Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for a Proposed Highway Project in Los Angeles County, California, 70247-70248 [2016-24480]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 196 / Tuesday, October 11, 2016 / Notices
State Justice Institute Board of
Directors
Chase T. Rogers (Chair), Chief Justice,
Supreme Court of Connecticut,
Hartford, CT
Daniel J. Becker (Vice Chair), State
Court Administrator, Utah
Administrative Office of the Courts,
Salt Lake City, UT
Gayle A. Nachtigal (Secretary), Senior
Circuit Court Judge, Washington
County Circuit Court, Hillsboro, OR
Hernan D. Vera (Treasurer), Principal,
Bird Marella P.C., Los Angeles, CA
Jonathan Lippman, Chief Judge of the
State of New York (ret.); Of Counsel,
Latham & Watkins, LLP, New York,
NY
David V. Brewer, Justice, Supreme Court
of Oregon, Salem, OR
Wilfredo Martinez, County Judge, 9th
Judicial Circuit of Florida, Orlando,
FL
Marsha J. Rabiteau, Executive Director,
Legal Policy Strategies Group,
Bloomfield, CT
John B. Nalbandian, Partner, Taft
Stettinius & Hollister LLP, Cincinnati,
OH
Isabel Framer, President, Language
Access Consultants LLC, Copley, OH
Jonathan D. Mattiello, Executive
Director (ex officio)
Jonathan D. Mattiello,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2016–24382 Filed 10–7–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement for a
Proposed Highway Project in Los
Angeles County, California
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
AGENCY:
The FHWA, on behalf of the
California Department of Transportation
(Caltrans), is issuing this notice to
advise the public that a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
will be prepared for proposed highway
improvements on Interstate 605 (I–605)
and State Route 60 (SR–60). The limits
of the Interstate 605 (I–605) and State
Route 60 (SR–60) Improvement Project
(Project) will traverse the cities of
Baldwin Park, El Monte, City of
Industry, Pico Rivera, South El Monte,
Whittier, and unincorporated Los
Angeles County. Improvements on I–
605 are proposed from south of Slauson
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:12 Oct 07, 2016
Jkt 241001
Avenue to the I–605/Interstate 10 (I–10)
Interchange, and improvements on SR–
60 are proposed from Santa Anita
Avenue to east of Turnbull Canyon
Road. A Project Study Report-Project
Development Study (PSR–PDS) for the
Project was approved in December 2015
(not attached).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ronald Kosinski, Deputy District
Director, Division of Environmental
Planning, District 7, 100 South Main
Street, Suite 100, Los Angeles, CA
90012, (213) 897–0703.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective
July 1, 2007, the FHWA assigned, and
Caltrans assumed, environmental
responsibilities for this Project pursuant
to 23 United States Code (U.S.C.) 327.
Caltrans will prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for the proposed Project. The purpose of
the Project is to reduce congestion,
improve freeway operations, improve
and enhance safety, and improve local
and system interchange operations. The
Project proposes widening along
southbound and northbound I–605 and
the addition of one mixed flow lane (a
standard freeway lane where vehicles
with any number of occupants can drive
anytime) along westbound SR–60
within the Project limits. The Project
will also include the addition of
auxiliary lanes, where necessary (lanes
used to separate entering, exiting, or
weaving traffic from through traffic).
Improvements to local streets and
interchanges would be required as part
of the Project. Interchanges that would
be affected include the I–605/Slauson
Avenue Interchange, I–605/Washington
Boulevard Interchange, I–605/Whittier
Boulevard Interchange, I–605/Beverly
Boulevard Interchange, I–605/Rose Hills
Road Interchange, I–605/Peck Road
Interchange, I–605/SR 60 Interchange, I–
605/Valley Boulevard Interchange, and
SR 60/Peck Road Interchange.
The following five Project alternatives
are under consideration.
