Promoting Diversity and Inclusion in the National Security Workforce, 69993-69997 [2016-24582]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 195 / Friday, October 7, 2016 / Presidential Documents
69993
Presidential Documents
Memorandum of October 5, 2016
Promoting Diversity and Inclusion in the National Security
Workforce
Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies
Our greatest asset in protecting the homeland and advancing our interests
abroad is the talent and diversity of our national security workforce. Under
my Administration, we have made important progress toward harnessing
the extraordinary range of backgrounds, cultures, perspectives, skills, and
experiences of the U.S. population toward keeping our country safe and
strong. As the United States becomes more diverse and the challenges we
face more complex, we must continue to invest in policies to recruit, retain,
and develop the best and brightest from all segments of our population.
Research has shown that diverse groups are more effective at problem solving
than homogeneous groups, and policies that promote diversity and inclusion
will enhance our ability to draw from the broadest possible pool of talent,
solve our toughest challenges, maximize employee engagement and innovation, and lead by example by setting a high standard for providing access
to opportunity to all segments of our society.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with O0
The purpose of this memorandum is to provide guidance to the national
security workforce in order to strengthen the talent and diversity of their
respective organizations. That workforce, which comprises more than 3 million people, includes the following departments, agencies, offices, and other
entities (agencies) that are primarily engaged in diplomacy, development,
defense, intelligence, law enforcement, and homeland security: 1) Department
of State: Civil Service and Foreign Service; 2) United States Agency for
International Development (USAID): Civil Service and Foreign Service; 3)
Department of Defense (DOD): commissioned officers, enlisted personnel,
and civilian personnel; 4) the 17 members of the Intelligence Community;
5) Department of the Treasury: Office of International Affairs and Office
of Critical Infrastructure Protection; 6) Department of Justice: National Security Division and Federal Bureau of Investigation; and 7) Department of
Homeland Security.
The data collected by these agencies do not capture the full range of diversity
in the national security workforce, but where data allow for broad comparison, they indicate that agencies in this workforce are less diverse on average
than the rest of the Federal Government. For example, as of 2015, only
the Department of State and USAID Civil Services were more diverse in
terms of gender, race, and ethnicity than the Federal workforce as a whole.
When comparing the agencies’ workforces to their leadership personnel (Senior Executive Service (SES) or its equivalent), all agencies’ leadership staffs
were less diverse than their respective workforces in terms of gender, and
all but DOD enlisted personnel and USAID Civil Service had less diverse
leadership in terms of race and ethnicity. While these data do not necessarily
indicate the existence of barriers to equal employment opportunity, we
can do more to promote diversity in the national security workforce, consistent with merit system principles and applicable law.
When I issued Executive Order 13583 of August 18, 2011 (Establishing
a Coordinated Government-wide Initiative to Promote Diversity and Inclusion
in the Federal Workforce), I directed all departments and agencies to develop
and implement a more comprehensive, integrated, and strategic focus on
diversity and inclusion. This memorandum supports that effort by providing
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:58 Oct 06, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4790
Sfmt 4790
E:\FR\FM\07OCO0.SGM
07OCO0
69994
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 195 / Friday, October 7, 2016 / Presidential Documents
guidance that 1) emphasizes a data-driven approach in order to increase
transparency and accountability at all levels; 2) takes into account leading
practices, research, and experience from the private and public sectors;
and 3) complements ongoing actions that agencies are taking pursuant to
Executive Order 13583 and under the leadership of the Diversity and Inclusion in Government Council, including but not limited to efforts related
to gender, race, ethnicity, disability status, veterans, sexual orientation and
gender identity, and other demographic categories. This memorandum also
supports Executive Order 13714 of December 15, 2015 (Strengthening the
Senior Executive Service), by directing agencies to take additional steps
to expand the pipeline of diverse talent into senior positions.
