User Fees for Offers in Compromise, 70654-70658 [2016-24666]
Download as PDF
70654
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 198 / Thursday, October 13, 2016 / Proposed Rules
comments and other relevant
information that, based on the criteria of
section 811(h), temporary placement of
mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine
in schedule I is necessary to avoid an
imminent hazard to the public safety,
DEA will follow the statutory
procedures for issuing such a temporary
scheduling order. As indicated above,
before issuing such a temporary
scheduling order, DEA would be
required to publish in the Federal
Register a new notice of intent.
Dated: October 6, 2016.
Chuck Rosenberg,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2016–24659 Filed 10–12–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
electronically via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov (indicate IRS and
REG–108934–16). The public hearing
will be held in the Main IR Auditorium
beginning at 10:00 a.m. in the Internal
Revenue Service Building, 1111
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20224.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the proposed amendments
to the regulations, Maria Del Pilar
Austin at (202) 317–5437; concerning
submissions of comments, the hearing,
or to be placed on the building access
list to attend the hearing, Regina
Johnson, at (202) 317–6901; concerning
cost methodology, Eva Williams, at
(202) 803–9728 (not toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Background
Internal Revenue Service
This document contains proposed
regulations that would amend § 300.3 of
the User Fee Regulations (26 CFR part
300), which provides for a user fee
applicable to offers in compromise
under section 7122 of the Internal
Revenue Code (Code).
Section 7122(a) provides the Secretary
the authority to compromise any civil or
criminal case arising under the internal
revenue laws, prior to the referral of that
case to the Department of Justice.
Section 7122(d)(1) requires the IRS to
prescribe guidelines for officers and
employees of the IRS to determine
whether an offer in compromise is
adequate and should be accepted to
resolve a dispute. Those guidelines can
generally be found in § 301.7122–1.
Under those guidelines, an offer in
compromise may be accepted if there is
doubt as to liability, if there is doubt as
to collectability, or if acceptance will
promote effective tax administration.
See § 301.7122–1(b).
When the IRS receives an offer in
compromise, it initially determines
whether the taxpayer submitting the
offer is eligible for the offer in
compromise program and, if the
taxpayer is eligible, whether the offer
submitted is otherwise processable.
Currently, a taxpayer may be ineligible
for the offer in compromise program for
a number of reasons, including if the
taxpayer is in bankruptcy or has not
filed all required tax returns. The IRS
will return an offer as nonprocessable if
the taxpayer is ineligible or if the offer
has not been properly submitted.
If the IRS determines the offer in
compromise is processable, then except
where the offer is made under section
7122(d)(3)(B) relating only to issues of
liability and the case is processed
without a financial investigation, the
26 CFR Part 300
[REG–108934–16]
RIN 1545–BN38
User Fees for Offers in Compromise
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
and notice of public hearing.
AGENCY:
This document contains
proposed amendments to the
regulations that provide user fees for
offers in compromise. The proposed
amendments affect taxpayers who wish
to pay their liabilities through offers in
compromise. The proposed effective
date for these proposed amendments to
the regulations is for offers in
compromise submitted on or after
February 27, 2017. This document also
provides a notice of public hearing on
these proposed amendments to the
regulations.
SUMMARY:
Written or electronic comments
must be received by November 28, 2016.
Outlines of topics to be discussed at the
public hearing scheduled for December
16, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. must be received
by November 28, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to:
Internal Revenue Service,
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–108934–16), Room
5203, Post Office Box 7604, Ben
Franklin Station, Washington, DC
20044. Submissions may be handdelivered Monday through Friday
between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–108934–16),
Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20224 or sent
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:36 Oct 12, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
IRS investigates and verifies the
taxpayer’s financial information
submitted with the offer to determine
whether such a compromise is
appropriate before accepting the terms
of the offer in compromise. If the IRS
initially rejects a processable offer in
compromise based on an investigation
of the taxpayer’s financial position,
section 7122(e)(1) provides that the IRS
must conduct an independent
administrative review of that decision
before communicating the rejection to
the taxpayer. If the independent
administrative review upholds the IRS’s
initial decision to reject a processable
offer in compromise, section 7122(e)(2)
provides that the taxpayer is notified of
the rejection and has the right to appeal
the rejection to the IRS’s Appeals Office.
When the IRS accepts an offer in
compromise, the IRS processes the
payments and monitors the taxpayer’s
compliance with the terms of the offer.
Under § 300.3, the IRS currently
charges $186 for processing an offer in
compromise, which includes reviewing
and monitoring the offer. Under
§ 300.3(b)(2)(i) and (ii), if a fee is
charged and the offer is accepted to
promote effective tax administration or
accepted based on doubt as to
collectability where the IRS has
determined that collection of an amount
greater than the amount offered would
create economic hardship, then the user
fee is applied against the amount to be
paid under the offer unless the taxpayer
requests that it be refunded. Section
300.3(b)(1)(i) and (ii) provide that no fee
is charged if an offer is based solely on
doubt as to liability, or made by a lowincome taxpayer.
Explanation of Provisions
A. Overview
To bring the user fee rate for offers in
compromise closer to the full cost to the
IRS of providing this taxpayer specific
service, the proposed regulations under
§ 300.3 would increase the user fee for
an offer in compromise to $300. The
proposed regulations do not modify
other portions of the User Fee
Regulations regarding offers in
compromise, such as § 300.3(b)(1)(i) and
(ii) which waive the user fee for offers
in compromise submitted by lowincome taxpayers and offers in
compromise based solely on doubt as to
liability. The increased user fee for
offers in compromise is proposed to be
effective for offers submitted on or after
February 27, 2017.
B. User Fee Authority
The Independent Offices
Appropriations Act (IOAA) (31 U.S.C.
