Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic; Shrimp Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; Revision of Bycatch Reduction Device Testing Manual, 66912-66918 [2016-23600]
Download as PDF
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
66912
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 189 / Thursday, September 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
designation of critical habitat for five
distinct population segments (DPSs) of
Atlantic sturgeon. Critical habitat for the
five DPSs was proposed in two separate
proposed rules, published on June 3,
2016, with a 90-day comment period.
DATES: The comment period for the
proposed rules that published on June 3,
2016 (81 FR 35701 and 81 FR 36078) are
reopened. Comments must be submitted
via the Federal eRulemaking Portal or
received at the appropriate address (see
ADDRESSES) by October 14, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by NOAA–NMFS–2015–0107
for the proposed rule for the Gulf of
Maine, New York Bight, and
Chesapeake Bay DPSs and identified by
NOAA–NMFS–2015–0157 for the
Carolina and South Atlantic DPSs, by
either of the following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20150107 or www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20150157, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: For docket NOAA–NMFS–
2015–0107, submit comments to
Assistant Regional Administrator,
Protected Resources Division, NMFS,
Greater Atlantic Regional Office, 55
Great Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA
01930. For docket NOAA–NMFS–2015–
0157, submit comments to Assistant
Regional Administrator, Protected
Resources Division, NMFS, Southeast
Regional Office, 263 13th Avenue
South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by us. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. We will accept
anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in
the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrew Herndon, NMFS, SERO at 727–
824–5312; Lynn Lankshear, NMFS,
GARFO at 978–282–8473; or Lisa
Manning, NMFS, Office of Protected
Resources at 301–427–8466.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:35 Sep 28, 2016
Jkt 238001
Reopening
On June 3, 2016, we, NMFS,
published two proposed rules (81 FR
35701and 81 FR 36078) to designate
critical habitat for the Gulf of Maine,
New York Bight, Chesapeake Bay,
Carolina, and South Atlantic DPSs of
Atlantic sturgeon under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973 (ESA), as amended.
A 90-day public comment period was
provided. Public comments were due by
September 1, 2016. NMFS received
multiple requests for extension of the
comment period. Based on the requests,
the comment period for each of these
proposed rules is reopened for an
additional 15 days to provide further
opportunity for public comment.
We are soliciting comments from the
public on all aspects of the proposal,
including information on the economic,
national security, and other relevant
impacts. Comments already received
during the 90-day comment period and
additional comments received during
the reopened 15-day comment period
will be considered prior to making the
final designations.
Background
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1533.
Frm 00047
[FR Doc. 2016–23530 Filed 9–28–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 160815740–6740–01]
RIN 0648–BG28
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; Shrimp
Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; Revision
of Bycatch Reduction Device Testing
Manual
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
framework procedure for adjusting
management measures of the Fishery
Management Plan for the Shrimp
Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico (Gulf
FMP), NMFS proposes to make
administrative revisions to the Bycatch
Reduction Device Testing Manual (BRD
Manual). The BRD Manual contains
procedures for the testing and
certification of BRDs for use in shrimp
trawls in the exclusive economic zone
(EEZ) in the Gulf of Mexico (Gulf) and
South Atlantic. The proposed changes
to the BRD Manual remove outdated or
obsolete data collection forms currently
appended to the BRD Manual and revise
the text to make several procedural
steps outlined in the BRD Manual
clearer and easier to understand. The
intended effect of these revisions is to
increase understanding of the BRD
certification protocols.
DATES: Comments must be received by
October 14, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on the proposed rule, identified by
NOAA–NMFS–2016–0109, by either of
the following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20160109, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
SUMMARY:
We propose to designate critical
habitat for the Gulf of Maine, New York
Bight, Chesapeake Bay, Carolina, and
South Atlantic Distinct Population
Segments (DPSs) of Atlantic sturgeon
(Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus). The
specific areas proposed for designation
include approximately 244 kilometers
(152 miles) of aquatic habitat for the
Gulf of Maine DPS, 547 kilometers (340
miles) of aquatic habitat for the New
York Bight DPS, and 729 kilometers
(453 miles) of aquatic habitat for the
Chesapeake Bay DPS. Our proposed
determinations for the Gulf of Maine,
New York Bight, and Chesapeake Bay
DPSs are described in the document
identified by NOAA–NMFS–2015–0107.
We also propose to designate
approximately 1,997 kilometers (1,241
miles) of occupied aquatic habitat and
383 kilometers (238 miles) of
unoccupied aquatic habitat for the
Carolina DPS, and approximately 2,911
kilometers (1,809 miles) of occupied
aquatic habitat and 33 kilometers (21
miles) of unoccupied aquatic habitat for
the South Atlantic DPS. Our proposed
determinations for the Carolina and
South Atlantic DPSs are described in
the document identified by NOAA–
NMFS–2015–0157. We do not propose
to exclude any particular areas from the
proposed critical habitat designations.
PO 00000
Dated: September 26, 2016.
Samuel D Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\29SEP1.SGM
29SEP1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 189 / Thursday, September 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
• Mail: Submit written comments to
Susan Gerhart, NMFS Southeast
Regional Office, 263 13th Avenue
South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter
‘‘N/A’’ in the required fields if you wish
to remain anonymous). Requests for
copies of the BRD Manual should be
sent to the NMFS Southeast Regional
Office, 263 13th Avenue South, St.
Petersburg, FL 33701.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan Gerhart, NMFS Southeast
Regional Office, telephone: 727–824–
5305, email: susan.gerhart@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
shrimp fishery in the Gulf EEZ is
managed under the Gulf FMP. The Gulf
FMP was prepared by the Gulf of
Mexico Fishery Management Council
(Gulf Council) and is implemented by
NMFS under the authority of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act) by regulations
at 50 CFR part 622.
The shrimp fishery in the South
Atlantic EEZ is managed under the FMP
for the Shrimp Fishery of the South
Atlantic Region (South Atlantic FMP).
The South Atlantic FMP was prepared
by the South Atlantic Fishery
Management Council (South Atlantic
Council) and is implemented by NMFS
under the authority of the MagnusonStevens Act by regulations at 50 CFR
part 622.
Initially, the South Atlantic and Gulf
Councils developed separate
amendments to their respective FMPs to
require the use of certified BRDs, and
the South Atlantic Council developed
their own BRD Manual, in cooperation
with NMFS. The South Atlantic Council
established these requirements through
Amendment 2 to the South Atlantic
FMP in 1997 (62 FR 18536, April 16,
1997). Subsequently, the Gulf Council
required, with limited exceptions, the
use of certified BRDs through
Amendment 9 to the Gulf FMP (63 FR
18139, April 14, 1998). Amendment 9
specified that NMFS would develop a
testing protocol for examining the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:35 Sep 28, 2016
Jkt 238001
bycatch reduction performance of
additional BRD designs. Regulations
implementing this initial testing
protocol were effective July 13, 1999 (64
FR 37690, July 13, 1999), except for a
collection-of-information requirement,
which became effective September 29,
1999 (64 FR 52427, September 29,
1999). In 2005, in Amendment 6 to the
South Atlantic FMP, the South Atlantic
Council transferred authority to NMFS
to maintain and revise the BRD Manual,
and established a certification criterion
identical to the Gulf Council’s eastern
Gulf criterion (70 FR 73383, December
12, 2005). In 2008, NMFS combined the
separate BRD Manuals, and established
a single procedural process for testing
BRDs, and a single BRD certification
criterion for both the Gulf and South
Atlantic (73 FR 8219, February 13,
2008). The proposed administrative
changes would not change the existing
BRD certification criterion.
When the two BRD Manuals were
initially developed, no mandatory
observer programs existed for Gulf and
South Atlantic Council-managed
species, thus there was no officially
established set of data collection forms.
To provide BRD testing applicants with
a standardized reporting method, forms
and instructions developed and used by
NMFS and other researchers during a
1990s Congressionally-mandated
Shrimp Trawl Bycatch Research
Program were provided with the BRD
Manual as Appendices A–I. This family
of forms was officially submitted for
review and approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act and assigned
a control number by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), OMB–
0648–0345. Subsequently, mandatory
observer programs were established by
NMFS for the reef fish fishery and the
shrimp fishery in the Gulf, and the
various fisheries managed by NMFS’
Highly Migratory Species Division.
NMFS established a package of observer
data collection forms to cover all of
these programs with an assigned control
number of OMB–0648–0593, and
incorporated the family of forms in a
standardized Observer Training Manual,
including the BRD testing and
certification family of forms.
