Medicare Program; Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System and Policy Changes and Fiscal Year 2017 Rates; Quality Reporting Requirements for Specific Providers; Graduate Medical Education; Hospital Notification Procedures Applicable to Beneficiaries Receiving Observation Services; Technical Changes Relating to Costs to Organizations and Medicare Cost Reports; Finalization of Interim Final Rules With Comment Period on LTCH PPS Payments for Severe Wounds, Modifications of Limitations on Redesignation by the Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board, and Extensions of Payments to MDHs and Low-Volume Hospitals; Correction, 68947-68963 [2016-24042]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 5, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
I. Background
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
42 CFR Parts 405, 412, 413, and 489
[CMS–1655–F; CMS–1664–F; CMS–1632–F2]
RIN 0938–AS77; 0938–AS88; 0938–AS41
Medicare Program; Hospital Inpatient
Prospective Payment Systems for
Acute Care Hospitals and the LongTerm Care Hospital Prospective
Payment System and Policy Changes
and Fiscal Year 2017 Rates; Quality
Reporting Requirements for Specific
Providers; Graduate Medical
Education; Hospital Notification
Procedures Applicable to Beneficiaries
Receiving Observation Services;
Technical Changes Relating to Costs
to Organizations and Medicare Cost
Reports; Finalization of Interim Final
Rules With Comment Period on LTCH
PPS Payments for Severe Wounds,
Modifications of Limitations on
Redesignation by the Medicare
Geographic Classification Review
Board, and Extensions of Payments to
MDHs and Low-Volume Hospitals;
Correction
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
This document corrects
technical and typographical errors in
the final rule that appeared in the
August 22, 2016 Federal Register titled
‘‘Medicare Program; Hospital Inpatient
Prospective Payment Systems for Acute
Care Hospitals and the Long-Term Care
Hospital Prospective Payment System
and Policy Changes and Fiscal Year
2017 Rates; Quality Reporting
Requirements for Specific Providers;
Graduate Medical Education; Hospital
Notification Procedures Applicable to
Beneficiaries Receiving Observation
Services; Technical Changes Relating to
Costs to Organizations and Medicare
Cost Reports; Finalization of Interim
Final Rules With Comment Period on
LTCH PPS Payments for Severe
Wounds, Modifications of Limitations
on Redesignation by the Medicare
Geographic Classification Review Board,
and Extensions of Payments to MDHs
and Low-Volume Hospitals.’’
DATES: This correction is effective
October 1, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Donald Thompson, (410) 786–4487.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Oct 04, 2016
Jkt 241001
In FR Doc. 2016–18476 of August 22,
2016 (81 FR 56761) there were a number
of technical and typographical errors
identified and corrected in the
Correction of Errors section of this
correcting document. The provisions in
this correcting document are effective as
if they had been included in the
document that appeared in the August
22, 2016 Federal Register. Accordingly,
the corrections are effective October 1,
2016.
II. Summary of Errors
A. Summary of Errors in the Preamble
On page 56775, we made a
typographical error in stating the cost
reduction.
On page 56796, we are correcting
errors and inadvertent omissions in the
summary and response to a comment on
the assignment of 18 additional
diagnosis codes.
On page 56797, we erroneously
referred to the wrong table.
On page 56801, we are correcting
errors and inadvertent omissions in our
response to comments on our proposal
to redesignate four ICD–10–PCS
procedure codes.
On page 56803 and in the table on
page 56804 describing ICD–10–PCS
Endovascular Thrombectomy Procedure
Codes Reassigned to MS–DRGs 270,
271, and 272 for FY 2017, we are
correcting technical errors in our
discussion in response to comments to
remove 34 ICD–10–PCS procedure
codes describing endovascular
thrombectomy of non-lower limbs from
the proposed list of codes to be
reassigned to MS–DRGs 270, 271 and
272. In this response, we erroneously
referred to 34 procedure codes
describing non-lower limb procedures
(as included in the list submitted by the
commenter) rather than 32 non-lower
limb procedure codes. Two of the 34
procedure codes identified by the
commenter, ICD–10–PCS procedure
codes 04CT3ZZ (Extirpation of matter
from right peroneal artery, percutaneous
approach) and 04CU3ZZ (Extirpation of
matter from left peroneal artery,
percutaneous approach), describe
endovascular thrombectomy of lower
limbs. These codes are assigned to MS–
DRGs 270, 271 and 272, accurately
replicating the logic of ICD–9–CM MS–
DRGs Version 32 and supporting
clinical and resource use homogeneity
as originally proposed and in
accordance with the finalized policy to
add procedures describing endovascular
thrombectomy of lower limbs to ICD–10
Version 34 MS–DRGS 270, 271 and 272.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
68947
On page 56804, as a result of our
correction of the MS–DRG assignment
in Table 6B—New Procedure Codes for
13 ICD–10–PCS procedure codes that
describe endovascular thrombectomy
procedures of the lower limb, as
described in section II.D. of this
correction document, we are making
additional conforming corrections to the
table describing ICD–10–PCS
Endovascular Thrombectomy Procedure
Codes Reassigned to MS–DRGs 270,
271, and 272 for FY 2017.
On pages 56821 and 56823, we
erroneously stated there were 58
additional combination codes for
removal and replacement of knee joints.
There were 57 additional combination
codes.
On pages 56822 and 56823, we
erroneously listed the code number for
(Replacement of Left Knee Joint,
Femoral Surface with Synthetic
Substitute, Cemented, Open Approach)
as code 0SRU0JA three times within the
table. The correct code number should
be 0SRU0J9 (Replacement of Left Knee
Joint, Femoral Surface with Synthetic
Substitute, Cemented, Open Approach).
As a result of the corrections to pages
56803, 56804, 56821, 56822, and 56823,
we have made conforming changes to
the ICD–10 MS–DRG Definitions
Manual Version 34 and ICD–10 MS–
DRG Grouper Software Version 34 for
FY 2017.
On page 56858, we erroneously
omitted MS–DRG 265 from the table of
MS–DRGs subject to the policy for
replaced devices offered without cost or
with a credit.
On pages 56895 and 56897, we
inadvertently made an error to the title
of ICD–10–PCS procedure code
XW03331 and omitted an additional
procedure code that describes
Idarucizumab. Cases involving
Idarucizumab that are eligible for new
technology add-on payments will be
identified by ICD–10–PCS procedure
codes XW03331 (Introduction of
Idarucizumab, Dabigatran reversal agent
into peripheral vein, percutaneous
approach, New Technology Group 1)
and XW04331 (Introduction of
Idarucizumab, Dabigatran reversal agent
into central vein, percutaneous
approach, New Technology Group 1).
On page 56927, as a result of the
correction of the technical errors
described in section II.B of this
correction document, we have made
conforming changes to the following:
The number of hospitals approved for
wage index reclassifications by the
Medicare Geographic Classification
Review Board (MGCRB) starting in FY
2017 and the number of hospitals in a
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
68948
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 5, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
MGCRB reclassification status for FY
2017.
On page 57002 in the table titled,
‘‘Previously Adopted and Newly
Finalized Baseline and Performance
Periods for the FY 2021 Program Year’’
we erroneously repeated the same
information three times, and in the first
instance provided incorrect
performance period years for the
Mortality (MORT–30–AMI, MORT–30–
HF, MORT–30–COPD) and THA/TKA
measures.
On page 57033, we made a
typographical error and omitted a dash
within the web link address creating a
non-functional link.
On pages 57195, 57196, 57199, 57211,
57213, 57218, and 57220 through 57223
we inadvertently made technical and
typographical errors to the Long-Term
Care Hospital Quality Reporting
Program section and have corrected
those errors for clarification.
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
B. Summary of Errors in the Addendum
As discussed in section II.D. of this
correcting document, we made technical
errors with regard to the calculation of
Factor 3 of the uncompensated care
payment methodology. The revisions
made to address some of these errors
directly affected and required the
recalculation of all the budget neutrality
factors and final outlier threshold.
Factor 3 is used to determine the
amount of total uncompensated care
payment a hospital is eligible to receive
as well as the amount of the
uncompensated care payment a hospital
receives per discharge. Per discharge
uncompensated care payments are then
included when determining total
payments for purposes of all of the
budget neutrality factors and the final
outlier threshold. Therefore, we made
conforming changes to pages 57278
through 57280, 57286, and 57291 to take
into account the updated per-discharge
uncompensated care payments
determined using revised Factor 3
amounts. We made further conforming
corrections to the national outlier
adjustment factors on page 57286 and
the table on page 57288 as a result of
these changes. Finally, we made
conforming corrections to the national
operating standardized amounts.
We made inadvertent errors related to
the MGCRB reclassification status of one
provider as well as the status of three
providers reclassified as urban to rural
under section 1886(d)(8)(E) of the Act
(codified in the regulations under
§ 412.103 and hereinafter referred to as
§ 412.103).
Specifically, the reclassification status
in the FY 2017 IPPS/LTCH PPS final
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Oct 04, 2016
Jkt 241001
rule did not properly reflect the
following:
• Withdrawal of a MGCRB
reclassification for FY 2017 for one
provider.
• Application of urban to rural
reclassification under § 412.103 for
three providers.
Therefore, on page 57279, we
recalculated the reclassification hospital
budget neutrality adjustment.
The reclassification errors also
required the recalculation of additional
budget neutrality adjustment factors, the
fixed-loss cost threshold, the final wage
indexes, and the national operating
standardized amounts. Therefore, we
made conforming changes to the
following:
• On page 57280, the rural floor
budget neutrality adjustment and the
wage index transition budget neutrality
adjustment.
• On page 57286, the calculation of
the outlier fixed-loss cost threshold and
the national outlier adjustment factors.
• On page 57288, the table titled
‘‘Change of FY 2016 Standardized
Amounts to the FY 2017 Standardized
Amounts’’.
On pages 57291 and 57293 through
57295, in our discussion of the
determination of the Federal hospital
inpatient capital related prospective
payment rate update, we have made
conforming corrections to the increase
in the capital Federal rate, the
incremental and cumulative budget
neutrality adjustment factors for
changes in the GAFs and the MS–DRG
relative weights, the GAF/MS–DRG
budget neutrality adjustment factor (due
to the errors in our calculation of the
GAFs, which are computed from the
wage index), the capital Federal rate,
and the outlier threshold (as discussed
previously).
Also, as a result of these errors, on
pages 57294 and 57295, we have made
conforming corrections in the tables
showing the comparison of factors and
adjustments for the FY 2016 capital
Federal rate and FY 2017 capital Federal
rate and the proposed FY 2017 capital
Federal rate and final FY 2017 capital
Federal rate.
On page 57307, we are making
conforming corrections the fixed-loss
amount for site neutral discharges due
to corrections in the IPPS rates and
factors discussed previously.
On page 57312, we have made
conforming corrections to the national
operating standardized amounts and
capital standard Federal payment rate
(which also include the rates payable to
hospitals located in Puerto Rico) in
Tables 1A, 1B, 1C, and 1D as a result of
the conforming corrections to certain
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
budget neutrality factors and the outlier
threshold (as described previously).
C. Summary of Errors in the Appendices
On pages 57312, 57315 through
57317, 57319 through 57323, 57330
through 57332 in our regulatory impact
analyses, we made conforming
corrections to the factors, values, and
tables and accompanying discussion of
the changes in operating and capital
IPPS payments for FY 2017 and the
effects of certain budget neutrality
factors as a result of the technical errors
that lead to conforming changes in our
calculation of the operating and capital
IPPS budget neutrality factors, outlier
threshold, final wage indexes, operating
standardized amounts, and capital
Federal rate (as described in section II.B.
of this correction document).
On pages 57324 through 57326, in the
table titled ‘‘Modeled Disproportionate
Share Hospital Payments for Estimated
FY 2017 DSHs by Hospital Type: Model
DSH $ (In Millions) From FY 2016 To
FY 2017’’ and the accompanying
discussion, we made corrections to
address technical and formatting errors
in the estimated impacts resulting from
inadvertent errors in the calculation of
Factor 3 for certain hospitals.
On pages 57331 through 57332, we
made conforming corrections to Table
III—Comparison of Total Payments Per
Case [FY 2016 Payments Compared to
FY 2017 Payments].
On page 57342, we made conforming
corrections to the discussion of the
estimated changes in operating and
capital IPPS payments and the
accounting statement and table for acute
care hospitals that arose from the
corrections of errors and conforming
changes as described in sections II.B.
and II.D. of this correcting document.
D. Summary of Errors in and
Corrections to Files and Tables Posted
on the CMS Web Site
We are correcting the errors in the
following IPPS tables that are listed on
page 57311 of the FY 2017 IPPS/LTCH
PPS final rule and are available on the
Internet on the CMS Web site at https://
www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Feefor-Service-Payment/
AcuteInpatientPPS/FY2017-IPPS-FinalRule-Home-Page.html. The tables that
are available on the Internet have been
updated to reflect the revisions
discussed in this correcting document.
Table 2—Case-Mix Index and Wage
Index Table—FY 2017. Because the
uncompensated care and reclassification
errors discussed in section II.B. of this
correction document required that we
recalculate the rural and imputed floor
budget neutrality factor, we are
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 5, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
correcting the values in the column
titled FY 2017 Wage Index for all
providers. For the three providers for
which we are applying urban to rural
reclassification under § 412.103, we are
correcting the values in the column
titled ‘‘FY 2017 Wage Index’’, inserting
the rural reclassified CBSA in the
column titled ‘‘Reclassified/
Redesignated CBSA’’, and inserting a
‘‘Y’’ in the column titled ‘‘Hospital
Reclassified as Rural Under Section
1886(d)(8)(E) of the Act (§ 412.103)’’.
For the provider that withdrew its
MGCRB reclassification for FY 2017, we
are revising the wage index in the
column titled FY 2017 Wage Index, and
we are removing the MGCRB flag in the
column titled MGCRB Reclass.
Table 3—Wage Index Table by
CBSA—FY 2017. Because the
uncompensated care and reclassification
errors discussed in section II.B. of this
correction document required that we
recalculate the rural and imputed floor
budget neutrality factor, we are making
corresponding changes to the wage
indexes and GAFs of all CBSAs listed in
Table 3. Specifically, we are correcting
the values and flags in the columns
titled ‘‘Wage Index’’, ‘‘Reclassified Wage
Index’’, ‘‘GAF’’, ‘‘Reclassified GAF’’,
‘‘Pre-Frontier and/or Pre-Rural Floor
Wage Index’’ and ‘‘Eligible for Rural
Floor Wage Index’’.
Table 6B—New Procedure Codes for
FY 2017. In Table 6B—New Procedure
Codes, we inadvertently listed the
incorrect MS–DRG assignment for 13
ICD–10–PCS procedure codes that
describe endovascular thrombectomy
procedures of the lower limb involving
a bifurcation. We are correcting the MS–
DRG assignment of these 13 ICD–10–
PCS codes in Table 6B.
Table 10—New Technology Add-On
Payment Thresholds for Applications
for FY 2018. We are correcting the
thresholds in this table as a result of the
corrections to the operating
standardized amounts discussed in
section II.B. of this correcting document.
Table 18—FY 2017 Medicare DSH
Uncompensated Care Payment Factor 3
and Projected DSH Eligibility. For the
FY 2017 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule, we
published a list of hospitals that we
identified to be subsection (d) hospitals
and subsection (d) Puerto Rico hospitals
eligible to receive empirically justified
Medicare DSH payment adjustments
and uncompensated care payments for
FY 2017. We also published, in the
Supplemental Medicare DSH File
located in the FY 2017 IPPS/LTCH PPS
final rule data files page at https://
www.cms.gov/Medicare/MedicareFeefor-Service-Payment/
AcuteInpatientPPS/FY2017-IPPS-
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Oct 04, 2016
Jkt 241001
FinalRule-Home-Page-Items/FY2017IPPSFinal-Rule-Data-Files.html, the data
used to calculate each hospital’s Factor
3, total uncompensated care payment,
and estimated uncompensated care
payment per discharge.
Shortly after the publication of the
FY2017 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule, we
discovered that, in calculating Factor 3
of the uncompensated care payment
methodology, we had understated the
low-income insured days of hospitals
that merged after 2011 with one
surviving provider number because we
inadvertently excluded the low income
insured days of acquired hospitals from
the low income insured days used in the
Factor 3 calculation of surviving
hospitals that were projected to receive
Medicare DSH in FY 2017. In addition,
we discovered that we had calculated a
Factor 3 for hospitals that have ceased
operations and erroneously calculated
Factor 3 using Medicaid days reported
on Worksheet S–3 instead of Worksheet
S–2 of certain hospitals’ FY 2013 cost
reports. We are revising Factor 3 for all
hospitals to correct these errors. These
corrections to the uncompensated care
payments impacted the calculation of
all the budget neutrality factors as well
as the outlier fixed-loss cost threshold
for outlier payments.
In addition, we discovered that we
had inadvertently excluded the
Medicaid days from the 2011 cost report
for a provider as well as the Medicaid
days from the 2012 cost report for
another provider from the calculation of
Factor 3. Due to technical errors by our
Medicare Administrative Contractors
the Medicaid days from these cost
reports were not included in the March
2016 update of HCRIS. We projected
that both providers would be eligible to
receive Medicare DSH in FY 2017.
Accordingly, we are revising Factor 3
for all hospitals to reflect these
Medicaid days; however, the impact of
these revisions is too small to affect
other aspects of the IPPS ratesetting,
such as the calculation of the fixed-loss
threshold for outlier payments.
We are also correcting the errors in
the following LTCH PPS table that is
listed on page 57311 of the FY 2017
IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule and is
available on the Internet on the CMS
Web site at https://www.cms.gov/
Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-ServicePayment/LongTermCareHospitalPPS/
index.html under the list item for
regulation number CMS–1655–F. The
table that is available on the Internet has
been updated to reflect the revisions
discussed in this correcting document.
Table 11—MS–LTC–DRGs, Relative
Weights, Geometric Average Length of
Stay, Short Stay Outlier (SSO)
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
68949
Threshold, and ‘‘IPPS Comparable
Threshold’’ for LTCH PPS Discharges
Occurring from October 1, 2016 through
September 30, 2017. We are correcting
this table by correcting typographical
errors for MS–LTC–DRGs 627 and 658
in the columns titled ‘‘Relative Weight,’’
‘‘Geometric Average Length of Stay,’’
‘‘Short-Stay Outlier (SSO) Threshold,’’
and ‘‘IPPS Comparable Threshold.’’
III. Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking
and Delay in Effective Date
We ordinarily publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register to provide a period for public
comment before the provisions of a rule
take effect in accordance with section
553(b) of the Administrative Procedure
Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). However,
we can waive this notice and comment
procedure if the Secretary finds, for
good cause, that the notice and
comment process is impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest, and incorporates a statement of
the finding and the reasons therefore in
the notice.
Section 553(d) of the APA ordinarily
requires a 30-day delay in the effective
date of final rules after the date of their
publication in the Federal Register.
This 30-day delay in effective date can
be waived, however, if an agency finds
for good cause that the delay is
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest, and the agency
incorporates a statement of the findings
and its reasons in the rule issued.
We believe that this correcting
document does not constitute a rule that
would be subject to the APA notice and
comment or delayed effective date
requirements. This correcting document
corrects technical and typographic
errors in the preamble, addendum,
payment rates, tables, and appendices
included or referenced in the FY 2017
IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule but does not
make substantive changes to the policies
or payment methodologies that were
adopted in the final rule. As a result,
this correcting document is intended to
ensure that the information in the FY
2017 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule
accurately reflects the policies adopted
in that final rule.
In addition, even if this were a rule to
which the notice and comment
procedures and delayed effective date
requirements applied, we find that there
is good cause to waive such
requirements. Undertaking further
notice and comment procedures to
incorporate the corrections in this
document into the final rule or delaying
the effective date would be contrary to
the public interest because it is in the
public’s interest for providers to receive
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
68950
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 5, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
appropriate payments in as timely a
manner as possible, and to ensure that
the FY 2017 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule
accurately reflects our policies.
Furthermore, such procedures would be
unnecessary, as we are not altering our
payment methodologies or policies, but
rather, we are simply implementing
correctly the policies that we previously
proposed, received comment on, and
subsequently finalized. This correcting
document is intended solely to ensure
that the FY 2017 IPPS/LTCH PPS final
rule accurately reflects these payment
methodologies and policies. Therefore,
we believe we have good cause to waive
the notice and comment and effective
date requirements.
IV. Correction of Errors
In FR Doc. 2016–18476 of August 22,
2016 (81 FR 56761), we are making the
following corrections:
A. Corrections of Errors in the Preamble
1. On page 56775, third column,
second bulleted paragraph, line 25, the
figure ‘‘$50.4 million’’ is corrected to
read ‘‘$56.4 million’’.
2. On page 56796—
a. Top half of the page, third column,
third full paragraph,
(1) Lines 4 and 5, the phrase
‘‘describing similar conditions’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘displayed in Table
6A—New Diagnosis Codes associated
with the proposed rule (which is
available via the Internet on the CMS
Web site at: https://www.cms.gov/
Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-ServicePayment/AcuteInpatientPPS/
index.html) that describe similar
conditions’’.
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
04CK3Z6 ......................
04CL3Z6 .......................
04CM3Z6 ......................
04CN3Z6 ......................
04CP3Z6 ......................
04CQ3Z6 ......................
04CR3Z6 ......................
04CS3Z6 ......................
04CT3Z6 ......................
04CT3ZZ ......................
04CU3Z6 ......................
04CU3ZZ ......................
04CV3Z6 ......................
04CW3Z6 .....................
04CY3Z6 ......................