E:\FR\FM\13OCP1.SGM
13OCP1
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 198 / Thursday, October 13, 2016 / Proposed Rules
9701) authorizes each agency to
promulgate regulations establishing the
charge for services provided by the
agency (user fees). The IOAA provides
that these user fee regulations are
subject to policies prescribed by the
President and shall be as uniform as
practicable. Those policies are currently
set forth in the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) Circular A–25, 58 FR
38142 (July 15, 1993; OMB Circular).
The IOAA states that the services
provided by an agency should be selfsustaining to the extent possible. 31
U.S.C. 9701(a). The OMB Circular states
that agencies that provide services that
confer special benefits on identifiable
recipients beyond those accruing to the
general public are to establish user fees
that recover the full cost of providing
those services. The OMB Circular
requires that agencies identify all
services that confer special benefits and
determine whether user fees should be
assessed for those services.
Agencies are to review user fees
biennially and update them as necessary
to reflect changes in the cost of
providing the underlying services.
During this biennial review, an agency
must calculate the full cost of providing
each service, taking into account all
direct and indirect costs to any part of
the U.S. government. The full cost of
providing a service includes, but is not
limited to, salaries, retirement benefits,
rents, utilities, travel, and management
costs, as well as an appropriate
allocation of overhead and other
support costs associated with providing
the service.
An agency should set the user fee at
an amount that recovers the full cost of
providing the service unless the agency
requests, and the OMB grants, an
exception to the full cost requirement.
The OMB may grant exceptions only
where the cost of collecting the fees
would represent an unduly large part of
the fee for the activity or any other
condition exists that, in the opinion of
the agency head, justifies an exception.
When the OMB grants an exception, the
agency does not collect the full cost of
providing the service and therefore must
fund the remaining cost of providing the
service from other available funding
sources. By doing so, the agency
subsidizes the cost of the service to the
recipients of reduced-fee services even
though the service confers a special
benefit on those recipients who should
otherwise be required to pay the full
costs of receiving that benefit as
provided for by the IOAA and the OMB
Circular.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:36 Oct 12, 2016
Jkt 241001
C. Offer in Compromise Program User
Fee
The offer in compromise program
confers a special benefit on identifiable
recipients beyond those accruing to the
general public. A taxpayer with an
accepted offer in compromise receives
the special benefit of resolving his or
her tax liabilities for a compromised
amount, provided the taxpayer complies
with the terms of the offer, and the
benefit of paying the compromised
amount over a period not to exceed 24
months. Further, section 6331(k)(1) of
the Code generally prohibits the IRS
from levying to collect taxes while a
request to enter into an offer in
compromise is pending, for 30 days
after a rejection, and, if a timely appeal
of a rejection is filed, for the duration
of the appeal. Because of these special
benefits, the IOAA and the OMB
Circular authorize the IRS to charge a
user fee for the offer in compromise that
reflects the full cost of providing the
service of the offer in compromise
program to the taxpayer.
The amount of the offer in
compromise user fee was last changed
in 2014. As required by the IOAA and
the OMB Circular, the IRS completed its
2015 biennial review of the offer in
compromise program and determined
that the full cost of an offer in
compromise is $2,450.
In accordance with the OMB Circular,
this proposed amendment to the
regulations increases the offer in
compromise fee to recover more of the
costs associated with such offers. These
proposed regulations propose to charge
less than full cost. While agencies are
generally required to charge full cost,
the OMB Circular permits certain
limited exceptions to this requirement.
The IRS requested and the OMB
approved an exception to the full cost
requirement. The proposed fee for
processing an offer in compromise is
$300. In light of constraints on IRS
resources for tax administration, the
Treasury Department and the IRS have
determined that it is necessary to recoup
more of the costs of the offer in
compromise program. The IRS will
continue its practice of providing
services subject to user fees at costs less
than otherwise charged where there is a
compelling tax administration reason to
do so. Therefore, these proposed
regulations do not modify the portions
of the current regulations that except
low-income taxpayers and offers based
on doubt as to liability from the user fee.
The proposed fee balances the need to
recover more of the costs with the goal
of encouraging offers in compromise.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
70655
As required under the OMB Circular,
the IRS will review the user fee for
offers in compromise during its 2017
biennial review. The IRS also plans to
evaluate the impact of the current
proposed fee increase on the offer in
compromise program, and the IRS will
take this impact into consideration
when revising the offer in compromise
user fee in the future.
D. Calculation of User Fees Generally
User fee calculations begin by first
determining the full cost for the service.
The IRS follows the guidance provided
by the OMB Circular to compute the full
cost of the service, which includes all
indirect and direct costs to any part of
the U.S. government including but not
limited to direct and indirect personnel
costs, physical overhead, rents, utilities,
travel, and management costs. The IRS’s
cost methodology is described below.
Once the total amount of direct and
indirect costs associated with a service
is determined, the IRS follows the
guidance in the OMB Circular to
determine the costs associated with
providing the service to each recipient,
which represents the average per unit
cost of that service. This average per
unit cost is the amount of the user fee
that will recover the full cost of the
service.
The IRS follows generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP), as
established by the Federal Accounting
Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) in
calculating the full cost of providing
services. The FASAB Handbook of
Accounting Standards and Other
Pronouncements, as amended, which is
available at https://files.fasab.gov/
pdffiles/2015_fasab_handbook.pdf,
includes the Statement of Federal
Financial Accounting Standards SFFAS
No. 4: Managerial Cost Accounting
Concepts and Standards for the Federal
Government (SFFAS No. 4). SFFAS No.
4 establishes internal costing standards
under GAAP to accurately measure and
manage the full cost of federal programs.
The methodology described below is in
accordance with SFFAS No. 4.
