Hours of Service of Drivers: Transco, Inc.; Application for Exemption, 66734-66736 [2016-23364]
Download as PDF
66734
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 28, 2016 / Notices
or optometrist’s report to the medical
examiner at the time of the annual
medical examination; and (4) that each
individual provide a copy of the annual
medical certification to the employer for
retention in the driver’s qualification
file, or keep a copy in his/her driver’s
qualification file if he/she is selfemployed. The driver must also have a
copy of the certification when driving,
for presentation to a duly authorized
Federal, State, or local enforcement
official.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
VI. Conclusion
Based upon its evaluation of the 47
exemption applications, FMCSA
exempts the following drivers from the
diabetes requirement in 49 CFR
391.41(b)(10), subject to the
requirements cited above (49 CFR
391.64(b)):
Richard B. Aungier (MT)
Christopher R. Barwick (NC)
Richard D. Bentley (IN)
Jeffrey C. Bergen (MA)
Stephen G. Bowen (IL)
Christopher J. Burgess (ID)
Edward D. Burman (MA)
Lynn J. Clark (UT)
Jamie A. Davidson (MN)
Kenneth W. Day (TN)
Horace Dickinson (GA)
Roy A. Duering (MN)
Howard J. Easter III (VA)
James R. Fifield (MI)
Scott A. Figert (OH)
Christopher E. Francklyn (CO)
Larry D. Funk (KS)
Mitchell P. Gibson (MI)
Steven S. Gray (CT)
Donald F. Greel, Jr. (MA)
Rosemary M. Holland (TX)
John A. Jung (OH)
Jerry H. Kahn (MN)
James J. Kramer (PA)
Sean T. Lewis (NJ)
Edwin Lozada (FL)
Kevin S. Martin (MN)
Allysa B. Meirowith (NY)
Darren D. Mish (WI)
Brian L. Murray (WA)
Thomas V. Noyes (MA)
Benny M. Perez (PA)
Gregory S. Pethtel (OH)
Thomas J. Price (WY)
Theodore D. Reagle (PA)
Eric A. Richie (AZ)
Joseph Romano (NY)
Keith E. Shumake (CO)
William G. Simpson (CO)
Jospeh A. Sisk (MS)
Elmer L. Sprouse (NV)
Stirling H. C. Sowerby (PA)
John J. Steele (AL)
Ryan M. Stumbaugh (PA)
David J. Walker (IA)
Shawn D. Weigel (KS)
William H. Yocum (MO)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:04 Sep 27, 2016
Jkt 238001
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e)
and 31315 each exemption is valid for
two years unless revoked earlier by
FMCSA. The exemption will be revoked
if the following occurs: (1) The person
fails to comply with the terms and
conditions of the exemption; (2) the
exemption has resulted in a lower level
of safety than was maintained before it
was granted; or (3) continuation of the
exemption would not be consistent with
the goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C.
31136(e) and 31315. If the exemption is
still effective at the end of the 2-year
period, the person may apply to FMCSA
for a renewal under procedures in effect
at that time.
Issued on: September 19, 2016.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016–23356 Filed 9–27–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA–2016–0244]
Hours of Service of Drivers: Transco,
Inc.; Application for Exemption
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of application for
exemption; request for comments.
