OAR-2016-0311. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the
Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Crystal Ostigaard, Air Program, EPA,
Region 8, Mailcode 8P-AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-
1129, (303) 312-6602, ostigaard.crystal@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On October 17, 2006 (71 FR 61144), the EPA strengthened the level
of the 24-hour PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS), lowering the primary and secondary standards from 65
micrograms per cubic meter ([micro]g/m\3\), the 1997 standard, to 35
[micro]g/m\3\. On November 13, 2009 (74 FR 58688), the EPA designated
three nonattainment areas in Utah for the 24-hour PM2.5
NAAQS of 35 [micro]g/m\3\. These are the Salt Lake City, Utah; Provo,
Utah; and
[[Page 71989]]
Logan, Utah-Idaho nonattainment areas. The State of Utah has made a
number of SIP submittals intended to address the requirements under
part D of title I of the CAA for these PM2.5 nonattainment
areas. Among those requirements are those in sections 172(c)(1) and
189(a)(1)(C) regarding RACM and reasonably available control technology
(RACT).
On August 18, 2016 (81 FR 55156), the EPA proposed to approve and
conditionally approve a number of RACM components in the
PM2.5 Moderate area SIP submitted by the State. Our proposed
notice provides details on the EPA's interpretation of the RACM
requirements under part D and our evaluation of the State's submittals.
The submittals dated May 9, 2013, May 20, 2014, September 8, 2015, and
March 8, 2016, contained various revisions to the Utah DAR, Title
R307--Environmental Quality, set of rules, most of which are applicable
to the Utah SIP for PM2.5 nonattainment areas. The rules we
are addressing in this final rule were provided by Utah in the four
different submissions listed above, and these rules are R307-101-2,
General Requirements: Definitions; R307-302, Solid Fuel Burning Devices
in Box Elder, Cache, Davis, Salt Lake, Tooele, Utah, and Weber
Counties; R307-312, Aggregate Processing Operations for
PM2.5 Nonattainment Areas; and R307-328, Gasoline Transfer
and Storage.
II. Response to Comments
The EPA did not receive any comments on the proposed action.
III. Final Action
For the reasons stated in our proposed notice, the EPA is
finalizing approval of revisions to Administrative Rule R307-101-2,
along with revisions in R307-300 Series; Requirements for Specific
Locations (Within Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas), R307-312 and
R307-328 for incorporation into the Utah SIP as submitted by the State
of Utah on March 8, 2016. This final rule completes the February 25,
2016 (81 FR 9343) conditional approval for R307-101-2, R307-312, and
R307-328 that had submission dates of February 2, 2012, May 9, 2013,
and May 20, 2014. Additionally, we are finalizing approval of Utah's
determination that R307-312 constitutes RACM for the Utah
PM2.5 SIP that was conditionally approved on February 25,
2016 (81 FR 9343); however, we are not acting at this time to determine
that Utah's PM2.5 attainment plan has met all requirements
regarding RACM under subparts 1 and 4 of part D, title I of the Act. We
intend to act separately on the remainder of Utah's PM2.5
attainment plan.
The EPA is finalizing the conditional approval of revisions for
R307-302 found in the May 9, 2013, May 20, 2014, and September 8, 2015
submittals. Additionally, the EPA is finalizing the conditional
approval of Utah's determination that R307-302 constitutes RACM for the
Utah PM2.5 SIP for solid fuel burning devices. As stated
earlier, we are not determining that Utah's PM2.5 attainment
plan has met all requirements regarding RACM under subparts 1 and 4 of
part D, title I of the Act. Under section 110(k)(4) of the Act, the EPA
may approve a SIP revision based on a commitment by the state to adopt
specific enforceable measures by a date certain, but not later than one
year after the date of approval of the plan revision. On May 19, 2016,
Utah submitted a commitment letter to adopt and submit specific
revisions within one year of our final action on these submittals;
specifically to add continuous controls that extend to startup,
shutdown, and malfunction, by establishing a prohibition on fuel types
that can't be burned in a solid fuel burning device at any time. Since
we are finalizing our conditional approval, Utah must adopt and submit
the specific revisions it has committed to within one year of our
finalization. If Utah does not submit these revisions within one year,
or if we find Utah's revisions to be incomplete, or we disapprove
Utah's revisions, this conditional approval will convert to a
disapproval. If any of these convert to a disapproval, that will
constitute a disapproval of a required plan element under part D of
title I of the Act, which starts an 18-month clock for sanctions, see
CAA section 179(a)(2), and the two-year clock for a federal
implementation plan (FIP) to address the disapproved plan element, see
CAA section 110(c)(1)(B).
