Safety Zones; San Francisco, CA, 70942-70944 [2016-24915]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
70942
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 199 / Friday, October 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Judith Starr,
General Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2016–24811 Filed 10–13–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7709–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2016–0154]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zones; San Francisco, CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is amending
several permanent safety zones located
in the Captain of the Port San Francisco
zone that are established to protect
public safety during annual firework
displays. These amendments are
necessary to update listed events to
accurately reflect the firework display
locations. This regulation prohibits the
movement of vessels within the
established firework display areas
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port (COTP) San Francisco or a
designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective November
14, 2016.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2016–
0154 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Lieutenant Junior Grade Christina
Ramirez, U.S. Coast Guard Sector San
Francisco; telephone 415–399–3585,
email D11-PF-MarineEvents@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Table of Abbreviations
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
On April 19, 2016 we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled Safety Zones; San Francisco,
CA, in the Federal Register (81 FR
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:00 Oct 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
22946), to amend several permanent
safety zones located in the Captain of
the Port San Francisco zone that are
established to protect public safety
during annual firework displays. There
we stated why we issued the NPRM,
and invited comments on our proposed
regulatory action related to the amended
fireworks safety zones. We received no
comments on the NPRM nor did we
receive a request for public meeting. A
public meeting was not held.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. The
Captain of the Port San Francisco
(COTP) has determined that potential
hazards associated with the current
outdated fireworks locations, if not
updated, pose safety concerns for event
crew, spectators, participants of the
event, participating vessels, and other
users and vessels of the waterway.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes,
and the Rule
As noted above, we received no
comments on our NPRM published on
April 19, 2016. There are no changes in
the regulatory text of this rule from the
proposed rule in the NPRM.
This rule amends Table 1 in
§ 165.1191 to update three events to
reflect the current event locations.
These events are listed numerically in
Table 1 of this section: (7), (8), (22).
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This NPRM has not been
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
action,’’ under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, duration,
and time-of-day of each safety zone.
Vessel traffic would be able to safely
transit around each safety zone which
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
would impact a small designated area of
the COTP San Francisco zone for less
than 1 hour during the evening when
vessel traffic is normally low. Moreover,
the Coast Guard would issue a Local
Notice to Mariner and Broadcast Notice
to Mariners via VHF–FM marine
channel 16 about the zone, and the rule
would allow vessels to seek permission
to enter the zones.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above this
rule would not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this rule or
any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule would not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
E:\FR\FM\14OCR1.SGM
14OCR1
70943
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 199 / Friday, October 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
more in any one year. Though this rule
would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a
preliminary determination that this
action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety
zones lasting less than 1 hour that
would prohibit entry within 1,000 feet
of a fireworks barge. Normally such
actions are categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2–1 of Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist and
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
*
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
*
*
*
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191,
195; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. In § 165.1191, in Table 1 to
§ 165.1191, revise items 7, 8, and 22, to
read as follows:
■
§ 165.1191 Northern California and Lake
Tahoe Area Annual Fireworks Events.
*
*
*
*
*
Table 1 to § 165.1191
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
7. San Francisco Independence Day Fireworks
Sponsor ...............................................................
Event Description ................................................
Date .....................................................................
Location 1 ...........................................................
Location 2 ...........................................................
Regulated Area 1 ................................................
Regulated Area 2 ................................................
The City of San Francisco.
Fireworks Display.
July 4th.
A barge located approximately 1000 feet off San Francisco Pier 39 at approximately 37°48′49″
N., 122°24′46″ W.
A barge located at the end of the San Francisco Municipal Pier at Aquatic Park at approximately 37°48′39″ N., 122°25′37″ W.
1. 100-foot radius around the fireworks barge during the loading, transit, setup, and until the
commencement of the scheduled display. Increases to a 1,000-foot radius upon commencement of the fireworks display.
2. 100-foot radius around the fireworks barge during the loading, transit, setup, and until the
commencement of the scheduled display. Increases to a 1,000-foot radius upon commencement of the fireworks display.
8. Fourth of July Fireworks, Berkeley Marina
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Sponsor ...............................................................
Event Description ................................................
Date .....................................................................
