Revise Notice of Intent for an Environmental Impact Statement: North-South Corridor Study: Interstate 10 to U.S. Highway 60, Pinal County, Arizona, 68095-68096 [2016-23784]
Download as PDF
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2016 / Notices
up to 1.500 mgd (peak day) (Docket No.
20120912).
13. Project Sponsor and Facility:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line
Company, LLC. Project: Atlantic Sunrise
(Chiques Creek), West Hempfield
Township, Lancaster County, Pa.
Surface water withdrawal of up to 2.880
mgd (peak day).
14. Project Sponsor and Facility:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line
Company, LLC. Project: Atlantic Sunrise
(Conestoga River-1), Conestoga
Township, Lancaster County, Pa.
Surface water withdrawal of up to 0.360
mgd (peak day).
15. Project Sponsor and Facility:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line
Company, LLC. Project: Atlantic Sunrise
(Conestoga River-1), Conestoga
Township, Lancaster County, Pa.
Consumptive water use of up to 0.100
mgd (peak day).
16. Project Sponsor and Facility:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line
Company, LLC. Project: Atlantic Sunrise
(Conestoga River-2), Conestoga
Township, Lancaster County, Pa.
Surface water withdrawal of up to 0.360
mgd (peak day).
17. Project Sponsor and Facility:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line
Company, LLC. Project: Atlantic Sunrise
(Conestoga River-2), Conestoga
Township, Lancaster County, Pa.
Consumptive water use of up to 0.100
mgd (peak day).
18. Project Sponsor and Facility:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line
Company, LLC. Project: Atlantic Sunrise
(Deep Creek), Hegins Township,
Schuylkill County, Pa. Surface water
withdrawal of up to 2.880 mgd (peak
day).
19. Project Sponsor and Facility:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line
Company, LLC. Project: Atlantic Sunrise
(Fishing Creek), Sugarloaf Township,
Columbia County, Pa. Surface water
withdrawal of up to 2.592 mgd (peak
day).
20. Project Sponsor and Facility:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line
Company, LLC. Project: Atlantic Sunrise
(Pequea Creek), Martic Township,
Lancaster County, Pa. Surface water
withdrawal of up to 2.880 mgd (peak
day).
21. Project Sponsor and Facility:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line
Company, LLC. Project: Atlantic Sunrise
(Roaring Creek), Franklin Township,
Columbia County, Pa. Surface water
withdrawal of up to 2.880 mgd (peak
day).
22. Project Sponsor and Facility:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line
Company, LLC. Project: Atlantic Sunrise
(Susquehanna River), Eaton Township,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:56 Sep 30, 2016
Jkt 241001
Wyoming County, Pa. Surface water
withdrawal of up to 2.592 mgd (peak
day).
23. Project Sponsor and Facility:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line
Company, LLC. Project: Atlantic Sunrise
(Susquehanna River), Eaton Township,
Wyoming County, Pa. Consumptive
water use of up to 0.100 mgd (peak day).
24. Project Sponsor and Facility:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line
Company, LLC. Project: Atlantic Sunrise
(Susquehanna River-1), Montour
Township and Catawissa Borough,
Columbia County, Pa. Surface water
withdrawal of up to 0.360 mgd (peak
day).
25. Project Sponsor and Facility:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line
Company, LLC. Project: Atlantic Sunrise
(Susquehanna River-1), Montour
Township and Catawissa Borough,
Columbia County, Pa. Consumptive
water use of up to 0.100 mgd (peak day).
26. Project Sponsor and Facility:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line
Company, LLC. Project: Atlantic Sunrise
(Swatara Creek), East Hanover
Township, Lebanon County, Pa. Surface
water withdrawal of up to 2.880 mgd
(peak day).
Project Applications Tabled
The Commission tabled action on the
following project applications:
1. Project Sponsor: Exelon Generation
Company, LLC. Project Facility: Muddy
Run Pumped Storage Project, Drumore
and Martic Townships, Lancaster
County, Pa. Application for an existing
hydroelectric facility.
2. Project Sponsor and Facility:
Gilberton Power Company, West
Mahanoy Township, Schuylkill County,
Pa. Application for renewal of
consumptive water use of up to 1.510
mgd (peak day) (Docket No. 19851202).