Over time, the various data collection
forms used by NMFS have been revised
or discarded, making many of the forms
in the BRD testing family of forms
obsolete (OMB–0648–0345). Currently,
only three of the eight original BRD
testing data forms in the Observer
Training Manual are specific to BRD
testing. NMFS intends to incorporate
those forms into the OMB–0648–0593
family of forms, and has already
discontinued the OMB–0648–0345
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
66913
family of forms. Therefore, the forms
need to be removed as appendices to the
BRD Manual and text revised within the
BRD Manual to remove references to
those forms.
NMFS has also revised some text and
instructions in the BRD Manual to make
the manual clearer and easier to
understand. For example, where forms
were referenced, the instructions only
stated that ‘‘The applicant should
submit a completed application form
(Appendix A)’’; given this action would
remove that form from the BRD Manual,
the instructions have been revised to
reflect the information that the
applicant must submit. Other revisions
to the BRD Manual include increased
consistency of terms; for example, ‘‘test’’
and ‘‘trawl’’ were used interchangeably,
as were ‘‘trawl’’ and ‘‘net.’’
These proposed changes to the BRD
Manual were presented to the Gulf and
South Atlantic Councils for their
consideration and no substantive
comments were received from either
Council regarding these administrative
changes.
These proposed changes to
management measures would not add to
or change any existing Federal
regulations. Therefore, no codified text
is associated with these proposed
changes to management measures.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, the NMFS
Assistant Administrator has determined
that this proposed rule is consistent
with the Gulf and South Atlantic FMPs,
other provisions of the MagnusonStevens Act, and other applicable laws,
subject to further consideration after
public comment.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration (SBA)
that this proposed change to
management measures, if implemented,
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The factual basis for this
determination is as follows:
The purpose of this proposed rule is
to make non-regulatory administrative
revisions to the BRD Manual to simplify
test reporting procedures and make the
procedural steps outlined in the BRD
Manual clearer and easier to
understand. The Magnuson-Stevens Act
provides the statutory basis for this
proposed rule.
This proposed rule, if implemented,
would directly affect entities that apply
E:\FR\FM\29SEP1.SGM
29SEP1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
66914
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 189 / Thursday, September 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
for and participate in BRD testing. The
primary entities expected to apply for
the BRD testing are state government,
academic, and not-for-profit entities.
Independent commercial shrimping
businesses in either the Gulf or South
Atlantic may also be included among
applicants. NMFS has not identified any
other small entities that would be
expected to be directly affected by this
proposed change to management
measures.
The SBA defines a small organization
as any not-for-profit enterprise that is
independently owned and operated and
not dominant in its field of operation.
This definition includes private
educational institutions. The SBA also
defines a small governmental
jurisdiction as the government of cities,
counties, towns, townships, villages,
school districts, or special districts with
a population less than 50,000. For
Regulatory Flexibility Act purposes
only, NMFS has established a small
business size standard for businesses,
including their affiliates, whose primary
industry is commercial fishing (see 50
CFR 200.2). A business primarily
engaged in commercial fishing (NAICS
code 11411) is classified as a small
business if it is independently owned
and operated, is not dominant in its
field of operation (including its
affiliates), and has combined annual
receipts not in excess of $11 million for
all its affiliated operations worldwide.
Over the period 2011–2015, a total of
5 separate entities applied for BRD
testing. These entities were NMFS, the
Gulf and South Atlantic Fisheries
Foundation (Foundation), the
University of Mississippi, Texas A&M
University, and one commercial shrimp
fisherman. Individual applications are
required for each BRD tested and a total
of 26 applications were submitted by
these 5 entities over this period. The
most applications in any year during
this period was 10 (2011), submitted by
3 applicants, and the fewest
applications was 1 (2015). NMFS
submitted the most applications, 10,
followed by the Foundation with 9. The
University of Mississippi submitted
three applications, and both Texas A&M
University (2013) and the commercial
shrimp fisherman (2015) submitted a
single application.
In addition to these entities, previous
applicants have included the Texas
Parks and Wildlife Department, the
Florida Department of Environmental
Protection, and the University of
Georgia. The respective state agencies
are extensions of their state
governments and, as such, exceed the
SBA population thresholds for small
government entities. Similarly, the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:35 Sep 28, 2016
Jkt 238001
public academic institutions are
extensions of the respective state
government educational systems and,
therefore, are similarly classified as
large entities. Although no private
colleges or universities have applied for
BRD testing, these institutions are
generally understood to be smaller than
public institutions in terms of student
population, staff, and operational
budgets. As a result, any private
educational institutions that might
apply for BRD testing would be
expected to be a small entity. Any
commercial shrimp fisherman that
might apply for BRD testing would do
so from the perspective of research and
not commercial fishing. However, as a
commercial shrimp fisherman, this
entity would be expected to primarily
engage in commercial fishing and not
research. Thus, for these entities, the
commercial fishing revenue threshold
would apply. From 2011 through 2013,
the greatest average annual revenue for
a single commercial shrimp fishing
business in the Gulf was approximately
$2.48 million. More recent information
is not available, nor is similar
information available on commercial
shrimp fishermen in the South Atlantic.
Nevertheless, because of the low
maximum revenue total in the Gulf, it
is assumed that any commercial shrimp
fisherman that would apply for BRD
testing would be a small business entity.
In summary, this proposed change to
management measures would be
expected to directly affect a few small
entities, such as not-for-profit
institutions, commercial shrimp
businesses, and private colleges or
universities.
The proposed revisions to the BRD
Manual would not directly affect fishery
participation, harvest, or the business
operation of any small entity. As
discussed in the Summary and
Supplementary Information sections of
this proposed change to management
measures, the proposed changes are
administrative in nature. This proposed
change to management measures would
only eliminate test reporting forms in
the BRD Manual that are either obsolete
or available elsewhere (NMFS
standardized Observer Training
Manual), revise text and instructions
that reference these forms, list the
information needed to be reported for
BRD testing instead of the specific
forms, and improve the consistency of
terms used in the BRD Manual. These
proposed changes are purely
administrative. They would not be
expected to affect actual BRD testing or
the costs associated with such, but
would be expected to improve
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
understanding of the testing process and
requirements, and facilitate better
circumstances under which BRD
research and gear development may
proceed. Although subsequent BRD
testing could result in future changes in
allowable BRDs, the use of which could
have direct economic consequences,
these would be indirect effects of this
proposed rule and outside the scope of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Based on the discussion above, NMFS
determines that this proposed change to
management measures, if implemented,
would not have a significant adverse
economic effect on a substantial number
of small entities. As a result, an initial
regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required and none has been prepared.
The BRD Manual published as an
appendix to a final rule published in the
Federal Register on February 13, 2008
(73 FR 8219, February 13, 2008), is
revised to read as follows.
Note: The following appendix will publish
in the Federal Register but will not appear
in the Code of Federal Regulations. See the
contacts under ADDRESSES to obtain the
complete BRD Manual.
Appendix—Bycatch Reduction Device
Testing Manual
Definitions
Bycatch reduction criterion is the standard
by which a BRD candidate will be evaluated.
To be certified for use by the shrimp fishery
in the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) off the
southeastern United States (North Carolina
through Texas), the BRD candidate must
demonstrate a successful reduction of total
finfish bycatch by at least 30 percent by
weight.
Bycatch reduction device (BRD) is any gear
or trawl modification designed to allow
finfish to escape from a shrimp trawl.
BRD candidate is a bycatch reduction
device to be tested for certification for use in
the commercial shrimp fishery of
southeastern United States.
Certified BRD is a BRD that has been tested
according to the procedure outlined herein
and has been determined by the RA as having
met the bycatch reduction criterion.
Control trawl means a trawl that is not
equipped with a BRD during a test.
Experimental trawl means the trawl that is
equipped with the BRD candidate during a
test.
Evaluation and oversight personnel means
scientists, observers, and other technical
personnel who, by reason of their occupation
or scientific expertise or training, are
approved by the RA as qualified to evaluate
and review the application and testing
process.
Gear Test Authorization (GTA) means a
document signed by the RA that specifically
exempts a person/vessel from Federal
regulations requiring the use of BRDs in
Federal waters. This GTA must be issued
prior to conducting any tests on BRD
candidates in Federal waters.
E:\FR\FM\29SEP1.SGM
29SEP1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 189 / Thursday, September 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Net/side bias means when the net(s) being
fished on one side of the vessel demonstrate
a different catch rate (fishing efficiency) than
the net(s) being fished on the other side of
the vessel during paired-net tests.
Observer means a person on the list
maintained by the RA of individuals
qualified to supervise and monitor a BRD
certification test.
Paired-net test means a tow during
certification trials where a control net and an
experimental net are fished simultaneously,
and the catches and catch rates between the
nets are compared.
Provisional Certification Criterion means a
secondary benchmark that would allow a
BRD candidate to be used for a time-limited
period in the southeastern shrimp fishery. To
meet the criterion, the BRD candidate must
demonstrate a successful reduction of total
finfish bycatch by at least 25 percent by
weight.
