Federal Home Loan Bank Membership for Non-Federally-Insured Credit Unions, 66545-66553 [2016-23289]
Download as PDF
66545
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 81, No. 188
Wednesday, September 28, 2016
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE
AGENCY
12 CFR Part 1263
RIN 2590–AA85
Federal Home Loan Bank Membership
for Non-Federally-Insured Credit
Unions
Federal Housing Finance
Agency.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking;
request for comments.
AGENCY:
The Federal Housing Finance
Agency (FHFA or Agency) is proposing
to amend its regulations governing
Federal Home Loan Bank (Bank)
membership to implement section
82001 of the Fixing America’s Surface
Transportation Act, which amended
section 4(a) of the Federal Home Loan
Bank Act (Bank Act) to authorize certain
credit unions without Federal share
insurance to become Bank members.
This proposed rule also would make
appropriate conforming changes to
FHFA’s membership regulations.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before November 28,
2016.
SUMMARY:
You may submit your
comments, identified by Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) 2590–AA85,
by any of the following methods:
• Agency Web site: www.fhfa.gov/
open-for-comment-or-input.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments. If
you submit your comment to the
Federal eRulemaking Portal, please also
send it by email to FHFA at
RegComments@fhfa.gov to ensure
timely receipt by the agency. Please
include Comments/RIN 2590–AA85 in
the subject line of the message.
• Courier/Hand Delivery: The hand
delivery address is: Alfred M. Pollard,
General Counsel, Attention: Comments/
RIN 2590–AA85, Federal Housing
Finance Agency, 400 Seventh Street
SW., Eighth Floor, Washington, DC
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:27 Sep 27, 2016
Jkt 238001
20219. Deliver the package to the
Seventh Street entrance Guard Desk,
First Floor, on business days between 9
a.m. to 5 p.m.
• U.S. Mail, United Parcel Service,
Federal Express or Other Mail Service:
The mailing address for comments is:
Alfred M. Pollard, General Counsel,
Attention: Comments/RIN 2590–AA85,
Federal Housing Finance Agency, 400
Seventh Street SW., Eighth Floor,
Washington, DC 20219.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric
M. Raudenbush, Associate General
Counsel, Office of General Counsel,
Eric.Raudenbush@fhfa.gov, (202) 649–
3084; or Julie Paller, Senior Financial
Analyst, Division of Bank Regulation,
Julie.Paller@fhfa.gov, (202) 649–3201
(not toll-free numbers), Federal Housing
Finance Agency, 400 Seventh Street
SW., Washington, DC 20219. The
telephone number for the
Telecommunications Device for the
Hearing Impaired is (800) 877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Comments
FHFA invites comments on all aspects
of the proposed rule and will take all
comments into consideration before
issuing a final rule. All comments
received will be posted without change
on the FHFA Web site at https://
www.fhfa.gov, and will include any
personal information provided, such as
name, address (mailing and email), and
telephone numbers. In addition, copies
of all comments received will be
available without change for public
inspection on business days between
the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m., at the
Federal Housing Finance Agency, 400
Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC
20219. To make an appointment to
inspect comments, please call the Office
of General Counsel at (202) 649–3804.
II. Background
Under the Bank Act, federally insured
depository institutions, including stateand federally chartered credit unions
whose member accounts are insured by
the National Credit Union Share
Insurance Fund (NCUSIF), have been
eligible for Bank membership since
1989. Until recently, however, statechartered credit unions without Federal
share insurance were ineligible for Bank
membership, except to the limited
extent that a credit union certified as a
‘‘community development financial
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
institution’’ (CDFI) could meet the
eligibility requirements applicable to
CDFIs. In December 2015, Congress
amended the Bank Act to authorize the
Banks to consider applications for
membership from state-chartered credit
unions without Federal share insurance
and to approve such applicants for Bank
membership (irrespective of their CDFI
status), provided that certain
prerequisites have been met.1 This
proposed rule would implement those
statutory amendments.
A. Amendment of the Bank Act To
Authorize Membership for NonFederally-Insured Credit Unions
Section 4 of the Bank Act specifies the
types of institutions that may be eligible
for membership in one of the eleven
district Banks and establishes
requirements that each of those types of
institutions must meet in order to be
eligible for Bank membership.1 When
enacted as part of the original Bank Act
in 1932, section 4 authorized thrift
institutions of various types, as well as
insurance companies, to become Bank
members, provided that the institution
met the applicable eligibility
requirements. At that time and for many
decades afterward, the statute did not
permit credit unions to become Bank
members. This changed in 1989, when
Congress amended section 4 to add
‘‘insured depository institution[s]’’ to
the list of entities that may be eligible
for Bank membership and defined that
term to include any depository
institution the accounts of which are
insured by the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or by the
NCUSIF.2 In effect, those amendments
authorized federally insured
commercial banks and credit unions to
become Bank members for the first time.
Commercial banks without Federal
deposit insurance and credit unions
without Federal share insurance
remained ineligible for Bank
membership even after the 1989
amendments.
In 2008, Congress amended the Bank
Act to authorize entities certified as
CDFIs by the CFDI Fund of the United
1 Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act
(FAST), Public Law 114–94, section 82001(a), 129
Stat. 1795 (2015), codified at 12 U.S.C.
1424(a)(5)(A) and (B).
1 See 12 U.S.C. 1424.
2 See Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery,
and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA), Public Law
101–73, section 704, 103 Stat. 183, 415 (1989).
E:\FR\FM\28SEP1.SGM
28SEP1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
66546
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 28, 2016 / Proposed Rules
States Department of the Treasury to
become Bank members, provided the
CDFI meets the membership eligibility
requirements established for such
entities. By law, credit unions—
including state-chartered credit unions
without Federal share insurance—may
be certified as CDFIs.3 Thus, since the
adoption of the 2008 statutory
amendments, a credit union that would
otherwise have been ineligible for Bank
membership due to a lack of Federal
share insurance may nonetheless be
eligible for membership if it is certified
as a CDFI and meets the eligibility
requirements applicable to CDFIs.
To implement those statutory
amendments, FHFA in January 2010
adopted amendments to part 1263 to
address membership eligibility and
application requirements for CDFIs and
to clarify the types of entities to be
treated as CDFIs for membership
purposes.4 That rule defined ‘‘CDFI’’ to
mean any entity that the CDFI Fund has
certified as a community development
financial institution, with the exception
of federally insured banks, thrifts, and
credit unions.5 As insured depository
institutions under the Bank Act, the
latter types of entities had already been
eligible for Bank membership prior to
the enactment of the statutory
provisions authorizing membership for
CDFIs. By excluding federally insured
depositories from the definition of
‘‘CDFI,’’ FHFA effectively required that
they continue to be treated solely as
insured depository institutions under
the membership regulation, even in
cases where the institution has been
certified as a CDFI. In explaining its
decision, the Agency cited its
conclusion that, while Congress adopted
the 2008 amendments to provide a new
avenue to membership for CDFIs that
had not previously been eligible, it did
not intend to provide an additional
avenue to membership for federally
insured depository institutions that had
already been eligible under the prior
law.6
While it effectively required that a
federally insured credit union certified
as a CDFI be treated as an insured
depository institution for Bank
membership purposes, the 2010 rule
mandated different treatment for statechartered credit unions without Federal
share insurance that have been certified
as a CDFI—a type of entity that the rule
termed a ‘‘CDFI credit union.’’ As
amended by the 2010 rule, the
membership regulation treats CDFI
3 See
12 U.S.C. 4701–4719; 12 CFR part 1805.
FR 678 (Jan. 5, 2010).
5 See 12 CFR 1263.1.
6 75 FR at 681.
4 75
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:27 Sep 27, 2016
Jkt 238001
credit unions as a type of CDFI and
generally subjects them to the same
standards that apply to non-depository
CDFIs, with the exception of those that
must be met in order for an applicant to
be deemed in compliance with the
statutory eligibility requirement that an
institution’s financial condition be
‘‘such that advances may be safely made
to it.’’ 7 With respect to the latter
requirement, the regulation requires that
CDFI credit unions demonstrate
compliance in a manner similar to that
which had already been required of all
other types of depository institution
applicants prior to the 2010
rulemaking.8 For non-depository CDFIs,
such as loan funds and venture capital
funds, the 2010 final rule established
separate financial condition
requirements that were tailored to the
unique structure and business of those
entities.9
In December 2015, Congress again
amended section 4 of the Bank Act, in
this case to permit state-chartered credit
unions without Federal share insurance
to be approved for Bank membership
(irrespective of their CDFI status) where
the credit union meets the membership
eligibility requirements applicable to
insured depository institutions and has
taken enumerated steps to demonstrate
that it meets the requirements for
Federal share insurance,
notwithstanding that it is not actually
federally insured.10 Specifically, new
section 4(a)(5) states that a credit union
lacking Federal share insurance that has
applied to become a member of a Bank
shall be treated as an insured depository
institution for purposes of determining
its eligibility for Bank membership,
provided that its state credit union
regulator has first determined that the
institution met the requirements for
Federal share insurance as of the date of
its application for membership.11
However, the new provision also
provides that if the state regulator for
such an applicant fails to make a
determination as to whether the
applicant met the requirements for
Federal share insurance before the
expiration of the six-month period that
begins on the date of its application for
membership, then the credit union
7 See
12 U.S.C. 1424(a)(2)(B).
12 CFR 1263.11(b).
9 See 12 CFR 1263.16(b).
10 Public Law 114–94, section 82001(a), 129 Stat.
1795 (2015).
11 12 U.S.C. 1424(a)(5). Although the statutory
text actually refers several times to ‘‘Federal deposit
insurance,’’ FHFA construes those references to
mean the federal share insurance that is provided
to credit unions by the NCUSIF, in light of the
evident purpose for which Congress adopted the
NFICU amendments.
8 See
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
applicant shall be deemed to have met
those requirements.12
Consistent with the regulatory
definitions that would be in effect under
the proposed rule, this Supplementary
Information refers to credit unions
without Federal share insurance that are
not certified as CDFIs as ‘‘non-federallyinsured credit unions’’ or ‘‘NFICUs’’ and
to credit unions without Federal share
insurance that are certified as CDFIs as
‘‘CDFI credit unions.’’ As discussed
below, under the proposed rule, CDFI
credit unions would continue to be
treated as they are under the existing
regulation and would not be subject to
the new regulatory provisions governing
NFICUs.
B. Letters to Banks Providing Guidance
on the Treatment of NFICUs Under the
2015 Statutory Amendments
On April 12, 2016, in response to
requests from several Banks for
guidance addressing the manner in
which they may accept and process
membership applications from NFICUs
that are newly eligible under the recent
statutory amendments, FHFA sent a
letter to each Bank describing how it
should comply with the new statutory
provisions. The guidance letters
addressed the substantive requirements
of the statutory amendments, the
procedures each Bank should follow in
processing applications, and the actions
the Bank should take to document
compliance with the new eligibility
requirements. The letters also noted the
Agency’s intent to initiate a rulemaking
to codify the substance of the guidance
and advised each Bank to process
membership applications from NFICUs
in accordance with the guidance until
FHFA adopts a final rule implementing
the new statutory provisions.
The amended statute provides that an
NFICU may be eligible for Bank
membership only if its state regulator
has determined that it meets all the
requirements for Federal share
insurance ‘‘as of the date of the
application for membership.’’ 13 With
respect to the nature of this
determination, the guidance letters
expressed FHFA’s view that the statute
requires that the state regulator of an
NFICU applicant determine that the
applicant actually satisfies all of the
applicable eligibility requirements for
NCUSIF share insurance under the
Federal Credit Union Act 14 and the
implementing regulations of the
NCUA.15 In response to specific
12 12
U.S.C. 1424(a)(5)(B)(ii).
U.S.C. 1424(a)(5)(B)(i).
14 12 U.S.C. 1751 et seq.
15 12 CFR part 745.
13 12
E:\FR\FM\28SEP1.SGM
28SEP1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 28, 2016 / Proposed Rules
questions FHFA had received, the
guidance clarified that a determination
by a state regulator that a particular
NFICU applicant is ‘‘eligible to apply’’
for NCUA insurance or is operating and
in good standing under state law is not
sufficient to satisfy the statutory
requirement.