3. Project Sponsor and Facility:
Gilberton Power Company, West
Mahanoy Township, Schuylkill County,
Pa. Application for groundwater
withdrawal of up to 1.870 mgd (30-day
average) from the Gilberton Mine Pool.
4. Project Sponsor and Facility:
Manbel Devco I, LP, Manheim
Township, Lancaster County, Pa.
Application for groundwater
withdrawal of up to 4.320 mgd (30-day
average) from the Belmont Quarry.
5. Project Sponsor and Facility:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line
Company, LLC. Project: Atlantic Sunrise
(Susquehanna River-2), Montour
Township, Columbia County, Pa.
Application for surface water
withdrawal of up to 2.880 mgd (peak
day).
6. Project Sponsor and Facility:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line
PO 00000
Frm 00140
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
68095
Company, LLC. Project: Atlantic Sunrise
(Susquehanna River-2), Montour
Township, Columbia County, Pa.
Application for consumptive water use
of up to 0.100 mgd (peak day).
7. Project Sponsor and Facility:
Village of Windsor, Broome County,
N.Y. Application for groundwater
withdrawal of up to 0.380 mgd (30-day
average) from Well 2.
8. Project Sponsor and Facility: West
Manchester Township Authority, West
Manchester Township, York County, Pa.
Application for groundwater
withdrawal of up to 0.216 mgd (30-day
average) from Well 7.
Project Application Withdrawn by
Project Sponsor
The following project sponsor
withdrew its project application:
1. Project Sponsor and Facility:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line
Company, LLC. Project: Atlantic Sunrise
(Little Fishing Creek), Mount Pleasant
Township, Columbia County, Pa.
Application for surface water
withdrawal of up to 2.880 mgd (peak
day).
Authority: Pub.L. 91–575, 84 Stat. 1509 et
seq., 18 CFR parts 806, 807, and 808.
Dated: September 27, 2016.
Stephanie L. Richardson,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016–23737 Filed 9–30–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7040–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Revise Notice of Intent for an
Environmental Impact Statement:
North-South Corridor Study: Interstate
10 to U.S. Highway 60, Pinal County,
Arizona
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), United States
Department of Transportation (USDOT).
ACTION: Revised Notice of Intent (NOI).
AGENCY:
A NOI to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
was published in the Federal Register
on September 20, 2010. The FHWA is
issuing this notice to advise the public
of a change to the environmental review
process for the proposed North-South
Corridor. The FHWA and the project
sponsor, the Arizona Department of
Transportation (ADOT), intend to use a
tiered process in which a Tier 1 EIS will
be prepared to evaluate potential
corridor alternatives, along with a NoAction alternative, for a future projectspecific alignment.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03OCN1.SGM
03OCN1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
68096
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2016 / Notices
The proposed tiering approach will
allow FHWA and ADOT to evaluate a
range of potential corridors within the
North-South Corridor Study (NSCS) area
boundaries and to broadly evaluate
social, economic, and environmental
impacts and mitigation approaches in
the Tier 1 EIS. In addition, the NSCS
area will be expanded to include an
adjacent State Route 24 (SR 24) corridor
study resulting in an updated study area
encompassing the original study area
between Interstate 10 (I–10) and U.S.
Highway 60 (U.S. 60) and adding the
extension of SR 24 from Ironwood Drive
to the North-South Corridor in Pinal
County, Arizona.
The Tier 1 analysis will utilize
technical data obtained thus far in the
environmental review process and
collect other information as required. If
the Record of Decision identifies an
Action (Build) corridor alternative,
subsequent projects will complete a Tier
2 National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) review where the agencies will
evaluate project-level, site-specific
impacts, and required mitigation and
commitments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Aryan Lirange, Senior Urban Engineer,
Federal Highway Administration, 4000
N. Central Avenue, Suite 1500, Phoenix,
AZ 85012, Telephone: (602) 382–8973,
Email: aryan.lirange@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
September 20, 2010, at 75 FR 57327,
FHWA, in cooperation with ADOT,
issued an NOI to prepare an EIS on a
proposed 40-mile-long project along a
new route located between U.S. 60 on
the north and I–10 on the south, in Pinal
County, Arizona. The project is
considered necessary to achieve a
transportation objective identified in
Pinal County’s 2008 Regionally
Significant Routes for Safety and
Mobility. The Study would address
current and future transportation needs
in an area that currently exceeds
existing road capacity and is expected to
continue to worsen with the projected
increase in traffic demand associated
with regional growth. The project scope
also incorporates the extension of SR 24
from Ironwood Drive to the NSCS
boundary. Information and documents
regarding the environmental review
process will be made available for the
duration of the Tier 1 EIS process on the
following Web site: https://
www.azdot.gov/projects/south-central/
north-south-corridor-study.