Provisionally certified BRD means a BRD
that has been tested according to the
procedure outlined herein and has been
determined by the RA as having met the
provisional certification criterion. A BRD
meeting the provisional certification criterion
would be certified by the RA for a period of
2 years.
Regional Administrator (RA) means the
Southeast Regional Administrator, National
Marine Fisheries Service.
Required measurements refers to the
quantification of gear characteristics such as
the dimensions and configuration of the
trawl, the BRD candidate, the doors, or the
location of the BRD in relation to other parts
of the trawl gear that are used to assess the
performance of the BRD candidate.
Sample size means the number of
successful tows.
Shrimp trawler means any vessel that is
equipped with one or more trawl nets where
the on-board or landed catch of shrimp is
more than 1 percent, by weight, of all fish
comprising its on-board or landed catch.
Successful tow means that the control and
experimental trawl were fished in accordance
with the requirements set forth herein and
the terms and conditions of the Letter of
Authorization, and there is no indication
problematic events occurred during the tow
that would impact or influence the fishing
efficiency (catch) of one or both nets.
Tow time means the total time (hours and
minutes) an individual trawl was fished (i.e.,
the time interval beginning when the winch
is locked after deploying the net overboard,
and ending when retrieval of the net is
initiated).
Trawl means a net and associated gear and
rigging used to catch shrimp. The terms trawl
and net are used interchangeably throughout
this manual, although in most instances,
‘‘trawl’’ is used to reflect the entire fishing rig
(e.g., doors, tickler chain, net, turtle excluder
device, etc.), whereas a ‘‘net’’ is used to
reflect a component of that fishing rig.
Try net means a separate net pulled for
brief periods by a shrimp trawler to test for
shrimp concentrations or determine fishing
conditions (e.g., presence of absence of
bottom debris, jellyfish, bycatch, and
seagrasses).
Tuning a net means adjusting the trawl and
its components to minimize or eliminate any
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:35 Sep 28, 2016
Jkt 238001
net/side bias that exists between the two nets
that will be used as the control and
experimental trawls during the certification
test.
I. Introduction
This Bycatch Reduction Device
Testing Manual (BRD Manual)
establishes a standardized process for
evaluating whether bycatch reduction
device (BRD) candidates meet the
established bycatch reduction criterion.
BRDs that meet the criterion can be
certified for use in the EEZ by the
southeastern shrimp fishery.
Requirements for BRDs used in shrimp
trawls in the Gulf of Mexico and South
Atlantic can be found in 50 CFR part
622.
The requirement to use BRDs in state
waters varies by state. Persons wishing
to conduct BRD candidate tests
exclusively in state waters do not need
to apply to the National Marine
Fisheries Service (NOAA Fisheries) for
authorization to conduct these tests but
should contact the appropriate state
officials for authorizations. However, for
NOAA Fisheries to certify a BRD
candidate for use in Federal waters,
tests conducted in state waters must
meet the criteria for the operations plan
and data collection procedures
established in this manual.
II. BRD Candidate Tests
A. Application
Persons interested in evaluating the
effectiveness of a BRD candidate to
reduce finfish from a shrimp trawl must
apply for, receive, and have on board
the approved vessel(s) during the test, a
Gear Test Authorization (GTA) from the
NOAA Fisheries Southeast Regional
Office Regional Administrator (RA). To
receive a GTA, the applicant must
submit the following documentation to
the RA: (1) Name, address, and contact
information of the applicant; (2) a list of
vessels to be used during the sampling
program, including the vessels’ U.S.
Coast Guard documentation numbers or
state registration numbers; (3) name,
address, and contact information of the
vessel owners and/or vessel operators;
(4) a brief statement of the purpose and
goal of the activity for which the GTA
is requested; (5) an operations plan (see
Section C below) describing the scope,
duration, dates, and location of the test,
and methods that will be used to
conduct the test; (6) an 8.5 inch x 11
inch (21.6 cm x 27.9 cm) diagram drawn
to scale of the BRD candidate design; (7)
an 8.5 inch x 11 inch (21.6 cm x 27.9
cm) diagram drawn to scale of the BRD
in the shrimp trawl; and (8) a
description of the mechanism by which
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
66915
the BRD candidate is expected to
exclude finfish.
An applicant requesting an GTA to
test an unapproved turtle excluder
device (TED) as a BRD (including
modifications to a certified TED where
the modifications would make the
configuration of the TED illegal) must
first apply for and obtain from the RA
an experimental TED authorization
pursuant to 50 CFR 223.207(e)(2).
Applicants should contact the Protected
Resources Division of NOAA Fisheries
Southeast Regional Office for further
information. The GTA applicant must
include a copy of that authorization
with the application.
Incomplete applications will be
returned to the applicant along with a
letter from the RA indicating what
actions the applicant may take to make
the application complete.
There is no cost to the applicant for
the RA’s administrative expenses such
as reviewing applications, issuing GTA,
evaluating test results, or certifying
BRDs. However, all other costs
associated with the actual testing
activities are the responsibility of the
applicant, or any associated sponsor.
If an application for a GTA is denied,
the RA will provide a letter of
explanation to the applicant, together
with relevant recommendations to
address the deficiencies that resulted in
the denial.
B. Allowable Activities
Issuance of a GTA to test a BRD
candidate in the South Atlantic or Gulf
of Mexico allows the applicant to
remove or disable the existing certified
BRD in one outboard net (to create a
control net), and to place the BRD
candidate in another outboard net in
lieu of a certified BRD (to create an
experimental net). All other trawls
under tow during the test must have a
certified BRD, unless these nets are
specifically exempted in the GTA. All
nets under tow during the test must
have an approved TED unless operating
under an authorization issued pursuant
to 50 CFR 223.207(e)(2), whereby the
test is being conducted on an
experimental TED. The GTA, and
experimental TED authorization if
applicable, must be on board the
vessel(s) while the test is being
conducted. The term of the GTA will be
60 days; should circumstances require a
longer test period, the applicant may
request a 60-day extension.
C. Operations Plan
An operations plan should be
submitted with the application
describing a method to compare the
catches of shrimp and fish in a control
E:\FR\FM\29SEP1.SGM
29SEP1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
66916
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 189 / Thursday, September 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
net (net without a BRD candidate
installed) to the catches of the same
species in an experimental net (a net
configured identically to the control net
but also equipped with the BRD
candidate).
The applicant may choose to conduct
a pre-certification test of a prototype
BRD candidate. A pre-certification test
would be conducted when the intent is
to assess the preliminary effectiveness
of a prototype BRD candidate under
field conditions, and to make
modifications to the prototype BRD
candidate during the field test. For precertification testing, the operations plan
must include only a description of the
scope, duration, dates, and location of
the test, along with a description of
methods that will be used to conduct
the test. No observer is required for a
pre-certification test, but the applicant
may choose to use an observer to
maintain a written record of the test.
The applicant will maintain a written
record for both the control and
experimental net during each tow.
Mandatory data collection is limited to
the weight of the shrimp catch and the
weight of the total finfish catch in each
test net during each tow. Although not
required, the applicant may wish to
incorporate some or all the certification
test requirements listed below.
For a BRD candidate to be considered
for certification, the operations plan
must be more detailed and address the
following topics:
• The primary assumption in
assessing the bycatch reduction
effectiveness of a BRD candidate during
paired net tests is that the inclusion of
the BRD candidate in the experimental
net is the only factor causing a
difference in catch from the control net.
Therefore, the nets to be used in the
tests must be calibrated (tuned) to
minimize, to the extent practicable, any
net/side bias in catch efficiency prior to
beginning a test series, and tuned again
after any gear modification or change.
Additional information on tuning
shrimp trawls to minimize bias is
available from NOAA Fisheries,
Harvesting Technology Branch,
Mississippi Laboratories, Pascagoula
Facility, 3209 Frederic Street,
Pascagoula, MS 39567; phone 601–762–
4591.
• A standard tow time for a proposed
evaluation should be defined. Tow
times must be representative of the tow
times used by commercial shrimp
trawlers. The applicant should indicate
what alternatives will be considered
should the proposed tow time need
adjustment once the test begins.
• A minimum sample size of 30
successful tows using a specific BRD
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:35 Sep 28, 2016
Jkt 238001
candidate design is required for the
statistical analysis described in Section
F. No alterations of the BRD candidate
design are allowed during a specific test
series. If the BRD candidate design is
altered, a new test series must be
started. If a gear change (i.e., changing
nets, doors, or rigging) is required, the
nets should be tuned again before
proceeding with further tests to
complete the 30-tow series. Minor
repairs to the gear (e.g., sewing holes in
the webbing; replacing a broken tickler
chain with a new one of the same
configuration) are not considered a
‘‘gear change.’’