1. Cost Center Allocation
The IRS determines the cost of its
services and the activities involved in
producing them through a cost
accounting system that tracks costs to
organizational units. The lowest
organizational unit in the IRS’s cost
accounting system is called a cost
center. Cost centers are usually separate
offices that are distinguished by subjectmatter area of responsibility or
geographic region. All costs of operating
a cost center are recorded in the IRS’s
cost accounting system and allocated to
E:\FR\FM\13OCP1.SGM
13OCP1
70656
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 198 / Thursday, October 13, 2016 / Proposed Rules
that cost center. The costs allocated to
a cost center are the direct costs for the
cost center’s activities as well as all
indirect costs, including overhead,
associated with that cost center. Each
cost is recorded in only one cost center.
2. Determining the Per Unit Cost
To establish the per unit cost, the total
cost of providing the service is divided
by the volume of services provided. The
volume of services provided includes
both services for which a fee is charged
as well as subsidized services. The
subsidized services are those where
OMB has approved an exception to the
full cost requirement, for example, to
charge a reduced fee to low-income
taxpayers. The volume of subsidized
services is included in the total volume
of services provided to ensure that the
IRS, and not those who are paying full
cost, subsidizes the cost of the reducedcost services.
3. Cost Estimation of Direct Labor and
Benefits
Not all cost centers are fully devoted
to only one service for which the IRS
charges a user fee. Some cost centers
work on a number of different services.
In these cases, the IRS estimates the cost
incurred in those cost centers
attributable to the service for which a
user fee is being calculated by
measuring the time required to
accomplish activities related to the
service, and estimating the average time
required to accomplish these activities.
The average time required to
accomplish these activities is multiplied
by the relevant organizational unit’s
average labor and benefits cost per unit
of time to determine the labor and
benefits cost incurred to provide the
service. To determine the full cost, the
IRS then adds an appropriate overhead
charge as discussed below.
4. Calculating Overhead
Overhead is an indirect cost of
operating an organization that cannot be
immediately associated with an activity
that the organization performs.
Overhead includes costs of resources
that are jointly or commonly consumed
by one or more organizational unit’s
activities but are not specifically
identifiable to a single activity. These
costs can include:
• General management and
administrative services of sustaining
and support organizations.
• Facilities management and ground
maintenance services (security, rent,
utilities, and building maintenance).
• Procurement and contracting
services.
• Financial management and
accounting services.
• Information technology services.
• Services to acquire and operate
property, plants and equipment.
• Publication, reproduction, and
graphics and video services.
• Research, analytical, and statistical
services.
• Human resources/personnel
services.
• Library and legal services.
To calculate the overhead allocable to
a service, the IRS first calculates the
Corporate Overhead rate and then
multiplies the Corporate Overhead rate
by the direct labor and benefits costs
determined as discussed above. The IRS
calculates the Corporate Overhead rate
annually based on cost elements
underlying the Statement of Net Cost
included in the IRS Annual Financial
Statements, which are audited by the
Government Accountability Office. The
Corporate Overhead rate is the ratio of
the sum of the IRS’s indirect labor and
benefits costs from the supporting and
sustaining organizational units—those
that do not interact directly with
taxpayers—and all non-labor costs to
the IRS’s labor and benefits costs of its
organizational units that interact
directly with taxpayers.
The Corporate Overhead rate of 65.85
percent for costs reviewed during FY
2015 was calculated based on FY 2014
costs as follows:
Indirect Labor and Benefits Costs .............................................................................................................................
Non-Labor Costs ........................................................................................................................................................
+
$1,693,339,843
$2,832,262,970
Total Indirect Costs ....................................................................................................................................................
Direct Labor and Benefits Costs ...............................................................................................................................
÷
$4,525,602,813
$6,872,934,473
Corporate Overhead Rate .........................................................................................................................................
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS
E. Calculation of Offer in Compromise
User Fee
The IRS used data from cost centers
dedicated to the offer in compromise
program and cost centers that work on
the offer in compromise program, as
well as other IRS programs, to
determine the full cost of the offer in
compromise program. The IRS used the
most recent two years of data, in this
case FY 2013 and FY 2014, and
averaged those costs in order to assure
anomalies, such as short term increases
or decreases in costs or numbers of
offers in compromise, would not
artificially impact the measured costs.
The offer in compromise program
work is primarily performed by
dedicated offices; therefore, the cost of
most of the program can be determined
through the costs recorded in the cost
centers underlying the offices dedicated
to the offer in compromise program. The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:36 Oct 12, 2016
Jkt 241001
IRS identified the offices that provide
100 percent of their time to this program
(Offer in Compromise Offices),
determined the full costs of the Offer in
Compromise Offices for FY 2013 and
2014, and averaged the costs for those
two years to determine the annual
average costs of those offices. The
average costs for the Offer in
Compromise Offices were as follows:
Offer in compromise offices
Average
costs
Labor and Benefits .................
Non-Labor and Support Costs
Offer in Compromise Offices
Full Cost.
$61,125,895
90,730,487
151,856,382
Because overhead and support costs
are already included in the ‘‘Non-Labor
and Support Costs’’ allocated to these
cost centers, a Corporate Overhead
factor has not been added to determine
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
65.85%
the full cost of the Offer in Compromise
Offices.
There are three IRS organizations that
perform work for the offer in
compromise program, but that are not
exclusively dedicated to the offer in
compromise program (Non-OIC
Dedicated Offices). Those organizations
are:
• Office of Chief Counsel
• Small Business/Self-Employed
(Examination)
• Office of Appeals
To calculate the average offer in
compromise program costs attributable
to these Non-OIC Dedicated Offices, the
IRS obtained the time spent by each
organization on the offer in compromise
program for FY 2013 and 2014,
calculated an annual average of that
time for each office, and multiplied that
annual average time by the average
hourly rates for that organization. After
determining the total labor and benefits
E:\FR\FM\13OCP1.SGM
13OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 198 / Thursday, October 13, 2016 / Proposed Rules
costs for the Non-OIC Dedicated Offices,
the IRS added the Corporate Overhead
costs allocable to these organizations to
determine the full cost of the services
provided by the Non-OIC Dedicated
70657
Offices. The costs are calculated as
follows:
NON-OIC DEDICATED OFFICES
Office of Chief Counsel
Average Hours .....................................................................................................................................................................................