This memorandum also aligns with congressional efforts to promote the
diversity of the national security workforce, which have been reflected in
legislation such as the:
• Foreign Service Act of 1980, which urged the Department of State
to develop policies to encourage the ‘‘entry into and advancement in the
Foreign Service by persons from all segments of American society’’;
• Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, which called
on the Intelligence Community to prescribe personnel policies and programs
that ensure its personnel ‘‘are sufficiently diverse for purposes of the collection and analysis of intelligence through the recruitment and training of
women, minorities, and individuals with diverse ethnic, cultural, and linguistic backgrounds’’; and
• National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013, which mandated that the U.S. military develop and implement a plan to accurately
measure the efforts of the military to ‘‘achieve a dynamic, sustainable level
of members of the armed forces (including reserve components) that, among
both commissioned officers and senior enlisted personnel of each armed
force, will reflect the diverse population of the United States eligible to
serve in the armed forces, including gender specific, racial, and ethnic
populations.’’
Promoting diversity and inclusion within the national security workforce
must be a joint effort and requires engagement by senior leadership, managers,
and the entire workforce, as well as effective collaboration among those
responsible for human resources, equal employment opportunity, and diversity and inclusion issues. In implementing the guidance in this memorandum,
agencies shall ensure their diversity and inclusion practices are fully integrated into broader succession planning efforts and supported by sufficient
resource allocations and effective programs that invest in personnel development and engagement. Where appropriate, they shall also support, coordinate,
and encourage research and other efforts by the Federal Government to
expand the knowledge base of best practices for broadening participation
and understanding the impact of diversity and inclusion on national security,
including in the fields of science and technology.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with O0
Therefore, by the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution
and the laws of the United States of America, I hereby direct the following:
Section 1. Collection, Analysis, and Dissemination of Workforce Data. Although collected data do not necessarily indicate the existence of barriers
to equal employment opportunity, the collection and analysis of metrics
allows agencies to assess their workforce talent gaps, as well as the effectiveness of their diversity and inclusion efforts and the adequacy of their resources to address these gaps. The dissemination of data to the public
and to agency personnel may increase the transparency and accountability
of their efforts. Accordingly, agencies in the national security workforce
shall:
(a) Make aggregate demographic data and other information available
to the public and broader workforce. Agencies shall make available to the
general public information on the state of diversity and inclusion in their
workforces. That information, which shall be updated at least once a year,
shall include aggregate demographic data by workforce or service and grade
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:58 Oct 06, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4790
Sfmt 4790
E:\FR\FM\07OCO0.SGM
07OCO0
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 195 / Friday, October 7, 2016 / Presidential Documents
69995
or rank; attrition and promotion demographic data; validated inclusion
metrics such as the New Inclusion Quotient (New IQ) index score; demographic comparisons to the relevant civilian labor force; and unclassified
reports and barrier analyses related to diversity and inclusion. Agencies
may publish data in proportions or percentages to account for classification
concerns, and the Intelligence Community may publish a community-wide
report with the data outlined in this section. In addition, agencies shall
provide to their workforces, including senior leadership at the Secretary
or Director level, a report that includes demographic data and information
on the status of diversity and inclusion efforts no later than 90 days after
the date of this memorandum and on an annual basis thereafter (or in
line with existing annual reporting requirements related to these issues,
if any).
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with O0
(b) Expand the collection and analysis of voluntary applicant flow data.
Applicant flow data tracks the selection rate variances for job positions
among different demographic categories and can assist agencies in examining
the fairness and inclusiveness of their recruitment efforts. Agencies shall
develop a system to collect and analyze applicant flow data for as many
positions as practicable in order to identify future areas for improvement
in attracting diverse talent, with particular attention to senior and management positions. The collection of data may be implemented in a phased
approach commensurate with agency resources. Agencies shall include such
analysis, including the percentage and level of positions for which data
are collected, and any resulting policy changes or recommendations in the
report required by section 1(a) of this memorandum.
(c) Identify additional categories for voluntary data collection of current
employees. The Federal Government provides minimum reporting categories
for agencies collecting race and ethnicity information in the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) Statistical Policy Directive ‘‘Standards for Maintaining, Collecting, and Presenting Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity.’’