Extirpation
Extirpation
Extirpation
Extirpation
Extirpation
Extirpation
Extirpation
Extirpation
Extirpation
Extirpation
Extirpation
Extirpation
Extirpation
Extirpation
Extirpation
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
Matter
Matter
Matter
Matter
Matter
Matter
Matter
Matter
Matter
Matter
Matter
Matter
Matter
Matter
Matter
7. On page 56821, middle of the
page—
a. Second column, first partial
paragraph, line 2, the phrase ‘‘identified
58’’ is corrected to read ‘‘identified 57’’.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Oct 04, 2016
Jkt 241001
(2) Lines 9 and 10, the phrase, ‘‘18
ICD–10–CN diagnosis codes in the
following table be reassigned’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘18 ICD–10–CM
diagnosis codes in the following table
also be reassigned’’.
b. Lower half of the page, first
column, last paragraph—
(1) Lines 6 and 7, the phrase
‘‘describing procedures performed on’’
is corrected to read ‘‘describing
conditions affecting’’.
(2) Line 14, the phrase ‘‘MS DRGs
091, 092 and 093.’’ is corrected to read
‘‘MS–DRGs 091, 092, and 093 because
they are also nervous system codes.’’
3. On page 56797, first column, first
paragraph, lines 15 and 16, the phrase
‘‘These 18 codes also are reflected in
Table 6E’’ is corrected to read ‘‘These 18
codes are reflected in Table 6A’’.
4. On page 56801, second column,
second full paragraph—
a. Lines 11 and 12, the phrase
‘‘performing such procedures because
loop’’ is corrected to read ‘‘performing
such procedures because, as noted in
the FY 2017 IPPS/LTCH PPS proposed
rule, loop’’.
b. Lines 25 and 26, the phrase ‘‘were
not able to finalize that specific
request.’’ is corrected to read ‘‘were not
able to replicate that specific request in
the ICD–9–CM based MS–DRGs.’’.
c. Lines 26 through 29, the sentence
‘‘Rather, we finalized an alternative
option, which was to change the
designation for four of the six codes
requested.’’ is corrected to read ‘‘Rather,
we proposed an alternative option,
which was to change the designation for
four of the six codes requested, because
we believed that if we limited the
change in designation to these four
from
from
from
from
from
from
from
from
from
from
from
from
from
from
from
Right Femoral Artery, Bifurcation, Percutaneous Approach.
Left Femoral Artery, Bifurcation, Percutaneous Approach.
Right Popliteal Artery, Bifurcation, Percutaneous Approach.
Left Popliteal Artery, Bifurcation, Percutaneous Approach.
Right Anterior Tibial Artery, Bifurcation, Percutaneous Approach.
Left Anterior Tibial Artery, Bifurcation, Percutaneous Approach.
Right Posterior Tibial Artery, Bifurcation, Percutaneous Approach.
Left Posterior Tibial Artery, Bifurcation, Percutaneous Approach.
Right Peroneal Artery, Bifurcation, Percutaneous Approach.
Right Peroneal Artery, Percutaneous Approach.
Left Peroneal Artery, Bifurcation, Percutaneous Approach.
Left Peroneal Artery, Percutaneous Approach.
Right Foot Artery, Bifurcation, Percutaneous Approach.
Left Foot Artery, Bifurcation, Percutaneous Approach.
Lower Artery, Bifurcation, Percutaneous Approach.
b. Third column, first partial
paragraph, line 3, the phrase ‘‘following
58’’ is corrected to read ‘‘following 57’’.
8. On pages 56821 through 56823, in
the table titled ‘‘ICD–10–PCS CODE
PAIRS PROPOSED TO BE ADDED TO
PO 00000
codes, the change would not have any
impact.’’.
d. Lines 40 through 41, the phrase
‘‘not finalizing the proposal to change
the two’’ is corrected to read ‘‘not
changing the designation of the two’’.
5. On page 56803, bottom of the
page—
a. First column, last paragraph, lines
7 and 8, the phrase ‘‘removing the 34
codes’’ is corrected to read ‘‘removing
32 of the 34 codes’’.
b. Second column, first partial
paragraph—
(1) Lines 5 and 6, the phrase ‘‘34 nonlower’’ is corrected to read ‘‘32 nonlower’’.
(2) Lines 8 and 9, the phrase ‘‘These
34 non-lower’’ is corrected to read
‘‘These 32 non-lower’’.
(3) Line 13, after the phrase ‘‘for FY
2017.’’ the paragraph is corrected by
adding sentences to read as follows:
‘‘Two of the procedure codes
identified by the commenter, ICD–10–
PCS procedure codes 04CT3ZZ
(Extirpation of matter from right
peroneal artery, percutaneous approach)
and 04CU3ZZ (Extirpation of matter
from left peroneal artery, percutaneous
approach) describe endovascular
thrombectomy of lower limbs and are
not non-lower limb procedure codes.’’.
c. Third column, first full paragraph,
line 11, the phrase ‘‘34 procedure’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘32 procedure’’.
6. On page 56804, top of page, the
table titled ‘‘ICD–10–PCS
ENDOVASCULAR THROMBECTOMY
PROCEDURE CODES REASSIGNED TO
MS–DRGs 270, 271, AND 272 FOR FY
2017’’ is corrected by adding the
following entries:
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
VERSION 34 ICD–10 MS–DRGs 466,
467, and 468: PROPOSED NEW KNEE
REVISION ICD–10–PCS
COMBINATIONS’’, the codes (in the 4th
column) for the following entries are
corrected to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 5, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
68951
ICD–10–PCS CODE PAIRS PROPOSED TO BE ADDED TO VERSION 34 ICD–10 MS–DRGS 466, 467, AND 468:
PROPOSED NEW KNEE REVISION ICD–10–PCS COMBINATIONS
Code
Code description
0SPD08Z ......
Removal of Spacer from Left Knee Joint, Open Approach.
0SPD38Z ......
Removal of Spacer from
Percutaneous Approach.
Knee
0SPD48Z ......
Removal of Spacer from Left Knee
Percutaneous Endoscopic Approach.
9. On page 56823, lower half of the
page—
a. First column, second paragraph,
line 10, the phrase ‘‘58 new’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘57 new’’.
b. Second column—
(1) First partial paragraph, line 11, the
phrase ‘‘58 new’’ is corrected to read ‘‘
new’’.
(2) First full paragraph, lines 3 and 4,
the phrase ‘‘58 new’’ is corrected to read
‘‘57 new’’.
10. On page 56858, top of the page,
the untitled table is corrected by adding
the following entry after line 34 (which
is the entry for MDC 5, MS–DRG 262):
MDC
5
MS–DRG
265
MS–DRG Title
AICD Lead Procedures.
Left
Code
Code description
and
0SRU0J9 ......
Joint,
and
0SRU0J9 ......
Joint,
and
0SRU0J9 ......
Replacement of Left Knee Joint, Femoral Surface
with Synthetic Substitute, Cemented, Open Approach.
Replacement of Left Knee Joint, Femoral Surface
with Synthetic Substitute, Cemented, Open Approach.
Replacement of Left Knee Joint, Femoral Surface
with Synthetic Substitute, Cemented, Open Approach.
11. On page 56895, third column, first
partial paragraph—
a. Lines 8 and 9, the phrase ‘‘a unique
ICD–10–PCS procedure code’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘two unique ICD–10–
PCS procedure codes’’.
b. Lines 10 through 15, the sentence
‘‘The approved procedure code is
XW0331 (Introduction of Idarucizumab,
Dabigatran reversal agent into central
vein, percutaneous approach, New
Technology Group 1).’’ is corrected to
read ‘‘The approved procedure codes
are XW0331 (Introduction of
Idarucizumab, Dabigatran reversal agent
into peripheral vein, percutaneous
approach, New Technology Group 1)
and XW04331 (Introduction of
Idarucizumab, Dabigatran reversal agent
into central vein, percutaneous
approach, New Technology Group 1).’’.
12. On page 56897, third column,
third full paragraph, line 11, the phrase
‘‘procedure code XW03331.’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘procedure codes
XW03331 and XW04331.’’.
13. On page 56927—
a. Second column, last partial
paragraph, line 5 the phrase ‘‘265
hospitals’’ is corrected to read ‘‘264
hospitals’’.
b. Third column, first partial
paragraph, line 12, the phrase ‘‘817
hospitals’’ is corrected to read ‘‘816
hospitals’’.
14. On page 57002, bottom of the
page, the table titled ‘‘PREVIOUSLY
ADOPTED AND NEWLY FINALIZED
BASELINE AND PERFORMANCE
PERIODS FOR THE FY 2021 PROGRAM
YEAR’’ is corrected to read as follows:
PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED AND NEWLY FINALIZED BASELINE AND PERFORMANCE PERIODS FOR THE FY 2021 PROGRAM YEAR
Domain
Baseline period
Clinical Care
• Mortality (MORT–30–AMI, MORT–30–HF,
MORT–30–COPD) *
• THA/TKA * ......................................................
• MORT–30–PN (updated cohort) ....................
Efficiency and Cost Reduction
• MSPB .............................................................
• Payment (AMI Payment and HF Payment) ...
Performance period
• July 1, 2011–June 30, 2014 .........................
• July 1, 2016–June 30, 2019
• April 1, 2011–March 31, 2014 ......................
• July 1, 2012–June 30, 2015 .........................
• April 1, 2016–March 31, 2019
• September 1, 2017–June 30, 2019
• January 1, 2017–December 31, 2017 ..........
• July 1, 2012–June 30, 2015 .........................
• January 1, 2019–December 31, 2019
• July 1, 2017–June 30, 2019
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
* Previously adopted baseline and performance periods that remain unchanged (80 FR 49562 through 49563).
15. On page 57033, first column, last
paragraph, lines 2 through 4, the web
link ‘‘https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/
Medicare-Fee-for-ServicePayment/
AcuteInpatientPPS/dgme.html’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘https://www.cms.gov/
Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-ServicePayment/AcuteInpatientPPS/
dgme.html.’’
16. On page 57195—
a. First column, last partial paragraph,
lines 4 and 5, the phrase ‘‘it
recommended’’ is corrected to read ‘‘the
commenters recommended’’.
b. Third column, third full
paragraph—
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:46 Oct 04, 2016
Jkt 241001
(1). Line 14, the phrase ‘‘This
measure’’ is corrected to read ‘‘The Drug
Regimen Review Conducted with
Follow-Up for Identified Issues-PAC
LTCH QRP quality measure’’.
(2) Lines 23 through 25, the phrase ‘‘
and Potentially Preventable 30-Day
Post-Discharge Readmission Measure for
LTCH QRP,’’ is corrected to read ‘‘,
Potentially Preventable 30-Day PostDischarge Readmission Measure for
LTCH QRP and Medicare Spending Per
Beneficiary-PAC LTCH QRP,’’.
17. On page 57196, third column, first
full paragraph, lines 13 through 16, the
phrase ‘‘with information more
frequently, such as unadjusted counts of
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
potentially preventable readmissions
(PPRs) and discharge data.’’ is corrected
to read ‘‘with information, such as
unadjusted counts of potentially
preventable readmissions (PPRs) and
discharge data, more frequently.’’
18. On page 57199, first column,
second full paragraph, lines 3 and 4, the
phrase ‘‘SES or SDS status.’’ is corrected
to read ‘‘SES or SDS.’’
19. On page 57211, third column,
second full paragraph, line 16, the
phrase ‘‘to discharge’’ is corrected to
read ‘‘to be discharged’’.
20. On page 57213—
a. Second column, last partial
paragraph, lines 6 through 8, the phrase
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
68952
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 5, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
‘‘and a SNF stay within a 30-day
window, the SNF stay is a candidate to
for’’ is corrected to read ‘‘and then a
SNF stay within a 30-day window, the
SNF stay is a candidate for’’.
b. Third column, after the last
paragraph, Footnote 280, lines 1 and 2,
the measure name ‘‘Hospital-Wide AllCause Readmission Measure (HWR)
(CMS/Yale).’’ is corrected to read
‘‘Hospital-Wide All-Cause Unplanned
Readmission Measure (HWR) (CMS/
Yale).’’
21. On page 57218, third column, first
full paragraph, lines 4 and 5, the phrase
‘‘The commenter was correct in its
interpretation of’’ is corrected to read
‘‘The commenter’s interpretation was
correct regarding’’.
22. On page 57220, second column,
second footnoted full paragraph
(Footnote 311), lines 1 through 6, the
footnote ‘‘311Greenwald, J.L.,
Halasyamani, L., Greene, J., LaCivita, C.,
et al. (2010). Making inpatient
medication reconciliation patient
centered, clinically relevant and
implementable: A consensus statement
on key principles and necessary first
steps. Journal of Hospital Medicine,
5(8), 477–485.’’ is corrected to read
‘‘311Institute of Medicine. Preventing
Medication Errors. Washington, DC:
National Academies Press; 2006.’’
23. On page 57221, second column,
second full paragraph, lines 3 and 4, the
phrase ‘‘cross-setting and quality
measure’’ is corrected to read ‘‘crosssetting quality measure’’.
24. On page 57222—
a. Second column, first full paragraph,
lines 11 and 12, the phrase ‘‘however,
the adoption of the measure’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘however, the
measure’’.
b. Third column, first full paragraph—
(1) Line 4, the word ‘‘facilities’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘facility’s’’.
(2) Line 22, the phrase ‘‘collected
admission’’ is corrected to read
‘‘collected at admission’’.
25. On page 57223—
a. First column, second paragraph—
(1) Lines 1 through 4, the phrase
‘‘Since the time of the MAP
consideration, with our measure
contractor, we tested this measure in a
pilot test involving twelve PAC
facilities,’’ is corrected to read ‘‘Since
the time of the NQF-convened MAP
consideration we have further tested
this measure in a pilot test involving
twelve PAC facilities’’.
(2) Lines 7 and 8, the phrase, ‘‘record
collection system’’ is corrected to read
‘‘records system’’.
b. Second column, third full
paragraph, lines 9 and 10, the phrase
‘‘PAC facility.’’ is corrected to read
‘‘PAC facility. We appreciate MedPAC
and other commenters’ recommendation
for a quality measure that assesses postdischarge medication communication
with primary care providers for patients
discharged to home.’’
B. Correction of Errors in the Addendum
1. On page 57278, third column, fifth
full paragraph,
a. Line 3, the figure ‘‘0.999079’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.999078’’.
b. Line 9, the figure ‘‘0.999079’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.999078’’.
2. On page 57279—
a. Second column, first full paragraph,
line 9, the figure ‘‘1.000209’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘1.00021’’.
b. Third column, third full paragraph,
line 12, the figure ‘‘0.988224’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.988136’’.
3. On page 57280—
a. First column, fifth full paragraph,
line 4, the figure ‘‘0.993200’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.991987’’.
b. Third column, second full
paragraph,
(1) Line 3, the figure ‘‘0.999994’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.999997’’.
(2) Line 6, the figure ‘‘0.999994’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.999997’’.
4. On page 57286—
a. Second column, last paragraph—
(1) Line 6, the figure ‘‘$23,570’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘$23,573’’.
(2) Line 8, the figure
‘‘$83,347,416,971’’ is corrected to read
‘‘$83,364,479,923’’.
(3) Line 9, the figure ‘‘$4,479,256,519’’
is corrected to read ‘‘$4,479,256,368’’.
b. Third column—
(1) First partial paragraph, line 11, the
figure ‘‘$23,570’’ is corrected to read
‘‘$23,573’’.
(2) Following the third full paragraph,
the untitled table is corrected to read as
follows:
Operating
standardized
amounts
National .........
Capital
Federal rate
0.948998
0.938602
5. On page 57288, middle of the page,
the table titled ‘‘CHANGE OF FY 2016
STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS TO THE
FY 2017 STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS’’,
is corrected to read as follows:
CHANGE OF FY 2016 STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS TO THE FY 2017 STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS
Hospital submitted quality
data and is a meaningful
EHR user
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
FY 2016 Base Rate after
removing:
1. FY 2016 Geographic
Reclassification Budget
Neutrality (0.988169).
2. FY 2016 Rural Community Hospital Demonstration Program Budget
Neutrality (0.999837).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
If Wage Index is Greater
Than 1.0000:
Labor (69.6 percent):
$4,394.09.
Nonlabor (30.4 percent):
$1,919.26.
15:06 Oct 04, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Hospital submitted quality
data and is NOT a
meaningful EHR user
If Wage Index is Greater
Than 1.0000:
Labor (69.6 percent):
$4,394.09.
Nonlabor (30.4 percent):
$1,919.26.
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Hospital did NOT submit
quality data and is a
meaningful EHR user
If Wage Index is Greater
Than 1.0000:
Labor (69.6 percent):
$4,394.09.
Nonlabor (30.4 percent):
$1,919.26.
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
Hospital did NOT submit
quality data and is NOT a
meaningful EHR user
If Wage Index is Greater
Than 1.0000:
Labor (69.6 percent):
$4,394.09.
Nonlabor (30.4 percent):
$1,919.26.
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 5, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
68953
CHANGE OF FY 2016 STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS TO THE FY 2017 STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS—Continued
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Hospital submitted quality
data and is a meaningful
EHR user
3. Cumulative FY 2008, FY
2009, FY 2012, FY
2013, FY 2014, FY 2015
and FY 2016 Documentation and Coding
Adjustments as Required
under Sections
7(b)(1)(A) and 7(b)(1)(B)
of Public Law 110–90
and Documentation and
Coding Recoupment Adjustment as required
under Section 631 of the
American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (0.9255).
4. FY 2016 Operating
Outlier Offset (0.948998).
5. FY 2016 New Labor
Market Delineation
Wage Index Transition
Budget Neutrality Factor
(0.999998).
6. FY 2017 2-Midnight
Rule Permanent Adjustment (1/0.998).
FY 2017 Update Factor .....
FY 2017 MS-DRG Recalibration Budget Neutrality Factor.
FY 2017 Wage Index
Budget Neutrality Factor.
FY 2017 Reclassification
Budget Neutrality Factor.
FY 2017 Operating Outlier
Factor.
Cumulative Factor: FY
2008, FY 2009, FY
2012, FY 2013, FY
2014, FY 2015, FY 2016
and FY 2017 Documentation and Coding
Adjustment as Required
under Sections
7(b)(1)(A) and 7(b)(1)(B)
of Public Law 110–90
and Documentation and
Coding Recoupment Adjustment as required
under Section 631 of the
American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012.
FY 2017 New Labor Market Delineation Wage
Index 3-Year Hold Harmless Transition Budget
Neutrality Factor.
FY 2017 2-Midnight Rule
One-Time Prospective
Increase.
National Standardized
Amount for FY 2017 if
Wage Index is Greater
Than 1.0000; Labor/NonLabor Share Percentage
(69.6/30.4).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Hospital submitted quality
data and is NOT a
meaningful EHR user
Hospital did NOT submit
quality data and is a
meaningful EHR user
Hospital did NOT submit
quality data and is NOT a
meaningful EHR user
If Wage Index is less Than
or Equal to 1.0000:
Labor (62 percent):
$3,914.28.
Nonlabor (38 percent):
$2,399.07.
If Wage Index is less Than
or Equal to 1.0000:
Labor (62 percent):
$3,914.28.
Nonlabor (38 percent):
$2,399.07.
If Wage Index is less Than
or Equal to 1.0000:
Labor (62 percent):
$3,914.28.
Nonlabor (38 percent):
$2,399.07.
If Wage Index is less Than
or Equal to 1.0000:
Labor (62 percent):
$3,914.28.
Nonlabor (38 percent):
$2,399.07.
1.0165 ...............................
0.999078 ...........................
0.99625 .............................
0.999078 ...........................
1.00975 .............................
0.999078 ...........................
0.9895.
0.999078.
1.00021 .............................
1.00021 .............................
1.00021 .............................
1.00021.
0.988136 ...........................
0.988136 ...........................
0.988136 ...........................
0.988136.
0.948998 ...........................
0.948998 ...........................
0.948998 ...........................
0.98998.
0.9118 ...............................
0.9118 ...............................
0.9118 ...............................
0.9118.
0.999997 ...........................
0.999997 ...........................
0.999997 ...........................
0.999997.
1.006 .................................
1.006 .................................
1.006 .................................
1.006.
Labor: $3,839.23 ...............
Nonlabor: $1,676.91 .........
Labor: $3,762.75 ...............
Nonlabor: $1,643.50 .........
Labor: $3,8143.74 .............
Nonlabor: $1,665.77 .........
Labor: $3,737.25.
Nonlabor: $1,632.37.
15:06 Oct 04, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
68954
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 5, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
CHANGE OF FY 2016 STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS TO THE FY 2017 STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS—Continued
Hospital submitted quality
data and is a meaningful
EHR user
National Standardized
Amount for FY 2017 if
Wage Index is less Than
or Equal to 1.0000;
Labor/Non-Labor Share
Percentage (62/38).
Hospital submitted quality
data and is NOT a
meaningful EHR user
Hospital did NOT submit
quality data and is a
meaningful EHR user
Labor: $3,420.01 ...............
Nonlabor: $2,096.13 .........
Labor: $3,351.88 ...............
Nonlabor: $2,054.37 .........
Labor: $3,397.30 ...............
Nonlabor: $2,082.21 .........
6. On page 57291—
a. First column, second full
paragraph, line 15, the figure
‘‘0.999079’’ is corrected to read
‘‘0.999078’’.
b. Third column, first full paragraph
line 6, the figure ‘‘1.84’’ is corrected to
read ‘‘1.83’’.
7. On page 57293, third column—
a. First partial paragraph—
(1) Line 1, the figure ‘‘0.9995’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.9994’’.