Average Salary and Benefits Rate ......................................................................................................................................................
Chief Counsel Labor Cost ...................................................................................................................................................................
13,688
$57.00
$780,216
Examination
Average Hours .....................................................................................................................................................................................
Average Salary and Benefits Rate ......................................................................................................................................................
Examination Labor Cost ......................................................................................................................................................................
3,723
$52.72
$196,277
Office of Appeals
Average Hours .....................................................................................................................................................................................
Average Salary and Benefits Rate ......................................................................................................................................................
Examination Labor Cost ......................................................................................................................................................................
128,610
$55.10
$7,086,411
Total Cost for Chief Counsel, Examination and Appeals
Total Labor and Benefits Cost .............................................................................................................................................................
Corporate Overhead at 65.85% ..........................................................................................................................................................
Total Non-OIC Dedicated Offices Cost ...............................................................................................................................................
To determine the full cost of the offer
in compromise program, the IRS
combined the Offer in Compromise
Offices’ full cost and the Non-OIC
Dedicated Offices’ full cost. The IRS
calculated the unit cost by dividing the
total offer in compromise program cost
by the average of offer in compromise
cases that were closed in FY 2013 and
in FY 2014. Closed offers are offers that
have been issued an acceptance letter,
closed as rejected or withdrawn/
terminated, or returned. An offer may be
returned either because the offer was
not processable when received, or after
the offer was initially determined to be
processable circumstances occur that
cause the offer to no longer be
$8,062,904
$5,309,422
$13,372,326
processable or the Service is unable to
proceed with the offer investigation.
The IRS closed 70,622 offer in
compromise cases in FY 2013 and
64,332 offer in compromise cases in FY
2014, for an average of offer in
compromise cases closed in FY 2013
and FY 2014 of 67,477.
UNIT COST FOR OFFER IN COMPROMISE
Total Offer in Compromise Offices ......................................................................................................................................................
Total Non-OIC Dedicated Offices ........................................................................................................................................................
Offer in Compromise Program Full Cost .............................................................................................................................................
Average FY 2013 and 2014 Annual Volume of Closed Offers in Compromise .................................................................................
Unit Cost ..............................................................................................................................................................................................
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS
Special Analyses
Certain IRS regulations, including this
one, are exempt from the requirements
of Executive Order 12866, as
supplemented and reaffirmed by
Executive Order 13563. Therefore, a
regulatory impact assessment is not
required. It is hereby certified that these
regulations will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This
certification is based on the information
that follows. The economic impact of
these regulations on any small entity
would result from the entity being
required to pay a fee prescribed by these
regulations in order to obtain a
particular service. The dollar amount of
the fee is not, however, substantial
enough to have a significant economic
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:36 Oct 12, 2016
Jkt 241001
impact on any entity subject to the fee
because generally the fee is applied to
offset an existing tax obligation that the
entity owes the IRS. As such, the fee
does not represent a payment of any
amount greater than what a substantial
number of entities owe the IRS. Lowincome taxpayers and taxpayers making
offers in compromise based on doubt as
to liability will continue not to be
charged a fee and therefore will not be
impacted economically by these
proposed regulations. Accordingly, a
regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of
the Internal Revenue Code, this notice
of proposed rulemaking will be
submitted to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on its
impact on small business.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
$151,856,382
$13,372,326
$165,228,708
67,477
$2,450
Comments and Public Hearing
Before these proposed amendments to
the regulations are adopted as final
regulations, consideration will be given
to any comments that are submitted
timely to the IRS as prescribed in this
preamble under the ADDRESSES heading.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
request comments on all aspects of the
proposed regulations. All comments
will be available at www.regulations.gov
or upon request.
A public hearing has been scheduled
for December 16, 2016, beginning at
10:00 a.m. in the Main IR Auditorium of
the Internal Revenue Service Building,
1111 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC. 20224. Due to building
security procedures, visitors must enter
at the Constitution Avenue entrance. In
addition, all visitors must present photo
E:\FR\FM\13OCP1.SGM
13OCP1
70658
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 198 / Thursday, October 13, 2016 / Proposed Rules
identification to enter the building.
Because of access restrictions, visitors
will not be admitted beyond the
immediate entrance area more than 30
minutes before the hearing starts. For
information about having your name
placed on the building access list to
attend the hearing, see the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble.
The rules of 26 CFR 601.601(a)(3)
apply to the hearing. Persons who wish
to present oral comments at the hearing
must submit written comments or
electronic comments by November 28,
2016 and submit an outline of the topics
to be discussed and the amount of time
to be devoted to each topic (a signed
original and 8 copies) by November 28,
2016 . A period of 10 minutes will be
allotted to each person for making
comments. An agenda showing the
scheduling of the speakers will be
prepared after the deadline for receiving
outlines has passed. Copies of the
agenda will be available free of charge
at the hearing.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these
regulations is Maria Del Pilar Austin of
the Office of the Associate Chief
Counsel (Procedure and
Administration). Other personnel from
the Treasury Department and the IRS
participated in their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 300
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, User fees.
Proposed Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 300 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 300—USER FEES
Paragraph. 1. The authority citation
for part 300 continues to read as
follows:
■
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 9701 * * *
Par 2. In § 300.3, paragraphs (b)(1)
introductory text and (d) are revised to
read as follows:
■
§ 300.3
Offer to compromise fee.
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Fee—(1) The fee for processing an
offer to compromise submitted before
February 27, 2017, is $186. The fee for
processing an offer to compromise
submitted on or after February 27, 2017,
is $300. No fee will be charged if an
offer is—* * *
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:36 Oct 12, 2016
Jkt 241001
(d) Effective/applicability date. This
section is applicable beginning February
27, 2017.