Alternative 1: No Build Alternative
In this alternative, there would be no
reconstruction or improvements to I–
605 or SR–60. I–605 within the Project
limits would continue to have four
mixed flow lanes that are 11-feet wide,
with 2-foot-wide median shoulders,
plus one high-occupancy vehicle (HOV)
lane and a 1-foot-wide HOV buffer.
Alternative 2: Standard Alternative
(Lane/Shoulder Widths)
Alternative 2 would meet Caltrans’
Highway Design Manual standards for
travel lanes and shoulders. This
alternative includes adding one mixed
PO 00000
Frm 00163
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
70247
flow lane on southbound and
northbound I–605 and widening all
lanes to 12 feet, for a total of five, 12foot-wide mixed flow lanes. The 2-footwide median shoulders would be
widened to 10 feet, and the 1-foot-wide
HOV buffer would be widened to four
feet. One 12-foot-wide mixed flow lane
would also be added on westbound SR–
60. Right-of-Way (ROW) acquisitions
would be required to accommodate the
proposed improvements and to meet
Caltrans’ Highway Design Manual
standards.
Alternative 3: Reduced Standard
Alternative (Lane/Shoulder Widths)
Alternative 3 includes many of the
design elements identified in
Alternative 2; however, this alternative
includes features that do not meet
Caltrans’ Highway Design Manual
standards to reduce ROW acquisitions.
On I–605, only two of the five mixed
flow lanes would be 12-feet wide, as the
remaining three lanes would be 11-feet
wide. The 2-foot-wide median shoulders
would be widened to 10 feet, and the 1foot-wide HOV buffer would be
widened to two feet.
Alternative 4: Hybrid Alternative
Alternative 4 includes many of the
same design elements identified in
Alternative 2; however, this alternative
includes features that do not meet
Caltrans’ Highway Design Manual
standards to reduce ROW acquisitions.
Like Alternative 2, this alternative
includes five mixed flow lanes on I–605,
but only one mixed flow lane would be
12-feet wide, which is added to the
outside travel lane. The remaining
portion of the highway, consisting of the
four 11-foot-wide mixed flow lanes, the
2-foot-wide median shoulders, and 1foot-wide HOV buffer, would not be
improved as part of this alternative.
Alternative 5: Transportation Systems
Management/Transportation Demand
Management (TSM/TDM)
The TSM/TDM Alternative would add
transportation system and demand
management techniques to existing
features within the Project limits.
Improvements that may be included as
part of this alternative are additional
ramp metering, improved signal timing,
increased transit service, improved
signage, development of rideshare/
carpool programs, and installation of
intelligent transportation systems.
Build Alternatives 2 through 4 may
include may include additional design
variations, which provide optional lane
use (general purpose, HOV), optional on
and off ramp modifications, and other
operational improvements. Build
E:\FR\FM\11OCN1.SGM
11OCN1
70248
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 196 / Tuesday, October 11, 2016 / Notices
alternatives proposed may be refined or
be removed from further consideration,
as engineering and environmental
analysis is conducted for the Project.
Analysis supporting the
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
will determine the improvements
necessary to meet the existing and
future transportation needs in the
corridor.
The following permits/approvals may
be required to construct the Project:
• 33 U.S.C. 408 Section 408 Permit
(United States (U.S.) Army Corps of
Engineers)
• Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 404
Permit (U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers)
• Section 1602 Agreement (California
Department of Fish and Wildlife)
• National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Permit
• Caltrans Statewide Permit and
Construction General Permit
• CWA Section 401 Water Quality
Certification and/or Waste Discharge
Requirement (WDR) (Regional Water
Quality Control Board)
• South Coast Air Quality Management
District (SCAQMD) Rules 403, 1403,
and 1166
• Clean Air Act, Transportation
Conformity Determination (FHWA;
Caltrans)
• Section 106 Compliance with
National Historic Preservation Act
• Section 7 Consultation with U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service in the event that
Federally-listed species are affected
• Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR)
Memorandum of Agreement
• Various City Encroachment Permits
Caltrans will be holding public
scoping meetings to provide an
overview of the Project, summarize the
environmental process, and receive
input regarding the environmental
issues and the suggested scope and
content of the EIS. These meetings will
include separate agency and public
scoping. One round of three meetings
will be held on November 1st through
November 3rd. Please refer to the table
below for meeting details:
Date
Time
Location
City of Industry ......................