AGENCY:
FMCSA announces that it has
received an application from Transco,
Inc. (Transco) for an exemption from the
30-minute rest break provision of the
Agency’s hours-of-service (HOS)
regulations for commercial motor
vehicle (CMV) drivers. Transco requests
that its drivers be permitted to comply
with the 30-minute rest break
requirement while performing on-duty,
not-driving tasks. The requested
exemption would apply to all Transco
drivers in its grocery and foodservice
divisions who provide driving and
delivery services to their customers. Due
to the nature of their operation, Transco
believes that compliance with the 30minute rest break rule negatively
impacts the overall safety and general
health of its CMV drivers, and therefore
requests this exemption for all of its
company drivers. FMCSA requests
public comment on Transco’s
application for exemption.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before October 28, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by Federal Docket
Management System Number FMCSA–
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2016–0244 by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. See the Public
Participation and Request for Comments
section below for further information.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building,
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building, Ground Floor, Room W12–
140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. E.T., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
Each submission must include the
Agency name and the docket number for
this notice. Note that DOT posts all
comments received without change to
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information included in a
comment. Please see the Privacy Act
heading below.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments, go to www.regulations.gov at
any time or visit Room W12–140 on the
ground level of the West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The on-line FDMS is available
24 hours each day, 365 days each year
Privacy Act: In accordance with 5
U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its
rulemaking process. DOT posts these
comments, without edit, including any
personal information the commenter
provides, to www.regulations.gov, as
described in the system of records
notice (DOT/ALL–14 FDMS), which can
be reviewed at www.dot.gov/privacy.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information concerning this notice,
contact Mr. Thomas Yager, Chief,
FMCSA Driver and Carrier Operations
Division; Office of Carrier, Driver and
Vehicle Safety Standards; Telephone:
(614) 942–6477. Email: MCPSD@
dot.gov. If you have questions on
viewing or submitting material to the
docket, contact Docket Services,
telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
FMCSA encourages you to participate
by submitting comments and related
materials.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
notice (FMCSA–2016–0244), indicate
E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM
28SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 28, 2016 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
the specific section of this document to
which the comment applies, and
provide a reason for suggestions or
recommendations. You may submit
your comments and material online or
by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but
please use only one of these means.
FMCSA recommends that you include
your name and a mailing address, an
email address, or a phone number in the
body of your document so the Agency
can contact you if it has questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
www.regulations.gov and put the docket
number, ‘‘FMCSA–2016–0244’’ in the
‘‘Keyword’’ box, and click ‘‘Search.’’
When the new screen appears, click on
‘‘Comment Now!’’ button and type your
comment into the text box in the
following screen. Choose whether you
are submitting your comment as an
individual or on behalf of a third party
and then submit. If you submit your
comments by mail or hand delivery,
submit them in an unbound format, no
larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you
submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the
facility, please enclose a stamped, selfaddressed postcard or envelope. FMCSA
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period
and may grant or not grant this
application based on your comments.
II. Legal Basis
FMCSA has authority under 49 U.S.C.
31136(e) and 31315 to grant exemptions
from certain Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Regulations (FMCSRs). FMCSA
must publish a notice of each exemption
request in the Federal Register (49 CFR
381.315(a)). The Agency must provide
the public an opportunity to inspect the
information relevant to the application,
including any safety analyses that have
been conducted. The Agency must also
provide an opportunity for public
comment on the request.
The Agency reviews safety analyses
and public comments submitted, and
determines whether granting the
exemption would likely achieve a level
of safety equivalent to, or greater than,
the level that would be achieved by the
current regulation (49 CFR 381.305).
The decision of the Agency must be
published in the Federal Register (49
CFR 381.315(b)) with the reasons for
denying or granting the application and,
if granted, the name of the person or
class of persons receiving the
exemption, and the regulatory provision
from which the exemption is granted.
The notice must also specify the
effective period and explain the terms
and conditions of the exemption. The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:04 Sep 27, 2016
Jkt 238001
exemption may be renewed (49 CFR
381.300(b)).
III. Request for Exemption
On December 27, 2011 (76 FR 81133),
FMCSA published a final rule amending
its hours-of-service (HOS) regulations
for drivers of property-carrying CMVs.
The final rule adopted several changes
to the HOS rules, including a new
provision requiring drivers to take a rest
break during the work day under certain
circumstances. Drivers may drive a
CMV only if 8 hours or less have passed
since the end of the driver’s last off-duty
or sleeper-berth period of at least 30
minutes. FMCSA did not specify when
drivers must take the 30-minute break,
but the rule requires that they wait no
longer than 8 hours after the last offduty or sleeper-berth period of that
length or longer to take the break if they
want to drive.