That standard also encourages agencies to collect more detailed data, which
can be compared by aggregating such data into minimum categories when
necessary. Further, agencies may also collect additional demographic data,
such as information regarding sexual orientation or gender identity. No
later than 90 days after the date of this memorandum, agencies shall determine whether they recommend the voluntary collection of more detailed
demographic data on additional categories. This process shall involve close
consultation with internal stakeholders, such as employee resource or affinity
groups; clear communication with the workforce to explain the purpose
of, legal protections related to, and anticipated use of such data; and adherence to relevant standards and guidance issued by the Federal Government.
Any determinations shall be submitted to OMB, the Office of Personnel
Management (OPM), the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and
the Department of Labor for consideration.
Sec. 2. Provision of Professional Development Opportunities and Tools Consistent with Merit System Principles. An inclusive work environment enhances agencies’ ability to retain and sustain a strong workforce by allowing
all employees to perform at their full potential and maximize their talent.
Professional development opportunities and tools are key to fostering that
potential, and each agency should make it a priority to ensure that all
employees have access to them consistent with merit system principles.
Agencies in the national security workforce shall therefore:
(a) Conduct stay and exit interviews or surveys. Agencies shall conduct
periodic interviews with a representative cross-section of personnel to understand their reasons for staying with their organization, as well as to receive
feedback on workplace policies, professional development opportunities, and
other issues affecting their decision to remain. They shall also provide
an opportunity for exit interviews or surveys of all departing personnel
to understand better their reasons for leaving. Agencies shall include analysis
from the interviews and surveys—including if and how the results of the
interviews differ by gender, race and national origin, sexual orientation,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:58 Oct 06, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4790
Sfmt 4790
E:\FR\FM\07OCO0.SGM
07OCO0
69996
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 195 / Friday, October 7, 2016 / Presidential Documents
gender identity, disability status, and other demographic variables—and any
resulting policy changes or recommendations in the report required by section
1(a) of this memorandum.
(b) Expand provision of professional development and career advancement
opportunities. Agencies shall prioritize resources to expand professional development opportunities that support mission needs, such as academic programs, private-public exchanges, and detail assignments to relevant positions
in private or international organizations; State, local, and tribal governments;
or other branches of the Federal Government. In addition, agencies in the
national security workforce shall offer, or sponsor employees to participate
in, an SES Candidate Development Program (CDP) or other programs that
train employees to gain the skills required for senior-level agency appointments. In determining which employees are granted professional development or career advancement opportunities, agencies shall ensure their SES
CDP comports with the provisions of 5 C.F.R. part 412, subpart C, including
merit staffing and assessment requirements. Agencies shall also consider
the number of expected senior-level vacancies as a factor in determining
the number of candidates to select for such programs. Agencies shall track
the demographics of program participants as well as the rate of placement
into senior-level positions for participants in such programs, evaluate such
data on an annual basis to look for ways to improve outreach and recruitment
for these programs consistent with merit system principles, and include
such data in the report required by section 1(a) of this memorandum.
(c) Institute a review process for security and counterintelligence determinations that result in assignment restrictions. For agencies in the national
security workforce that place assignment restrictions on personnel or otherwise prohibit certain geographic assignments due to a security determination,
these agencies shall ensure a review process exists consistent with the
Adjudicative Guidelines for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified
Information, as well as applicable counterintelligence considerations. Agencies shall ensure that affected personnel are informed of the right to seek
review and the process for doing so.
Sec. 3. Strengthening of Leadership Engagement and Accountability. Senior
leadership and supervisors play an important role in fostering diversity
and inclusion in the workforce they lead and in setting an example for
cultivating talent consistent with merit system principles. Toward that end,
agencies in the national security workforce shall:
(a) Reward and recognize efforts to promote diversity and inclusion. Agencies are strongly encouraged to consider implementing performance and
advancement requirements that reward and recognize senior leaders’ and
supervisors’ efforts in fostering an inclusive environment and cultivating
talent consistent with merit system principles, such as through participation
in mentoring programs or sponsorship initiatives, recruitment events, and
other opportunities. They are also encouraged to create opportunities for
senior leadership and supervisors to participate in outreach events and
to discuss issues related to diversity and inclusion with the workforce on
a regular basis, including with employee resource groups.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with O0
(b) Collect and disseminate voluntary demographic data of external advisory committees and boards. For agencies in the national security workforce
that have external advisory committees or boards to which their senior
leadership appoints members, they are strongly encouraged to collect voluntary demographic data from the members of committee and boards, and
to include such data in the information and report required by section
1(a) of this memorandum.