Tuesday, Nov. 1, 2016 ........
6:30 p.m.–8:30 p.m ...
South El Monte .....................
Wednesday, Nov. 2, 2016 ...
6:30 p.m.–8:30 p.m ...
Whittier ..................................
Thursday, Nov. 3, 2016 .......
6:30 p.m.–8:30 p.m ...
Whittier ..................................
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
City
Thursday, Nov. 3, 2016 .......
3:00 p.m.–4:30 p.m ...
Public Scoping Meeting, Industry Hills Expo Center,
16200 Temple Avenue, City of Industry, CA 91744.
Public Scoping Meeting, South El Monte Senior Center,
1556 Central Ave., South El Monte, CA 91733.
Public Scoping Meeting, Palm Park, Palm A–B Room,
5703 Palm Ave., Whittier, CA 90601.
Agency Scoping Meeting, Palm Park, Palm A–B Room,
5703 Palm Ave., Whittier, CA 90601.
Letters describing the proposed action
and soliciting comments will be sent to
appropriate Federal, State, and
Participating Agencies; tribal
governments and local agencies and
private organizations and citizens who
have previously expressed or are known
to have interest in this proposal. The
Draft EIS is anticipated to be available
for public and agency review and
comment in mid-2019. Public meetings
will be held in study area communities
during the public and agency review
and comment period. In addition,
public hearings will be held for the
Project. Public notice will be given for
the time and place of the public
meetings and hearings. The Draft EIS
will be available for public and agency
review and comment prior to the public
hearings.
To ensure that the full range of issues
related to this proposed action is
addressed and all significant concerns
are identified, comments and
suggestions are invited from all
interested parties. Comments or
questions about this proposed action
and the EIS should be directed to
Caltrans at the address provided above.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway
Planning and Construction. The
regulations implementing Executive
Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to
this program.)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:12 Oct 07, 2016
Jkt 241001
Issued on: October 3, 2016.
Josue M. Yambo,
Senior Transportation Engineer, Project
Delivery Division, Federal Highway
Administration, Sacramento, California.
[FR Doc. 2016–24480 Filed 10–7–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA–2016–0207]
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption
Applications; Vision
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of applications for
exemptions; request for comments.
AGENCY:
FMCSA announces receipt of
applications from 18 individuals for
exemption from the vision requirement
in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations. They are unable to meet
the vision requirement in one eye for
various reasons. The exemptions will
enable these individuals to operate
commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) in
interstate commerce without meeting
the prescribed vision requirement in
one eye. If granted, the exemptions
would enable these individuals to
qualify as drivers of commercial motor
vehicles (CMVs) in interstate commerce.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00164
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Comments must be received on
or before November 10, 2016. All
comments will be investigated by
FMCSA. The exemptions will be issued
the day after the comment period closes.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
bearing the Federal Docket Management
System (FDMS) Docket No. FMCSA–
2016–0207 using any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal
Holidays.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
Instructions: Each submission must
include the Agency name and the
docket numbers for this notice. Note
that all comments received will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. Please
see the Privacy Act heading below for
further information.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments, go to https://
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\11OCN1.SGM
11OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 11, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70247-70248]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-24480]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for
a Proposed Highway Project in Los Angeles County, California
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FHWA, on behalf of the California Department of
Transportation (Caltrans), is issuing this notice to advise the public
that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) will be prepared for
proposed highway improvements on Interstate 605 (I-605) and State Route
60 (SR-60). The limits of the Interstate 605 (I-605) and State Route 60
(SR-60) Improvement Project (Project) will traverse the cities of
Baldwin Park, El Monte, City of Industry, Pico Rivera, South El Monte,
Whittier, and unincorporated Los Angeles County. Improvements on I-605
are proposed from south of Slauson Avenue to the I-605/Interstate 10
(I-10) Interchange, and improvements on SR-60 are proposed from Santa
Anita Avenue to east of Turnbull Canyon Road. A Project Study Report-
Project Development Study (PSR-PDS) for the Project was approved in
December 2015 (not attached).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ronald Kosinski, Deputy District
Director, Division of Environmental Planning, District 7, 100 South
Main Street, Suite 100, Los Angeles, CA 90012, (213) 897-0703.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective July 1, 2007, the FHWA assigned,
and Caltrans assumed, environmental responsibilities for this Project
pursuant to 23 United States Code (U.S.C.) 327.