The Tier 1 EIS will use all existing
data including the NSCS Alternatives
Selection Report completed in October
2014 and engineering, environmental,
and socioeconomic data collected since
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:56 Sep 30, 2016
Jkt 241001
the issuance of the original NOI. The
FHWA intends to issue a single Final
Tier 1 EIS and Record of Decision
document pursuant to Fixing America’s
Surface Transportation Act Section 1311
requirements, unless FHWA determines
statutory criteria or practicability
considerations preclude issuance of a
combined document.
Stakeholder and Public Involvement:
Stakeholder and public outreach will
continue throughout this Tier 1 EIS
process to provide opportunities for
agency and public input on the study.
A public hearing will be held upon
release of the Tier 1 Draft EIS for public
and agency review.
Alternatives: Corridor alternatives
with widths appropriate for the
evaluation of the full range of potential
impacts will be developed within the
updated study area. The Tier 1 EIS will
evaluate a reasonable range of ‘‘Action’’
corridor alternatives and the ‘‘No
Action’’ alternative.
Environmental Review Process: The
Tier 1 EIS will be developed in
accordance with Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ)
regulations (40 Code of Federal
Regulations [CFR] part 1500 et seq.)
implementing NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.), and FHWA regulations. The
FHWA and ADOT will use a tiered
process, as provided for in 40 CFR
1508.28 and in accordance with FHWA
guidance, in the completion of the
environmental study.
If the Record of Decision indicates
that FHWA has selected one of the
corridor alternatives as the
environmentally preferred alternative,
the evaluation of a specific highway
alignment within the selected corridor
would occur in a subsequent phase of
the study. Subsequent Tier 2
assessment(s) would address a proposed
highway alignment to be developed
within the corridor alternative selected
in the Tier 1 EIS, and would incorporate
by reference the Tier 1 data, evaluations,
and findings. The Tier 2 NEPA
evaluation(s) would concentrate on sitespecific issues and alternatives relevant
to implementing a new highway
alignment within the selected Tier 1
alternative corridor, and would identify
the environmental consequences and
measures necessary to mitigate
environmental impacts at a site-specific
level of detail.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway Research,
Planning and Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this
program.)
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 315; U.S.C. 771.123.
PO 00000
Frm 00141
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Issued on: September 27, 2016.
Karla S. Petty,
Arizona Division Administrator, Federal
Highway Administration.
[FR Doc. 2016–23784 Filed 9–30–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA–2016–0003]
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption
Applications; Hearing
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of applications for
exemption; request for comments.
AGENCY:
FMCSA announces receipt of
applications from 26 individuals for an
exemption from the hearing requirement
in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations (FMCSRs) to operate
commercial motor vehicles (CMV) in
interstate commerce. Granting these
exemptions would enable these hard of
hearing and deaf individuals to operate
CMVs in interstate commerce.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before November 2, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
bearing the Federal Docket Management
System (FDMS) Docket No. FMCSA–
2016–0003 using any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal
Holidays.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
Instructions: Each submission must
include the Agency name and the
docket number(s) for this notice. Note
that all comments received will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. Please
see the Privacy Act heading below for
further information.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments, go to https://
www.regulations.gov at any time or
Room W12–140 on the ground level of
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03OCN1.SGM
03OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 191 (Monday, October 3, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68095-68096]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-23784]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Revise Notice of Intent for an Environmental Impact Statement:
North-South Corridor Study: Interstate 10 to U.S. Highway 60, Pinal
County, Arizona
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), United States Department
of Transportation (USDOT).
ACTION: Revised Notice of Intent (NOI).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: A NOI to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was
published in the Federal Register on September 20, 2010. The FHWA is
issuing this notice to advise the public of a change to the
environmental review process for the proposed North-South Corridor. The
FHWA and the project sponsor, the Arizona Department of Transportation
(ADOT), intend to use a tiered process in which a Tier 1 EIS will be
prepared to evaluate potential corridor alternatives, along with a No-
Action alternative, for a future project-specific alignment.