John Dalrymple,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2016–24666 Filed 10–12–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 151006928–6899–01]
RIN 0648–BF43
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Jonah Crab Fishery; Advance
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement;
Scoping Process
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed
rulemaking; request for comments.
AGENCY:
Based on Atlantic States
Marine Fisheries Commission
recommendations, we are issuing this
advance notice of proposed rulemaking
announcing our intent to develop
regulations in support of an Interstate
Fishery Management Plan for Jonah
crab. The advance notice of proposed
rulemaking is necessary to provide the
public with background information
and to alert interested parties of future
regulations governing Jonah crab fishing
in Federal waters of the Exclusive
Economic Zone. We are also
announcing our intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement in
accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act. This notice is
to alert the interested public of the
scoping process and potential
development of a draft Environmental
Impact Statement, and to outline
opportunity for public participation in
that process.
DATES: Written and electronic comments
must be received on or before November
14, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on the Jonah Crab Plan, identified by
NOAA–NMFS–2015–0127, by either of
the following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20150127, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
John K. Bullard, Regional
Administrator, NMFS, Greater Atlantic
Regional Fisheries Office, 55 Great
Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930.
Mark the outside of the envelope:
‘‘Comments on Jonah Crab Plan.’’
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/
A’’ in the required fields if you wish to
remain anonymous).
Requests for copies of the
Commission’s Jonah Crab Plan should
be directed to Robert Beal, Executive
Director, Atlantic States Marine
Fisheries Commission, 1050 N.
Highland St, Suite A–N, Arlington, VA
22201. It is also available electronically
at: https://www.asmfc.org/uploads/file/
55e9daffJonahCrabInterstateFMP_
Aug2015.pdf.
Requests for copies of the scoping
document and other information should
be directed to Allison Murphy, Fishery
Policy Analyst, NOAA Fisheries,
Greater Atlantic Regional Fisheries
Office, 55 Great Republic Drive,
Gloucester, MA 01930, telephone (978)
281–9122. The scoping document will
be available electronically at: https://
www.greateratlantic.fisheries.noaa.gov/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Allison Murphy, Fishery Policy Analyst,
NMFS, allison.murphy@noaa.gov,
telephone (978) 281–9122.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Jonah crab (Cancer borealis), also
known as rock crab, is not currently
managed under Federal regulations. The
Atlantic States Marine Fisheries
Commission’s Lobster Board, working
through its public meeting process,
approved an Interstate Fishery
Management Plan for Jonah Crab in
August 2015. The goal of the plan is to
promote conservation, reduce the
possibility of recruitment failure, and
allow the industry to continue fishing
E:\FR\FM\13OCP1.SGM
13OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 198 (Thursday, October 13, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 70654-70658]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-24666]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 300
[REG-108934-16]
RIN 1545-BN38
User Fees for Offers in Compromise
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains proposed amendments to the regulations
that provide user fees for offers in compromise. The proposed
amendments affect taxpayers who wish to pay their liabilities through
offers in compromise. The proposed effective date for these proposed
amendments to the regulations is for offers in compromise submitted on
or after February 27, 2017. This document also provides a notice of
public hearing on these proposed amendments to the regulations.
DATES: Written or electronic comments must be received by November 28,
2016. Outlines of topics to be discussed at the public hearing
scheduled for December 16, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. must be received by
November 28, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to: Internal Revenue Service, CC:PA:LPD:PR
(REG-108934-16), Room 5203, Post Office Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions may be hand-delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-
108934-16), Courier's Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20224 or sent electronically via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov (indicate IRS and REG-
108934-16). The public hearing will be held in the Main IR Auditorium
beginning at 10:00 a.m. in the Internal Revenue Service Building, 1111
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20224.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the proposed amendments to
the regulations, Maria Del Pilar Austin at (202) 317-5437; concerning
submissions of comments, the hearing, or to be placed on the building
access list to attend the hearing, Regina Johnson, at (202) 317-6901;
concerning cost methodology, Eva Williams, at (202) 803-9728 (not toll-
free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document contains proposed regulations that would amend Sec.
300.3 of the User Fee Regulations (26 CFR part 300), which provides for
a user fee applicable to offers in compromise under section 7122 of the
Internal Revenue Code (Code).
Section 7122(a) provides the Secretary the authority to compromise
any civil or criminal case arising under the internal revenue laws,
prior to the referral of that case to the Department of Justice.
Section 7122(d)(1) requires the IRS to prescribe guidelines for
officers and employees of the IRS to determine whether an offer in
compromise is adequate and should be accepted to resolve a dispute.
Those guidelines can generally be found in Sec. 301.7122-1. Under
those guidelines, an offer in compromise may be accepted if there is
doubt as to liability, if there is doubt as to collectability, or if
acceptance will promote effective tax administration. See Sec.
301.7122-1(b).
When the IRS receives an offer in compromise, it initially
determines whether the taxpayer submitting the offer is eligible for
the offer in compromise program and, if the taxpayer is eligible,
whether the offer submitted is otherwise processable. Currently, a
taxpayer may be ineligible for the offer in compromise program for a
number of reasons, including if the taxpayer is in bankruptcy or has
not filed all required tax returns. The IRS will return an offer as
nonprocessable if the taxpayer is ineligible or if the offer has not
been properly submitted.
If the IRS determines the offer in compromise is processable, then
except where the offer is made under section 7122(d)(3)(B) relating
only to issues of liability and the case is processed without a
financial investigation, the IRS investigates and verifies the
taxpayer's financial information submitted with the offer to determine
whether such a compromise is appropriate before accepting the terms of
the offer in compromise. If the IRS initially rejects a processable
offer in compromise based on an investigation of the taxpayer's
financial position, section 7122(e)(1) provides that the IRS must
conduct an independent administrative review of that decision before
communicating the rejection to the taxpayer. If the independent
administrative review upholds the IRS's initial decision to reject a
processable offer in compromise, section 7122(e)(2) provides that the
taxpayer is notified of the rejection and has the right to appeal the
rejection to the IRS's Appeals Office. When the IRS accepts an offer in
compromise, the IRS processes the payments and monitors the taxpayer's
compliance with the terms of the offer.