(2) Line 4, ‘‘0.9855’’ is corrected to
read ‘‘0.9854’’.
b. First full paragraph, line 16, the
figure ‘‘0.9851’’ is corrected to read
‘‘0.9850’’.
c. Last paragraph—
(1) Line 2, the figure ‘‘0.9991’’is
corrected to read ‘‘0.9990’’.
(2) Line 4, ‘‘0.9995’’ is corrected to
read ‘‘0.9994’’.
8. On page 57294—
a. Top of the page—
(1) Second column—
(a) First full paragraph, line 17, the
figure ‘‘$446.81’’ is corrected to read
‘‘$446.79’’.
Hospital did NOT submit
quality data and is NOT a
meaningful EHR user
Labor: $3,329.16.
Nonlabor: $2,040.46.
(b) Second bulleted paragraph, line 6,
the figure ‘‘0.9991’’ is corrected to read
‘‘0.9990’’.
(2) Third column, second full
paragraph—
(a) Line 13, the figure, ‘‘0.09’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.10’’.
(b) Line 26, the figure, ‘‘1.84’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘1.832’’.
b. Bottom of the page, the table titled
‘‘COMPARISON OF FACTORS AND
ADJUSTMENTS: FY 2016 CAPITAL
FEDERAL RATE AND FY 2017
CAPITAL FEDERAL RATE’’ is corrected
to read as follows:
COMPARISON OF FACTORS AND ADJUSTMENTS: FY 2016 CAPITAL FEDERAL RATE AND FY 2017 CAPITAL FEDERAL RATE
FY 2016
Update Factor 1 ................................................................................................
GAF/DRG Adjustment Factor 1 ........................................................................
Outlier Adjustment Factor 2 ..............................................................................
Permanent 2-midnight Policy Adjustment Factor ............................................
One-Time 2-midnight Policy Adjustment Factor ..............................................
Capital Federal Rate ........................................................................................
1.0130
0.9976
0.9365
N/A
N/A
$438.75
FY 2017
1.009
0.9990
0.9386
1.002
1.006
$446.79
Change
1.009
0.9990
1.0022
1.002
1.006
1.0183
Percent
change 3
0.9
¥0.10
0.22
0.2
0.6
1.83
1 The update factor and the GAF/DRG budget neutrality adjustment factors are built permanently into the capital Federal rates. Thus, for example, the incremental change from FY 2016 to FY 2017 resulting from the application of the 0.9990 GAF/DRG budget neutrality adjustment factor
for FY 2017 is a net change of 0.9990 (or ¥0.10 percent).
2 The outlier reduction factor is not built permanently into the capital Federal rate; that is, the factor is not applied cumulatively in determining
the capital Federal rate. Thus, for example, the net change resulting from the application of the FY 2017 outlier adjustment factor is 0.9386/
0.9365, or 1.0022 (or 0.22 percent).
3 Sum of individual changes may not match percent change in capital rate due to rounding.
9. On page 57295—
a. The top of the page, the table titled
‘‘COMPARISON OF FACTORS AND
ADJUSTMENTS: PROPOSED FY 2017
CAPITAL FEDERAL RATE AND FINAL
FY 2017 CAPITAL FEDERAL RATE’’ is
corrected to read as follows:
COMPARISON OF FACTORS AND ADJUSTMENTS: PROPOSED FY 2017 CAPITAL FEDERAL RATE AND FINAL FY 2017
CAPITAL FEDERAL RATE
Proposed
FY 2017
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Update Factor 1 ................................................................................................
GAF/DRG Adjustment Factor 1 ........................................................................
Outlier Adjustment Factor 2 ..............................................................................
Permanent 2-midnight Policy Adjustment Factor ............................................
One-Time 2-midnight Policy Adjustment Factor ..............................................
Capital Federal Rate ........................................................................................
b. Lower three-fourths of the page,
first column, second paragraph, line 21,
the figure, ‘‘$23,570.’’ is corrected to
read ‘‘$23,573.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Oct 04, 2016
Jkt 241001
1.0090
0.9993
0.9374
1.002
1.006
$446.35
10. On page 57307, second column,
first full paragraph—
a. Line 15, the figure ‘‘$23,570’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘$23,573’’.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Final
FY 2017
1.0090
0.9990
0.9386
1.002
1.006
$446.79
Change
1.0000
0.9997
1.0013
1.000
1.000
1.0010
Percent
change
0.00
¥0.03
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.10
b. Line 35, the figure ‘‘$23,570’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘$23,573’’.
11. On page 57312—
a. Top of the page—
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 5, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
(1) Table 1A titled ‘‘NATIONAL
ADJUSTED OPERATING
STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS, LABOR/
NONLABOR (69.6 PERCENT LABOR
SHARE/30.4 PERCENT NONLABOR
SHARE IF WAGE INDEX IS GREATER
68955
THAN 1)—FY 2017’’ is corrected to read
as follows:
TABLE 1A—NATIONAL ADJUSTED OPERATING STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS, LABOR/NONLABOR (69.6 PERCENT LABOR
SHARE/30.4 PERCENT NONLABOR SHARE IF WAGE INDEX IS GREATER THAN 1)—FY 2017
Hospital submitted quality data
and is a meaningful EHR user
(update = 1.65 percent)
Hospital submitted quality data
and is NOT a meaningful EHR
user
(update = ¥0.375 percent)
Hospital did NOT submit quality
data and is a meaningful EHR
user
(update = 0.975 percent)
Hospital did NOT submit quality
data and is NOT a meaningful
EHR user
(update = ¥1.05 percent)
Labor
Nonlabor
Labor
Nonlabor
Labor
Nonlabor
Labor
Nonlabor
$3,839.23
$1,677.91
$3,762.75
$1,643.50
$3,813.74
$1,665.77
$3,737.25
$1,632.37
(2) Table 1B titled ‘‘NATIONAL
ADJUSTED OPERATING
STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS, LABOR/
NONLABOR (62 PERCENT LABOR
SHARE/38 PERCENT NONLABOR
SHARE IF WAGE INDEX IS LESS
THAN OR EQUAL TO 1)—FY 2017’’ is
corrected to read as follows:
TABLE 1B—NATIONAL ADJUSTED OPERATING STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS, LABOR/NONLABOR (62 PERCENT LABOR SHARE/
38 PERCENT NONLABOR SHARE IF WAGE INDEX IS LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 1)—FY 2017
Hospital submitted quality data
and is a meaningful EHR user
(update = 1.65 percent)
Hospital submitted quality data
and is NOT a meaningful EHR
user
(update = ¥0.375 percent)
Hospital did NOT submit quality
data and is a meaningful EHR
user
(update = 0.975 percent)
Hospital did NOT submit quality
data and is NOT a meaningful
EHR user
(update = ¥1.05 percent)
Labor
Nonlabor
Labor
Nonlabor
Labor
Nonlabor
Labor
Nonlabor
$3,420.01
$2,096.13
$3,351.88
$2,054.37
$3,397.30
$2,082.21
$3,329.16
$2,040.46
b. Middle of the page—
(1) Table 1C titled ‘‘ADJUSTED
OPERATING STANDARDIZED
AMOUNTS FOR HOSPITALS IN
PUERTO RICO, LABOR/NONLABOR
(NATIONAL: 62 PERCENT LABOR
SHARE/38 PERCENT NONLABOR
SHARE BECAUSE WAGE INDEX IS
LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 1);—FY
2017’’ is corrected to read as follows:
TABLE 1C—ADJUSTED OPERATING STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS FOR HOSPITALS IN PUERTO RICO, LABOR/NONLABOR (NATIONAL: 62 PERCENT LABOR SHARE/38 PERCENT NONLABOR SHARE BECAUSE WAGE INDEX IS LESS THAN OR
EQUAL TO 1)—FY 2017
Rates if wage index is greater than 1
Rates if wage index is less
than or equal to 1
Standardized amount
Labor
National 1 ........................................
1 For
Nonlabor
Labor
Nonlabor
Not Applicable ................................
Not Applicable ................................
$3,420.01
$2,096.13
FY 2017, there are no CBSAs in Puerto Rico with a national wage index greater than 1.
(2) Table 1D titled ‘‘CAPITAL
STANDARD FEDERAL PAYMENT
RATE—FY 2017’’ is corrected as
follows:
TABLE 1D—CAPITAL STANDARD
FEDERAL PAYMENT RATE—FY 2017
Rate
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
National .................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Oct 04, 2016
$446.79
Jkt 241001
C. Corrections of Errors in the
Appendices
1. On page 57312, bottom of the page,
third column, first partial paragraph,
a. Line 8, the figure ‘‘$987’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘$990’’.
b. Line 10, the figure ‘‘$66’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘$72’’.
2. On page 57315, upper three-fourths
of the page—
a. Second column, third full
paragraph,
(1) Line 7, the figure ‘‘1,380’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘1,369’’.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(2) Line 9, the figure ‘‘1,135’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘1,146’’.
b. Third column, first full paragraph,
line 13—
(1) The figure ‘‘1,372’’ is corrected to
read ‘‘1,369’’.
(2) The figure ‘‘1,150’’ is corrected to
read ‘‘1,153’’.
3. On pages 57315 through 57317, the
table titled ‘‘TABLE I—IMPACT
ANALYSIS OF CHANGES TO THE IPPS
FOR OPERATING COSTS FOR FY
2017’’ is corrected to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
68956
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 5, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE I—IMPACT ANALYSIS OF CHANGES TO THE IPPS FOR OPERATING COSTS FOR FY 2017
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
All Hospitals ..................................
By Geographic Location:
Urban hospitals .............................
Large urban areas .................
Other urban areas ..................
Rural hospitals ..............................
Bed Size (Urban):
0–99 beds ..............................
100–199 beds ........................
200–299 beds ........................
300–499 beds ........................
500 or more beds ..................
Bed Size (Rural):
0–49 beds ..............................
50–99 beds ............................
100–149 beds ........................
150–199 beds ........................
200 or more beds ..................
Urban by Region:
New England ..........................
Middle Atlantic ........................
South Atlantic .........................
East North Central .................
East South Central .................
West North Central ................
West South Central ................
Mountain ................................
Pacific .....................................
Puerto Rico ............................
Rural by Region:
New England ..........................
Middle Atlantic ........................
South Atlantic .........................
East North Central .................
East South Central .................
West North Central ................
West South Central ................
Mountain ................................
Pacific .....................................
By Payment Classification:
Urban hospitals ......................
Large urban areas .................
Other urban areas ..................
Rural areas ............................
Teaching Status:
Nonteaching ...........................
Fewer than 100 residents ......
100 or more residents ............
Urban DSH:
Non-DSH ................................
100 or more beds ..................
Less than 100 beds ...............
Rural DSH:
SCH ........................................
RRC .......................................
100 or more beds ..................
Less than 100 beds ...............
Urban teaching and DSH:
Both teaching and DSH .........
Teaching and no DSH ...........
No teaching and DSH ............
No teaching and no DSH .......
Special Hospital Types:
RRC .......................................
SCH ........................................
MDH .......................................
SCH and RRC .......................
MDH and RRC .......................
Type of Ownership:
Voluntary ................................
Proprietary ..............................
Government ...........................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Oct 04, 2016
FY 2017
Wage data
under new
CBSA designations with
application of
wage budget
neutrality
(2) 3
(3) 4
FY 2017
MGCRB
reclassifications
Rural and
imputed floor
with
application of
national rural
and
imputed floor
budget
neutrality
Application of
the frontier
wage index
and
out-migration
adjustment
All FY 2017
changes
(4) 5
FY 2017
weights and
DRG changes
with
application of
recalibration
budget
neutrality
(1) 2
Number
of
hospitals 1
Hospital rate
update and
documentation
and coding
adjustment
(5) 6
(6) 7
(7) 8
3,330
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.9
2,515
1,369
1,146
815
0.9
0.9
1.0
1.6
0.0
0.1
0.0
¥0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
¥0.1
¥0.3
0.1
1.3
0.0
¥0.1
0.2
¥0.2
0.1
0.0
0.2
0.1
0.9
0.9
1.0
1.2
659
767
446
431
212
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
¥0.2
¥0.1
¥0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.0
¥0.1
0.0
0.0
¥0.5
0.0
0.1
¥0.2
¥0.2
0.1
0.3
0.0
0.1
¥0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.0
0.9
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.1
317
292
120
46
40
1.5
1.8
1.6
1.7
1.6
¥0.5
¥0.6
¥0.4
¥0.2
¥0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.8
1.5
1.7
2.5
¥0.2
¥0.2
¥0.2
¥0.3
¥0.3
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.0
0.0
1.0
1.2
1.0
1.3
1.5
116
315
407
390
147
163
385
163
378
51
0.8
0.9
1.0
0.9
1.0
1.1
0.9
1.1
0.9
0.9
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
¥0.5
¥0.1
¥0.2
¥0.1
¥0.1
¥0.1
0.2
0.1
0.4
¥0.5
1.1
0.8
¥0.5
¥0.2
¥0.4
¥0.8
¥0.5
¥0.3
¥0.4
¥1.0
0.9
¥0.2
¥0.3
¥0.4
¥0.3
¥0.4
¥0.4
1.2
1.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.7
0.0
0.2
0.1
0.1
¥0.4
0.9
0.9
1.0
1.2
1.0
1.2
2.2
0.5
0.3
21
54
128
115
155
98
160
60
24
0
2,522
1,369
1,153
808
1.3
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.1
2.2
1.5
1.7
1.9
0.0
0.9
0.9
1.0
1.6
¥0.2
¥0.4
¥0.5
¥0.4
¥0.3
¥0.4
¥0.4
¥0.4
¥0.4
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
¥0.4
0.3
0.1
¥0.1
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.4
0.1
¥0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
1.4
0.8
2.3
1.0
2.2
0.2
1.3
0.2
1.3
0.0
¥0.1
¥0.3
0.1
1.4
¥0.3
¥0.2
¥0.3
¥0.2
¥0.4
¥0.1
¥0.3
¥0.1
¥0.1
0.0
0.0
¥0.1
0.2
¥0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.2
0.1
1.6
1.6
1.0
1.2
1.0
1.5
1.2
1.3
1.3
0.0
0.9
0.9
1.0
1.2
2,266
815
249
1.1
1.0
0.9
¥0.2
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
¥0.1
¥0.1
0.2
0.0
¥0.2
0.1
0.2
0.0
0.8
0.9
1.1
589
1,642
363
0.9
0.9
1.0
¥0.1
0.1
¥0.3
¥0.2
0.0
0.0
0.2
¥0.1
¥0.5
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.8
0.9
0.7
240
325
29
142
2.0
1.7
0.9
0.8
¥0.6
¥0.3
¥0.4
¥0.4
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
1.8
2.9
1.3
¥0.1
¥0.2
¥0.4
¥0.4
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.7
1.4
1.3
0.5
0.2
898
109
1,107
408
0.9
0.9
1.0
0.9
0.1
0.0
¥0.1
¥0.1
0.0
¥0.1
0.1
¥0.2
¥0.2
1.1
¥0.1
¥0.4
¥0.1
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
1.0
0.7
0.8
0.9
189
324
148
126
12
0.8
2.1
1.7
2.2
2.1
¥0.1
¥0.3
¥0.6
¥0.3
¥0.6
0.1
¥0.1
0.0
0.1
¥0.1
1.9
0.0
0.6
0.4
1.3
0.0
0.0
¥0.1
¥0.1
¥0.2
0.5
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
1.2
1.7
1.3
1.8
2.2
1,927
881
522
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
¥0.1
0.0
0.0
¥0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.9
0.9
0.9
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
68957
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 5, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE I—IMPACT ANALYSIS OF CHANGES TO THE IPPS FOR OPERATING COSTS FOR FY 2017—Continued
Medicare Utilization as a Percent
of Inpatient Days:
0–25 .......................................
25–50 .....................................
50–65 .....................................
Over 65 ..................................
FY 2017 Reclassifications by the
Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board:
All Reclassified Hospitals .......
Non¥Reclassified Hospitals ..
Urban Hospitals Reclassified
Urban Nonreclassified Hospitals ...................................
Rural Hospitals Reclassified
Full Year .............................
Rural Nonreclassified Hospitals Full Year ...................
All Section 401 Reclassified
Hospitals: ............................
Other Reclassified Hospitals
(Section 1886(d)(8)(B)) ......
FY 2017
Wage data
under new
CBSA designations with
application of
wage budget
neutrality
(2) 3
(3) 4
FY 2017
MGCRB
reclassifications
Rural and
imputed floor
with
application of
national rural
and
imputed floor
budget
neutrality
Application of
the frontier
wage index
and
out-migration
adjustment
All FY 2017
changes
(4) 5
FY 2017
weights and
DRG changes
with
application of
recalibration
budget
neutrality
(1) 2
Number
of
hospitals 1
Hospital rate
update and
documentation
and coding
adjustment
(5) 6
(6) 7
(7) 8
523
2,122
545
89
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.2
0.1
0.0
¥0.2
¥0.3
0.1
0.0
¥0.1
0.3
¥0.3
0.0
0.6
¥0.4
0.2
¥0.1
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.2
1.1
0.9
0.9
1.0
791
2,539
532
1.1
1.0
1.0
¥0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
¥0.1
2.3
¥0.8
2.3
¥0.2
0.1
¥0.1
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.9
0.9
0.9
1,936
0.9
0.1
0.0
¥0.9
0.1
0.1
0.9
277
1.7
¥0.3
0.1
2.2
¥0.2
0.0
1.3
489
1.6
¥0.4
0.2
¥0.2
¥0.2
0.3
1.1
72
1.7
¥0.2
0.0
0.3
¥0.1
0.9
1.5
48
1.2
¥0.4
0.1
3.1
¥0.4
0.0
0.8
1 Because
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
data necessary to classify some hospitals by category were missing, the total number of hospitals in each category may not equal the national total. Discharge data are from FY 2015, and hospital cost report data are from reporting periods beginning in FY 2012 and FY 2013.
2 This column displays the payment impact of the hospital rate update and other adjustments including the 1.65 percent adjustment to the national standardized
amount and hospital-specific rate (the estimated 2.7 percent market basket update reduced by 0.3 percentage points for the multifactor productivity adjustment and
the 0.75 percentage point reduction under the Affordable Care Act), the ¥1.5 percent documentation and coding adjustment to the national standardized amount and
the adjustment of (1/0.998) to permanently remove the ¥0.2 percent reduction, and the 1.006 temporary adjustment to address the effects of the 0.2 percent reduction in effect for FYs 2014 through 2016 related to the 2-midnight policy.
3 This column displays the payment impact of the changes to the Version 34 GROUPER, the changes to the relative weights and the recalibration of the MS DRG
weights based on FY 2015 MedPAR data in accordance with section 1886(d)(4)(C)(iii) of the Act. This column displays the application of the recalibration budget neutrality factor of 0.999078 in accordance with section 1886(d)(4)(C)(iii) of the Act.
4 This column displays the payment impact of the update to wage index data using FY 2013 cost report data and the OMB labor market area delineations based on
2010 Decennial Census data. This column displays the payment impact of the application of the wage budget neutrality factor, which is calculated separately from the
recalibration budget neutrality factor, and is calculated in accordance with section 1886(d)(3)(E)(i) of the Act. The wage budget neutrality factor is 1.000210.
5 Shown here are the effects of geographic reclassifications by the Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board (MGCRB) along with the effects of the continued implementation of the new OMB labor market area delineations on these reclassifications. The effects demonstrate the FY 2017 payment impact of going from no
reclassifications to the reclassifications scheduled to be in effect for FY 2017. Reclassification for prior years has no bearing on the payment impacts shown here.
This column reflects the geographic budget neutrality factor of 0.988136.
6 This column displays the effects of the rural and imputed floor based on the continued implementation of the new OMB labor market area delineations. The Affordable Care Act requires the rural floor budget neutrality adjustment to be 100 percent national level adjustment. The rural floor budget neutrality factor (which includes the imputed floor) applied to the wage index is 0.991987. This column also shows the effect of the 3-year transition for hospitals that were located in urban
counties that became rural under the new OMB delineations or hospitals deemed urban where the urban area became rural under the new OMB delineations, with a
budget neutrality factor of 0.999997.
7 This column shows the combined impact of the policy required under section 10324 of the Affordable Care Act that hospitals located in frontier States have a
wage index no less than 1.0 and of section 1886(d)(13) of the Act, as added by section 505 of Public Law 108–173, which provides for an increase in a hospital’s
wage index if a threshold percentage of residents of the county where the hospital is located commute to work at hospitals in counties with higher wage indexes.
These are not budget neutral policies.
8 This column shows the estimated change in payments from FY 2016 to FY 2017.
4. On page 57319,
a. First column, second full
paragraph,
(1) Line 6, the figure ‘‘0.988224’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.988136’’.
(2) Line 13, the figure ‘‘1.4’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘1.3’’.
b. Second column—
(1) First full paragraph—
(a) Line 8, the figure ‘‘0.9930’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.991987’’.
(b) Line 9, the figure ‘‘0.7’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.8’’.
(2) Third full paragraph—
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Oct 04, 2016
Jkt 241001
(a) Line 1, the figure ‘‘397’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘436’’.
(b) Line 5—
(1) The figure ‘‘0.9930’’ is corrected to
read ‘‘0.991987’’.
(2) The figure ‘‘0.7’’ is corrected to
read ‘‘0.8’’.
(c) Line 23, the figure ‘‘1.0’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.9’’.
(d) Line 31, the figure ‘‘$24’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘$22’’.
(e) Line 33, the figure ‘‘0.7’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.6’’.
c. Third column—
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(1) First full paragraph,
(a) Line 7, the figure ‘‘$10’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘$6.4’’.
(b) Line 18, the figure ‘‘$17’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘$18’’.
(2) Second full paragraph, line 28, the
figure ‘‘0.999994’’ is corrected to read
‘‘0.999997’’.