• For tests conducted on twin-rig
vessels (one net on the port side and one
net on the starboard side), biases that
might result from the use of a try net
should be minimized. Total fishing
times for a try net must be a consistent
percentage of the total tow time during
each tow made in the test.
• To incorporate any potential net/
side bias that remains after the tuning
tows (e.g., the effect of a try net), or to
accommodate for bias that develops
between the control and experimental
nets during the test, the operations plan
should outline a timetable ensuring that
an equal number of successful tows are
made with the BRD candidate employed
in both the port and starboard nets.
• Mandatory data to be collected
during a test includes: (1) Detailed
vessel and gear specifications and (2)
pertinent information concerning the
location, duration, and catch from
individual tows as set forth in forms
available from the Science and Research
Director (SRD) of the Southeast
Fisheries Science Center. Applicants
should contact the NOAA Fisheries,
Galveston Laboratory, 4700 Avenue U,
Galveston, TX 77551; phone 409–766–
3500.
• Following each paired tow, the
catches from the control and
experimental nets must be examined
separately. This requires that the catch
from each net be kept separate from
each other, as well as from the catch
taken in other nets fished during that
tow. Mandatory data collections include
recording the weight of the total catch
of each test net (control and
experimental nets), and the weight of
the total shrimp catch (i.e., brown,
white, pink, rock, or other shrimp by
species) in each test net.
• To determine the total finfish catch
in each test net, two procedures may be
used under different conditions. If the
total catch in a net does not fill one
standard 1-bushel (ca. 10 gal or 30 L)
polyethylene shrimp basket (ca. 70 lb
[31.8 kg] of catch), but the tow is
otherwise considered successful, data
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
must be collected on the entire catch of
the net, and recorded as a ‘‘select’’
sample, indicating that the values
represent the total catch of the
particular net. If the catch in a net
exceeds 70 lb (31.8 kg), a well-mixed
sample consisting of one standard 1bushel [ca. 10 gal] (30 L) polyethylene
shrimp basket must be taken from the
total catch of the net. The total weight
of the sample must be recorded, as well
as the weight (and number as
applicable) of finfish in aggregate.
• The forms available from the SRD
include record keeping opportunities for
additional species; collection of this
information is optional for certification
evaluation purposes. However,
applicants testing BRD candidates are
encouraged to collect additional
information that may be pertinent to
addressing bycatch issues in their
respective regions. For example, in the
western Gulf of Mexico applicants are
especially encouraged to collect
information on the bycatch of juvenile
red snapper. Such data collection would
follow the same procedure as sampling
the total finfish catch.
The operations plan should address
what the applicant will do should it
become necessary to deviate from the
primary procedures outlined in the
operations plan. The plan should
describe in detail what will be done to
continue the test in a reasonable manner
that is consistent with the primary
procedures. For example, it may become
necessary to alter the pre-selected tow
time to adapt to local fishing conditions
to successfully complete the test. Prior
to issuing a GTA, the RA may consult
with evaluation personnel to review the
acceptability of these proposed
alterations.
D. Observer Requirement
It is the responsibility of the applicant
to ensure that a qualified observer is on
board the vessel during the certification
tests. Observers may include employees
or individuals acting on behalf of NOAA
Fisheries, state fishery management
agencies, universities, or private
industry. Any change in information or
testing circumstances, such as
replacement of the observer, must be
reported to the RA within 30 days.
Under 50 CFR 600.746, when any
fishing vessel is required to carry an
observer as part of a mandatory observer
program under the Magnuson Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (16 U.S.C. 1801, et seq.), the owner
or operator of the vessel must comply
with guidelines, regulations, and
conditions to ensure their vessel is
adequate and safe to carry an observer,
and to allow normal observer functions
E:\FR\FM\29SEP1.SGM
29SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 189 / Thursday, September 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
to collect information as described in
this Manual. A vessel owner is deemed
to meet this requirement if the vessel
displays one of the following: (1) A
current Commercial Fishing Vessel
Safety Examination decal, issued within
the last 2 years, that certifies
compliance with regulations found in
33 CFR, chapter I, and 46 CFR, chapter
I; (2) a certificate of compliance issued
pursuant to 46 CFR 28.710; or (3) a valid
certificate of inspection pursuant to 46
U.S.C. 3311. The observer has the right
to check for major safety items, and if
those items are absent or unserviceable,
the observer may choose not to sail with
the vessel until those deficiencies are
corrected.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
E. Reports
A report on the BRD candidate test
results must be submitted by the
applicant or associated sponsor before
the RA will consider the BRD for
certification. The report must contain a
comprehensive description of the test,
copies of all completed data forms used
during the test, and photographs,
drawings, and similar material
describing the BRD. The report must
include a description and explanation of
any unanticipated deviations from the
operations plan that occurred during the
test. These deviations must be described
in sufficient detail to allow evaluation
and oversight personnel selected by
NOAA Fisheries to determine if the tests
were continued in a reasonable manner
consistent with the approved operations
plan procedures. Applicants must
provide information on the cost of
materials, labor, and installation of the
BRD candidate. In addition, any unique
or special circumstances of the tests,
such as special operational
characteristics or fishing techniques,
which enhance the BRD’s performance,
should be described and documented as
appropriate.
F. Certification
The RA will determine whether the
required reports and supporting
materials are sufficient to evaluate the
BRD candidate’s effectiveness. The
determination of sufficiency would be
based on whether the applicant adhered
to the prescribed testing procedure or
provided adequate justification for any
deviations from the procedure during
the test. If the RA determines that the
data are sufficient for evaluation, the
BRD candidate will be evaluated to
determine if it meets the bycatch
reduction criterion. In making a
decision, the RA may consult with
evaluation and oversight personnel.
Based on the data submitted for review,
the RA will determine the effectiveness
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:35 Sep 28, 2016
Jkt 238001
of the BRD candidate, using appropriate
statistical procedures such as Bayesian
analyses, to determine if the BRD
candidate meets the following
conditions:
(1) There is at least a 50-percent
probability that the true reduction rate
of the BRD candidate meets the bycatch
reduction criterion (i.e., the BRD
candidate demonstrates a best point
estimate [sample mean] that meets the
certification criterion); and
(2) There is no more than a 10-percent
probability that the true reduction rate
of the BRD candidate is more than 5
percentage points less than the bycatch
reduction criterion.
To be certified for use in the fishery,
the BRD candidate will have to satisfy
both conditions. The first condition
ensures that the observed reduction rate
of the BRD candidate has an acceptable
level of certainty that it meets the
bycatch reduction criterion. The second
condition ensures the BRD candidate
demonstrates a reasonable degree of
certainty the observed reduction rate
represents the true reduction rate of the
BRD candidate. This determination
ensures the operational use of the BRD
candidate in the shrimp fishery will, on
average, provide a level of bycatch
reduction that meets the established
bycatch reduction criterion. Interested
parties may obtain details regarding the
hypothesis testing procedure to be used
by contacting NOAA Fisheries,
Harvesting Technology Branch,
Mississippi Laboratories, Pascagoula
Facility, 3209 Frederic Street,
Pascagoula, MS 39567; phone 228–762–
4591. Following a favorable
determination of the certification
analysis, the RA will certify the BRD
(with any appropriate conditions as
indicated by test results) and publish
the notice of certification in the Federal
Register.
In addition, based on the data
provided, if the BRD candidate does not
meet the bycatch reduction certification
criterion in accordance with the
conditions outlined above, the RA may
provisionally certify a BRD candidate
based on the following condition:
There is at least a 50-percent
probability that the true reduction rate
of the BRD candidate is no more than
5 percentage points less than the
bycatch reduction criterion (i.e., the
BRD candidate demonstrates a best
point estimate [sample mean] within 5
percentage points of the certification
criterion).
A provisional certification will be
effective for 2 years from the date of
publication of a notice in the Federal
Register announcing this provisional
certification. This time period will
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
66917
allow additional wide-scale industry
evaluation of the BRD candidate, during
which additional effort would be made
to improve the efficiency of the BRD to
meet the certification criterion.
III. BRDs Not Certified and
Resubmission Procedures
The RA will advise the applicant, in
writing, if a BRD is not certified. This
notification will explain why the BRD
was not certified and what the applicant
may do to either modify the BRD or the
testing procedures to improve the
chances of having the BRD certified in
the future. If certification was denied
because of insufficient information, the
RA will explain what information is
lacking. The applicant must provide the
additional information within 60 days
from receipt of such notification. If the
RA subsequently certifies the BRD, the
RA will announce the certification in
the Federal Register.