Under Sec. 300.3, the IRS currently charges $186 for processing an
offer in compromise, which includes reviewing and monitoring the offer.
Under Sec. 300.3(b)(2)(i) and (ii), if a fee is charged and the offer
is accepted to promote effective tax administration or accepted based
on doubt as to collectability where the IRS has determined that
collection of an amount greater than the amount offered would create
economic hardship, then the user fee is applied against the amount to
be paid under the offer unless the taxpayer requests that it be
refunded. Section 300.3(b)(1)(i) and (ii) provide that no fee is
charged if an offer is based solely on doubt as to liability, or made
by a low-income taxpayer.
Explanation of Provisions
A. Overview
To bring the user fee rate for offers in compromise closer to the
full cost to the IRS of providing this taxpayer specific service, the
proposed regulations under Sec. 300.3 would increase the user fee for
an offer in compromise to $300. The proposed regulations do not modify
other portions of the User Fee Regulations regarding offers in
compromise, such as Sec. 300.3(b)(1)(i) and (ii) which waive the user
fee for offers in compromise submitted by low-income taxpayers and
offers in compromise based solely on doubt as to liability. The
increased user fee for offers in compromise is proposed to be effective
for offers submitted on or after February 27, 2017.
B. User Fee Authority
The Independent Offices Appropriations Act (IOAA) (31 U.S.C.
[[Page 70655]]
9701) authorizes each agency to promulgate regulations establishing the
charge for services provided by the agency (user fees). The IOAA
provides that these user fee regulations are subject to policies
prescribed by the President and shall be as uniform as practicable.
Those policies are currently set forth in the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) Circular A-25, 58 FR 38142 (July 15, 1993; OMB Circular).
The IOAA states that the services provided by an agency should be
self-sustaining to the extent possible. 31 U.S.C. 9701(a). The OMB
Circular states that agencies that provide services that confer special
benefits on identifiable recipients beyond those accruing to the
general public are to establish user fees that recover the full cost of
providing those services. The OMB Circular requires that agencies
identify all services that confer special benefits and determine
whether user fees should be assessed for those services.
Agencies are to review user fees biennially and update them as
necessary to reflect changes in the cost of providing the underlying
services. During this biennial review, an agency must calculate the
full cost of providing each service, taking into account all direct and
indirect costs to any part of the U.S. government. The full cost of
providing a service includes, but is not limited to, salaries,
retirement benefits, rents, utilities, travel, and management costs, as
well as an appropriate allocation of overhead and other support costs
associated with providing the service.
An agency should set the user fee at an amount that recovers the
full cost of providing the service unless the agency requests, and the
OMB grants, an exception to the full cost requirement. The OMB may
grant exceptions only where the cost of collecting the fees would
represent an unduly large part of the fee for the activity or any other
condition exists that, in the opinion of the agency head, justifies an
exception. When the OMB grants an exception, the agency does not
collect the full cost of providing the service and therefore must fund
the remaining cost of providing the service from other available
funding sources. By doing so, the agency subsidizes the cost of the
service to the recipients of reduced-fee services even though the
service confers a special benefit on those recipients who should
otherwise be required to pay the full costs of receiving that benefit
as provided for by the IOAA and the OMB Circular.
C. Offer in Compromise Program User Fee
The offer in compromise program confers a special benefit on
identifiable recipients beyond those accruing to the general public. A
taxpayer with an accepted offer in compromise receives the special
benefit of resolving his or her tax liabilities for a compromised
amount, provided the taxpayer complies with the terms of the offer, and
the benefit of paying the compromised amount over a period not to
exceed 24 months. Further, section 6331(k)(1) of the Code generally
prohibits the IRS from levying to collect taxes while a request to
enter into an offer in compromise is pending, for 30 days after a
rejection, and, if a timely appeal of a rejection is filed, for the
duration of the appeal. Because of these special benefits, the IOAA and
the OMB Circular authorize the IRS to charge a user fee for the offer
in compromise that reflects the full cost of providing the service of
the offer in compromise program to the taxpayer.
The amount of the offer in compromise user fee was last changed in
2014. As required by the IOAA and the OMB Circular, the IRS completed
its 2015 biennial review of the offer in compromise program and
determined that the full cost of an offer in compromise is $2,450.
In accordance with the OMB Circular, this proposed amendment to the
regulations increases the offer in compromise fee to recover more of
the costs associated with such offers. These proposed regulations
propose to charge less than full cost. While agencies are generally
required to charge full cost, the OMB Circular permits certain limited
exceptions to this requirement. The IRS requested and the OMB approved
an exception to the full cost requirement. The proposed fee for
processing an offer in compromise is $300. In light of constraints on
IRS resources for tax administration, the Treasury Department and the
IRS have determined that it is necessary to recoup more of the costs of
the offer in compromise program. The IRS will continue its practice of
providing services subject to user fees at costs less than otherwise
charged where there is a compelling tax administration reason to do so.
Therefore, these proposed regulations do not modify the portions of the
current regulations that except low-income taxpayers and offers based
on doubt as to liability from the user fee. The proposed fee balances
the need to recover more of the costs with the goal of encouraging
offers in compromise.
As required under the OMB Circular, the IRS will review the user
fee for offers in compromise during its 2017 biennial review. The IRS
also plans to evaluate the impact of the current proposed fee increase
on the offer in compromise program, and the IRS will take this impact
into consideration when revising the offer in compromise user fee in
the future.