The guidance also addressed the
meaning of the term ‘‘date of the
application for membership,’’ which
Congress designated as the date as of
which the state regulator is to determine
whether an NFICU meets the eligibility
requirements for Federal share
insurance and on which begins the
statutory six-month period after which
an NFICU shall be deemed to meet those
requirements if its state regulator fails to
act. Because Congress did not specify
precisely what constitutes the ‘‘date of
the application,’’ FHFA construed the
term consistently with similar language
in the existing membership regulation.
The guidance explained that the ‘‘date
of the application’’ should be the date
on which an NFICU has provided to a
Bank a ‘‘complete’’ membership
application—i.e., an application that
includes all information that is required
to assess the applicant’s compliance
with the applicable statutory and
regulatory membership eligibility
requirements, as well as any other
information the Bank deems necessary
to act on an application. The existing
membership regulation uses this
concept of a ‘‘complete’’ application to
establish the starting point of the 60-day
period during which a Bank is generally
required to make a determination on a
membership application.16
The guidance stated that a Bank
generally should process a membership
application from an NFICU in the same
manner it would process a membership
application from a federally insured
credit union, up to the point when the
Bank determines that the NFICU has
provided all information required to
assess its compliance with the
applicable membership eligibility
requirements. The existing membership
regulation requires that, once a Bank
makes such a determination with
respect to the application of a federally
insured credit union (or that of any
other type of applicant), it must inform
the applicant that the application is
‘‘complete’’ and generally must act on
the application within 60 days. The
guidance, however, advised that, when
a Bank has made such a determination
with respect to the application of an
NFICU, the Bank should instead inform
the NFICU that its application is
‘‘provisionally complete’’ and that it
16 See
12 CFR 1263.3(c).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:27 Sep 27, 2016
Jkt 238001
must take further steps before the
application may be deemed fully
complete and ready to be acted upon.
Under the guidance, a Bank is to regard
an NFICU’s application to be only
‘‘provisionally’’ complete at that point
because it would not include the
documentation that the NFICU’s state
regulator either has determined that the
applicant satisfied the requirements for
Federal share insurance as of the date of
the application or has failed to make
that determination within six months.
The guidance advised that, when
informing an NFICU applicant that its
application is provisionally complete, a
Bank should instruct it to make a
written request of its state regulator for
a determination that the NFICU satisfied
all of the eligibility requirements for
Federal share insurance as of the date of
that request, and to provide a copy of
that request to the Bank on the same day
it transmits the request to the
regulator.17
With respect to the completion of the
membership application, the guidance
advised that a Bank should act on an
NFICU’s application only after having
received one of the following three
items: (1) An affirmative written
response from the regulator that the
NFICU meets the eligibility
requirements for Federal share
insurance; (2) a written statement from
the regulator that it cannot or will not
make any determination regarding the
NFICU’s eligibility for Federal share
insurance; or (3) a written statement
from the NFICU applicant that six
months have expired from the date of
the membership application without the
state regulator providing any response
to the NFICU’s request. Items (1) and (3)
above closely track the statutory
requirements. Regarding item (2), FHFA
concluded that, although the statute
does not address the possibility that a
state regulator may expressly decline to
make a determination (as opposed to
merely failing to respond to a request),
it is permissible to consider such a
written statement as the substantive
equivalent of a failure to respond within
six months. The Agency noted that the
statutory six-month review period
appeared to be intended to ensure that
a state credit union regulator would
have a sufficient amount of time to
determine whether a particular credit
17 The guidance letters also included an example
of a statement that an applicant could include in
the request to its supervisor, which was intended
to provide clarity as to the required nature of the
request. The letters also noted that, in the event that
a state supervisor were unable or unwilling to
provide an affirmative response to the NFICU, then
the applicant may ask the supervisor to provide a
written statement to that effect.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
66547
union satisfied the requirements for
Federal share insurance. The guidance
reflected FHFA’s belief that, in the event
that a state regulator were to conclude
that it could not make such a
determination for any credit union due
to a lack of familiarity with the NCUA
underwriting process or for other
reasons, receipt of a written statement to
that effect will suffice to allow a Bank
to approve an NFICU’s membership
application without waiting for the sixmonth period to expire.18 The guidance
advised the Banks to retain in each
NFICU applicant’s membership file
copies of the relevant documents,
including the applicant’s request to its
state regulator and any response from
the regulator or statement from the
applicant that the regulator had not
responded, as part of its required
records for all membership applications.
Finally, the guidance letters
addressed the possibility that an
existing Bank member that is a statechartered federally insured credit union
might voluntarily cancel its Federal
share insurance, thus becoming an
NFICU—a scenario that the new
statutory provisions do not explicitly
address. The guidance made clear that
such a credit union may voluntarily
surrender its Federal share insurance
without jeopardizing its status as a Bank
member and without having to request
from its state regulator the type of
determination that the statute requires
to be made with respect to NFICU
applicants. The guidance letters
reasoned that NCUA’s prior approval of
the credit union for Federal share
insurance is dispositive as to the key
issue under the statutory amendments—
i.e., whether the institution satisfies the
eligibility requirements for Federal
share insurance—thus obviating any
need for the member’s state regulator to
make that same decision.
III. The Proposed Rule
The proposed rule would codify into
part 1263 of FHFA’s regulations the core
concepts of the guidance letters. The
principal regulatory provisions
regarding NFICUs would be located in
a new § 1263.19 (a reserved section
number under the existing regulation),
which would set forth the prerequisites
that an NFICU must meet in order to be
treated as an insured depository
institution for purposes of determining
18 FHFA is aware of one instance in which a state
credit union regulator has advised a Bank that it
could not make a determination regarding a state
credit union’s eligibility for federal share insurance
because the state regulator was not familiar with the
specific underwriting and related processes
employed by NCUA when acting on applications
for federal share insurance.
E:\FR\FM\28SEP1.SGM
28SEP1
66548
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 28, 2016 / Proposed Rules
its eligibility for membership. As
described in more detail below, the
proposed rule would also make a
number of conforming revisions to other
sections of the regulation.
A. Primary Revisions
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
1. Definitions of NFICU and Insured
Depository Institution—§ 1263.1
The proposed rule would define
‘‘non-federally-insured credit union’’ to
mean a ‘‘State-chartered credit union
that does not have Federal share
insurance and that has not been
certified as a CDFI by the CDFI Fund.’’
The proposed rule would not include
CDFI credit unions within this
definition, notwithstanding that they are
also state-chartered credit unions that
do not have Federal share insurance.
The existing regulation generally
requires CDFI credit unions to comply
with the membership eligibility
requirements that are applicable to
CDFIs generally, rather than those
applicable to depository institutions,
with the exception of provisions relating
to the applicant’s financial condition.
The proposed rule would make no
substantive changes to any of the
provisions that currently apply to CDFI
credit unions and would treat them
separately from NFICUs for membership
purposes.
The definition of ‘‘insured depository
institution’’ in the existing membership
regulation follows the Bank Act
definition of that term and includes any
federally insured bank, savings
association, or credit union. The
proposed rule would revise the
regulatory definition of ‘‘insured
depository institution’’ to include, in
addition to federally insured depository
institutions, NFICUs meeting the
prerequisites of proposed § 1263.19. As
an ‘‘insured depository institution’’
under the revised regulation, any
qualifying NFICU applying for Bank
membership would be subject to all of
the provisions of the membership
regulation that apply to insured
depository institutions generally, except
where otherwise provided. Thus, a
qualifying NFICU applicant would be
eligible for membership only if: It is
duly organized under Federal or State
law; it is subject to inspection and
regulation under Federal or State
banking laws, or similar laws; it makes
long-term home mortgage loans; its
financial condition is such that
advances may be safely made to it
(hereinafter the ‘‘financial condition’’
requirement); its management and its
home financing policy are both
consistent with sound and economical
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:27 Sep 27, 2016
Jkt 238001
home financing;19 and it has at least 10
percent of its assets in ‘‘residential
mortgage loans’’ (hereinafter the ‘‘10
percent’’ requirement).20 With the
exception of the financial condition
requirement, an NFICU applicant would
be required to demonstrate compliance
with each of those eligibility
requirements in the same manner that is
required of insured depository
institutions generally. As discussed
below, the proposed rule would require
an NFICU applicant to demonstrate
compliance with the financial condition
requirement in the same manner as a
CDFI credit union.21
2. Prerequisites for an NFICU To Be
Treated as an Insured Depository
Institution—§ 1263.19
The proposed rule would add to the
membership regulation a new § 1263.19,
which would set forth the prerequisites
that an NFICU must meet in order to be
treated as an insured depository
institution for purposes of determining
its eligibility for membership. The
substantive and procedural
requirements set forth in proposed
§ 1263.19 are, in all material respects,
identical to those set forth in the
guidance letters, although the proposed
rule would provide additional
clarification on certain points. As
described below, paragraph (a) of the
new section would address the
treatment of NFICUs that are applying
for Bank membership, while paragraph
(b) would address the status of any
credit union that already is a Bank
member but that opts to become an
NFICU by canceling its Federal share
insurance.
NFICUs Applying for Bank Membership
Section 126319(a) addresses the
prerequisites that must be met before a
Bank may approve an NFICU applicant
for membership. In parallel with the
inclusion of qualifying NFICUs within
the regulatory definition of ‘‘insured
depository institution,’’ the introductory
clause to this provision provides that an
NFICU applicant shall be treated as an
insured depository institution for
purposes of determining its eligibility
for membership, provided that it
19 12
CFR 1263.6(a).
CFR 1263.6(b). The Bank Act exempts
certain smaller depository institutions—
‘‘community financial institutions’’ (CFIs)—from
the 10 percent requirement, but defines CFI to
include only institutions the deposits of which are
insured under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act
(FDIA) that have total assets below a certain
threshold amount. 12 U.S.C. 1422(10)A)(i),
1424(a)(4). Because a credit union cannot obtain
deposit insurance under the FDIA, it cannot qualify
as a CFI regardless of its level of total assets.
21 See 12 CFR 1263.11(b).
20 12
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
complies with all of the requirements of
§ 1263.19(a).
The proposed rule would first require
that a Bank obtain from an NFICU
applicant all of the information that the
Bank generally requires to process
membership applications from federally
insured depository institutions,
including all of the information needed
to demonstrate compliance with the
eligibility requirements described
above. Once a Bank has obtained that
information, the rule would require that
the Bank notify the NFICU that its
application is provisionally complete
and that the NFICU should request from
its state regulator a determination that it
satisfies the requirements for obtaining
Federal share insurance as of the date of
the request.22 The notice must also
inform the NFICU that its application
will not be deemed to be complete until
the Bank has received acceptable
documentation pertaining to the
regulator’s response to the NFICU
applicant’s request.
Proposed § 1263.19(a)(3) would
require a Bank to deem an NFICU’s
application to be complete after it has
received any one of the following items:
(1) A written statement from the
regulator confirming that the NFICU
satisfies the requirements for Federal
share insurance; (2) a written statement
from the regulator that it is unable to
make that determination; or (3) a written
statement from the NFICU that it has not
received a response from the state
regulator within the statutory six-month
period, and that the regulator has not
determined that the NFICU does not
meet the requirements for Federal share
insurance. Once a Bank has received
one of those three items and has deemed
the NFICU’s application to be complete,
the proposed rule would require that the
Bank act upon the application in
accordance with § 1263.3(c). That
existing provision requires that a Bank
notify an applicant when it deems the
application to be complete and (with
certain exceptions) either approve or
deny the application within 60 calendar
days of the date it made that
determination.23 The cross-reference to
22 The NFICU must simultaneously provide to the
Bank a copy of its request to the state regulator. The
guidance letters had included an example of
language that an NFICU could use in its request to
its state regulator, but the proposed rule would not
do so. A number of NFICUs have since been
admitted to membership, and appear to have
encountered no difficulties in obtaining a response
from the state regulators, which suggests that there
is no need for the regulation to address this topic.
Banks may continue to use the sample language if
they choose to do so.
23 The regulation allows a Bank to suspend the
60-day review period if it subsequently determines
that it does not in fact have all of the information
E:\FR\FM\28SEP1.SGM
28SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 28, 2016 / Proposed Rules
§ 1263.3(c) is intended to make clear
that a Bank would be permitted the
same amount of time to act upon a fully
complete NFICU application as it has to
act upon a complete application from
any other type of eligible institution.