Location ...............................................................
Regulated Area ...................................................
*
*
Berkeley Marina.
Fireworks Display.
July 4th.
A barge located near Berkeley Pier at approximately 37°51′40″ N., 122° 19′19″ W.
100-foot radius around the fireworks barge during the loading, transit, setup, and until the
commencement of the scheduled display. Increases to a 1,000-foot radius upon commencement of the fireworks display.
*
*
*
*
22. Monte Foundation Fireworks
Sponsor ...............................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:44 Oct 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
Monte Foundation Fireworks.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\14OCR1.SGM
14OCR1
*
70944
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 199 / Friday, October 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1 TO § 165.1191—Continued
Event Description ................................................
Date .....................................................................
Location ...............................................................
Regulated Area ...................................................
*
*
Fireworks Display.
Second Saturday in October.
Capitola Pier in Capitola, CA.
1,000-foot safety zone around the navigable waters of the Capitola Pier.
*
Dated: September 15, 2016.
Anthony J. Ceraolo,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2016–24915 Filed 10–13–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 49
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2011–0151; FRL–9952–86–
OAR]
RIN 2060–AR98
General Permits and Permits by Rule
for the Federal Minor New Source
Review Program in Indian Country for
Six Source Categories
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is finalizing general
permits for use in Indian country
pursuant to the Federal Minor New
Source Review (NSR) Program in Indian
Country for new or modified minor
sources in the following six source
categories: concrete batch plants; boilers
and emergency engines; stationary spark
ignition engines; stationary compression
ignition engines; graphic arts and
printing operations; and sawmill
facilities.
SUMMARY:
This final rule is effective on
November 14, 2016.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2011–0151. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
DATES:
*
*
e.g., Confidential Business Information
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available electronically
through https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher Stoneman, Outreach and
Information Division, Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards, (C–
304–03), Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park, North
Carolina, 27711, telephone number
(919) 541–0823, facsimile number (919)
541–0072, email address:
stoneman.chris@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘Reviewing
Authority,’’ ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer
to the EPA. The information in this
preamble is organized as follows:
Table of Contents
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
B. Where can I get a copy of this document
and other related information?
II. Overview of the Final Rule
III. Background
A. Federal Minor New Source Review
Program in Indian Country
B. General Permits and Permits by Rule for
the Federal Minor New Source Review
Program in Indian Country—Proposed
Rule
IV. Final Rulemaking Action
A. Permitting Documents and
Implementation Tools
B. Issues Concerning Aspects of Finalizing
a General Permit/Permit by Rule for
Graphic Arts and Printing Operations
C. Proposed Rule Change to the Federal
Indian Country Minor New Source
Review Rule in One Area: Shortening the
General Permit Application Review
Process From 90 to 45 Days for Graphic
Arts and Printing Operations
*
*
D. Control Technology Review
E. Setback Requirements
F. Requirements Relating to Threatened or
Endangered Species and Historic
Properties
G. Use of Throughput Limits and Capacity
Limits
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution or Use
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTAA)
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions
To Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
Entities potentially affected by this
final action consist of owners and
operators of facilities included in the
following source categories that are
located, or planning to locate, in an
Indian reservation or in another area of
Indian country (as defined in 18 U.S.C.
1151) over which an Indian tribe, or the
EPA, has demonstrated that the tribe has
jurisdiction where there is no EPAapproved program in place and that are
subject to the requirements of the
Federal Indian Country Minor NSR rule.
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
TABLE 1—SOURCE CATEGORIES
North
American
industry
classification
categories
Industry categories
Boilers and Emergency Engines ................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:00 Oct 13, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00022
11
2211
321
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Examples of regulated industries
Agriculture, Greenhouses.
Electric Power Generation.
Wood Product Manufacturing (Except Sawmill Facilities).
E:\FR\FM\14OCR1.SGM
14OCR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 199 (Friday, October 14, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 70942-70944]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-24915]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2016-0154]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zones; San Francisco, CA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is amending several permanent safety zones
located in the Captain of the Port San Francisco zone that are
established to protect public safety during annual firework displays.