D. Calculation of User Fees Generally
User fee calculations begin by first determining the full cost for
the service. The IRS follows the guidance provided by the OMB Circular
to compute the full cost of the service, which includes all indirect
and direct costs to any part of the U.S. government including but not
limited to direct and indirect personnel costs, physical overhead,
rents, utilities, travel, and management costs. The IRS's cost
methodology is described below.
Once the total amount of direct and indirect costs associated with
a service is determined, the IRS follows the guidance in the OMB
Circular to determine the costs associated with providing the service
to each recipient, which represents the average per unit cost of that
service. This average per unit cost is the amount of the user fee that
will recover the full cost of the service.
The IRS follows generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), as
established by the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB)
in calculating the full cost of providing services. The FASAB Handbook
of Accounting Standards and Other Pronouncements, as amended, which is
available at https://files.fasab.gov/pdffiles/2015_fasab_handbook.pdf,
includes the Statement of Federal Financial Accounting Standards SFFAS
No. 4: Managerial Cost Accounting Concepts and Standards for the
Federal Government (SFFAS No. 4). SFFAS No. 4 establishes internal
costing standards under GAAP to accurately measure and manage the full
cost of federal programs. The methodology described below is in
accordance with SFFAS No. 4.
1. Cost Center Allocation
The IRS determines the cost of its services and the activities
involved in producing them through a cost accounting system that tracks
costs to organizational units. The lowest organizational unit in the
IRS's cost accounting system is called a cost center. Cost centers are
usually separate offices that are distinguished by subject-matter area
of responsibility or geographic region. All costs of operating a cost
center are recorded in the IRS's cost accounting system and allocated
to
[[Page 70656]]
that cost center. The costs allocated to a cost center are the direct
costs for the cost center's activities as well as all indirect costs,
including overhead, associated with that cost center. Each cost is
recorded in only one cost center.
2. Determining the Per Unit Cost
To establish the per unit cost, the total cost of providing the
service is divided by the volume of services provided. The volume of
services provided includes both services for which a fee is charged as
well as subsidized services. The subsidized services are those where
OMB has approved an exception to the full cost requirement, for
example, to charge a reduced fee to low-income taxpayers. The volume of
subsidized services is included in the total volume of services
provided to ensure that the IRS, and not those who are paying full
cost, subsidizes the cost of the reduced-cost services.
3. Cost Estimation of Direct Labor and Benefits
Not all cost centers are fully devoted to only one service for
which the IRS charges a user fee. Some cost centers work on a number of
different services. In these cases, the IRS estimates the cost incurred
in those cost centers attributable to the service for which a user fee
is being calculated by measuring the time required to accomplish
activities related to the service, and estimating the average time
required to accomplish these activities. The average time required to
accomplish these activities is multiplied by the relevant
organizational unit's average labor and benefits cost per unit of time
to determine the labor and benefits cost incurred to provide the
service. To determine the full cost, the IRS then adds an appropriate
overhead charge as discussed below.
4. Calculating Overhead
Overhead is an indirect cost of operating an organization that
cannot be immediately associated with an activity that the organization
performs. Overhead includes costs of resources that are jointly or
commonly consumed by one or more organizational unit's activities but
are not specifically identifiable to a single activity. These costs can
include:
General management and administrative services of
sustaining and support organizations.
Facilities management and ground maintenance services
(security, rent, utilities, and building maintenance).
Procurement and contracting services.
Financial management and accounting services.
Information technology services.
Services to acquire and operate property, plants and
equipment.
Publication, reproduction, and graphics and video
services.
Research, analytical, and statistical services.
Human resources/personnel services.
Library and legal services.
To calculate the overhead allocable to a service, the IRS first
calculates the Corporate Overhead rate and then multiplies the
Corporate Overhead rate by the direct labor and benefits costs
determined as discussed above. The IRS calculates the Corporate
Overhead rate annually based on cost elements underlying the Statement
of Net Cost included in the IRS Annual Financial Statements, which are
audited by the Government Accountability Office. The Corporate Overhead
rate is the ratio of the sum of the IRS's indirect labor and benefits
costs from the supporting and sustaining organizational units--those
that do not interact directly with taxpayers--and all non-labor costs
to the IRS's labor and benefits costs of its organizational units that
interact directly with taxpayers.
The Corporate Overhead rate of 65.85 percent for costs reviewed
during FY 2015 was calculated based on FY 2014 costs as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indirect Labor and Benefits Costs........ $1,693,339,843
Non-Labor Costs.......................... + $2,832,262,970
---------------------
Total Indirect Costs..................... $4,525,602,813
Direct Labor and Benefits Costs.......... / $6,872,934,473
---------------------
Corporate Overhead Rate.................. 65.85%
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E. Calculation of Offer in Compromise User Fee
The IRS used data from cost centers dedicated to the offer in
compromise program and cost centers that work on the offer in
compromise program, as well as other IRS programs, to determine the
full cost of the offer in compromise program. The IRS used the most
recent two years of data, in this case FY 2013 and FY 2014, and
averaged those costs in order to assure anomalies, such as short term
increases or decreases in costs or numbers of offers in compromise,
would not artificially impact the measured costs.
The offer in compromise program work is primarily performed by
dedicated offices; therefore, the cost of most of the program can be
determined through the costs recorded in the cost centers underlying
the offices dedicated to the offer in compromise program. The IRS
identified the offices that provide 100 percent of their time to this
program (Offer in Compromise Offices), determined the full costs of the
Offer in Compromise Offices for FY 2013 and 2014, and averaged the
costs for those two years to determine the annual average costs of
those offices. The average costs for the Offer in Compromise Offices
were as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Offer in compromise offices Average costs
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Labor and Benefits........................ $61,125,895
Non-Labor and Support Costs............... 90,730,487
Offer in Compromise Offices Full Cost..... 151,856,382
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because overhead and support costs are already included in the
``Non-Labor and Support Costs'' allocated to these cost centers, a
Corporate Overhead factor has not been added to determine the full cost
of the Offer in Compromise Offices.