(c) Expand training on unconscious bias, inclusion, and flexible work
policies. Agencies shall expand their provision of training on implicit or
unconscious bias, inclusion, and flexible work policies and make implicit
or unconscious bias training mandatory for senior leadership and management positions, as well as for those responsible for outreach, recruitment,
hiring, career development, promotion, and security clearance adjudication.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:58 Oct 06, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4790
Sfmt 4790
E:\FR\FM\07OCO0.SGM
07OCO0
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 195 / Friday, October 7, 2016 / Presidential Documents
69997
The provision of training may be implemented in a phased approach commensurate with agency resources. Agencies shall also make available training
for bureaus, directorates, or divisions whose inclusion scores, such as those
measured by the New IQ index, consistently rank below the agency-wide
average 3 or more years in a row. Agencies should give special attention
to ensuring the continuous incorporation of research-based best practices,
including those to address the intersectionality between certain demographics
and job positions.
Sec. 4. Reporting on Progress. No later than 120 days after the date of
this memorandum, and on an annual basis thereafter, the Assistant to the
President for National Security Affairs, in consultation with the Directors
of OMB and OPM, shall report to the President on the progress of the
national security workforce in implementing the requirements of this memorandum, based on information provided by relevant departments and agencies.
Sec. 5. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this memorandum shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department, agency, or
the head thereof, or the status of that department or agency within the
Federal Government; or
(ii) the functions of the Director of OMB relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This memorandum shall be implemented consistent with applicable
law, and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c) This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right
or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by
any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities,
its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
(d) The Director of OPM is hereby authorized and directed to publish
this memorandum in the Federal Register.
THE WHITE HOUSE,
Washington, October 5, 2016
[FR Doc. 2016–24582
Billing code 6325–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:58 Oct 06, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4790
Sfmt 4790
E:\FR\FM\07OCO0.SGM
07OCO0
OB#1.EPS
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with O0
Filed 10–6–16; 11:15 am]
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 195 (Friday, October 7, 2016)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Pages 69993-69997]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-24582]
Presidential Documents
Federal Register / Vol. 81 , No. 195 / Friday, October 7, 2016 /
Presidential Documents
[[Page 69993]]
Memorandum of October 5, 2016
Promoting Diversity and Inclusion in the National
Security Workforce
Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and
Agencies
Our greatest asset in protecting the homeland and
advancing our interests abroad is the talent and
diversity of our national security workforce. Under my
Administration, we have made important progress toward
harnessing the extraordinary range of backgrounds,
cultures, perspectives, skills, and experiences of the
U.S. population toward keeping our country safe and
strong. As the United States becomes more diverse and
the challenges we face more complex, we must continue
to invest in policies to recruit, retain, and develop
the best and brightest from all segments of our
population. Research has shown that diverse groups are
more effective at problem solving than homogeneous
groups, and policies that promote diversity and
inclusion will enhance our ability to draw from the
broadest possible pool of talent, solve our toughest
challenges, maximize employee engagement and
innovation, and lead by example by setting a high
standard for providing access to opportunity to all
segments of our society.
The purpose of this memorandum is to provide guidance
to the national security workforce in order to
strengthen the talent and diversity of their respective
organizations. That workforce, which comprises more
than 3 million people, includes the following
departments, agencies, offices, and other entities
(agencies) that are primarily engaged in diplomacy,
development, defense, intelligence, law enforcement,
and homeland security: 1) Department of State: Civil
Service and Foreign Service; 2) United States Agency
for International Development (USAID): Civil Service
and Foreign Service; 3) Department of Defense (DOD):
commissioned officers, enlisted personnel, and civilian
personnel; 4) the 17 members of the Intelligence
Community; 5) Department of the Treasury: Office of
International Affairs and Office of Critical
Infrastructure Protection; 6) Department of Justice:
National Security Division and Federal Bureau of
Investigation; and 7) Department of Homeland Security.