5. On page 57320, the table titled ‘‘FY
2017 IPPS Estimated Payments Due to
Rural Floor and Imputed Floor with
National Budget Neutrality’’ is corrected
to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
68958
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 5, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
FY 2017 IPPS ESTIMATED PAYMENTS DUE TO RURAL AND IMPUTED FLOOR WITH NATIONAL BUDGET NEUTRALITY
Number of
hospitals
Percent change in
payments due to
application of rural
floor and imputed
floor with budget
neutrality
Difference
(in $ millions)
(1)
State
Number of
hospitals that will
receive the rural
floor or imputed
floor
(2)
(3)
(4)
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Alabama ...................................................................................
Alaska ......................................................................................
Arizona .....................................................................................
Arkansas ..................................................................................
California ..................................................................................
Colorado ..................................................................................
Connecticut ..............................................................................
Delaware ..................................................................................
Washington, DC .......................................................................
Florida ......................................................................................
Georgia ....................................................................................
Hawaii ......................................................................................
Idaho ........................................................................................
Illinois .......................................................................................
Indiana .....................................................................................
Iowa .........................................................................................
Kansas .....................................................................................
Kentucky ..................................................................................
Louisiana ..................................................................................
Maine .......................................................................................
Massachusetts .........................................................................
Michigan ...................................................................................
Minnesota ................................................................................
Mississippi ................................................................................
Missouri ....................................................................................
Montana ...................................................................................
Nebraska ..................................................................................
Nevada .....................................................................................
New Hampshire .......................................................................
New Jersey ..............................................................................
New Mexico .............................................................................
New York .................................................................................
North Carolina ..........................................................................
North Dakota ............................................................................
Ohio .........................................................................................
Oklahoma .................................................................................
Oregon .....................................................................................
Pennsylvania ............................................................................
Puerto Rico ..............................................................................
Rhode Island ............................................................................
South Carolina .........................................................................
South Dakota ...........................................................................
Tennessee ...............................................................................
Texas .......................................................................................
Utah .........................................................................................
Vermont ...................................................................................
Virginia .....................................................................................
Washington ..............................................................................
West Virginia ............................................................................
Wisconsin .................................................................................
Wyoming ..................................................................................
6. On page 57321, second column,
first partial paragraph —
a Line 1, the figure ‘‘277’’ is corrected
to read ‘‘278’’.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Oct 04, 2016
Jkt 241001
83
6
57
44
301
48
31
6
7
171
105
12
14
126
89
35
53
65
95
18
58
95
49
62
74
12
26
24
13
64
25
154
84
6
130
86
34
151
51
11
57
18
92
320
33
6
76
49
29
65
10
b Line 7, the figure ‘‘1.0’’ is corrected
to read ‘‘0.9’’.
7. On pages 57321 through 57323, the
table titled ‘‘TABLE II—IMPACT
ANALYSIS OF CHANGES FOR FY 2017
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
¥0.3
2.1
3.5
¥0.4
1.3
0.2
0.2
0
¥0.4
¥0.3
¥0.4
¥0.3
¥0.3
¥0.4
¥0.4
¥0.4
¥0.3
¥0.4
¥0.4
¥0.4
0.6
¥0.4
¥0.3
¥0.4
¥0.3
0.3
¥0.3
¥0.2
2.2
0.2
¥0.3
¥0.3
¥0.4
¥0.3
¥0.4
¥0.3
¥0.4
¥0.4
0.1
4.7
¥0.1
¥0.2
¥0.3
¥0.4
¥0.3
¥0.2
¥0.3
¥0.1
¥0.2
¥0.3
¥0.1
6
4
46
0
186
3
8
2
0
16
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
2
0
15
0
0
0
2
4
0
3
9
18
0
21
1
1
10
2
2
5
12
10
5
0
20
3
1
0
1
6
3
6
0
¥6
4
63
¥4
131
3
4
0
¥1
¥2
¥18
¥10
¥1
¥1
¥19
¥11
¥4
¥3
¥6
¥5
¥2
22
¥18
¥6
¥4
¥8
1
¥2
¥2
11
6
¥1
¥20
¥12
¥1
¥13
¥4
¥4
¥20
0
18
¥2
¥1
¥7
¥26
¥2
¥1
¥8
¥1
¥5
0
ACUTE CARE HOSPITAL OPERATING
PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM
[PAYMENTS PER DISCHARGE]’’ is
corrected to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 5, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
68959
TABLE II—IMPACT ANALYSIS OF CHANGES FOR FY 2017 ACUTE CARE HOSPITAL OPERATING PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT
SYSTEM
[Payments per discharge]
Estimated
average
FY 2016
payment per
discharge
Estimated
average FY
2017
payment per
discharge
FY 2017
changes
(1)
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Number of
hospitals
(2)
(3)
(4)
All Hospitals .....................................................................................................
By Geographic Location:
Urban hospitals .........................................................................................
Large urban areas ....................................................................................
Other urban areas ....................................................................................
Rural hospitals ..........................................................................................
Bed Size (Urban):
0–99 beds .................................................................................................
100–199 beds ...........................................................................................
200–299 beds ...........................................................................................
300–499 beds ...........................................................................................
500 or more beds .....................................................................................
Bed Size (Rural):
0–49 beds .................................................................................................
50–99 beds ...............................................................................................
100–149 beds ...........................................................................................
150–199 beds ...........................................................................................
200 or more beds .....................................................................................
Urban by Region:
New England ............................................................................................
Middle Atlantic ..........................................................................................
South Atlantic ...........................................................................................
East North Central ....................................................................................
East South Central ...................................................................................
West North Central ...................................................................................
West South Central ..................................................................................
Mountain ...................................................................................................
Pacific .......................................................................................................
Puerto Rico ...............................................................................................
Rural by Region:
New England ............................................................................................
Middle Atlantic ..........................................................................................
South Atlantic ...........................................................................................
East North Central ....................................................................................
East South Central ...................................................................................
West North Central ...................................................................................
West South Central ..................................................................................
Mountain ...................................................................................................
Pacific .......................................................................................................
By Payment Classification:
Urban hospitals .........................................................................................
Large urban areas ....................................................................................
Other urban areas ....................................................................................
Rural areas ...............................................................................................
Teaching Status:
Nonteaching ..............................................................................................
Fewer than 100 residents .........................................................................
100 or more residents ..............................................................................
Urban DSH:
Non-DSH ..................................................................................................
100 or more beds .....................................................................................
Less than 100 beds ..................................................................................
Rural DSH:
SCH ..........................................................................................................
RRC ..........................................................................................................
100 or more beds .....................................................................................
Less than 100 beds ..................................................................................
Urban teaching and DSH:
Both teaching and DSH ............................................................................
Teaching and no DSH ..............................................................................
No teaching and DSH ..............................................................................
No teaching and no DSH .........................................................................
Special Hospital Types:
RRC ..........................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Oct 04, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3,330
$11,542
$11,649
0.9
2,515
1,369
1,146
815
11,890
12,690
10,946
8,602
11,997
12,799
11,051
8,707
0.9
0.9
1.0
1.2
659
767
446
431
212
9,392
10,050
10,757
12,092
14,613
9,478
10,117
10,840
12,202
14,772
0.9
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.1
317
292
120
46
40
7,208
8,192
8,434
9,243
10,171
7,279
8,292
8,519
9,367
10,320
1.0
1.2
1.0
1.3
1.5
116
315
407
390
147
163
385
163
378
51
12,957
13,471
10,498
11,190
10,042
11,578
10,693
12,279
15,372
8,491
12,901
13,593
10,595
11,303
10,160
11,692
10,820
12,549
15,452
8,513
¥0.4
0.9
0.9
1.0
1.2
1.0
1.2
2.2
0.5
0.3
21
54
128
115
155
98
160
60
24
11,818
8,655
8,043
8,918
7,639
9,420
7,243
10,100
12,045
12,009
8,791
8,122
9,023
7,716
9,560
7,328
10,228
12,197
1.6
1.6
1.0
1.2
1.0
1.5
1.2
1.3
1.3
2,522
1,369
1,153
808
11,886
12,690
10,940
8,602
11,993
12,799
11,046
8,706
0.9
0.9
1.0
1.2
2,266
815
249
9,600
11,133
16,764
9,680
11,231
16,949
0.8
0.9
1.1
589
1,642
363
10,055
12,247
8,853
10,140
12,359
8,914
0.8
0.9
0.7
240
325
29
142
8,584
9,006
7,018
6,823
8,702
9,123
7,054
6,838
1.4
1.3
0.5
0.2
898
109
1,107
408
13,344
11,361
10,047
9,455
13,474
11,442
10,124
9,539
1.0
0.7
0.8
0.9
189
9,709
9,824
1.2
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
68960
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 5, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE II—IMPACT ANALYSIS OF CHANGES FOR FY 2017 ACUTE CARE HOSPITAL OPERATING PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT
SYSTEM—Continued
[Payments per discharge]
Number of
hospitals
Estimated
average
FY 2016
payment per
discharge
Estimated
average FY
2017
payment per
discharge
FY 2017
changes
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
SCH ..........................................................................................................
MDH ..........................................................................................................
SCH and RRC ..........................................................................................
MDH and RRC ..........................................................................................
Type of Ownership:
Voluntary ...................................................................................................
Proprietary ................................................................................................
Government ..............................................................................................
Medicare Utilization as a Percent of Inpatient Days:
0–25 ..........................................................................................................
25–50 ........................................................................................................
50–65 ........................................................................................................
Over 65 .....................................................................................................
FY 2017 Reclassifications by the Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board:
All Reclassified Hospitals .........................................................................
Non-Reclassified Hospitals .......................................................................
Urban Hospitals Reclassified ....................................................................
Urban Nonreclassified Hospitals ..............................................................
Rural Hospitals Reclassified Full Year .....................................................
Rural Nonreclassified Hospitals Full Year ................................................
All Section 401 Reclassified Hospitals .....................................................
Other Reclassified Hospitals (Section 1886(d)(8)(B)) ..............................
7. On page 57324, top of the page,
third column, last paragraph, line 1, the
figure ‘‘2,426’’ is corrected to read
‘‘2,419’’.
324
148
126
12
10,344
7,321
10,767
8,822
10,516
7,415
10,957
9,019
1.7
1.3
1.8
2.2
1,927
881
522
11,719
10,130
12,485
11,830
10,218
12,596
0.9
0.9
0.9
523
2,122
545
89
14,996
11,460
9,343
6,948
15,160
11,562
9,431
7,019
1.1
0.9
0.9
1.0
791
2,539
532
1,936
277
489
72
48
11,399
11,595
12,008
11,849
8,984
8,173
11,307
7,889
11,507
11,701
12,115
11,955
9,101
8,266
11,474
7,954
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
1.3
1.1
1.5
0.8
8. On pages 57324 and 57325, the
table titled ‘‘Modeled Disproportionate
Share Hospital Payments for Estimated
FY 2017 DSHs by Hospital Type: Model
DSH $ (In Millions) From FY 2016 to FY
2017’’ is corrected to read as follows:
MODELED DISPROPORTIONATE SHARE HOSPITAL PAYMENTS FOR ESTIMATED FY 2017 DSHS BY HOSPITAL TYPE: MODEL
DSH $ (IN MILLIONS) FROM FY 2016 TO FY 2017
Total .....................................................................................
By Geographic Location:
Urban Hospitals ............................................................
Large Urban Areas ................................................
Other Urban Areas ................................................
Rural Hospitals .............................................................
Bed Size (Urban):
0 to 99 Beds .................................................................
100 to 249 Beds ...........................................................
250+ Beds ....................................................................
Bed Size (Rural):
0 to 99 Beds .................................................................
100 to 249 Beds ...........................................................
250+ Beds ....................................................................
Urban by Region:
East North Central ........................................................
East South Central .......................................................
Middle Atlantic ..............................................................
Mountain .......................................................................
New England ................................................................
Pacific ...........................................................................
Puerto Rico ...................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Oct 04, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
FY 2016
final
rule estimated
DSH $ *
(in millions)
FY 2017
final
rule estimated
DSH $ *
(in millions)
Dollar
difference:
FY 2017–
FY 2016
(in millions)
Percent
change **
(1)
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Number of
DSHs
(FY 2017)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
2,419
$9,767
$9,551
¥$216
¥2.2
1,921
1,045
876
498
9,294
5,885
3,408
473
9,106
5,765
3,341
445
¥188
¥120
¥68
¥28
¥2.0
¥2.0
¥2.0
¥5.9
336
837
748
189
2,211
6,894
185
2,154
6,767
¥4
¥57
¥127
¥2.2
¥2.6
¥1.8
368
116
14
206
211
56
190
199
56
¥16
¥12
0
¥7.8
¥5.5
¥0.2
322
129
232
125
90
312
41
1,273
574
1,614
448
394
1,459
104
1,252
566
1,570
448
385
1,448
116
¥22
¥8
¥44
0
¥9
¥10
12
¥1.7
¥1.4
¥2.7
¥0.1
¥2.4
¥0.7
11.3
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 5, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
68961
MODELED DISPROPORTIONATE SHARE HOSPITAL PAYMENTS FOR ESTIMATED FY 2017 DSHS BY HOSPITAL TYPE: MODEL
DSH $ (IN MILLIONS) FROM FY 2016 TO FY 2017—Continued
Number of
DSHs
(FY 2017)
FY 2017
final
rule estimated
DSH $ *
(in millions)
Dollar
difference:
FY 2017–
FY 2016
(in millions)
Percent
change **
(1)
South Atlantic ................................................................
West North Central .......................................................
West South Central ......................................................
Rural by Region:
East North Central ........................................................
East South Central .......................................................
Middle Atlantic ..............................................................
Mountain .......................................................................
New England ................................................................
Pacific ...........................................................................
South Atlantic ................................................................
West North Central .......................................................
West South Central ......................................................
By Payment Classification:
Urban Hospitals ............................................................
Large Urban Areas ................................................
Other Urban Areas ................................................
Rural Hospitals .............................................................
Teaching Status:
Nonteaching ..................................................................
Fewer than 100 residents .............................................
100 or more residents ..................................................
Type of Ownership:
Voluntary .......................................................................
Proprietary ....................................................................
Government ..................................................................
Unknown .......................................................................
Medicare Utilization Percent:
Missing or Unknown .....................................................
0 to 25 ...........................................................................
25 to 50 .........................................................................
50 to 65 .........................................................................
Greater than 65 ............................................................
FY 2016
final
rule estimated
DSH $ *
(in millions)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
314
104
252
1,777
451
1,200
1,721
439
1,161
¥56
¥11
¥39
¥3.2
¥2.5
¥3.2
64
141
28
21
11
7
86
31
109
49
149
34
16
15
9
98
20
83
44
141
33
15
16
7
92
19
78
¥4
¥8
¥1
0
1
¥3
¥6
¥1
¥6
¥8.3
¥5.3
¥2.4
¥0.2
7.2
¥27.4
¥6.4
¥6.3
¥7.0
1,886
1,043
843
533
9,243
5,884
3,359
523
9,055
5,764
3,292
496
¥188
¥120
¥68
¥28
¥2.0
¥2.0
¥2.0
¥5.3
1,544
637
238
3,117
3,213
3,437
3,053
3,132
3,366
¥64
¥81
¥71
¥2.1
¥2.5
¥2.1
1,405
541
471
2
6,044
1,672
2,023
27
5,913
1,629
1,983
25
¥131
¥43
¥40
¥2
¥2.2
¥2.6
¥2.0
¥6.1
4
428
1,617
319
51
1
3,013
6,356
385
12
1
2,974
6,189
375
11
0
¥39
¥166
¥10
¥1
0.9
¥1.3
¥2.6
¥2.5
¥8.2
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Source: Dobson | DaVanzo analysis of 2011–2013 Hospital Cost Reports.
* Dollar DSH calculated by [0.25 * estimated section 1886(d)(5)(F) payments] + [0.75 * estimated section 1886(d)(5)(F) payments * Factor 2 *
Factor 3]. When summed across all hospitals projected to receive DSH payments, DSH payments are estimated to be $9,767 million in FY 2016
and $9,551 million in FY 2017.
** Percentage change is determined as the difference between Medicare DSH payments modeled for the FY 2017 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule
(column 3) and Medicare DSH payments modeled for the FY 2016 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule (column 2) divided by Medicare DSH payments
modeled for the FY 2016 final rule (column 2) times 100 percent.
9. On page 57325, bottom of the page,
third column, last paragraph, line 8, the
figure ‘‘6.4’’ is corrected to read ‘‘5.9’’.
10. On page 57326, first column—
a. First partial paragraph—
(1) Line 7 the figure ‘‘5.2’’ is corrected
to read ‘‘5.5’’.
(2) Line 8, the figure ‘‘5.9’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.2’’.
b. First full paragraph, line 12, the
figure ‘‘11.4’’ is corrected to read ‘‘11.3’’.
c. Third full paragraph (last
paragraph)—
(1) Line 12, the figure ‘‘11.4’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘11.3’’.
(2) Line 18, the figure ‘‘$9.5 million’’
is corrected to read ‘‘$9.4 million’’.
11. On page 57330, third column—
a. Fourth bulleted paragraph, line 4,
the figure ‘‘0.9991’’ is corrected to read
‘‘0.9990’’.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Oct 04, 2016
Jkt 241001
b. Last paragraph, line 6, the figure
‘‘1.84’’ is corrected to read ‘‘1.83’’.
12. On page 57331, top half of the
page—
a. First column—
(1) First partial paragraph—
(a) Line 1, the phrase ‘‘Less than half
of the hospitals’’ is corrected to read
‘‘Most of the hospitals’’.
(b) Lines 4 through 6, the phrase ‘‘the
effects of changes to the GAFs, while the
remainder of these urban area hospitals
would experience no change or a
decrease in’’ is corrected to read ‘‘the
effects of changes to the GAFs, while
hospitals in one urban area are expected
to experience a decrease in’’.
(c) Line 11, the phrase ‘‘except for two
rural areas where changes in’’ is
corrected to read, ‘‘except for one rural
area where changes in’’.
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(2) Third paragraph, lines 8 and line
9, the phrase ‘‘0.7 percent, while
hospitals in rural areas, on average, are
expected to experience a 0.8’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.7 percent, and
hospitals in rural areas, on average, are
also expected to experience a 0.7’’.
b. Second column—
(1) First partial paragraph, lines 2
through 6, the sentence ‘‘The primary
factor contributing to the small
difference in the projected increase in
capital IPPS payments per case for
urban hospitals as compared to rural
hospitals is the changes to the GAFs.’’
is corrected by deleting the sentence.
(2) First full paragraph—
(a) Lines 4 through 8, ‘‘range from a
4.2 percent increase for the Puerto Rico
urban hospitals, and a 1.4 percent
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
68962
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 5, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
increase for the West South Central
urban region to a 0.7 percent increase
for the Mountain urban region.’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘range from a 4.1
percent increase for the Puerto Rico
urban hospitals, and a 2.1 percent
increase for the Mountain urban region
to a 0.7 percent increase for several
other urban regions.’’.
(b) Line 13, the figure ‘‘4.2’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘4.1’’.
(c) Line 23, the figure ‘‘1.6’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘2.1’’.
(d) Line 26, the figure ‘‘0.4’’ should
read ‘‘0.1’’.
c. Third column—
(1) First full paragraph, line 9, the
figure ‘‘0.7’’ is corrected to read ‘‘0.6’’.
(2) Second full paragraph—
(a) Line 13, the figure ‘‘1.0’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.9’’.
(b) Line 17, the figure ‘‘1.0’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.9’’.
(c) Line 20, the figure ‘‘0.2’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.3’’.
13. On pages 57331 and 57332, the
table titled ‘‘Table III.—Comparison of
Total Payments Per Case [FY 2016
Payments Compared To FY 2017
Payments]’’ is corrected to read as
follows:
TABLE III—COMPARISON OF TOTAL PAYMENTS PER CASE
[FY 2016 payments compared to FY 2017 payments]
Average FY
2016
payments/case
Average FY
2017
payments/case
3,330
1,369
1,146
815
2,515
659
767
446
431
212
815
317
292
120
46
40
912
1,011
871
618
947
768
824
865
958
1,139
618
520
577
610
669
738
920
1,019
879
623
955
774
829
871
967
1,149
623
524
582
614
673
745
0.8
0.7
0.9
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.7
0.9
0.9
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.9
2,515
116
315
407
390
147
163
385
163
378
51
815
21
54
128
115
155
98
160
60
24
947
1,031
1,056
840
908
793
923
858
977
1,219
435
618
868
591
584
638
562
666
536
718
804
955
1,024
1,064
847
915
804
930
868
998
1,227
453
623
878
603
584
643
566
668
542
717
812
0.8
¥0.6
0.7
0.8
0.8
1.3
0.7
1.1
2.1
0.7
4.1
0.7
1.1
2.1
0.0
0.9
0.9
0.4
1.2
¥0.1
1.0
3,330
1,369
1,153
808
912
1,011
870
619
920
1,019
878
623
0.8
0.7
0.9
0.7
2,266
815
249
771
885
1,287
776
892
1,298
0.7
0.8
0.9
1,642
363
968
696
976
702
0.8
0.8
240
325
575
649
581
654
1.0
0.7
29
538
540
0.4
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Number of
hospitals
By Geographic Location:
All hospitals ..............................................................................................
Large urban areas (populations over 1 million) ................................
Other urban areas (populations of 1 million of fewer) ......................
Rural areas ........................................................................................
Urban hospitals .........................................................................................
0–99 beds ..........................................................................................
100–199 beds ....................................................................................
200–299 beds ....................................................................................
300–499 beds ....................................................................................
500 or more beds ..............................................................................
Rural hospitals ..........................................................................................