Caltrans will prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for
the proposed Project. The purpose of the Project is to reduce
congestion, improve freeway operations, improve and enhance safety, and
improve local and system interchange operations. The Project proposes
widening along southbound and northbound I-605 and the addition of one
mixed flow lane (a standard freeway lane where vehicles with any number
of occupants can drive anytime) along westbound SR-60 within the
Project limits. The Project will also include the addition of auxiliary
lanes, where necessary (lanes used to separate entering, exiting, or
weaving traffic from through traffic). Improvements to local streets
and interchanges would be required as part of the Project. Interchanges
that would be affected include the I-605/Slauson Avenue Interchange, I-
605/Washington Boulevard Interchange, I-605/Whittier Boulevard
Interchange, I-605/Beverly Boulevard Interchange, I-605/Rose Hills Road
Interchange, I-605/Peck Road Interchange, I-605/SR 60 Interchange, I-
605/Valley Boulevard Interchange, and SR 60/Peck Road Interchange.
The following five Project alternatives are under consideration.
Alternative 1: No Build Alternative
In this alternative, there would be no reconstruction or
improvements to I-605 or SR-60. I-605 within the Project limits would
continue to have four mixed flow lanes that are 11-feet wide, with 2-
foot-wide median shoulders, plus one high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane
and a 1-foot-wide HOV buffer.
Alternative 2: Standard Alternative (Lane/Shoulder Widths)
Alternative 2 would meet Caltrans' Highway Design Manual standards
for travel lanes and shoulders. This alternative includes adding one
mixed flow lane on southbound and northbound I-605 and widening all
lanes to 12 feet, for a total of five, 12-foot-wide mixed flow lanes.
The 2-foot-wide median shoulders would be widened to 10 feet, and the
1-foot-wide HOV buffer would be widened to four feet. One 12-foot-wide
mixed flow lane would also be added on westbound SR-60. Right-of-Way
(ROW) acquisitions would be required to accommodate the proposed
improvements and to meet Caltrans' Highway Design Manual standards.
Alternative 3: Reduced Standard Alternative (Lane/Shoulder Widths)
Alternative 3 includes many of the design elements identified in
Alternative 2; however, this alternative includes features that do not
meet Caltrans' Highway Design Manual standards to reduce ROW
acquisitions. On I-605, only two of the five mixed flow lanes would be
12-feet wide, as the remaining three lanes would be 11-feet wide. The
2-foot-wide median shoulders would be widened to 10 feet, and the 1-
foot-wide HOV buffer would be widened to two feet.
Alternative 4: Hybrid Alternative
Alternative 4 includes many of the same design elements identified
in Alternative 2; however, this alternative includes features that do
not meet Caltrans' Highway Design Manual standards to reduce ROW
acquisitions. Like Alternative 2, this alternative includes five mixed
flow lanes on I-605, but only one mixed flow lane would be 12-feet
wide, which is added to the outside travel lane. The remaining portion
of the highway, consisting of the four 11-foot-wide mixed flow lanes,
the 2-foot-wide median shoulders, and 1-foot-wide HOV buffer, would not
be improved as part of this alternative.