The data collected by these agencies do not capture the
full range of diversity in the national security
workforce, but where data allow for broad comparison,
they indicate that agencies in this workforce are less
diverse on average than the rest of the Federal
Government. For example, as of 2015, only the
Department of State and USAID Civil Services were more
diverse in terms of gender, race, and ethnicity than
the Federal workforce as a whole. When comparing the
agencies' workforces to their leadership personnel
(Senior Executive Service (SES) or its equivalent), all
agencies' leadership staffs were less diverse than
their respective workforces in terms of gender, and all
but DOD enlisted personnel and USAID Civil Service had
less diverse leadership in terms of race and ethnicity.
While these data do not necessarily indicate the
existence of barriers to equal employment opportunity,
we can do more to promote diversity in the national
security workforce, consistent with merit system
principles and applicable law.
When I issued Executive Order 13583 of August 18, 2011
(Establishing a Coordinated Government-wide Initiative
to Promote Diversity and Inclusion in the Federal
Workforce), I directed all departments and agencies to
develop and implement a more comprehensive, integrated,
and strategic focus on diversity and inclusion. This
memorandum supports that effort by providing
[[Page 69994]]
guidance that 1) emphasizes a data-driven approach in
order to increase transparency and accountability at
all levels; 2) takes into account leading practices,
research, and experience from the private and public
sectors; and 3) complements ongoing actions that
agencies are taking pursuant to Executive Order 13583
and under the leadership of the Diversity and Inclusion
in Government Council, including but not limited to
efforts related to gender, race, ethnicity, disability
status, veterans, sexual orientation and gender
identity, and other demographic categories. This
memorandum also supports Executive Order 13714 of
December 15, 2015 (Strengthening the Senior Executive
Service), by directing agencies to take additional
steps to expand the pipeline of diverse talent into
senior positions.
This memorandum also aligns with congressional efforts
to promote the diversity of the national security
workforce, which have been reflected in legislation
such as the:
Foreign Service Act of 1980, which urged
the Department of State to develop policies to
encourage the ``entry into and advancement in the
Foreign Service by persons from all segments of
American society'';
Intelligence Reform and Terrorism
Prevention Act of 2004, which called on the
Intelligence Community to prescribe personnel policies
and programs that ensure its personnel ``are
sufficiently diverse for purposes of the collection and
analysis of intelligence through the recruitment and
training of women, minorities, and individuals with
diverse ethnic, cultural, and linguistic backgrounds'';
and
National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013, which mandated that the U.S. military
develop and implement a plan to accurately measure the
efforts of the military to ``achieve a dynamic,
sustainable level of members of the armed forces
(including reserve components) that, among both
commissioned officers and senior enlisted personnel of
each armed force, will reflect the diverse population
of the United States eligible to serve in the armed
forces, including gender specific, racial, and ethnic
populations.''
Promoting diversity and inclusion within the national
security workforce must be a joint effort and requires
engagement by senior leadership, managers, and the
entire workforce, as well as effective collaboration
among those responsible for human resources, equal
employment opportunity, and diversity and inclusion
issues. In implementing the guidance in this
memorandum, agencies shall ensure their diversity and
inclusion practices are fully integrated into broader
succession planning efforts and supported by sufficient
resource allocations and effective programs that invest
in personnel development and engagement. Where
appropriate, they shall also support, coordinate, and
encourage research and other efforts by the Federal
Government to expand the knowledge base of best
practices for broadening participation and
understanding the impact of diversity and inclusion on
national security, including in the fields of science
and technology.