0–49 beds ..........................................................................................
50–99 beds ........................................................................................
100–149 beds ....................................................................................
150–199 beds ....................................................................................
200 or more beds ..............................................................................
By Region:
Urban by Region ......................................................................................
New England .....................................................................................
Middle Atlantic ...................................................................................
South Atlantic ....................................................................................
East North Central .............................................................................
East South Central ............................................................................
West North Central ............................................................................
West South Central ...........................................................................
Mountain ............................................................................................
Pacific ................................................................................................
Puerto Rico ........................................................................................
Rural by Region ........................................................................................
New England .....................................................................................
Middle Atlantic ...................................................................................
South Atlantic ....................................................................................
East North Central .............................................................................
East South Central ............................................................................
West North Central ............................................................................
West South Central ...........................................................................
Mountain ............................................................................................
Pacific ................................................................................................
By Payment Classification:
All hospitals ..............................................................................................
Large urban areas (populations over 1 million) ................................
Other urban areas (populations of 1 million of fewer) ......................
Rural areas ...............................................................................................
Teaching Status:
Non-teaching .....................................................................................
Fewer than 100 Residents ................................................................
100 or more Residents ......................................................................
Urban DSH:
100 or more beds .......................................................................
Less than 100 beds ...................................................................
Rural DSH:
Sole Community (SCH/EACH) ...................................................
Referral Center (RRC/EACH) ....................................................
Other Rural:
100 or more beds ................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Oct 04, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
Change
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 5, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
68963
TABLE III—COMPARISON OF TOTAL PAYMENTS PER CASE—Continued
[FY 2016 payments compared to FY 2017 payments]
Average FY
2016
payments/case
Average FY
2017
payments/case
142
526
528
0.3
898
109
1,107
408
1,043
942
813
815
1,052
948
820
820
0.9
0.6
0.8
0.6
2,529
189
324
126
948
772
706
748
955
782
716
756
0.7
1.4
1.4
1.1
532
1,936
277
489
42
953
948
650
578
599
962
955
655
580
602
0.9
0.7
0.9
0.3
0.5
1,927
881
522
926
820
963
934
827
969
0.8
0.8
0.6
523
2,122
545
89
1,103
916
745
529
1,114
923
750
531
1.0
0.8
0.7
0.4
Number of
hospitals
Less than 100 beds ............................................................
Urban teaching and DSH:
Both teaching and DSH ....................................................................
Teaching and no DSH .......................................................................
No teaching and DSH .......................................................................
No teaching and no DSH ..................................................................
Rural Hospital Types:
Non special status hospitals ..............................................................
RRC/EACH ........................................................................................
SCH/EACH ........................................................................................
SCH, RRC and EACH .......................................................................
Hospitals Reclassified by the Medicare Geographic Classification Review
Board:
FY2017 Reclassifications:
All Urban Reclassified .......................................................................
All Urban Non-Reclassified ...............................................................
All Rural Reclassified ........................................................................
All Rural Non-Reclassified .................................................................
Other Reclassified Hospitals (Section 1886(d)(8)(B)) .......................
Type of Ownership:
Voluntary ...........................................................................................
Proprietary .........................................................................................
Government .......................................................................................
Medicare Utilization as a Percent of Inpatient Days:
0–25 ...................................................................................................
25–50 .................................................................................................
50–65 .................................................................................................
Over 65 ..............................................................................................
14. On page 57342—
a. Top of the page—
(1) First column, first full paragraph—
(a) Line 11, the figure ‘‘987’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘990’’.
(b) Line 23, the figure ‘‘809’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘811’’.
(2) Second column, first partial
paragraph—
(a) Line 12, the figure ‘‘809’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘811’’.
(b) Line 14, the figure’’680’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘683’’.
(c) Line 19, the figure ‘‘66’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘72’’.
Change
(d) Line 23, the figure ‘‘746’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘755’’.
b. Middle of the page, the table titled
‘‘TABLE V—ACCOUNTING
STATEMENT: CLASSIFICATION OF
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES UNDER
THE IPPS FROM FY 2016 TO FY 2017’’
is corrected to read as follows:
TABLE V—ACCOUNTING STATEMENT: CLASSIFICATION OF ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES UNDER THE IPPS FROM FY 2016
TO FY 2017
Category
Transfers
Annualized Monetized Transfers ..............................................................
From Whom to Whom ..............................................................................
Dated: September 29, 2016.
Madhura Valverde,
Executive Secretary to the Department,
Department of Health and Human Services.
[FR Doc. 2016–24042 Filed 9–30–16; 11:15 am]
$755 million.
Federal Government to IPPS Medicare Providers.
ACTION:
Fish and Wildlife Service
SUMMARY:
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2015–0132;
4500030113]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
RIN 1018–AZ09
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Threatened Species Status
for Kentucky Arrow Darter With 4(d)
Rule
AGENCY:
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Oct 04, 2016
Jkt 241001
Final rule.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), determine
threatened species status under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (Act),
as amended, for Kentucky arrow darter
(Etheostoma spilotum), a fish species
from the upper Kentucky River basin in
Kentucky. The effect of this regulation
will be to add this species to the List of
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife.
We are also adopting a rule under
section 4(d) of the Act (a ‘‘4(d) rule’’) to
further provide for the conservation of
the Kentucky arrow darter.
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 5, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 68947-68963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-24042]
[[Page 68947]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
42 CFR Parts 405, 412, 413, and 489
[CMS-1655-F; CMS-1664-F; CMS-1632-F2]
RIN 0938-AS77; 0938-AS88; 0938-AS41
Medicare Program; Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems
for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective
Payment System and Policy Changes and Fiscal Year 2017 Rates; Quality
Reporting Requirements for Specific Providers; Graduate Medical
Education; Hospital Notification Procedures Applicable to Beneficiaries
Receiving Observation Services; Technical Changes Relating to Costs to
Organizations and Medicare Cost Reports; Finalization of Interim Final
Rules With Comment Period on LTCH PPS Payments for Severe Wounds,
Modifications of Limitations on Redesignation by the Medicare
Geographic Classification Review Board, and Extensions of Payments to
MDHs and Low-Volume Hospitals; Correction
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document corrects technical and typographical errors in
the final rule that appeared in the August 22, 2016 Federal Register
titled ``Medicare Program; Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment
Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long-Term Care Hospital
Prospective Payment System and Policy Changes and Fiscal Year 2017
Rates; Quality Reporting Requirements for Specific Providers; Graduate
Medical Education; Hospital Notification Procedures Applicable to
Beneficiaries Receiving Observation Services; Technical Changes
Relating to Costs to Organizations and Medicare Cost Reports;
Finalization of Interim Final Rules With Comment Period on LTCH PPS
Payments for Severe Wounds, Modifications of Limitations on
Redesignation by the Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board,
and Extensions of Payments to MDHs and Low-Volume Hospitals.''
DATES: This correction is effective October 1, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald Thompson, (410) 786-4487.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In FR Doc. 2016-18476 of August 22, 2016 (81 FR 56761) there were a
number of technical and typographical errors identified and corrected
in the Correction of Errors section of this correcting document. The
provisions in this correcting document are effective as if they had
been included in the document that appeared in the August 22, 2016
Federal Register. Accordingly, the corrections are effective October 1,
2016.
II. Summary of Errors
A. Summary of Errors in the Preamble
On page 56775, we made a typographical error in stating the cost
reduction.
On page 56796, we are correcting errors and inadvertent omissions
in the summary and response to a comment on the assignment of 18
additional diagnosis codes.
On page 56797, we erroneously referred to the wrong table.
On page 56801, we are correcting errors and inadvertent omissions
in our response to comments on our proposal to redesignate four ICD-10-
PCS procedure codes.
On page 56803 and in the table on page 56804 describing ICD-10-PCS
Endovascular Thrombectomy Procedure Codes Reassigned to MS-DRGs 270,
271, and 272 for FY 2017, we are correcting technical errors in our
discussion in response to comments to remove 34 ICD-10-PCS procedure
codes describing endovascular thrombectomy of non-lower limbs from the
proposed list of codes to be reassigned to MS-DRGs 270, 271 and 272. In
this response, we erroneously referred to 34 procedure codes describing
non-lower limb procedures (as included in the list submitted by the
commenter) rather than 32 non-lower limb procedure codes. Two of the 34
procedure codes identified by the commenter, ICD-10-PCS procedure codes
04CT3ZZ (Extirpation of matter from right peroneal artery, percutaneous
approach) and 04CU3ZZ (Extirpation of matter from left peroneal artery,
percutaneous approach), describe endovascular thrombectomy of lower
limbs. These codes are assigned to MS-DRGs 270, 271 and 272, accurately
replicating the logic of ICD-9-CM MS-DRGs Version 32 and supporting
clinical and resource use homogeneity as originally proposed and in
accordance with the finalized policy to add procedures describing
endovascular thrombectomy of lower limbs to ICD-10 Version 34 MS-DRGS
270, 271 and 272.
On page 56804, as a result of our correction of the MS-DRG
assignment in Table 6B--New Procedure Codes for 13 ICD-10-PCS procedure
codes that describe endovascular thrombectomy procedures of the lower
limb, as described in section II.D. of this correction document, we are
making additional conforming corrections to the table describing ICD-
10-PCS Endovascular Thrombectomy Procedure Codes Reassigned to MS-DRGs
270, 271, and 272 for FY 2017.
On pages 56821 and 56823, we erroneously stated there were 58
additional combination codes for removal and replacement of knee
joints. There were 57 additional combination codes.
On pages 56822 and 56823, we erroneously listed the code number for
(Replacement of Left Knee Joint, Femoral Surface with Synthetic
Substitute, Cemented, Open Approach) as code 0SRU0JA three times within
the table. The correct code number should be 0SRU0J9 (Replacement of
Left Knee Joint, Femoral Surface with Synthetic Substitute, Cemented,
Open Approach).
As a result of the corrections to pages 56803, 56804, 56821, 56822,
and 56823, we have made conforming changes to the ICD-10 MS-DRG
Definitions Manual Version 34 and ICD-10 MS-DRG Grouper Software
Version 34 for FY 2017.
On page 56858, we erroneously omitted MS-DRG 265 from the table of
MS-DRGs subject to the policy for replaced devices offered without cost
or with a credit.
On pages 56895 and 56897, we inadvertently made an error to the
title of ICD-10-PCS procedure code XW03331 and omitted an additional
procedure code that describes Idarucizumab. Cases involving
Idarucizumab that are eligible for new technology add-on payments will
be identified by ICD-10-PCS procedure codes XW03331 (Introduction of
Idarucizumab, Dabigatran reversal agent into peripheral vein,
percutaneous approach, New Technology Group 1) and XW04331
(Introduction of Idarucizumab, Dabigatran reversal agent into central
vein, percutaneous approach, New Technology Group 1).
On page 56927, as a result of the correction of the technical
errors described in section II.B of this correction document, we have
made conforming changes to the following: The number of hospitals
approved for wage index reclassifications by the Medicare Geographic
Classification Review Board (MGCRB) starting in FY 2017 and the number
of hospitals in a
[[Page 68948]]
MGCRB reclassification status for FY 2017.
On page 57002 in the table titled, ``Previously Adopted and Newly
Finalized Baseline and Performance Periods for the FY 2021 Program
Year'' we erroneously repeated the same information three times, and in
the first instance provided incorrect performance period years for the
Mortality (MORT-30-AMI, MORT-30-HF, MORT-30-COPD) and THA/TKA measures.
On page 57033, we made a typographical error and omitted a dash
within the web link address creating a non-functional link.
On pages 57195, 57196, 57199, 57211, 57213, 57218, and 57220
through 57223 we inadvertently made technical and typographical errors
to the Long-Term Care Hospital Quality Reporting Program section and
have corrected those errors for clarification.
B. Summary of Errors in the Addendum
As discussed in section II.D. of this correcting document, we made
technical errors with regard to the calculation of Factor 3 of the
uncompensated care payment methodology. The revisions made to address
some of these errors directly affected and required the recalculation
of all the budget neutrality factors and final outlier threshold.
Factor 3 is used to determine the amount of total uncompensated care
payment a hospital is eligible to receive as well as the amount of the
uncompensated care payment a hospital receives per discharge. Per
discharge uncompensated care payments are then included when
determining total payments for purposes of all of the budget neutrality
factors and the final outlier threshold. Therefore, we made conforming
changes to pages 57278 through 57280, 57286, and 57291 to take into
account the updated per-discharge uncompensated care payments
determined using revised Factor 3 amounts. We made further conforming
corrections to the national outlier adjustment factors on page 57286
and the table on page 57288 as a result of these changes. Finally, we
made conforming corrections to the national operating standardized
amounts.
We made inadvertent errors related to the MGCRB reclassification
status of one provider as well as the status of three providers
reclassified as urban to rural under section 1886(d)(8)(E) of the Act
(codified in the regulations under Sec. 412.103 and hereinafter
referred to as Sec. 412.103).
Specifically, the reclassification status in the FY 2017 IPPS/LTCH
PPS final rule did not properly reflect the following:
Withdrawal of a MGCRB reclassification for FY 2017 for one
provider.
Application of urban to rural reclassification under Sec.
412.103 for three providers.
Therefore, on page 57279, we recalculated the reclassification
hospital budget neutrality adjustment.
The reclassification errors also required the recalculation of
additional budget neutrality adjustment factors, the fixed-loss cost
threshold, the final wage indexes, and the national operating
standardized amounts. Therefore, we made conforming changes to the
following:
On page 57280, the rural floor budget neutrality
adjustment and the wage index transition budget neutrality adjustment.
On page 57286, the calculation of the outlier fixed-loss
cost threshold and the national outlier adjustment factors.
On page 57288, the table titled ``Change of FY 2016
Standardized Amounts to the FY 2017 Standardized Amounts''.
On pages 57291 and 57293 through 57295, in our discussion of the
determination of the Federal hospital inpatient capital related
prospective payment rate update, we have made conforming corrections to
the increase in the capital Federal rate, the incremental and
cumulative budget neutrality adjustment factors for changes in the GAFs
and the MS-DRG relative weights, the GAF/MS-DRG budget neutrality
adjustment factor (due to the errors in our calculation of the GAFs,
which are computed from the wage index), the capital Federal rate, and
the outlier threshold (as discussed previously).
Also, as a result of these errors, on pages 57294 and 57295, we
have made conforming corrections in the tables showing the comparison
of factors and adjustments for the FY 2016 capital Federal rate and FY
2017 capital Federal rate and the proposed FY 2017 capital Federal rate
and final FY 2017 capital Federal rate.
On page 57307, we are making conforming corrections the fixed-loss
amount for site neutral discharges due to corrections in the IPPS rates
and factors discussed previously.
On page 57312, we have made conforming corrections to the national
operating standardized amounts and capital standard Federal payment
rate (which also include the rates payable to hospitals located in
Puerto Rico) in Tables 1A, 1B, 1C, and 1D as a result of the conforming
corrections to certain budget neutrality factors and the outlier
threshold (as described previously).
C. Summary of Errors in the Appendices
On pages 57312, 57315 through 57317, 57319 through 57323, 57330
through 57332 in our regulatory impact analyses, we made conforming
corrections to the factors, values, and tables and accompanying
discussion of the changes in operating and capital IPPS payments for FY
2017 and the effects of certain budget neutrality factors as a result
of the technical errors that lead to conforming changes in our
calculation of the operating and capital IPPS budget neutrality
factors, outlier threshold, final wage indexes, operating standardized
amounts, and capital Federal rate (as described in section II.B. of
this correction document).
On pages 57324 through 57326, in the table titled ``Modeled
Disproportionate Share Hospital Payments for Estimated FY 2017 DSHs by
Hospital Type: Model DSH $ (In Millions) From FY 2016 To FY 2017'' and
the accompanying discussion, we made corrections to address technical
and formatting errors in the estimated impacts resulting from
inadvertent errors in the calculation of Factor 3 for certain
hospitals.
On pages 57331 through 57332, we made conforming corrections to
Table III--Comparison of Total Payments Per Case [FY 2016 Payments
Compared to FY 2017 Payments].
On page 57342, we made conforming corrections to the discussion of
the estimated changes in operating and capital IPPS payments and the
accounting statement and table for acute care hospitals that arose from
the corrections of errors and conforming changes as described in
sections II.B. and II.D. of this correcting document.
D. Summary of Errors in and Corrections to Files and Tables Posted on
the CMS Web Site
We are correcting the errors in the following IPPS tables that are
listed on page 57311 of the FY 2017 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule and are
available on the Internet on the CMS Web site at https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/AcuteInpatientPPS/FY2017-IPPS-Final-Rule-Home-Page.html. The tables that are available on the
Internet have been updated to reflect the revisions discussed in this
correcting document.
Table 2--Case-Mix Index and Wage Index Table--FY 2017. Because the
uncompensated care and reclassification errors discussed in section
II.B. of this correction document required that we recalculate the
rural and imputed floor budget neutrality factor, we are
[[Page 68949]]
correcting the values in the column titled FY 2017 Wage Index for all
providers. For the three providers for which we are applying urban to
rural reclassification under Sec. 412.103, we are correcting the
values in the column titled ``FY 2017 Wage Index'', inserting the rural
reclassified CBSA in the column titled ``Reclassified/Redesignated
CBSA'', and inserting a ``Y'' in the column titled ``Hospital
Reclassified as Rural Under Section 1886(d)(8)(E) of the Act (Sec.
412.103)''. For the provider that withdrew its MGCRB reclassification
for FY 2017, we are revising the wage index in the column titled FY
2017 Wage Index, and we are removing the MGCRB flag in the column
titled MGCRB Reclass.
Table 3--Wage Index Table by CBSA--FY 2017. Because the
uncompensated care and reclassification errors discussed in section
II.B. of this correction document required that we recalculate the
rural and imputed floor budget neutrality factor, we are making
corresponding changes to the wage indexes and GAFs of all CBSAs listed
in Table 3. Specifically, we are correcting the values and flags in the
columns titled ``Wage Index'', ``Reclassified Wage Index'', ``GAF'',
``Reclassified GAF'', ``Pre-Frontier and/or Pre-Rural Floor Wage
Index'' and ``Eligible for Rural Floor Wage Index''.
Table 6B--New Procedure Codes for FY 2017. In Table 6B--New
Procedure Codes, we inadvertently listed the incorrect MS-DRG
assignment for 13 ICD-10-PCS procedure codes that describe endovascular
thrombectomy procedures of the lower limb involving a bifurcation. We
are correcting the MS-DRG assignment of these 13 ICD-10-PCS codes in
Table 6B.
Table 10--New Technology Add-On Payment Thresholds for Applications
for FY 2018. We are correcting the thresholds in this table as a result
of the corrections to the operating standardized amounts discussed in
section II.B. of this correcting document.
Table 18--FY 2017 Medicare DSH Uncompensated Care Payment Factor 3
and Projected DSH Eligibility. For the FY 2017 IPPS/LTCH PPS final
rule, we published a list of hospitals that we identified to be
subsection (d) hospitals and subsection (d) Puerto Rico hospitals
eligible to receive empirically justified Medicare DSH payment
adjustments and uncompensated care payments for FY 2017. We also
published, in the Supplemental Medicare DSH File located in the FY 2017
IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule data files page at https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Feefor-Service-Payment/AcuteInpatientPPS/FY2017-IPPS-FinalRule-Home-Page-Items/FY2017-IPPSFinal-Rule-Data-Files.html, the
data used to calculate each hospital's Factor 3, total uncompensated
care payment, and estimated uncompensated care payment per discharge.
Shortly after the publication of the FY2017 IPPS/LTCH PPS final
rule, we discovered that, in calculating Factor 3 of the uncompensated
care payment methodology, we had understated the low-income insured
days of hospitals that merged after 2011 with one surviving provider
number because we inadvertently excluded the low income insured days of
acquired hospitals from the low income insured days used in the Factor
3 calculation of surviving hospitals that were projected to receive
Medicare DSH in FY 2017. In addition, we discovered that we had
calculated a Factor 3 for hospitals that have ceased operations and
erroneously calculated Factor 3 using Medicaid days reported on
Worksheet S-3 instead of Worksheet S-2 of certain hospitals' FY 2013
cost reports. We are revising Factor 3 for all hospitals to correct
these errors. These corrections to the uncompensated care payments
impacted the calculation of all the budget neutrality factors as well
as the outlier fixed-loss cost threshold for outlier payments.
In addition, we discovered that we had inadvertently excluded the
Medicaid days from the 2011 cost report for a provider as well as the
Medicaid days from the 2012 cost report for another provider from the
calculation of Factor 3. Due to technical errors by our Medicare
Administrative Contractors the Medicaid days from these cost reports
were not included in the March 2016 update of HCRIS. We projected that
both providers would be eligible to receive Medicare DSH in FY 2017.
Accordingly, we are revising Factor 3 for all hospitals to reflect
these Medicaid days; however, the impact of these revisions is too
small to affect other aspects of the IPPS ratesetting, such as the
calculation of the fixed-loss threshold for outlier payments.
We are also correcting the errors in the following LTCH PPS table
that is listed on page 57311 of the FY 2017 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule
and is available on the Internet on the CMS Web site at https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/LongTermCareHospitalPPS/ under the list item for regulation
number CMS-1655-F. The table that is available on the Internet has been
updated to reflect the revisions discussed in this correcting document.
Table 11--MS-LTC-DRGs, Relative Weights, Geometric Average Length
of Stay, Short Stay Outlier (SSO) Threshold, and ``IPPS Comparable
Threshold'' for LTCH PPS Discharges Occurring from October 1, 2016
through September 30, 2017. We are correcting this table by correcting
typographical errors for MS-LTC-DRGs 627 and 658 in the columns titled
``Relative Weight,'' ``Geometric Average Length of Stay,'' ``Short-Stay
Outlier (SSO) Threshold,'' and ``IPPS Comparable Threshold.''
III. Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking and Delay in Effective Date
We ordinarily publish a notice of proposed rulemaking in the
Federal Register to provide a period for public comment before the
provisions of a rule take effect in accordance with section 553(b) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). However, we
can waive this notice and comment procedure if the Secretary finds, for
good cause, that the notice and comment process is impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest, and incorporates a
statement of the finding and the reasons therefore in the notice.
Section 553(d) of the APA ordinarily requires a 30-day delay in the
effective date of final rules after the date of their publication in
the Federal Register. This 30-day delay in effective date can be
waived, however, if an agency finds for good cause that the delay is
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest, and the
agency incorporates a statement of the findings and its reasons in the
rule issued.
We believe that this correcting document does not constitute a rule
that would be subject to the APA notice and comment or delayed
effective date requirements. This correcting document corrects
technical and typographic errors in the preamble, addendum, payment
rates, tables, and appendices included or referenced in the FY 2017
IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule but does not make substantive changes to the
policies or payment methodologies that were adopted in the final rule.
As a result, this correcting document is intended to ensure that the
information in the FY 2017 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule accurately reflects
the policies adopted in that final rule.
In addition, even if this were a rule to which the notice and
comment procedures and delayed effective date requirements applied, we
find that there is good cause to waive such requirements. Undertaking
further notice and comment procedures to incorporate the corrections in
this document into the final rule or delaying the effective date would
be contrary to the public interest because it is in the public's
interest for providers to receive
[[Page 68950]]
appropriate payments in as timely a manner as possible, and to ensure
that the FY 2017 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule accurately reflects our
policies. Furthermore, such procedures would be unnecessary, as we are
not altering our payment methodologies or policies, but rather, we are
simply implementing correctly the policies that we previously proposed,
received comment on, and subsequently finalized. This correcting
document is intended solely to ensure that the FY 2017 IPPS/LTCH PPS
final rule accurately reflects these payment methodologies and
policies. Therefore, we believe we have good cause to waive the notice
and comment and effective date requirements.
IV. Correction of Errors
In FR Doc. 2016-18476 of August 22, 2016 (81 FR 56761), we are
making the following corrections:
A. Corrections of Errors in the Preamble
1. On page 56775, third column, second bulleted paragraph, line 25,
the figure ``$50.4 million'' is corrected to read ``$56.4 million''.
2. On page 56796--
a. Top half of the page, third column, third full paragraph,
(1) Lines 4 and 5, the phrase ``describing similar conditions'' is
corrected to read ``displayed in Table 6A--New Diagnosis Codes
associated with the proposed rule (which is available via the Internet
on the CMS Web site at: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/AcuteInpatientPPS/) that describe similar
conditions''.
(2) Lines 9 and 10, the phrase, ``18 ICD-10-CN diagnosis codes in
the following table be reassigned'' is corrected to read ``18 ICD-10-CM
diagnosis codes in the following table also be reassigned''.
b. Lower half of the page, first column, last paragraph--
(1) Lines 6 and 7, the phrase ``describing procedures performed
on'' is corrected to read ``describing conditions affecting''.
(2) Line 14, the phrase ``MS DRGs 091, 092 and 093.'' is corrected
to read ``MS-DRGs 091, 092, and 093 because they are also nervous
system codes.''
3. On page 56797, first column, first paragraph, lines 15 and 16,
the phrase ``These 18 codes also are reflected in Table 6E'' is
corrected to read ``These 18 codes are reflected in Table 6A''.
4. On page 56801, second column, second full paragraph--
a. Lines 11 and 12, the phrase ``performing such procedures because
loop'' is corrected to read ``performing such procedures because, as
noted in the FY 2017 IPPS/LTCH PPS proposed rule, loop''.
b. Lines 25 and 26, the phrase ``were not able to finalize that
specific request.'' is corrected to read ``were not able to replicate
that specific request in the ICD-9-CM based MS-DRGs.''.
c. Lines 26 through 29, the sentence ``Rather, we finalized an
alternative option, which was to change the designation for four of the
six codes requested.'' is corrected to read ``Rather, we proposed an
alternative option, which was to change the designation for four of the
six codes requested, because we believed that if we limited the change
in designation to these four codes, the change would not have any
impact.''.
d. Lines 40 through 41, the phrase ``not finalizing the proposal to
change the two'' is corrected to read ``not changing the designation of
the two''.
5. On page 56803, bottom of the page--
a. First column, last paragraph, lines 7 and 8, the phrase
``removing the 34 codes'' is corrected to read ``removing 32 of the 34
codes''.
b. Second column, first partial paragraph--
(1) Lines 5 and 6, the phrase ``34 non-lower'' is corrected to read
``32 non-lower''.
(2) Lines 8 and 9, the phrase ``These 34 non-lower'' is corrected
to read ``These 32 non-lower''.
(3) Line 13, after the phrase ``for FY 2017.'' the paragraph is
corrected by adding sentences to read as follows:
``Two of the procedure codes identified by the commenter, ICD-10-
PCS procedure codes 04CT3ZZ (Extirpation of matter from right peroneal
artery, percutaneous approach) and 04CU3ZZ (Extirpation of matter from
left peroneal artery, percutaneous approach) describe endovascular
thrombectomy of lower limbs and are not non-lower limb procedure
codes.''.
c. Third column, first full paragraph, line 11, the phrase ``34
procedure'' is corrected to read ``32 procedure''.
6. On page 56804, top of page, the table titled ``ICD-10-PCS
ENDOVASCULAR THROMBECTOMY PROCEDURE CODES REASSIGNED TO MS-DRGs 270,
271, AND 272 FOR FY 2017'' is corrected by adding the following
entries:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
04CK3Z6........................... Extirpation of Matter from Right
Femoral Artery, Bifurcation,
Percutaneous Approach.
04CL3Z6........................... Extirpation of Matter from Left
Femoral Artery, Bifurcation,
Percutaneous Approach.
04CM3Z6........................... Extirpation of Matter from Right
Popliteal Artery, Bifurcation,
Percutaneous Approach.
04CN3Z6........................... Extirpation of Matter from Left
Popliteal Artery, Bifurcation,
Percutaneous Approach.
04CP3Z6........................... Extirpation of Matter from Right
Anterior Tibial Artery,
Bifurcation, Percutaneous Approach.
04CQ3Z6........................... Extirpation of Matter from Left
Anterior Tibial Artery,
Bifurcation, Percutaneous Approach.
04CR3Z6........................... Extirpation of Matter from Right
Posterior Tibial Artery,
Bifurcation, Percutaneous Approach.
04CS3Z6........................... Extirpation of Matter from Left
Posterior Tibial Artery,
Bifurcation, Percutaneous Approach.
04CT3Z6........................... Extirpation of Matter from Right
Peroneal Artery, Bifurcation,
Percutaneous Approach.
04CT3ZZ........................... Extirpation of Matter from Right
Peroneal Artery, Percutaneous
Approach.
04CU3Z6........................... Extirpation of Matter from Left
Peroneal Artery, Bifurcation,
Percutaneous Approach.
04CU3ZZ........................... Extirpation of Matter from Left
Peroneal Artery, Percutaneous
Approach.
04CV3Z6........................... Extirpation of Matter from Right
Foot Artery, Bifurcation,
Percutaneous Approach.
04CW3Z6........................... Extirpation of Matter from Left Foot
Artery, Bifurcation, Percutaneous
Approach.
04CY3Z6........................... Extirpation of Matter from Lower
Artery, Bifurcation, Percutaneous
Approach.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. On page 56821, middle of the page--
a. Second column, first partial paragraph, line 2, the phrase
``identified 58'' is corrected to read ``identified 57''.
b. Third column, first partial paragraph, line 3, the phrase
``following 58'' is corrected to read ``following 57''.
8. On pages 56821 through 56823, in the table titled ``ICD-10-PCS
CODE PAIRS PROPOSED TO BE ADDED TO VERSION 34 ICD-10 MS-DRGs 466, 467,
and 468: PROPOSED NEW KNEE REVISION ICD-10-PCS COMBINATIONS'', the
codes (in the 4th column) for the following entries are corrected to
read as follows:
[[Page 68951]]
ICD-10-PCS Code Pairs Proposed To Be Added to Version 34 ICD-10 MS-DRGs 466, 467, and 468: Proposed New Knee
Revision ICD-10-PCS Combinations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Code Code description Code Code description
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0SPD08Z.................. Removal of Spacer from and 0SRU0J9.................. Replacement of Left Knee
Left Knee Joint, Open Joint, Femoral Surface
Approach. with Synthetic
Substitute, Cemented,
Open Approach.
0SPD38Z.................. Removal of Spacer from and 0SRU0J9.................. Replacement of Left Knee
Left Knee Joint, Joint, Femoral Surface
Percutaneous Approach. with Synthetic
Substitute, Cemented,
Open Approach.
0SPD48Z.................. Removal of Spacer from and 0SRU0J9.................. Replacement of Left Knee
Left Knee Joint, Joint, Femoral Surface
Percutaneous Endoscopic with Synthetic
Approach. Substitute, Cemented,
Open Approach.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9. On page 56823, lower half of the page--
a. First column, second paragraph, line 10, the phrase ``58 new''
is corrected to read ``57 new''.
b. Second column--
(1) First partial paragraph, line 11, the phrase ``58 new'' is
corrected to read `` new''.
(2) First full paragraph, lines 3 and 4, the phrase ``58 new'' is
corrected to read ``57 new''.
10. On page 56858, top of the page, the untitled table is corrected
by adding the following entry after line 34 (which is the entry for MDC
5, MS-DRG 262):
------------------------------------------------------------------------
MDC MS-DRG MS-DRG Title
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 265 AICD Lead Procedures.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
11. On page 56895, third column, first partial paragraph--
a. Lines 8 and 9, the phrase ``a unique ICD-10-PCS procedure code''
is corrected to read ``two unique ICD-10-PCS procedure codes''.
b. Lines 10 through 15, the sentence ``The approved procedure code
is XW0331 (Introduction of Idarucizumab, Dabigatran reversal agent into
central vein, percutaneous approach, New Technology Group 1).'' is
corrected to read ``The approved procedure codes are XW0331
(Introduction of Idarucizumab, Dabigatran reversal agent into
peripheral vein, percutaneous approach, New Technology Group 1) and
XW04331 (Introduction of Idarucizumab, Dabigatran reversal agent into
central vein, percutaneous approach, New Technology Group 1).''.
12. On page 56897, third column, third full paragraph, line 11, the
phrase ``procedure code XW03331.'' is corrected to read ``procedure
codes XW03331 and XW04331.''.
13. On page 56927--
a. Second column, last partial paragraph, line 5 the phrase ``265
hospitals'' is corrected to read ``264 hospitals''.
b. Third column, first partial paragraph, line 12, the phrase ``817
hospitals'' is corrected to read ``816 hospitals''.
14. On page 57002, bottom of the page, the table titled
``PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED AND NEWLY FINALIZED BASELINE AND PERFORMANCE
PERIODS FOR THE FY 2021 PROGRAM YEAR'' is corrected to read as follows:
Previously Adopted and Newly Finalized Baseline and Performance Periods
for the FY 2021 Program Year
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Domain Baseline period Performance period
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Clinical Care
Mortality (MORT-30-AMI, July 1, July 1,
MORT-30-HF, MORT-30-COPD) * 2011-June 30, 2016-June 30,
2014. 2019
THA/TKA *.............. April 1, April 1,
2011-March 31, 2016-March 31,
2014. 2019
MORT-30-PN (updated July 1, September
cohort). 2012-June 30, 1, 2017-June 30,
2015. 2019
Efficiency and Cost Reduction
MSPB................... January January
1, 2017-December 1, 2019-December
31, 2017. 31, 2019
Payment (AMI Payment July 1, July 1,
and HF Payment). 2012-June 30, 2017-June 30,
2015. 2019
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Previously adopted baseline and performance periods that remain
unchanged (80 FR 49562 through 49563).
15. On page 57033, first column, last paragraph, lines 2 through 4,
the web link ``https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-ServicePayment/AcuteInpatientPPS/dgme.html'' is corrected to read
``https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/AcuteInpatientPPS/dgme.html.''
16. On page 57195--
a. First column, last partial paragraph, lines 4 and 5, the phrase
``it recommended'' is corrected to read ``the commenters recommended''.
b. Third column, third full paragraph--
(1). Line 14, the phrase ``This measure'' is corrected to read
``The Drug Regimen Review Conducted with Follow-Up for Identified
Issues-PAC LTCH QRP quality measure''.
(2) Lines 23 through 25, the phrase `` and Potentially Preventable
30-Day Post-Discharge Readmission Measure for LTCH QRP,'' is corrected
to read ``, Potentially Preventable 30-Day Post-Discharge Readmission
Measure for LTCH QRP and Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary-PAC LTCH
QRP,''.
17. On page 57196, third column, first full paragraph, lines 13
through 16, the phrase ``with information more frequently, such as
unadjusted counts of potentially preventable readmissions (PPRs) and
discharge data.'' is corrected to read ``with information, such as
unadjusted counts of potentially preventable readmissions (PPRs) and
discharge data, more frequently.''
18. On page 57199, first column, second full paragraph, lines 3 and
4, the phrase ``SES or SDS status.'' is corrected to read ``SES or
SDS.''
19. On page 57211, third column, second full paragraph, line 16,
the phrase ``to discharge'' is corrected to read ``to be discharged''.
20. On page 57213--
a. Second column, last partial paragraph, lines 6 through 8, the
phrase
[[Page 68952]]
``and a SNF stay within a 30-day window, the SNF stay is a candidate to
for'' is corrected to read ``and then a SNF stay within a 30-day
window, the SNF stay is a candidate for''.
b. Third column, after the last paragraph, Footnote 280, lines 1
and 2, the measure name ``Hospital-Wide All-Cause Readmission Measure
(HWR) (CMS/Yale).'' is corrected to read ``Hospital-Wide All-Cause
Unplanned Readmission Measure (HWR) (CMS/Yale).''
21. On page 57218, third column, first full paragraph, lines 4 and
5, the phrase ``The commenter was correct in its interpretation of'' is
corrected to read ``The commenter's interpretation was correct
regarding''.
22. On page 57220, second column, second footnoted full paragraph
(Footnote 311), lines 1 through 6, the footnote ``\311\Greenwald, J.L.,
Halasyamani, L., Greene, J., LaCivita, C., et al. (2010). Making
inpatient medication reconciliation patient centered, clinically
relevant and implementable: A consensus statement on key principles and
necessary first steps. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 5(8), 477-485.''
is corrected to read ``\311\Institute of Medicine. Preventing
Medication Errors. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006.''
23. On page 57221, second column, second full paragraph, lines 3
and 4, the phrase ``cross-setting and quality measure'' is corrected to
read ``cross-setting quality measure''.
24. On page 57222--
a. Second column, first full paragraph, lines 11 and 12, the phrase
``however, the adoption of the measure'' is corrected to read
``however, the measure''.
b. Third column, first full paragraph--
(1) Line 4, the word ``facilities'' is corrected to read
``facility's''.
(2) Line 22, the phrase ``collected admission'' is corrected to
read ``collected at admission''.
25. On page 57223--
a. First column, second paragraph--
(1) Lines 1 through 4, the phrase ``Since the time of the MAP
consideration, with our measure contractor, we tested this measure in a
pilot test involving twelve PAC facilities,'' is corrected to read
``Since the time of the NQF-convened MAP consideration we have further
tested this measure in a pilot test involving twelve PAC facilities''.
(2) Lines 7 and 8, the phrase, ``record collection system'' is
corrected to read ``records system''.
b. Second column, third full paragraph, lines 9 and 10, the phrase
``PAC facility.'' is corrected to read ``PAC facility. We appreciate
MedPAC and other commenters' recommendation for a quality measure that
assesses post-discharge medication communication with primary care
providers for patients discharged to home.''
B. Correction of Errors in the Addendum
1. On page 57278, third column, fifth full paragraph,
a. Line 3, the figure ``0.999079'' is corrected to read
``0.999078''.
b. Line 9, the figure ``0.999079'' is corrected to read
``0.999078''.
2. On page 57279--
a. Second column, first full paragraph, line 9, the figure
``1.000209'' is corrected to read ``1.00021''.
b. Third column, third full paragraph, line 12, the figure
``0.988224'' is corrected to read ``0.988136''.
3. On page 57280--
a. First column, fifth full paragraph, line 4, the figure
``0.993200'' is corrected to read ``0.991987''.
b. Third column, second full paragraph,
(1) Line 3, the figure ``0.999994'' is corrected to read
``0.999997''.
(2) Line 6, the figure ``0.999994'' is corrected to read
``0.999997''.
4. On page 57286--
a. Second column, last paragraph--
(1) Line 6, the figure ``$23,570'' is corrected to read
``$23,573''.
(2) Line 8, the figure ``$83,347,416,971'' is corrected to read
``$83,364,479,923''.
(3) Line 9, the figure ``$4,479,256,519'' is corrected to read
``$4,479,256,368''.
b. Third column--
(1) First partial paragraph, line 11, the figure ``$23,570'' is
corrected to read ``$23,573''.
(2) Following the third full paragraph, the untitled table is
corrected to read as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating
standardized Capital
amounts Federal rate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
National................................ 0.948998 0.938602
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. On page 57288, middle of the page, the table titled ``CHANGE OF
FY 2016 STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS TO THE FY 2017 STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS'', is
corrected to read as follows:
Change of FY 2016 Standardized Amounts to the FY 2017 Standardized Amounts
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hospital submitted Hospital did NOT Hospital did NOT
Hospital submitted quality data and submit quality submit quality
quality data and is NOT a data and is a data and is NOT a
is a meaningful meaningful EHR meaningful EHR meaningful EHR
EHR user user user user
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2016 Base Rate after If Wage Index is If Wage Index is If Wage Index is If Wage Index is
removing: Greater Than Greater Than Greater Than Greater Than
1. FY 2016 Geographic 1.0000: 1.0000: 1.0000: 1.0000:
Reclassification Budget Labor (69.6 Labor (69.6 Labor (69.6 Labor (69.6
Neutrality (0.988169). percent): percent): percent): percent):
2. FY 2016 Rural Community $4,394.09.. $4,394.09.. $4,394.09.. $4,394.09.
Hospital Demonstration Program Nonlabor (30.4 Nonlabor (30.4 Nonlabor (30.4 Nonlabor (30.4
Budget Neutrality (0.999837). percent): percent): percent): percent):
$1,919.26.. $1,919.26.. $1,919.26.. $1,919.26.
[[Page 68953]]
3. Cumulative FY 2008, FY 2009, If Wage Index is If Wage Index is If Wage Index is If Wage Index is
FY 2012, FY 2013, FY 2014, FY less Than or less Than or less Than or less Than or
2015 and FY 2016 Documentation Equal to 1.0000: Equal to 1.0000: Equal to 1.0000: Equal to 1.0000:
and Coding Adjustments as Labor (62 Labor (62 Labor (62 Labor (62
Required under Sections percent): percent): percent): percent):
7(b)(1)(A) and 7(b)(1)(B) of $3,914.28.. $3,914.28.. $3,914.28.. $3,914.28.
Public Law 110-90 and Nonlabor (38 Nonlabor (38 Nonlabor (38 Nonlabor (38
Documentation and Coding percent): percent): percent): percent):
Recoupment Adjustment as $2,399.07.. $2,399.07.. $2,399.07.. $2,399.07.
required under Section 631 of
the American Taxpayer Relief
Act of 2012 (0.9255).
4. FY 2016 Operating Outlier
Offset (0.948998).
5. FY 2016 New Labor Market
Delineation Wage Index
Transition Budget Neutrality
Factor (0.999998).
6. FY 2017 2-Midnight Rule
Permanent Adjustment (1/0.998).
FY 2017 Update Factor........... 1.0165............ 0.99625........... 1.00975........... 0.9895.
FY 2017 MS[dash]DRG 0.999078.......... 0.999078.......... 0.999078.......... 0.999078.
Recalibration Budget Neutrality
Factor.
FY 2017 Wage Index Budget 1.00021........... 1.00021........... 1.00021........... 1.00021.
Neutrality Factor.
FY 2017 Reclassification Budget 0.988136.......... 0.988136.......... 0.988136.......... 0.988136.
Neutrality Factor.
FY 2017 Operating Outlier Factor 0.948998.......... 0.948998.......... 0.948998.......... 0.98998.
Cumulative Factor: FY 2008, FY 0.9118............ 0.9118............ 0.9118............ 0.9118.
2009, FY 2012, FY 2013, FY
2014, FY 2015, FY 2016 and FY
2017 Documentation and Coding
Adjustment as Required under
Sections 7(b)(1)(A) and
7(b)(1)(B) of Public Law 110-90
and Documentation and Coding
Recoupment Adjustment as
required under Section 631 of
the American Taxpayer Relief
Act of 2012.
FY 2017 New Labor Market 0.999997.......... 0.999997.......... 0.999997.......... 0.999997.
Delineation Wage Index 3-Year
Hold Harmless Transition Budget
Neutrality Factor.
FY 2017 2[dash]Midnight Rule One- 1.006............. 1.006............. 1.006............. 1.006.
Time Prospective Increase.
National Standardized Amount for Labor: $3,839.23.. Labor: $3,762.75.. Labor: $3,8143.74. Labor: $3,737.25.
FY 2017 if Wage Index is Nonlabor: Nonlabor: Nonlabor: Nonlabor:
Greater Than 1.0000; Labor/Non- $1,676.91. $1,643.50. $1,665.77. $1,632.37.