However, given that an NFICU’s
application should already include all
of the information needed to determine
whether it meets the applicable
membership eligibility requirements at
the time it sends the request to its
regulator, FHFA anticipates that in
many cases Banks would be prepared to
act upon an NFICU application shortly
after receiving the required
documentation regarding the response
of the state regulator, especially when
the regulator fails to respond within six
months or does not provide a response
until the end of that timeframe.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
A Credit Union That Becomes an NFICU
When Already a Member
While proposed § 1263.19(a)
addresses the treatment of NFICUs
applying to become a Bank member,
§ 1263.19(b) addresses the status of any
existing credit union Bank member that
opts to become an NFICU by canceling
its Federal share insurance. The
guidance letters made clear that any
such credit union may voluntarily
surrender its Federal share insurance
without affecting its status as a Bank
member. Consistent with that position,
proposed § 1263.19(b) would explicitly
authorize such a credit union to remain
a member without requiring it to request
a determination of its state regulator as
to whether it meets the requirements for
Federal share insurance. The proposed
rule would require that the Bank
determine that the member has canceled
its Federal share insurance
voluntarily—i.e., that NCUA has
approved the credit union’s request to
terminate its Federal share insurance.24
The Banks could make this
determination by obtaining a copy of
NCUA’s approval of the credit union’s
request to terminate its Federal
insurance. Upon converting to an
NFICU, the credit union would remain
subject to all regulatory provisions that
apply to insured depository institution
members.
The recent statutory amendments
focus on state-chartered credit unions
that have not previously been eligible
that is required to process the application. In such
cases, a Bank may require that the applicant
provide additional information, but must resume
the 60-day review period when the applicant
supplies the requested information. 12 CFR
1263.3(c).
24 See 12 U.S.C. 1786(a) (voluntary termination of
federal share insurance); 12 CFR 708b.201(d)
(termination of federal share insurance requires
prior approval of NCUA).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:27 Sep 27, 2016
Jkt 238001
for Bank membership due to their lack
of Federal share insurance; the
amendments do not address whether all
of the requirements that apply to NFICU
applicants should also apply to existing
Bank members that wish to surrender
their Federal share insurance while
remaining as members. As FHFA noted
in the guidance letters, the key question
with respect to whether any particular
NFICU may be eligible for Bank
membership under the statutory
amendments is whether the institution
actually meets all of the requirements
for Federal share insurance. In the case
of an existing Bank member that is a
federally insured state-chartered credit
union, NCUA has already definitively
answered that question by having
previously approved the credit union
for Federal share insurance and having
continued to provide that insurance up
until the time the credit union
voluntarily canceled it. For that reason,
nothing would be gained by construing
the statute as requiring existing credit
union Bank members that voluntarily
cancel their Federal share insurance to
seek that same determination from their
state regulators in order to remain a
member as an NFICU.
Requiring a Bank to confirm that the
cancelation of a member’s Federal share
insurance was voluntary would provide
reasonable assurance that the member
satisfies the requirements for Federal
share insurance and, thus, remains
eligible for membership as an NFICU
despite no longer being a federally
insured depository institution. As noted
above, the core requirement for NFICUs
under the statutory amendments is a
determination that the NFICU satisfies
the requirements for Federal share
insurance, and the best evidence that a
newly converted NFICU satisfies those
requirements would be that it had
remained federally insured until
voluntarily relinquishing the insurance.
It is also possible, however, that a
federally insured credit union could
lose its Federal share insurance through
an involuntary termination for cause by
NCUA. If NCUA were to terminate a
Bank member’s share insurance
involuntarily, then that institution
would cease to be eligible for Bank
membership because NCUA’s action
would demonstrate that the institution
could not meet the prerequisites for
membership as an NFICU and, without
Federal share insurance, it would no
longer be eligible for membership as a
federally insured depository institution.
In such a case, a Bank likely would be
required to terminate the credit union’s
membership because, unless the credit
union happened to be certified as a
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
66549
CDFI, it would no longer satisfy any of
the provisions under which credit
unions may eligible for membership.
B. Conforming Amendments
The proposed rule would also make a
number of conforming revisions to part
1263, which are discussed below.
1. Definitions—§ 1263.1
In addition to the substantive
revisions to § 1263.1 that are discussed
above, the proposed rule would make a
number of non-substantive revisions to
that section. First, the rule would add a
definition of ‘‘Federal share insurance’’
and define that term to mean ‘‘insurance
coverage of credit union member
accounts provided by the National
Credit Union Share Insurance Fund
under title II of the Federal Credit Union
Act (12 U.S.C. 1781 et seq.).’’
The rule would also revise the
definition of ‘‘CDFI credit union,’’
which is currently defined to mean ‘‘a
State-chartered credit union that has
been certified as a CDFI by the CDFI
Fund and that does not have Federal
share insurance,’’ to reverse the order of
the two clauses so that it would instead
refer to ‘‘a State-chartered credit union
that does not have Federal share
insurance and that has been certified as
a CDFI by the CDFI Fund.’’ FHFA is
proposing to make this minor change so
that the definition of ‘‘CDFI credit
union’’ will be structured in parallel
with the definition of ‘‘non-federallyinsured credit union.’’ The intent of this
is to make clear that the amended
regulation would address two types of
state-chartered credit unions without
Federal share insurance—those that are
not certified as a CDFI (non-federallyinsured credit unions) and those that are
certified as a CDFI (CDFI credit
unions)—and would subject them to
different membership requirements.
In the definition of ‘‘community
development financial institution or
CDFI,’’ the proposed rule would revise
the reference to ‘‘a credit union insured
under the Federal Credit Union Act (12
U.S.C. 1751 et seq.)’’ to refer instead to
‘‘a credit union that has Federal share
insurance.’’ FHFA is proposing this
minor non-substantive change so that
the terminology used in the definition of
‘‘CDFI’’ will be consistent with that in
the proposed definitions of ‘‘nonfederally-insured credit union’’ and
‘‘CDFI credit union,’’ both of which
would employ the newly-defined term
‘‘Federal share insurance’’ to refer to
insurance obtained under the Federal
Credit Union Act.
Finally, the proposed rule would
revise the definition of ‘‘regulatory
financial report,’’ which currently refers
E:\FR\FM\28SEP1.SGM
28SEP1
66550
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 28, 2016 / Proposed Rules
to a financial report that an ‘‘applicant’’
is required to file with its regulator, to
refer instead to a financial report that an
‘‘institution’’ is required to file with its
regulator. In addition to requiring a
Bank to obtain information from
applicants’ regulatory financial reports
for many purposes, FHFA’s regulations
also require that a Bank obtain
information from members’ regulatory
financial reports in some circumstances.
The proposed revision would make
clear that the term ‘‘regulatory financial
report’’ refers to the reports of both
applicants and members.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
2. Membership Application
Requirements—§ 1263.2
Section 1263.2(b) of the existing
regulation requires a Bank to prepare for
each applicant a written membership
application digest addressing whether
or not the applicant meets each of the
applicable requirements for membership
under the regulation. The proposed rule
would revise that provision to require
expressly that a Bank include in the
application digest for each NFICU
applicant a written summary of the
manner in which the applicant has
complied with the requirements of
proposed § 1263.19(a). FHFA would
expect a Bank to note in the digest the
date on which the NFICU applicant
transmitted to its state regulator the
request required under proposed
§ 1263.19(a)(2), as well as the date on
which the Bank received the written
statement addressing the results of that
request required under proposed
§ 1263.19(a)(3). The Agency would also
expect the Bank to describe in the digest
which of the three types of written
statements that are permissible under
§ 1263.19(a)(3) was used to satisfy the
requirement of that provision.
The proposed rule would also revise
§ 1263.2(c), which requires a Bank to
maintain a membership file for each
applicant, to make clear that a Bank
should include in the file for an NFICU
applicant any documents required
under proposed § 1263.19.
3. Compliance With the Financial
Condition Requirement—§ 1263.11
Existing § 1263.11 governs the manner
in which Banks are to determine
whether depository institution
applicants, including insured
depository institutions and CDFI credit
unions, are in compliance with the
statutory ‘‘financial condition’’
eligibility requirement. Paragraph (a)
requires that a Bank review a number of
different items regarding the financial
condition of depository institution
applicants, including: (1) Regulatory
financial reports the applicant filed with
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:27 Sep 27, 2016
Jkt 238001
its regulator for the last six calendar
quarters and three year-ends; (2) the
applicant’s most recent audited
financial statements; (3) the applicant’s
most recent regulatory examination
report; (4) a written description of any
outstanding enforcement actions against
the applicant; and (5) any other relevant
document or information concerning the
financial condition of the applicant that
comes to the Bank’s attention.
In its 2010 final rule amending part
1263 to implement the statutory
amendments that authorized Bank
membership for CDFIs, FHFA revised
§ 1263.11(a) to make clear that the
review requirement applies to CDFI
credit unions, in addition to other types
of depository institutions. In explaining
its decision to make that revision, the
Agency explained that ‘‘[a]lthough CDFI
credit unions do not file regulatory
financial reports with the NCUA, they
do file comparable reports with their
appropriate state regulator, and FHFA
believes that those documents may be
used to assess the financial condition of
the CDFI credit unions.’’ 25 Similarly,
Banks can and should use financial
reports filed by NFICU applicants with
their state regulators to assess the
applicants’ financial condition.
Although the proposed rule would not
revise § 1263.11(a) to refer expressly to
NFICUs, the review requirements of that
provision would nonetheless apply in
the case of NFICU applicants, given that
NFICUs meeting the prerequisites of
§ 1263.19 would generally be treated as
insured depository institutions for
purposes of determining their eligibility
for membership under the amended
regulation.
Existing § 1263.11(b) establishes three
standards that a depository institution
applicant must meet to be deemed in
compliance with the ‘‘financial
condition’’ requirement: (1) It must have
received a composite regulatory
examination rating from its state
regulator within the preceding two
years; (2) it must meet all of its
minimum statutory and regulatory
capital requirements; and (3) it must
meet the ‘‘minimum performance
standard’’ described in § 1263.11(b)(3).
The latter provision deems any
applicant that received a composite
rating of ‘‘1’’ on its most recent
regulatory examination, except for a
CDFI credit union, to be automatically
in compliance with the ‘‘minimum
performance standard.’’ 26 That
provision requires that any non-CDFI
depository institution with an
examination rating of ‘‘2’’ or ‘‘3,’’ as
25 75
26 12
PO 00000
FR at 684.
CFR 1263.11(b)(3)(i), (iii).
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
well as any CDFI credit union regardless
of its examination rating, satisfy
performance trend criteria relating to its
(A) earnings (the applicant must have
positive income in four of the six most
recent quarters), (B) nonperforming
assets (nonperforming loans and leases
plus other real estate owned must not
exceed 10 percent of total loans and
leases plus other real estate owned in
the most recent quarter), and (C)
allowance for loan and lease losses (the
ratio must have been 60 percent or
greater during four of the six most
recent quarters) in order to meet the
‘‘minimum performance standard.’’ 27
In adopting its final rule on
membership for CDFIs in 2010, FHFA
decided to require all CDFI credit union
applicants—including those with a
current state examination rating of
‘‘1’’—to demonstrate compliance with
the performance trend criteria specified
in § 1263.11(b)(3), while continuing to
exempt other types of depository
institutions having a ‘‘1’’ rating from
that requirement. In the Supplemental
Information to the 2010 final rule, FHFA
described its decision to require that
even the most highly rated CDFI credit
unions satisfy the performance trend
criteria as ‘‘prudent.’’ The Agency noted
that, because such institutions are not
subject to oversight by the NCUA and
because they had not previously been
eligible for membership, the Banks were
likely to be less familiar with the state
examination processes and ratings
systems to which they are subject than
with those that apply to federally
insured depository institutions.28
For similar reasons, the proposed rule
would revise § 1263.11(b)(3)(iii) to
require that NFICUs meet the minimum
performance standard in the same way
that CDFI credit unions must under the
existing provision—that is, by having
received a ‘‘1,’’ ‘‘2,’’ or ‘‘3’’ composite
rating in its most recent regulatory
examination and by meeting the
performance trend criteria for earnings,
nonperforming assets, and allowance for
loan and lease losses. FHFA believes
that, given the Banks’ lack of experience
with non-federally-insured credit
unions, it is also prudent to require all
NFICUs to meet the performance trend
criteria as part of satisfying the
‘‘financial condition’’ eligibility
requirement. Despite the fact that a
subset of credit unions without Federal
share insurance—i.e., CDFI credit
unions—have been permitted to become
Bank members since 2010, it does not
appear that the Banks have approved
any such institutions for membership to
27 12
28 75
E:\FR\FM\28SEP1.SGM
CFR 1263.11(b)(3)(i).