Transco seeks an exemption from the
30-minute rest break provision in 49
CFR 395.3(a)(3)(ii). Transco operates
through McLane Company, Inc., its
commonly-owned affiliate, which
delivers food products and other goods
to various grocery stores and restaurants
throughout the United States. McLane’s
Grocery and Foodservice divisions
maintain distribution centers
throughout the country, each employing
between 100 and 300 drivers. McLane’s
drivers provide just-in-time food
delivery services to its customers, which
include convenience stores, mass
merchants, and various dining
establishments. Transco contends that
its drivers/operations differ greatly from
the average long-haul CMV driver for
the following reasons:
• Multi-stop daily deliveries: Its
drivers typically make daily multi-stop
deliveries to Transco’s customers,
returning to their originating
distribution center at the end of each
load, which takes an average of 19
hours. On average, each Transco driver
makes nine stops per day;
• Significant physical activity: Each
delivery requires the driver to get in and
out of the CMV on multiple occasions
to unload grocery, fresh food, and other
products for delivery. Specifically,
deliveries to smaller customers, which
comprise the majority of each driver’s
deliveries, include parking the CMV
close the customer’s store, lowering a
ramp from the rear of the CMV to the
ground, and off-loading freight using a
two-wheeled cart into the store. For
larger customers, the driver delivers the
freight at the customer’s loading dock;
and
• Breaks in the driving routine: Each
delivery effectively breaks up the
otherwise uninterrupted driving
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66735
routine. The physical activities that
Transco drivers engage in on a daily
basis differs significantly from those of
long-haul truck drivers who often do not
engage in vigorous physical activity.
According to Transco, as a result of
these operational differences, the 30minute rest break requirement does not
increase safety when applied to its
drivers; instead, the applicant claims
the requirement may very well decrease
road safety for its drivers. For the
typical long-haul CMV driver, the 30minute rest break serves as an
opportunity to break the monotony of
driving and relieve some of the stress of
continuous driving, but for Transco’s
drivers, by the nature of the work they
currently have breaks—which includes
physical exercise—several times each
day.
Additionally, Transco states that the
30-minute rest break requirement causes
its drivers to travel over 8.2 million
additional miles each year on more than
18,000 additional loads. This increase in
miles traveled results in eight additional
reportable accidents per year, and also
requires Transco CMVs to use over 1.3
million more gallons of fuel each year.
This influx of CMVs on public highways
also increases congestion, and wear on
critical infrastructure. The 30-minute
rest-break requirement also degrades the
health of Transco’s drivers as leading
clinical studies reveal sedentary
activities substantially increase the risk
of cardiovascular disease among adults.
By insisting that the rest-break
requirement be performed off-duty, it
essentially forces Transco’s drivers to
stop physical activity and become
sedentary.
Transco believes that the granting of
this exemption would offer two
benefits—(1) the exemption would
reduce the number of motor vehicle
accidents and congestion on public
roads by reducing the overall miles
travelled to serve its customers; and (2)
the exemption would increase the
health of their drivers by increasing
their physical activity through the
course of their deliveries and
substantially reducing any sedentary
periods. Transco contends that under
the exemption, its operations would
maintain a level of safety equivalent to,
if not greater than, that achieved by
complying with the regulation. In its
application, Transco lists a number of
on-going company safety activities
already in place to provide continuous
training to drivers about both safety
policy violations and driving behaviors
that increase risk. These activities
include on-board visual monitoring
systems, Automatic On-Board Recording
Devices, driver training, weekly safety
E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM
28SEN1
66736
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 28, 2016 / Notices
inspections, full compliance
assessments, and periodic safety
committee meetings, which Transco
contends would ensure an equivalent
level of safety if the requested
exemption is granted.
A copy of the Transco’s application
for exemption is available for review in
the docket for this notice.
Issued on: September 15, 2016.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016–23364 Filed 9–27–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2016–0086]
Decision That Certain Nonconforming
Motor Vehicles Are Eligible for
Importation
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petitions.
AGENCY:
This document announces
decisions by NHTSA that certain motor
vehicles not originally manufactured to
comply with all applicable Federal
Motor Vehicle Safety Standards
(FMVSS) are eligible for importation
into the United States because they are
substantially similar to vehicles
originally manufactured for sale in the
United States and certified by their
manufacturers as complying with the
safety standards, and they are capable of
being readily altered to conform to the
standards or because they have safety
features that comply with, or are
capable of being altered to comply with,
all applicable FMVSS.
DATES: These decisions became effective
on the dates specified in Annex A.
ADDRESSES: For further information
contact Mr. George Stevens, Office of
Vehicle Safety Compliance, NHTSA
(202–366–5308).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a
motor vehicle that was not originally
manufactured to conform to all
applicable FMVSS shall be refused
admission into the United States unless
NHTSA has decided that the motor
vehicle is substantially similar to a
motor vehicle originally manufactured
for importation into and/or sale in the
United States, certified under 49 U.S.C.