Labor Share Percentage (69.6/
30.4).
[[Page 68954]]
National Standardized Amount for Labor: $3,420.01.. Labor: $3,351.88.. Labor: $3,397.30.. Labor: $3,329.16.
FY 2017 if Wage Index is less Nonlabor: Nonlabor: Nonlabor: Nonlabor:
Than or Equal to 1.0000; Labor/ $2,096.13. $2,054.37. $2,082.21. $2,040.46.
Non-Labor Share Percentage (62/
38).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. On page 57291--
a. First column, second full paragraph, line 15, the figure
``0.999079'' is corrected to read ``0.999078''.
b. Third column, first full paragraph line 6, the figure ``1.84''
is corrected to read ``1.83''.
7. On page 57293, third column--
a. First partial paragraph--
(1) Line 1, the figure ``0.9995'' is corrected to read ``0.9994''.
(2) Line 4, ``0.9855'' is corrected to read ``0.9854''.
b. First full paragraph, line 16, the figure ``0.9851'' is
corrected to read ``0.9850''.
c. Last paragraph--
(1) Line 2, the figure ``0.9991''is corrected to read ``0.9990''.
(2) Line 4, ``0.9995'' is corrected to read ``0.9994''.
8. On page 57294--
a. Top of the page--
(1) Second column--
(a) First full paragraph, line 17, the figure ``$446.81'' is
corrected to read ``$446.79''.
(b) Second bulleted paragraph, line 6, the figure ``0.9991'' is
corrected to read ``0.9990''.
(2) Third column, second full paragraph--
(a) Line 13, the figure, ``0.09'' is corrected to read ``0.10''.
(b) Line 26, the figure, ``1.84'' is corrected to read ``1.832''.
b. Bottom of the page, the table titled ``COMPARISON OF FACTORS AND
ADJUSTMENTS: FY 2016 CAPITAL FEDERAL RATE AND FY 2017 CAPITAL FEDERAL
RATE'' is corrected to read as follows:
Comparison of Factors and Adjustments: FY 2016 Capital Federal Rate and FY 2017 Capital Federal Rate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percent change
FY 2016 FY 2017 Change \3\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Update Factor \1\............................... 1.0130 1.009 1.009 0.9
GAF/DRG Adjustment Factor \1\................... 0.9976 0.9990 0.9990 -0.10
Outlier Adjustment Factor \2\................... 0.9365 0.9386 1.0022 0.22
Permanent 2-midnight Policy Adjustment Factor... N/A 1.002 1.002 0.2
One-Time 2-midnight Policy Adjustment Factor.... N/A 1.006 1.006 0.6
Capital Federal Rate............................ $438.75 $446.79 1.0183 1.83
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The update factor and the GAF/DRG budget neutrality adjustment factors are built permanently into the
capital Federal rates. Thus, for example, the incremental change from FY 2016 to FY 2017 resulting from the
application of the 0.9990 GAF/DRG budget neutrality adjustment factor for FY 2017 is a net change of 0.9990
(or -0.10 percent).
\2\ The outlier reduction factor is not built permanently into the capital Federal rate; that is, the factor is
not applied cumulatively in determining the capital Federal rate. Thus, for example, the net change resulting
from the application of the FY 2017 outlier adjustment factor is 0.9386/0.9365, or 1.0022 (or 0.22 percent).
\3\ Sum of individual changes may not match percent change in capital rate due to rounding.
9. On page 57295--
a. The top of the page, the table titled ``COMPARISON OF FACTORS
AND ADJUSTMENTS: PROPOSED FY 2017 CAPITAL FEDERAL RATE AND FINAL FY
2017 CAPITAL FEDERAL RATE'' is corrected to read as follows:
Comparison of Factors and Adjustments: Proposed FY 2017 Capital Federal Rate and Final FY 2017 Capital Federal
Rate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed FY
2017 Final FY 2017 Change Percent change
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Update Factor \1\............................... 1.0090 1.0090 1.0000 0.00
GAF/DRG Adjustment Factor \1\................... 0.9993 0.9990 0.9997 -0.03
Outlier Adjustment Factor \2\................... 0.9374 0.9386 1.0013 0.13
Permanent 2-midnight Policy Adjustment Factor... 1.002 1.002 1.000 0.00
One-Time 2-midnight Policy Adjustment Factor.... 1.006 1.006 1.000 0.00
Capital Federal Rate............................ $446.35 $446.79 1.0010 0.10
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
b. Lower three-fourths of the page, first column, second paragraph,
line 21, the figure, ``$23,570.'' is corrected to read ``$23,573.''
10. On page 57307, second column, first full paragraph--
a. Line 15, the figure ``$23,570'' is corrected to read
``$23,573''.
b. Line 35, the figure ``$23,570'' is corrected to read
``$23,573''.
11. On page 57312--
a. Top of the page--
[[Page 68955]]
(1) Table 1A titled ``NATIONAL ADJUSTED OPERATING STANDARDIZED
AMOUNTS, LABOR/NONLABOR (69.6 PERCENT LABOR SHARE/30.4 PERCENT NONLABOR
SHARE IF WAGE INDEX IS GREATER THAN 1)--FY 2017'' is corrected to read
as follows:
Table 1A--National Adjusted Operating Standardized Amounts, Labor/Nonlabor (69.6 Percent Labor Share/30.4 Percent Nonlabor Share if Wage Index Is
Greater Than 1)--FY 2017
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hospital submitted quality data and is Hospital submitted quality data and Hospital did NOT submit quality data Hospital did NOT submit quality data
a meaningful EHR user (update = 1.65 is NOT a meaningful EHR user and is a meaningful EHR user and is NOT a meaningful EHR user
percent) (update = -0.375 percent) (update = 0.975 percent) (update = -1.05 percent)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Labor Nonlabor Labor Nonlabor Labor Nonlabor Labor Nonlabor
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$3,839.23 $1,677.91 $3,762.75 $1,643.50 $3,813.74 $1,665.77 $3,737.25 $1,632.37
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Table 1B titled ``NATIONAL ADJUSTED OPERATING STANDARDIZED
AMOUNTS, LABOR/NONLABOR (62 PERCENT LABOR SHARE/38 PERCENT NONLABOR
SHARE IF WAGE INDEX IS LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 1)--FY 2017'' is corrected
to read as follows:
Table 1B--National Adjusted Operating Standardized Amounts, Labor/Nonlabor (62 Percent Labor Share/38 Percent Nonlabor Share if Wage Index Is Less Than
or Equal to 1)--FY 2017
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hospital submitted quality data and is Hospital submitted quality data and Hospital did NOT submit quality data Hospital did NOT submit quality data
a meaningful EHR user (update = 1.65 is NOT a meaningful EHR user (update and is a meaningful EHR user (update and is NOT a meaningful EHR user
percent) = -0.375 percent) = 0.975 percent) (update = -1.05 percent)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Labor Nonlabor Labor Nonlabor Labor Nonlabor Labor Nonlabor
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$3,420.01 $2,096.13 $3,351.88 $2,054.37 $3,397.30 $2,082.21 $3,329.16 $2,040.46
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
b. Middle of the page--
(1) Table 1C titled ``ADJUSTED OPERATING STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS FOR
HOSPITALS IN PUERTO RICO, LABOR/NONLABOR (NATIONAL: 62 PERCENT LABOR
SHARE/38 PERCENT NONLABOR SHARE BECAUSE WAGE INDEX IS LESS THAN OR
EQUAL TO 1);--FY 2017'' is corrected to read as follows:
Table 1C--Adjusted Operating Standardized Amounts for Hospitals in Puerto Rico, Labor/Nonlabor (National: 62
Percent Labor Share/38 Percent Nonlabor Share Because Wage Index Is Less Than or Equal to 1)--FY 2017
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rates if wage index is greater than 1 Rates if wage index is less than
-------------------------------------------- or equal to 1
Standardized amount ---------------------------------
Labor Nonlabor Labor Nonlabor
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
National \1\...................... Not Applicable...... Not Applicable...... $3,420.01 $2,096.13
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For FY 2017, there are no CBSAs in Puerto Rico with a national wage index greater than 1.
(2) Table 1D titled ``CAPITAL STANDARD FEDERAL PAYMENT RATE--FY
2017'' is corrected as follows:
Table 1D--Capital Standard Federal Payment Rate--FY 2017
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
National............................................... $446.79
------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Corrections of Errors in the Appendices
1. On page 57312, bottom of the page, third column, first partial
paragraph,
a. Line 8, the figure ``$987'' is corrected to read ``$990''.
b. Line 10, the figure ``$66'' is corrected to read ``$72''.
2. On page 57315, upper three-fourths of the page--
a. Second column, third full paragraph,
(1) Line 7, the figure ``1,380'' is corrected to read ``1,369''.
(2) Line 9, the figure ``1,135'' is corrected to read ``1,146''.
b. Third column, first full paragraph, line 13--
(1) The figure ``1,372'' is corrected to read ``1,369''.
(2) The figure ``1,150'' is corrected to read ``1,153''.
3. On pages 57315 through 57317, the table titled ``TABLE I--IMPACT
ANALYSIS OF CHANGES TO THE IPPS FOR OPERATING COSTS FOR FY 2017'' is
corrected to read as follows:
[[Page 68956]]
Table I--Impact Analysis of Changes to the IPPS for Operating Costs for FY 2017
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2017 FY 2017 Wage Rural and
weights and data under new imputed floor
Hospital rate DRG changes CBSA with Application of the
Number of update and with designations FY 2017 MGCRB application of frontier wage All FY 2017
hospitals documentation application of with reclassifications national rural index and changes
\1\ and coding recalibration application of and imputed out[dash]migration
adjustment budget wage budget floor budget adjustment
neutrality neutrality neutrality
........... (1) \2\ (2) \3\ (3) \4\ (4) \5\ (5) \6\ (6) \7\ (7) \8\
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All Hospitals.................................................. 3,330 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.9
By Geographic Location:
Urban hospitals................................................ 2,515 0.9 0.0 0.0 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.9
Large urban areas.......................................... 1,369 0.9 0.1 0.0 -0.3 -0.1 0.0 0.9
Other urban areas.......................................... 1,146 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 1.0
Rural hospitals................................................ 815 1.6 -0.4 0.1 1.3 -0.2 0.1 1.2
Bed Size (Urban):
0-99 beds.................................................. 659 0.9 -0.2 0.2 -0.5 0.1 0.2 0.9
100-199 beds............................................... 767 1.0 -0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.7
200-299 beds............................................... 446 1.0 -0.1 -0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.8
300-499 beds............................................... 431 1.0 0.1 0.0 -0.2 0.1 0.2 0.9
500 or more beds........................................... 212 0.9 0.2 0.0 -0.2 -0.2 0.0 1.1
Bed Size (Rural):
0-49 beds.................................................. 317 1.5 -0.5 0.1 0.2 -0.2 0.3 1.0
50-99 beds................................................. 292 1.8 -0.6 0.1 0.8 -0.2 0.1 1.2
100-149 beds............................................... 120 1.6 -0.4 0.0 1.5 -0.2 0.2 1.0
150-199 beds............................................... 46 1.7 -0.2 0.2 1.7 -0.3 0.0 1.3
200 or more beds........................................... 40 1.6 -0.1 0.2 2.5 -0.3 0.0 1.5
Urban by Region:
New England................................................ 116 0.8 0.0 -0.5 1.1 0.9 0.1 -0.4
Middle Atlantic............................................ 315 0.9 0.1 -0.1 0.8 -0.2 0.1 0.9
South Atlantic............................................. 407 1.0 0.0 -0.2 -0.5 -0.3 0.1 0.9
East North Central......................................... 390 0.9 0.0 -0.1 -0.2 -0.4 0.0 1.0
East South Central......................................... 147 1.0 0.0 -0.1 -0.4 -0.3 0.0 1.2
West North Central......................................... 163 1.1 0.1 -0.1 -0.8 -0.4 0.7 1.0
West South Central......................................... 385 0.9 0.0 0.2 -0.5 -0.4 0.0 1.2
Mountain................................................... 163 1.1 0.0 0.1 -0.3 1.2 0.2 2.2
Pacific.................................................... 378 0.9 0.0 0.4 -0.4 1.0 0.1 0.5
Puerto Rico................................................ 51 0.9 0.1 -0.5 -1.0 0.1 0.1 0.3
Rural by Region:
New England................................................ 21 1.3 -0.2 0.3 1.4 -0.3 0.2 1.6
Middle Atlantic............................................ 54 1.7 -0.4 0.1 0.8 -0.2 0.1 1.6
South Atlantic............................................. 128 1.7 -0.5 -0.1 2.3 -0.3 0.1 1.0
East North Central......................................... 115 1.7 -0.4 0.0 1.0 -0.2 0.1 1.2
East South Central......................................... 155 1.1 -0.3 0.4 2.2 -0.4 0.1 1.0
West North Central......................................... 98 2.2 -0.4 0.0 0.2 -0.1 0.3 1.5
West South Central......................................... 160 1.5 -0.4 0.4 1.3 -0.3 0.1 1.2
Mountain................................................... 60 1.7 -0.4 0.1 0.2 -0.1 0.2 1.3
Pacific.................................................... 24 1.9 -0.4 -0.3 1.3 -0.1 0.0 1.3
By Payment Classification: 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Urban hospitals............................................ 2,522 0.9 0.0 0.0 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.9
Large urban areas.......................................... 1,369 0.9 0.1 0.0 -0.3 -0.1 0.0 0.9
Other urban areas.......................................... 1,153 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 1.0
Rural areas................................................ 808 1.6 -0.4 0.1 1.4 -0.2 0.1 1.2
Teaching Status:
Nonteaching................................................ 2,266 1.1 -0.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.8
Fewer than 100 residents................................... 815 1.0 0.0 0.0 -0.1 0.0 0.2 0.9
100 or more residents...................................... 249 0.9 0.2 0.0 -0.1 -0.2 0.0 1.1
Urban DSH:
Non-DSH.................................................... 589 0.9 -0.1 -0.2 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.8
100 or more beds........................................... 1,642 0.9 0.1 0.0 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.9
Less than 100 beds......................................... 363 1.0 -0.3 0.0 -0.5 0.1 0.1 0.7
Rural DSH:
SCH........................................................ 240 2.0 -0.6 0.1 0.1 -0.1 0.0 1.4
RRC........................................................ 325 1.7 -0.3 0.1 1.8 -0.2 0.0 1.3
100 or more beds........................................... 29 0.9 -0.4 0.1 2.9 -0.4 0.1 0.5
Less than 100 beds......................................... 142 0.8 -0.4 0.2 1.3 -0.4 0.7 0.2
Urban teaching and DSH:
Both teaching and DSH...................................... 898 0.9 0.1 0.0 -0.2 -0.1 0.1 1.0
Teaching and no DSH........................................ 109 0.9 0.0 -0.1 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.7
No teaching and DSH........................................ 1,107 1.0 -0.1 0.1 -0.1 0.3 0.1 0.8
No teaching and no DSH..................................... 408 0.9 -0.1 -0.2 -0.4 0.0 0.2 0.9
Special Hospital Types:
RRC........................................................ 189 0.8 -0.1 0.1 1.9 0.0 0.5 1.2
SCH........................................................ 324 2.1 -0.3 -0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7
MDH........................................................ 148 1.7 -0.6 0.0 0.6 -0.1 0.1 1.3
SCH and RRC................................................ 126 2.2 -0.3 0.1 0.4 -0.1 0.0 1.8
MDH and RRC................................................ 12 2.1 -0.6 -0.1 1.3 -0.2 0.0 2.2
Type of Ownership:
Voluntary.................................................. 1,927 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.9
Proprietary................................................ 881 1.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.9
Government................................................. 522 1.0 0.0 -0.1 -0.2 0.0 0.1 0.9
[[Page 68957]]
Medicare Utilization as a Percent of Inpatient Days:
0-25....................................................... 523 0.8 0.1 0.1 -0.3 0.2 0.0 1.1
25-50...................................................... 2,122 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.1 0.1 0.9
50-65...................................................... 545 1.2 -0.2 -0.1 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.9
Over 65.................................................... 89 1.2 -0.3 0.3 -0.4 0.2 0.2 1.0
FY 2017 Reclassifications by the Medicare Geographic
Classification Review Board:
All Reclassified Hospitals................................. 791 1.1 -0.1 0.0 2.3 -0.2 0.0 0.9
Non-Reclassified Hospitals................................. 2,539 1.0 0.0 0.0 -0.8 0.1 0.1 0.9
Urban Hospitals Reclassified............................... 532 1.0 0.0 -0.1 2.3 -0.1 0.0 0.9
Urban Nonreclassified Hospitals............................ 1,936 0.9 0.1 0.0 -0.9 0.1 0.1 0.9
Rural Hospitals Reclassified Full Year..................... 277 1.7 -0.3 0.1 2.2 -0.2 0.0 1.3
Rural Nonreclassified Hospitals Full Year.................. 489 1.6 -0.4 0.2 -0.2 -0.2 0.3 1.1
All Section 401 Reclassified Hospitals:.................... 72 1.7 -0.2 0.0 0.3 -0.1 0.9 1.5
Other Reclassified Hospitals (Section 1886(d)(8)(B))....... 48 1.2 -0.4 0.1 3.1 -0.4 0.0 0.8
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Because data necessary to classify some hospitals by category were missing, the total number of hospitals in each category may not equal the national total. Discharge data are from FY
2015, and hospital cost report data are from reporting periods beginning in FY 2012 and FY 2013.
\2\ This column displays the payment impact of the hospital rate update and other adjustments including the 1.65 percent adjustment to the national standardized amount and hospital-specific
rate (the estimated 2.7 percent market basket update reduced by 0.3 percentage points for the multifactor productivity adjustment and the 0.75 percentage point reduction under the Affordable
Care Act), the -1.5 percent documentation and coding adjustment to the national standardized amount and the adjustment of (1/0.998) to permanently remove the -0.2 percent reduction, and the
1.006 temporary adjustment to address the effects of the 0.2 percent reduction in effect for FYs 2014 through 2016 related to the 2-midnight policy.
\3\ This column displays the payment impact of the changes to the Version 34 GROUPER, the changes to the relative weights and the recalibration of the MS DRG weights based on FY 2015 MedPAR
data in accordance with section 1886(d)(4)(C)(iii) of the Act. This column displays the application of the recalibration budget neutrality factor of 0.999078 in accordance with section
1886(d)(4)(C)(iii) of the Act.
\4\ This column displays the payment impact of the update to wage index data using FY 2013 cost report data and the OMB labor market area delineations based on 2010 Decennial Census data. This
column displays the payment impact of the application of the wage budget neutrality factor, which is calculated separately from the recalibration budget neutrality factor, and is calculated
in accordance with section 1886(d)(3)(E)(i) of the Act. The wage budget neutrality factor is 1.000210.
\5\ Shown here are the effects of geographic reclassifications by the Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board (MGCRB) along with the effects of the continued implementation of the new
OMB labor market area delineations on these reclassifications. The effects demonstrate the FY 2017 payment impact of going from no reclassifications to the reclassifications scheduled to be
in effect for FY 2017. Reclassification for prior years has no bearing on the payment impacts shown here. This column reflects the geographic budget neutrality factor of 0.988136.
\6\ This column displays the effects of the rural and imputed floor based on the continued implementation of the new OMB labor market area delineations. The Affordable Care Act requires the
rural floor budget neutrality adjustment to be 100 percent national level adjustment. The rural floor budget neutrality factor (which includes the imputed floor) applied to the wage index is
0.991987. This column also shows the effect of the 3-year transition for hospitals that were located in urban counties that became rural under the new OMB delineations or hospitals deemed
urban where the urban area became rural under the new OMB delineations, with a budget neutrality factor of 0.999997.
\7\ This column shows the combined impact of the policy required under section 10324 of the Affordable Care Act that hospitals located in frontier States have a wage index no less than 1.0 and
of section 1886(d)(13) of the Act, as added by section 505 of Public Law 108-173, which provides for an increase in a hospital's wage index if a threshold percentage of residents of the
county where the hospital is located commute to work at hospitals in counties with higher wage indexes. These are not budget neutral policies.
\8\ This column shows the estimated change in payments from FY 2016 to FY 2017.
4. On page 57319,
a. First column, second full paragraph,
(1) Line 6, the figure ``0.988224'' is corrected to read
``0.988136''.
(2) Line 13, the figure ``1.4'' is corrected to read ``1.3''.
b. Second column--
(1) First full paragraph--
(a) Line 8, the figure ``0.9930'' is corrected to read
``0.991987''.
(b) Line 9, the figure ``0.7'' is corrected to read ``0.8''.
(2) Third full paragraph--
(a) Line 1, the figure ``397'' is corrected to read ``436''.
(b) Line 5--
(1) The figure ``0.9930'' is corrected to read ``0.991987''.
(2) The figure ``0.7'' is corrected to read ``0.8''.
(c) Line 23, the figure ``1.0'' is corrected to read ``0.9''.
(d) Line 31, the figure ``$24'' is corrected to read ``$22''.
(e) Line 33, the figure ``0.7'' is corrected to read ``0.6''.
c. Third column--
(1) First full paragraph,
(a) Line 7, the figure ``$10'' is corrected to read ``$6.4''.
(b) Line 18, the figure ``$17'' is corrected to read ``$18''.
(2) Second full paragraph, line 28, the figure ``0.999994'' is
corrected to read ``0.999997''.