FR at 684–685.
28SEP1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 28, 2016 / Proposed Rules
date. Consequently, the safety and
soundness concerns arising from the
Banks’ relative lack of familiarity with
the regimes that apply to credit unions
that are subject to regulation and
supervision only at the state level
continue to exist and apply with equal
validity to both CDFI credit unions and
NFICUs.29
The Bank Act requires that the
primary Federal banking regulators
make available to the Banks, in
confidence, reports of condition and
other information relating to the
condition of any Bank member or other
institution with which a Bank
contemplates having transactions
authorized by the Bank Act, such as
applicants for membership.30 That
provision, however, does not apply to
state banking regulators and the
supervisory reports that they prepare
relating to depository institutions
organized under state law. Although
many Banks have arrangements with
state banking regulators, including state
credit union regulators, under which
those regulators provide the Banks with
access to confidential supervisory
information, including reports of
examination, for the institutions they
regulate, that may not be the case for
every state. This raises a question as to
whether a Bank may approve an
application for membership received
from an NFICU whose state regulator
declines to provide the Bank with
access to the reports of examination for
its regulated entities or to allow the
credit unions it regulates to disclose the
composite rating derived from those
examinations.
Under the existing membership
regulation, compliance with § 1263.11
creates a presumption that a depository
institution applicant meets the statutory
‘‘financial condition’’ requirement.
While failure to comply with § 1263.11
creates a presumption that a depository
institution applicant does not meet the
‘‘financial condition’’ requirement, that
presumption of noncompliance may be
rebutted. Section 1263.17(d) provides
that, if a depository institution applicant
does not have a composite regulatory
examination rating, does not have the
minimum rating required by the
regulations, or does not meet the
performance trend criteria, the applicant
may still meet the ‘‘financial condition’’
requirement if it or the Bank prepares a
written justification providing
29 The proposed rule would differ from the
guidance letters in making clear that the exemption
that applies generally to depository institutions that
have received a composite rating of ‘‘1’’ does not
apply to NFICUs. The guidance letters did not
address this point directly.
30 12 U.S.C. 1442(a)(1).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:27 Sep 27, 2016
Jkt 238001
substantial evidence that is acceptable
to the Bank that it is in a sound financial
condition, notwithstanding its failure to
meet one or more of the requirements of
§ 1263.11.31 Although FHFA encourages
all of the Banks to reach agreements
with the appropriate state regulators to
allow them to review the reports of
examination for all state-chartered
depository institutions, a Bank may rely
on the alternative provisions of
§ 1263.17(d) to rebut any presumption
of noncompliance with the ‘‘financial
condition’’ requirement that arises from
a state credit union regulator’s decision
not to provide a Bank with access to the
reports of examination for its regulated
entities.
4. Reports and Examinations—§ 1261.31
Existing § 1263.31 sets forth a number
of stipulations to which each Bank
member is deemed to have agreed as a
condition precedent to becoming a Bank
member. Under paragraph (b) of this
section, each institution admitted to
Bank membership agrees that reports of
examination by local, state or Federal
agencies, or institutions may be
furnished by those authorities to the
Bank or to FHFA upon request. The
proposed rule would revise § 1263.31(b)
to specify that, with respect to any
member that is an NFICU or CDFI credit
union, the member also agrees that
reports of examination by any private
entity that provides it with share
insurance may be furnished to the Bank
or to FHFA. To the best of FHFA’s
knowledge, there is only one insurance
company in the United States currently
providing private share insurance for
state-chartered credit unions.
Under existing § 1263.31(e), each
institution also agrees, as a condition of
Bank membership, that it will provide
to the Bank, within 20 days of filing,
copies of reports of condition and
operations filed with its appropriate
Federal banking agency. The proposed
rule would revise that provision to state
that each member also agrees to provide
any reports of condition and operations
it may be required to file with its
appropriate state regulator and that each
member that is an NFICU or a CDFI
credit union agrees to provide any such
reports it may be required to file with
a private entity providing it with share
insurance.
IV. Consideration of Differences
Between the Banks and the Enterprises
Section 1313(f) of the Safety and
Soundness Act requires the Director of
FHFA, when promulgating regulations
relating to the Banks, to consider the
31 12
PO 00000
CFR 1263.17(d).
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
66551
differences between the Banks and the
Enterprises (Fannie Mae and Freddie
Mac) as they relate to: The Banks’
cooperative ownership structure; the
mission of providing liquidity to
members; the affordable housing and
community development mission; their
capital structure; and their joint and
several liability on consolidated
obligations.32 The Director also may
consider any other differences that are
deemed appropriate. In preparing this
proposed rule, the Director considered
the differences between the Banks and
the Enterprises as they relate to the
above factors, and determined that the
rule is appropriate. FHFA requests
comments regarding whether
differences related to those factors
should result in any revisions to the
proposed rule.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA) requires that FHFA consider the
impact of paperwork and other
information collection burdens imposed
on the public.33 Under the PRA and the
implementing regulations of the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB), an
agency may not collect or sponsor the
collection of information, nor may it
impose an information collection
requirement unless it displays a
currently valid control number assigned
by OMB.34 FHFA’s regulation
‘‘Members of the Federal Home Loan
Banks,’’ located at 12 CFR part 1263,
contains several collections of
information that OMB has approved
under control number 2590–0003,
which is due to expire on December 31,
2016. The proposed rule would not
make any revisions that would affect the
burden estimates for those collections of
information. Therefore, FHFA has not
submitted any materials to OMB for
review.
VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act 35
(RFA) requires that a regulation that has
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities,
small businesses, or small organizations
must include an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis describing the
regulation’s impact on small entities.
Such an analysis need not be
undertaken if the agency has certified
that the regulation will not have a
significant economic impact on a
32 12
U.S.C. 4513(f).
44 U.S.C. 3507(a) and (d).
34 See 44 U.S.C. 3512(a); 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3)(vi).
35 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.
33 See
E:\FR\FM\28SEP1.SGM
28SEP1
66552
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 28, 2016 / Proposed Rules
substantial number of small entities.36
FHFA has considered the impact of the
proposed rule under the RFA. The
General Counsel of FHFA certifies that
the proposed rule, if adopted as a final
rule, is not likely to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities because the
regulation applies only to the Banks,
which are not small entities for
purposes of the RFA.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 1263
Federal home loan banks, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons stated in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, and under
the authority of 12 U.S.C. 4511, 4513,
and 4526, FHFA proposes to amend part
1263 of subchapter D of chapter XII of
title 12 of the Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
PART 1263—MEMBERS OF THE
BANKS
1. The authority citation for part 1263
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1422, 1423, 1424,
1426, 1430, 1442, 4511, 4513.
2. Amend § 1263.1 as follows:
a. Revise the definitions of ‘‘CDFI
credit union’’ and ‘‘Community
development financial institution or
CDFI’’;
■ b. Add, in alphabetical order, a
definition for ‘‘Federal share
insurance’’;
■ c. Revise the definition of ‘‘Insured
depository institution’’;
■ d. Add, in alphabetical order, a
definition for ‘‘Non-federally-insured
credit union’’; and
■ e. Revise the definition of ‘‘Regulatory
financial report’’.
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
■
§ 1263.1
Definitions
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
CDFI credit union means a Statechartered credit union that does not
have Federal share insurance and that
has been certified as a CDFI by the CDFI
Fund.
*
*
*
*
*
Community development financial
institution or CDFI means an institution
that is certified as a community
development financial institution by the
CDFI Fund under the Community
Development Banking and Financial
Institutions Act of 1994 (12 U.S.C. 4701
et seq.), other than a bank or savings
association insured under the Federal
36 See
5 U.S.C. 605(b).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:27 Sep 27, 2016
Jkt 238001
Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1811 et
seq.), a holding company for such a
bank or savings association, or a credit
union that has Federal share insurance.
*
*
*
*
*
Federal share insurance means
insurance coverage of credit union
member accounts provided by the
National Credit Union Share Insurance
Fund under subchapter II of the Federal
Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1781 et
seq.).
*
*
*
*
*
Insured depository institution means:
(1) An insured depository institution
as defined in section 2(9) of the Bank
Act, as amended (12 U.S.C. 1422(9));
and
(2) To the extent provided under
§ 1263.19, a non-federally-insured credit
union.
*
*
*
*
*
Non-federally-insured credit union
means a State-chartered credit union
that does not have Federal share
insurance and that has not been
certified as a CDFI by the CDFI Fund.
*
*
*
*
*
Regulatory financial report means a
financial report that an institution is
required to file with its appropriate
regulator on a specific periodic basis,
including the quarterly call report for
commercial banks and savings
associations, quarterly or semi-annual
call report for credit unions, NAIC’s
annual or quarterly statement for
insurance companies, or other similar
report, including such report
maintained by the appropriate regulator
in an electronic database.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 1263.2
[Amended]
3. Amend § 1263.2:
a. By removing the word ‘‘1263.18’’
wherever it appears and, in its place,
adding the word ‘‘1263.19’’; and
■ b. In paragraph (b), by adding after the
final period the words ‘‘In preparing a
digest for a non-federally-insured credit
union applicant, the Bank shall
summarize the manner in which the
applicant has complied with the
requirements of § 1263.19(a).’’.
■
■
§ 1263.3
[Amended]
4. Amend § 1263.3, in paragraph (c),
by removing from the second sentence
the words ‘‘a Bank’’ and adding in their
place the words ‘‘the Bank’’.
■
§ 1263.11
[Amended]
5. Amend § 1263.11, in paragraph
(b)(3)(iii), by removing the words ‘‘A
CDFI credit union applicant’’ and
adding in their place the words ‘‘An
applicant that is a CDFI credit union or
a non-federally-insured credit union’’.
■
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Subpart C—Eligibility Requirements
6. Add § 1263.19 and move it from
subpart D to subpart C.
The addition reads as follows:
■
§ 1263.19
unions.
Non-federally-insured credit
(a) Applicants. Except where
otherwise provided, a non-federallyinsured credit union applying to
become a member of a Bank shall be
treated as an insured depository
institution for purposes of determining
its eligibility for membership under this
part, provided that all of the following
requirements have been met:
(1) Provisional completion of
application. After a non-federallyinsured credit union initiates the
application process, the Bank shall
obtain from the applicant all
information required by this part, and
any other information the Bank deems
necessary, to process the application,
except for the items required under
paragraphs (a)(2) and (3) of this section.
Upon obtaining all such information,
the Bank shall notify the applicant in
writing that its application is
provisionally complete and that, in
order to complete the application
process, it must comply with paragraph
(a)(2) of this section and subsequently
provide one of the items listed in
paragraph (a)(3) of this section.
(2) Request to regulator. After receipt
of the notice required under paragraph
(a)(1) of this section, the applicant shall
send to its appropriate State regulator a
written request for a determination that
the applicant meets all requirements for
Federal share insurance as of the date of
the request. The applicant shall provide
to the Bank a copy of that request
simultaneously with its transmittal to
the regulator.
(3) Final completion of application.
The Bank shall deem an application to
be complete, and shall act upon the
application in accordance with
§ 1263.3(c), upon obtaining from the
applicant any one of the following
items:
(i) A written statement from the
applicant’s appropriate State regulator
that the applicant met all of the
eligibility requirements for Federal
share insurance as of the date of the
request sent pursuant to paragraph (a)(2)
of this section;
(ii) A written statement from the
applicant’s appropriate State regulator
that it cannot or will not make a
determination regarding the applicant’s
eligibility for Federal share insurance;
or
(iii) A written statement from the
applicant, prepared no earlier than the
E:\FR\FM\28SEP1.SGM
28SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 28, 2016 / Proposed Rules
end of the six-month period beginning
on the date of the request sent pursuant
to paragraph (a)(2) of this section,
certifying that the applicant did not
receive from its appropriate State
regulator within that six-month period
either a response as described in
paragraph (a)(3)(i) or (ii) or a response
stating that that the applicant did not
meet all of the eligibility requirements
for Federal share insurance as of the
date of the request sent pursuant to
paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(b) Members canceling Federal share
insurance. A Bank member that is a
federally insured credit union and that
subsequently cancels its Federal share
insurance may remain a member of the
Bank, subject to all regulatory
provisions applicable to insured
depository institution members,
provided that the Bank has determined
that the institution has canceled its
Federal share insurance voluntarily.