30115, and of the same model year as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:04 Sep 27, 2016
Jkt 238001
the model of the motor vehicle to be
compared, and is capable of being
readily altered to conform to all
applicable FMVSS.
Where there is no substantially
similar U.S.-certified motor vehicle, 49
U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(B) permits a
nonconforming motor vehicle to be
admitted into the United States if its
safety features comply with, or are
capable of being altered to comply with,
all applicable FMVSS based on
destructive test data or such other
evidence as NHTSA decides to be
adequate.
Petitions for eligibility decisions may
be submitted by either manufacturers or
importers who have registered with
NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR part 592. As
specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA
publishes notice in the Federal Register
of each petition that it receives, and
affords interested persons an
opportunity to comment on the petition.
At the close of the comment period,
NHTSA decides, on the basis of the
petition and any comments that it has
received, whether the vehicle is eligible
for importation. The agency then
publishes this decision in the Federal
Register.
NHTSA received petitions from
registered importers to decide whether
the vehicles listed in Annex A to this
notice are eligible for importation into
the United States. To afford an
opportunity for public comment,
NHTSA published notice of these
petitions as specified in Annex A. The
reader is referred to those notices for a
thorough description of the petitions.
Comments: No substantive comments
were received in response to the
petitions identified in Appendix A.
NHTSA Decision: Accordingly, on the
basis of the foregoing, NHTSA hereby
decides that each motor vehicle listed in
Annex A to this notice, which was not
originally manufactured to comply with
all applicable FMVSS, is either
substantially similar to a motor vehicle
manufactured for importation into and/
or sale in the United States, and
certified under 49 U.S.C. 30115, as
specified in Annex A, and is capable of
being readily altered to conform to all
applicable FMVSS or has safety features
that comply with, or are capable of
being altered to comply with, all
applicable Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standards.
Vehicle Eligibility Number for Subject
Vehicles: The importer of a vehicle
admissible under any final decision
must indicate on the form HS–7
accompanying entry the appropriate
vehicle eligibility number indicating
that the vehicle is eligible for entry.
Vehicle eligibility numbers assigned to
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
vehicles admissible under this decision
are specified in Annex A.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A),
(a)(1)(B) and (b)(1); 49 CFR 593.7; delegations
of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8.
Jeffrey M. Giuseppe,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
Annex A—Nonconforming Motor
Vehicles Decided To Be Eligible For
Importation
1. Docket No. NHTSA–2014–0058
Nonconforming Vehicles: 2008 Aston Martin
Vantage V8 passenger vehicles.
Substantially Similar U.S. Certified Vehicles:
2008 Aston Martin Vantage V8 passenger
vehicles.
Notice of Petition Published at: 81 FR 26867
(May 4, 2016)
Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–582
(effective date July 1, 2016)
2. Docket No. NHTSA–2015–0082
Nonconforming Vehicles: 2009 MercedesBenz G Class Long Wheelbase (LWB) (463
Chassis) multipurpose passenger vehicles.
Substantially Similar U.S. Certified Vehicles:
2009 Mercedes-Benz G Class Long
Wheelbase (LWB) (463 Chassis)
multipurpose passenger vehicles.
Notice of Petition Published at: 81 FR 26869
(May 4, 2016)
Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–583
(effective date July 1, 2016)
3. Docket No. NHTSA–2015–0084
Nonconforming Vehicles: 2012 Jeep Wrangler
multipurpose passenger vehicles
manufactured for the Mexican market.
Substantially Similar U.S. Certified Vehicles:
2012 Jeep Wrangler multipurpose
passenger vehicles.
Notice of Petition Published at: 81 FR 29616
(May 12, 2016)
Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–584
(effective date July 1, 2016)
4. Docket No. NHTSA–2016–0060
Nonconforming Vehicles: 2011 Ducati
Multistrada motorcycles.
Substantially Similar U.S. Certified Vehicles:
2011 Ducati Multistrada motorcycles.
Notice of Petition Published at: 81 FR 46998
(July 19, 2016)
Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–585
(effective date August 26, 2016)
5. Docket No. NHTSA–2016–0005
Nonconforming Vehicles: 1994–1995
Lamborghini Diablo SE30 passenger cars.