5. On page 57320, the table titled ``FY 2017 IPPS Estimated
Payments Due to Rural Floor and Imputed Floor with National Budget
Neutrality'' is corrected to read as follows:
[[Page 68958]]
FY 2017 IPPS Estimated Payments Due to Rural and Imputed Floor With National Budget Neutrality
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percent change in
Number of payments due to
hospitals that application of
State Number of will receive the rural floor and Difference (in $
hospitals rural floor or imputed floor millions)
imputed floor with budget
neutrality
(1) (2) (3) (4)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama............................. 83 6 -0.3 -6
Alaska.............................. 6 4 2.1 4
Arizona............................. 57 46 3.5 63
Arkansas............................ 44 0 -0.4 -4
California.......................... 301 186 1.3 131
Colorado............................ 48 3 0.2 3
Connecticut......................... 31 8 0.2 4
Delaware............................ 6 2 0 0
Washington, DC...................... 7 0 -0.4 -1
Florida............................. 171 16 -0.3 -2
Georgia............................. 105 0 -0.4 -18
Hawaii.............................. 12 0 -0.3 -10
Idaho............................... 14 0 -0.3 -1
Illinois............................ 126 3 -0.4 -1
Indiana............................. 89 0 -0.4 -19
Iowa................................ 35 0 -0.4 -11
Kansas.............................. 53 0 -0.3 -4
Kentucky............................ 65 0 -0.4 -3
Louisiana........................... 95 2 -0.4 -6
Maine............................... 18 0 -0.4 -5
Massachusetts....................... 58 15 0.6 -2
Michigan............................ 95 0 -0.4 22
Minnesota........................... 49 0 -0.3 -18
Mississippi......................... 62 0 -0.4 -6
Missouri............................ 74 2 -0.3 -4
Montana............................. 12 4 0.3 -8
Nebraska............................ 26 0 -0.3 1
Nevada.............................. 24 3 -0.2 -2
New Hampshire....................... 13 9 2.2 -2
New Jersey.......................... 64 18 0.2 11
New Mexico.......................... 25 0 -0.3 6
New York............................ 154 21 -0.3 -1
North Carolina...................... 84 1 -0.4 -20
North Dakota........................ 6 1 -0.3 -12
Ohio................................ 130 10 -0.4 -1
Oklahoma............................ 86 2 -0.3 -13
Oregon.............................. 34 2 -0.4 -4
Pennsylvania........................ 151 5 -0.4 -4
Puerto Rico......................... 51 12 0.1 -20
Rhode Island........................ 11 10 4.7 0
South Carolina...................... 57 5 -0.1 18
South Dakota........................ 18 0 -0.2 -2
Tennessee........................... 92 20 -0.3 -1
Texas............................... 320 3 -0.4 -7
Utah................................ 33 1 -0.3 -26
Vermont............................. 6 0 -0.2 -2
Virginia............................ 76 1 -0.3 -1
Washington.......................... 49 6 -0.1 -8
West Virginia....................... 29 3 -0.2 -1
Wisconsin........................... 65 6 -0.3 -5
Wyoming............................. 10 0 -0.1 0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. On page 57321, second column, first partial paragraph --
a Line 1, the figure ``277'' is corrected to read ``278''.
b Line 7, the figure ``1.0'' is corrected to read ``0.9''.
7. On pages 57321 through 57323, the table titled ``TABLE II--
IMPACT ANALYSIS OF CHANGES FOR FY 2017 ACUTE CARE HOSPITAL OPERATING
PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM [PAYMENTS PER DISCHARGE]'' is corrected to
read as follows:
[[Page 68959]]
Table II--Impact Analysis of Changes for FY 2017 Acute Care Hospital Operating Prospective Payment System
[Payments per discharge]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Estimated
Number of average FY average FY FY 2017
hospitals 2016 payment 2017 payment changes
per discharge per discharge
(1) (2) (3) (4)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All Hospitals................................... 3,330 $11,542 $11,649 0.9
By Geographic Location:
Urban hospitals............................. 2,515 11,890 11,997 0.9
Large urban areas........................... 1,369 12,690 12,799 0.9
Other urban areas........................... 1,146 10,946 11,051 1.0
Rural hospitals............................. 815 8,602 8,707 1.2
Bed Size (Urban):
0-99 beds................................... 659 9,392 9,478 0.9
100-199 beds................................ 767 10,050 10,117 0.7
200-299 beds................................ 446 10,757 10,840 0.8
300-499 beds................................ 431 12,092 12,202 0.9
500 or more beds............................ 212 14,613 14,772 1.1
Bed Size (Rural):
0-49 beds................................... 317 7,208 7,279 1.0
50-99 beds.................................. 292 8,192 8,292 1.2
100-149 beds................................ 120 8,434 8,519 1.0
150-199 beds................................ 46 9,243 9,367 1.3
200 or more beds............................ 40 10,171 10,320 1.5
Urban by Region:
New England................................. 116 12,957 12,901 -0.4
Middle Atlantic............................. 315 13,471 13,593 0.9
South Atlantic.............................. 407 10,498 10,595 0.9
East North Central.......................... 390 11,190 11,303 1.0
East South Central.......................... 147 10,042 10,160 1.2
West North Central.......................... 163 11,578 11,692 1.0
West South Central.......................... 385 10,693 10,820 1.2
Mountain.................................... 163 12,279 12,549 2.2
Pacific..................................... 378 15,372 15,452 0.5
Puerto Rico................................. 51 8,491 8,513 0.3
Rural by Region:
New England................................. 21 11,818 12,009 1.6
Middle Atlantic............................. 54 8,655 8,791 1.6
South Atlantic.............................. 128 8,043 8,122 1.0
East North Central.......................... 115 8,918 9,023 1.2
East South Central.......................... 155 7,639 7,716 1.0
West North Central.......................... 98 9,420 9,560 1.5
West South Central.......................... 160 7,243 7,328 1.2
Mountain.................................... 60 10,100 10,228 1.3
Pacific..................................... 24 12,045 12,197 1.3
By Payment Classification:
Urban hospitals............................. 2,522 11,886 11,993 0.9
Large urban areas........................... 1,369 12,690 12,799 0.9
Other urban areas........................... 1,153 10,940 11,046 1.0
Rural areas................................. 808 8,602 8,706 1.2
Teaching Status:
Nonteaching................................. 2,266 9,600 9,680 0.8
Fewer than 100 residents.................... 815 11,133 11,231 0.9
100 or more residents....................... 249 16,764 16,949 1.1
Urban DSH:
Non-DSH..................................... 589 10,055 10,140 0.8
100 or more beds............................ 1,642 12,247 12,359 0.9
Less than 100 beds.......................... 363 8,853 8,914 0.7
Rural DSH:
SCH......................................... 240 8,584 8,702 1.4
RRC......................................... 325 9,006 9,123 1.3
100 or more beds............................ 29 7,018 7,054 0.5
Less than 100 beds.......................... 142 6,823 6,838 0.2
Urban teaching and DSH:
Both teaching and DSH....................... 898 13,344 13,474 1.0
Teaching and no DSH......................... 109 11,361 11,442 0.7
No teaching and DSH......................... 1,107 10,047 10,124 0.8
No teaching and no DSH...................... 408 9,455 9,539 0.9
Special Hospital Types:
RRC......................................... 189 9,709 9,824 1.2
[[Page 68960]]
SCH......................................... 324 10,344 10,516 1.7
MDH......................................... 148 7,321 7,415 1.3
SCH and RRC................................. 126 10,767 10,957 1.8
MDH and RRC................................. 12 8,822 9,019 2.2
Type of Ownership:
Voluntary................................... 1,927 11,719 11,830 0.9
Proprietary................................. 881 10,130 10,218 0.9
Government.................................. 522 12,485 12,596 0.9
Medicare Utilization as a Percent of Inpatient
Days:
0-25........................................ 523 14,996 15,160 1.1
25-50....................................... 2,122 11,460 11,562 0.9
50-65....................................... 545 9,343 9,431 0.9
Over 65..................................... 89 6,948 7,019 1.0
FY 2017 Reclassifications by the Medicare
Geographic Classification Review Board:
All Reclassified Hospitals.................. 791 11,399 11,507 0.9
Non-Reclassified Hospitals.................. 2,539 11,595 11,701 0.9
Urban Hospitals Reclassified................ 532 12,008 12,115 0.9
Urban Nonreclassified Hospitals............. 1,936 11,849 11,955 0.9
Rural Hospitals Reclassified Full Year...... 277 8,984 9,101 1.3
Rural Nonreclassified Hospitals Full Year... 489 8,173 8,266 1.1
All Section 401 Reclassified Hospitals...... 72 11,307 11,474 1.5
Other Reclassified Hospitals (Section 48 7,889 7,954 0.8
1886(d)(8)(B)).............................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. On page 57324, top of the page, third column, last paragraph,
line 1, the figure ``2,426'' is corrected to read ``2,419''.
8. On pages 57324 and 57325, the table titled ``Modeled
Disproportionate Share Hospital Payments for Estimated FY 2017 DSHs by
Hospital Type: Model DSH $ (In Millions) From FY 2016 to FY 2017'' is
corrected to read as follows:
Modeled Disproportionate Share Hospital Payments for Estimated FY 2017 DSHS by Hospital Type: Model DSH $ (in
Millions) From FY 2016 to FY 2017
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2016 final FY 2017 final Dollar
Number of rule estimated rule estimated difference: FY Percent change
DSHs (FY 2017) DSH $ * (in DSH $ * (in 2017- FY 2016 **
millions) millions) (in millions)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total........................... 2,419 $9,767 $9,551 -$216 -2.2
By Geographic Location:
Urban Hospitals............. 1,921 9,294 9,106 -188 -2.0
Large Urban Areas....... 1,045 5,885 5,765 -120 -2.0
Other Urban Areas....... 876 3,408 3,341 -68 -2.0
Rural Hospitals............. 498 473 445 -28 -5.9
Bed Size (Urban):
0 to 99 Beds................ 336 189 185 -4 -2.2
100 to 249 Beds............. 837 2,211 2,154 -57 -2.6
250+ Beds................... 748 6,894 6,767 -127 -1.8
Bed Size (Rural):
0 to 99 Beds................ 368 206 190 -16 -7.8
100 to 249 Beds............. 116 211 199 -12 -5.5
250+ Beds................... 14 56 56 0 -0.2
Urban by Region:
East North Central.......... 322 1,273 1,252 -22 -1.7
East South Central.......... 129 574 566 -8 -1.4
Middle Atlantic............. 232 1,614 1,570 -44 -2.7
Mountain.................... 125 448 448 0 -0.1
New England................. 90 394 385 -9 -2.4
Pacific..................... 312 1,459 1,448 -10 -0.7
Puerto Rico................. 41 104 116 12 11.3
[[Page 68961]]
South Atlantic.............. 314 1,777 1,721 -56 -3.2
West North Central.......... 104 451 439 -11 -2.5
West South Central.......... 252 1,200 1,161 -39 -3.2
Rural by Region:
East North Central.......... 64 49 44 -4 -8.3
East South Central.......... 141 149 141 -8 -5.3
Middle Atlantic............. 28 34 33 -1 -2.4
Mountain.................... 21 16 15 0 -0.2
New England................. 11 15 16 1 7.2
Pacific..................... 7 9 7 -3 -27.4
South Atlantic.............. 86 98 92 -6 -6.4
West North Central.......... 31 20 19 -1 -6.3
West South Central.......... 109 83 78 -6 -7.0
By Payment Classification:
Urban Hospitals............. 1,886 9,243 9,055 -188 -2.0
Large Urban Areas....... 1,043 5,884 5,764 -120 -2.0
Other Urban Areas....... 843 3,359 3,292 -68 -2.0
Rural Hospitals............. 533 523 496 -28 -5.3
Teaching Status:
Nonteaching................. 1,544 3,117 3,053 -64 -2.1
Fewer than 100 residents.... 637 3,213 3,132 -81 -2.5
100 or more residents....... 238 3,437 3,366 -71 -2.1
Type of Ownership:
Voluntary................... 1,405 6,044 5,913 -131 -2.2
Proprietary................. 541 1,672 1,629 -43 -2.6
Government.................. 471 2,023 1,983 -40 -2.0
Unknown..................... 2 27 25 -2 -6.1
Medicare Utilization Percent:
Missing or Unknown.......... 4 1 1 0 0.9
0 to 25..................... 428 3,013 2,974 -39 -1.3
25 to 50.................... 1,617 6,356 6,189 -166 -2.6
50 to 65.................... 319 385 375 -10 -2.5
Greater than 65............. 51 12 11 -1 -8.2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: Dobson [bond] DaVanzo analysis of 2011-2013 Hospital Cost Reports.
* Dollar DSH calculated by [0.25 * estimated section 1886(d)(5)(F) payments] + [0.75 * estimated section
1886(d)(5)(F) payments * Factor 2 * Factor 3]. When summed across all hospitals projected to receive DSH
payments, DSH payments are estimated to be $9,767 million in FY 2016 and $9,551 million in FY 2017.
** Percentage change is determined as the difference between Medicare DSH payments modeled for the FY 2017 IPPS/
LTCH PPS final rule (column 3) and Medicare DSH payments modeled for the FY 2016 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule
(column 2) divided by Medicare DSH payments modeled for the FY 2016 final rule (column 2) times 100 percent.
9. On page 57325, bottom of the page, third column, last paragraph,
line 8, the figure ``6.4'' is corrected to read ``5.9''.
10. On page 57326, first column--
a. First partial paragraph--
(1) Line 7 the figure ``5.2'' is corrected to read ``5.5''.
(2) Line 8, the figure ``5.9'' is corrected to read ``0.2''.
b. First full paragraph, line 12, the figure ``11.4'' is corrected
to read ``11.3''.
c. Third full paragraph (last paragraph)--
(1) Line 12, the figure ``11.4'' is corrected to read ``11.3''.
(2) Line 18, the figure ``$9.5 million'' is corrected to read
``$9.4 million''.
11. On page 57330, third column--
a. Fourth bulleted paragraph, line 4, the figure ``0.9991'' is
corrected to read ``0.9990''.
b. Last paragraph, line 6, the figure ``1.84'' is corrected to read
``1.83''.
12. On page 57331, top half of the page--
a. First column--
(1) First partial paragraph--
(a) Line 1, the phrase ``Less than half of the hospitals'' is
corrected to read ``Most of the hospitals''.
(b) Lines 4 through 6, the phrase ``the effects of changes to the
GAFs, while the remainder of these urban area hospitals would
experience no change or a decrease in'' is corrected to read ``the
effects of changes to the GAFs, while hospitals in one urban area are
expected to experience a decrease in''.
(c) Line 11, the phrase ``except for two rural areas where changes
in'' is corrected to read, ``except for one rural area where changes
in''.
(2) Third paragraph, lines 8 and line 9, the phrase ``0.7 percent,
while hospitals in rural areas, on average, are expected to experience
a 0.8'' is corrected to read ``0.7 percent, and hospitals in rural
areas, on average, are also expected to experience a 0.7''.
b. Second column--
(1) First partial paragraph, lines 2 through 6, the sentence ``The
primary factor contributing to the small difference in the projected
increase in capital IPPS payments per case for urban hospitals as
compared to rural hospitals is the changes to the GAFs.'' is corrected
by deleting the sentence.
(2) First full paragraph--
(a) Lines 4 through 8, ``range from a 4.2 percent increase for the
Puerto Rico urban hospitals, and a 1.4 percent
[[Page 68962]]
increase for the West South Central urban region to a 0.7 percent
increase for the Mountain urban region.'' is corrected to read ``range
from a 4.1 percent increase for the Puerto Rico urban hospitals, and a
2.1 percent increase for the Mountain urban region to a 0.7 percent
increase for several other urban regions.''.
(b) Line 13, the figure ``4.2'' is corrected to read ``4.1''.
(c) Line 23, the figure ``1.6'' is corrected to read ``2.1''.
(d) Line 26, the figure ``0.4'' should read ``0.1''.
c. Third column--
(1) First full paragraph, line 9, the figure ``0.7'' is corrected
to read ``0.6''.
(2) Second full paragraph--
(a) Line 13, the figure ``1.0'' is corrected to read ``0.9''.
(b) Line 17, the figure ``1.0'' is corrected to read ``0.9''.
(c) Line 20, the figure ``0.2'' is corrected to read ``0.3''.
13. On pages 57331 and 57332, the table titled ``Table III.--
Comparison of Total Payments Per Case [FY 2016 Payments Compared To FY
2017 Payments]'' is corrected to read as follows:
Table III--Comparison of Total Payments per Case
[FY 2016 payments compared to FY 2017 payments]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average FY Average FY
Number of 2016 payments/ 2017 payments/ Change
hospitals case case
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Geographic Location:
All hospitals............................... 3,330 912 920 0.8
Large urban areas (populations over 1 1,369 1,011 1,019 0.7
million)...............................
Other urban areas (populations of 1 1,146 871 879 0.9
million of fewer)......................
Rural areas............................. 815 618 623 0.7
Urban hospitals............................. 2,515 947 955 0.8
0-99 beds............................... 659 768 774 0.8
100-199 beds............................ 767 824 829 0.6
200-299 beds............................ 446 865 871 0.7
300-499 beds............................ 431 958 967 0.9
500 or more beds........................ 212 1,139 1,149 0.9
Rural hospitals............................. 815 618 623 0.7
0-49 beds............................... 317 520 524 0.7
50-99 beds.............................. 292 577 582 0.8
100-149 beds............................ 120 610 614 0.6
150-199 beds............................ 46 669 673 0.6
200 or more beds........................ 40 738 745 0.9
By Region:
Urban by Region............................. 2,515 947 955 0.8
New England............................. 116 1,031 1,024 -0.6
Middle Atlantic......................... 315 1,056 1,064 0.7
South Atlantic.......................... 407 840 847 0.8
East North Central...................... 390 908 915 0.8
East South Central...................... 147 793 804 1.3
West North Central...................... 163 923 930 0.7
West South Central...................... 385 858 868 1.1
Mountain................................ 163 977 998 2.1
Pacific................................. 378 1,219 1,227 0.7
Puerto Rico............................. 51 435 453 4.1
Rural by Region............................. 815 618 623 0.7
New England............................. 21 868 878 1.1
Middle Atlantic......................... 54 591 603 2.1
South Atlantic.......................... 128 584 584 0.0
East North Central...................... 115 638 643 0.9
East South Central...................... 155 562 566 0.9
West North Central...................... 98 666 668 0.4
West South Central...................... 160 536 542 1.2
Mountain................................ 60 718 717 -0.1
Pacific................................. 24 804 812 1.0
By Payment Classification:
All hospitals............................... 3,330 912 920 0.8
Large urban areas (populations over 1 1,369 1,011 1,019 0.7
million)...............................
Other urban areas (populations of 1 1,153 870 878 0.9
million of fewer)......................
Rural areas................................. 808 619 623 0.7
Teaching Status:
Non-teaching............................ 2,266 771 776 0.7
Fewer than 100 Residents................ 815 885 892 0.8
100 or more Residents................... 249 1,287 1,298 0.9
Urban DSH:
100 or more beds.................... 1,642 968 976 0.8
Less than 100 beds.................. 363 696 702 0.8
Rural DSH:
Sole Community (SCH/EACH)........... 240 575 581 1.0
Referral Center (RRC/EACH).......... 325 649 654 0.7
Other Rural:
100 or more beds................ 29 538 540 0.4
[[Page 68963]]
Less than 100 beds.............. 142 526 528 0.3
Urban teaching and DSH:
Both teaching and DSH................... 898 1,043 1,052 0.9
Teaching and no DSH..................... 109 942 948 0.6
No teaching and DSH..................... 1,107 813 820 0.8
No teaching and no DSH.................. 408 815 820 0.6
Rural Hospital Types:
Non special status hospitals............ 2,529 948 955 0.7
RRC/EACH................................ 189 772 782 1.4
SCH/EACH................................ 324 706 716 1.4
SCH, RRC and EACH....................... 126 748 756 1.1
Hospitals Reclassified by the Medicare
Geographic Classification Review Board:
FY2017 Reclassifications:
All Urban Reclassified.................. 532 953 962 0.9
All Urban Non-Reclassified.............. 1,936 948 955 0.7
All Rural Reclassified.................. 277 650 655 0.9
All Rural Non-Reclassified.............. 489 578 580 0.3
Other Reclassified Hospitals (Section 42 599 602 0.5
1886(d)(8)(B)).........................
Type of Ownership:
Voluntary............................... 1,927 926 934 0.8
Proprietary............................. 881 820 827 0.8
Government.............................. 522 963 969 0.6
Medicare Utilization as a Percent of
Inpatient Days:
0-25.................................... 523 1,103 1,114 1.0
25-50................................... 2,122 916 923 0.8
50-65................................... 545 745 750 0.7
Over 65................................. 89 529 531 0.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
14. On page 57342--
a. Top of the page--
(1) First column, first full paragraph--
(a) Line 11, the figure ``987'' is corrected to read ``990''.
(b) Line 23, the figure ``809'' is corrected to read ``811''.
(2) Second column, first partial paragraph--
(a) Line 12, the figure ``809'' is corrected to read ``811''.
(b) Line 14, the figure''680'' is corrected to read ``683''.
(c) Line 19, the figure ``66'' is corrected to read ``72''.
(d) Line 23, the figure ``746'' is corrected to read ``755''.
b. Middle of the page, the table titled ``TABLE V--ACCOUNTING
STATEMENT: CLASSIFICATION OF ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES UNDER THE IPPS FROM
FY 2016 TO FY 2017'' is corrected to read as follows:
Table V--Accounting Statement: Classification of Estimated Expenditures
Under the IPPS From FY 2016 to FY 2017
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category Transfers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annualized Monetized Transfers......... $755 million.
From Whom to Whom...................... Federal Government to IPPS
Medicare Providers.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated: September 29, 2016.
Madhura Valverde,
Executive Secretary to the Department, Department of Health and Human
Services.
[FR Doc. 2016-24042 Filed 9-30-16; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P