IV. Decertification of BRDs
The RA will decertify a BRD
whenever NOAA Fisheries determines a
BRD no longer satisfies the bycatch
reduction criterion. Before determining
whether to decertify a BRD, the RA will
notify the appropriate Fishery
Management Council(s) in writing, and
the public will be provided an
opportunity to comment on any
proposed decertification through a
publication of a proposed rule in the
Federal Register with a comment period
of not less than 15 days. The RA will
consider any comments from the
affected Council(s) and public, and if
the RA elects to proceed with
decertification of the BRD, the RA will
publish a final rule in the Federal
Register, which would remove the BRD
from the certified list of BRDs.
V. Interactions With Sea Turtles
The following section is provided for
informational purposes. Sea turtles are
listed under the Endangered Species Act
as either endangered or threatened. The
following procedures apply to
incidental take of sea turtles under 50
CFR 223.206(d)(1):
Any sea turtles taken incidentally
during the course of fishing or scientific
research activities must be handled with
due care to prevent injury to live
specimens, observed for activity, and
returned to the water according to the
following procedures:
(A) Sea turtles that are actively
moving or determined to be dead (as
described in paragraph (B)(4) below)
must be released over the stern of the
boat. In addition, they must be released
only when fishing or scientific
collection gear is not in use, when the
E:\FR\FM\29SEP1.SGM
29SEP1
66918
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 189 / Thursday, September 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
engine gears are in neutral position, and
in areas where they are unlikely to be
recaptured or injured by vessels.
(B) Resuscitation must be attempted
on sea turtles that are comatose or
inactive by:
(1) Placing the turtle on its bottom
shell (plastron) so that the turtle is right
side up and elevating its hindquarters at
least 6 inches (15.2 cm) for a period of
4 to 24 hours. The amount of elevation
depends on the size of the turtle; greater
elevations are needed for larger turtles.
Periodically, rock the turtle gently left to
right and right to left by holding the
outer edge of the shell (carapace) and
lifting one side about 3 inches (7.6 cm)
then alternate to the other side. Gently
touch the eye and pinch the tail (reflex
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:35 Sep 28, 2016
Jkt 238001
test) periodically to see if there is a
response.
(2) Sea turtles being resuscitated must
be shaded and kept damp or moist but
under no circumstance be placed into a
container holding water. A water-soaked
towel placed over the head, carapace,
and flippers is the most effective
method in keeping a turtle moist.
(3) Sea turtles that revive and become
active must be released over the stern of
the boat only when fishing or scientific
collection gear is not in use, when the
engine gears are in neutral position, and
in areas where they are unlikely to be
recaptured or injured by vessels. Sea
turtles that fail to respond to the reflex
test or fail to move within 4 hours (up
to 24, if possible) must be returned to
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
the water in the same manner as that for
actively moving turtles.
(4) A turtle is determined to be dead
if the muscles are stiff (rigor mortis)
and/or the flesh has begun to rot;
otherwise, the turtle is determined to be
comatose or inactive and resuscitation
attempts are necessary.
Any sea turtle so taken must not be
consumed, sold, landed, offloaded,
transshipped, or kept below deck.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: September 19, 2016.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–23600 Filed 9–28–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\29SEP1.SGM
29SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 189 (Thursday, September 29, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 66912-66918]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-23600]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 160815740-6740-01]
RIN 0648-BG28
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic;
Shrimp Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; Revision of Bycatch Reduction
Device Testing Manual
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the framework procedure for adjusting
management measures of the Fishery Management Plan for the Shrimp
Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico (Gulf FMP), NMFS proposes to make
administrative revisions to the Bycatch Reduction Device Testing Manual
(BRD Manual). The BRD Manual contains procedures for the testing and
certification of BRDs for use in shrimp trawls in the exclusive
economic zone (EEZ) in the Gulf of Mexico (Gulf) and South Atlantic.
The proposed changes to the BRD Manual remove outdated or obsolete data
collection forms currently appended to the BRD Manual and revise the
text to make several procedural steps outlined in the BRD Manual
clearer and easier to understand. The intended effect of these
revisions is to increase understanding of the BRD certification
protocols.
DATES: Comments must be received by October 14, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on the proposed rule, identified by
NOAA-NMFS-2016-0109, by either of the following methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2016-0109, click the
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or
attach your comments.
[[Page 66913]]
Mail: Submit written comments to Susan Gerhart, NMFS
Southeast Regional Office, 263 13th Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL
33701.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily
by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous). Requests for copies of the BRD Manual should be sent to the
NMFS Southeast Regional Office, 263 13th Avenue South, St. Petersburg,
FL 33701.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Gerhart, NMFS Southeast Regional
Office, telephone: 727-824-5305, email: susan.gerhart@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The shrimp fishery in the Gulf EEZ is
managed under the Gulf FMP. The Gulf FMP was prepared by the Gulf of
Mexico Fishery Management Council (Gulf Council) and is implemented by
NMFS under the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation
and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) by regulations at 50 CFR part
622.
The shrimp fishery in the South Atlantic EEZ is managed under the
FMP for the Shrimp Fishery of the South Atlantic Region (South Atlantic
FMP). The South Atlantic FMP was prepared by the South Atlantic Fishery
Management Council (South Atlantic Council) and is implemented by NMFS
under the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Act by regulations at 50
CFR part 622.
Initially, the South Atlantic and Gulf Councils developed separate
amendments to their respective FMPs to require the use of certified
BRDs, and the South Atlantic Council developed their own BRD Manual, in
cooperation with NMFS. The South Atlantic Council established these
requirements through Amendment 2 to the South Atlantic FMP in 1997 (62
FR 18536, April 16, 1997). Subsequently, the Gulf Council required,
with limited exceptions, the use of certified BRDs through Amendment 9
to the Gulf FMP (63 FR 18139, April 14, 1998). Amendment 9 specified
that NMFS would develop a testing protocol for examining the bycatch
reduction performance of additional BRD designs. Regulations
implementing this initial testing protocol were effective July 13, 1999
(64 FR 37690, July 13, 1999), except for a collection-of-information
requirement, which became effective September 29, 1999 (64 FR 52427,
September 29, 1999). In 2005, in Amendment 6 to the South Atlantic FMP,
the South Atlantic Council transferred authority to NMFS to maintain
and revise the BRD Manual, and established a certification criterion
identical to the Gulf Council's eastern Gulf criterion (70 FR 73383,
December 12, 2005). In 2008, NMFS combined the separate BRD Manuals,
and established a single procedural process for testing BRDs, and a
single BRD certification criterion for both the Gulf and South Atlantic
(73 FR 8219, February 13, 2008). The proposed administrative changes
would not change the existing BRD certification criterion.
When the two BRD Manuals were initially developed, no mandatory
observer programs existed for Gulf and South Atlantic Council-managed
species, thus there was no officially established set of data
collection forms. To provide BRD testing applicants with a standardized
reporting method, forms and instructions developed and used by NMFS and
other researchers during a 1990s Congressionally-mandated Shrimp Trawl
Bycatch Research Program were provided with the BRD Manual as
Appendices A-I. This family of forms was officially submitted for
review and approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act and assigned a
control number by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), OMB-0648-
0345. Subsequently, mandatory observer programs were established by
NMFS for the reef fish fishery and the shrimp fishery in the Gulf, and
the various fisheries managed by NMFS' Highly Migratory Species
Division. NMFS established a package of observer data collection forms
to cover all of these programs with an assigned control number of OMB-
0648-0593, and incorporated the family of forms in a standardized
Observer Training Manual, including the BRD testing and certification
family of forms.
Over time, the various data collection forms used by NMFS have been
revised or discarded, making many of the forms in the BRD testing
family of forms obsolete (OMB-0648-0345). Currently, only three of the
eight original BRD testing data forms in the Observer Training Manual
are specific to BRD testing. NMFS intends to incorporate those forms
into the OMB-0648-0593 family of forms, and has already discontinued
the OMB-0648-0345 family of forms. Therefore, the forms need to be
removed as appendices to the BRD Manual and text revised within the BRD
Manual to remove references to those forms.
NMFS has also revised some text and instructions in the BRD Manual
to make the manual clearer and easier to understand. For example, where
forms were referenced, the instructions only stated that ``The
applicant should submit a completed application form (Appendix A)'';
given this action would remove that form from the BRD Manual, the
instructions have been revised to reflect the information that the
applicant must submit. Other revisions to the BRD Manual include
increased consistency of terms; for example, ``test'' and ``trawl''
were used interchangeably, as were ``trawl'' and ``net.''
These proposed changes to the BRD Manual were presented to the Gulf
and South Atlantic Councils for their consideration and no substantive
comments were received from either Council regarding these
administrative changes.
These proposed changes to management measures would not add to or
change any existing Federal regulations. Therefore, no codified text is
associated with these proposed changes to management measures.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the
NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined that this proposed rule is
consistent with the Gulf and South Atlantic FMPs, other provisions of
the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable laws, subject to further
consideration after public comment.