Substantially Similar U.S. Certified Vehicles:
1994–1995 Lamborghini Diablo SE30
passenger cars.
Notice of Petition Published at: 81 FR 47490
(July 21, 2016)
Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–586
(effective date September 1, 2016)
6. Docket No. NHTSA–2016–0055
Nonconforming Vehicles: 2008–2011 Ferrari
599 passenger cars.
Substantially Similar U.S. Certified Vehicles:
2008–2011 Ferrari 599 passenger cars.
Notice of Petition Published at: 81 FR 47491
(July 21, 2016)
E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM
28SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 188 (Wednesday, September 28, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66734-66736]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-23364]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA-2016-0244]
Hours of Service of Drivers: Transco, Inc.; Application for
Exemption
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of application for exemption; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA announces that it has received an application from
Transco, Inc. (Transco) for an exemption from the 30-minute rest break
provision of the Agency's hours-of-service (HOS) regulations for
commercial motor vehicle (CMV) drivers. Transco requests that its
drivers be permitted to comply with the 30-minute rest break
requirement while performing on-duty, not-driving tasks. The requested
exemption would apply to all Transco drivers in its grocery and
foodservice divisions who provide driving and delivery services to
their customers. Due to the nature of their operation, Transco believes
that compliance with the 30-minute rest break rule negatively impacts
the overall safety and general health of its CMV drivers, and therefore
requests this exemption for all of its company drivers. FMCSA requests
public comment on Transco's application for exemption.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 28, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Federal Docket
Management System Number FMCSA-2016-0244 by any of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. See the
Public Participation and Request for Comments section below for further
information.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building, Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building, Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.
E.T., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
Each submission must include the Agency name and the docket number
for this notice. Note that DOT posts all comments received without
change to www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
included in a comment. Please see the Privacy Act heading below.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments, go to www.regulations.gov at any time or visit Room W12-140
on the ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., ET, Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The on-line FDMS is available 24 hours each
day, 365 days each year
Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits
comments from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT
posts these comments, without edit, including any personal information
the commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the
system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.dot.gov/privacy.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information concerning this
notice, contact Mr. Thomas Yager, Chief, FMCSA Driver and Carrier
Operations Division; Office of Carrier, Driver and Vehicle Safety
Standards; Telephone: (614) 942-6477. Email: MCPSD@dot.gov. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, contact
Docket Services, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Participation and Request for Comments
FMCSA encourages you to participate by submitting comments and
related materials.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
notice (FMCSA-2016-0244), indicate
[[Page 66735]]
the specific section of this document to which the comment applies, and
provide a reason for suggestions or recommendations. You may submit
your comments and material online or by fax, mail, or hand delivery,
but please use only one of these means. FMCSA recommends that you
include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or a phone
number in the body of your document so the Agency can contact you if it
has questions regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to www.regulations.gov and put
the docket number, ``FMCSA-2016-0244'' in the ``Keyword'' box, and
click ``Search.'' When the new screen appears, click on ``Comment
Now!'' button and type your comment into the text box in the following
screen. Choose whether you are submitting your comment as an individual
or on behalf of a third party and then submit. If you submit your
comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no
larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying and electronic
filing. If you submit comments by mail and would like to know that they
reached the facility, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard
or envelope. FMCSA will consider all comments and material received
during the comment period and may grant or not grant this application
based on your comments.
II. Legal Basis
FMCSA has authority under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315 to grant
exemptions from certain Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations
(FMCSRs). FMCSA must publish a notice of each exemption request in the
Federal Register (49 CFR 381.315(a)). The Agency must provide the
public an opportunity to inspect the information relevant to the
application, including any safety analyses that have been conducted.
The Agency must also provide an opportunity for public comment on the
request.
The Agency reviews safety analyses and public comments submitted,
and determines whether granting the exemption would likely achieve a
level of safety equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be
achieved by the current regulation (49 CFR 381.305). The decision of
the Agency must be published in the Federal Register (49 CFR
381.315(b)) with the reasons for denying or granting the application
and, if granted, the name of the person or class of persons receiving
the exemption, and the regulatory provision from which the exemption is
granted. The notice must also specify the effective period and explain
the terms and conditions of the exemption. The exemption may be renewed
(49 CFR 381.300(b)).