Therefore, by the authority vested in me as President
by the Constitution and the laws of the United States
of America, I hereby direct the following:
Section 1. Collection, Analysis, and Dissemination of
Workforce Data. Although collected data do not
necessarily indicate the existence of barriers to equal
employment opportunity, the collection and analysis of
metrics allows agencies to assess their workforce
talent gaps, as well as the effectiveness of their
diversity and inclusion efforts and the adequacy of
their resources to address these gaps. The
dissemination of data to the public and to agency
personnel may increase the transparency and
accountability of their efforts. Accordingly, agencies
in the national security workforce shall:
(a) Make aggregate demographic data and other
information available to the public and broader
workforce. Agencies shall make available to the general
public information on the state of diversity and
inclusion in their workforces. That information, which
shall be updated at least once a year, shall include
aggregate demographic data by workforce or service and
grade
[[Page 69995]]
or rank; attrition and promotion demographic data;
validated inclusion metrics such as the New Inclusion
Quotient (New IQ) index score; demographic comparisons
to the relevant civilian labor force; and unclassified
reports and barrier analyses related to diversity and
inclusion. Agencies may publish data in proportions or
percentages to account for classification concerns, and
the Intelligence Community may publish a community-wide
report with the data outlined in this section. In
addition, agencies shall provide to their workforces,
including senior leadership at the Secretary or
Director level, a report that includes demographic data
and information on the status of diversity and
inclusion efforts no later than 90 days after the date
of this memorandum and on an annual basis thereafter
(or in line with existing annual reporting requirements
related to these issues, if any).
(b) Expand the collection and analysis of voluntary
applicant flow data. Applicant flow data tracks the
selection rate variances for job positions among
different demographic categories and can assist
agencies in examining the fairness and inclusiveness of
their recruitment efforts. Agencies shall develop a
system to collect and analyze applicant flow data for
as many positions as practicable in order to identify
future areas for improvement in attracting diverse
talent, with particular attention to senior and
management positions. The collection of data may be
implemented in a phased approach commensurate with
agency resources. Agencies shall include such analysis,
including the percentage and level of positions for
which data are collected, and any resulting policy
changes or recommendations in the report required by
section 1(a) of this memorandum.
(c) Identify additional categories for voluntary
data collection of current employees. The Federal
Government provides minimum reporting categories for
agencies collecting race and ethnicity information in
the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) Statistical
Policy Directive ``Standards for Maintaining,
Collecting, and Presenting Federal Data on Race and
Ethnicity.'' That standard also encourages agencies to
collect more detailed data, which can be compared by
aggregating such data into minimum categories when
necessary. Further, agencies may also collect
additional demographic data, such as information
regarding sexual orientation or gender identity. No
later than 90 days after the date of this memorandum,
agencies shall determine whether they recommend the
voluntary collection of more detailed demographic data
on additional categories. This process shall involve
close consultation with internal stakeholders, such as
employee resource or affinity groups; clear
communication with the workforce to explain the purpose
of, legal protections related to, and anticipated use
of such data; and adherence to relevant standards and
guidance issued by the Federal Government. Any
determinations shall be submitted to OMB, the Office of
Personnel Management (OPM), the Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission, and the Department of Labor for
consideration.
Sec. 2. Provision of Professional Development
Opportunities and Tools Consistent with Merit System
Principles. An inclusive work environment enhances
agencies' ability to retain and sustain a strong
workforce by allowing all employees to perform at their
full potential and maximize their talent. Professional
development opportunities and tools are key to
fostering that potential, and each agency should make
it a priority to ensure that all employees have access
to them consistent with merit system principles.
Agencies in the national security workforce shall
therefore:
(a) Conduct stay and exit interviews or surveys.
Agencies shall conduct periodic interviews with a
representative cross-section of personnel to understand
their reasons for staying with their organization, as
well as to receive feedback on workplace policies,
professional development opportunities, and other
issues affecting their decision to remain. They shall
also provide an opportunity for exit interviews or
surveys of all departing personnel to understand better
their reasons for leaving. Agencies shall include
analysis from the interviews and surveys--including if
and how the results of the interviews differ by gender,
race and national origin, sexual orientation,
[[Page 69996]]
gender identity, disability status, and other
demographic variables--and any resulting policy changes
or recommendations in the report required by section
1(a) of this memorandum.