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration (SBA) that this proposed change to management measures,
if implemented, would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. The factual basis for this
determination is as follows:
The purpose of this proposed rule is to make non-regulatory
administrative revisions to the BRD Manual to simplify test reporting
procedures and make the procedural steps outlined in the BRD Manual
clearer and easier to understand. The Magnuson-Stevens Act provides the
statutory basis for this proposed rule.
This proposed rule, if implemented, would directly affect entities
that apply
[[Page 66914]]
for and participate in BRD testing. The primary entities expected to
apply for the BRD testing are state government, academic, and not-for-
profit entities. Independent commercial shrimping businesses in either
the Gulf or South Atlantic may also be included among applicants. NMFS
has not identified any other small entities that would be expected to
be directly affected by this proposed change to management measures.
The SBA defines a small organization as any not-for-profit
enterprise that is independently owned and operated and not dominant in
its field of operation. This definition includes private educational
institutions. The SBA also defines a small governmental jurisdiction as
the government of cities, counties, towns, townships, villages, school
districts, or special districts with a population less than 50,000. For
Regulatory Flexibility Act purposes only, NMFS has established a small
business size standard for businesses, including their affiliates,
whose primary industry is commercial fishing (see 50 CFR 200.2). A
business primarily engaged in commercial fishing (NAICS code 11411) is
classified as a small business if it is independently owned and
operated, is not dominant in its field of operation (including its
affiliates), and has combined annual receipts not in excess of $11
million for all its affiliated operations worldwide.
Over the period 2011-2015, a total of 5 separate entities applied
for BRD testing. These entities were NMFS, the Gulf and South Atlantic
Fisheries Foundation (Foundation), the University of Mississippi, Texas
A&M University, and one commercial shrimp fisherman. Individual
applications are required for each BRD tested and a total of 26
applications were submitted by these 5 entities over this period. The
most applications in any year during this period was 10 (2011),
submitted by 3 applicants, and the fewest applications was 1 (2015).
NMFS submitted the most applications, 10, followed by the Foundation
with 9. The University of Mississippi submitted three applications, and
both Texas A&M University (2013) and the commercial shrimp fisherman
(2015) submitted a single application.
In addition to these entities, previous applicants have included
the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection, and the University of Georgia. The respective
state agencies are extensions of their state governments and, as such,
exceed the SBA population thresholds for small government entities.
Similarly, the public academic institutions are extensions of the
respective state government educational systems and, therefore, are
similarly classified as large entities. Although no private colleges or
universities have applied for BRD testing, these institutions are
generally understood to be smaller than public institutions in terms of
student population, staff, and operational budgets. As a result, any
private educational institutions that might apply for BRD testing would
be expected to be a small entity. Any commercial shrimp fisherman that
might apply for BRD testing would do so from the perspective of
research and not commercial fishing. However, as a commercial shrimp
fisherman, this entity would be expected to primarily engage in
commercial fishing and not research. Thus, for these entities, the
commercial fishing revenue threshold would apply. From 2011 through
2013, the greatest average annual revenue for a single commercial
shrimp fishing business in the Gulf was approximately $2.48 million.
More recent information is not available, nor is similar information
available on commercial shrimp fishermen in the South Atlantic.
Nevertheless, because of the low maximum revenue total in the Gulf, it
is assumed that any commercial shrimp fisherman that would apply for
BRD testing would be a small business entity. In summary, this proposed
change to management measures would be expected to directly affect a
few small entities, such as not-for-profit institutions, commercial
shrimp businesses, and private colleges or universities.
The proposed revisions to the BRD Manual would not directly affect
fishery participation, harvest, or the business operation of any small
entity. As discussed in the Summary and Supplementary Information
sections of this proposed change to management measures, the proposed
changes are administrative in nature. This proposed change to
management measures would only eliminate test reporting forms in the
BRD Manual that are either obsolete or available elsewhere (NMFS
standardized Observer Training Manual), revise text and instructions
that reference these forms, list the information needed to be reported
for BRD testing instead of the specific forms, and improve the
consistency of terms used in the BRD Manual. These proposed changes are
purely administrative. They would not be expected to affect actual BRD
testing or the costs associated with such, but would be expected to
improve understanding of the testing process and requirements, and
facilitate better circumstances under which BRD research and gear
development may proceed. Although subsequent BRD testing could result
in future changes in allowable BRDs, the use of which could have direct
economic consequences, these would be indirect effects of this proposed
rule and outside the scope of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Based on the discussion above, NMFS determines that this proposed
change to management measures, if implemented, would not have a
significant adverse economic effect on a substantial number of small
entities. As a result, an initial regulatory flexibility analysis is
not required and none has been prepared.
The BRD Manual published as an appendix to a final rule published
in the Federal Register on February 13, 2008 (73 FR 8219, February 13,
2008), is revised to read as follows.
Note: The following appendix will publish in the Federal
Register but will not appear in the Code of Federal Regulations. See
the contacts under ADDRESSES to obtain the complete BRD Manual.
Appendix--Bycatch Reduction Device Testing Manual
Definitions
Bycatch reduction criterion is the standard by which a BRD
candidate will be evaluated. To be certified for use by the shrimp
fishery in the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) off the southeastern
United States (North Carolina through Texas), the BRD candidate must
demonstrate a successful reduction of total finfish bycatch by at
least 30 percent by weight.
Bycatch reduction device (BRD) is any gear or trawl modification
designed to allow finfish to escape from a shrimp trawl.
BRD candidate is a bycatch reduction device to be tested for
certification for use in the commercial shrimp fishery of
southeastern United States.
Certified BRD is a BRD that has been tested according to the
procedure outlined herein and has been determined by the RA as
having met the bycatch reduction criterion.
Control trawl means a trawl that is not equipped with a BRD
during a test.
Experimental trawl means the trawl that is equipped with the BRD
candidate during a test.
Evaluation and oversight personnel means scientists, observers,
and other technical personnel who, by reason of their occupation or
scientific expertise or training, are approved by the RA as
qualified to evaluate and review the application and testing
process.
Gear Test Authorization (GTA) means a document signed by the RA
that specifically exempts a person/vessel from Federal regulations
requiring the use of BRDs in Federal waters. This GTA must be issued
prior to conducting any tests on BRD candidates in Federal waters.
[[Page 66915]]
Net/side bias means when the net(s) being fished on one side of
the vessel demonstrate a different catch rate (fishing efficiency)
than the net(s) being fished on the other side of the vessel during
paired-net tests.
Observer means a person on the list maintained by the RA of
individuals qualified to supervise and monitor a BRD certification
test.
Paired-net test means a tow during certification trials where a
control net and an experimental net are fished simultaneously, and
the catches and catch rates between the nets are compared.
Provisional Certification Criterion means a secondary benchmark
that would allow a BRD candidate to be used for a time-limited
period in the southeastern shrimp fishery. To meet the criterion,
the BRD candidate must demonstrate a successful reduction of total
finfish bycatch by at least 25 percent by weight.
Provisionally certified BRD means a BRD that has been tested
according to the procedure outlined herein and has been determined
by the RA as having met the provisional certification criterion. A
BRD meeting the provisional certification criterion would be
certified by the RA for a period of 2 years.
Regional Administrator (RA) means the Southeast Regional
Administrator, National Marine Fisheries Service.
Required measurements refers to the quantification of gear
characteristics such as the dimensions and configuration of the
trawl, the BRD candidate, the doors, or the location of the BRD in
relation to other parts of the trawl gear that are used to assess
the performance of the BRD candidate.
Sample size means the number of successful tows.
Shrimp trawler means any vessel that is equipped with one or
more trawl nets where the on-board or landed catch of shrimp is more
than 1 percent, by weight, of all fish comprising its on-board or
landed catch.
Successful tow means that the control and experimental trawl
were fished in accordance with the requirements set forth herein and
the terms and conditions of the Letter of Authorization, and there
is no indication problematic events occurred during the tow that
would impact or influence the fishing efficiency (catch) of one or
both nets.
Tow time means the total time (hours and minutes) an individual
trawl was fished (i.e., the time interval beginning when the winch
is locked after deploying the net overboard, and ending when
retrieval of the net is initiated).
Trawl means a net and associated gear and rigging used to catch
shrimp. The terms trawl and net are used interchangeably throughout
this manual, although in most instances, ``trawl'' is used to
reflect the entire fishing rig (e.g., doors, tickler chain, net,
turtle excluder device, etc.), whereas a ``net'' is used to reflect
a component of that fishing rig.
Try net means a separate net pulled for brief periods by a
shrimp trawler to test for shrimp concentrations or determine
fishing conditions (e.g., presence of absence of bottom debris,
jellyfish, bycatch, and seagrasses).