These amendments are necessary to update listed events to accurately
reflect the firework display locations. This regulation prohibits the
movement of vessels within the established firework display areas
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP) San Francisco or a
designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective November 14, 2016.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2016-0154 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Lieutenant Junior Grade Christina Ramirez, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector San Francisco; telephone 415-399-3585, email D11-PF-MarineEvents@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
On April 19, 2016 we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled Safety Zones; San Francisco, CA, in the Federal
Register (81 FR 22946), to amend several permanent safety zones located
in the Captain of the Port San Francisco zone that are established to
protect public safety during annual firework displays. There we stated
why we issued the NPRM, and invited comments on our proposed regulatory
action related to the amended fireworks safety zones. We received no
comments on the NPRM nor did we receive a request for public meeting. A
public meeting was not held.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C.
1231. The Captain of the Port San Francisco (COTP) has determined that
potential hazards associated with the current outdated fireworks
locations, if not updated, pose safety concerns for event crew,
spectators, participants of the event, participating vessels, and other
users and vessels of the waterway.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule
As noted above, we received no comments on our NPRM published on
April 19, 2016. There are no changes in the regulatory text of this
rule from the proposed rule in the NPRM.
This rule amends Table 1 in Sec. 165.1191 to update three events
to reflect the current event locations. These events are listed
numerically in Table 1 of this section: (7), (8), (22).
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This NPRM has not been designated
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-day of each safety zone. Vessel traffic
would be able to safely transit around each safety zone which would
impact a small designated area of the COTP San Francisco zone for less
than 1 hour during the evening when vessel traffic is normally low.
Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue a Local Notice to Mariner and
Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the
zone, and the rule would allow vessels to seek permission to enter the
zones.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above this rule would not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the
Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule would not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
[[Page 70943]]
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule would not result
in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a preliminary
determination that this action is one of a category of actions that do
not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety zones lasting less than 1 hour
that would prohibit entry within 1,000 feet of a fireworks barge.
Normally such actions are categorically excluded from further review
under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD. A preliminary environmental analysis checklist and
Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this
rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1,
6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
2. In Sec. 165.1191, in Table 1 to Sec. 165.1191, revise items 7, 8,
and 22, to read as follows:
Sec. 165.1191 Northern California and Lake Tahoe Area Annual
Fireworks Events.
* * * * *
Table 1 to Sec. 165.1191
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. San Francisco Independence Day Fireworks
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsor...................... The City of San Francisco.
Event Description............ Fireworks Display.
Date......................... July 4th.
Location 1................... A barge located approximately 1000 feet
off San Francisco Pier 39 at
approximately 37[deg]48'49'' N.,
122[deg]24'46'' W.
Location 2................... A barge located at the end of the San
Francisco Municipal Pier at Aquatic Park
at approximately 37[deg]48'39'' N.,
122[deg]25'37'' W.
Regulated Area 1............. 1. 100-foot radius around the fireworks
barge during the loading, transit,
setup, and until the commencement of the
scheduled display. Increases to a 1,000-
foot radius upon commencement of the
fireworks display.
Regulated Area 2............. 2. 100-foot radius around the fireworks
barge during the loading, transit,
setup, and until the commencement of the
scheduled display. Increases to a 1,000-
foot radius upon commencement of the
fireworks display.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8. Fourth of July Fireworks, Berkeley Marina
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsor...................... Berkeley Marina.
Event Description............ Fireworks Display.
Date......................... July 4th.
Location..................... A barge located near Berkeley Pier at
approximately 37[deg]51'40'' N.,
122[deg] 19'19'' W.
Regulated Area............... 100-foot radius around the fireworks
barge during the loading, transit,
setup, and until the commencement of the
scheduled display. Increases to a 1,000-
foot radius upon commencement of the
fireworks display.
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
22. Monte Foundation Fireworks
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsor...................... Monte Foundation Fireworks.
[[Page 70944]]
Event Description............ Fireworks Display.
Date......................... Second Saturday in October.
Location..................... Capitola Pier in Capitola, CA.
Regulated Area............... 1,000-foot safety zone around the
navigable waters of the Capitola Pier.
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated: September 15, 2016.
Anthony J. Ceraolo,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2016-24915 Filed 10-13-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