Subpart E—Withdrawal, Termination,
and Readmission
7. Revise the heading of subpart E to
read as set out above.
■ 8. Amend § 1263.31 by revising
paragraphs (b) and (e) to read as follows:
■
§ 1263.31
Reports and examinations.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Agrees that reports of examination
by local, State, or Federal agencies or
institutions, or by any private entity
providing share insurance to a member
that is a non-federally-insured credit
union or a CDFI credit union, may be
furnished by such authorities or entities
to the Bank or FHFA upon request;
*
*
*
*
*
(e) To the extent applicable, agrees to
provide to the Bank, within 20 days of
filing, copies of reports of condition and
operations required to be filed with:
(1) The member’s appropriate Federal
banking agency;
(2) The member’s appropriate State
regulator; or
(3) Any private entity providing share
insurance to a member that is a nonfederally-insured credit union or a CDFI
credit union.
Dated: September 22, 2016.
Melvin L. Watt,
Director, Federal Housing Finance Agency.
[FR Doc. 2016–23289 Filed 9–27–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8070–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:27 Sep 27, 2016
Jkt 238001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2016–9116; Directorate
Identifier 2016–NM–068–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all The
Boeing Company Model 767–200, –300,
and –400ER series airplanes. This
proposed AD was prompted an
evaluation by the design approval
holder (DAH) indicating that the
fuselage skin lap splices are subject to
widespread fatigue damage (WFD). This
proposed AD would require repetitive
inspections to detect any crack in the
fuselage skin at the skin lap splices. We
are proposing this AD to detect and
correct cracks at the fuselage skin lap
splice, which can rapidly link up,
possibly resulting in rapid
decompression and loss of structural
integrity of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by November 14,
2016.
SUMMARY:
You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this NPRM, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone:
206–544–5000, extension 1; fax: 206–
766–5680; Internet: https://
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view
this referenced service information at
the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
66553
call 425–227–1221. It is also available
on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
9116.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
9116; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Wayne Lockett, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA 98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6447;
fax: 425–917–6590; email:
wayne.lockett@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposal. Send your comments to
an address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2016–9116; Directorate Identifier 2016–
NM–068–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
Fatigue damage can occur locally, in
small areas or structural design details,
or globally, in widespread areas.
Multiple-site damage (MSD) is
widespread damage that occurs in a
large structural element such as a single
rivet line of a lap splice joining two
large skin panels. Widespread damage
can also occur in multiple elements
such as adjacent frames or stringers.
Multiple-site damage and multiple-
E:\FR\FM\28SEP1.SGM
28SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 188 (Wednesday, September 28, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 66545-66553]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-23289]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 28, 2016 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 66545]]
FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY
12 CFR Part 1263
RIN 2590-AA85
Federal Home Loan Bank Membership for Non-Federally-Insured
Credit Unions
AGENCY: Federal Housing Finance Agency.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA or Agency) is
proposing to amend its regulations governing Federal Home Loan Bank
(Bank) membership to implement section 82001 of the Fixing America's
Surface Transportation Act, which amended section 4(a) of the Federal
Home Loan Bank Act (Bank Act) to authorize certain credit unions
without Federal share insurance to become Bank members. This proposed
rule also would make appropriate conforming changes to FHFA's
membership regulations.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before November 28,
2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your comments, identified by Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) 2590-AA85, by any of the following methods:
Agency Web site: www.fhfa.gov/open-for-comment-or-input.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. If you submit your
comment to the Federal eRulemaking Portal, please also send it by email
to FHFA at RegComments@fhfa.gov to ensure timely receipt by the agency.
Please include Comments/RIN 2590-AA85 in the subject line of the
message.
Courier/Hand Delivery: The hand delivery address is:
Alfred M. Pollard, General Counsel, Attention: Comments/RIN 2590-AA85,
Federal Housing Finance Agency, 400 Seventh Street SW., Eighth Floor,
Washington, DC 20219. Deliver the package to the Seventh Street
entrance Guard Desk, First Floor, on business days between 9 a.m. to 5
p.m.
U.S. Mail, United Parcel Service, Federal Express or Other
Mail Service: The mailing address for comments is: Alfred M. Pollard,
General Counsel, Attention: Comments/RIN 2590-AA85, Federal Housing
Finance Agency, 400 Seventh Street SW., Eighth Floor, Washington, DC
20219.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric M. Raudenbush, Associate General
Counsel, Office of General Counsel, Eric.Raudenbush@fhfa.gov, (202)
649-3084; or Julie Paller, Senior Financial Analyst, Division of Bank
Regulation, Julie.Paller@fhfa.gov, (202) 649-3201 (not toll-free
numbers), Federal Housing Finance Agency, 400 Seventh Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20219. The telephone number for the Telecommunications
Device for the Hearing Impaired is (800) 877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Comments
FHFA invites comments on all aspects of the proposed rule and will
take all comments into consideration before issuing a final rule. All
comments received will be posted without change on the FHFA Web site at
https://www.fhfa.gov, and will include any personal information
provided, such as name, address (mailing and email), and telephone
numbers. In addition, copies of all comments received will be available
without change for public inspection on business days between the hours
of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m., at the Federal Housing Finance Agency, 400
Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20219. To make an appointment to
inspect comments, please call the Office of General Counsel at (202)
649-3804.
II. Background
Under the Bank Act, federally insured depository institutions,
including state- and federally chartered credit unions whose member
accounts are insured by the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund
(NCUSIF), have been eligible for Bank membership since 1989. Until
recently, however, state-chartered credit unions without Federal share
insurance were ineligible for Bank membership, except to the limited
extent that a credit union certified as a ``community development
financial institution'' (CDFI) could meet the eligibility requirements
applicable to CDFIs. In December 2015, Congress amended the Bank Act to
authorize the Banks to consider applications for membership from state-
chartered credit unions without Federal share insurance and to approve
such applicants for Bank membership (irrespective of their CDFI
status), provided that certain prerequisites have been met.\1\ This
proposed rule would implement those statutory amendments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (FAST), Public
Law 114-94, section 82001(a), 129 Stat. 1795 (2015), codified at 12
U.S.C. 1424(a)(5)(A) and (B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Amendment of the Bank Act To Authorize Membership for Non-Federally-
Insured Credit Unions
Section 4 of the Bank Act specifies the types of institutions that
may be eligible for membership in one of the eleven district Banks and
establishes requirements that each of those types of institutions must
meet in order to be eligible for Bank membership.\1\ When enacted as
part of the original Bank Act in 1932, section 4 authorized thrift
institutions of various types, as well as insurance companies, to
become Bank members, provided that the institution met the applicable
eligibility requirements. At that time and for many decades afterward,
the statute did not permit credit unions to become Bank members. This
changed in 1989, when Congress amended section 4 to add ``insured
depository institution[s]'' to the list of entities that may be
eligible for Bank membership and defined that term to include any
depository institution the accounts of which are insured by the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or by the NCUSIF.\2\ In effect,
those amendments authorized federally insured commercial banks and
credit unions to become Bank members for the first time. Commercial
banks without Federal deposit insurance and credit unions without
Federal share insurance remained ineligible for Bank membership even
after the 1989 amendments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See 12 U.S.C. 1424.
\2\ See Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement
Act of 1989 (FIRREA), Public Law 101-73, section 704, 103 Stat. 183,
415 (1989).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 2008, Congress amended the Bank Act to authorize entities
certified as CDFIs by the CFDI Fund of the United
[[Page 66546]]
States Department of the Treasury to become Bank members, provided the
CDFI meets the membership eligibility requirements established for such
entities. By law, credit unions--including state-chartered credit
unions without Federal share insurance--may be certified as CDFIs.\3\
Thus, since the adoption of the 2008 statutory amendments, a credit
union that would otherwise have been ineligible for Bank membership due
to a lack of Federal share insurance may nonetheless be eligible for
membership if it is certified as a CDFI and meets the eligibility
requirements applicable to CDFIs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See 12 U.S.C. 4701-4719; 12 CFR part 1805.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To implement those statutory amendments, FHFA in January 2010
adopted amendments to part 1263 to address membership eligibility and
application requirements for CDFIs and to clarify the types of entities
to be treated as CDFIs for membership purposes.\4\ That rule defined
``CDFI'' to mean any entity that the CDFI Fund has certified as a
community development financial institution, with the exception of
federally insured banks, thrifts, and credit unions.\5\ As insured
depository institutions under the Bank Act, the latter types of
entities had already been eligible for Bank membership prior to the
enactment of the statutory provisions authorizing membership for CDFIs.
By excluding federally insured depositories from the definition of
``CDFI,'' FHFA effectively required that they continue to be treated
solely as insured depository institutions under the membership
regulation, even in cases where the institution has been certified as a
CDFI. In explaining its decision, the Agency cited its conclusion that,
while Congress adopted the 2008 amendments to provide a new avenue to
membership for CDFIs that had not previously been eligible, it did not
intend to provide an additional avenue to membership for federally
insured depository institutions that had already been eligible under
the prior law.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 75 FR 678 (Jan. 5, 2010).
\5\ See 12 CFR 1263.1.
\6\ 75 FR at 681.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
While it effectively required that a federally insured credit union
certified as a CDFI be treated as an insured depository institution for
Bank membership purposes, the 2010 rule mandated different treatment
for state-chartered credit unions without Federal share insurance that
have been certified as a CDFI--a type of entity that the rule termed a
``CDFI credit union.'' As amended by the 2010 rule, the membership
regulation treats CDFI credit unions as a type of CDFI and generally
subjects them to the same standards that apply to non-depository CDFIs,
with the exception of those that must be met in order for an applicant
to be deemed in compliance with the statutory eligibility requirement
that an institution's financial condition be ``such that advances may
be safely made to it.'' \7\ With respect to the latter requirement, the
regulation requires that CDFI credit unions demonstrate compliance in a
manner similar to that which had already been required of all other
types of depository institution applicants prior to the 2010
rulemaking.\8\ For non-depository CDFIs, such as loan funds and venture
capital funds, the 2010 final rule established separate financial
condition requirements that were tailored to the unique structure and
business of those entities.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See 12 U.S.C. 1424(a)(2)(B).
\8\ See 12 CFR 1263.11(b).
\9\ See 12 CFR 1263.16(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In December 2015, Congress again amended section 4 of the Bank Act,
in this case to permit state-chartered credit unions without Federal
share insurance to be approved for Bank membership (irrespective of
their CDFI status) where the credit union meets the membership
eligibility requirements applicable to insured depository institutions
and has taken enumerated steps to demonstrate that it meets the
requirements for Federal share insurance, notwithstanding that it is
not actually federally insured.\10\ Specifically, new section 4(a)(5)
states that a credit union lacking Federal share insurance that has
applied to become a member of a Bank shall be treated as an insured
depository institution for purposes of determining its eligibility for
Bank membership, provided that its state credit union regulator has
first determined that the institution met the requirements for Federal
share insurance as of the date of its application for membership.\11\
However, the new provision also provides that if the state regulator
for such an applicant fails to make a determination as to whether the
applicant met the requirements for Federal share insurance before the
expiration of the six-month period that begins on the date of its
application for membership, then the credit union applicant shall be
deemed to have met those requirements.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Public Law 114-94, section 82001(a), 129 Stat. 1795 (2015).
\11\ 12 U.S.C. 1424(a)(5). Although the statutory text actually
refers several times to ``Federal deposit insurance,'' FHFA
construes those references to mean the federal share insurance that
is provided to credit unions by the NCUSIF, in light of the evident
purpose for which Congress adopted the NFICU amendments.
\12\ 12 U.S.C. 1424(a)(5)(B)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consistent with the regulatory definitions that would be in effect
under the proposed rule, this Supplementary Information refers to
credit unions without Federal share insurance that are not certified as
CDFIs as ``non-federally-insured credit unions'' or ``NFICUs'' and to
credit unions without Federal share insurance that are certified as
CDFIs as ``CDFI credit unions.'' As discussed below, under the proposed
rule, CDFI credit unions would continue to be treated as they are under
the existing regulation and would not be subject to the new regulatory
provisions governing NFICUs.