There are three IRS organizations that perform work for the offer
in compromise program, but that are not exclusively dedicated to the
offer in compromise program (Non-OIC Dedicated Offices). Those
organizations are:
Office of Chief Counsel
Small Business/Self-Employed (Examination)
Office of Appeals
To calculate the average offer in compromise program costs
attributable to these Non-OIC Dedicated Offices, the IRS obtained the
time spent by each organization on the offer in compromise program for
FY 2013 and 2014, calculated an annual average of that time for each
office, and multiplied that annual average time by the average hourly
rates for that organization. After determining the total labor and
benefits
[[Page 70657]]
costs for the Non-OIC Dedicated Offices, the IRS added the Corporate
Overhead costs allocable to these organizations to determine the full
cost of the services provided by the Non-OIC Dedicated Offices. The
costs are calculated as follows:
Non-OIC Dedicated Offices
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office of Chief Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average Hours........................................... 13,688
Average Salary and Benefits Rate........................ $57.00
Chief Counsel Labor Cost................................ $780,216
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Examination
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average Hours........................................... 3,723
Average Salary and Benefits Rate........................ $52.72
Examination Labor Cost.................................. $196,277
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office of Appeals
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average Hours........................................... 128,610
Average Salary and Benefits Rate........................ $55.10
Examination Labor Cost.................................. $7,086,411
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Cost for Chief Counsel, Examination and Appeals
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Labor and Benefits Cost........................... $8,062,904
Corporate Overhead at 65.85%............................ $5,309,422
Total Non-OIC Dedicated Offices Cost.................... $13,372,326
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To determine the full cost of the offer in compromise program, the
IRS combined the Offer in Compromise Offices' full cost and the Non-OIC
Dedicated Offices' full cost. The IRS calculated the unit cost by
dividing the total offer in compromise program cost by the average of
offer in compromise cases that were closed in FY 2013 and in FY 2014.
Closed offers are offers that have been issued an acceptance letter,
closed as rejected or withdrawn/terminated, or returned. An offer may
be returned either because the offer was not processable when received,
or after the offer was initially determined to be processable
circumstances occur that cause the offer to no longer be processable or
the Service is unable to proceed with the offer investigation. The IRS
closed 70,622 offer in compromise cases in FY 2013 and 64,332 offer in
compromise cases in FY 2014, for an average of offer in compromise
cases closed in FY 2013 and FY 2014 of 67,477.
Unit Cost for Offer in Compromise
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Offer in Compromise Offices....................... $151,856,382
Total Non-OIC Dedicated Offices......................... $13,372,326
Offer in Compromise Program Full Cost................... $165,228,708
Average FY 2013 and 2014 Annual Volume of Closed Offers 67,477
in Compromise..........................................
Unit Cost............................................... $2,450
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Special Analyses
Certain IRS regulations, including this one, are exempt from the
requirements of Executive Order 12866, as supplemented and reaffirmed
by Executive Order 13563. Therefore, a regulatory impact assessment is
not required. It is hereby certified that these regulations will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This certification is based on the information that follows.
The economic impact of these regulations on any small entity would
result from the entity being required to pay a fee prescribed by these
regulations in order to obtain a particular service. The dollar amount
of the fee is not, however, substantial enough to have a significant
economic impact on any entity subject to the fee because generally the
fee is applied to offset an existing tax obligation that the entity
owes the IRS. As such, the fee does not represent a payment of any
amount greater than what a substantial number of entities owe the IRS.
Low-income taxpayers and taxpayers making offers in compromise based on
doubt as to liability will continue not to be charged a fee and
therefore will not be impacted economically by these proposed
regulations. Accordingly, a regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Internal Revenue Code,
this notice of proposed rulemaking will be submitted to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment
on its impact on small business.
Comments and Public Hearing
Before these proposed amendments to the regulations are adopted as
final regulations, consideration will be given to any comments that are
submitted timely to the IRS as prescribed in this preamble under the
ADDRESSES heading. The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments
on all aspects of the proposed regulations. All comments will be
available at www.regulations.gov or upon request.
A public hearing has been scheduled for December 16, 2016,
beginning at 10:00 a.m. in the Main IR Auditorium of the Internal
Revenue Service Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC.
20224. Due to building security procedures, visitors must enter at the
Constitution Avenue entrance. In addition, all visitors must present
photo
[[Page 70658]]
identification to enter the building. Because of access restrictions,
visitors will not be admitted beyond the immediate entrance area more
than 30 minutes before the hearing starts. For information about having
your name placed on the building access list to attend the hearing, see
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble.
The rules of 26 CFR 601.601(a)(3) apply to the hearing. Persons who
wish to present oral comments at the hearing must submit written
comments or electronic comments by November 28, 2016 and submit an
outline of the topics to be discussed and the amount of time to be
devoted to each topic (a signed original and 8 copies) by November 28,
2016 . A period of 10 minutes will be allotted to each person for
making comments. An agenda showing the scheduling of the speakers will
be prepared after the deadline for receiving outlines has passed.
Copies of the agenda will be available free of charge at the hearing.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these regulations is Maria Del Pilar Austin
of the Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and
Administration). Other personnel from the Treasury Department and the
IRS participated in their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 300
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, User fees.
Proposed Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 300 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 300--USER FEES
0
Paragraph. 1. The authority citation for part 300 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 9701 * * *
0
Par 2. In Sec. 300.3, paragraphs (b)(1) introductory text and (d) are
revised to read as follows:
Sec. 300.3 Offer to compromise fee.
* * * * *
(b) Fee--(1) The fee for processing an offer to compromise
submitted before February 27, 2017, is $186. The fee for processing an
offer to compromise submitted on or after February 27, 2017, is $300.
No fee will be charged if an offer is--* * *
* * * * *
(d) Effective/applicability date. This section is applicable
beginning February 27, 2017.
John Dalrymple,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2016-24666 Filed 10-12-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P