Tuning a net means adjusting the trawl and its components to
minimize or eliminate any net/side bias that exists between the two
nets that will be used as the control and experimental trawls during
the certification test.
I. Introduction
This Bycatch Reduction Device Testing Manual (BRD Manual)
establishes a standardized process for evaluating whether bycatch
reduction device (BRD) candidates meet the established bycatch
reduction criterion. BRDs that meet the criterion can be certified for
use in the EEZ by the southeastern shrimp fishery. Requirements for
BRDs used in shrimp trawls in the Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic can
be found in 50 CFR part 622.
The requirement to use BRDs in state waters varies by state.
Persons wishing to conduct BRD candidate tests exclusively in state
waters do not need to apply to the National Marine Fisheries Service
(NOAA Fisheries) for authorization to conduct these tests but should
contact the appropriate state officials for authorizations. However,
for NOAA Fisheries to certify a BRD candidate for use in Federal
waters, tests conducted in state waters must meet the criteria for the
operations plan and data collection procedures established in this
manual.
II. BRD Candidate Tests
A. Application
Persons interested in evaluating the effectiveness of a BRD
candidate to reduce finfish from a shrimp trawl must apply for,
receive, and have on board the approved vessel(s) during the test, a
Gear Test Authorization (GTA) from the NOAA Fisheries Southeast
Regional Office Regional Administrator (RA). To receive a GTA, the
applicant must submit the following documentation to the RA: (1) Name,
address, and contact information of the applicant; (2) a list of
vessels to be used during the sampling program, including the vessels'
U.S. Coast Guard documentation numbers or state registration numbers;
(3) name, address, and contact information of the vessel owners and/or
vessel operators; (4) a brief statement of the purpose and goal of the
activity for which the GTA is requested; (5) an operations plan (see
Section C below) describing the scope, duration, dates, and location of
the test, and methods that will be used to conduct the test; (6) an 8.5
inch x 11 inch (21.6 cm x 27.9 cm) diagram drawn to scale of the BRD
candidate design; (7) an 8.5 inch x 11 inch (21.6 cm x 27.9 cm) diagram
drawn to scale of the BRD in the shrimp trawl; and (8) a description of
the mechanism by which the BRD candidate is expected to exclude
finfish.
An applicant requesting an GTA to test an unapproved turtle
excluder device (TED) as a BRD (including modifications to a certified
TED where the modifications would make the configuration of the TED
illegal) must first apply for and obtain from the RA an experimental
TED authorization pursuant to 50 CFR 223.207(e)(2). Applicants should
contact the Protected Resources Division of NOAA Fisheries Southeast
Regional Office for further information. The GTA applicant must include
a copy of that authorization with the application.
Incomplete applications will be returned to the applicant along
with a letter from the RA indicating what actions the applicant may
take to make the application complete.
There is no cost to the applicant for the RA's administrative
expenses such as reviewing applications, issuing GTA, evaluating test
results, or certifying BRDs. However, all other costs associated with
the actual testing activities are the responsibility of the applicant,
or any associated sponsor.
If an application for a GTA is denied, the RA will provide a letter
of explanation to the applicant, together with relevant recommendations
to address the deficiencies that resulted in the denial.
B. Allowable Activities
Issuance of a GTA to test a BRD candidate in the South Atlantic or
Gulf of Mexico allows the applicant to remove or disable the existing
certified BRD in one outboard net (to create a control net), and to
place the BRD candidate in another outboard net in lieu of a certified
BRD (to create an experimental net). All other trawls under tow during
the test must have a certified BRD, unless these nets are specifically
exempted in the GTA. All nets under tow during the test must have an
approved TED unless operating under an authorization issued pursuant to
50 CFR 223.207(e)(2), whereby the test is being conducted on an
experimental TED. The GTA, and experimental TED authorization if
applicable, must be on board the vessel(s) while the test is being
conducted. The term of the GTA will be 60 days; should circumstances
require a longer test period, the applicant may request a 60-day
extension.
C. Operations Plan
An operations plan should be submitted with the application
describing a method to compare the catches of shrimp and fish in a
control
[[Page 66916]]
net (net without a BRD candidate installed) to the catches of the same
species in an experimental net (a net configured identically to the
control net but also equipped with the BRD candidate).
The applicant may choose to conduct a pre-certification test of a
prototype BRD candidate. A pre-certification test would be conducted
when the intent is to assess the preliminary effectiveness of a
prototype BRD candidate under field conditions, and to make
modifications to the prototype BRD candidate during the field test. For
pre-certification testing, the operations plan must include only a
description of the scope, duration, dates, and location of the test,
along with a description of methods that will be used to conduct the
test. No observer is required for a pre-certification test, but the
applicant may choose to use an observer to maintain a written record of
the test. The applicant will maintain a written record for both the
control and experimental net during each tow. Mandatory data collection
is limited to the weight of the shrimp catch and the weight of the
total finfish catch in each test net during each tow. Although not
required, the applicant may wish to incorporate some or all the
certification test requirements listed below.
For a BRD candidate to be considered for certification, the
operations plan must be more detailed and address the following topics:
The primary assumption in assessing the bycatch reduction
effectiveness of a BRD candidate during paired net tests is that the
inclusion of the BRD candidate in the experimental net is the only
factor causing a difference in catch from the control net. Therefore,
the nets to be used in the tests must be calibrated (tuned) to
minimize, to the extent practicable, any net/side bias in catch
efficiency prior to beginning a test series, and tuned again after any
gear modification or change. Additional information on tuning shrimp
trawls to minimize bias is available from NOAA Fisheries, Harvesting
Technology Branch, Mississippi Laboratories, Pascagoula Facility, 3209
Frederic Street, Pascagoula, MS 39567; phone 601-762-4591.
A standard tow time for a proposed evaluation should be
defined. Tow times must be representative of the tow times used by
commercial shrimp trawlers. The applicant should indicate what
alternatives will be considered should the proposed tow time need
adjustment once the test begins.
A minimum sample size of 30 successful tows using a
specific BRD candidate design is required for the statistical analysis
described in Section F. No alterations of the BRD candidate design are
allowed during a specific test series. If the BRD candidate design is
altered, a new test series must be started. If a gear change (i.e.,
changing nets, doors, or rigging) is required, the nets should be tuned
again before proceeding with further tests to complete the 30-tow
series. Minor repairs to the gear (e.g., sewing holes in the webbing;
replacing a broken tickler chain with a new one of the same
configuration) are not considered a ``gear change.''
For tests conducted on twin-rig vessels (one net on the
port side and one net on the starboard side), biases that might result
from the use of a try net should be minimized. Total fishing times for
a try net must be a consistent percentage of the total tow time during
each tow made in the test.
To incorporate any potential net/side bias that remains
after the tuning tows (e.g., the effect of a try net), or to
accommodate for bias that develops between the control and experimental
nets during the test, the operations plan should outline a timetable
ensuring that an equal number of successful tows are made with the BRD
candidate employed in both the port and starboard nets.
Mandatory data to be collected during a test includes: (1)
Detailed vessel and gear specifications and (2) pertinent information
concerning the location, duration, and catch from individual tows as
set forth in forms available from the Science and Research Director
(SRD) of the Southeast Fisheries Science Center. Applicants should
contact the NOAA Fisheries, Galveston Laboratory, 4700 Avenue U,
Galveston, TX 77551; phone 409-766-3500.
Following each paired tow, the catches from the control
and experimental nets must be examined separately. This requires that
the catch from each net be kept separate from each other, as well as
from the catch taken in other nets fished during that tow. Mandatory
data collections include recording the weight of the total catch of
each test net (control and experimental nets), and the weight of the
total shrimp catch (i.e., brown, white, pink, rock, or other shrimp by
species) in each test net.
To determine the total finfish catch in each test net, two
procedures may be used under different conditions. If the total catch
in a net does not fill one standard 1-bushel (ca. 10 gal or 30 L)
polyethylene shrimp basket (ca. 70 lb [31.8 kg] of catch), but the tow
is otherwise considered successful, data must be collected on the
entire catch of the net, and recorded as a ``select'' sample,
indicating that the values represent the total catch of the particular
net. If the catch in a net exceeds 70 lb (31.8 kg), a well-mixed sample
consisting of one standard 1-bushel [ca. 10 gal] (30 L) polyethylene
shrimp basket must be taken from the total catch of the net. The total
weight of the sample must be recorded, as well as the weight (and
number as applicable) of finfish in aggregate.
The forms available from the SRD include record keeping
opportunities for additional species; collection of this information is
optional for certification evaluation purposes. However, applicants
testing BRD candidates are encouraged to collect additional information
that may be pertinent to addressing bycatch issues in their respective
regions. For example, in the western Gulf of Mexico applicants are
especially encouraged to collect information on the bycatch of juvenile
red snapper. Such data collection would follow the same procedure as
sampling the total finfish catch.