Alternative 5: Transportation Systems Management/Transportation Demand
Management (TSM/TDM)
The TSM/TDM Alternative would add transportation system and demand
management techniques to existing features within the Project limits.
Improvements that may be included as part of this alternative are
additional ramp metering, improved signal timing, increased transit
service, improved signage, development of rideshare/carpool programs,
and installation of intelligent transportation systems.
Build Alternatives 2 through 4 may include may include additional
design variations, which provide optional lane use (general purpose,
HOV), optional on and off ramp modifications, and other operational
improvements. Build
[[Page 70248]]
alternatives proposed may be refined or be removed from further
consideration, as engineering and environmental analysis is conducted
for the Project.
Analysis supporting the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) will
determine the improvements necessary to meet the existing and future
transportation needs in the corridor.
The following permits/approvals may be required to construct the
Project:
33 U.S.C. 408 Section 408 Permit (United States (U.S.) Army
Corps of Engineers)
Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 404 Permit (U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers)
Section 1602 Agreement (California Department of Fish and
Wildlife)
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit
Caltrans Statewide Permit and Construction General Permit
CWA Section 401 Water Quality Certification and/or Waste
Discharge Requirement (WDR) (Regional Water Quality Control Board)
South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rules
403, 1403, and 1166
Clean Air Act, Transportation Conformity Determination (FHWA;
Caltrans)
Section 106 Compliance with National Historic Preservation Act
Section 7 Consultation with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in
the event that Federally-listed species are affected
Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) Memorandum of Agreement
Various City Encroachment Permits
Caltrans will be holding public scoping meetings to provide an
overview of the Project, summarize the environmental process, and
receive input regarding the environmental issues and the suggested
scope and content of the EIS. These meetings will include separate
agency and public scoping. One round of three meetings will be held on
November 1st through November 3rd. Please refer to the table below for
meeting details:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
City Date Time Location
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Industry................. Tuesday, Nov. 1, 6:30 p.m.-8:30 p.m............ Public Scoping Meeting,
2016. Industry Hills Expo
Center, 16200 Temple
Avenue, City of
Industry, CA 91744.
South El Monte................... Wednesday, Nov. 2, 6:30 p.m.-8:30 p.m............ Public Scoping Meeting,
2016. South El Monte Senior
Center, 1556 Central
Ave., South El Monte,
CA 91733.
Whittier......................... Thursday, Nov. 3, 6:30 p.m.-8:30 p.m............ Public Scoping Meeting,
2016. Palm Park, Palm A-B
Room, 5703 Palm Ave.,
Whittier, CA 90601.
Whittier......................... Thursday, Nov. 3, 3:00 p.m.-4:30 p.m............ Agency Scoping Meeting,
2016. Palm Park, Palm A-B
Room, 5703 Palm Ave.,
Whittier, CA 90601.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Letters describing the proposed action and soliciting comments will
be sent to appropriate Federal, State, and Participating Agencies;
tribal governments and local agencies and private organizations and
citizens who have previously expressed or are known to have interest in
this proposal. The Draft EIS is anticipated to be available for public
and agency review and comment in mid-2019. Public meetings will be held
in study area communities during the public and agency review and
comment period. In addition, public hearings will be held for the
Project. Public notice will be given for the time and place of the
public meetings and hearings. The Draft EIS will be available for
public and agency review and comment prior to the public hearings.
To ensure that the full range of issues related to this proposed
action is addressed and all significant concerns are identified,
comments and suggestions are invited from all interested parties.
Comments or questions about this proposed action and the EIS should be
directed to Caltrans at the address provided above. (Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning and
Construction. The regulations implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and
activities apply to this program.)
Issued on: October 3, 2016.
Josue M. Yambo,
Senior Transportation Engineer, Project Delivery Division, Federal
Highway Administration, Sacramento, California.
[FR Doc. 2016-24480 Filed 10-7-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P