(b) Expand provision of professional development
and career advancement opportunities. Agencies shall
prioritize resources to expand professional development
opportunities that support mission needs, such as
academic programs, private-public exchanges, and detail
assignments to relevant positions in private or
international organizations; State, local, and tribal
governments; or other branches of the Federal
Government. In addition, agencies in the national
security workforce shall offer, or sponsor employees to
participate in, an SES Candidate Development Program
(CDP) or other programs that train employees to gain
the skills required for senior-level agency
appointments. In determining which employees are
granted professional development or career advancement
opportunities, agencies shall ensure their SES CDP
comports with the provisions of 5 C.F.R. part 412,
subpart C, including merit staffing and assessment
requirements. Agencies shall also consider the number
of expected senior-level vacancies as a factor in
determining the number of candidates to select for such
programs. Agencies shall track the demographics of
program participants as well as the rate of placement
into senior-level positions for participants in such
programs, evaluate such data on an annual basis to look
for ways to improve outreach and recruitment for these
programs consistent with merit system principles, and
include such data in the report required by section
1(a) of this memorandum.
(c) Institute a review process for security and
counterintelligence determinations that result in
assignment restrictions. For agencies in the national
security workforce that place assignment restrictions
on personnel or otherwise prohibit certain geographic
assignments due to a security determination, these
agencies shall ensure a review process exists
consistent with the Adjudicative Guidelines for
Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified
Information, as well as applicable counterintelligence
considerations. Agencies shall ensure that affected
personnel are informed of the right to seek review and
the process for doing so.
Sec. 3. Strengthening of Leadership Engagement and
Accountability. Senior leadership and supervisors play
an important role in fostering diversity and inclusion
in the workforce they lead and in setting an example
for cultivating talent consistent with merit system
principles. Toward that end, agencies in the national
security workforce shall:
(a) Reward and recognize efforts to promote
diversity and inclusion. Agencies are strongly
encouraged to consider implementing performance and
advancement requirements that reward and recognize
senior leaders' and supervisors' efforts in fostering
an inclusive environment and cultivating talent
consistent with merit system principles, such as
through participation in mentoring programs or
sponsorship initiatives, recruitment events, and other
opportunities. They are also encouraged to create
opportunities for senior leadership and supervisors to
participate in outreach events and to discuss issues
related to diversity and inclusion with the workforce
on a regular basis, including with employee resource
groups.
(b) Collect and disseminate voluntary demographic
data of external advisory committees and boards. For
agencies in the national security workforce that have
external advisory committees or boards to which their
senior leadership appoints members, they are strongly
encouraged to collect voluntary demographic data from
the members of committee and boards, and to include
such data in the information and report required by
section 1(a) of this memorandum.
(c) Expand training on unconscious bias, inclusion,
and flexible work policies. Agencies shall expand their
provision of training on implicit or unconscious bias,
inclusion, and flexible work policies and make implicit
or unconscious bias training mandatory for senior
leadership and management positions, as well as for
those responsible for outreach, recruitment, hiring,
career development, promotion, and security clearance
adjudication.
[[Page 69997]]
The provision of training may be implemented in a
phased approach commensurate with agency resources.
Agencies shall also make available training for
bureaus, directorates, or divisions whose inclusion
scores, such as those measured by the New IQ index,
consistently rank below the agency-wide average 3 or
more years in a row. Agencies should give special
attention to ensuring the continuous incorporation of
research-based best practices, including those to
address the intersectionality between certain
demographics and job positions.
Sec. 4. Reporting on Progress. No later than 120 days
after the date of this memorandum, and on an annual
basis thereafter, the Assistant to the President for
National Security Affairs, in consultation with the
Directors of OMB and OPM, shall report to the President
on the progress of the national security workforce in
implementing the requirements of this memorandum, based
on information provided by relevant departments and
agencies.
Sec. 5. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this
memorandum shall be construed to impair or otherwise
affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department, agency, or the
head thereof, or the status of that department or agency within the Federal
Government; or
(ii) the functions of the Director of OMB relating to budgetary,
administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This memorandum shall be implemented consistent
with applicable law, and subject to the availability of
appropriations.
(c) This memorandum is not intended to, and does
not, create any right or benefit, substantive or
procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any
party against the United States, its departments,
agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or
agents, or any other person.
(d) The Director of OPM is hereby authorized and
directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal
Register.
(Presidential Sig.)
THE WHITE HOUSE,
Washington, October 5, 2016
[FR Doc. 2016-24582
Filed 10-6-16; 11:15 am]
Billing code 6325-01-P