B. Letters to Banks Providing Guidance on the Treatment of NFICUs Under
the 2015 Statutory Amendments
On April 12, 2016, in response to requests from several Banks for
guidance addressing the manner in which they may accept and process
membership applications from NFICUs that are newly eligible under the
recent statutory amendments, FHFA sent a letter to each Bank describing
how it should comply with the new statutory provisions. The guidance
letters addressed the substantive requirements of the statutory
amendments, the procedures each Bank should follow in processing
applications, and the actions the Bank should take to document
compliance with the new eligibility requirements. The letters also
noted the Agency's intent to initiate a rulemaking to codify the
substance of the guidance and advised each Bank to process membership
applications from NFICUs in accordance with the guidance until FHFA
adopts a final rule implementing the new statutory provisions.
The amended statute provides that an NFICU may be eligible for Bank
membership only if its state regulator has determined that it meets all
the requirements for Federal share insurance ``as of the date of the
application for membership.'' \13\ With respect to the nature of this
determination, the guidance letters expressed FHFA's view that the
statute requires that the state regulator of an NFICU applicant
determine that the applicant actually satisfies all of the applicable
eligibility requirements for NCUSIF share insurance under the Federal
Credit Union Act \14\ and the implementing regulations of the NCUA.\15\
In response to specific
[[Page 66547]]
questions FHFA had received, the guidance clarified that a
determination by a state regulator that a particular NFICU applicant is
``eligible to apply'' for NCUA insurance or is operating and in good
standing under state law is not sufficient to satisfy the statutory
requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 12 U.S.C. 1424(a)(5)(B)(i).
\14\ 12 U.S.C. 1751 et seq.
\15\ 12 CFR part 745.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The guidance also addressed the meaning of the term ``date of the
application for membership,'' which Congress designated as the date as
of which the state regulator is to determine whether an NFICU meets the
eligibility requirements for Federal share insurance and on which
begins the statutory six-month period after which an NFICU shall be
deemed to meet those requirements if its state regulator fails to act.
Because Congress did not specify precisely what constitutes the ``date
of the application,'' FHFA construed the term consistently with similar
language in the existing membership regulation. The guidance explained
that the ``date of the application'' should be the date on which an
NFICU has provided to a Bank a ``complete'' membership application--
i.e., an application that includes all information that is required to
assess the applicant's compliance with the applicable statutory and
regulatory membership eligibility requirements, as well as any other
information the Bank deems necessary to act on an application. The
existing membership regulation uses this concept of a ``complete''
application to establish the starting point of the 60-day period during
which a Bank is generally required to make a determination on a
membership application.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See 12 CFR 1263.3(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The guidance stated that a Bank generally should process a
membership application from an NFICU in the same manner it would
process a membership application from a federally insured credit union,
up to the point when the Bank determines that the NFICU has provided
all information required to assess its compliance with the applicable
membership eligibility requirements. The existing membership regulation
requires that, once a Bank makes such a determination with respect to
the application of a federally insured credit union (or that of any
other type of applicant), it must inform the applicant that the
application is ``complete'' and generally must act on the application
within 60 days. The guidance, however, advised that, when a Bank has
made such a determination with respect to the application of an NFICU,
the Bank should instead inform the NFICU that its application is
``provisionally complete'' and that it must take further steps before
the application may be deemed fully complete and ready to be acted
upon. Under the guidance, a Bank is to regard an NFICU's application to
be only ``provisionally'' complete at that point because it would not
include the documentation that the NFICU's state regulator either has
determined that the applicant satisfied the requirements for Federal
share insurance as of the date of the application or has failed to make
that determination within six months. The guidance advised that, when
informing an NFICU applicant that its application is provisionally
complete, a Bank should instruct it to make a written request of its
state regulator for a determination that the NFICU satisfied all of the
eligibility requirements for Federal share insurance as of the date of
that request, and to provide a copy of that request to the Bank on the
same day it transmits the request to the regulator.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ The guidance letters also included an example of a
statement that an applicant could include in the request to its
supervisor, which was intended to provide clarity as to the required
nature of the request. The letters also noted that, in the event
that a state supervisor were unable or unwilling to provide an
affirmative response to the NFICU, then the applicant may ask the
supervisor to provide a written statement to that effect.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to the completion of the membership application, the
guidance advised that a Bank should act on an NFICU's application only
after having received one of the following three items: (1) An
affirmative written response from the regulator that the NFICU meets
the eligibility requirements for Federal share insurance; (2) a written
statement from the regulator that it cannot or will not make any
determination regarding the NFICU's eligibility for Federal share
insurance; or (3) a written statement from the NFICU applicant that six
months have expired from the date of the membership application without
the state regulator providing any response to the NFICU's request.
Items (1) and (3) above closely track the statutory requirements.
Regarding item (2), FHFA concluded that, although the statute does not
address the possibility that a state regulator may expressly decline to
make a determination (as opposed to merely failing to respond to a
request), it is permissible to consider such a written statement as the
substantive equivalent of a failure to respond within six months. The
Agency noted that the statutory six-month review period appeared to be
intended to ensure that a state credit union regulator would have a
sufficient amount of time to determine whether a particular credit
union satisfied the requirements for Federal share insurance. The
guidance reflected FHFA's belief that, in the event that a state
regulator were to conclude that it could not make such a determination
for any credit union due to a lack of familiarity with the NCUA
underwriting process or for other reasons, receipt of a written
statement to that effect will suffice to allow a Bank to approve an
NFICU's membership application without waiting for the six-month period
to expire.\18\ The guidance advised the Banks to retain in each NFICU
applicant's membership file copies of the relevant documents, including
the applicant's request to its state regulator and any response from
the regulator or statement from the applicant that the regulator had
not responded, as part of its required records for all membership
applications.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ FHFA is aware of one instance in which a state credit union
regulator has advised a Bank that it could not make a determination
regarding a state credit union's eligibility for federal share
insurance because the state regulator was not familiar with the
specific underwriting and related processes employed by NCUA when
acting on applications for federal share insurance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the guidance letters addressed the possibility that an
existing Bank member that is a state-chartered federally insured credit
union might voluntarily cancel its Federal share insurance, thus
becoming an NFICU--a scenario that the new statutory provisions do not
explicitly address. The guidance made clear that such a credit union
may voluntarily surrender its Federal share insurance without
jeopardizing its status as a Bank member and without having to request
from its state regulator the type of determination that the statute
requires to be made with respect to NFICU applicants. The guidance
letters reasoned that NCUA's prior approval of the credit union for
Federal share insurance is dispositive as to the key issue under the
statutory amendments--i.e., whether the institution satisfies the
eligibility requirements for Federal share insurance--thus obviating
any need for the member's state regulator to make that same decision.
III. The Proposed Rule
The proposed rule would codify into part 1263 of FHFA's regulations
the core concepts of the guidance letters. The principal regulatory
provisions regarding NFICUs would be located in a new Sec. 1263.19 (a
reserved section number under the existing regulation), which would set
forth the prerequisites that an NFICU must meet in order to be treated
as an insured depository institution for purposes of determining
[[Page 66548]]
its eligibility for membership. As described in more detail below, the
proposed rule would also make a number of conforming revisions to other
sections of the regulation.
A. Primary Revisions
1. Definitions of NFICU and Insured Depository Institution--Sec.
1263.1
The proposed rule would define ``non-federally-insured credit
union'' to mean a ``State-chartered credit union that does not have
Federal share insurance and that has not been certified as a CDFI by
the CDFI Fund.'' The proposed rule would not include CDFI credit unions
within this definition, notwithstanding that they are also state-
chartered credit unions that do not have Federal share insurance. The
existing regulation generally requires CDFI credit unions to comply
with the membership eligibility requirements that are applicable to
CDFIs generally, rather than those applicable to depository
institutions, with the exception of provisions relating to the
applicant's financial condition. The proposed rule would make no
substantive changes to any of the provisions that currently apply to
CDFI credit unions and would treat them separately from NFICUs for
membership purposes.
The definition of ``insured depository institution'' in the
existing membership regulation follows the Bank Act definition of that
term and includes any federally insured bank, savings association, or
credit union. The proposed rule would revise the regulatory definition
of ``insured depository institution'' to include, in addition to
federally insured depository institutions, NFICUs meeting the
prerequisites of proposed Sec. 1263.19. As an ``insured depository
institution'' under the revised regulation, any qualifying NFICU
applying for Bank membership would be subject to all of the provisions
of the membership regulation that apply to insured depository
institutions generally, except where otherwise provided. Thus, a
qualifying NFICU applicant would be eligible for membership only if: It
is duly organized under Federal or State law; it is subject to
inspection and regulation under Federal or State banking laws, or
similar laws; it makes long-term home mortgage loans; its financial
condition is such that advances may be safely made to it (hereinafter
the ``financial condition'' requirement); its management and its home
financing policy are both consistent with sound and economical home
financing;\19\ and it has at least 10 percent of its assets in
``residential mortgage loans'' (hereinafter the ``10 percent''
requirement).\20\ With the exception of the financial condition
requirement, an NFICU applicant would be required to demonstrate
compliance with each of those eligibility requirements in the same
manner that is required of insured depository institutions generally.
As discussed below, the proposed rule would require an NFICU applicant
to demonstrate compliance with the financial condition requirement in
the same manner as a CDFI credit union.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 12 CFR 1263.6(a).
\20\ 12 CFR 1263.6(b). The Bank Act exempts certain smaller
depository institutions--``community financial institutions''
(CFIs)--from the 10 percent requirement, but defines CFI to include
only institutions the deposits of which are insured under the
Federal Deposit Insurance Act (FDIA) that have total assets below a
certain threshold amount. 12 U.S.C. 1422(10)A)(i), 1424(a)(4).
Because a credit union cannot obtain deposit insurance under the
FDIA, it cannot qualify as a CFI regardless of its level of total
assets.
\21\ See 12 CFR 1263.11(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Prerequisites for an NFICU To Be Treated as an Insured Depository
Institution--Sec. 1263.19
The proposed rule would add to the membership regulation a new
Sec. 1263.19, which would set forth the prerequisites that an NFICU
must meet in order to be treated as an insured depository institution
for purposes of determining its eligibility for membership. The
substantive and procedural requirements set forth in proposed Sec.
1263.19 are, in all material respects, identical to those set forth in
the guidance letters, although the proposed rule would provide
additional clarification on certain points. As described below,
paragraph (a) of the new section would address the treatment of NFICUs
that are applying for Bank membership, while paragraph (b) would
address the status of any credit union that already is a Bank member
but that opts to become an NFICU by canceling its Federal share
insurance.
NFICUs Applying for Bank Membership
Section 126319(a) addresses the prerequisites that must be met
before a Bank may approve an NFICU applicant for membership. In
parallel with the inclusion of qualifying NFICUs within the regulatory
definition of ``insured depository institution,'' the introductory
clause to this provision provides that an NFICU applicant shall be
treated as an insured depository institution for purposes of
determining its eligibility for membership, provided that it complies
with all of the requirements of Sec. 1263.19(a).
The proposed rule would first require that a Bank obtain from an
NFICU applicant all of the information that the Bank generally requires
to process membership applications from federally insured depository
institutions, including all of the information needed to demonstrate
compliance with the eligibility requirements described above. Once a
Bank has obtained that information, the rule would require that the
Bank notify the NFICU that its application is provisionally complete
and that the NFICU should request from its state regulator a
determination that it satisfies the requirements for obtaining Federal
share insurance as of the date of the request.\22\ The notice must also
inform the NFICU that its application will not be deemed to be complete
until the Bank has received acceptable documentation pertaining to the
regulator's response to the NFICU applicant's request.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ The NFICU must simultaneously provide to the Bank a copy of
its request to the state regulator. The guidance letters had
included an example of language that an NFICU could use in its
request to its state regulator, but the proposed rule would not do
so. A number of NFICUs have since been admitted to membership, and
appear to have encountered no difficulties in obtaining a response
from the state regulators, which suggests that there is no need for
the regulation to address this topic. Banks may continue to use the
sample language if they choose to do so.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Sec. 1263.19(a)(3) would require a Bank to deem an
NFICU's application to be complete after it has received any one of the
following items: (1) A written statement from the regulator confirming
that the NFICU satisfies the requirements for Federal share insurance;
(2) a written statement from the regulator that it is unable to make
that determination; or (3) a written statement from the NFICU that it
has not received a response from the state regulator within the
statutory six-month period, and that the regulator has not determined
that the NFICU does not meet the requirements for Federal share
insurance. Once a Bank has received one of those three items and has
deemed the NFICU's application to be complete, the proposed rule would
require that the Bank act upon the application in accordance with Sec.