[[Page 68096]]
The proposed tiering approach will allow FHWA and ADOT to evaluate
a range of potential corridors within the North-South Corridor Study
(NSCS) area boundaries and to broadly evaluate social, economic, and
environmental impacts and mitigation approaches in the Tier 1 EIS. In
addition, the NSCS area will be expanded to include an adjacent State
Route 24 (SR 24) corridor study resulting in an updated study area
encompassing the original study area between Interstate 10 (I-10) and
U.S. Highway 60 (U.S. 60) and adding the extension of SR 24 from
Ironwood Drive to the North-South Corridor in Pinal County, Arizona.
The Tier 1 analysis will utilize technical data obtained thus far
in the environmental review process and collect other information as
required. If the Record of Decision identifies an Action (Build)
corridor alternative, subsequent projects will complete a Tier 2
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review where the agencies will
evaluate project-level, site-specific impacts, and required mitigation
and commitments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aryan Lirange, Senior Urban Engineer,
Federal Highway Administration, 4000 N. Central Avenue, Suite 1500,
Phoenix, AZ 85012, Telephone: (602) 382-8973, Email:
aryan.lirange@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 20, 2010, at 75 FR 57327, FHWA,
in cooperation with ADOT, issued an NOI to prepare an EIS on a proposed
40-mile-long project along a new route located between U.S. 60 on the
north and I-10 on the south, in Pinal County, Arizona. The project is
considered necessary to achieve a transportation objective identified
in Pinal County's 2008 Regionally Significant Routes for Safety and
Mobility. The Study would address current and future transportation
needs in an area that currently exceeds existing road capacity and is
expected to continue to worsen with the projected increase in traffic
demand associated with regional growth. The project scope also
incorporates the extension of SR 24 from Ironwood Drive to the NSCS
boundary. Information and documents regarding the environmental review
process will be made available for the duration of the Tier 1 EIS
process on the following Web site: https://www.azdot.gov/projects/south-central/north-south-corridor-study.
The Tier 1 EIS will use all existing data including the NSCS
Alternatives Selection Report completed in October 2014 and
engineering, environmental, and socioeconomic data collected since the
issuance of the original NOI. The FHWA intends to issue a single Final
Tier 1 EIS and Record of Decision document pursuant to Fixing America's
Surface Transportation Act Section 1311 requirements, unless FHWA
determines statutory criteria or practicability considerations preclude
issuance of a combined document.
Stakeholder and Public Involvement: Stakeholder and public outreach
will continue throughout this Tier 1 EIS process to provide
opportunities for agency and public input on the study. A public
hearing will be held upon release of the Tier 1 Draft EIS for public
and agency review.
Alternatives: Corridor alternatives with widths appropriate for the
evaluation of the full range of potential impacts will be developed
within the updated study area. The Tier 1 EIS will evaluate a
reasonable range of ``Action'' corridor alternatives and the ``No
Action'' alternative.
Environmental Review Process: The Tier 1 EIS will be developed in
accordance with Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations (40
Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] part 1500 et seq.) implementing NEPA
(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), and FHWA regulations. The FHWA and ADOT will
use a tiered process, as provided for in 40 CFR 1508.28 and in
accordance with FHWA guidance, in the completion of the environmental
study.
If the Record of Decision indicates that FHWA has selected one of
the corridor alternatives as the environmentally preferred alternative,
the evaluation of a specific highway alignment within the selected
corridor would occur in a subsequent phase of the study. Subsequent
Tier 2 assessment(s) would address a proposed highway alignment to be
developed within the corridor alternative selected in the Tier 1 EIS,
and would incorporate by reference the Tier 1 data, evaluations, and
findings. The Tier 2 NEPA evaluation(s) would concentrate on site-
specific issues and alternatives relevant to implementing a new highway
alignment within the selected Tier 1 alternative corridor, and would
identify the environmental consequences and measures necessary to
mitigate environmental impacts at a site-specific level of detail.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205,
Highway Research, Planning and Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental
consultation on Federal programs and activities apply to this
program.)
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 315; U.S.C. 771.123.
Issued on: September 27, 2016.
Karla S. Petty,
Arizona Division Administrator, Federal Highway Administration.
[FR Doc. 2016-23784 Filed 9-30-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P