The operations plan should address what the applicant will do
should it become necessary to deviate from the primary procedures
outlined in the operations plan. The plan should describe in detail
what will be done to continue the test in a reasonable manner that is
consistent with the primary procedures. For example, it may become
necessary to alter the pre-selected tow time to adapt to local fishing
conditions to successfully complete the test. Prior to issuing a GTA,
the RA may consult with evaluation personnel to review the
acceptability of these proposed alterations.
D. Observer Requirement
It is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that a
qualified observer is on board the vessel during the certification
tests. Observers may include employees or individuals acting on behalf
of NOAA Fisheries, state fishery management agencies, universities, or
private industry. Any change in information or testing circumstances,
such as replacement of the observer, must be reported to the RA within
30 days. Under 50 CFR 600.746, when any fishing vessel is required to
carry an observer as part of a mandatory observer program under the
Magnuson Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C.
1801, et seq.), the owner or operator of the vessel must comply with
guidelines, regulations, and conditions to ensure their vessel is
adequate and safe to carry an observer, and to allow normal observer
functions
[[Page 66917]]
to collect information as described in this Manual. A vessel owner is
deemed to meet this requirement if the vessel displays one of the
following: (1) A current Commercial Fishing Vessel Safety Examination
decal, issued within the last 2 years, that certifies compliance with
regulations found in 33 CFR, chapter I, and 46 CFR, chapter I; (2) a
certificate of compliance issued pursuant to 46 CFR 28.710; or (3) a
valid certificate of inspection pursuant to 46 U.S.C. 3311. The
observer has the right to check for major safety items, and if those
items are absent or unserviceable, the observer may choose not to sail
with the vessel until those deficiencies are corrected.
E. Reports
A report on the BRD candidate test results must be submitted by the
applicant or associated sponsor before the RA will consider the BRD for
certification. The report must contain a comprehensive description of
the test, copies of all completed data forms used during the test, and
photographs, drawings, and similar material describing the BRD. The
report must include a description and explanation of any unanticipated
deviations from the operations plan that occurred during the test.
These deviations must be described in sufficient detail to allow
evaluation and oversight personnel selected by NOAA Fisheries to
determine if the tests were continued in a reasonable manner consistent
with the approved operations plan procedures. Applicants must provide
information on the cost of materials, labor, and installation of the
BRD candidate. In addition, any unique or special circumstances of the
tests, such as special operational characteristics or fishing
techniques, which enhance the BRD's performance, should be described
and documented as appropriate.
F. Certification
The RA will determine whether the required reports and supporting
materials are sufficient to evaluate the BRD candidate's effectiveness.
The determination of sufficiency would be based on whether the
applicant adhered to the prescribed testing procedure or provided
adequate justification for any deviations from the procedure during the
test. If the RA determines that the data are sufficient for evaluation,
the BRD candidate will be evaluated to determine if it meets the
bycatch reduction criterion. In making a decision, the RA may consult
with evaluation and oversight personnel. Based on the data submitted
for review, the RA will determine the effectiveness of the BRD
candidate, using appropriate statistical procedures such as Bayesian
analyses, to determine if the BRD candidate meets the following
conditions:
(1) There is at least a 50-percent probability that the true
reduction rate of the BRD candidate meets the bycatch reduction
criterion (i.e., the BRD candidate demonstrates a best point estimate
[sample mean] that meets the certification criterion); and
(2) There is no more than a 10-percent probability that the true
reduction rate of the BRD candidate is more than 5 percentage points
less than the bycatch reduction criterion.
To be certified for use in the fishery, the BRD candidate will have
to satisfy both conditions. The first condition ensures that the
observed reduction rate of the BRD candidate has an acceptable level of
certainty that it meets the bycatch reduction criterion. The second
condition ensures the BRD candidate demonstrates a reasonable degree of
certainty the observed reduction rate represents the true reduction
rate of the BRD candidate. This determination ensures the operational
use of the BRD candidate in the shrimp fishery will, on average,
provide a level of bycatch reduction that meets the established bycatch
reduction criterion. Interested parties may obtain details regarding
the hypothesis testing procedure to be used by contacting NOAA
Fisheries, Harvesting Technology Branch, Mississippi Laboratories,
Pascagoula Facility, 3209 Frederic Street, Pascagoula, MS 39567; phone
228-762-4591. Following a favorable determination of the certification
analysis, the RA will certify the BRD (with any appropriate conditions
as indicated by test results) and publish the notice of certification
in the Federal Register.
In addition, based on the data provided, if the BRD candidate does
not meet the bycatch reduction certification criterion in accordance
with the conditions outlined above, the RA may provisionally certify a
BRD candidate based on the following condition:
There is at least a 50-percent probability that the true reduction
rate of the BRD candidate is no more than 5 percentage points less than
the bycatch reduction criterion (i.e., the BRD candidate demonstrates a
best point estimate [sample mean] within 5 percentage points of the
certification criterion).
A provisional certification will be effective for 2 years from the
date of publication of a notice in the Federal Register announcing this
provisional certification. This time period will allow additional wide-
scale industry evaluation of the BRD candidate, during which additional
effort would be made to improve the efficiency of the BRD to meet the
certification criterion.
III. BRDs Not Certified and Resubmission Procedures
The RA will advise the applicant, in writing, if a BRD is not
certified. This notification will explain why the BRD was not certified
and what the applicant may do to either modify the BRD or the testing
procedures to improve the chances of having the BRD certified in the
future. If certification was denied because of insufficient
information, the RA will explain what information is lacking. The
applicant must provide the additional information within 60 days from
receipt of such notification. If the RA subsequently certifies the BRD,
the RA will announce the certification in the Federal Register.
IV. Decertification of BRDs
The RA will decertify a BRD whenever NOAA Fisheries determines a
BRD no longer satisfies the bycatch reduction criterion. Before
determining whether to decertify a BRD, the RA will notify the
appropriate Fishery Management Council(s) in writing, and the public
will be provided an opportunity to comment on any proposed
decertification through a publication of a proposed rule in the Federal
Register with a comment period of not less than 15 days. The RA will
consider any comments from the affected Council(s) and public, and if
the RA elects to proceed with decertification of the BRD, the RA will
publish a final rule in the Federal Register, which would remove the
BRD from the certified list of BRDs.
V. Interactions With Sea Turtles
The following section is provided for informational purposes. Sea
turtles are listed under the Endangered Species Act as either
endangered or threatened. The following procedures apply to incidental
take of sea turtles under 50 CFR 223.206(d)(1):
Any sea turtles taken incidentally during the course of fishing or
scientific research activities must be handled with due care to prevent
injury to live specimens, observed for activity, and returned to the
water according to the following procedures:
(A) Sea turtles that are actively moving or determined to be dead
(as described in paragraph (B)(4) below) must be released over the
stern of the boat. In addition, they must be released only when fishing
or scientific collection gear is not in use, when the
[[Page 66918]]
engine gears are in neutral position, and in areas where they are
unlikely to be recaptured or injured by vessels.
(B) Resuscitation must be attempted on sea turtles that are
comatose or inactive by:
(1) Placing the turtle on its bottom shell (plastron) so that the
turtle is right side up and elevating its hindquarters at least 6
inches (15.2 cm) for a period of 4 to 24 hours. The amount of elevation
depends on the size of the turtle; greater elevations are needed for
larger turtles. Periodically, rock the turtle gently left to right and
right to left by holding the outer edge of the shell (carapace) and
lifting one side about 3 inches (7.6 cm) then alternate to the other
side. Gently touch the eye and pinch the tail (reflex test)
periodically to see if there is a response.
(2) Sea turtles being resuscitated must be shaded and kept damp or
moist but under no circumstance be placed into a container holding
water. A water-soaked towel placed over the head, carapace, and
flippers is the most effective method in keeping a turtle moist.
(3) Sea turtles that revive and become active must be released over
the stern of the boat only when fishing or scientific collection gear
is not in use, when the engine gears are in neutral position, and in
areas where they are unlikely to be recaptured or injured by vessels.
Sea turtles that fail to respond to the reflex test or fail to move
within 4 hours (up to 24, if possible) must be returned to the water in
the same manner as that for actively moving turtles.
(4) A turtle is determined to be dead if the muscles are stiff
(rigor mortis) and/or the flesh has begun to rot; otherwise, the turtle
is determined to be comatose or inactive and resuscitation attempts are
necessary.
Any sea turtle so taken must not be consumed, sold, landed,
offloaded, transshipped, or kept below deck.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: September 19, 2016.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-23600 Filed 9-28-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P