1263.3(c). That existing provision requires that a Bank notify an
applicant when it deems the application to be complete and (with
certain exceptions) either approve or deny the application within 60
calendar days of the date it made that determination.\23\ The cross-
reference to
[[Page 66549]]
Sec. 1263.3(c) is intended to make clear that a Bank would be
permitted the same amount of time to act upon a fully complete NFICU
application as it has to act upon a complete application from any other
type of eligible institution. However, given that an NFICU's
application should already include all of the information needed to
determine whether it meets the applicable membership eligibility
requirements at the time it sends the request to its regulator, FHFA
anticipates that in many cases Banks would be prepared to act upon an
NFICU application shortly after receiving the required documentation
regarding the response of the state regulator, especially when the
regulator fails to respond within six months or does not provide a
response until the end of that timeframe.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ The regulation allows a Bank to suspend the 60-day review
period if it subsequently determines that it does not in fact have
all of the information that is required to process the application.
In such cases, a Bank may require that the applicant provide
additional information, but must resume the 60-day review period
when the applicant supplies the requested information. 12 CFR
1263.3(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A Credit Union That Becomes an NFICU When Already a Member
While proposed Sec. 1263.19(a) addresses the treatment of NFICUs
applying to become a Bank member, Sec. 1263.19(b) addresses the status
of any existing credit union Bank member that opts to become an NFICU
by canceling its Federal share insurance. The guidance letters made
clear that any such credit union may voluntarily surrender its Federal
share insurance without affecting its status as a Bank member.
Consistent with that position, proposed Sec. 1263.19(b) would
explicitly authorize such a credit union to remain a member without
requiring it to request a determination of its state regulator as to
whether it meets the requirements for Federal share insurance. The
proposed rule would require that the Bank determine that the member has
canceled its Federal share insurance voluntarily--i.e., that NCUA has
approved the credit union's request to terminate its Federal share
insurance.\24\ The Banks could make this determination by obtaining a
copy of NCUA's approval of the credit union's request to terminate its
Federal insurance. Upon converting to an NFICU, the credit union would
remain subject to all regulatory provisions that apply to insured
depository institution members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ See 12 U.S.C. 1786(a) (voluntary termination of federal
share insurance); 12 CFR 708b.201(d) (termination of federal share
insurance requires prior approval of NCUA).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The recent statutory amendments focus on state-chartered credit
unions that have not previously been eligible for Bank membership due
to their lack of Federal share insurance; the amendments do not address
whether all of the requirements that apply to NFICU applicants should
also apply to existing Bank members that wish to surrender their
Federal share insurance while remaining as members. As FHFA noted in
the guidance letters, the key question with respect to whether any
particular NFICU may be eligible for Bank membership under the
statutory amendments is whether the institution actually meets all of
the requirements for Federal share insurance. In the case of an
existing Bank member that is a federally insured state-chartered credit
union, NCUA has already definitively answered that question by having
previously approved the credit union for Federal share insurance and
having continued to provide that insurance up until the time the credit
union voluntarily canceled it. For that reason, nothing would be gained
by construing the statute as requiring existing credit union Bank
members that voluntarily cancel their Federal share insurance to seek
that same determination from their state regulators in order to remain
a member as an NFICU.
Requiring a Bank to confirm that the cancelation of a member's
Federal share insurance was voluntary would provide reasonable
assurance that the member satisfies the requirements for Federal share
insurance and, thus, remains eligible for membership as an NFICU
despite no longer being a federally insured depository institution. As
noted above, the core requirement for NFICUs under the statutory
amendments is a determination that the NFICU satisfies the requirements
for Federal share insurance, and the best evidence that a newly
converted NFICU satisfies those requirements would be that it had
remained federally insured until voluntarily relinquishing the
insurance. It is also possible, however, that a federally insured
credit union could lose its Federal share insurance through an
involuntary termination for cause by NCUA. If NCUA were to terminate a
Bank member's share insurance involuntarily, then that institution
would cease to be eligible for Bank membership because NCUA's action
would demonstrate that the institution could not meet the prerequisites
for membership as an NFICU and, without Federal share insurance, it
would no longer be eligible for membership as a federally insured
depository institution. In such a case, a Bank likely would be required
to terminate the credit union's membership because, unless the credit
union happened to be certified as a CDFI, it would no longer satisfy
any of the provisions under which credit unions may eligible for
membership.
B. Conforming Amendments
The proposed rule would also make a number of conforming revisions
to part 1263, which are discussed below.
1. Definitions--Sec. 1263.1
In addition to the substantive revisions to Sec. 1263.1 that are
discussed above, the proposed rule would make a number of non-
substantive revisions to that section. First, the rule would add a
definition of ``Federal share insurance'' and define that term to mean
``insurance coverage of credit union member accounts provided by the
National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund under title II of the
Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1781 et seq.).''
The rule would also revise the definition of ``CDFI credit union,''
which is currently defined to mean ``a State-chartered credit union
that has been certified as a CDFI by the CDFI Fund and that does not
have Federal share insurance,'' to reverse the order of the two clauses
so that it would instead refer to ``a State-chartered credit union that
does not have Federal share insurance and that has been certified as a
CDFI by the CDFI Fund.'' FHFA is proposing to make this minor change so
that the definition of ``CDFI credit union'' will be structured in
parallel with the definition of ``non-federally-insured credit union.''
The intent of this is to make clear that the amended regulation would
address two types of state-chartered credit unions without Federal
share insurance--those that are not certified as a CDFI (non-federally-
insured credit unions) and those that are certified as a CDFI (CDFI
credit unions)--and would subject them to different membership
requirements.
In the definition of ``community development financial institution
or CDFI,'' the proposed rule would revise the reference to ``a credit
union insured under the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1751 et
seq.)'' to refer instead to ``a credit union that has Federal share
insurance.'' FHFA is proposing this minor non-substantive change so
that the terminology used in the definition of ``CDFI'' will be
consistent with that in the proposed definitions of ``non-federally-
insured credit union'' and ``CDFI credit union,'' both of which would
employ the newly-defined term ``Federal share insurance'' to refer to
insurance obtained under the Federal Credit Union Act.
Finally, the proposed rule would revise the definition of
``regulatory financial report,'' which currently refers
[[Page 66550]]
to a financial report that an ``applicant'' is required to file with
its regulator, to refer instead to a financial report that an
``institution'' is required to file with its regulator. In addition to
requiring a Bank to obtain information from applicants' regulatory
financial reports for many purposes, FHFA's regulations also require
that a Bank obtain information from members' regulatory financial
reports in some circumstances. The proposed revision would make clear
that the term ``regulatory financial report'' refers to the reports of
both applicants and members.
2. Membership Application Requirements--Sec. 1263.2
Section 1263.2(b) of the existing regulation requires a Bank to
prepare for each applicant a written membership application digest
addressing whether or not the applicant meets each of the applicable
requirements for membership under the regulation. The proposed rule
would revise that provision to require expressly that a Bank include in
the application digest for each NFICU applicant a written summary of
the manner in which the applicant has complied with the requirements of
proposed Sec. 1263.19(a). FHFA would expect a Bank to note in the
digest the date on which the NFICU applicant transmitted to its state
regulator the request required under proposed Sec. 1263.19(a)(2), as
well as the date on which the Bank received the written statement
addressing the results of that request required under proposed Sec.
1263.19(a)(3). The Agency would also expect the Bank to describe in the
digest which of the three types of written statements that are
permissible under Sec. 1263.19(a)(3) was used to satisfy the
requirement of that provision.
The proposed rule would also revise Sec. 1263.2(c), which requires
a Bank to maintain a membership file for each applicant, to make clear
that a Bank should include in the file for an NFICU applicant any
documents required under proposed Sec. 1263.19.
3. Compliance With the Financial Condition Requirement--Sec. 1263.11
Existing Sec. 1263.11 governs the manner in which Banks are to
determine whether depository institution applicants, including insured
depository institutions and CDFI credit unions, are in compliance with
the statutory ``financial condition'' eligibility requirement.
Paragraph (a) requires that a Bank review a number of different items
regarding the financial condition of depository institution applicants,
including: (1) Regulatory financial reports the applicant filed with
its regulator for the last six calendar quarters and three year-ends;
(2) the applicant's most recent audited financial statements; (3) the
applicant's most recent regulatory examination report; (4) a written
description of any outstanding enforcement actions against the
applicant; and (5) any other relevant document or information
concerning the financial condition of the applicant that comes to the
Bank's attention.
In its 2010 final rule amending part 1263 to implement the
statutory amendments that authorized Bank membership for CDFIs, FHFA
revised Sec. 1263.11(a) to make clear that the review requirement
applies to CDFI credit unions, in addition to other types of depository
institutions. In explaining its decision to make that revision, the
Agency explained that ``[a]lthough CDFI credit unions do not file
regulatory financial reports with the NCUA, they do file comparable
reports with their appropriate state regulator, and FHFA believes that
those documents may be used to assess the financial condition of the
CDFI credit unions.'' \25\ Similarly, Banks can and should use
financial reports filed by NFICU applicants with their state regulators
to assess the applicants' financial condition. Although the proposed
rule would not revise Sec. 1263.11(a) to refer expressly to NFICUs,
the review requirements of that provision would nonetheless apply in
the case of NFICU applicants, given that NFICUs meeting the
prerequisites of Sec. 1263.19 would generally be treated as insured
depository institutions for purposes of determining their eligibility
for membership under the amended regulation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ 75 FR at 684.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Existing Sec. 1263.11(b) establishes three standards that a
depository institution applicant must meet to be deemed in compliance
with the ``financial condition'' requirement: (1) It must have received
a composite regulatory examination rating from its state regulator
within the preceding two years; (2) it must meet all of its minimum
statutory and regulatory capital requirements; and (3) it must meet the
``minimum performance standard'' described in Sec. 1263.11(b)(3). The
latter provision deems any applicant that received a composite rating
of ``1'' on its most recent regulatory examination, except for a CDFI
credit union, to be automatically in compliance with the ``minimum
performance standard.'' \26\ That provision requires that any non-CDFI
depository institution with an examination rating of ``2'' or ``3,'' as
well as any CDFI credit union regardless of its examination rating,
satisfy performance trend criteria relating to its (A) earnings (the
applicant must have positive income in four of the six most recent
quarters), (B) nonperforming assets (nonperforming loans and leases
plus other real estate owned must not exceed 10 percent of total loans
and leases plus other real estate owned in the most recent quarter),
and (C) allowance for loan and lease losses (the ratio must have been
60 percent or greater during four of the six most recent quarters) in
order to meet the ``minimum performance standard.'' \27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ 12 CFR 1263.11(b)(3)(i), (iii).
\27\ 12 CFR 1263.11(b)(3)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In adopting its final rule on membership for CDFIs in 2010, FHFA
decided to require all CDFI credit union applicants--including those
with a current state examination rating of ``1''--to demonstrate
compliance with the performance trend criteria specified in Sec.
1263.11(b)(3), while continuing to exempt other types of depository
institutions having a ``1'' rating from that requirement. In the
Supplemental Information to the 2010 final rule, FHFA described its
decision to require that even the most highly rated CDFI credit unions
satisfy the performance trend criteria as ``prudent.'' The Agency noted
that, because such institutions are not subject to oversight by the
NCUA and because they had not previously been eligible for membership,
the Banks were likely to be less familiar with the state examination
processes and ratings systems to which they are subject than with those
that apply to federally insured depository institutions.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ 75 FR at 684-685.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For similar reasons, the proposed rule would revise Sec.