III. Request for Exemption
On December 27, 2011 (76 FR 81133), FMCSA published a final rule
amending its hours-of-service (HOS) regulations for drivers of
property-carrying CMVs. The final rule adopted several changes to the
HOS rules, including a new provision requiring drivers to take a rest
break during the work day under certain circumstances. Drivers may
drive a CMV only if 8 hours or less have passed since the end of the
driver's last off-duty or sleeper-berth period of at least 30 minutes.
FMCSA did not specify when drivers must take the 30-minute break, but
the rule requires that they wait no longer than 8 hours after the last
off-duty or sleeper-berth period of that length or longer to take the
break if they want to drive.
Transco seeks an exemption from the 30-minute rest break provision
in 49 CFR 395.3(a)(3)(ii). Transco operates through McLane Company,
Inc., its commonly-owned affiliate, which delivers food products and
other goods to various grocery stores and restaurants throughout the
United States. McLane's Grocery and Foodservice divisions maintain
distribution centers throughout the country, each employing between 100
and 300 drivers. McLane's drivers provide just-in-time food delivery
services to its customers, which include convenience stores, mass
merchants, and various dining establishments. Transco contends that its
drivers/operations differ greatly from the average long-haul CMV driver
for the following reasons:
Multi-stop daily deliveries: Its drivers typically make
daily multi-stop deliveries to Transco's customers, returning to their
originating distribution center at the end of each load, which takes an
average of 19 hours. On average, each Transco driver makes nine stops
per day;
Significant physical activity: Each delivery requires the
driver to get in and out of the CMV on multiple occasions to unload
grocery, fresh food, and other products for delivery. Specifically,
deliveries to smaller customers, which comprise the majority of each
driver's deliveries, include parking the CMV close the customer's
store, lowering a ramp from the rear of the CMV to the ground, and off-
loading freight using a two-wheeled cart into the store. For larger
customers, the driver delivers the freight at the customer's loading
dock; and
Breaks in the driving routine: Each delivery effectively
breaks up the otherwise uninterrupted driving routine. The physical
activities that Transco drivers engage in on a daily basis differs
significantly from those of long-haul truck drivers who often do not
engage in vigorous physical activity.
According to Transco, as a result of these operational differences,
the 30-minute rest break requirement does not increase safety when
applied to its drivers; instead, the applicant claims the requirement
may very well decrease road safety for its drivers. For the typical
long-haul CMV driver, the 30-minute rest break serves as an opportunity
to break the monotony of driving and relieve some of the stress of
continuous driving, but for Transco's drivers, by the nature of the
work they currently have breaks--which includes physical exercise--
several times each day.
Additionally, Transco states that the 30-minute rest break
requirement causes its drivers to travel over 8.2 million additional
miles each year on more than 18,000 additional loads. This increase in
miles traveled results in eight additional reportable accidents per
year, and also requires Transco CMVs to use over 1.3 million more
gallons of fuel each year. This influx of CMVs on public highways also
increases congestion, and wear on critical infrastructure. The 30-
minute rest-break requirement also degrades the health of Transco's
drivers as leading clinical studies reveal sedentary activities
substantially increase the risk of cardiovascular disease among adults.
By insisting that the rest-break requirement be performed off-duty, it
essentially forces Transco's drivers to stop physical activity and
become sedentary.
Transco believes that the granting of this exemption would offer
two benefits--(1) the exemption would reduce the number of motor
vehicle accidents and congestion on public roads by reducing the
overall miles travelled to serve its customers; and (2) the exemption
would increase the health of their drivers by increasing their physical
activity through the course of their deliveries and substantially
reducing any sedentary periods. Transco contends that under the
exemption, its operations would maintain a level of safety equivalent
to, if not greater than, that achieved by complying with the
regulation. In its application, Transco lists a number of on-going
company safety activities already in place to provide continuous
training to drivers about both safety policy violations and driving
behaviors that increase risk. These activities include on-board visual
monitoring systems, Automatic On-Board Recording Devices, driver
training, weekly safety
[[Page 66736]]
inspections, full compliance assessments, and periodic safety committee
meetings, which Transco contends would ensure an equivalent level of
safety if the requested exemption is granted.
A copy of the Transco's application for exemption is available for
review in the docket for this notice.
Issued on: September 15, 2016.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-23364 Filed 9-27-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P