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of Utah
Division of Administrative Rules described in the amendments set forth
to 40 CFR part 52 below. Therefore, these materials have been approved
by the EPA for inclusion in the state implementation plan, have been
incorporated by reference by the EPA into that plan, are fully
federally enforceable under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of the
effective date of the final rulemaking of the EPA's approval, and will
be incorporated by reference by the Director of the Federal Register in
the next update to the SIP compilation.\1\ The EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these materials generally available through
www.regulations.gov and/or at the EPA Region 8 Office (please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves of state law as meeting
federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that reason, this final action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
[[Page 71990]]
does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by December 19, 2016. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Intergovernmental relations, Incorporation by reference, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organization compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: September 26, 2016.
Debra H. Thomas,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart TT--Utah
0
2. Section 52.2320, the table in paragraph (c) is amended as follows:
0
a. Under ``R307-101. General Requirements'' by revising the entry for
``R307-101-2'';
0
b. Under ``R307-302. Davis, Salt Lake, and Utah Counties: Residential
Fireplaces and Stoves'' by revising the entries ``R307-302-1'', ``R307-
302-2'', ``R307-302-3'', ``R307-302-4'';
0
c. Under ``R307-302. Davis, Salt Lake, and Utah Counties: Residential
Fireplaces and Stoves'' by adding the entries ``R307-302-05'', ``R307-
302-06'';
0
d. Under ``R307-312. Aggregate Processing Operations for
PM2.5; Nonattainment Areas'' by revising the entry for
``R307-312'';
0
e. Under ``R307-312. Aggregate Processing Operations for
PM2.5; Nonattainment Areas'' by removing the entry for
``R307-312-5(2)(a)'';
0
f. Under ``R307-328. Ozone Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas and Utah
and Weber Counties: Gasoline Transfer and Storage'' by revising the
entry for ``R307-328''; and
0
g. Under ``R307-328. Ozone Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas and Utah
and Weber Counties: Gasoline Transfer and Storage'' by removing the
entry for ``307-328-4(6)''.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 52.2320 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Final rule citation,
Rule No. Rule title effective date date Comments
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R307-101. General Requirements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
R307-101-2................. Definitions.......... 3/3/2016 [Insert Federal .....................
Register citation],
10/19/2016.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R307-302. Davis, Salt Lake, and Utah Counties: Residential Fireplaces and Stoves
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R307-302-01................ Definitions.......... 2/4/2015 [Insert Federal Conditionally
Register citation], approved through 10/
10/19/2016. 19/2017.
R307-302-02................ No-Burn Periods for 2/4/2015 [Insert Federal Conditionally
PM10. Register citation], approved through 10/
10/19/2016. 19/2017.
R307-302-03................ No-Burn Periods for 3/6/2014 [Insert Federal Conditionally
Carbon Monoxide. Register citation], approved through 10/
10/19/2016. 19/2017.
R307-302-04................ Violations........... 3/6/2014 [Insert Federal Conditionally
Register citation], approved through 10/
10/19/2016. 19/2017.
R307-302-05................ Opacity and other 3/6/2014 [Insert Federal Conditionally
Controls for Heating Register citation], approved through 10/
Appliances. 10/19/2016. 19/2017.
[[Page 71991]]
R307-302-06................ Prohibition.......... 1/1/2013 [Insert Federal Conditionally
Register citation], approved through 10/
10/19/2016. 19/2017.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R307-312. Aggregate Processing Operations for PM2.5; Nonattainment Areas
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R307-312................... Aggregate Processing 2/4/2016 [Insert Federal .....................
Operations for PM2.5 Register citation],
Nonattainment Areas. 10/19/2016.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R307-328. Ozone Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas and Utah and Weber Counties: Gasoline Transfer and Storage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R307-328................... Ozone Nonattainment 2/4/2016 [Insert Federal .....................
and Maintenance Register citation],
Areas and Utah and 10/19/2016.
Weber Counties:
Gasoline Transfer
and Storage.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2016-25148 Filed 10-18-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P