1263.11(b)(3)(iii) to require that NFICUs meet the minimum performance
standard in the same way that CDFI credit unions must under the
existing provision--that is, by having received a ``1,'' ``2,'' or
``3'' composite rating in its most recent regulatory examination and by
meeting the performance trend criteria for earnings, nonperforming
assets, and allowance for loan and lease losses. FHFA believes that,
given the Banks' lack of experience with non-federally-insured credit
unions, it is also prudent to require all NFICUs to meet the
performance trend criteria as part of satisfying the ``financial
condition'' eligibility requirement. Despite the fact that a subset of
credit unions without Federal share insurance--i.e., CDFI credit
unions--have been permitted to become Bank members since 2010, it does
not appear that the Banks have approved any such institutions for
membership to
[[Page 66551]]
date. Consequently, the safety and soundness concerns arising from the
Banks' relative lack of familiarity with the regimes that apply to
credit unions that are subject to regulation and supervision only at
the state level continue to exist and apply with equal validity to both
CDFI credit unions and NFICUs.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ The proposed rule would differ from the guidance letters in
making clear that the exemption that applies generally to depository
institutions that have received a composite rating of ``1'' does not
apply to NFICUs. The guidance letters did not address this point
directly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Bank Act requires that the primary Federal banking regulators
make available to the Banks, in confidence, reports of condition and
other information relating to the condition of any Bank member or other
institution with which a Bank contemplates having transactions
authorized by the Bank Act, such as applicants for membership.\30\ That
provision, however, does not apply to state banking regulators and the
supervisory reports that they prepare relating to depository
institutions organized under state law. Although many Banks have
arrangements with state banking regulators, including state credit
union regulators, under which those regulators provide the Banks with
access to confidential supervisory information, including reports of
examination, for the institutions they regulate, that may not be the
case for every state. This raises a question as to whether a Bank may
approve an application for membership received from an NFICU whose
state regulator declines to provide the Bank with access to the reports
of examination for its regulated entities or to allow the credit unions
it regulates to disclose the composite rating derived from those
examinations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ 12 U.S.C. 1442(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the existing membership regulation, compliance with Sec.
1263.11 creates a presumption that a depository institution applicant
meets the statutory ``financial condition'' requirement. While failure
to comply with Sec. 1263.11 creates a presumption that a depository
institution applicant does not meet the ``financial condition''
requirement, that presumption of noncompliance may be rebutted. Section
1263.17(d) provides that, if a depository institution applicant does
not have a composite regulatory examination rating, does not have the
minimum rating required by the regulations, or does not meet the
performance trend criteria, the applicant may still meet the
``financial condition'' requirement if it or the Bank prepares a
written justification providing substantial evidence that is acceptable
to the Bank that it is in a sound financial condition, notwithstanding
its failure to meet one or more of the requirements of Sec.
1263.11.\31\ Although FHFA encourages all of the Banks to reach
agreements with the appropriate state regulators to allow them to
review the reports of examination for all state-chartered depository
institutions, a Bank may rely on the alternative provisions of Sec.
1263.17(d) to rebut any presumption of noncompliance with the
``financial condition'' requirement that arises from a state credit
union regulator's decision not to provide a Bank with access to the
reports of examination for its regulated entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ 12 CFR 1263.17(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Reports and Examinations--Sec. 1261.31
Existing Sec. 1263.31 sets forth a number of stipulations to which
each Bank member is deemed to have agreed as a condition precedent to
becoming a Bank member. Under paragraph (b) of this section, each
institution admitted to Bank membership agrees that reports of
examination by local, state or Federal agencies, or institutions may be
furnished by those authorities to the Bank or to FHFA upon request. The
proposed rule would revise Sec. 1263.31(b) to specify that, with
respect to any member that is an NFICU or CDFI credit union, the member
also agrees that reports of examination by any private entity that
provides it with share insurance may be furnished to the Bank or to
FHFA. To the best of FHFA's knowledge, there is only one insurance
company in the United States currently providing private share
insurance for state-chartered credit unions.
Under existing Sec. 1263.31(e), each institution also agrees, as a
condition of Bank membership, that it will provide to the Bank, within
20 days of filing, copies of reports of condition and operations filed
with its appropriate Federal banking agency. The proposed rule would
revise that provision to state that each member also agrees to provide
any reports of condition and operations it may be required to file with
its appropriate state regulator and that each member that is an NFICU
or a CDFI credit union agrees to provide any such reports it may be
required to file with a private entity providing it with share
insurance.
IV. Consideration of Differences Between the Banks and the Enterprises
Section 1313(f) of the Safety and Soundness Act requires the
Director of FHFA, when promulgating regulations relating to the Banks,
to consider the differences between the Banks and the Enterprises
(Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) as they relate to: The Banks' cooperative
ownership structure; the mission of providing liquidity to members; the
affordable housing and community development mission; their capital
structure; and their joint and several liability on consolidated
obligations.\32\ The Director also may consider any other differences
that are deemed appropriate. In preparing this proposed rule, the
Director considered the differences between the Banks and the
Enterprises as they relate to the above factors, and determined that
the rule is appropriate. FHFA requests comments regarding whether
differences related to those factors should result in any revisions to
the proposed rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ 12 U.S.C. 4513(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) requires that FHFA
consider the impact of paperwork and other information collection
burdens imposed on the public.\33\ Under the PRA and the implementing
regulations of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), an agency may
not collect or sponsor the collection of information, nor may it impose
an information collection requirement unless it displays a currently
valid control number assigned by OMB.\34\ FHFA's regulation ``Members
of the Federal Home Loan Banks,'' located at 12 CFR part 1263, contains
several collections of information that OMB has approved under control
number 2590-0003, which is due to expire on December 31, 2016. The
proposed rule would not make any revisions that would affect the burden
estimates for those collections of information. Therefore, FHFA has not
submitted any materials to OMB for review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ See 44 U.S.C. 3507(a) and (d).
\34\ See 44 U.S.C. 3512(a); 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3)(vi).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act \35\ (RFA) requires that a
regulation that has a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities, small businesses, or small organizations must
include an initial regulatory flexibility analysis describing the
regulation's impact on small entities. Such an analysis need not be
undertaken if the agency has certified that the regulation will not
have a significant economic impact on a
[[Page 66552]]
substantial number of small entities.\36\ FHFA has considered the
impact of the proposed rule under the RFA. The General Counsel of FHFA
certifies that the proposed rule, if adopted as a final rule, is not
likely to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities because the regulation applies only to the Banks, which
are not small entities for purposes of the RFA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.
\36\ See 5 U.S.C. 605(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 1263
Federal home loan banks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons stated in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, and under
the authority of 12 U.S.C. 4511, 4513, and 4526, FHFA proposes to amend
part 1263 of subchapter D of chapter XII of title 12 of the Code of
Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 1263--MEMBERS OF THE BANKS
0
1. The authority citation for part 1263 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1422, 1423, 1424, 1426, 1430, 1442, 4511,
4513.
0
2. Amend Sec. 1263.1 as follows:
0
a. Revise the definitions of ``CDFI credit union'' and ``Community
development financial institution or CDFI'';
0
b. Add, in alphabetical order, a definition for ``Federal share
insurance'';
0
c. Revise the definition of ``Insured depository institution'';
0
d. Add, in alphabetical order, a definition for ``Non-federally-
insured credit union''; and
0
e. Revise the definition of ``Regulatory financial report''.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 1263.1 Definitions
* * * * *
CDFI credit union means a State-chartered credit union that does
not have Federal share insurance and that has been certified as a CDFI
by the CDFI Fund.
* * * * *
Community development financial institution or CDFI means an
institution that is certified as a community development financial
institution by the CDFI Fund under the Community Development Banking
and Financial Institutions Act of 1994 (12 U.S.C. 4701 et seq.), other
than a bank or savings association insured under the Federal Deposit
Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1811 et seq.), a holding company for such a
bank or savings association, or a credit union that has Federal share
insurance.
* * * * *
Federal share insurance means insurance coverage of credit union
member accounts provided by the National Credit Union Share Insurance
Fund under subchapter II of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C.
1781 et seq.).
* * * * *
Insured depository institution means:
(1) An insured depository institution as defined in section 2(9) of
the Bank Act, as amended (12 U.S.C. 1422(9)); and
(2) To the extent provided under Sec. 1263.19, a non-federally-
insured credit union.
* * * * *
Non-federally-insured credit union means a State-chartered credit
union that does not have Federal share insurance and that has not been
certified as a CDFI by the CDFI Fund.
* * * * *
Regulatory financial report means a financial report that an
institution is required to file with its appropriate regulator on a
specific periodic basis, including the quarterly call report for
commercial banks and savings associations, quarterly or semi-annual
call report for credit unions, NAIC's annual or quarterly statement for
insurance companies, or other similar report, including such report
maintained by the appropriate regulator in an electronic database.
* * * * *
Sec. 1263.2 [Amended]
0
3. Amend Sec. 1263.2:
0
a. By removing the word ``1263.18'' wherever it appears and, in its
place, adding the word ``1263.19''; and
0
b. In paragraph (b), by adding after the final period the words ``In
preparing a digest for a non-federally-insured credit union applicant,
the Bank shall summarize the manner in which the applicant has complied
with the requirements of Sec. 1263.19(a).''.
Sec. 1263.3 [Amended]
0
4. Amend Sec. 1263.3, in paragraph (c), by removing from the second
sentence the words ``a Bank'' and adding in their place the words ``the
Bank''.
Sec. 1263.11 [Amended]
0
5. Amend Sec. 1263.11, in paragraph (b)(3)(iii), by removing the
words ``A CDFI credit union applicant'' and adding in their place the
words ``An applicant that is a CDFI credit union or a non-federally-
insured credit union''.
Subpart C--Eligibility Requirements
0
6. Add Sec. 1263.19 and move it from subpart D to subpart C.
The addition reads as follows:
Sec. 1263.19 Non-federally-insured credit unions.
(a) Applicants. Except where otherwise provided, a non-federally-
insured credit union applying to become a member of a Bank shall be
treated as an insured depository institution for purposes of
determining its eligibility for membership under this part, provided
that all of the following requirements have been met:
(1) Provisional completion of application. After a non-federally-
insured credit union initiates the application process, the Bank shall
obtain from the applicant all information required by this part, and
any other information the Bank deems necessary, to process the
application, except for the items required under paragraphs (a)(2) and
(3) of this section. Upon obtaining all such information, the Bank
shall notify the applicant in writing that its application is
provisionally complete and that, in order to complete the application
process, it must comply with paragraph (a)(2) of this section and
subsequently provide one of the items listed in paragraph (a)(3) of
this section.
(2) Request to regulator. After receipt of the notice required
under paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the applicant shall send to its
appropriate State regulator a written request for a determination that
the applicant meets all requirements for Federal share insurance as of
the date of the request. The applicant shall provide to the Bank a copy
of that request simultaneously with its transmittal to the regulator.
(3) Final completion of application. The Bank shall deem an
application to be complete, and shall act upon the application in
accordance with Sec. 1263.3(c), upon obtaining from the applicant any
one of the following items:
(i) A written statement from the applicant's appropriate State
regulator that the applicant met all of the eligibility requirements
for Federal share insurance as of the date of the request sent pursuant
to paragraph (a)(2) of this section;
(ii) A written statement from the applicant's appropriate State
regulator that it cannot or will not make a determination regarding the
applicant's eligibility for Federal share insurance; or
(iii) A written statement from the applicant, prepared no earlier
than the
[[Page 66553]]
end of the six-month period beginning on the date of the request sent
pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of this section, certifying that the
applicant did not receive from its appropriate State regulator within
that six-month period either a response as described in paragraph
(a)(3)(i) or (ii) or a response stating that that the applicant did not
meet all of the eligibility requirements for Federal share insurance as
of the date of the request sent pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of this
section.
(b) Members canceling Federal share insurance. A Bank member that
is a federally insured credit union and that subsequently cancels its
Federal share insurance may remain a member of the Bank, subject to all
regulatory provisions applicable to insured depository institution
members, provided that the Bank has determined that the institution has
canceled its Federal share insurance voluntarily.
Subpart E--Withdrawal, Termination, and Readmission
0
7. Revise the heading of subpart E to read as set out above.
0
8. Amend Sec. 1263.31 by revising paragraphs (b) and (e) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1263.31 Reports and examinations.
* * * * *
(b) Agrees that reports of examination by local, State, or Federal
agencies or institutions, or by any private entity providing share
insurance to a member that is a non-federally-insured credit union or a
CDFI credit union, may be furnished by such authorities or entities to
the Bank or FHFA upon request;
* * * * *
(e) To the extent applicable, agrees to provide to the Bank, within
20 days of filing, copies of reports of condition and operations
required to be filed with:
(1) The member's appropriate Federal banking agency;
(2) The member's appropriate State regulator; or
(3) Any private entity providing share insurance to a member that
is a non-federally-insured credit union or a CDFI credit union.
Dated: September 22, 2016.
Melvin L. Watt,
Director, Federal Housing Finance Agency.
[FR Doc. 2016-23289 Filed 9-27-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8070-01-P